Outcomes in patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy who were admitted to intensive care (CARTTAS): an international, multicentre, observational cohort study

Talicabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: results from an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 study

BACKGROUND

In low-income and middle-income counties (LMICs), the outcome of relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies is poor due to the absence of effective therapies. We report the results of a phase 1/2 study of a novel humanised anti-CD19 4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, talicabtagene autoleucel, for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 study was done at six tertiary cancer centres in India. Phase 1 was a single-centre study done in Tata Memorial Hospital, India, in patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas. Phase 2 was a single-arm, multicentre, basket trial done in five tertiary cancer centres in patients aged 15 years and older with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or B-cell lymphoma. Eligible patients had a life expectancy of 12 weeks or more, an ECOG performance status of 0-1 (phase 1) or 0-2 (phase 2), and an adequate organ function. Patients underwent apheresis to obtain at least 1 × 109 lymphocytes to manufacture CAR T cells. Lymphodepletion therapy was done with cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 for 3 days or bendamustine 90 mg/m2 for 2 days. Patients were then infused intravenously with talicabtagene autoleucel 1 × 107-5 × 109 CAR T cells in a fractionated schedule (10%, 30%, and 60%, on days 0, 1, and 2, respectively) during phase 1 or at least 5 × 106 CAR T cells per kg (up to 2 × 109 CAR T cells) on day 0 during phase 2. The primary endpoints were safety (phase 1) and overall response rate (phase 2). The efficacy analysis was done in the efficacy evaluable cohort (all patients who received the target dose and 3 days of lymphodepletion therapy). The safety analysis was done in the safety population (all patients who received talicabtagene autoleucel). The trials are registered with Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI/2021/04/032727 and CTRI/2022/12/048211), and enrolment is closed.

FINDINGS

Of 64 patients, 14 were enrolled in phase 1 (from May 11, 2021, to May 13, 2022) and 50 were enrolled in phase 2 (Dec 27, 2022, to Aug 31, 2023). The median age of the overall cohort was 44 years (IQR 27-57), and 49 (77%) of 64 patients were male and 15 (23%) were female. In phase 1, no dose-limiting toxicities occurred at doses of 2 × 106-17 × 106 CAR T cells per kg. A dose of at least 5 × 106 CAR T cells per kg was chosen for phase 2 based on a complete response in three of seven patients at this dose. The most common grade 3 or worse toxicities were haematological events: anaemia (35 [61%] of 57 patients), thrombocytopenia (37 [65%] patients), neutropenia (55 [96%] patients, and febrile neutropenia (27 [47%]) patients). There were two treatment-related deaths, one due to febrile neutropenia, immune-effector cell associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and septic shock, and the second due to pulmonary bleed, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome, and cytokine release syndrome. In 51 efficacy-evaluable patients (36 with B-cell lymphoma and 15 with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia), the overall response rate was 73% (37 of 51; 95% CI 59-83).

INTERPRETATION

Talicabtagene autoleucel had a manageable safety profile and induced durable responses in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. This therapy addresses an important unmet need for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies in India.

FUNDING

Immunoadoptive Cell Therapy (ImmunoACT) and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).

Understanding oncologic emergencies and related emergency department visits and hospitalizations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer frequently visit the emergency department (ED) and are at high risk for hospitalization due to severe illness from cancer progression or treatment side effects. With an aging population and rising cancer incidence rates worldwide, it is crucial to understand how EDs and other acute care venues manage oncologic emergencies. Insights from other nations and health systems may inform resources necessary for optimal ED management and novel care delivery pathways. We described clinical management of oncologic emergencies and their contribution to ED visits and hospitalizations worldwide.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed original research studies published in the English language between January 1st, 2003, to December 31st, 2022, garnered from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We included all studies investigating adult (≥ 18 years) cancer patients with emergency visits. We examined chief complaints or predictors of ED use that explicitly defined oncologic emergencies.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 49 articles addressing cancer-related emergency visits. Most publications reported single-site studies (n = 34/49), with approximately even distribution across clinical settings- ED (n = 22/49) and acute care hospital/ICU (n = 27/49). The number of patient observations varied widely among the published studies (range: 9 - 87,555 patients), with most studies not specifying the cancer type (n = 33/49), stage (n = 41/49), or treatment type (n = 36/49). Most studies (n = 31/49) examined patients aged ≥ 60 years. Infection was the most common oncologic emergency documented (n = 22/49), followed by pain (n = 20/49), dyspnea (n = 19/49), and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (n = 17/49). Interventions within the ED or hospital ranged from pharmacological management with opioids (n = 11/49), antibiotics (n = 9/49), corticosteroids (n = 5/49), and invasive procedures (e.g., palliative stenting; n = 13/49) or surgical interventions (n = 2/49).

CONCLUSION

Limited research specifically addresses oncologic emergencies despite the international prevalence of ED presentations among cancer patients. Patients with cancer presenting to the ED appear to have a variety of complaints which could result from their cancers and thus may require tailored diagnostic and intervention pathways to provide optimal acute care. Further acute geriatric oncology research may clarify the optimal management strategies to improve the outcomes for this vulnerable patient population.

Critical care considerations of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies represents a major advancement in the treatment of refractory hematologic malignancies, with high remission rates for relapsed B-cell lymphomas and leukemias. However, it is associated with a broad spectrum of potentially life-threatening toxicities, many of which require intensive care unit (ICU) management. Key complications include Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), as well as severe infections, Immune Effector Cell-associated Hematotoxicity (ICAHT), coagulopathies, and organ dysfunctions resulting from the intense inflammatory response induced by CAR T-cells. Approximately one third of patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy require ICU admission. Among those patients, CRS is the leading indication. ICANS and sepsis are other major causes of admission to the ICU. This review provides a comprehensive overview of ICU considerations for managing CAR T-cell-related toxicities, covering criteria for ICU admission, approaches to grading and treating complications, and interdisciplinary recommendations to optimize patient outcomes. Enhanced awareness and early intervention are critical in reducing ICU mortality and improving overall survival in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy.

Economic evaluation of critically ill adult CAR-T cell recipients-analysis from a healthcare payer perspective

BACKGROUND

CAR-T cell (chimeric antigen receptor T) therapy is now part of standard of care treatment of B‑cell lineage malignancies. Although it is an effective treatment, it comes along with adverse side effects and toxicities that may require intensive care therapy. The costs related to critical care therapy in critically ill patients after CAR‑T administration have not been evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients who had received CAR‑T therapy and were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care university medical centre in Germany between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2022. Cause of admission and ICU therapy as well as treatment and total hospitals costs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with a history of CAR-T cell therapy for underlying haematological malignancy were included. The median age of all patients was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR] 50-70) and 37% (n = 11) were female. 93% (n = 28) of patients had non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 7% (n = 2) had multiple myeloma. The cohort was stratified whether the ICU admission was CAR‑T therapy related (i.e. within 30 days after CAR‑T therapy; 73%, n = 22) or the admission was of an other cause (> 30 days after CAR‑T therapy) (27%, n = 8). The median duration from CAR‑T therapy to ICU admission was 6 (range 5-8) days in CAR-T cell therapy associated ICU admissions compared with 52 (range 31-126) days in other admissions. The overall illness severity on admission was numerically higher in CAR-T-related ICU admission compared to other admissions (46 vs. 43 points, p = 0.18). Vasopressor therapy (50% vs. 75%; p = 0.19), invasive mechanical ventilation (27% vs. 50%; p = 0.24) and renal replacement therapy (14% vs. 50%; p < 0.05) were used in CAR-T-associated admission compared to other admissions, respectively. The ICU mortality (23% vs. 50%; p = 0.15) was higher in patients with other ICU admission. Median total costs of the entire inpatient stay in hospital were € 27,845 (range 8661-368,286 €) in CAR-T-associated ICU admissions compared to € 59,234 (range 23,182-127,044 €) in the group of other ICU admissions (costs of the CAR‑T product not included).

