Use of Physician Global Assessment in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of its psychometric properties

Type I interferon biomarker in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: associations of Siglec-1 with disease activity and treatment response

OBJECTIVES

Novel biomarkers are needed to guide therapy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Expression of Siglec-1, a type I interferon biomarker, was examined in adult patients with IIM in relation to disease activity and treatment response.

METHODS

We analyzed PBMC samples from 19 newly diagnosed adult IIM patients who participated in a phase-2 pilot study on efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) monotherapy, and from 9 healthy controls. Siglec-1 expression on monocytes was measured by flow cytometry before and after treatment, and was evaluated in relation to IIM subtype, physician global activity (PhGA) scores, manual muscle strength (MMT) and the total improvement score (TIS).

RESULTS

Diagnoses included dermatomyositis (DM; n = 9), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM; n = 5), non-specific/overlap myositis (NSM/OM; n = 4) and antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS; n = 1). All patients showed increased Siglec-1 expression at baseline. Relative median fluorescence intensity of Siglec-1 was highest in patients with DM. After 9 weeks, follow-up samples were available for 15 patients of whom 10 patients showed a decline in Siglec-1 expression. In DM, Siglec-1 correlated with disease activity (MMT; rs = -0.603, P = 0.013 and PhGA; rs = 0.783, P < 0.001) and with the TIS (rs = -0.786, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Siglec-1 was increased in treatment-naive IIM patients and showed a decline after IVIG monotherapy. In DM, Siglec-1 expression correlated with relevant clinical measures. This underlines the dynamic role of type I IFN in IIM and the biomarker potential of Siglec-1, in particular in DM. These findings should be further validated in larger cohorts with longer follow-up.

Association of lupus low disease activity state and remission with reduced organ damage and flare in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with high disease activity: a multi-national, longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVE

High disease activity status (HDAS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with adverse long-term outcomes. We examined the frequency of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and remission (REM) attainment in HDAS patients and whether their attainment was associated with improved patient outcomes.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical and outcomes data, collected prospectively from a multinational cohort between 2013 and 2020, were analysed. Disease activity was assessed using SLEDAI-2K. HDAS was defined as SLEDAI-2K ≥ 10. Patients' first visit with SLEDAI-2K ≥ 10 was assigned as baseline. Survival analyses were performed to examine the associations between cumulative and sustained LLDAS and REM attainment in HDAS patients and subsequent organ damage accrual and flare.

RESULTS

A total of 1029 HDAS patients with a median study duration of 2.7 years [IQR: 1.0, 4.8] were studied. LLDAS and REM were attained at least once by 71% (LLDAS-ever, n = 726) and 41% (REM-ever, n = 418) of patients. Approximately one-fifth of patients attained ≥50% cumulative time in LLDAS or REM. In total, 37% (n = 385) of patients attained ≥3months of sustained LLDAS, with progressively lower proportions of patients attaining longer periods of sustained LLDAS. Lower proportions of patients attained sustained REM. Attainment of cumulative and sustained LLDAS or REM provided significant protection against damage accrual and flare in HDAS patients. Sustained periods of LLDAS and REM were difficult to achieve and were therefore a more stringent target, but provided the most protection against damage accrual or flare.

CONCLUSION

LLDAS and REM were achievable targets in HDAS patients, and provided significant protection against adverse outcomes.

Framework for implementing treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus routine clinical care: consensus statements from an international task force

Implementation of Treat-to-Target (T2T) in routine clinical practice remains low in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Real-world data reveal excessive use of glucocorticoids (GCs) and frequently inadequate disease control. Here, an international task force convened to develop a consensus framework for implementing T2T in routine clinical care of adult patients with SLE. This T2T task force comprised an international panel of 22 physicians involved in the care of SLE and 3 lupus patient research partners. Following a scoping review and online discussions, during which definitions and instruments available for T2T in SLE were examined, the panel developed potential framework statements for implementing T2T in SLE, which were extensively discussed before being agreed upon by Delphi consensus. Additionally, the current challenges of implementing T2T in SLE and how future research may address these issues were analyzed. The framework comprises 5 overarching principles and 11 statements. Despite the absence of formal evidence that T2T offers superiority to conventional SLE management, T2T in SLE has been recommended for over a decade. This task force offers a framework for effectively implementing T2T in SLE from a real-life perspective, informing a wide range of physicians, including those outside the limited circle of lupus specialists.

Outcomes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with belimumab: a post hoc efficacy analysis of five phase III clinical trials by British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment criteria

OBJECTIVES

To determine belimumab efficacy assessed using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from phase III belimumab randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A post hoc analysis was carried out on five RCTs in active adult SLE: four with intravenous (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-NEA, EMBRACE) and one with subcutaneous belimumab (BLISS-SC). The 52-week landmark assessments were analysed across trials. Treatment response was defined according to BICLA criteria (BILAG improvement; no worsening of disease activity based on BILAG and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2K; no deterioration in Physician's Global Assessment ≥0.3 (scale: 0-3); no treatment failure).

