What is the incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in adults within the acute hospital setting? A systematic review

Incidence and characteristics of device-related pressure injuries in intensive care: A four-year analysis

OBJECTIVES

To describe and analyse the incidence and characteristics of intensive care-acquired device-related pressure injuries.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis of intensive care-acquired pressure injuries during 2019-2022.

SETTING

Single general intensive care unit in Brisbane, Australia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intensive care-acquired pressure injury incidence, device-related pressure injury incidence, non-device-related pressure injury incidence, pressure injury category and location, device associated with pressure injury.

RESULTS

During the 4-year period, there were 7343 intensive care admissions of whom 413 (5.6 %) patients developed an intensive care-acquired pressure injury. The incidence of device-related pressure injury was 4.0 % compared to 2.7 % non-device-related pressure injury. In total there were 461 device-related pressure injuries, which were mostly (55 %) associated with endotracheal tubes or the methods used to secure them. Consequently, the majority of injuries were found on the mucous membranes (lips, mouth and tongue). The other main devices associated with injuries were high-flow nasal prongs (9.3 %), indwelling urinary catheters (6.7 %), nasogastric tubes (6.5 %) and oxygen masks (5.0 %). Overall, device-related pressure injuries were less severe than non-device-related pressure injuries, however they occurred in a shorter time frame (median 4 days versus 6 days). A range of factors was associated with device-related pressure injuries but overall, their presence or duration was less than with non-device-related pressure injuries.

CONCLUSION

The study results provide rigorous evidence of the incidence and characteristics of device-related pressures injuries, that can be used to benchmark with other intensive care units nationally and internationally.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Endotracheal tube-associated pressure injuries were the most common type of device-related injury, providing a clear focus for preventative intervention. Given the high proportion of these device-related injuries, effective interventions would have a significant impact on overall reduction of intensive care-acquired pressure injuries. Since most injuries occur within three days of device insertion, early preventative intervention is time-critical.

Medical device-related pressure injuries in the operating room: A scoping review

AIMS

To map the existing literature describing medical device-related pressure injuries in patients during surgery, including investigation of the incidence, types of medical devices, risk factors and strategies for preventing medical device-related pressure injuries.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

In April 2023, three databases were searched. Studies about adult patients undergoing surgery, from 2014 onwards, in English and Chinese were included. Data were extracted about study characteristics and data related to research questions. The Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework were used to synthesize findings.

RESULTS

Two different types of evidence were included in this review; 14 research studies and two quality improvement studies. The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the operating room was 0.56%-24.5% and respiratory devices were the most common medical devices investigated. Length of surgery, age and BMI were risk factors for medical device-related pressure injuries in a few studies. The application of a prophylactic dressing and dressing maintenance was the most common prevention strategy.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing research is needed to confirm the incidence of, and risk factors for, medical device-related pressure injuries in the operating room. Additionally, more high-quality evidence is needed to underpin current prevention strategies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Operating room nurses need to be aware of the risks of medical device-related pressure injuries and assess and plan prevention strategies accordingly. Once more high-quality evidence is available, operating room nurses could implement prevention strategies like prophylactic dressings.

REPORTING METHOD

Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Risk factors for oral mucosal pressure injury associated with endotracheal tubes in intensive care unit patients: A single-centre longitudinal study with brief follow-up

BACKGROUND

In intensive care units (ICUs), endotracheal tubes (ETTs) cause injury to the oral mucosa through friction and pressure. The incidence and risk factors of oral mucosal pressure injuries (PIs) have gained increasing attention in recent years.

AIM

The study aimed to identify risk factors for oral mucosal PIs associated with ETTs.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-centre brief follow-up longitudinal study conducted from January to May 2022. It recruited 250 patients without oral mucosal PIs who received mechanical ventilation support via ETT and were hospitalized in the ICU of a teaching and research hospital in Turkey. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate the onset time of oral mucosal PI using the ETT repositioning time as an independent variable.