CONCLUSION

In relation to the total costs of CAR-T-cell therapy (production of the CAR‑T product), therapy-associated complications have a relatively low impact on the costs and utilization of ICU resources.

Neuropsychiatric manifestations following chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for cancer: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and management strategies

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has emerged as a transformative modality in the treatment of patients with cancer. However, it is increasingly evident that this therapeutic approach is not without its challenges. The unique nature of CAR-T cells as living drugs introduces a distinct set of side effects. As the application of CAR-T cell therapy expands to treat a broader range of diseases, it becomes increasingly important to devise effective strategies for handling the associated toxicities. Challenges in treating patients with CAR-T cells include addressing complications such as cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and cytopenias. This comprehensive review seeks to systematically identify, categorize and elucidate all previously described neurological and psychological side effects associated with CAR-T cell therapy, shedding light on the pertinent laboratory findings that underscore these phenomena.

METHODS

PubMed, Springer Link, and ScienceDirect were systematically searched for empirical studies on adult patients with cancer receiving CAR-T cell therapy for hemato-oncological malignancies. Quality assessment was conducted using Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) for randomized trials and adherence to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist for observational studies. The synthesis of findings was conducted via a narrative approach, consolidating the diverse array of data into a coherent framework.

RESULTS

From an initial pool of 2,276 citations, 546 studies met the inclusion criteria, exhibiting a rich tapestry of heterogeneity in terms of study characteristics and patient samples. The incidence of neuropsychological symptoms varied notably across different CAR-T cell products and hematological malignancies. Among the most frequently reported neuropsychological symptoms were aphasia, attention deficits, impaired consciousness, and disorientation, alongside a constellation of other symptoms including confusion, cognitive impairment, memory loss, writing difficulties, fatigue, headache, agitation, tremor, seizures, and psychomotor retardation. Early intervention strategies, including corticosteroids and tocilizumab, have shown the potential to reduce the intensity of neuropsychological symptoms and prevent their progression to critical complications.

CONCLUSION

These insights underscore the imperative of extending neuropsychological assessments beyond the conventional Immune Effector Cell-Associated Encephalopathy score framework.

Evolving strategies for addressing CAR T-cell toxicities

The field of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has grown from a fully experimental concept to now boasting a multitude of treatments including six FDA-approved products targeting various hematologic malignancies. Yet, along with their efficacy, these therapies come with side effects requiring timely and thoughtful interventions. In this review, we discuss the most common toxicities associated with CAR T-cells to date, highlighting risk factors, prognostication, implications for critical care management, patient experience optimization, and ongoing work in the field of toxicity mitigation. Understanding the current state of the field and standards of practice is critical in order to improve and manage potential toxicities of both current and novel CAR T-cell therapies as they are applied in the clinic.

Survivorship in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Recipients: Infections, Secondary Malignancies, and Non-Relapse Mortality

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has significantly advanced the treatment of hematologic malignancies, offering curative potential for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. However, the long-term survivorship of these patients is marked by unique challenges, particularly immune deficits and infectious complications, second primary malignancies (SPMs), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Understanding and addressing these risks is paramount to improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

SUMMARY

This review explores the incidence and risk factors for NRM and long-term complications following CAR T-cell therapy. Infections are the leading cause of NRM, accounting for over 50% of cases, driven by neutropenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, and impaired cellular immunity. SPMs, including secondary myeloid and T-cell malignancies, are increasingly recognized, prompting the FDA to issue a black box warning, although their direct link to CAR T cells remains disputed. While CAR T-cell-specific toxicities like cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome contribute to morbidity, they represent only a minority of NRM cases. The management of these complications is critical as CAR T-cell therapy is being evaluated for broader use, including in earlier treatment lines and for non-malignant conditions like autoimmune diseases.

KEY MESSAGES

CAR T-cell therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, but survivorship is complicated by infections, SPMs, and ultimately endangered by NRM. Prophylactic strategies, close monitoring, and toxicity management strategies are key to improving long-term outcomes.

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Hospitalized Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Patients Who Developed Acute Respiratory Failure

Objectives:The aim of the study was to examine the incidence, baseline characteristics, and outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy admissions in individuals who developed acute respiratory failure (ARF). The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the years 2017 to 2020. Methods: The study identified CAR-T cell therapy hospitalizations through the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) codes. Patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) were further classified using specific International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze baseline characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and outcomes. Results: Analysis of the NIS Database identified 5545 CAR-T therapy admissions between 2017 and 2020, revealing a rising trend over time. In our study, we found that hypertension (39%), dyslipidemia (21.7%), and venous thromboembolism (13%) were the most frequently observed comorbidities in CAR-T cell therapy admissions. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) was reported in 7.1% of admissions, and they had higher all-cause in-hospital mortality than CAR-T cell therapy admissions without ARF (32.9% vs 1.3%, P < 0.001). ARF admissions that required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) also had higher all-cause in-hospital mortality compared to admissions not requiring IMV (48.9% vs 11.8%, P = 0.001). There was no difference in the mortality rate among admissions with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, and Leukemia that utilized CAR-T therapy. Conclusions: In this largest study to date, we illuminate the incidence and outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy admissions with ARF. Higher mortality rates were observed in CAR-T cell therapy admissions with ARF. The study emphasizes the crucial role of interdisciplinary collaboration in CAR-T patient management and calls for additional research to clarify ARF's etiology and inform effective management strategies.

A Primer on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy-related Toxicities for the Intensivist

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an innovative treatment approach that has shown remarkable efficacy against several hematologic malignancies. However, its use can be associated with unique and sometimes severe toxicities that require admission to intensive care unit in 30% of patients, and intensivists should be aware of immune-mediated toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy and management of adverse events. We will review available literature on current diagnostic criteria and therapeutic strategies for mitigating these most common toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in the post-infusion period. The authors will also review other toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy including cytopenias, acquired immunocompromised states, and infections, and discuss the available literature on best supportive care and prophylaxis recommendations. Critical care medicine specialists play a crucial role in the management of patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapies. With the expanding use of these products in increasing numbers of treating centers, intensivists' roles as part of the multidisciplinary team caring for these patients will have an outsized impact on the continued success of these promising therapies.

Management of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell-associated toxicities

The use of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells is a significant therapeutic improvement increasing the prognosis for patients with a variety of hematological malignancies. However, this therapy has also sometimes life-threatening, complications. Therefore, knowledge of the treatment and management of these complications, especially in treatment centers and intensive care units, respectively, is of outstanding importance. This review provides recommendations for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of CAR-T cell-associated complications such as cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome, hematotoxicity, hypogammaglobulinemia, and CAR-T cell-induced pseudo-progression amongst others for physicians treating patients with CAR-T cell-associated complications and intensivists.

