The evolving use of higher risk grafts is associated with an increased incidence of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation

Deceased donor liver utilisation and assessment: Consensus guidelines from the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association

Over the past two decades, the application of machine perfusion (MP) in human liver transplantation has moved from the realm of clinical exploration to routine clinical practice. Both in situ and ex situ perfusion strategies are feasible, safe, and may offer improvements in relevant post-transplant outcomes. An important utility of these strategies is the ability to transplant grafts traditionally considered too risky to transplant using conventional cold storage alone. While dynamic assessment and ultimately transplantation of such livers is an important goal for the international liver transplant community, its clinical application is inconsistent. To this end, ELITA (the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association) gathered a panel of experts to create consensus guidelines regarding selection, approach, and criteria for deceased donor liver assessment in the MP era. An eight-member steering committee (SC) convened a panel of 44 professionals working in 14 countries in Europe and North America. The SC identified topics related to liver utilisation and assessment for transplantation. For each topic, subtopics were created to answer specific clinical questions. A systematic literature review was performed, and the panel graded relevant evidence. The SC drafted initial statements addressing each clinical question. Statements were presented at the in-person Consensus Meeting on Liver Discard and Viability Assessment during the ELITA Summit held from April 19-20, 2024, in Madrid, Spain. Online voting was held to approve statements according to a modified Delphi method; statements reaching ≥85% agreement were approved. Statements addressing liver utilisation, the definition of high-risk livers, and strategies and criteria for dynamic liver assessment are presented.

Development of a prediction index for persistent acute kidney injury following orthotopic liver transplant

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study aimed to identify factors associated with persistent AKI (pAKI) and to develop a risk index. The impact of pAKI on mortality and renal function over a 5-year period was also assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, adult OLT recipients were included. pAKI was defined as AKI lasting >72 hours. Logistic regression identified pAKI-associated factors, which were used to create a risk index. Long-term renal function was then evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 305 patients, 23 % developed pAKI. The median MELD (Model for End-stage Liver Disease) score was 17. Multivariate analysis identified male sex, reoperation, transfusion of >6 units of red blood cells, anhepatic time >50 minutes, and norepinephrine use >0.25 mcg/kg/min as significant risk factors. The risk index assigned 3 points each to male sex and norepinephrine use, and 5 points to the remaining factors. A score ≥11 had moderate performance (AUC 0.70) and a negative predictive value of 90 %. Patients with pAKI had longer ICU and hospital stays and higher in-hospital mortality. At 5 years, overall mortality did not differ significantly, but those with pAKI had a 10 ml/min/1.73m² lower eGFR.

CONCLUSIONS

pAKI is a frequent OLT complication, negatively affecting short-term outcomes and long-term renal function. The proposed risk index effectively identifies patients at low risk, supporting targeted monitoring and prevention.

Protective value of ischemia-free liver transplantation on post-transplant acute kidney injury

Background & Aims

Ischemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) completely avoids ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), thus potentially reducing acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation (LT). Therefore, this study investigated whether IFLT has a protective effect against AKI after LT.

Methods

In total, 862 patients who had undergone LT between 2017 to 2022 were divided into an ischemia-free liver transplantation group (IFLT group) and conventional liver transplantation group (CLT group) based on the surgical methods used. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for post hoc randomization in the 1:1 matching between the groups. Post-transplant kidney function, graft function, and patient survival were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors of AKI after LT.

Results

Overall, 745 out of 862 patients were finally enrolled, of whom 98 underwent IFLT. PSM created 94 pairs of patients. IFLT resulted in a significant reduction in Stage-3 AKI (3.2% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.003), severe AKI (SAKI) (13.8% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.044), and renal replacement therapy (RRT) ratio (3.2% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.015) compared with the CLT group. The early allograft dysfunction (EAD) incidence of the IFLT group significantly decreased (8.5% vs. 44.7%, p <0.001). Livers from the extended criteria donation (ECD) were received in 49 patients who underwent IFLT and 46 patients who underwent CLT. Compared with the ECD-CLT group, the Stage-3 AKI and SAKI incidence in the ECD-IFLT group were both decreased (p <0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis further confirmed that both using IFLT and avoiding ECD were protective factors for post-transplant Stage-3 AKI.

Conclusions

IFLT significantly reduces the incidence of post-transplant SCKI, Stage-3 AKI, and RRT. Importantly, this protective effect is also present in patients receiving ECD livers.

Impact and implications

Ischemia-free liver transplantation significantly reduces the incidence of severe acute kidney injury, Stage-3 acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy after liver transplantation. Importantly, this protective effect is also present in patients receiving extended criteria donation livers.

Clinical trial number

ChiCTR2400081755.

Age Matters: What Affects the Cumulative Lifespan of a Transplanted Liver?

OBJECTIVE

To assess factors affecting the cumulative lifespan of a transplanted liver.

BACKGROUND

Liver aging is different from other solid organs. It is unknown how old a liver can actually get after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Deceased donor liver transplants from 1988 to 2021 were queried from the United States UNOS registry. Cumulative liver age was calculated as donor age + recipient graft survival.

RESULTS

In total, 184,515 livers were included. Most were donation after brain death donors (n = 175,343). The percentage of livers achieving >70, 80, 90, and 100 years cumulative age was 7.8% (n = 14,392), 1.9% (n = 3576), 0.3% (n = 528), and 0.01% (n = 21), respectively. The youngest donor age contributing to a cumulative liver age >90 years was 59 years, with posttransplant survival of 34 years. In pediatric recipients, 736 (4.4%) and 282 livers (1.7%) survived >50 and 60 years overall, respectively. Transplanted livers achieved cumulative age >90 years in 2.86 per 1000 and >100 years in 0.1 per 1000. The U.S. population at large has a cumulative "liver age" >90 years in 5.35 per 1000 persons, and >100 years in 0.2 per 1000. Livers aged >60 years at transplant experienced both improved cumulative survival ( P < 0.0001) and interestingly improved survival after transplantation ( P < 0.0001). Recipient warm ischemia time of >30 minutes was most predictive of reduced cumulative liver survival overall (n = 184,515, hazard ratio = 1.126, P < 0.001) and excluding patients with mortality in the first 6 months (n = 151,884, hazard ratio = 0.973, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, transplanted livers frequently get as old as those in the average population despite ischemic-reperfusion-injury and immunosuppression. The presented results justify using older donor livers regardless of donation type, even in sicker recipients with limited options.

Can Novel Biomarkers Effectively Predict Acute Kidney Injury in Liver or Kidney Transplant Recipients?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) constitutes a common complication associated with liver or kidney transplantation, which may significantly impact the graft condition and perioperative mortality. Current AKI diagnostic criteria based on serum creatinine (sCr) and urine output alterations are widely utilized in routine clinical practice. However, the diagnostic value of sCr may be limited by various confounding factors, including age, sex, reduced or increased muscle mass, and pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, sCr is rather a late indicator of AKI, as its concentration tends to increase only when the severity of the injury is enough to decrease the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Recent expertise highlights the need for novel biomarkers in post-transplantation AKI diagnosis, prediction of event-associated mortality, or evaluation of indications for renal replacement treatment (RRT). Over the last decade, the diagnostic performance of various AKI biomarkers has been assessed, among which some showed the potential to outperform sCr in AKI diagnosis. Identifying susceptible individuals, early diagnosis, and prompt intervention are crucial for successful transplantation, undisturbed graft function in long-term follow-up, and decreased mortality. However, the research on AKI biomarkers in transplantation still needs to be explored. The field lacks consistent results, rigorous study designs, and external validation. Considering the rapidly growing prevalence of CKD and cirrhosis that are associated with the transplantation at their end-stage, as well as the existing knowledge gap, the aim of this article was to provide the most up-to-date review of the studies on novel biomarkers in the diagnosis of post-transplantation AKI.

