Outcome of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors

Final 3-year results from the EVIDENS study, an observational study of nivolumab in non-small cell lung cancer

EVIDENS was a prospective, non-interventional, longitudinal study conducted in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving nivolumab in France. It recruited adults with pathologically confirmed NSCLC who initiated nivolumab between October 2016 and November 2017; the final results are reported here. Primary outcomes included baseline characteristics and 36-month overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; assessed regardless of nivolumab continuation or interruption). Overall, 1423 patients were included in the analysis population (median age 66 years; non-squamous histology 69.1%; stage IV disease 91.5%; brain metastases 19.9%). Almost all patients (99.7%) had received prior chemotherapy, and most patients received nivolumab as second-line (73.5%) or later (26.1%) therapy. The 36-month OS rate was 19.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5-22.0); OS was significantly shorter in patients with squamous versus non-squamous tumors (9.8 [95% CI 8.6-11.2] months vs 11.8 [95% CI 10.2-13.2] months; p = 0.005). The 36-month PFS rate was 8.8% (95% CI 7.3-10.4). The 12-month investigator-assessed best ORR in the overall population was 20.4%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, smoking status, tumor histology, disease stage and liver metastasis independently predicted survival. Grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 8.0% and 0.8% of patients, respectively; eight treatment-related deaths occurred (0.005%). HRQoL was maintained with slight improvement throughout the study, without statistical significance. These results confirm that the real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in these patients is similar to that observed in clinical trials.

Tislelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin as the more effective chemoimmunotherapy strategy in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective, two-cohort, phase 2 trial

This prospective, two-cohort phase 2 trial with random allocation was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel cohorts at a 1:1 ratio, and received intravenous tislelizumab (200 mg, day 1) combined with cisplatin (25 mg/m2, days 1-3) and either nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) or paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) in a 21-day cycle for two cycles before surgery. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate. From March 01, 2022 to April 10, 2023, 46 patients were enrolled (n = 23 in each cohort), with 42 patients receiving the full two-cycle treatments and undergoing surgery (n = 22 in the nab-paclitaxel cohort, n = 20 in the paclitaxel cohort). The MPR rate and the pCR rate in the total cohort were 44.2% (19/42) and 19.0% (8/42), respectively, with 59.1% (13/22) and 31.8% (7/22) in the nab-paclitaxel cohort and 30.0% (6/20) and 5.0% (1/20) in paclitaxel cohorts. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were anemia (89.1%) and alopecia (71.7%), and no significant difference in TRAEs was observed between the two cohorts. Up until March 28, 2024, the median follow-up time was 15.5 months (range of 6.0-24.3 months), and the survival analysis revealed that the patients in the nab-paclitaxel cohort had a higher event-free survival (p = .002). In conclusion, neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel, rather than cisplatin and paclitaxel, is a more effective neoadjuvant strategy for locally advanced thoracic ESCC.

[First line treatment of non-oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small cell lung cancer]

Since 2017, anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy has been the cornerstone of first-line treatment for stage IV non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer. Its phase I development has established that the level of PD-L1 expression by tumor cells is predictive of response rate and progression-free survival. Above 50%, it makes chemotherapy not mandatory, with a median survival for pembrolizumab monotherapy of around 26 months and five-year survival of 32%. Large phase III studies have also validated the combination of anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 level of expression, increasing five-year survival from 10% to 18%. Dual immunotherapy combining anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-(L)1 might be interesting, especially in PD-L1 negative tumors, but is not available in France. Treatment personalization, particularly in the case of PD-L 1 expression >50%, should be based on response and non-response factors to immunotherapy, including patient-related factors such as performans status, age, smoking status, as well as tumor-related factors such as disease aggressiveness, tumor volume, mutational profile, along with concomitant medications. The optimal duration of immunotherapy is uncertain and arbitrarily set at two years. Many options are currently being explored to improve first-line treatment outcomes, as the majority of patients experience resistance to immunotherapy.

A retrospective study of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for patients with baseline brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

This multi-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of first-line immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM). The study included 138 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or in combination with brain radiotherapy (BRT), from 2020 to October 2023. Intracranial overall response rate (iORR), overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were evaluated. Although patients receiving ICIs plus BRT showed a trend toward longer OS compared with ICI alone, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.201). Among 82 patients with available data, the iORR was 49.1% (35-63) in the ICIs alone group, and 75.9% (56-90) in the ICIs + BRT group. Notably, in patients requiring corticosteroids or mannitol, combination therapy was associated with a better prognosis (P = 0.05). We found that the iORR of patients treated with ICIs + BRT was improved and did not increase the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Besides, the combination of ICIs and BRT improved the survival rate of subgroups of patients using corticosteroids.

Cancer brain metastasis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumors in adults and the major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The occurrence of BMs varies according to the type of primary tumors with most frequence in lung cancer, melanoma and breast cancer. Among of them, lung cancer has been reported to have a higher risk of BMs than other types of cancers with 40 ~ 50% of such patients will develop BMs during the course of disease. BMs lead to many neurological complications and result in a poor quality of life and short life span. Although the treatment strategies were improved for brain tumors in the past decades, the prognosis of BMs patients is grim. Poorly understanding of the molecular and cellular characteristics of BMs and the complicated interaction with brain microenvironment are the major reasons for the dismal prognosis of BM patients. Recent studies have enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of BMs. The newly identified potential therapeutic targets and the advanced therapeutic strategies have brought light for a better cure of BMs. In this review, we summarized the mechanisms of BMs during the metastatic course, the molecular and cellular landscapes of BMs, and the advances of novel drug delivery systems for overcoming the obstruction of blood-brain barrier (BBB). We further discussed the challenges of the emerging therapeutic strategies, such as synergistic approach of combining targeted therapy with immunotherapy, which will provide vital clues for realizing the precise and personalized medicine for BM patients in the future.

The safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies for lung cancer brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on brain metastasis

Individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop brain metastases face a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have emerged as a promising immunotherapy for treating lung cancer with brain metastases. This systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline and evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in treating lung cancer patients with brain metastases. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies up to 27 August 2023. Data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, radiological response rates, and adverse events were extracted. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA v.17. Our literature search yielded 39 eligible studies involving 15,428 patients. The overall response rate for PD-1 inhibitors was substantial, with pooled rates of 39% for overall response, 7% for complete response (CR), 27% for partial response (PR), and 31% for stable disease (SD). The pooled 6-month OS rate was 77%, and the 1-year OS rate was 61%. Subgroup analyses revealed higher PD-L1 expression levels and the use of platinum-based chemotherapy alongside immunotherapy were associated with improved outcomes. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in treating lung cancer patients with brain metastases, as evidenced by significant improvements in OS, PFS, and response rates. Incorporating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors into the treatment regimen, particularly for patients with high PD-L1 expression, has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Emerging Therapies for Brain Metastases in NSCLC, Breast Cancer, and Melanoma: A Critical Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advancements in precision medicine have shifted the treatment paradigm of brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, and melanoma, especially through targeted therapies focused on specific molecular drivers. These novel agents have improved outcomes by overcoming challenges posed by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and resistance mechanisms, enabling more effective treatment of BM.

