Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

Unraveling the kinase code: Role of protein kinase in lung cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies

Lung cancer is a prominent cause of cancer-related deaths globally, prompting exploration into the molecular pathways governing cancer cell signaling. Recent insights highlight the critical role of kinases in carcinogenesis and metastasis, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where protein kinases significantly contribute to drug resistance. These diverse enzymes catalyze protein phosphorylation and are implicated in cancer through misregulated expression, amplification, aberrant phosphorylation, mutations, and chromosomal translocations. Amplifications of kinases serve as important diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers across various cancers. Notably, the Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway is crucial for the survival and proliferation of tumor cells. Novel therapeutic approaches are being explored to precisely target these pathways. Peptide-based therapies offer specificity and reduced toxicity compared to conventional treatments, while gene therapy targets abnormal genetic expressions. Advances in nanotechnology and CRISPR/Cas9 systems enhance gene delivery methods, holding promise for targeting specific molecular pathways in lung cancer treatment and minimizing systemic toxicity.

Iruplinalkib for G1202R-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase double fusion failed to alectinib: a case report

The novel and highly selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) inhibitor iruplinalkib showed potent activity and manageable safety profiles in patients with ALK -rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the evidence of iruplinalkib for uncommon ALK double fusion and secondary G1202R resistance mutation is limited. Here, we report a case of a 36-year-old male with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon TTC7A - ALK and EML4 - ALK double fusion. Alectinib as first-line therapy showed partial response, with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 20 months. When his disease progressed, the ALK secondary G1202R resistance mutation was identified. His metastatic paraesophageal lymph node decreased during iruplinalkib treatment, achieving an ongoing PFS benefit for 10 months. Treatment-related adverse events of iruplinalkib were grade 1 hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. The modeling simulation revealed that the G1202R mutation exerted little effect on the binding of iruplinalkib. Iruplinalkib showed potency to G1202R because of its unique chemical structure and removal of steric clashes, which might be a promising option for ALK -rearranged NSCLC patients with G1202R resistance mutation.

Inter-Ethnic Differences in the Efficacy and Safety of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Used in Oncology: Insights From Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Differences in the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been observed across ethnic/ancestry subpopulations (previously reviewed to 2017). With an expanding number of TKIs approved since that time, an updated review of TKI response across ethnic/ancestry subpopulations in Phase 3 TKI clinical trials was conducted. A total of 73 population subgroup analyses (defined by participant race, ethnicity, ancestry or geographic region) of progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) were identified by a literature search. Twelve (16%) of the analyses investigating the efficacy of afatinib, brigatinib, dacomitinib, gilteritinib, lorlatinib, neratinib, osimertinib, or pazopanib were assessed to report population differences in PFS and/or OS. For 28 (38%) of the analyses that showed suggestions of a potential efficacy difference across subpopulations, limitations in the data available precluded further assessment. There were 17 (23%) analyses assessed to report comparable efficacy outcomes across diverse subpopulations. The majority of clinical trials noted no clinically remarkable differences in safety between subpopulations; however, for brigatinib, crizotinib, pazopanib, and sunitinib, distinct patterns of adverse events were reported in the Asian and non-Asian subgroups. The underrepresentation of specific subpopulations, the grouping together of results of diverse subpopulations, as well as inconsistencies in the definition and reporting of participant ethnicity/ancestry are barriers to the meaningful exploration of inter-ethnic differences in TKI response. Therefore, further insight into the associations between ethnicity/ancestry and TKI response will require an increase in the diversity of clinical trial participants and appropriate analysis and reporting of subpopulation results.

ALK in cancer: from function to therapeutic targeting

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that acts as an oncogenic driver in solid and haematological malignancies in both children and adults. Although ALK-expressing (ALK+) tumours show strong initial responses to the series of ALK inhibitors currently available, many patients will develop resistance. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in ALK oncogenic signalling, together with existing and promising new modalities to treat ALK-driven tumours, including currently approved ALK-directed therapies, namely tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel approaches such as ALK-specific immune therapies. Although ALK inhibitors have changed the management and clinical history of ALK+ tumours, they are still insufficient to cure most of the patients. Therefore, more effort is needed to further improve outcomes and prevent the tumour resistance, recurrence and metastatic spread that many patients with ALK+ tumours experience. Here, we outline how a multipronged approach directed against ALK and other essential pathways that sustain the persistence of ALK+ tumours, together with potent or specific immunotherapies, could achieve this goal. We envision that the lessons learned from treating ALK+ tumours in the clinic could ultimately accelerate the implementation of innovative combination therapies to treat tumours driven by other tyrosine kinases or oncogenes with similar properties.

Ceritinib Reduces Transendothelial Invasion of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells by Restoring Claudin-10 and Suppressing VEGF-A Signaling

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells that cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can lead to brain metastases, a severe complication of NSCLC. 7Preventing brain metastasis is crucial for improving the survival rates of NSCLC patients. Ceritinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for treating certain advanced stages of NSCLC. This study investigates the potential of ceritinib in blocking brain metastasis by examining its effect on NSCLC cell transendothelial invasion using an in vitro BBB model. Our findings demonstrate that co-culturing human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3) with NSCLC lines A549, NCI-H292, and NCI-H596 increases paracellular permeability and reduces transendothelial electrical resistance. Ceritinib mitigates these effects, preventing NSCLC cell invasion through the hCMEC/D3 monolayer and restoring Claudin-10 expression in hCMEC/D3 cells. Knocking down Claudin-10 counteracts the beneficial effects of ceritinib in reducing endothelial permeability. Mechanistically, ceritinib suppresses the expression of VEGF-A and VEGF-R2. Adding VEGF-A reverses ceritinib's protective effect against NSCLC cell invasion. Our results indicate that ceritinib may diminish NSCLC-caused BBB compromise by restoring Claudin-10-associated tight junctions, potentially by influencing VEGF-A/VEGF-R2 signaling. More research is needed to clarify how ceritinib specifically interacts with and regulates the VEGF pathway.

Cardiovascular toxicity of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Aim: We conducted network meta-analysis to assess cardiovascular toxicity of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs).Materials & methods: Eleven articles involving 2855 patients and six interventions including crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib, lorlatinib, brigatinib and chemotherapy were analyzed.Results: No significant difference was observed in overall cardiovascular risk among ALK-TKIs. Subgroup analysis showed that for cardiac toxicity, crizotinib and alectinib were more likely to cause myocardial rhythm abnormalities. Crizotinib and ceritinib had a higher risk of Q-T prolongation than chemotherapy. For vascular toxicity, crizotinib and ceritinib had a higher risk of thrombotic events than brigatinib. Crizotinib and lorlatinib were more likely to cause blood pressure abnormalities.Conclusion: Clinicians should carefully monitoring cardiovascular events when ALK-TKIs used in NSCLCs patients with baseline cardiovascular diseases.

Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology-A Guiding Compass for Targeted Therapy and Emerging Applications

Multigene sequencing technologies provide a foundation for targeted therapy and precision oncology by identifying actionable alterations and enabling the development of treatments that substantially improve clinical outcomes. This review emphasizes the importance of having a molecular compass guiding treatment decision-making through the multitude of alterations and genetic mutations, showcasing why NGS plays a pivotal role in modern oncology.

Nodal Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Therapeutic Challenges and Future Perspectives

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) present a significant clinical challenge despite recent advances in the development of novel therapeutic agents, guided by a deeper understanding of the pathobiology and the genetic and molecular characteristics underlying this complex and heterogeneous group of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) [...].

Safety Profile and Hepatotoxicity of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) have become first-line therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK rearrangements. This study investigates ALK-TKI-associated adverse events (AEs), focusing on identifying hepatotoxicity signals and previously undocumented safety concerns. Using disproportionality analysis of 56,864 reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we systematically classified AEs via the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). At the System Organ Class (SOC) level, crizotinib exhibited a significantly stronger signal for eye disorders, ceritinib was uniquely linked to gastrointestinal disorders, and loratinib was predominantly associated with metabolism and nutrition disorders. Several AEs previously undocumented in drug labels were identified, including pericardial effusion, elevated C-reactive protein, hemolytic anemia, hemoptysis, and decreased hemoglobin. Furthermore, crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib were significantly associated with hepatotoxicity, marked by elevated alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and hepatic enzyme levels. These findings highlight the need for vigilant monitoring of unlabeled AEs and potential label updates, particularly for hepatotoxicity risks associated with crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib.

Adverse kidney related events following targeted therapies in lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

To summarize current evidence on kidney related adverse events (AEs) following targeted therapies in lung cancer from trial settings.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Library. Randomized controlled trials that had reported kidney related AEs following targeted therapies in lung cancer were eligible. Outcomes included renal dysfunction as reported, increased serum creatinine, proteinuria, urinary tract infection (UTI), and electrolyte disorders. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane guidelines. The incidence of the examined outcomes, along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were combined using a random-effects model. Network analysis was applied if the comparisons had passed the consistency test. Publication bias was assessed using Funnel plot analysis.

Results

57 studies encompassing 11,497 patients were included. The pooled incidences (95% CI) of acute kidney injury (AKI), increased serum creatinine, proteinuria, and UTI following targeted therapies in lung cancer were 1% (0%, 2%), 4% (1%, 8%), 9% (6%, 13%), and 6% (2%, 12%), respectively. Targeted therapies did not increase the risk of AKI, yet were associated with higher incidence of proteinuria, particularly vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors containing therapies. Multiple electrolyte disorders could be observed following targeted treatments, with the pooled incidences ranging from 4% to 21%; however, most electrolytes disorders had limited number of reports. Most of the reported kidney related AEs were of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1 or 2. Publication bias was present for kidney related AEs excluding AKI.

Conclusion

Kidney related adverse events are not uncommon following targeted therapies in lung cancer in trial settings. In comparison to chemotherapy alone, targeted therapies did not increase the risk of AKI, yet were associated with higher risk of proteinuria. Proteinuria and electrolytes disorders are more often observed than renal dysfunction and UTI. All types of AEs were mostly mild in severity.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO CRD42023441979.

Hepatic adverse events associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS database and analysis of drug-gene interaction network

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are vital for treating ALK-positive cancers but have been associated with liver injury, necessitating further safety investigation. This study examines hepatic adverse event (AE) signals related to ALK TKIs using the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and explores potential mechanisms of liver injury.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

AE reports from FAERS (Q3 2011 to Q1 2024) related to liver injury were analyzed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) methods. Pathway enrichment and drug-gene network analyses were performed to investigate underlying mechanisms.

RESULTS

This study identified 2,132 AE reports from the FAERS database linking hepatic AEs to ALK TKIs therapy. Significant signals were detected by ROR and MGPS methods, with common AEs including aminotransferase abnormalities, hyperbilirubinemia, and increased blood alkaline phosphatase, mainly occurring within the first 30 days of treatment. Gene analysis revealed key nodes in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, such as PIK3CA, SRC, and PTK2. Enriched KEGG pathways included the MAPK, PI3K-Akt, and Ras signaling.

CONCLUSION

This pharmacovigilance study identifies significant AE signals linking ALK TKIs to liver injury, highlighting potential mechanisms and providing insights for clinical management and patient outcomes.

Emerging Targeted Therapies in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Targeted therapies have changed the treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer and led to improved patient survival across all stages of lung cancer. Newer advances in common and novel oncogenic drivers continue to occur at vigorous speed, making it challenging to stay up to date with the rapidly evolving field. In this article, we review the emerging perspectives in the treatment of actionable targets in lung cancer. We focus on the development of newer KRAS-directed therapies, particularly on non-G12C mutations, pan-RAS inhibitors, and RAS-GTP inhibitors. We also describe the current standard of care for EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC and dive into the novel treatments expected to be in the clinic soon. A similar approach is taken toward MET, HER2, RET, ROS1, and FGFR alterations as emerging targets in non-small-cell lung cancer. Finally, we conclude this review with the current body of evidence for targeting TROP-2 as a novel target, potentially of importance in post-targeted therapy scenarios.

Matters of the Heart: Cardiotoxicity Related to Target Therapy in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionised by the introduction of targeted therapies. With the improvement of response and frequently of overall survival, however, a whole new set of adverse events emerged. In fact, due to the peculiar mechanism of action of each one of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies, every drug has its own specific safety profile. In addition, this safety profile could not fully emerge from clinical trials data, as patients in clinical practice usually have more comorbidities and frailties. Cardiotoxicity is a well-known and established adverse event of anti-cancer therapies. However, only recently it has become a central topic for targeted therapies in NSCLC, due to the unknown real range and frequency. Management of this toxicity begins with prevention, and must balance the need of continuing an effective anticancer treatment versus low risk of even fatal events and the preservation of long-term quality of life. The aim of this review is to summarise the current knowledge focusing on currently used targeted therapies in NSCLC.

EML4-ALK: Update on ALK Inhibitors

Since the discovery of the first-generation ALK inhibitor, many other tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated to be effective in the first line or further lines of treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EMLA4-ALK translocation. This review traces the main milestones in the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic patients and the survival outcomes in the first-line and second-line settings with different ALK inhibitors. It presents the two options available for first-line treatment at the present time: sequencing different ALK inhibitors versus using the most potent inhibitor in front-line treatment. The efficacy outcomes of different ALK inhibitors in the first-line setting; the molecular profile of the disease, including mutation resistances and ALK variants and co-mutations; and patients' co-morbidities and inhibitor toxicities should be taken into account to address the choice of the first-line treatment, as suggested in this review.

