The effects of heparins on the liver: application of mechanistic serum biomarkers in a randomized study in healthy volunteers

Establishing reference ranges for circulating biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury in healthy human volunteers

AIMS

The potential of mechanistic biomarkers to improve prediction of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and hepatic regeneration is widely acknowledged. We sought to determine reference intervals for new biomarkers of DILI and regeneration, as well as to characterize their natural variability and impact of diurnal variation.

METHODS

Serum samples from 227 healthy volunteers were recruited as part of a cross-sectional study; of these, 25 subjects had weekly serial sampling over 3 weeks, while 23 had intensive blood sampling over a 24h period. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), MicroRNA-122 (miR-122), High Mobility Group Box-1 (HMGB1), total Keratin-18 (K18), caspase-cleaved Keratin-18 (ccK18), Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GLDH) and Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 (CSF-1) were assayed.

RESULTS

Reference intervals were established for each biomarker based on the 97.5% quantile (90% CI) following the assessment of fixed effects in univariate and multivariable models. Intra-individual variability was found to be non-significant, and there was no significant impact of diurnal variation.

CONCLUSION

Reference intervals for novel DILI biomarkers have been described. An upper limit of a reference range might represent the most appropriate mechanism to utilize these data. These data can now be used to interpret data from exploratory clinical DILI studies and to assist their further qualification as required by regulatory authorities.

Blood toxicogenomics reveals potential biomarkers for management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

Introduction: Accurate diagnosis, assessment, and prognosis of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is problematic, in part due to the shortcomings of traditional blood biomarkers. Studies in rodents and healthy volunteers have supported that RNA transcript changes in whole blood may address some of these shortcomings. Methods: In this study, we conducted RNA-Seq analysis on peripheral blood samples collected from 55 patients with acute IDILI and 17 patients with liver injuries not attributed to IDILI. Results and discussion: Three differentially expressed genes (DEGs; CFD, SQLE, and INKA1) were identified as significantly associated with IDILI vs. other liver injuries. No DEGs were identified comparing IDILI patients to the 5 patients with autoimmune hepatitis, suggesting possible common underlying mechanisms. Two genes (VMO1 and EFNA1) were significantly associated with hepatocellular injury compared to mixed/cholestatic injury. When patients with severe vs. milder IDILI were compared, we identified over 500 DEGs. The top pathways identified from these DEGs had in common down regulation of multiple T-cell specific genes. Further analyses confirmed that these changes could largely be accounted for by a fall in the concentration of circulating T-cells during severe DILI, perhaps due to exhaustion or sequestration of these cells in the liver. Exploration of DEGs specific for the individual causal agents was largely unsuccessful, but isoniazid-induced IDILI demonstrated 25 DEGs compared to other non-isoniazid IDILI cases. Finally, among the 14 IDILI patients that had hepatocellular jaundice (i.e., Hy's Law cases), we identified 39 DEGs between the 4 patients with fatal or liver transplantation outcomes compared to those that recovered. These findings suggest the potential for blood-based transcriptomic biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of IDILI.

Serum glutamate dehydrogenase activity enables sensitive and specific diagnosis of hepatocellular injury in humans

Serum activities of alanine- and aspartate aminotransferases (ALT and AST) are considered the "gold standard" biomarkers of hepatocyte injury in clinical practice and drug development. However, due to the expression of ALT and AST in myocytes, the diagnosis of hepatocellular injury in patients with underlying muscle diseases, including drug-induced muscle injury, is severely limited. Thus, we proposed glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) as a liver-specific alternative to serum ALT and AST. In fact, our exploratory studies showed that GLDH has comparable performance to ALT for detecting hepatocyte injury without interference from concomitant muscle injury. Here, we report the results of studies confirming the reference intervals in a healthy human population and the sensitivity and specificity of GLDH for the detection of hepatocyte injury in human subjects. In human subjects, we could not perform liver biopsies due to ethical reasons; we also confirmed the relationship of GLDH and histopathologic lesions using 32 model toxicants in rats. Furthermore, we have shown that injury to tissues that are known to express appreciable levels of GLDH does not affect serum GLDH measurements, indicating excellent liver specificity of serum GLDH. Finally, we observed faster elimination of GLDH than ALT in humans, indicating that decreasing GLDH values could be considered an early sign of recovery. This study provides comprehensive evidence of excellent sensitivity and liver specificity of GLDH for diagnosis of hepatocellular injury, including evaluation of reference intervals, which is essential for the interpretation of serum GLDH in human subjects.

Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 inhibitor increases plasma alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activities via a shedding of the intestinal villi and an increase in intestinal permeability in rats

Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) is a key enzyme for fat absorption step in the enterocytes. We previously reported that DGAT1 inhibition increased plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities in corn oil-loaded rats via protein kinase C (PKC) activation. In the present study, we investigated the mechanism with respect to the morphology and permeability of the small intestine, focusing on PKC function, and found that shortening of the intestinal villi and a decrease in the number of tdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling-positive cells in the tips of the villi were observed in the jejunum of DGAT1 inhibitor-treated rats loaded with corn oil. These results suggested that the tips of the villi were shed into the intestinal lumen. Next, fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, 110 kDa (FD-110) was administered intraduodenally to DGAT1 inhibitor-treated rats loaded with corn oil and we found that plasma FD-110 concentrations increased, indicating that the intestinal permeability to molecules with a molecular weight of approximately 110,000 (e.g., ALT and AST) increased. Taken together, the present results suggested that DGAT1 inhibitor-treatment in combination with corn oil causes ALT and AST to leak from the enterocytes into the blood by shedding the tips of the intestinal villi and increasing intestinal permeability.

Effect of Enoxaparin and Daikenchuto Coadministration on Hepatic Disorder Markers in Gynecological Cancer Patients after Abdominal Surgery

Enoxaparin and daikenchuto are commonly administered to prevent venous thromboembolism and intestinal obstruction after gynecological malignancy surgery. However, the effects of their combined use on hepatic function are not well studied. This study aimed to clarify the effects of the coadministration of enoxaparin and daikenchuto on hepatic function. First, Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) data were analyzed to identify signals of hepatic disorders. Second, a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent surgery for gynecological malignancies was conducted. This study defined hepatic disorders as an increase in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransaminase (ALT) levels above the reference values, using 1-h postoperative values as the baseline. The analysis of JADER data revealed an increased risk for hepatic disorders with the coadministration of enoxaparin and daikenchuto. An observational study also showed higher odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the occurrence of hepatic disorders in the coadministration group (4.27; 2.11-8.64) and enoxaparin alone group (2.48; 1.31-4.69) than in the daikenchuto alone group. The median increase in the ALT level was also higher in the coadministration group (34; 15-59) than in the enoxaparin alone (19; 6-38) and daikenchuto alone groups (8; 3-33). In conclusion, our study suggests that compared with the use of enoxaparin or daikenchuto alone, enoxaparin and daikenchuto coadministration increases the risk of hepatic disorders, with more significant increases in AST and ALT levels. Healthcare workers need to be aware of these potential side effects when combining these drugs after surgery for gynecological malignancies.

