Changing the System - Major Trauma Patients and Their Outcomes in the NHS (England) 2008-17

Clinical outcomes of closed versus open simple ankle fractures patterns requiring soft tissue reconstruction: A prospective comparative observational study

BACKGROUND

Contemporary guidelines advocate for initial debridement and single-stage definitive fixation with immediate soft tissue reconstruction for open fractures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage stabilization and immediate definitive soft tissue coverage in open ankle fractures compared to closed fractures.

METHODS

We compared all isolated open ankle fractures (OF) treated between January 2017 and June 2019 to a control group of operatively managed closed ankle fractures (CF). The OF group included patients with extensive soft tissue injury loss with periosteal stripping and bone exposure (Gustilo and Anderson IIIB) requiring split skin graft, rotational flap or free flap. Clinical outcomes assessed included infection rates, amputation, revision hardware surgery, surgical reduction, non-union rates, and functional outcomes (assessed using the MOXFQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires). Health provider matrices were utilized to evaluate cost-benefit parameters, such as length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 27 OF and 35 CF cases with AO classification 44 A-C fractures were analyzed following standard treatment protocols. No amputations were reported, but deep/superficial infections occurred in 3 patients in the OF group compared to 2 in the CF group. There was a three-folds increase in mal-union (P = .11), rates of additional surgeries and discharge times in the OF group. (P < 0.05). However, return to functional weight bearing between OF (mean 10.6 weeks) and CF (mean 7.2 weeks) was similar (P = 0.06), and there were no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L and MOXFQ scores at the end of orthopaedic treatment p = 0.5 and 0.16 respectively. The mean hospital LOS was significantly longer for OF (15.6 days) compared to CF (5.4 days) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Definitive stabilization and immediate soft tissue reconstruction in the management of open ankle fractures result in high rates of limb salvage and achieve functional outcomes similar to those seen in matched closed ankle fractures upon completion of orthopedic treatment. Although the patient journey is extended, soft tissue and infective complications do not significantly differ. This calls for further investigation to establish the long-term cost-benefit implications of this approach.

Strengthening trauma resuscitation education and training in low-resource settings: A call for global inclusion

Trauma is a leading cause of preventable death worldwide, disproportionately affecting low-resource settings where access to specialized care is limited. Systemic barriers, including fragmented trauma networks and workforce shortages, contribute to poor outcomes. Strengthening trauma resuscitation through structured education and training is critical to improving survival and reducing disparities. However, traditional trauma training models often fail to address regional constraints, limiting their effectiveness. Brazil has developed a comprehensive trauma resuscitation education model by integrating public awareness campaigns, medical student-led initiatives, digital learning, simulation-based training, and telemedical support. A horizontal approach to trauma patient management, combined with hands-on immersive simulation training, has further enhanced this framework, emphasizing the team approach and non-technical skills essential for high-performance trauma care. This narrative review examines Brazil's trauma resuscitation training strategies and explores their potential to serve as a template for low-resource settings. By analyzing key educational components, we identify cost-effective solutions to strengthen trauma system capacity. To bridge disparities, trauma education must extend beyond well-resourced environments. Faculty development, sustainable mentorship, and access to technology-driven education are critical to equipping providers with the skills needed to manage complex trauma scenarios. Mobile simulation units and telemedicine platforms expand training to remote regions, while scalable digital platforms enable real-time collaboration. Despite these advancements, funding constraints, logistical barriers, and the need for culturally tailored education hinder widespread implementation. Embedding trauma education into national health policies and disaster response systems is essential to ensuring sustainable, high-quality trauma care worldwide.

The Effect of Residential Distance from Inpatient Setting on Outcomes of Rehabilitation Following Acquired Brain Injury

BackgoundInpatient rehabilitation may be required after an acquired brain injury. This can be located a long way from someone's usual residence. Outcomes for those living further away from the inpatient setting could be impacted by the complexities of discharge planning and limited access to family and friends.ObjectiveTo determine the relationship between distance of usual residence from the location of inpatient rehabilitation and subsequent rehabilitation outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted between 2014 and 2022 to a neurorehabilitation unit comparing admission complexity, diagnostic category, wait for admission, length of stay, change in functional status and care needs between patients usually resident near (< 20 miles) and distant (>=20 miles) from the unit.ResultsFor the 849 patients admitted there were no differences between the groups in the time since initial injury (p = .99), baseline complexity (p = .51), functional status (p = .31), care needs (p = .78) nor in the different diagnostic categories. There were no differences in their length of stay (p = .20), change in their functional status (p = .69) or care needs (p = .68).ConclusionsThe provision of appropriate facilities is more important to patient outcomes than geographical proximity for inpatient rehabilitation following acquired brain injury.

The Norwegian national trauma registry: development process and essential data insights

BACKGROUND

Understanding trauma epidemiology, patient demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes is essential for optimising trauma systems. The Norwegian Trauma Registry (NTR) monitors and improves the Norwegian Trauma System, setting care standards and overseeing system development. The registry was officially recognised as a national register in 2013. This study outlines the establishment of the population-based national registry and provides an overview of selected data.

METHODS

Norway's trauma system includes trauma centres, acute care hospitals, and prehospital services. The registry collects injury details, clinical outcomes, and patient experiences. Local NTR databases that are linked to a central database are maintained at each hospital, and only certified data registrars can enter and validate data. This enables data linkages across hospitals. The NTR includes potentially severely injured patients but also includes undertriaged patients (defined as severely injured patients who are not met by a trauma team activation upon hospital arrival). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data from trauma patients registered between 2015 and 2023. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) from 2022 were also assessed.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2023, 78 275 trauma patients were recorded, with annual patient inclusion rising from 7586 in 2015 to 9759 in 2023. All 38 Norwegian hospitals contributed data in 2023. Median age was 41 years (IQR: 21-62), and 66.5% were men. The highest injury rate was among those aged 15-24 years. Penetrating injuries accounted for 4.6% of cases. Severely injured patients with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) ≥ 16 totalled 16 678 (21.3%), while 10 509 (13.4%) had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16. Polytrauma was identified in 3783 (4.9%) of patients using the Newcastle definition and in 2508 (3.2%) patients using the Berlin definition. In 2023, a trauma team was activated for 8731(89.4%) patients recorded in the registry. PROMs data from 2022 showed that 47.2% (1018/2157) of the patients reported anxiety or depression 12 months post-injury. Among those without physical injuries, 8.0% (11/138) were out of work or education. Of the severely injured patients (NISS ≥ 16) who were employed or in education prior to the injury, 26.4% (83/314) had not returned to work or education after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The Norwegian Trauma Registry has been successfully implemented in all trauma hospitals in Norway, enabling comprehensive data collection to support trauma care improvements and research.

Ten-year outcome of a dedicated hip fracture unit embedded within a level 1 major trauma centre

INTRODUCTION

Fragility hip fracture (FHF) care has been revolutionised by the introduction of the best practice tariff and its associated quality assessment domains. However, increasing demands on trauma services, most notably in regional major trauma centres (MTC), have resulted in competing challenges for clinical resources. This study aims to identify whether a dedicated hip fracture unit (HFU) embedded within a trust hosting the regional MTC affords sustained improvements in clinical outcomes for FHFs.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective cohort study was performed using a prospectively collected database that was cross-referenced against contemporary data submitted to the National Hip Fracture Database by a single multicentre National Health Service trust. The study period encompassed a 10-year period covering 5 years before and 5 years after formation of a dedicated HFU. The outcomes evaluated include time to surgery, length of hospital stay, discharge location and mortality.

RESULTS

Some 4,998 patients sustained FHFs: 2,387 patients (2,533 injuries) treated prior to formation of the HFU formation and 2,611 patients (2,813 injuries) treated after. The mean time to surgical intervention was significantly lower in the group treated at the HFU by 3.1 days (p < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced at the HFU (p < 0.001). More patients were discharged back to their premorbid residence from the HFU (47% vs 40%). The 30- and 365-day mortality rates were significantly reduced at the HFU (p = 0.005 and p = 0.024, respectively).

CONCLUSION

When embedded within an MTC, the HFU model is a sustainable operational structure in the medium term that provides clear clinical benefits and could be replicated nationally and internationally at similar institutions.

