A multi-center study on safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with kidney transplant

The safety and efficacy of atezolizumab for recurrent primary liver cancer after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proved to have certain therapeutic effects for primary liver cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of their applications in liver transplantation (LT) recipients with recurrent tumor remained unclear and even controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in LT recipients with recurrent PLC from August 1, 2019, to July 1, 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of allograft rejection, while secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Additionally, risk factors associated with ICI-related rejection were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of eight LT recipients with recurrent PLC were included in the study, comprising six cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and two cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The median number of atezolizumab treatment cycles was 3 (range, 1-10). Graft rejection occurred in 25% of patients (2/8). The median overall survival (mOS) from the initiation of atezolizumab was 6.2 months (range, 0.7-12.5 months), with a mortality rate of 75% (6/8). The ORR (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) was 28.5% (2/7), and the disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease [SD]) was 42.9% (3/7). Time from LT to recurrence (P = 0.008) and Interval time from LT to atezolizumab (P = 0.005) were associated with liver rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Atezolizumab demonstrated a certain degree of efficacy as a salvage treatment for patients with recurrent HCC and ICC after LT. However, given the potential risk of allograft rejection, careful evaluation of safety is essential before initiating ICI therapy. Moreover, close monitoring and timely intervention are necessary during treatment to mitigate the risk of rejection. Future studies should further explore the optimal timing and strategies for ICI administration in this patient population.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors use in lung transplant recipients: a case series and systematic review of literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an innovative treatment that has improved long-term survival in several neoplastic diseases over the past decade. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, particularly lung transplant (LTx) recipients, have been largely excluded from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficiency of ICIs, because of the perceived high risk of allograft rejection. In this study, we sought to evaluate the use of ICIs for all neoplastic diseases in LTx patients in all French LTx centers and two Belgian centers. We found only a limited number of cases in which ICIs were suggested to two patients due to a lack of alternative treatments. In the first case, acute respiratory failure and death occurred, whereas in the second case, ICI treatment was well tolerated and resulted in a partial response. In addition, we presented the case of a third LTx patient in whom the use of ICIs was considered but not used due to the patient's comorbidities. This last case highlights the difficulty of discussing the risk-benefit balance, which ultimately did not favor ICI treatment of this patient. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary to investigate the safety and efficacy of ICIs in LTx recipients.

Immunotherapy response in immunosuppressed patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 183 patients

Objective

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer with poor outcomes in immunosuppressed patients. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieve ~60% response rates in immunocompetent MCC patients, their efficacy in immunosuppressed patients remains unclear due to exclusion from trials. This study compares ICI outcomes, safety and the impact of immunosuppression subtypes between these groups.

Methods and analysis

This retrospective study analysed 183 advanced MCC patients on first-line ICIs from a Seattle-based data repository. Of these, 147 were immunocompetent, and 36 were immunosuppressed (chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) n=10, autoimmune disorders n=10, other haematologic malignancies n=9, solid organ transplants n=4 and HIV/AIDS n=3). Outcomes included objective response rate, disease progression, MCC-specific and overall survival probability, adjusted for age, sex and stage at ICI initiation.

Results

Initial ICI response rates at 6 months were 50% in immunosuppressed and 61.5% in immunocompetent patients (HR=0.71, p=0.17). Immunosuppressed patients had higher risks of disease progression (2 years: 53.9% vs 42.1%, HR=1.65, p=0.05) and MCC-specific mortality (2 years: 38.7% vs 24.4%, HR=1.85, p=0.04). CLL patients (n=10) had a particularly low response rate (response rate: 20.0% vs 61.5%, HR=0.18, p=0.02) and high progression risk (2 years: 80.0% vs 42.1%, HR=4.09, p=0.01). Immunosuppressed patients faced higher rates of ICI toxicity (6-month risk: 51.6% vs 36.6%, HR=1.79, p=0.03).

Conclusions

ICIs provide meaningful benefits to immunosuppressed MCC patients, though their response rates are lower, and progression risk is higher compared with immunocompetent patients.

Treatment with programmed-death-1 inhibitors for non-melanoma skin cancer among immunocompromised patients with subgroup analysis of solid organ transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Programmed-cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have emerged as a standard of care treatment among advanced-stage or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Immune-compromised patients and particularly solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are considered at high risk for cSCC. When treated with PD-1 inhibitors, the possibility of organ rejection, autoimmune flare, or insufficient response to treatment is feared. As these patients were excluded from past prospective clinical trials, we aim to describe our institute's experience regarding these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on cSCC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Comparisons were made between immune-compromised and immune-competent groups, with a subgroup analysis of SOTR.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised of 133 patients, including 97.8% receiving Cemiplimab with a mean age of 77.2 ± 11.7 years. Immune-compromised patients constituted 26.9% (n = 35) of the cohort, including 10 SOTR (all kidney transplant recipients). Objective response rates (ORRs) and disease control rates (DCR) were comparable between immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients receiving Cemiplimab (ORR: 76.8% vs 62.9%, P = .12; DCR: 81.1% vs 68.6%, P = .13). SOTR demonstrated an 80% ORR and DCR. Progression-free survival was comparable across all groups. Toxicity rates were similar between immunosuppressed and immunocompetent subgroups (68.6% vs 62.1%, P = .5). Two OTRs (20%) experienced acute graft rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1 inhibitors demonstrate efficacy and safety in immunosuppressed cSCC patients. While effective in SOTR, treatment requires multidisciplinary management due to the potential risk of organ rejection. These findings provide valuable insights into this understudied population and support the use of PD-1 inhibitors in immunosuppressed patients with advanced cSCC.

Treatment of metastatic melanoma with anti-PD-1 and anti-LAG-3 in a kidney transplant recipient

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have quickly emerged as standard therapy in multiple cancers, yet their application in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) remains challenging due to risk of graft rejection. In this case, report, we highlight the successful use of a lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) inhibitor, relatlimab, in combination with nivolumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] inhibitor) for the treatment of metastatic melanoma in a kidney transplant recipient. The patient developed a complete metabolic response to therapy. LAG-3 expression was notably positive in the renal graft, but negative in the metastatic melanoma tumor tissue. Although the outcome resulted in rapid renal graft rejection, this underscores the need for further research into LAG-3's dual role in cancer therapy and allograft rejection in organ transplant recipients.