RESULTS

A total of 3086 patients received belimumab (n=1869) or placebo (n=1217). BICLA response frequencies at week 52 were greater with belimumab vs placebo in BLISS-52 (OR (95% CI): 1.49 (1.05-2.12); p=0.024), BLISS-NEA (1.62 (1.12-2.33); p=0.010) and BLISS-SC (1.89 (1.39-2.57); p<0.001). A highly significant difference was observed in the pooled population (1.47 (1.25-1.72); p<0.001; adjusted for trial variance). Belimumab yielded greater BICLA response frequencies than placebo irrespective of baseline glucocorticoid dose (>7.5 or ≤7.5 mg/day of a prednisone equivalent), in patients with baseline SLEDAI-2K≥10 and in patients with positive anti-double-stranded (ds)DNA and/or low C3/C4 levels at baseline. Belimumab combined with anti-malarials yielded greater frequency of BICLA response attainment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of five RCTs evaluating belimumab in SLE, belimumab conferred superiority over placebo to yield BICLA response in the overall study population and in subgroups of patients with high global or serological activity at baseline. The benefit of belimumab was more prominent when combined with anti-malarials.

Predicting EQ-5D full health state in systemic lupus erythematosus using machine learning algorithms

Objectives

To determine factors associated with reports of EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) full health state (FHS) before and after a trial intervention in patients with SLE, resorting to machine learning algorithms.

Methods

We conducted a post hoc analysis of two phase 3 clinical trials of belimumab (BLISS-52, BLISS-76). Demographic, laboratory and clinical features were retrieved and the Monte Carlo Feature Selection algorithm was employed, then further refined upon consideration of collinearity and clinical relevance. We used support vector machine with radial basis function kernel (SVMRadial), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), neural network (NNet) and logistic regression (LR) to capture both linear and non-linear relationships while ensuring interpretability and robustness.

Results

Among 1642 SLE patients, 12.9% reported FHS at baseline and 23.1% at week 52. Selected features were age, sex, Asian ancestry, baseline cSLEDAI-2K, SELENA-SLEDAI PGA, and urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR) and baseline EQ-5D 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) index score (week 52 models only). The models predicting FHS demonstrated comparable performance at baseline and week 52. A maximum area under the curve of 0.73 was seen for the baseline LASSO and LR models and a maximum of 0.77 for the week 52 LASSO and NNet models. Negative predictive values were high for all models (0.88-0.94). Calibration showed marginal improvement in week 52 models.

Conclusion

Machine learning identified older age, female sex, non-Asian ancestry, high disease activity and low UPCR to be associated with a lack of FHS experience in SLE patients at baseline and week 52. High baseline EQ-5D-3L index scores constituted the strongest predictor of FHS at week 52.

Trial registration

The BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00424476 and NCT00410384, respectively).

Headache in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A matched case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the prevalence and characteristics of headaches between patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and people without the disease and to assess whether there was a relationship between headaches and disease activity.

BACKGROUND

Headache is a common symptom in patients with SLE; however, the effect of SLE on headaches is not fully known.

METHODS

This was a case-control study. Individuals with and without SLE matched by age and sex were compared. All participants were assessed by a neurologist. A semi-structured questionnaire, the six-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used. Disease activity was measured by a rheumatologist using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and quantified using the modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 scale (modified SLEDAI-2K). Data were collected between November 2021 and January 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 228 individuals were included, 114 in each group. The SLE group presented with more moderate/severe headache attacks than the controls (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-4.95; p = 0.013). When comparing patients with active SLE and those without disease activity, there was no difference in the prevalence (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.38-5.74), type (migraine: OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.71-3.99; tension-type headache: OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.25-1.68), frequency (4; 2-15 vs. 3; 1-12 days/month; p = 0.250), intensity (moderate/severe intensity: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.19-1.82), or impact of headache (HIT-6: 61; 50-65 vs. 56; 45-63; p = 0.278). The magnitude of SLE activity (modified SLEDAI-2K) demonstrated no statistically significant association with the impact (standardized beta coefficient: 0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.09; p = 0.792) or monthly frequency of headache (standardized beta coefficient: 0.09, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.26; p = 0.275).

CONCLUSIONS

Headache is a common symptom in SLE, although the prevalence was similar to that of the controls without the disease. While patients with SLE had more intense headache attacks than the controls without SLE, there was no association between headache and SLE activity.

Time trends of variability in disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Disease activity both between and within patients with SLE is highly variable, yet factors driving this variability remain unclear. This study aimed to identify predictors of variability in SLE disease activity over time.