RESULTS

Oral mucosal PIs associated with ETT developed in 41.6% of patients. Of the 250 endotracheally intubated patients, the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II) score was 27.5 (min/max: 18/42), the mean length of stay (LOS) in the ICU was 24 days (min/max: 13/80). The median body mass index (BMI) of patients with oral mucosal PIs was (24.59 [IQR = 3.81] kg/m2), significantly lower than the median BMI of patients without oral mucosal PIs (26.62 [IQR = 5.93] kg/m2) (Z = 4.200; p < .001). The earliest onset of oral mucosal PIs was noted at 16 h after the start of follow-up, and the latest was 208 h after the start of follow-up, with a median of 160 (IQR = 48) h (approximately 6.7 days). Patients whose ETT was repositioned after 10.5 h had a higher risk of developing oral mucosal PIs (OR = 3.77; 95% CI: 2.65-5.37; p < .001). The decision tree (CHAID) method was applied to determine the time required to reposition the ETT to prevent oral mucosal PIs. The decision tree correctly classified the occurrence of oral mucosal PIs by 60.6% and the non-occurrence of oral mucosal PIs by 97.9%. Patients with parenteral nutrition and a low frequency of ETT repositioning time had a higher risk of oral mucosal PIs (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Parenteral nutrition support and ETT repositioning timing were the primary risk factors for developing oral mucosal PIs. Close monitoring of endotracheally intubated patients receiving parenteral nutrition is essential, with particular attention to forming oral mucosal PIs. Additionally, repositioning the ETT at intervals of no more than 8 h may help reduce the risk of oral mucosal PI development.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

As ICU patients are particularly vulnerable to mucosal membrane PIs, recognizing the associated risk factors is crucial for early detection and prevention. This study highlights the specific risk factors for oral mucosal PIs, equipping nurses with the knowledge to develop targeted interventions to prevent these injuries.

Incidence, characteristics and risk factors of endotracheal tube-related pressure injuries in intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Medical devices commonly used for the treatment and care of critically ill patients can cause pressure injuries in intensive care units (ICUs). The endotracheal tube (ETT) is one of the most common medical devices to cause pressure injuries.

AIM

This study investigated the incidence of, characteristics of and risk factors for ETT-related pressure injuries for ICU patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This study adopted a prospective descriptive research design. The sample consisted of 146 endotracheally intubated patients. Data were collected using a patient information form, an Endotracheal Tube-Related Pressure Injuries Assessment Form, the Braden Risk Assessment Tool and the Nutritional Assessment Test.

RESULTS

The study revealed that 80.14% of the patients developed ETT-related pressure injuries. Over half of the ETT-related pressure injuries appeared on Day 3 or 4 (56.41%). High body mass index was found to be associated with the development of ETT-related pressure injuries (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.26, p = .003). None of the other variables were statistically significant in the development of pressure injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ETT-related pressure injuries was quite high in the internal, surgical and anaesthesia ICUs. High body mass index was associated with the development of ETT-related pressure injuries. Intensive care nurses should implement interventions to prevent ETT-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation support.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

ETT-related pressure injuries are common in ICU patients. High body mass index was associated with the development of ETT-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients. The skin and mucosa should be assessed for the development of ETT-related pressure injuries during the daily assessment of the patients receiving mechanical ventilation support. The ETT should be repositioned regularly, and the most suitable ETT fixation method should be used.

Medical device-related pressure injuries in paediatric patients: An incidence study in a children's hospital

AIM

To determine the incidence of pressure injuries from medical devices in children.

BACKGROUND

Medical devices can cause pressure injuries on skin and soft tissues.

DESIGN

A prospective, descriptive study adhering to STROBE guidelines.

METHODS

This study was conducted in the third-level Paediatric Intensive Care Unit of Ege University Hospital in İzmir, Türkiye between April 2019 and October 2019 in Türkiye. Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years with medical devices were observed for pressure injuries using Braden scales and a specific monitoring form.

RESULTS

In this study, we followed 522 medical devices applied to 96 patients. The three most commonly used medical devices were the ECG probe (21%), the blood pressure cuff (16%) and the saturation probe. Out of the 522 medical devices followed, 36 caused pressure injuries (6.8%).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries was found to be high. Effective training and implementation strategies need to be devised for paediatric nurses to prevent pressure injuries associated with medical devices.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The results of this study reveal that pressure injuries related to medical devices are an important health problem in paediatric hospitals. Therefore, awareness-raising and educational activities among health professionals and nurses should be accelerated.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution in the study.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in Hemodynamically Unstable Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and identify potential risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable adults (patients classified class III or IV on the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28; TISS-28).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

The target population was critically ill adults who were using one or more medical devices and categorized as class III or IV on the TISS-28. The study sample comprised 77 participants followed daily until discharge, death, transfer, or lesion development. Data were collected from January to March 2020. The study setting was an intensive care unit with 40 beds in a large hospital in a municipality in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