Trends in Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Receiving One or More ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs): A Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada

The treatment landscape for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC has rapidly evolved following the approval of several ALK TKIs in Canada. However, public funding of ALK TKIs is mostly limited to the first line treatment setting. Using linked provincial health administrative databases, we examined real-world outcomes of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC receiving ALK TKIs in Ontario between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2021. Demographic, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns were summarized using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the treatment groups. A total of 413 patients were identified. Patients were administered alectinib (n = 154), crizotinib (n = 80), or palliative-intent chemotherapy (n = 55) in the first-line treatment. There was a significant difference in first-line PFS between the treatment groups. The median PFS (mPFS) was not reached for alectinib (95% CI, 568 days-not reached), compared to 8.2 months (95% CI, 171-294 days) for crizotinib (HR = 0.34, p < 0.0001) and 2.4 months (95% CI, 65-100 days) for chemotherapy (HR = 0.14, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in first-line OS between the treatment groups. In patients who received more than one line of treatment, there was a significant difference in mOS between patients who received two or more lines of ALK TKIs compared to those who received one line of ALK TKI (mOS = 55 months (95% CI, 400-987 days) and 26 months (95% CI, 1448-2644 days), respectively, HR = 4.64, p < 0.0001). This study confirms the effectiveness of ALK TKIs in real-world practice and supports the potential benefit of multiple lines of ALK TKI on overall survival in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

Establishment and characterization of NCC-GCTB10-C1: a novel cell line derived from a patient with recurrent giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare osteolytic tumor composed of mononuclear stromal cells, macrophages, and osteoclast-like giant cells. While generally benign, GCTB has a high risk of local recurrence and can occasionally undergo malignant transformation or metastasis, posing significant clinical challenges. The primary treatment is complete surgical resection; however, effective management strategies for recurrent or advanced GCTB remain elusive, underscoring the need for further preclinical research. This study reports the establishment of a novel cell line, NCC-GCTB10-C1, derived from a recurrent GCTB lesion. NCC-GCTB10-C1 retains the characteristic H3-3A G34W mutation, which is central to the tumor's pathogenesis, and demonstrates significant growth potential, spheroid formation capability, and invasive properties. Extensive drug screening of NCC-GCTB10-C1, along with nine previously established GCTB cell lines, revealed a distinct drug response profile, with the cell line showing resistance to many previously effective agents. However, doxorubicin, foretinib, and ceritinib were identified as promising therapeutic candidates due to their low IC50 values in NCC-GCTB10-C1. The establishment of NCC-GCTB10-C1 offers a critical resource for further research into GCTB, especially in the context of recurrent disease, and holds potential for the development of more effective treatment strategies.

Cardiovascular Considerations During Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence and JACC: CardioOncology Expert Panel Recommendations

The administration of certain cancer therapies can be associated with the development of cardiovascular toxicity or complications. This spectrum of toxicities is broad and requires nuanced approaches for prevention, identification, and management. This expert panel summarizes the consensus of opinions of diverse health care professionals in several key areas: 1) cardioprotection involves strategies aimed at the primary prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity; 2) surveillance entails monitoring for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity during cancer therapy; 3) permissive cardiotoxicity is the informed continuation of cancer therapy in the presence of cardiovascular toxicity, along with the implementation of mitigating cardiovascular treatments; and 4) special considerations include the invasive management of severe cardiovascular disease in patients receiving treatments for advanced cancer and the exploration of drug-drug interactions in cardio-oncology. In this expert panel, we also highlight gaps in evidence in an effort to continue to advance science in the cardiovascular care of our patients undergoing cancer therapy.

Advances in the Treatment of Rare Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality rate worldwide, with nearly 2.5 million new cases and more than 1.8 million deaths reported globally in 2022. Lung cancer is broadly categorized into two main types: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with NSCLC accounting for about 85% of all cases. Early-stage lung cancers often present without obvious symptoms, resulting in most patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage where traditional chemotherapy has limited efficacy. Recent advances in molecular biology have elucidated the pivotal role of gene mutations in tumor development, paving the way for targeted therapies that have markedly benefited patients. Beyond the well-known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, an increasing number of new molecular targets have been identified, including ROS1 rearrangement, BRAF mutation, NTRK fusion, RET fusion, MET mutation, KRAS G12C mutation, HER2 mutation, ALK rearrangement, and NRG1 fusion. Some of these targeted therapies have already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and many others are currently undergoing clinical trials. This review summarizes recent advances in NSCLC treatment with molecular targets, highlighting progress, challenges, and their impact on patient prognosis.

Research progress on the role of bypass activation mechanisms in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

The clinical application of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the quality of life and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying driver genes. However, resistance to TKI treatment is inevitable. Bypass signal activation is one of the important reasons for TKI resistance. Although TKI drugs inhibit downstream signaling pathways of driver genes, key signaling pathways within tumor cells can still be persistently activated through bypass routes such as MET gene amplification, EGFR gene amplification, and AXL activation. This continuous activation maintains tumor cell growth and proliferation, leading to TKI resistance. The fundamental strategy to treat TKI resistance mediated by bypass activation involves simultaneously inhibiting the activated bypass signals and the original driver gene signaling pathways. Some clinical trials based on this combined treatment approach have yielded promising preliminary results, offering more treatment options for NSCLC patients with TKI resistance. Additionally, early identification of resistance mechanisms through liquid biopsy, personalized targeted therapy against these mechanisms, and preemptive targeting of drug-tolerant persistent cells may provide NSCLC patients with more sustained and effective treatment.

Updated Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib in a Phase 2 Study in Chinese Patients With Previously Treated Advanced ALK-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Lorlatinib, a brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, demonstrated robust overall and intracranial antitumor activity in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with an ALK inhibitor in a global phase 1/2 study (NCT01970865) and a multicenter phase 2 study conducted in China (NCT03909971). We report updated 3-year follow-up data from the phase 2 study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC that progressed after crizotinib as the only prior ALK inhibitor (cohort 1) or after 1 non-crizotinib ALK inhibitor (cohort 2), were enrolled in the study. All patients received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily.

RESULTS

At data cutoff, of 109 enrolled patients, the median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival (PFS) was 35.8 months in cohort 1 (n = 67) and 33.1 months in cohort 2 (n = 42). Median PFS (95% CI) per independent central review was 26.3 months (16.6-35.9) and 5.6 months (2.9-12.4), respectively. The median duration of follow-up for overall survival (OS) was 36.4 months and 37.5 months, respectively. Median OS (95% CI) was not reached (NR; NR-NR) and 21.9 months (11.9-NR), respectively. Median intracranial time to progression (95% CI) was NR (NR-NR) and NR (9.7 months-NR), respectively. No new safety signals emerged with long-term treatment.

CONCLUSION

The long-term data confirm robust overall and intracranial clinical activity of lorlatinib, with no new safety signals emerging. These results support using lorlatinib in Chinese patients with previously treated ALK-positive NSCLC with or without brain metastases.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT03909971.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastases

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an emerging class of targeted anticancer agents that have demonstrated impressive efficacy in numerous cancer types. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ADCs have become a component of the treatment armamentarium for a subset of patients with metastatic disease. Emerging data suggest that some ADCs exhibit impressive activity even in central nervous system (CNS) metastases, a disease site that is difficult to treat and associated with poor prognosis. Herein, we describe and summarize the existing evidence surrounding ADCs in NSCLC with a focus on CNS activity.

