Human models of migraine - short-term pain for long-term gain

Abscisic acid ameliorates cognitive dysfunctions, but not facial allodynia, in a male rat nitroglycerin migraine model

OBJECTIVE

Abscisic acid (ABA), found in fruits and vegetables and produced in the human body, has anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and pro-cognitive effects. The impact of ABA on trigeminal nerve hyperalgesia and cognitive behaviors in a rat migraine model was evaluated.

DESIGN

Male rats (n = 8) were randomly distributed into 5 groups (Control, Sham, Abscisic acid (ABA), Nitroglycerin (NTG), and Nitroglycerin + Abscisic acid (NTG+ABA). Migraine was induced through 4 injections of NTG (5 mg/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.)). ABA (10 µg/rat intracerebroventricular (i.c.v)) was administered 4 times with an interval of 24 hours. To evaluate trigeminal nerve hyperalgesia, the von Frey, acetone, and air puff tests were used. To evaluate locomotor and cognitive function of the animals, the open field, elevated plus maze (EPM), tail suspension (TST), Morris water maze (MWM), and passive avoidance (PA) tests were administered. Total antioxidant capacity levels (n = 5; TAC) were also monitored.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between the surgically treated groups and the control group, but no differences in pain indexes were found in migraine animals when ABA was present. ABA-treated animals among the migraine groups showed reductions in anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors. Additionally, in the MWM test, the ABA animals exhibited improved spatial learning, while their memory did not show improvement. Avoidance learning and memory were not affected when evaluated using the PA. Increases in TAC were seen in ABA-treated animals in both serum and the spinal trigeminal nucleus.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, ABA reduces NTG-induced cognitive impairments, and antioxidant activity could play a role in the underlying ABA-mediated mechanism.

Advances in understanding migraine for the development of novel pharmacotherapies: the use of human provocation migraine models

INTRODUCTION

Whilst migraine treatment has advanced significantly over recent times, the mechanisms of attack genesis and heterogeneity in treatment response are two amidst several areas that remain poorly understood and require further development. Experimental migraine provocation is an area that holds promise in advancing this understanding.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a literature search using PubMed, of 'human migraine triggering' and 'human migraine provocation' to identify articles of interest. We discuss therapeutic targets that have emerged from such work, including calcitonin family peptides (amylin (AMY) and adrenomedullin (ADM)), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) and potassium channels. We discuss our views on the clinical translation of the outcomes of such studies, and their previous and potential future impact on migraine therapeutics.

EXPERT OPINION

Migraine provocation models provide a valuable means to study human migraine phenotypically and biologically, as well as to assess treatment response. Downstream intracellular mechanisms of provocation agents can be targeted during cellular processing to alter cell function and influence migraine mechanisms. It is important to caveat the clinical translation of provocation studies, given that just because a substance triggers migraine experimentally, does not necessarily mean that the substance is involved in the spontaneous human condition.

Effects of substance P on headache induction and arterial dilation in healthy adults

ObjectiveTo determine whether intravenous infusion of substance P elicits headache and arterial dilation in healthy adults.MethodsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study, we randomly allocated healthy adults to receive either substance P (1.5 pmol/kg/min) or placebo (isotonic saline) by 20-minute intravenous infusion on separate experiment days. The primary endpoint was the incidence of headache within 12 hours after the infusion. Other endpoints included the area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity scores over the 12-hour observation period and AUC changes in the superficial temporal artery (STA) diameter from baseline to 120 minutes post-infusion.ResultsTwenty-one participants underwent randomization and completed both experiment days. Headache was reported by 15 (71%) of 21 participants following substance P, compared with two (10%) after placebo (p < 0.001). The AUC for headache intensity scores was significantly higher after substance P infusion than after placebo (p = 0.03). In addition, there was a significant STA diameter increase with substance P, compared with placebo (p = 0.005).ConclusionsAmong healthy adults, substance P infusion elicited headache and arterial dilation. These findings support a role for substance P in headache pathogenesis and encourage further investigation in migraine and other headache disorders. Additional research is also needed to explore new therapeutic strategies targeting substance P or its downstream signaling.Trial Registration:CT identifier: NCT06632080.

Advancing understanding of migraine pathophysiology and therapy by consideration of patient sex

Recent reports support the startling conclusion that peripheral nociceptors, the first link in pain transmission, are sexually dimorphic. The mechanisms promoting pain in men and women are therefore likely to be different, suggesting the need to consider patient sex as a factor in managing pain and painful conditions such as migraine. Many patients do not achieve sufficient benefit from available therapies and migraine therefore remains a major unmet medical need. The concept of sexual dimorphism in pain mechanism reveals previously unrecognized gaps in knowledge of migraine pathophysiology and in treatment outcomes. As migraine is highly female prevalent, our knowledge is based on studies conducted predominately in women. Data from these studies have rarely been analyzed and reported based on sex, limiting our interpretation of the occurrence, timing and severity of disease symptoms as well as possible differences in treatment efficacy in men. Inclusion of a higher proportion of men in both mechanistic investigations and clinical trials is therefore needed. Advancing our knowledge and improving therapeutic outcomes will require both preclinical and clinical investigations that address the contribution of sex in headache pain and other non-painful symptoms of migraine that impact the quality of life for patients. This viewpoint highlights the importance of considering sex as a variable in advancing our understanding of migraine pathophysiology and therapy. Consideration of patient sex could influence current clinical practice and the design of clinical studies.

PACAP38-induced migraine attacks are independent of CGRP signaling: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP38) are key pathogenic drivers of migraine. While CGRP has become the target of several mechanism-based therapies, less is known about PACAP38 signaling in migraine pathogenesis. Previous studies suggest that PACAP38 can modulate CGRP release, but it might also induce migraine attacks via CGRP-independent mechanisms. Whether PACAP38 signaling is independent of and parallel to CGRP signaling has implications for future therapeutic strategies. Here, we aimed to ascertain whether PACAP-38 can mediate migraine attacks independently of CGRP signaling by assessing the ability of eptinezumab to prevent PACAP38-induced migraine attacks.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, we randomly allocated adults with migraine without aura to receive either an intravenous infusion of 300-mg eptinezumab or matching placebo (isotonic saline) over 30 min. Two hours post-infusion, all participants were administered PACAP38 intravenously at 10 pmol/kg/min for 20 min. The primary endpoint was the incidence of migraine attacks during the 24-hour observational period post-infusion of eptinezumab or placebo. Key secondary endpoints included between-group differences in incidence of headache, and area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity scores, diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and facial skin blood flow.

RESULTS

A total of 38 participants were enrolled and completed the study. No difference was observed in the incidence of PACAP38-induced migraine attacks between the eptinezumab (10 [53%] of 19) and placebo (12 [63%] of 19) groups (Fisher's exact test: P = 0.74). Headache of any intensity was reported by 15 (79%) participants in the eptinezumab group, compared with 16 (84%) participants in the placebo group (Fisher's exact test: P > 0.99). The AUC for headache intensity scores did not differ between the two groups during the first 12 h post-infusion of PACAP38 (Mann-Whitney U-test: P = 0.96). No differences were observed in AUC between the eptinezumab and placebo groups with respect to changes in STA diameter and facial skin blood flow (P > 0.05). No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PACAP38 may mediate its signaling independently of CGRP in migraine pathogenesis. Therapies targeting PACAP signaling are thus a promising new avenue for treating migraine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05635604. Registered on November 15 2022.

Revisiting substance P in migraine: a methodological approach inspired by anti-CGRP and anti-PACAP success

Substance P, previously dismissed as a therapeutic target for migraine due to the failure of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, warrants renewed attention. Building on the success of therapies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) in migraine prevention, which highlight the importance of targeting peptides, this proposal reexamines substance P as a mediator in migraine pathophysiology. Using an established methodological framework, migraine-inducing properties of substance P can be evaluated through randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover studies involving healthy volunteers and individuals with a history of migraine. This approach aims to establish proof of concept for substance P's role in migraine, laying the groundwork for investigations with animal and cell-based models and advancing the development of innovative treatments for patients refractory to current therapies.

Cerebral blood flow and arterial responses in migraine: history and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

It is largely accepted that migraine with aura (MA) is caused by cortical spreading depression (CSD) and that migraine without aura (MO) is not. This is mostly based on old studies of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and studies of vascular responses. These studies are partly forgotten today and may, therefore, be worthwhile reviewing.