RECENT FINDINGS

In NSCLC, therapies such as osimertinib have improved efficacy in treating EGFR-mutant BM, with emerging combinations such as amivantamab and lazertinib offering promising alternatives for patients resistant to frontline therapies. In HER2-positive breast cancer, significant advancements with tucatinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) have transformed the treatment landscape, achieving improved survival and intracranial control in patients with BM. Similarly, in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), novel therapies such as sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) offer new hope for managing BM. For melanoma, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab and ipilimumab has proven effective in enhancing survival for patients with BM, both in BRAF-mutant and wild-type cases. Developing targeted therapies penetrating the BBB has revolutionized BM treatment by targeting key drivers like EGFR, ALK, HER2, and BRAF. Despite improved survival, challenges persist, particularly for patients with resistant genetic alterations. Future research should optimise combination therapies, overcome resistance, and refine treatment sequencing. Continued emphasis on personalized, biomarker-driven approaches offers the potential to further improve outcomes, even for complex cases.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors according to programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis: A real-world prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Studies have shown the antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BM). However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of ICI is similar between patients with and without BM. It is yet unclear whether the efficacy of ICI in patients with BM increases with higher levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as observed in patients without BM.

METHODS

We compared the outcomes of ICI treatment between patients with and without BM using a cohort containing 1741 prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer. We investigated whether there were differences in the outcomes of ICI based on PD-L1 expression levels between these patients.

RESULTS

We enrolled 240 patients with NSCLC with or without BM who were treated with ICI or both chemotherapy and ICI. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between all patients with or without BM (p = 0.489). However, OS was significantly shorter in patients with BM than in those without in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group (16.5 M vs. 30.6 M, p = 0.003) but not in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% or negative group. BM was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: [95% confidence interval], 2.045; [1.058-3.953], p = 0.033) in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that the outcomes of patients with or without BM treated with ICI were not significantly different. The efficacy of ICI in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% would be lower in patients with BM than in those without.

Checkpoint based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand 1 (PD-L1) has radically changed the management of many types of solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many clinical trials have demonstrated that ICIs improve the survival and the quality of life of patients with advanced non oncogene NSCLC as compared to standard therapies. However, not all patients achieve a clinical benefit from this immunotherapeutic approach. As a result, real-word validation of the efficacy and safety of ICIs can be useful for defining potential predictive biomarkers as well as for overcoming limitations linked to clinical trial restrictions.

METHODS

We retrospectively retrieved the clinical data of patients with advanced non oncogene NSCLC treated with ICIs (anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1) as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy at "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona" University Hospital from January 2016 to December 2023. Potential correlations between clinical-pathological characteristics and safety or survival outcomes were investigated employing the Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis method and log-rank test, as applicable. Multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Clinical data of 129 patients were retrieved. At a median follow-up of 29.70 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.27 months and 8.43 months, respectively. At the multivariate analyses, smoking status, presence of bone metastases and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were correlated with both PFS and OS. Moreover, patients treated with anti-PD-1-based therapy achieved an increased clinical benefit than those treated with anti-PD-L1.

DISCUSSION

In this study we described our real-world experience of ICIs for the treatment of patients with advanced non oncogene NSCLC. A decreased OS in our study population was reported as compared to that of patients included in the clinical trials. Noteworthy, correlations between clinical-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes emerged. Nevertheless, the potential integration of clinical-pathological characteristics as predictive biomarkers in more accurate therapeutic algorithms as well as the underlying biological mechanisms should be further validated in ad hoc studies.

Advances in the Management of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Lung cancer, both non-small cell and small cell, harbors a high propensity for spreading to the central nervous system. Radiation therapy remains the backbone of the management of brain metastases. Recent advances in stereotactic radiosurgery have expanded its indications and ongoing studies seek to elucidate optimal fractionation and coordination with systemic therapies, especially targeted inhibitors with intracranial efficacy. Efforts in whole-brain radiotherapy aim to preserve neurocognition and to investigate the need for prophylactic cranial irradiation. As novel combinatorial strategies are tested and prognostic/predictive biomarkers are identified and tested, the management of brain metastases in lung cancer will become increasingly personalized to optimally balance intracranial efficacy with preserving neurocognitive function and patient values.

Central nervous system metastases in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the therapeutic landscape

Up to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Current treatments for this subgroup of patients with advanced NSCLC include local therapies (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and, less frequently, whole-brain radiotherapy), targeted therapies for oncogene-addicted NSCLC (small molecules, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (as monotherapy or combination therapy), with multiple new drugs in development. However, confirming the intracranial activity of these treatments has proven to be challenging, given that most lung cancer clinical trials exclude patients with untreated and/or progressing CNS metastases, or do not include prespecified CNS-related endpoints. Here we review progress in the treatment of patients with CNS metastases originating from NSCLC, examining local treatment options, systemic therapies, and multimodal therapeutic strategies. We also consider challenges regarding assessment of treatment response and provide thoughts around future directions for managing CNS disease in patients with advanced NSCLC.

[First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with brain metastases]

INTRODUCTION

Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy.

STATE OF THE ART

NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

PERSPECTIVES

The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Under-Represented by Clinical Trials

Since the initial US FDA approval of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for the treatment of non-oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) nine years ago, this therapeutic strategy has been cemented as a crucial component of treatment for most of these patients. However, there is a clear efficacy-effectiveness gap whereby patients in the 'real world' seem to have more modest clinical outcomes compared to those enrolled in landmark clinical trials. This gap may be driven by the under-representation of important patient populations, including populations defined by clinical or molecular characteristics. In this review, we summarize the data outlining the evidence of ICIs in patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), underlying autoimmune disease (AID), older age, active brain metastases (BMs), and molecular aberrations such as EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, BRAF mutations and ROS1 fusions.

Immune landscape of oncohistone-mutant gliomas reveals diverse myeloid populations and tumor-promoting function

Histone H3-mutant gliomas are deadly brain tumors characterized by a dysregulated epigenome and stalled differentiation. In contrast to the extensive datasets available on tumor cells, limited information exists on their tumor microenvironment (TME), particularly the immune infiltrate. Here, we characterize the immune TME of H3.3K27M and G34R/V-mutant gliomas, and multiple H3.3K27M mouse models, using transcriptomic, proteomic and spatial single-cell approaches. Resolution of immune lineages indicates high infiltration of H3-mutant gliomas with diverse myeloid populations, high-level expression of immune checkpoint markers, and scarce lymphoid cells, findings uniformly reproduced in all H3.3K27M mouse models tested. We show these myeloid populations communicate with H3-mutant cells, mediating immunosuppression and sustaining tumor formation and maintenance. Dual inhibition of myeloid cells and immune checkpoint pathways show significant therapeutic benefits in pre-clinical syngeneic mouse models. Our findings provide a valuable characterization of the TME of oncohistone-mutant gliomas, and insight into the means for modulating the myeloid infiltrate for the benefit of patients.