METHODS

Sociodemographic and pertinent clinical data, pressure injury (PI) risk assessed using the Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk, and head-to-toe skin inspections were completed. The incidence rate of MDRPIs was calculated, and survival analyses were completed via the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Forty-nine of 77 participants developed an MDRPI, reflecting an incidence rate of 63.6%. Collectively, 71 MDRPIs occurred in these 49 participants. Univariate analysis indicated significant associations between MDRPI occurrences and level of consciousness ( P = < .001), use of tube holder for ventilation devices ( P = .013), nasal cannula ( P = .034), nasogastric cannula ( P = .034), presence of edema ( P = .001), infection ( P = .007), higher TISS score ( P = .047), and greater number of medical devices ( P = .022). Survival analysis indicated that a high or very high-risk score on the Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk ( P = .043) and edema ( P = .030) are risk factors for MDRPI occurrences in this vulnerable population.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of MDRPIs was 63.6%. The categories with the highest high or very high risk scores on the Braden Scale for Risk of Pressure Pain and Edema emerged as risk factors for MDRPI in this critically ill and vulnerable population.

Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Care and Prevention Training Program (DevICeU): Effects on intensive care nurses' knowledge, prevention performance and point prevalence

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the training given to intensive care unit (ICU) nurses to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) on nurses' knowledge levels, their prevention performance, and the point prevalence (PP) of MDRPIs.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN

A pre-post test intervention study without a control group.

SETTING

The study was conducted between May and July 2023 with ICU nurses in three phases: pre-training phase (E0) (104 nurses, 116 patients), training implementation phase (E) and post-training phase (E1) (89 nurses, 120 patients).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The data were collected by using the Patient (E0, E1) and Nurse (E0) Characteristic Forms, MDRPI Follow-up and Prevalence Form (E0, E1), D.E.V.I.C.E Performance Observation Checklist (E0, E1), MDRPI Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (E0, E1), Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale (E0, E1), Pressure Injury Grading Form (E0, E1), and Feedback Form about the Training Process (E).

RESULTS

The mean MDRPI knowledge score of the nurses increased significantly from E0 to E1 (13.23 ± 1.43 vs. 20.02 ± 1.30, p = 0.001), with the highest improvement in the staging and prevention themes. Nurses' MDRPI prevention performance increased significantly from E0 to E1 (2.15 ± 1.01 vs. 11.17 ± 1.65, p = 0.001). There was a significant difference between the PP rate at E0 (61.2 %) and E1 (27.5 %) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study indicated that the training on MDRPIs given to ICU nurses increased their knowledge and prevention performance and decreased the prevalence of MDRPIs. However, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these findings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Since MDRPIs have more complex staging and prevention practices than conventional PIs, they require the adoption of a training approach that includes visual materials and practical methods in addition to theoretical knowledge. Accurate definitions of medical device dimensions and fixation, skin assessment, and prevention practices will lead to the desired outcome of reducing MDRPIs in ICUs.

Medical device-related pressure injuries prevention practices of intensive care unit nurses: A cross-sectional study in Turkey

AIM

Medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) are becoming increasingly common across all healthcare services and age groups in terms of both incidence and severity. It is crucial for nurses to be aware that MDRPI is a potential complication of healthcare services. This study aimed to assess the preventive practices of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses in relation to MDRPIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted with 96 nurses between March 10 and April 31, 2021. The "Nurse Information Form" and the "MDRPIs Prevention Practices Questionnaire" form were used for the data collection.

RESULTS

The overall practice scores of ICU nurses in preventing MDRPIs were 50.83 ± 12.93. Out of the participants, 57.3% (n = 55) achieved a total practice score of 51 and above out of 68 (considered an acceptable score indicating proficiency in positive practice). The items with the most negative practice levels among nurses were related to statements such as 'I apply hydrocolloid, thin foam, or a silicone-type dressing to prevent MDPRI' (2.86 ± 0.85) and 'I use the normal pressure injury staging when staging the MDRPI' (2.88 ± 0.86). No significant difference was observed between the mean scores of MDRPI prevention practices and the characteristics of ICU nurses, such as education level, years working in the unit, and years of experience in the profession (p > 0.05). Furthermore, a positive correlation was found between age and practice levels in preventing MDRPIs (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The study results indicate that the practice levels of ICU nurses in preventing MDRPIs were insufficient. We believe that regular in-service training programs, grounded in clinical practice, are necessary to enhance nurses' awareness and management of MDRPIs.

Determination of Incidence and Risk Factors of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in the ICU: A Descriptive Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in the ICU.