METHODS

The review is based on the authors life-long involvement in these issues and his knowledge of the relevant literature plus scrutiny of reference lists of these papers.

RESULTS

The strongest evidence for CSD in MA came from studies using intraarterial injection of 133-Xenon and recording from 254 areas of the relevant hemisphere. Measurements could be taken before and during development of an attack because the procedure triggered MA. The findings were identical to many features of CSD. They were confirmed using 133-Xenon Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography (SPECT).It was shown that the generally accepted vasospastic theory of migraine was incorrect. Headache started while rCBF was decreased and did not change during later hyperperfusion. rCBF remained normal in MO but later studies have shown increase in areas also activated by other pain. Flow Was focally increased in the brain stem also after treatment of the pain. Dilatation of large cerebral arteries during MO attack was first shown with ultrasound and later confirmed by MR angiography which also showed a lack of dilatation of extracerebral arteries.

DISCUSSION

Much has in later years been done using modern PET and MR techniques. These studies have confirmed the old studies and have added many new aspects which are not reviewed here. The final proof of CSD during MA and its absence during MO still awaits the definitive study.

CONCLUSION

Studies from the 1980ies and 1990ies caused a fundamental shift in our understanding of the vascular and cortical mechanisms of migraine. They remain a solid base for our current understanding and inspire further study.

Male-female comparison of vasomotor effects of circulating hormones in human intracranial arteries

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine whether there are sex differences in vasomotor responses and receptor localization of hormones and neuropeptides with relevance to migraine (vasopressin, oxytocin, estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, amylin, adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)) in human intracranial arteries.

METHODS

Human cortical cerebral and middle meningeal arteries were used in this study. The tissues were removed in conjunction with neurosurgery and donated with consent. Vasomotor responses of arteries, after exposure to hormones or neuropeptides, were recorded using a wire myograph. Immunohistochemistry was performed to examine the expression and localization of their receptors within human intracranial arteries.

RESULTS

Vasopressin showed the strongest contractile responses, followed by oxytocin and progesterone. CGRP displayed the strongest vasodilatory response when compared to adrenomedullin, amylin, testosterone and estrogen. No significant differences were observed in vasomotor responses between male and female arteries. The vasomotor effects were supported by the presence of corresponding receptors in the vascular smooth muscle cells. Estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ), progesterone receptor (PR), vasopressin 1a receptor (V1aR), and the oxytocin receptor (OTR) were expressed in the walls of both cerebral arteries overlying the cerebral cortex and intracranial arteries of the dura mater. ERα, V1aR, and PR were found to be localized in both smooth muscle cells and endothelium, whereas OTR was exclusively located within the smooth muscle cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypothalamic, sex hormones and the pancreas hormone (amylin) receptors are expressed in the human intracranial artery walls. The vasomotor responses revealed no sex differences, however contractile responses to vasopressin was higher and more potent in MMA compared to CCA when pooling data from both sexes. Overall, the hormones estrogen, progesterone and oxytocin, which drop in circulating levels at onset of menstruation, only showed modest vasomotor responses as compared to CGRP. This suggests that their role in inducing menstrual migraine attacks is not directly related to vasomotor responses.

Neuroanatomical evidence and a mouse calcitonin gene-related peptide model in line with human functional magnetic resonance imaging data support the involvement of peptidergic Edinger-Westphal nucleus in migraine

ABSTRACT

The urocortin 1 (UCN1)-expressing centrally projecting Edinger-Westphal (EWcp) nucleus is influenced by circadian rhythms, hormones, stress, and pain, all known migraine triggers. Our study investigated EWcp's potential involvement in migraine. Using RNAscope in situ hybridization and immunostaining, we examined the expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor components in both mouse and human EWcp and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). Tracing study examined connection between EWcp and the spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN). The intraperitoneal CGRP injection model of migraine was applied and validated by light-dark box, and von Frey assays in mice, in situ hybridization combined with immunostaining, were used to assess the functional-morphological changes. The functional connectivity matrix of EW was examined using functional magnetic resonance imaging in control humans and interictal migraineurs. We proved the expression of CGRP receptor components in both murine and human DRN and EWcp. We identified a direct urocortinergic projection from EWcp to the STN. Photophobic behavior, periorbital hyperalgesia, increased c-fos gene-encoded protein immunoreactivity in the lateral periaqueductal gray matter and trigeminal ganglia, and phosphorylated c-AMP-responsive element binding protein in the STN supported the efficacy of CGRP-induced migraine-like state. Calcitonin gene-related peptide administration also increased c-fos gene-encoded protein expression, Ucn1 mRNA, and peptide content in EWcp/UCN1 neurons while reducing serotonin and tryptophan hydroxylase-2 levels in the DRN. Targeted ablation of EWcp/UCN1 neurons induced hyperalgesia. A positive functional connectivity between EW and STN as well as DRN has been identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. The presented data strongly suggest the regulatory role of EWcp/UCN1 neurons in migraine through the STN and DRN with high translational value.

Harnessing Miniscope Imaging in Freely Moving Animals to Unveil Migraine Pathophysiology and Validate Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder that affects millions worldwide. Elucidating its underlying mechanisms is crucial for developing effective therapeutic interventions. In this editorial, we discuss the potential applications of one-photon miniscopes, which enable minimally invasive, high spatiotemporal resolution fluorescence imaging in freely moving animals. By providing real-time visualization of vascular dynamics and neuronal activity, these cutting-edge techniques can offer unique insights into migraine pathophysiology. We explore the significance of these applications in preclinical research with a case study demonstrating their potential to drive the development of novel therapeutic strategies for effective migraine management.

Migraine headache and aura induced by hypoxia

Migraine, a common neurological disorder, impacts over a billion individuals globally. Its complex aetiology involves various signalling cascades. Hypoxia causes headaches such as high-altitude headache and acute mountain sickness which share phenotypical similarities with migraine. Epidemiological data indicate an increased prevalence of migraine with and without aura in high-altitude populations. Experimental studies have further shown that hypoxia can induce migraine attacks. This review summarizes evidence linking hypoxia to migraine, delves into potential pathophysiological mechanisms and highlights research gaps.

Meningeal brain borders and migraine headache genesis

Migraine is a highly prevalent and disabling pain disorder that affects >1 billion people worldwide. One central hypothesis points to the cranial meninges as a key site underlying migraine headache genesis through complex interplay between meningeal sensory nerves, blood vessels, and adjacent immune cells. How these interactions might generate migraine headaches remains incompletely understood and a subject of much debate. In this review we discuss clinical and preclinical evidence supporting the concept that meningeal sterile inflammation, involving neurovascular and neuroimmune interactions, underlies migraine headache genesis. We examine downstream signaling pathways implicated in the development of migraine pain in response to exogenous events such as infusing migraine-triggering chemical substances. We further discuss cortex-to-meninges signaling pathways that could underlie migraine pain in response to endogenous events, such as cortical spreading depolarization (CSD), and explore future directions for the field.

Animal Models of Chronic Migraine: From the Bench to Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic migraine is a disabling progressive disorder without effective management approaches. Animal models have been developed and used in chronic migraine research. However, there are several problems with existing models. Therefore, we aimed to summarize and analyze existing animal models to facilitate translation from basic to clinical.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most commonly used models are the inflammatory soup induction model and the nitric oxide donor induction model. In addition, KATP openers have also been used in model induction. Based on the above models, some molecular targets have been identified, such as glutamate receptors. However, each model has its shortcomings and characteristics, and there are still some common problems that need to be solved, such as spontaneous headache, evaluation criteria after model establishment, and identification methods. In this review, we summarized and highlighted the advantages and limitations of the currently commonly used animal models of chronic migraine with a special focus on drug discovery and current therapeutic strategies, and discussed the directions that can be worked on in the future.

A real-world adverse events study of rimegepant from the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this research is to conduct an exhaustive evaluation of rimegepant with the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) repository.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study downloaded the reporting files related to rimegepant from the second quarter of 2020 to the first quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis was utilized to explore the relationship between rimegepant and adverse drug events (ADEs).