Post Liver Transplant Renal Dysfunction-Evaluation, Management and Immunosuppressive Practice

Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective and lifesaving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Significant improvement in intermediate and long-term survival has been possible due to advancements in immunosuppressive therapy, perioperative care, and surgical techniques. Despite these advances, metabolic complications, including diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, and renal dysfunction, are challenging issues after LT. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) after LT are common and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of kidney injury after LT is challenging, and no technique has yet proven effective in prediction of renal dysfunction. The methods for assessing renal function range from formulas that predict glomerular filtration rate to non-invasive biomarkers. The universal adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease has a direct impact on the incidence of peri-transplant AKI and development of CKD in the long-term. Post-LT renal dysfunction is multifactorial and is usually a result of pre-transplantation comorbidities, occurrence of renal dysfunction on the waiting list, perioperative events, and post-transplant nephrotoxic immunosuppressive medication use. Early identification of patients at risk for renal dysfunction and adoption of preventive measures are crucial in the pre-transplant period. No data are currently available to suggest a surgical technique that reliably demonstrates renal protection. Nephroprotective strategies during LT follow accepted surgical practice guidelines, such as maintenance of intravascular volume and mean arterial pressure. The management of kidney disease following LT is challenging, as by the time the serum creatinine is significantly elevated, few interventions impact the course of progression. Early nephroprotective measures are strongly advised and they mostly center on delaying the administration of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) during the initial postoperative period, lowering CNI dosage and combining CNI with mycophenolate mofetil and everolimus. The reasons for renal failure following LT, the techniques used to diagnose it, and the therapies designed to preserve renal function both immediately and late after LT are all critically evaluated in this review.

End-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion does not improve renal outcome following liver transplantation from aged donors: A single-center retrospective report

BACKGROUND

Organ transplantation using grafts from elderly donors entails a higher risk for severe ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Advanced IRI after liver transplantation (LT) seems to be associated with the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). We studied if end-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) of liver grafts, aimed at mitigating liver IRI, impacts on the frequency and severity of AKI after LT.

METHODS

LTs performed at our center between January 2017 and December 2022 using organs from deceased brain-dead donors aged 70 or older were reviewed. From November 2020 on, HOPE was performed routinely in this donor category. The frequency and severity of AKI (KDIGO criteria) within 48 hours of graft reperfusion and the model of early allograft function (MEAF) were compared between HOPE-LTs (n = 30) and control LTs (n = 71).

RESULTS

AKI developed in 23/30 (77%) HOPE-LTs and in 40/71 (56%) control LTs (p = n.s.), with no difference in severity and timing between groups. Renal replacement therapy was required in 3/30 (10%) HOPE-LTs and 6/71 (8%) control LTs. In addition, transaminase leak during the first week (marker of IRI) and MEAF were similar between groups. These findings persisted after propensity matching. Histology showed more hepatocyte vacuolization and higher Suzuki score in HOPE-LTs. Although this analysis could have been underpowered, no trends supporting the benefit of HOPE on liver and renal injury after LT were ever identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, HOPE in this group of older donors does not seem to improve either graft IRI, or the incidence of early AKI after LT.

Effects of 20% albumin infusion therapy during liver transplantation on plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin level: A randomized controlled trial

The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation was lower in patients with serum albumin levels ≥3.0 mg/dL during surgery. We tested whether intraoperative infusion of 20% albumin affects neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) level, a reliable indicator of AKI. We randomly assigned 134 patients undergoing liver transplantation into albumin group (n=70, 20% albumin 200 mL) and the control group (n=66, crystalloid solution 200 mL). The 2 study fluids were infused at 100 mL/h from the start of the anhepatic phase. The primary outcome was plasma NGAL level at 1 hour after graft reperfusion. Albumin level at the start of graft reperfusion was significantly greater in albumin group than in the control group [2.9 (2.4-3.3) g/dL vs. 2.3 (2.0-2.7) g/dL, p <0.001]. The NGAL level at 1 hour after graft reperfusion was not significantly different between the 2 groups [100.2 (66.7-138.8) ng/mL vs. 92.9 (70.8-120.6) ng/mL, p =0.46], and the AKI risk was not either (63.9% vs. 67.8%, adjusted p =0.73). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding hospital readmission within 30 days/90 days after transplantation (32.6% vs. 41.5%, adjusted p =0.19 and 55.0% vs. 55.7%, adjusted p =0.87). Graft survival probability at 30 days/90 days/1 year after transplantation was 90.0%/84.3%/78.6% in albumin group and 97.0%/90.9%/89.4% in the control group [HR=1.6 (0.6-4.0), adjusted p =0.31]. In conclusion, intraoperative infusion of 20% albumin 200 mL increased the albumin level but failed to maintain serum albumin ≥3.0 mg/dL during surgery. The hypertonic albumin therapy did not significantly affect plasma NGAL level and clinical outcomes including AKI.

A Novel Online Calculator Predicting Acute Kidney Injury After Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation (LT) is a common complication, and its development is thought to be multifactorial. We aimed to investigate potential risk factors and build a model to identify high-risk patients. A total of 199 LT patients were enrolled and each patient data was collected from the electronic medical records. Our primary outcome was postoperative AKI as diagnosed and classified by the KDIGO criteria. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operating algorithm and multivariate logistic regression were utilized to select factors and construct the model. Discrimination and calibration were used to estimate the model performance. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to assess the clinical application value. Five variables were identified as independent predictors for post-LT AKI, including whole blood serum lymphocyte count, RBC count, serum sodium, insulin dosage and anhepatic phase urine volume. The nomogram model showed excellent discrimination with an AUC of 0.817 (95% CI: 0.758-0.876) in the training set. The DCA showed that at a threshold probability between 1% and 70%, using this model clinically may add more benefit. In conclusion, we developed an easy-to-use tool to calculate the risk of post-LT AKI. This model may help clinicians identify high-risk patients.

Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates acute kidney injury induced by hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats

Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, caused by limited blood supply and subsequent blood supply, is a causative factor resulting in morbidity and mortality during liver transplantation and liver resection. Hepatic I/R injury frequently contributes to remote organ injury, such as kidney, lung, and heart. It has been demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is effective in remote organ injury after I/R injury. Here, our aim is to investigate the potential action of VNS on hepatic I/R injury-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and explore its underlying mechanisms. To test this hypothesis, male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned into three experimental groups: Sham group (sham operation, n = 6); I/R group (hepatic I/R with sham VNS, n = 6); and VNS group (hepatic I/R with VNS, n = 6). VNS was performed during the entire hepatic I/R process. Our results showed that throughout the hepatic I/R process, VNS significantly regulated the expression levels of various iconic factors and greatly enhanced the protein expression levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1) in the kidneys. These findings suggested that VNS may ameliorate hepatic I/R injury-induced AKI by suppressing inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis probably through activating the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway.