The Use of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treatment-Literature Review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The median survival time for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer before the era of molecular-based personalized treatment was 7.9 months. The discovery of predictive factors and the introduction of molecular diagnostics into daily practice made a breakthrough, enabling several years of survival in patients with advanced disease. The discovery of rearrangements in the ALK gene and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors has resulted in a dramatic improvement in the prognosis of patients with this subtype of cancer. Currently, three generations of ALK inhibitors differing in activity, toxicity and degree of penetration into the central nervous system are available in clinical practice. The current state of knowledge on ALK inhibitors used in clinical practice is summarised in this research paper. Methods of diagnosis of abnormalities in ALK have been shown, and the review of research that contributed to the development of the next generation of ALK inhibitors has been presented.

Novel insight into mechanisms of ROS1 catalytic activation via loss of the extracellular domain

The ROS1 receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) possesses the largest extracellular amino-terminal domain (ECD) among the human RTK family, yet the mechanisms regulating its activation are not fully understood. While chimeric ROS1 fusion proteins, resulting from chromosomal rearrangements, are well-known oncogenic drivers, their activation mechanisms also remain underexplored. To elucidate the role of the ROS1 ECD in catalytic regulation, we engineered a series of amino-terminal deletion mutants. Our functional studies compared the full-length ROS1 receptor, the CD74-ROS1 oncogenic fusion, and ECD-deleted ROS1 constructs, identifying the ECD regions that inhibit ROS1 tyrosine kinase activity. Notably, we found that deletion of the ROS1 ECD alone significantly increases constitutive catalytic activation and neoplastic transformation in the absence of an amino-terminal fusion partner, challenging the presumed necessity for a dimerization domain in the activation mechanism of kinase fusions in cancer. Our data suggest that inter-genic deletions resulting in the loss of the ECD may be underappreciated oncogenic drivers in cancer. Furthermore, our studies demonstrate that RNASE7 is not a ligand for the ROS1 receptor as previously reported, confirming that ROS1 remains an orphan receptor. Thus, the discovery of a ROS1 ligand remains an important future priority. These findings highlight the potential for disease-associated somatic aberrations or splice variants that modify the ROS1 ECD to promote constitutive receptor activation, warranting further investigation.

Exploring Demographic Representation and Reporting in Lung Cancer Clinical Trials with Canadian Sites from 2013 to 2023

This review evaluates the reporting of demographic characteristics and the diversity of participants of phase III lung cancer clinical trials with Canadian research sites. A literature search was conducted using the ClinicalTrials.gov registry to identify clinical trials conducted between 1 January 2013, and 31 December 2023. The demographic reporting practices and the representation of sex/gender, racial, and ethnic groups were assessed. The location of Canadian research sites was also examined for trends in reporting and representation. Associated publications were reviewed for demographic data collection methods. Of the 25 clinical trials, 24 reported race and 18 also reported ethnicity. All clinical trials reported sex/gender, and the city and province of the participating Canadian sites. Most participants were White (66.1%), identified as not Hispanic or Latino (81.4%), and were male (57.8%). The provinces with the most clinical trial sites were Ontario (43.6%) and Quebec (34.2%). Lung cancer clinical trials lack adequate demographic reporting and representation of females, diverse patient groups, and geographical locations in Canada with high lung cancer incidence rates. Specifically, the Indigenous Peoples of Canada and Nunavut require better representation in lung cancer clinical trials conducted in Canada. These findings highlight the need to improve diversity and demographic representation in clinical research.

Targeting ALK receptors in non-small cell lung cancer: what is the road ahead?

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene-rearrangements are identified in about 3-5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), and ALK-rearranged NSCLC is to be considered an oncogene-addicted cancer with peculiar clinical characteristics.

AREAS COVERED

Several ALK inhibitors have been studied and approved for use in the treatment of advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC with reported superiority in terms of efficacy and safety profile compared with chemotherapy. Second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors (alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) offer to NSCLC patients a clinically meaningful prolongment of survival with a very good quality of life profile. However, resistances to these agents always occur, with less satisfying options for second-line treatments. Direct comparisons among these agents are not available, and the choice among brigatinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib as first-line treatment remains challenging. Very recently, alectinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy outcomes compared with chemotherapy also in resected stage IB-IIIA ALK-rearranged NSCLC, extending the clinical benefit offered by ALK inhibitors also to the adjuvant setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Future development of ALK inhibitors in NSCLC treatment includes the search for optimal management of acquired resistance to first-line treatments and the extension of use of ALK inhibitors also to neoadjuvant and preferably to perioperative setting.

Understanding the treatment response and resistance to targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer: clinical insights and perspectives

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common subtype of lung cancer with a generally poor prognosis. In recent years, advances in targeted therapy and sequencing technology have brought significant improvement in the therapeutic outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC. Targeted inhibitors directed against specific mutated or rearranged oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and receptor tyrosine kinase ROS proto-oncogene 1(ROS1) among others, exhibit promising anti-tumor activity. Unfortunately, some patients develop acquired resistance and disease progression soon after initial remission. Despite the continuous development of new drugs and strategies to overcome drug resistance, it is still a major challenge in the treatment of NSCLC. The landscape of targeted therapy for NSCLC is evolving rapidly in response to the pace of scientific research. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of tumor target antigens and agents related to targeted therapy in NSCLC.

Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria for brain metastases in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated-mutated and ALK-fusion non-small cell lung cancer

The American Radium Society (ARS) Central Nervous System (CNS) committee reviewed literature on epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) and ALK-fusion (ALK+) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of brain metastases (BrMs) from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) to generate appropriate use guidelines addressing use of TKIs in conjunction with or in lieu of radiotherapy (RT). The panel developed three key questions to guide systematic review: can radiotherapy be deferred in patients receiving EGFR or ALK TKIs at (1) diagnosis or (2) recurrence? Should TKI be administered concurrently with RT (3)? Two literature searches were performed (May 2019 and December 2023). The panel developed 8 model cases and voted on treatment options using a 9-point scale, with 1-3, 4-6 and 7-9 corresponding to usually not appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually appropriate (respectively), per the UCLA/RAND Appropriateness Method. Consensus was achieved in only 4 treatment scenarios, all consistent with existing ARS-AUC guidelines for multiple BrM. The panel did not reach consensus that RT can be appropriately deferred in patients with BrM receiving CNS penetrant ALK or EGFR TKIs, though median scores indicated deferral may be appropriate under most circumstances. Whole brain RT with concurrent TKI generated broad disagreement except in cases with 2-4 BrM, where it was considered usually not appropriate. We identified no definitive studies dictating optimal sequencing of TKIs and RT for EGFRm and ALK+ BrM. Until such studies are completed, the committee hopes these cases guide decision- making in this complex clinical space.