Pro: All Cardiac Arrest Patients Should Be Transferred To a Cardiac Arrest Center

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is characterized by a high prevalence and is burdened by significant mortality and morbidity. While underlying atherosclerotic coronary artery disease accounts for the majority of the cases in the Western world owing to lifestyle and dietary customs, several other conditions and diseases can lead to OHCA. Although patient survival rates have doubled over the past 3 decades, only marginal improvements in terms of overall survival and neurologic outcomes have been observed over the last decade. A growing body of evidence suggests that regional differences in OHCA outcomes may be attributable to differences in hospital infrastructure and healthcare provider expertise, thus contributing to increased awareness of the importance of cardiac arrest centers (CACs). CACs are centers of excellence for post-cardiac arrest care, which provide dedicated, continuous access to specialized multidisciplinary facilities and expert physicians (eg, emergency department, cardiac intensive care unit, coronary angiography laboratory, rehabilitation departments), ultimately seeking to optimize patient management and improve their survival rates and functional outcomes. Here we provide an overview of the complex management of OHCA patients and outline evidence-based benefits that can result from the treatment of OHCA patients in dedicated CACs.

Paediatric Major Trauma Psychology Service Evaluation: An Early Review of an Integrated Model of Care

BACKGROUND

Major trauma is a leading cause of death and disability in children and young people (CYP) in the United Kingdom (UK). Since 2012, major trauma centres (MTCs) have been created with specialist expertise to treat patients suffering with lifechanging injuries. Much research has focused on the physical recovery of patients; however, the psychological and psychosocial impacts of major trauma are significant and often neglected/deprioritised. Less is known about this area in relation to a paediatric population.

METHODS

This service evaluation reports on the first year of an integrated psychological pathway within a London paediatric MTC. The proactive approach involves inpatient and outpatient psychological support, screening children and families for trauma symptoms and emotional distress, offering psychological intervention where required, and liaison with community mental health teams, social care services and third sector organisations. Descriptive statistics are reported on the patient demographics and mechanism of injury, as well as screening scores at 6 weeks and 3 months following the traumatic incident. Patient feedback is also presented.

RESULTS

The results demonstrate a significant increase in the numbers of children and families offered psychological support following the creation of the pathway and an overwhelmingly positive response from service users.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical implications are outlined, and areas for further development are discussed.

Characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors in patients with penetrating and blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) is well-known worldwide as rare and life-threatening. However, because no nationwide cohort study of penetrating and blunt TDI has been conducted in Japan and other countries where penetrating trauma is relatively uncommon, the clinical characteristics of all TDI are unknown. We aimed to describe the characteristics of TDI patients, compare penetrating TDI with blunt TDI, and identify mortality risk factors in Japan.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified TDI patients between 2004 and 2019 using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank. We extracted data on patient demographics, type of trauma, cause of trauma, physiological parameters, region of concomitant injury, associated injury, and management. We compared penetrating and blunt TDI for each variable. The primary outcome was mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify mortality risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 338,744 patients, 1,147 (0.3%) had TDI, of which 771 were eligible for analysis (excluding 308 in cardiac arrest on arrival). Penetrating TDI represented 29.8% and blunt TDI 70.2%, and comparing penetrating and blunt TDI, the most common cause was self-inflicted (48.7%) vs. accident (85.6%), males were 68.7% vs. 66.0% of the patients (P = 0.50), and the mortality rate was 8.3% vs. 26.4% (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis found that age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.04), Injury Severity Score (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.006-1.06), Revised Trauma Score (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.45-0.67), severe concomitant abdominal injury (OR 2.45, 95%CI 1.32-4.56), severe concomitant upper extremity injury (OR 3.38, 95%CI 1.24-9.17) were independent predictors of mortality, and computed tomography (CT) (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.15-0.69) and diaphragm repair (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.25-0.78) were protective factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japan, we found that penetrating TDI was mainly caused by self-injury and the male-female ratio was the same as for blunt TDI, although blunt TDI was much more frequent. TDI was considered highly lethal, with over 25% of patients in cardiac arrest on arrival. Our unique independent predictors were CT, severe concomitant abdominal injury, and severe concomitant upper extremity injury. These findings may help in the management of TDI in countries with less common penetrating trauma.

Substantial heterogeneity in trauma triage tool characteristic operationalization for identification of major trauma: a hybrid systematic review

PURPOSE

Trauma Triage Tools (TTTs) support pre-hospital staff to identify major trauma patients based on prehospital characteristics and bring them to appropriate trauma centres. However, while triaging trauma has been examined extensively, there appears to be little consensus on how variables within TTTs are applied. We therefore aimed to examine the prehospital characteristics and their operationalization applied in the international literature in TTTs.

METHODS

We applied a hybrid systematic review approach. Searches were conducted in multiple databases. We initially searched for systematic reviews that analyse prehospital characteristics applied in TTTs, then supplemented this with an updated search of original TTT papers from November 2019.

RESULTS

We identified 92 papers which identified 52 adult general population TTTs. Results indicate considerable heterogeneity in prehospital characteristics included in TTTs internationally. There was similarity in the higher-level categories included in the tools: tools often included measurements of a patient's physiological characteristics, injury characteristics, mechanism of injury and any modifiers for high-risk groups. However, the prehospital characteristics that made up those groups, how they were applied and interpreted were found to vary considerably.

CONCLUSION

While there is agreement in the higher-level categories used in TTTs, the thresholds adopted in specific variables vary widely, which may reflect statistical rather than clinical considerations. This may contribute to considerable variation in standards of major trauma triaging internationally. An agreed taxonomy of operationalization of prehospital characteristics used in TTTs is required to prevent sub-optimal clinical decision-making in major trauma triaging.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023393094.

Higher hospital volume reduces early failure rates in single-stage revision TKR for infection: An analysis of the United Kingdom National Joint Registry and National Administrative Databases

PURPOSE

Revision knee replacement (RevKR) for infection is rare but increasing. It is hypothesised that higher hospital volume reduces adverse outcomes. The aim was to estimate the association of surgical unit volume with outcomes following first, single-stage RevKR for infection.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study merged data from the United Kingdom National Joint Registry, Hospital Episode Statistics, National Patient Reported Outcome Measures and the Civil Registrations of Death. Patients undergoing procedures between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2019 were included. Early outcomes were chosen to reflect the quality of the surgical provision and included re-revision at 2 years, mortality, serious medical complications, length of stay and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Adjusted fixed effect multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between surgical unit mean annual caseload and the risk of adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1477 patients underwent first-time single-stage RevKRs for infection across 267 surgical units and 716 surgeons. Following adjustment for age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, surgeon volume, year of surgery and operation funder and modelling surgical unit volume with restricted cubic spline, a greater mean annual volume was associated with a lower risk of re-revision at 2 years. The odds of re-revision in hospitals performing fewer than or equal to 12 cases per year was 2.53 (95% confidence interval = 1.50-4.31) times more likely than hospitals performing three to four cases per month. Annual variation in surgical unit volume was not associated with mortality and serious medical complications within 90 days. Only 99 out of 1477 (7%) of patients had linked PROMs which precluded subsequent analysis.

CONCLUSION

Overall, higher volume surgical units had lower rates of early re-revision following the first RevKR for infection. We were unable to provide recommended specific volume thresholds for units; however, the probability of re-revision appears to be lowest in the highest volume units.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data.

The Epidemiology of Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries in England and Wales-A 32-Year Review

Background

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (TBPI) are often devastating and life-changing and are thought to be becoming more prevalent. Several studies have investigated the epidemiology of TBPI in other countries (e.g., United States, Brazil); however, a similar analysis is yet to be undertaken in England and Wales. The aim of this cohort study was to determine the incidence and epidemiology of TBPI in England and Wales.

Methods

The Trauma Audit and Research Network database was reviewed to identify 1,297 eligible patients admitted with TBPI between 1990 and 2022. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, associated injuries, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The median age of patients with TBPI was 41 years, and 77% (n = 997) were male. There was a significant difference in age between male patients and female patients, with male patients aged younger than 18 years (confidence interval 14.4-21.3) at the time of injury. The predominant injury mechanism was vehicle collision (65%), with 62% riding motorcycle or quad bikes. The majority of other injuries resulted from falls less than 2 m (19%). Falls less than 2 m were particularly prevalent in patients aged older than 65 years, who represented 19% of the cohort. TBPI was commonly associated with other injuries (94%), predominately bony injuries including dislocations and fractures.

Conclusion

This is the first epidemiological study of TBPI within England and Wales. Vehicle incidents, particularly involving motorcycles, are the commonest cause of TBPI; however, there is a substantial cohort of elderly patients sustaining TBPI, often from falls. These findings may aid improved and earlier recognition of TBPI, enabling timely management.