Liver Graft Proteomics Reveals Potential Incipient Mechanisms behind Early Renal Dysfunction after Liver Transplantation

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent after liver transplantation (LT) and correlates with later development of chronic kidney disease. Its etiology is multifactorial and combines pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors. Additionally, the liver graft itself seems an important element in the development of AKI, yet the detailed mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that grafts of LT recipients developing significant early AKI may show distinct proteomic alterations, and we set out to identify proteome differences between LT recipients developing moderate or severe AKI (n = 7) and LT recipients without early renal injury (n = 7). Liver biopsies obtained one hour after reperfusion were assessed histologically and using quantitative proteomics. Several cytokines and serum amyloid A2 (SAA2) were analyzed in serum samples obtained preoperatively, 2−4 h, and 20−24 h after graft reperfusion, respectively. LT induced mild histological alterations without significant differences between groups but uniformly altered liver function tests peaking on postoperative day 1, with a trend towards more severe alterations in patients developing AKI. Global quantitative proteomic analysis revealed 136 proteins differing significantly in their expression levels (p < 0.05, FC 20%): 80 proteins had higher and 56 had lower levels in the AKI group. Most of these proteins were related to immune and inflammatory responses, host defense, and neutrophil degranulation. No differences between the studied pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines or SAA2 between groups were found at any moment. Our results suggest that grafts of LT patients who develop early AKI reveal a distinct proteome dominated by an early yet prominent activation of the innate immunity. These findings support the hypothesis that AKI after LT may be favored by certain graft characteristics.

Modelling kidney outcomes based on MELD eras - impact of MELD score in renal endpoints after liver transplantation

Background

Acute kidney injury is a common complication in solid organ transplants, notably liver transplantation. The MELD is a score validated to predict mortality of cirrhotic patients, which is also used for organ allocation, however the influence of this allocation criteria on AKI incidence and mortality after liver transplantation is still uncertain.

Methods

This is a retrospective single center study of a cohort of patients submitted to liver transplant in a tertiary Brazilian hospital: Jan/2002 to Dec/2013, divided in two groups, before and after MELD implementation (pre-MELD and post MELD). We evaluate the differences in AKI based on KDIGO stages and mortality rates between the two groups.

Results

Eight hundred seventy-four patients were included, 408 in pre-MELD and 466 in the post MELD era. The proportion of patients that developed AKI was lower in the post MELD era (p 0.04), although renal replacement therapy requirement was more frequent in this group (p < 0.01). Overall mortality rate at 28, 90 and 365 days was respectively 7%, 11% and 15%. The 1-year mortality rate was lower in the post MELD era (20% vs. 11%, p < 0.01). AKI incidence was 50% lower in the post MELD era even when adjusted for clinically relevant covariates (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Liver transplants performed in the post MELD era had a lower incidence of AKI, although there were more cases requiring dialysis. 1-year mortality was lower in the post MELD era, suggesting that patient care was improved during this period.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Attenuates Acute Kidney Injury Induced by Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Suppressing Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis in Rats.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1937916/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Hepatic ischemia reperfusion (I/R) injury, caused by limited blood supply and subsequent blood supply, is a causative factor resulting in morbidity and mortality during liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection. Hepatic I/R injury frequently contributes to remote organ injury, such as kidney, lung, and heart. It has been demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is effective in remote organ injury after ischemia reperfusion injury. Here, our aim is to investigate the potential action of VNS on hepatic I/R injury-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and explore its underlying mechanisms. To test this hypothesis, male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned into three experimental groups: Sham group (sham operation, n=6); I/R group (hepatic I/R with sham VNS, n=6); and VNS group (hepatic I/R with VNS, n=6). VNS was performed during the entire hepatic I/R process. Our results showed that throughout the hepatic I/R process, VNS significantly reduced inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, and greatly enhanced the protein expression levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1) in the kidneys. These findings suggest that VNS may ameliorate hepatic I/R injury-induced AKI by suppressing inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis probably through activating the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway.

Renal function after liver transplantation: Real-world experience with basiliximab induction and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Routine use of delayed reduced-dose calcineurin-inhibitor treatment with induction immunosuppression in liver transplantation to minimize post-operative kidney injury is still scarce.

AIM

To evaluate real-world experience of basiliximab induction with delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, kidney function was evaluated pre- and postoperatively by measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Adult patients undergoing liver transplantation between 2000 and 2017 were divided into a conventional treatment group (immediate-introduction of tacrolimus, target trough levels 10-15 ng/mL, and corticosteroids, n = 203) and a revised treatment group (basiliximab induction, reduced-dose tacrolimus, target through levels 5-8 ng/mL, delayed until day three, and mycophenolate mofetil 2000 mg/day, n = 343).

RESULTS

Mean mGFR was similar between groups at wait-listing (85.3 vs 84.1 ml/min/1.73m², p = 0.60), but higher in the revised treatment group at 3 (56.8 vs 63.4 ml/min/1.73m², p = 0.004) and 12 months post-transplant (60.9 vs 69.7 ml/min/1.73m², p<0.001); this difference remained after correcting for multiple confounders and was independent of pre-transplant mGFR. In the revised treatment group, biopsy proven acute rejection rate was lower (38% vs. 21%, p<0.001), and graft-survival better (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab induction with delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus is associated with less kidney injury when compared to standard-dose tacrolimus, without increased risk of rejection, graft loss or death.

Intraoperative risk factors of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common complications of liver transplantation (LT). We examined the impact of intraoperative management on risk for AKI following LT. In this retrospective observational study, we linked data from the electronic health record with standardized transplant outcomes. Our primary outcome was stage 2 or 3 AKI as defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines within the first 7 days of LT. We used logistic regression models to test the hypothesis that the addition of intraoperative variables, including inotropic/vasopressor administration, transfusion requirements, and hemodynamic markers improves our ability to predict AKI following LT. We also examined the impact of postoperative AKI on mortality. Of the 598 adult primary LT recipients included in our study, 43% (n = 255) were diagnosed with AKI within the first 7 postoperative days. Several preoperative and intraoperative variables including (1) electrolyte/acid-base balance disorder (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 253.6 or 276.x and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes E22.2 or E87.x, where x is any digit; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.917, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.280-2.869; p = 0.002); (2) preoperative anemia (aOR, 2.612; 95% CI, 1.405-4.854; p = 0.002); (3) low serum albumin (aOR, 0.576; 95% CI, 0.410-0.808; p = 0.001), increased potassium value during reperfusion (aOR, 1.513; 95% CI, 1.103-2.077; p = 0.01), and lactate during reperfusion (aOR, 1.081; 95% CI, 1.003-1.166; p = 0.04) were associated with posttransplant AKI. New dialysis requirement within the first 7 days postoperatively predicted the posttransplant mortality. Our study identified significant association between several potentially modifiable variables with posttransplant AKI. The addition of intraoperative data did not improve overall model discrimination.