RESULTS

This study analyzed 6659 ADE reports associated with rimegepant as the primary suspected (PS) drug. In the disproportionate analysis of system organ classes (SOCs), the significant signal for rimegepant was general disorders and administration site conditions.On the preferred terms level, 35 ADEs were identified following the exclusion. The top five ADEs with high signal strengths were medication overuse headache, nasal edema, tension headache, performance status decreased, and motion sickness. The most frequent ADEs were nausea, feeling abnormal, abdominal pain upper, somnolence, and hypersensitivity. In addition, we need to pay attention to the ADEs not mentioned in the instruction and clinically significant: vertigo, hyperacusis, somnolence, Raynaud's phenomenon, motion sickness, panic attack, and fear.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights previously unrecognized safety concerns associated with the use of rimegepant. These novel safety aspects suggest that while these treatments can be effective, additional risks may need further exploration.

The Trigeminal Sensory System and Orofacial Pain

The trigeminal sensory system consists of the trigeminal nerve, the trigeminal ganglion, and the trigeminal sensory nuclei (the mesencephalic nucleus, the principal nucleus, the spinal trigeminal nucleus, and several smaller nuclei). Various sensory signals carried by the trigeminal nerve from the orofacial area travel into the trigeminal sensory system, where they are processed into integrated sensory information that is relayed to higher sensory brain areas. Thus, knowledge of the trigeminal sensory system is essential for comprehending orofacial pain. This review elucidates the individual nuclei that comprise the trigeminal sensory system and their synaptic transmission. Additionally, it discusses four types of orofacial pain and their relationship to the system. Consequently, this review aims to enhance the understanding of the mechanisms underlying orofacial pain.

Insights from triggers and prodromal symptoms on how migraine attacks start: The threshold hypothesis

BACKGROUND

The prodrome or premonitory phase is the initial phase of a migraine attack, and it is considered as a symptomatic phase in which prodromal symptoms may occur. There is evidence that attacks start 24-48 hours before the headache phase. Individuals with migraine also report several potential triggers for their attacks, which may be mistaken for premonitory symptoms and hinder migraine research.

METHODS

This review aims to summarize published studies that describe contributions to understanding the fine difference between prodromal/premonitory symptoms and triggers, give insights for research, and propose a way forward to study these phenomena. We finally aim to formulate a theory to unify migraine triggers and prodromal symptoms. For this purpose, a comprehensive narrative review of the published literature on clinical, neurophysiological and imaging evidence on migraine prodromal symptoms and triggers was conducted using the PubMed database.

RESULTS

Brain activity and network connectivity changes occur during the prodromal phase. These changes give rise to prodromal/premonitory symptoms in some individuals, which may be falsely interpreted as triggers at the same time as representing the early manifestation of the beginning of the attack. By contrast, certain migraine triggers, such as stress, hormone changes or sleep deprivation, acting as a catalyst in reducing the migraine threshold, might facilitate these changes and increase the chances of a migraine attack. Migraine triggers and prodromal/premonitory symptoms can be confused and have an intertwined relationship with the hypothalamus as the central hub for integrating external and internal body signals.

CONCLUSIONS

Differentiating migraine triggers and prodromal symptoms is crucial for shedding light on migraine pathophysiology and improve migraine management.

High-frequency episodic migraine: Time for its recognition as a migraine subtype?

BACKGROUND

High-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) has gained attention in the field of headache research and clinical practice. In this narrative review, we analyzed the available literature to assess the evidence that could help decide whether HFEM may represent a distinct clinical and/or biological entity within the migraine spectrum.

METHODS

The output of the literature search included 61 papers that were allocated to one of the following topics: (i) socio-demographic features and burden; (ii) clinical and therapeutic aspects; (iii) pathophysiology; and (iv) classification.

RESULTS

Multiple features differentiate subjects with HFEM from low-frequency episodic migraine and from chronic migraine: education, employment rates, quality of life, disability and psychiatric comorbidities load. Some evidence also suggests that HFEM bears a specific profile of activation of cortical and spinal pain-related pathways, possibly related to maladaptive plasticity.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with HFEM bear a distinctive clinical and socio-demographic profile within the episodic migraine group, with a higher disease burden and an increased risk of transitioning to chronic migraine. Recognizing HFEM as a distinct entity is an opportunity for the better understanding of migraine and the spectrum of frequency with which it can manifest, as well as for stimulating further research and more adequate public health approaches.

The headache research priorities: Research goals from the American Headache Society and an international multistakeholder expert group

OBJECTIVE

To identify and disseminate research priorities for the headache field that should be areas of research focus during the next 10 years.

BACKGROUND

Establishing research priorities helps focus and synergize the work of headache investigators, allowing them to reach the most important research goals more efficiently and completely.

METHODS

The Headache Research Priorities organizing and executive committees and working group chairs led a multistakeholder and international group of experts to develop headache research priorities. The research priorities were developed and reviewed by clinicians, scientists, people with headache, representatives from headache organizations, health-care industry representatives, and the public. Priorities were revised and finalized after receiving feedback from members of the research priorities working groups and after a public comment period.

RESULTS

Twenty-five research priorities across eight categories were identified: human models, animal models, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, treatment, inequities and disparities, research workforce development, and quality of life. The priorities address research models and methods, development and optimization of outcome measures and endpoints, pain and non-pain symptoms of primary and secondary headaches, investigations into mechanisms underlying headache attacks and chronification of headache disorders, treatment optimization, research workforce recruitment, development, expansion, and support, and inequities and disparities in the headache field. The priorities are focused enough that they help to guide headache research and broad enough that they are widely applicable to multiple headache types and various research methods.

CONCLUSIONS

These research priorities serve as guidance for headache investigators when planning their research studies and as benchmarks by which the headache field can measure its progress over time. These priorities will need updating as research goals are met and new priorities arise.

Mechanisms of GTN-induced migraine: Role of NOS isoforms, sGC and peroxynitrite in a migraine relevant mouse model

BACKGROUND

Migraine research has highlighted the pivotal role of nitric oxide (NO) in migraine pathophysiology. Nitric oxide donors such as glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) induce migraine attacks in humans, whereas spontaneous migraine attacks can be aborted by inhibiting NO production. The present study aimed to investigate how GTN triggers migraine through its three nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms (neuronal NOS (nNOS), endothelial NOS (eNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS)) via a suspected feed-forward phenomenon.

METHODS

Migraine-relevant hypersensitivity was induced by repeated injection of GTN in an in vivo mouse model. Cutaneous tactile sensitivity was assessed using von Frey filaments. Signaling pathways involved in this model were dissected using non-selective and selective NOS inhibitors, knockout mice lacking eNOS or nNOS and their wild-type control mice. Also, we tested a soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitor and a peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst (Ntotal = 312).

RESULTS

Non-selective NOS inhibition blocked GTN-induced hypersensitivity. This response was partially associated with iNOS, and potentially nNOS and eNOS conjointly. Furthermore, we found that the GTN response was largely dependent on the generation of peroxynitrite and partly soluble guanylate cyclase.

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine-relevant hypersensitivity induced by GTN is mediated by a possible feed-forward phenomenon of NO driven mainly by iNOS but with contributions from other isoforms. The involvement of peroxynitrite adds to the notion that oxidative stress reactions are also involved.

Study on the involvement of microglial S100A8 in neuroinflammation and microglia activation during migraine attacks

BACKGROUND

Microglia is the primary source of inflammatory factors during migraine attacks. This study aims to investigate the role of microglia related genes (MRGs) in migraine attacks.

METHODS

The RNA sequencing results of migraineurs and the panglaodb database were used to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in migraine related to microglia. A migraine rat model was established for validating and localizing of the MRGs, and subsequent screening for target genes was conducted. A shRNA was designed to interference the expression of target genes and administered into the trigeminal ganglion (TG) of rats. Pain sensitivity in rats was evaluated via the hot water tail-flick (HWTF) and formalin-induced pain (FIP) experiments. ELISA was used to quantify the levels of inflammatory cytokines and CGRP. WB and immunofluorescence assays were applied to detect the activation of microglia.

RESULTS

A total of five DEGs in migraine related to microglia were obtained from RNA sequencing and panglaodb database. Animal experiments showed that these genes expression were heightened in the TG and medulla oblongata (MO) of migraine rats. The gene S100A8 co-localized with microglia in both TG and MO. The HWTF and FIP experiments demonstrated that interference with S100A8 alleviated the sense of pain in migraine rats. Moreover, the levels of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, and CGRP in the TG and MO of rats in the model rats were increased, and the expression of microglia markers IBA-1, M1 polarization markers CD86 and iNOS was upregulated. Significantly, interference with S100A8 reversed these indicators.

CONCLUSION

Interference with S100A8 in microglia increased the pain threshold during migraine attacks, and inhibited neuroinflammation and microglia activation.