Level of Evidence

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cortical Neurotransmitters Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Change Following Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury

Introduction  GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. In response to injury within the central nervous system, GABA promotes cortical plasticity and represents a potential pharmacological target to improve functional recovery. However, it is unclear how GABA changes in the brain after traumatic brachial plexus injuries (tBPIs) which represents the rationale for this pilot study. Methods  We serially scanned seven males (mean age 42 years [SD 19] without head injury) up to 19 months after tBPIs. T1-weighted images (1-mm isotropic resolution) and J-edited spectra (MEscher-GArwood Point RESolved Spectroscopy [MEGA-PRESS], TE 68 ms, TR 2,000 ms, 2 cm isotropic voxels) were acquired using a MAGNETOM Prisma 3T (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Data were analyzed in jMRUI blind to clinical information to quantify GABA, creatine plus phosphocreatine (Cr), and N-acetylaspartate (NAA) concentrations. Additionally, gray matter and white matter proportions were assessed using SPECTRIM software. Interhemispheric means were compared using linear methods. Confidence intervals (CIs) were generated to the 95% level. Results  Within weeks of injury, the hemisphere representing the injured upper limb had a significantly lower GABA:NAA ratio (mean difference 0.23 [CI 0.06-0.40]) and GABA:Cr ratio (mean difference 0.75 [CI 0.24-1.25]) than the uninjured side. There were no interhemispheric differences in NAA:Cr. By 12 months post-injury, interhemispheric differences in metabolite concentrations equalized. There was no difference in the proportion of gray matter, white matter, or cerebrospinal fluid between the injured and uninjured hemispheres. Conclusion  After brachial plexus injuries, there are interhemispheric differences in GABA concentrations within the sensory and motor cortex. This represents a potential pharmacological target that warrants further investigation.

Helicopter emergency medical services demonstrate reduced time to emergency anaesthesia in an undifferentiated trauma population: a retrospective observational analysis across three major trauma networks

BACKGROUND

Early rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia (RSI) and tracheal intubation for patients with airway or ventilatory compromise following major trauma is recommended, with guidance suggesting a 45-min timeframe. Whilst on-scene RSI is recommended, the potential time benefit offered by Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has not been studied. We compared the time from 999/112 emergency call to delivery of RSI between patients intubated either in the Emergency Department or pre-hospital by HEMS.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study of major trauma patients in South-East England who received a pre-hospital RSI (PHRSI) or Emergency Department RSI (EDRSI) between 2 January 2018 and 24 September 2019. Data were extracted from the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network database. The primary outcome was the time from emergency call to delivery of RSI. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 30-days or hospital discharge, time from arrival of service at hospital or scene to RSI, time from emergency call to Computerised Tomography scan, and conveyance interval. Linear regression was used to model time to RSI in both groups.

RESULTS

Of 378 eligible patients, 209 patients met inclusion criteria. 103 received a PHRSI and 106 received an EDRSI. Most patients were male (n = 171, 82%) and the median age was 48 years (IQR 28-65). 94% sustained a blunt injury mechanism and head was the most injured body region for both cohorts (n = 134, 64%). 63% (n = 67) of patients receiving a PHRSI were conveyed by helicopter. PHRSI was delivered significantly earlier with a median of 64 [IQR 51-75] minutes (95% CI, 60-68) compared with EDRSI with a median of 84 [IQR 68-113] minutes (95% CI, 76-94), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Major trauma patients who had a pre-hospital RSI received this time-critical intervention sooner after their injury than those who received an emergency anaesthetic after conveyance to a specialist hospital. Patient outcome benefit of HEMS delivered early RSI should be explored.

London Major Trauma System: a review of an organised trauma system and the challenges it faces

London Major Trauma System (LMTS) was the first organised trauma system in the United Kingdom. It was created in 2010 in response to multiple reviews that suggested a large number of deaths from trauma may have been preventable. LMTS has all the features of a modern organised trauma system, including regionalisation, integration of care, transfer services, trauma teams, and a world leading research service. Since its introduction the benefits on mortality, morbidity, and other key metrics have been widely demonstrated. Despite its success, LMTS still faces a number of challenges; most notably from the ageing population, but also in ensuring equity of improvements across the entirety of the trauma network and throughout the whole patient journey. The very nature of LMTS being an inclusive and organised trauma system will help it in facing these challenges.

'Endless variation on a theme': a document analysis of international and UK major trauma triage tools

Introduction

Triage tools are used within trauma networks to identify which injured patients should be bypassed and pre-alerted to major trauma centres. Despite the importance of treating the 'right patient in the right place at the right time', there has been no consensus on triage tool structure or content. This study aimed to identify, collate, review, summarise and recognise patterns across established major trauma triage tools.

Methods

UK and international triage tools used between 2012 and 2021 were identified through literature review and correspondence with trauma networks. A conceptual content analysis was then undertaken using an inductive codebook, comprising concepts of triage tool structure, intended population, inclusion criteria and included variables and thresholds. Thematic analysis was also performed to identify higher-level patterns within the data, with emerging patterns becoming categories for analysis. A narrative synthesis of findings was then undertaken.

Results

In total, 53 major trauma tools were identified, comprising 19 UK tools and 35 published international tools. Most triage tools (n = 42/53, 80%) were developed by expert opinion, were paper based and shared a common structure of multiple domains, with constituent triage predictors assessed in parallel. A minority of tools were statistically derived prediction models, operationalised either as simple scores (n = 10, 19%) or as an electronic application (n = 1, 1%). Overall, 173 distinct triage variables were used, with the median number of constituent triage variables per triage tool being 19 (range 3-31). Four distinct patterns of triage tools were identified during thematic analysis, which differed in terms of format, number of triage variables, thresholds, scope for clinical judgement and relative diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion

Many diverse major trauma triage tools were identified, with no consensus in format, structure or content. Quantification of constituent variables and identification of distinct categories of triage tools may guide the design of future triage tools.

[Prehospital blood transfusion : Opportunities and challenges for the German emergency medical services]

BACKGROUND

Exsanguination is the leading cause of preventable death in severe trauma. Immediate hemorrhage control and transfusion of blood products are critical to maintain oxygen delivery and address trauma-induced coagulopathy. While prehospital blood product transfusion (PHBT) is established in neighboring countries, the fragmented configuration of Germany's emergency medical service (EMS) infrastructure has delayed the adoption of widespread PHBT programmes. This review aims to provide an updated perspective on the evolution, international practices and research needs of PHBT within the German context.

METHODS

This narrative review is based on a PubMed search using the search terms "prehospital" and "blood*". From an initial 4738 articles, 333 were directly related to PHBT and were subjected to further detailed examination. The literature, including referenced studies, was categorized into areas such as history, rationale, international practices, and evidence, and analyzed for quality.

RESULTS

The benefit of early blood transfusion in major trauma has been established since WW1, explaining the efforts to initiate this lifesaving intervention as early as possible in the care pathway, including the prehospital field. Recent randomized trials have faced design and recruitment challenges, reflecting the complexity of the research question. These trials have yielded inconclusive results regarding the survival benefits of PHBT in civilian settings. This scenario raises doubts about the capability of randomized trials to resolve questions concerning survival advantages. Despite these difficulties, there is a discernible trend indicating potential improvements in patient outcomes. In Germany, the incidence of trauma-associated shock stands at 38 per 100,000 individuals per year. It is estimated that between 300 and 1800 patients annually possibly benefit from PHBT.

CONCLUSION

Prehospital Blood Transfusion appears to be promising but identifying patient groups most likely to benefit as well as the most suitable blood products remain unresolved issues. In Germany PHBT programs are not yet widely established. Paradoxically, this situation, paired with the extensive German Trauma Registry, provides a prime opportunity for comprehensive prospective cohort studies, addressing the balance between PHBT benefits, logistical feasibility, and implementation strategies. Such studies are essential for establishing guidelines and integrating PHBT efficiently into German trauma care protocols.

The influence of socioeconomic status on management and outcomes in major trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Major trauma is a leading cause of death and disability in younger individuals and poses a significant public health concern. There is a growing interest in understanding the complex relationships between socioeconomic deprivation and major trauma. Anecdotal evidence suggests that deprivation is associated with more violent and debilitating injuries. There remains a paucity in literature evaluating major trauma outcomes in relation to socioeconomic deprivation.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was performed to identify studies from 1947 to March 2024. The primary outcome was to establish the distribution of injuries based on deprivation, with secondary outcomes evaluating surgical intervention rates, length of stay, and mortality. Quantitative pooling of data was based on the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies and 878,872 trauma patients were included. A substantial proportion (28%) of trauma incidents occurred in the most deprived group. Patients from the lowest socioeconomic group were considerably younger (weighted mean difference [WMD] -9.85 years and 95% confidence intervals [CI] -9.99 to -9.70) and more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR] 1.36 and 95% CI 1.14-1.63). There were no differences in surgical intervention (OR 1.74 and 95% CI 0.97-3.13), length of stay (WMD 1.15 days and 95% CI -0.32-2.62), and mortality (OR 1.04 and 95% CI 0.95-1.14) regardless of background.