Nephrotoxicity of targeted therapy used to treat lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, especially non-small cell lung cancer. Early diagnosis and better treatment choices have already provided a more promising prognosis for cancer patients. In targeted therapy, antagonists target specific genes supporting cancer growth, proliferation and metastasis. With the incorporation of targeted therapies in routine cancer therapy, it is imperative that the array of toxicities associated with these agents must be well-recognized and managed, especially since these toxicities are distinct from those seen with conventional cytotoxic agents. Drug-related nephrotoxicity has attracted attention when initiating cancer therapy. Our review aims to summarize the adverse renal effects caused by targeted therapy during lung cancer treatment, mainly focusing on EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Also, we discuss the possible mechanism of the side effect and provide managements to help improve the renal function in clinical practice.

Avelumab in Combination With Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: Phase 1b/2 Results From the JAVELIN Lung 101 Trial

Introduction

The JAVELIN Lung 101 phase 1b/2 trial evaluated avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) combined with lorlatinib or crizotinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) in ALK-positive or ALK-negative advanced NSCLC, respectively.

Methods

Starting doses of lorlatinib 100 mg once daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily were administered with avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Primary objectives were assessment of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose in phase 1 and objective response rate in phase 2. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and confirmed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

Results

In the avelumab plus lorlatinib group (ALK-positive; n = 31; 28 in phase 1b; three in phase 2), two of 28 assessable patients (7%) had DLT, and the MTD and recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. In the avelumab plus crizotinib group (ALK-negative; n = 12; all phase 1b), five of 12 assessable patients (42%) had DLT, and the MTD was exceeded with avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus crizotinib 250 mg twice daily; alternative crizotinib doses were not assessed. Objective response rate was 52% (95% confidence interval, 33%-70%) with avelumab plus lorlatinib (complete response, 3%; partial response, 48%) and 25% (95% confidence interval, 6%-57%) with avelumab plus crizotinib (all partial responses).

Conclusions

Avelumab plus lorlatinib treatment in ALK-positive NSCLC was feasible, but avelumab plus crizotinib treatment in ALK-negative NSCLC could not be administered at the doses tested. No evidence of increased antitumor activity was observed in either group.

ClinicalTrialsgov identifier

NCT02584634.

Benefits of NGS in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Vary by Populations and Timing of Examination

Despite the widespread application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in advanced lung adenocarcinoma, its impact on survival and the optimal timing for the examination remain uncertain. This cohort study included advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent NGS testing. We categorized patients into four groups: Group 1: treatment-naïve, upfront NGS; Group 2: Treatment-naïve, exclusionary EGFR/ALK/ROS1; Group 3: post-treatment, no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1; Group 4: known driver mutation and post-TKI treatment. A total of 424 patients were included. There were 128, 126, 90, and 80 patients in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. In Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, targetable mutations were identified in 76.6%, 49.2%, 41.1%, and 33.3% of the patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Mutation-targeted treatments were applied in 68.0%, 15.1%, 27.8%, and 22.5% of the patients, respectively (p < 0.001). In the overall population, patients receiving mutation-targeted treatments exhibited significantly longer overall survival (OS) (aHR 0.54 [95% CI 0.37-0.79], p = 0.001). The most profound benefit was seen in the Group 1 patients (not reached vs. 40.4 months, p = 0.028). The median OS of patients with mutation-targeted treatments was also significantly longer among Group 2 patients. The median post-NGS survival of patients receiving mutation-targeted treatments was numerically longer in Group 3 and Group 4 patients. In conclusion, mutation-targeted therapy is associated with a favorable outcome. However, the opportunities of NGS-directed treatment and the survival benefits of mutation-targeted treatment were various among different populations.

Changing ALK-TKI mechanisms of resistance in re-biopsies of ALK-rearranged NSCLC: ALK mutations followed by SCLC-like histologic transformation: A case report

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are the recommended treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer but are prone to eventual drug resistance. Herein we report a 45-year-old Asian woman diagnosed with EML4-ALK rearranged lung adenocarcinoma. Small cell lung cancer-like phenotypic transformation occurred when resistance to crizotinib treatment. Next-generation sequencing was performed and detected an ALK rearrangement co-existent with a TP53 gene mutation in the small cell specimens. The patient had a good response to alectinib with a progression-free survival >7 months. After disease progression, newly emerged ALK p.G1269A and p.L1196 M gene mutations co-existent with ALK rearrangement were detected. The patient had a good initial response to ceritinib treatment, which last for >12 months. After ceritinib failure, however, more complicated mutations within the ALK kinase domain (p.G1269A, p.L1196 M, newly emerged p.D1203 N, and p.L1122V) were detected. Ultimately, due to terminal rapid progression and resistance to lorlatinib, the overall survival was nearly 3 years. Our case showed that next-generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may be an appropriate choice after transformation to small cell lung cancer and failure to one ALK-TKI. Sequential biopsies and gene mutation monitoring are important to arrange the sequence of different generation ALK-TKIs. Appropriate sequential therapies may yield a prolonged response with a satisfactory quality of life in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

Navigating resistance to ALK inhibitors in the lorlatinib era: a comprehensive perspective on NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has revolutionized targeted therapy. This dynamic landscape, featuring novel ALK inhibitors and combination therapies, necessitates a profound understanding of resistance mechanisms for effective treatment strategies. Recognizing two primary categories - on-target and off-target resistance - underscores the need for comprehensive assessment.

AREAS COVERED

This review delves into the intricacies of resistance to ALK inhibitors, exploring complexities in identification and management. Molecular testing, pivotal for early detection and accurate diagnosis, forms the foundation for patient stratification and resistance management. The literature search methodology involved comprehensive exploration of Pubmed and Embase. The multifaceted perspective encompasses new therapeutic horizons, ongoing clinical trials, and their clinical implications post the recent approval of lorlatinib.

EXPERT OPINION

Our expert opinion encapsulates the critical importance of understanding resistance mechanisms in the context of ALK inhibitors for shaping successful treatment approaches. With a focus on molecular testing and comprehensive assessment, this review contributes valuable insights to the evolving landscape of NSCLC therapy.

ALK inhibitors in cancer: mechanisms of resistance and therapeutic management strategies

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have been identified as potent oncogenic drivers in several malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The discovery of ALK inhibition using a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has dramatically improved the outcomes of patients with ALK-mutated NSCLC. However, the emergence of intrinsic and acquired resistance inevitably occurs with ALK TKI use. This review describes the molecular mechanisms of ALK TKI resistance and discusses management strategies to overcome therapeutic resistance.

Clinical Management of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Brain Metastases, and Actionable Genomic Alterations: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 60% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with metastatic disease, and approximately 20% have brain metastases (BrMs) at diagnosis. During the disease course, 25-50% of patients will develop BrMs. Despite available treatments, survival rates for patients with NSCLC and BrMs remain low, and their overall prognosis is poor. Even with newer agents for NSCLC, options for treating BrMs can be limited by their ineffective transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the unique brain tumor microenvironment. The presence of actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) is a key determinant of optimal treatment selection, which aims to maximize responses and minimize toxicities. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to understand the current landscape of the clinical management of patients with NSCLC and BrMs, particularly those with AGAs.

