Thymic stromal lymphopoietin: its role and potential as a therapeutic target in asthma

Tezepelumab achieves improvement of severe uncontrolled asthma and rhinosinusitis: Case series

Tezepelumab, a mAb targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), reduces exacerbations in severe asthma. Four cases in which patients with severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps showed improvements in both conditions after receiving tezepelumab treatment are presented.

Tezepelumab can Restore Normal Lung Function in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma: Pooled Results from the PATHWAY and NAVIGATOR Studies

INTRODUCTION

This post hoc analysis assessed the ability of tezepelumab treatment to restore normal lung function in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with abnormal lung function at baseline pooled from the PATHWAY and NAVIGATOR studies.

METHODS

PATHWAY and NAVIGATOR were multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Patients (12-80 years old) included in this analysis received tezepelumab 210 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks or matched placebo for 52 weeks. Patients had a percent predicted pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of < 80% (< 90% for adolescents in NAVIGATOR) at screening. The change from baseline to week 52 in pre-BD FEV1 was assessed by baseline percent predicted pre-BD FEV1 subgroup [abnormal (< 80%) and normal (≥ 80%)]. The proportion of patients with abnormal lung function at baseline who achieved normal lung function at week 52 was assessed overall and by biomarker level and disease duration subgroups.

RESULTS

Of the 665 and 669 patients who received tezepelumab or placebo, respectively, 564 and 569 had abnormal lung function at baseline. Tezepelumab improved the pre-BD FEV1 from baseline to week 52 versus placebo by 0.14 L [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.19] and 0.13 L (95% CI 0.01-0.24) in patients with abnormal and normal lung function at baseline, respectively. A higher proportion of tezepelumab than placebo recipients with abnormal lung function at baseline achieved normal lung function at week 52 (17.2% vs. 9.9%, respectively). Among tezepelumab recipients, those with higher levels of type 2 inflammatory biomarkers and a shorter duration of disease at baseline were more likely to achieve normal lung function at week 52.

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, a greater proportion of tezepelumab than placebo recipients with abnormal lung function at baseline achieved normal lung function at week 52.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PATHWAY: NCT02054130; NAVIGATOR: NCT03347279.

Targeting alarmins in asthma: From bench to clinic

Over the past 2 decades, mechanistic studies of allergic and type 2 (T2)-mediated airway inflammation have led to multiple approved therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma. The approval and availability of these monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE, a T2 cytokine (IL-5) and/or cytokine receptors (IL-5Rα, IL-4Rα) has been central to the progresses made in the management of moderate-to-severe asthma over this period. However, there are persistent gaps in clinician's ability to provide precise care, given that many patients with T2-high asthma do not respond to IgE- or T2 cytokine-targeting therapies and that patients with T2-low asthma have few therapeutic options. The new frontier of precision medicine in asthma, as well as in other allergic diseases, includes the targeting of epithelium-derived cytokines known as alarmins, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-25, IL-33, and their receptors. The effects of these alarmins, which can act upstream of immune cells, involve both the innate and adaptive systems and hold potential for the treatment of both T2-high and -low disease. Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin antibody, has already been approved for the treatment of severe asthma. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of alarmin biology with a primary focus on allergic airway diseases. We link the mechanistic corollaries to the clinical implications and advances in drug development targeting alarmins, with a particular focus on currently approved treatments, those under study, and future potential targets in alarmin signaling pathways.

The combination of allergen immunotherapy and biologics for inhalant allergies: Exploring the synergy

The development of monoclonal antibodies that selectively target IgE and type 2 immunity has opened new possibilities in the treatment of allergies. Although they have been used mainly as single therapies found to have efficacy in the management of asthma and other T2-mediated diseases, there is a growing interest in using these monoclonal antibodies in combination with allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT has transformed the treatment of allergic diseases by aiming to modify the underlying immune response to allergens rather than just providing temporary symptom relief. Despite the proven efficacy and safety of AIT, unmet needs call for further research and innovation. Combination strategies involving biologics and AIT exhibit potential in improving short-term efficacy, reducing adverse events, and increasing immunologic tolerance. Anti-IgE emerges as the most promising therapeutic strategy, not only enhancing AIT's safety and tolerability but also providing additional evidence of efficacy compared with AIT alone. Anti-interleukin-4 receptor offers a reduction in adverse effects and an improved immunologic profile when combined with AIT; however, its impact on short-term efficacy seems limited. The combination of cat dander subcutaneous immunotherapy with anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin was synergistic with enhanced efficacy and altered immune responses that persisted for 1 year after discontinuation compared with AIT alone. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the sustained benefits and safety profiles of combination strategies.

In vitro models to study viral-induced asthma exacerbation: a short review for a key issue

Asthma is a heterogenous inflammatory bronchial disease involving complex mechanisms, several inflammatory pathways, and multiples cell-type networks. Bronchial inflammation associated to asthma is consecutive to multiple aggressions on epithelium, such as microbiologic, pollutant, and antigenic agents, which are responsible for both T2 and non-T2 inflammatory responses and further airway remodeling. Because asthma physiopathology involves multiple crosstalk between several cell types from different origins (epithelial, mesenchymal, and immune cells) and numerous cellular effectors, no single and/or representative in vitro model is suitable to study the overall of this disease. In this short review, we present and discuss the advantages and limitations of different in vitro models to decipher different aspects of virus-related asthma physiopathology and exacerbation.

Tezepelumab in Adults with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Treatment with tezepelumab has been effective for sinonasal symptoms in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and a history of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, but its efficacy and safety in adults with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is unknown.

METHODS

We randomly assigned adults with physician-diagnosed, symptomatic, severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps to receive standard care and either tezepelumab (at a dose of 210 mg) or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The coprimary end points were the changes from baseline in the total nasal-polyp score (range, 0 to 4 [for each nostril]; higher scores indicate greater severity) and the mean nasal-congestion score (range, 0 to 3; higher scores indicate greater severity) at week 52. Key secondary end points assessed in the overall population were the loss-of-smell score, the total score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22; range, 0 to 110; higher scores indicate greater severity), the Lund-Mackay score (range, 0 to 24; higher scores indicate greater severity), the total symptom score (range, 0 to 24; higher scores indicate greater severity), and the first decision to treat with nasal-polyp surgery or use of systemic glucocorticoid therapy, or both, assessed in time-to-event analyses (individual and composite).

RESULTS

In total, 203 patients were assigned to receive tezepelumab and 205 to receive placebo. At week 52, the patients who received tezepelumab had significant improvements in the total nasal-polyp score (mean difference vs. placebo, -2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.39 to -1.74) and the mean nasal-congestion score (-1.03; 95% CI, -1.20 to -0.86) (P<0.001 for both scores). Tezepelumab significantly improved the loss-of-smell score (mean difference vs. placebo, -1.00; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.83), SNOT-22 total score (-27.26; 95% CI, -32.32 to -22.21), Lund-Mackay score (-5.72; 95% CI, -6.39 to -5.06), and total symptom score (-6.89; 95% CI, -8.02 to -5.76) (P<0.001 for all scores). Surgery for nasal polyps was indicated in significantly fewer patients in the tezepelumab group (0.5%) than in the placebo group (22.1%) (hazard ratio, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.09); there was significantly less use of systemic glucocorticoids with tezepelumab (5.2%) than with placebo (18.3%) (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.27) (P<0.001 for both time-to-event analyses).

CONCLUSIONS

Tezepelumab therapy led to significantly greater reductions in the size of nasal polyps, the severity of nasal congestion and sinonasal symptoms, and the use of nasal-polyp surgery and systemic glucocorticoids than placebo in adults with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Amgen; WAYPOINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04851964.).