Risk Assessment for Hepatobiliary Toxicity Liabilities in Drug Development

Risk assessment of hepatobiliary toxicities represents one of the greatest challenges and, more often than not, one of the most rewarding activities in which toxicologic pathologists can partake, and often times lead. This is in part because each liver toxicity picture is a bit different, informed by a broad range and diversity of relevant data, and also in part because the heavily relied upon animal models are imperfect regarding predictivity of hepatic effects in humans. Following identification and characterization of a hepatotoxicity hazard, typically in nonclinical toxicology studies, a holistic and integrated assessment of liver-relevant endpoints is conducted that typically incorporates ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) information (ideally, including extensive transporter data, exposure margins, and possibly concentration of parent/metabolite at region of injury), target expression/function, in silico prediction data, in vitro hepatocyte data, liver/circulating biomarkers, and importantly, species specificity of any of these data. Of course, a thorough understanding, developed in close partnership with clinical colleagues, of the anticipated liver disease status of intended patient populations is paramount to hepatic risk assessment. This is particularly important since the likelihood of translatable determinant hepatic events observed in nonclinical models to occur in humans has been reasonably well established.

Probable Enoxaparin-Induced Liver Injury in a Young Patient: A Case Report of a Diagnostic Challenge

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with elevated liver enzyme levels in a small percentage of patients. Elevations more than five times the upper limit of normal are uncommon and have been noted to primarily occur in patients receiving higher doses. The literature reports mild, primarily asymptomatic cases, with adverse effects at higher therapeutic doses. We report the case of a 27-year-old woman who developed drug-induced liver injury (DILI) while receiving enoxaparin during admission for a loculated pleural effusion secondary to pulmonary tuberculosis. The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score delineated enoxaparin as the likely cause.

Liver toxicity of intravenous heparin treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), which is an indicator of liver dysfunction, may increase during treatment in patients in the acute phase of stroke. However, the cause of the ALT elevation is unclear, as multiple medications are often being used. We investigated the relationship between medications used in acute ischemic stroke, including cerebral infarction and transient ischemic attack, and ALT elevation.

METHODS

The subjects were 230 patients who had been diagnosed with cerebral infarction or TIA and treated at the Stroke Care Unit of Fukuoka University Hospital. We investigated ALT abnormalities that occurred from the start of the treatment over the subsequent 14 days. We also followed patients for an additional seven days to confirm the peak ALT levels. A binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between medications used during the period and ALT elevation.

RESULTS

The incidence of ALT abnormality was 23.9% (55/230). ALT elevation was mostly mild and peaked within 21 days of treatment initiation in 93.2% of the patients, excluding indeterminate patients. A binary logistic regression analysis showed that unfractionated heparin (odds ratio [OR] 2.759, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.328-5.729, p = 0.007) was extracted as a cause of ALT elevation. In a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for the administration period of unfractionated heparin, the cut-off value (area under the ROC curve) for ALT elevation was 6 days (0.575). Significant factors contributing to ALT elevation caused by unfractionated heparin included an unfractionated heparin administration period of ≥ 6 days (OR 2.951, 95% CI 1.244-7.000, p = 0.014) and edaravone combination (OR 2.594, 95% CI 1.159-5.808, p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

In the acute phase of stroke, we believe that unfractionated heparin discontinuation is not necessary when hepatotoxicity of unfractionated heparin is suspected. However, physicians should be aware of the risk of liver toxicity when unfractionated heparin is administered for more than six days or when edaravone is used in combination.

Assessment of the Frequency, Phenotypes, and Outcomes of Acute Liver Injury Associated with Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in 1.4 Million Patients in the Veterans Health Administration

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced liver injury is a significant health issue, yet the exposure-based incidence remains to be characterized.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the frequency, phenotypes, and outcomes of acute liver injury associated with amoxicillin/clavulanate using a large electronic health record system.

METHODS

Using the Veterans Health Administration electronic health record system, we developed the framework to identify unexplained acute liver injury, defined by alanine aminotransferase and/or alkaline phosphatase elevation temporally linked to prescription records of amoxicillin/clavulanate, a major culprit of clinically significant drug-induced liver injury, excluding other competing causes. The population was subcategorized by pre-existing liver conditions and inpatient status at the time of exposure for the analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1,445,171 amoxicillin/clavulanate first exposures in unique individuals [92% men; mean age (standard deviation): 59 (15) years], 6476 (incidence: 0.448%) acute liver injuries were identified. Of these, 4427 (65%) had alternative causes, yielding 2249 (incidence: 0.156%) with unexplained acute liver injuries. The incidence of unexplained acute liver injury was lowest in outpatients without underlying liver disease (0.067%) and highest in inpatients with pre-existing liver conditions (0.719%). Older age, male sex, and American Indian or Alaska Native (vs White) were associated with a higher incidence of unexplained acute liver injury. Cholestatic injury affected 74%, exhibiting a higher frequency with advanced age, inpatient exposure, and pre-existing liver conditions. Hepatocellular injury with bilirubin elevation affected 0.003%, with a higher risk at age >45 years. During a 12-month follow-up, patients with unexplained acute liver injury had a higher adjusted overall mortality risk than those without evident acute liver injury.

CONCLUSIONS

This framework identifies unexplained acute liver injury following drug exposure in large electronic health record datasets. After validating in other systems, this framework can aid in deducing drug-induced liver injury in the general patient population and regulatory decision making to promote drug safety and public health.

Clinical Outcome and Risk Assessment in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients with Elevated Transaminases and Acute Kidney Injury: A Single Center Study

OBJECTIVES

Initial reports indicate a high incidence of abnormal aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with COVID-19 and possible association with acute kidney injury (AKI). We aimed to investigate clinical features of elevated transaminases on admission, its association with AKI, and outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the registered data of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and assessment of the AST and ALT was performed. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with community-acquired AKI (CA-AKI) and hospital-acquired AKI (HA-AKI).

RESULTS

The subjects comprised 828 patients (mean age = 65.0±16.0 years; 51.4% male). Hypertension was present in 70.3% of patients, diabetes mellitus in 26.0%, and chronic kidney disease in 8.5%. In-hospital mortality was 21.0%. At admission, only 41.5% of patients had hypertransaminasemia. Patients with elevated transaminases at admission were younger, had higher levels of inflammatory markers and D-dimer, and poorer outcomes. The AKI incidence in the study population was 27.1%. Patients with hypertransaminasemia were more likely to develop AKI (33.5% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.003). Patients with predominantly elevated AST (compared to elevated ALT) were more likely to have adverse outcomes. Multinomial logistic regression found that hypertension, chronic kidney disease, elevated AST, and hematuria were associated with CA-AKI. Meanwhile, age > 65 years, hypertension, malignancy, elevated AST, and hematuria were predictors of HA-AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated transaminases on admission were associated with AKI and poor outcomes. Patients with elevated AST were more likely to have adverse outcomes. Elevated AST on admission was associated with CA-AKI and was a predictor of HA-AKI.