METHOD

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant SLR was conducted to identify studies in patients with BrMs in NSCLC. Searches used the EMBASE and MEDLINE® databases, and articles published between January 1, 2017 and September 26, 2022 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Overall, 179 studies were included in the SLR. This subset review focused on 80 studies that included patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs (19 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], two single-arm studies, and 59 observational studies). Sixty-four of the 80 studies reported on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 14 on anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations, and two on both alterations. Ninety-five percent of studies evaluated targeted therapy. All RCTs allowed patients with previously treated, asymptomatic, or neurologically stable BrMs; the percentage of asymptomatic BrMs varied across observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although targeted therapies demonstrate systemic benefits for patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs, there remains a continued need for effective therapies to treat and prevent BrMs in this population. Increased BBB permeability of emerging therapies may improve outcomes for this population.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with driver alterations.

METHODS

This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Eight new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients based on targetable driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

Alk-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma: From molecular genetics to therapeutic targeting

Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) is a potent oncogenic driver of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). ALK is constitutively activated by gene fusion events between the ALK and other gene fusion partners in about 2-3% of LUADs, characterized by few other gene alterations. ALK-fusions are a druggable target through potent pharmacological inhibitors of tyrosine kinase activity. Thus, several ALK-TKIs (Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors) of first-, second- and third-generation have been developed that improved the outcomes of ALK-rearranged LUADs when used as first- or second-line agents. However, resistance mechanisms greatly limit the durability of the therapeutic effects elicited by these TKIs. The molecular mechanisms responsible for these resistance mechanisms have been in part elucidated, but overcoming acquired resistance to ALK-derived therapy remains a great challenge. Some new therapeutic strategies under investigation aim to induce long-term remission in ALK-fusion positive LUADs.

Current treatment and novel insights regarding ROS1-targeted therapy in malignant tumors

BACKGROUND

The proto-oncogene ROS1 encodes an intrinsic type I membrane protein of the tyrosine kinase/insulin receptor family. ROS1 facilitates the progression of various malignancies via self-mutations or rearrangements. Studies on ROS1-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been conducted, and some have been approved by the FDA for clinical use. However, the adverse effects and mechanisms of resistance associated with ROS1 inhibitors remain unknown. In addition, next-generation ROS1 inhibitors, which have the advantage of treating central nervous system metastases and alleviating endogenous drug resistance, are still in the clinical trial stage.

METHOD

In this study, we searched relevant articles reporting the mechanism and clinical application of ROS1 in recent years; systematically reviewed the biological mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and research progress on ROS1 inhibitors; and provided perspectives for the future of ROS1-targeted therapy.

RESULTS

ROS1 is most expressed in malignant tumours. Only a few ROS1 kinase inhibitors are currently approved for use in NSCLC, the efficacy of other TKIs for NSCLC and other malignancies has not been ascertained. There is no effective standard treatment for adverse events or resistance to ROS1-targeted therapy. Next-generation TKIs appear capable of overcoming resistance and delaying central nervous system metastasis, but with a greater incidence of adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research on next-generation TKIs regarding the localization of ROS1 and its fusion partners, binding sites for targeted drugs, and coadministration with other drugs is required. The correlation between TKIs and chemotherapy or immunotherapy in clinical practice requires further study.

Targeted therapeutic options in early and metastatic NSCLC-overview

The complex therapeutic strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed significantly in recent years. Disease-free survival increased significantly with immunotherapy and chemotherapy registered in perioperative treatments, as well as adjuvant registered immunotherapy and targeted therapy (osimertinib) in case of EGFR mutation. In oncogenic-addictive metastatic NSCLC, primarily in adenocarcinoma, the range of targeted therapies is expanding, with which the expected overall survival increases significantly, measured in years. By 2021, the FDA and EMA have approved targeted agents to inhibit EGFR activating mutations, T790 M resistance mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET fusion. In 2022, the range of authorized target therapies was expanded. With therapies that inhibit KRASG12C, EGFR exon 20, HER2 and MET. Until now, there was no registered targeted therapy for the KRAS mutations, which affect 30% of adenocarcinomas. Thus, the greatest expectation surrounded the inhibition of the KRAS G12C mutation, which occurs in ∼15% of NSCLC, mainly in smokers and is characterized by a poor prognosis. Sotorasib and adagrasib are approved as second-line agents after at least one prior course of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Adagrasib in first-line combination with pembrolizumab immunotherapy proved more beneficial, especially in patients with high expression of PD-L1. In EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation of lung adenocarcinoma, amivantanab was registered for progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. Lung adenocarcinoma carries an EGFR exon 20, HER2 insertion mutation in 2%, for which the first targeted therapy is trastuzumab deruxtecan, in patients already treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Two orally administered selective c-MET inhibitors, capmatinib and tepotinib, were also approved after chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma carrying MET exon 14 skipping mutations of about 3%. Incorporating reflex testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) expands personalized therapies by identifying guideline-recommended molecular alterations.

Analyses of quality of life in cancer drug trials - a review of measurements and analytical choices in post-reimbursement studies

OBJECTIVES

For drugs reimbursed with limited evidence of patient benefits, confirmatory evidence of overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) benefits is important. For QoL data to serve as valuable input to patients and decision-makers, it must be measured and analyzed using appropriate methods. We aimed to assess the measurement and analyses of post-reimbursement QoL data for cancer drugs introduced in Swedish healthcare with limited evidence at the time of reimbursement.

METHODS

We reviewed any published post-reimbursement trial data on QoL for cancer drugs reimbursed in Sweden between 2010 and 2020 with limited evidence of improvement in QoL and OS benefits at the time of reimbursement. We extracted information on the instruments used, frequency of measurement, extent of missing data, statistical approaches, and the use of pre-registration and study protocols.

RESULTS

Out of 22 drugs satisfying our inclusion criteria, we identified published QoL data for 12 drugs in 22 studies covering multiple cancer types. The most frequently used QoL instruments were EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3/5L. We identified three areas needing improvement in QoL measurement and analysis: (i) motivation for the frequency of measurements, (ii) handling of the substantial missing data problem, and (iii) inclusion and adherence to QoL analyses in clinical trial pre-registration and study protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review shows that the measurements and analysis of QoL data in our sample of cancer trials covering drugs initially reimbursed without any confirmed QoL or OS evidence have significant room for improvement. The increasing use of QoL assessments must be accompanied by a stricter adherence to best-practice guidelines to provide valuable input to patients and decision-makers.

QALY-type preference and willingness-to-pay among end-of-life patients with cancer treatments: a pilot study using discrete choice experiment

PURPOSE

Quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is a dominant measurement of health gain in economic evaluations for pricing drugs. However, end-of-life (EoL) patients' preference for QALY gains in life expectancy (LE) and quality of life (QoL) during different disease stages remains unknown and is seldom involved in decision-making. This study aims to measure preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) towards different types of QALY gain among EoL cancer patients.