Airway epithelial cells as drivers of severe asthma pathogenesis

Our understanding of the airway epithelium's role in driving asthma pathogenesis has evolved over time. From being regarded primarily as a physical barrier that could be damaged via inflammation, the epithelium is now known to actively contribute to asthma development through interactions with the immune system. The airway epithelium contains multiple cell types with specialized functions spanning barrier action, mucociliary clearance, immune cell recruitment, and maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Environmental insults may cause direct or indirect injury to the epithelium leading to impaired barrier function, epithelial remodelling, and increased release of inflammatory mediators. In severe asthma, the epithelial barrier repair process is inhibited and the response to insults is exaggerated, driving downstream inflammation. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms also maintain dysregulation of the epithelial barrier, adding to disease chronicity. Here, we review the role of the airway epithelium in severe asthma and how targeting the epithelium can contribute to asthma treatment.

Real-World Biologic Use Patterns in Severe Asthma, 2015-2021: The CLEAR Study

Background

Biologics targeting immunoglobulin E, interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 or IL-5 signaling are effective at treating severe asthma; however, individual patients' responses may be suboptimal, leading to therapy switching or stopping. The CLEAR study aimed to assess real-world biologic use patterns and associated clinical outcomes in patients receiving care for severe asthma.

Methods

CLEAR was a multicenter, observational study that included adults (≥18 years old) from 23 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry between December 2015 and August 2021. Patients who initiated biologic therapy were categorized as continuing the initial biologic for 6 months, switching to another biologic within 6 months or stopping biologic treatment within 6 months. Outcomes were assessed using the closest available data to 12 months after biologic initiation, using propensity score-weighted multivariable regression models.

Results

Among 1,859 patients who initiated biologic therapy, 1,116 (60.0%) continued, 474 (25.5%) switched and 269 (14.5%) stopped treatment. Patients who switched or stopped therapy had a higher annualized asthma exacerbation rate post-initiation than those who continued (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% confidence interval]: switched, 1.83 [1.51, 2.22]; stopped, 1.53 [1.19, 1.95]) and were more likely to have uncontrolled asthma at last assessment (adjusted odds ratio: switched, 5.40 [3.12, 9.33]; stopped, 4.02 [2.32, 6.98]). Compared with those who continued therapy, patients who switched had a higher long-term daily oral corticosteroid dose (adjusted β: 3.77 [1.71, 4.37] mg) and higher rates of hospitalizations (aIRR: 2.58 [1.52, 4.37]) and emergency room visits (aIRR: 2.12 [1.39, 3.24]).

Conclusion

Switching or stopping biologic therapy was associated with worse clinical outcomes than continuing the initial therapy.

A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Post-Marketing Safety of Tezepelumab

BACKGROUND

Tezepelumab has shown promising efficacy for adult patients with severe asthma since its approval. However, the post-marketing safety evaluation of tezepelumab is currently lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the post-marketing safety of tezepelumab based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.

METHODS

Adverse events (AEs) reported from January 2022 to December 2023 were extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. Disproportionality analysis by reporting odds ratio and empirical Bayesian geometric mean was performed to detect potential AEs related to tezepelumab. We also assessed clinical characteristics and time to onset of AEs.

RESULTS

A total of 1,699 tezepelumab-related AE reports were identified during the study period. We detected 30 tezepelumab-related AE signals by simultaneously applying the two algorithms. At the system organ class level, the most common system organ class related to tezepelumab was respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders. At the preferred term level, common AEs including arthralgia and back pain were detected, which were also documented in the label of tezepelumab and clinical trials. New unexpected AEs such as chest pain and myalgia were also identified. Median time to onset of tezepelumab-related AEs was 7.5 days and most AEs occurred within the first 1 month after tezepelumab initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the post-marketing safety of tezepelumab in the real-world setting. Our findings will provide valuable evidence for future clinical studies and management of safety issues of tezepelumab.

Short-term Tezepelumab effectiveness in patients with severe asthma: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

Severe asthma presents significant management challenges, often requiring advanced treatments to control symptoms and reduce exacerbations. The use of monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the clinical course of patients with severe asthma, showing a significant impact on exacerbations reduction, oral corticosteroids (OCS) cessation and on the improvement of lung function and quality of life. Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for these patients.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, prospective, multicenter study including 20 patients with confirmed severe asthma according to ERS guidelines and GINA recommendations. Patients received Tezepelumab 210 mg every 4 wk due to uncontrolled asthma despite maximal inhalation treatment with ICS/LABA. Data were collected before treatment initiation (T0) and after three months from the first administration (T3).

RESULTS

After three months of Tezepelumab treatment, we reported significant improvements in asthma symptoms and quality of life, as well as a consistent reduction in exacerbations and OCS use. We found no statistically meaningful differences among main clinical and functional outcomes according to inflammatory biomarkers, while lung function improved significantly in patients with less allergic sensitization. No serious adverse event was reported during the follow up, while the rates of mild adverse effects were comparable to those from registration trials.

CONCLUSION

Tezepelumab demonstrated short-term efficacy in improving asthma control and quality of life, showing a favorable safety profile. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up would confirm these findings and identify predictors of response to Tezepelumab.

TL1A, a novel alarmin in airway, intestinal, and autoimmune disorders

The term alarmin denotes a broad class of molecules rapidly released to alert the immune system through the engagement of specific receptors on immune cells. Three alarmin cytokines-thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-33, and IL-25-are released from epithelial and certain stromal cells. TNF-like cytokine 1A (TL1A) is a member of the TNF cytokine superfamily, first identified in human endothelial cells. TL1A is now considered a novel alarmin expressed by human and mouse bronchial and intestinal epithelial cells. TL1A exerts its biological activities by binding to a trimeric receptor DR3 (death receptor 3), expressed on a wide spectrum of immune and structural cells, including lung fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and bronchial epithelial cells. TL1A has been implicated in experimental and human inflammatory bowel diseases as well as in airway inflammation and remodeling in severe asthma. A monoclonal antibody anti-TL1A (tulisokibart) is effective in inducing clinical remission in ulcerative colitis patients. Increasing evidence suggests that TL1A is also involved in certain autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. These emerging findings broaden the role of TL1A in various human inflammatory conditions. Several clinical trials are currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies targeting TL1A in asthma or inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Tezepelumab for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: Results of the phase 2b INCEPTION study

BACKGROUND

Tezepelumab, an mAb inhibiting thymic stromal lymphopoietin, is an upstream-targeted therapy with potential to inhibit multiple pathways in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate tezepelumab efficacy and safety in patients with CSU despite treatment with second-generation H1 antihistamines.

METHODS

This phase 2b study randomized 183 patients (125 anti-IgE therapy-naive; 58 anti-IgE therapy-experienced) to placebo every 2 weeks, tezepelumab 210 mg every 4 weeks, tezepelumab 420 mg every 2 weeks, or omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (anti-IgE-naive only) for 16-week treatment. The primary end point was change from baseline in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at week 16. Safety and exploratory end points were evaluated through week 32.

RESULTS

The 16-week primary end point was not met. In the overall population, tezepelumab 210 mg and 420 mg did not significantly improve UAS7 versus placebo (least squares mean [SE]: -13.5 [1.6] and -14.7 [1.5], respectively, vs -13.6 [1.6], P = .99, nominal and P = .60, nominal, respectively). Greater improvement in UAS7 versus placebo was observed in the anti-IgE-naive tezepelumab-treated populations (nominal significance); a trend toward significance was observed with omalizumab. In the anti-IgE-naive population, there was delayed, sustained, 32-week off-treatment improvement in UAS7 versus placebo with tezepelumab 210 mg (nominally significant) and 420 mg (trend), but not with omalizumab. This effect was larger in patients with lower baseline IgE levels and longer CSU duration and accompanied sustained IL-5 and IL-13 reductions. Tezepelumab and placebo safety findings were balanced.

CONCLUSION

Although the 16-week primary end point was not met, tezepelumab showed post-treatment reductions in CSU activity through week 32, suggesting a delayed, sustained, thymic stromal lymphopoietin blockade treatment effect.

