Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate (K-877), a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator, in patients with dyslipidemia: Results from a 24-week, randomized, double blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial

Pemafibrate Reduced Liver Stiffness in Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease Complicated with Hyperlipidemia and Liver Fibrosis with a Fibrosis-4 Index Above 1.3

Objective To evaluate the effect of pemafibrate (PEM) on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods We retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with hyperlipidemia and MASLD to determine changes in clinical factors between the start of PEM treatment and 0.5 years later. Using FibroScan, 39 of 43 patients were evaluated for liver stiffness (LS; kPa) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP; dB/m). None of the patients had decompensated cirrhosis. Results Thirty patients were women, the median age was 66 years old, the median fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score was 2.52, the median LS was 8.05 kPa, and the median CAP was 280.5 dB/m at the start of PEM treatment. AST, ALT, ALP, γGTP, and triglyceride levels decreased 0.5 years after starting PEM treatment, but FIB-4, LS, and CAP values did not decrease. However, LS decreased in patients with a FIB-4 index ≥1.3 at the start of PEM treatment, whereas it did not change in patients with a FIB-4 index <1.3. Similarly, LS decreased in patients with a value ≥8 kPa at the start of treatment and did not change in those with <8 kPa. The decreased LS group had higher baseline ALT and LS levels and lower ALT levels during 0.5 years of follow-up than the increased LS group. Conclusion At the initiation of PEM treatment, the LS decreased in patients with MASLD complicated by hyperlipidemia and moderate LS (FIB-4>1.3 or LS >8 kPa). Although there is currently no approved treatment for MASLD, PEM may be a viable treatment option for MASLD with mild LS.

Pemafibrate modulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and prevents alcohol-associated liver disease in rats

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) with steatosis or steatohepatitis that could progress to liver cirrhosis is a common problem in chronic alcohol consumption. Pemafibrate is a novel, highly specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) modulator, which regulates the expression of the target genes related to lipid and glucose metabolism. Here, we evaluated the effect of pemafibrate to prevent ALD and steatosis in rats.

METHODS

The animals were treated with liquid diet containing ethanol (36% of total calories) or an isocaloric carbohydrate diet for 4 weeks. Subsequently, both groups were fed with either 0.5% aqueous methylcellulose solution (MC) or MC containing 0.3 mg/kg body weight of pemafibrate orally twice a day along with the liquid diet for another 4 weeks. A set of animals were sacrificed at the 4th week before the start of pemafibrate treatment and the remaining animals at the end of 8 weeks. Blood and liver samples were collected for biochemical and histopathological evaluations.

RESULTS

Treatment with pemafibrate prevented inflammation and steatosis in the hepatic tissue. Furthermore, pemafibrate administration markedly increased hepatic NAD and NADH levels, reduced both serum and hepatic triglyceride levels, and upregulated the expression of molecules involved in lipid metabolism.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study demonstrated that pemafibrate modulates target genes related to hepatic lipid metabolism and prevents deposition of fat globules in the liver during chronic alcohol feeding in rats. Therefore, pemafibrate could be used as a potent therapeutic agent to prevent steatosis and related adverse events in ALD.

Evaluation of the beneficial effects of pemafibrate in hypertriglyceridemia with or without alcohol drinking (PAR-CHAT: PARmodia-CHikushi Anti-dyslipidemia Trial)

Purpose

To examine the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in outpatients with hypertriglyceridemia, including alcoholic hypertriglyceridemia.

Method

This multicenter, open-label, prospective observational study (C20-07-009) included outpatients with hypertriglyceridemia being treated with pemafibrate who were registered at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital or associated clinics. Endpoints were changes in serum triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), hepatic biomarkers, and other blood values from baseline to 24 weeks and safety. Patients were compared according to alcohol drinking.

Result

From October 2020 to March 2022, 203 patients were registered at 14 facilities. We analyzed 174 patients (mean age, 65.5 years) with baseline fasting TG values who continued pemafibrate for 24 weeks; 55 % drank alcohol, and 35 % were receiving statins. Median fasting TG was 284 mg/dL (IQR, 228-392 mg/dL) at baseline and decreased significantly to 141 mg/dL (IQR, 108-194 mg/dL) at 24 weeks (p < 0.01), independent of alcohol use (non-drinking group, 259 to 134 mg/dL; daily drinking group, 318 to 169 mg/dL; occasional drinking group, 298 to 158 mg/dL; all p < 0.01). Median HDL-C increased significantly from 46 mg/dL (IQR, 39-53 mg/dL) at baseline to 53 mg/dL (IQR, 45-60 mg/dL) at 24 weeks (p < 0.01). Hepatic biomarkers improved significantly at 24 weeks. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) increased significantly overall, but not in patients receiving statins. Side effects throughout the study period included dizziness and nausea (1 patient each).

Conclusion

Pemafibrate improves TG, HDL-C, hepatic biomarkers and hypertriglyceridemia regardless of alcohol consumption and is safe. Increase of LDL-C was suppressed in patients treated with statins.

Drugs targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

The year 2024 witnessed the accelerated approvals of two peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). PPARs, including three isoforms (PPARα, PPARγ, and PPARδ), are therapeutic targets generating considerable debate yet also seeing significant advances in their successful targeting. Currently, selective PPAR agonists are used to manage hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and PBC, and dual/pan-PPAR agonists have been developed to address various disorders. In this review, we summarize the PPAR agonists approved globally, and their pros and cons as therapeutic agents for various diseases, with a particular focus on those agonists marketed since 2010.

A Man with Primary Hyperchylomicronemia with Triglyceride Levels Exceeding 11,000 mg/dL Was Well Controlled by Pemafibrate Combined with Dietary Therapy

A 50-year-old man with a triglyceride (TG) level of 11,397 mg/dL was admitted to our hospital. He consumed a high-fat and high-carbohydrate diet as well as more than 100 g of alcohol per day. He had type 2 diabetes and obesity and had previously suffered from severe acute pancreatitis twice. A genetic analysis revealed compound heterozygous mutations in APOA5 (c.56C>G and c.553G>T). In addition to low-fat meals and alcohol cessation, administration of pemafibrate lowered his triglyceride levels to <150 mg/dL.

Effects of Pemafibrate and Eicosapentaenoic Acid Ethyl Ester on Endothelial Function in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia and Coronary Artery Disease: A Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label Randomised Controlled Trial

Despite intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapies effectively reducing cardiovascular events, residual cardiovascular risks remain significant, with hypertriglyceridemia being an important contributing factor. Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator, has shown strong triglyceride-lowering effects and potential vascular benefits. Similarly, eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (EPA) has demonstrated cardiovascular protective effects, particularly in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. However, the comparative impact of these agents on endothelial function, a key marker of atherosclerotic progression, has not been thoroughly evaluated in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The PRIME (PRospective comparIson of peMafibrate and Eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester on vascular functions for hypertriglyceridemia) trial is a multi-center, open-label, randomised trial designed to compare the effects of pemafibrate and EPA on endothelial function in patients with CAD and hypertriglyceridemia. Patients receiving statin therapy with fasting triglyceride levels ≥150 mg/dL will be randomised into two groups: pemafibrate (0.2 mg/day, with possible dose escalation to 0.4 mg/day) or EPA (1800 mg/day, with possible dose escalation to 2700 mg/day). Endothelial function will be assessed with reactive hyperemia index (RHI). The primary endpoint is the change in RHI at 12 weeks. The secondary endpoints include the changes in RHI at 24 weeks, correlations between changes in RHI and changes in lipid biomarkers, and changes in biochemical parameters at 12 and 24 weeks. This study investigates the comparative effects of pemafibrate and EPA on endothelial function, addressing an unmet need in managing residual cardiovascular risk in patients with CAD. The findings will contribute to the optimisation of treatment strategies in patients with CAD and hypertriglyceridemia.

Clinical Pharmacology of Pemafibrate Extended-release Formulation in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia-A Phase 2, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Randomized, Single-blind, Crossover study

AIMS

Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the selective PPARα modulator pemafibrate as once-daily extended-release (XR) tablets were compared with those of twice-daily immediate-release (IR) tablets in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled crossover, phase 2 clinical pharmacology study was performed in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Patients were randomly assigned to IR 0.2 mg/day, XR 0.4 mg/day, or XR 0.8 mg/day before/after meals (fasted/fed) and treated for a total of eight weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage change in fasting serum triglycerides (TG).