METHODS

We attributed QALY gain to four types, gain in LE and QoL, respectively, and during both progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS). A discrete choice experiment including five attributes (the four QALY attributes and one cost attribute) with three levels each was developed and conducted with 85 Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in 2022. All levels were set with QALY gain/cost synthesised from research on anti-lung cancer drugs recently listed by Chinese National Healthcare Security Administration. Each respondent answered six choice tasks in a face-to-face interview. The data were analysed using mixed logit models.

RESULTS

Patients valued LE-related QALY gain in PFS most, with a relative importance of 81.8% and a WTP of $43,160 [95% CI 26,751 ~ 59,569] per QALY gain. Respondents consistently preferred LE-related to QoL-related QALY gain regardless of disease stage. Patients with higher income or lower education levels tended to pay more for QoL-related QALY gain.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a prioritised resource allocation to EoL-prolonging health technologies. Given the small sample size and large individual heterogeneity, a full-scale study is needed to provide more robust results.

Treatment sequencing after failure to alectinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Alectinib is the first-line therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Although some guidelines have recommended using other anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure, evidence for such regimens in patients who fail to respond to alectinib is limited. This study involved using administrative claims data from acute care hospitals in Japan. We extracted the data of 634 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between September 1, 2014, and January 31, 2023, who received alectinib treatment before treatment with another anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor. We assessed distributions of patients according to their treatment sequencing and prognosis among three periods defined based on the initial marketing dates of lorlatinib and brigatinib. The type of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure changed over time. In the most recent period, lorlatinib (58%) and brigatinib (40%) became predominant. Two-year overall survival improved over time (47%-84%), accompanied by an increased 2-year proportion of patients who continuously used anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure (13%-44%). The times to treatment discontinuation of the regimen between patients treated with lorlatinib and brigatinib were similar, with a hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.64) in the period after marketing brigatinib. This study provides insights into the evolving treatment landscape for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer who experience failed alectinib treatment and highlights the need for further studies and data accumulation to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Real world study of safety and efficacy of lorlatinib as second line and beyond in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in India - a multicentre chart review study (ROSELAND)

Background

Lorlatinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-inhibitor, is approved as frontline as well as subsequent line of therapy in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is limited literature about safety and efficacy of lorlatinib in Indian patients.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective multicentre study on patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC received lorlatinib as second line and beyond between May 2017 and December 2021. ALK was tested either by immunohistochemistry or fluorescent in-situ hybridisation. Clinicopathologic features, treatment details, toxicity and outcomes were analysed.

Results

A total of 38 patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 years (range: 30-72) and male: female ratio of 20:18. Fifteen (44%) patients had brain metastases at baseline. Lorlatinib use was - second line in 11 (29%), third line in 21 (55%) and fourth line in 4 (11%) of patients, respectively. The best radiologic response to lorlatinib was - complete response in 9 (24%), partial response in 17 (46%), stable disease in 9 (24%) and progressive disease in 2 (5%) of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 76.6 months (95% CI: 68.9-100), the median progression-free survival (PFS) of lorlatinib was not reached (95% CI: 24.3-not reached) and median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 93.1 months (95% CI: 62-not reached). Both median PFS (p = 0.48) and median OS (p = 0.74) was similar between second line and later line use of lorlatinib. Thirty-three (87%) patients experienced treatment-related toxicity and six (16%) patients required dose modification.

Conclusion

Lorlatinib was highly efficacious in terms of overall response rate, median PFS and median OS in this small real-world cohort of advanced ALK+ve NSCLC with a manageable safety profile.

Identifying optimal ALK inhibitors in first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy, safety and effects on quality of life of different ALK-inhibitors for global and Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The included RCTs were identified through a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov, and major cancer conferences. The assessment of progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS, overall survival (OS), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was carried out using restricted mean survival time (RMST) model, fractional polynomial model and Royston-Parmar model. Time-invariant hazard ratio (HR) models were also used to validate and supplement the primary analysis. Objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events with any grade, grade 3-5 were assessed through a Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary measures for OS, PFS, and PROs were HR and RMST. The odds ratio was the metric for evaluating safety, ORR, 12-month PFS rate, 24-month OS rate, and the 12-month non-deterioration rate of PROs. Subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics were performed.

RESULTS

A total of fourteen studies (ten for first-line, four for second-line) consisting of nine treatments (chemotherapy, crizotinib, alectinib [600mg BID], low-dose alectinib [300mg BID], brigatinib, ceritinib, ensartinib, envonalkib, and lorlatinib) were included. In the first-line setting, alectinib showed a significant advantage over crizotinib and had the longest OS among all ALK-inhibitors. Compared to crizotinib, lorlatinib had the best efficacy regarding PFS for global patients, followed closely by alectinib and brigatinib. For Asian patients, alectinib significantly improved PFS compared to other treatments. In second-line, alectinib had the highest PFS for patients pretreated with crizotinib, followed by brigatinib, ceritinib and chemotherapy. Alectinib, irrespective of the dose, was the safest first-line option, whereas lorlatinib, brigatinib, and ceritinib showed poorer safety profiles. Alectinib was also the safest ALK-inhibitor for crizotinib-resistant patients. Brigatinib had the best performance in terms of PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering both efficacy and safety, alectinib appears to be the preferable treatment in first-line and second-line, particularly for Asian patients.

Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX‑0593) on non‑small cell lung cancer with SPECC1L‑ALK fusion: A case report

The evidence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-like (SPECC1L)-ALK fusion was limited. In a previous case report, a Chinese, 44-year-old, female non-smoker with stage IV NSCLC harbouring SPECC1L-ALK fusion was treated with crizotinib ± bevacizumab for 23 months (from October 2017 to September 2019) and second-generation ALK inhibitor iruplinalkib for 2.5 months (from October 2019 to January 2020). The present study is an updated case report of subsequent follow-up of this patient. The patient participated in the phase II INTELLECT study and received iruplinalkib 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in phase at 60 mg once daily. Systemic partial response was achieved 1 month later. Intracranial complete response was achieved nearly 5 months after iruplinalkib treatment initiation. Systemic and intracranial responses continued as of cut-off date (February 2023). The progression-free survival reached 39.3 months, with right censoring (progression did not occur during follow-up). Grade 3 hypertriglyceridaemia complicated with grade 2 hypercholesterolaemia recovered after fenofibrate treatment. The other adverse events were not noteworthy. Iruplinalkib demonstrated promising systemic and intracranial efficacy for NSCLC harbouring SPECC1L-ALK gene, with acceptable and manageable adverse events (for example, grade 3 hypertriglyceridaemia or grade 2 hypercholesterolaemia). Iruplinalkib may be an ideal option for patients with rare ALK fusions.