Risk factors for acute kidney injury after liver transplantation in intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication during the postoperative period following liver transplantation. Occurrence of AKI in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is associated with increased mortality and higher costs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate occurrences of moderate or severe AKI among patients admitted to the ICU after liver transplantation and investigate characteristics associated with this complication.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Single-center retrospective cohort study in a public hospital, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients admitted to the ICU between January 2015 and April 2017 were included. AKI was defined from a modified Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) score (i.e. based exclusively on serum creatinine levels).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (36.7%) developed AKI KDIGO 2 or 3; mostly KDIGO 3 (16 out of the 18 patients). Lactate level within the first six hours after ICU admission (odds ratio, OR: 1.3; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.021-1.717; P = 0.034) and blood transfusion requirement within the first week following transplantation (OR: 8.4; 95% CI: 1.687-41.824; P = 0.009) were independently associated with development of AKI. Patients with AKI KDIGO 2 or 3 underwent more renal replacement therapy (72.2% versus 3.2%; P < 0.01), had longer hospital stay (20 days versus 15 days; P = 0.001), higher in-hospital mortality (44.4% versus 6.5%; P < 0.01) and higher mortality rate after one year (44.4% versus 9.7%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Need for blood transfusion during ICU stay and hyperlactatemia within the first six postoperative hours after liver transplantation are independently associated with moderate or severe AKI. Developing AKI is apparently associated with poor outcomes.

Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation

Improved survival after liver transplantation has led to an aging cohort of recipients at risk of renal dysfunction. The etiology of renal dysfunction is typically multifactorial; calcineurin inhibitors nephrotoxicity, pretransplant renal dysfunction, and perioperative acute kidney injury are important risk factors. Metabolic complications such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease also contribute to the development of renal disease. Most LT recipients will eventually develop some degree of renal dysfunction. Criteria to select candidates for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation have been established. Both delayed introduction of CNIs and renal-sparing immunosuppressive regimens may reduce progression of renal dysfunction.

Perioperative kidney injury in liver transplantation: a prospective study with renal histology and measured glomerular filtration rates

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent after liver transplantation (LT), with impact on graft function, morbidity and mortality. Although multifactorial, the pathophysiology of perioperative kidney injury remains unclear. Our aims were to analyze the frequency, evolution and risk factors for kidney impairment during the peri- and early post-operative period.

METHODS

In a prospective, single-center study of 27 adult patients undergoing first single-organ LT, we analyzed measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) pre-transplant, at post-operative day (POD) 10, and at 1, 3, 12 and 36 months. Kidney and liver graft biopsies were performed during LT.

RESULTS

A median mGFR decline of 45% was detected from pre-transplant to POD 10, correlating strongly with the mGFR evolution from baseline to 12 months (rs = 0.80, p<.001) and baseline to 36 months (rs = 0.82, p<.001). AKI occurred in 59% of recipients within 48 h of LT, notably before the introduction of calcineurin inhibitors on POD 3. AKI was strongly associated with mGFR at 12 and 36 months. Kidney and liver graft biopsies showed only minor histological changes. Donor and recipient body mass index, recipient age, model of end-stage liver disease score, diagnosis of hepatitis C, donor cause of death, as well as bleeding, transfusions and duration of the anhepatic phase correlated with early kidney dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The greatest decline in mGFR was evident within 10 days and AKI within hours of LT, irrespective of baseline mGFR and before introduction of calcineurin inhibitors. Very early post-LT kidney injury has substantial consequences for long-term kidney function.

[Kidney failure after liver transplantation]

One third of cirrhotic patients present impaired kidney function. It has multifactorial causes and has a harmful effect on patients' morbi-mortality before and after liver transplant. Kidney function does not improve in all patients after liver transplantation and liver-transplant recipients are at high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. Causes for renal dysfunction can be divided in three groups: preoperative, peroperative and postoperative factors. To date, there is no consensus for the modality of evaluation the risk for chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation, and for its prevention. In the present review, we describe the outcome of kidney function after liver transplantation, and the prognostic factors of chronic kidney disease to determine a risk stratification for each patient. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic options to prevent kidney dysfunction in this setting, and highlight the indications of combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Current aspects of renal dysfunction after liver transplantation

The development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) after liver transplantation (LT) exerts a severe effect on the survival of patients. The widespread adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease score strongly impacted CKD incidence after the procedure, as several patients are transplanted with previously deteriorated renal function. Due to its multifactorial nature, encompassing pre-transplantation conditions, perioperative events, and nephrotoxic immunosuppressor therapies, the accurate identification of patients under risk of renal disease, and the implementation of preventive approaches, are extremely important. Methods for the evaluation of renal function in this setting range from formulas that estimate the glomerular filtration rate, to non-invasive markers, although no option has yet proved efficient in early detection of kidney injury. Considering the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as a factor of utmost importance after LT, early nephroprotective strategies are highly recommended. They are based mainly on delaying the application of CNI during the immediate postoperative-period, reducing their dosage, and associating them with other less nephrotoxic drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil and everolimus. This review provides a critical assessment of the causes of renal dysfunction after LT, the methods of its evaluation, and the interventions aimed at preserving renal function early and belatedly after LT.

Literature review of the mechanisms of acute kidney injury secondary to acute liver injury

People exposed to liver ischaemia reperfusion (IR) injury often develop acute kidney injury and the combination is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Molecular mediators released by the liver in response to IR injury are the likely cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in this setting, but the mediators have not yet been identified. Identifying the mechanism of injury will allow the identification of therapeutic targets which may modulate both liver IR injury and AKI following liver IR injury.

Post-Liver Transplant Acute Kidney Injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common condition following liver transplantation (LT). It negatively impacts patient outcomes by increasing the chances of developing chronic kidney disease and reducing graft and patient survival rates. Multiple definitions of AKI have been proposed and used throughout the years, with the International Club of Ascites definition being the most widely now used for patients with cirrhosis. Multiple factors are associated with the development of post-LT AKI and can be categorized into pre-LT comorbidities, donor and recipient characteristics, operative factors, and post-LT factors. Many of these factors can be optimized in an attempt to minimize the risk of AKI occurring and to improve renal function if AKI is already present. A special consideration during the post-LT phase is needed for immunosuppression as certain immunosuppressive medications can be nephrotoxic. The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus (TAC) is the mainstay of immunosuppression but can result in AKI. Several strategies including use of the monoclonoal antibody basilixamab to allow for delayed initiation of tacrolimus therapy and minimization through combination and minimization or elimination of TAC through combination with mycophenolate mofetil or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have been implemented to reverse and avoid AKI in the post-LT setting. Renal replacement therapy may ultimately be required to support patients until recovery of AKI after LT. Overall, by improving renal function in post-LT patients with AKI, outcomes can be improved.

Hemodynamic Instability During Liver Transplantation in Patients With End-stage Liver Disease: A Consensus Document from ILTS, LICAGE, and SATA

Hemodynamic instability (HDI) during liver transplantation (LT) can be difficult to manage and increases postoperative morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical causes of HDI, patient- and graft-related factors are also important. Nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation is a common denominator associated with end-stage liver disease related to HDI. Despite intense investigation, optimal management strategies remain elusive. In this consensus article, experts from the International Liver Transplantation Society, the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe, and the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia performed a rigorous review of the most current literature regarding the epidemiology, causes, and management of HDI during LT. Special attention has been paid to unique LT-associated conditions including the causes and management of vasoplegic syndrome, cardiomyopathies, LT-related arrhythmias, right and left ventricular dysfunction, and the specifics of medical and fluid management in end-stage liver disease as well as problems specifically related to portal circulation. When possible, management recommendations are made.