A Case of Rapidly Progressing Urothelial Carcinoma Arising After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Treated with Chemotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The incidence of malignancy following long-term immunosuppression is increased in organ transplant recipients. We report a case of a patient with right ureteral and bladder cancer after living donor kidney transplantation for chronic glomerulonephritis and who was administered chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. A 75-year-old male, 20 years post-living donor kidney transplantation for chronic glomerulonephritis, presented with malignant cells in urinary cytology. Despite initial treatments including transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, the tumor progressed to high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Computerized tomography results showed a right ureteral tumor and multiple lymph node metastases. Therefore, the patient underwent systemic chemotherapy with four cycles of gemcitabine and carboplatin. Pembrolizumab was administered due to rapid cancer progression; however, the cancer progressed further, and the patient was treated palliatively. The patient was treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a reduced dose of immunosuppressive drugs with no rejection during the treatment course.

PDL1 inhibitors may be associated with a lower risk of allograft rejection than PD1 and CTLA4 inhibitors: analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database

Background

Transplant recipients face increased cancer mortality due to immunosuppressive treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved survival rates, but data on the use of these agents in transplant recipients is scarce. ICI may trigger allograft rejection, but the absolute risk of AR between the different ICI classes remains to be defined.

Methods

VigiBase® (WHO's pharmacovigilance database) was queried for reports of AR involving CTLA4, PD1, or PDL1 inhibitors. Disproportionality analysis compares the proportion of reports with a specific adverse drug reaction (ADR) and a given drug to the proportion of reports with the same ADR and other drugs. A lower 95% confidence interval for the Information Component (IC) >0 suggests a signal. The comparative Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) for AR, between PD1 and PDL1 inhibitors, was calculated.

Results

We gathered 159 AR involving an ICI, especially nivolumab (73, 45.9%), mostly affecting kidneys (87, 54.7%). Median time to onset: 28 days. Fatal outcome: 36 reports (22.6%). ICI were significantly associated with AR: IC=1.7 [1.4;1.9]. Specifically, PD1 inhibitors yielded an IC of 2.0 [1.7;2.2] (152 reports observed compared to 38 expected). By contrast, the IC of PDL1 inhibitors was negative: -2.6 [-6.4;-1.0] (1 observed, 9 expected). The comparative ROR of PD1 compared to PDL1 inhibitors was 33.7 [4.7;240.9] (p=0.0005).

Conclusions

We confirm the association between ICI treatment and AR. Notably, PDL1 inhibitors showed surprisingly low AR reports compared to CTLA4 and PD1 inhibitors. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm whether PDL1 inhibitors indeed reduce AR risk compared to other ICI.

Transplant oncology and anti-cancer immunosuppressants

Organ transplantation is a life-saving intervention that enhances the quality of life for patients with end-stage organ failure. However, long-term immunosuppressive therapy is required to prevent allogeneic graft rejection, which inadvertently elevates the risk of post-transplant malignancies, especially for liver transplant recipients with a prior history of liver cancer. In response, the emerging field of transplant oncology integrates principles from oncology and immunology to improve outcomes for patients at high risk of tumor occurrence or recurrence following transplantation. Therefore, it is of substantial clinical significance to develop immunosuppressants that possess both immunosuppressive and anti-tumor properties. For instance, mTOR inhibitors demonstrate anti-tumor effects among antimetabolite immunosuppressive drugs, and recent studies indicate that capecitabine, an antimetabolite chemotherapeutic, may also exhibit immunosuppressive activity in the clinic for liver transplants suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma. This review systematically explores potential immunosuppressants with dual anti-tumor and immunosuppressive effects to support the management of transplant patients at elevated risk of tumor occurrence or recurrence.

Immune suppression sustained allograft acceptance requires PD1 inhibition of CD8+ T cells

Organ transplant recipients require continual immune-suppressive therapies to sustain allograft acceptance. Although medication nonadherence is a major cause of rejection, the mechanisms responsible for graft loss in this clinically relevant context among individuals with preceding graft acceptance remain uncertain. Here, we demonstrate that skin allograft acceptance in mice maintained with clinically relevant immune-suppressive therapies, tacrolimus and mycophenolate, sensitizes hypofunctional PD1hi graft-specific CD8+ T cells. Uninterrupted immune-suppressive therapy is required because drug discontinuation triggers allograft rejection, replicating the requirement for immune-suppressive therapy adherence in transplant recipients. Graft-specific CD8+ T cells in allograft-accepted mice show diminished effector differentiation and cytokine production, with reciprocally increased PD1 expression. Allograft acceptance-induced PD1 expression is essential, as PDL1 blockade reinvigorates graft-specific CD8+ T cell activation with ensuing allograft rejection despite continual immune-suppressive therapy. Thus, PD1 sustained CD8+ T cell inhibition is essential for allograft acceptance maintained by tacrolimus plus mycophenolate. This necessity for PD1 in sustaining allograft acceptance explains the high rates of rejection in transplant recipients with cancer administered immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD1/PDL1, highlighting shared immune suppression pathways exploited by tumor cells and current therapies for averting allograft rejection.

Diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated nephrotoxicity: a position statement from the American Society of Onco-nephrology

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer and are now the backbone of therapy for several malignancies. However, ICIs can cause a spectrum of kidney immune-related adverse events including acute kidney injury (AKI), most commonly manifesting as acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), although glomerular disease and electrolyte disturbances have also been reported. In this position statement by the American Society of Onco-nephrology (ASON), we summarize the incidence and risk factors for ICI-AKI, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinicopathologic features of ICI-AKI. We also discuss novel diagnostic approaches and promising biomarkers for ICI-AKI. From expert panel consensus, we provide clinical practice points for the initial assessment and diagnosis of ICI-AKI, management and immunosuppressive therapy, and consideration for rechallenge with ICI following AKI episodes. In addition, we explore ICI use in special populations, such as kidney transplant recipients, and propose key areas of focus for future research and clinical investigation.

Interrelation of Natural Polyphenol and Fibrosis in Diabetic Nephropathy

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a common and serious complication of diabetes mellitus and a major cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Renal fibrosis, which corresponds to excessive deposition of extracellular matrix and leads to scarring, is a characteristic feature of the various progressive stages of DN. It can trigger various pathological processes leading to the activation of autophagy, inflammatory responses and a vicious circle of oxidative stress and inflammation. Although it is known that DN can be alleviated by mechanisms linked to antioxidants, reducing inflammation and improving autophagy, how to improve DN by reducing fibrosis using natural polyphenols needs to be studied further. Nowadays, natural polyphenolic compounds with excellent safety and efficacy are playing an increasingly important role in drug discovery. Therefore, this review reveals the multiple mechanisms associated with fibrosis in DN, as well as the different signaling pathways (including TGF-β/SMAD, mTORC1/p70S6K, JAK/STAT/SOCS and Wnt/β-catenin) and the potential role in the fibrotic niche. In parallel, we summarize the types of polyphenolic compounds and their pharmacodynamic effects, and finally evaluate the use of polyphenols to modulate relevant targets and pathways, providing potential research directions for polyphenols to improve DN. In summary, the problem of long-term monotherapy resistance can be reduced with natural polyphenols, while reducing the incidence of toxic side effects. In addition, potential targets and their inhibitors can be identified through these pathways, offering potential avenues of research for natural polyphenols in the pharmacological treatment of multisite fibrosis.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients: Current therapeutic and screening strategies