Brain-wide mapping of c-Fos expression in nitroglycerin-induced models of migraine

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by complex, widespread, and sudden attacks with an unclear pathogenesis, particularly in chronic migraine (CM). Specific brain regions, including the insula, amygdala, thalamus, and cingulate, medial prefrontal, and anterior cingulate cortex, are commonly activated by pain stimuli in patients with CM and animal models. This study employs fluorescence microscopy optical sectioning tomography (fMOST) technology and AAV-PHP.eB whole-brain expression to map activation patterns of brain regions in CM mice, thus enhancing the understanding of CM pathogenesis and suggesting potential treatment targets.

METHODS

By repeatedly administering nitroglycerin (NTG) to induce migraine-like pain in mice, a chronic migraine model (CMM) was established. Olcegepant (OLC) was then used as treatment and its effects on mechanical pain hypersensitivity and brain region activation were observed. All mice underwent mechanical withdrawal threshold, light-aversive, and elevated plus maze tests. Viral injections were administered to the mice one month prior to modelling, and brain samples were collected 2 h after the final NTG/vehicle control injection for whole-brain imaging using fMOST.

RESULTS

In the NTG-induced CMM, mechanical pain threshold decreased, photophobia, and anxiety-like behavior were observed, and OLC was found to improve these manifestations. fMOST whole-brain imaging results suggest that the isocortex-cerebral cortex plate region, including somatomotor areas (MO), somatosensory areas (SS), and main olfactory bulb (MOB), appears to be the most sensitive area of activation in CM (P < 0.05). Other brain regions such as the inferior colliculus (IC) and intermediate reticular nucleus (IRN) were also exhibited significant activation (P < 0.05). The improvement in migraine-like symptoms observed with OLC treatment may be related to its effects on these brain regions, particularly SS, MO, ansiform lobule (AN), IC, spinal nucleus of the trigeminal, caudal part (Sp5c), IRN, and parvicellular reticular nucleus (PARN) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

fMOST whole-brain imaging reveals c-Fos + cells in numerous brain regions. OLC improves migraine-like symptoms by modulating brain activity in some brain regions. This study demonstrates the activation of the specific brain areas in NTG-induced CMM and suggests some regions as a potential treatment mechanism according to OLC.

Molecular nociceptive mechanisms in migraine: The migraine cascade

OBJECTIVE

This review will explore the categorization of migraine-provoking molecules, their cellular actions, site of action and potential drug targets based on the migraine cascade model.

METHODS

Personal experience and literature.

RESULTS

Migraine impacts over 1 billion people worldwide but is underfunded in research. Recent progress, particularly through the human and animal provocation model, has deepened our understanding of its mechanisms. This model have identified endogenous neuropeptides such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) that induces controlled migraine-like attacks leading to significant discoveries of their role in migraine. This knowledge led to the development of CGRP-inhibiting drugs; a groundbreaking migraine treatment now accessible globally. Also a PACAP-inhibiting drug was effective in a recent phase II trial. Notably, rodent studies have shed light on pain pathways and the mechanisms of various migraine-inducing substances identifying novel drug targets. This is primarily done by using selective inhibitors that target specific signaling pathways of the known migraine triggers leading to the hypothesized cellular cascade model of migraine.

CONCLUSION

The model of migraine presents numerous opportunities for innovative drug development. The future of new migraine treatments is limited only by the investment from pharmaceutical companies.

VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors mediate tactile hindpaw hypersensitivity and carotid artery dilatation induced by PACAP38 in a migraine relevant mouse model

BACKGROUND

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) is a neuropeptide pivotal in migraine pathophysiology and is considered a promising new migraine drug target. Although intravenous PACAP triggers migraine attacks and a recent phase II trial with a PACAP-inhibiting antibody showed efficacy in migraine prevention, targeting the PACAP receptor PAC1 alone has been unsuccessful. The present study investigated the role of three PACAP receptors (PAC1, VPAC1 and VPAC2) in inducing migraine-relevant hypersensitivity in mice.

METHODS

Hindpaw hypersensitivity was induced by repeated PACAP38 injections. Tactile sensitivity responses were quantified using von Frey filaments in three knockout (KO) mouse strains, each lacking one of the PACAP-receptors (Ntotal = 160). Additionally, ex vivo wire myography was used to assess vasoactivity of the carotid artery, and gene expression of PACAP receptors was examined by qPCR.

RESULTS

PACAP38 induced hypersensitivity in WT controls (p < 0.01) that was diminished in VPAC1 and VPAC2 KO mice (p < 0.05). In contrast, PAC1 KO mice showed similar responses to WT controls (p > 0.05). Myograph experiments supported these findings showing diminished vasoactivity in VPAC1 and VPAC2 KO mice. We found no upregulation of the non-modified PACAP receptors in KO mice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study assessed all three PACAP receptors in a migraine mouse model and suggests a significant role of VPAC receptors in migraine pathophysiology. The lack of hypersensitivity reduction in PAC1 KO mice suggests the involvement of other PACAP receptors or compensatory mechanisms. The results indicate that targeting only individual PACAP receptors may not be an effective migraine treatment.

Provocation of attacks to discover migraine signaling mechanisms and new drug targets: early history and future perspectives - a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

The development of several experimental migraine provocation models has significantly contributed to an understanding of the signaling mechanisms of migraine. The early history of this development and a view to the future are presented as viewed by the inventor of the models.

METHODS

Extensive knowledge of the literature was supplemented by scrutiny of reference lists.

RESULTS

Early studies used methodologies that were not blinded. They suggested that histamine and nitroglycerin (Glyceryl trinitrate, GTN) could induce headache and perhaps migraine. The development of a double blind, placebo-controlled model, and the use of explicit diagnostic criteria for induced migraine was a major step forward. GTN, donor of nitric oxide (NO), induced headache in people with- and without migraine as well as delayed migraine attacks in those with migraine. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) did the same, supporting the development of CGRP antagonists now widely used in patients. Likewise, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) provoked headache and migraine. Recently a PACAP antibody has shown anti migraine activity in a phase 2 trial. Increase of second messengers activated by NO, CGRP and PACAP effectively induced migraine. The experimental models have also been used in other types of headaches and have been combined with imaging and biochemical studies. They have also been used for drug testing and in genetic studies.

CONCLUSION

Conclusion. Human migraine provocation models have informed about signaling mechanisms of migraine leading to new drugs and drug targets. Future use of these models in imaging-, biochemistry- and genetic studies as well as in the further study of animal models is promising.

Environmental enrichment alleviates hyperalgesia by modulating central sensitization in a nitroglycerin-induced chronic migraine model of mice

BACKGROUND

Chronic migraine (CM) is a debilitating neurofunctional disorder primarily affecting females, characterized by central sensitization. Central sensitization refers to the enhanced response to sensory stimulation, which involves changes in neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity, and neurotransmitter release. Environmental enrichment (EE) can increase the movement, exploration, socialization and other behaviors of mice. EE has shown promising effects in various neurological disorders, but its impact on CM and the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether EE has the potential to serve as a cost-effective intervention strategy for CM.

METHODS

A mouse CM model was successfully established by repeated administration of nitroglycerin (NTG). We selected adult female mice around 8 weeks old, exposed them to EE for 2 months, and then induced the CM model. Nociceptive threshold tests were measured using Von Frey filaments and a hot plate. The expression of c-Fos, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and inflammatory response were measured using WB and immunofluorescence to evaluate central sensitization. RNA sequencing was used to find differentially expressed genes and signaling pathways. Finally, the expression of the target differential gene was investigated.

RESULTS

Repeated administration of NTG can induce hyperalgesia in female mice and increase the expression of c-Fos and CGRP in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC). Early exposure of mice to EE reduced NTG-induced hyperalgesia in CM mice. WB and immunofluorescence revealed that EE inhibited the overexpression of c-Fos and CGRP in the TNC of CM mice and alleviated the inflammatory response of microglia activation. RNA sequencing analysis identified that several central sensitization-related signaling pathways were altered by EE. VGluT1, a key gene involved in behavior, internal stimulus response, and ion channel activity, was found to be downregulated in mice exposed to EE.

CONCLUSION

EE can significantly ameliorate hyperalgesia in the NTG-induced CM model. The mechanisms may be to modulate central sensitization by reducing the expression of CGRP, attenuating the inflammatory response, and downregulating the expression of VGluT1, etc., suggesting that EE can serve as an effective preventive strategy for CM.