Anticoagulation in patients with acute kidney injury undergoing kidney replacement therapy

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is used to provide supportive therapy for critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury and various other non-renal indications. Modalities of KRT include continuous KRT (CKRT), intermittent hemodialysis (HD), and sustained low efficiency daily dialysis (SLED). However, circuit clotting is a major complication that has been investigated extensively. Extracorporeal circuit clotting can cause reduction in solute clearances and can cause blood loss, leading to an upsurge in treatment costs and a rise in workload intensity. In this educational review, we discuss the pathophysiology of the clotting cascade within an extracorporeal circuit and the use of various types of anticoagulant methods in various pediatric KRT modalities.

Chemokines in Primary Liver Cancer

The liver is responsible for extremely important functions in the human body. In the liver’s structure, we distinguish between connective tissue (stroma) and parenchyma, the latter of which is formed from the basic structural and functional units of the liver—hepatocytes. There are many factors, that negatively affect the liver cells, contributing to their damage. This may lead to fibrosis, liver failure and, in consequence, primary liver cancer, which is the sixth most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Chemokines are a large family of secreted proteins. Their main role is to direct the recruitment and migration of cells to sites of inflammation or injury. Some authors suggest that these proteins might play a potential role in the development of many malignancies, including primary liver cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate and summarize the knowledge regarding liver diseases, especially primary liver cancer (HCC) and the participation of chemokines in the development of this malignancy. Chemokines involved in the initiation of this type of tumor belong mainly to the CC and CXC chemokines. Their significant role in the course of hepatocellular carcinoma proves their usefulness in detecting and monitoring the course and treatment in patients with this disease.

Hepatic Function in Premature Lambs Supported by the Artificial Placenta and Total Parenteral Nutrition

The artificial placenta (AP) promotes organ development and reduces organ injury in a lamb model of extreme prematurity. This study evaluates hepatic outcomes after AP support with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) administration. Premature lambs (116-121 days estimated gestational age; term = 145) were cannulated for 7 days of AP support. Lambs received TPN with SMOFlipid (n = 7) or Intralipid (n = 5). Liver function and injury were compared between the two groups biochemically and histologically. Groups were compared by ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons or linear-mixed effects models. From baseline to day 7, total bilirubin (Intralipid 2.6 ± 2.3 to 7.9 ± 4.4 mg/dl; SMOFlipid 0.3 ± 0.1 to 5.5 ± 2.3 mg/dl), alanine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase increased in both groups ( p < 0.001 for all). Direct bilirubin (0.3 ± 0.2 to 1.8 ± 1.4 mg/dl; p = 0.006) and AST (27 ± 5 to 309 ± 242 mg/dl; p < 0.001) increased in SMOFlipid group (not measured in Intralipid group). On liver histology, Intralipid showed more cholestasis than SMOFlipid; both groups showed more than tissue controls. The Intralipid group alone showed hepatocyte injury and had more congestion than controls. Lambs supported by the AP with TPN administration maintain normal hepatic function and sustain minimal hepatic injury. SMOFlipid is associated with decreased cholestasis and hepatic injury versus Intralipid.

Challenges and Future of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Research-Laboratory Tests

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but potentially severe adverse drug event, which is also a major cause of study cessation and market withdrawal during drug development. Since no acknowledged diagnostic tests are available, DILI diagnosis poses a major challenge both in clinical practice as well as in pharmacovigilance. Differentiation from other liver diseases and the identification of the causative agent in the case of polymedication are the main issues that clinicians and drug developers face in this regard. Thus, efforts have been made to establish diagnostic testing methods and biomarkers in order to safely diagnose DILI and ensure a distinguishment from alternative liver pathologies. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic methods used in differential diagnosis, especially with regards to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH), in vitro causality methods using individual blood samples, biomarkers for diagnosis and severity prediction, as well as experimental predictive models utilized in pre-clinical settings during drug development regimes.

Liver Injury in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: Possible Role of Therapy

Patients with COVID-19 show a high prevalence of liver injury. The pattern of this liver damage is still not fully understood. Different etiopathogenetic factors may concur; from a direct cytopathic effect, once the virus binds to the ACE-2 receptors, to the immune-mediated collateral damage, due to cytokine storm. The presence of pre-existing chronic liver disease is a contributing factor for acute organ damage during SARS-CoV2 infection. Last but not least, treatments probably play a role, also, in determining hepatotoxicity: many of the drugs we have used or are still using to treat COVID-19, combined with non-invasive ventilation, are known to sometimes determine acute liver injury. Although liver damage associated with COVID-19 is often transient and can resolve without any special treatment, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms, particularly to better treat its more severe forms.

Redrawing the map to novel DILI biomarkers in circulation: Where are we, where should we go, and how can we get there?

Circulating biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) have been a focus of research in hepatology over the last decade, and several novel DILI biomarkers that hold promise for certain applications have been identified. For example, glutamate dehydrogenase holds promise as a specific biomarker of liver injury in patients with concomitant muscle damage. It may also be a specific indicator of mitochondrial damage. In addition, microRNA-122 is sensitive for early detection of liver injury in acetaminophen overdose patients. However, recent events in the field of DILI biomarker research have provided us with an opportunity to step back, consider how biomarker discovery has been done thus far, and determine how to move forward in a way that will optimize the discovery process. This is important because major challenges remain in the DILI field and related areas that could be overcome in part by new biomarkers. In this short review, we briefly describe recent progress in DILI biomarker discovery and development, identify current needs, and suggest a general approach to move forward.

Serum Sorbitol Dehydrogenase as a Novel Prognostic Factor for Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Surgical Resection

The majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing curative resection experience tumor recurrence. To examine the association between preoperative serum sorbitol dehydrogenase (SORD), a liver-derived enzyme that reflects liver damage, and recurrence of HCC after curative resection, 92 patients were randomly selected who underwent curative resection for HCC between 2011 and 2012 from a prospective registry. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared based on serum SORD levels. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate prognostic factors for RFS. During a median follow-up duration of 57.1 months, 43 patients experienced HCC recurrence. Patients with serum SORD ≥15 ng/mL (HR, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.76-6.81; p < 0.001) had worse RFS compared with patients with serum SORD <15 ng/mL. Serum AFP and SORD levels were two independent prognostic factors for RFS. When patients were stratified by baseline serum SORD and AFP levels, patients with serum AFP levels ≥400 ng/mL and serum SORD levels ≥15 ng/mL had a distinctly poor prognosis with the lowest RFS rates (HR, 22.08; 95% CI, 6.91-70.50; p < 0.001). Baseline serum SORD is an effective prognostic factor for HCC after resection. It may help guide patient selection for surgery, especially when combined with serum AFP levels.

