Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease

Oral factor xia inhibitor milvexian after a recent acute coronary syndrome: Rationale and design of the phase 3 (Librexia ACS)

BACKGROUND

Despite current antiplatelet therapy, patients remain at risk of recurrent ischemic events after acute coronary syndromes (ACS), which may reflect persistently elevated thrombin generation. Factor XIa inhibition reduces thrombin generation and may improve clinical outcomes with minimal bleeding risk.

DESIGN

Librexia ACS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05754957) is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial to test the efficacy and safety of milvexian, an oral, selective factor XIa inhibitor, in addition to conventional antiplatelet therapy after a recent ACS. Eligibility criteria include symptoms of spontaneous ischemia, a diagnosis of ACS and cardiac biomarker elevation indicative of myonecrosis within 7 days before randomization, along with at least 2 risk-enhancing factors. Participants are randomly assigned to oral milvexian (25 mg twice daily) or a matched placebo. Randomization is stratified according to the planned duration and type of antiplatelet therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint is the time to first occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemic stroke that will enroll approximately 16,000 patients with follow-up until 875 events are accrued. The first major secondary endpoint is time to the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, MI, ischemic stroke, major adverse limb events, and symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety endpoint is Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3c or 5 bleeding.

SUMMARY

The Librexia-ACS trial will determine the efficacy and safety of milvexian after ACS and will be the first trial to test whether factor XIa inhibition in addition to standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy reduces major adverse cardiovascular events without an increased risk of significant bleeding.

The effect of colchicine on coagulation in patients with chronic coronary disease who use vitamin K antagonists

BACKGROUND

Low-dose (0.5 mg/day) colchicine improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease. Around 10-15% of these patients simultaneously use anticoagulant therapy, including vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs). In vitro studies and case reports have described a possible interaction between colchicine and VKAs leading to increased INR, but controlled studies are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate if there is a drug-drug interaction between low-dose colchicine and VKAs in patients with chronic coronary disease.

METHODS

This study was a sub-analysis of the randomized low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2 (LoDoCo2) trial. This placebo-controlled trial investigated efficacy of colchicine 0.5 mg once daily in patients with chronic coronary disease. For the current study, we included a selection of Dutch patients who concomitantly used a VKA. Following a 30 days open-label colchicine run-in phase, patients were randomized to colchicine or placebo. The primary outcome was the intra-patient difference in international normalized ratio (INR) during the first month after starting or stopping colchicine as compared to the preceding month. Secondary outcomes included changes in VKA daily dosage, assessed in the same pattern and before and after randomization, and time in therapeutic range (TTR), assessed before and after randomization to reflect long-term effects. INR measurements were part of routine clinical care.

RESULTS

In total, 73 patients were included (35 colchicine and 38 in the placebo group). No significant intra-patient change in INR was observed after starting colchicine during the open-label run-in phase (mean INR: 2.60 before vs. 2.67 during run-in, difference 0.07, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.26; p = 0.50). Similarly, stopping colchicine treatment (i.e., randomization to placebo) did not significantly alter INR levels (mean INR: 2.70 during run-in vs. 2.81 after randomization, difference 0.11, 95% CI - 0.12 to 0.33; p = 0.34). The change in mean VKA daily dosage was - 0.01 mg (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01; p = 0.35) when starting colchicine and - 0.01 mg (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01; p = 0.41) when switching to placebo. TTR in patients allocated to active treatment was 65.8% in the year prior to the start of colchicine and 73.4% in the year after randomization to colchicine (change in TTR 7.56%, 95% CI - 0.14 to 15.26%; p = 0.05). Mean VKA dosage remained similar (change in VKA dosage of 0.01 mg; 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.13 mg; p = 0.84).

CONCLUSION

No significant changes in INR, VKA dosage, or TTR in patients using VKAs after starting or stopping colchicine were observed. These results suggest that there is no need for additional INR monitoring beyond the standard of care when using low-dose colchicine, though further studies in larger populations would help to confirm this conclusion.

Research priorities for peripheral artery disease: A statement from the Society for Vascular Medicine

Lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects approximately 236 million people worldwide and at least eight million people in the United States (US). Despite availability of new therapies that prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), these and major adverse limb events (MALE) remain common and occur more frequently in people with PAD, either with or without coronary artery disease (CAD), compared to people with CAD who do not have PAD. The most effective therapies to prevent cardiovascular events are not identical in people with PAD and those with CAD. Walking impairment and the risk of lower-extremity amputation are significantly greater in people with PAD compared to those without PAD. This report from the Society for Vascular Medicine (SVM) proposes and summarizes high-priority topics for scientific investigation in PAD, with the goal of improving health outcomes in people with PAD. To develop this report, a multidisciplinary team of scientists and clinicians reviewed literature, proposed high-priority topics for scientific investigation, and voted to rank the highest priority topics for scientific investigation. Priorities for clinical scientific investigation include: determine the current prevalence of PAD in the US by age, sex, race, and ethnicity; improve methods to diagnose PAD; develop new medical therapies to eliminate walking impairment; and improve implementation of established therapies to reduce rates of MACE and MALE in people with PAD. Priorities in basic science and translational science investigation include: developing animal models that closely resemble the vascular, skeletal muscle, and platelet pathology in patients with PAD and defining the genetic and epigenetic contributors to PAD and PAD-associated outcomes. Successful investigation of these research priorities will require more well-trained investigators focused on scientific investigation of PAD, greater and more efficient enrollment of diverse patients with PAD in randomized clinical trials, and increased research funding dedicated to PAD.

Long-term Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: An Updated Review of Current Evidence

PURPOSE

Despite improvements in the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis in patients with coronary artery disease during the past decade, it is estimated that approximately 19 million people annually die from cardiovascular diseases worldwide. Atherothrombosis remains the core pathobiology of acute complications including myocardial infarction (MI), and therefore, antithrombotic therapy plays a pivotal role in the strategies for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) prevention. Unlike early antithrombotic management after acute coronary syndrome, less evidence is available on long-term antithrombotic therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). In addition, greater recognition of the impact of bleeding complications of such therapies has led to a more complex and personalized approach to their application. The purpose of this article is to review the available evidence on long-term antithrombotic therapy in patients with CCS including those with high-risk characteristics such as prior MI or polyvascular disease.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed in major databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The main focus of this narrative review was on available data from guidelines, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies that assessed the efficacy and safety profile of long-term antithrombotic therapy in patients with CCS.

FINDINGS

Several studies suggest that long-term antithrombotic therapy is effective in reducing the risk of recurrent MACEs in patients with CCS. Current clinical guidelines recommend single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin as a first-line long-term strategy for patients without indication for oral anticoagulation. However, novel approaches focused on P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are emerging. More intensive antithrombotic strategies including long-term dual antiplatelet therapy and dual pathway inhibition further reduce ischemic risk but at the cost of increased bleeding.

IMPLICATIONS

This review highlights the importance of close monitoring and regular reassessment of the risk-benefit balance of antithrombotic therapy in patients with CCS. Overall, long-term antithrombotic therapy with either single antiplatelet therapy or dual antiplatelet therapy/dual pathway inhibition is effective in reducing the risk of MACEs in patients with CCS. The choice of antithrombotic therapy should be individualized based on the patient's clinical profile, particularly for thrombohemorrhagic risk. Future research should focus on identifying the optimal antithrombotic regimen for specific subgroups of patients with prior MI particularly for those with high bleeding risk.

Future of factor XI inhibitors in cardiovascular practice

Anticoagulation is indicated for treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thrombosis. Targeting different steps of the coagulation process, currently available anticoagulants entail an increased risk of bleeding, which detrimentally impacts on prognosis and hinders the administration of an effective antithrombotic regimen. Factor XI (FXI) inhibition has emerged as a strategy to uncouple prevention of thrombosis from bleeding. Indeed, while FXI is crucial for the amplification phase in pathological thrombosis, it is ancillary in physiological hemostasis. A comprehensive search in several scientific databases has been performed to identify relevant studies in the field. In addition, ongoing trials have been searched for in proper datasets to provide an updated and comprehensive assessment of the current state of investigations on FXI inhibition. Many compounds have been tested to inhibit FXI at different stages (i.e., synthesis, activation, or interactions with target molecules and coagulation factors). These include antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, natural peptides and aptamers. In phase 2 studies, FXI inhibitors reduced thrombotic complications without any corresponding increase in bleeding. FXI inhibitors were noninferior and potentially superior to low-molecular-weight heparin in orthopedic surgery and reduced bleeding compared to apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. FXI inhibition is also under testing in other conditions, including end-stage renal disease, cancer, or noncardioembolic stroke. FXI inhibition represents a promising and rapidly emerging approach for a number of clinical indications. This article reviews the rationale, evidence, pharmacology, and future applications of FXI inhibition.