RESULTS

Of 63 randomized patients, 60 received the study drug. Patients were 78.3% male, mean age (±SD) 57.5±9.8 years, BMI 25.5±3.7 kg/m2, and fasting TG 221.3±68.1 mg/dL. Fasting serum TG decreased significantly from baseline in all groups (LS mean [95% CI];-43.6 [-47.7, -39.5] % for IR 0.2 mg/day, -41.1 [-45.1, -37.0] % for XR 0.4mg/day, -39.7 [-43.8, -35.6] % for XR 0.8 mg/day), indicating that XR 0.4 and XR 0.8 mg/day were not inferior to IR 0.2 mg/day. TG-lowering effects tended to be stronger for fed than fasted administration. MRTss, tmax, and t1/2 were longer for XR than for IR. Adverse events showed no major inter-group differences: 12.5% (5/40 patients) for IR 0.2, 17.5% (7/40) for XR 0.4, and 20.0% (8/40) for XR 0.8 mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with hypertriglyceridemia, XR substantially lowered TG at all doses, with maximum effectiveness at 0.4 mg/day, the dose approved in Japan, to a level comparable to IR 0.2 mg/day. There were no safety concerns up to 0.8 mg/day.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Pemafibrate in Patients with both Dyslipidemia and Severe Renal Impairment: A Phase 4 Study

AIMS

Per the package insert, pemafibrate was contraindicated for use in patients with severe renal impairment despite its biliary excretion. To validate this, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of pemafibrate for 12 weeks in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and renal impairment.

METHODS

In this phase 4, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study, 21 patients were randomly assigned to pemafibrate 0.2 mg/day or placebo within Groups A (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ＜30 mL/min/1.73m2 without hemodialysis; pemafibrate n=4; placebo, n=2), B (hemodialysis; pemafibrate, n=4; placebo, n=1), and C (eGFR ≥ 30 and ＜60 mL/min/1.73m2 without hemodialysis; pemafibrate, n=8; placebo, n=2) for 12 weeks. Area under the concentration vs time curve within the dosing interval (τ) (AUCτ) of pemafibrate was measured after 12-week administration.

RESULTS

The AUCτ (geometric mean) of pemafibrate was 7.333 and 7.991 ng·h/mL in Groups A+B and C, respectively; in Groups A+B to C at 12 weeks, the geometric mean ratio of pemafibrate AUCτ was 0.92 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 1.36). The upper limit of the 90% CI was ≤ 2.0 (predetermined criterion). There was no consistent trend in the AUCτ and maximum plasma concentration of pemafibrate with/without statin use. Renal impairment degree did not affect the incidence of adverse events. No safety concerns were observed.

CONCLUSION

Pemafibrate repeated administration in patients with severe renal impairment did not increase pemafibrate exposure.

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate, a Novel Selective PPARα Modulator in Chinese Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Double-Masked, Randomized, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Comparison Trial

AIMS

Pemafibrate substantially lowers serum triglyceride (TG) levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels primarily in Japan, but it has not been evaluated in China. We aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in Chinese patients with hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C levels by comparing placebo and fenofibrate.

METHODS

A multicenter, double-masked trial was conducted in China involving 344 patients with high TG and low HDL-C levels randomly assigned to one of four groups: pemafibrate 0.2 mg/d, pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d, fenofibrate 200 mg/d, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage change in fasting TG levels.

RESULTS

The percentage change in TG levels from baseline was -34.1%, -44.0%, -30.5%, and 6.5% in the pemafibrate 0.2 mg/d, pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d, fenofibrate 200 mg/d, and placebo groups, respectively. Pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d significantly reduced TG levels compared with that in both placebo (p＜0.0001) and fenofibrate groups (p=0.0083). Significant improvements in HDL-C, remnant cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A1 levels were also observed with both doses of pemafibrate than with the placebo. Pemafibrate showed significantly smaller changes in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum creatinine levels than those with fenofibrate.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese patients, pemafibrate exhibited superior efficacy in improving TG levels and enhanced hepatic and renal safety compared to fenofibrate. Thus, pemafibrate may represent a promising therapeutic option for dyslipidemia in Chinese patients.

Pemafibrate and cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with systolic heart failure receiving guideline-directed medical therapy

Pemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activator. Pemafibrate has been shown to reduce serum triglyceride levels to an equivalent or greater extent than traditional fibrates, with a lower incidence of drug-related adverse events. Pemafibrate may have the potential to improve clinical outcomes in carefully selected patients with cardiovascular diseases by ameliorating dyslipidemia and stabilizing systemic arteriosclerosis. Additionally, several experimental studies have demonstrated a novel potential for pemafibrate in improving heart failure through its pleiotropic effects. We encountered two patients with systolic heart failure that was refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy. Both patients experienced further cardiac reverse remodeling and an improvement in hypertriglyceridemia following a six-month course of pemafibrate add-on therapy. Pemafibrate might facilitate cardiac reverse remodeling when incorporated into conventional heart failure medications. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical implications of incorporating pemafibrate into medical therapy for heart failure patients. Future research should also explore the long-term effects of pemafibrate on cardiovascular outcomes, the underlying mechanisms of its pleiotropic benefits, and its efficacy in diverse patient populations to solidify its role in heart failure management.

Learning objective

Pemafibrate, a recently introduced selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activator that improves hypertriglyceridemia, may facilitate cardiac reverse remodeling when incorporated into conventional heart failure medications.

Current and experimental pharmacotherapy for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disease, with its incidence increasing in parallel with the global prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite our steadily increasing knowledge of its pathogenesis, there is as yet no available pharmacotherapy specifically tailored for NAFLD. To define the appropriate management, it is important to clarify the context in which the disease appears. In the case of concurrent metabolic comorbidities, NAFLD patients are treated by targeting these comorbidities, such as diabetes and obesity. Thus, GLP-1 analogs, PPAR, and SGLT2 inhibitors have recently become central to the treatment of NAFLD. In parallel, randomized trials are being conducted to explore new agents targeting known pathways involved in NAFLD progression. However, there is an imperative need to intensify the effort to design new, safe drugs with biopsy-proven efficacy. Of note, the main target of the pharmacotherapy should be directed to the regression of fibrotic NASH, as this histologic stage has been correlated with increased overall as well as liver-related morbidity and mortality. Herein we discuss the drugs currently at the forefront of NAFLD treatment.

Pemafibrate for treating MASLD complicated by hypertriglyceridaemia: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, now known as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is a phenotype of the metabolic syndrome in the liver and is clearly associated with metabolic abnormalities such as hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia. Although the prevalence of MASLD is increasing worldwide, there is currently no consensus on the efficacy and safety of the drugs used to treat MASLD/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator, was designed to have higher peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alfa (PPARα) agonist activity and selectivity than existing PPARα agonists, and in development trials, without increasing creatinine levels, lipid parameters and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were significantly improved. Thus, pemafibrate may effectively ameliorate the pathogenesis and metabolic abnormalities in MASLD/MASH. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in patients with MASLD/MASH.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This trial was designed as an open-label, three-arm, randomised controlled study. After obtaining informed consent, patients aged 20-80 years who met the selection criteria were enrolled. Patients were randomised to receive pemafibrate 0.4 mg/day, 0.2 mg/day or fenofibrate (n=120 per group). The duration of treatment was 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in ALT levels after 24 weeks of administration. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in liver fibrosis markers (fibrosis-4 index, type IV collagen 7s, enhanced liver fibrosis and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer) at 48 weeks as well as changes in liver fat mass and liver stiffness measured by MRI and ultrasound (US) at centres equipped with MRI and US capabilities.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the Yokohama City University Certified Institutional Review Board before participant enrolment (CRB20-014). The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed journals and the key findings will be presented at international scientific conferences. Participants wishing to understand the results of this study will be contacted directly on data publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (number: jRCTs031200280).

PROTOCOL VERSION

V.1.9, 23 November 2023.