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are particularly prone to developing malignancies, often manifesting multiple tumors and tumors with a heightened susceptibility to metastasis, resulting in much lower survival rates when compared to the general population. Among these, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) respresent a major challenge in terms of morbidity and mortality following organ transplantation. The management of post-transplant CSCC requires expertise from various disciplines, including dermatology, maxillofacial surgery, transplant medicine, radiation oncology, and medical oncology. Furthermore, the unique behaviors and prevalence of tumors in SOTRs necessitate tailored pathways for screening and treatment, distinct from those designed for immunocompetent patients. Despite the proven efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in several cancers, SOTRs have often been systematically excluded from clinical trials due to concerns about potential allograft rejection and loss. Consequently, most data on the safety and efficacy of ICIs in SOTRs are derived from case series and reports. Given the significant risks involved, alternative therapeutic options should be thoroughly discussed with patients before considering ICI therapy. This literature review aims to provide an overview of CSCC in SOTRs, with a specific emphasis on therapeutic and screening strategies, particularly highlighting immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy for Cancer in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Difficult Balance Between Risks and Benefits

Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant patients. Unfortunately, the use of new anti-cancer therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) in this population has been associated with rejection rates up to 40%, in retrospective studies. The main challenge is to maintain the patient in a delicate immunologic balance in which, while antitumor therapy defeats cancer the graft is safely protected from rejection. Recent clinical trials with ICPI have included kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and the results advocate for a paradigm shift in the management of basal immunosuppression. This suggests that downward adjustments should be avoided or, even better, that this adjustment should be "dynamic." This review summarizes the latest scientific evidence available in renal transplantation under ICPI treatment: case series, prospective studies, histopathologic diagnosis, immunosuppression regimens and new biomarkers. This article will provide the latest information in on this specific field, allowing nephrologists to gain valuable knowledge and to be aware of new approaches to immunosuppression management in oncological kidney transplant patients.

Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been widely investigated in urothelial carcinoma; however, the utility of ICI therapy in the treatment of organ transplant recipients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is unclear. We herein report the first case of a first-line anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy for a kidney transplant patient with mUC.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 71-year-old woman who received a kidney transplant in 2003 was diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma in 2018. After operation of the tumor, the patient developed local recurrence at the site of the right kidney and bladder and multiple distant metastases in May 2020. Considering the intolerance of chemotherapy and high tumor mutation burden, we administered the anti-PD-1 agent tislelizumab (200 mg every three weeks). Partial response was achieved after two cycles of therapy and sustained until 18th cycles. There were no signs of kidney graft rejection. The immunotherapy was temporarily stopped after the 18th course because of a suspicious immune-related pneumonitis and was continued in December 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

This case demonstrates the feasibility of safely achieving stable cancer control in a kidney transplant patient with mUC without encountering graft rejection by using single-agent anti-PD-1 treatment.

PD-1 immunology in the kidneys: a growing relationship

In recent years, knowledge regarding immune regulation has expanded rapidly, and major advancements have been made in immunotherapy for immune-associated disorders, particularly cancer. The programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway is a cornerstone in immune regulation. It comprises PD-1 and its ligands mediating immune tolerance mechanisms and immune homeostasis. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that the PD-1 axis has a crucial immunosuppressive role in the tumor microenvironment and autoimmune diseases. PD-1 receptors and ligands on immune cells and renal parenchymal cells aid in maintaining immunological homeostasis in the kidneys. Here, we present a comprehensive review of PD-1 immunology in various kidney disorders, including renal cell carcinoma, glomerulonephritis, kidney transplantation, renal aging, and renal immune-related adverse events secondary to PD-1 immunotherapy.

Acute Allograft Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Educational Case Report

Rationale

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have an increased risk of malignancy due to chronic immunosuppression. The emerging use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been a promising development for the treatment of malignancy, but their use adds to the complexity of immunosuppression management for KT recipients. This case report describes 2 cases of acute rejection in KT recipients following ICI initiation and discusses the balance of malignancy treatment with adequate immunosuppression.

Presenting Concerns of Patients

The first patient is a 44-year-old male KT recipient with a diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma presenting with acute kidney injury 6 days following initiation of an ICI. The second patient is a 73-year-old male KT recipient with a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma presenting with acute kidney injury 2 weeks following initiation of an ICI.

Diagnoses

Both patients were diagnosed with acute rejection in the setting of reduced immunosuppression and initiation of an ICI.

Interventions

Both cases received an increased dose of steroid without improvement of graft function. The first patient subsequently underwent a delayed graft nephrectomy due to complications of acute rejection, whereas the second patient did not undergo nephrectomy.

Outcomes

The first patient experienced complications including perioperative bleeding requiring multiple operations, but ultimately stabilized on hemodialysis and showed a durable response to ICI. The second patient remained dialysis-dependent post-ICI treatment and was readmitted with allograft complications leading to his eventual death.

Teaching Points

This study underscores the complexity of managing KT recipients diagnosed with malignancy and receiving ICIs. The balance between immunosuppression reduction to treat malignancy and preventing allograft rejection presents a significant challenge. Key considerations include the risk of acute allograft rejection and patient-centered decision-making. These cases highlight the need for further research to develop evidence-based guidelines for managing this patient population. In addition, the patient perspective in this study highlights the importance of careful risk-benefit analysis and the impact of treatment decisions on patient-focused outcomes.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Kidney Transplant Recipients - A Review of Potential Complications and Management Strategies

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has enabled a paradigm shift in Oncology, with the treatment of metastatic cancer in certain tumor types becoming akin to the treatment of chronic disease. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk of developing cancer compared to the general population. Historically, KTR were excluded from ICI clinical trials due to concern for allograft rejection and decreased anti-tumor efficacy. While early post-marketing data revealed an allograft rejection risk of 40%-50%, 2 recent small prospective trials have demonstrated lower rates of rejection of 0%-12%, suggesting that maintenance immunosuppression modification prior to ICI start modulates rejection risk. Moreover, objective response rates induced by ICI for the treatment of advanced or metastatic skin cancer, the most common malignancy in KTR, have been comparable to those achieved by immune intact patients. Non-invasive biomarkers may have a role in risk-stratifying patients before starting ICI, and monitoring for rejection, though allograft biopsy is required to confirm diagnosis. This clinically focused review summarizes current knowledge on complications of ICI use in KTR, including their mechanism, risk mitigation strategies, non-invasive biomarker use, approaches to treatment of rejection, and suggestions for future directions in research.