The Emerging Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Lung cancer has the highest incidence of brain metastases (BM) among solid organ cancers. Traditionally whole brain radiation therapy has been utilized for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM treatment, although stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as the superior treatment modality for most patients. Highly penetrant central nervous system (CNS) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have also shown significant CNS activity in patients harboring select oncogenic drivers. There is emerging evidence that patients without oncogene-driven tumors derive benefit from the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The CNS activity of ICIs have not been well studied given exclusion of patients with active BM from landmark trials, due to concerns of inadequate CNS penetration and activity. However, studies have challenged the idea of an immune-privileged CNS, given the presence of functional lymphatic drainage within the CNS and destruction of the blood brain barrier by BM. An emerging understanding of the interactions between tumor and CNS immune cells in the BM tumor microenvironment also support a role for immunotherapy in BM treatment. In addition, posthoc analyses of major trials have shown improved intracranial response and survival benefit of regimens with ICIs over chemotherapy (CT) alone for patients with BM. Two prospective phase 2 trials evaluating pembrolizumab monotherapy and atezolizumab plus CT in patients with untreated NSCLC BM also demonstrated significant intracranial responses. This review describes the interplay between CNS immune cells and tumor cells, discusses current evidence for ICI CNS activity from retrospective and prospective studies, and speculates on future directions of investigation.

Patterns of brain metastases response to immunotherapy with pembrolizumab

PURPOSE

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from lung cancers and melanoma, significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in local therapies, there is a need for effective systemic treatments. Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has shown promise for some patients with untreated brain metastases from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to analyze the response of brain metastasis to pembrolizumab and associate characteristics like size and location with treatment outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study used imaging data from a phase II trial of pembrolizumab in melanoma or NSCLC patients with untreated brain metastases. MRI evaluations were conducted at 2 month intervals, with each brain metastasis treated as a distinct tumor for response assessment, based on modified RECIST criteria (maximum 5 lesions, 5 mm target lesions).

RESULTS

Of 130 individual target metastases (> 5 mm), in 65 patients with NSCLC (90 metastases) and Melanoma (40 metastases), 32 (24.6%) demonstrated complete resolution, 24 (18.5%) had partial resolution, 32 (24.6%) were SD and 42 (32.3%) demonstrated PD. Those smaller than 10 mm were more likely to show complete resolution (p = 0.0218), while those ≥ 10 mm were more likely to have PR. There was no significant association between size, number or location (supratentorial vs. infratentorial) and lesion progression. The median time to metastatic lesion progression in the brain was 5.7-7 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab is effective in brain metastases from NSCLC and melanoma, showing response (CR + PR) in 43% and progression (PD) in 32% of metastases. With the median time to CNS progression of 5.7-7 weeks, careful radiographic monitoring is essential to guide timely local treatment decisions.

The Efficiency and Safety of Triple-Drug Combination of Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel, Anlotinib and PD-1/L1 Inhibitors in the 2nd or Above Line of Advanced NSCLC: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Existing research data indicates that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-ptx), anlotinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors have individually shown efficacy in second-line and subsequent treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study seeks to investigate the potential of an optimized treatment regimen in this context by combining these three drugs and evaluating both efficacy and safety outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2020 and January 2022, we collected data from pre-treated advanced NSCLC patients who received a combination therapy of nab-ptx, anlotinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors as a second-line or later treatment. The primary endpoints for the study included the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS), while adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that the ORR of this regimen in pretreated NSCLC patients was 35.71%, with mean PFS of 5.0 months and mean OS of 10.0 months. Further analysis suggested correlations between the efficacy of the regimen and factors such as PD-L1 expression levels, the occurrence of certain types of adverse events, and the status of NK cell activity. Additionally, the tolerable toxicity profile of this regimen indicates its potential applicability in the treatment of pretreated advanced NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Our study displayed that triple-drug combination of nab-ptx, anlotinib and PD-1/L1 inhibitors showed promising efficiency and tolerated cytotoxicity in the 2nd or above line treatment of advanced NSCLC, indicating the potential of such regimen as an important option for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, due to limitations in patient numbers, its actual clinical value awaits further research confirmation.

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibitors in small cell lung cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors frequently encounter unusual side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the correlation of irAEs development with clinical response in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unknown.

METHOD

This retrospective study enrolled 244 stage IV SCLC patients who receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors from 3 cancer centers. The correlation of irAEs with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

140 in 244 (57%) patients experienced irAEs, with 122 (87.1%) experiencing one and 18 (12.9%) experiencing two or more. Compared to patient without irAEs, those developing irAEs had higher ORR (73.6% vs. 52.9%, P < 0.001) and DCR (97.9% vs. 79.8%, P < 0.001), as well as prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 4.5 months, P < 0.001) and OS (23.2 vs. 21.6 months, P < 0.05). Among the different spectra of irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, rash, and pneumonitis were the most powerful indicator for improved PFS. When analyzed as a time-dependent covariate, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with significant improvement in PFS rather than in OS. Furthermore, patients experiencing multisystem irAEs displayed a longer PFS and OS compared with single-system irAEs and the irAE-free ones. IrAEs grade and steroid use did not impact the predictive value of irAEs on PFS.

CONCLUSION

The presence of irAEs predicts superior clinical benefit in SCLC. Patients who develop multi-system irAEs may have an improved survival than those developed single-system irAEs and no-irAEs. This association persists even when systemic corticosteroids were used for irAEs management.

A Review of Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cancer immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to a dramatic increase in the survival of patients with lung cancer across all stages. Over the past decade, the field has experienced rapid maturation; however, several challenges continue to complicate patient management. This review aims to highlight the data that led to this dramatic shift in practice as well as to focus on key challenges. These include determining the optimal therapy duration, managing frail patients or those with brain metastases, addressing the challenges posed by immune-related adverse events, and defining the various patterns of clinical and radiological responses to immunotherapy.

Expression of overall survival-EMT-immune cell infiltration genes predict the prognosis of glioma

This study investigates the crucial role of immune- and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated genes and non-coding RNAs in glioma development and diagnosis, given the challenging 5-year survival rates associated with this prevalent CNS malignant tumor. Clinical and RNA data from glioma patients were meticulously gathered from CGGA databases, and EMT-related genes were sourced from dbEMT2.0, while immune-related genes were obtained from MSigDB. Employing consensus clustering, novel molecular subgroups were identified. Subsequent analyses, including ESTIMATE, TIMER, and MCP counter, provided insights into the tumor microenvironment (TIME) and immune status. Functional studies, embracing GO, KEGG, GSVA, and GSEA analyses, unraveled the underlying mechanisms governing these molecular subgroups. Utilizing the LASSO algorithm and multivariate Cox regression, a prognostic risk model was crafted. The study unveiled two distinct molecular subgroups with significantly disparate survival outcomes. A more favorable prognosis was linked to low immune scores, high tumor purity, and an abundance of immune infiltrating cells with differential expression of non-coding RNAs, including miRNAs. Functional analyses illuminated enrichment of immune- and EMT-associated pathways in differentially expressed genes and non-coding RNAs between these subgroups. GSVA and GSEA analyses hinted at abnormal EMT status potentially contributing to glioma-associated immune disorders. The risk model, centered on OS-EMT-ICI genes, exhibited promise in accurately predicting survival in glioma. Additionally, a nomogram integrating the risk model with clinical characteristics demonstrated notable accuracy in prognostic predictions for glioma patients. In conclusion, OS-EMT-ICI gene and non-coding RNA expression emerges as a valuable indicator intricately linked to immune microenvironment dysregulation, offering a robust tool for precise prognosis prediction in glioma patients within the OBMRC framework.