Kidney Failure after Liver Transplantation

One-third of patients with cirrhosis present kidney failure (AKI and CKD). It has multifactorial causes and a harmful effect on morbidity and mortality before and after liver transplantation. Kidney function does not improve in all patients after liver transplantation, and liver transplant recipients are at a high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. The causes of renal dysfunction can be divided into three groups: pre-operative, perioperative and post-operative factors. To date, there is no consensus on the modality to evaluate the risk of chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation, or for its prevention. In this narrative review, we describe the outcome of kidney function after liver transplantation, and the prognostic factors of chronic kidney disease in order to establish a risk categorization for each patient. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic options to prevent kidney dysfunction in this context, and highlight the indications of combined liver–kidney transplantation.

Basiliximab With Delayed Tacrolimus Improves Short-Term Renal Outcomes Post-Liver Transplantation-a Real-World Experience

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after liver transplantation (LT). Induction with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists is often used as a "renal-sparing" strategy. The aim of this study was to assess this approach in a real-world setting in an LT center.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of LTs between 2011 and 2018 was performed to assess the impact of a renal-sparing strategy using basiliximab in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids from day 0 post-LT along with delayed introduction of tacrolimus. This was compared with a group receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids from the outset.

RESULTS

The renal-sparing regimen was associated with significantly lower incidence of all-stage AKI at day 7 post-LT (36% vs 55%, P = .006) and less decline in renal function at 3 months (39% vs 57%, P = .01). No further significant differences in renal outcomes were observed at other time points on follow-up to 1 year post-LT. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute cellular rejection, inpatient length of stay or graft survival. The decision to adopt a renal-sparing regimen was predominantly made on a clinically reactive basis within the first 24 hours post-LT in 77%, and was preordained in 23%. Cost-effectiveness analysis did not find evidence of a significant cost saving when using a renal-sparing strategy.

CONCLUSION

This study provides real-world analysis of the use of a renal-sparing immunosuppression regimen in LT. Although improvements in incidence of AKI in the short term were demonstrated, this did not translate to cost savings or improved renal outcomes after 3 months.

Application of machine learning models for predicting acute kidney injury following donation after cardiac death liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT) and is an indicator of poor prognosis. The establishment of a more accurate preoperative prediction model of AKI could help to improve the prognosis of LT. Machine learning algorithms provide a potentially effective approach.

METHODS

A total of 493 patients with donation after cardiac death LT (DCDLT) were enrolled. AKI was defined according to the clinical practice guidelines of kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO). The clinical data of patients with AKI (AKI group) and without AKI (non-AKI group) were compared. With logistic regression analysis as a conventional model, four predictive machine learning models were developed using the following algorithms: random forest, support vector machine, classical decision tree, and conditional inference tree. The predictive power of these models was then evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The incidence of AKI was 35.7% (176/493) during the follow-up period. Compared with the non-AKI group, the AKI group showed a remarkably lower survival rate (P < 0.001). The random forest model demonstrated the highest prediction accuracy of 0.79 with AUC of 0.850 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.794-0.905], which was significantly higher than the AUCs of the other machine learning algorithms and logistic regression models (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The random forest model based on machine learning algorithms for predicting AKI occurring after DCDLT demonstrated stronger predictive power than other models in our study. This suggests that machine learning methods may provide feasible tools for forecasting AKI after DCDLT.

Modifiable risk factors of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and critical complication of liver transplantation (LT), which is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health care cost. We aimed to identify modifiable risk factors of AKI after LT.

METHODS

A literature search of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases was performed to identify studies investigating risk factors of AKI after LT. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to rate study quality. Effect size and 95% confidence interval were pooled using a random-effect model with inverse-variance method.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven articles with 28,844 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Seventeen modifiable risk factors were found, including overweight, preoperative use of diuretic, preoperative anemia, donation after cardiac death organ, donor BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, ABO-incompatible LT, low graft to recipient body weight ratio, intraoperative hypotension, major bleeding, intraoperative use of vasopressor, large RBC transfusion, postreperfusion syndrome, postoperative use of vasopressors, overexposure to calcineurin inhibitor, calcineurin inhibitor without mycophenolate mofetil, graft dysfunction and infection. A total of 38 articles were included in the systematic review, in which 8 modifiable risk factors and 1 protective factor were additionally associated in single studies with the incidence of AKI after LT.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective interventions based on identified modifiable risk factors in the perioperative management and graft allocation and preservation may be promising to reduce the incidence of AKI after LT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42020166918 ).

Donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: An in-depth analysis and propensity score-matched comparison

BACKGROUND

Careful donor-recipient matching and reduced ischemia times have improved outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT). This study examines a single-center experience with DCD LT including high-acuity and hospitalized recipients.

METHODS

DCD LT outcomes were compared to a propensity score-matched (PSM) donation after brain death (DBD) LT cohort (1:4); 32 DCD LT patients and 128 PSM DBD LT patients transplanted from 2008 to 2018 were included. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models examining patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

Median MELD score in the DCD LT cohort was 22, with median MELD of 27 for DCD LT recipients with decompensated cirrhosis. No difference in mortality or graft loss was found (p < .05) between DCD LT and PSM DBD LT at 3 years post-transplant, nor was DCD an independent risk factor for patient or graft survival. Post-LT severe acute kidney injury was similar in both groups. Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) occurred in 6.3% (n = 2) of DCD LT recipients, resulting in 1 graft loss and 1 death.

CONCLUSION

This study supports that DCD LT outcomes can be similar to DBD LT, with a low rate of ITBL, in a cohort including high-acuity recipients. Strict donor selection criteria, ischemia time minimization, and avoiding futile donor/recipient combinations are essential considerations.

Chronic severe hepatitis and preoperative creatinine are independent risk factors for acute kidney injury after liver transplantation

Background

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) offers the highest chance of cure in comparison with all other treatment for liver tumors and other end stage liver disease. However, the complications caused by liver transplantation significantly affect its therapeutic effect, and acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common of these. It is, therefore, necessary to identify the risk factors of AKI after liver transplantation.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective study of patients receiving liver transplantation at the Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital between January 2015 to January 2019 was conducted.

Patients were divided into a normal control group and AKI group based on their previous medical history. Preoperative and intraoperative indicators including preoperative creatinine, uric acid, and the intraoperative input of protein were then recorded.

Results

A total of 419 patients were enrolled into the study. The control group consisted of 336 patients while 83 patients formed an AKI group based on the grading criteria of AKI. There were significant differences in chronic severe hepatitis (P=0.001), liver cancer (P=0.044), intraoperative input of sodium bicarbonate (P=0.019), input of red blood cell suspension (P=0.004), the input of blood plasma (P=0.043), intraoperative urine output (P=0.006), and preoperative creatinine (P=0.041) between the control and AKI group. Multivariate analysis indicated that chronic severe hepatitis (OR: 2.872; P=0.003) and preoperative creatinine (OR: 1.083; P=0.011) were independent risk factors for AKI in patients receiving liver transplantation.

Conclusions

Chronic severe hepatitis and preoperative creatinine may be potential risk factors for the occurrence of AKI after liver transplantation.

