1
|
Ahmed AK, Sijercic VC, Akhtar MS, Elbayomy A, Marouf MA, Zeleke MS, Sayad R, Abdelshafi A, Laird NJ, El‐Mokhtar MA, Ruthig GR, Hetta HF. Cholera rages in Africa and the Middle East: A narrative review on challenges and solutions. Health Sci Rep 2024; 7:e2013. [PMID: 38742091 PMCID: PMC11089255 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aim Cholera is a life-threatening infectious disease that is still one of the most common acute watery diarrheal diseases in the world today. Acute diarrhea and severe dehydration brought on by cholera can cause hypovolemic shock, which can be fatal in minutes. Without competent clinical therapy, the rate of case fatality surpasses 50%. The purpose of this review was to highlight cholera challenges in Africa and the Middle East and explain the reasons for why this region is currently a fertile environment for cholera. We investigated cholera serology, epidemiology, and the geographical distribution of cholera in Africa and the Middle East in 2022 and 2023. We reviewed detection methods, such as rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), and treatments, such as antibiotics and phage therapy. Finally, this review explored oral cholera vaccines (OCVs), and the vaccine shortage crisis. Methods We carried out a systematic search in multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Embase, for studies on cholera using the following keywords: ((Cholera) OR (Vibrio cholera) and (Coronavirus) OR (COVID-19) OR (SARS-CoV2) OR (The Middle East) OR (Africa)). Results and Conclusions Cholera outbreaks have increased dramatically, mainly in Africa and many Middle Eastern countries. The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced the attention devoted to cholera and disrupted diagnosis and treatment services, as well as vaccination initiatives. Most of the cholera cases in Africa and the Middle East were reported in Malawi and Syria, respectively, in 2022. RDTs are effective in the early detection of cholera epidemics, especially with limited advanced resources, which is the case in much of Africa. By offering both direct and indirect protection, expanding the use of OCV will significantly reduce the burden of current cholera outbreaks in Africa and the Middle East.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ahmed Elbayomy
- Faculty of MedicineMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
- School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of Wisconsin−MadisonMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Mohamed A. Marouf
- Faculty of MedicineMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of MedicineUniversity of South FloridaTampaFloridaUSA
| | - Mahlet S. Zeleke
- Menelik II Medical and Health Science CollegeKotebe Metropolitan UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia
| | - Reem Sayad
- Faculty of MedicineAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt
| | | | | | - Mohamed A. El‐Mokhtar
- Gilbert & Rose‐Marie Chagoury School of MedicineLebanese American UniversityByblosLebanon
| | | | - Helal F. Hetta
- Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Natural Products and Alternative Medicine, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of TabukTabukSaudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sarker AR, Khan AI, Islam MT, Chowdhury F, Khanam F, Kang S, Ahmmed F, Im J, Kim DR, Tadesse BT, Ahmed T, Aziz AB, Hoque M, Park J, Liu X, Pak G, Zaman K, Marks F, Kim JH, Clemens JD, Qadri F. Cost of oral cholera vaccine delivery in a mass immunization program for children in urban Bangladesh. Vaccine X 2022; 12:100247. [PMID: 36545347 PMCID: PMC9761845 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholera poses a substantial health burden in the developing world due to both epidemic and endemic diseases. The World Health Organization recommends oral cholera vaccines for mass vaccination campaigns in addition to traditional prevention practices and treatments in resource-poor settings. In many developing countries like Bangladesh, the major challenge behind implementing mass vaccination campaigns concerns the affordability of the oral cholera vaccine (OCV). Vaccination of children with OCV is not only an impactful approach for controlling cholera at the population level and reducing childhood morbidity but is also considered more cost-effective than vaccinating all ages. The aim of the study was to estimate the cost of an OCV campaign for children from a societal perspective using empirical study. A total of 66,311 children aged 1 to 14 years old were fully vaccinated with two doses of the OCV Shanchol while 9,035 individuals received one dose of this vaccine. The estimated societal cost per individual for full vaccination was US$ 6.11, which includes the cost of vaccine delivery estimated at US$ 1.95. The cost per single dose was estimated at US$ 2.86. The total provider cost for full vaccination was estimated at US$ 6.01 and the recipient cost at US$ 0.10. Our estimation of OCV delivery costs for children was relatively higher than what was found in a similar mass OCV campaign for all age groups, indicating that there may be additional cost factors to consider in targeted vaccine campaigns. This analysis provides useful benchmarks for the possible costs related to delivery of OCV to children and future OCV cost-effectiveness models should factor in these possible cost disparities. Attempts to reduce the cost per dose are likely to have a greater impact on the cost of similar vaccination campaigns in many resource-poor settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdur Razzaque Sarker
- Population Studies Division, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), Bangladesh,Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ashraful Islam Khan
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh,Corresponding author at: International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
| | - Md. Taufiqul Islam
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Fahima Chowdhury
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Farhana Khanam
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Sophie Kang
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Faisal Ahmmed
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Justin Im
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Deok Ryun Kim
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden,Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 9086, Ethiopia
| | - Tasnuva Ahmed
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | - Masuma Hoque
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Juyeon Park
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea,Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0AW, United Kingdom
| | - Xinxue Liu
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Gideok Pak
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Khalequ Zaman
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Florian Marks
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea,Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0AW, United Kingdom,University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar,Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jerome H. Kim
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - John D. Clemens
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea,UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA
| | - Firdausi Qadri
- International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ribera-Cano A, Dupont M, Houzé-Cerfon CH, Houzé-Cerfon V, Hart A, Hertelendy AJ, Ciottone G, Bounes V. Evaluation of a prototype decontamination mobile unit (UMDEO) for COVID-19 vaccination: A cross-sectional survey in France. Vaccine 2021; 39:7441-7445. [PMID: 34782160 PMCID: PMC8563340 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY In the context of the worldwide vaccination campaign against COVID-19, France has been deploying multiple sites for mass vaccination. This study aimed to assess the perceived usefulness of a prototype decontamination mobile unit (UMDEO) for COVID-19 vaccination among both the patient and healthcare providers perspectives. METHODS This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in Toulouse over two days. UMDEO is a fully comprehensive, versatile solution that was deployed as a 5-row vaccination unit. A written questionnaire was distributed from March 6th-7th, 2021 among all patients presenting for vaccination at the mobile center, as well as the team participating in the vaccination campaign. RESULTS Among the vaccinated patients (n = 1659), 1409 participants (84.9%) filled out the survey, as well as 68 out of 85 (80%) within the UMDEO team. The maximum patient rate was 98 people per hour. The majority of participants and caregivers (1307 [93.2%] and 67 [98.5%] respectively) agreed that the mobile unit increased access to vaccination. A total of 91.3% patients (n = 1281) and 95.6% caregivers (n = 65) believed that it would speed up the overall vaccination campaign. CONCLUSION The majority of the vaccinated population and of the team participating in the survey were satisfied with the usefulness of UMDEO as a vaccination center. Toulouse is currently the only city to have used such a structure for vaccination, but it could be used as a basis for planning other mobile units to increase vaccination access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ribera-Cano
- SAMU 31, Disaster Medicine Unit, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Maud Dupont
- Emergency Department, Toulouse UniversiCty Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Charles-Henri Houzé-Cerfon
- Toulouse Institute of Simulation Healthcare (Institut Toulousain de Simulation en Santé, ItSimS), University Hospital Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Emergency Department, Toulouse UniversiCty Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | | | - Alexander Hart
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Attila J Hertelendy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Gregory Ciottone
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Vincent Bounes
- SAMU 31, Disaster Medicine Unit, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oral Cholera Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9121482. [PMID: 34960228 PMCID: PMC8708586 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9121482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Although measuring vaccine efficacy through the conventional phase III study design, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial serves as the "gold standard", effectiveness studies, conducted in the context of a public health program, seek to broaden the understanding of the impact of a vaccine in a real world setting including both individual and population level impacts. Cholera is an acute diarrheal infection caused by the ingestion of food or water contaminated with the bacterium Vibrio cholerae. Since the 1980s, either killed or live oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been developed and efficacy and effectiveness studies have been conducted on OCV. Although the results of OCV effectiveness studies sometimes showed outliers, the tendency seen is for effectiveness of the vaccine used in public health settings to be somewhat higher than estimated in randomized controlled trials due to the influence of indirect herd protection. Efficacy and Effectiveness studies both generate important information about the vaccine performance characteristics and its impact when used in real world populations at risk for the disease.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ozawa S, Yemeke TT, Mitgang E, Wedlock PT, Higgins C, Chen HH, Pallas SW, Abimbola T, Wallace A, Bartsch SM, Lee BY. Systematic review of the costs for vaccinators to reach vaccination sites: Incremental costs of reaching hard-to-reach populations. Vaccine 2021; 39:4598-4610. [PMID: 34238610 PMCID: PMC10680154 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Economic evidence on how much it may cost for vaccinators to reach populations is important to plan vaccination programs. Moreover, knowing the incremental costs to reach populations that have traditionally been undervaccinated, especially those hard-to-reach who are facing supply-side barriers to vaccination, is essential to expanding immunization coverage to these populations. METHODS We conducted a systematic review to identify estimates of costs associated with getting vaccinators to all vaccination sites. We searched PubMed and the Immunization Delivery Cost Catalogue (IDCC) in 2019 for the following costs to vaccinators: (1) training costs; (2) labor costs, per diems, and incentives; (3) identification of vaccine beneficiary location; and (4) travel costs. We assessed if any of these costs were specific to populations that are hard-to-reach for vaccination, based on a framework for examining supply-side barriers to vaccination. RESULTS We found 19 studies describing average vaccinator training costs at $0.67/person vaccinated or targeted (SD $0.94) and $0.10/dose delivered (SD $0.07). The average cost for vaccinator labor and incentive costs across 29 studies was $2.15/dose (SD $2.08). We identified 13 studies describing intervention costs for a vaccinator to know the location of a beneficiary, with an average cost of $19.69/person (SD $26.65), and six studies describing vaccinator travel costs, with an average cost of $0.07/dose (SD $0.03). Only eight of these studies described hard-to-reach populations for vaccination; two studies examined incremental costs per dose to reach hard-to-reach populations, which were 1.3-2 times higher than the regular costs. The incremental cost to train vaccinators was $0.02/dose, and incremental labor costs for targeting hard-to-reach populations were $0.16-$1.17/dose. CONCLUSION Additional comparative costing studies are needed to understand the potential differential costs for vaccinators reaching the vaccination sites that serve hard-to-reach populations. This will help immunization program planners and decision-makers better allocate resources to extend vaccination programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachiko Ozawa
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Maternal and Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Tatenda T Yemeke
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mitgang
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Patrick T Wedlock
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Colleen Higgins
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hui-Han Chen
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sarah W Pallas
- Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Taiwo Abimbola
- Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Aaron Wallace
- Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah M Bartsch
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Bruce Y Lee
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yemeke TT, Mitgang E, Wedlock PT, Higgins C, Chen HH, Pallas SW, Abimbola T, Wallace A, Bartsch SM, Lee BY, Ozawa S. Promoting, seeking, and reaching vaccination services: A systematic review of costs to immunization programs, beneficiaries, and caregivers. Vaccine 2021; 39:4437-4449. [PMID: 34218959 PMCID: PMC10711749 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Understanding the costs to increase vaccination demand among under-vaccinated populations, as well as costs incurred by beneficiaries and caregivers for reaching vaccination sites, is essential to improving vaccination coverage. However, there have not been systematic analyses documenting such costs for beneficiaries and caregivers seeking vaccination. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Immunization Delivery Cost Catalogue (IDCC) in 2019 for the costs for beneficiaries and caregivers to 1) seek and know how to access vaccination (i.e., costs to immunization programs for social mobilization and interventions to increase vaccination demand), 2) take time off from work, chores, or school for vaccination (i.e., productivity costs), and 3) travel to vaccination sites. We assessed if these costs were specific to populations that faced other non-cost barriers, based on a framework for defining hard-to-reach and hard-to-vaccinate populations for vaccination. RESULTS We found 57 studies describing information, education, and communication (IEC) costs, social mobilization costs, and the costs of interventions to increase vaccination demand, with mean costs per dose at $0.41 (standard deviation (SD) $0.83), $18.86 (SD $50.65) and $28.23 (SD $76.09) in low-, middle-, and high-income countries, respectively. Five studies described productivity losses incurred by beneficiaries and caregivers seeking vaccination ($38.33 per person; SD $14.72; n = 3). We identified six studies on travel costs incurred by beneficiaries and caregivers attending vaccination sites ($11.25 per person; SD $9.54; n = 4). Two studies reported social mobilization costs per dose specific to hard-to-reach populations, which were 2-3.5 times higher than costs for the general population. Eight studies described barriers to vaccination among hard-to-reach populations. CONCLUSION Social mobilization/IEC costs are well-characterized, but evidence is limited on costs incurred by beneficiaries and caregivers getting to vaccination sites. Understanding the potential incremental costs for populations facing barriers to reach vaccination sites is essential to improving vaccine program financing and planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatenda T Yemeke
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mitgang
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY 10027, USA
| | - Patrick T Wedlock
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY 10027, USA
| | - Colleen Higgins
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hui-Han Chen
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sarah W Pallas
- Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Taiwo Abimbola
- Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Aaron Wallace
- Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah M Bartsch
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY 10027, USA
| | - Bruce Y Lee
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY 10027, USA
| | - Sachiko Ozawa
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Maternal and Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Banks C, Portnoy A, Moi F, Boonstoppel L, Brenzel L, Resch SC. Cost of vaccine delivery strategies in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine 2021; 39:5046-5054. [PMID: 34325935 PMCID: PMC8238647 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted immunization services critical to the prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases in many low- and middle- income countries around the world. These services will need to be modified in order to minimize COVID-19 transmission and ensure the safety of health workers and the community. Additional budget will be required to implement these modifications that ensure safe delivery. Methods Using a simple modeling analysis, we estimated the additional resource requirements associated with modifications to supplementary immunization activities (campaigns) and routine immunization services via fixed sites and outreach in 2020 US dollars. We considered the following four categories of costs: (1) personal protective equipment (PPE) & infection prevention and control (IPC) measures for immunization sessions; (2) physical distancing and screening during immunization sessions; (3) delivery strategy changes, such as changes in session sizes and frequency; and (4) other operational cost increases, including additional social mobilization, training, and hazard pay to compensate health workers. Results We found that implementing a range of measures to protect health workers and communities from COVID-19 transmission could result in a per-facility start-up cost of $466–799 for routine fixed-site delivery and $12–220 for routine outreach delivery, and $12–108 per immunization campaign site. A recurrent monthly cost of $137–1,024 for fixed-site delivery and $152–848 for outreach delivery per facility could be incurred, and a $0.32–0.85 increase in the cost per dose during campaigns. Conclusions By illustrating potential cost implications of providing immunization services through a range of strategies in a safe manner, these estimates can provide a benchmark for program managers and policy makers on the additional budget required. These findings can help country practitioners and global development partners planning the continuation of immunization services in the context of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allison Portnoy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, United States.