Unraveling the Potential of ALK-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comprehensive Insights and Future Directions

Background and Objective: This review comprehensively explores the intricate landscape of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), focusing specifically on its pivotal role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tracing ALK's discovery, from its fusion with nucleolar phosphoprotein (NPM)-1 in anaplastic large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (ALCL) in 1994, the review elucidates the subsequent impact of ALK gene alterations in various malignancies, including inflammatory myofibroblastoma and NSCLC. Approximately 3-5% of NSCLC patients exhibit complex ALK rearrangements, leading to the approval of six ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) by 2022, revolutionizing the treatment landscape for advanced metastatic ALK + NSCLC. Notably, second-generation TKIs such as alectinib, ceritinib, and brigatinib have emerged to address resistance issues initially associated with the pioneer ALK-TKI, crizotinib. Methods: To ensure comprehensiveness, we extensively reviewed clinical trials on ALK inhibitors for NSCLC by 2023. Additionally, we systematically searched PubMed, prioritizing studies where the terms "ALK" AND "non-small cell lung cancer" AND/OR "NSCLC" featured prominently in the titles. This approach aimed to encompass a spectrum of relevant research studies, ensuring our review incorporates the latest and most pertinent information on innovative and alternative therapeutics for ALK + NSCLC. Key Content and Findings: Beyond exploring the intricate details of ALK structure and signaling, the review explores the convergence of ALK-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, investigating the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in ALK-altered NSCLC tumors. Despite encouraging preclinical data, challenges observed in trials assessing combinations such as nivolumab-crizotinib, mainly due to severe hepatic toxicity, emphasize the necessity for cautious exploration of these novel approaches. Additionally, the review explores innovative directions such as ALK molecular diagnostics, ALK vaccines, and biosensors, shedding light on their promising potential within ALK-driven cancers. Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis covers molecular mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and immune interactions associated with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. As a pivotal resource, the review guides future research and therapeutic interventions in ALK-targeted therapy for NSCLC.

A computational examination of the therapeutic advantages of fourth-generation ALK inhibitors TPX-0131 and repotrectinib over third-generation lorlatinib for NSCLC with ALK F1174C/L/V mutations

Background: In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a pivotal factor in promoting cancer development is the rearrangement in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase ALK gene, resulting in elevated ALK protein expression. F1174C/L/V is the acquired secondary resistant mutation in ALK. Significant survival improvements have been seen while tyrosine kinase inhibitors specifically target ALK. Nevertheless, the emergence of drug resistance hinders the clinical effectiveness of these drugs. Objective: This research sought to find the binding affinity/inhibitory effects of the existing drug lorlatinib (LOR) and upcoming TPX-0131 (zotizalkib/TPX) and repotrectinib (TPX-0005/REP) inhibitors against ALK F1174C/L/V mutations using computational approaches to identify potential strategies over resistance. Methods: We conducted molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and MMPBSA calculations to investigate how compact macrocyclic inhibitors, such as TPX-0131 and repotrectinib, fit within the ATP-binding boundary and differ from LOR. Results: Our results demonstrated that TPX-0131 and repotrectinib contributed to higher binding energy in F1174C and F1174L mutations than LOR. Repotrectinib showed greater binding energy in the F1174V mutation, whereas LOR and TPX-0131 exhibited similar binding energy. However, all three inhibitors showed significant binding energy toward F1174C/L/V mutations found in NSCLC. Conclusion: This comparative study of the potential binding effects of fourth-generation inhibitors TPX-0131 and repotrectinib and third-generation inhibitor LOR for ALK F1174C/L/V mutations revealed the atomistic insights of the binding mechanism. These computational findings enable us to carry out further research for the clinical implementation of fourth-generation ALK inhibitors on ALK-positive NSCLC.

Progress of non-small-cell lung cancer with ROS1 rearrangement

ROS1 rearrangement is found in 0.9%-2.6% of people with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) target ROS1 and can block tumor growth and provide clinical benefits to patients. This review summarizes the current knowledge on ROS1 rearrangements in NSCLCs, including the mechanisms of ROS1 oncogenicity, epidemiology of ROS1-positive tumors, methods for detecting rearrangements, molecular characteristics, therapeutic agents, and mechanisms of drug resistance.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced ALK Rearrangement-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Portugal: Results of a National Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Rearrangements in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene define a molecular subgroup of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) that should be treated with ALK-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to portray the Portuguese reality about the diagnosis and treatment of stage IV ALK-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

Institutions that treat lung cancer in Portugal were invited to participate in an anonymous electronic questionnaire. A total of 22/35 geographically dispersed institutions responded. A descriptive statistical analysis of the results was performed.

RESULTS

Reflex molecular testing was done in 54.6% of the institutions. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was the preferred diagnostic method (90.9%). Typically, physicians obtained molecular study results within 14-21 days. Alectinib was the most commonly used first-line treatment. For patients with brain metastases, 86.4% of the physicians preferred alectinib and 13.6% preferred first-line brigatinib. In the case of asymptomatic oligoprogression in the central nervous system, 85.7% of physicians performed local treatment and kept the patient on a TKI; if symptomatic, 66.7% gave local treatment and stayed with the TKI, while 28.6% gave local treatment and altered the TKI. For patients with symptomatic systemic progression, 47.6% and 38.1% of physicians prescribed lorlatinib after initial treatment with alectinib or brigatinib, respectively. After progression on lorlatinib, 42.9% of respondents chose chemotherapy and 57.1% requested detection of resistance mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS is widely used for the molecular characterization of ALK-positive NSCLC in Portugal. The country has access to up-to-date therapy. Overall, national clinical practice follows international recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC.

Sharing Experience with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: An Italian Expert Panel Discussion

BACKGROUND

ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment and largely improved the survival outcomes of patients with NSCLC harboring ALK rearrangements. Different ALK TKI compounds have demonstrated antitumor activity in these patients and are available in clinical practice. However, clinical expertise across countries varies according to local regulatory approval of different drugs, identifying multiple treatment scenarios to comply with international guidelines and clinical practice.

METHODS

A virtual webinar was held on July 2023 to discuss the state of the art and future perspectives in the treatment of ALK rearrangement in advanced NSCLC in Italy. The faculty hosting the webinar was composed of eight medical oncologists from different regions of Italy with clinical expertise in treating patients with lung cancer. Live-shared notes were used to produce a report to serve as the basis of a review manuscript on the topic.

RESULTS

Alectinib and brigatinib are the preferred front-line treatment options in Italy, pending approval of the front-line medicine lorlatinib, which would be considered among the choices. Due to a local regulatory limitation of second-line lorlatinib, which is not allowed after front-line brigatinib, alectinib is commonly the preferred front-line choice to follow a sequence of alectinib, followed by lorlatinib, followed by platinum plus pemetrexed chemotherapy. Age and performance status were not considered per se as clinical features influencing treatment choice. However, treatment compliance is deemed a relevant factor in decision making with regard to the number of pills to be administered. In general, given the availability of alternative choices, the spectrum of patients' comorbidities and polypharmacotherapy interactions should be taken into account in treatment selection according to the toxicity profile of each compound. In addition, several issues were debated with regard to improving treatment outcomes, including testing, brain metastases, and management of an oligoprogressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment scenario of ALK-positive disease is dynamically evolving. Furthermore, not all FDA- and EMA-approved compounds are approved in Italy with the same indications. This influences therapeutic opportunities and increases the need for greater clinical expertise to help and guide treatment selection.