Cancer Screening and Cancer Treatment in Kidney Transplant Recipients

As the population ages and post-transplant survival improves, pretransplant and post-transplant malignancy are becoming increasingly common. In addition, rapid advances in cancer therapies and improving outcomes prompt us to rethink pretransplant cancer-free wait time and screening strategies. Although kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at higher risk of developing cancer, epidemiological data on how to best screen and treat cancers in KTRs are incomplete. Thus, current recommendations are still largely on the basis of studies in the general population, and their validity in KTRs is uncertain. Kidney transplant candidates without prior cancer should be evaluated for latent malignancies even in the absence of symptoms. Conversely, individuals with a history of malignancy require thorough monitoring to detect potential recurrences or de novo malignancies. When treating KTRs with cancer, reducing immunosuppression can enhance antitumor immunity, yet this also increases the risk of graft rejection. Optimal treatment and immunosuppression management remains undefined. As the emergence of novel cancer therapies adds complexity to this challenge, individualized risk-benefit assessment is crucial. In this review, we discuss up-to-date data on pretransplant screening and cancer-free wait time, as well as post-transplant cancer screening, prevention strategies, and treatment, including novel therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies.

Relative survival in patients with cancer and kidney failure

BACKGROUND

The population with kidney failure is at increased risk of cancer and associated mortality. Relative survival can provide insight into the excess mortality, directly or indirectly, attributed to cancer in the population with kidney failure.

METHODS

We estimated relative survival for people all ages receiving dialysis (n = 4089) and kidney transplant recipients (n = 3253) with de novo cancer, and for the general population with cancer in Australia and New Zealand (n = 3 043 166) over the years 1980-2019. The entire general population was the reference group for background mortality, adjusted for sex, age, calendar year and country. We used Poisson regression to quantify excess mortality ratios.

RESULTS

Five-year relative survival for all-site cancer was markedly lower than that for the general population for people receiving dialysis [0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-0.26] and kidney transplant recipients (0.55, 95% CI 0.53-0.57). In dialysis, excess mortality was more than double (2.16, 95% CI 2.08-2.25) that of the general population with cancer and for kidney transplant recipients 1.34 times higher (95% CI 1.27-2.41). There was no difference in excess mortality from lung cancer between people with kidney failure and the general population with cancer. Comparatively, there was a significant survival deficit for people with kidney failure, compared with the general population with cancer, for melanoma, breast cancer and prostate cancers.

CONCLUSION

Decreased cancer survival in kidney failure may reflect differences in multi-morbidity burden, reduced access to treatment, or greater harm from or reduced efficacy of treatments. Our findings support research aimed at investigating these hypotheses.

Current Advances and Challenges in the Management of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed Patients

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common skin malignancy and poses a significant risk to immunosuppressed patients, such as solid organ transplant recipients and those with hematopoietic malignancies, who are up to 100 times more likely to develop cSCC compared with the general population. This review summarizes the current state of treatment for cSCC in immunosuppressed patients, focusing on prevention, prophylaxis, surgical and non-surgical treatments, and emerging therapies. Preventative measures, including high-SPF sunscreen and prophylactic retinoids, are crucial for reducing cSCC incidence in these patients. Adjusting immunosuppressive regimens, particularly favoring mTOR inhibitors over calcineurin inhibitors, has been shown to lower cSCC risk. Surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery remain the primary treatments, with adjuvant radiation therapy recommended for high-risk cases. Traditional chemotherapy and targeted therapies like EGFR inhibitors have been utilized, though their efficacy varies. Immunotherapy, particularly with agents like cemiplimab and pembrolizumab, has shown promise, but its use in immunosuppressed patients requires further investigation due to potential risks of organ rejection and exacerbation of underlying conditions. Treatment of cSCC in immunosuppressed patients is multifaceted, involving preventive strategies, tailored surgical approaches, and cautious use of systemic therapies. While immunotherapy has emerged as a promising option, its application in immunosuppressed populations necessitates further research to optimize safety and efficacy. Future studies should focus on the integration of personalized medicine and combination therapies to improve outcomes for this vulnerable patient group.

Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Solid-Organ-Transplant-Associated Immunosuppression

The management of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) has been revolutionized by the introduction of immunotherapy. Yet, successful treatment with immunotherapy relies on an adequate antitumor immune response. Patients who are solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have a higher incidence of CSCC compared to the general population. This review discusses the current knowledge of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of patients with CSCC who are immunocompromised because of their chronic exposure to immunosuppressive medications to prevent allograft rejection. First, we discuss the prognostic impact of immunosuppression in patients with CSCC. Next, we review the risk of CSCC development in immunosuppressed patients due to SOT. In addition, we provide an overview of the biological immune disruption present in transplanted immunosuppressed CSCC patients. We discuss the available evidence on the use of immunotherapy and provide a framework for the management approach with SOTRs with CSCC. Finally, we discuss potential novel approaches that are being investigated for the management of immunosuppressed patients with CSCC.

Post-Kidney Transplant Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis From a Single Italian Center

We describe the epidemiology of cancer after kidney transplantation (KTx), investigating its risk factors and impact on therapeutic management and survival in KTx recipients (KTRs). The association between modification of immunosuppressive (IS) therapy after cancer and survival outcomes was analyzed. We collected data from 930 KTRs followed for 7 [1-19] years. The majority of KTRs received KTx from a deceased donor (84%). In total, 74% of patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and 26% with ATG. Maintenance therapy included steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolate. Patients with at least one cancer (CA+) amounted to 19%. NMSC was the most common tumor (55%). CA+ were older and had a higher BMI. Vasculitis and ADPKD were more prevalent in CA+. ATG was independently associated with CA+ and was related to earlier cancer development in survival and competing risk analyses (p = 0.01 and <0.0001; basiliximab 89 ± 4 vs. ATG 40 ± 4 months). After cancer diagnosis, a significant prognostic impact was derived from the shift to mTOR inhibitors compared to a definitive IS drug suspension (p = 0.004). Our data confirm the relevance of cancer as a complication in KTRs with ATG as an independent risk factor. An individualized choice of IS to be proposed at the time of KTx is crucial in the prevention of neoplastic risk. Finally, switching to mTORi could represent an important strategy to improve patient survival.