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Extended-Release Tablet: a Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Comparison Trial

AIMS

Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that lowers serum triglyceride levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, is approved for treating dyslipidemia as twice-daily immediate-release (IR) tablets. A once-daily extended-release (XR) tablet has also been developed. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day; once daily) to IR (0.2 mg/day; twice daily) in lowering triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

METHODS

This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included patients with fasting triglycerides ≥ 200 mg/dL who received IR (0.2 mg/day) or XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Common treatment effects at weeks 4 through 12 were compared between groups using repeated analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

In 356 randomized patients, fasting triglyceride levels decreased by 48.0%, 43.8%, and 48.0% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively, confirming the non-inferiority of both XR regimens to IR. The proportion of patients who achieved fasting triglycerides ＜150 mg/dL was 45.7%, 37.4%, and 51.7%, while the percentage change of triglycerides in the subgroup with baseline triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL was -59.3%, -52.2%, and -66.3% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

XR (0.2 and 0.4 mg/day) was non-inferior to IR (0.2 mg/day). XR 0.4 mg/day demonstrated a more potent triglyceride-lowering effect than XR 0.2 mg/day and should be considered for patients with high triglyceride levels.

Selective activation of PPARα by pemafibrate mitigates peritoneal inflammation and fibrosis through suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome and modulation of inflammation

Peritoneal inflammation and fibrosis remain major challenges to the long-term maintenance of peritoneal dialysis. Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) modulator, has been implicated in the management of fibrosis-related disorders. We investigated whether pemafibrate ameliorates peritoneal inflammation and fibrosis and explored the underlying mechanisms in mice with methylglyoxal (MGO)-induced peritoneal fibrosis (MGO mice). MGO mice exhibited peritoneal fibrosis with increased expression of mesenchymal markers, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), and substantial deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Additionally, MGO mice exhibited peritoneal inflammation as indicated by elevated tumor necrosis factor-α expression and macrophage infiltration in peritoneal tissue. These effects were mitigated by pemafibrate treatment, which also restored peritoneal membrane function. Furthermore, pemafibrate promoted anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization in both mice and THP-1 cells. In human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs), pemafibrate effectively inhibited interferon-γ-induced production of TGF-β1 and ECM while suppressing the proinflammatory cytokines nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and activator protein 1. The NF-κB inhibitory effect of pemafibrate involved stabilization of the NF-κB inhibitory protein IkBα. Notably, pemafibrate hindered activation of the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3/caspase-1 axis in interferon-γ-stimulated THP-1 cells. These findings suggest that pemafibrate ameliorates peritoneal inflammation and fibrosis, making it a promising candidate for peritoneal fibrosis therapy.

Managing hypertriglyceridemia for cardiovascular disease prevention: Lessons from the PROMINENT trial

BACKGROUND

Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that hypertriglyceridemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, large clinical studies on triglyceride-lowering therapy have yielded inconsistent results. In the current review, we reassess the importance of triglyceride-lowering therapy in preventing CVD based on previous literature and the recently published findings of the PROMINENT trial.

METHODS

This narrative review is based on literature and public documents published up to November 2023.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses of trials on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonists and triglyceride-lowering therapy, including the PROMINENT trial, have indicated that triglyceride-lowering therapy can reduce CVD events. Mendelian randomization studies have also indicated that triglyceride is indeed a true risk factor for coronary artery disease, leaving no doubt about its relationship to CVD. Meanwhile, the negative results from the PROMINENT trial were likely due to the insufficient triglyceride-lowering effect, slight increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, and the inclusion of mostly high-intensity statin users as target patients. It is unlikely that adverse events counteracted the effectiveness of pemafibrate on outcomes. Additionally, pemafibrate has shown positive effects on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and peripheral artery disease.

CONCLUSION

Although the PROMINENT trial did not demonstrate the significance of pemafibrate as a triglyceride-lowering therapy in a specific population, it does not necessarily negate the potential benefits of treating hypertriglyceridemia in reducing CVD events. It is necessary to explore appropriate populations that could benefit from this therapy, utilize data from the PROMINENT trial and other databases, and validate findings in real-world settings.

Application of PPAR Ligands and Nanoparticle Technology in Metabolic Steatohepatitis Treatment

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/steatohepatitis (MASLD/MASH) is a major disease worldwide whose effective treatment is challenging. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily and function as ligand-activated transcription factors. To date, three distinct subtypes of PPARs have been characterized: PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ. PPARα and PPARγ are crucial regulators of lipid metabolism that modulate the transcription of genes involved in fatty acid (FA), bile acid, and cholesterol metabolism. Many PPAR agonists, including natural (FAs, eicosanoids, and phospholipids) and synthetic (fibrate, thiazolidinedione, glitazar, and elafibranor) agonists, have been developed. Furthermore, recent advancements in nanoparticles (NPs) have led to the development of new strategies for MASLD/MASH therapy. This review discusses the applications of specific cell-targeted NPs and highlights the potential of PPARα- and PPARγ-targeted NP drug delivery systems for MASLD/MASH treatment.

Drug-drug interactions between pemafibrate and statins on pharmacokinetics in healthy male volunteers: Open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover studies

Elevated triglyceride levels are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events despite guideline-based statin treatment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) agonists exert a significant triglyceride-lowering effect. However, combination therapy of PPARα agonists with statins poses an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis, which is rare but a major concern of the combination therapy. Pharmacokinetic interaction is suspected to be a contributing factor to the risk. To examine the potential for combination therapy with the selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) pemafibrate and statins, drug-drug interaction studies were conducted with open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover designs for the combination of pemafibrate 0.2 mg twice daily and each of 6 statins once daily: pitavastatin 4 mg/day (n = 18), atorvastatin 20 mg/day (n = 18), rosuvastatin 20 mg/day (n = 29), pravastatin 20 mg/day (n = 18), simvastatin 20 mg/day (n = 20), and fluvastatin 60 mg/day (n = 19), involving healthy male volunteers. The pharmacokinetic parameters of pemafibrate and each of the statins were similar regardless of coadministration. There was neither an effect on the systemic exposure of pemafibrate nor a clinically important increase in the systemic exposure of any of the statins on the coadministration although the systemic exposure of simvastatin was reduced by about 15% and its open acid form by about 60%. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity in plasma samples from the simvastatin and pemafibrate combination group was about 70% of that in the simvastatin alone group. In conclusion, pemafibrate did not increase the systemic exposure of statins, and vice versa, in healthy male volunteers.

Effectiveness of 1-year pemafibrate treatment on steatotic liver disease: the influence of alcohol consumption

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Pemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that improves serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in dyslipidemia patients. We previously reported that pemafibrate significantly improves liver function, serum triglyceride (TG) levels and liver stiffness in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients, however the influence of alcohol consumption was not considered. Therefore, we explored pemafibrate efficacy in patients with steatotic liver disease (SLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated pemafibrate efficacy on liver enzymes and lipids in metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD (MASLD) (n = 93), MASLD plus increased alcohol intake (MetALD; n = 23) and ALD (n = 22) patients who had taken pemafibrate for at least 48 weeks. Liver shear wave velocity (SWV, n = 75) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In MASLD group, ALT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) and TG values were significantly decreased from baseline to week 24 and week 48 ( P  < 0.0001). ALT and TG values in MetALD group and ALT and AST values in ALD group were also significantly decreased from baseline to week 24 and week 48. Study participant SWV values decreased from baseline to week 48. We observed no significant difference in changes to ALT, AST, γ-GTP and TG (value at week 24 or week 48 minus value at baseline) among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Pemafibrate improves liver function and liver stiffness thus making it a promising therapeutic agent for SLD, even in patients with excess alcohol consumption (MetALD and ALD groups).

Impact of pemafibrate on lipid profile and insulin resistance in hypertriglyceridemic patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome

This study examined the effects of pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonist, on the serum biochemical parameters of male patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome (MetS). This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized, crossover study that treated hypertriglyceridemia with pemafibrate or bezafibrate for 24 weeks, followed by a crossover of another 24 weeks. Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 55 were male. Forty-one of 55 male patients were found to have MetS. In this sub-analysis, male patients with MetS (MetS group, n = 41) and those without MetS (non-MetS group, n = 14) were compared. The primary endpoint was a change in fasting serum triglyceride (TG) levels during pemafibrate therapy, and the secondary endpoints were changes in insulin resistance-related markers and liver function parameters. Serum TG levels significantly decreased (MetS group, from 266.6 to 148.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001; non-MetS group, from 203.9 to 97.6 mg/dL, p < 0.001); however, a percent change (%Change) was not significantly different between the groups (- 44.1% vs. - 51.6%, p = 0.084). Serum insulin levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance significantly decreased in the MetS group but not in the non-MetS group. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased in the MetS group compared with that in the non-MetS group (alanine aminotransferase, - 25.1% vs. - 11.3%, p = 0.027; gamma-glutamyl transferase, - 45.8% vs. - 36.2%, p = 0.020). In conclusion, pemafibrate can effectively decrease TG levels in patients with MetS, and it may be a more efficient drug for improving insulin resistance and liver function in such patients.