Long-term safety of tezepelumab in patients with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Tezepelumab has demonstrated its effectiveness in patients with asthma, but its safety, especially for long-term use, needs to be further explored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety of long-term use of tezepelumab in patients with asthma.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of asthma with tezepelumab, compared with placebo, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to weighted mean differences (WMDs) and risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Seven RCTs (enrolling 2050 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Serious adverse event (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95), upper respiratory tract infection (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.96), and asthma (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.76) were more frequent in the placebo groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with at least one adverse event (AE), AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment, all-cause death, influenza, bronchitis, nasopharyngitis, headache, and hypertension between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Long-term (12-52 wk) use of tezepelumab in patients with asthma does not increase the incidence of adverse events.

IL1RL1 variant may affect the response to type 2 biologics in patients with severe asthma

Background

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with variable response to treatment. Genetic backgrounds are involved in the severity of type 2 asthma, but their effects on responses to biologics remain unknown. This study aimed to clarify the role of genetic factors in response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.

Methods

Adults with severe asthma receiving biologics were enrolled in this multicentre, observational, real-world study. The responses to biologics were evaluated using Physicians' Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE). Optimal biologic for each patient was also determined based on the best GETE score for the biologic used or currently used biologic. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (IL1RL1, rs1420101; IL4RA, rs8832; and TSLP rs1837253) were examined.

Results

Among the 113 patients analysed, 53 (46.9%) had an excellent GETE score for at least one biologic. These patients with an excellent GETE score for at least one biologic, particularly for benralizumab, had the risk genotype of rs1420101 more frequently than the remaining patients, independent of the clinical demographics. Regarding the optimal biologic for each patient, anti-IL-5 drugs were optimal for patients with the rs1420101 TT or rs8832 GG genotype. Furthermore, dupilumab was similarly effective, regardless of the risk genotypes examined in this study.

Conclusion

IL1RL1 rs1420101 TT genotype and/or IL4RA rs8832 GG genotype may predict an excellent or optimal response to biologic therapy in each patient, particularly to anti-interleukin-5 targeted therapy. The elucidation of genetic predisposition may improve the management of severe asthma in the era of biologics.

Benralizumab: from tissue distribution to eosinophilic cytotoxicity up to potential immunoregulation

INTRODUCTION

Benralizumab, a monoclonal IgG antibody, has emerged as a key therapeutic agent in severe asthma by specifically targeting eosinophils, pivotal cells that drive inflammation and tissue damage. Over the past two decades, the availability of such targeted therapies has allowed patients to achieve better disease control. Real-world evidence has consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of benralizumab in managing severe asthma.

AREAS COVERED

This paper discusses the kinetic and potential mechanism of action of benralizumab beyond the well-known antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity involving natural killer cells.

EXPERT OPINION

The available data so far clearly show that reducing eosinophils, one of the main drivers of inflammation and tissue damage in SA, accounts for clinical benefits to these patients. Benralizumab is able to directly reduce tissue levels of eosinophils via multiple mechanisms, and additionally, it is potentially able to modulate the innate immune response. The complex and unique multiple modes of action of benralizumab and its pharmacokinetic features, seem to be the milestone on which the effectiveness of benralizumab is founded.

Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP): Evidence in Respiratory Epithelial-driven Diseases Including Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is increasingly recognized for its pivotal role in the pathogenesis of various epithelial-driven chronic inflammatory diseases. This review navigates the existing evidence on TSLP, with a particular focus on asthma, before delving into the current understanding of its role in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). We explore the role of TSLP in the pathogenesis of asthma and CRSwNP, two conditions often interconnected and collectively referred to as"Global Airway Disease". Additionally, this review assesses the therapeutic potential of TSLP inhibition as a treatment option for both CRSwNP and asthma. A systematic literature search was conducted; selected publications were used to describe the biology of TSLP, including its expression and diverse effects on inflammation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of TSLP in asthma is well established and supported by the efficacy of tezepelumab, the first anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody approved for both type 2 (T2)-high and T2-low severe asthma. TSLP may be a key contributor to CRSwNP pathogenesis as evidenced by genetic and mechanistic studies in which TSLP has been shown to regulate T2 inflammation and influence non-T2 responses. Preliminary data from the NAVIGATOR trial indicate that tezepelumab may reduce CRSwNP symptoms in patients with comorbid asthma. While further research is required to clarify the extent of TSLP contribution in CRSwNP, this review highlights the potential of anti-TSLP therapies as a novel approach for managing severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP. If these preliminary findings are confirmed, targeting TSLP could become a promising strategy to treat CRSwNP with or without comorbid asthma.

Interleukin-38-overexpressing adenovirus infection in dendritic cell-based treatment enhances immunotherapy for allergic asthma via inducing Foxp3+ regulatory T cells

Allergic asthma is a chronic disease tied to unusual immune reactions involving type 2 T helper (Th2) cells specific to allergens. Dendritic cells (DCs) play a crucial role in guiding T-cell responses. Regulatory T (Treg) cells have the ability to suppress effector T-cell responses, and interleukin (IL)-38 is involved in Treg cell differentiation. In this study, we explored impacts of IL-38 on the activation and function of DCs, and we then developed an IL-38-overexpressing adenovirus (Ad-IL38) to evaluate its effectiveness in treating allergic asthma in mice through the adaptive transfer of Ad-IL38-infected DCs (IL38-DCs). Treating lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated bone marrow-derived DCs with recombinant IL-38 reduced cluster of differentiation 80 (CD80), CD86, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II expressions and decreased IL-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α while increasing IL-10 secretion. The simultaneous culture of these semi-mature DCs with allogeneic CD4+ T cells facilitated the production of Forkhead box protein P3-positive (Foxp3+) Treg cells. A transcriptomic analysis revealed downregulation of the Chil3, Inhba, and Ctgf genes that are crucial for regulating inflammatory responses and cytokine-mediated signaling pathways in IL-38-treated DCs. In an animal model of asthma, IL38-DC treatment effectively decreased levels of an ovalbumin (OVA)-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody in serum, attenuated the severity of airway hyperresponsiveness, reduced the production of Th2-type cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) and proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, lowered expressions of the Th2-related cytokines IL-25 and thymic stromal-derived lymphopoietin (TSLP) by lung epithelial cells, and mitigated airway inflammation. Notably, enhanced expression of Foxp3+ Treg cells was linked to increased mRNA levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β production in vivo. In conclusion, we comprehensively clarified the immunomodulatory effects of IL-38 on DCs and provide a new treatment with IL-38 genetically modified DCs for alleviating Th2-mediated allergic diseases.

Clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission with tezepelumab in a broad population of patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: results over 2 years from the NAVIGATOR and DESTINATION studies

BACKGROUND

In asthma, clinical response is characterised by disease improvement with treatment, whereas clinical remission is characterised by long-term disease stabilisation with or without ongoing treatment. The proportions of patients receiving tezepelumab who responded to treatment and who achieved on-treatment clinical remission were assessed in the NAVIGATOR (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03347279) and DESTINATION (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03706079) studies of severe, uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

NAVIGATOR and DESTINATION were phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies; DESTINATION was an extension of NAVIGATOR. Complete clinical response was defined as achieving all of the following: ≥50% reduction in exacerbations versus the previous year, improvements in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of ≥100 mL or ≥5%, improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-6 score of ≥0.5 and physician's assessment of asthma improvement. On-treatment clinical remission was defined as an ACQ-6 total score ≤1.5, stable lung function (pre-BD FEV1 >95% of baseline) and no exacerbations or use of oral corticosteroids during the time periods assessed.

