A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and COVID-19 progression and mortality

Impact of COVID-19 on mucormycosis presentation and laboratory values: A comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an alarming increase in mucormycosis coinfections and its rapid progression. The overlapping risk factors and symptoms between COVID-19 and mucormycosis further complicate prompt detection, which is crucial for patient survival. This study aims to investigate potential differences in mucormycosis progression, initial symptom presentation, and laboratory value alterations in mucormycosis patients with COVID-19 history to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve outcomes in this complex clinical scenario.

METHODOLOGY

This retrospective cohort study, conducted from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022, examined 102 patients diagnosed with mucormycosis at two primary teaching hospitals. Patients were categorized into two groups based on COVID-19 history. Variables included demographic information, clinical parameters, laboratory results, and outcomes. The study compared patient laboratory studies and presentation symptoms between COVID-19 history-positive and COVID-19 history-negative groups, with a particular focus on mortality rates and associated comorbidities such as diabetes, cancer and immunosuppressive treatment.

RESULTS

Initial clinical presentations differed significantly, eneralized Estimating Equations (GEE) analysis, adjusted for comorbidities, revealed COVID-19 history was associated with increased platelet counts (P = 0.0311) and decreased facial swelling (P = 0.049) and fever symptom reporting (P < 0.001). Cancer history, diabetes, and immunosuppressive treatment also showed significant associations with various clinical and laboratory parameters. Laboratory analysis revealed significant differences between mucormycosis patients with and without COVID-19 history. The COVID-19 history-positive group showed lower WBC counts (P = 0.002), and higher hemoglobin levels (P < 0.001) compared to controls. Diabetes was more prevalent in COVID-19 history-positive patients, while cancer history was more common in controls.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals intricate relationships between COVID-19 history, mucormycosis, patient presentation, challenging earlier findings. Mucormycosis patients with COVID-19 history exhibited higher platelet counts and altered symptom presentation. The research highlights varied symptom patterns across patient subgroups and underscores the complexity of interactions between COVID-19, cancer, and diabetes in mucormycosis cases. These findings advocate multivariate analytical approaches to better understand these multifaceted relationships.

Novel indicator for erectile dysfunction: the CALLY index, evidence from data of NHANES 2001-2004

Purpose

This study explored the association between the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index and erectile dysfunction (ED).

Patients and methods

Data from 2,128 participants in the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed and classified into ED and non-ED groups.Additionally, a separate analysis of complete erectile dysfunction was conducted.A weighted multiple logistic regression model was used to assess the association between CALLY and ED, while smooth curve fitting was applied to explore their linear relationship.ROC analysis was conducted to compare the predictive accuracy (AUC) of CALLY, Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and the product of platelet count and neutrophil count (PPN) for ED.

Results

After adjustment, Ln-CALLY was negatively associated with ED (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69-0.85, p < 0.0001) and complete ED (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-1.00, p = 0.0450).The highest Ln-CALLY tertile (Q3) was associated with a significantly lower risk of ED compared to Q1 (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.30-0.55, p < 0.0001).A similar trend was observed for complete ED (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006).Curve fitting revealed a negative correlation between CALLY and both types of ED.Subgroup analysis confirmed the consistent and independent association.CALLY exhibited superior predictive performance for ED (AUC = 0.6512) and complete ED (AUC = 0.6237) compared to other markers.

Conclusion

Higher CALLY levels were linked to a reduced ED risk and proved a superior predictor compared to other inflammatory markers.

SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 drives osteoclastogenesis in preexisting immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at higher risk for severe COVID-19 and long-term complications in bone health. Emerging clinical evidence demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 infection reduces bone turnover and promotes bone loss, but the mechanism underlying worsened bone health remains elusive. This study sought to identify specific immune mediators that exacerbated preexisting IMIDs after SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Plasma samples from 4 groups were analyzed: healthy, IMID only, COVID-19 only, and COVID-19 + IMID. Using high-throughput multiplexed proteomics, we profiled 1,500 protein biomarkers and identified 148 unique biomarkers in COVID-19 patients with IMIDs, including elevated inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-17F) and bone resorption markers. Long-term circulating SARS-CoV-2 ORF8, a virulence factor for COVID-19, was detected in the COVID + IMID group. RA was one of the most common IMIDs in our study. ORF8 treatment of RA-derived human osteoblasts (RA-hOBs) increased levels of inflammatory (TNF, IL6, CCL2) and bone resorption (RANKL/osteoprotegerin ratio) markers compared with healthy controls. Supernatants from ORF8-treated RA-hOBs drove the differentiation of macrophages into osteoclast-like cells. These findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 exposure can exacerbate IMIDs through ORF8-driven inflammation and osteoclastogenesis, highlighting potential therapeutic targets for managing COVID-19-induced bone pathologies.

Efficacy and safety of asunercept, a CD95L-selective inhibitor, in hospitalised patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19: ASUNCTIS, a multicentre, randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 2 trial

Background

The phase 2 ASUNCTIS study assessed the efficacy and safety of asunercept, a fully human CD95 (Fas) ligand-binding protein, in hospitalised patients with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to assess the clinical benefit of CD95 ligand inhibition in this viral disease.

Methods

In this open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial, patients with COVID-19-induced pneumonia and respiratory deterioration were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) in 12 Russian and Spanish hospitals using an interactive web-response system to receive standard of care (SOC) or SOC plus weekly asunercept 25 mg, 100 mg, or 400 mg, administered intravenously for up to 4 weeks, or until hospital discharge or death. The randomisation was stratified according to the respiratory support methods at the time of enrolment, corresponding to categories 4-6 of a clinical severity assessment scale comprising 9 levels that was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) at the time of the study. The main inclusion criterion was laboratory confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 OR typical radiological signs of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary endpoint was time from randomisation to clinical improvement on two consecutive days of at least one category on a WHO clinical severity assessment scale in the modified intent-to-treat population. All patients were subjected to regular safety analyses. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2020-001887-27) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04535674).

Findings

Between October 9, 2020, and September 24, 2021, 438 patients were randomly assigned to SOC (n = 110) or SOC plus asunercept 25 mg (n = 109), 100 mg (n = 109), or 400 mg (n = 110). The primary endpoint, time to sustained clinical improvement of one WHO category on two consecutive days from randomization, was in median [95% confidence interval]: 9 [6-12], 8 [7-12], 8 [7-11] and 13 [9-20] days for the 400 mg, 100 mg, 25 mg asunercept and SOC groups, respectively. The standard deviations for the 400 mg, 100 mg, 25 mg asunercept and SOC groups were 5.3, 4.9, 4.7 and 5 days, respectively. The observed differences between groups failed to reach statistical significance (one-sided p-value = 0.041). In total, 290 adverse events (AE) were registered in 145 patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment: 77 AEs in 37 (33.6%) patients in the SOC group, 80 AEs in 38 (34.9%) patients in the 25 mg group, 61 AEs in 35 (32.7%) patients in the 100 mg group and 72 AEs in 35 (32.1%) patients in the 400 mg group. There was no treatment-related death reported. In summary, asunercept was well tolerated at all doses tested and no specific safety signals were detected.

Interpretation

The primary endpoint of time to sustained clinical improvement for distinct asunercept arms compared to SOC failed to meet statistical significance. The compound was safe and well tolerated.

Funding

Apogenix GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.