METHODS

In this descriptive study, the researchers collected data through systematic observation of patients (n = 58) in the ICU. The patients were evaluated within 24 hours of ICU admission and then followed up until they were discharged. A total of 482 patient-days were followed. The researchers used the MDRPI follow-up form, the patient descriptive form, the MDRPI follow-up form, and the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk for data collection.

RESULTS

Overall, 39.7% of the 58 patients hospitalized in the ICU developed an MDRPI, and 5.2% of the MDRPIs were evaluated as stage 2. These injuries occurred in an average of 5 days after the patient was admitted to the ICU. Among the MDRPIs that developed, 31.9% were located in the nose, 21.3% in the mouth, and 14.9% on the cheeks. Intubation tubes were used in 7.3% of the patients, nasogastric tubes in 22.4% of the patients, and radial artery catheters in 10.5% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of MDRPI is correlated with the type of medical device used. Providers should establish a planned care protocol based on the anatomic placement of the medical device and take necessary precautions to prevent MDRPI.

Strategies in surface engineering for the regulation of microclimates in skin-medical product interactions

There is a growing number of personal healthcare devices that are in prolonged contact with the skin. The functionality of these products is linked to the interface formed by the contact between the medical apparatus and the skin. The interface can be characterised by its topology, compliance, and moisture and thermal regulating capabilities. Many devices are, however, described to have suboptimal and occlusive contacts, resulting in physiological unfavourable microclimates at the interface. The resulting poor management of moisture and temperature can impact the functionality and utility of the device and, in severe cases, lead to physical harm to the user. Being able to control the microclimate is therefore expected to limit medical-device related injuries and prevent associated skin complications. Surface engineering can modify and potentially enhance the regulation of the microclimate factors surrounding the interface between a product's surface and the skin. This review provides an overview of potential engineering solutions considering the needs for, and influences on, regulation of temperature and moisture by considering the skin-medical device interface as a system. These findings serve as a platform for the anticipated progress in the role of surface engineering for skin-device microclimate regulation.

Feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing a medical device-related pressure injury algorithm for critically ill patients using non-invasive ventilation

OBJECTIVES

Describe the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing a nurse-led intervention to prevent medical device-related pressure injury in critical care patients using non-invasive ventilation during hospitalization.

STUDY DESIGN

A quality improvement project, using a descriptive single-arm study design with convenience sampling.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This study was conducted at a Midwestern medical center with 640 beds (two hospital campuses). After an educational session, the nurse-led algorithm for non-invasive ventilation medical device-related pressure injury prevention was implemented in two critical care nursing units (cardiac medical progressive care and neurotrauma intensive care unit). Nursing staff were full or part-time critical care nurses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the non-invasive ventilation medical device-related pressure injury algorithm were measured (bedside rounding and pre/post System Usability Scale).

RESULTS

Thirty-five nurses (52.2 %) completed a pre-educational survey; 8 (11.2 %) completed a post-survey. The total mean pre-survey score was 70.7 (SD ± 13.6) and the post-survey mean score was 71.3(SD ± 19.6). There was a statistically significant increase in the post-survey mean score {Χ2 (1, N = 43) = 43.5, p <.05}, however, the 0.06 increase was not clinically meaningful. Bedside rounding interviews (n = 22) indicated 82 % (n = 18) of the nurses used the algorithm. The SUS tool mean score was 83.3 (10.73) pre-implementation (n = 21); and 85.63 (8.26) post-implementation (n = 5), indicating clinical usability of the algorithm pre- and post-implementation.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing a medical device-related pressure injury algorithm for critically ill patients using non-invasive ventilation were demonstrated during this study. More nursing research is needed to develop scalable interdisciplinary clinical algorithms to reduce medical device-related pressure injuries in patients using non-invasive ventilation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study focused on the bedside usability of the algorithm in a clinical setting. Implementing this nursing-developed algorithm created an interdisciplinary framework in which nursing assessment may guide clinical care.

Risk factors predicting hospital-acquired pressure injury in adult patients: An overview of reviews

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries remain a significant patient safety threat. Current well-known pressure injury risk assessment tools have many limitations and therefore do not accurately predict the risk of pressure injury development over diverse populations. A contemporary understanding of the risk factors predicting pressure injury in adult hospitalised patients will inform pressure injury prevention and future researchers considering risk assessment tool development may benefit from our summary and synthesis of risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

To summarise and synthesise systematic reviews that identify risk factors for hospital-acquired pressure injury development in adult patients.

DESIGN

An overview of systematic reviews.