METHODS

We analysed data from 2930 patients with SLE across 13 countries, collected over 38 754 clinic visits between 2013 and 2020. Clinic visit records were converted to panel data with 1-year intervals. The time-adjusted mean disease activity, termed AMS, was calculated. The yearly change in [Formula: see text], denoted as [Formula: see text], was regressed onto [Formula: see text] and other potential predictors using random-effects models. Some variables were split into a person-mean component to assess between-patient differences and a demeaned component to assess within-patient variability.

RESULTS

Overall, variability in SLE disease activity exhibited stabilisation over time. A significant inverse relationship emerged between a patient's disease activity in a given year and variability in disease activity in the subsequent year: a 1-point increase in person-mean disease activity was associated with a 0.27-point decrease (95% CI -0.29 to -0.26, p<0.001) in subsequent variability. Additionally, a 1-point increase in within-patient disease activity variability was associated with a 0.56-point decrease (95% CI -0.57 to -0.55, p<0.001) in the subsequent year. Furthermore, each 1-point increase in the annual average time-adjusted mean Physician Global Assessment was associated with a 0.08-point decrease (90% CI -0.13 to -0.03, p=0.002) in disease activity variability for the following year. Prednisolone dose and the duration of activity in specific organ systems exhibited negative and positive associations, respectively, with disease activity variability in the subsequent year. Patients from less affluent countries displayed greater disease activity variability compared with those from wealthier nations.

CONCLUSION

Disease activity tends to be less variable among patients with higher or more variable disease activity in the previous year. Within-patient variability in disease activity has a stronger impact on subsequent fluctuations than differences between individual patients.

Translocating gut pathobiont Enterococcus gallinarum induces TH17 and IgG3 anti-RNA-directed autoimmunity in mouse and human

Chronic autoimmune diseases often lead to long-term sequelae and require lifelong immunosuppression because of an incomplete understanding of the triggers and drivers in genetically predisposed patients. Gut bacteria that escape the gut barrier, known as translocating gut pathobionts, have been implicated as instigators and perpetuators of extraintestinal autoimmune diseases in mice. The gut microbial contributions to autoimmunity in humans remain largely unclear, including whether specific pathological human adaptive immune responses are triggered by such pathobionts. Here, we show that the translocating pathobiont Enterococcus gallinarum can induce both human and mouse interferon-γ+ T helper 17 (TH17) differentiation and immunoglobulin G3 (IgG3) subclass switch of anti-E. gallinarum RNA antibodies, which correlated with anti-human RNA autoantibody responses in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and autoimmune hepatitis, two extraintestinal autoimmune diseases. E. gallinarum RNA, but not human RNA, triggered Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8), and TLR8-mediated human monocyte activation promoted human TH17 induction by E. gallinarum. Translocation of the pathobiont triggered increased anti-RNA autoantibody titers that correlated with renal autoimmune pathophysiology in murine gnotobiotic lupus models and with disease activity in patients with SLE. These studies elucidate cellular mechanisms of how a translocating gut pathobiont induces systemic human T cell- and B cell-dependent autoimmune responses and provide a framework for developing host- and microbiota-derived biomarkers and targeted therapies in autoimmune diseases.

Longitudinal associations of flare and damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of organ damage (damage) and flare and to examine longitudinal associations between flares and subsequent damage accrual, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration cohort with ≥3 years of prospectively captured data were studied. Flares were assessed at routine visits, while damage ((Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology) Damage Index) was assessed annually. Multivariable, multifailure survival analyses were carried out to quantify the association between flares and damage accrual.

RESULTS

1556 patients with SLE with a median (IQR) of 5.7 (3.9, 7.0) years of follow-up were studied. 39.5% (n=614) of patients had damage at enrolment, and 31.9% (n=496) accrued damage during the study observation period. The incidence of damage accrual during observation was ~58/1000 person-years. Overall, 74.1% (n=1153) of patients experienced a flare of any severity (mild/moderate or severe) at least once; 56.9% (n=885) experienced recurrent (≥2) flares. The risk of subsequent damage accrual in patients who experienced mild-to-moderate flare, after controlling for confounders, was 32% greater than in patients without flares (adjusted HR) (95% CI 1.32 (1.17 to 1.72)). The risk of damage accrual was greater if patients had severe flares (HR (95% CI) 1.58 (1.18 to 2.11)). For each additional flare, the risk of damage accrual increased by 7% (HR (95% CI) 1.07 (1.02 to 1.13)).

CONCLUSIONS

Flares independently increased the risk of damage accrual. Prevention of flares should be considered a necessary goal of SLE disease management to minimise permanent damage.