Exhaustion of T cells after renal transplantation

Renal transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the challenge of transplant rejection and the complications associated with immunosuppressants necessitates a deeper understanding of the underlying immune mechanisms. T cell exhaustion, a state characterized by impaired effector functions and sustained expression of inhibitory receptors, plays a dual role in renal transplantation. While moderate T cell exhaustion can aid in graft acceptance by regulating alloreactive T cell responses, excessive exhaustion may impair the recipient's ability to control viral infections and tumors, posing significant health risks. Moreover, drugs targeting T cell exhaustion to promote graft tolerance and using immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment in transplant recipients are areas deserving of further attention and research. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the changes in T cell exhaustion levels after renal transplantation and their implications for graft survival and patient outcomes. We discuss the molecular mechanisms underlying T cell exhaustion, the role of specific exhaustion markers, the potential impact of immunosuppressive therapies, and the pharmaceutical intervention on T cell exhaustion levels. Additionally, we demonstrate the potential to modulate T cell exhaustion favorably, enhancing graft survival. Future research should focus on the distinctions of T cell exhaustion across different immune states and subsets, as well as the interactions between exhausted T cells and other immune cells. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing transplant outcomes and ensuring long-term graft survival while maintaining immune competence.

Experience with pembrolizumab in a renal transplant patient with advanced lung cancer: a case report and review

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a change because of the advancement of new therapies, like immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including pembrolizumab. A 64-year-old woman received a kidney transplant in 2012 because of chronic kidney disease secondary to glomerulosclerosis, diagnosed in 2020 with stage IV NSCLC because of metastasis in the contralateral lung, with programmed death ligand 1programmed death ligand 1 expression of 98%, starting treatment with ICIs, despite presenting a graft rejection risk around 40%. After three ICIs cycles, the patient presented a partial response, with good tolerance to treatment and no signs of graft failure. ICIs were maintained for 19 cycles, until disease progression was observed on a reassessment computed tomography, with a progression-free interval of 18 months, with no evidence of treatment rejection. In transplant patients diagnosed with some type of tumor, antineoplastic therapies may be less effective than in the general population. The current evidence derives from observational studies and case series, since this patient population was excluded from clinical trials, suggesting that the use of ICIs in patients with kidney transplants can lead to acute graft rejection. This is still a controversial issue, it is necessary to improve the quality of the data, with the implementation of clinical trials or prospective studies.

Rapid Life-Saving Response to Anti-PD-1 in a Solid Organ Transplant Recipient With Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review

SUMMARY

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy is considered effective in the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma but the use of these agents in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) is often taken with caution. While anti-tumor effects without graft rejection have been reported, studies have shown high rates of fatal graft rejection with immune checkpoint therapy. In this case report, we present an SOTR patient with life-threatening, acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to rapidly progressive metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with lung and pleural involvement. Modification of their immunosuppressive regimen and treatment with front-line anti-PD-1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab, led to rapid clinical response with near complete resolution of metastatic pulmonary disease and no long-term evidence of graft rejection. Our case report shows that front-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors can be safely administered in SOTR patients with rapid metastatic disease control.

Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus infection in immunocompromised patients

Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), is a ubiquitous γ-Herpesvirus that infects over 95% of the human population and can establish a life-long infection without causing any clinical symptoms in healthy individuals by residing in memory B-cells. Primary infection occurs in childhood and is mostly asymptomatic, however in some young adults it can result in infectious mononucleosis (IM). In immunocompromised individuals however, EBV infection has been associated with many different malignancies. Since EBV can infect both epithelial and B-cells and very rarely NK cells and T-cells, it is associated with both epithelial cancers like nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and gastric carcinoma (GC), with lymphomas including Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) or Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) and rarely with NK/T-cell lymphomas. Currently there are no approved antivirals active in PTLD nor in any other malignancy. Moreover, lytic phase disease almost never requires antiviral treatment. Although many novel therapies against EBV have been described, the management and/or prevention of EBV primary infections or reactivations remains difficult. In this review, we discuss EBV infection, therapies targeting EBV in both lytic and latent state with novel therapeutics developed that show anti-EBV activity as well as EBV-associated malignancies both, epithelial and lymphoproliferative malignancies and emerging therapies targeting the EBV-infected cells.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and renal toxicity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of a broad spectrum of cancers as metastatic melanoma, non-small lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma. These humanized monoclonal antibodies target immune-regulatory receptors expressed on T lymphocytes, antigen presenting cells and tumor cells and induce an immunological anti-tumor response. If on the one hand these molecules have led to considerable improvement in survival outcomes, on the other hand these therapies can be associated with immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). While these side effects have become well known, the best diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are still under investigation. The authors discuss pathophysiology, clinical presentation and histological features of ICIs renal toxicity. Furthermore, we focus on kidney transplant (KT) recipients, including the therapeutic adaptation approach to immunosuppression and the risk of rejection.

Immune checkpoint blockers in solid organ transplant recipients and cancer: the INNOVATED cohort

BACKGROUND

Patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) and solid tumors are usually excluded from clinical trials testing immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). As transplant rates are increasing, we aimed to evaluate ICB outcomes in this population, with a special focus on lung cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study collecting real data of ICB use in patients with SOT and solid tumors. Clinical data and treatment outcomes were assessed by using retrospective medical chart reviews in every participating center. Study endpoints were: overall response rate (ORR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events.

RESULTS

From August 2016 to October 2022, 31 patients with SOT (98% kidney) and solid tumors were identified (36.0% lung cancer, 19.4% melanoma, 13.0% genitourinary cancer, 6.5% gastrointestinal cancer). Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was positive in 29% of tumors. Median age was 61 years, 69% were males, and 71% received ICB as first-line treatment. In the whole cohort the ORR was 45.2%, with a 6-month PFS of 56.8%. In the lung cancer cohort, the ORR was 45.5%, with a 6-month PFS of 32.7%, and median overall survival of 4.6 months. The grade 3 immune-related adverse events rate leading to ICB discontinuation was 12.9%. Allograft rejection rate was 25.8%, and risk of rejection was similar regardless of the type of ICB strategy (monotherapy or combination, 28% versus 33%, P = 1.0) or response to ICB treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

ICB could be considered a feasible option for SOT recipients with some advanced solid malignancies and no alternative therapeutic options. Due to the risk of allograft rejection, multidisciplinary teams should be involved before ICB therapy.

Special populations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on special populations poorly represented in current evidence-based practice for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This includes the elderly and frail, patients on immunosuppression or with autoimmune diseases, patients with brain, liver, and/or bone metastases, and RCC with sarcomatoid features.

RECENT FINDINGS

Certain populations are poorly represented in current trials for mRCC. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases are often excluded from first-line therapy trials. Modern doublet systemic therapy appears to benefit patients with bone or liver metastases, but data supporting this conclusion is not robust. Post-hoc analyses on patients with sarcomatoid differentiation have shown improved response to modern doublet therapy over historical treatments. The elderly are underrepresented in current clinical trials, and most trials exclude all but high-performing (nonfrail) patients, though true frailty is likely poorly captured using the current widely adopted indices. It is difficult to make conclusions about the efficacy of modern therapy in these populations from subgroup analyses. Data from trials on other malignancies in patients with autoimmune diseases or solid organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may still have benefit, though at the risk of disease flare or organ rejection. The efficacy of ICIs has not been demonstrated specifically for RCC in this group of patients.