| | | | | | | | - Stephen C Resch
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Amani A, Fouda AAB, Nangmo AJ, Bama SN, Tatang CA, Mbang MA, Douba ECE, Noula AGM, Dia M, Bouhenia M. Reactive mass vaccination campaign against cholera in the COVID-19 context in Cameroon: challenges, best practices and lessons learned. Pan Afr Med J 2021; 38:392. [PMID: 34381536 PMCID: PMC8325454 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.392.27754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction since 1971, Cameroon is facing a growing series of cholera epidemics despite all the efforts made by the government to address this huge public health threat. In 2020, in addition to the COVID-19 pandemic, Cameroon recorded a high cholera case fatality rate of 4.3% following epidemics noted in the South, Littoral and South-West regions. The Cameroon Ministry of Public Health, has thus organized a reactive vaccination campaign against cholera to address the high mortality rate in the affected health districts of those regions. The objective of this study was to describe the challenges, best practices and lessons learned drawing from daily experiences from this reactive vaccination campaign against cholera. Methods we conducted a cross-sectional study drawn from the results of the campaign. We had a target population of 631,109 participants aged 1 year and above resident of the targeted health areas. Results the overall vaccination coverage was 64.4% with a refusal rate ranging from 0-10% according to health districts. Vaccination coverage was the lowest among people aged 20 years and above. The main challenge was difficulty maintaining physical distanciation, the main best practice was the screening of all actors taking part at the vaccination against COVID-19 and we found that emphasizing on thorough population sensitization through quarter heads and social mobilizers and adequately programming the campaign during a good climate season is crucial to achieving good vaccination coverage. Conclusion lessons learned from this study could serve to inform various agencies in the event of planning rapid mass vaccination programs during pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adidja Amani
- Sub-Directorate of Vaccination, Directorate of Family Health, Ministry of Public Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - André Arsène Bita Fouda
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Vaccine-Preventable Disease Unit, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo
| | | | | | - Collins Asaah Tatang
- Sub-Directorate of Vaccination, Directorate of Family Health, Ministry of Public Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Marie Angèle Mbang
- Sub-Directorate of Vaccination, Directorate of Family Health, Ministry of Public Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Emmanuel Christian Epee Douba
- National Operating Office, Disease Prevention and Control Office, Emergency Preparedness and Control Office, World Health Organization Country Office, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Aimé Gilbert Mbonda Noula
- Community Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Cluster Support Team, Central Africa Region, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Mariette Dia
- World Health Organization Africa Office, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Deen J, Clemens JD. Licensed and Recommended Inactivated Oral CholeraVaccines: From Development to Innovative Deployment. Trop Med Infect Dis 2021; 6:32. [PMID: 33803390 PMCID: PMC8005943 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed6010032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholera is a disease of poverty and occurs where there is a lack of access to clean water and adequate sanitation. Since improved water supply and sanitation infrastructure cannot be implemented immediately in many high-risk areas, vaccination against cholera is an important additional tool for prevention and control. We describe the development of licensed and recommended inactivated oral cholera vaccines (OCVs), including the results of safety, efficacy and effectiveness studies and the creation of the global OCV stockpile. Over the years, the public health strategy for oral cholera vaccination has broadened-from purely pre-emptive use to reactive deployment to help control outbreaks. Limited supplies of OCV doses continues to be an important problem. We discuss various innovative dosing and delivery approaches that have been assessed and implemented and evidence of herd protection conferred by OCVs. We expect that the demand for OCVs will continue to increase in the coming years across many countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Deen
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Pedro Gil Street, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines;
| | - John D. Clemens
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
- UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liang KYH, Orata FD, Islam MT, Nasreen T, Alam M, Tarr CL, Boucher YF. A Vibrio cholerae Core Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme To Facilitate the Epidemiological Study of Cholera. J Bacteriol 2020; 202:e00086-20. [PMID: 32540931 PMCID: PMC7685551 DOI: 10.1128/jb.00086-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) has gained popularity in recent years in epidemiological research and subspecies-level classification. cgMLST retains the intuitive nature of traditional MLST but offers much greater resolution by utilizing significantly larger portions of the genome. Here, we introduce a cgMLST scheme for Vibrio cholerae, a bacterium abundant in marine and freshwater environments and the etiologic agent of cholera. A set of 2,443 core genes ubiquitous in V. cholerae were used to analyze a comprehensive data set of 1,262 clinical and environmental strains collected from 52 countries, including 65 newly sequenced genomes in this study. We established a sublineage threshold based on 133 allelic differences that creates clusters nearly identical to traditional MLST types, providing backwards compatibility to new cgMLST classifications. We also defined an outbreak threshold based on seven allelic differences that is capable of identifying strains from the same outbreak and closely related isolates that could give clues on outbreak origin. Using cgMLST, we confirmed the South Asian origin of modern epidemics and identified clustering affinity among sublineages of environmental isolates from the same geographic origin. Advantages of this method are highlighted by direct comparison with existing classification methods, such as MLST and single-nucleotide polymorphism-based methods. cgMLST outperforms all existing methods in terms of resolution, standardization, and ease of use. We anticipate this scheme will serve as a basis for a universally applicable and standardized classification system for V. cholerae research and epidemiological surveillance in the future. This cgMLST scheme is publicly available on PubMLST (https://pubmlst.org/vcholerae/).IMPORTANCE Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae isolates of the O1 and O139 serogroups are the causative agents of cholera, an acute diarrheal disease that plagued the world for centuries, if not millennia. Here, we introduce a core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for V. cholerae Using this scheme, we have standardized the definition for subspecies-level classification, facilitating global collaboration in the surveillance of V. cholerae In addition, this typing scheme allows for quick identification of outbreak-related isolates that can guide subsequent analyses, serving as an important first step in epidemiological research. This scheme is also easily scalable to analyze thousands of isolates at various levels of resolution, making it an invaluable tool for large-scale ecological and evolutionary analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Y H Liang
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fabini D Orata
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Tania Nasreen
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Munirul Alam
- Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Cheryl L Tarr
- Enteric Diseases Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yann F Boucher
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Singapore Center for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ngwa MC, Alemu W, Okudo I, Owili C, Ugochukwu U, Clement P, Devaux I, Pezzoli L, Oche JA, Ihekweazu C, Sack DA. The reactive vaccination campaign against cholera emergency in camps for internally displaced persons, Borno, Nigeria, 2017: a two-stage cluster survey. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002431. [PMID: 32601092 PMCID: PMC7326259 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2017, amidst insecurity and displacements posed by Boko Haram armed insurgency, cholera outbreak started in the Muna Garage camp for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in Borno State, Nigeria. In response, the Borno Ministry of Health and partners determined to provide oral cholera vaccine (OCV) to about 1 million people in IDP camps and surrounding communities in six Local Government Areas (LGAs) including Maiduguri, Jere, Konduga, Mafa, Dikwa, and Monguno. As part of Monitoring and Evaluation, we described the coverage achieved, adverse events following immunisation (AEFI), non-vaccination reasons, vaccination decisions as well as campaign information sources. METHODS We conducted two-stage probability cluster surveys with clusters selected without replacement according to probability-proportionate-to-population-size in the six LGAs targeted by the campaign. Individuals aged ≥1 years were the eligible study population. Data sources were household interviews with vaccine card verification and memory recall, if no card, as well as multiple choice questions with an open-ended option. RESULTS Overall, 12 931 respondents participated in the survey. Overall, 90% (95% CI: 88 to 92) of the target population received at least one dose of OCV, range 87% (95% CI: 75 to 94) in Maiduguri to 94% (95% CI: 88 to 97) in Monguno. The weighted two-dose coverage was 73% (95% CI: 68 to 77) with a low of 68% (95% CI: 46 to 86) in Maiduguri to a high of 87% (95% CI: 74 to 95) in Dikwa. The coverage was lower during first round (76%, 95% CI: 71 to 80) than second round (87%, 95% CI: 84 to 89) and ranged from 72% (95% CI: 42 to 89) and 82% (95% CI: 82 to 91) in Maiduguri to 87% (95% CI: 75 to 95) and 94% (95% CI: 88 to 97) in Dikwa for the respective first and second rounds. Also, coverage was higher among females of age 5 to 14 and ≥15 years than males of same age groups. There were mild AEFI with the most common symptoms being fever, headache and diarrhoea occurring up to 48 hours after ingesting the vaccine. The most common actions taken after AEFI symptoms included 'did nothing' and 'self-medicated at home'. The top reason for taking vaccine was to protect from cholera while top reason for non-vaccination was travel/work. The main source of campaign information was a neighbour. An overwhelming majority (96%, 95% CI: 95% to 98%) felt the campaign team treated them with respect. While 43% (95% CI: 36% to 50%) asked no questions, 37% (95% CI: 31% to 44%) felt the team addressed all their concerns. CONCLUSION The campaign achieved high coverage using door-to-door and fixed sites strategies amidst insecurity posed by Boko Haram. Additional studies are needed to improve how to reduce non-vaccination, especially for the first round. While OCV provides protection for a few years, additional actions will be needed to make investments in water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moise Chi Ngwa
- International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David A Sack
- International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee EC, Azman AS, Kaminsky J, Moore SM, McKay HS, Lessler J. The projected impact of geographic targeting of oral cholera vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa: A modeling study. PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1003003. [PMID: 31825965 PMCID: PMC6905526 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholera causes an estimated 100,000 deaths annually worldwide, with the majority of burden reported in sub-Saharan Africa. In May 2018, the World Health Assembly committed to reducing worldwide cholera deaths by 90% by 2030. Oral cholera vaccine (OCV) plays a key role in reducing the near-term risk of cholera, although global supplies are limited. Characterizing the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of mass OCV deployment strategies is critical for setting expectations and developing cholera control plans that maximize the chances of success. METHODS AND FINDINGS We compared the projected impacts of vaccination campaigns across sub-Saharan Africa from 2018 through 2030 when targeting geographically according to historical cholera burden and risk factors. We assessed the number of averted cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years and the cost-effectiveness of these campaigns with models that accounted for direct and indirect vaccine effects and population projections over time. Under current vaccine supply projections, an approach optimized to targeting by historical burden is projected to avert 828,971 (95% CI 803,370-859,980) cases (equivalent to 34.0% of projected cases; 95% CI 33.2%-34.8%). An approach that balances logistical feasibility with targeting historical burden is projected to avert 617,424 (95% CI 599,150-643,891) cases. In contrast, approaches optimized for targeting locations with limited access to water and sanitation are projected to avert 273,939 (95% CI 270,319-277,002) and 109,817 (95% CI 103,735-114,110) cases, respectively. We find that the most logistically feasible targeting strategy costs US$1,843 (95% CI 1,328-14,312) per DALY averted during this period and that effective geographic targeting of OCV campaigns can have a greater impact on cost-effectiveness than improvements to vaccine efficacy and moderate increases in coverage. Although our modeling approach does not project annual changes in baseline cholera risk or directly incorporate immunity from natural cholera infection, our estimates of the relative performance of different vaccination strategies should be robust to these factors. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that geographic targeting substantially improves the cost-effectiveness and impact of oral cholera vaccination campaigns. Districts with the poorest access to improved water and sanitation are not the same as districts with the greatest historical cholera incidence. While OCV campaigns can improve cholera control in the near term, without rapid progress in developing water and sanitation services or dramatic increases in OCV supply, our results suggest that vaccine use alone is unlikely to allow us to achieve the 2030 goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Lee
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Andrew S. Azman
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Joshua Kaminsky
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sean M. Moore
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America
- Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Heather S. McKay
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Justin Lessler