Diagnostic accuracy of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Existing challenges with the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and active disease, mainly by non-rheumatologists, have prompted the search for novel biomarkers. Elevations in indices derived from blood cell counts, e.g., the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have been reported in RA patients. However, their diagnostic accuracy has not been comprehensively assessed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity of the NLR and PLR, obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the presence of RA and active disease. We searched electronic databases from inception to 15 March 2024 and assessed the risk of bias using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024533546). In 15 studies, the NLR exhibited acceptable accuracy for the presence of RA (area under the curve, AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80) and active disease (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.74). The PLR exhibited good accuracy for the presence of RA (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.83). There were insufficient studies to assess the accuracy of the PLR for the presence of active disease. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the NLR and the PLR are promising biomarkers of RA (NLR and PLR) and active disease (NLR). Further research is required to investigate whether the NLR and PLR can significantly enhance the capacity to diagnose RA and active disease in clinical practice.

Impact of Hyponatremia on COVID-19-Related Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Sodium disturbances are observed in one-third of patients with COVID-19 and result from multifaceted mechanisms. Notably, hyponatremia is associated with disease progression and mortality.

AIM

We aimed to analyze the impact of hyponatremia on COVID-19 outcomes and its correlation with clinical and laboratory parameters during the first wave.

METHODS

We evaluated the sodium levels of 558 patients with COVID-19 between 21 March 2020, and 31 July 2020, at a single center. We performed linear regression analyses to explore the correlation of sodium levels with COVID-19-related outcomes, demographic data, signs and symptoms, and laboratory parameters. Next, we conducted Pearson correlation analyses. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Hyponatremia was found in 35.3% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. This was associated with the need for intensive care transfer (B = -1.210, p = 0.009) and invasive mechanical ventilation (B = -1.063, p = 0.032). Hyponatremia was frequently found in oncologic patients (p = 0.002) and solid organ transplant recipients (p < 0.001). Sodium was positively associated with diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.041) and productive cough (p = 0.022) and negatively associated with dry cough (p = 0.032), anorexia (p = 0.004), and nausea/vomiting (p = 0.007). Regarding the correlation of sodium levels with other laboratory parameters, we observed a positive correlation with hematocrit (p = 0.011), lymphocytes (p = 0.010), pCO2 (p < 0.0001), bicarbonate (p = 0.0001), and base excess (p = 0.008) and a negative correlation with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.009), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.033), and arterial blood glucose (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyponatremia is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. It is associated with demographic data and clinical and laboratory parameters. Therefore, hyponatremia is an important tool for risk stratification in COVID-19 patients.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in systemic lupus erythematosus

The wide range of clinical and serological manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the lack of accepted diagnostic criteria warrant the identification of novel, more accurate biomarkers. Hematological indices derived from full blood cell counts, particularly the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have shown promise in SLE; however, a critical appraisal of their diagnostic accuracy is lacking. We sought to address this issue by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the NLR and PLR in SLE. The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to 15 March 2024 for studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity of the NLR and PLR, obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the presence of SLE, disease severity, organ involvement (lupus nephritis, pericarditis, and pleural disease), and complications (infections). The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024531446). The NLR exhibited good accuracy for the diagnosis of SLE (eight studies; area under the curve, AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.85) and lupus nephritis (nine studies; AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.84), but not for severe disease (nine studies; AUC = 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73) or infections (six studies; AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77). The PLR exhibited good accuracy for the diagnosis of severe disease (six studies; AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.87). There were an insufficient number of studies to assess the accuracy of the PLR for the diagnosis of SLE, lupus nephritis, or infections. No study investigated the NLR and PLR in SLE patients with pericarditis or pleural disease. Therefore, the NLR and the PLR have a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for the presence of SLE and lupus nephritis (NLR) and severe disease (PLR). Further studies are warranted to determine whether the NLR and PLR, in combination with clinical evaluation and other serological biomarkers, can enhance the diagnosis and management of SLE.