RESULTS

Higher proportions of tezepelumab than placebo recipients achieved complete clinical response over weeks 0-52 (46% versus 24%; OR 2.83, 95% CI 2.10-3.82) and on-treatment clinical remission over weeks 0-52 (28.5% versus 21.9%; OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.95-2.19) and weeks >52-104 (33.5% versus 26.7%; OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.97-2.14). Tezepelumab recipients who achieved on-treatment clinical remission versus complete clinical response at week 52 had better preserved lung function and lower inflammatory biomarker levels at baseline, and fewer exacerbations in the 12 months before the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, tezepelumab treatment was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving complete clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission compared with placebo. Both are clinically important outcomes, but may be driven by different patient characteristics.

Positioning tezepelumab for patients with severe asthma: from evidence to unmet needs

Several endotypes of severe asthma with predominantly type 2 inflammation can be distinguished by the immune pathways driving the inflammatory processes. However, in the absence of type 2 inflammation, asthma is less clearly defined and is generally associated with poor responses to conventional anti-asthmatic therapies. Studies have shown that disruption of the epithelial barrier triggers inflammatory responses and increases epithelial permeability. A key aspect of this process is that epithelial cells release alarmin cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), in response to allergens and infections. Among these cytokines, TSLP has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for severe asthma, leading to the development of a new biologic, tezepelumab (TZP). By blocking TSLP, TZP may produce wide-ranging effects. Based on positive clinical trial results, TZP appears to offer a promising, safe, and effective treatment approach. This narrative review examines the evidence for treating severe asthma with TZP, analyses clinical trial findings, and provides clinicians with practical insights into identifying patients who may respond best to this novel biologic therapy.

Targeting the IL-5 pathway in eosinophilic asthma: A comparison of anti-IL-5 versus anti-IL-5 receptor agents

Eosinophilic asthma is characterized by frequent exacerbations, poor symptom control and accelerated lung function decline. It is now recognized that the immune response underlying eosinophilic asthma involves a complex network of interconnected pathways from both the adaptive and innate immune systems. Within this response, interleukin-5 (IL-5) plays a central role in eosinophil differentiation, activation and survival and has emerged as a key target for therapies treating severe asthma. The monoclonal antibodies mepolizumab and reslizumab target the ligand IL-5, preventing its interaction with eosinophils; in contrast, benralizumab binds to the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R), preventing IL-5 from binding and leading to substantially greater eosinophil reduction by enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Although no direct head-to-head clinical trials of asthma have been published to formally evaluate the clinical significance of these different therapeutic approaches, the potential benefits of partial versus complete eosinophil depletion continue to remain an important area of study and debate. Here, we review the existing real-world and clinical study data of anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5R therapies in severe eosinophilic asthma.

Biomarkers in asthma, potential for therapeutic intervention

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by multiple phenotypes with varying risk factors and therapeutic responses. This Commentary describes research on biomarkers for T2-"high" and T2-"low" inflammation, a hallmark of the disease. Patients with asthma who exhibit an increase in airway T2 inflammation are classified as having T2-high asthma. In this endotype, Type 2 cytokines interleukins (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13, plus other inflammatory mediators, lead to increased eosinophilic inflammation and elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). In contrast, T2-low asthma has no clear definition. Biomarkers are considered valuable tools as they can help identify various phenotypes and endotypes, as well as treatment response to standard treatment or potential therapeutic targets, particularly for biologics. As our knowledge of phenotypes and endotypes expands, biologics are increasingly integrated into treatment strategies for severe asthma. These treatments block specific inflammatory pathways or single mediators. While single or composite biomarkers may help to identify subsets of patients who might benefit from these treatments, only a few inflammatory biomarkers have been validated for clinical application. One example is sputum eosinophilia, a particularly useful biomarker, as it may suggest corticosteroid responsiveness or reflect non-compliance to inhaled corticosteroids. As knowledge develops, a meaningful goal would be to provide individualized care to patients with asthma.

Efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with severe asthma and persistent airflow obstruction

Background

Persistent airflow obstruction (PAO) in patients with asthma can be difficult to treat. Tezepelumab blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine implicated in asthma pathogenesis. This analysis evaluated the efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and PAO.

Methods

PATHWAY (phase 2b) and NAVIGATOR (phase 3) were multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. This post hoc analysis included PATHWAY and NAVIGATOR patients who received tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Change from baseline to week 52 in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the annualised asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) over 52 weeks were assessed in patients with and without PAO (post-bronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7) at baseline.

Results

Of the 1334 included patients, 782 (58.6%) had PAO at baseline. At week 52, greater improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 from baseline were observed in tezepelumab versus placebo recipients with PAO (least-squares (LS) mean 0.24 versus 0.07 L; difference 0.17 L, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.23) and without PAO (LS mean 0.20 versus 0.12 L; difference 0.08 L, 95% CI: 0.01-0.15). Tezepelumab reduced the AAER versus placebo by 61% (95% CI: 51-69) and 56% (95% CI: 42-67) in patients with and without PAO, respectively. For patients with PAO at baseline, the proportion without PAO at week 52 was higher with tezepelumab (12.1%) than placebo (6.6%) (odds ratio 1.96, 95% CI: 1.30-2.94).

Conclusion

Tezepelumab improved lung function and reduced exacerbations versus placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with and without PAO.

Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017-2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry

Introduction

Patients with severe asthma may be prescribed biologic therapies to improve disease control. The EVEREST study aimed to characterize the global disease burden of patients with severe asthma without access to biologics and those who have access but do not receive biologics, as well as the remaining unmet need despite use of these therapies.

Methods

This was a historical cohort study of patients with severe asthma (aged ≥18 years) in the International Severe Asthma Registry receiving Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2018 step 5 treatment, or with uncontrolled disease at GINA step 4. Prospective data on patient clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and medication use over a 12-month period between December 2017 and May 2022 were assessed for the following five groups: biologics accessible (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, or dupilumab); biologics inaccessible; biologics accessible but not received; biologics accessible and received; and biologic recipients whose asthma remained suboptimally controlled.

Results

Overall, 9587 patients from 21 countries were included. Among patients in the biologics accessible (n=5073), biologics inaccessible (n=3041), and biologics accessible but not received (n=382) groups, 41.4%, 18.7%, and 49.6% experienced at least two exacerbations, 11.5%, 10.5%, and 6.2% required at least one hospitalization, 47.9%, 54.6%, and 71.2% had uncontrolled asthma, and 23.9%, 8.6%, and 11.0% received long-term oral corticosteroids (LTOCS), respectively. Following biologic therapy, among patients who received biologics overall (n=2666) and among those whose asthma remained suboptimally controlled (n=1780), 19.1% and 23.0% experienced at least two exacerbations, 2.7% and 2.9% required at least one hospitalization, and 16.7% and 22.0% received LTOCS, respectively.

Conclusion

There is a substantial disease burden in both patients without access to biologics and those with access who do not receive these therapies, although specific outcomes may vary between these groups. There also remains a high unmet need among biologic recipients, many of whom have a suboptimal response to treatment.

Systematic literature review on early clinical evidence for immune-resolution therapies and potential benefits to patients and healthcare providers

Introduction

Several current therapies for autoimmune diseases do not provide sustained remission. Therapies that focus on the restoration of homeostasis within the immune system (i.e., immune resolution) could overcome the limitations of current therapies and provide more durable remission. However, there is no established consensus on appropriate clinical trial designs and endpoints to evaluate such therapies. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) focusing on five index diseases (asthma, atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], and ulcerative colitis) to explore published literature on 1) expert opinion on immune-resolution outcomes that should be measured in clinical trials; and 2) quantification of immune resolution in previous clinical trials.

Methods

The SLR was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Embase and MEDLINE databases were systematically searched (2013-2023) for published English language articles. Conference proceedings (2020-2022) from American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Rheumatology, Digestive Disease Week, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, and European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology were searched to include relevant abstracts. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023406489).