Septic shock in the immunocompromised cancer patient: a narrative review

Immunosuppressed patients, particularly those with cancer, represent a momentous and increasing portion of the population, especially as cancer incidence rises with population growth and aging. These patients are at a heightened risk of developing severe infections, including sepsis and septic shock, due to multiple immunologic defects such as neutropenia, lymphopenia, and T and B-cell impairment. The diverse and complex nature of these immunologic profiles, compounded by the concomitant use of immunosuppressive therapies (e.g., corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, and immunotherapy), superimposed by the breakage of natural protective barriers (e.g., mucosal damage, chronic indwelling catheters, and alterations of anatomical structures), increases the risk of various infections. These and other conditions that mimic sepsis pose substantial diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Factors that elevate the risk of progression to septic shock in these patients include advanced age, pre-existing comorbidities, frailty, type of cancer, the severity of immunosuppression, hypoalbuminemia, hypophosphatemia, Gram-negative bacteremia, and type and timing of responses to initial treatment. The management of vulnerable cancer patients with sepsis or septic shock varies due to biased clinical practices that may result in delayed access to intensive care and worse outcomes. While septic shock is typically associated with poor outcomes in patients with malignancies, survival has significantly improved over time. Therefore, understanding and addressing the unique needs of cancer patients through a new paradigm, which includes the integration of innovative technologies into our healthcare system (e.g., wireless technologies, medical informatics, precision medicine), targeted management strategies, and robust clinical practices, including early identification and diagnosis, coupled with prompt admission to high-level care facilities that promote a multidisciplinary approach, is crucial for improving their prognosis and overall survival rates.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy: Harnessing extracellular vesicles for enhanced efficacy

A cutting-edge approach in cell-based immunotherapy for combating resistant cancer involves genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) lymphocytes. In recent years, these therapies have demonstrated effectiveness, leading to their commercialization and clinical application against certain types of cancer. However, CAR-T therapy faces limitations, such as the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) that can render CAR-T cells ineffective, and the adverse side effects of the therapy, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a diverse group of membrane-bound particles released into the extracellular environment by virtually all cell types. They are essential for intercellular communication, transferring cargoes such as proteins, lipids, various types of RNAs, and DNA fragments to target cells, traversing biological barriers both locally and systemically. EVs play roles in numerous physiological processes, with those from both immune and non-immune cells capable of modulating the immune system through activation or suppression. Leveraging this capability of EVs to enhance CAR-T cell therapy could represent a significant advancement in overcoming its current limitations. This review examines the current landscape of CAR-T cell immunotherapy and explores the potential role of EVs in augmenting its therapeutic efficacy.

Novel prognostic scoring systems for severe CRS and ICANS after anti-CD19 CAR T cells in large B-cell lymphoma

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are now used in routine practice for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Severe (grade ≥ 3) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are still the most concerning acute toxicities leading to frequent intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonging hospitalization, and adding significant cost to treatment. We report on the incidence of CRS and ICANS and the outcomes in a large cohort of 925 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in France based on patient data captured through the DESCAR-T registry. CRS of any grade occurred in 778 patients (84.1%), with 74 patients (8.0%) with grade 3 CRS or higher, while ICANS of any grade occurred in 375 patients (40.5%), with 112 patients (12.1%) with grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Based on the parameters selected by multivariable analyses, two independent prognostic scoring systems (PSS) were derived, one for grade ≥ 3 CRS and one for grade ≥ 3 ICANS. CRS-PSS included bulky disease, a platelet count < 150 G/L, a C-reactive protein (CRP) level > 30 mg/L and no bridging therapy or stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 CRS. ICANS-PSS included female sex, low level of platelets (< 150 G/L), use of axi-cel and no bridging therapy or SD/PD after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Both scores were externally validated in international cohorts of patients treated with tisa-cel or axi-cel.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Postinfusion Fever: Infection Profile, Clinical Parameters, and Biomarkers Trends to Assist Antibiotic Stewardship

Background

This study aimed to describe documented infections associated with postinfusion fever after CAR T-cell therapy and to evaluate daily changes in vital signs, laboratory results, and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) in patients with and without confirmed bacterial infections following fever onset, with the objective of assisting in antibiotic stewardship.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational study including all consecutive adult patients who received CAR T-cell therapy. Documented infection in the first fever episode after infusion, and clinical and analytic trend comparison of patients with bacterial documented infections and those without documented infections, are described.

Results

Among 152 patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy, 87 (57.2%) had fever within 30 days of infusion, with a median time from infusion to fever of 3 (interquartile range, 2-5) days. Of these 87 patients, 82 (94.3%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics. Infection was documented in 9 (10.3%) patients and only 4 (4.6%) had bacterial infections. Clinical signs and biomarkers were similar in patients with bacterial documented infection and in those without documented infection at fever onset. Fever, tachycardia, and high C-reactive protein levels remained high during the first 3 days after CAR T-cell infusion, even when no infection was documented.

Conclusions

Fever is a common symptom following CAR T-cell infusion and is largely treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, confirmed bacterial documented infections after the first fever post-CAR T-cell infusion are very unusual. Because clinical parameters and biomarkers are not useful for identifying infectious fever, other methods should be assessed to ensure the proper use of antibiotics.

Reactions and adverse events induced by T-cell engagers as anti-cancer immunotherapies, a comprehensive review

T-cell engagers (TCE) are cancer immunotherapies that have recently demonstrated meaningful benefit for patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors. The anticipated widespread use of T cell engagers poses implementation challenges and highlights the need for guidance to anticipate, mitigate, and manage adverse events. By mobilizing T-cells directly at the contact of tumor cells, TCE mount an obligatory and immediate anti-tumor immune response that could result in diverse reactions and adverse events. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most common reaction and is largely confined to the first drug administrations during step-up dosage. Cytokine release syndrome should be distinguished from infusion related reaction by clinical symptoms, timing to occurrence, pathophysiological aspects, and clinical management. Other common reactions and adverse events with TCE are immune effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), infections, tumor flare reaction and cytopenias. The toxicity profiles of TCE and CAR-T cells have commonalities and distinctions that we sum-up in this review. As compared with CAR-T cells, TCE are responsible for less frequently severe CRS or ICANS. This review recapitulates terminology, pathophysiology, severity grading system and management of reactions and adverse events related to TCE.

Quality of Life and Prognostic Awareness in Caregivers of Patients Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy

Caregivers of patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) play a critical role during treatment, yet their experience remains largely unaddressed. We aimed to longitudinally describe quality of life (QoL) and psychological distress, as well as prognostic awareness, in caregivers and explore the association of prognosis awareness with baseline psychological distress. We conducted a longitudinal study of caregivers of patients undergoing CAR-T and examined QoL (CAReGiverOncology QoL questionnaire) and psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) prior to CAR-T (baseline) and at days 7, 30, 90, and 180 post-CAR-T. At baseline, caregivers and patients completed the Prognostic Awareness Impact Scale, which examines cognitive understanding of prognosis, emotional coping with prognosis, and adaptive response (ie, capacity to use prognostic awareness to inform life decisions). We enrolled 58% (69 of 120) of eligible caregivers. Caregivers reported QoL impairments that did not change over time (B = 0.09; P = .452). The rates of clinically significant depression and anxiety symptoms were 47.7% and 20.0%, respectively, at baseline, and 39.1% and 17.4% at 180 days. One-third (32%) of the caregivers and patients reported that their oncologist said the cancer is curable. Caregivers' greater emotional coping with prognosis was associated with fewer symptoms of anxiety (B = -.17; P < .001) and depression (B = -.02; P < .001). Cognitive understanding of prognosis and adaptive response were not associated with psychological distress. Caregivers reported QoL impairments throughout the study period. A substantial proportion of caregivers experienced psychological distress and reported misperceptions about the prognosis, highlighting the need for supportive care interventions.