METHODS

Cochrane and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodologies guided this overview. The Cochrane library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles published in English from January 2008 to September 2022. Two researchers independently screened articles against the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included reviews using "a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews" (AMSTAR version 2). Data were categorised using an inductive approach and synthesised according to the recent pressure injury conceptual frameworks.

RESULTS

From 11 eligible reviews, 37 risk factors were categorised inductively into 14 groups of risk factors. From these, six groups were classified into two domains: four to mechanical boundary conditions and two to susceptibility and tolerance of the individual. The remaining eight groups were evident across both domains. Four main risk factors, including diabetes, length of surgery or intensive care unit stay, vasopressor use, and low haemoglobin level were synthesised. The overall quality of the included reviews was low in five studies (45 %) and critically low in six studies (55 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlighted the limitations in the methodological quality of the included reviews that may have influenced our results regarding risk factors. Current risk assessment tools and conceptual frameworks do not fully explain the complex and changing interactions amongst risk factors. This may warrant the need for more high-quality research, such as cohort studies, focussing on predicting hospital-acquired pressure injury in adult patients, to reconsider these risk factors we synthesised.

REGISTRATION

This overview was registered with the PROSPERO (CRD42022362218) on 27 September 2022.

Prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries among older people living in nursing homes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pressure injuries are a fundamental safety concern in older people living in nursing homes. Recent studies report a disparate body of evidence on pressure injury prevalence and incidence in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically quantify the prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries among older people living in nursing homes, and to identify the most frequently occurring PI stage(s) and anatomical location(s).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING(S)

Nursing homes, aged care, or long-term care facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

Older people, 60 years and older.

METHODS

Cross-sectional and cohort studies reporting on either prevalence or incidence of pressure injuries were included. Studies published in English from 2000 onwards were systematically searched in Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and ProQuest. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were undertaken independently by two or more authors and adjudicated by another. Outcomes included pressure injury point prevalence, cumulative incidence, and nursing home acquired pressure injury rate. In meta-analyses, Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistic were used to explore heterogeneity. Random effects models were used in the presence of substantial heterogeneity. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

RESULTS

3384 abstracts were screened, and 47 full-text studies included. In 30 studies with 355,784 older people, the pooled pressure injury prevalence for any stage was 11.6 % (95 % CI 9.6-13.7 %). Fifteen studies with 5,421,798 older people reported the prevalence of pressure injury excluding stage I and the pooled estimate was 7.2 % (95 % CI 6.2-8.3 %). The pooled incidence for pressure injury of any stage in four studies with 10,645 older people was 14.3 % (95 % CI 5.5-26.2 %). Nursing home acquired pressure injury rate was reported in six studies with 79,998 older people and the pooled estimate was 8.5 % (95 % CI 4.4-13.5 %). Stage I and stage II pressure injuries were the most common stages reported. The heel (34.1 %), sacrum (27.2 %) and foot (18.4 %) were the three most reported locations of pressure injuries. Meta-regression results indicated a reduction in pressure injury prevalence over the years of data collection.

CONCLUSION

The burden of pressure injuries among older people in nursing homes is similar to hospitalised patients and requires a targeted approach to prevention as is undertaken in hospitals. Future studies using robust methodologies focusing on epidemiology of pressure injury development in older people are needed to conduct as the first step of preventing pressure injuries.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42022328367.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Pressure injury rates in nursing homes are comparable to hospital rates indicating the need for targeted programmes similar to those in hospitals.

Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit and related risk factors

AIM

At present, physicians employ medical devices extensively in the treatment of numerous diseases and in the care and follow-up of patients. However, these medical devices are a potential cause of pressure injuries.The study aimed to investigate the incidence and affecting risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) in an adult intensive care unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a longitudinal descriptive/analytical and cross-sectional study. The researchers conducted this study with 213 intensive care patients between 15.06.2021 and 15.12.2021. The skin and mucosa under and around each medical device were observed once a day for MDRPIs during the stay of patients who had been hospitalized in the intensive care unit for at least 24 h. The data were collected using Patient Information Form developed by the researchers based on the literature, Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Monitoring Form, the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator (Jackson/Cubbin BARHATr)-Turkish Version, the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Pressure Injury Staging System and the Glasgow Coma Scale.