Results

The SLR included 26 publications on 20 trials and 12 expert opinions. Expert opinions generally lacked specific recommendations on the assessment of immune resolution in clinical trials and instead suggested targets or biomarkers for future therapies. The targets included thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in asthma; T helper (Th)2 and Th22 cells and their respective cytokines (interleukin [IL]-4R and IL-22) in atopic dermatitis; inhibitory/regulatory molecules involved in T-cell modulation, and protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 22 (PTPN22) in rheumatoid arthritis; low-dose IL-2 therapy in SLE; and pro-resolution mediators in ulcerative colitis and asthma. In the interventional studies, direct biomarker assessments of immune resolution were the number/proportion of regulatory T-cells (Treg) and the ratio Th17/Treg in SLE and rheumatoid arthritis; the number of T follicular helper cells (Tfh), Th1, Th2, Th17, and Th22 in atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and SLE; and mucosal proinflammatory gene signatures (tumor necrosis factor [TNF], interleukin 1 alpha [IL1A], regenerating family member 1 alpha [REG1A], IL8, interleukin 1 beta [IL1B], and leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors A [LILRA]) in ulcerative colitis. Several studies reported a statistically significant relationship between clinical remission and immune-resolution biomarkers, suggesting a link between T-cell homeostasis, cytokine production, and disease activity in autoimmune diseases.

Discussion

Existing literature does not offer clear guidance on the evaluation of immune resolution in interventional studies. Further research and consensus are needed to assess a treatment's ability to induce long-term remission or low disease activity.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023406489, identifier CRD42023406489.

Real-World Data on Tezepelumab in Patients With Severe Asthma in Germany

BACKGROUND

Tezepelumab is a novel biologic blocking thymic stromal lymphopoetin, approved for severe asthma irrespective of biomarker levels or phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize a real-world tezepelumab patient cohort and the efficacy among various asthma phenotypes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicenter study on patients with severe asthma initiating tezepelumab. Clinical response was evaluated at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

We included 129 patients with an average age of 52.5 ± 13.1 years, 59.7% were female. The majority (86.0%) had increased type 2 (T2) biomarkers, 68.2% an allergic and 31.8% an eosinophilic phenotype. 23.3% of patients were biologic-naive. 22 (18.2%) patients discontinued tezepelumab therapy owing to suspected side effects or insufficient efficacy. At 6 months' follow-up, median reduction in annualized exacerbation rate was-1 [25th percentile; 75% percentile {-2.9; 0.0}], the reduction of oral corticosteroid dose among patients with long-term oral corticosteroid therapy was -5 mg [-10; 0] and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) improved by 2 [0; 5] points. A treatment response according to Biologic Asthma Response Score of 80.8% was demonstrated. There were no significant differences in treatment response between T2-high versus T2-low, early- versus adult-onset and eosinophilic versus non-eosinophilic asthma. Prior treatment with other biologics was associated with inferior treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-life cohort, including a large proportion of patients with history of previous biologic use and encompassing various subgroups, the majority responded to tezepelumab. Our data further suggest a steroid-sparing effect of tezepelumab.

Exploring the therapeutic potential of monoclonal antibodies targeting TSLP and IgE in asthma management

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the utilization of biologic therapies for the management of asthma. Both TSLP and IgE are important immune molecules in the development of asthma, and they are involved in the occurrence and regulation of inflammatory response.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted to gather information on anti-TSLP antibody and anti-IgE antibody.

RESULTS

This investigation elucidates the distinct mechanistic roles of Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP) and Immunoglobulin E (IgE) in the pathogenesis of asthma, with a particular emphasis on delineating the therapeutic mechanisms and pharmacological properties of monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE and TSLP. Through a meticulous examination of clinical trials involving paradigmatic agents such as omalizumab and tezepelumab, we offer valuable insights into the potential treatment modalities for diseases with shared immunopathogenic pathways involving IgE and TSLP.

CONCLUSION

The overarching objective of this comprehensive study is to delve into the latest advancements in asthma therapeutics and to provide guidance for future investigations in this domain.

New Therapies in Outpatient Pulmonary Medicine

Newer medications and devices, as well as greater understanding of the benefits and limitations of existing treatments, have led to expanded treatment options for patients with lung disease. Treatment advances have led to improved outcomes for patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, and cystic fibrosis. The risks and benefits of available treatments are substantially variable within these heterogeneous disease groups. Defining the role of newer therapies mandates both an understanding of these disorders and overall treatment approaches. This section will review general treatment approaches in addition to focusing on newer therapies for these conditions..

To investigate the function of age-related genes in different subtypes of asthma based on bioinformatics analysis

Asthma is a heterogeneous airway inflammatory disease that can be classified according to the inflammatory phenotype. The pathogenesis, clinical features, response to hormone therapy, and prognosis of different inflammatory phenotypes differ significantly. This condition also refers to age-related chronic ailments. Here, we intend to identify the function of aging-related genes in different inflammatory phenotypes of asthma using bioinformatic analyses. Initially, the research adopted the GSEA analysis to understand the fundamental mechanisms that govern different inflammatory phenotypes of asthma pathogenesis and use the CIBERSORT algorithm to assess the immune cell composition. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of eosinophilic asthma (EA), neutrophilic asthma (NA), and paucigranulocytic asthma (PGA) were identified through the limma R package. Aging-related genes, screened from multiple databases, were intersected with DEGs of asthma to obtain the asthma-aging-related DEGs. Then, the GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses showed that the NA- and EA-aging-related DEGs are involved in the various cytokine-mediated signaling pathways. PPI network and correlation analysis were performed to identify and evaluate the correlation of the hub genes. Further, the clinical characteristics of asthma-aging-related DEGs were explored through ROC analysis. 3 and 12 aging-related DEGs in EA and NA patients show high diagnostic accuracy, respectively (AUC >0.7). This study provided valuable insights into aging-related gene therapy for phenotype-specific asthma. Moreover, the study suggests that effective interventions against asthma may operate by disrupting the detrimental cycle of "aging induces metabolic diseases, which exacerbate aging".

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Exposure-Efficacy and Body Weight-Response Analyses for Tezepelumab in Patients With Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma

Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks the activity of thymic stromal lymphopoietin. This analysis assessed the suitability of a fixed-dose regimen of tezepelumab 210 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in adults and adolescents with severe, uncontrolled asthma. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using data from 1368 patients with asthma or healthy participants enrolled in 8 clinical studies (phases 1-3). Tezepelumab exposure-efficacy relationships were analyzed in the phase 3 NAVIGATOR study (NCT03347279), using asthma exacerbation rates over 52 weeks and changes in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s at week 52. Tezepelumab pharmacokinetics were well characterized by a 2-compartment linear disposition model with first-order absorption and elimination following subcutaneous and intravenous administration at 2.1-420 and 210-700 mg, respectively. There were no clinically relevant effects on tezepelumab pharmacokinetics from age (≥12 years), sex, race/ethnicity, renal or hepatic function, disease severity (inhaled corticosteroid dose level), concomitant asthma medication use, smoking history, or anti-drug antibodies. Body weight was the most influential covariate on tezepelumab exposure, but no meaningful differences in efficacy or safety were observed across body weight quartiles in patients with asthma who received tezepelumab 210 mg subcutaneously Q4W. There was no apparent relationship between tezepelumab exposure and efficacy at this dose regimen, suggesting that it is on the plateau of the exposure-response curve of tezepelumab. In conclusion, a fixed-dose regimen of tezepelumab 210 mg subcutaneously Q4W is appropriate for eligible adults and adolescents with severe, uncontrolled asthma.

Research progress of airway inflammation in asthma: A bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the prevalence of asthma has gradually increased and the number of asthmatics worldwide has reached 358 million, which has caused huge economic loss. Airway inflammation is an important feature of asthma, and international research in this field has a high degree of heat. Therefore, this paper uses the bibliometric method to systematically review and visualize the literature in this field, aiming to provide some reference value for follow-up related research.

METHODS

To retrieve the research literature on airway inflammation in asthma from 2003 to 2022 in the Web of Science Core Collection database. The bibliometric method was used to systematically analyze the included literature data by using visualization analysis software such as CiteSpace (6.2. R4) and VOSviewer (1.6.19).