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khan IA, Khan AI, Rahman A, Siddique SA, Islam MT, Bhuiyan MAI, Chowdhury AI, Saha NC, Biswas PK, Saha A, Chowdhury F, Clemens JD, Qadri F. Organization and implementation of an oral cholera vaccination campaign in an endemic urban setting in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Glob Health Action 2019; 12:1574544. [PMID: 30764750 PMCID: PMC6383613 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1574544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Bangladesh has historically been cholera endemic, with seasonal cholera outbreaks occurring each year. In collaboration with the government of Bangladesh, the Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) initiated operational research to test strategies to reach the high-risk urban population with an affordable oral cholera vaccine (OCV) “ShancholTM” and examine its effectiveness in reducing diarrhea due to cholera. Here we report a sub-analysis focusing on the organization, implementation and effectiveness of different oral cholera vaccine delivery strategies in the endemic urban setting in Bangladesh. We described how the vaccination program was planned, prepared and implemented using different strategies to deliver oral cholera vaccine to a high-risk urban population in Dhaka, Bangladesh based on administrative data and observations made during the program. The objective of this study is to evaluate the organization, implementation and effectiveness of different oral cholera vaccine delivery strategies in the endemic urban setting in Bangladesh. OCV administration by trained local volunteers through outreach sites and mop-up activities yielded high coverage of 82% and 72% of 172,754 targeted individuals for the first and second dose respectively, using national Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) campaign mechanisms without disrupting routine immunization activities. The cost of delivery was low. Safety and cold chain requirements were adequately managed. The adopted strategies were technically and programmatically feasible. Current evidence on implementation strategies in different settings together with available OCV stockpiles should encourage at-risk countries to use OCV along with other preventive and control measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iqbal Ansary Khan
- a Medical Social Science , Institute of Epidemiology Disease Control and Research (IEDCR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Ashraful Islam Khan
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Anisur Rahman
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Shah Alam Siddique
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Md Taufiqul Islam
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Md Amirul Islam Bhuiyan
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Atique Iqbal Chowdhury
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Nirod Chandra Saha
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Prasanta Kumar Biswas
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Amit Saha
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Fahima Chowdhury
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - John D Clemens
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Firdausi Qadri
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brew J, Sauboin C. A Systematic Review of the Incremental Costs of Implementing a New Vaccine in the Expanded Program of Immunization in Sub-Saharan Africa. MDM Policy Pract 2019; 4:2381468319894546. [PMID: 31903423 PMCID: PMC6923695 DOI: 10.1177/2381468319894546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. The World Health Organization is planning a pilot introduction of a new malaria vaccine in three sub-Saharan African countries. To inform considerations about including a new vaccine in the vaccination program of those and other countries, estimates from the scientific literature of the incremental costs of doing so are important. Methods. A systematic review of scientific studies reporting the costs of recent vaccine programs in sub-Saharan countries was performed. The focus was to obtain from each study an estimate of the cost per dose of vaccine administered excluding the acquisition cost of the vaccine and wastage. Studies published between 2000 and 2018 and indexed on PubMed could be included and results were standardized to 2015 US dollars (US$). Results. After successive screening of 2119 titles, and 941 abstracts, 58 studies with 80 data points (combinations of country, vaccine type, and vaccination approach-routine v. campaign) were retained. Most studies used the so-called ingredients approach as costing method combining field data collection with documented unit prices per cost item. The categorization of cost items and the extent of detailed reporting varied widely. Across the studies, the mean and median cost per dose administered was US$1.68 and US$0.88 with an interquartile range of US$0.54 to US$2.31. Routine vaccination was more costly than campaigns, with mean cost per dose of US$1.99 and US$0.88, respectively. Conclusion. Across the studies, there was huge variation in the cost per dose delivered, between and within countries, even in studies using consistent data collection tools and analysis methods, and including many health facilities. For planning purposes, the interquartile range of US$0.54 to US$2.31 may be a sufficiently precise estimate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Brew
- ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res.
(CRESIB), Hospital Clínic—Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tembo T, Simuyandi M, Chiyenu K, Sharma A, Chilyabanyama ON, Mbwili-Muleya C, Mazaba ML, Chilengi R. Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0215972. [PMID: 31150406 PMCID: PMC6544210 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2016, for the very first time, the Ministry of Health in Zambia implemented a reactive outbreak response to control the spread of cholera and vaccinated at-risk populations with a single dose of Shancol-an oral cholera vaccine (OCV). This study aimed to assess the costs of cholera illness and determine the cost-effectiveness of the 2016 vaccination campaign. METHODOLOGY From April to June 2017, we conducted a retrospective cost and cost-effectiveness analysis in three peri-urban areas of Lusaka. To estimate costs of illness from a household perspective, a systematic random sample of 189 in-patients confirmed with V. cholera were identified from Cholera Treatment Centre registers and interviewed for out-of-pocket costs. Vaccine delivery and health systems costs were extracted from financial records at the District Health Office and health facilities. The cost of cholera treatment was derived by multiplying the subsidized cost of drugs by the quantity administered to patients during hospitalisation. The cost-effectiveness analysis measured incremental cost-effectiveness ratio-cost per case averted, cost per life saved and cost per DALY averted-for a single dose OCV. RESULTS The mean cost per administered vaccine was US$1.72. Treatment costs per hospitalized episode were US$14.49-US$18.03 for patients ≤15 years old and US$17.66-US$35.16 for older patients. Whereas households incurred costs on non-medical items such as communication, beverages, food and transport during illness, a large proportion of medical costs were borne by the health system. Assuming vaccine effectiveness of 88.9% and 63%, a life expectancy of 62 years and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of US$1,500, the costs per case averted were estimated US$369-US$532. Costs per life year saved ranged from US$18,515-US$27,976. The total cost per DALY averted was estimated between US$698-US$1,006 for patients ≤15 years old and US$666-US$1,000 for older patients. CONCLUSION Our study determined that reactive vaccination campaign with a single dose of Shancol for cholera control in densely populated areas of Lusaka was cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tannia Tembo
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Kanema Chiyenu
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Anjali Sharma
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | | | | | - Roma Chilengi
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Semá Baltazar C, Rafael F, Langa JPM, Chicumbe S, Cavailler P, Gessner BD, Pezzoli L, Barata A, Zaina D, Inguane DL, Mengel MA, Munier A. Oral cholera vaccine coverage during a preventive door-to-door mass vaccination campaign in Nampula, Mozambique. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198592. [PMID: 30281604 PMCID: PMC6169854 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In addition to improving water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) measures and optimal case management, the introduction of Oral cholera vaccine (OCV) is a complementary strategy for cholera prevention and control for vulnerable population groups. In October 2016, the Mozambique Ministry of Health implemented a mass vaccination campaign using a two-dose regimen of the Shanchol™ OCV in six high-risk neighborhoods of Nampula city, in Northern Mozambique. Overall 193,403 people were targeted by the campaign, which used a door-to-door strategy. During campaign follow-up, a population survey was conducted to assess: (1) OCV coverage; (2) frequency of adverse events following immunization; (3) vaccine acceptability and (4) reasons for non-vaccination. Methodology/Principal findings In the absence of a household listing and clear administrative neighborhood delimitations, we used geospatial technology to select households from satellite images and used the support of community leaders. One person per household was randomly selected for interview. In total, 636 individuals were enrolled in the survey. The overall vaccination coverage with at least one dose (including card and oral reporting) was 69.5% (95%CI: 51.2–88.2) and the two-dose coverage was 51.2% (95%CI: 37.9–64.3). The campaign was well accepted. Among the 185 non-vaccinated individuals, 83 (44.6%) did not take the vaccine because they were absent when the vaccination team visited their houses. Among the 451 vaccinated individuals, 47 (10%) reported minor and non-specific complaints, and 78 (17.3%) mentioned they did not receive any information before the campaign. Conclusions/Significance In spite of overall coverage being slightly lower than expected, the use of a mobile door-to-door strategy remains a viable option even in densely-populated urban settings. Our results suggest that campaigns can be successfully implemented and well accepted in Mozambique in non-emergency contexts in order to prevent cholera outbreaks. These findings are encouraging and complement the previous Mozambican experience related to OCV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sergio Chicumbe
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | | | | | - Américo Barata
- Direcção Provincial de Saúde, Ministry of Health, Nampula, Mozambique
| | - Dores Zaina
- Direcção de Saúde de Cidade, Ministry of Health, Nampula, Mozambique
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Massing LA, Aboubakar S, Blake A, Page AL, Cohuet S, Ngandwe A, Mukomena Sompwe E, Ramazani R, Allheimen M, Levaillant P, Lechevalier P, Kashimi M, de la Motte A, Calmejane A, Bouhenia M, Dabire E, Bompangue D, Kebela B, Porten K, Luquero F. Highly targeted cholera vaccination campaigns in urban setting are feasible: The experience in Kalemie, Democratic Republic of Congo. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018; 12:e0006369. [PMID: 29734337 PMCID: PMC5957443 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Oral cholera vaccines are primarily recommended by the World Health Organization for cholera control in endemic countries. However, the number of cholera vaccines currently produced is very limited and examples of OCV use in endemic countries, and especially in urban settings, are scarce. A vaccination campaign was organized by Médecins Sans Frontières and the Ministry of Health in a highly endemic area in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This study aims to describe the vaccine coverage achieved with this highly targeted vaccination campaign and the acceptability among the vaccinated communities. Methods and findings We performed a cross-sectional survey using random spatial sampling. The study population included individuals one year old and above, eligible for vaccination, and residing in the areas targeted for vaccination in the city of Kalemie. Data sources were household interviews with verification by vaccination card. In total 2,488 people were included in the survey. Overall, 81.9% (95%CI: 77.9–85.3) of the target population received at least one dose of vaccine. The vaccine coverage with two doses was 67.2% (95%CI: 61.9–72.0) among the target population. The vaccine coverage was higher during the first round (74.0, 95%CI: 69.3–78.3) than during the second round of vaccination (69.1%, 95%CI: 63.9–74.0). Vaccination coverage was lower in male adults. The main reason for non-vaccination was to be absent during the campaign. No severe adverse events were notified during the interviews. Conclusions Cholera vaccination campaigns using highly targeted strategies are feasible in urban settings. High vaccination coverage can be obtained using door to door vaccination. However, alternative strategies should be considered to reach non-vaccinated populations like male adults and also in order to improve the efficiency of the interventions. The oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol, has already been shown as an effective tool in controlling a cholera outbreak. The limited amount of doses, concurrently with the logistic constraints associated with a targeted vaccination campaign are serious difficulties to tackle in order to organize a vaccination campaign in an urban setting. Although the World Health Organization recommends its use for cholera control in endemic countries, the fact remains that the use of the oral cholera vaccine in endemic setting has scarcely been described, especially in an urban setting, until now. Médecins Sans Frontières and the Ministry of Health from Democratic Republic of Congo organized a vaccination campaign of a limited part of the urbanized and highly endemic city of Kalemie, in the Tanganyika Province using a door to door strategy. The vaccine coverage in the targeted zones was high and demonstrated the feasibility of cholera vaccination campaign in this setting but also the need for creative strategies in order to reach population remaining hard to vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Adalbert Ngandwe
- Ministère de la Santé Publique, Katanga, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | | | - Romain Ramazani
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Katanga, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | | | | | | | - Marie Kashimi
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Katanga, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | | | | | | | - Ernest Dabire
- World Health Organization, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Didier Bompangue
- Ministère de la Santé Publique, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Benoit Kebela
- Ministère de la Santé Publique, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lam E, Al-Tamimi W, Russell SP, Butt MOUI, Blanton C, Musani AS, Date K. Oral Cholera Vaccine Coverage during an Outbreak and Humanitarian Crisis, Iraq, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 2018; 23:38-45. [PMID: 27983502 PMCID: PMC5176248 DOI: 10.3201/eid2301.160881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
During November–December 2015, as part of the 2015 cholera outbreak response in Iraq, the Iraqi Ministry of Health targeted ≈255,000 displaced persons >1 year of age with 2 doses of oral cholera vaccine (OCV). All persons who received vaccines were living in selected refugee camps, internally displaced persons camps, and collective centers. We conducted a multistage cluster survey to obtain OCV coverage estimates in 10 governorates that were targeted during the campaign. In total, 1,226 household and 5,007 individual interviews were conducted. Overall, 2-dose OCV coverage in the targeted camps was 87% (95% CI 85%–89%). Two-dose OCV coverage in the 3 northern governorates (91%; 95% CI 87%–94%) was higher than that in the 7 southern and central governorates (80%; 95% CI 77%–82%). The experience in Iraq demonstrates that OCV campaigns can be successfully implemented as part of a comprehensive response to cholera outbreaks among high-risk populations in conflict settings.