Fibrates and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

The high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been well described. However, the efficacy of fibrates on the risk of MACE in patients with CKD remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study using data from a large administrative database that included more than 1.5 million Japanese patients. We defined cases as CKD patients with incidences of MACE and matched them with controls based on age, sex, calendar year of cohort entry and CKD stage. Fibrate exposure timing was categorized as current, recent or past. A conditional logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between fibrate use and the risk of MACE.

RESULTS

Our study included 47 490 patients with CKD, with 15 830 MACE identified during a median follow-up of 9.4 months. The numbers of fibrates used during the study period were 556 (3.5%) in the case group and 1109 (3.5%) in the control group. Fibrate use was significantly associated with a decreased risk of MACE [odds ratio (OR) 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.94], particularly for current (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.68-0.97) and recent use (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48-0.90). Regarding the class effect of fibrates, pemafibrate use, but not bezafibrate or fenofibrate use, was significantly associated with a decreased risk of MACE (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.528-0.997).

CONCLUSION

Recent and current fibrate use, especially pemafibrate use, was associated with a reduced risk of MACE in patients with CKD. This suggests the potential benefits of continuous fibrate therapy and the possible superiority of pemafibrate over other fibrates. However, further investigations in different populations are required to confirm the generalizability of these findings.

Switching from Conventional Fibrates to Pemafibrate Has Beneficial Effects on the Renal Function of Diabetic Subjects with Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGRUOUND

Fibrates have renal toxicity limiting their use in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, pemafibrate has fewer toxic effects on renal function. In the present analysis, we evaluated the effects of pemafibrate on the renal function of diabetic subjects with or without CKD in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

We performed a sub-analysis of data collected during a multi-center, prospective, observational study of the effects of pemafibrate on lipid metabolism in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by hypertriglyceridemia (the PARM-T2D study). The participants were allocated to add pemafibrate to their existing regimen (ADD-ON), switch from their existing fibrate to pemafibrate (SWITCH), or continue conventional therapy (CTRL). The changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 52 weeks were compared among these groups as well as among subgroups created according to CKD status.

RESULTS

Data for 520 participants (ADD-ON, n=166; SWITCH, n=96; CTRL, n=258) were analyzed. Of them, 56.7% had CKD. The eGFR increased only in the SWITCH group, and this trend was also present in the CKD subgroup (P<0.001). On the other hand, eGFR was not affected by switching in participants with severe renal dysfunction (G3b or G4) and/or macroalbuminuria. Multivariate analysis showed that being older and a switch from fenofibrate were associated with elevation in eGFR (both P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

A switch to pemafibrate may be associated with an elevation in eGFR, but to a lesser extent in patients with poor renal function.

A Comparison of Alanine Aminotransferase Normalization between Pemafibrate and Bezafibrate in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Objective Pemafibrate is a recently developed selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator that can improve alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the effectiveness of ALT normalization with pemafibrate and bezafibrate, a traditional fibrate, has not been compared. Methods In this retrospective study, we compared the effects of pemafibrate and bezafibrate on ALT normalization in patients with NAFLD. The primary endpoint was the ALT normalization rate at 12 months after administration. Patients Twenty and 14 patients with NAFLD receiving pemafibrate and bezafibrate, respectively, were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients had elevated ALT levels and dyslipidemia at entry. Results The ALT normalization rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 40%, 55%, and 60% for pemafibrate and 14.3%, 28.6%, and 14.3% for bezafibrate, respectively. The ALT normalization rate at 12 months was significantly higher in patients treated with pemafibrate than in those treated with bezafibrate (p=0.01). Pemafibrate, when compared with bezafibrate, was shown to be a significant factor for ALT normalization in a multivariable analysis with an adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 13.8 (1.6-115, p=0.01). Conclusion Pemafibrate is effective in ALT normalization in patients with NAFLD and may be used as a treatment for NAFLD.

Impact of pemafibrate in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease complicated by dyslipidemia: A single-arm prospective study

Background and Aim

This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of 48-week pemafibrate treatment in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) complicated by dyslipidemia.

Methods

A total of 110 patients diagnosed with MASLD complicated by dyslipidemia received pemafibrate at a dose of 0.1 mg twice daily for 48 weeks.

Results

The participants were 54 males and 37 females, with a median age of 63 (52-71) years. Besides improvement in lipid profile, significant reductions from baseline to 48 weeks of treatment were found in liver-related enzymes, such as aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.001 for all). A significant decrease in the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was observed in patients with insulin resistance (HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5) (4.34 at baseline to 3.89 at Week 48, P < 0.05). Moreover, changes in ALT were weakly correlated with those in HOMA-IR (r = 0.34; p < 0.05). Regarding noninvasive liver fibrosis tests, platelets, Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2-binding protein, type IV collagen 7s, and the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score significantly decreased from baseline to Week 48. Most adverse events were Grades 1-2, and no drug-related Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that 48-week pemafibrate administration improved liver-related enzymes and surrogate marker of liver fibrosis in patients with MASLD. The improvement of insulin resistance by pemafibrate may contribute to the favorable effect on MASLD complicated by dyslipidemia.

The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the regulation of bile acid metabolism

Bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver. Dysregulation of bile acid homeostasis, characterized by excessive accumulation in the liver, gallbladder and blood, can lead to hepatocellular damage and the development of cholestatic liver disease. Nuclear receptors play a crucial role in the control of bile acid metabolism by efficiently regulating bile acid synthesis and transport in the liver. Among these receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), a ligand-activated transcription factor belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, controls the expression of genes involved in adipogenesis, lipid metabolism, inflammation and glucose homeostasis and has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of the metabolic syndrome in the past two decades. Emerging evidence suggests that PPAR activation holds promise as a therapeutic target for cholestatic liver disease, as it affects both bile acid production and transport. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in elucidating the role of PPAR in the regulation of bile acid metabolism, highlighting the current position of PPAR agonists in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. By summarizing the specific regulatory effects of PPAR on bile acids, this review contributes to the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies for cholestatic liver diseases.

Protective Effect of Pemafibrate Treatment against Diabetic Retinopathy in Spontaneously Diabetic Torii Fatty Rats

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) can cause visual impairment and blindness, and the increasing global prevalence of diabetes underscores the need for effective therapies to prevent and treat DR. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the protective effect of pemafibrate treatment against DR, using a Spontaneously Diabetic Torii (SDT) fatty rat model of obese type 2 diabetes. SDT fatty rats were fed either a diet supplemented with pemafibrate (0.3 mg/kg/day) for 16 weeks, starting at 8 weeks of age (Pf SDT fatty: study group), or normal chow (SDT fatty: controls). Normal chow was provided to Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (SD: normal controls). Electroretinography (ERG) was performed at 8 and 24 weeks of age to evaluate the retinal neural function. After sacrifice, retinal thickness, number of retinal folds, and choroidal thickness were evaluated, and immunostaining was performed for aquaporin-4 (AQP4). No significant differences were noted in food consumption, body weight, or blood glucose level after pemafibrate administration. Triglyceride levels were reduced, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were increased. Extension of oscillatory potential (OP)1 and OP3 waves on ERG was suppressed in the Pf SDT fatty group. Retinal thickness at 1,500 microns from the optic disc improved in the Pf SDT fatty group. No significant improvements were noted in choroidal thickness or number of retinal folds. Quantitative analyses showed that AQP4-positive regions in the retinas were significantly larger in the Pf SDT fatty group than in the SDT fatty group. The findings suggest that pemafibrate treatment can exert protective effects against DR.

Impact of Statin or Fibrate Therapy on Homocysteine Concentrations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Statins and fibrates are two lipid-lowering drugs used in patients with dyslipidemia. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the magnitude of the effect of statin and fibrate therapy on serum homocysteine levels.