Orexins and primary headaches: an overview of the neurobiology and clinical impact

INTRODUCTION

Primary headaches, including migraines and cluster headaches, are highly prevalent disorders that significantly impact quality of life. Several factors suggest a key role for the hypothalamus, including neuroimaging studies, attack periodicity, and the presence of altered homeostatic regulation. The orexins are two neuropeptides synthesized almost exclusively in the lateral hypothalamus with widespread projections across the central nervous system. They are involved in an array of functions including homeostatic regulation and nociception, suggesting a potential role in primary headaches.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes current knowledge of the neurobiology of orexins, their involvement in sleep-wake regulation, nociception, and functions relevant to the associated symptomology of headache disorders. Preclinical reports of the antinociceptive effects of orexin-A in preclinical models are discussed, as well as clinical evidence for the potential involvement of the orexinergic system in headache.

EXPERT OPINION

Several lines of evidence support the targeted modulation of orexinergic signaling in primary headaches. Critically, orexins A and B, acting differentially via the orexin 1 and 2 receptors, respectively, demonstrate differential effects on trigeminal pain processing, indicating why dual-receptor antagonists failed to show clinical efficacy. The authors propose that orexin 1 receptor agonists or positive allosteric modulators should be the focus of future research.

Non-vascular ATP-sensitive potassium channel activation does not trigger migraine attacks: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of NN414, a selective KATP channel opener for the Kir6.2/SUR1 channel subtype found in neurons and β-pancreatic cells, in inducing migraine attacks in individuals with migraine without aura.

METHODS

Thirteen participants were randomly allocated to receive NN414 and placebo on two days separated by at least one week. The primary endpoint was the difference in the incidence of migraine attacks after NN414 compared with placebo. The secondary endpoints were the difference in the area under the curve for headache intensity scores, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (VMCA), superficial temporal artery diameter, heart rate and mean arterial pressure.

RESULTS

Twelve participants completed the study, with two (16.6%) reporting migraine attacks after NN414 compared to one (8.3%) after placebo (p = 0.53). The area under the curve for headache intensity, VMCA, superficial temporal artery diameter, heart rate and mean arterial pressure did not differ between NN414 and placebo (p > 0.05, all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

The lack of migraine induction upon activation of the Kir6.2/SUR1 channel subtype suggests it may not contribute to migraine pathogenesis. Our findings point to KATP channel blockers that target the Kir6.1/SUR2B subtype, found in cerebral vasculature, as potential candidates for innovative antimigraine treatments.Registration number: NCT04744129.

Pathophysiology of Migraine

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the current understanding of migraine pathophysiology through insights gained from the extended symptom spectrum of migraine, neuroanatomy, migraine neurochemistry, and therapeutics.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Recent advances in human migraine research, including human experimental migraine models and functional neuroimaging, have provided novel insights into migraine attack initiation, neurochemistry, neuroanatomy, and therapeutic substrates. It has become clear that migraine is a neural disorder, in which a wide range of brain areas and neurochemical systems are implicated, producing a heterogeneous clinical phenotype. Many of these neural pathways are monoaminergic and peptidergic, such as those involving calcitonin gene-related peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. We are currently witnessing an exciting era in which specific drugs targeting these pathways have shown promise in treating migraine, including some studies suggesting efficacy before headache has even started.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Migraine is a brain disorder involving both headache and altered sensory, limbic, and homeostatic processing. A complex interplay between neurotransmitter systems, physiologic systems, and pain processing likely occurs. Targeting various therapeutic substrates within these networks provides an exciting avenue for future migraine therapeutics.

Investigations of the migraine-provoking effect of levcromakalim in patients with migraine with aura

BACKGROUND/HYPOTHESIS

Experimental provocation studies have yielded important insights in migraine pathophysiology. Levcromakalim has been previously shown to induce migraine-like attacks with and without aura. In this study, we aim to further explore the migraine aura-inducing potential of levcromakalim.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study, 27 adult participants with migraine with aura received intravenous infusions of levcromakalim and saline. Headache, aura and associated symptoms were evaluated for 24 hours following administration of the study drug. The primary endpoint was occurrence of migraine-like attacks with or without aura in the 24-hour observation period.

RESULTS

Thirteen participants developed migraine-like attacks on the active day only (P = 0.0098), and four participants developed aura on the active day only (P = 0.68). The median time to onset of migraine-like headache was three hours, and the median time to onset of aura was 27.5 minutes.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

Our findings affirm the potent migraine-inducing effect of levcromakalim. We observed a lower induction-rate of migraine aura than previously reported. Further studies are warranted to identify predictors of migraine aura following levcromakalim.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04905654.

Mast-cell-specific receptor mediates alcohol-withdrawal-associated headache in male mice

Rehabilitation from alcohol addiction or abuse is hampered by withdrawal symptoms including severe headaches, which often lead to rehabilitation failure. There is no appropriate therapeutic option available for alcohol-withdrawal-induced headaches. Here, we show the role of the mast-cell-specific receptor MrgprB2 in the development of alcohol-withdrawal-induced headache. Withdrawing alcohol from alcohol-acclimated mice induces headache behaviors, including facial allodynia, facial pain expressions, and reduced movement, which are symptoms often observed in humans. Those behaviors were absent in MrgprB2-deficient mice during alcohol withdrawal. We observed in vivo spontaneous activation and hypersensitization of trigeminal ganglia (TG) neurons in alcohol-withdrawal WT mice, but not in alcohol-withdrawal MrgprB2-deficient mice. Increased mast cell degranulation by alcohol withdrawal in dura mater was dependent on the presence of MrgprB2. The results indicate that alcohol withdrawal causes headache via MrgprB2 of mast cells in dura mater, suggesting that MrgprB2 is a potential target for treating alcohol-withdrawal-related headaches.

Migraine Comorbidities

Novel knowledge about the interrelationships and reciprocal effects of migraine and epilepsy, migraine and mood disorders, or migraine and irritable bowel syndrome has emerged in recent decades. Over time, comorbid pathologies associated with migraine that share common physiopathological mechanisms were studied. Among these studied pathologies is epilepsy, a disorder with common ion channel dysfunctions as well as dysfunctions in glutamatergic transmission. A high degree of neuronal excitement and ion channel abnormalities are associated with epilepsy and migraine and antiepileptic drugs are useful in treating both disorders. The coexistence of epilepsy and migraine may occur independently in the same individual or the two may be causally connected. The relationship between cortical spreading depression (CSD) and epileptic foci has been suggested by basic and clinical neuroscience research. The most relevant psychiatric comorbidities associated with migraine are anxiety and mood disorders, which influence its clinical course, treatment response, and clinical outcome. The association between migraine and major depressive disorder can be explained by a robust molecular genetic background. In addition to its role as a potent vasodilator, CGRP is also involved in the transmission of nociception, a phenomenon inevitably linked with the stress and anxiety caused by frequent migraine attacks. Another aspect is the role of gut microbiome in migraine's pathology and the gut-brain axis involvement. Irritable bowel syndrome patients are more likely to suffer migraines, according to other studies. There is no precise explanation for how the gut microbiota contributes to neurological disorders in general and migraines in particular. This study aims to show that migraines and comorbid conditions, such as epilepsy, microbiota, or mood disorders, can be connected from the bench to the bedside. It is likely that these comorbid migraine conditions with common pathophysiological mechanisms will have a significant impact on best treatment choices and may provide clues for future treatment options.