How I manage acute respiratory failure in patients with hematological malignancies

ABSTRACT

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is common in patients with hematological malignancies notably those with acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. ARF is the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, with a 35% case fatality rate. Failure to identify the ARF cause is associated with mortality. A prompt, well-designed diagnostic workup is crucial. The investigations are chosen according to pretest diagnostic probabilities, estimated by the DIRECT approach: D stands for delay, or time since diagnosis; I for pattern of immune deficiency; R and T for radiological evaluation; E refers to clinical experience, and C to the clinical picture. Thorough familiarity with rapid diagnostic tests helps to decrease the use of bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage, which can cause respiratory status deterioration in those patients with hypoxemia. A prompt etiological diagnosis shortens the time on unnecessary empirical treatments, decreasing iatrogenic harm and costs. High-quality collaboration between intensivists and hematologists and all crossdisciplinary health care workers is paramount. All oxygen delivery systems should be considered to minimize invasive mechanical ventilation. Treatment of the malignancy is started or continued in the ICU under the guidance of the hematologists. The goal is to use the ICU as a bridge to recovery, with the patient returning to the hematology ward in sufficiently good clinical condition to receive optimal anticancer treatment.

Toxicities, intensive care management, and outcome of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in adults: an update

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are a promising new immunotherapy for haematological malignancies. Six CAR-T cells products are currently available for adult patients with refractory or relapsed high-grade B cell malignancies, but they are associated with severe life-threatening toxicities and side effects that may require admission to ICU.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this short pragmatic review is to synthesize for intensivists the knowledge on CAR-T cell therapy with emphasis on CAR-T cell-induced toxicities and ICU management of complications according to international recommendations, outcomes and future issues.

Noninvasive longitudinal PET/CT imaging of CAR T cells using PSMA reporter gene

PURPOSE

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has achieved great success in treating hematologic malignancies. However, it is yet to prove effective in the treatment of solid tumors. Thus, it is necessary to develop appropriate methodology for the long-term, accurate, and quantitative evaluation of the distribution and activities of CAR T cells in solid tumors. In the present study, we engineered TfR ΔPSMA CAR (CAR-ΔPSMA) T cells, which targeted the transferrin receptor (TfR) expressed by tumor cells and could be tracked in vivo via a reporter gene encoding the truncated prostate specific membrane antigen (ΔPSMA). We then quantitatively monitored these CAR T cells in vitro and in vivo using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

The CAR-ΔPSMA T cells were genetically engineered by transducing T cells with a lentiviral vector encoding TfR41BBζ-T2A-ΔPSMA. Firstly, the target expression, activation, and cytotoxicity of CAR-ΔPSMA T cells were validated in vitro. Secondly, the minimum thresholds of CAR-ΔPSMA T cells detection for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT were also determined in vitro and in vivo respectively. Lastly, the feasibility of monitoring the biodistribution and infiltration of CAR-ΔPSMA T cells after systematic administration was evaluated in the breast cancer subcutaneous xenograft model.

RESULTS

The CAR-ΔPSMA T cells retained activation and tumor killing capacity after transduction of the ΔPSMA-encoding reporter gene. Next, the CAR-ΔPSMA T cells could be reliably tracked by [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT, the detection sensitivity of which was 250 cells/mm3 in vitro and 100 cells/mm3 in vivo. Next, the sequential imaging assays revealed that [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT could be used to specifically visualize ΔPSMA+ CAR T cells at the tumor site. The increase in the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 signal intensity over time allowed us to effectively detect CAR T cells in vivo.

CONCLUSION

Our findings preliminarily confirmed that [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT could reliably detect CAR-ΔPSMA T cells in vitro and in vivo in solid tumors, laying the foundation for the monitoring CAR T cell therapy in the future.

Features and outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU for chimeric antigen receptor T cell-related toxicity: a French multicentre cohort

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is increasingly used in patients with refractory haematological malignancies but can induce severe adverse events. We aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after CAR-T therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study included consecutive adults admitted to either of two French ICUs in 2018-2022 within 3 months after CAR-T therapy.

RESULTS

Among 238 patients given CAR-T therapy, 84 (35.3%) required ICU admission and were included in the study, a median of 5 [0-7] days after CAR-T infusion. Median SOFA and SAPSII scores were 3 [2-6] and 39 [30-48], respectively. Criteria for cytokine release syndrome were met in 80/84 (95.2%) patients, including 18/80 (22.5%) with grade 3-4 toxicity. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 46/84 (54.8%) patients, including 29/46 (63%) with grade 3-4 toxicity. Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was diagnosed in 15/84 (17.9%) patients. Tocilizumab was used in 73/84 (86.9%) patients, with a median of 2 [1-4] doses. Steroids were given to 55/84 (65.5%) patients, including 21/55 (38.2%) given high-dose pulse therapy. Overall, 23/84 (27.4%) patients had bacterial infections, 3/84 (3.6%) had fungal infections (1 invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and 2 Mucorales), and 2 (2.4%) had cytomegalovirus infection. Vasopressors were required in 23/84 (27.4%), invasive mechanical ventilation in 12/84 (14.3%), and dialysis in 4/84 (4.8%) patients. Four patients died in the ICU (including 2 after ICU readmission, i.e., overall mortality was 4.8% of patients). One year after CAR-T therapy, 41/84 (48.9%) patients were alive and in complete remission, 14/84 (16.7%) were alive and in relapse, and 29/84 (34.5%) had died. These outcomes were similar to those of patients never admitted to the ICU.

CONCLUSION

ICU admission is common after CAR-T therapy and is usually performed to manage specific toxicities. Our experience is encouraging, with low ICU mortality despite a high rate of grade 3-4 toxicities, and half of patients being alive and in complete remission at one year.

Donor-derived stem cell infusion for sustained pancytopenia after CD19 CAR-T therapy for relapsed patients post allogeneic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness of donor-derived chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells in the treatment of relapsed cases after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and whether donor-derived peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) have a therapeutic effect on pancytopenia after CAR-T cell therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed data from five adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who had relapse after allo-HSCT and received donor-derived CAR-T cell therapy and donor-derived PBSCs to promote hematopoietic recovery.

RESULTS

All patients had negative minimal residual disease after CAR-T therapy, grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome, and developed grade 4 hematologic toxicity. During the pancytopenia stage after CAR-T cell therapy, donor-derived PBSCs were transfused without graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Four patients had grade I-II acute GVHD (aGVHD). After corticosteroid treatment, aGVHD resolved and hematopoiesis was restored. Although steroids in combination with etanercept and ruxolitinib relieved symptoms in one patient with grade IV aGVHD, complete hematopoietic recovery was not achieved, and the patient died due to severe infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-derived CAR-T cell therapy is safe and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory ALL after allo-HSCT. Donor-derived PBSCs infusion could achieve hematopoietic recovery with controllable aGVHD in patients with persistent pancytopenia.