METHODS

A search was undertaken of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases up to 15 July 2022. Primary endpoints focused on plasma homocysteine levels. Data were quantitatively analyzed using fixed or random- effect models, as appropriate. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the drugs and hydrophilic-lipophilic balance of statins.

RESULTS

After screening 1134 papers, 52 studies with a total of 20651 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis showed a significant decrease in plasma homocysteine levels after statin therapy (WMD: -1.388 μmol/L, 95% CI: [-2.184, -0.592], p = 0.001; I2 = 95%). However, fibrate therapy significantly increased plasma homocysteine levels (WMD: 3.459 μmol/L, 95% CI: [2.849, 4.069], p < 0.001; I2 = 98%). The effect of atorvastatin and simvastatin depended on the dose and duration of treatment (atorvastatin [coefficient: 0.075 [0.0132, 0.137]; p = 0.017, coefficient: 0.103 [0.004, 0.202]; p = 0.040, respectively] and simvastatin [coefficient: -0.047 [-0.063, -0.031]; p < 0.001, coefficient: 0.046 [0.016, 0.078]; p = 0.004]), whereas the effect of fenofibrate persisted over time (coefficient: 0.007 [-0.011, 0.026]; p = 0.442) and was not altered by a change in dosage (coefficient: -0.004 [-0.031, 0.024]; p = 0.798). In addition, the greater homocysteine- lowering effect of statins was associated with higher baseline plasma homocysteine concentrations (coefficient: -0.224 [-0.340, -0.109]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Fibrates significantly increased homocysteine levels, whereas statins significantly decreased them.

How to Handle Elevated Triglycerides: Life after PROMINENT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertriglyceridaemia (HTG) is a common condition characterised by elevated levels of plasma triglycerides (TG), which are transported in the blood mainly by TG-rich lipoproteins (TRL). Elevated TG levels (150-400 mg/dL) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Severe HTG (>880 mg/dL) is associated with a risk of acute pancreatitis only. Randomised clinical trials investigating the clinical benefit of TG-lowering drugs in patients with elevated TG levels have provided conflicting results.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elevated TG levels are only one marker of altered lipid/lipoprotein metabolism and indeed reflect altered concentrations of one or more classes or subfractions of TRL, which in turn may have a different association with CV risk. Fibrates, the drugs most commonly used to treat HTG, provide cardiovascular benefits to only a specific subgroup of patients. The lack of clinical benefit from pemafibrate has emphasised the concept that lowering TG levels is not sufficient to reduce the CV risk unless it is accompanied by a reduction in the number of circulating atherogenic lipoproteins, which can be assessed by determining apolipoprotein B levels. Treatment with omega-3 fatty acids was also ineffective in reducing CV risk, with the exception of icosapent ethyl, which, however, appears to have beneficial effects beyond lipids. New drugs are currently being developed that aim to lower TG levels by targeting apolipoprotein C-III or angiopoietin-like-3, both of which are involved in the metabolism of TGs. TG reduction can be achieved by various drugs, but most of them are ineffective in reducing CV risk. The results of outcome studies on new TG-lowering drugs will clarify whether lowering apoB levels is critical to achieve clinical benefit.

Impact of Pemafibrate Therapy on Reducing Small Dense Low-Density-Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Levels in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia

BACKGROUND

Small dense LDL-cholesterol is a recently discovered cardiovascular risk factor beyond LDL-cholesterol. Pemafibrate is a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α modulator that reduces triglyceride levels. Given the significant association between triglycerides and small dense LDL-cholesterol levels, pemafibrate may reduce the levels of small dense LDL-cholesterol.

METHODS

Patients with hypertriglyceridemia who started pemafibrate therapy and continued it for >3 months between 2018 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The levels of small dense LDL-cholesterol, which was estimated using Sampson's equation, consisting of the LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels, were compared between baseline and 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients receiving pemafibrate therapy (median age: 63 years, 69 male) were eligible, including 33 patients (34%) who received concomitant statins. Small dense LDL-cholesterol levels decreased significantly during the course of 3-month pemafibrate therapy from 48.9 (IQR: 35.7, 57.9) mg/dL to 38.8 (IQR: 30.0, 45.1) mg/dL, regardless of the concomitant administration of statins (p < 0.001). The rate of cardiovascular events decreased significantly from the pre-treatment 1-year period to the treatment 1-year period (from 13 to 2 events, from 0.133 to 0.021 events per year, incidence rate ratio: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.17, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pemafibrate therapy may mitigate the concentrations of small dense LDL-cholesterol autonomously in patients manifesting hypertriglyceridemia within the authentic clinical milieu. The clinical importance of the diminishment in small dense LDL-cholesterol instigated via pemafibrate merits further scrutiny.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology CXIII: Nuclear Receptor Superfamily-Update 2023

The NR superfamily comprises 48 transcription factors in humans that control a plethora of gene network programs involved in a wide range of physiologic processes. This review will summarize and discuss recent progress in NR biology and drug development derived from integrating various approaches, including biophysical techniques, structural studies, and translational investigation. We also highlight how defective NR signaling results in various diseases and disorders and how NRs can be targeted for therapeutic intervention via modulation via binding to synthetic lipophilic ligands. Furthermore, we also review recent studies that improved our understanding of NR structure and signaling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-regulated transcription factors that are critical regulators of myriad physiological processes. NRs serve as receptors for an array of drugs, and in this review, we provide an update on recent research into the roles of these drug targets.

Preferable effects of pemafibrate on liver function and fibrosis in subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated with liver damage

BACKGROUND

Pemafibrate has been reported to ameliorate lipid profiles and liver dysfunction. However, which patients derive benefit from the hepatoprotective effects of pemafibrate is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a sub-analysis of the PARM-T2D study where subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated by hypertriglyceridemia were prospectively treated with pemafibrate or conventional therapies for 52 weeks. From the original cohort, subjects who had metabolic-associated fatty liver disease without changing their treatment regimens for comorbidities were analyzed. Eligible subjects (n = 293) (average age 61.2 ± 11.7 years, 37.5% female) treated with pemafibrate (pemafibrate, n = 152) or controls who did not change their treatment regimens (controls, n = 141) were divided into three groups based on their alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels: ALT ≤ upper normal limit (UNL) (pemafibrate, n = 65; controls, n = 50), UNL < ALT ≤ 2×UNL (pemafibrate, n = 58; controls, n = 54), and 2×UNL < ALT (pemafibrate, n = 29; controls, n = 27).

RESULTS

Pemafibrate treatment significantly ameliorated ALT levels (from 29 to 22 U/L, p < 0.001 by Wilcoxon's signed-rank test) in the total cohort and subjects with high ALT levels (2×ULN < ALT), and improved liver fibrosis as assessed by the Fibrosis-4 index (mean change - 0.05 (95% confidence interval: -0.22 to - 0.02), p < 0.05 versus baseline by the Mann-Whitney U-test and p < 0.05 versus the ALT ≤ UNL group by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

The hepatoprotective effects of pemafibrate were dominant in subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated with liver dysfunction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Center Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000037385).

Gamma-glutamyl transferase predicts pemafibrate treatment response in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α modulator, has been shown to improve liver function among nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients with dyslipidemia. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify predictors of pemafibrate efficacy in NAFLD patients.

METHODS

A total of 75 NAFLD patients with dyslipidemia who received pemafibrate twice per day for 48 weeks were enrolled in this study. We used the FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score as a benchmark for treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

Median FAST score significantly decreased from 0.96 at baseline to 0.93 at week 48 (P < 0.001). Significant improvements in levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and triglycerides were also noted. The serum level of GGT at baseline was correlated with change in FAST score (r = -0.22, P = 0.049). Changes in AST, ALT, and GGT were positively correlated with change in FAST score (r = 0.71, r = 0.61, and r = 0.38). Multivariate analyses identified age and GGT level at baseline as significantly associated with improvement of FAST score by pemafibrate therapy (odds ratio 1.11, 1.02, respectively). Patients over 50 years of age and with a GGT of 90 IU/L or higher showed significantly greater improvement in the FAST score than other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemafibrate improves the FAST score of NAFLD patients with complicating dyslipidemia, especially in older patients with high GGT level. GGT is useful as an indicator of optimal treatment choice for NAFLD patients with dyslipidemia.