Stroke Prognosis: The Impact of Combined Thrombotic, Lipid, and Inflammatory Markers

AIM

D-dimer, lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are known predictors of vascular events; however, their impact on the stroke prognosis is unclear. This study used data from the Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III) to assess their combined effect on functional disability and mortality after acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

In total, 9,450 adult patients with AIS were enrolled between August 2015 and March 2018. Patients were categorized based on a cutoff value for D-dimer, Lp(a), and hs-CRP in the plasma. Adverse outcomes included poor functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS score ≥ 3)) and one- year all-cause mortality. Logistic and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between individual and combined biomarkers and adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients with elevated levels of all three biomarkers had the highest odds of functional disability (OR adjusted: 2.01; 95% CI (1.47-2.74); P＜0.001) and mortality (HR adjusted: 2.93; 95% CI (1.55-5.33); P＜0.001). The combined biomarkers improved the predictive accuracy for disability (C-statistic 0.80 vs.0.79, P＜0.001) and mortality (C-statistic 0.79 vs.0.78, P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Elevated D-dimer, Lp(a), and hs-CRP levels together increase the risk of functional disability and mortality one-year post-AIS more than any single biomarker.

Clinical Practice Guideline for detection and management of diabetic kidney disease: A consensus report by the Spanish Society of Nephrology

To address all the changes in the management of people with diabetes (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), under the auspices of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group (GEENDIAB) decided to publish an updated Clinical Practice Guideline for detection and management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). It is aimed at a wide audience of clinicians treating diabetes and CKD. The terminology of kidney disease in diabetic patients has evolved toward a more inclusive nomenclature that avoids underdiagnosis of this entity. Thus, the terms "diabetes and kidney disease" and "diabetic kidney disease" are those proposed in the latest KDIGO 2022 guidelines to designate the whole spectrum of patients who can benefit from a comprehensive therapeutic approach only differentiated according to eGFR range and albuminuria. Recommendations have been divided into five main areas of interest: Chapter 1: Screening and diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease, Chapter 2: Metabolic control in people with diabetes and CKD, Chapter 3: Blood pressure control in people with diabetic kidney disease, Chapter 4: Treatment targeting progression of CKD in people with diabetic kidney disease, and Chapter 5: Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in people with diabetes and CKD. World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for guideline development were followed to report this guideline. Systematic reviews were carried out, with outcome ratings and summaries of findings, and we reported the strength of recommendations following the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" GRADE evidence profiles.

Machine learning in cardiovascular risk assessment: Towards a precision medicine approach

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Validated risk scores are the basis of guideline-recommended care, but most scores lack the capacity to integrate complex and multidimensional data. Limitations inherent to traditional risk prediction models and the growing burden of residual cardiovascular risk highlight the need for refined strategies that go beyond conventional paradigms. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) provide unique opportunities to refine cardiovascular risk assessment and surveillance through the integration of diverse data types and sources, including clinical, electrocardiographic, imaging and multi-omics derived data. In fact, ML models, such as deep neural networks, can handle high-dimensional data through which phenotyping and cardiovascular risk assessment across diverse patient populations become much more precise, fostering a paradigm shift towards more personalized care. Here, we review the role of ML in advancing cardiovascular risk assessment and discuss its potential to identify novel therapeutic targets and to improve prevention strategies. We also discuss key challenges inherent to ML, such as data quality, standardized reporting, model transparency and validation, and discuss barriers in its clinical translation. We highlight the transformative potential of ML in precision cardiology and advocate for more personalized cardiovascular prevention strategies that go beyond previous notions.

Pragmatic monitoring of emerging efficacy data in randomized controlled trials

Monitoring the conduct of phase III randomized controlled trials is driven by ethical reasons to protect the study integrity and the safety of trial participants. We propose a group sequential, pragmatic approach for monitoring the accumulating efficacy information in randomized controlled trials. The "Population Health Research Institute boundary" is simple to implement and sensible, as it considers the reduction in uncertainty with increasing information as the study progresses. It is also pragmatic, since it takes into consideration the typical monitoring behavior of monitoring committees of large multicenter trials and is relatively easily implemented. It not only controls the overall Lan-DeMets type I error probability (alpha) spent, but performs better than other group sequential boundaries for the total nominal study alpha. We illustrate the use of our monitoring approach in the early termination of two past completed trials.

Detecting irregularities in randomized controlled trials using machine learning

BACKGROUND

Over the course of a clinical trial, irregularities may arise in the data. Trialists implement human-intensive, expensive central statistical monitoring procedures to identify and correct these irregularities before the results of the trial are analyzed and disseminated. Machine learning algorithms have shown promise for identifying center-level irregularities in multi-center clinical trials with minimal human intervention. We aimed to characterize the form-level data irregularities in several historical clinical trials and evaluate the ability of a machine learning-based outlier detection algorithm to identify them.

METHODS

Data irregularities previously identified by humans in historical clinical trials were ascertained by comparing preliminary snapshots of the trial databases to the final, locked databases. We measured the ability of a machine learning based outlier detection algorithm to identify form-level irregularities using concordance (area under the receiver operator characteristic), positive predictive value (precision), and sensitivity (recall).

RESULTS

We examined preliminary snapshots of seven historical clinical trials which randomized a total of 77,001 participants. We extracted a total of 1,267,484 completed entries from 358 case report forms containing irregularities from all snapshots across all trials, containing a total of 24,850 form-wide irregularities (median per-form form-level irregularity rate: 1.81%). Our proposed machine learning algorithm detects form-level irregularities with a median concordance of 0.74 (interquartile range = 0.57-0.89), slightly exceeding the performance of a previously proposed machine learning approach with a median area under the receiver operator characteristic of 0.73 (interquartile range = 0.54-0.88).

CONCLUSION

Data irregularities in historical clinical trials were ascertained by comparing preliminary snapshots of the trial database to the final database. These irregularities can be categorized according to their scope. Irregularities can be successfully detected by a machine learning algorithm as early or earlier than a human can, without human intervention. Such an approach may complement existing techniques for central statistical monitoring in large multi-center randomized controlled trials and possibly improve the efficiency of costly data verification processes.

Prediction of Major Adverse Limb Events in Females with Peripheral Artery Disease using Blood-Based Biomarkers and Clinical Features

The objective of this study was to identify a female-specific prognostic biomarker for peripheral artery disease (PAD) and develop a prediction model for 2-year major adverse limb events (MALE). Patients with/without PAD were recruited (n=461). Plasma concentrations of 68 circulating proteins were measured and patients were followed for 2 years. The primary outcome was MALE (composite of vascular intervention, major amputation, or acute/chronic limb threatening ischemia). We trained a random forest model using: 1) clinical characteristics, 2) female-specific PAD biomarker, and 3) clinical characteristics and female-specific PAD biomarker. Galectin-9 was the only protein to be significantly elevated in females compared to males in the discovery/validation analyses. The random forest model achieved the following AUROC's: 0.72 (clinical features), 0.83 (Galectin-9), and 0.86 (clinical features + Galectin-9). We identified Galectin-9 as a female-specific PAD biomarker and developed an accurate prognostic model for 2-year MALE using a combination of clinical features and plasma Galectin-9 levels.

Clinical Outcomes Based on High Bleeding Risk in Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease Who Have Undergone Endovascular Therapy

PURPOSE

Endovascular therapies (EVTs) for symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are efficient and minimally invasive. However, patients with PAD tend to have high bleeding risk (HBR), and there are limited data regarding the HBR for patients with PAD after EVT. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and severity of HBR, as well as its association with clinical outcomes in the patients with PAD who underwent EVT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria were applied to 732 consecutive patients with lower extremity PAD post-EVT to assess the prevalence of HBR, and its association with major bleeding events, all-cause mortality, and ischemic events. The ARC-HBR scores (1 point for each major criterion and 0.5 points for each minor criterion) were obtained and the patients were divided into four groups (score: 0-0.5; low risk, score: 1-1.5; moderate risk, score: 2-2.5; high risk, and score: ≥3; very high risk) according to the score. Major bleeding events were defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type-3 or type-5 bleeding, and ischemic events were defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and acute limb ischemia within 2 years.