SUMMARY

The elderly, frail, and immunosuppressed, those with tumors having aggressive histologic features, and patients with brain, bone, and/or liver metastases represent the populations least understood in the modern era of RCC treatment.

[Urogenital tumors following kidney transplantation-monocentric analysis of incidences and overview of urological preventive measures]

BACKGROUND

Urogenital tumors are among the most common solid malignancies after kidney transplantation (TX).

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the incidence and mortality of urogenital tumors after kidney TX in our own patient population as well as answered the question of recommended follow-up necessity and frequency in this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective monocentric data collection of tumor diseases and the most common urogenital tumors after kidney TX at the Transplant Center Dresden between 2010 and 2020 was done. From this, we derived recommendations for a useful follow-up concept.

RESULTS

A total of 13% (93/710) of kidney TX patients developed a neoplasm. Older patients (60.1 ± 10.6 vs. 53.8 ± 12.5; p < 0.001), with higher Charlson scores (≥ 4: 68% vs. 46%; p < 0.001) and a previous tumor history (18% vs. 8%; p < 0.001) were more likely to develop a neoplasm after transplantation. In the multivariate analysis, previous tumor history was found to be an independent predictor of tumor development after renal transplantation (OR 2.2; 95%-KI [1.2-4.1]; p = 0.01). Urogenital tumors accounted for 30% (28/93) of all malignancies. Renal cell carcinoma of the native kidney was the most common (n = 12) neoplasm, followed by prostate cancer (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

Most solid malignancies after kidney TX arise from the urinary tract. Due to their frequency, there is an urgent need for specialized urological therapy and long-term follow-up care. Even before listing for TX, risk factors can be recognized and individual concepts for follow-up care can be developed.

How to deal with renal toxicities from immune-based combination treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A nephrological consultation for Oncologists

We are witnessing a revolution in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Indeed, several immune-based combinations (ICI [immune checkpoint inhibitor] + ICI, or ICI + antiangiogenic agents) have been approved as first-line therapy for mRCC after demonstrating superior efficacy over the previous standard. Despite all the improvements made, safety remains a critical issue, adverse events (AEs) being the main reason for drug discontinuations or dose reductions, ultimately resulting in an increased risk of losing efficacy. Thus, a good understanding of the AEs associated with the use of immune-based combinations, their prevention, and management, are key in order to maximize therapeutic effectiveness. Among these AEs, renal ones are relatively frequent, but always difficult to be diagnosed, not to take into account that it is often difficult to determine which drug is to blame for such toxicities. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common finding in patients with RCC, either as a pre-existing condition and/or as a consequence of cancer and its treatment; furthermore, CKD, especially in advanced stages and in patients undergoing dialysis, may influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of anticancer agents. Finally, managing cancer therapy in kidney transplanted patients is another challenge. In this review, we discuss the therapy management of immune-based combinations in patients with CKD, on dialysis, or transplanted, as well as their renal toxicities, with a focus on their prevention, detection and practical management, taking into account the crucial role of the consulting nephrologist within the multidisciplinary care of these patients.

Experience with pembrolizumab in a renal transplant patient with advanced lung cancer: a case report and review

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a change due to the advancement of new therapies, like immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including pembrolizumab. A 64-year-old woman received a kidney transplant in 2012 due to chronic kidney disease secondary to glomerulosclerosis, diagnosed in 2020 with stage IV NSCLC due to metastasis in the contralateral lung, with PD-L1 expression of 98%, starting treatment with ICIs, despite presenting a graft rejection risk around 40%. After 3 ICI cycles, the patient presented a partial response, with good tolerance to treatment and no signs of graft failure. ICIs were maintained for 19 cycles, until disease progression was observed on a reassessment computed tomography, with a progression-free interval of 18 months, with no evidence of treatment rejection. In transplant patients diagnosed with some type of tumor, antineoplastic therapies may be less effective than in the general population. The current evidence derives from observational studies and case series, since this patient population was excluded from clinical trials, suggesting that the use of ICIs in patients with kidney transplants can lead to acute graft rejection. This is still a controversial issue, it is necessary to improve the quality of the data, with the implementation of clinical trials or prospective studies.

Fine-tuning tumor- and allo-immunity: advances in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients

Cancer is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have a 2- to 4-fold higher risk of developing cancer compared to the general population and post-transplant malignancy is the third most common cause of death in KTR. Moreover, it is well known that certain cancer types are overrepresented after transplantation, especially non-melanoma skin cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, with remarkable survival benefit in a subgroup of patients. ICI are monoclonal antibodies that block the binding of specific co-inhibitory signaling molecules. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and its ligand programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the main targets of ICI. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) have been excluded from clinical trials owing to concerns about tumor response, allo-immunity, and risk of transplant rejection. Indeed, graft rejection has been estimated as high as 48% and represents an emerging problem. The underlying mechanisms of organ rejection in the context of treatment with ICI are poorly understood. The search for restricted antitumoral responses without graft rejection is of paramount importance. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the use of ICI in KTR, the potential mechanisms involved in kidney graft rejection during ICI treatment, potential biomarkers of rejection, and how to deal with rejection in clinical practice.

Cemiplimab in locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: prospective real-world data from the DRUG Access Protocol

Background

The DRUG Access Protocol provides patients with cancer access to registered anti-cancer drugs that are awaiting reimbursement in the Netherlands and simultaneously collects prospective real-world data (RWD). Here, we present RWD from PD-1 blocker cemiplimab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (laCSCC; mCSCC).

Methods

Patients with laCSCC or mCSCC received cemiplimab 350 mg fixed dose every three weeks. Primary endpoints were objective clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) at 16 weeks, physician-assessed CBR, defined as clinician's documentation of improved disease or SD based on evaluation of all available clinical parameters at 16 weeks, objective response rate (ORR), and safety, defined as grade ≥ 3 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring up to 30 days after last drug administration. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Findings

Between February 2021 and December 2022, 151 patients started treatment. Objective and physician-assessed CBR were 54.3% (95% CI, 46.0-62.4) and 59.6% (95% CI, 51.3-67.5), respectively. ORR was 35.1% (95% CI, 27.5-43.3). After a median follow-up of 15.2 months, median DoR was not reached. Median PFS and OS were 12.2 (95% CI, 7.0-not reached) and 24.2 months (95% CI, 18.8-not reached), respectively. Sixty-eight TRAEs occurred in 29.8% of patients. Most commonly reported TRAE was a kidney transplant rejection (9.5%).

Interpretation

Cemiplimab proved highly effective and safe in this real-world cohort of patients with laCSCC or mCSCC, confirming its therapeutic value in the treatment of advanced CSCC in daily clinical practice.