CONCLUSION

Major trauma is prevalent in deprived areas and in younger individuals, with an increasing trend of deprivation in male patients. Although the rates of surgery, length of stay, and mortality did not differ between groups, planning of public health interventions should target areas of higher deprivation.

Translating training to medical practice in trauma care, a literature review

Trauma, a global health challenge, remains a significant cause of mortality despite advances in trauma management. The establishment of trauma teams has revolutionized care in trauma resuscitation. The training of these teams is designed to promote self-trust and empower trainees in trauma care, enhance performance, and improve patient outcomes. Various training curricula have been developed, utilizing a plethora of teaching methods such as lectures, simulations, debriefings, skill workshops, and demonstrations. However, a universally accepted gold standard curriculum in trauma training is yet to be defined, and there is no standard method for delivering education in injury care teaching. In this review, we have examined relevant literature data on standard teaching programs, the educational delivery methods used, and their impact on adult trauma patients' outcomes and trained team-related outcomes. While most studies indicate improved trained team performance, they consistently show no improvement in patient-specific outcomes such as mortality, morbidity, and length of stay. However, data hints at optimal educational delivery and the role that technology may play in the future of trauma training development.

Cardiac arrest centres for patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Regionalisation and organised pathways of care using specialist centre hospitals can improve outcomes for critically ill patients. Cardiac arrest centre hospitals (CAC) may optimise the delivery of post-resuscitation care. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) has called for a review of the current evidence base.

AIM

This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of cardiac arrest centres for patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest.

METHODS

Articles were included if they met the prospectively registered (PROSPERO) inclusion criteria. These followed the PICOST framework for ILCOR systematic reviews. A strict definition for a CAC was used, reflecting current position statements and clinical practice. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched using pre-determined criteria from inception to 31 December 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool and ROBINS-I. The certainty of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the GRADE approach. Substantial heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and a narrative synthesis with visualisation of effect estimates in forest plots was performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met eligibility criteria, including data on over 145,000 patients. One was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) at low risk of bias and the remainder were observational studies, all at moderate or serious risk of bias. All studies included adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. One study used initial shockable rhythm as an inclusion criterion and most studies (n = 12) included patients regardless of prehospital ROSC status. Two studies, including the RCT, excluded patients with ST elevation. Survival to hospital discharge with a favourable neurological outcome was reported by 11 studies and favoured CAC care in all observational studies, but the RCT showed no difference. Survival to 30 days with a favourable neurological outcome was reported by two observational studies and favoured CAC care in both. Survival to hospital discharge was reported by 13 observational studies and generally favoured CAC care. Survival to 30 days was reported by two studies, where the observational study favoured CAC care, but the RCT showed no difference.

CONCLUSION

This review supports a weak recommendation that adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are cared for at CACs based on very low certainty of evidence. Randomised evidence has not confirmed the benefits of CACs found in observational studies, however this RCT was a single trial in a very specific setting and a population without ST elevation on post-ROSC ECG. The role of CACs in shockable and non-shockable subgroups, direct versus secondary transfer, as well as the impact of increased transport time and bypassing local hospitals remains unclear.

Ocular injuries among patients with major trauma in England and Wales from 2004 to 2021

BACKGROUND

Ocular trauma is a significant cause of blindness and is often missed in polytrauma. No contemporary studies report eye injuries in the setting of severe trauma in the UK. We investigated ocular injury epidemiology and trends among patients suffering major trauma in England and Wales from 2004 to 2021.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study utilising the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) registry. Major trauma cases with concomitant eye injuries were included. Major trauma was defined as Injury Severity Score >15. Ocular injuries included globe, cranial nerve II, III, IV, and VI, and tear duct injuries. Orbital fractures and adnexal and lid injuries were not included. Demographics, injury profiles, and outcomes were extracted. We report descriptive statistics and 3-yearly trends.

RESULTS

Of 287 267 major trauma cases, 2368 (0.82%) had ocular injuries: prevalence decreased from 1.87% to 0.66% over the 2004-2021 period (P < 0.0001). Males comprised 72.2% of ocular injury cases, median age was 34.5 years. The proportion of ocular injuries from road traffic collisions fell from 43.1% to 25.3% while fall-related injuries increased and predominated (37.6% in 2019/21). Concomitant head injury occurred in 86.6%. The most common site of ocular injury was the conjunctiva (29.3%). Compared to previous TARN data (1989-2004), retinal injuries were threefold more prevalent (5.9% vs 18.5%), while corneal injuries were less (31.0% vs 6.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst identifying eye injuries in major trauma is challenging, it appears ocular injury epidemiology in this setting has shifted, though overall prevalence is low. These findings may inform prevention strategies, guideline development and resource allocation.

Key components of rehabilitation programmes for adults with complex fractures following traumatic injury: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Complex fractures are severe injuries that cause considerable disability, particularly in the working population. Effective rehabilitation is essential to achieve good outcomes, however, it is unclear what the best rehabilitation strategy is for adults with complex fractures, after their discharge from hospital. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and map the breadth of evidence available on this topic.

METHODS

A systematic search was completed on 24th July 2023 using a combination of subject and specialist databases. In addition, a secondary search assessed unpublished literature from trial registries. A citation search was completed on the selected studies. The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to extract consistent data on the interventions reported in the studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews was followed.

RESULTS

19,253 studies were identified from the search strategy of which 25 studies met the eligibility criteria. Most interventions were exercise-based and delivered by physiotherapists. Some studies compared manual therapy treatments to other forms of physiotherapy or a placebo, whilst others investigated psychosocial interventions, such as cognitive behavioural therapy, in comparison to usual care. Two studies took a multidisciplinary team approach, incorporating components such as exercise, functional activities and self-management strategies.

DISCUSSION

The studies included were heterogenous in terms of population (fracture type, location and complexity), intervention content and therapeutic aims. However, commonalities were found with most interventions or comparators including range of movement, strengthening and task specific exercises; functional tasks; gait and balance training; and advice on return to activities as components. Value was attributed to components such as, a coordinated team approach, person-centred rehabilitation, supervised exercise and psychosocial support.

CONCLUSION

There is a broad and varied approach to the rehabilitation of complex fractures. The studies differed in population and approach, with a wide range of injuries, interventions and modes of delivery reported. Fidelity was poorly described, with only a third of studies reporting adherence or acceptability. There was inconclusive evidence to inform clinical practice and further research is advised. Qualitative, expert consensus, and coproduction approaches are recommended methods to develop complex interventions and best practice guidance.

Understanding patients' perspectives of clinical communication within a Major Trauma Centre

Clinical communication between major trauma patients (MTP) and healthcare professionals is extremely complex. Multiple demands are placed on specialist multi-disciplinary teams (MDT) and patients in all stages of treatment. Patient-staff clinical communication has an integral role in MTP healthcare experiences, supporting them with a range of physical and psychological difficulties post-injury. This study aimed to understand MTP perspectives of clinical communication within a MTC through qualitative semi-structured interviews. Twenty participants were purposively sampled from an outpatient follow-up clinic and interviews were analysed using a pluralistic qualitative approach. Three themes were conceptualised from the data; "Challenges to speaking up" "Conversations left me feeling" and "Strategies need to be clinical but tailored". Patients often found it challenging to speak up due to feelings of vulnerability, confusion, and challenges navigating medical terminology. Patients spoke of not wanting to burden staff and family members playing a role in patient-staff communication, but these challenges require further exploration. Patients highlighted the positive (feel reassured, cared for, and human again) and negative (feeling like an object, angry, confused, and dependent) emotional impact of staff communication. Patients also described the benefits of being provided with written information, clear explanations of injuries and person-centred communication. MTP require multiple options to communicate and address psychological difficulties. Greater training on the emotional impact of conversations, skills to respond to psychological distress and communication guidance for staff, is needed to improve clinical communication with MTP.

What affects implementation of the UK major trauma rehabilitation prescription? A survey informed by the behaviour change wheel

OBJECTIVE

Major trauma 'Rehabilitation Prescriptions' aim to facilitate continuity of care and describe patient needs following discharge from UK Major Trauma Centre (MTCs), however research suggests rehabilitation prescriptions are not being implemented as intended. We aimed to identify factors influencing completion and use of rehabilitation prescriptions using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

DESIGN

Online survey informed by the TDF and BCW.

SETTING

UK trauma rehabilitation pathway.

POPULATION

Rehabilitation and trauma service providers involved in completing and/or using rehabilitation prescriptions (n = 78).

ANALYSIS

Mean scores were calculated for TDF behavioural domains, identifying facilitators (score ≥5) and barriers (≤3.5) to rehabilitation prescription implementation. Thematic analysis of free text data informed by the BCW/TDF identified further facilitators and barriers, plus potential behaviour change strategies.