RESULTS

High bleeding risk occurred in 78.8% of the patients. Major bleeding events, all-cause mortality, and ischemic events occurred in 9.7%, 18.7%, and 6.4% of the study cohort, respectively, within 2 years. During the follow-up period, major bleeding events significantly increased with the ARC-HBR score. The severity of the ARC-HBR score was significantly associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events (high risk: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.28, 24.62]; p=0.022; very high risk: adjusted HR: 10.37; 95% CI: [2.32, 46.30]; p=0.002). All-cause mortality and ischemic events also significantly increased with higher ARC-HBR score.

CONCLUSIONS

High bleeding risk patients with lower extremity PAD can be at a high risk of bleeding events, mortality, and ischemic events after EVT. The ARC-HBR criteria and its associated scores can successfully stratify HBR patients and assess the bleeding risk in patients with lower extremity PAD who undergo EVT.Clinical ImpactEndovascular therapies (EVTs) for symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are efficient and minimally invasive. However, patients with PAD tend to have high bleeding risk (HBR), and there are limited data regarding the HBR for patients with PAD after EVT. Post EVT, most of the patients with PAD were classified as having HBR using the Academic Research Consortium for HBR (ARC-HBR) criteria and the rate of bleeding events as well as mortality and ischemic events within 2 years increased as the ARC-HBR score increased in this retrospective study of 732 participants. HBR patients with PAD can be at high risk of not only bleeding events but also mortality and ischemic events in the mid-term. The ARC-HBR criteria and its associated scores can successfully stratify HBR patients and assess the bleeding risk in patients with PAD who underwent EVT.

Validation of High Ischemic and Bleeding Risk Criteria of European Guidelines in Peripheral Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

The 2024 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) propose the dedicated high ischemic risk (HIR) and high bleeding risk (HBR) criteria.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to validate the ESC-HIR and HBR criteria using real-world data.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2022, this multicenter retrospective registry included 824 patients undergoing endovascular treatment for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal PAD. The ESC-HIR criteria include previous amputation, critical limb-threatening ischemia, previous revascularization, high-risk comorbidities (heart failure, diabetes, polyvascular disease), and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, while the ESC-HBR criteria include dialysis or renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2), acute coronary syndrome <30 days, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and active or clinically significant bleeding. Although patients were initially divided into 4 groups according to the presence or absence of HIR and HBR, patients with HBR and no HIR were excluded caused by the small sample size (n = 2). Major adverse cardiovascular and limb events and bleedings were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 822 patients, 62 (7.5%), 467 (56.8%), and 293 (35.6%) were grouped in the HIR (-)/HBR (-), HIR (+)/HBR (-), and HIR (+)/HBR (+). During the median follow-up period of 726 days, major adverse cardiovascular and limb events occurred in 0%, 9.5%, and 16.4% among the 3 groups (P = 0.005). The incidence of major bleeding events was 4.8%, 2.4%, and 6.8%, respectively (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The ESC-HIR and HBR criteria successfully stratified ischemic and bleeding risks in patients with PAD undergoing endovascular treatment.

Perioperative Antithrombotic Strategies in Vascular Surgery: A Survey in Germany

Background and Aims

The variety of modern antithrombotic medications complicates the choice of individual perioperative therapy in vascular surgery, especially when more than one antithrombotic option is possible. The aim of this study was to determine the perioperative and periinterventional setting concerning antithrombotics in vascular surgery in Germany.

Methods

This article is based on a survey from year 2018 of heads of German vascular surgical departments or units regarding their experience with different anticoagulants. The survey asked for the frequency and time of preoperative pausing of the antithrombotics before various vascular operations or interventions.

Results

The evaluable response rate was 52% (169/324). Acetylsalicylic acid was discontinued before open aortic surgery in 9% (15/169) of respondents. Clopidogrel was paused in 65% (107/169) before open aortic surgery, in 25% (41/169) before vascular surgery (like carotid endarterectomy, endovascular aortic repair, or operations on peripheral arteries), and in 11% (18/169) before peripheral percutaneous interventions. Discontinuation of vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants (took place before conventional operations in 99.4%; oral anticoagulation was continued for peripheral percutaneous interventions in only 6% (8/169). Management was heterogeneous with regard to the timing of the perioperative medication pause. Clopidogrel was not discontinued according to time specifications in 8%; ticagrelor in 75%; rivaroxaban in 23%; and dabigatran in 29%, compared to the recommendations of the industrial information sheets.

Conclusion

The perioperative antithrombotic therapy in German vascular surgery clinics is not uniform and does not correspond to the current specialist recommendations in a notable proportion of clinics.

Factor XI inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism

Therapeutic anticoagulation is essential to prevent and treat venous and arterial thromboembolism. The available agents target coagulation factors involved in thrombus formation but are associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Factor XI plays a minor role in haemostasis but contributes substantially to thrombus expansion, making it an attractive target to mitigate bleeding while maintaining antithrombotic efficacy. Various novel inhibitors, including antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies and small molecules, have been developed. Phase II trials in orthopaedic surgery showed dose-dependent reductions in venous thromboembolism without significantly increasing bleeding compared with enoxaparin. In the first phase III trial of a small-molecule inhibitor of activated factor XI in patients with atrial fibrillation, asundexian was associated with a reduction in bleeding but also a higher risk of stroke, compared with apixaban. Factor XI inhibitors appear safe and hold promise for secondary prevention in myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke, with ongoing phase III trials assessing their broader efficacy and safety. This Review discusses the rationale, pharmacology, evidence and future directions of factor XI inhibitors across various clinical settings.

Intersections and Challenges in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stroke: Pathophysiology, Treatment Dilemmas, and Integrated Prevention Strategies

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stroke are interconnected conditions that often share risk factors such as atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and systemic inflammation. When these events occur simultaneously, they present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This review explores the pathophysiological mechanisms linking ACS and stroke, including common pathways like plaque instability, cardioembolism, and endothelial dysfunction, while highlighting the distinct features of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. The manuscript provides an overview of diagnostic strategies, emphasizing the role of biomarkers, advanced neuroimaging, and risk stratification tools in guiding acute management. Furthermore, the review delves into treatment approach, emphasizing the need to balance reperfusion therapies for ACS with thrombolysis or thrombectomy for ischemic stroke while carefully managing the challenges posed by anticoagulation in cases complicated by bleeding. Long-term strategies for secondary prevention are examined, including antithrombotic regimens tailored to the dual risk of thrombosis and bleeding, as well as lipid-lowering and blood pressure management. Future perspectives highlight the potential of novel pharmacological agents, neuroprotective therapies, and AI-driven tools to enhance patient outcomes. This review underscores the importance of integrated, multidisciplinary care and identifies key areas for future research to optimize the management of these high-risk patients.

Variations in antithrombotic prescriptions and evaluation of extended clopidogrel therapy after lower extremity revascularization for peripheral artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The optimal antithrombotic combination and duration after open surgical or endovascular lower extremity revascularization (LER) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) lacks consensus. This study examines the variability of antithrombotic prescriptions in a tertiary care center, highlighting challenges in related research. The durations of the various prescriptions were captured, and this study focused on studying the impact of duration of clopidogrel therapy on patient outcomes.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of patients with PAD undergoing LER were reviewed. All antithrombotic prescriptions after initial LER were abstracted by pharmacists. Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients who received clopidogrel after initial LER were evaluated. A comparison of patients who received extended clopidogrel therapy (>12 months) compared with limited clopidogrel therapy (≤12 months) was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared and analysis focused on major adverse limb events (MALEs), major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1954 patients received 17 different perioperative antithrombotic combinations and 101 combinations over long-term follow-up. Clopidogrel was the most commonly used medication in 69.8% (n = 1363). Among patients treated with clopidogrel after LER, 69.5% (n = 947) received extended therapy (>12 months). Patients who received extended clopidogrel therapy were more likely to have had a prior endovascular procedure (21.8% vs 15.2%; P = .005); those who received limited therapy (≤12 months) were older (72 years vs 69 years; P < .001) and more likely to have congestive heart failure (21% vs 14%; P = .001) and chronic renal insufficiency (22.2% vs 15.6%; P < .004). Patients in the extended therapy group were more likely to be treated for claudication (57.5% vs 46.1%; P < .001) compared with patients with limited therapy, but there was no difference in revascularization strategies. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly higher overall survival, MALE-free survival, and MACE-free survival in patients with extended clopidogrel therapy without difference in freedom from MALE or MACE. Cox regression demonstrated independent association of limited clopidogrel therapy with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.31), mortality or MALE (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.53), and mortality or MACE (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.2-1.62). The duration of clopidogrel therapy was not associated with bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of unique prescription combinations found in this study highlights real-world variations in antithrombotic therapy after revascularization for patients with PAD. Extended clopidogrel therapy was associated with improved survival compared with limited therapy in this analysis without an increase in bleeding. Observational studies of antithrombotic therapy are limited by extensive variations and factors affecting prescription patterns that can only be reconciled in prospective randomized trials.