Collapse
|
19
|
Démolis R, Botão C, Heyerdahl LW, Gessner BD, Cavailler P, Sinai C, Magaço A, Le Gargasson JB, Mengel M, Guillermet E. A rapid qualitative assessment of oral cholera vaccine anticipated acceptability in a context of resistance towards cholera intervention in Nampula, Mozambique. Vaccine 2017; 36:6497-6505. [PMID: 29174106 PMCID: PMC6190029 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Revised: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Political resistance impacts potential OCV acceptability. Perceived vulnerability to cholera overrides rationale for OCV hesitancy. Case-by-case preemptive studies maximize public health intervention acceptability.
Introduction While planning an immunization campaign in settings where public health interventions are subject to politically motivated resistance, designing context-based social mobilization strategies is critical to ensure community acceptability. In preparation for an Oral Cholera Vaccine campaign implemented in Nampula, Mozambique, in November 2016, we assessed potential barriers and levers for vaccine acceptability. Methods Questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions, as well as observations, were conducted before the campaign. The participants included central and district level government informants (national immunization program, logistics officers, public health directors, and others), community leaders and representatives, and community members. Results During previous well chlorination interventions, some government representatives and health agents were attacked, because they were believed to be responsible for spreading cholera instead of purifying the wells. Politically motivated resistance to cholera interventions resurfaced when an OCV campaign was considered. Respondents also reported vaccine hesitancy related to experiences of problems during school-based vaccine introduction, rumors related to vaccine safety, and negative experiences following routine childhood immunization. Despite major suspicions associated with the OCV campaign, respondents’ perceived vulnerability to cholera and its perceived severity seem to override potential anticipated OCV vaccine hesitancy. Discussion Potential hesitancy towards the OCV campaign is grounded in global insecurity, social disequilibrium, and perceived institutional negligence, which reinforces a representation of estrangement from the central government, triggering suspicions on its intentions in implementing the OCV campaign. Recommendations include a strong involvement of community leaders, which is important for successful social mobilization; representatives of different political parties should be equally involved in social mobilization efforts, before and during campaigns; and public health officials should promote other planned interventions to mitigate the lack of trust associated with perceived institutional negligence. Successful past initiatives include public intake of purified water or newly introduced medication by social mobilizers, teachers or credible leaders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Démolis
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, Bât. JB Say, 4e étage, aile A, 13 chemin du Levant, 01210 Ferney-Voltaire, France.
| | - Carlos Botão
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Avenido Eduardo Mundlane/Salvador Allende, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - Bradford D Gessner
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, Bât. JB Say, 4e étage, aile A, 13 chemin du Levant, 01210 Ferney-Voltaire, France
| | - Philippe Cavailler
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, Bât. JB Say, 4e étage, aile A, 13 chemin du Levant, 01210 Ferney-Voltaire, France
| | - Celestino Sinai
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Avenido Eduardo Mundlane/Salvador Allende, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Amílcar Magaço
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Avenido Eduardo Mundlane/Salvador Allende, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Jean-Bernard Le Gargasson
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, Bât. JB Say, 4e étage, aile A, 13 chemin du Levant, 01210 Ferney-Voltaire, France
| | - Martin Mengel
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, Bât. JB Say, 4e étage, aile A, 13 chemin du Levant, 01210 Ferney-Voltaire, France
| | - Elise Guillermet
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, Bât. JB Say, 4e étage, aile A, 13 chemin du Levant, 01210 Ferney-Voltaire, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Routh JA, Sreenivasan N, Adhikari BB, Andrecy LL, Bernateau M, Abimbola T, Njau J, Jackson E, Juin S, Francois J, Tohme RA, Meltzer MI, Katz MA, Mintz ED. Cost Evaluation of a Government-Conducted Oral Cholera Vaccination Campaign-Haiti, 2013. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2017; 97:37-42. [PMID: 29064362 PMCID: PMC5676633 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-1023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The devastating 2010 cholera epidemic in Haiti prompted the government to introduce oral cholera vaccine (OCV) in two high-risk areas of Haiti. We evaluated the direct costs associated with the government's first vaccine campaign implemented in August-September 2013. We analyzed data for major cost categories and assessed the efficiency of available campaign resources to vaccinate the target population. For a target population of 107,906 persons, campaign costs totaled $624,000 and 215,295 OCV doses were dispensed. The total vaccine and operational cost was $2.90 per dose; vaccine alone cost $1.85 per dose, vaccine delivery and administration $0.70 per dose, and vaccine storage and transport $0.35 per dose. Resources were greater than needed-our analyses suggested that approximately 2.5-6 times as many persons could have been vaccinated during this campaign without increasing the resources allocated for vaccine delivery and administration. These results can inform future OCV campaigns in Haiti.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janell A Routh
- Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nandini Sreenivasan
- Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bishwa B Adhikari
- Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lesly L Andrecy
- Field Epidemiology Training Program, Direction d'Epidémiologie de Laboratoire et de Recherches (DELR), Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population (MSPP), Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Margarette Bernateau
- Field Epidemiology Training Program, Direction d'Epidémiologie de Laboratoire et de Recherches (DELR), Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population (MSPP), Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Taiwo Abimbola
- Global Immunizations Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Joseph Njau
- Global Immunizations Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Stanley Juin
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Embassy, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Jeannot Francois
- Directeur du Programme Elargi de Vaccination (DPEV), MSPP, Ave Maïs Gaté, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Rania A Tohme
- Global Immunizations Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Martin I Meltzer
- Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mark A Katz
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Embassy, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Eric D Mintz
- Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Haddison EC, Abdullahi LH, Muloiwa R, Hussey GD, Kagina BM. Comparison of school based and supplemental vaccination strategies in the delivery of vaccines to 5-19 year olds in Africa - a systematic review. F1000Res 2017; 6:1833. [PMID: 29375814 PMCID: PMC5765397 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.12804.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Some vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) still remain a public health burden in many African countries. The occurrence of VPDs in all age groups has led to the realization of the need to extend routine immunisation services to school age children, adolescents and adults. Supplemental immunisation activities (SIAs) and school based vaccinations (SBVs) are common strategies used to complement the expanded programme on immunisation (EPI). This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of SIAs compared to SBVs in the administration of vaccines to 5-19 year olds in Africa. Methods: Systematic review methods were used to address our study aim. Several electronic databases were searched up to March 30, 2017 for primary studies investigating the delivery of vaccines via SIAs or SBVs to 5-19 year olds. This search was complemented by browsing reference lists of potential studies obtained from search outputs. Outcomes considered for inclusion were: vaccination coverage, costs of the strategy or its effect on routine immunisation services. Results: Out of the 4938 studies identified, 31 studies met the review inclusion criteria. Both SIAs and SBVs showed high vaccination coverage. However, the SIAs reported higher coverage than SBVs: 91% (95% CI: 84%, 98%) versus 75% (95% CI: 67%, 83%). In most settings, SBVs were reported to be more expensive than SIAs. The SIAs were found to negatively affect routine immunisation services. Conclusions: Both SIAs and SBVs are routinely used to complement the EPI in the delivery of vaccines in Africa. In settings where school enrolment is suboptimal, as is the case in many African countries, our results show SIAs may be more effective in reaching school age children and adolescents than SBVs. Our results re-iterate the importance of evaluating systematic evidence to best inform African authorities on the optimal vaccine delivery strategies targeting school age children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eposi C Haddison
- Vaccines for Africa Initiative (VACFA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Leila H Abdullahi
- Vaccines for Africa Initiative (VACFA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Division of Medical Microbiology & Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Rudzani Muloiwa
- Vaccines for Africa Initiative (VACFA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Gregory D Hussey
- Vaccines for Africa Initiative (VACFA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Division of Medical Microbiology & Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Benjamin M Kagina
- Vaccines for Africa Initiative (VACFA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ilboudo PG, Huang XX, Ngwira B, Mwanyungwe A, Mogasale V, Mengel MA, Cavailler P, Gessner BD, Le Gargasson JB. Cost-of-illness of cholera to households and health facilities in rural Malawi. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0185041. [PMID: 28934285 PMCID: PMC5608291 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholera remains an important public health problem in many low- and middle-income countries. Vaccination has been recommended as a possible intervention for the prevention and control of cholera. Evidence, especially data on disease burden, cost-of-illness, delivery costs and cost-effectiveness to support a wider use of vaccine is still weak. This study aims at estimating the cost-of-illness of cholera to households and health facilities in Machinga and Zomba Districts, Malawi. A cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected cost data was undertaken in this investigation. One hundred patients were purposefully selected for the assessment of the household cost-of-illness and four cholera treatment centres and one health facility were selected for the assessment conducted in health facilities. Data collected for the assessment in households included direct and indirect costs borne by cholera patients and their families while only direct costs were considered for the assessment conducted in health facilities. Whenever possible, descriptive and regression analysis were used to assess difference in mean costs between groups of patients. The average costs to patients’ households and health facilities for treating an episode of cholera amounted to US$65.6 and US$59.7 in 2016 for households and health facilities, respectively equivalent to international dollars (I$) 249.9 and 227.5 the same year. Costs incurred in treating a cholera episode were proportional to duration of hospital stay. Moreover, 52% of households used coping strategies to compensate for direct and indirect costs imposed by the disease. Both households and health facilities could avert significant treatment expenditures through a broader use of pre-emptive cholera vaccination. These findings have direct policy implications regarding priority investments for the prevention and control of cholera.