Biomarkers of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) - a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an unpredictable event, and there are no specific biomarkers that can distinguish DILI from alternative explanations or predict its clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review summarizes the available evidence for all biomarkers proposed to have a role in the diagnosis or prognosis of DILI. Following a comprehensive search, we included all types of studies in humans. We included DILI cases based on any threshold criteria but excluded intrinsic DILI, commonly caused by paracetamol overdose. We classified studies into diagnostic and prognostic categories and assessed their methodological quality. After reviewing the literature, 14 studies were eligible.

EXPERT OPINION

Diagnostic studies were heterogeneous with regard to the study population and outcomes measured. Prognostic models were developed by integrating novel biomarkers, risk scores, and traditional biomarkers, which increased their prognostic ability to predict death or transplantation by 6 months. This systematic review highlights the case of need for non-genetic biomarkers that distinguish DILI from acute liver injury related to alternative etiology. Biomarkers with the potential to identify serious adverse outcomes from acute DILI should be validated in independent prospective cohorts with a substantial number of cases.

Signal Detection of Potential Hepatotoxic Drugs: Case-Control Study Using Both a Spontaneous Reporting System and Electronic Medical Records

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a common adverse drug event. Spontaneous reporting systems such as the Japanese Adverse Event Report Database (JADER) have been used to evaluate the association between drugs and adverse drug events. However, the association of drugs with adverse drug events may be overestimated due to reporting biases. Therefore, it is important to objectively evaluate the association using liver function test values. The aim of the present study was to predict potential hepatotoxic drugs using real-world data including electronic medical records and the JADER database. A total of 70009 (2779 with DILI and 67230 without DILI) and 438515 (10235 with DILI and 428280 without DILI) Japanese adult patients were extracted from electronic medical records and the JADER database, respectively. Drugs with ≥100 DILI patients in both of the two databases were regarded as suspected drugs for DILI. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between the suspected drugs and increased risk of DILI. Among the suspected drugs, broad-spectrum antibiotics such as meropenem, tazobactam/piperacillin and ceftriaxone were significantly associated with an increased risk of DILI, and meropenem had a greater risk of DILI in both of the two databases. Additionally, there were significant associations of mosapride and L-carbocisteine with increased risk of DILI. In addition to well-known associations between antibiotic drugs and DILI, mosapride and L-carbocisteine were found to be new potential signals of drugs causing hepatotoxicity. This study indicates potential hepatotoxic drugs that require further causality assessment.

Serum biomarkers of isoniazid-induced liver injury: Aminotransferases are insufficient, and OPN, L-FABP and HMGB1 can be promising novel biomarkers

Isoniazid (INH)-induced liver injury is a great challenge for tuberculosis treatment. Existing biomarkers cannot accurately determine the occurrence of this injury in the early stage. Therefore, developing early specific sensitive biomarkers of INH-induced liver injury is urgent. A rat model of liver injury was established with gastric infusion of INH or INH plus rifampicin (RFP). We examined seven potential novel serum biomarkers, namely, glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), liver-fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (MCSF1R), osteopontin (OPN), total cytokeratin 18 (K18), and caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 (ccK18), to evaluate their sensitivity and specificity on INH-induced liver injury. With the increase of drug dosage, combining with RFP and prolonging duration of administration, the liver injury was aggravated, showing as decreased weight of the rats, upgraded liver index and oxidative stress level, and histopathological changes of liver becoming marked. But the activity of serum aminotransferases decreased significantly. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of OPN, L-FABP, HMGB1, MCSF1R, and GLDH was 0.88, 0.87, 0.85, 0.71, and 0.70 (≥0.7), respectively, and 95% confidence interval of them did not include 0.5, with statistical significance, indicating their potential abilities to become biomarkers of INH-induced liver injury. In conclusion, we found traditional biomarkers ALT and AST were insufficient to discover the INH-induced liver injury accurately and OPN, L-FABP, and HMGB1 can be promising novel biomarkers.

Effects of Bivalirudin and Unfractionated Heparin on Liver and Renal Function in Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Coronary Angiography with/without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and bivalirudin are widely used as anticoagulants in cardiovascular medicine, including for thrombosis prevention during coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Little is known of the effects of UFH and bivalirudin on liver and kidney function in patients subjected to these procedures. This study compared the effects of bivalirudin and UFH on liver/renal function in patients with coronary artery disease who underwent CAG, with or without PCI.

METHODS

The study comprised 134 consecutive patients (40-89 years-old), who underwent CAG (or CAG and PCI); among them, 66 and 68 patients were subject to, respectively, bivalirudin or UFH. The following indicators of liver/renal function were measured before and after the procedures: plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine clearance, and serum creatinine. Patients were further stratified by severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD), based on original eGFR.

RESULTS

Relative to baseline, in the bivalirudin group, ALT and AST were higher after CAG (p=0.005, 0.025), while blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were lower (p=0.049, <0.001). In the UFH group, ALT, AST, eGFR, and creatinine clearance were lower after CAG (p≤0.001, all). Patients given bivalirudin with moderate or severe CKD, but not those with mild CKD, gained significant improvement in kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to UFH, bivalirudin may better safeguard the renal function of patients with coronary artery disease who undergo CAG, especially patients with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency. UFH may cause less liver damage than bivalirudin.

Liver Injury Among Japanese Patients Treated Using Prophylactic Enoxaparin After Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, has been used to prevent thrombotic events during major surgery without increasing the rate of hemorrhage. On the other hand, it was reported to cause liver injury, but the details of liver injury induced by prophylactic enoxaparin after abdominal surgery remain unclear.

AIMS

This study aimed to clarify the relationship between prophylactic enoxaparin and liver injury after colorectal surgery, and characterize the injury profile.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 732 Japanese patients who underwent elective resection of the colorectum, and compared their clinicopathological background, details of surgery, postoperative complications, including liver injury, and the type of liver injury according to prophylactic use of enoxaparin. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for liver injury during the postoperative period.

RESULTS

The rate of liver injury was 8.9% for patients treated by prophylactic enoxaparin and 1.4% for those who did not receive enoxaparin after colorectal surgery (p < 0.0001). The median onset of liver injury among patients receiving enoxaparin was seven days, and the majority demonstrated the hepatocellular pattern. Enoxaparin was one of the independent risk factors for postoperative liver injury by multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 7.63, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic use of enoxaparin markedly increased the rate of postoperative liver injury in patients who underwent colorectal surgery. Our study confirmed that close monitoring of liver function parameters is essential for patients receiving enoxaparin during the postoperative period.

Biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury: a mechanistic perspective through acetaminophen hepatotoxicity

Introduction: Liver injury induced by drugs is a serious clinical problem. Many circulating biomarkers for identifying and predicting drug-induced liver injury (DILI) have been proposed.Areas covered: Biomarkers are mainly predicated on the mechanistic understanding of the underlying DILI, often in the context of acetaminophen overdose. New panels of biomarkers have emerged that are related to recovery/regeneration rather than injury following DILI. We explore the clinical relevance and limitations of these new biomarkers including recent controversies. Extracellular vesicles have also emerged as a promising vector of biomarkers, although the biological role for EVs may limit their clinical usefulness. New technological approaches for biomarker discovery are also explored.Expert opinion: Recent clinical studies have validated the efficacy of some of these new biomarkers, cytokeratin-18, macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor, and osteopontin for DILI prognosis. Low prevalence of DILI is an inherent limitation to DILI biomarker development. Furthering mechanistic understanding of DILI and leveraging technological advances (e.g. machine learning/omics) is necessary to improve upon the newest generation of biomarkers. The integration of omics approaches with machine learning has led to novel insights in cancer research and DILI research is poised to leverage these technologies for biomarker discovery and development.

Oxidative Stress in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI): From Mechanisms to Biomarkers for Use in Clinical Practice

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a type of hepatic injury caused by an uncommon drug adverse reaction that can develop to conditions spanning from asymptomatic liver laboratory abnormalities to acute liver failure (ALF) and death. The cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in DILI are poorly understood. Hepatocyte damage can be caused by the metabolic activation of chemically active intermediate metabolites that covalently bind to macromolecules (e.g., proteins, DNA), forming protein adducts-neoantigens-that lead to the generation of oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which can eventually lead to cell death. In parallel, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) stimulate the immune response, whereby inflammasomes play a pivotal role, and neoantigen presentation on specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules trigger the adaptive immune response. A wide array of antioxidant mechanisms exists to counterbalance the effect of oxidants, including glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione peroxidase (GPX), which are pivotal in detoxification. These get compromised during DILI, triggering an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants defense systems, generating oxidative stress. As a result of exacerbated oxidative stress, several danger signals, including mitochondrial damage, cell death, and inflammatory markers, and microRNAs (miRNAs) related to extracellular vesicles (EVs) have already been reported as mechanistic biomarkers. Here, the status quo and the future directions in DILI are thoroughly discussed, with a special focus on the role of oxidative stress and the development of new biomarkers.

Design and Rationale of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2/3 Study Evaluating Dociparstat in Acute Lung Injury Associated with Severe COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, and the consequent morbidity and mortality attributable to progressive hypoxemia and subsequent respiratory failure threaten to overrun hospital critical care units globally. New agents that address the hyperinflammatory "cytokine storm" and hypercoagulable pathology seen in these patients may be a promising approach to treat patients, minimize hospital stays, and ensure hospital wards and critical care units are able to operate effectively. Dociparstat sodium (DSTAT) is a glycosaminoglycan derivative of heparin with robust anti-inflammatory properties, with the potential to address underlying causes of coagulation disorders with substantially reduced risk of bleeding compared to commercially available heparin.

METHODS

This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial to determine the safety and efficacy of DSTAT added to standard of care in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 who require supplemental oxygen. Phase 2 will enroll 12 participants in each of two dose-escalating cohorts to confirm the safety of DSTAT in this population. Following review of the data, an additional 50 participants will be enrolled. Contingent upon positive results, phase 3 will enroll approximately 450 participants randomized to DSTAT or placebo. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants who survive and do not require mechanical ventilation through day 28.

DISCUSSION

Advances in standard of care, recent emergency use authorizations, and positive data with dexamethasone have likely contributed to an increasing proportion of patients who are surviving without the need for mechanical ventilation. Therefore, examining the time to improvement in the NIAID score will be essential to provide a measure of drug effect on recovery. Analysis of additional endpoints, including supportive biomarkers (e.g., IL-6, HMGB1, soluble-RAGE, D-dimer), will be performed to further define the effect of DSTAT in patients with COVID-19 infection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT04389840, Registered 13 May 2020.

Identification of Serum Biomarkers to Distinguish Hazardous and Benign Aminotransferase Elevations

The standard circulating biomarker of liver injury in both clinical settings and drug safety testing is alanine aminotransferase (ALT). However, ALT elevations sometimes lack specificity for tissue damage. To identify novel serum biomarkers with greater specificity for injury, we combined unique animal models with untargeted proteomics, followed by confirmation with immunoblotting. Using proteomics, we identified 109 proteins in serum from mice with acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury that were not detectable in serum from mice with benign ALT elevations due to high-dose dexamethasone (Dex). We selected 4 (alcohol dehydrogenase 1A1 [Aldh1a1], aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 [Adh1], argininosuccinate synthetase 1 [Ass1], and adenosylhomocysteinase [Ahcy]) with high levels for further evaluation. Importantly, all 4 were specific for injury when using immunoblots to compare serum from Dex-treated mice and mice with similar lower ALT elevations due to milder models of APAP or bromobenzene-induced liver injury. Immunoblotting for ALDH1A1, ADH1, and ASS1 in serum from APAP overdose patients without liver injury and APAP overdose patients with mild liver injury revealed that these candidate biomarkers can be detected in humans with moderate liver injury as well. Interestingly, further experiments with serum from rats with bile duct ligation-induced liver disease indicated that Aldh1a1 and Adh1 are not detectable in serum in cholestasis and may therefore be specific for hepatocellular injury and possibly even drug-induced liver injury, in particular. Overall, our results strongly indicate that ALDH1A1, ADH1, and ASS1 are promising specific biomarkers for liver injury. Adoption of these biomarkers could improve preapproval drug safety assessment.

The potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications of exosomes in drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has gradually become a global public medical problem, which can be caused by more than 1000 currently available drugs. Unfortunately, the diagnosis and treatment of DILI are limited and imperfect. Exosomes can be secreted by a variety of cells and tissues in the body, rich in cell-type specific proteins, nucleic acids and lipids, which has been widely studied as an important intercellular communication vehicle in liver diseases. Emerging data suggest that circulating exosomes and their cargos can be used as minimally-invasive sources of potential molecular biomarkers for the early detection, monitoring and evaluation of DILI. Exosomes in the urine were also found to contain proteins or RNAs that were indicative of DILI. In addition, exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cell or hepatocyte are considered potential therapeutic agents to promote liver regenerative responses, modulate inflammatory response and deduce hepatocytes apoptosis. Based on the current findings, we suggest the potential applications of exosomes as biomarkers and therapeutics for DILI.