Hepatorenal Syndrome

Development of acute kidney injury in patients with chronic liver disease is common and portends a poor prognosis. Diagnosis remains challenging, as traditional markers, such as serum creatinine, are not reliable. Recent development of novel biomarkers may assist with this. Pathophysiology of this condition is multifactorial, relating to physiologic changes associated with portal hypertension, kidney factors, and systemic inflammatory response. Mainstay of treatment remains use of vasoconstrictors along with albumin. Recent guidelines streamline the selection of patients that will require simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. Posttransplant kidney injury is common relating to multiple factors.

Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion Versus Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Liver Transplantation From Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death: First International Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare HOPE and NRP in liver transplantation from cDCD.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Liver transplantation after cDCD is associated with higher rates of graft loss. Dynamic preservation strategies such as NRP and HOPE may offer safer use of cDCD grafts.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative cohort study assessing outcomes after cDCD liver transplantation in 1 Swiss (HOPE) and 6 French (NRP) centers. The primary endpoint was 1-year tumor-death censored graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

A total of 132 and 93 liver grafts were transplanted after NRP and HOPE, respectively. NRP grafts were procured from younger donors (50 vs 61 years, P < 0.001), with shorter functional donor warm ischemia (22 vs 31 minutes, P < 0.001) and a lower overall predicted risk for graft loss (UK-DCD-risk score 6 vs 9 points, P < 0.001). One-year tumor-death censored graft and patient survival was 93% versus 86% (P = 0.125) and 95% versus 93% (P = 0.482) after NRP and HOPE, respectively. No differences in non-anastomotic biliary strictures, primary nonfunction and hepatic artery thrombosis were observed in the total cohort and in 32 vs. 32 propensity score-matched recipients CONCLUSION:: NRP and HOPE in cDCD achieved similar post-transplant recipient and graft survival rates exceeding 85% and comparable to the benchmark values observed in standard DBD liver transplantation. Grafts in the HOPE cohort were procured from older donors and had longer warm ischemia times, and consequently achieved higher utilization rates. Therefore, randomized controlled trials with intention-to-treat analysis are needed to further compare both preservation strategies, especially for high-risk donor-recipient combinations.

Optimal timing of initiating CRRT in patients with acute kidney injury after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication after liver transplantation (LT), and is associated with high mortality. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is an important treatment for AKI, but the optimal time for initiation is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic effect of initial CRRT treatment time.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 173 recipients undergoing LT from January 2018 to March 2019. AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. All patients receiving CRRT were divided into early and late group according to urine output. Prognosis was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 48 (27.8%) patients were identified with AKI, 23 (13.3%) of whom received CRRT. According to urine output, 13 (56.5%) patients were in early group and 10 (43.5%) patients in late group. AKI was associated with longer intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, increased post-operative 90-day mortality and the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Patients in late CRRT group had a longer ICU stay {median, IQR, 183.5 [92.25-336.75] vs. 139 [94-240] hours, P=0.043} and hospital stay {median, IQR, 38.5 [17.5-62.75] vs. 35 [17-38] days, P=0.019} than patients in early CRRT group, respectively. The rate of severe infection was significantly higher in the late CRRT group than in the early CRRT group (80.0% vs. 30.8%, P=0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

AKI was associated with longer length of ICU and hospital stay, poor short-term mortality and functional recovery of transplanted organ. Early initiation of CRRT could reduce the severe infection and length of ICU and hospital stay.

Renal disease in the allograft recipient

Chronic renal failure after liver transplantation (LT) is significantly more frequent than after lung or heart transplantation and it results in an increased short and long-term mortality. Renal impairment may occur before LT (functional or due to preexisting parenchymal kidney disease), in the peri-operative period or later after LT. The number of patients with renal failure after LT has increased due to the liver allocation based on MELD and to the more liberal use of higher risk grafts. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is the most important cause of renal dysfunction but is a modifiable factor. Strategy to prevent CNI-associated nephrotoxicity is post-op CNI minimization by induction therapy and reduced dose and/or delayed introduction of CNI in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or everolimus with no penalty in term of rejection. With everolimus, usually started one month after LT, a drastic minimization of CNI is possible and this results in superior kidney function until at least 3 years follow up. At the moment of renal impairment a drastic reduction of CNI dose together with the introduction of MMF results in an improvement in GFR at 6 to 2 years with a low rate of acute rejection. However, secondary prevention fails to normalize renal function in most of the patients once e GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m²ml.

Interaction between tacrolimus, MELD score and acute kidney injury after liver transplantation. Analysis on a large contemporary bicenter meld-era series

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation (LT) is a common problem with complex management. The aims were to analyze the profile of AKI-RIFLE categories in the post-transplant setting of a wide multicentre cohort of patients in the MELD era and to specifically determine the effect of tacrolimus-based (TACRO) immunosuppressive regimes on the development of AKI.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 550 (2007-2012) consecutive patients transplanted at Reina Sofia, Cordoba, and King's College Hospital, London, was performed. Inclusion criterion was to have CNI as part of initial immunosuppression immediately after LT.

RESULTS

After exclusion criteria, a total of 477 patients were analyzed. Incidence of AKI within the first 2 weeks after LT was 65.8% (AKI-Risk), 41.3% (AKI-Injury), and 12.3% (AKI-Failure). The development of any type of AKI had no impact on short- and/or long-term survival up to 3 years after the transplant. Moreover, AKI was almost universal in the early post-transplant period and TACRO trough concentrations during the first 2 weeks after the transplant were not predictors of AKI in none of its categories in the multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-TACRO-based regimes were not as useful as expected in the prevention of AKI when analyzed in the context of a large contemporary LT series.

Immunosuppression in Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: Can Induction Modify Graft Survival?

Recipients of donation after circulatory death (DCD) LTs historically have an increased risk of graft failure. Antibody induction (AI) with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or anti-interleukin 2 receptor (anti-IL2R) immunotherapy may decrease the incidence of graft failure by mitigating ischemia/reperfusion injury. A retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for LTs between 2002 and 2015 was conducted to determine whether ATG or anti-IL2R AI was associated with graft survival in DCD. A secondary endpoint was postoperative renal function as measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate at 6 and 12 months. Among DCD recipients, ATG (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; P = 0.03), but not anti-IL2R (HR = 0.82; P = 0.10), was associated with a decrease in graft failure at 3 years when compared with recipients without AI. ATG (HR = 0.90; P = 0.02) and anti-IL2R (HR = 0.94; P = 0.03) were associated with a decreased risk of graft failure in donation after brain death (DBD) liver recipients at 3 years compared with no AI. When induction regimens were compared between DCD and DBD, only ATG (HR = 1.19; P = 0.19), and not anti-IL2R (HR = 1.49; P < 0.01) or no AI (HR = 1.77; P < 0.01), was associated with similar survival between DCD and DBD. In conclusion, AI therapy with ATG was associated with improved longterm liver allograft survival in DCD compared with no AI. ATG was associated with equivalent graft survival between DCD and DBD, suggesting a beneficial role of immune cell depletion in DCD outcomes.

Influence of donor and recipient gender on liver transplantation outcomes in Europe

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The impact of gender and donor/recipient gender mismatch on LT outcomes is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of LT in Europe, using the ELTR database, between male and female recipients, including donor/recipient gender mismatch.

METHODS

Recipient, donor and transplant characteristics were compared between male and female patients. Patient survival was compared between groups, and the impact of donor/recipient gender matching as well as donor and recipient anthropometric characteristics were evaluated as potential risk factors for post-LT death/graft loss.