The efficiency and safety of temozolomide and PD-1/L1 inhibitors in pretreated NSCLC with brain metastasis: a retrospective cohort

OBJECTIVE

Previous research has shown that both temozolomide (TMZ) and PD-1/L1 inhibitors (PD-1/L1) alone exhibit certain potential in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM), in this study, we will explore combining the two in order to seek new effective treatment options for NSCLC with BM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During 2021.1 to 2023.12, we collected the date of these pretreated-NSCLC with BM who accept the treatment of TMZ and PD-1/L1, the objective response ratio (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were set as the primary endpoint, meanwhile, the toxicity of such regimen was also recorded.

RESULTS

About 42 patients are enrolled, our primary analysis demonstrated that the ORR of such regimen toward NSCLC with BM was 26.19%, with Approximate intracranial and extracranial lesion ORR was 6% and 20% respectively, the DCR was about 64.29%, the mean PFS and OS was about 4 m and 8.5 m. Further analysis indicated that the efficiency correlated with the diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (ds-GPA) score. Moreover, the toxicity can also be tolerated, indicating the application potential of such regimen against NSCLC with BM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results exhibited that with tolerated toxicity, the combination of TMZ and PD-1/L1 shows promising efficiency against NSCLC with BM, this would be of great significance for the treatment of NSCLC with brain metastasis. However, due to the limitation of sample and retrospective property, the real value of such regimen needed to be further confirmed in the future.

Immunomodulatory Precision: A Narrative Review Exploring the Critical Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment

An immune checkpoint is a signaling pathway that regulates the recognition of antigens by T-cell receptors (TCRs) during an immune response. These checkpoints play a pivotal role in suppressing excessive immune responses and maintaining immune homeostasis against viral or microbial infections. There are several FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and avelumab. These ICIs target cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Furthermore, ongoing efforts are focused on developing new ICIs with emerging potential. In comparison to conventional treatments, ICIs offer the advantages of reduced side effects and durable responses. There is growing interest in the potential of combining different ICIs with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or targeted therapies. This article comprehensively reviews the classification, mechanism of action, application, and combination strategies of ICIs in various cancers and discusses their current limitations. Our objective is to contribute to the future development of more effective anticancer drugs targeting immune checkpoints.

Case report: Long-term intracranial effect of zimberelimab monotherapy following surgical resection of high PD-L1-expressing brain metastases from NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounted for the majority of lung cancer cases worldwide. Brain metastases (BM) frequently complicate NSCLC and portend a dismal prognosis. To control neurological symptoms, surgical resection is commonly followed by brain radiotherapy (RT). However, RT is often complicated by neurotoxicity. For patients with tumors that harbor positive driver genes, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are considered the standard of care. Nevertheless, treatment options for those without driver gene mutations are still debated. Programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)/ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, as well as for those with asymptomatic BM. However, the effect of anti-PD-1 antibodies on active BM within such specific populations is undetermined. Herein we present a case of a 65-year-old patient with NSCLC and high PD-L1-expressing BM. The patient underwent surgical resection of BM followed by first-line monotherapy with 31 cycles of zimberelimab, a novel anti-PD-1 antibody, and has already achieved 24 months of progression-free survival and intracranial recurrence-free survival. To our knowledge, this is the first report regarding the intracranial effect of zimberelimab on BM from primary lung cancer. This case report might facilitate an understanding of the intracranial effects of different anti-PD-1 antibodies for such populations.

Immunotherapy With Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases in Patients With NSCLC: NEJ060

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment has become standard treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. We aimed to determine the survival benefit of upfront radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs) in patients with NSCLC who received ICI alone (ICI-alone) or with chemotherapy (ICI-chemo).

Methods

This study included consecutive patients with NSCLC having BMs who received ICI alone or ICI-chemo at 50 institutes between February 2017 and September 2021. The presence of BMs was confirmed by imaging before treatment. Treatment outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not receive upfront radiotherapy for BMs. Potential confounding factors were adjusted between the groups through inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis and overlap weighting (OW) analysis with propensity scores.

Results

Patients were grouped as ICI-alone cohort, 224 patients (upfront-radiotherapy group, 135 patients; no-radiotherapy group, 89 patients) and ICI-chemo cohort, 367 patients (upfront-radiotherapy group, 212 patients; no-radiotherapy group, 155 patients). In the ICI-alone cohort, the overall survival of the upfront-radiotherapy group was significantly longer than that of the no-radiotherapy group (IPTW-adjusted hazards ratio [HR] = 0.45 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.72], OW-adjusted HR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.35-0.77]). In contrast, in the ICI-chemo cohort, the OS of the upfront-radiotherapy group was not significantly different from that of the no-radiotherapy group (IPTW-adjusted HR = 1.02 [95% CI: 0.70-1.48], OW-adjusted HR = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.65-1.33]).

Conclusions

Upfront radiotherapy for BMs was associated with longer overall survival in patients with NSCLC who received ICI alone; however, it did not exhibit survival benefits in the patients who received ICI-chemo.

Intracranial Efficacy of Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Real-World Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR or ALK Alterations

Contrary to Pemetrexed-containing chemo-immunotherapy studies, Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel (ABCP) treatment has consistently shown clinical benefit in prospective studies in patients with lung cancer and actionable mutations, where intracranial metastases are common. Here, we aimed to describe the real-life population of patients fit to receive ABCP after targeted therapy and quantify its clinical effect in patients with brain metastases. Patients treated in Cheshire and Merseyside between 2019 and 2022 were identified. Data were collected retrospectively. A total of 34 patients with actionable EGFR or ALK alterations had treatment with a median age of 59 years (range 32-77). The disease control rate was 100% in patients with PDL1 ≥ 1% (n = 10). In total, 19 patients (56%) had brain metastases before starting ABCP, 17 (50%) had untreated CNS disease, and 4 (22%) had PDL1 ≥ 1%. The median time to symptom improvement was 12.5 days (range 4-21 days), with 74% intracranial disease control rates and 89.5% synchronous intracranial (IC) and extracranial (EC) responses. IC median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) was 6.48 months, EC mPFS was 10.75 months, and median Overall Survival 11.47 months. ABCP in real-life patients with brain metastases (treated or untreated) was feasible and showed similar efficacy to that described in patients without actionable mutations treated with upfront chemo-immunotherapy.