Cutting-edge European guidelines for managing lower extremity peripheral arterial disease - Featuring selected insights on PAD management

The new guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases (PAAD) from the European Society of Cardiology and endorsed by the European Society of Vascular Medicine (ESVM), emphasize on a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach focusing on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with a wide range of PAAD, including lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The aim of this summary, focusing on PAD and coordinated by the Young Academy of ESVM, is to provide young angiologists with the fundamental principles of these guidelines and to assist them in navigating their everyday clinical practice. PAD diagnosis relies on objective evaluation of flow/oxygen reduction at rest, with arterial ultrasound as the first imaging modality to confirm the presence of arterial lesions. The main goals of PAD management are not only to improve functioning and prevent the occurrence of adverse events at the lower limb level, but also to reduce the overall atherosclerotic burden and achieve the general well-being of patients. To this end, traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors need to be properly addressed through lifestyle changes and tailored drug therapies. For patients with exertional limb symptoms, supervised exercise training is recommended. Interventional treatment is indicated for limb salvage in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia and may also be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting in less severe patients with persisting symptoms and reduced quality of life after a minimum period of optimal medical treatment including exercise therapy. For trainees or young specialists in Angiology/Vascular Medicine, these guidelines provide essential elements to improve patient management, encourage interdisciplinary collaboration, and ensure an integrated approach to vascular diseases.

Global trends and hotspots in macrophage research related to hypertension from 2015-2024: bibliometric research and visualization analysis

Background

Hypertension continues to be a global health and economic burden, conventionally characterized by a chronic inflammatory state. Macrophages are critical for the initiation, progression and manifestation of hypertension. As studies on the relationship between macrophages and hypertension increase substantially, identifying critical research areas and unraveling potential interaction mechanisms become increasingly essential.

Methods

Articles associated with hypertension and macrophages in recent 10 years were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection for analysis, using Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer, CiteSpace and Scimago Graphica.

Results

After excluding studies that did not meet inclusive standard based on time (2015-2024) and type (article or reviews), 2,013 original articles related to macrophages associated with hypertension were included. The number of publications has been increasing annually. These records consisted of 2,013 English language papers published in 351 journals by 315 institutions or regions from 83 countries/regions between 2015 and 2024. We analyzed the co-cited references clusters to objectively outline the current state of research, including the regulatory mechanisms of hypertension, diseases related to hypertension, and the lifestyle factor. Inflammation remains one of the most popular research hot-spot. The most popular publishing journal in this field is PLOS ONE and the most prolific writer is Li, Hui-Hua. The primary keywords cluster in this field is inflammation, with the highest occurrences and TLS among the top 10 keywords.

Conclusion

These comprehensive and visualized bibliometric results summarized the significant findings in macrophage-related hypertension studies over the past 10 years. Macrophages appear to be effective in the treatment of hypertension as potential targets, but further research is needed to clarify the specific pathophysiological mechanisms involved.

Aspirin plus rivaroxaban efficacy and safety in embolic stroke of undetermined source: A randomized, placebo-controlled, outcome assessor-blind, feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

The high prevalence of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), the considerable risk of ischemic stroke, and the need for novel antithrombotic strategies highlight ESUS as an important priority in stroke research in the coming years. This study is designed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban along with aspirin in reducing stroke recurrence in patients with ESUS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study is a parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomized, outcome-assessor blind, on patients in whom ESUS has recently (7-60 days) identified and had one risk factor of a potential embolic source. The recruited patients were randomly assigned to: rivaroxaban 2.5 mg two times daily plus ASA 80 mg once daily (intervention) or ASA 80 mg once daily plus placebo (control) (1:1 ratio). All patients were followed up every 3 months until 12 months. Any side effects or outcome events were recorded. The primary outcome was clarified as the rate of stroke recurrence and major bleeding occurrence.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with ESUS were recruited in this study (21 in each group). Stroke recurred in 3 patients in the comparator group and 1 patient in the intervention group (OR: 0.30; 95 % CI = 0.02-3.14, P = 0.31; RR= 0.33; 95 % CI = 0.03-2.95, P = 0.32). No major hemorrhagic event occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems reasonable to test, in a larger study, the effect of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg BID) plus aspirin on the prevention of stroke recurrence in patient with ESUS and a potential embolic source.

Anticoagulants: From chance discovery to structure-based design

Taking a historical perspective, we review the discovery, pharmacology, and clinical evaluation of the old and new anticoagulants that have been approved for clinical use. The drugs are discussed chronologically, starting in the 1880s, and progressing through to 2024. The innovations in technology used to develop novel anticoagulants came in fits and starts and reflected the advances in science and technology over these decades, whereas the shift from anecdote to evidence-based use of anticoagulants was delayed until the principles of epidemiology and biostatistics were introduced into clinical trial design and to the approval process. Hirudin, heparin, and vitamin K antagonists were discovered by chance, and were used clinically before their mechanism of action was elucidated and before their net clinical benefits were evaluated in randomized clinical trials. Subsequent anticoagulants were designed based on a better understanding of the structure and function of coagulation proteins, including antithrombin, thrombin, and factor Xa, and underwent more rigorous preclinical and clinical evaluation before regulatory approval. By simplifying oral anticoagulation, the direct oral anticoagulants have revolutionized anticoagulation care and have enhanced the uptake of anticoagulation, but bleeding has not been eliminated and there is a need for more effective and convenient anticoagulants for thrombosis triggered by the contact pathway of coagulation. The newly developed factor XIa and XIIa inhibitors have the potential to address these unmet clinical needs and are undergoing clinical evaluation for several indications. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of thrombosis, which remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Elucidation of the structure and function of coagulation enzymes, their cofactors, and inhibitors, coupled with advances in structure-based design led to the discovery of more convenient, safer, and more effective anticoagulants that have revolutionized the management of thrombotic disorders.

Dual pathway inhibition in patients with peripheral artery disease in Germany

Background: Dual-pathway inhibition (DPI) with aspirin and rivaroxaban exhibited a net clinical benefit for patients with cardiovascular disease in the randomized COMPASS trial. The non-observational, international XATOA registry showed that the COMPASS results can be reproduced in clinical practice in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD). Here we report patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for the subgroup of German PAD patients of the XATOA registry and compare them to COMPASS PAD patients. Patients and methods: XATOA was an international prospective registry of patients receiving DPI with a mean follow-up period of 15 months. The subgroup of German patients with PAD in XATOA comprised 1,819 patients, of which 925 patients (50.9%) had only PAD and 894 patients (49.1%) had both CAD and PAD. Patient characteristics such as prior medical history and prior medications as well as clinical outcomes such as incidences of major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding events were assessed. Results: DPI was well-tolerated in clinical practice. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes especially for patients with only PAD differed from characteristics and outcomes of the overall German XATOA population as well as the PAD subgroup of COMPASS. Patients with only PAD were markedly less supplied with lipid-lowering agents and betablockers. Incidences of MALE were high in German PAD patients of XATOA (9.0%) and markedly higher than in the PAD subgroup of COMPASS (1.2%). Incidences of MACE and major bleeding events were lower in German PAD patients of XATOA (MACE: 2.9%, major bleeding: 1.4%) than in PAD patients of COMPASS (MACE: 5.1%, major bleeding: 3.1%). Conclusions: DPI with rivaroxaban and aspirin is well-tolerated by PAD patients in German clinical practice. PAD patients in Germany exhibit different characteristics and show a different clinical outcome profile than PAD patients in COMPASS.

Unmet Needs and Opportunities for Australian Innovation and Clinical Research to Improve Quality of Life and Outcomes in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is characterised by atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion of arteries that leads to reduced blood flow to the limbs. PAD is associated with a very high rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality making the health and economic burden of PAD substantial. Despite high-quality evidence and international guidelines recommending conservative medical management of risk factors, and exercise and lifestyle interventions, surgical revascularisation (open or endovascular) remains the main treatment for PAD. Alarmingly, up to one-third of patients do not receive best medical therapy after revascularisation surgery despite evidence supporting this treatment reduces cardiovascular events. Due to the considerable health burden that PAD presents, this manuscript aims to identify gaps in care and clinical research in PAD across Australia and proposes potential collaborative solutions. In Australia, there is significant disparity in care between rural/regional and metropolitan communities. These gaps are exacerbated by inequitable access to services across Australia, particularly for First Nation Australians, culturally and linguistically diverse groups and those living in regional and remote areas. This review identifies unmet needs for patients with PAD that are multifaceted, spanning from improved understanding of disease mechanisms, diagnostic tools for risk stratification and personalised therapy, to a paucity of medical and rehabilitation therapies for symptoms or prevention of cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, there are opportunities for national and international registries to optimise clinical trial quality and outcomes. Strategies should be applied to improve implementation of optimal medical therapy in PAD which will improve quality of life, reduce health care costs, and prevent secondary complications, limb loss, and mortality across Australia's diverse population.