Collapse
|
23
|
Parker LA, Rumunu J, Jamet C, Kenyi Y, Lino RL, Wamala JF, Mpairwe AM, Muller V, Llosa AE, Uzzeni F, Luquero FJ, Ciglenecki I, Azman AS. Neighborhood-targeted and case-triggered use of a single dose of oral cholera vaccine in an urban setting: Feasibility and vaccine coverage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017; 11:e0005652. [PMID: 28594891 PMCID: PMC5478158 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In June 2015, a cholera outbreak was declared in Juba, South Sudan. In addition to standard outbreak control measures, oral cholera vaccine (OCV) was proposed. As sufficient doses to cover the at-risk population were unavailable, a campaign using half the standard dosing regimen (one-dose) targeted high-risk neighborhoods and groups including neighbors of suspected cases. Here we report the operational details of this first public health use of a single-dose regimen of OCV and illustrate the feasibility of conducting highly targeted vaccination campaigns in an urban area. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Neighborhoods of the city were prioritized for vaccination based on cumulative attack rates, active transmission and local knowledge of known cholera risk factors. OCV was offered to all persons older than 12 months at 20 fixed sites and to select groups, including neighbors of cholera cases after the main campaign ('case-triggered' interventions), through mobile teams. Vaccination coverage was estimated by multi-stage surveys using spatial sampling techniques. 162,377 individuals received a single-dose of OCV in the targeted neighborhoods. In these neighborhoods vaccine coverage was 68.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 64.0-73.7) and was highest among children ages 5-14 years (90.0%, 95% CI 85.7-94.3), with adult men being less likely to be vaccinated than adult women (Relative Risk 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.96). In the case-triggered interventions, each lasting 1-2 days, coverage varied (range: 30-87%) with an average of 51.0% (95% CI 41.7-60.3). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Vaccine supply constraints and the complex realities where cholera outbreaks occur may warrant the use of flexible alternative vaccination strategies, including highly-targeted vaccination campaigns and single-dose regimens. We showed that such campaigns are feasible. Additional work is needed to understand how and when to use different strategies to best protect populations against epidemic cholera.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A. Parker
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Department of Public Health, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - John Rumunu
- Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Health, Juba, South Sudan
| | | | - Yona Kenyi
- Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Health, Juba, South Sudan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Francisco J. Luquero
- Epicentre, Paris, France
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Andrew S. Azman
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Scobie HM, Phares CR, Wannemuehler KA, Nyangoma E, Taylor EM, Fulton A, Wongjindanon N, Aung NR, Travers P, Date K. Use of Oral Cholera Vaccine and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in a Long-Standing Refugee Camp, Thailand, 2012-2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016; 10:e0005210. [PMID: 27992609 PMCID: PMC5167226 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) are relatively new public health interventions, and limited data exist on the potential impact of OCV use on traditional cholera prevention and control measures—safe water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH). To assess OCV acceptability and knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) regarding cholera and WaSH, we conducted cross-sectional surveys, 1 month before (baseline) and 3 and 12 months after (first and second follow-up) a preemptive OCV campaign in Maela, a long-standing refugee camp on the Thailand-Burma border. We randomly selected households for the surveys, and administered questionnaires to female heads of households. In total, 271 (77%), 187 (81%), and 199 (85%) households were included in the baseline, first and second follow-up surveys, respectively. Anticipated OCV acceptability was 97% at baseline, and 91% and 85% of household members were reported to have received 1 and 2 OCV doses at first follow-up. Compared with baseline, statistically significant differences (95% Wald confidence interval not overlapping zero) were noted at first and second follow-up among the proportions of respondents who correctly identified two or more means of cholera prevention (62% versus 78% and 80%), reported boiling or treating drinking water (19% versus 44% and 69%), and washing hands with soap (66% versus 77% and 85%); a significant difference was also observed in the proportion of households with soap available at handwashing areas (84% versus 90% and 95%), consistent with reported behaviors. No significant difference was noted in the proportion of households testing positive for Escherichia coli in stored household drinking water at second follow-up (39% versus 49% and 34%). Overall, we observed some positive, and no negative changes in cholera- and WaSH-related KAPs after an OCV campaign in Maela refugee camp. OCV campaigns may provide opportunities to reinforce beneficial WaSH-related KAPs for comprehensive cholera prevention and control. Safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) are the primary measures for cholera prevention and control. Since 2010, oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been recommended as an additional tool for endemic and epidemic cholera prevention and control. Given the relatively new use of OCVs in public health programs, there is limited information on the impact of OCV use on traditional WaSH activities, i.e., can they serve as complementary tools, or will OCV use have a negative impact on WaSH-related behaviors? This study reports the findings of knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) surveys conducted before and after a preventive OCV campaign (2013) in a long-standing refugee camp in Thailand, where frequent cholera outbreaks had occurred in recent years. The surveys demonstrated high acceptability of the OCV campaign and several modest improvements in cholera and WaSH KAPs among the camp population. OCV campaigns may be used as opportunities to reinforce cholera and WaSH-related messaging towards strengthening comprehensive cholera prevention and control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather M. Scobie
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Christina R. Phares
- Thailand Ministry of Public Health – U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
- Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Kathleen A. Wannemuehler
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Edith Nyangoma
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Eboni M. Taylor
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Anna Fulton
- Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Nuttapong Wongjindanon
- Thailand Ministry of Public Health – U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Naw Rody Aung
- Première Urgence-Aide Médicale Internationale, Mae Sot, Thailand
| | - Phillipe Travers
- Première Urgence-Aide Médicale Internationale, Mae Sot, Thailand
| | - Kashmira Date
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mogasale V, Ramani E, Wee H, Kim JH. Oral Cholera Vaccination Delivery Cost in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Analysis Based on Systematic Review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016; 10:e0005124. [PMID: 27930668 PMCID: PMC5145138 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of the oral cholera vaccine (OCV) is a vital short-term strategy to control cholera in endemic areas with poor water and sanitation infrastructure. Identifying, estimating, and categorizing the delivery costs of OCV campaigns are useful in analyzing cost-effectiveness, understanding vaccine affordability, and in planning and decision making by program managers and policy makers. OBJECTIVES To review and re-estimate oral cholera vaccination program costs and propose a new standardized categorization that can help in collation, analysis, and comparison of delivery costs across countries. DATA SOURCES Peer reviewed publications listed in PubMed database, Google Scholar and World Health Organization (WHO) websites and unpublished data from organizations involved in oral cholera vaccination. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA The publications and reports containing oral cholera vaccination delivery costs, conducted in low- and middle-income countries based on World Bank Classification. Limits are humans and publication date before December 31st, 2014. PARTICIPANTS No participants are involved, only costs are collected. INTERVENTION Oral cholera vaccination and cost estimation. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHOD A systematic review was conducted using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cost items were categorized into four main cost groups: vaccination program preparation, vaccine administration, adverse events following immunization and vaccine procurement; the first three groups constituting the vaccine delivery costs. The costs were re-estimated in 2014 US dollars (US$) and in international dollar (I$). RESULTS Ten studies were identified and included in the analysis. The vaccine delivery costs ranged from US$0.36 to US$ 6.32 (in US$2014) which was equivalent to I$ 0.99 to I$ 16.81 (in I$2014). The vaccine procurement costs ranged from US$ 0.29 to US$ 29.70 (in US$2014), which was equivalent to I$ 0.72 to I$ 78.96 (in I$2014). The delivery costs in routine immunization systems were lowest from US$ 0.36 (in US$2014) equivalent to I$ 0.99 (in I$2014). LIMITATIONS The reported cost categories are not standardized at collection point and may lead to misclassification. Costs for some OCV campaigns are not available and analysis does not include direct and indirect costs to vaccine recipients. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS Vaccine delivery cost estimation is needed for budgeting and economic analysis of vaccination programs. The cost categorization methodology presented in this study is helpful in collecting OCV delivery costs in a standardized manner, comparing delivery costs, planning vaccination campaigns and informing decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittal Mogasale
- International Vaccine Institute, Policy and Economic Research Department, SNU Research Park, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Enusa Ramani
- International Vaccine Institute, Policy and Economic Research Department, SNU Research Park, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyeseung Wee
- International Vaccine Institute, Policy and Economic Research Department, SNU Research Park, Seoul, South Korea
- Korea Development Institute, Sejong-si, South Korea
| | - Jerome H. Kim
- International Vaccine Institute, Policy and Economic Research Department, SNU Research Park, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sauvageot D, Njanpop-Lafourcade BM, Akilimali L, Anne JC, Bidjada P, Bompangue D, Bwire G, Coulibaly D, Dengo-Baloi L, Dosso M, Orach CG, Inguane D, Kagirita A, Kacou-N’Douba A, Keita S, Kere Banla A, Kouame YJP, Landoh DE, Langa JP, Makumbi I, Miwanda B, Malimbo M, Mutombo G, Mutombo A, NGuetta EN, Saliou M, Sarr V, Senga RK, Sory F, Sema C, Tante OV, Gessner BD, Mengel MA. Cholera Incidence and Mortality in Sub-Saharan African Sites during Multi-country Surveillance. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016; 10:e0004679. [PMID: 27186885 PMCID: PMC4871502 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2015] [Accepted: 04/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholera burden in Africa remains unknown, often because of weak national surveillance systems. We analyzed data from the African Cholera Surveillance Network (www.africhol.org). METHODS/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS During June 2011-December 2013, we conducted enhanced surveillance in seven zones and four outbreak sites in Togo, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Guinea, Uganda, Mozambique and Cote d'Ivoire. All health facilities treating cholera cases were included. Cholera incidences were calculated using culture-confirmed cholera cases and culture-confirmed cholera cases corrected for lack of culture testing usually due to overwhelmed health systems and imperfect test sensitivity. Of 13,377 reported suspected cases, 34% occurred in Conakry, Guinea, 47% in Goma, DRC, and 19% in the remaining sites. From 0-40% of suspected cases were aged under five years and from 0.3-86% had rice water stools. Within surveillance zones, 0-37% of suspected cases had confirmed cholera compared to 27-38% during outbreaks. Annual confirmed incidence per 10,000 population was <0.5 in surveillance zones, except Goma where it was 4.6. Goma and Conakry had corrected incidences of 20.2 and 5.8 respectively, while the other zones a median of 0.3. During outbreaks, corrected incidence varied from 2.6 to 13.0. Case fatality ratios ranged from 0-10% (median, 1%) by country. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Across different African epidemiological contexts, substantial variation occurred in cholera incidence, age distribution, clinical presentation, culture confirmation, and testing frequency. These results can help guide preventive activities, including vaccine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Didier Bompangue
- Universite de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Republique Democratique du Congo
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Atek Kagirita
- Central Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Sakoba Keita
- Ministere de la sante publique et de l’hygiene publique, Conakry, Guinea
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Berthe Miwanda
- Institut National de Recherche Biomedicale, Kinshasa, Republique Democratique du Congo
| | | | - Guy Mutombo
- Ministere de la santé, Division Provinciale de la santé, Goma, Republique Democratique du Congo
| | - Annie Mutombo
- Ministère de la santé, Kinshasa, Republique Democratique du Congo
| | | | | | - Veronique Sarr
- Ministere de la sante publique et de l’hygiene publique, Conakry, Guinea
| | | | - Fode Sory
- Ministere de la sante publique et de l’hygiene publique, Conakry, Guinea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Optimized oral cholera vaccine distribution strategies to minimize disease incidence: A mixed integer programming model and analysis of a Bangladesh scenario. Vaccine 2015; 33:6218-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2015] [Revised: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
28
|
Mogasale V, Kar SK, Kim JH, Mogasale VV, Kerketta AS, Patnaik B, Rath SB, Puri MK, You YA, Khuntia HK, Maskery B, Wierzba TF, Sah B. An Estimation of Private Household Costs to Receive Free Oral Cholera Vaccine in Odisha, India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9:e0004072. [PMID: 26352143 PMCID: PMC4564266 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Service provider costs for vaccine delivery have been well documented; however, vaccine recipients' costs have drawn less attention. This research explores the private household out-of-pocket and opportunity costs incurred to receive free oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign in rural Odisha, India. METHODS Following a government-driven oral cholera mass vaccination campaign targeting population over one year of age, a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was conducted to estimate private household costs among vaccine recipients. The questionnaire captured travel costs as well as time and wage loss for self and accompanying persons. The productivity loss was estimated using three methods: self-reported, government defined minimum daily wages and gross domestic product per capita in Odisha. FINDINGS On average, families were located 282.7 (SD = 254.5) meters from the nearest vaccination booths. Most family members either walked or bicycled to the vaccination sites and spent on average 26.5 minutes on travel and 15.7 minutes on waiting. Depending upon the methodology, the estimated productivity loss due to potential foregone income ranged from $0.15 to $0.29 per dose of cholera vaccine received. The private household cost of receiving oral cholera vaccine constituted 24.6% to 38.0% of overall vaccine delivery costs. INTERPRETATION The private household costs resulting from productivity loss for receiving a free oral cholera vaccine is a substantial proportion of overall vaccine delivery cost and may influence vaccine uptake. Policy makers and program managers need to recognize the importance of private costs and consider how to balance programmatic delivery costs with private household costs to receive vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittal Mogasale
- International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| | - Shantanu K. Kar
- Regional Medical Research Center (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Jong-Hoon Kim
- International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Anna S. Kerketta
- Regional Medical Research Center (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | | | | | - Mahesh K. Puri
- International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Ae You
- International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Brian Maskery
- International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Binod Sah
- International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tohme RA, François J, Wannemuehler K, Iyengar P, Dismer A, Adrien P, Hyde TB, Marston BJ, Date K, Mintz E, Katz MA. Oral Cholera Vaccine Coverage, Barriers to Vaccination, and Adverse Events following Vaccination, Haiti, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis 2015; 21:984-91. [PMID: 25988350 PMCID: PMC4451924 DOI: 10.3201/eid2106.141797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2013, the first government-led oral cholera vaccination (OCV) campaign in Haiti was implemented in Petite Anse and Cerca Carvajal. To evaluate vaccination coverage, barriers to vaccination, and adverse events following vaccination, we conducted a cluster survey. We enrolled 1,121 persons from Petite Anse and 809 persons from Cerca Carvajal, categorized by 3 age groups (1-4, 5-14, >15 years). Two-dose OCV coverage was 62.5% in Petite Anse and 76.8% in Cerca Carvajal. Two-dose coverage was lowest among persons >15 years of age. In Cerca Carvajal, coverage was significantly lower for male than female respondents (69% vs. 85%; p<0.001). No major adverse events were reported. The main reason for nonvaccination was absence during the campaign. Vaccination coverage after this campaign was acceptable and comparable to that resulting from campaigns implemented by nongovernmental organizations. Future campaigns should be tailored to reach adults who are not available during daytime hours.