Effect of Immunosuppression on the Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination

Immunosuppressive treatment in patients with rheumatic diseases can maintain disease remission but also increase risk of infection. Their response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is frequently blunted. In this study we evaluated the effect of immunosuppression exposure on humoral and T cell immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in two distinct cohorts of patients; one during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and 3 months later during convalescence, and another prior to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with follow up sampling 6 weeks after vaccination. Results were compared between rituximab-exposed (in previous 6 months), immunosuppression-exposed (in previous 3 months), and non-immunosuppressed groups. The immune cell phenotype was defined by flow cytometry and ELISA. Antigen specific T cell responses were estimated using a whole blood stimulation interferon-γ release assay. A focused post-vaccine assessment of rituximab-treated patients using high dimensional spectral cytometry was conducted. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection was characterised by T cell lymphopenia, and a reduction in NK cells and naïve CD4 and CD8 cells, without any significant differences between immunosuppressed and non-immunosuppressed patient groups. Conversely, activated CD4 and CD8 cell counts increased in non-immunosuppressed patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection but this response was blunted in the presence of immunosuppression. In rituximab-treated patients, antigen-specific T cell responses were preserved in SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but patients were unable to mount an appropriate humoral response.

Identification of FasL as a crucial host factor driving COVID-19 pathology and lethality

The dysregulated immune response and inflammation resulting in severe COVID-19 are still incompletely understood. Having recently determined that aberrant death-ligand-induced cell death can cause lethal inflammation, we hypothesized that this process might also cause or contribute to inflammatory disease and lung failure following SARS-CoV-2 infection. To test this hypothesis, we developed a novel mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 model (MA20) that recapitulates key pathological features of COVID-19. Concomitantly with occurrence of cell death and inflammation, FasL expression was significantly increased on inflammatory monocytic macrophages and NK cells in the lungs of MA20-infected mice. Importantly, therapeutic FasL inhibition markedly increased survival of both, young and old MA20-infected mice coincident with substantially reduced cell death and inflammation in their lungs. Intriguingly, FasL was also increased in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of critically-ill COVID-19 patients. Together, these results identify FasL as a crucial host factor driving the immuno-pathology that underlies COVID-19 severity and lethality, and imply that patients with severe COVID-19 may significantly benefit from therapeutic inhibition of FasL.

Assessment of hematologic indices for diagnosis in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction

The aim was to present effective approaches utilizing novel hematological parameters for early diagnosis of juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE).

Material and methods

Our study at Umraniye Training and Research Hospital involved a jSLE patient cohort from 2016 to 2022 and matched healthy controls aligning with sex and age. We use the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) for disease activity. Our approach was to analyze leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and platelet counts, along with ratios such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and monocyte-to-platelet ratio (MPR). We also explored novel indices: the systemic inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) to identify relationships between systemic indices and jSLE activity.

Results

Upon comparative analysis with the healthy control group, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients exhibited significantly elevated levels of the hematological parameters NLR, SII, and SIRI (p-values: 0.010, 0.048, 0.025, respectively). Among SLE patients, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet distribution width (PDW) values were notably higher, while hemoglobin, red blood cell distribution width (RDW), and procalcitonin (PCT) values were significantly lower. In comparison, C-reactive protein (CRP) and sedimentation values were markedly elevated in the SLE group in contrast to the healthy control cohort. Patients with significantly elevated disease activity had notably higher values of NLR (p = 0.010) and SII (p = 0.048). Among patients with positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA), elevated levels of NLR, SII, and SIRI were noted (p-values: 0.018, 0.021, 0.035).

Conclusions

In this study, the novel hematological markers SII, SIRI, and AISI were found to effectively reflect inflammation in SLE patients, exhibit associations with high disease activity, and demonstrate heightened sensitivity in detecting cases with high disease activity.