Endothelial activation and damage as a common pathological substrate in different pathologies and cell therapy complications

The endothelium is a biologically active interface with multiple functions, some of them common throughout the vascular tree, and others that depend on its anatomical location. Endothelial cells are continually exposed to cellular and humoral factors, and to all those elements (biological, chemical, or hemodynamic) that circulate in blood at a certain time. It can adapt to different stimuli but this capability may be lost if the stimuli are strong enough and/or persistent in time. If the endothelium loses its adaptability it may become dysfunctional, becoming a potential real danger to the host. Endothelial dysfunction is present in multiple clinical conditions, such as chronic kidney disease, obesity, major depression, pregnancy-related complications, septic syndromes, COVID-19, and thrombotic microangiopathies, among other pathologies, but also in association with cell therapies, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and treatment with chimeric antigen receptor T cells. In these diverse conditions, evidence suggests that the presence and severity of endothelial dysfunction correlate with the severity of the associated disease. More importantly, endothelial dysfunction has a strong diagnostic and prognostic value for the development of critical complications that, although may differ according to the underlying disease, have a vascular background in common. Our multidisciplinary team of women has devoted many years to exploring the role of the endothelium in association with the mentioned diseases and conditions. Our research group has characterized some of the mechanisms and also proposed biomarkers of endothelial damage. A better knowledge would provide therapeutic strategies either to prevent or to treat endothelial dysfunction.

Predicting infections in patients with haematological malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies: A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) are increasingly used to treat haematological malignancies. Strategies for preventing infections in CAR-T-treated patients rely on expert opinions and consensus guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aimed to identify risk factors for infections in CAR-T-treated patients with haematological malignancies.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search utilized MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify relevant studies from conception until 30 September 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Trials and observational studies were eligible.

PARTICIPANTS

Studies required ≥10 patients treated for haematological malignancy to report infection events (as defined by the study), and either (a) a descriptive, univariate or multivariate analysis of the relationship between infections event and a risk factors for infections, or (b) diagnostic performance of a biochemical/immunological marker in CAR-T-treated patients with infection.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search utilised MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify relevant studies from conception until September 30, 2022. Eligibility/Participants/Intervention: Trials and observational studies were eligible. Studies required ≥ 10 patients treated for haematological malignancy, to report infection events (as defined by the study), and either A) a descriptive, univariate or multivariate analysis of the relationship between infections event and a risk-factors for infections, or B) diagnostic performance of a biochemical/immunological marker in CAR-T treated patients with infection.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Bias assessment was undertaken according to Joanna Brigg's Institute criteria for observational studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Data were synthesized descriptively because of the heterogeneity of reporting.

RESULTS

A total of 1522 patients across 15 studies were identified. All-cause infections across haematological malignancies were associated with lines of prior therapy, steroid administration, immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity and treatment-emergent neutropenia. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and cytokine profiles did not reliably predict infections. Predictors of viral, bacterial and fungal infections were poorly canvassed.

DISCUSSION

Meta-analysis of the current literature is not possible because of significant heterogeneity in definitions of infections and risk factors, and small, underpowered cohort studies. Radical revision of how we approach reporting infections for novel therapies is required to promptly identify infection signals and associated risks in patients receiving novel therapies. Prior therapies, neutropenia, steroid administration and immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity remain the most associated with infections in CAR-T-treated patients.

Sepsis and acute respiratory failure in patients with cancer: how can we improve care and outcomes even further?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Care and outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer have improved over the past decade. This selective review will discuss recent updates in sepsis and acute respiratory failure among patients with cancer, with particular focus on important opportunities to improve outcomes further through attention to phenotyping, predictive analytics, and improved outcome measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of cancer diagnoses in intensive care units (ICUs) is nontrivial and increasing. Sepsis and acute respiratory failure remain the most common critical illness syndromes affecting these patients, although other complications are also frequent. Recent research in oncologic sepsis has described outcome variation - including ICU, hospital, and 28-day mortality - across different types of cancer (e.g., solid vs. hematologic malignancies) and different sepsis definitions (e.g., Sepsis-3 vs. prior definitions). Research in acute respiratory failure in oncology patients has highlighted continued uncertainty in the value of diagnostic bronchoscopy for some patients and in the optimal respiratory support strategy. For both of these syndromes, specific challenges include multifactorial heterogeneity (e.g. in etiology and/or underlying cancer), delayed recognition of clinical deterioration, and complex outcomes measurement.

SUMMARY

Improving outcomes in oncologic critical care requires attention to the heterogeneity of cancer diagnoses, timely recognition and management of critical illness, and defining appropriate ICU outcomes.

Prevention of ICU-acquired infection with decontamination regimen in immunocompromised patients: a pre/post observational study

PURPOSE

Although the proportion of immunocompromised patients admitted to the ICU is increasing, data regarding specific management, including acquired infection (ICU-AI) prophylaxis, in this setting are lacking. We aim to investigate the effect of multiple-site decontamination regimens (MSD) in immunocompromised patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective pre-/post-observational study in 2 ICUs in Bretagne, western France. Adults who required mechanical ventilation for 24 h or more were eligible. During the study period, MSD was implemented in participating ICUs in addition to standard care. It consists of the administration of topical antibiotics (gentamicin, colistin sulfate, and amphotericin B), four times daily in the oropharynx and the gastric tube, 4% chlorhexidine bodywash once daily, and a 5-day nasal mupirocin course.

RESULTS

Overall, 295 immunocompromised patients were available for analysis (151 in the post-implementation group vs 143 in the pre-implementation group). Solid organ cancer was present in 77/295 patients while immunomodulatory treatments were noticed in 135/295. They were 35 ICU-AI in 29/143 patients in the standard-care group as compared with 10 ICU-AI in 9/151 patients in the post-implementation group (p < 0.001). In a multivariable Poisson regression model, MSD was independently associated with a decreased incidence of ICU-AI (incidence rate ratio = 0.39; 95%CI [0.20-0.87] p = 0.008). There were 35/143 deaths in the standard-care group as compared with 22/151 in the post-implementation group (p = 0.046), this difference remained in a multivariable Cox model (HR = 0.58; 95CI [0.34-0.95] p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, MSD appeared to be associated with improved outcomes in critically ill immunocompromised patients.

Outcomes of CAR-T Cell Therapy Recipients Admitted to the ICU: In Search for a Standard of Care-A Brief Overview and Meta-Analysis of Proportions

OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective was to describe the baseline characteristics, main reasons for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and interventions required in the ICU across patients who received CAR-T cell immunotherapy. The secondary objectives were to evaluate different outcomes (ICU mortality) across patients admitted to the ICU after having received CAR-T cell therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a medical literature review, which included MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library, of studies published from the inception of the databases until 2022. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analyses of proportions of several studies, including CAR-T cell-treated patients who required ICU admission. Outcomes in the meta-analysis were evaluated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included four studies and analyzed several outcomes, including baseline characteristics and ICU-related findings. CAR-T cell recipients admitted to the ICU are predominantly males (62% CI-95% (57-66)). Of the total CAR-T cell recipients, 4% CI-95% (3-5) die in the hospital, and 6% CI-95% (4-9) of those admitted to the ICU subsequently die. One of the main reasons for ICU admission is acute kidney injury (AKI) in 15% CI-95% (10-19) of cases and acute respiratory failure in 10% CI-95% (6-13) of cases. Regarding the interventions initiated in the ICU, 18% CI-95% (13-22) of the CAR-T recipients required invasive mechanical ventilation during their ICU stay, 23% CI-95% (16-30) required infusion of vasoactive drugs, and 1% CI-95% (0.1-3) required renal replacement therapy (RRT). 18% CI-95% (13-22) of the initially discharged patients were readmitted to the ICU within 30 days, and the mean length of hospital stay is 22 days CI-95% (19-25). The results paint a current state of matter in CAR-T cell recipients admitted to the ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

To better understand immunotherapy-related complications from an ICU standpoint, acknowledge the deteriorating patient on the ward, reduce the ICU admission rate, advance ICU care, and improve the outcomes of these patients, a standard of care and research regarding CAR-T cell-based immunotherapies should be created. Studies that are looking from the perspective of intensive care are highly warranted because the available literature regarding this area is scarce.