RESULTS

The incidence of MDRPIs was 28.6% (61/213). The study revealed that 48.4% (46/95) of these injuries were caused by medical devices for respiratory system, 26.3% (25/95) by devices for gastrointestinal and genitourinary system. The study also revealed that 70.5% of MDRPIs occurred on the skin and 29.5% on the mucosal membrane, and that 82.1% of the MDRPIs occurring on the skin were at Stage 1. In terms of anatomical location, 21.1% of these injuries developed on the fingers and 13.7% on the mouth/lip. In multivariate analysis, parenteral + enteral (p = 0.006, OR = 0.083, 95%CI = [0.014-0.497]) and oral nutrition (p = 0.037, OR = 0.210, 95%CI = [0.049-0.908]), a higher number of devices (nine or more) (p = 0.002, OR = 5.387, 95%CI = [1.840-15.772]) and the duration of device wear (p < 0.05) were identified as independent risk factors for the occurrence of MDRPIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that the incidence of MDRPIs was relatively high and was associated with various factors. It is critical for intensive care nurses, who encounter MDRPIs more frequently, to consider these factors while caring for their patients and to take appropriate preventive measures to reduce the incidence of these injuries.

A point prevalence study of medical device-associated pressure injuries: A cross-sectional study

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the point prevalence and associated risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPI) in intensive care patients in Turkey.

BACKGROUND

MDRPI remain a clinical problem that has garnered the attention of healthcare professionals.

DESIGN

This study used a cross-sectional design and was conducted over a single day in all intensive care units.

METHOD

Data were collected through face-to-face interviews, observation, skin examination and detailed diagnosis of MDRPI development and influencing factors. Presence of pressure injuries on the skin in the areas where the patient's medical device was placed was defined. The study was reported according to the STROBE declaration.

RESULTS

MDRPI developed in 65 out of 200 patients included in the study (32.5%). The most frequent locations were on the face (71%). The MDRPIs were commonly associated with nasogastric tube (29.2%), endotracheal tube (18.5%) and CPAP mask (15.4%). A significant proportion of these injuries were mucosal (53.8%, n = 35). The majority of the skin pressure injuries were classified as Stage II (18.5%, n = 12). The risk increased 14 times in patients who were hospitalised for 9-16 days and 13 times in those who received mechanical ventilator support.

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that MDRPI developed in approximately one of three patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit, and the length of hospital stay and mechanical ventilator support were important determining risk factors. The high prevalence of MDRPI may indicate inadequate nursing care quality. Therefore, it is recommended that nurses be aware of risk factors and evaluate the suitability and safety of medical devices.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution was involved in this study.

Interventions and strategies to prevent medical device-related pressure injury in adult patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Current evidence shows that medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) has a high prevalence (10%) and incidence (12%), and much research has been done to prevent MDRPI in recent years. However, to our knowledge, there is limited systematic review available on interventions and strategies to prevent MDRPI.

AIM

To synthesise research evidence on interventions and strategies used to prevent MDRPI.

METHODS

This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA Guidelines. We searched six databases including Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Web of Science and ProQuest with no restriction to year of publication. Data were extracted and checked by two authors independently. A narrative summary technique was used to describe the findings. Implementation strategies were grouped into six classifications: dissemination/implementation process/integration/capacity building/sustainability/scale-up strategies.

RESULTS

Twenty-four peer-reviewed papers met the inclusion criteria, which comprised of 11 quality improvement projects and 13 original research. Types of devices included respiratory devices (non-invasive ventilation mask, CPAP/BiPAP mask, endotracheal tube), gastrointestinal/urinary devices and other devices. Interventions used included the use of dressing, hyperoxygenated fatty acids, full-face mask, training, and/or multidisciplinary education, use of special securement devices or tube holder, repositioning, application of stockinette, early removal and foam ring use. Common implementation strategies included ongoing staff education, audit and standardising documentation or guideline development.

CONCLUSION

Much work on MDRPI prevention strategies has been undertaken. There were a variety of devices reported, however, it is evident that higher quality research is needed.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Current evidence shows that interventions including use of dressing or special securement device, repositioning, and training/multidisciplinary education can be beneficial for MDRPI prevention. High-quality research, such as randomised controlled trials are needed to test the effectiveness of the interventions and their implementation strategies. No patient or public contribution.