Analysis of related factors for systemic lupus erythematosus flare after SARS-Cov-2 infection: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Since COVID-19 infections are more common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, most recent research has focused on the outcome of COVID-19, with fewer studies on disease activity in SLE. This research aims to evaluate flares in SLE with COVID-19 infection while investigating predictive factors.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect information on patients with previously diagnosed SLE from multi-center. SLE patients infected with COVID-19 after December 7, 2022, were selected. Detailed information covering demographic characteristics, SLE and COVID-19 clinical features, disease activity, and medication was collected through an electronic questionnaire. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate the predictive factors for SLE disease onset after COVID-19 infection.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients were finally included in our analysis. Thirty (12.5%) of those enrolled reported an SLE flare. Multivariate analysis with logistic models confirmed that SLE in the active stage (OR 2.617, 95% CI 1.008-6.514, p = .041) and COVID-19 duration (OR 4.140, 95% CI 1.412-11.694, p = .008) were predictors for flare in SLE patients with Covid-19 infection. In contrast, immunosuppressants were associated with a low incidence of flare of SLE (OR 0.138, 95% CI 0.042-0.46, p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The active phase of SLE and the progression of COVID-19 were the main risk factors for disease exacerbation in SLE patients, while the use of immunosuppressive medications was associated with a lower risk of flare-ups. These findings provide valuable insights for managing SLE patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus Clinician-Reported Outcome Predicts Damage in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Data From the Almenara Lupus Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictive value of the LFA-REAL ClinRO (Lupus Foundation of America Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus clinician-reported outcome) on damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

METHODS

Data from a prevalent lupus cohort were used. The LFA-REAL ClinRO includes 9 domains: mucocutaneous (global and 3 subdomains), musculoskeletal (global and 2 subdomains), cardiorespiratory, neuropsychiatric, renal, hematological, constitutional, vasculitis, and other (it allows for other or rare manifestations). For each domain, a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale is used, and global domains are included except for the mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal domains where the subdomains are included; it allows for 3 manifestations under "other," so the score ranges from 0 to 1400 (sum of 14 in the visual analog scale). Damage was assessed with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index. Generalized estimating equations were performed, being the outcome the increase in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index; confounders from the previous visit were included; adjusted multivariable models were done. Incidence rate ratios per 10-unit increase in the LFA-REAL ClinRO were reported. Similar models were performed to evaluate the impact of the SLEDAI-2K (SLE Disease Activity Index) and physician global assessment on damage to determine which measure would better predict damage accrual.

RESULTS

Three-hundred thirty-one patients and 1425 visits were included, 1.9 (SD 1.2) years of follow-up. Disease duration at baseline was 10.7 (7.4) years. The mean LFA-REAL ClinRO was 18.2 (SD 30.7). During the follow-up visits, 63 (17.9%) patients accrued damage once; 4 (1.1%) accrued damage twice. The LFA-REAL ClinRO was predictive of damage accrual even after adjustment for possible confounders (incidence rate ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.16; p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained using the SLEDAI-2K and the physician global assessment.

CONCLUSION

The LFA-REAL ClinRO is predictive of damage accrual, even after adjusting for possible confounders.

Addition of constitutional symptoms to the SLEDAI-2K improves overall disease activity assessment: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Constitutional symptoms (fatigue, lymphadenopathy, and weight loss) are not included in the SLE disease activity index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K). In this pilot study, we assessed the concurrent and construct validity of a revised SLEDAI-2K (SLED-R) that included these symptoms with the original SLEDAI-2K (SLED-O), using the physician global assessment of disease activity (PGA) as the reference.

METHODS

Our revised SLED-R substituted the SLED-O's fever descriptor with a constitutional descriptor that included fever, fatigue, lymphadenopathy, and/or weight loss. SLED-O, SLED-R, PGA and patient global assessment (PtGA) scores were collected prospectively. Bland-Altman correlations for repeated measures were calculated and Meng's z-test was used to compare correlations between dependent and overlapping correlation coefficients. Associations between constitutional symptoms and disease activity measures were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square tests and repeated measures correlations.

RESULTS

1123 SLED-O, SLED-R, PGA, and 1066 PtGA were collected in 239 subjects. The new descriptor was scored in 45 subjects (18.8%) and 92 instances (8.1%), while the original descriptor, fever, was scored in only 4 subjects (1.7%) and 5 instances (0.4%). Mean SLED-O, PGA and PtGA scores were higher when the constitutional descriptor was scored versus not (p < .001). The correlation between SLED-R and PGA was marginally higher than between SLED-O and PGA (p < .001). Fatigue contributed most to this increase (p = .001) and associated with both higher PGA and PtGA scores (p < .001). Mean SLED-O and PGA scores were higher when ≥1 constitutional symptom(s) were scored versus not (p < .002). Correlations between PGA and PtGA when the new descriptor was scored versus not were similar (p = .860). The frequency of concordance between PGA and PtGA was lower when the new descriptor was scored (55%) versus not (72.5%), with PGA > PtGA when the new descriptor was scored (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The addition of constitutional symptoms to SLEDAI-2K, particularly fatigue, resulted in a marginal increase in its correlation with PGA, and new constitutional symptoms associated with higher SLED-O and PGA scores. As fatigue is subjective and difficult to attribute to SLE, its validity and inter-rater reliability in scoring remains uncertain. The clinical utility of SLED-R remains unclear, and further studies of its validity and reliability are needed.