RESULTS

A total of 46,334 LT patients were evaluated (70.5% men and 29.5% women). Ten-year survival rate was significantly higher in female than in male recipients (66% vs 59%, P < .0001). At multivariate analysis, adjusted for indication to LT and type of graft, donor/recipient gender mismatch (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.2; P = .003), donor age > 60 years (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18; P = .027) and recipient age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.1-1.02; P < .0001) were significantly associated with post-LT lower survival rate in men. Conversely in female recipients, donor BMI > 30 (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.6; P = .005), donor age > 60 years (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.32; P = .027) and recipient age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.02; P < .0001) were significantly associated with lower post-LT survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor/recipient gender mismatch in male recipients and the use of obese donor in female recipients are associated with reduced survival after LT. Therefore, the incorporation of donor and recipient anthropometric quantities in the allocation process should be a matter of further studies, as their matching can significantly influence long-term outcomes.

Association of post-reperfusion syndrome and ischemia-reperfusion injury with acute kidney injury after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequently observed after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) even in patients with previously normal renal function. In this study, we investigated the impact of factors such graft steatosis, post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS), and hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury (HIRI) on the development of AKI after OLT in adult patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined consecutive adult patients who underwent OLT at our institution between July 2011 and June 2017. AKI was diagnosed based on the criteria proposed by the International Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) workgroup. Peak aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level within 72 hours after OLT was used as a surrogate marker for HIRI. Graft steatosis was diagnosed by histopathological examination using specimens biopsied intraoperatively at the end of transplantation procedure and categorized as <10%, 10%-20%, 20%-30%, and ≥30% of hepatic steatosis.

RESULTS

Out of 386 patients, 141 (37%) developed AKI (KDIGO stage 1:71 patients; stage 2:29 patients; stage 3:41 patients). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that cold ischemic time (P = .012) and HIRI (P = .007) were independent risk factors for post-OLT AKI. Multivariable analysis also revealed that graft steatosis was associated with HIRI but not directly with AKI. PRS was not associated with HIRI or AKI in the multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that greater severity of liver graft injury during transplantation negatively affects renal function after OLT. As expected, the severity of liver graft steatosis contributes to accelerated liver injury occurring during the transplantation procedure.

Medical management of metabolic and cardiovascular complications after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation represents the only curative option for patients with end-stage liver disease, fulminant hepatitis and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Even though major advances in transplantation in the last decades have achieved excellent survival rates in the early post-transplantation period, long-term survival is hampered by the lack of improvement in survival in the late post transplantation period (over 5 years after transplantation). The main etiologies for late mortality are malignancies and cardiovascular complications. The latter are increasingly prevalent in liver transplant recipients due to the development or worsening of metabolic syndrome and all its components (arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, renal injury, etc.). These comorbidities result from a combination of pre-liver transplant features, immunosuppressive agent side-effects, changes in metabolism and hemodynamics after liver transplantation and the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle. In this review we describe the most prevalent metabolic and cardiovascular complications present after liver transplantation, as well as proposing management strategies.

Acute Kidney Injury Patterns Following Transplantation of Steatotic Liver Allografts

BACKGROUND

Steatotic grafts are increasingly being used for liver transplant (LT); however, the impact of graft steatosis on renal function has not been well described.

METHODS

A total of 511 allografts from Mayo Clinic Arizona and Minnesota were assessed. We evaluated post-LT acute kidney injury (AKI) patterns, perioperative variables and one-year outcomes for patients receiving moderately steatotic allografts (>30% macrovesicular steatosis, n = 40) and compared them to non-steatotic graft recipients.

RESULTS

Post-LT AKI occurred in 52.5% of steatotic graft recipients versus 16.7% in non-steatotic recipients (p < 0.001). Ten percent of steatotic graft recipients required new dialysis post-LT (p = 0.003). At five years, there were no differences for AKI vs. no AKI patient survival (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.08-10.6, p = 0.95) or allograft survival (HR 1.73, 95% CI 0.23-13.23, p = 0.59) for those using steatotic grafts. Lipopeliosis on biopsy was common in those who developed AKI (61.0% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.04), particularly when the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was ≥20 (88.9%; p = 0.04). Lipopeliosis was a predictor of post-LT AKI (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.1-34.6, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

One-year outcomes for moderately steatotic grafts are satisfactory; however, a higher percentage of post-LT AKI and initiation of dialysis can be expected. Presence of lipopeliosis on biopsy appears to be predictive of post-LT AKI.

Predictive Impact of Modified-Prognostic Nutritional Index for Acute Kidney Injury within 1-week after Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the common complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been used as a predictive model for postoperative complications. Here, we create a new predictive model based on the PNI and compared its predictive accuracy to other models in patients who underwent LDLT. Material and Methods: The data from 423 patients were collected retrospectively. The patients were dichotomized into the non-AKI and the AKI groups. Multivariate adjustment for significant postoperative variables based on univariate analysis was performed. A new predictive model was created using the results from logistic regression analysis, dubbed the modified-PNI model (mPNI). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was generated to determine the diagnostic accuracy and cutoff value of individual models. The net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to investigate diagnostic improvement by the mPNI. Results: Fifty-four patients (12.7 %) were diagnosed with AKI within 1-week after LDLT. The mPNI had the highest predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.823). The model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores and PNI were 0.793 and 0.749, respectively, and the INR and serum bilirubin were 0.705 and 0.637, respectively. The differences in the AUCs were statistically significant among the mPNI, PNI, INR, and serum bilirubin. The cutoff value for mPNI was 8.7. The NRI was 10.4% and the IDI was 3.3%. Conclusions: The mPNI predicted AKI within 1-week better than other scoring systems in patients who underwent LDLT. The recommended cutoff value of mPNI is 8.7.

The AKI Prediction Score: a new prediction model for acute kidney injury after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication after liver transplantation. Although numerous risk factors for AKI have been identified, their cumulative impact remains unclear. Our aim was therefore to design a new model to predict post-transplant AKI.

METHODS

Risk analysis was performed in patients undergoing liver transplantation in two centres (n = 1230). A model to predict severe AKI was calculated, based on weight of donor and recipient risk factors in a multivariable regression analysis according to the Framingham risk-scheme.

RESULTS

Overall, 34% developed severe AKI, including 18% requiring postoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT). Five factors were identified as strongest predictors: donor and recipient BMI, DCD grafts, FFP requirements, and recipient warm ischemia time, leading to a range of 0-25 score points with an AUC of 0.70. Three risk classes were identified: low, intermediate and high-risk. Severe AKI was less frequently observed if recipients with an intermediate or high-risk were treated with a renal-sparing immunosuppression regimen (29 vs. 45%; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The AKI Prediction Score is a new instrument to identify recipients at risk for severe post-transplant AKI. This score is readily available at end of the transplant procedure, as a tool to timely decide on the use of kidney-sparing immunosuppression and early RRT.

Effect of sevoflurane and propofol on acute kidney injury in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality after major abdominal surgery. However, little is known about the effect of anesthetics on the development of AKI after pediatric liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to compare the effects of propofol and sevoflurane anesthetics on postoperative AKI after LT surgery.