Collapse
|
30
|
When, how, and where can oral cholera vaccines be used to interrupt cholera outbreaks? Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2014; 379:231-58. [PMID: 24402712 DOI: 10.1007/82_2013_353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
Cholera continues to be a major global health problem, at times causing major and prolonged outbreaks in both endemic and nonendemic settings in developing countries. While improved water quality, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) will provide the ultimate solution to prevention of this disease burden, this is a far-off goal for most developing countries. Oral cholera vaccines cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been demonstrated to be effective in the control of cholera outbreaks, and constitute useful tools to be used in conjunction with efforts to improve WASH. Two killed OCVs are prequalified by WHO for purchase by UN agencies for international use. Recently, WHO has launched a global stockpile stockpile of killed OCVs for use to control outbreaks. Rational deployment of OCV from this stockpile will require consideration of costs, feasibility, disease epidemiology epidemiology , and the protective characteristics of the vaccine deployed, as well as effective and rapid coordination of processes and logistics logistics used to make decisions on deployment and delivery of the vaccine to the population in need. Despite not having data on all the questions of relevance as to how to use OCVs to control cholera outbreaks in different settings, there is clearly more than enough evidence to initiate their use, as answers to remaining questions and refinement of policies will mainly come with experience.
Collapse
|
31
|
Martin S, Lopez AL, Bellos A, Deen J, Ali M, Alberti K, Anh DD, Costa A, Grais RF, Legros D, Luquero FJ, Ghai MB, Perea W, Sack DA. Post-licensure deployment of oral cholera vaccines: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2014; 92:881-93. [PMID: 25552772 PMCID: PMC4264394 DOI: 10.2471/blt.14.139949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2014] [Revised: 09/14/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe and analyse the characteristics of oral cholera vaccination campaigns; including location, target population, logistics, vaccine coverage and delivery costs. METHODS We searched PubMed, the World Health Organization (WHO) website and the Cochrane database with no date or language restrictions. We contacted public health personnel, experts in the field and in ministries of health and did targeted web searches. FINDINGS A total of 33 documents were included in the analysis. One country, Viet Nam, incorporates oral cholera vaccination into its public health programme and has administered approximately 10.9 million vaccine doses between 1997 and 2012. In addition, over 3 million doses of the two WHO pre-qualified oral cholera vaccines have been administered in more than 16 campaigns around the world between 1997 and 2014. These campaigns have either been pre-emptive or reactive and have taken place under diverse conditions, such as in refugee camps or natural disasters. Estimated two-dose coverage ranged from 46 to 88% of the target population. Approximate delivery cost per fully immunized person ranged from 0.11-3.99 United States dollars. CONCLUSION Experience with oral cholera vaccination campaigns continues to increase. Public health officials may draw on this experience and conduct oral cholera vaccination campaigns more frequently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Martin
- Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anna Lena Lopez
- University of the Philippines Manila-National Institutes of Health, Manila, Philippines
| | - Anna Bellos
- Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jacqueline Deen
- Delivering Oral Vaccine Effectively (DOVE), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America (USA)
| | - Mohammad Ali
- Delivering Oral Vaccine Effectively (DOVE), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America (USA)
| | - Kathryn Alberti
- United Nations Children's Fund, United Nations Plaza, New York, USA
| | - Dang Duc Anh
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Alejandro Costa
- Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Dominique Legros
- Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Megan B Ghai
- Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - William Perea
- Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David A Sack
- Delivering Oral Vaccine Effectively (DOVE), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America (USA)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Uddin MJ, Wahed T, Saha NC, Kaukab SST, Khan IA, Khan AI, Saha A, Chowdhury F, Clemens JD, Qadri F. Coverage and acceptability of cholera vaccine among high-risk population of urban Dhaka, Bangladesh. Vaccine 2014; 32:5690-5. [PMID: 25149429 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2014] [Revised: 07/06/2014] [Accepted: 08/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol), along with other interventions, is a potential new measure to prevent or control cholera. A mass cholera-vaccination programme was launched in urban Dhaka, Bangladesh, during February-April 2011 targeting about 173,041 people who are at high risk of cholera. This cross-sectional, descriptive study assessed the coverage and acceptability of the vaccine. The study used a quantitative household survey and qualitative data-collection techniques comprising focus-group discussions, in-depth interviews, and observations for assessment. The findings revealed that 88% of the target population received the first dose of the vaccine, and 79% received the second dose. Absence of persons at home was a prominent cause of not administering the first (71%) and the second dose (67%). Thirty-three percent of the respondents (n=9308) did not like the taste of the vaccine. Only 1.3% and 3% recipients of the first dose and the second dose of the vaccine respectively reported adverse effects within 28 days of vaccination, and the adverse effects included vomiting or vomiting tendency and diarrhoea. To improve the coverage of the cholera vaccine, exploration of effective solutions to reach the unvaccinated population is required. The vaccine may be more acceptable to the community through changing its taste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Jasim Uddin
- Centre for Equity and Health Systems, icddr,b, Bangladesh.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Amit Saha
- Centre for Vaccine Sciences, icddr,b, Bangladesh.
| | | | - John David Clemens
- Office of the Executive Director, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Using Mobile Health (mHealth) and geospatial mapping technology in a mass campaign for reactive oral cholera vaccination in rural Haiti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014; 8:e3050. [PMID: 25078790 PMCID: PMC4117440 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 06/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In mass vaccination campaigns, large volumes of data must be managed efficiently and accurately. In a reactive oral cholera vaccination (OCV) campaign in rural Haiti during an ongoing epidemic, we used a mobile health (mHealth) system to manage data on 50,000 participants in two isolated communities. Methods Data were collected using 7-inch tablets. Teams pre-registered and distributed vaccine cards with unique barcodes to vaccine-eligible residents during a census in February 2012. First stored on devices, data were uploaded nightly via Wi-fi to a web-hosted database. During the vaccination campaign between April and June 2012, residents presented their cards at vaccination posts and their barcodes were scanned. Vaccinee data from the census were pre-loaded on tablets to autopopulate the electronic form. Nightly analysis of the day's community coverage informed the following day's vaccination strategy. We generated case-finding reports allowing us to identify those who had not yet been vaccinated. Results During 40 days of vaccination, we collected approximately 1.9 million pieces of data. A total of 45,417 people received at least one OCV dose; of those, 90.8% were documented to have received 2 doses. Though mHealth required up-front financial investment and training, it reduced the need for paper registries and manual data entry, which would have been costly, time-consuming, and is known to increase error. Using Global Positioning System coordinates, we mapped vaccine posts, population size, and vaccine coverage to understand the reach of the campaign. The hardware and software were usable by high school-educated staff. Conclusion The use of mHealth technology in an OCV campaign in rural Haiti allowed timely creation of an electronic registry with population-level census data, and a targeted vaccination strategy in a dispersed rural population receiving a two-dose vaccine regimen. The use of mHealth should be strongly considered in mass vaccination campaigns in future initiatives. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently endorsed the creation of a global oral cholera vaccine (OCV) stockpile as part of an integrated, strategic framework to address the re-emerging threat that cholera causes worldwide. In conjunction, the WHO also called for continued monitoring and evaluation around the use of OCV in different settings. In response to the cholera epidemic in Haiti that began in October 2010, Partners In Health, an implementing partner of Haiti's Ministry of Health, vaccinated 50,000 Haitians in two rural communities in the Artibonite Valley in 2012. In this paper, the authors describe the use of mobile health (mHealth) technology for data collection and geospatial mapping to document this rural OCV campaign, focusing on the utility, benefits, and challenges of mHealth in a reactive campaign in the midst of the ongoing epidemic.