Effects of Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Variants on Platelet Morphology and Activation

Platelets are central elements of hemostasis and also play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of thrombosis in coronavirus disease 2019. This study was planned to investigate the effects of different severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) recombinant spike protein variants on platelet morphology and activation. Citrated whole blood collected from ostensibly healthy subjects was challenged with saline (control sample) and with 2 and 20 ng/mL final concentration of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein of Ancestral, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants. Platelet count was found to be decreased with all SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein variants and concentrations tested, achieving the lowest values with 20 ng/mL Delta recombinant spike protein. The mean platelet volume increased in all samples irrespective of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein variants and concentrations tested, but especially using Delta and Alpha recombinant spike proteins. The values of both platelet function analyzer-200 collagen-adenosine diphosphate and collagen-epinephrine increased in all samples irrespective of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein variants and concentrations tested, and thus reflecting platelet exhaustion, and displaying again higher increases with Delta and Alpha recombinant spike proteins. Most samples where SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike proteins were added were flagged as containing platelet clumps. Morphological analysis revealed the presence of a considerable number of activated platelets, platelet clumps, platelet-monocyte, and platelet-neutrophils aggregates, especially in samples spiked with Alpha and Delta recombinant spike proteins at 20 ng/mL. These results provide support to the evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is capable of activating platelets through its spike protein, though such effect varies depending on different spike protein variants.

Prognostic Value of D-dimer to Lymphocyte Ratio (DLR) in Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: A Validation Study in a National Cohort

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to validate the role of the D-dimer to lymphocyte ratio (DLR) for mortality prediction in a large national cohort of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter, observational study that included hospitalized patients due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in Spain was conducted from March 2020 to March 2022. All biomarkers and laboratory indices analyzed were measured once at admission.

RESULTS

A total of 10,575 COVID-19 patients were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 66.9 (±16) years, and 58.6% (6202 patients) of them were male. The overall mortality rate was 16.3% (n = 1726 patients). Intensive care unit admission was needed in 10.5% (n = 1106 patients), non-invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 8.8% (n = 923 patients), and orotracheal intubation was required in 7.5% (789 patients). DLR presented a c-statistic of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.71) for in-hospital mortality with an optimal cut-off above 1. Multivariate analysis showed an independent association for in-hospital mortality for DLR > 1 (adjusted OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.09-4.04; p = 0.03); in the same way, survival analysis showed a higher mortality risk for DLR > 1 (HR 2.24; 95% CI 2.03-2.47; p < 0.01). Further, no other laboratory indices showed an independent association for mortality in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the usefulness of DLR as a prognostic biomarker for mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, being an accessible, cost-effective, and easy-to-use biomarker in daily clinical practice.

Meta-analysis of the systemic immune-inflammatory index and in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients

Background

The potential significance of immunoinflammatory factors in the prognosis of individuals afflicted with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is worthy of examination. The systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), a recently developed immunoinflammatory metric based on the enumeration of neutrophils, platelets, and lymphocytes in blood samples, holds promise for elucidating this relationship. Consequently, in order to explore any possible correlation between the SII levels at admission and the in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19, we undertook a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

In pursuit of accomplishing the aim of this meta-analysis, an extensive search was conducted to seek out pertinent observational studies featuring longitudinal follow-up across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and the Web of Science databases. The I2 statistic was utilized to estimate the extent of heterogeneity and the Cochrane Q test was employed to evaluate heterogeneity between studies. The synthesis of outcomes involved the use of random-effects models, accounting for the possible influence of heterogeneity.

Results

Our analysis included sixteen studies, encompassing 10,007 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Among them, 1801 patients (18.0 %) succumbed during hospitalization. The pooled results indicated that a high SII at admission was substantially linked to a higher risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 2.41, 95 % confidence interval: 1.78 to 3.24, p < 0.001; I2 = 86 %). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a negative correlation between mean SII at baseline and patient mortality in individual studies (coefficients = -0.00023 and -0.030, p < 0.05), effectively explaining the observed heterogeneity. Furthermore, in patients with lower baseline SII (<1300) and a lower risk of mortality (<20 %), we observed a more pronounced association between high SII levels and the risk of all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

The results of our study indicate that a high SII upon admission could potentially function as a prognostic indicator for mortality during hospitalization in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, particularly in individuals categorized as low risk.