RESULTS

Most respondents worked in UK MTCs (n = 63) and were physiotherapists (n = 34), trauma rehabilitation coordinators (n = 16) or occupational therapists (n = 15). 'Social/professional role and identity', 'knowledge' and 'emotion' (the highest-scoring TDF domains) were facilitators to implementing rehabilitation prescriptions. Qualitative data identified barriers to rehabilitation prescription completion, including 'seen as tick-box exercise','not a priority', lack of resources (IT and workforce), poor inter-service communication, limited knowledge/training. Facilitators included therapist buy-in, standardised training, easy inter-service rehabilitation prescription transfer, usefulness for sharing patient needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rehabilitation prescriptions are valued by some service providers, their effectiveness is hindered by negative attitudes, limited knowledge and poor communication. Uncertainties exist about whether rehabilitation prescriptions achieve their goals, particularly in documenting patient needs, engaging patients in rehabilitation, and informing onward referrals following MTC discharge. Improving IT systems, empowering patients, redirecting funding, and providing training might improve their usage. Further research should explore service provider and patient perspectives, and prospective long-term follow-up on outcomes of rehabilitation prescription recommendations.

The UK resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients with life-threatening torso haemorrhage: the (UK-REBOA) multicentre RCT

Background

The most common cause of preventable death after injury is haemorrhage. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is intended to provide earlier, temporary haemorrhage control, to facilitate transfer to an operating theatre or interventional radiology suite for definitive haemostasis.

Objective

To compare standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta versus standard care in patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage in the emergency department.

Design

Pragmatic, multicentre, Bayesian, group-sequential, registry-enabled, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, compared to standard care alone.

Setting

United Kingdom Major Trauma Centres.

Participants

Trauma patients aged 16 years or older with confirmed or suspected life-threatening torso haemorrhage deemed amenable to adjunctive treatment with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to: standard care, as expected in a major trauma centre standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

Main outcome measures

Primary: Mortality at 90 days. Secondary: Mortality at 6 months, while in hospital, and within 24, 6 and 3 hours; need for haemorrhage control procedures, time to commencement of haemorrhage procedure, complications, length of stay (hospital and intensive care unit-free days), blood product use. Health economic: Expected United Kingdom National Health Service perspective costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years, modelled over a lifetime horizon.

Data sources

Case report forms, Trauma Audit and Research Network registry, NHS Digital (Hospital Episode Statistics and Office of National Statistics data).

Results

Ninety patients were enrolled: 46 were randomised to standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and 44 to standard care. Mortality at 90 days was higher in the standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta group (54%) compared to the standard care group (42%). The odds ratio was 1.58 (95% credible interval 0.72 to 3.52). The posterior probability of an odds ratio > 1 (indicating increased odds of death with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta) was 86.9%. The overall effect did not change when an enthusiastic prior was used or when the estimate was adjusted for baseline characteristics. For the secondary outcomes (3, 6 and 24 hours mortality), the posterior probability that standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta was harmful was higher than for the primary outcome. Additional analyses to account for intercurrent events did not change the direction of the estimate for mortality at any time point. Death due to haemorrhage was more common in the standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta group than in the standard care group. There were no serious adverse device effects. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is less costly (probability 99%), due to the competing mortality risk but also substantially less effective in terms of lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (probability 91%).

Limitations

The size of the study reflects the relative infrequency of exsanguinating traumatic haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. There were some baseline imbalances between groups, but adjusted analyses had little effect on the estimates.

Conclusions

This is the first randomised trial of the addition of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta to standard care in the management of exsanguinating haemorrhage. All the analyses suggest that a strategy of standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is potentially harmful.

Future work

The role (if any) of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the pre-hospital setting remains unclear. Further research to clarify its potential (or not) may be required.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN16184981.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/199/09) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 54. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Major trauma patients and their outcomes - A retrospective observational study of critical care trauma admissions to a trauma unit with special services

INTRODUCTION

International data describes a changing pattern to trauma over the last decade, with an increasingly comorbid population presenting challenges to trauma management and resources. In Ireland, resource provision and management of trauma is being transformed to deliver a trauma network, in line with international best practice. Our hospital plays a crucial role within this network and is designated a Trauma Unit with Specialist Services (TUSS) to distinguish it from standard trauma units.

METHODS

This study aims to describe the characteristics of patients and injuries and assess trends in mortality rates. It is a retrospective observational study of adult ICU trauma admissions from August 2010 to July 2021. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30-days, 90-days, and 1 year. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, disposition, and complications. Patients were categorised by age, injury severity score (ISS), and mechanism of injury.

RESULTS

In all, 709 patients were identified for final analysis. Annual admissions doubled since 2010/11, with a trough of 41 admissions, increasing to peak at 95 admissions in 2017/18. Blunt trauma accounted for 97.6% of cases. Falls <2 m (45.4%) and RTAs (29.2%) were the main mechanisms of injury. Polytrauma comprised 41.9% of admissions. Traumatic brain injury accounted for 30.2% of cases; 18.8% of these patients were transferred to a neurosurgical centre. The majority of patients, 58.1%, were severely injured (ISS ≥ 16). Patients ≥ 65 years of age accounted for 45.7% of admissions, with falls <2 m their primary mechanism of injury. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality reduced with an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 8.0% (95% CI: -8.37%, 24.36%), 12.9% (95% CI: -4.19%, 29.94%) and 8.2% (95% CI: -9.64%, 26.09%) for 30-day, 90-day and 1-year respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality for 30-days and 90-days post presentation to hospital (P-values of 0.018, 0.033 and 0.152 for 30-day, 90-day and 1-year respectively).

CONCLUSION

The burden of major trauma in our hospital is considerable and increasing over time. Substantial changes in demographics, injury mechanism and mortality were seen, with outcomes improving over time. This is consistent with international data where trauma systems have been adopted.

Student advanced trauma management and skills (SATMAS): a validation study

INTRODUCTION

Despite trauma accounting 9% of global mortality, it has been demonstrated that undergraduate trauma teaching is inadequate nationally and worldwide. With COVID-19 exacerbating this situation, a scalable, accessible, and cost-effective undergraduate trauma teaching is required.

METHODS

Our Continual Professional Development United Kingdom (CPUDK)-accredited University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) Major Trauma Service (MTS) affiliated programme consisted of seven biweekly pre-recorded sessions that were delivered online through the Moodle educational platform to University of Birmingham students. Pre- and post-randomised session-specific multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and anonymous feedback forms were administered.

RESULTS

There were 489 student responses, with 63 students completing all seven sessions. On an 8-point scale, students' objective knowledge scores increased by a mean of 1.2 (p < 0.001). Using a 5-point Likert scale, students also showed improvement in subjective outcomes including their confidence in assessing trauma patient (absolute difference (AD) 1.38, p < 0.001), advising initial investigations and formulating initial management plans (AD 1.78, p < 0.001) and thereby their confidence to manage a trauma patient overall (AD 1.98, p < 0.001). A total of 410 student responses endorsed the online delivery of SATMAS through Moodle and recommended SATMAS to future medical students.

CONCLUSION

SATMAS has demonstrated positive student feedback and extensive recruitment from only one centre, demonstrating that our programme can be an indispensable low-cost learning resource that prepares undergraduate medical students for their trauma exams and informs the implementation of clinical skills required by all doctors. We publish our pilot study findings to encourage similar teaching programmes to be adopted at other universities nationally and internationally, to synergistically benefit students, tutors, and ultimately patients, on a larger scale.

Control of Haemorrhage in Orthopaedic Trauma

This paper aims to outline current practices and examine promising new advancements in the modern management of haemorrhage in orthopaedic trauma. Many prehospital and perioperative haemorrhage control strategies and techniques have been available to clinicians for multiple decades, yet our understanding and utilisation of these practices continues to be refined and optimised. There is a particular focus in this article on issues related to resuscitation and coagulation in trauma. We examine the complex mechanisms that lead to coagulopathy in trauma patients as well as the transformative effect tranexamic acid has had in limiting blood loss. We also explore some emerging technologies such as endovascular interventions and clot-stabilising dressings and devices that are likely to have a significant impact going forward.

Early vocational rehabilitation and psychological support for trauma patients to improve return to work (the ROWTATE trial): study protocol for an individually randomised controlled multicentre pragmatic trial

BACKGROUND

Moderately severe or major trauma (injury severity score (ISS) > 8) is common, often resulting in physical and psychological problems and leading to difficulties in returning to work. Vocational rehabilitation (VR) can improve return to work/education in some injuries (e.g. traumatic brain and spinal cord injury), but evidence is lacking for other moderately severe or major trauma.