Collapse
|
34
|
Kar SK, Sah B, Patnaik B, Kim YH, Kerketta AS, Shin S, Rath SB, Ali M, Mogasale V, Khuntia HK, Bhattachan A, You YA, Puri MK, Lopez AL, Maskery B, Nair GB, Clemens JD, Wierzba TF. Mass vaccination with a new, less expensive oral cholera vaccine using public health infrastructure in India: the Odisha model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014; 8:e2629. [PMID: 24516675 PMCID: PMC3916257 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2013] [Accepted: 11/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The substantial morbidity and mortality associated with recent cholera outbreaks in Haiti and Zimbabwe, as well as with cholera endemicity in countries throughout Asia and Africa, make a compelling case for supplementary cholera control measures in addition to existing interventions. Clinical trials conducted in Kolkata, India, have led to World Health Organization (WHO)-prequalification of Shanchol, an oral cholera vaccine (OCV) with a demonstrated 65% efficacy at 5 years post-vaccination. However, before this vaccine is widely used in endemic areas or in areas at risk of outbreaks, as recommended by the WHO, policymakers will require empirical evidence on its implementation and delivery costs in public health programs. The objective of the present report is to describe the organization, vaccine coverage, and delivery costs of mass vaccination with a new, less expensive OCV (Shanchol) using existing public health infrastructure in Odisha, India, as a model. Methods All healthy, non-pregnant residents aged 1 year and above residing in selected villages of the Satyabadi block (Puri district, Odisha, India) were invited to participate in a mass vaccination campaign using two doses of OCV. Prior to the campaign, a de jure census, micro-planning for vaccination and social mobilization activities were implemented. Vaccine coverage for each dose was ascertained as a percentage of the censused population. The direct vaccine delivery costs were estimated by reviewing project expenditure records and by interviewing key personnel. Results The mass vaccination was conducted during May and June, 2011, in two phases. In each phase, two vaccine doses were given 14 days apart. Sixty-two vaccination booths, staffed by 395 health workers/volunteers, were established in the community. For the censused population, 31,552 persons (61% of the target population) received the first dose and 23,751 (46%) of these completed their second dose, with a drop-out rate of 25% between the two doses. Higher coverage was observed among females and among 6–17 year-olds. Vaccine cost at market price (about US$1.85/dose) was the costliest item. The vaccine delivery cost was $0.49 per dose or $1.13 per fully vaccinated person. Discussion This is the first undertaken project to collect empirical evidence on the use of Shanchol within a mass vaccination campaign using existing public health program resources. Our findings suggest that mass vaccination is feasible but requires detailed micro-planning. The vaccine and delivery cost is affordable for resource poor countries. Given that the vaccine is now WHO pre-qualified, evidence from this study should encourage oral cholera vaccine use in countries where cholera remains a public health problem. Cholera – an acute life-threatening diarrheal illness – continues to disrupt public health in resource poor countries. The devastating outbreaks in Haiti and Zimbabwe – to name just two of many occurrences – calls for the use of available oral cholera vaccines as an additional tool in the arsenal of cholera control measures. An oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) has been licensed in India since 2009; however, there has only been limited use of this vaccine in government public health programs. A vaccination campaign using 2 doses of Shanchol was conducted in Odisha, India, during May and June, 2011, where 31,552 persons (61% of the target population) received the first dose and 23,751 of them completed their second dose. The vaccine delivery cost was $0.49 per dose. Through our findings and experience, we discuss the organization of the cholera vaccination campaign in Odisha, the challenges met for conducting the campaign and the strategies designed to overcome those challenges, and the delivery costs incurred in the use of this vaccine, the first of its kind, in a public health setting. We believe that evidence from this study is of significant interest and use to policymakers from countries where cholera remains a public health problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shantanu K. Kar
- Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Binod Sah
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Yang Hee Kim
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Sunheang Shin
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Mohammad Ali
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | - Young Ae You
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mahesh K. Puri
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Anna Lena Lopez
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- University of the Philippines Manila, National Institutes of Health, Manila, Philippines
| | - Brian Maskery
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gopinath B. Nair
- Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India
| | - John D. Clemens
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gujral L, Sema C, Rebaudet S, Taibo CLA, Manjate AA, Piarroux R, Gessner BD, Jani IV. Cholera epidemiology in Mozambique using national surveillance data. J Infect Dis 2013; 208 Suppl 1:S107-14. [PMID: 24101638 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mozambique has experienced cholera for several decades. This study was undertaken to evaluate epidemiologic patterns to assist in guiding public health interventions. METHODS We evaluated district-level Ministry of Health data for 123 consecutive weeks starting 1 January 2009. Cholera cases reported to the national level were based on clinical suspicion rather than microbiological confirmation. Time and space analyses with mapping and spatial statistics were undertaken. RESULTS During 2009-2011, Mozambique identified 220 deaths among the 25 431 reported suspected cholera cases (case fatality ratio [CFR], 0.87%). There were 108 outbreaks that occurred in 73 (50%) of Mozambique's 145 districts. Five distinct spatial clusters were identified involving inland and coastal as well as rural and urban populations. Among 78 outbreaks whose duration was known, average duration was 7.2 weeks (median, 6; range, 1-25). During weeks 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, and ≥ 10 after an outbreak, CFRs were 1.6%, 0.66%, 0.33%, and 0.25%, respectively. During 2010, districts that experienced an outbreak during 2009 had a CFR of 0.2% compared with 4.3% among other districts. DISCUSSION Mozambique continues to experience widespread cholera outbreaks of short duration involving distinct spatial clusters. These findings will influence choice of public health strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Gujral
- National Direction of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Coverage and cost of a large oral cholera vaccination program in a high-risk cholera endemic urban population in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Vaccine 2013; 31:6058-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 09/25/2013] [Accepted: 10/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
37
|
Luquero FJ, Grout L, Ciglenecki I, Sakoba K, Traore B, Heile M, Dialo AA, Itama C, Serafini M, Legros D, Grais RF. First outbreak response using an oral cholera vaccine in Africa: vaccine coverage, acceptability and surveillance of adverse events, Guinea, 2012. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7:e2465. [PMID: 24147164 PMCID: PMC3798604 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2013] [Accepted: 08/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification of two safe and effective oral cholera vaccines (OCV), concerns about the acceptability, potential diversion of resources, cost and feasibility of implementing timely campaigns has discouraged their use. In 2012, the Ministry of Health of Guinea, with the support of Médecins Sans Frontières organized the first mass vaccination campaign using a two-dose OCV (Shanchol) as an additional control measure to respond to the on-going nationwide epidemic. Overall, 316,250 vaccines were delivered. Here, we present the results of vaccination coverage, acceptability and surveillance of adverse events. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We performed a cross-sectional cluster survey and implemented adverse event surveillance. The study population included individuals older than 12 months, eligible for vaccination, and residing in the areas targeted for vaccination (Forécariah and Boffa, Guinea). Data sources were household interviews with verification by vaccination card and notifications of adverse events from surveillance at vaccination posts and health centres. In total 5,248 people were included in the survey, 3,993 in Boffa and 1,255 in Forécariah. Overall, 89.4% [95%CI:86.4-91.8%] and 87.7% [95%CI:84.2-90.6%] were vaccinated during the first round and 79.8% [95%CI:75.6-83.4%] and 82.9% [95%CI:76.6-87.7%] during the second round in Boffa and Forécariah respectively. The two dose vaccine coverage (including card and oral reporting) was 75.8% [95%CI: 71.2-75.9%] in Boffa and 75.9% [95%CI: 69.8-80.9%] in Forécariah respectively. Vaccination coverage was higher in children. The main reason for non-vaccination was absence. No severe adverse events were notified. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE The well-accepted mass vaccination campaign reached high coverage in a remote area with a mobile population. Although OCV should not be foreseen as the long-term solution for global cholera control, they should be integrated as an additional tool into the response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lise Grout
- Epicentre, Paris, France
- Médecins sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Keita Sakoba
- Ministry of Health, Conakry, Guinea
- African Cholera Surveillance Network, Paris, France
| | - Bala Traore
- Direction Préfectorale de la Santé, Ministry of Health, Conakry, Guinea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Merten S, Schaetti C, Manianga C, Lapika B, Hutubessy R, Chaignat CL, Weiss M. Sociocultural determinants of anticipated vaccine acceptance for acute watery diarrhea in early childhood in Katanga Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2013; 89:419-25. [PMID: 23878187 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Rotavirus and oral cholera vaccines have the potential to reduce diarrhea-related child mortality in low-income settings and are recommended by the World Health Organization. Uptake of vaccination depends on community support, and is based on local priorities. This study investigates local perceptions of acute watery diarrhea in childhood and anticipated vaccine acceptance in two sites in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In 2010, 360 randomly selected non-affected adults were interviewed by using a semi-structured questionnaire. Witchcraft and breastfeeding were perceived as potential cause of acute watery diarrhea by 51% and 48% of respondents. Despite misperceptions, anticipated vaccine acceptance at no cost was 99%. The strongest predictor of anticipated vaccine acceptance if costs were assumed was the educational level of the respondents. Results suggest that the introduction of vaccines is a local priority and local (mis)perceptions of illness do not compromise vaccine acceptability if the vaccine is affordable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Merten
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Schaetti C, Weiss MG, Ali SM, Chaignat CL, Khatib AM, Reyburn R, Duintjer Tebbens RJ, Hutubessy R. Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012; 6:e1844. [PMID: 23056660 PMCID: PMC3464297 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2012] [Accepted: 08/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) as a supplementary tool to conventional prevention of cholera. Dukoral, a killed whole-cell two-dose OCV, was used in a mass vaccination campaign in 2009 in Zanzibar. Public and private costs of illness (COI) due to endemic cholera and costs of the mass vaccination campaign were estimated to assess the cost-effectiveness of OCV for this particular campaign from both the health care provider and the societal perspective. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Public and private COI were obtained from interviews with local experts, with patients from three outbreaks and from reports and record review. Cost data for the vaccination campaign were collected based on actual expenditure and planned budget data. A static cohort of 50,000 individuals was examined, including herd protection. Primary outcome measures were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per death, per case and per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. One-way sensitivity and threshold analyses were conducted. The ICER was evaluated with regard to WHO criteria for cost-effectiveness. Base-case ICERs were USD 750,000 per death averted, USD 6,000 per case averted and USD 30,000 per DALY averted, without differences between the health care provider and the societal perspective. Threshold analyses using Shanchol and assuming high incidence and case-fatality rate indicated that the purchase price per course would have to be as low as USD 1.2 to render the mass vaccination campaign cost-effective from a health care provider perspective (societal perspective: USD 1.3). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Based on empirical and site-specific cost and effectiveness data from Zanzibar, the 2009 mass vaccination campaign was cost-ineffective mainly due to the relatively high OCV purchase price and a relatively low incidence. However, mass vaccination campaigns in Zanzibar to control endemic cholera may meet criteria for cost-effectiveness under certain circumstances, especially in high-incidence areas and at OCV prices below USD 1.3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Schaetti
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mitchell G. Weiss
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Said M. Ali
- Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri, Ministry of Health of Zanzibar, Chake-Chake, Pemba, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Claire-Lise Chaignat
- Global Task Force on Cholera Control, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ahmed M. Khatib
- Ministry of Health of Zanzibar, Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania
| | | | | | - Raymond Hutubessy
- Initiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schaetti C, Ali SM, Hutubessy R, Khatib AM, Chaignat CL, Weiss MG. Social and cultural determinants of oral cholera vaccine uptake in Zanzibar. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2012; 8:1223-9. [PMID: 22894965 DOI: 10.4161/hv.20901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Effectiveness of mass cholera vaccination campaigns requires not only technical and financial capacity but also consideration of social and cultural factors affecting vaccine acceptance. This study examined the influence of local community views of cholera on oral cholera vaccine (OCV) uptake in a mass vaccination campaign in 2009 in peri-urban and rural areas of Zanzibar. It used data from interviews conducted before the campaign and followed previous research assessing determinants of anticipated OCV acceptance. OCV uptake was lower than the reported anticipated acceptance. Less than half of the 356 adult respondents (49.7%) drank the required two doses of OCV. Variables referring to socio-cultural features of diarrheal illness that respondents identified with a cholera case vignette explained uptake better than analysis only of socio-demographic characteristics. Somatic features of illness not specific for cholera were negative determinants. Recognition of unconsciousness as a serious sign of dehydration and concern that cholera outbreaks would overwhelm the local healthcare system in the rural area were positive determinants of acceptance. Female gender, rural residence and older age were also positive determinants of OCV uptake. For further vaccine action with OCVs, cholera as a cause of severe dehydration should be distinguished from other causes of diarrhea. Planning should acknowledge rural concern about the relationship of limited capacity of the healthcare system to cope with cholera outbreaks and the priority of a cholera vaccine. Findings recommend particular efforts to increase cholera immunization coverage among young adults, in peri-urban areas and for men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Schaetti