Risk factors and outcome of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell patients admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: CART-PICU study

Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)T-cell CD19 therapy is an effective treatment for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. It can be associated with life-threatening toxicities which often require PICU admission. Purpose: to describe clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of these patients.

Methods

Prospective observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2016-2021. Children who received CAR-T admitted to PICU were included. We collected epidemiological, clinical characteristics, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), treatment, length of stay and mortality.

Results

CAR T-cells (4-1BB constructs) were infused in 59 patients. Twenty-four (40.7%) required PICU admission, length of stay was 4 days (IQR 3-6). Median age was 8.3 years (range 4-24). Patients admitted to PICU presented higher disease burden before infusion: 24% blasts in bone marrow (IQR 5-72) vs. 0 (0-6.9), p<0.001. No patients with <5% blasts were admitted to PICU. Main reasons for admissions were CRS (n=20, 83.3%) and ICANS (n=3, 12.5%). Fourteen patients (58.3%) required inotropic support, 14(58.3%) respiratory. Sixteen patients (66.6%) received tocilizumab, 10(41.6%) steroids, 6(25.0%) anakinra, and 5(20.8%) siltuximab. Ten patients (41.6%) presented neurotoxicity, six of them severe (ICANS 3-4). Two patients died at PICU (8.3%) because of refractory CRS-hemophagocytic lymphohistyocitosis (carHLH) syndrome. There were no significant differences in relapse rate after CAR-T in patients requiring PICU, it was more frequently CD19 negative (p=0.344).

Discussion

PICU admission after CAR-T therapy was mainly due to CRS. Supportive treatment allowed effective management and high survival. Some patients presenting with carHLH, can suffer a fulminant course.

Quantifying the available capacity and resource needs for provision of CAR-T therapies in the National Health Service in Spain: a survey-based study

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the readiness of Spanish National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to provide chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T), and to identify and quantify the different resources needed to provide CAR-T considering three scenarios defined by 10, 25 and 50 patients per centre per year.

DESIGN

Targeted literature review and quantitative study using a questionnaire and telephone interviews. An algorithm was created to determine hospitals' readiness based on their capacity and capability. All the requirements for quantification were assessed and validated by the steering committee, formed by members of the Spanish Group of Haematopoietic Transplantation and Cell Therapy. A weighting system (from 0 to 1) was established for capability quantification. For resources quantification, a scoring system was established, with 0 points representing the minimum and 3 points the maximum of additional resources that a hospital indicated necessary.

SETTING

40 Spanish hospital centres that perform allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation were invited to complete the questionnaire for capacity quantification, 28 of which provided valid responses. Nine hospitals participated in the interviews for resource quantification, eight of which had previously been designated by the Ministry of Health (MoH) to provide CAR-T.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Current capacity of NHS Spanish sites to administer CAR-T under different theoretical scenarios with varying numbers of procedures, and the potential healthcare resources that would be needed to realise the theoretical capacity requirements.

RESULTS

Four hospitals were optimally ready, 17 were somewhat ready and 7 were not ready. The actual extrapolated capacity of the currently designated MoH CAR-T sites would allow treatment of approximately 250 patients per year. Regarding healthcare resource needs, the numbers of haematologists, nurses and beds were the most important limiting factors, and those requiring further growth as patient numbers increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the number of CAR-T-qualified centres and/or increasing resources in the current designated sites are two potential strategies that should be considered to treat CAR-T-eligible patients in Spain.

Management and Prevention of Cellular-Therapy-Related Toxicity: Early and Late Complications

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has dramatically changed prognosis and treatment of relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. Currently the 6 FDA approved products target various surface antigens. While CAR-T therapy achieves good response, life-threatening toxicities have been reported. Mechanistically, can be divided into two categories: (1) toxicities related to T-cell activation and release of high levels of cytokines: or (2) toxicities resulting from interaction between CAR and CAR targeted antigen expressed on non-malignant cells (i.e., on-target, off-tumor effects). Variations in conditioning therapies, co-stimulatory domains, CAR T-cell dose and anti-cytokine administration, pose a challenge in distinguishing cytokine mediated related toxicities from on-target, off-tumor toxicities. Timing, frequency, severity, as well as optimal management of CAR T-cell-related toxicities vary significantly between products and are likely to change as newer therapies become available. Currently the FDA approved CARs are targeted towards the B-cell malignancies however the future holds promise of expanding the target to solid tumor malignancies. Further highlighting the importance of early recognition and intervention for early and late onset CAR-T related toxicity. This contemporary review aims to describe presentation, grading and management of commonly encountered toxicities, short- and long-term complications, discuss preventive strategies and resource utilization.

Characterization of the endotheliopathy, innate-immune activation and hemostatic imbalance underlying CAR-T cell toxicities: laboratory tools for an early and differential diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell-based immunotherapy constitutes a revolutionary advance for treatment of relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies. Nevertheless, cytokine release and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndromes are life-threatening toxicities in which the endothelium could be a pathophysiological substrate. Furthermore, differential diagnosis from sepsis, highly incident in these patients, is challenging. Suitable laboratory tools could be determinant for their appropriate management.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients treated with CAR-T cell immunotherapy for hematological malignancies (n=46 with CD19-positive diseases, n=16 with multiple myeloma) were included. Plasma samples were obtained: before CAR-T cell infusion (baseline); after 24-48 hours; at suspicion of any toxicity onset and 24-48 hours after immunomodulatory treatment. Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction (soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1), soluble TNF receptor 1 (sTNFRI), thrombomodulin (TM), soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 factor (ST2), angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2)), innate immunity activation (neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), soluble C5b-9 (sC5b-9)) and hemostasis/fibrinolysis (von Willebrand Factor antigen (VWF:Ag), ADAMTS-13 (A13), α2-antiplasmin (α2-AP), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen (PAI-1 Ag)) were measured and compared with those in cohorts of patients with sepsis and healthy donors.

RESULTS

Patients who developed CAR-T cell toxicities presented increased levels of sVCAM-1, sTNFRI and ST2 at the clinical onset versus postinfusion values. Twenty-four hours after infusion, ST2 levels were good predictors of any CAR-T cell toxicity, and combination of ST2, Ang-2 and NETs differentiated patients requiring intensive care unit admission from those with milder clinical presentations. Association of Ang-2, NETs, sC5b-9, VWF:Ag and PAI-1 Ag showed excellent discrimination between severe CAR-T cell toxicities and sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides relevant contributions to the current knowledge of the CAR-T cell toxicities pathophysiology. Markers of endotheliopathy, innate immunity activation and hemostatic imbalance appear as potential laboratory tools for their prediction, severity and differential diagnosis.