METHODS

ROWTATE is an individually randomised controlled multicentre pragmatic trial of early VR and psychological support in trauma patients. It includes an internal pilot, economic evaluation, a process evaluation and an implementation study. Participants will be screened for eligibility and recruited within 12 weeks of admission to eight major trauma centres in England. A total of 722 participants with ISS > 8 will be randomised 1:1 to VR and psychological support (where needed, following psychological screening) plus usual care or to usual care alone. The ROWTATE VR intervention will be provided within 2 weeks of study recruitment by occupational therapists and where needed, by clinical psychologists. It will be individually tailored and provided for ≤ 12 months, dependent on participant need. Baseline assessment will collect data on demographics, injury details, work/education status, cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic distress, disability, recovery expectations, financial stress and health-related quality of life. Participants will be followed up by postal/telephone/online questionnaires at 3, 6 and 12 months post-randomisation. The primary objective is to establish whether the ROWTATE VR intervention plus usual care is more effective than usual care alone for improving participants' self-reported return to work/education for at least 80% of pre-injury hours at 12 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes include other work outcomes (e.g. hours of work/education, time to return to work/education, sickness absence), depression, anxiety, post-traumatic distress, work self-efficacy, financial stress, purpose in life, health-related quality of life and healthcare/personal resource use. The process evaluation and implementation study will be described elsewhere.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide robust evidence regarding a VR intervention for a major trauma population. Evidence of a clinically and cost-effective VR intervention will be important for commissioners and providers to enable adoption of VR services for this large and important group of patients within the NHS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN: 43115471. Registered 27/07/2021.

Rehabilitation after musculoskeletal injury: European perspective

Trauma is one of the main causes of death in younger people and ongoing disability worldwide. In Europe, while there is generally good organization of trauma reception and acute treatment, rehabilitation from major musculoskeletal injuries is less well defined and provided. This article documents the diverse approaches to rehabilitation after major injury in 6 European nations. The recognition of need is universal, but achieving a robust rehabilitation strategy is more elusive across the varying health care systems. Switzerland has the most robust service in the insured population. In the other countries, particularly where there is a reliance on public institutes, this provision is at best patchy. In the Netherlands, innovative patient-empowering strategies have gained traction with notable success, and in the United Kingdom, a recent randomized trial also showed this approach to be reproducible and robust. Overall, there is a clear need for learning across the national systems and implementation of a minimum set of standards.

Mapping the processes and information flows of a prehospital emergency care system in Rwanda: a process mapping exercise

OBJECTIVE

A vital component of a prehospital emergency care system is getting an injured patient to the right hospital at the right time. Process and information flow mapping are recognised methods to show where efficiencies can be made. We aimed to understand the process and information flows used by the prehospital emergency service in transporting community emergencies in Rwanda in order to identify areas for improvement.

DESIGN

Two facilitated process/information mapping workshops were conducted. Process maps were produced in real time during discussions and shared with participants for their agreement. They were further validated by field observations.

SETTING

The study took place in two prehospital care settings serving predominantly rural and predominantly urban patients.

PARTICIPANTS

24 healthcare professionals from various cadres. Field observations were done on 49 emergencies across both sites.

RESULTS

Two maps were produced, and four main process stages were described: (1) call triage by the dispatch/call centre team, (2) scene triage by the ambulance team, (3) patient monitoring by the ambulance team on the way to the health facility and (4) handover process at the health facility. The first key finding was that the rural site had multiple points of entry into the system for emergency patients, whereas the urban system had one point of entry (the national emergency number); processes were otherwise similar between sites. The second was that although large amounts of information were collected to inform decision-making about which health facility to transfer patients to, participants found it challenging to articulate the intellectual process by which they used this to make decisions; guidelines were not used for decision-making.

DISCUSSION

We have identified several areas of the prehospital care processes where there can be efficiencies. To make efficiencies in the decision-making process and produce a standard approach for all patients will require protocolising care pathways.

Does the implementation of a trauma system affect injury-related morbidity and economic outcomes? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Trauma accounts for a huge burden of disease worldwide. Trauma systems have been implemented in multiple countries across the globe, aiming to link and optimise multiple aspects of the trauma care pathway, and while they have been shown to reduce overall mortality, much less is known about their cost-effectiveness and impact on morbidity.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to explore the impact the implementation of a trauma system has on morbidity, quality of life and economic outcomes, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All comparator study types published since 2000 were included, both retrospective and prospective in nature, and no limits were placed on language. Data were reported as a narrative review.

RESULTS

Seven articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria, all of which reported a pre-trauma and post-trauma system implementation comparison in high-income settings. The overall study quality was poor, with all studies demonstrating a severe risk of bias. Five studies reported across multiple types of trauma patients, the majority describing a positive impact across a variety of morbidity and health economic outcomes following trauma system implementation. Two studies focused specifically on traumatic brain injury and did not demonstrate any impact on morbidity outcomes.

DISCUSSION

There is currently limited and poor quality evidence that assesses the impact that trauma systems have on morbidity, quality of life and economic outcomes. While trauma systems have a fundamental role to play in high-quality trauma care, morbidity and disability data can have large economic and cultural consequences, even if mortality rates have improved. The sociocultural and political context of the surrounding healthcare infrastructure must be better understood before implementing any trauma system, particularly in resource-poor and fragile settings.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022348529 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Healthcare professional views about a prehospital redirection pathway for stroke thrombectomy: a multiphase deductive qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy for stroke is highly effective but time-critical. Delays are common because many patients require transfer between local hospitals and regional centres. A two-stage prehospital redirection pathway consisting of a simple ambulance screen followed by regional centre assessment to select patients for direct admission could optimise access. However, implementation might be challenged by the limited number of thrombectomy providers, a lack of prehospital diagnostic tests for selecting patients and whether finite resources can accommodate longer ambulance journeys plus greater central admissions. We undertook a three-phase, multiregional, qualitative study to obtain health professional views on the acceptability and feasibility of a new pathway.

METHODS

Online focus groups/semistructured interviews were undertaken designed to capture important contextual influences. We purposively sampled NHS staff in four regions of England. Anonymised interview transcripts underwent deductive thematic analysis guided by the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment and Challenges to Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability, Implementation) Implementation Science framework.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight staff participated in 4 focus groups, 2 group interviews and 18 individual interviews across 4 Ambulance Trusts, 5 Hospital Trusts and 3 Integrated Stroke Delivery Networks (ISDNs). Five deductive themes were identified: (1) (suspected) stroke as a condition, (2) the pathway change, (3) the value participants placed on the proposed pathway, (4) the possible impact on NHS organisations/adopter systems and (5) the wider healthcare context. Participants perceived suspected stroke as a complex scenario. Most viewed the proposed new thrombectomy pathway as beneficial but potentially challenging to implement. Organisational concerns included staff shortages, increased workflow and bed capacity. Participants also reported wider socioeconomic issues impacting on their services contributing to concerns around the future implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive views from health professionals were expressed about the concept of a proposed pathway while raising key content and implementation challenges and useful 'real-world' issues for consideration.

Conservative management versus invasive management of significant traumatic pneumothoraces in the emergency department (the CoMiTED trial): a study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic pneumothoraces are present in one of five victims of severe trauma. Current guidelines advise chest drain insertion for most traumatic pneumothoraces, although very small pneumothoraces can be managed with observation at the treating clinician's discretion. There remains a large proportion of patients in whom there is clinical uncertainty as to whether an immediate chest drain is required, with no robust evidence to inform practice. Chest drains carry a high risk of complications such as bleeding and infection. The default to invasive treatment may be causing potentially avoidable pain, distress and complications. We are evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an initial conservative approach to the management of patients with traumatic pneumothoraces.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The CoMiTED (Conservative Management in Traumatic Pneumothoraces in the Emergency Department) trial is a multicentre, pragmatic parallel group, individually randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to establish whether initial conservative management of significant traumatic pneumothoraces is non-inferior to invasive management in terms of subsequent emergency pleural interventions, complications, pain, breathlessness and quality of life. We aim to recruit 750 patients from at least 40 UK National Health Service hospitals. Patients allocated to the control (invasive management) group will have a chest drain inserted in the emergency department. For those in the intervention (initial conservative management) group, the treating clinician will be advised to manage the participant without chest drain insertion and undertake observation. The primary outcome is a binary measure of the need for one or more subsequent emergency pleural interventions within 30 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes include complications, cost-effectiveness, patient-reported quality of life and patient and clinician views of the two treatment options; participants are followed up for 6 months.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial received approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 4 (reference: 22/WA/0118) and the Health Research Authority. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN35574247.