Funding

The DRUG Access Protocol is supported by all participating pharmaceutical companies: Bayer, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi.

Pharmacotherapy considerations in patients who develop acute kidney injury during anti-cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently develops in patients receiving cancer therapy and requires a wide differential diagnosis due to possible role of unique cancer and drug-related factors, in addition to common pre- and post-renal causes. Rapid development of new molecular targeted anti-cancer drugs and immunotherapies has opened unprecedented possibilities of treatment at the price of an increased spectrum of renal side effects.

AREAS COVERED

The present review aims at providing a state-of-the-art picture of AKI in cancer patient (PubMed and Embase libraries were searched from inception to January 2024), with a focus on differential diagnosis and management of diverse clinical settings. Reports of parenchymal AKI due to glomerular, microvascular, tubular and interstitial damage have been constantly increasing. Complex electrolyte and acid-base disorders can coexist. The role of renal biopsy and possible therapeutic approaches are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Onconephrology has become an important subspecialty of clinical nephrology, requiring constantly updated skills and a high degree of interdisciplinary integration to tackle diagnostic challenges and even therapeutic and ethical dilemmas. Integrated onconephrological guidelines and availability of biomarkers may provide new tools for management of this unique type of patients in the near future.

Nivolumab + Tacrolimus + Prednisone ± Ipilimumab for Kidney Transplant Recipients With Advanced Cutaneous Cancers

PURPOSE

Cancer-related mortality rates among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are high, but these patients have largely been excluded from trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors because of immunosuppression and risk of treatment-related allograft loss (TRAL). We conducted a prospective clinical trial testing nivolumab (NIVO) + tacrolimus (TACRO) + prednisone (PRED) ± ipilimumab (IPI) in KTR with advanced cutaneous cancers.

METHODS

Adult KTR with advanced melanoma or basal, cutaneous squamous, or Merkel cell carcinomas were eligible. Immunosuppression was standardized to TACRO (serum trough 2-5 ng/mL) + PRED 5 mg once daily. Patients then received NIVO 480 mg IV once every 4 weeks. The primary composite end point was partial or complete (tumor) response (CR) or stable disease per RECIST v1.1 without allograft loss at 16W. Patients with progressive disease (PD) could receive IPI 1 mg/kg IV + NIVO 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks × 4 followed by NIVO. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels were measured approximately once every 2 weeks as a potential predictor of allograft rejection.

RESULTS

Among eight evaluable patients, none met the trial's primary end point. All eight patients experienced PD on NIVO + TACRO + PRED; TRAL occurred in one patient. Six patients then received IPI + NIVO + TACRO + PRED. Best overall responses: two CR (one with TRAL) and four PD (one with TRAL). In total, 7 of 8 pre-NIVO tumor biopsies contained a paucity of infiltrating immune cells. In total, 2 of 5 on-NIVO biopsies demonstrated moderate immune infiltrates; both patients later experienced a CR to IPI + NIVO. In 2 of 3 patients with TRAL, dd-cfDNA elevations occurred 10 and 15 days before increases in serum creatinine.

CONCLUSION

In most KTR with advanced skin cancer, TACRO + PRED provides insufficient allograft protection and compromises immune-mediated tumor regression after administration of NIVO ± IPI. Elevated dd-cfDNA levels can signal treatment-related allograft rejection earlier than rises in serum creatinine.

Cemiplimab for Kidney Transplant Recipients With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Cemiplimab is approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Solid organ transplant recipients have been excluded from immunotherapy trials, given concern for allograft rejection despite their increased risk of skin cancers. Chronic immunosuppression is necessary to prevent organ rejection but may attenuate antitumor response with PD-1 inhibitors.

METHODS

We report a phase I study of cemiplimab for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with advanced CSCC. After cross-taper to a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor and pulsed dose corticosteroids (prednisone 40 mg once daily, the day before and on days 1-3 of each cycle, followed by 20 mg once daily on days 4-6, then 10 mg once daily until the day before each subsequent cycle), patients received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 2 years and were assessed for response every 8 weeks. The primary end point was the rate of kidney rejection, with key secondary end points including rate and duration of response, and survival.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were treated. No kidney rejection or loss was observed. A response to cemiplimab was observed in five of 11 evaluable patients (46%; 90% CI, 22 to 73), including two with durable responses beyond a year. Median follow-up was 6.8 months (range, 0.7-29.8). Treatment-related grade 3 or greater adverse events occurred in five patients (42%), including diarrhea, infection, and metabolic disturbances. One patient died of angioedema and anaphylaxis attributed to mTOR inhibitor cross-taper.

CONCLUSION

mTOR inhibitor and corticosteroids represent a favorable immunosuppressive regimen for KTRs with advanced CSCC receiving immunotherapy. This combination resulted in durable antitumor responses with no kidney rejection events (funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04339062]).

Metastatic Melanoma Treatment in Special Populations

ABSTRACT

This review outlines the most up-to-date metastatic melanoma treatment recommendations and relevant risks for patients with solid organ transplants, patients with renal dysfunction, and patients with preexisting autoimmune conditions. These specific treatment populations were excluded from the original clinical trials, which studied immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in the advanced melanoma setting. We have synthesized the current body of literature, mainly case series and retrospective analyses, to reflect the evidence for the treatment of these special patient populations at present.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and acute kidney injury

As a new type of anti-tumor immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the prognosis of multiple malignancies. However, renal complications are becoming more frequent. Nephrotoxicity often manifests as acute kidney injury (AKI), and the most common histopathological type is acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN). Based on previous studies of the incidence and potential risk factors for nephrotoxicity, in this review, we describe the mechanism of AKI after ICIs treatment, summarize the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of AKI, and discuss the diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI). In addition, we review the current status of ICIs rechallenge and the therapeutic strategies of ICIs applied in kidney transplant recipients. Finally, we emphasize the importance of collaboration between nephrologists and oncologists to guide the treatment of ICIs and the management of renal complications.

Clinical significance of mechanistic target of rapamycin expression in vessels that encapsulate tumor cluster-positive hepatocellular carcinoma patients who have undergone living donor liver transplantation

Background

There is limited published information regarding the expression of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) in vessels that encapsulate tumor cluster (VETC)-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, has been approved as an immunosuppressant for use in HCC patients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

Using a database of 214 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC, we examined the mTOR protein and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) in VETC-positive HCC by immunohistochemical staining. The presence of VETC and mTOR expression were evaluated in both primary and recurrent HCC lesions.