Outcomes of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases Treated with the Upfront Single Agent Pembrolizumab: A Retrospective and Multicentric Study of the ESCKEYP GFPC Cohort

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cause of brain metastasis (BM). Little is known about immune checkpoint inhibitor activity in the central nervous system, especially in patients receiving monotherapy for tumors with a tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50%. This noninterventional, retrospective, multicenter study, conducted with the GFPC, included treatment-naïve patients strongly positive for PD-L1 (TPS ≥ 50%) with BM receiving first-line single-agent pembrolizumab treatment between May 2017 and November 2019. The primary endpoints were centrally reviewed intracranial overall response rates (ORRs), centrally reviewed intracranial progression-free survival (cPFS), extracranial PFS, and overall survival were secondary endpoints. Forty-three patients from five centers were included. Surgical or local radiation therapy was administered to 31 (72%) patients, mostly before initiating ICI therapy (25/31). Among 38/43 (88.4%) evaluable patients, the intracranial ORR was 73%. The median PFS was 8.3 months. The cerebral and extracerebral median PFS times were 9.2 and 5.3 months, respectively. The median OS was 25.5 months. According to multivariate analysis, BM surgery before ICI therapy was the only factor significantly associated with both improved PFS (HR = 0.44) and OS (HR = 0.45). This study revealed the feasibility and outcome of front-line pembrolizumab treatment in this population with BM.

Effects of glucocorticoid use on survival of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide, with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the majority of cases. Patients with NSCLC have achieved great survival benefits from immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoints. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are frequently used for palliation of cancer-associated symptoms, as supportive care for non-cancer-associated symptoms, and for management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and prognostic significance of glucocorticoid use in advanced patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

The study searched publications from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine disc, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database up to March 1st, 2022, and conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effects of glucocorticoid use on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs through the available data. The study calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

This study included data from 25 literatures that were mainly retrospective, with 8713 patients included. Patients taking GCs had a higher risk for tumor progression and death compared with those not taking GCs (PFS: HR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.33-1.86, P <0.001; OS: HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.41-1.88, P <0.001). GCs used for cancer-associated symptoms caused an obviously negative effect on both PFS and OS (PFS: HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.32-2.29, P <0.001; OS: HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.52-2.04, P <0.001). However, GCs used for irAEs management did not negatively affect prognosis (PFS: HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-1.00, P = 0.050; OS: HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.83, P = 0.005), and GCs used for non-cancer-associated indications had no effect on prognosis (PFS: HR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.63-1.32, P = 0.640; OS: HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.59-1.41, P = 0.680).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, the use of GCs for palliation of cancer-associated symptoms may result in a worse PFS and OS, indicating that they increase the risk of tumor progression and death. But, in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, the use of GCs for the management of irAEs may be safe, and the use of GCs for the treatment of non-cancer-associated symptoms may not affect the ICIs' survival benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to be careful and evaluate indications rationally before administering GCs in individualized clinical management.

Real-World Survival of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Versus Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Synchronous Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

This study assessed real-world survival among older patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs) at diagnosis (synchronous BM [SBM]) receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared with chemotherapy only.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC and SBM age 65 years or older at diagnosis from 2010 to 2019 SEER-Medicare database and received US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICIs (pembrolizumab/nivolumab/ipilimumab/atezolizumab/durvalumab/cemiplimab) and/or chemotherapy (platinum-based doublets/taxane/pemetrexed/gemcitabine) as first-line systemic treatment were included, excluding those with no cranial radiation or ever being treated with targeted therapies. Overall survival time was from the start of systemic treatment (ICI/chemotherapy) to death, censored at disenrollment from Medicare part A/B, enrollment in part C, or end of the study period (December 31, 2019). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were compared between treatment groups using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) between groups, adjusting for patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The study included 1,481 patients (1,303 chemotherapy and 178 ICI). The median (range) age was 71 (65-91) years. First-line ICI patients were more likely to be older, live in urban areas, and less likely to be non-White than the chemotherapy group. KM estimates showed that survival curves initially overlapped but diverged approximately 6 months after initiating first-line systemic treatment (median survival [95% CI]: ICI, 190 [131 to 303] days versus chemotherapy, 189 [177 to 201] days), with ICI showing a better survival than the chemotherapy group (log-rank test P < .0001). First-line ICI was associated with a lower risk of death compared with chemotherapy in adjusted CPH model (HR [95% CI], 0.67 [0.55 to 0.80]; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Among older patients with NSCLC and SBM, first-line ICI use was associated with improved survival occurring 6 months after treatment initiation compared with chemotherapy only.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and brain metastasis

The presence of brain metastases (BM) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their incidence seems to be higher in patients with oncogene-driven tumours, especially those with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged tumours. Although targeted treatments demonstrate significant efficacy regarding BM, they only apply to a minority of NSCLC patients. On the other hand, systemic therapies for nononcogenic-driven NSCLC with BM have shown limited clinical benefit. In recent years, immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy has been adopted as a new standard of care in first-line therapy. This approach seems to be beneficial to patients with BM in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Combined immune checkpoint inhibition as well as the combination of immunotherapy and radiation therapy show promising results with significant, but overall acceptable toxicity. A pragmatic approach of allowing enrolment of patients with untreated or symptomatic BM in randomised trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors strategies, possibly coupled with central nervous system-related endpoints may be needed to generate data to refine treatment for this patient population.

Immunotherapy and brain metastasis in lung cancer: connecting bench side science to the clinic

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common form of intracranial malignant neoplasms in adults, with a profound impact on quality of life and traditionally associated with a dismal prognosis. Lung cancer accounts for approximately 40%-50% of BM across different tumors. The process leading to BMs is complex and includes local invasion, intravasation, tumor cells circulation into the bloodstream, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, extravasation of tumor cells into the brain parenchyma, and interaction with cells of the brain microenvironment, among others. Once the tumor cells have seeded in the brain parenchyma, they encounter different glial cells of the brain, as well as immune cells. The interaction between these cells and tumor cells is complex and is associated with both antitumoral and protumoral effects. To overcome the lethal prognosis associated with BMs, different treatment strategies have been developed, such as immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, which have demonstrated to be an effective treatment in both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. These antibodies have shown to be effective in the treatment of BM, alone or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, many unsolved questions remain to be answered, such as the sequencing of immunotherapy and radiotherapy, the optimal management in symptomatic BMs, the role of the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, and so forth. The complexity in the management of BMs in the era of immunotherapy requires a multidisciplinary approach to adequately treat this devastating event. The aim of this review is to summarize evidence regarding epidemiology of BM, its pathophysiology, current approach to treatment strategies, as well as future perspectives.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

About 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastases (BMs) throughout the disease, and the occurrence of BMs is considered to have a fairly high mortality rate. Therefore, the management of brain metastases in NSCLC patients is a clinical challenge. Currently, multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment methods are often used to achieve effective control of intracranial disease and prolong survival. Immunotherapy (IT) is one of the core therapies for NSCLC. Single or combined IT represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) of programmed death-1(PD-1)/ programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC.ICIs has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with BMs, although patients with BMs are mostly underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we summarized the mechanism of ICIs in the treatment of BMs, and the clinical research and treatment progress of ICIs and their combination with other therapies in patients with BMs s from NSCLC.