Apixaban to Prevent Covert Infarcts After Cryptogenic Stroke in Patients With Atrial Cardiopathy: A Secondary Analysis of the ARCADIA Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

In the Atrial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs in Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke (ARCADIA) randomized clinical trial, anticoagulation did not prevent recurrent stroke among patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. It is unknown whether anticoagulation prevents covert infarcts in this population.

Objective

To test the use of apixaban vs aspirin for prevention of nonlacunar covert infarcts after cryptogenic stroke in patients with atrial cardiopathy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

ARCADIA-MRI, an ancillary study to the ARCADIA trial with a median follow-up period of 27 months, enrolled participants from 75 sites in the US from November 14, 2019, until December 2, 2022. Participants in ARCADIA were invited to coenroll in ARCADIA-MRI if they had not permanently discontinued the study drug and had no contraindications on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 310 (31%) of the 1015 ARCADIA participants enrolled in ARCADIA-MRI and of those 174 (56%) with adequate quality baseline and follow-up MRI were included in the present analyses.

Interventions

MRI performed at the time of the index stroke served as the baseline image unless it was unavailable or of insufficient quality, in which case a new research MRI was obtained. A follow-up research MRI was performed upon each participant's completion of participation in the ARCADIA parent study.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was incident nonlacunar covert infarct on the follow-up MRI assessed by 2 independent raters who were masked to treatment assignment.

Results

Baseline characteristics were balanced between the apixaban (n = 79) and aspirin (n = 95) arms. The mean (SD) age was 66 (10.6) years, and the median (IQR) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 1 (0-2). Ninety-one participants (52.3%) were male. During the median (IQR) follow-up of 811 (487-1288) days, the risk of incident nonlacunar covert infarcts was lower in the apixaban group (5.1%) than the aspirin group (17.9%) (weighted relative risk, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10-0.83).

Conclusions and Relevance

Apixaban compared to aspirin was associated with fewer incident nonlacunar covert infarcts among a subset of patients with a recent cryptogenic ischemic stroke and atrial cardiopathy who were enrolled in ARCADIA.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192215.

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin compared to aspirin alone in patients with coronary and peripheral artery diseases in Iran

BACKGROUND

Low-dose aspirin and rivaroxaban are the cornerstone treatment for cardiovascular prevention in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and/or stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). The combination of rivaroxaban with aspirin imposes a synergistic effect on the inhibition of factor-induced platelet aggregation. The present work aimed at comparing the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban alone (5 mg twice daily) with aspirin alone in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) or coronary artery disease (CAD) and related subgroups.

METHODS

This pharmacoeconomic study was performed based on the insurance organization and utilized a state-transition decision Markov model. From the COMPASS trial, Clinical efficacy and Clinical events were collected. Health outcomes and cost were assessed over a 20-year time horizon (lifetime). The direct costs of medical services were included in the analysis. The results were stated based on Incremental Cost-Utility (ICUR) and Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Uncertainty was assessed utilizing deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Discount rates of .058 and .03 were included for cost and effectiveness data, respectively. The budget impact based on the Markov model was estimated as the financial burden resulting from the insurance coverage of rivaroxaban.

RESULTS

In the total of CAD and PAD patients, treatment with rivaroxaban plus aspirin and rivaroxaban alone were more expensive than the aspirin alone, but also more effective, resulting in ICUR being $4594/QALY and $13601/QALY respectively, and for ICER being $3348/LYG and $9901/LYG. In PAD patients rivaroxaban plus aspirin had higher effectiveness than aspirin alone that ICUR and ICER being $11929/QALY and $9896/LYG respectively. In CAD patients, treatment with rivaroxaban plus aspirin was expensive and less effective than aspirin alone. The estimated annual budget impact was $28,253,135 for the rivaroxaban plus aspirin and $292,593,909 for the rivaroxaban alone in the total of CAD and PAD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that rivaroxaban plus aspirin is a cost-effective alternative in PAD and total of CAD and PAD patients. In CAD patients, rivaroxaban plus aspirin and rivaroxaban alone were not cost-effective.

Rivaroxaban to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Despite medical advancements, patients remain at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Traditional anticoagulation strategies have shown limited efficacy. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has emerged as a potential alternative.

OBJECTIVES

This review examines the role of rivaroxaban in reducing MACE and MALE in CAD and PAD patients, focusing on its pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for studies on rivaroxaban's use in CAD and PAD.

RESULTS

The COMPASS trial demonstrated that rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin significantly reduced MACE and MALE but increased major bleeding. The COMPASS-LTOLE and VOYAGER PAD trials confirmed these findings. However, the COMMANDER HF trial found no benefit in heart failure patients without atrial fibrillation. Cost-effectiveness studies support rivaroxaban as a viable treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban plus aspirin effectively reduces thrombotic events in high-risk CAD and PAD patients. Despite an increased bleeding risk, its benefits outweigh the risks in selected populations. Future studies should explore personalized treatment approaches and long-term outcomes.

Anticoagulation Management: Current Landscape and Future Trends

Blood transports nutrients and oxygen to the cells while removing the waste. It also possesses a hemostasis function to prevent excessive bleeding. However, abnormal clot formation (thrombosis) within healthy blood vessels can lead to life-threatening conditions like heart attacks, strokes, and pulmonary embolism. This review explores anticoagulants, their historical aspects, current clinical applications, and future trends. Anticoagulants play a critical role in preventing and treating thrombosis by interfering with different stages of blood clotting. The journey began with heparin, a rapidly acting injectable medication discovered in 1916. The introduction of warfarin in the 1950s revolutionized anticoagulation by offering long-term oral regimens. Today, anticoagulants are crucial for managing conditions like deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, especially in an aging population with a rising prevalence of thrombotic complications. Three main types of anticoagulants are used today: vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), injectable heparins, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Despite advancements, managing anticoagulant therapy remains complex due to individual patient variability, the need for regular monitoring, and the delicate balance between preventing thrombosis and bleeding risks. Emerging trends include the development of factor XIa inhibitors, which promise more targeted thrombosis prevention with potentially lower bleeding risks. This review highlights the ongoing innovation in anticoagulant development, the need for precise management, and potential future avenues like factor XIa inhibitors. Additionally, artificial intelligence holds promise for improving patient outcomes and addressing the complexities of thrombotic disease management by personalizing therapy and reducing bleeding risks.

Association between guideline-directed medical therapy and reintervention risk following peripheral vascular interventions in patients with peripheral artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Reintervention following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is recommended post-PVI, yet its association with reintervention outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed Vascular Quality Initiative registry data linked with Medicare outcome for patients undergoing PVI for PAD (2017-2018). GDMT was defined as the receipt of statin, antiplatelet, and angiotensin-converting enzyme or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE/ARB) therapy if hypertensive at discharge. Competing risk analyses and conditional risk models assessed the reintervention outcome, and the recurrent reintervention outcomes within 2 years, by GDMT receipt, compliance with each GDMT element, the number of elements received, and GDMT rate across sites and operators in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