Reduction in retinal microvascular perfusion during migraine attacks

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there are changes in structure and function of the retinal vasculature during and between migraine attacks using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

BACKGROUND

Migraine attacks commonly include visual symptoms, but the potential role of the retina in these symptoms is not well understood. OCTA is a rapid, non-invasive imaging technique that is used to visualize the retinal microvasculature with high spatial resolution in a clinical setting. In this study we used OCTA to quantify different features of the retinal vasculature in patients with migraine during and between attacks, as well as in healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of 37 patients with migraine with aura (MA) (median [interquartile range, IQR] age of 37 [14] years, 86% female) and 30 with migraine without aura (MO) (median [IQR] age of 37 [17] years, 77% female) and 20 HCs (median [IQR] age of 35 [7] years, 50% female). Macular OCTA scans were obtained for all participants for the interictal analysis. In 12 MA and eight MO, scans were captured both during and outside of migraine attacks and five HCs had initial and repeat scans. In addition to analyzing the morphology of the foveal avascular zone, we calculated the vessel flux index (VFI), which is an indicator of retinal perfusion and conventional metrics (such as vessel area density) in the foveal and parafoveal regions.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the parafoveal VFI in the ictal state between the groups (p = 0.009). During migraine attacks there was a significant reduction in the parafoveal region VFI in MA (-7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10% to -4%; p = 0.006) and MO (-7%, 95% CI -10% to -3%; p = 0.016) from their interictal baseline as compared to the change between repeat scans in HCs (2%, 95% CI -3% to 7%). Interictally, there was a mean (standard deviation [SD]) 13% (10%) (p = 0.003) lower blood perfusion in the MA group as compared to the MO group in the foveal region (mean [SD] 0.093 [0.023] vs. 0.107 [0.021], p = 0.003). Interictal analysis also revealed higher circularity in the superficial foveal avascular zone in the MA group compared with the MO group (mean [SD] 0.686 [0.088] vs. 0.629 [0.120], p = 0.004). In addition, interictal analysis of the patients with MA or MO and unilateral headache showed increased retinal vascular parameters consistent with greater perfusion in the eye ipsilateral to the side of the pain as compared with the contralateral eye.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that perfusion is reduced in MA and MO in the parafoveal retina during the ictal period. Interictally, the foveal retina in MA has reduced perfusion when compared to the foveal retina in MO. Patients with unilateral headache showed interictal asymmetry of retinal perfusion between eyes. These results indicate that changes in retinal perfusion could be a part of migraine pathophysiology, and that distinct retinal vascular signatures identified with OCTA could represent biomarkers for migraine.

Targeting CGRP pathways and aura: A peripheral site with a central effect

Targeting CGRP-pathways has substantially expanded our options for treating individuals with migraine. Although the efficacy of these drugs on migraine aura is yet to be fully revealed, it seems from existing studies that CGRP antagonism reduces the number of migraine auras. The present perspective summarizes the evidence linking CGRP to the migraine aura and proposes a model by which targeting the CGRP-pathways and, thus, inhibition the interaction between C- and Aδ-trigeminal fibers might reverse a possible high cortical glutamate level leading to a reduced number of migraine auras.

Second messenger signalling bypasses CGRP receptor blockade to provoke migraine attacks in humans

There are several endogenous molecules that can trigger migraine attacks when administered to humans. Notably, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been identified as a key player in a signalling cascade involved in migraine attacks, acting through the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in various cells, including intracranial vascular smooth muscle cells. However, it remains unclear whether intracellular cAMP signalling requires CGRP receptor activation during a migraine attack in humans. To address this question, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial using a human provocation model involving the administration of CGRP and cilostazol in individuals with migraine pretreated with erenumab or placebo. Our study revealed that migraine attacks can be provoked in patients by cAMP-mediated mechanisms using cilostazol, even when the CGRP receptor is blocked by erenumab. Furthermore, the dilation of cranial arteries induced by cilostazol was not influenced by the CGRP receptor blockade. These findings provide clinical evidence that cAMP-evoked migraine attacks do not require CGRP receptor activation. This discovery opens up new possibilities for the development of mechanism-based drugs for the treatment of migraine.

Neurovascular Compression-Induced Intracranial Allodynia May Be the True Nature of Migraine Headache: an Interpretative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgical deactivation of migraine trigger sites by extracranial neurovascular decompression has produced encouraging results and challenged previous understanding of primary headaches. However, there is a lack of in-depth discussions on the pathophysiological basis of migraine surgery. This narrative review provides interpretation of relevant literature from the perspective of compressive neuropathic etiology, pathogenesis, and pathophysiology of migraine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vasodilation, which can be asymptomatic in healthy subjects, may produce compression of cranial nerves in migraineurs at both extracranial and intracranial entrapment-prone sites. This may be predetermined by inherited and acquired anatomical factors and may include double crush-type lesions. Neurovascular compression can lead to sensitization of the trigeminal pathways and resultant cephalic hypersensitivity. While descending (central) trigeminal activation is possible, symptomatic intracranial sensitization can probably only occur in subjects who develop neurovascular entrapment of cranial nerves, which can explain why migraine does not invariably afflict everyone. Nerve compression-induced focal neuroinflammation and sensitization of any cranial nerve may neurogenically spread to other cranial nerves, which can explain the clinical complexity of migraine. Trigger dose-dependent alternating intensity of sensitization and its synchrony with cyclic central neural activities, including asymmetric nasal vasomotor oscillations, may explain the laterality and phasic nature of migraine pain. Intracranial allodynia, i.e., pain sensation upon non-painful stimulation, may better explain migraine pain than merely nociceptive mechanisms, because migraine cannot be associated with considerable intracranial structural changes and consequent painful stimuli. Understanding migraine as an intracranial allodynia could stimulate research aimed at elucidating the possible neuropathic compressive etiology of migraine and other primary headaches.

Towards precision medicine in migraine: Recent therapeutic advances and potential biomarkers to understand heterogeneity and treatment response

After 35 years since the introduction of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD), we are living in the era of the second great revolution in migraine therapies. First, discoveries of triptans provided a breakthrough in acute migraine treatment utilizing bench-to-bedside research results on the role of serotonin in migraine. Next, the discovery of the role of neuropeptides, more specifically calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine attack led to the development of anti-CGRP therapies that are effective both in acute and preventive treatment, and are also able to reduce migraine-related burden. Here, we reviewed the most recent clinical studies and real-world data on available migraine-specific medications, including triptans, ditants, gepants and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Novel drug targets, such as PACAP and amylins were also discussed. To address the main challenges of migraine therapy, the high heterogeneity of people with migraine, the prevalent presence of various comorbid disorders, and the insufficient medical care of migraine patients were covered. Promising novel approaches from the fields of omics, blood and saliva biomarker, imaging and provocation studies might bring solutions for these challenges with the potential to identify further drug targets, distinguish more homogeneous patient subgroups, contribute to more optimal drug selection strategies, and detect biomarkers in association with headache features or predicting treatment efficacy. In the future, the combined analysis of data of different biomarker modalities with machine learning algorithms may serve precision medicine in migraine treatment.

Serological Biomarkers of Chronic Migraine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic migraine (CM) is a chronic form of migraine that differs from episodic migraine (EM) in terms of prevalence, comorbidities, response to treatment, and biomarkers. The aim of this review was to summarize the recent findings on serological biomarkers of CM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuronal, inflammatory, and vascular markers have been investigated to assess their diagnostic and prognostic ability and treatment effectiveness. Several markers showed significant alterations according to disease status and treatment response in CM. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), glutamate, and adiponectin appear to be the most promising blood biomarkers for CM. Most studies have shown altered ictal and interictal levels of these markers in CM compared with those in EM and controls. Additionally, they showed a significant association with treatment outcomes. Total adiponectin and high-molecular-weight adiponectin levels were less studied as biomarkers of CM than CGRP and glutamate levels but showed promising results. The development of suitable biomarkers could revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of CM and ultimately decrease the disability and societal costs of the disease.

Profiling migraine patients according to clinical and psychophysical characteristics: a cluster analysis approach

AIM

This study aims to profile migraine patients according clinical and psychophysical characteristics.

METHOD

In this observational study, two cohorts of migraine patients(episodic/chronic) were included. Cohort-1: ictal/perictal phase; Cohort-2: interictal phase.The following variables were assessed: headache frequency; disability; cervical active range of motion(AROM) in flexion, extension, right/left lateral flexion, right/left rotation; pressure-pain threshold(PPT) over: temporalis, two cervical areas(C1/C4 vertebral segments), and two distal pain-free areas(hand/leg). Cluster analysis was performed using the K-means algorithm. Differences across clusters were investigated.