Phase II Trial of Atezolizumab Combined With Carboplatin and Pemetrexed for Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Untreated Brain Metastases (Atezo-Brain, GECP17/05)

PURPOSE

The Atezo-Brain study evaluated atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with untreated brain metastases, a population traditionally excluded from trials.

METHODS

This single-arm phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with untreated brain metastases without neurologic symptoms or asymptomatic with medical treatment. Dexamethasone was allowed up to 4 mg once daily. Atezolizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed was given for four to six cycles followed by atezolizumab plus pemetrexed until progression for a maximum of 2 years. The primary end points were to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks and the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events during the first 9 weeks. Intracranial outcomes were assessed using response assessment in neuro-oncology brain metastases criteria.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled and 22 (55%) were receiving corticosteroids at baseline. The overall 12-week PFS rate was 62.2% (95% credibility interval [CrI], 47.1 to 76.2). The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events during the first 9 weeks was 27.5%. Most neurologic events were grade 1 and 2 but five patients (12.5%) experienced grade 3-4 neurologic events. With a median follow-up of 31 months, intracranial median PFS was 6.9 months and response rate was 42.7% (95% CrI, 28.1 to 57.9). Systemic median PFS was 8.9 months and response rate was 45% (95% CrI, 28.1 to 57.9). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 16.9) and the 2-year OS rate was 27.5% (95% CI, 16.6 to 45.5).

CONCLUSION

Atezolizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed demonstrates activity in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with untreated brain metastases with an acceptable safety profile.

Examining the Effect of ALK and EGFR Mutations on Survival Outcomes in Surgical Lung Brain Metastasis Patients

In the context of the post-genomic era, where targeted oncological therapies like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are gaining prominence, this study investigates whether these therapies can enhance survival for lung carcinoma patients with specific genetic mutations-EGFR-amplified and ALK-rearranged mutations. Prior to this study, no research series had explored how these mutations influence patient survival in cases of surgical lung brain metastases (BMs). Through a multi-site retrospective analysis, the study examined patients who underwent surgical resection for BM arising from primary lung cancer at Emory University Hospital from January 2012 to May 2022. The mutational statuses were determined from brain tissue biopsies, and survival analyses were conducted. Results from 95 patients (average age: 65.8 ± 10.6) showed that while 6.3% had anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged mutations and 20.0% had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-amplified mutations-with 9.5% receiving second-line therapies-these mutations did not significantly correlate with overall survival. Although the sample size of patients receiving targeted therapies was limited, the study highlighted improved overall survival and progression-free survival rates compared to earlier trials, suggesting advancements in systemic lung metastasis treatment. The study suggests that as more targeted therapies emerge, the prospects for increased overall survival and progression-free survival in lung brain metastasis patients will likely improve.

Unexpected Durable Complete Response With Anti-PD-L1 Blockade in Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma: A Case Report With Host and Tumor Biomarker Analysis

We extensively characterized a metastatic UPS with a 71-month lasting complete response to immunotherapy.

KRAS G12C Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Linked to Female Sex and High Risk of CNS Metastasis: Population-based Demographics and Survival Data From the National Swedish Lung Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Real-world data on demographics related to KRAS mutation subtypes are crucial as targeted drugs against the p.G12C variant have been approved.

METHOD

We identified 6183 NSCLC patients with reported NGS-based KRAS status in the Swedish national lung cancer registry between 2016 and 2019. Following exclusion of other targetable drivers, three cohorts were studied: KRAS-G12C (n = 848), KRAS-other (n = 1161), and driver negative KRAS-wild-type (wt) (n = 3349).

RESULTS

The prevalence of KRAS mutations and the p.G12C variant respectively was 38%/16% in adenocarcinoma, 28%/13% in NSCLC-NOS and 6%/2% in squamous cell carcinoma. Women were enriched in the KRAS-G12C (65%) and KRAS-other (59%) cohorts versus KRAS-wt (48%). A high proportion of KRAS-G12C patients in stage IV (28%) presented with CNS metastasis (vs. KRAS-other [19%] and KRAS-wt [18%]). No difference in survival between the mutation cohorts was seen in stage I-IIIA. In stage IV, median overall survival (mOS) from date of diagnosis was shorter for KRAS-G12C and KRAS-other (5.8 months/5.2 months) vs. KRAS wt (6.4 months). Women had better outcome in the stage IV cohorts, except in KRAS-G12C subgroup where mOS was similar between men and women. Notably, CNS metastasis did not impact survival in stage IV KRAS-G12C, but was associated with poorer survival, as expected, in KRAS-other and KRAS-wt.

CONCLUSION

The KRAS p.G12C variant is a prevalent targetable driver in Sweden and significantly associated with female sex and presence of CNS metastasis. We show novel survival effects linked to KRAS p.G12C mutations in these subgroups with implications for clinical practice.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Updates in Leptomeningeal Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of advanced metastatic cancer associated with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study reviews the current understanding of the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of LMD. We highlight opportunities for advances in this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, the use of soluble CSF biomarkers has expanded, suggesting improved sensitivity over traditional cytology, identification of targetable mutations, and potential utility for monitoring disease burden. Recent studies of targeted small molecules and intrathecal based therapies have demonstrated an increase in overall and progression-free survival. In addition, there are several ongoing trials evaluating immunotherapy in LMD. Though overall prognosis of LMD remains poor, studies suggest a potential role for soluble CSF biomarkers in diagnosis and management and demonstrate promising findings in patient outcomes with targeted therapies for specific solid tumors. Despite these advances, there continues to be a gap of knowledge in this disease, emphasizing the importance of inclusion of LMD patients in clinical trials.

Nivolumab and ipilimumab with concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of the safety cohort for non-randomized, open-label, phase I/II trial

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastasis (BM), for which the current standard of care is radiation therapy with or without surgery. There are no prospective data on the safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) concurrent with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for BM. This is the safety cohort of the phase I/II investigator-initiated trial of SRS with nivolumab and ipilimumab for patients with BM from NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-institution study included patients with NSCLC with active BM amenable to SRS. Brain SRS and systemic therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab were delivered concurrently (within 7 days). The endpoints were safety and 4-month intracranial progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled in the safety cohort, 10 of whom were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 9.7-24.3 months). The median interval between systemic therapy and radiation therapy was 3 days. Only one patient had a DLT; hence, predefined stopping criteria were not met. In addition to the patient with DLT, three patients had treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events, including elevated liver function tests, fatigue, nausea, adrenal insufficiency, and myocarditis. One patient had a confirmed influenza infection 7 months after initiation of protocol treatment (outside the DLT assessment window), leading to pneumonia and subsequent death from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. The estimated 4-month intracranial PFS rate was 70.7%.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent brain SRS with nivolumab/ipilimumab was safe for patients with active NSCLC BM. Preliminary analyses of treatment efficacy were encouraging for intracranial treatment response.

Survival of patients with KRAS G12C mutated stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with and without brain metastases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Few data is available on whether brain metastases (BM) influence survival in patients with stage IV KRAS G12C mutated (KRAS G12C+ ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) +/- chemotherapy ([chemo]-ICI).