The European Trauma Course: Transforming systems through training

The European Trauma Course (ETC) exemplifies an innovative approach to multispecialty trauma education. This initiative was started as a collaborative effort among the European Society for Emergency Medicine, the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology under the auspices of the European Resuscitation Council. With the robust support of these societies, the project has evolved into the independent European Trauma Course Organisation. Over the past 15 years, the ETC has transcended traditional training by integrating team dynamics and non-technical skills into a scenario-based simulation course, helping to shape trauma care practice and education. A distinctive feature of the ETC is its training of doctors and allied healthcare professionals, fostering a collaborative and holistic approach to trauma care. The ETC stands out for its unique team-teaching approach, which has gained widespread recognition as the standard for in-hospital trauma care training not only in Europe but also beyond. Since its inception ETC has expanded geographically from Finland to Sudan and from Brazil to the Emirates, training nearly 20,000 healthcare professionals and shaping trauma care practice and education across 25 countries. Experiencing exponential growth, the ETC continues to evolve, reflecting its unmet demand in trauma team education. This review examines the evolution of the ETC, its innovative team-teaching methodology, national implementation strategies, current status, and future challenges. It highlights its impact on trauma care, team training, and the effect on other life support courses in various countries.

Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool

Introduction

Major trauma centre (MTC) care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. English ambulance services and trauma networks currently use a range of triage tools to select patients for bypass to MTCs. A standardised national triage tool may improve triage accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the reproducibility of decision-making.

Methods

We conducted an expert consensus process to derive and develop a major trauma triage tool for use in English trauma networks. A web-based Delphi survey was conducted to identify and confirm candidate triage tool predictors of major trauma. Facilitated roundtable consensus meetings were convened to confirm the proposed triage tool's purpose, target diagnostic threshold, scope, intended population and structure, as well as the individual triage tool predictors and cut points. Public and patient involvement (PPI) focus groups were held to ensure triage tool acceptability to service users.

Results

The Delphi survey reached consensus on nine triage variables in two domains, from 109 candidate variables after three rounds. Following a review of the relevant evidence during the consensus meetings, iterative rounds of discussion achieved consensus on the following aspects of the triage tool: reference standard, scope, target diagnostic accuracy and intended population. A three-step tool comprising physiology, anatomical injury and clinical judgement domains, with triage variables assessed in parallel, was recommended. The triage tool was received favourably by PPI focus groups.

Conclusions

This paper presents a new expert consensus derived major trauma triage tool with defined purpose, scope, intended population, structure, constituent variables, variable definitions and thresholds. Prospective evaluation is required to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness, acceptability and usability.

The accuracy of prehospital triage decisions in English trauma networks - a case-cohort study

BACKGROUND

Care for injured patients in England is provided by inclusive regional trauma networks. Ambulance services use triage tools to identify patients with major trauma who would benefit from expedited Major Trauma Centre (MTC) care. However, there has been no investigation of triage performance, despite its role in ensuring effective and efficient MTC care. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of prehospital major trauma triage in representative English trauma networks.

METHODS

A diagnostic case-cohort study was performed between November 2019 and February 2020 in 4 English regional trauma networks as part of the Major Trauma Triage Study (MATTS). Consecutive patients with acute injury presenting to participating ambulance services were included, together with all reference standard positive cases, and matched to data from the English national major trauma database. The index test was prehospital provider triage decision making, with a positive result defined as patient transport with a pre-alert call to the MTC. The primary reference standard was a consensus definition of serious injury that would benefit from expedited major trauma centre care. Secondary analyses explored different reference standards and compared theoretical triage tool accuracy to real-life triage decisions.

RESULTS

The complete-case case-cohort sample consisted of 2,757 patients, including 959 primary reference standard positive patients. The prevalence of major trauma meeting the primary reference standard definition was 3.1% (n=54/1,722, 95% CI 2.3 - 4.0). Observed prehospital provider triage decisions demonstrated overall sensitivity of 46.7% (n=446/959, 95% CI 43.5-49.9) and specificity of 94.5% (n=1,703/1,798, 95% CI 93.4-95.6) for the primary reference standard. There was a clear trend of decreasing sensitivity and increasing specificity from younger to older age groups. Prehospital provider triage decisions commonly differed from the theoretical triage tool result, with ambulance service clinician judgement resulting in higher specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital decision making for injured patients in English trauma networks demonstrated high specificity and low sensitivity, consistent with the targets for cost-effective triage defined in previous economic evaluations. Actual triage decisions differed from theoretical triage tool results, with a decreasing sensitivity and increasing specificity from younger to older ages.

Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine research priorities for the management of major trauma, representing the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals.

DESIGN/SETTING

An international research priority-setting partnership.

PARTICIPANTS

People who have experienced major trauma, their carers and relatives, and healthcare professionals involved in treating patients after major trauma. The scope included chest, abdominal and pelvic injuries as well as major bleeding, multiple injuries and those that threaten life or limb.

METHODS

A multiphase priority-setting exercise was conducted in partnership with the James Lind Alliance over 24 months (November 2021-October 2023). An international survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties which were then combined into several indicative questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the questions had not already been sufficiently answered. A second international survey asked respondents to prioritise the research questions. A final shortlist of 19 questions was taken to a stakeholder workshop, where consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities.

RESULTS

A total of 1572 uncertainties, submitted by 417 respondents (including 132 patients and carers), were received during the initial survey. These were refined into 53 unique indicative questions, of which all 53 were judged to be true uncertainties after reviewing the existing evidence. 373 people (including 115 patients and carers) responded to the interim prioritisation survey and 19 questions were taken to a final consensus workshop between patients, carers and healthcare professionals. At the final workshop, a consensus was reached for the ranking of the top 10 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

The top 10 research priorities for major trauma include patient-centred questions regarding pain relief and prehospital management, multidisciplinary working, novel technologies, rehabilitation and holistic support. These shared priorities will now be used to guide funders and teams wishing to research major trauma around the globe.

Equitable access to quality injury care; Equi-Injury project protocol for prioritizing interventions in four low- or middle-income countries: a mixed method study

BACKGROUND

Equitable access to quality care after injury is an essential step for improved health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We introduce the Equi-Injury project, in which we will use integrated frameworks to understand how to improve equitable access to quality care after injury in four LMICs: Ghana, Pakistan, Rwanda and South Africa.

METHODS

This project has 5 work packages (WPs) as well as essential cross-cutting pillars of community engagement, capacity building and cross-country learning. In WP1, we will identify needs, barriers, and facilitators to impactful stakeholder engagement in developing and prioritising policy solutions. In WP2, we will collect data on patient care and outcomes after injuries. In WP3, we will develop an injury pathway model to understand which elements in the pathway of injury response, care and treatment have the biggest impact on health and economic outcomes. In WP4, we will work with stakeholders to gain consensus on solutions to address identified issues; these solutions will be implemented and tested in future research. In WP5, in order to ascertain where learning is transferable across contexts, we will identify which outcomes are shared across countries. The study has received approval from ethical review boards (ERBs) of all partner countries in South Africa, Rwanda, Ghana, Pakistan and the University of Birmingham.

DISCUSSION

This health system evaluation project aims to provide a deeper understanding of injury care and develop evidence-based interventions within and across partner countries in four diverse LMICs. Strong partnership with multiple stakeholders will facilitate utilisation of the results for the co-development of sustainable interventions.

Review article: Pre-hospital trauma guidelines and access to lifesaving interventions in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand

The centralisation of trauma services in western countries has led to an improvement in patient outcomes. Effective trauma systems include a pre-hospital trauma system. Delivery of high-level pre-hospital trauma care must include identification of potential major trauma patients, access and correct application of lifesaving interventions (LSIs) and timely transport to definitive care. Globally, many nations endorse nationwide pre-hospital major trauma triage guidelines, to ensure a universal approach to patient care. This paper examined clinical guidelines from all 10 EMS in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. All relevant trauma guidelines were included, and key information was extracted. Authors compared major trauma triage criteria, all LSI included in guidelines, and guidelines for transport to definitive care. The identification of major trauma patients varied between all 10 EMS, with no universal criteria. The most common approach to trauma triage included a three-step assessment process: physiological criteria, identified injuries and mechanism of injury. Disparity between physiological criteria, injuries and mechanism was found when comparing guidelines. All 10 EMS had fundamental LSI included in their trauma guidelines. Fundamental LSI included haemorrhage control (arterial tourniquets, pelvic binders), non-invasive airway management (face mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices) and pleural wall needle decompression. Variation in more advanced LSI was evident between EMS. Optimising trauma triage guidelines is an important aspect of a robust and evidence driven trauma system. The lack of consensus in trauma triage identified in the present study makes benchmarking and comparison of trauma systems difficult.