Impact of Preemptive Use of Tocilizumab on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Outcomes in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Despite the impressive results of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell treatment for lymphomas, adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and infections are major issues that can lead to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Current guidelines recommend tocilizumab for treating patients with CRS grade (G) ≥2; however, the optimal timing of intervention has yet to be determined. Our institution adopted the preemptive use of tocilizumab in cases of persistent G1 CRS, defined as fever (≥38 °C) for >24 hours. This preemptive tocilizumab treatment aimed to reduce evolution to severe (G≥3) CRS, ICU admission, or death. We report on 48 prospectively collected consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with autologous CD19-targeted CAR T cells. In total, 39 patients (81%) developed CRS. CRS started as G1 in 28 patients, as G2 in patients, and as G3 in 1 patient. Tocilizumab was administered in 34 patients, including 23 patients who received "preemptive" tocilizumab and 11 patients who received tocilizumab for G2 or G3 CRS from the onset of symptoms. CRS resolved without worsening severity in 19 patients out of 23 (83%) who received preemptive tocilizumab; 4 patients (17%) progressed from G1 to G2 for the development of hypotension and quickly responded to the introduction of steroids. No patients treated with a preemptive approach developed G3 or G4 CRS. Ten out of 48 patients (21%) were diagnosed with ICANS, including 5 patients with G3 or G4. Six infectious events occurred. The overall ICU admission rate was 19%. ICANS management was the most relevant reason for ICU admission (7 patients), and no patient required ICU to manage CRS. No deaths from CAR-T toxicity were observed. Our data indicate that preemptive tocilizumab use is feasible and useful in reducing severe CRS and CRS-related ICU admission, with no impact on neurotoxicity or infection rate. Therefore, early use of tocilizumab can be considered, especially for patients at high risk of CRS.

Emergency department use by patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T cell infusion therapy

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell infusion (CAR T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies, but treatment-related toxicities are of concern. Understanding the timing and reasons for which patients present to the emergency department (ED) after CAR T therapy can assist with the early recognition and management of toxicities.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted for patients who had undergone CAR T therapy in the past 6 months and visited the ED of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 04/01/2018 and 08/01/2022. The timing of presentation after CAR T product infusion, patient characteristics, and outcomes of the ED visit were examined. Survival analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results

During the period studied, there were 276 ED visits by 168 unique patients. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (103/168; 61.3%), multiple myeloma (21/168; 12.5%), or mantle cell lymphoma (16/168; 9.5%). Almost all 276 visits required urgent (60.5%) or emergent (37.7%) care, and 73.5% of visits led to admission to the hospital or observation unit. Fever was the most frequent presenting complaint, reported in 19.6% of the visits. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates after the index ED visits were 17.0% and 32.2%, respectively. Patients who had their first ED visit &gt;14 days after CAR T product infusion had significantly worse overall survival (multivariable hazard ratio 3.27; 95% confidence interval 1.29–8.27; P=0.012) than patients who first visited the ED within 14 days of CAR T product infusion.

Conclusion

Cancer patients who receive CAR T therapy commonly visit the ED, and most are admitted and/or require urgent or emergent care. During early ED visits patients mainly present with constitutional symptoms such as fever and fatigue, and these early visits are associated with better overall survival.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation: an international expert statement

Combined advances in haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and intensive care management have improved the survival of patients with haematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit. In cases of refractory respiratory failure or refractory cardiac failure, these advances have led to a renewed interest in advanced life support therapies, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), previously considered inappropriate for these patients due to their poor prognosis. Given the scarcity of evidence-based guidelines on the use of ECMO in patients receiving HCT and the need to provide equitable and sustainable access to ECMO, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, and the International ECMO Network aimed to develop an expert consensus statement on the use of ECMO in adult patients receiving HCT. A steering committee with expertise in ECMO and HCT searched the literature for relevant articles on ECMO, HCT, and immune effector cell therapy, and developed opinion statements through discussions following a Quaker-based consensus approach. An international panel of experts was convened to vote on these expert opinion statements following the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation statement was followed to prepare this Position Paper. 36 statements were drafted by the steering committee, 33 of which reached strong agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and expert panel, and rephrased before an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 33 statements received strong agreement and three weak agreement. This Position Paper could help to guide intensivists and haematologists during the difficult decision-making process regarding ECMO candidacy in adult patients receiving HCT. The statements could also serve as a basis for future research focused on ECMO selection criteria and bedside management.

Management of adult patients with haematological malignancies in critical care

There are a diverse range of haematological malignancies with varying clinical presentations and prognoses. Patients with haematological malignancy may require admission to critical care at the time of diagnosis or due to treatment related effects and complications. Although the prognosis for such patients requiring critical care has improved, there remain uncertainties in optimal clinical management. Identification of patients who will benefit from critical care admission is challenging and selective involvement of palliative care may help to reduce unnecessary and non-beneficial treatments. While patients with haematological malignancy can present a challenge to critical care physicians, good outcomes can be achieved. In this narrative review, we provide a brief overview of relevant haematological malignancies for the critical care physician and a summary of recent treatment advances. Subsequently, we focus on critical care management for the patient with haematological malignancy including sepsis; acute respiratory failure; prevention and treatment of tumour lysis syndrome; thrombocytopaenia; and venous thromboembolism. We also discuss immunotherapeutic-specific related complications and their management, including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. While the management of haematological malignancies is highly specialised and increasingly centralised, acutely unwell patients often present to their local hospital with complications requiring critical care expertise. The aim of this review is to provide a contemporary overview of disease and management principles for non-specialist critical care teams.

Infectious complications of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies

CAR T-cells have revolutionized the treatment of many hematological malignancies. Thousands of patients with lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma have received this "living medicine" and achieved durable remissions. Their place in therapy continues to evolve, and there is ongoing development of new generation CAR constructs, CAR T-cells against solid tumors and CAR T-cells against chronic infections like human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B. A significant fraction of CAR T-cell recipients, unfortunately, develop infections. This is in part due to factors intrinsic to the patient, but also to the treatment, which requires lymphodepletion (LD), causes neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia and necessarily increases the state of immunosuppression of the patient. The goal of this review is to present the infectious complications of CAR T-cell therapy, explain their temporal course and risk factors, and provide recommendations for their prevention, diagnosis, and management.

Acute Kidney Injury in Cancer Immunotherapy Recipients

Cancer immunotherapy has now entered clinical practice and has reshaped the standard of care for many cancer patients. With these new strategies, specific toxicities have emerged, and renal side effects have been described. In this review, we will describe the causes of acute kidney injury in CAR T cell, immune checkpoint inhibitors and other cancer immuno-therapy recipients. CAR T cell therapy and bispecific T cell engaging antibodies can lead to acute kidney injury as a consequence of cytokine release syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, sepsis or specific CAR T cell infiltration. Immune checkpoint blockade most often results in acute tubular interstitial nephritis, but glomerular diseases have also been described. Although the pathophysiology remains mostly elusive, we will describe the mechanisms of renal damage in these contexts, its prognosis and treatment. As the place of immunotherapy in the anti-cancer armamentarium is exponentially increasing, close collaboration between nephrologists and oncologists is of utmost importance to provide the best standard of care for these patients.