Unraveling the clinical significance and prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index, and delta neutrophil index: An extensive literature review

In the field of critical care medicine, substantial research efforts have focused on identifying high-risk patient groups. This research has led to the development of diverse diagnostic tools, ranging from basic biomarkers to complex indexes and predictive algorithms that integrate multiple methods. Given the ever-evolving landscape of medicine, driven by rapid advancements, changing treatment strategies, and emerging diseases, the development and validation of diagnostic tools remains an ongoing and dynamic process. Specific changes in complete blood count components, such as neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets, are key immune system responses influenced by various factors and crucial in systemic inflammation, injury, and stress. It has been reported that indices such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and delta neutrophil index calculated using various ratios of these elements, are important predictors of various outcomes in conditions where the inflammatory process is at the forefront. In this narrative review, we concluded that NLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI show promise in predicting outcomes for different health conditions related to inflammation. While these tests are accessible, reliable, and cost-effective, their standalone predictive performance for a specific condition is limited.

The value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and PLT count for the diagnosis and prediction of COVID-19 severity

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 and influenza A can cause severe respiratory illness. Differentiating between the two diseases and identifying critically ill patients in times of epidemics become a challenge for frontline medical staff. We sought to investigate whether both diseases and their severity could be recognized by routine blood parameters.

METHODS

Our retrospective study analysed the clinical data and first-time routine blood parameters of 80 influenza A patients and 123 COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 patients were divided into three groups according to treatment modalities and outcomes: outpatient group, inpatient without invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) group, and inpatient with IMV group. We used the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests to analyze the differences in routine blood parameters between the two or three groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Compared with outpatient influenza A patients, outpatient COVID-19 patients had a higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (6.63 vs 3.55). ROC analysis showed that the NLR had a high diagnostic value for differentiating COVID-19 from influenza A (AUC = 0.739). The best cut-off point of the NLR was 6.48, the diagnostic sensitivity was 0.523, and the specificity was 0.925. The median platelet (PLT) count in the different COVID-19 groups was as follows: outpatient group (189×109/L), inpatient without IMV group (161×109/L), and inpatient with IMV group (94×109/L). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found a significant association between PLT and treatment modality and outcome in COVID-19 patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

NLR can be used as a potential biological indicator to distinguish COVID-19 and influenza A. Decreased PLT predicts the critical condition of COVID-19 patients and helps stratify the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

Predictive value of hematological indices on incidence and severity of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a common complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which raises the COVID-19 disease's fatality rate from 3% to 45%. Nevertheless, due to fairly indistinguishable clinical symptoms and a lack of validated clinical prediction models, PTE diagnosis in COVID-19 patients is challenging. This study aims to investigate the applicability of hematological indices to predict PTE incidence and its severity in SARS-CoV-2 patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent CT angiography to assess probable PTE in them. The correlation between complete blood count parameters 1 day before CT angiography and CT angiography outcomes, and simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (s-PESI) was investigated.

RESULTS

We discovered that among individuals with a probable PTE, males and those with higher platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratios had a greater likelihood of PTE incidence (p < .001, .027, and .037, respectively). PLR was a significant and independent predictor of PTE with a p value of .045. Moreover, a higher neutrophil count was associated with a higher s-PESI score in COVID-19 patients developing PTE (p: .038).

CONCLUSIONS

Among hematological indices, NLR and more precisely PLR are cost-effective and simply calculable markers that can assist physicians in determining whether or not COVID-19 patients with clinically probable PTE require CT angiography and the higher neutrophil count can be employed as an indicator of PTE severity in COVID-19 patients. Further large multicenter and prospective studies are warranted to corroborate these observations.

Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI), Disease Severity, and Mortality in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Combined indices of different haematological cell types appear to be particularly promising for investigating the link between systemic inflammation and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), an emerging index derived from neutrophil, monocyte, platelet, and lymphocyte counts, in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with different disease severity and survival status. We searched electronic databases between the 1st of December 2019 and the 10th of June 2023 and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of evidence. In 13 studies, severe disease/death was associated with significantly higher AISI values on admission vs. non-severe disease/survival (standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.68, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.97, p < 0.001). The AISI was also significantly associated with severe disease/death in five studies reporting odds ratios (4.39, 95% CI 2.12 to 9.06, p ˂ 0.001), but not in three studies reporting hazard ratios (HR = 1.000, 95% CI 0.999 to 1.002, p = 0.39). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values for severe disease/death were 0.66 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.73), 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83), and 0.79 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.83), respectively. Our study has shown that the AISI on admission can effectively discriminate between patients with different disease severity and survival outcome (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023438025).

Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients Who Have Undergone Liver Transplantation: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

In liver transplant (LT) recipients, immunosuppressive therapy may potentially increase the risk of severe COVID-19 and may increase the mortality in patients. However, studies have shown conflicting results, with various studies reporting poor outcomes while the others show no difference between the LT recipients and healthy population. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on survival of LT recipients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing the data from 387 LT recipients diagnosed with COVID-19. LT recipients were divided into two groups: survival (n = 359) and non-survival (n = 28) groups. A logistic regression model was used to determine the independent risk factors for mortality. Machine learning models were used to analyze the contribution of independent variables to the mortality in LT recipients.

RESULTS

The COVID-19-related mortality rate in LT recipients was 7.2%. Multivariate analysis showed that everolimus use (p = 0.012; OR = 6.2), need for intubation (p = 0.001; OR = 38.4) and discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy (p = 0.047; OR = 7.3) were independent risk factors for mortality. Furthermore, COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of mortality by 100 fold and was the single independent factor determining the survival of the LT recipients.

CONCLUSION

The effect of COVID-19 infection on LT recipients is slightly different from the effect of the disease on the general population. The COVID-19-related mortality is lower than the general population and vaccination for COVID-19 significantly reduces the risk of mortality.

Systemic inflammation index, disease severity, and mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

An excessive systemic pro-inflammatory state increases the risk of severe disease and mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is uncertainty regarding whether specific biomarkers of inflammation can enhance risk stratification in this group. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate an emerging biomarker of systemic inflammation derived from routine hematological parameters, the systemic inflammation index (SII), in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity and survival status.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, between the 1st of December 2019 and the 15th of March 2023. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation, respectively (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023420517).

Results

In 39 studies, patients with a severe disease or non-survivor status had significantly higher SII values on admission compared to patients with a non-severe disease or survivor status (standard mean difference (SMD)=0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.06, p<0.001; moderate certainty of evidence). The SII was also significantly associated with the risk of severe disease or death in 10 studies reporting odds ratios (1.007, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.014, p=0.032; very low certainty of evidence) and in six studies reporting hazard ratios (1.99, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.92, p=0.047; very low certainty of evidence). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for severe disease or mortality were 0.71 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.75), 0.71 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.77), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.80), respectively. In meta-regression, significant correlations were observed between the SMD and albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and D-dimer.

Discussion

Our systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that the SII on admission is significantly associated with severe disease and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, this inflammatory biomarker derived from routine haematological parameters can be helpful for early risk stratification in this group.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023420517.

Ultra-rare RTEL1 gene variants associate with acute severity of COVID-19 and evolution to pulmonary fibrosis as a specific long COVID disorder

BACKGROUND

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus that caused an ongoing pandemic of a pathology termed Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). Several studies reported that both COVID-19 and RTEL1 variants are associated with shorter telomere length, but a direct association between the two is not generally acknowledged. Here we demonstrate that up to 8.6% of severe COVID-19 patients bear RTEL1 ultra-rare variants, and show how this subgroup can be recognized.