Methods

A total of 120 pediatric patients scheduled for pediatric LT were randomly assigned to receive either continuous infusion of propofol or inhalation of sevoflurane. Serum creatinine (Scr), inflammatory medium and oxidative stress factors and renal biomarkers were measured before surgery (T1), 5 min after anhepatic phase (T2), 10 min after ischemia reperfusion (T3), 2 h after ischemia reperfusion (T4), 24 h after surgery (T5), and 3 d after surgery (T6) to evaluate the effects of anesthetics on the development of postoperative AKI.

Results

The incidence of AKI was lower in patients receiving sevoflurane than those receiving propofol. The mean arterial pressure was changed slightly in sevoflurane group. The inflammatory factors of interleukin-18, tumor necrosis factor-α, and the levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were lower in sevoflurane group, while no oxidative stress factors [hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase)] and interleukin-10 showed differences between the groups.

Conclusions

Anesthesia with sevoflurane may be associated with a modest decrease in the incidence of AKI when compared with propofol. Further clarification with relevance to such association is warranted.

Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation: Impact of Extended Criteria Grafts

The use of extended criteria donor (ECD) grafts has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation. However, the relation between graft quality and development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the impact of ECD grafts for CKD after liver transplantation. All patients (2007-2015) transplanted for end-stage liver disease at our center were assessed. Longterm kidney function was divided into 4 groups: no CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], ≥60 mL/minute/1.73 m² ), mild CKD (eGFR, 30-59 mL/minute/1.73 m² ), severe CKD (eGFR, 15-29 mL/minute/1.73 m² ), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Marginal donation after brain death (DBD) grafts (donor age, >70 years; body mass index, >35 kg/m² ; cold storage, >12 hours) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) grafts were considered ECD grafts. Overall, 926 patients were included, and 43% received an ECD graft (15% marginal DBD; 28% DCD). After 5 years, 35% developed CKD; severe CKD and ESRD occurred in only 2% and 1%, respectively. CKD rates were comparable for all 3 graft groups (standard group, 36%; marginal DBD group, 29%; DCD group, 35%; standard versus marginal DBD groups, P = 0.16; standard versus DCD group, P = 0.80). None of the ECD criteria were identified as independent risk factors in a Cox regression model for CKD. Risk factors included recipient age, female sex, and preoperative kidney function. Furthermore, recipients who had severe acute kidney injury (AKI; Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stages 2 and 3) had a 1.8-fold increased risk for CKD. Longterm kidney function of recipients with severe AKI depended on the recovery of kidney function in the first postoperative week. In conclusion, there is no direct relation between the use of ECD grafts and CKD after liver transplantation. However, caution should be taken in recipients who experience severe AKI, regardless of graft type.

Revascularization Time in Liver Transplantation: Independent Prediction of Inferior Short- and Long-term Outcomes by Prolonged Graft Implantation

BACKGROUND

Strategies for successful transplantation are much needed in the era of organ shortage, and there has been a resurgence of interest on the impact of revascularization time (RT) on outcomes in liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

All primary LT performed in Birmingham between 2009 and 2014 (n = 678) with portal reperfusion first were stratified according to RT (<44 minutes vs ≥44 minutes) and graft quality (standard liver graft [SLG], Donor Risk Index < 2.3 vs marginal liver graft [MLG], Donor Risk Index ≥ 2.3).

RESULTS

Revascularization time of 44 minutes or longer resulted in significantly greater incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (29% vs 47%, P < 0.001), posttransplant acute kidney injury (AKI) (39% vs 60%, P < 0.001), and new-onset AKI (37% vs 56%, P < 0.001), along with poor long-term outcome (3-year graft survival 92% vs 83%, P = 0.001; 3-year patient survival 87% vs 79%, P = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, RT ≥ 44 was a significant independent predictor of EAD, renal dysfunction, and overall graft survival, but not patient survival. The cumulative effect of prolonged revascularization in marginal grafts (MLG) resulted in the worst transplant outcome compared with all other groups, which could be mitigated by rapid revascularization (SLG, SLG, MLG vs MLG; EAD 24%, 39%, 39% vs 69%; AKI 32%, 46%, 51% vs 70%; 3-year graft survival 94%, 87%, 88% vs 70%, respectively; each P < 0.001). Factors associated with lack of abdominal space, larger grafts, and surgical skills were predictive of RT ≥ 44.

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter graft revascularization is a protective factor in LT, particularly in the setting of graft marginality. Careful graft-recipient matching and emphasis on surgical expertise may aid in achieving better outcomes in LT.

Retrieval Practice or Overall Donor and Recipient Risk: What Impacts on Outcomes After Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation in the United Kingdom?

Parameters of retrieval surgery are meticulously documented in the United Kingdom, where up to 40% of livers are donation after circulatory death (DCD) donations. This retrospective analysis focuses on outcomes after transplantation of DCD livers, retrieved by different UK centers between 2011 and 2016. Donor and recipient risk factors and the donor retrieval technique were assessed. A total of 236 DCD livers from 9 retrieval centers with a median UK DCD risk score of 5 (low risk) to 7 points (high risk) were compared. The majority used University of Wisconsin solution for aortic flush with a median hepatectomy time of 27-44 minutes. The overall liver injury rate appeared relatively high (27.1%) with an observed tendency toward more retrieval injuries from centers performing a quicker hepatectomy. Among all included risk factors, the UK DCD risk score remained the best predictor for overall graft loss in the multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). In high-risk and futile donor-recipient combinations, the occurrence of liver retrieval injuries had negative impact on graft survival (P = 0.023). Expectedly, more ischemic cholangiopathies (P = 0.003) were found in livers transplanted with a higher cumulative donor-recipient risk. Although more biliary complications with subsequent graft loss were found in high-risk donor-recipient combinations, the impact of the standardized national retrieval practice on outcomes after DCD liver transplantation was minimal.

Incidence and Impact of Acute Kidney Injury after Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The study's aim was to summarize the incidence and impacts of post-liver transplant (LTx) acute kidney injury (AKI) on outcomes after LTx.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases from inception until December 2018 to identify studies assessing the incidence of AKI (using a standard AKI definition) in adult patients undergoing LTx. Effect estimates from the individual studies were derived and consolidated utilizing random-effect, the generic inverse variance approach of DerSimonian and Laird. The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42018100664).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight cohort studies, with a total of 13,422 LTx patients, were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated incidence rates of post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) were 40.7% (95% CI: 35.4%⁻46.2%) and 7.7% (95% CI: 5.1%⁻11.4%), respectively. Meta-regression showed that the year of study did not significantly affect the incidence of post-LTx AKI (p = 0.81). The pooled estimated in-hospital or 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality rates of patients with post-LTx AKI were 16.5% (95% CI: 10.8%⁻24.3%) and 31.1% (95% CI: 22.4%⁻41.5%), respectively. Post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring RRT were associated with significantly higher mortality with pooled ORs of 2.96 (95% CI: 2.32⁻3.77) and 8.15 (95%CI: 4.52⁻14.69), respectively. Compared to those without post-LTx AKI, recipients with post-LTx AKI had significantly increased risk of liver graft failure and chronic kidney disease with pooled ORs of 3.76 (95% CI: 1.56⁻9.03) and 2.35 (95% CI: 1.53⁻3.61), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The overall estimated incidence rates of post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring RRT are 40.8% and 7.0%, respectively. There are significant associations of post-LTx AKI with increased mortality and graft failure after transplantation. Furthermore, the incidence of post-LTx AKI has remained stable over the ten years of the study.