Cannabidiol and Abnormal Liver Chemistries in Healthy Adults: Results of a Phase I Clinical Trial

Liver safety concerns were raised in randomized controlled trials of cannabidiol (CBD) in patients with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes, but the relevance of these concerns to healthy adults consuming CBD is unclear. The objective of this manuscript is to report on liver safety findings from healthy adults who received therapeutic daily doses of CBD for ~ 3.5 weeks and to investigate any correlation between transaminase elevations and baseline characteristics, pharmacogenetic, and pharmacokinetic data. Sixteen healthy adults were enrolled in a phase I, open-label, fixed single-sequence drug-drug interaction trial to investigate the effect of repeated dose administration of CBD (1,500 mg/day) on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 activity. Seven (44%) participants experienced peak serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN). For five (31%) participants, the value exceeded 5 × ULN, therefore meeting the international consensus criteria for drug-induced liver injury. There was no correlation between transaminase elevations and baseline characteristics, CYP2C19 genotype, or CBD plasma concentrations. All ALT elevations above the ULN began within 2-4 weeks of initial exposure to CBD. Among the six participants with ALT elevations who were discontinued from the protocol, some had symptoms consistent with hepatitis or hypersensitivity. We conclude that healthy adults consuming CBD may experience elevations in serum ALT consistent with drug-induced liver injury. Given the demonstrated interindividual variation in susceptibility, clinicians should be alert to this potential effect from CBD, which is increasingly available in various nonprescription forms and doses to consumers.

Toll-like Receptor 4 Inhibitor TAK-242 Improves Fulminant Hepatitis by Regulating Accumulation of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell

Fulminant hepatitis (FH) is an acute clinical disease with a poor prognosis and high mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the protective effect of the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) inhibitor TAK-242 on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/D-galactosamine (D-GalN)-induced explosive hepatitis and explore in vivo and in vitro mechanisms. Mice were pretreated with TAK-242 for 3 h prior to LPS (10 μg/kg)/D-GalN (250 mg/kg) administration. Compared to the LPS/D-GalN group, the TAK-242 pretreatment group showed significantly prolonged survival, reduced serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, relieved oxidative stress, and reduced inflammatory interleukin (IL)-6, IL-12, and tumor necrosis factor-α levels. In addition, TAK-242 increased the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Next, mice were treated with an anti-Gr-1 antibody to deplete MDSCs, and adoptive transfer experiments were performed. We found that TAK-242 protected against FH by regulating MDSCs. In the in vitro studies, TAK-242 regulated the accumulation of MDSCs and promoted the release of immunosuppressive inflammatory cytokines. In addition, TAK-242 inhibited protein expression of nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinases. In summary, TAK-242 had a hepatoprotective effect against LPS/D-GalN-induced explosive hepatitis in mice. Its protective effect may be involved in suppressing inflammation, reducing oxidative stress, and increasing the proportion of MDSCs.

Comparison of the Effects of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Fondaparinux on Liver Function in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism

Hepatotoxicity with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux is a relatively common adverse reaction. This study assessed the effects of LMWH and fondaparinux on liver function in patients with pulmonary embolism based on a retrospective cohort. As a result, a total of 463 patients with pulmonary embolism and treated with LMWH (enoxaparin sodium or nadroparin calcium) or fondaparinux sodium were included. Liver dysfunction was identified in 79 patients (17.1%), of whom 97.5% had grade 1 drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and 2.5% had grade 2 DILI. The results showed that liver dysfunction usually occurred in the first week after anticoagulant administration, and the liver tests of all patients with liver dysfunction gradually recovered or alleviated at discharge. The multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that a longer treatment course and hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBsAg+) were risk factors for liver dysfunction (P < .05). Moreover, nadroparin calcium had the highest risk of liver dysfunction, approximately 2.2 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1740-4.224; P = .015) that of enoxaparin sodium. In conclusion, nearly one-fifth and 10% of patients prescribed with LMWH or fondaparinux, respectively, for pulmonary embolism had liver dysfunction, mainly with mild liver injury and characterized by self-limited elevated serum transaminase levels. Hence, during the 3 anticoagulant applications, we should pay more attention to the monitoring of liver function in the first week and transit to oral anticoagulants if possible, especially for patients who are HBsAg+ or suffering from other liver diseases.

Serum glutamate dehydrogenase activity enables early detection of liver injury in subjects with underlying muscle impairments

Serum activities of alanine and aspartate aminotransferases (ALT and AST) are used as gold standard biomarkers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular injury. Since ALT and AST lack liver specificity, the diagnosis of the onset of hepatocellular injury in patients with underlying muscle impairments is severely limited. Thus, we evaluated the potential of glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) as a liver specific alternative biomarker of hepatocellular injury. In our study, serum GLDH in subjects with Duchene muscular dystrophy (DMD) was equivalent to serum GLDH in age matched healthy subjects, while serum ALT was increased 20-fold in DMD subjects. Furthermore, serum GLDH in 131 subjects with variety of muscle impairments was similar to serum GLDH of healthy subjects while serum ALT corelated with serum creatine kinase, a widely accepted biomarker of muscle impairment. In addition, significant elevations of ALT, AST, and CK were observed in a case of a patient with rhabdomyolysis, while serum GLDH stayed within the normal range until the onset of hypoxia-induced liver injury. In a mouse model of DMD (DMD^mdx), serum GLDH but not serum ALT clearly correlated with the degree of acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Taken together, our data support the utility of serum GLDH as a liver-specific biomarker of liver injury that has a potential to improve diagnosis of hepatocellular injury in patients with underlying muscle impairments. In drug development, GLDH may have utility as a biomarker of drug induced liver injury in clinical trials of new therapies to treat muscle diseases such as DMD.

Understanding Idiosyncratic Toxicity: Lessons Learned from Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions (IADRs) encompass a diverse group of toxicities that can vary by drug and patient. The complex and unpredictable nature of IADRs combined with the fact that they are rare makes them particularly difficult to predict, diagnose, and treat. Common clinical characteristics, the identification of human leukocyte antigen risk alleles, and drug-induced proliferation of lymphocytes isolated from patients support a role for the adaptive immune system in the pathogenesis of IADRs. Significant evidence also suggests a requirement for direct, drug-induced stress, neoantigen formation, and stimulation of an innate response, which can be influenced by properties intrinsic to both the drug and the patient. This Perspective will provide an overview of the clinical profile, mechanisms, and risk factors underlying IADRs as well as new approaches to study these reactions, focusing on idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.

Next-Generation DILI Biomarkers: Prioritization of Biomarkers for Qualification and Best Practices for Biospecimen Collection in Drug Development

The diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenge in clinical trials in drug development. The qualification of emerging biomarkers capable of predicting DILI soon after the initiation of treatment, differentiating DILI from underlying liver disease, identifying the causal entity, and assigning appropriate treatment options after DILI is diagnosed are needed. Qualification efforts have been hindered by lack of properly stored and consented biospecimens that are linked to clinical data relevant to a specific context of use. Recommendations are made for biospecimen collection procedures, with the focus on clinical trials, and for specific emerging biomarkers to focus qualification efforts.