RESULTS

Cohort-1: 100 patients were included, and two clusters were identified. Cluster-1.1 (19%), Cluster-1.2 (81%). Cluster 1.1 had a higher percentage of men (P = .037) and higher disability (P = .003) compared to Clusters 1.2. Cluster 1.2 had reduced AROM in flexion, extension, and left/right lateral flexion (P < .037), and lower PPT value in all areas (P < .001) compared to Cluster 1.1. Cohort-2: 98 patients were included and three clusters were identified. Cluster-2.1(18%), Cluster-2.2(45%), and Cluster-2.3(37%). Cluster-2.1 had a higher percentage of men compared to clusters-2.2 and 2.3 (P = .009). Cluster-2.3 had higher headache frequency, and disability compared to Cluster-2.2 (P < .006), and higher disability compared to Cluster-2.1 (P = .010). Cluster-2.3 had reduced AROM in all directions compared to Clusters-2.1 and 2.2 (P < .029). Clusters-2.2 and 2.3 have lower PPT values in all areas compared to Cluster-1.1 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In the Ictal/perictal phase, two clusters were identified according to clinical and psychophysical characteristics, with one group showing no psychophysical impairment and one with increased pain-sensitivity and cervical musculoskeletal-dysfunctions.In the interictal phase, three clusters could be identified, with one group showing no psychophysical impairment, one increased pain-sensitivity, and one increased pain sensitivity and cervical musculoskeletal-dysfunctions.

Genetic Mechanisms of Migraine: Insights from Monogenic Migraine Mutations

Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder burdening patients globally. Through the increasing development of preclinical and clinical experimental migraine models, advancing appreciation of the extended clinical phenotype, and functional neuroimaging studies, we can further our understanding of the neurobiological basis of this highly disabling condition. Despite increasing understanding of the molecular and chemical architecture of migraine mechanisms, many areas require further investigation. Research over the last three decades has suggested that migraine has a strong genetic basis, based on the positive family history in most patients, and this has steered exploration into possibly implicated genes. In recent times, human genome-wide association studies and rodent genetic migraine models have facilitated our understanding, but most migraine seems polygenic, with the monogenic migraine mutations being considerably rarer, so further large-scale studies are required to elucidate fully the genetic underpinnings of migraine and the translation of these to clinical practice. The monogenic migraine mutations cause severe aura phenotypes, amongst other symptoms, and offer valuable insights into the biology of aura and the relationship between migraine and other conditions, such as vascular disease and sleep disorders. This review will provide an outlook of what is known about some monogenic migraine mutations, including familial hemiplegic migraine, familial advanced sleep-phase syndrome, and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy.

The Role of Glial Cells in Different Phases of Migraine: Lessons from Preclinical Studies

Migraine is a complex and debilitating neurological disease that affects 15% of the population worldwide. It is defined by the presence of recurrent severe attacks of disabling headache accompanied by other debilitating neurological symptoms. Important advancements have linked the trigeminovascular system and the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide to migraine pathophysiology, but the mechanisms underlying its pathogenesis and chronification remain unknown. Glial cells are essential for the correct development and functioning of the nervous system and, due to its implication in neurological diseases, have been hypothesised to have a role in migraine. Here we provide a narrative review of the role of glia in different phases of migraine through the analysis of preclinical studies. Current evidence shows that astrocytes and microglia are involved in the initiation and propagation of cortical spreading depolarization, the neurophysiological correlate of migraine aura. Furthermore, satellite glial cells within the trigeminal ganglia are implicated in the initiation and maintenance of orofacial pain, suggesting a role in the headache phase of migraine. Moreover, microglia in the trigeminocervical complex are involved in central sensitization, suggesting a role in chronic migraine. Taken altogether, glial cells have emerged as key players in migraine pathogenesis and chronification and future therapeutic strategies could be focused on targeting them to reduce the burden of migraine.

Migraine Treatment: Towards New Pharmacological Targets

Migraine is a debilitating neurological condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Until a few years ago, preventive migraine treatments were based on molecules with pleiotropic targets, developed for other indications, and discovered by serendipity to be effective in migraine prevention, although often burdened by tolerability issues leading to low adherence. However, the progresses in unravelling the migraine pathophysiology allowed identifying novel putative targets as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Nevertheless, despite the revolution brought by CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants, a significant percentage of patients still remains burdened by an unsatisfactory response, suggesting that other pathways may play a critical role, with an extent of involvement varying among different migraine patients. Specifically, neuropeptides of the CGRP family, such as adrenomedullin and amylin; molecules of the secretin family, such as pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP); receptors, such as transient receptor potential (TRP) channels; intracellular downstream determinants, such as potassium channels, but also the opioid system and the purinergic pathway, have been suggested to be involved in migraine pathophysiology. The present review provides an overview of these pathways, highlighting, based on preclinical and clinical evidence, as well as provocative studies, their potential role as future targets for migraine preventive treatment.

Molecular Mechanisms of Migraine: Nitric Oxide Synthase and Neuropeptides

Migraine is a common condition with disabling attacks that burdens people in the prime of their working lives. Despite years of research into migraine pathophysiology and therapeutics, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms at play in this complex neurovascular condition. Additionally, there remains a relative paucity of specific and targeted therapies available. Many sufferers remain underserved by currently available broad action preventive strategies, which are also complicated by poor tolerance and adverse effects. The development of preclinical migraine models in the laboratory, and the advances in human experimental migraine provocation, have led to the identification of key molecules likely involved in the molecular circuity of migraine, and have provided novel therapeutic targets. Importantly, the identification that vasoconstriction is neither necessary nor required for headache abortion has changed the landscape of migraine treatment and has broadened the therapy targets for patients with vascular risk factors or vascular disease. These targets include nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and several neuropeptides that are involved in migraine. The ability of NO donors and infusion of some of these peptides into humans to trigger typical migraine-like attacks has supported the development of targeted therapies against these molecules. Some of these, such as those targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), have already reached clinical practice and are displaying a positive outcome in migraineurs for the better by offering targeted efficacy without significant adverse effects. Others, such as those targeting pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP), are showing promise and are likely to enter phase 3 clinical trials in the near future. Understanding these nitrergic and peptidergic mechanisms in migraine and their interactions is likely to lead to further therapeutic strategies for migraine in the future.

Debate: differences and similarities between tension-type headache and migraine

Tension-type headache (TTH) and migraine are two common primary headaches distinguished by clinical characteristics according to the 3^rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders. Migraine is identified by specific features such as being more prevalent in females, being aggravated by physical activity, certain genetic factors, having photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, vomiting, or aura, and responding to specific drugs. Nonetheless, TTH and migraine share some common characteristics, such as onset occurring in the 20 s, and being triggered by psychological factors like stress, moderate pain severity, and mild nausea in chronic TTH. Both conditions involve the trigeminovascular system in their pathophysiology. However, distinguishing between TTH and migraine in clinical practice, research, and epidemiological studies can be challenging, as there is a lack of specific diagnostic tests and biomarkers. Moreover, both conditions may coexist, further complicating the diagnostic process. This review aims to explore the similarities and differences in the pathophysiology, epidemiology, burden and disability, comorbidities, and responses to pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments of TTH and migraine. The review also discusses future research directions to address the diagnostic challenges and improve the understanding and management of these conditions.

Meningeal Mechanisms and the Migraine Connection

Migraine is a complex neurovascular pain disorder linked to the meninges, a border tissue innervated by neuropeptide-containing primary afferent fibers chiefly from the trigeminal nerve. Electrical or mechanical stimulation of this nerve surrounding large blood vessels evokes headache patterns as in migraine, and the brain, blood, and meninges are likely sources of headache triggers. Cerebrospinal fluid may play a significant role in migraine by transferring signals released from the brain to overlying pain-sensitive meningeal tissues, including dura mater. Interactions between trigeminal afferents, neuropeptides, and adjacent meningeal cells and tissues cause neurogenic inflammation, a critical target for current prophylactic and abortive migraine therapies. Here we review the importance of the cranial meninges to migraine headaches, explore the properties of trigeminal meningeal afferents, and briefly review emerging concepts, such as meningeal neuroimmune interactions, that may one day prove therapeutically relevant.

The human NTG model of migraine in drug discovery and development

INTRODUCTION

Various triggers can originate a migraine attack. In healthy volunteers and patients with migraine, the nitroglycerin (NTG) provocation model induces a headache that resembles migraine in pain characteristics and vascular manifestations. This headache is reversible and treatable in monitored conditions, providing an opportunity to test novel antimigraine medications in early clinical development.

AREAS COVERED

This perspective covers the main characteristics and applications of the human NTG model of migraine with effective and ineffective antimigraine therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

The NTG model represents a potential de-risking strategy to test novel hypotheses for antimigraine mechanisms in humans. Considering previous studies conducted with effective and ineffective antimigraine therapies, the sensitivity of the model was 71% while the specificity was 100%. The probability that following an analgesic effect, that compound would truly be efficacious in individuals with migraine was 100%. Following a negative result, the probability that such compound would truly be ineffective in patients with individuals was 33%. A clinical trial testing the analgesic properties of novel compounds after a sublingual and/or intravenous NTG challenge in migraine patients may support a subsequent phase 2 trial for the treatment of migraine.