METHODS

A cohort of 2246 SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects, collected within the GEN-COVID Multicenter study, was used in this work. Whole exome sequencing analysis was performed using the NovaSeq6000 System, and machine learning methods were used for candidate gene selection of severity. A nested study, comparing severely affected patients bearing or not variants in the selected gene, was used for the characterisation of specific clinical features connected to variants in both acute and post-acute phases.

RESULTS

Our GEN-COVID cohort revealed a total of 151 patients carrying at least one RTEL1 ultra-rare variant, which was selected as a specific acute severity feature. From a clinical point of view, these patients showed higher liver function indices, as well as increased CRP and inflammatory markers, such as IL-6. Moreover, compared to control subjects, they present autoimmune disorders more frequently. Finally, their decreased diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide after six months of COVID-19 suggests that RTEL1 variants can contribute to the development of SARS-CoV-2-elicited lung fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

RTEL1 ultra-rare variants can be considered as a predictive marker of COVID-19 severity, as well as a marker of pathological evolution in pulmonary fibrosis in the post-COVID phase. This notion can be used for a rapid screening in hospitalized infected people, for vaccine prioritization, and appropriate follow-up assessment for subjects at risk. Trial Registration NCT04549831 ( www.

CLINICALTRIAL

org ).

Platelet-neutrophil interaction in COVID-19 and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to commonly induce a thrombotic diathesis, particularly in severely affected individuals. So far, this COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) has been partially explained by hyperactivated platelets as well as by the prothrombotic effects of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) released from neutrophils. However, precise insight into the bidirectional relationship between platelets and neutrophils in the pathophysiology of CAC still lags behind. Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare autoimmune disorder caused by auto-antibody formation in response to immunization with adenoviral vector vaccines. VITT is associated with life-threatening thromboembolic events and thus, high fatality rates. Our concept of the thrombophilia observed in VITT is relatively new, hence a better understanding could help in the management of such patients with the potential to also prevent VITT. In this review we aim to summarize the current knowledge on platelet-neutrophil interplay in COVID-19 and VITT.

Dapsone Lowers Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Mortality in COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the ICU

Some physicians use dapsone as part of the standard treatment of severe COVID-19 patients entering the ICU, though some do not. To obtain an indication of whether dapsone is helping or not, we undertook a retrospective chart review of 29 consecutive ICU COVID-19 patients receiving dapsone and 30 not receiving dapsone. As we previously reported, of those given dapsone, 9/29 (30%) died, while of those not given dapsone, 18/30 (60%) died. We looked back on that data set to determine if there might be basic laboratory findings in these patients that might give an indication of a mechanism by which dapsone was acting. We found that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio decreased in 48% of those given dapsone and in 30% of those not given dapsone. We concluded that dapsone might be lowering that ratio. We then reviewed collected data on neutrophil related inflammation pathways on which dapsone might act as presented here. As this was not a controlled study, many variables prevent drawing any conclusions from this work; a formal, randomized controlled study of dapsone in severe COVID-19 is warranted.

Overview of Antiviral Drug Therapy for COVID-19: Where Do We Stand?

The vaccine weapon has resulted in being essential in fighting the COVID-19 outbreak, but it is not fully preventing infection due to an alarming spreading of several identified variants of concern. In fact, the recent emergence of variants has pointed out how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still represents a global health threat. Moreover, oral antivirals also develop resistance, supporting the need to find new targets as therapeutic tools. However, cocktail therapy is useful to reduce drug resistance and maximize vaccination efficacy. Natural products and metal-drug-based treatments have also shown interesting antiviral activity, representing a valid contribution to counter COVID-19 outbreak. This report summarizes the available evidence which supports the use of approved drugs and further focuses on significant clinical trials that have investigated the safety and efficacy of repurposing drugs and new molecules in different COVID-19 phenotypes. To date, there are many individuals vulnerable to COVID-19 exhibiting severe symptoms, thus characterizing valid therapeutic strategies for better management of the disease is still a challenge.