RESULTS

A total of 1892 articles published in 423 journals were included in this study, from 1912 institutions in 62 countries/regions. The number of articles published between 2003 and 2022 showed a trend of fluctuating growth. The country with the largest number of articles published was China (558,29.49 %), followed by the United States (371,19.61 %) and Korea (212,11.21 %). Gibson, Peter G is the author with the highest number of publications, and Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is the most published journal.

CONCLUSION SUBSECTIONS

This study systematically reveals the state of the literature in the field of airway inflammation in asthma over the past 20 years. The exploration of inflammatory cell components, pathway molecules and biological agents are research hotspots in this field and should be further studied.

A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of SHR-1905, a long-acting anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin antibody, in healthy subjects

Introduction

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is integral to inducing innate and T helper two cell inflammation that leads to clinical symptoms of asthma. SHR-1905 is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 kappa monoclonal antibody that inhibits TSLP bioactivity, developed for the treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma. This phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single ascending dose study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of subcutaneous SHR-1905 in healthy subjects.

Methods

Five dose cohorts were planned (50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 mg) and subjects were randomized (8:2) in each cohort to receive SHR-1905 or placebo with a follow-up period up to Day 253.

Results

The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild and the incidence of TEAEs was comparable between the SHR-1905 and the placebo groups. The maximum serum concentration was reached 7.0-17.6 days after injection. The serum concentration of SHR-1905 increased with increasing dose level, and SHR-1905 exposure exhibited in a slightly greater-than-dose-proportional manner from 50 to 600 mg. SHR-1905 had a prolonged serum half-life around 80 days supporting every 6-month dosing. In SHR-1905 treated subjects, 15% tested positive for anti-drug antibodies post-dose with no apparent effect on corresponding PK profiles or safety.

Conclusion

SHR-1905 demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile with a long half-life in healthy subjects after a single administration in the dose range of 50-600 mg.

Clinical Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04800263.

Efficacy of Tezepelumab in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma Across Multiple Clinically Relevant Subgroups in the NAVIGATOR Study

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with severe asthma continue to experience symptoms and exacerbations despite treatment with standard-of-care therapy. In the phase 3 NAVIGATOR study, tezepelumab significantly reduced exacerbations over 52 weeks compared with placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. This analysis assessed the efficacy of tezepelumab in reducing asthma exacerbations in various clinically relevant subgroups of patients in NAVIGATOR.

METHODS

NAVIGATOR was a phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants (12-80 years old) with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomized 1:1 to receive tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Pre-specified and post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) over 52 weeks in clinically relevant subgroups of patients defined by baseline patient characteristics, medical history, exacerbation triggers, medication eligibility and medication use before and during the study.

RESULTS

Tezepelumab reduced the AAER over 52 weeks compared with placebo across a wide range of patient subgroups assessed. Reductions in exacerbations were similar across subgroups defined by baseline patient characteristics, ranging from 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21, 65) to 60% (95% CI: 44, 71) in subgroups analysed by sex, smoking history and body mass index. Among the asthma-related comorbidity subgroups investigated, patients with aspirin or NSAID sensitivity had the greatest reductions in AAER with tezepelumab compared with placebo (83%; 95% CI: 66, 91). In patients eligible to receive dupilumab, tezepelumab reduced exacerbations compared with placebo by 64% (95% CI: 54, 71). Reductions in the AAER with tezepelumab compared with placebo were also observed irrespective of exacerbation trigger category and the number of asthma controller medications patients were receiving at baseline.

CONCLUSION

These findings further support the benefits of tezepelumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and can help to inform healthcare providers' treatment decisions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279).

Comparative efficacy of biologics for patients with inadequately controlled asthma: A network meta-analysis

Background

Few studies have evaluated the comparative efficacy of biologics for asthma. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of biologics.

Methods

This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of a biologic compared to a placebo or another biologic in patients with inadequately controlled asthma despite high-intensity treatment, published by January 6, 2022. Two researchers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. The outcomes of interest were the annual asthma exacerbation rate (AER), forced expiratory volume per second before bronchodilator use (preBD FEV1), the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), and asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) results. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted, and a random effects model was used to draw pooled incidence rate ratio or standardized mean differences.

Results

Twenty-three RCTs with 8376 participants were retrieved. All biologics included in this study were associated with significantly better effects than placebo in AER, preBD FEV1, and ACQ outcomes. Although there were no significant differences between the biologics in the overall study population, patients with eosinophil levels ≥300 cells/μL or eosinophilic asthma showed that dupilumab and tezepelumab were significantly better than anti-IL-5 biologics in improving preBD FEV1. Additionally, in patients with eosinophil levels ≥300 cells/μL, benralizumab, unlike reslizumab, performed significantly better than placebo in improving ACQ and AQLQ outcomes.

Conclusion

The comparative effects of biologics can be considered with phenotypes and biomarkers to help clinicians select an appropriate treatment for inadequately controlled asthma.

Association of Obesity and Severe Asthma in Adults

The incidence of obesity and asthma continues to enhance, significantly impacting global public health. Adipose tissue is an organ that secretes hormones and cytokines, causes meta-inflammation, and contributes to the intensification of bronchial hyperreactivity, oxidative stress, and consequently affects the different phenotypes of asthma in obese people. As body weight increases, the risk of severe asthma increases, as well as more frequent exacerbations requiring the use of glucocorticoids and hospitalization, which consequently leads to a deterioration of the quality of life. This review discusses the relationship between obesity and severe asthma, the underlying molecular mechanisms, changes in respiratory function tests in obese people, its impact on the occurrence of comorbidities, and consequently, a different response to conventional asthma treatment. The article also reviews research on possible future therapies for severe asthma. The manuscript is a narrative review of clinical trials in severe asthma and comorbid obesity. The articles were found in the PubMed database using the keywords asthma and obesity. Studies on severe asthma were then selected for inclusion in the article. The sections: 'The classification connected with asthma and obesity', 'Obesity-related changes in pulmonary functional tests', and 'Obesity and inflammation', include studies on subjects without asthma or non-severe asthma, which, according to the authors, familiarize the reader with the pathophysiology of obesity-related asthma.

Skin, gut, and lung barrier: Physiological interface and target of intervention for preventing and treating allergic diseases

The epithelial barriers of the skin, gut, and respiratory tract are critical interfaces between the environment and the host, and they orchestrate both homeostatic and pathogenic immune responses. The mechanisms underlying epithelial barrier dysfunction in allergic and inflammatory conditions, such as atopic dermatitis, food allergy, eosinophilic oesophagitis, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and asthma, are complex and influenced by the exposome, microbiome, individual genetics, and epigenetics. Here, we review the role of the epithelial barriers of the skin, digestive tract, and airways in maintaining homeostasis, how they influence the occurrence and progression of allergic and inflammatory conditions, how current treatments target the epithelium to improve symptoms of these disorders, and what the unmet needs are in the identification and treatment of epithelial disorders.

A review on potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of leishmaniasis

Leishmania, a protozoan parasite, is responsible for the occurrence of leishmaniasis, a disease that is prevalent in tropical regions. Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL), also known as kala-azar in Asian countries, is one of the most significant forms of VL, along with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis (ML). Management of this condition typically entails the use of chemotherapy as the sole therapeutic option. The current treatments for leishmaniasis present several drawbacks, including a multitude of side effects, prolonged treatment duration, disparate efficacy across different regions, and the emergence of resistance. To address this urgent need, it is imperative to identify alternative treatments that are both safer and more effective. The identification of appropriate pharmacological targets in conjunction with biological pathways constitutes the initial stage of drug discovery. In this review, we have addressed the key metabolic pathways that represent potential pharmacological targets as well as prominent treatment options for leishmaniasis.