Perioperative management of adults with traumatic brain injury

Despite advances in management strategy, traumatic brain injury remains strongly associated with neurological impairment and mortality. Management of traumatic brain injury requires careful and targeted management of the physiological consequences which extend beyond the scope of the primary impact to the cranium. Here, we present a review of the principles of its acute management in adults. We outline the procedure which patients are assessed and the critical physiological variables which must be monitored to prevent further neurological damage. We describe current interventional strategies from the context of the underlying physiological mechanisms and recent clinical data and identify persisting challenges in traumatic brain injury management and potential avenues of future progress.

Traumatic Native Hip Dislocations: An Audit at a Major Trauma Centre and Assessment of Clinical Practice at Centres Across the United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION

Native hip dislocations are defined as traumatic dislocations of the hip, typically high-energy and associated with polytrauma. The majority of these injuries occur following motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). Due to the inherent stability of the hip joint, a significant force is required to cause dislocation. It is critical that such injuries are managed and reduced in a timely manner. We evaluated the current practice in a major trauma centre (MTC) in Cardiff and gathered information from emergency departments (EDs) in Wales and MTCs around the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

We did an evaluation of the current practice with a retrospective audit of all traumatic native hip dislocations presenting to the MTC at Cardiff from August 2018 to February 2021. Data was obtained from Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN), medical records, radiology and theatre management systems. An online survey was developed and disseminated to EDs in Wales and MTCs across the UK.

RESULTS

There were 15 traumatic hip dislocation cases over the period evaluated. Sixty percent of cases were due to MVA. Eighty-six percent of patients had an associated fracture, with one Pipkin type IV fracture dislocation. The mean time to reduction from injury was 532 minutes (240-804 minutes), with 28.6% reduced within 6 hours and 71.4% reduced within 12 hours. Two patients had reduction performed in the ED (mean time to reduction, 275 minutes). There was one occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN) and one of chondrolysis at the follow-up. The response rate to the survey was 80% and 83% in Wales and MTCs nationally, respectively. The majority (82%) of departments did not have an established pathway in place for managing traumatic native hip dislocations with a preference for reduction in the operating theatre.

CONCLUSION

Native hip dislocations are rare, high-energy injuries associated with significant morbidity. The available evidence suggests time to reduction is imperative in reducing the risk of future complications. The establishment of a pathway to guide management and having a mechanism to perform reductions in the ED may produce significant reductions in this time, impacting outcomes.

Trends in the incidence of rib and sternal fractures: A nationwide study of the global burden of disease database, 1990-2019

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the ribs and sternum are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Characterization of the injury burden across England is necessary to inform and evaluate developments in trauma care and infrastructure, however is yet to be comprehensively undertaken. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe trends in the incidence of sternal and rib fractures across England between 1990 and 2019.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Age-standardised incidence rates (ASIRs) for rib and sternal fractures in males and females were extracted from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study by all causes, falls and road traffic collisions for 9 sub-regions of England. Temporal trends within the study period were analysed using Joinpoint regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall ASIRs in England in 2019 were 30.34/100,000 and 46.02/100,000 for females and males, respectively. Between 1990 and 2019, the estimated overall percentage change across England was +0.20 % among females and -7.05 % among males. A statistically significant increase in ASIR was observed in all 9 sub-regions of England among females from 2014-2019 (p<0.001). Among males, a statistically significant increase in ASIR was observed in 7 of the 9 regions from 2014-2019 (p<0.001) and in the remaining 2 regions from 2015-2019 (p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

Increasing ASIRs of rib and sternal fractures were observed among females and decreasing ASIRs among males, with overall ASIRs higher among males. Developments in trauma infrastructure and associated variations in diagnostic and management strategies over the observation period likely contribute to changes in the national injury burden. The findings are suggestive of the importance of ongoing financial investment in trauma infrastructure and of clear clinical guidelines to manage an increasing national injury burden.

Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation, Weaning, and the Role of Tracheostomy

Depending on the definitional criteria used, approximately 5% to 10% of critical adults will require prolonged mechanical ventilation with longer-term outcomes that are worse than those ventilated for a shorter duration. Outcomes are affected by patient characteristics before critical illness and its severity but also by organizational characteristics and care models. Definitive trials of interventions to inform care activities, such as ventilator weaning, upper airway management, rehabilitation, and nutrition specific to the prolonged mechanical ventilation patient population, are lacking. A structured and individualized approach developed by the multiprofessional team in discussion with the patient and their family is warranted.

Trauma systems in high socioeconomic index countries in 2050

Considerable political, structural, environmental and epidemiological change will affect high socioeconomic index (SDI) countries over the next 25 years. These changes will impact healthcare provision and consequently trauma systems. This review attempts to anticipate the potential impact on trauma systems and how they could adapt to meet the changing priorities. The first section describes possible epidemiological trajectories. A second section exposes existing governance and funding challenges, how these can be met, and the need to incorporate data and information science into a learning and adaptive trauma system. The last section suggests an international harmonization of trauma education to improve care standards, optimize immediate and long-term patient needs and enhance disaster preparedness and crisis resilience. By demonstrating their capacity for adaptation, trauma systems can play a leading role in the transformation of care systems to tackle future health challenges.

Can the MIRACLE2 Score Be Used in the Prehospital Environment and Is It Useful? An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

The MIRACLE2 score has been developed for use in a primary percutaneous coronary intervention center. It is unclear if it is feasible in the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) setting.

METHODS

The computerized system at 1 UK HEMS was interrogated between December 1, 2020, and May 1, 2022, for the components of the MIRACLE2 score (recorded contemporaneously) plus demographics and outcomes in all post-return of spontaneous circulation patients conveyed to the hospital. pH was excluded because of no point-of-care testing resulting in a modified MIRACLE2 score (maximum score of 9). Data were analyzed using the chi-square test; P < .05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty patients (240 males) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were reviewed. Ninety-two adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests had sustained return of spontaneous circulation and a median MIRACLE2 score of 4 (range, 0-7). Forty-seven patients died before hospital discharge; the median MIRACLE2 score was higher in those who died (4) than those who survived (1.5, P < .01); 90.3% of those with a score ≥ 5 were triaged to an emergency department rather than directly to a catheterization laboratory.

CONCLUSION

A modified MIRACLE2 score can be calculated in the HEMS setting. The benefit of point-of-care testing pH requires investigation. There may be a benefit in predicting outcomes in this nondifferentiated group, but additional research is required.

The Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) Consensus Statement on Major Trauma Training in the UK

INTRODUCTION

Since the establishment of the Major Trauma Networks in 2012, it is estimated that an extra 1,600 lives have been saved across England. Although the delivery of trauma care has improved significantly, the provision of trauma training has not and remains fragmented. The Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT), an independent organisation run by trainees, is dedicated to excellence in surgical training within the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI). The aim of this study was to develop a consensus statement representing the views of the ASiT on the future of trauma surgery training.

METHODS

A modified nominal group technique was used in five stages: 1, scoping exercise; 2, virtual consultation; 3, nominal group consensus meeting; 4, virtual feedback from stakeholders; and 5, virtual confirmation by the ASiT Council. The design and reporting of the consensus followed best practice methodology for consensus research.

RESULTS

Overall, 62 participants gave 90 statements across stages 1-3. Eleven key themes were identified, all of which met the consensus of the ASiT Council. The key findings were widespread support for increased exposure to trauma for medical students and early surgical trainees as well as an increased use of simulation methods and improved focus on non-technical skills within trauma surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study sets out the position of the ASiT on the future of trauma surgery training and how training in major trauma surgery in the UK and ROI could be improved.

Maternal outcomes of pregnant patients after trauma: a retrospective study of the Trauma Registry of England and Wales

INTRODUCTION

Trauma accounts for 20% of deaths in pregnant women. Injury characterisation and outcome in pregnant women following trauma is poorly described. To understand and inform optimum care of this key injury population, a study was conducted using the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database.

METHODS

In total, 341 pregnant and 26,774 non-pregnant female patients aged 15 to 46 years were identified for comparison from the TARN database. Mortality, cross-sectional imaging, blood product administration and EQ-5D scores were compared between the two groups. Mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and mortality rate before and after the creation of regional trauma networks were reported for pregnant patients.

RESULTS

Pregnancy was recorded in 1.3% (341/27,115) of included patients, with the most common cause of injury being road traffic collisions. A reduction in crude maternal mortality was observed over the course of the study period (7.3% to 2.9%). Baseline mean EQ-5D (0.47) and EQ-VAS (54.08) improved to 0.81 (p < 0.001) and 85.75 (p = 0.001), respectively, at 6 months following injury.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of trauma in pregnancy is small and mortality in injured pregnant women decreased over the study period. Pregnant patients have significantly improved patient-reported outcome measures 6 months after injury although this is limited in impact because of poor response rates and outcome reporting. Construction and validation of tools aiding in outcome reporting will help considerably in understanding further gains in the care of pregnant women.