Molecular Biomarkers in Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Challenges and Future Perspectives

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one among the common adverse drug reactions and the leading causes of drug development attritions, black box warnings, and post-marketing withdrawals. Despite having relatively low clinical incidence, its potentially severe adverse events should be considered in the individual patients due to the high risk of acute liver failure. Although traditional liver parameters have been applied to the diagnosis of DILI, the lack of specific and sensitive biomarkers poses a major limitation, and thus accurate prediction of the subsequent clinical course remains a significant challenge. These drawbacks prompt the investigation and discovery of more effective biomarkers, which could lead to early detection of DILI, and improve its diagnosis and prognosis. Novel promising biomarkers include glutamate dehydrogenase, keratin 18, sorbitol dehydrogenase, glutathione S-transferase, bile acids, cytochrome P450, osteopontin, high mobility group box-1 protein, fatty acid binding protein 1, cadherin 5, miR-122, genetic testing, and omics technologies, among others. Furthermore, several clinical scoring systems have gradually emerged for the diagnosis of DILI including the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), Clinical Diagnostic Scale (CDS), and Digestive Disease Week Japan (DDW-J) systems. However, currently their predictive value is limited with certain inherent deficiencies. Thus, perhaps the greatest benefit would be achieved by simultaneously combining the scoring systems and those biomarkers. Herein, we summarized the recent research progress on molecular biomarkers for DILI to improved approaches for its diagnosis and clinical management.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Biomarkers, Requirements, Candidates, and Validation

The hepatotoxicity of drugs is the main cause of drug withdrawal from the pharmaceutical market and interruption of the development of new molecules. Biomarkers are useful in several situations. In case of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI), biomarkers can be used to confirm liver damage, its severity, prognosis, confirm drug causality, or define the type of DILI. In this review, we will first present the currently used biomarkers and candidate biomarkers for the future. The current biomarkers are certainly very helpful including with the assistance of diagnostic method such the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method, but provide a limited information for the early detection of liver injury, the role of specific drug and the prediction of DILI. Some biomarkers are promising but they are not yet available for routine use. Studies are still needed to confirm their interest, particularly in comparison to Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method.

Novel biomarkers for potential risk stratification of drug induced liver injury (DILI): A narrative perspective on current trends

BACKGROUND

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is an increasing cause of acute liver injury especially with increasing need for pharmacotherapy of widening comorbidities amongst our ever-aging population. Uncertainty however remains regarding both acceptable and widely agreeable diagnostic algorithms as well a clear understanding of mechanistic insights that most accurately underpins it. In this review, we have explored the potential role of emerging novel markers of DILI and how they could possibly be integrated into clinical care of patients.

METHODS

We explored PUBMED and all other relevant databases for scientific studies that explored potential utility of novel biomarkers of DILI, and subsequently carried out a narrative synthesis of this data. As this is a narrative review with no recourse to patient identifiable information, no ethics committee's approval was sought or required.

RESULTS

Novel biomarkers such as microRNA-122 (miR-122) profiles, high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), and cytokeratin-18 (K-18), amongst others do have the potential for reducing diagnostic uncertainties associated with DILI.

CONCLUSION

With the increasing validation of some of the novel liver biomarkers such as K-18, mir-122, HMGB-1, and GLDH, there is the potential for improvement in the diagnostic uncertainty commonly associated with cases of DILI.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury in patients: Detection, severity assessment, and regulatory implications

Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury (IDILI) is a rare but potentially life-threatening event that is caused by drugs that, at usual therapeutic doses, do not cause any biochemical or clinical evidence of liver injury in the majority of treated patients. The most common clinical phenotypes of IDILI are "acute hepatitis," "mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic hepatitis," and "cholestatic hepatitis" and these are distinguished by clinical, biochemical and histologic characteristics. Anti-microbials, herbals and dietary supplements are now the agents most often implicated in the US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network registry. There are several scales that have been used to characterize the severity of IDILI events. There are no reliable means to accurately predict the course of an IDILI event at presentation. In clinical trials, the "gold standard" liver safety signal is the occurrence of "Hy's Law Cases." Making the diagnosis of IDILI, and when a patient is taking multiple drugs, identifying the most likely culprit can be challenging, but many drugs cause IDILI with characteristic clinical and biochemical presentations, or "signatures." In a clinical trial, it is sometimes possible to identify an overlooked "signature" of IDILI by characterizing more minor, asymptomatic, and transient elevations in liver chemistries. This observation can be helpful in assessing causation in rare serious liver events occurring in the clinical trial, or first recognized post-marketing.

Combination of the low anticoagulant heparin CX-01 with chemotherapy for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

Relapses in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) are a result of quiescent leukemic stem cells (LSCs) in marrow stromal niches, where they resist chemotherapy. LSCs employ CXCL12/CXCR4 to home toward protective marrow niches. Heparin disrupts CXCL12-mediated sequestration of cells in the marrow. CX-01 is a low-anticoagulant heparin derivative. In this pilot study, we combined CX-01 with chemotherapy for the treatment of AML. Induction consisted of cytarabine and idarubicin (7 + 3) with CX-01. Twelve patients were enrolled (median age, 56 years; 3 women). Three, 5, and 4 patients had good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk disease, respectively. Day 14 bone marrows were available on 11 patients and were aplastic in all without detectable leukemia. Eleven patients (92%) had morphologic complete remission after 1 induction (CR1). Eight patients were alive at a median follow-up of 24 months (4 patients in CR1). Three patients received an allogeneic stem cell transplant in CR1. Median disease-free survival was 14.8 months. Median overall survival was not attained at the maximum follow-up time of 29.4 months. No CX-01-associated serious adverse events occurred. Median day to an untransfused platelet count of at least 20 × 10⁹/L was 21. CX-01 is well tolerated when combined with intensive therapy for AML and appears associated with enhanced count recovery and treatment efficacy.

Candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of drug-induced liver injury: An international collaborative effort

Current blood biomarkers are suboptimal in detecting drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and predicting its outcome. We sought to characterize the natural variabilty and performance characteristics of 14 promising DILI biomarker candidates. Serum or plasma from multiple cohorts of healthy volunteers (n = 192 and n = 81), subjects who safely took potentially hepatotoxic drugs without adverse effects (n = 55 and n = 92) and DILI patients (n = 98, n = 28, and n = 143) were assayed for microRNA-122 (miR-122), glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), total cytokeratin 18 (K18), caspase cleaved K18, glutathione S-transferase α, alpha-fetoprotein, arginase-1, osteopontin (OPN), sorbitol dehydrogenase, fatty acid binding protein, cadherin-5, macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (MCSFR), paraoxonase 1 (normalized to prothrombin protein), and leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin-2. Most candidate biomarkers were significantly altered in DILI cases compared with healthy volunteers. GLDH correlated more closely with gold standard alanine aminotransferase than miR-122, and there was a surprisingly wide inter- and intra-individual variability of miR-122 levels among healthy volunteers. Serum K18, OPN, and MCSFR levels were most strongly associated with liver-related death or transplantation within 6 months of DILI onset. Prediction of prognosis among DILI patients using the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease was improved by incorporation of K18 and MCSFR levels. Conclusion: GLDH appears to be more useful than miR-122 in identifying DILI patients, and K18, OPN, and MCSFR are promising candidates for prediction of prognosis during an acute DILI event. Serial assessment of these biomarkers in large prospective studies will help further delineate their role in DILI diagnosis and management.