Results

Forty-three of the 214 patients (20.1%) were VETC-positive, and 29 of these 43 patients (67.4%) expressed mTOR. Relative Ang-2 expression was significantly higher in the mTOR-positive than in the mTOR-negative group (p = 0.037). Thirty-four of the 214 patients experienced HCC recurrence after LDLT; 20 of these were operable. The primary lesions of six of these 20 patients were VETC-positive; five of these six patients also had VETC-positive recurrent lesions (p < 0.001). The expression of mTOR was significantly higher in the VETC-positive lesions (p = 0.0018).

Conclusions

We showed that mTOR expression was higher in the VETC-positive primary and recurrent lesions than in the VETC-negative ones.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recipients of Renal Allografts

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of malignancy as a result of immunosuppression and are increasingly exposed to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). However, CPI therapy can precipitate allograft rejection. This review aims to summarize the current literature describing the epidemiology, immunological mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of CPI-associated allograft rejection.Initial studies of CPIs suggested allograft rejection post commencement of CPIs occured commonly (40-60%), occurring between 2 and 6 weeks after CPI initiation, with a cancer response rate approaching 50%. More recent studies with predefined, structured immunosuppressive regimens have seen rejection rates of 0-12.5%, with rejection occurring later. Allograft biopsy remains the mainstay of diagnosis; however, noninvasive tools are emerging, including donor-derived cell-free DNA, urinary chemokine assessment, and defining alloreactive T-cell clones prior to or during CPI therapy.

Breaking the barriers in cancer care: The next generation of herpes simplex virus-based oncolytic immunotherapies for cancer treatment

Since the US Food and Drug Administration first approved talimogene laherparepvec for the treatment of melanoma in 2015, the field of oncolytic immunotherapy (OI) has rapidly evolved. There are numerous ongoing clinical studies assessing the clinical activity of OIs across a wide range of tumor types. Further understanding of the mechanisms underlying the anti-tumor immune response has led to the development of OIs with improved immune-mediated preclinical efficacy. In this review, we discuss the key approaches for developing the next generation of herpes simplex virus-based OIs. Modifications to the viral genome and incorporation of transgenes to promote safety, tumor-selective replication, and immune stimulation are reviewed. We also review the advantages and disadvantages of intratumoral versus intravenous administration, summarize clinical evidence supporting the use of OIs as a strategy to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade, and consider emerging opportunities to improve OI efficacy in the combination setting.

Durable complete response to early immunotherapy discontinuation in a kidney transplant recipient with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

The usage of immunotherapy to treat skin malignancies in transplant patients requires weighing the risk of acute organ transplant rejection with the potential reduction of antitumor efficacy by transplant immunosuppression. Reducing the duration of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment may help prevent acute transplant rejection and late immune-related adverse events.

CASE PRESENTATION

An allogenic kidney transplant patient who developed regionally metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma received four cycles of pembrolizumab with complete response to therapy. Therapy was discontinued due to fatigue, significant cancer response, and to reduce the risk of acute graft rejection. His renal function remained stable, and he achieved subsequent durable response after treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Organ transplant recipients with complete response to immunotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma may continue to respond despite early treatment cessation. This may reduce the risks of late immune-related adverse events and acute graft rejection.

PD-L1 and PD-1 expression in pediatric post-transplant Burkitt lymphoma and other monomorphic post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) develop as a consequence of immune suppression. Programmed death protein 1 (PD-1), a regulator of host immune activation, binds to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) to suppress the T-cell immune response. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway may play a role in PTLD. The objective was to describe intratumoral expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in pediatric monomorphic PTLD, and assess if density of these cells is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

PROCEDURE

Clinical variables and outcome data were collected on B-cell monomorphic PTLD treated in Toronto, Canada between 2000 and 2017. Diagnostic area from tumor tissue was identified to count CD3-positive or PD-1-positive cells and CD3-negative lymphoma B cells or PD-L1-positive cells. CD3+ , PD-1+ , and PD-L1+ cell densities were compared between cases of PTLD. OS and PFS were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 25 cases of B-cell monomorphic PTLD; majority Burkitt lymphoma (32%) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (56%). All cases had CD3+ cells infiltrating the tumor, and median percentage of CD3+ cells was 14% (interquartile range: 6.2%-25%). Twelve cases (48%) had PD-1+ cell infiltrating (range: 1%-83%) and 13 cases (52%) had no PD-1+ cells infiltrating. Sixteen cases (64%) had PD-L1+ cells present; however, there was no PD-L1 expression on any Burkitt lymphoma tissue. When comparing PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, there was no difference in OS or PFS.

CONCLUSION

Intratumoral presence of PD-1+ and PD-L1+ cells varied in pediatric patients with monomorphic PTLD; however, no relationship to OS and PFS was identified.

Prior cancer history and suitability for kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for most patients with kidney failure. For patients with a prior history of treated cancers, listing and transplant eligibility decisions are complex. Patients and health professionals are obliged to consider the time-periods between cancer cure and transplantation, the risk of cancer recurrence under the influence of immunosuppression and anti-cancer treatment options if the disease recurs. Cancer recurrence is associated with a high mortality rate, thus potentially reduces the projected survival benefit of transplantation, and dampens the utility of scarce organs. In view of the uncertain risk of harms, clinicians may consider transplantation for candidates with prior cancer history only after an extended period of cancer-free interval, as the fear of disease recurrence and shortened life expectancy may outweigh the benefits of receiving a kidney transplant compared with dialysis. Over the past decade, the evolution of novel anti-cancer therapies coupled with improved understanding of cancer genomics have led to considerable improvement in cancer-free survival. It is therefore justifiable to make individualized transplant suitability decisions based the joint effects of cancer biology, available therapeutic options and prognostic covariates on clinical outcomes. In this review, we first summarized the cancer epidemiology in kidney transplant recipients. We then explored how the probability of cancer cure, risk of recurrence and outcomes in candidates with a prior cancer history may influence the decisions to transplant. Finally, the role of shared decision-making between health professionals and patients regarding the optimal management options, and considerations of patients' preferences and values are discussed.

A case of bladder cancer after bilateral lung transplantation following bone marrow transplantation

Introduction

The incidence of bladder cancer following transplantation is high; however, no previous studies have reported the development of bladder cancer following bone marrow and bilateral lung transplantations.

Case presentation

A 42-year-old man who was followed for bilateral lung transplantation due to chronic graft-versus-host disease following bone marrow transplantation complained of gross hematuria. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was performed for cT1N0M0 bladder cancer. On the following night, he experienced severe respiratory failure and was intubated. He was discharged on postoperative day 32 with the introduction of home oxygen therapy. The pathological diagnosis was invasive urothelial carcinoma, high-grade, pT1, with urothelial carcinoma in situ. Further treatment could not be performed because of his poor performance status and immunosuppressive state.

Conclusion

Vigorous screening for bladder cancer coexisting with other malignancies should be performed for transplant recipients for the early diagnosis and prompt treatment of a relatively aggressive bladder cancer.