We included 13,244 patients (mean age 72.0 ± 9.9, women 41.0%). The reintervention outcome did not differ by GDMT receipt (cumulative incidence: 43.0% [95% CI 41.0-44.9%] in no GDMT vs 41.2% [95% CI 39.4- 43.0%] in GDMT; subhazard ratio (sHR): 1.03 [95% CI 0.97-1.10]), compliance with GDMT elements, the number of elements received, or site and operator GDMT rates (sHR per 10% increase: 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.03] and 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.02]) (all p > 0.05). However, a higher operator GDMT rate reduced the recurrent reintervention risk (HR: 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Around 40% of patients undergoing a PVI experience reintervention within 2 years, but the outcome was not reduced with GDMT receipt, and higher GDMT rates by site and operators were not associated with reintervention risk. Future studies should focus on medication adherence, refills, and more granular GDMT data for PAD care surveillance postrevascularization.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Balancing the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains clinically challenging. Questions regarding the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after TAVR still need to be definitively answered.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs after TAVR in individuals with and without indication for anticoagulation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP on 7 October 2023 together with reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NOACs versus antiplatelet therapy or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) after TAVR in adults with or without an indication for anticoagulation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods and conducted random-effects pair-wise analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and major bleeding. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs with 4808 participants in the NMA. Of these, one compared rivaroxaban versus antiplatelet therapy in people without an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR; one compared apixaban versus antiplatelet therapy in people without an indication for anticoagulation or versus VKA in people with an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR; one compared edoxaban versus VKA in people with an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR; and one compared edoxaban with antiplatelet therapy in people without an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR. The mean age of trial participants was 81 years. Follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 18 months. Overall, we judged the risk of bias in the included trials to be low in all domains except for blinding, which was assessed as high in all four studies. No studies evaluated dabigatran. In people without an indication for anticoagulation, rivaroxaban and apixaban may increase all-cause mortality after TAVR as compared to antiplatelet therapy (rivaroxaban: risk ratio (RR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13 to 2.46; studies = 1, participants = 1644; moderate-certainty evidence; apixaban: RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.02; studies = 1, participants = 1049; low-certainty evidence), while edoxaban may result in little or no difference (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.27 to 9.36; studies = 1, participants = 229; low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests little or no difference between rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban and antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular mortality (rivaroxaban: RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.10; studies = 1, participants = 1644; apixaban: RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.65; studies = 1, participants = 1049; edoxaban: RR 7.44, 95% CI 0.39 to 142.38; studies = 1, participants = 229) and between rivaroxaban or edoxaban and antiplatelets in stroke (rivaroxaban: RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.00; studies = 1, participants = 1644; edoxaban: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.15 to 7.42; studies = 1, participants = 229). While rivaroxaban versus antiplatelets probably increases major bleeding after TAVR (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.65; studies = 1, participants = 1644; moderate-certainty evidence), there may be little or no difference between apixaban and antiplatelet therapy (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.64; studies = 1, participants = 1049; low-certainty evidence). It is unclear if edoxaban has an effect on major bleeding, although the point estimate suggests increased bleeding (versus antiplatelets: RR 2.13, 95% CI 0.54 to 8.30; studies = 1, participants = 229; low-certainty evidence). In people with an indication for anticoagulation, low-certainty evidence suggests apixaban or edoxaban may result in little to no difference in our predefined primary efficacy outcomes after TAVR when compared to VKA (all-cause mortality: apixaban: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.77; studies = 1, participants = 451; edoxaban: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.20; studies = 1, participants = 1426; cardiovascular mortality: apixaban: RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.70; studies = 1, participants = 451; edoxaban: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.57; studies = 1, participants = 1426; stroke: apixaban: RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.70; studies = 1, participants = 451; edoxaban: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.34; studies = 1, participants = 1426). While apixaban may result in a similar rate of bleeding as VKA in this population, edoxaban probably increases major bleeding after TAVR in people with an indication for anticoagulation (apixaban: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.54; studies = 1, participants = 451; low-certainty evidence; edoxaban: RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.93; studies = 1, participants = 1426; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without an indication for oral anticoagulation, rivaroxaban and apixaban may increase all-cause mortality when compared to antiplatelet therapy, while edoxaban may result in little or no difference. There might be little or no difference between rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban and antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular mortality, and between rivaroxaban or edoxaban and antiplatelets in stroke. While rivaroxaban probably increases major bleeding following TAVR, there might be little or no difference between apixaban and antiplatelet therapy, and the effect of edoxaban on major bleeding remains unclear. In people with an indication for anticoagulation, apixaban and edoxaban may be as effective as VKA in preventing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and stroke. Apixaban may lead to a similar rate of major bleeding as VKA in this population. However, edoxaban probably increases major bleeding following TAVR when compared to VKA. Our NMA did not show superiority of one NOAC over another for any of the primary outcomes. Head-to-head trials directly comparing NOACs against each other are required to increase the certainty of the evidence.

Silent Myocardial Infarction and Risk of Stroke Recurrence: A Post Hoc Analysis of the IRIS Trial

BACKGROUND

Unrecognized or silent myocardial infarction (MI) detected on an ECG is associated with first-ever stroke, but the impact on stroke recurrence is unknown. We aimed to determine the association of silent MI with stroke recurrence in patients with a recent ischemic stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Subjects from the IRIS (Insulin Resistance Intervention After Stroke) trial with an available ECG were included. Clinical MI was defined as a history of hospitalization for MI. Silent MI was defined as ECG evidence of MI in the absence of clinical MI. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. Ischemic stroke and subtype were assessed as secondary outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for demographics, pioglitazone, and vascular risk factors was used to examine the association between MI and stroke recurrence. A total of 2282 participants met the inclusion criteria. Clinical and silent MI were identified in 161 (7.1%) and 94 (4.1%) subjects, respectively. Over the study period, 209 recurrent strokes occurred, with 191 classified as ischemic. In the fully adjusted model, silent MI was significantly associated with any stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 2.29 [95% CI, 1.34-3.90]) and ischemic stroke (HR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.18-3.70]) recurrence. Clinical MI was associated with stroke recurrence in the unadjusted analysis but not in the fully adjusted model (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.81-2.11]). Silent MI was not associated with potential cardioembolic subtypes (HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 0.70-3.22]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with a recent ischemic stroke, silent MI was associated with stroke recurrence. Tailored prevention strategies in this population warrant future investigation.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00091949.

Assessment of quitting versus using aspirin therapy in patients with stabilized coronary artery disease after stenting who require long-term oral anticoagulation: Rationale for and design of the AQUATIC double-blind randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic management in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and previous stent implantation who require long-term oral anticoagulation is highly challenging in daily practice, especially in those at high residual risk of coronary and vascular events. Dual therapy with oral anticoagulation and aspirin may lead to a higher risk of bleeding, whereas stopping aspirin in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention may lead to recurrent ischaemic events.

AIM

To assess the optimal antithrombotic regimen that should be pursued long term (often lifelong) in these patients.

METHODS

The AQUATIC study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study conducted in patients with chronic coronary syndrome at high risk of ischaemic events (i.e., stent implantation [> 6 months before inclusion] in a context of previous acute coronary syndrome and/or with high-risk features of ischaemic event recurrences) and requiring long-term oral anticoagulation. For superiority, we ensure 80% power at level α=0.05 to detect a 25% reduction in hazard in the experimental group relative to the control group. Overall, 2000 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral anticoagulation and aspirin or oral anticoagulation and placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, coronary revascularization and acute limb ischaemia. Major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition is a secondary safety endpoint that will be assessed as a priority.

CONCLUSION

The AQUATIC trial will test the efficacy and safety of adding aspirin to long-term oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and previous coronary stenting who are at high residual risk of recurrent ischaemic events and require oral anticoagulation.

Prolonged antithrombotic treatment after de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients after acute coronary syndrome - which strategy should be applied? The ELECTRA-SIRIO 2 investigators standpoint

De-escalation of dual antiplatelet (DAPT) intensity may be considered in patients with high risk of bleeding after acute coronary syndrome. Some high risk patients after de-escalation may require antithrombotic therapy prolonged over 12 months. With the current guideline recommended strategies, there are some doubts and uncertainties with respect to the transition period. Herein we discuss these issues more extensively. De-escalation of DAPT, intended to decrease bleeding risk, may be accomplished by switching to a drug with reduced antiplatelet effect (de-escalation by switching), by reducing the dose (de-escalation by dose reduction), or by removing an antiplatelet agent (de-escalation by discontinuation). The dilemma concerns patients who have undergone scheduled, early de-escalation of DAPT to monotherapy with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor at standard dose, as in the TWILIGHT study. The dilemma is even greater in patients whose de-escalation consisted of both reduction in dose of one and discontinuation of the other antiplatelet agent. This strategy is currently being tested in the ELECTRA-SIRIO 2 study. When making a therapeutic decision in patients who meet the criteria for prolonged dual antithrombotic therapy we suggest considering the previously applied DAPT de-escalation strategy. In general, unless the risk of ischemic events has increased since prior de-escalation, there is no scientific rationale for escalating antithrombotic treatment in a patient previously de-escalated (through reduction or discontinuation). Regardless of the treatment strategy, its effectiveness depends on the patient's adherence to medical recommendations.

Rivaroxaban, in combination with low-dose aspirin, is associated with a reduction in proinflammatory and prothrombotic circulating vesicle signatures in patients with cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Despite secondary prevention with aspirin, patients with stable cardiovascular disease (CVD) remain at elevated long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. The Cardiovascular Outcomes in People Using Anticoagulant Strategies (COMPASS) double-blind, randomized clinical trial demonstrated that aspirin plus low-dose rivaroxaban (COMPASS regime) significantly decreased the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events by 24% compared with aspirin alone. However, the mechanisms underlying these potential synergistic/nonantithrombotic effects remain elusive. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are crucial messengers regulating a myriad of biological/pathological processes and are highly implicated in CVD.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that circulating EV profiles reflect the cardioprotective properties of the COMPASS regime.