Hepatotoxicity With Elevated Bilirubin Secondary to Prophylactic Doses of Unfractionated Heparin: A Case Report and Review of Heparin-Induced Hepatotoxicity

Objective: To report a case of heparin-induced hepatotoxicity in a patient without prior liver dysfunction who received prophylactic doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH). Case Summary: A 70-year-old man with no prior liver dysfunction was admitted to the hospital for presyncope, secondary to dehydration, and new-onset congestive heart failure. Prophylactic UFH was initiated for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. Within 2 days, he developed increases in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase. By day 4, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were greater than 5 and 9 times the upper limit of normal, respectively. Alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin were markedly elevated as well. UFH was discontinued on day 4, and liver enzymes subsequently normalized. Discussion: Hepatotoxicity, defined as increases in transaminases greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal, is relatively rare-estimated to occur in only 5% of those receiving therapy with UFH. Concurrent elevations in bilirubin have rarely been reported. Enzymes typically begin to rise after 4 to 5 days of UFH use and return to normal within 2 weeks of discontinuation. Previously published case reports of heparin-induced hepatotoxicity have occurred with therapeutic doses of either UFH or low-molecular-weight heparins. Conclusions: Heparin-induced hepatotoxicity may occur more rapidly than previously described, and even with the use of prophylactic doses of UFH. Given their widespread use, it is important for clinicians to consider heparins in their differential as a potential cause of hepatotoxicity especially in patients without underlying hepatic disease.

Serum biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury: Current status and future directions

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), which is caused by drugs and herbal or dietary supplements, remains a serious concern for drug developers, regulators, and clinicians; however, serum biomarkers utilized to detect and monitor DILI have not changed in decades and have limitations. Data-driven mathematical modeling that incorporates the release and clearance kinetics of traditional biomarkers has improved their use in the prediction of liver safety liabilities for new drug candidates. Several newer biomarkers have shown promise in terms of liver specificity, predicting the outcome of DILI events, and providing insight into its underlying mechanisms. For these new biomarkers to be qualified for regulatory acceptance, it will require their assessment in large numbers of patients who are receiving a wide range of compounds and who develop a broad spectrum of liver injuries. The ongoing and evolving international biomarker consortia should play a major role in this effort, which is likely to transform the assessment of liver safety in clinical trials and in the clinic.

The diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an uncommon but important cause of liver disease that can arise after exposure to a multitude of drugs and herbal and dietary supplements. The severity of idiosyncratic DILI varies from mild serum aminotransferase elevations to the development of severe liver injury that can progress to acute liver failure resulting in death or liver transplantation within days of DILI onset. Chronic liver injury that persists for more than 6 months after DILI onset is also becoming increasingly recognized in up to 20% of DILI patients. Host demographic (age, gender, race), clinical and laboratory features at DILI onset have been associated with the severity and outcome of liver injury in DILI patients. In addition to cessation of the suspect drug, other medical interventions including the use of N-acetylcysteine and corticosteroids in selected patients have shown some clinical benefit, but additional prospective studies are needed. A number of promising diagnostic, prognostic and mechanistic serum and genetic biomarkers may help improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of idiosyncratic DILI.

The diagnostic role of miR-122 in drug-induced liver injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a potentially severe adverse drug reaction especially in susceptible patients. But there are no sensitive or specific parameters to detecting DILI. The specific expression of miR-122 in the liver has been a hotspot in the evaluation of hepatic toxicity due to its high stability and sensitivity.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review through July 31, 2017 to identify studies which evolved DILI patients testing miR-122 without limiting a certain drug. According to the PRISMA statement, a meta-analysis: the diagnostic role of miR-122 in DILI was made. QUADAS-2 quality evaluation table was used to evaluate the quality of the documentary evidence, PRISMA flowchart and quality evaluation table were drawn with RevMan, use Stata to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of miR-122 in diagnosing DILI, ROC curve and Deeks funnel plot were also drawn by STATA.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involved 194 DILI patients and 251 controls, all were tested miR-122 (fold change). Sensitivity of miR-122 in diagnosing DILI was [0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.91), I = 53.46%] and specificity was [0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97), I = 65.10%], the area under ROC curve was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97). While in acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury, the sensitivity was [0.82 (95%CI, 0.67-0.91), I = 65.77%] specificity was [0.96 (95%CI, 0.88-0.99), I = 31.46%], AUROC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found miR-122 have a high specificity in DILI, and a modest positive diagnostic effects. On the basis of the limited evidence, further research is needed to evaluate the long-term observation and more clinical data to testify miR-122 in diagnosing DILI.

Biomarkers associated with binaprofen‑induced liver injury

Drug‑induced liver injury (DILI) is a common hepatic disease. The identification of biomarkers for DILI prediction is critical for rational drug use. The aim of the present study was to investigate liver injury caused by binaprofen and identify proteins that may serve as early biomarkers to predict DILI. For in vivo DILI assays, zebrafish were exposed to acetaminophen (APAP) and binaprofen for 12‑96 h before lethal concentration 50 (LC50), histopathological analysis, conventional and non‑conventional biomarker measurements were conducted. In vitro assays were performed in cultured liver cells; after 6‑24 h treatment with APAP and binaprofen the same measurements were conducted as aforementioned. The in vivo assays indicated that the LC50 of APAP was 5.2 mM, whereas the LC50 of binaprofen was 1.2 mM; 12‑48 h post‑treatment, liver cells exhibited mild to moderate vacuolization in a time‑ and concentration‑dependent manner in response to both drugs. During this time, conventional and non‑conventional biomarkers were also altered in a time‑ and concentration‑dependent manner; however, alterations in the levels of non‑conventional biomarkers occurred at an earlier time point compared with conventional biomarkers. The in vitro assays indicated that the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of APAP was 16.2 mM, whereas the IC50 of binaprofen was 5.3 mM; 12‑48 h post‑treatment, cultured liver cells exhibited mild to moderate swelling in a time‑ and concentration‑dependent manner. Alterations in the levels of conventional and non‑conventional biomarkers were similar to those observed in the in vivo assays. As a non‑steroidal anti‑inflammatory drug, binaprofen exhibited expected levels of liver toxicity in in vitro and in vivo assays, which were similar to APAP. Total bile acid and argininosuccinate lyase were identified as early biomarkers, which could accurately predict onset of binaprofen‑induced liver injury.

WITHDRAWN: Reference intervals for putative biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury and liver regeneration in healthy human volunteers

The publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.