Factors influencing the severity of medical device-related pressure injuries: Pressure injury staging comparison

Medical device-related pressure injuries are receiving increased attention because their social and economic costs are increasing. This study aimed to analyse the stages for each risk factor, and to assess which has a greater impact on severity. We performed a retrospective analysis of 237 patients. Severity was evaluated by pressure injury stages, and the following categories were considered as risk factors: perceptual functioning, malnutrition, reduced mobility, comorbidities, extrinsic factors, medical devices, anatomical areas, and hospital stay. The stages of pressure injury stages were more for vascular access devices than for respiratory devices. The following were related to severity: mental deterioration-related diseases, mental status, albumin level, haemoglobin level, total cholesterol level, intensive care unit care, days of hospitalisation, and time to develop pressure injuries after admission. Decreased mental status, anaemia, hypoalbuminemia, and low total cholesterol levels were particularly critical. However, factors such as anatomical areas, age, malignancy, diabetes mellitus, diseases related to malnutrition, abnormal body mass index, immobility-related diseases, physical restraints, and Braden scale scores were not. A different approach to the management of medical device-related pressure injuries is necessary because they have distinctive characteristics and causative factors than other pressure injury types.

Model construction of factors influencing intensive care unit nurses' medical device-related pressure injury knowledge, attitude, and practice

The ability of knowledge, attitude, and practice of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses to perform medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) can affect the incidence of MDRPI in ICU patients. Therefore, in order to improve ICU nurses' understanding and nursing ability of MDRPIs, we investigated the non-linear relationship (synergistic and superimposed relationships) between the factors influencing ICU nurses' ability of knowledge, attitude, and practice. A Clinical Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Questionnaire for the Prevention of MDRPI in Critically Ill Patients was administered to 322 ICU nurses from tertiary hospitals in China from January 1, 2022 to June 31, 2022. After the questionnaire was distributed, the data were collected and sorted out, and the corresponding statistical analysis and modelling software was used to analyse the data. IBM SPSS 25.0 software was used to conduct Single factor analysis and Logistic regression analysis on the data, so as to screen the statistically significant influencing factors. IBM SPSS Modeler18.0 software was used to construct a decision tree model of the factors influencing MDRPI knowledge, attitude, and practice of ICU nurses, and ROC curves were plotted to analyse the accuracy of the model. The results showed that the overall passing rate of ICU nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practice score was 72%. The statistically significant predictor variables ranked in importance were education background (0.35), training (0.31), years of working (0.24), and professional title (0.10). AUC = 0.718, model prediction performance is good. There is a synergistic and superimposed relationship between high education background, attended training, high years of working and high professional title. Nurses with the above factors have strong MDRPI knowledge, attitude, and practice ability. Therefore, nursing managers can develop a reasonable and effective scheduling system and MDRPI training program based on the study results. The ultimate goal is to improve the ability of ICU nurses to know and act on MDRPI and to reduce the incidence of MDRPI in ICU patients.

Developing the Baptist Health Injury Risk Assessment Phase 1: Exploring Risk Factors

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for developing hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) among critically ill adult inpatients.

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries remain a priority quality focus for Magnet ® organizations. Recent studies cite medical devices as a primary cause, yet published risk assessments lack inclusion of those threats.

METHODS

Nurses at a 434-bed, 4-time Magnet ® -designated hospital led a retrospective study acros 9 American Nurses Credentialing Center-designated facilities. Using a chart review tool, data were collected within 48 hours of a confirmed HAPI.

RESULTS

Of 207 HAPIs reported, 54% (n = 113) involved deep tissue pressure injuries and 50.2% (n = 104) involved 19 medical devices. Individuals with a HAPI also used 1 or more of 7 distinct types of mobility-limiting medical equipment.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings support the development of a critical care risk assessment with inclusion of a medical device and mobility-limiting medical equipment as risk factors. A secondary study is underway for specificity and sensitivity testing of this assessment.

Oxygen saturation probe-related pressure injury prevention in children on an inpatient pediatric unit: a best practice implementation project

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this project was to increase compliance with rotation and documentation of rotation of oxygen saturation probes to reduce medical-device-related pressure injuries in children on a pediatric inpatient unit.

INTRODUCTION

There are a multitude of factors that place hospitalized children at an increased risk for medical-device-related pressure injuries. Evidence supports the rotation of medical devices, if appropriate, at least twice daily to minimize the risk of medical-device-related pressure injuries in hospitalized children.

METHODS

The project used JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit tool for encouraging evidence-based practices. A baseline audit was conducted, followed by the implementation of targeted strategies. The project was completed with a follow-up audit to determine change in practice.

RESULTS

The baseline audit revealed significant deficits in two of the seven audit criteria. Barriers to the rotation of oxygen saturation probes and the assessment of skin under oxygen saturation probes were identified by the project team and an electronic health record (EHR) documentation change was implemented. Follow-up audits were not conducted on the five criteria that showed high compliance at baseline. For the remaining two audit criteria, data revealed no improvement in one of the criteria (3% compliance at both baseline and follow-up audits) and an increase from 0% compliance to 43% compliance in the second criterion.