Structural Brain MR Imaging Alterations in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Neuropsychiatric Events

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a complex autoimmune disease known for its diverse clinical manifestations, including neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, which impacts a patient's quality of life. Our aim was to explore the relationships among brain MR imaging morphometric findings, neuropsychiatric events, and laboratory values in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, shedding light on potential volumetric biomarkers and diagnostic indicators for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (14 with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, 13 with systemic lupus erythematosus), 24 women and 3 men (average age, 43 years, ranging from 21 to 62 years) were included in this cross-sectional study, along with 10 neuropsychiatric patients as controls. An MR imaging morphometric analysis, with the VolBrain online platform, to quantitatively assess brain structural features and their differences between patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic lupus erythematosus, was performed. Correlations and differences between MR imaging morphometric findings and laboratory values, including disease activity scores, such as the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index, were explored. An ordinary least squares regression analysis further explored the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index relationship with MR imaging features.

RESULTS

For neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus and non-neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, the brain regions with the largest difference in volumetric measurements were the insular central operculum volume (P value = .003) and the occipital cortex thickness (P = .003), which were lower in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. The partial correlation analysis showed that the most correlated morphometric features with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus were subcallosal area thickness asymmetry (P < .001) and temporal pole thickness asymmetry (P = .011). The ordinary least squares regression analysis yielded an R 2 of 0.725 for the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score, with calcarine cortex volume as a significant predictor, and an R 2 of 0.715 for the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index score, with medial postcentral gyrus volume as a significant predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

The MR imaging volumetric analysis, along with the correlation study and the ordinary least squares regression analysis, revealed significant differences in brain regions and their characteristics between patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus and those with systemic lupus erythematosus, as well as between patients with different Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index scores.

Defining remission in childhood-onset lupus: PReS-endorsed consensus definitions by an international task force

OBJECTIVE

To derive childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) specific remission definitions for future treat-to-target (T2T) trials, observational studies, and clinical practice.

METHODS

The cSLE International T2T Task Force conducted Delphi surveys exploring paediatric perspectives on adult-onset SLE remission targets. A modified nominal group technique was used to discuss, refine, and agree on the cSLE remission target criteria.

RESULTS

The Task Force proposed two definitions of remission: 'cSLE clinical remission on steroids (cCR)' and 'cSLE clinical remission off steroids (cCR-0)'. The common criteria are: (1) Clinical-SLEDAI-2 K = 0; (2) PGA score < 0.5 (0-3 scale); (4) stable antimalarials, immunosuppressive, and biologic therapy (changes due to side-effects, adherence, weight, or when building up to target dose allowed). Criterion (3) in cCR is the prednisolone dose ≤0.1 mg/kg/day (maximum 5 mg/day), whereas in cCR-0 it is zero.

CONCLUSIONS

cSLE definitions of remission have been proposed, maintaining sufficient alignment with the adult-SLE definition to facilitate life-course research.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score Remission and Low Disease Activity States Discriminate Drug From Placebo and Better Health-Related Quality of Life

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the ability of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) remission and low disease activity (LDA) to discriminate active drug from placebo and to discriminate outcomes in the patients' perspective (health-related quality of life [HR-QoL]) in SLE trials.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the pooled Belimumab in Subjects With SLE (BLISS)-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials data. SLE-DAS remission and LDA attainment and discrimination between belimumab and placebo at 52 weeks were compared using chi-square tests. At week 52, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores were compared between patients attaining SLE-DAS remission versus nonremission and SLE-DAS LDA versus non-LDA using the t-test and Mann-Whitney test. Mean changes from week 0 to 52 in SF-36 and FACIT-F scores were compared between groups using multivariate regression analysis adjusted for baseline scores.