Fitness and frailty in myeloma

As the aging population grows, so too does the number of well-tolerated antimyeloma therapies. Physicians will see an increasing volume of patients for subsequent lines of therapy, which could now extend this relationship for over a decade. For younger patients, treatment choices are infrequently impacted by concerns of fitness, but instead about effecting the deepest, most durable response. Older adults, in contrast, are more likely to experience under- than overtreatment, and therefore more objective (and ideally straightforward) ways to evaluate their fitness and ability to tolerate therapy will increasingly assist in decision-making. Post hoc analyses categorizing the fitness of trial patients in the modern treatment era globally demonstrate that even in highly selected populations, those that are recategorized as less fit or frail are consistently at higher risk of inferior outcomes and increased toxicities. Real-world data are comparatively lacking but do demonstrate that most patients with myeloma are not representative of those enrolled on clinical trials, generally more heavily burdened by comorbidities and more likely to be categorized as "less than fit." Simultaneously, the number of therapeutic options open to patients in the relapsed setting continues to grow, now including T-cell engagers and cellular therapies, with their unique toxicity profiles. The aim of this review is to summarize the available data, highlight some of the approaches possible to easily assess fitness and how results might inform treatment selection, and illustrate ways that patients' condition can be optimized rather than lead to exclusion from the more complex therapies newly available.

Risk of infection in patients with hematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cell therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma. Underlying and treatment-related variables may contribute to the development of infectious complications.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of overall and severe (grade ≥3) infection in patients with hematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cells. Secondary outcomes included the specific rates of bacterial, viral and invasive fungal infection (IFI), and infection-related mortality. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 27 May 2022. Sensitivity analysis were performed according to the type of malignancy and study design (randomized clinical trials [RCTs] or observational studies).

RESULTS

Forty-five studies (34 RCTs) comprising 3,591 patients were included. The pooled incidence rates of overall and severe infection were 33.8% (I² = 96.31%) and 16.2% (I² = 74.41%). The respiratory tract was the most common site of infection. Most events were bacterial or viral, whereas the occurrence of IFI was rare. The pooled attributable mortality was 1.8% (I² = 43.44%).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection is a frequent adverse event in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Further research should address specific risk factors in this population.

Severe infections in recipients of cancer immunotherapy: what intensivists need to know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given the increased number of cancer patients admitted in the ICU and the growing importance of immunotherapy in their therapeutic arsenal, intensivists will be increasingly confronted to patients treated with immunotherapies who will present with complications, infectious and immunologic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Apart from their specific immunologic toxicities, cancer immunotherapy recipients also have specific immune dysfunction and face increased infectious risks that may lead to intensive care unit admission.

SUMMARY

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is associated with profound immunosuppression and the risks of bacterial, fungal and viral infections vary according to the time since infusion.Immune checkpoint blockers are associated with an overall favorable safety profile but associations of checkpoint blockers and corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs prescribed to treat immune-related adverse events are associated with increased risks of bacterial and fungal infections.The T-cell engaging bispecific therapy blinatumomab causes profound B-cell aplasia, hypogammaglobulinemia and neutropenia, but seems to be associated with fewer infectious adverse events compared with standard intensive chemotherapy.Lastly, intravesical administration of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) can lead to disseminated BCGitis and severe sepsis requiring a specific antibiotherapy, often associated with corticosteroid treatment.

The use of ICU resources in CAR-T cell recipients: a hospital-wide study

Background

CAR-T cell (chimeric antigen receptor T) therapy has emerged as an effective treatment of refractory hematological malignancies. Intensive care management is intrinsic to CAR-T cell therapy. We aim to describe and to assess outcomes in critically ill CAR-T cell recipients.

Study design and methods

Hospital-wide retrospective study. Consecutive CAR-T cell recipients requiring ICU admission from July 2017 and December 2020 were included.

Results

71 patients (median age 60 years [37–68]) were admitted to the ICU 6 days [4–7] after CAR-T cell infusion. Underlying malignancies included diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n = 53, 75%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (17 patients, 24%) and multiple myeloma (n = 1, 1.45%). Performance status (PS) was 1 [1–2]. Shock was the main reason for ICU admission (n = 40, 48%). Isolated cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was the most common complication (n = 33, 46%), while 21 patients (30%) had microbiologically documented bacterial infection (chiefly catheter-related infection). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was reported in 26 (37%) patients. At ICU admission, vasopressors were required in 18 patients (25%) and invasive mechanical ventilation in two. Overall, 49 (69%) and 40 patients (56%) received tocilizumab or steroids, respectively.

Determinant of mortality were the reason for ICU admission (disease progression vs. sepsis or CRS (HR 4.02 [95%CI 1.10–14.65]), Performance status (HR 1.97/point [95%CI 1.14–3.41]) and SOFA score (HR 1.16/point [95%CI 1.01–1.33]).

Conclusions

Meaningful survival could be achieved in up to half the CAR-T cell recipients. The severity of organ dysfunction is a major determinant of death, especially in patients with altered performance status or disease progression.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-022-01036-2.

The treatment landscape for Relapsed Refractory B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)

The last eight years have seen a rapid expansion of salvage options for patients with relapsed refractory (RR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The efficacy of targeted approaches with blinatumomab and Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), outweigh that of conventional chemotherapeutic regimens, and the reduced toxicity profile has also translated into higher transplant realization rates. Factors influencing the sequential use of these two antibodies include the preference for InO in those with high disease burden, while blinatumomab is a superior agent for attaining MRD responses in low disease burden groups. InO should not be used first in those with significant liver disease. Most impressive is the advent of chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy (CAR-T), a curative therapy in a significant proportion of younger patients with RR-ALL. Careful consideration is now required in the selection of relapse therapies; this review summarizes current available strategies and how to navigate the treatment landscape for RR ALL.

Critical care management of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy recipients

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising immunotherapeutic treatment concept that is changing the treatment approach to hematologic malignancies. The development of CAR T-cell therapy represents a prime example for the successful bench-to-bedside translation of advances in immunology and cellular therapy into clinical practice. The currently available CAR T-cell products have shown high response rates and long-term remissions in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and relapsed/refractory lymphoma. However, CAR T-cell therapy can induce severe life-threatening toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, or infection, which require rapid and aggressive medical treatment in the intensive care unit setting. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in the clinical management of severe life-threatening events in CAR T-cell recipients. Furthermore, key challenges that have to be overcome to maximize the safety of CAR T cells are discussed.

[CAR-T CELLS: How does the EBMT registry monitor European activities, identify hurdles and prepare for changes in regulations]

CAR-T Cells are gene therapy medicinal products, a subcategory of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products as defined in the EC Regulation 1394/2007. They may represent the first example of such medicinal products that are industry-manufactured and commercialized on a large scale. Their very nature, their manufacturing processes, pricing and conditions upon which they were approved by regulatory agencies, all lead the latter to require long-term follow-up after marketing approval with a view for a better definition of CAR-T Cells safety profile and efficacy profile in real world conditions. Collection and analysis of data over a 15-year period of time represents a technical and political challenge. So does the a priori definition of data to be collected for a wealth of forthcoming analyses that focus on the interests of a variety of stakeholders. EBMT has been collecting and analyzing data on hematopoietic cell transplants for decades. EBMT currently works with many interested parties to collect data on patients treated with CAR-T Cells.

Noninfectious complications of hematopoietic cell transplantation

Noninfectious lung diseases contribute to nonrelapse mortality. They constitute a spectrum of diseases that can affect the parenchyma, airways, or vascular pulmonary components and specifically exclude cardiac and renal causes. The differential diagnoses of these entities differ as a function of time after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Specific diagnosis, prognosis, and optimal treatment remain challenging, although progress has been made in recent decades.

Outcomes in patients requiring intensive care for CAR T-cell toxicity

Overview of: Azoulay É, Castro P, Maamar A, et al Outcomes in patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy who were admitted to intensive care (CARTTAS): an international, multicentre, observational cohort study. Lancet Haematol 2021;8:e355-64.