METHODS

Data was retrospectively collected from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. The cumulative incidence of intracranial progression, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was determined for patients with KRAS G12C+ stage IV NSCLC diagnosed January 1 - June 30, 2019, treated with first-line (chemo)-ICI. OS and PFS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and BM+ and BM- groups were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of 2489 patients with stage IV NSCLC, 153 patients had KRAS G12C+ and received first-line (chemo)-ICI. Of those patients, 35% (54/153) underwent brain imaging (CT and/or MRI), of which 85% (46/54) MRI. Half of the patients with brain imaging (56%; 30/54) had BM, concerning one-fifth (20%; 30/153) of all patients, of which 67% was symptomatic. Compared to BM-, patients with BM+ were younger and had more organs affected with metastasis. Around one-third (30%) of patients with BM+ had ≥5 BM at diagnosis. Three quarters of patients with BM+ received cranial radiotherapy prior to start of (chemo)-ICI. The 1-year cumulative incidence of intracranial progression was 33% for patients with known baseline BM and 7% for those without (p = 0.0001). Median PFS was 6.6 (95% CI 3.0-15.9) and 6.7 (95% CI 5.1-8.5) months for BM+ and BM- (p = 0.80), respectively. Median OS was 15.7 (95% CI 6.2-27.3) and 17.8 (95% CI 13.4-22.0) months for BM+ and BM- (p = 0.77), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Baseline BM are common in patients with metastatic KRAS G12C+ NSCLC. During (chemo)-ICI treatment, intracranial progression was more frequent in patients with known baseline BM, justifying regular imaging during treatment. In our study, presence of known baseline BM did not influence OS or PFS.

Investigational treatment strategies in glioblastoma: progress made and barriers to success

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (IDHwt), remains an incurable disease despite considerable research effort. The current standard of care since 2005 comprises maximal safe resection followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide; more recently, the addition of tumor treating fields was approved in the newly diagnosed and recurrent disease settings.

AREAS COVERED

Searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov provided a foundation for this review. We first describe early research including carmustine wafers, brachytherapy, anti-angiogenesis, and immune checkpoint inhibition for glioblastoma. Next, we discuss challenges precluding the translation of preclinical successes. This is followed by a description of promising treatments such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy as well as the recent qualified successes of cancer vaccinations. Non-immunotherapy trials are also highlighted, and ongoing or pending phase 2 and 3 clinical trials are codified in study tables.

EXPERT OPINION

Unfortunately, hundreds of trials, including of agents effective in systemic malignancy, have not drastically changed management of glioblastoma. This may reflect unique resistance mechanisms and highlights a need for multimodality treatments beyond surgery, radiation, and conventional chemotherapy. Novel techniques, such as those in the emerging field of cancer neuroscience, may help uncover tolerable and effective regimens for this lethal malignancy.

Central nervous systemic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and concordance between intra/extracranial response in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) markedly improve the clinical outcomes of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the intracranial efficacy of ICI is not well elucidated, and previous studies showed discordant outcomes of ICI between intracranial and extracranial diseases. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the intracranial and extracranial response of patients with NSCLC and brain metastasis who were treated with ICI in the real-world setting.

METHODS

A total of 55 patients (median age, 63 years [range 42-80]; male, 78%) who had NSCLC with brain metastasis and treated with ICI monotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. We separately assessed the response rates of brain lesions and systemic lesions, and estimated the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The median OS and overall PFS were 17.0 months (95% CI 10.3-25.6) and 3.19 months (95% CI 2.24-5.03), respectively. The intracranial objective response rate and disease control rate of ICI were 36 and 54%, respectively. Among the 44 patients who showed disease progression, only 32% (n = 14) showed concordant outcomes and 9 patients (20%) showed opposing discordant outcomes. Eight patients continued ICI with local brain therapy after intracranial progression, and their median extracranial PFS and OS were 15 months (95% CI 5.0-not assessed [NA]) and 23.8 months (95% CI 14.7-NA), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI monotherapy had a clinically meaningful intracranial efficacy in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis. Watchful waiting and close monitoring without local radiotherapy might be feasible in NSCLC patients with asymptomatic active brain metastasis.

Emerging Role of Glioma Stem Cells in Mechanisms of Therapy Resistance

Since their discovery at the beginning of this millennium, glioma stem cells (GSCs) have sparked extensive research and an energetic scientific debate about their contribution to glioblastoma (GBM) initiation, progression, relapse, and resistance. Different molecular subtypes of GBM coexist within the same tumor, and they display differential sensitivity to chemotherapy. GSCs contribute to tumor heterogeneity and recapitulate pathway alterations described for the three GBM subtypes found in patients. GSCs show a high degree of plasticity, allowing for interconversion between different molecular GBM subtypes, with distinct proliferative potential, and different degrees of self-renewal and differentiation. This high degree of plasticity permits adaptation to the environmental changes introduced by chemo- and radiation therapy. Evidence from mouse models indicates that GSCs repopulate brain tumors after therapeutic intervention, and due to GSC plasticity, they reconstitute heterogeneity in recurrent tumors. GSCs are also inherently resilient to standard-of-care therapy, and mechanisms of resistance include enhanced DNA damage repair, MGMT promoter demethylation, autophagy, impaired induction of apoptosis, metabolic adaptation, chemoresistance, and immune evasion. The remarkable oncogenic properties of GSCs have inspired considerable interest in better understanding GSC biology and functions, as they might represent attractive targets to advance the currently limited therapeutic options for GBM patients. This has raised expectations for the development of novel targeted therapeutic approaches, including targeting GSC plasticity, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells, and oncolytic viruses. In this review, we focus on the role of GSCs as drivers of GBM and therapy resistance, and we discuss how insights into GSC biology and plasticity might advance GSC-directed curative approaches.

Outcome differences between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-based monotherapy and combination treatments in NSCLC with brain metastases

INTRODUCTION

Without the clear immunophenotyping of brain metastases (BrMs), the optimal treatment strategy based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and BrMs remains unknown.

METHODS

308 patients with NSCLC received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based monotherapy or combination therapy were retrospectively identified. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were used to determine the treatment outcomes differences. Transcriptomic analysis of paired primary lung lesions and BrMs were performed to dissect the specific tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of BrMs.

RESULTS

The presence of BrMs was associated with significantly inferior PFS (2.5 vs. 3.7 months; P = 0.0053) and OS (8.3 vs. 15.4 months; P = 0.0122) in monotherapy group, while it was only associated with poorer PFS (4.6 vs. 7.0 months; P = 0.0009) but similar OS (22.8 vs. 21.0 months; P = 0.9808) in combination treatment group. Of patients with BrMs, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus antiangiogenic therapy was associated with longest PFS (7.7 vs. 3.2 vs. 2.5 months; P = 0.0251) and OS (29.2 vs. 15.8 vs. 8.3 months; P = 0.0001) when compared with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Multivariate analyses suggested that combination treatment was independently correlated with significantly longer PFS (P = 0.028) and OS (P < 0.001) in patients with BrMs. Transcriptomic analysis showed a suppressive TIME in BrMs with decreased CD4⁺ T cells and M1 macrophages but increased M2 macrophages infiltration.