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schaetti C, Ali SM, Chaignat CL, Khatib AM, Hutubessy R, Weiss MG. Improving community coverage of oral cholera mass vaccination campaigns: lessons learned in Zanzibar. PLoS One 2012; 7:e41527. [PMID: 22844489 PMCID: PMC3402403 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2011] [Accepted: 06/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent research in two cholera-endemic communities of Zanzibar has shown that a majority (∼94%) of the adult population was willing to receive free oral cholera vaccines (OCVs). Since OCV uptake in the 2009 campaign reached only ∼50% in these communities, an evaluation of social and cultural factors and of barriers was conducted to understand this difference for future cholera control planning. Methodology/Principal Findings A random sample of 367 adult peri-urban and rural community residents (46.6% immunized vs. 53.4% unimmunized) was studied with a semi-structured interview that inquired about social and cultural features of cholera depicted in a vignette and barriers to OCV uptake. Symptoms (rectal pain, loose skin only in rural community) and perceived causes (uncovered food, contact with contaminated water) specific for severe diarrhea were associated with uptake. Purchasing drugs from pharmacies to stop diarrhea and vomiting was negatively associated with uptake. Increasing household size, age and previous enteric illness episode were positively related to uptake, the latter only at the rural site. The most prominent barrier to uptake was competing obligations or priorities (reported by 74.5%, identified as most important barrier by 49.5%). Next most prominent barriers were lacking information about the campaign (29.6%, 12.2%), sickness (14.3%, 13.3%) and fear of possible vaccine side effects (15.3%, 5.6%). The majority of unvaccinated respondents requested repetition of the vaccination with free OCVs. Conclusions/Significance Factors associated with uptake indicated a positive impact of the vaccination campaign and of sensitization activities on vaccine acceptance behavior. Unlike communities opposed to cholera control or settings where public confidence in vaccines is lacking, identified barriers to uptake indicated a good campaign implementation and trust in the health system. Despite prospects and demand for repeating the vaccination, local decision-makers should reconsider how careful logistical arrangements may improve community coverage and thus effectiveness of vaccination campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Schaetti
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Cholera is a major global health problem, causing approximately 100,000 deaths annually, about half of which occur in sub-Saharan Africa. Although early-generation parenteral cholera vaccines were abandoned as public health tools owing to their limited efficacy, newer-generation oral cholera vaccines have attractive safety and protection profiles. Both killed and live oral vaccines have been licensed, although only killed oral vaccines are currently manufactured and available. These killed oral vaccines not only provide direct protection to vaccinated individuals, but also confer herd immunity. The combination of direct vaccine protection and vaccine herd immunity effects makes these vaccines highly cost-effective and, therefore, attractive for use in developing countries. Administration of these oral vaccines does not require qualified medical personnel, which makes their use practical--even in developing countries. Although new-generation oral cholera vaccines should not be considered in isolation from other preventive approaches, especially improved water quality and sanitation, they represent important tools in the public health armamentarium to control both endemic and epidemic cholera.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Clemens
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul National University Research Park, San 4-8, Nakseongdae-dong, Kwanak-gu, Seoul 151-919, Korea.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Luquero FJ, Banga CN, Remartínez D, Palma PP, Baron E, Grais RF. Cholera epidemic in Guinea-Bissau (2008): the importance of "place". PLoS One 2011; 6:e19005. [PMID: 21572530 PMCID: PMC3087718 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2010] [Accepted: 03/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As resources are limited when responding to cholera outbreaks, knowledge about where to orient interventions is crucial. We describe the cholera epidemic affecting Guinea-Bissau in 2008 focusing on the geographical spread in order to guide prevention and control activities. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We conducted two studies: 1) a descriptive analysis of the cholera epidemic in Guinea-Bissau focusing on its geographical spread (country level and within the capital); and 2) a cross-sectional study to measure the prevalence of houses with at least one cholera case in the most affected neighbourhood of the capital (Bairro Bandim) to detect clustering of households with cases (cluster analysis). All cholera cases attending the cholera treatment centres in Guinea-Bissau who fulfilled a modified World Health Organization clinical case definition during the epidemic were included in the descriptive study. For the cluster analysis, a sample of houses was selected from a satellite photo (Google Earth™); 140 houses (and the four closest houses) were assessed from the 2,202 identified structures. We applied K-functions and Kernel smoothing to detect clustering. We confirmed the clustering using Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic. A total of 14,222 cases and 225 deaths were reported in the country (AR = 0.94%, CFR = 1.64%). The more affected regions were Biombo, Bijagos and Bissau (the capital). Bairro Bandim was the most affected neighborhood of the capital (AR = 4.0). We found at least one case in 22.7% of the houses (95%CI: 19.5-26.2) in this neighborhood. The cluster analysis identified two areas within Bairro Bandim at highest risk: a market and an intersection where runoff accumulates waste (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Our analysis allowed for the identification of the most affected regions in Guinea-Bissau during the 2008 cholera outbreak, and the most affected areas within the capital. This information was essential for making decisions on where to reinforce treatment and to guide control and prevention activities.
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
EDITORIAL NOTE This review is superseded by the published Cochrane Review, Saif‐Ur‐Rahman 2024 [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014573], which considers only the oral killed vaccines because the live oral vaccines do not have World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification. Saif‐Ur‐Rahman 2024 also considered only currently available WHO pre‐qualified oral killed cholera vaccines (Dukoral, Shanchol, and Euvichol/Euvichol‐Plus). BACKGROUND Cholera is a cause of acute watery diarrhoea which can cause dehydration and death if not adequately treated. It usually occurs in epidemics, and is associated with poverty and poor sanitation. Effective, cheap, and easy to administer vaccines could help prevent epidemics. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral cholera vaccines in preventing cases of cholera and deaths from cholera. SEARCH STRATEGY In October 2010, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; LILACS; the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT), and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for relevant published and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of oral cholera vaccines in healthy adults and children. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Each trial was assessed for eligibility and risk of bias by two authors working independently. Data was extracted by two independent reviewers and analysed using the Review Manager 5 software. Outcomes are reported as vaccine protective efficacy (VE) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN RESULTS Seven large efficacy trials, four small artificial challenge studies, and twenty-nine safety trials contributed data to this review.Five variations of a killed whole cell vaccine have been evaluated in large scale efficacy trials (four trials, 249935 participants). The overall vaccine efficacy during the first year was 52% (95% CI 35% to 65%), and during the second year was 62% (95% CI 51% to 62%). Protective efficacy was lower in children aged less than 5 years; 38% (95% CI 20% to 53%) compared to older children and adults; 66% (95% CI 57% to 73%).One trial of a killed whole cell vaccine amongst military recruits demonstrated 86% protective efficacy (95% CI 37% to 97%) in a small epidemic occurring within 4 weeks of the 2-dose schedule (one trial, 1426 participants). Efficacy data is not available beyond two years for the currently available vaccine formulations, but based on data from older trials is unlikely to last beyond three years.The safety data available on killed whole cell vaccines have not demonstrated any clinically significant increase in adverse events compared to placebo.Only one live attenuated vaccine has reached Phase III clinical evaluation and was not effective (one trial, 67508 participants). Two new candidate live attenuated vaccines have demonstrated clinical effectiveness in small artificial challenge studies, but are still in development. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The currently available oral killed whole cell vaccines can prevent 50 to 60% of cholera episodes during the first two years after the primary vaccination schedule. The impact and cost-effectiveness of adopting oral cholera vaccines into the routine vaccination schedule of endemic countries will depend on the prevalence of cholera, the frequency of epidemics, and access to basic services providing rapid rehydration therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Sinclair
- International Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK, L3 5QA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
An optimization model for reducing typhoid cases in developing countries without increasing public spending. Vaccine 2009; 27:1609-21. [PMID: 19146902 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2008] [Revised: 12/16/2008] [Accepted: 12/20/2008] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
This article considers the investment case for using the Vi polysaccharide vaccine in developing countries from two perspectives: reducing typhoid cases and limiting new health care spending. A case study is presented using data from South and Southeast Asia. The purpose of the paper, however, is to draw broad implications that may apply to developing countries in general. Typical consumer demand functions developed from stated preference household surveys in South and Southeast Asia are used to predict probabilities of adults and children purchasing typhoid vaccinations at different prices. These functions are incorporated in a formal mathematical model. Using data from the recent literature for South and Southeast Asia for typhoid incidence, Vi vaccine effectiveness, public cost of illness, and vaccination program cost, three mass vaccination policy alternatives are evaluated: charging adults and children different (optimal) prices, charging uniform prices, and providing free vaccines. Assuming differential pricing is politically feasible, different vaccine prices for children and adults would maximize the number of typhoid cases avoided from a mass vaccination program if the public sector faces a budget constraint on spending for the vaccination program. However, equal prices for children and adults produce very similar results, and they might be more readily accepted by the community. Alternatively, if vaccines are free, the number of cases is not significantly reduced compared to either pricing policy, but a large external financial contribution from government or donors would be required. A Monte Carlo simulation explores the effects of uncertain parameters on vaccination program outcomes.
Collapse
|
47
|
Chaignat CL, Monti V, Soepardi J, Petersen G, Sorensen E, Narain J, Kieny MP. Cholera in disasters: do vaccines prompt new hopes? Expert Rev Vaccines 2008; 7:431-5. [PMID: 18444890 DOI: 10.1586/14760584.7.4.431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Humanitarian aid workers regularly encounter the challenge of setting up functioning surveillance systems immediately after a disaster. Detecting potential outbreaks of diseases, such as cholera, that might arise from disturbed living conditions, displacement and lack of clean water and sanitation is, therefore, extremely difficult. Fears of cholera outbreaks are often rife in such conditions and the pertinence of using cholera vaccines, now available on the market, merit attention. The case of Aceh province, Indonesia, following the 2004 tsunami is examined here: the government of Indonesia decided to carry out a mass vaccination campaign using oral cholera vaccines, a two-dose product that has not been used widely in the particular circumstances of complex emergencies. The preparation and implementation of this campaign faced many hindrances that unfavorably impacted on the time taken to vaccinate the target population and the costs involved. An estimated 69.3% of the target population received immunization. Evidence gathered during the Aceh campaign could be compared with those of a campaign held in another emergency context--Darfur (Sudan). In spite of many dissimilarities, both experiences illustrate the fact that the question of feasibility and relevance of interventions, as well as prioritization of health needs in complex emergencies, remain crucial to alleviate the affected population's suffering in the most efficient way. Following these two campaigns, WHO recommendations on the use of oral cholera vaccines in complex emergencies were issued in 2006.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire-Lise Chaignat
- Global Task Force on Cholera Control, Department of Neglected Tropical Diseases, Communicable Diseases Cluster, World Health Organization, 20, av. Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Longini IM, Nizam A, Ali M, Yunus M, Shenvi N, Clemens JD. Controlling endemic cholera with oral vaccines. PLoS Med 2007; 4:e336. [PMID: 18044983 PMCID: PMC2082648 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2007] [Accepted: 10/15/2007] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although advances in rehydration therapy have made cholera a treatable disease with low case-fatality in settings with appropriate medical care, cholera continues to impose considerable mortality in the world's most impoverished populations. Internationally licensed, killed whole-cell based oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been available for over a decade, but have not been used for the control of cholera. Recently, these vaccines were shown to confer significant levels of herd protection, suggesting that the protective potential of these vaccines has been underestimated and that these vaccines may be highly effective in cholera control when deployed in mass immunization programs. We used a large-scale stochastic simulation model to investigate the possibility of controlling endemic cholera with OCVs. METHODS AND FINDINGS We construct a large-scale, stochastic cholera transmission model of Matlab, Bangladesh. We find that cholera transmission could be controlled in endemic areas with 50% coverage with OCVs. At this level of coverage, the model predicts that there would be an 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72%-98%) reduction in cholera cases among the unvaccinated, and a 93% (95% CI 82%-99%) reduction overall in the entire population. Even a more modest coverage of 30% would result in a 76% (95% CI 44%-95%) reduction in cholera incidence for the population area covered. For populations that have less natural immunity than the population of Matlab, 70% coverage would probably be necessary for cholera control, i.e., an annual incidence rate of < or = 1 case per 1,000 people in the population. CONCLUSIONS Endemic cholera could be reduced to an annual incidence rate of < or = 1 case per 1,000 people in endemic areas with biennial vaccination with OCVs if coverage could reach 50%-70% depending on the level of prior immunity in the population. These vaccination efforts could be targeted with careful use of ecological data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ira M Longini
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|