The ATP sensitive potassium channel (KATP) is a novel target for migraine drug development

Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, affecting work and social life. It has been estimated that sales of migraine medicines will reach 12.9 billion USD in 2027. To reduce social impact, migraine treatments must improve, and the ATP-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channel is a promising target because of the growing evidence of its implications in the pathogenesis of migraine. Strong human data show that opening of the K_ATP channel using levcromakalim is the most potent headache and migraine trigger ever tested as it induces headache in almost all healthy subjects and migraine attacks in 100% of migraine sufferers. This review will address the basics of the K_ATP channel together with clinical and preclinical data on migraine implications. We argue that K_ATP channel blocking, especially the Kir6.1/SUR2B subtype, may be a target for migraine drug development, however translational issues remain. There are no human data on the closure of the K_ATP channel, although blocking the channel is effective in animal models of migraine. We believe there is a good likelihood that an antagonist of the Kir6.1/SUR2B subtype of the K_ATP channel will be effective in the treatment of migraine. The side effects of such a blocker may be an issue for clinical use, but the risk is likely only moderate. Future clinical trials of a selective Kir6.1/SUR2B blocker will answer these questions.

Future targets for migraine treatment beyond CGRP

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a disabling and chronic neurovascular headache disorder. Trigeminal vascular activation and release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of migraine. This knowledge has led to the development of CGRP(-receptor) therapies. Yet, a substantial proportion of patients do not respond to these treatments. Therefore, alternative targets for future therapies are warranted. The current narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological role of these possible non-CGRP targets in migraine.

FINDINGS

We covered targets of the metabotropic receptors (pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), amylin, and adrenomedullin), intracellular targets (nitric oxide (NO), phosphodiesterase-3 (PDE3) and -5 (PDE5)), and ion channels (potassium, calcium, transient receptor potential (TRP), and acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC)). The majority of non-CGRP targets were able to induce migraine-like attacks, except for (i) calcium channels, as it is not yet possible to directly target channels to elucidate their precise involvement in migraine; (ii) TRP channels, activation of which can induce non-migraine headache; and (iii) ASICs, as their potential in inducing migraine attacks has not been investigated thus far. Drugs that target its receptors exist for PACAP, NO, and the potassium, TRP, and ASIC channels. No selective drugs exist for the other targets, however, some existing (migraine) treatments appear to indirectly antagonize responses to amylin, adrenomedullin, and calcium channels. Drugs against PACAP, NO, potassium channels, TRP channels, and only a PAC₁ antibody have been tested for migraine treatment, albeit with ambiguous results.

CONCLUSION

While current research on these non-CGRP drug targets has not yet led to the development of efficacious therapies, human provocation studies using these targets have provided valuable insight into underlying mechanisms of migraine headaches and auras. Further studies are needed on these alternative therapies in non-responders of CGRP(-receptor) targeted therapies with the ultimate aim to pave the way towards a headache-free future for all migraine patients.

Ketosis and migraine: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Introduction

Headaches are a prevalent disorder worldwide, and there is compelling evidence that certain dietary interventions could provide relief from attacks. One promising approach is ketogenic therapy, which replaces the brain's glucose fuel source with ketone bodies, potentially reducing the frequency or severity of headaches.

Aim

This study aims to conduct a systematic review of the scientific literature on the impact of ketosis on migraine, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method.

Results

After a careful selection process and bias evaluation, 10 articles were included in the review, primarily from Italy. The bias assessment indicated that 50% of the selected articles had a low risk of bias in all domains, with the randomization process being the most problematic domain. Unfortunately, the evaluation of ketosis was inconsistent between articles, with some assessing ketonuria, some assessing ketonemia, and some not assessing ketosis levels at all. Therefore, no association could be made between the level of ketosis and the prevention or reduction of migraine attacks. The ketogenic therapies tested in migraine treatments included the very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD, n = 4), modified Atkins diet (MAD, n = 3), classic ketogenic diet (cKDT, n = 2), and the administration of an exogenous source of beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB). The meta-analysis, despite reporting high heterogeneity, found that all interventions had an overall significant effect (Z = 9.07, p < 0.00001; subgroup differences, Chi2 = 9.19, dif = 3, p = 0.03; I², 67.4%), regardless of the type of endogenous or exogenous induction of ketosis.

Conclusion

The initial findings of this study suggest that metabolic ketogenic therapy may provide some benefit in treating migraines and encourage further studies, especially randomized clinical trials with appropriate and standardized methodologies. The review strongly recommends the use of the adequate measurement of ketone levels during ketogenic therapy to monitor adherence to the treatment and improve knowledge of the relationship between ketone bodies and efficacy.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022330626.

Regional cerebral perfusion during the premonitory phase of triggered migraine: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled functional imaging study using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling

OBJECTIVE

To identify changes in regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) associated with premonitory symptoms (PS) of nitroglycerin (NTG)-triggered migraine attacks.

BACKGROUND

PS could provide insights into attack initiation and alterations in neuronal function prior to headache onset.

METHODS

We undertook a functional imaging study using a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized approach in patients with migraine who spontaneously experienced PS, and in whom PS and migraine-like headache could be induced by administration of NTG. All study visits took place in a dedicated clinical research facility housing a monitoring area with clinical beds next to a 3Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Fifty-three patients with migraine were enrolled; imaging on at least one triggered visit was obtained from 25 patients, with 21 patients completing the entire imaging protocol including a placebo visit. Whole brain CBF maps were acquired using 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (3D pCASL).

RESULTS

The primary outcome was that patients with migraine not taking preventive treatment (n = 12) displayed significant increases in CBF in anterior cingulate cortex, caudate, midbrain, lentiform, amygdala and hippocampus (p < 0.05 family-wise error-corrected) during NTG-induced PS. A separate region of interest analysis revealed significant CBF increases in the region of the hypothalamus (p = 0.006, effect size 0.77). Post hoc analyses revealed significant reductions in CBF over the occipital cortices in participants with a history of migraine with underlying aura (n = 14).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified significant regional CBF changes associated with NTG-induced PS, consistent with other investigations and with novel findings, withstanding statistical comparison against placebo. These findings were not present in patients who continually took preventive medication. Additional findings were identified only in participants who experience migraine with aura. Understanding this biological and treatment-related heterogeneity is vital to evaluating functional imaging outcomes in migraine research.

The effect of Lu AG09222 on PACAP38- and VIP-induced vasodilation, heart rate increase, and headache in healthy subjects: an interventional, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), structurally related to vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), is one of the important mediators in the pathogenesis of migraine and is known to dilate cranial arteries and induce headache and migraine. Our objective was to determine whether Lu AG09222-an investigational humanized monoclonal antibody directed against PACAP ligand-would inhibit the PACAP-signaling cascade by abolishing its vasodilatory and headache-inducing abilities.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, single-dose, placebo-controlled study of Lu AG09222, healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years without history of headache disorders were randomly allocated to three treatment sequences (1:2:2) on two experimental infusion visits with 9 ± 3 days' interval: placebo + saline + saline (n = 5), placebo + PACAP38 + VIP (n = 10), and Lu AG09222 + PACAP38 + VIP (n = 10). The primary outcome measure was area under the curve (AUC) of the change in superficial temporal artery (STA) diameter from 0 to 120 min after start of infusion of PACAP38. The study was conducted at the Danish Headache Center in Copenhagen, Denmark.

RESULTS

In participants who received Lu AG09222 + PACAP38 infusion, there was a significantly lower STA diameter (mean (SE) [95% CI] AUC ‒35.4 (4.32) [‒44.6, ‒26.3] mm × min; P < 0.0001) compared to participants who received placebo + PACAP38 infusion. Secondary and explorative analysis revealed that PACAP38 infusion induced an increase in facial blood flow, heart rate and mild headache, and indicated that these PACAP38-induced responses were inhibited by Lu AG09222.

CONCLUSIONS

This proof-of-mechanism study demonstrated that Lu AG09222 inhibited PACAP38-induced cephalic vasodilation and increases in heart rate, and reduced concomitant headache. Lu AG09222 may be a potential therapy against migraine and other PACAP-mediated diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04976309. Registration date: July 19, 2021.