RESULTS

At week 52, significantly more patients attained SLE-DAS LDA taking belimumab 1 mg/kg (17.9% vs 13.0%; P = 0.023; odds ratio [OR] 1.459; relative risk [RR] 1.377; number needed to treat [NNT] 20.4) and 10 mg/kg (21.7% vs 13.0%; P < 0.001; OR 1.853; RR 1.668; NNT 11.5) compared with placebo. Likewise, more patients attained SLE-DAS remission taking belimumab 10 mg/kg compared to placebo (14.7% vs 10.1%; P = 0.019; OR 1.532; RR 1.454; NNT 21.7). At week 52, patients attaining SLE-DAS remission and LDA presented higher SF-36 domain and summary scores (all P < 0.001) and FACIT-F scores (both P < 0.001). Mean improvements from baseline in SF-36 and FACIT-F scores were significantly higher in patients achieving SLE-DAS remission and LDA.

CONCLUSION

SLE-DAS remission and LDA showed discriminant ability for identifying patients receiving active drug in SLE clinical trials. Attainment of these SLE-DAS targets are associated with better HR-QoL.

Defining the physician global assessment threshold equivalent to remission in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

The optimal threshold of the physician global assessment (PGA) for remission in SLE has never been evaluated systematically. The aim of this study was to assess the ideal PGA threshold associated with physician remission and to investigate its impact on remission rates in our lupus cohort.

METHODS

In this monocentric cross-sectional study, patients with SLE were evaluated for physician remission by asking the treating physicians whether they considered their patient to be in remission, regardless of objective remission criteria. Furthermore, two objective remission definitions were applied: (i) DORIS (Definition Of Remission In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) remission using a PGA of <2 (0-10) (corresponding to <0.5 on a visual analogue scale 0-3 used in DORIS); and (ii) DORIS remission with omission of PGA (modDORIS). A receiver operating characteristic analysis and regression analyses were performed to assess the ideal PGA threshold and factors influencing PGA.

RESULTS

Of the 233 patients included, 126 patients (54.0%) were in physician remission, 42.5% in DORIS remission and 67.0% in modDORIS remission. A PGA of <2 [numeric rating scale (NRS) 0-10] had the highest sensitivity (79%) and specificity (81%) for physician remission and modDORIS (area under the curve 0.85 and 0.69). PGA of patients fulfilling any of the remission definitions was associated with pain and hypocomplementemia. Damage was numerically higher in patients in modDORIS only; no association between PGA and damage was found in regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Using a PGA threshold of <2 (0-10), corresponding to <0.6 (0-3), resulted in best prediction of physician remission. PGA levels seem to be influenced by pain and complement levels but not disease damage.

The SLE-DAS provides an accurate and feasible flare tool in the clinical setting: a validation study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the criterion validity of the SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS) flare tool and compare its performance in identifying flares against other instruments.

METHODS

Patients with SLE fulfilling SLE-DAS low disease activity at baseline were included from two academic lupus clinics. During follow-up, flares were identified by the senior attending clinician, applying the expert-consensus-based definition as gold-standard. The first clinical flare from flaring patients, and the first visit after baseline in patients without flares were analysed. In each no flare/flare visits, we assessed flares by SLE-DAS (score increase ≥1.72), classic-SELENA Flare Index (c-SELENA FI), revised-SELENA FI (r-SELENA FI), and SLEDAI-2K (score increase ≥4). We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's Kappa agreement of each flare tool against the gold-standard.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients were included and followed-up for 22.9 (14.2) months. Incidence of flares was 8.19/100 patient-years, with 69 patients experiencing flares. The SLE-DAS identified 96.6% of the expert-defined flares implying a treatment change and classified 28.0% of those as moderate/severe. Sensitivity and specificity for the gold-standard flare definition were: SLE-DAS 97.1% and 97.3%, c-SELENA FI 88.4% and 98.1%, r-SELENA FI 88.4% and 96.8%, SLEDAI-2K 56.5% and 99.2%, respectively. Kappa coefficients of these instruments were 0.902 (95% CI: 0.847, 0.957), 0.870 (95% CI: 0.805, 0.935), 0.832 (95% CI: 0.761, 0.903), and 0.663 (95% CI: 0.557, 0.769), respectively. The number of flare misclassifications was lowest with the SLE-DAS, and highest with the SLEDAI-2K.

CONCLUSION

The SLE-DAS accurately identifies and categorizes flares as mild or moderate/severe. It is feasible and, thus, may help the physicians' treatment decisions in the clinical practice setting.

Usefulness of Belimumab in Adult Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Evaluated Using Single Indexes: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background

Belimumab is the first antibody drug approved for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits soluble B lymphocyte stimulator protein. In clinical trials, a composite index was used to assess efficacy of belimumab. However, clinical guidelines on SLE treatment currently use single efficacy indexes.

Objective

The main objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of belimumab utilizing single indexes used in routine clinical practice, rather than the composite efficacy index used in clinical trials during the development phase. As a secondary endpoint, safety was also evaluated.

Methods

Several databases were searched to identify reports published up to December 1, 2021 on randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of belimumab in adult patients with SLE. From the clinical trial data, efficacy was evaluated using single indexes including the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index, and Physician Global Assessment. Safety was also assessed. Data were synthesized and analyzed using Review Manager 5.4. This study protocol was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number: UMIN000052846).