METHODS

A cohort of stable CVD patients (N = 40) who participated in the COMPASS trial and were previously randomized to receive aspirin were prospectively recruited and assigned a revised regimen of open-label aspirin plus rivaroxaban. Blood samples were obtained at baseline (aspirin only) and 6-month follow-up. Plasma EV concentration, size, and origin were analyzed by nanoparticle tracking analysis and flow cytometry. EVs were enriched by ultracentrifugation for proteomic analysis.

RESULTS

The COMPASS regime fundamentally altered small (<200 nm) and large (200-1000 nm) EV concentration and size compared with aspirin alone. Crucially, levels of platelet-derived and myeloperoxidase-positive EVs became significantly decreased at follow-up. Comparative proteomic characterization further revealed a significant decrease in highly proinflammatory protein expression at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The observed changes in EV subpopulations, together with the differential protein expression profiles, suggest amelioration of an underlying proinflammatory and prothrombotic state upon dual therapy, which may be of clinical relevance toward understanding the fundamental mechanism underlying the reported superior cardiovascular outcomes associated with this antithrombotic regimen.

Combination Antithrombotic Therapy for Reduction of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

BACKGROUND

Stroke secondary to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is associated with high recurrence risk despite currently available secondary prevention strategies. In patients with systemic atherosclerosis, a significant reduction of stroke risk with no increase in intracranial or fatal hemorrhage was seen when rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily was added to aspirin. However, there are no trials in ICAD using this combination. To facilitate the design of future ICAD trials, the CATIS-ICAD study (Combination Antithrombotic Treatment for Prevention of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease) assessed (1) the feasibility of recruitment, (2) the safety of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy, and (3) trends toward efficacy.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point pilot trial conducted in 10 Canadian centers. Eligible participants aged ≥40 years, with acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin or aspirin alone within 7 to 100 days of their index event. The primary safety outcome was hemorrhagic stroke. The main efficacy end point was the composite of ischemic stroke or covert brain infarct on magnetic resonance imaging at the end of the study.

RESULTS

A total of 101 participants were randomized. Average enrollment was 10 participants/site per year. Average follow-up was 20 months. Median time from index stroke to randomization was 67 days. The median age of participants was 67 years (±10.94), and 29% of participants were women. There was no hemorrhagic stroke in either arm. The composite efficacy outcome was less frequent in the combination arm (15.7%) compared with the aspirin arm (24.0%), with a hazard ratio of 0.78 ([95% CI, 0.32-1.93]; P=0.59) favoring the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A multicenter randomized trial comparing the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack due to ICAD is feasible and appears safe without an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. A numerical trend toward efficacy for the composite primary end point of symptomatic ischemic stroke and covert infarcts was observed. These findings will inform the design of a phase III trial.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04142125.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for coronary thrombosis treatment: where are we today?

INTRODUCTION

Advances in pharmacotherapy for coronary thrombosis treatment and prevention have transformed the clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease but increased the complexity of therapeutic decision-making. Improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention techniques and stent design have reduced the incidence of thrombotic complications, which consequently has increased the challenge of adequately powering clinical trials of novel antithrombotic strategies for efficacy outcomes. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of coronary thrombosis and the characteristics of antithrombotic drugs can help with therapeutic decisions.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the pathophysiology of coronary thrombosis and the mechanisms of action of drugs developed for its treatment, provides an overview of the key issues in decision-making, and highlights key areas for further work in order to guide clinicians on how to individualize risk management and address gaps in the evidence base.

EXPERT OPINION

Individualization of antithrombotic therapy regimens has become a vital part of optimizing risk management in people with coronary thrombosis. A critical appraisal of the strengths and limitations of available drugs and the evidence supporting the use of different antithrombotic combinations is intended to provide direction to clinicians and point the way toward further improvements in pharmacotherapy for coronary thrombosis treatment and prevention.

Treat the patient, not the disease: The embolic stroke of undetermined source as an opportunity to optimize cardiovascular prevention in a holistic approach

For any physician treating a patient with a medical condition of unclear etiology, the differential diagnosis aims to identify the actual most probable cause among various potential etiologies, in order to tailor treatment options. In patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), this can be challenging due to the frequent presence of multiple potential embolic sources, raising difficulties to identify the most likely cause. Additionally, despite targeted preventive measures for the presumed embolic source, patients may remain at risk for stroke and cardiovascular events due to other unrecognized or underestimated pathologies. The multi-level complexity and multimorbidity typically associated with ESUS, represents a challenge that requires broad knowledge of the cardiovascular pathophysiology, deep expertise of the available diagnostic and therapeutic options, and interdisciplinary approach. At the same time, it is an ideal opportunity to assess thoroughly the overall cardiovascular status of the patient, which in turn can allow us to optimize therapeutic and preventive strategies in a holistic approach, and prevent future strokes, cardiovascular events and disability through different parallel pathways. In this context, rather than narrowing our perspective on identifying the specific embolic source presumed to be the most likely cause of ESUS, it is crucial to shift our focus from the disease to the patient, and evaluate the overall cardiovascular profile by assessing the risk of all cardiovascular comorbidities present, no matter if causally associated with ESUS or not. In order to bring across these points and more, this article is centred around a clinical case that serves as a starting point to illustrate the holistic approach to the management of patients with ESUS. After all, this is the beauty, the magic and the art of Internal Medicine: to treat the patient, not the disease, the system or the organ.

Impact of Antithrombotic Therapy on Thrombotic and Bleeding Complications after Elective Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of antithrombotic therapy on occurrence of thrombotic and bleeding complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center cohort study, patients who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm were categorized into three antithrombotic groups: single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), anticoagulants, or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Outcome measures were the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), prosthetic limb occlusions, and bleeding complications during follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 616 patients (SAPT: n = 450, anticoagulants: n = 84, and DAPT: n = 82), Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference (log-rank p = 0.37) in incidence of MACE between patients receiving SAPT (20.9%), anticoagulants (25.0%), and DAPT (14.6%) during a median follow-up of almost 4 years. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age (HR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.01) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (HR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.12-1.91; p = 0.01) were significant predictors for MACE. Prosthetic limb occlusion was observed in 38 patients during a median follow-up of 4 years; incidence between patients receiving SAPT (5.8%), anticoagulants (10.7%), and DAPT (3.7%) was not significantly different (log-rank p = 0.08). Age (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.00; p = 0.03) and use of anticoagulants (HR = 3.79, 95% CI 1.46-9.83; p < 0.01) were significant predictors for prosthetic limb occlusion. Bleeding complications occurred in 73 patients during median follow-up of almost 4 years, without significant difference (log rank p = 0.06) in incidence between patients receiving SAPT (10.7%), anticoagulants (19.0%), and DAPT (11.0%). ASA classification (HR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.23-2.46; p < 0.01) was a significant predictor for bleeding complications.

CONCLUSION

Use of anticoagulants after EVAR appears to be associated with a higher risk of prosthetic limb occlusion compared to the use of single or dual antiplatelet therapy.

Antiplatelets for Cardiovascular Disease in Non-valvular AF with Rivaroxaban: A Subanalysis of the EXPAND Study

AIM

In this subanalysis of the EXPAND study, we evaluated the risks and benefits of rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) complicated by stable coronary artery disease (CAD), ischemic stroke, or peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS

From the EXPAND study population (n=7,141), patients with NVAF complicated by stable CAD (n=886), ischemic stroke (n=1,231), or PAD (n=160) were included. Patients complicated by any of them were set as ALL (n=2,030). Patients were all treated with rivaroxaban (10 or 15 mg/day) with (+) or without (-) APT. Efficacy outcomes were symptomatic stroke＋systemic embolism (SE), symptomatic stroke＋SE＋myocardial infarction＋cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. Safety outcomes included major and any bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for differences between the APT(+) and APT(-) groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the efficacy outcomes between the APT(+) and APT(-) groups in the ALL cohort or in the CAD and STROKE sub-cohorts. In the PAD subcohort, the HR [95% CI] for all-cause death in the APT(+) group increased (4.43 [1.05-18.71]; p=0.043). In the APT(+) group, the HR [95% CI] for any bleeding increased in the ALL cohort (1.28 [1.01-1.62]; p=0.044) and STROKE subcohort (1.42 [1.01-2.01]; p=0.047), and for major bleeding in the CAD subcohort (2.00 [1.01-3.93]; p=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban with APT did not reduce ischemic outcomes in patients with stable CAD or ischemic stroke; however, it did increase the risk of bleeding in patients with stable CAD or ischemic stroke.