Efficacy of Pemafibrate Versus Fenofibrate Administration on Serum Lipid Levels in Patients with Dyslipidemia: Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pemafibrate is a novel fibrate class drug that is a highly potent and selective agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα). We performed the first ever network meta-analysis containing the largest ever group of patients to test the efficacy of pemafibrate in improving lipid levels compared with fenofibrate and placebo in patients with dyslipidemia.

METHODS

Potentially relevant clinical trials were identified in Medline, PubMed, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Controlled Trials registry. Nine randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria out of 40 potentially available articles. The primary effect outcome was a change in the levels of triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), or low-density lipoproteins (LDL) before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 12,359 subjects were included. The mean patient age was 54.73 (years), the mean ratio for female patients was 18.75%, and the mean examination period was 14.22 weeks. The dose for pemafibrate included in our study was 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg twice daily, whereas the dose for fenofibrate was 100 mg/day. Data showed a significant reduction in TG and a mild increase in HDL levels across the pemafibrate group at different doses and fenofibrate 100 mg group (with greatest effect observed with pemafibrate 0.1 mg twice daily). A mild increase in LDL was also observed in all groups, but the increase in LDL in the 0.1 mg twice daily dose group was statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

Pemafibrate 0.1 mg twice daily dose led to highest reduction in TG levels and the highest increase in HDL levels compared with other doses of pemafibrate, fenofibrate, and placebo.

Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in patients with hypertriglyceridemia in clinical settings: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently, pemafibrate, a selective PPARα modulator, has been developed as a treatment for hypertriglyceridemia and has attracted much attention. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in hypertriglyceridemia patients under clinical settings.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated changes in lipid profiles and various parameters before and after 24-week pemafibrate administration in patients with hypertriglyceridemia who had not previously taken fibrate medications. There were 79 cases included in the analysis. 24 weeks after the treatment with pemafibrate, TG was significantly reduced from 312 ± 226 to 167 ± 94 mg/dL. In addition, lipoprotein fractionation tests using PAGE method showed a significant decrease in the ratio of VLDL and remnant fractionations, which are TG-rich lipoproteins. After pemafibrate administration, body weight, HbA1c, eGFR, and CK levels were not changed, but liver injury indices such as ALT, AST, and γ-GTP were significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

In this study, pemafibrate improved the metabolism of atherosclerosis-induced lipoproteins in hypertriglyceridemia patients. In addition, it showed no off-target effects such as hepatic and renal damage or rhabdomyolysis.

Favorable Effect of Pemafibrate on Insulin Resistance and β-Cell Function in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertriglyceridemia: A Subanalysis of the PARM-T2D Study

Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulator, has beneficial effects on lipid metabolism. However, its effects on glucose metabolism in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remain to be fully clarified. This was a subanalysis of the PARM-T2D study, a multicenter prospective observational study on the use of pemafibrate versus conventional therapy for 52 weeks in subjects with T2DM complicated with hypertriglyceridemia. The subanalysis included participants who did not change their treatment for diabetes and did not receive insulin or insulin secretagogues during the study period. Changes in glucose metabolism markers, including homeostatic model assessment (HOMA2) scores and disposition index, were assessed. A total of 279 participants (141 in the pemafibrate group; 138 in the control group) met the criteria for the subanalysis. There were no significant changes in HbA1c during the 52-week study period in both groups. However, the pemafibrate group showed significant improvements versus the control group for insulin resistance assessed by HOMA2-R (-0.15 versus 0.08; estimated treatment difference -0.23 (95% confidence interval -0.44, -0.02); p = 0.03) and maintenance of β-cell function assessed by disposition index (0.015 versus -0.023; estimated treatment difference 0.037 (95% confidence interval 0.005, 0.069); p = 0.02). Correlation analyses showed that improvements in HOMA2-R and disposition index were significantly associated with improvements in lipid abnormalities and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase. In conclusion, pemafibrate reduced insulin resistance and maintained β-cell function in subjects with T2DM and hypertriglyceridemia, presumably by improving lipid profiles and lipid-related hepatocyte stress.

Novel Selective PPARα Modulator Pemafibrate for Dyslipidemia, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), and Atherosclerosis

Statins, the intestinal cholesterol transporter inhibitor (ezetimibe), and PCSK9 inhibitors can reduce serum LDL-C levels, leading to a significant reduction in cardiovascular events. However, these events cannot be fully prevented even when maintaining very low LDL-C levels. Hypertriglyceridemia and reduced HDL-C are known as residual risk factors for ASCVD. Hypertriglyceridemia and/or low HDL-C can be treated with fibrates, nicotinic acids, and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Fibrates were demonstrated to be PPARα agonists and can markedly lower serum TG levels, yet were reported to cause some adverse effects, including an increase in the liver enzyme and creatinine levels. Recent megatrials of fibrates have shown negative findings on the prevention of ASCVD, which were supposed to be due to their low selectivity and potency for binding to PPAR α. To overcome the off-target effects of fibrates, the concept of a selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) was proposed. Kowa Company, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), has developed pemafibrate (K-877). Compared with fenofibrate, pemafibrate showed more favorable effects on the reduction of TG and an increase in HDL-C. Fibrates worsened liver and kidney function test values, although pemafibrate showed a favorable effect on liver function test values and little effect on serum creatinine levels and eGFR. Minimal drug-drug interactions of pemafibrate with statins were observed. While most of the fibrates are mainly excreted from the kidney, pemafibrate is metabolized in the liver and excreted into the bile. It can be used safely even in patients with CKD, without a significant increase in blood concentration. In the megatrial of pemafibrate, PROMINENT, for dyslipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes, mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL-C and LDL-C levels, the incidence of cardiovascular events did not decrease among those receiving pemafibrate compared to those receiving the placebo; however, the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease was lower. Pemafibrate may be superior to conventional fibrates and applicable to CKD patients. This current review summarizes the recent findings on pemafibrate.

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study

AIM

Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist.

METHODS

In this randomized crossover study, 60 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride [TG] ≥ 150 mg/dL) were treated with pemafibrate of 0.2 mg/day or bezafibrate of 400 mg/day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change (%Change) from baseline in TG levels, while the secondary endpoints were %Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) levels.

RESULTS

The %Change in TG and Apo A-I levels was significantly greater with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (-46.1% vs. -34.7%, p＜0.001; 9.2% vs. 5.7%, p =0.018, respectively). %Change in HDL-C levels was not significantly different between the two treatments. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate. Creatinine levels significantly increased in both treatments; however, its %Change was significantly lower with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (5.72% vs. 15.5%, p＜0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs did not differ between the two treatments; however, the number of patients with elevated creatinine levels (≥ 0.5 mg/dL and/or 25% from baseline) was significantly higher in the bezafibrate group than in the pemafibrate group (14/60 vs. 3/60, p =0.004) [corrected].

CONCLUSION

Compared with bezafibrate, pemafibrate is more effective in decreasing TG levels and increasing Apo A-I levels and is safer regarding liver and renal function.

Design and methods of an open-label, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of pemafibrate on proteinuria in CKD patients (PROFIT-CKD)

BACKGROUND

Hypertriglyceridemia is increasingly considered a residual risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pemafibrate-a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator and a new treatment for hypertriglyceridemia in CKD patients-is reported to have fewer side effects in CKD patients than other fibrates. Appropriate control of hypertriglyceridemia can be expected to improve renal prognosis. However, data on the renal protective effect of pemafibrate are limited. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pemafibrate on urinary protein excretion in CKD patients.

METHODS

The Pemafibrate, open-label, Randomized cOntrolled study to evaluate the renal protective eFfect In hyperTriglyceridemia patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (PROFIT-CKD) study is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Participants are outpatients with hypertriglyceridemia aged 20 years and over, who have received the care of a nephrologist or a diabetologist for more than 3 months. Inclusion criteria include the following: proteinuria (urine protein/creatinine ratio of ≥ 0.15 g/gCr) within three months before allocation, and hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL and < 1,000 mg/dL) at allocation. In the treatment group, pemafibrate is added to conventional treatment, while conventional treatment is continued with no additional treatment in the control group. Target patient enrollment is 140 patients. The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the logarithmic urine protein/creatinine ratio at 12 months after study start.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide new findings on the renal protective effect of pemafibrate in CKD patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center (UMIN-CTR: UMIN000042284).