CONCLUSION

NSCLC with BrMs obtained barely satisfactory overall benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, partly due to its immunosuppressive TIME. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination treatment, especially anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-angiogenic treatment, could significantly improve the clinical outcomes of patients with NSCLC and BrMs.

Intracranial activity of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring no actionable mutations; however, data on their efficacy among patients presenting with intracranial lesions are limited. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with measurable brain metastasis at initial diagnosis.

METHODS

Our study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of a total of 211 patients diagnosed with driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC with measurable, asymptomatic brain metastasis at baseline from Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to the first-line treatment regimen received: ICI combined with chemotherapy ( n = 102) or chemotherapy ( n = 109). Systemic and intracranial objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Adverse events were also compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the chemotherapy-based regimen, the ICI-containing regimen was associated with a significantly higher intracranial (44.1% [45/102] vs . 28.4% [31/109], χ2 = 5.620, P = 0.013) and systemic (49.0% [50/102] vs . 33.9% [37/109], χ2 = 4.942, P = 0.019) ORRs and longer intracranial (11.0 months vs . 7.0 months, P <0.001) and systemic (9.0 months vs . 5.0 months, P <0.001) PFS. Multivariable analysis consistently revealed an independent association between receiving ICI plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line regimen and prolonged intracranial PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.73, P <0.001) and systemic PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66, P <0.001). No unexpected serious adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides real-world clinical evidence that ICI combined with chemotherapy is a promising first-line treatment option for driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC patients who present with brain metastasis at initial diagnosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ , OMESIA, NCT05129202.

Optimizing treatment of brain metastases in an era of novel systemic treatments: a single center consecutive series

BACKGROUND

The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases consists of surgical resection, radiation treatment and systemic treatment. Tailoring and timing these treatment modalities is challenging. This study presents real-world data from consecutively treated patients and assesses the impact of all treatment strategies and their relation with survival. The aim is to provide new insights to improve multidisciplinary decisions towards individualized treatment strategies in patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective consecutive cohort study was performed. Patients with brain metastases were included between June 2018 and May 2020. Brain metastases of small cell lung carcinoma were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed in multivariable models.

RESULTS

676 patients were included in the study, 596 (88%) received radiotherapy, 41 (6%) awaited the effect of newly started or switched systemic treatment and 39 (6%) received best supportive care. Overall survival in the stereotactic radiotherapy group was 14 months (IQR 5-32) and 32 months (IQR 11-43) in patients who started or switched systemic treatment and initially did not receive radiotherapy. In patients with brain metastases without options for local or systemic treatment best supportive care was provided, these patients had an overall survival of 0 months (IQR 0-1). Options for systemic treatment, Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70 and breast cancer were prognostic for a longer overall survival, while progressive extracranial metastases and whole-brain-radiotherapy were prognostic for shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing prognosis in light of systemic treatment options is crucial after the diagnosis of brain metastasis for the consideration of radiotherapy versus best supportive care.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer has the highest risk of brain metastasis (BM) among all solid carcinomas. The emergence of BM has a significant impact on the selection of oncologic treatment for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the most promising treatment option for patients without druggable mutations and have been shown to improve survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM in clinical trials with good safety. Moreover, ICI has shown certain effects in NSCLC BM, and the overall intracranial efficacy is comparable to extracranial efficacy. However, a proportion of patients showed discordant responses in primary and metastatic lesions, suggesting that multiple mechanisms may exist underlying ICI activity in BM. According to studies pertaining to tumor immune microenvironments, ICIs may be capable of provoking immunity in situ. Meanwhile, systematic immune cells activated by ICIs can migrate into the central nervous system and exert antitumor effects. This review summarizes the present evidence for ICI treatment efficacy in NSCLC BM and proposes the possible mechanisms of ICI treatment for NSCLC BMs based on existing evidence.

Comedications with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Involvement of the Microbiota, Impact on Efficacy and Practical Implications

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a major breakthrough in solid oncology over the past decade. The immune system and the gut microbiota are involved in their complex mechanisms of action. However, drug interactions have been suspected of disrupting the fine equilibrium necessary for optimal ICI efficacy. Thus, clinicians are facing a great deal of sometimes contradictory information on comedications with ICIs and must at times oppose conflicting objectives between oncological response and comorbidities or complications. We compiled in this review published data on the role of the microbiota in ICI efficacy and the impact of comedications. We found mostly concordant results on detrimental action of concurrent corticosteroids, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors. The timeframe seems to be an important variable each time to preserve an initial immune priming at ICIs initiation. Other molecules have been associated with improved or impaired ICIs outcomes in pre-clinical models with discordant conclusions in retrospective clinical studies. We gathered the results of the main studies concerning metformin, aspirin, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, beta blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, opioids, and statins. In conclusion, one should always assess the necessity of concomitant treatment according to evidence-based recommendations and discuss the possibility of postponing ICI initiation or switching strategies to preserve the critical window.

A novel score system based on arginine metabolism-related genes to predict prognosis, characterize immune microenvironment, and forecast response to immunotherapy in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma

Introduction: Glioblastoma is one of the most lethal cancers and leads to more than 200,000 deaths annually. However, despite lots of researchers devoted to exploring novel treatment regime, most of these attempts eventually failed to improve the overall survival of glioblastoma patients in near 20 years. Immunotherapy is an emerging therapy for cancers and have succeeded in many cancers. But most of its application in glioblastoma have been proved with no improvement in overall survival, which may result from the unique immune microenvironment of glioblastoma. Arginine is amino acid and is involved in many physiological processes. Many studies have suggested that arginine and its metabolism can regulate malignancy of multiple cancers and influence the formation of tumor immune microenvironment. However, there is hardly study focusing on the role of arginine metabolism in glioblastoma. Methods: In this research, based on mRNA sequencing data of 560 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients from three public cohorts and one our own cohort, we aimed to construct an arginine metabolism-related genes signature (ArMRS) based on four essential arginine metabolism-related genes (ArMGs) that we filtered from all genes with potential relation with arginine metabolism. Subsequently, the glioblastoma patients were classified into ArMRS high-risk and low-risk groups according to calculated optimal cut-off values of ArMRS in these four cohorts. Results: Further validation demonstrated that the ArMRS was an independent prognostic factor and displayed fine efficacy in prediction of glioblastoma patients' prognosis. Moreover, analyses of tumor immune microenvironment revealed that higher ArMRS was correlated with more immune infiltration and relatively "hot" immunological phenotype. We also demonstrated that ArMRS was positively correlated with the expression of multiple immunotherapy targets, including PD1 and B7-H3. Additionally, the glioblastomas in the ArMRS high-risk group would present with more cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) infiltration and better predicted response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Discussion: In conclusion, our study constructed a novel score system based on arginine metabolism, ArMRS, which presented with good efficacy in prognosis prediction and strong potential to predict unique immunological features, resistance to immunotherapy, and guide the application of immunotherapy in IDH-wild type glioblastoma.