Dysregulation of Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Cardiovascular Diseases

Mitochondria dysfunction plays a central role in the development of vascular diseases as oxidative stress promotes alterations in mitochondrial morphology and function that contribute to disease progression. Redox imbalances can affect normal cellular processes including mitochondrial biogenesis, electrochemical equilibrium, and the regulation of mitochondrial DNA. In this review, we will discuss these imbalances and, in particular, the potential role of mitochondrial fusion, fission, biogenesis, and mitophagy in the context of vascular diseases and how the dysregulation of normal function might contribute to disease progression. We will also discuss potential implications of targeting mitochondrial regulation as therapeutic targets to treat vascular disease formation.

Cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine in patients with chronic coronary disease in The Netherlands

AIMS

Recent trials have shown that low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) reduces major cardiovascular events in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine therapy in patients with chronic coronary disease when added to standard background therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This Markov cohort cost-effectiveness model used estimates of therapy effectiveness, transition probabilities, costs, and quality of life obtained from the Low-Dose Colchicine 2 trial, as well as meta-analyses and public sources. In this trial, low-dose colchicine was added to standard of care and compared with placebo. The main outcomes were cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization, quality-adjusted life year (QALY), the cost per QALY gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), and net monetary benefit. In the model, low-dose colchicine therapy yielded 0.04 additional QALYs compared with standard of care at an incremental cost of €455 from a societal perspective and €729 from a healthcare perspective, resulting in a cost per QALY gained of €12 176/QALY from a societal perspective and €19 499/QALY from a healthcare perspective. Net monetary benefit was €1414 from a societal perspective and €1140 from a healthcare perspective. Low-dose colchicine has a 96 and 94% chance of being cost-effective, from a societal and a healthcare perspective, respectively, when using a willingness to pay of €50 000/QALY. Net monetary benefit would decrease below zero when annual low-dose colchicine costs would exceed an annual cost of €221 per patient.

CONCLUSION

Adding low-dose colchicine to standard of care in patients with chronic coronary disease is cost-effective according to commonly accepted thresholds in Europe and Australia and compares favourably in cost-effectiveness to other drugs used in chronic coronary disease.

Clinical significance of a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in patients with vascular disease

BACKGROUND

The Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial enrolled patients with vascular disease but excluded patients requiring oral anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the clinical significance of a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) during follow-up.

METHODS

New AF was identified from hospitalization, study drug discontinuation, and adverse event reports. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine risk factors for new AF. Time-updated covariate analysis was used to study the association of new AF with outcomes.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 23 months, 655 of 27,395 participants (2.4%) were diagnosed with AF (incidence, 1.3 per 100 patient-years). In adjusted analyses, advanced age, male sex, White ethnicity, higher body mass index, higher systolic blood pressure, heart failure, and prior myocardial infarction were associated with new AF. Compared with participants without a new diagnosis of AF during follow-up or before receiving a diagnosis of new AF, participants were at increased risk of a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction after a new diagnosis of AF (8.8 vs 2.4 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR], 3.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.81-4.75). Risk increases with new AF were also observed for hospitalization for heart failure (6.8 vs 0.8 per 100 patient-years; HR, 8.64; 95% CI, 6.31-11.83) and major bleeding (3.9 vs 1.3 per 100 patient-years; HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.15-4.69).

CONCLUSION

In patients with vascular disease, a new diagnosis of AF was associated with a marked increase in risk of adverse outcomes, especially hospitalization for heart failure.

Clopidogrel combined with rivaroxaban in peripheral artery disease after revascularization

Background

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel-rivaroxaban combination compared to aspirin-rivaroxaban combination in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods

Consecutive patients with symptomatic PAD patients were analyzed from January, 2018 to June, 2022 at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on the antithrombotic therapy. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE), and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Patients were followed until the first occurrence of any outcomes or the study end date (30 June 2024).

Results

A total of 695 patients were enrolled into this study. The clopidogrel-rivaroxaban combination significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.41-0.83) without increasing the risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.27-1.69). When analyzed separately, clopidogrel-rivaroxaban combination was associated with a reduced risk of MALE (HR: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.41-0.91), although no significant differences were observed in terms of MACE (HR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.34-1.20) or all bleeding events (HR: 1.00, 95%CI: 0.52-1.93). In the subgroup analysis, there were no significant interactions between the treatment groups and the subgroups of age, diabetes, lesion sites, Rutherford classifications and renal function for composite outcome, MACE and MALE.

Conclusion

The clopidogrel-rivaroxaban combination in PAD patients may offer enhanced cardiovascular protection without increasing the risk of bleeding complications. These findings suggested that clopidogrel could be a superior alternative to aspirin in dual antithrombotic therapy for PAD management.

Thrombosis, Translational Medicine, and Biomarker Research: Moving the Needle

Arterial and venous thromboembolism are leading causes of morbidity and death worldwide. Despite significant advances in the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of thrombotic diseases over the past 3 decades, the adoption of findings stemming from translational biomarker research in clinical practice remains limited. Biomarkers provide an opportunity to enhance our understanding of pathophysiological processes and optimize treatment strategies. They hold the promise of revolutionizing patient care. Still, this potential remains untapped, and several factors impede their use for near-patient applications. We sought to provide an overview of biomarker research in arterial and venous thromboembolic disease. We then aimed to discuss key barriers to the broader clinical implementation of biomarker research and highlight promising strategies to overcome them. We emphasize the merits of translational and implementation science to bridge the gaps from bench to bedside. Innovative trial design, data sharing, and collaborative efforts between academia and industry will be essential. Purposeful regression methodology using rational conceptual framework design, causal mediation analysis, and artificial intelligence might better leverage the use of observational data. Dedicated translational science training programs geared toward educating physicians on the appropriate measurement, interpretation, and integration of biomarker data in clinical practice should foster endorsement by frontline physicians. Finally, we make the case in support of a paradigm shift in cardiovascular medicine. Improved recognition of biomarker research and a greater emphasis on mechanistic evidence can better equip clinicians to deal with the uncertainty that defines the practice of thrombosis medicine.

Impact of Frailty on the Benefits of Dual Pathway Inhibition for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in the COMPASS Randomised Trial

BACKGROUND

Individuals with frailty are at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding. The objective of this study was to determine whether the effects of 2.5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily in addition to low-dose aspirin are similar among frail compared with nonfrail patients with chronic atherosclerotic vascular disease.

METHODS

In the COMPASS trial (NCT01776424), patients with chronic atherosclerotic vascular disease were randomised to receive 100 mg aspirin daily, 100 mg aspirin daily plus 2.5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily, or 5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily. In this post hoc analysis, frailty was evaluated by constructing a cumulative deficit index from 37 diseases, signs, and symptoms. The frailty index for each participant was calculated as the proportion of the 37 deficits exhibited, with values > 0.2 considered to be frail. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported.

RESULTS

Frailty was present in 13% of the trial population. In nonfrail individuals, adding 2.5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily to aspirin reduced the primary outcome (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.80) and mortality (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90), but increased major bleeding (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.51-2.31); Among participants with frailty, its effects on the primary outcome (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79-1.42), mortality (HR 1.08, 0.80-1.46), and major bleeding (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.71-1.70) were not evident (respective interaction P values 0.011, 0.049, and 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with chronic atherosclerotic vascular disease, the benefit of adding 2.5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily to aspirin was not evident in patients with frailty.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01776424.

Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing dental procedures

A growing number of patients receiving antithrombotic therapy require dental procedures. Dental interventions in these patients can be challenging, as the risk of bleeding from the continuation of antithrombotic therapy needs to be weighed against the thromboembolic risk associated with drug interruption or de-escalation. Most minor dental procedures, including simple dental cleaning and filling, pose minimal bleeding risk, and antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy can be continued without interruption. Local hemostatic measures, such as tranexamic mouthwash, can be used, as needed, to reduce bleeding events following these interventions. Managing antithrombotic therapy during more invasive dental interventions and oral surgeries with a higher risk of perioperative bleeding necessitates the consideration of specific factors influencing the bleeding risk and thromboembolism. In patients receiving antithrombotic therapy for primary prevention, temporary interruption is reasonable. In others, the decisions may be more complex and more nuanced. In this article, we review the current evidence for managing patients receiving oral antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs scheduled for various dental procedures and present a practical approach for the periprocedural management of antithrombotic treatments.