Eosinophil peroxidase promotes bronchial epithelial cells to secrete asthma-related factors and induces the early stage of airway remodeling

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by chronic airway inflammation, reversible airflow limitation, and airway remodeling. Eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) is the most abundant secondary granule protein unique to activated eosinophils. In this study, we aimed to illustrate the effect of EPX on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in BEAS-2B cells. Our research found that both EPX and ADAM33 were negatively correlated with FEV1/FVC and FEV1%pred, and positively correlated with IL-5 levels. Asthma patients had relatively higher levels of ADAM33 and EPX compared to the healthy control group. The expression of TSLP, TGF-β1 and ADAM33 in the EPX intervention group was significantly higher. Moreover, EPX could promote the proliferation, migration and EMT of BEAS-2B cells, and the effect of EPX on various factors was significantly improved by the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. The findings from this study could potentially offer a novel therapeutic target for addressing airway remodeling in bronchial asthma, particularly focusing on EMT.

Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: The role of the epithelium

Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a key clinical feature of asthma. The presence of AHR in people with asthma provides the substrate for bronchoconstriction in response to numerous diverse stimuli, contributing to airflow limitation and symptoms including breathlessness, wheeze, and chest tightness. Dysfunctional airway smooth muscle significantly contributes to AHR and is displayed as increased sensitivity to direct pharmacologic bronchoconstrictor stimuli, such as inhaled histamine and methacholine (direct AHR), or to endogenous mediators released by activated airway cells such as mast cells (indirect AHR). Research in in vivo human models has shown that the disrupted airway epithelium plays an important role in driving inflammation that mediates indirect AHR in asthma through the release of cytokines such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin and IL-33. These cytokines upregulate type 2 cytokines promoting airway eosinophilia and induce the release of bronchoconstrictor mediators from mast cells such as histamine, prostaglandin D2, and cysteinyl leukotrienes. While bronchoconstriction is largely due to airway smooth muscle contraction, airway structural changes known as remodeling, likely mediated in part by epithelial-derived mediators, also lead to airflow obstruction and may enhance AHR. In this review, we outline the current knowledge of the role of the airway epithelium in AHR in asthma and its implications on the wider disease. Increased understanding of airway epithelial biology may contribute to better treatment options, particularly in precision medicine.

Tezepelumab in patients with allergic and eosinophilic asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease commonly driven by allergic and/or eosinophilic inflammation, both of which may be present in severe disease. Most approved biologics for severe asthma are indicated for specific phenotypes and target individual downstream type 2 components of the inflammatory cascade. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (immunoglobulin G2λ), binds specifically to thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial cytokine that initiates and sustains allergic and eosinophilic inflammation in asthma. By blocking TSLP, tezepelumab has demonstrated efficacy across known asthma phenotypes and acts upstream of all current clinically used biomarkers. In a pooled analysis of the phase 2b PATHWAY (NCT02054130) and phase 3 NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279) studies, compared with placebo, tezepelumab reduced the annualized asthma exacerbation rate over 52 weeks by 62% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53, 70) in patients with perennial aeroallergen sensitization (allergic asthma); by 71% (95% CI: 62, 78) in patients with a baseline blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL; and by 71% (95% CI: 59, 79) in patients with allergic asthma and a baseline blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL. This review examines the efficacy and mode of action of tezepelumab in patients with allergic asthma, eosinophilic asthma and coexisting allergic and eosinophilic phenotypes.

Natural killer T cells in allergic asthma: implications for the development of novel immunotherapeutical strategies

Allergic asthma has emerged as a prevalent allergic disease worldwide, affecting most prominently both young individuals and lower-income populations in developing and developed countries. To devise effective and curative immunotherapy, it is crucial to comprehend the intricate nature of this condition, characterized by an immune response imbalance that favors a proinflammatory profile orchestrated by diverse subsets of immune cells. Although the involvement of Natural Killer T (NKT) cells in asthma pathology is frequently implied, their specific contributions to disease onset and progression remain incompletely understood. Given their remarkable ability to modulate the immune response through the rapid secretion of various cytokines, NKT cells represent a promising target for the development of effective immunotherapy against allergic asthma. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the current understanding of NKT cells in the context of allergic asthma, along with novel therapeutic approaches that leverage the functional response of these cells.

Airway remodelling in asthma and the epithelium: on the edge of a new era

Asthma is a chronic, heterogeneous disease of the airways, often characterised by structural changes known collectively as airway remodelling. In response to environmental insults, including pathogens, allergens and pollutants, the epithelium can initiate remodelling via an inflammatory cascade involving a variety of mediators that have downstream effects on both structural and immune cells. These mediators include the epithelial cytokines thymic stromal lymphopoietin, interleukin (IL)-33 and IL-25, which facilitate airway remodelling through cross-talk between epithelial cells and fibroblasts, and between mast cells and airway smooth muscle cells, as well as through signalling with immune cells such as macrophages. The epithelium can also initiate airway remodelling independently of inflammation in response to the mechanical stress present during bronchoconstriction. Furthermore, genetic and epigenetic alterations to epithelial components are believed to influence remodelling. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of the roles of the epithelium and epithelial cytokines in driving airway remodelling, facilitated by developments in genetic sequencing and imaging techniques. We also explore how new and existing therapeutics that target the epithelium and epithelial cytokines could modify airway remodelling.

Development of a novel humanized anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody HZ-1127 with anti-allergic diseases and cancer potential

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is a member of the IL-2 cytokine family and has been widely recognized as a master regulator of type 2 inflammatory responses at barrier surfaces. Recent studies found dysregulation of the TSLP-TSLP receptor (TSLPR) pathway is associated with the pathogenesis of not only allergic diseases but also a wide variety of cancers including both solid tumors and hematological tumors. Thus, the blockade of TSLP represents an attractive therapeutic strategy for allergic diseases and cancer. In this study, we report the development of a novel humanized anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody (mAb) HZ-1127. Binding affinity, specificity, and ability of HZ-1127 in inhibiting TSLP were tested. HZ-1127 selectively binds to the TSLP cytokine with high affinity and specificity. Furthermore, HZ-1127 dramatically inhibits TSLP-dependent STAT5 activation and is more potent than Tezepelumab, which is an FDA-approved humanized mAb against TSLP for severe asthma treatment in inhibiting TSLP-induced CCL17 and CCL22 chemokines secretion in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Our pre-clinical study demonstrates that HZ-1127 may serve as a potential therapeutic agent for allergic diseases and cancer.

Airway hyperresponsiveness correlates with airway TSLP in asthma independent of eosinophilic inflammation

BACKGROUND

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is released from the airway epithelium in response to various environmental triggers, inducing a type-2 inflammatory response, and is associated with airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and exacerbations. TSLP may also induce AHR via a direct effect on airway smooth muscle and mast cells, independently of type-2 inflammation, although association between airway TSLP and AHR across asthma phenotypes has been described sparsely.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the association between AHR and levels of TSLP in serum, sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with asthma with and without type-2 inflammation.

METHODS

A novel ultrasensitive assay was used to measure levels of TSLP in patients with asthma (serum, n = 182; sputum, n = 81; bronchoalveolar lavage, n = 85) and healthy controls (serum, n = 47). The distribution and association among airway and systemic TSLP, measures of AHR, type-2 inflammation, and severity of disease were assessed.

RESULTS

TSLP in sputum was associated with AHR independently of levels of eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (ρ = 0.49, P = .005). Serum TSLP was higher in both eosinophil-high and eosinophil-low asthma compared to healthy controls: geometric mean: 1600 fg/mL (95% CI: 1468-1744 fg/mL) and 1294 fg/mL (95% CI: 1167-1435 fg/mL) versus 846 fg/mL (95% CI: 661-1082 fg/mL), but did not correlate with the level of AHR. Increasing age, male sex, and eosinophils in blood were associated with higher levels of TSLP in serum, whereas lung function, inhaled corticosteroid dose, and symptom score were not.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between TSLP in sputum and AHR to mannitol irrespective of markers of type-2 inflammation further supports a role of TSLP in AHR that is partially independent of eosinophilic inflammation.