Results

The search identified 12 reports that met the inclusion criteria. Five reports were included in efficacy evaluation and 9 in safety evaluation. The primary endpoint was SLEDAI. Significantly more belimumab-treated patients achieved a ≥4-point reduction in SLEDAI (relative risk 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.40; P < 0.00001) compared with placebo. Other efficacy endpoints were also improved significantly in the belimumab group. No difference in safety was found between belimumab and placebo.

Conclusions

The present meta-analysis evaluating clinical trial data using various single indexes recommended by clinical guidelines for SLE verifies that addition of belimumab to standard of care is efficacious for moderate-to-severe SLE.

Clinical trial outcomes for SLE: what we have and what we need

The paradigm of drug approval in SLE currently relies on successful large phase III randomised controlled trials and a set of primary, secondary and additional end points. Taken together, these outcomes offer a nuanced understanding of the efficacy and safety of the investigational agent. In this review, we thoroughly examine the main outcomes used in SLE trials and highlight unmet requirements as well as potential venues for future trial design in SLE. Disease activity indices can be broadly categorised into global-specific and organ-specific indices, in particular for skin, joints and kidneys, but there is no universal consensus about their use in clinical trials. Because each of these instruments has its own intrinsic strengths and weaknesses, the assessment of treatment response has progressed from relying solely on one individual disease activity index to using composite responder definitions. Those are typically measured from the trial baseline to the end point assessment date and may be combined with the need to taper and maintain glucocorticoids (GCs) within prespecified ranges. Remission and low disease activity are two critical states in the perspective of 'Treat-to-Target' trials, but are not fully recognised by regulators. While significant progress has been made in clinical trial outcomes for SLE, there is a clear need for continued innovation. Addressing these challenges will require collaboration between researchers, clinicians, patients as well as with regulatory agencies to refine existing outcome measures, incorporate meaningful and ethnically diverse patient perspectives, foster relevant digital opportunities and explore new therapeutic avenues, including early use of investigational agents. By doing so, we can advance our ability to manage SLE effectively and safely and improve the lives of those living with this complex and impactful autoimmune disease.

What is the best instrument to measure disease activity in SLE? - SLE-DAS vs Easy BILAG

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous condition making assessment of disease activity challenging. However, thorough assessment is essential to evaluate patients longitudinally, to guide therapeutic decisions, and for clinical trials. Currently, the most popular disease activity index in clinical practice and trials is SLEDAI-2K. Its main advantage is ease of use, but significant weaknesses of SLEDAI-2K are omission of several serious manifestations, inability to capture change within an organ system, and fixed severity weightings that are often inappropriate. Recently several groups have developing improved tools. We report here the debate held at CORA meeting on this issue. SLE-DAS includes 17 weighted clinical and laboratory parameters including continuous measures in 4 items with an online calculator. A higher sensitivity to change compared to SLEDAI-2K has been demonstrated in its validation studies. Easy BILAG is an improved format of the BILAG-2004 that retains its content but greatly simplified. Its scoring using a single-page form that incorporates concise definitions for key terms next to clinical items. Easy-BILAG demonstrates higher accuracy and less variability and increased and better user feedback compared to the standard BILAG-2004 format. Both the indices discussed at CORA showed an advantage in measuring disease activity compared to SLEDAI.

Latent Class Analysis Identifies Distinct Phenotypes of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Predictive of Flares after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: Results from the Coronavirus National Vaccine Registry for ImmuNe Diseases SINGapore (CONVIN-SING)

We recently reported that messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination was associated with flares in 9% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Herein, we focused our analysis on patients from a multi-ethnic Southeast Asian lupus cohort with the intention of identifying distinct phenotypes associated with increased flares after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

METHODS

Six hundred and thirty-three SLE patients from eight public healthcare institutions were divided into test and validation cohorts based on healthcare clusters. Latent class analysis was performed based on age, ethnicity, gender, vaccine type, past COVID-19 infection, interruption of immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatment for vaccination, disease activity and background immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatment as input variables. Data from both cohorts were then combined for mixed effect Cox regression to determine which phenotypic cluster had a higher risk for time to first SLE flare, adjusted for the number of vaccine doses.