Pemafibrate inhibited renal dysfunction and fibrosis in a mouse model of adenine-induced chronic kidney disease

AIMS

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARα) levels are markedly lower in the kidneys of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Fibrates (PPARα agonists) are therapeutic agents against hypertriglyceridemia and potentially against CKD. However, conventional fibrates are eliminated by renal excretion, limiting their use in patients with impaired renal function. Here, we aimed to evaluate the renal risks associated with conventional fibrates via clinical database analysis and investigate the renoprotective effects of pemafibrate, a novel selective PPARα modulator mainly excreted into the bile.

MAIN METHODS

The risks associated with conventional fibrates (fenofibrate, bezafibrate) to the kidneys were evaluated using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Pemafibrate (1 or 0.3 mg/kg/day) was administered daily using an oral sonde. Its renoprotective effects were examined in unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO)-induced renal fibrosis model mice (UUO mice) and adenine-induced CKD model mice (CKD mice).

KEY FINDINGS

The ratios of glomerular filtration rate decreased and blood creatinine increased were markedly higher after conventional fibrate use. Pemafibrate administration suppressed increased gene expressions of collagen-I, fibronectin, and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) in the kidneys of UUO mice. In CKD mice, it suppressed increased plasma creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels and decreased red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels, along with renal fibrosis. Moreover, it inhibited the upregulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and IL-6 in the kidneys of CKD mice.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results demonstrated the renoprotective effects of pemafibrate in CKD mice, confirming its potential as a therapeutic agent for renal disorders.

Safety and efficacy of switching to pemafibrate from bezafibrate in patients with chronic liver disease

AIM

Although fibrates were developed as lipid-lowering drugs, their efficacy against liver dysfunction in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, such as primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and fatty liver disease, has also been reported. Although fibrates act on some peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), pemafibrate is a novel selective PPAR-α modulator. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

We analyzed 58 patients with chronic liver disease who switched from bezafibrate to pemafibrate because of minor adverse effects and/or incomplete response.

RESULTS

This study included 41 patients with cholestatic liver disease and 17 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Reasons for switching to pemafibrate were renal function decline in 31 patients, hemoglobin decline in 17 patients, creatine kinase (CK) elevation in 11 patients, incomplete response of liver dysfunction in 39 patients, and incomplete response of hyperlipidemia in 13 patients. After 3 months, although no significant change in CK was seen, hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly increased, and creatinine was significantly decreased. Significant decreases in hepatobiliary enzymes were seen in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, but not in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. No significant changes in serum lipids were observed. No patients discontinued pemafibrate due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to pemafibrate could improve adverse effects due to bezafibrate, and appeared effective against liver dysfunction in cholestatic liver disease patients with incomplete response to bezafibrate.

Effect of a combination of pemafibrate and a mild low-carbohydrate diet on obese and non-obese patients with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently, pemafibrate and a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) have each been reported to improve fatty liver disease. However, it is unclear whether their combination improves fatty liver disease and is equally effective in obese and non-obese patients.

METHODS

In 38 metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) patients, classified by baseline body mass index (BMI), changes in laboratory values, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were studied after 1 year of combined pemafibrate plus mild LCD.

RESULTS

The combination treatment resulted in weight loss (P = 0.002), improvement in hepatobiliary enzymes (γ-glutamyl transferase, P = 0.027; aspartate aminotransferase, P < 0.001; alanine transaminase [ALT], P < 0.001), and improvement in liver fibrosis markers (FIB-4 index, P = 0.032; 7 s domain of type IV collagen, P = 0.002; M2BPGi, P < 0.001). Vibration-controlled transient elastography improved from 8.8 to 6.9 kPa (P < 0.001) and MRE improved from 3.1 to 2.8 kPa (P = 0.017) in the liver stiffness. MRI-PDFF improved from 16.6% to 12.3% in liver steatosis (P = 0.007). In patients with a BMI of 25 or higher, improvements of ALT (r = 0.659, P < 0.001) and MRI-PDFF (r = 0.784, P < 0.001) were significantly correlated with weight loss. However, in patients with a BMI below 25, the improvements of ALT or PDFF were not accompanied by weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined treatment with pemafibrate and a low-carbohydrate diet resulted in weight loss and improvements in ALT, MRE, and MRI-PDFF in MAFLD patients. Although such improvements were associated with weight loss in obese patients, the improvements were observed irrespective of weight loss in non-obese patients, indicating this combination can be effective both in obese and non-obese MAFLD patients.

Effect of Pemafibrate on Hemorheology in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia and Aggravated Blood Fluidity Associated with Type 2 Diabetes or Metabolic Syndrome

Persistent high serum triglyceride (TG) and free fatty acid (FFA) levels, which are common in metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, are risk factors for cardiovascular events because of exacerbated hemorheology. To explore the effects of pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator, on hemorheology, we performed a single-center, nonrandomized, controlled study in patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 6-10%) or metabolic syndrome, with fasting TG levels of ≥ 150 mg/dL and a whole blood transit time of > 45 s on a microarray channel flow analyzer (MCFAN). Patients were divided into a study group, receiving 0.2 mg/day of pemafibrate (n = 50) for 16 weeks, and a non-pemafibrate control group (n = 46). Blood samples were drawn 8 and 16 weeks after entry to the study to evaluate whole blood transit time as a hemorheological parameter, leukocyte activity by MCFAN, and serum FFA levels. No serious adverse events were observed in either of the groups. After 16 weeks, the pemafibrate group showed a 38.6% reduction in triglycerides and a 50.7% reduction in remnant lipoproteins. Pemafibrate treatment did not significantly improve whole blood rheology or leukocyte activity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome complicated by hypertriglyceridemia and exacerbated hemorheology.

Current and Emerging Therapies for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction in Hypertriglyceridemia

Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is a prevalent medical condition in patients with cardiometabolic risk factors and is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), if left undiagnosed and undertreated. Current guidelines identify HTG as a risk-enhancing factor and, as a result, recommend clinical evaluation and lifestyle-based interventions to address potential secondary causes of elevated triglyceride (TG) levels. For individuals with mild to moderate HTG at risk of ASCVD, statin therapy alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering medications known to decrease ASCVD risk are guideline-endorsed. In addition to lifestyle modifications, patients with severe HTG at risk of acute pancreatitis may benefit from fibrates, mixed formulation omega-3 fatty acids, and niacin; however, evidence does not support their use for ASCVD risk reduction in the contemporary statin era. Novel therapeutics including those that target apoC-III and ANGPTL3 have shown to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective for lowering TG levels. Given the growing burden of cardiometabolic disease and risk factors, public health and health policy strategies are urgently needed to enhance access to effective pharmacotherapies, affordable and nutritious food options, and timely health care services.

Effect of pemafibrate on liver enzymes and shear wave velocity in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients

Background/Aims

Pemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that improves serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in dyslipidemia patients. Pemafibrate was reported to reduce ALT in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients, but efficacy was not clearly elucidated due to the small size of previous study populations. Therefore, we explored pemafibrate efficacy in NAFLD patients.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated pemafibrate efficacy on liver enzymes (n = 132) and liver shear wave velocity (SWV, n = 51) in NAFLD patients who had taken pemafibrate for at least 24 weeks.

Results

Patient ALT levels were decreased from 81.0 IU/L at baseline to 48.0 IU/L at week 24 (P < 0.0001). Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) and triglyceride (TG) were significantly decreased, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and platelet count were significantly increased, with no change in body weight being observed. Study participant SWV values decreased from 1.45 m/s at baseline to 1.32 m/s at week 48 (P < 0.001). Older age (P = 0.035) and serum TG levels (P = 0.048) were significantly associated with normalized ALT. Changes in AST, ALT, γ-GTP and body weight were significantly correlated with change in SWV.

Conclusion

Pemafibrate significantly improves liver function, serum TG and liver stiffness in NAFLD patients. Pemafibrate is a promising therapeutic agent for NAFLD and may be a candidate for NAFLD patients with elevated TG.

The effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl on apoB-48 in dyslipidemic patients treated with statin: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group trial in Japan (PROUD48 study)

Background

We compared the lowering effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl on fasting apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 (apoB-48), a marker that reflects postprandial hypertriglyceridemia, which is one of the residual risks for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) with statin treatment.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group trial was conducted at 4 medical institutions between April 2020 and May 2022. A total of 126 ambulatory patients with dyslipidemia receiving statin treatment for more than 4 weeks, aged 20-79 years with fasting triglyceride (TG) levels of ≥177 mg/dl were randomly assigned to 16-week pemafibrate 0.4 mg per day treatment group (PEMA, n = 63) or omega-3 fatty acid ethyl 4 g per day treatment group (OMEGA-3, n = 63). The primary endpoint was the percentage change in fasting apoB-48 from baseline to week 16.

Results

The percentage changes in fasting apoB-48 in PEMA and OMEGA-3 were -50.8% (interquartile range -62.9 to -30.3%) and -17.5% (-38.3 to 15.3%) (P < 0.001), respectively. As the secondary endpoints, the changes in fasting apoB-48 in PEMA and OMEGA-3 were -3.10 μg/ml (-5.63 to -1.87) and -0.90 μg/ml (-2.95 to 0.65) (P < 0.001), respectively. Greater decreases with significant differences in the percentage changes in TG, remnant lipoprotein cholesterol, apoC-III, fasting plasma glucose, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase were observed in PEMA, compared with OMEGA-3. Greater increases with significant differences in those in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apoA-I, and apoA-II were observed in PEMA, compared with OMEGA-3. PEMA showed anti-atherosclerotic lipoprotein profiles in gel-permeation high-performance liquid chromatography analyses, compared with OMEGA-3. Although adverse events occurred in 9 of 63 (14.3%) patients in PEMA and 3 of 63 (4.8%) patients in OMEGA-3, no serious adverse events associated with drug were observed in either group.

Conclusions

This is the first randomized trial to compare the lowering effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl on fasting apoB-48. We concluded that pemafibrate was superior to omega-3 fatty acid ethyl in lowering effect of fasting apoB-48. Pemafibrate is expected to reduce the residual risk for ASCVD with statin treatment.

Clinical trial registration

https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en, identifier jRCTs071200011.

Patient Selection for Pemafibrate Therapy to Prevent Adverse Cardiovascular Events

Background: pemafibrate is a newly-introduced selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α modulator, which decreases serum triglyceride levels with few drug-related adverse events and may reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in carefully selected patients with hypertriglyceridemia. We aimed to understand which specific cohorts may benefit or not from pemafibrate therapy for adverse cardiovascular event risk reduction. Methods: patients with hypertriglyceridemia at baseline received pemafibrate therapy for two years or until October 2022. The factors that were associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events, defined as heart failure hospitalization, stroke, and acute coronary syndromes, were investigated. Results: a total of 121 patients (median 62 years, 88 men) remained on pemafibrate therapy for a median of 566 days without any drug-related adverse events. During a 3-month therapeutic period, triglyceride levels improved significantly from 302 (205, 581) mg/dL to 178 (117, 253) mg/dL (p < 0.001). During the overall therapeutic period, there were nine cardiovascular events. Comorbid chronic heart failure, comorbid coronary disease, and a lower pemafibrate dosing were independently associated with the primary endpoint (p < 0.05 for all). Those with multiple risk factors (N = 30) had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint as compared with others (27% versus 3%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: pemafibrate significantly improves hypertriglyceridemia. A higher dose of pemafibrate should be considered to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with chronic heart failure or coronary disease.

Triglyceride Lowering with Pemafibrate to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk

BACKGROUND

High triglyceride levels are associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but whether reductions in these levels would lower the incidence of cardiovascular events is uncertain. Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator, reduces triglyceride levels and improves other lipid levels.

METHODS

In a multinational, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with type 2 diabetes, mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride level, 200 to 499 mg per deciliter), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels of 40 mg per deciliter or lower to receive pemafibrate (0.2-mg tablets twice daily) or matching placebo. Eligible patients were receiving guideline-directed lipid-lowering therapy or could not receive statin therapy without adverse effects and had low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of 100 mg per deciliter or lower. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, coronary revascularization, or death from cardiovascular causes.

RESULTS

Among 10,497 patients (66.9% with previous cardiovascular disease), the median baseline fasting triglyceride level was 271 mg per deciliter, HDL cholesterol level 33 mg per deciliter, and LDL cholesterol level 78 mg per deciliter. The median follow-up was 3.4 years. As compared with placebo, the effects of pemafibrate on lipid levels at 4 months were -26.2% for triglycerides, -25.8% for very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, -25.6% for remnant cholesterol (cholesterol transported in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins after lipolysis and lipoprotein remodeling), -27.6% for apolipoprotein C-III, and 4.8% for apolipoprotein B. A primary end-point event occurred in 572 patients in the pemafibrate group and in 560 of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.15), with no apparent effect modification in any prespecified subgroup. The overall incidence of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups, but pemafibrate was associated with a higher incidence of adverse renal events and venous thromboembolism and a lower incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with type 2 diabetes, mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL and LDL cholesterol levels, the incidence of cardiovascular events was not lower among those who received pemafibrate than among those who received placebo, although pemafibrate lowered triglyceride, VLDL cholesterol, remnant cholesterol, and apolipoprotein C-III levels. (Funded by the Kowa Research Institute; PROMINENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03071692.).

Study protocol of the PROUD48 study comparing the effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters on ApoB-48 in statin-treated patients with dyslipidaemia: a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised, parallel group trial in Japan

INTRODUCTION

This study will compare the lowering effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters on fasting apolipoprotein B-48 (apoB-48), a surrogate marker reflecting postprandial hypertriglyceridaemia, which is a residual risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with statin treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised, parallel group, comparative trial. Adult Japanese patients with dyslipidaemia receiving statin treatment for more than 4 weeks with a fasting triglyceride level ≥177 mg/dL will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive pemafibrate (0.4 mg orally per day) or omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters (4 g orally per day) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint is the percentage change in fasting apoB-48 from baseline to 16 weeks. The key secondary endpoints include the change in fasting apoB-48 from baseline to 16 weeks, the percentage changes in clinical variables from baseline to 16 weeks and the incidence of adverse events. A total sample size of 128 was set by considering the increased drop-out rate due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to estimation based on a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.8 for apoB-48.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol has been approved by the Certified Review Board of the University of the Ryukyus for Clinical Research Ethics (No. CRB7200001) and will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results of the study will be disseminated through publications and conference presentations to participants, healthcare professionals and the public.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs071200011.

Effects of pemafibrate on lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia: A multi-center prospective observational study, the PARM-T2D study

AIMS

Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulator, was shown to ameliorate lipid abnormalities in a phase III clinical trial of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, its efficacy has not been demonstrated in real-world clinical practice in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

We performed a multi-center prospective observational study of the use of pemafibrate in patients with T2DM and hypertriglyceridemia versus conventional therapy, with or without a fibrate. The primary outcomes were the changes from baseline in fasting serum triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations at week 52.

RESULTS

We recruited 650 patients, and data from 504 (252 per group) were analyzed after propensity score matching. In the pemafibrate group, both TG and HDL-C showed significant improvements (p < 0.001), and several indices reflecting TG-rich lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol particle size, and liver enzyme elevations were significantly ameliorated compared with the control group, but there was no difference in glycemic control markers. One of the key secondary endpoints showed that switching from conventional fibrates to pemafibrate improved eGFR but increased uric acid concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T2DM, pemafibrate has superior effects on lipid profile as well as liver and renal dysfunction to conventional fibrates.

A new perspective on NAFLD: Focusing on the crosstalk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) and farnesoid X receptor (FXR)

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is primarily caused by abnormal lipid metabolism and the accumulation of triglycerides in the liver. NAFLD is also associated with hepatic steatosis and nutritional and energy imbalances and is a chronic liver disease associated with a number of factors. Nuclear receptors play a key role in balancing energy and nutrient metabolism, and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) and farnesoid X receptor (FXR) regulate lipid metabolism genes, controlling hepatocyte lipid utilization and regulating bile acid (BA) synthesis and transport. They play an important role in lipid metabolism and BA homeostasis. At present, PPARα and FXR are the most promising targets for the treatment of NAFLD among nuclear receptors. This review focuses on the crosstalk mechanisms and transcriptional regulation of PPARα and FXR in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and summarizes PPARα and FXR drugs in clinical trials, laying a theoretical foundation for the targeted treatment of NAFLD and the development of novel therapeutic strategies.