The airway epithelium: an orchestrator of inflammation, a key structural barrier and a therapeutic target in severe asthma

Asthma is a disease of heterogeneous pathology, typically characterised by excessive inflammatory and bronchoconstrictor responses to the environment. The clinical expression of the disease is a consequence of the interaction between environmental factors and host factors over time, including genetic susceptibility, immune dysregulation and airway remodelling. As a critical interface between the host and the environment, the airway epithelium plays an important role in maintaining homeostasis in the face of environmental challenges. Disruption of epithelial integrity is a key factor contributing to multiple processes underlying asthma pathology. In this review, we first discuss the unmet need in asthma management and provide an overview of the structure and function of the airway epithelium. We then focus on key pathophysiological changes that occur in the airway epithelium, including epithelial barrier disruption, immune hyperreactivity, remodelling, mucus hypersecretion and mucus plugging, highlighting how these processes manifest clinically and how they might be targeted by current and novel therapeutics.

Tezepelumab: patient selection and place in therapy in severe asthma

Asthma is a disease characterised by heterogeneous and multifaceted airway inflammation. Despite the availability of effective treatments, a substantial percentage of patients with the type 2 (T2)-high, but mainly the T2-low, phenotype complain of persistent symptoms, airflow limitation, and poor response to treatments. Currently available biologicals target T2 cytokines, but no monoclonal antibodies or other specific therapeutic options are available for non-T2 asthma. However, targeted therapy against alarmins is radically changing this perspective. The development of alarmin-targeted therapies, of which tezepelumab (TZP) is the first example, may offer broad action on inflammatory pathways as well as an enhanced therapeutic effect on epithelial dysfunction. In this regard, TZP demonstrated positive results not only in patients with severe T2 asthma but also those with non-allergic, non-eosinophilic disease. Therefore, it is necessary to identify clinical features of patients who can benefit from an upstream targeted therapy such as anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin. The aims of this narrative review are to understand the role of alarmins in asthma pathogenesis and epithelial dysfunction, examine the rationale underlying the indication of TZP treatment in severe asthma, summarise the results of clinical studies, and recognise the specific characteristics of patients potentially eligible for TZP treatment.

Tezepelumab for Severe Asthma: One Drug Targeting Multiple Disease Pathways and Patient Types

Asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the airways, affecting many children, adolescents, and adults worldwide. Up to 10% of people with asthma have severe disease, associated with a higher risk of hospitalizations, greater healthcare costs, and poorer outcomes. Patients with severe asthma generally require high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and additional controller medications to achieve disease control; however, many patients remain uncontrolled despite this intensive treatment. The treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma has improved with greater understanding of asthma pathways and phenotypes as well as the advent of targeted biologic therapies. Tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody, blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine that has multifaceted effects on the initiation and persistence of asthma inflammation and pathophysiology. Unlike other biologic treatments, tezepelumab has demonstrated efficacy across severe asthma phenotypes, with the magnitude of effects varying by phenotype. Here we describe the anti-inflammatory effects and efficacy of tezepelumab across the most relevant phenotypes of severe asthma. Across clinical studies, tezepelumab reduced annualized asthma exacerbation rates versus placebo by 63-71% in eosinophilic severe asthma, by 58-68% in allergic severe asthma, by 67-71% in allergic and eosinophilic severe asthma, by 34-49% in type 2-low asthma, and by 31-41% in oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Furthermore, in all these asthma phenotypes, tezepelumab demonstrated higher efficacy in reducing exacerbations requiring hospitalizations or emergency department visits versus placebo. In patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, who commonly have multiple drivers of inflammation and disease, tezepelumab may modulate airway inflammation more extensively, as other available biologics block only specific downstream components of the inflammatory cascade.

A dual computational and experimental strategy to enhance TSLP antibody affinity for improved asthma treatment

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is a key cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of asthma and other allergic diseases. Targeting TSLP and its signaling pathways is increasingly recognized as an effective strategy for asthma treatment. This study focused on enhancing the affinity of the T6 antibody, which specifically targets TSLP, by integrating computational and experimental methods. The initial affinity of the T6 antibody for TSLP was lower than the benchmark antibody AMG157. To improve this, we utilized alanine scanning, molecular docking, and computational tools including mCSM-PPI2 and GEO-PPI to identify critical amino acid residues for site-directed mutagenesis. Subsequent mutations and experimental validations resulted in an antibody with significantly enhanced blocking capacity against TSLP. Our findings demonstrate the potential of computer-assisted techniques in expediting antibody affinity maturation, thereby reducing both the time and cost of experiments. The integration of computational methods with experimental approaches holds great promise for the development of targeted therapeutic antibodies for TSLP-related diseases.

Non-Type 2 and Mixed Inflammation in Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Lower Airway Disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to discuss the role of non-type 2 inflammation in patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and comorbid lower airway disease.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, TRIP Database, ProQuest, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, government and health organizations, and graduate-level theses.

REVIEW METHODS

This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Search strategy was peer-reviewed by medical librarians. Studies were included if they utilized airway sampling, non-type 2 cytokines, and patients with CRS and lower airway disease.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven from 7060 articles were included. In patients with CRS and comorbid asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/bronchiectasis, 60% (n = 12), 33% (n = 2), and 100% (n = 1), respectively, demonstrated mixed or non-type 2 endotypes. Comorbid CRS and asthma produced type 1 (n = 1.5), type 2 (n = 8), type 3 (n = 1), mixed type 1/2 (n = 1), and mixed type 1/2/3 (n = 8.5) endotype shifts. AERD demonstrated type 2 (n = 4), mixed type 2/3 (n = 1), and mixed type 1/2/3 (n = 1) endotype shifts. CRS with COPD or bronchiectasis demonstrated a mixed 1/2 (n = 1) endotype shift.

CONCLUSION

Type 2 disease has been extensively reviewed due to advent biologics targeting type 2 inflammation, but outcomes may be suboptimal due to the presence of non-type 2 inflammation. A proportion of patients with CRS and comorbid lower airway disease demonstrated mixed and non-type 2 endotype shifts. This emphasizes that patients with unified airway disease may have forms of inflammation beyond classical type 2 disease which could inform biologic development. Laryngoscope, 134:1005-1013, 2024.

Tezepelumab decreases airway epithelial IL-33 and T2-inflammation in response to viral stimulation in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Respiratory virus infections are main triggers of asthma exacerbations. Tezepelumab, an anti-TSLP mAb, reduces exacerbations in patients with asthma, but the effect of blocking TSLP on host epithelial resistance and tolerance to virus infection is not known.

AIM

To examine effects of blocking TSLP in patients with asthma on host resistance (IFNβ, IFNλ, and viral load) and on the airway epithelial inflammatory response to viral challenge.

METHODS

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF, n = 39) and bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) were obtained from patients with uncontrolled asthma before and after 12 weeks of tezepelumab treatment (n = 13) or placebo (n = 13). BECs were cultured in vitro and exposed to the viral infection mimic poly(I:C) or infected by rhinovirus (RV). Alarmins, T2- and pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFNβ IFNλ, and viral load were analyzed by RT-qPCR and multiplex ELISA before and after stimulation.

RESULTS

IL-33 expression in unstimulated BECs and IL-33 protein levels in BALF were reduced after 12 weeks of tezepelumab. Further, IL-33 gene and protein levels decreased in BECs challenged with poly(I:C) after tezepelumab whereas TSLP gene expression remained unaffected. Poly(I:C)-induced IL-4, IL-13, and IL-17A release from BECs was also reduced with tezepelumab whereas IFNβ and IFNλ expression and viral load were unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Blocking TSLP with tezepelumab in vivo in asthma reduced the airway epithelial inflammatory response including IL-33 and T2 cytokines to viral challenge without affecting anti-viral host resistance. Our results suggest that blocking TSLP stabilizes the bronchial epithelial immune response to respiratory viruses.