CONCLUSION

Optimizing EHR documentation, specifically ease and efficiency of EHR documentation, has the potential to positively impact clinical practice.

Incidence and characteristics of hospital-acquired mucous membrane pressure injury: A five-year analysis

BACKGROUND

Pressure injuries on mucous membranes are caused by pressure from medical devices at the site of injury and differ to those on the skin. Intensive care patients, who have multiple devices in situ, are particularly vulnerable. There is a significant knowledge gap regarding mucous membrane pressure injury (MMPI) incidence in acute hospital settings.

AIM

To analyse MMPI incidence and characteristics in a tertiary acute general hospital.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis of hospital clinical incident reports was conducted. The sample included all adults with MMPIs between 2015 and 2019. The STROBE reporting guideline was followed.

RESULTS

There were 414 reports of MMPI. Most (91.5%, n = 379) were hospital-acquired with the majority found in intensive care patients (74.4%, n = 282). Hospital-acquired MMPI incidence was 0.1% (11 MMPI per 10,000 hospital episodes). In intensive care, the incidence was 2.4% (235 MMPI per 10,000 intensive care episodes). The median time from device insertion until reporting of an MMPI was 3 days. The most common sites of mucosal injury were the lips (35.6%) and mouth (28.8%). In all cases except one, MMPI was associated with medical device use at the site of injury. Five device types were identified (oral endotracheal tube-related 70.3%; urinary catheter 15.5%; gastric tube 8.3%; nasal prongs 3.5%; tracheostomy tube 2.4%). In intensive care, oral endotracheal tube-related devices were most often associated with MMPI (84.8%), whereas in non-intensive care MMPI it was the urinary catheter (51.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

While hospital-acquired MMPI incidence is relatively low, it is considerably higher in intensive care patients compared to those in non-intensive care settings. The most common sites are the lips and mouth.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Mucous membrane pressure injuries represent a significant proportion of all hospital-acquired pressure injuries.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Neither patients nor the public were directly involved in this project.

Alternatives and preferences for materials in use for pressure ulcer prevention: An experiment-reinforced literature review

Alleviation of localised, sustained tissue loads and microclimate management are the most critical performance criteria for materials in use for pressure ulcer prevention, such as in prophylactic dressings, padding or cushioning. These material performance criteria can be evaluated by calculating the extents of matching between the material stiffness (elastic modulus) and the thermal conductivity of the protective dressing, padding or cushioning with the corresponding properties of native skin, separately or in combination. Based on these bioengineering performance criteria, hydrocolloids, which are commonly used for prophylaxis of medical device-related pressure ulcers, exhibit poor stiffness matching with skin. In addition, there is remarkable variability in the modulus and thermal conductivity matching levels of different material types used for pressure ulcer prevention, however, it appears that among the materials tested, hydrogels provide the optimal matching with skin, followed by gels and silicone foams. The stiffness matching for hydrocolloids appears to be inferior even to that of gauze. This article provides quantitative performance criteria and metrics for these evaluations, and grades commonly used material types to biomechanically guide clinicians and industry with regards to the selection of dressings for pressure ulcer prevention, both due to bodyweight forces and as a result of applied medical devices.

Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings

Mucous membrane pressure injury (MMPI) is associated with a history of medical device use at the site of injury. The current international guideline recommends they should be reported in incidence and prevalence studies. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse the incidence and prevalence of hospital-acquired MMPI in adults admitted to acute hospital settings. Database searches (EBSCO CINAHL Complete, EBSCO Medline Complete, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science) were undertaken between October 2019 and February 2021, using search terms related to hospital-acquired, mucosal and device-related pressure injury/ulcer incidence and prevalence. Searches were limited to the English language. Articles published between 2008 and 2020, reporting incidence or prevalence of mucous membrane or medical device-related pressure injury in non-interventional samples were selected. Two authors assessed study bias and extracted data, with a third reviewer as arbitrator. Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria; most provided incidence data. No studies were found that specifically reported MMPI incidence or prevalence. It was possible to calculate incidence or prevalence from four studies; all were in intensive care settings. MMPI incidence of 0.8% and 30.4%, and prevalence of 1.7% and 3.7% were found. One study provided data that enabled calculation of prevalence of 0.1% in a non-intensive care sample. Only one other study provided specific data about MMPI. It is concluded that there is insufficient evidence available to enable estimation of MMPI incidence or prevalence in either acute hospital or intensive care settings.