RESULTS

Two clusters were identified in the test (C1 vs. C2), validation (C1' vs. C2') and combined (C1″ vs. C2″) cohorts, with corresponding clusters sharing similar characteristics. Of 633 SLE patients, 88.6% were female and there was multi-ethnic representation with 74.9% Chinese, 14.2% Malay and 4.6% Indian. The second cluster (C2, C2' and C2″) was smaller compared to the first. SLE patients in the second cluster (C2 and C2') were more likely to be male, non-Chinese and younger, with higher baseline disease activity. The second cluster (C2″) had more incident flares (hazard ratio = 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9, p = 0.014) after vaccination. A higher proportion of patients in C2″ had immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatment interruption for vaccination as compared to patients in C1″ (6.6% vs. 0.2%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We identified two distinct phenotypic clusters of SLE with different patterns of flares following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Caution has to be exercised in monitoring for post-vaccination flares in patients with risk factors for flares such as non-Chinese ethnicity, young age, male gender and suboptimal disease control at the time of vaccination.

Comparative analysis of contemporary anti-double stranded DNA antibody assays for systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective

Elevated double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody levels in blood serum are considered a disease-specific marker in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), correlate with disease activity and the incidence of lupus nephritis, and can be detected in up to 86% of all SLE cases. Despite the high clinical relevance, the variety of dsDNA antibody testing methods with heterogenous performance in clinical use remains challenging. This study is the first to prospectively investigate the performance of two of today's most commonly applied anti-dsDNA testing methods head-to-head under real-world conditions, as well as their correlation with other clinical and serological disease parameters in SLE patients.

Methods

In this prospective study, all SLE patients undergoing treatment at the Department of Rheumatology at the University Hospital Bonn within a 13-months period (n=41) and control patients without connective-tissue disease (n=51) were consecutively enrolled and examined. For all study participants' serum samples both anti-dsDNA-NcX enzyme-linked immunoassay testing EUROIMMUN, Luebeck, Germany) and the fluorescence immunoassay ELiA dsDNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) were performed. In addition, demographic data, further laboratory values and disease activity parameters were recorded. Clinical disease activity was assessed by SLEDAI-2K.

Results

Both assays showed high specificity (anti-dsDNA-NcX ELISA: 0.9, ELiA dsDNA: 0.959), but there were notable differences in sensitivity (anti-dsDNA-NcX ELISA: 0.51, ELiA dsDNA: 0.38). Pearsons's correlation yielded a positive correlation between anti-dsDNA concentrations and CRP concentrations for the anti-dsDNA-NcX ELISA (R=0.22; p=0.038) and a mild-to-moderate inverse correlation between concentrations of anti-dsDNA and complement C4 for the ELiA dsDNA test (R=-0.22; p=0.045) when SLE and control patients were considered together. Other than, no significant correlation between anti-dsDNA concentrations and clinical or laboratory findings was found for either test procedure.

Conclusion

Both anti-dsDNA antibody assays represent reliable examination methods with high specificity for the diagnosis of SLE that fulfill EULAR/ACR requirements. However, the anti-dsDNA-NcX ELISA showed superior sensitivity and significant correlation with disease activity (as measured by CRP concentrations).

Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE: Are we there yet?

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a great heterogenicity in course and clinical manifestations. Although prognosis improved in the last decades of the 20th century, mortality remains higher than in the general population and uncontrolled disease activity and therapy-related adverse effects have been identified as major contributors to damage accrual and poor outcomes. Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE represents a great challenge even to the expert rheumatologist. Global disease activity indices are tools developed to assess activity across multiple organ systems. Several disease activity indices have been developed over the years, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, and knowing them is essential for understanding research studies, such as clinical trials, in which they are used. Organ-specific activity indices have been developed concurrently to represent organ involvement such as glomerulonephritis, cutaneous and musculoskeletal lupus manifestations. Regarding damage, the SLICC/ACR damage index has proven to be an effective tool for damage accrual assessment, yet not devoid of drawbacks. This review provides an overview of the most frequently utilized indices developed for the assessment of activity and damage in SLE highlighting their pros and cons when applied to the research and clinical setting.

Predictors of flare in SLE patients fulfilling lupus low disease activity state: a cohort study of 292 patients with 36-month follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The treatment target in SLE should be maintained stable by preventing flares. The objectives were to identify predictors of flare in patients attaining lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), and to assess whether remission with no glucocorticoids is associated with lower risk of flares.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of SLE patients followed in a referral centre over 3 years. Baseline was the first visit where each patient attained LLDAS. Flares up to 36 months' follow-up were identified by three instruments: revised Safety of Estrogen in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) Flare Index (r-SFI), SLEDAI-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS). Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters at baseline were evaluated as predictors of flare, with distinct models for each flare instrument, using survival analysis with univariate followed by multivariate Cox regression. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined with 95% CI.

RESULTS

A total of 292 patients fulfilling LLDAS were included. Over follow-up, 28.4%, 24.7% and 13.4% of the patients developed one or more flare, according to r-SFI, SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2K definitions, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the predictors of SLE-DAS flares were presence of anti-U1-ribonucleoprotein (anti-U1RNP) (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.30, 3.59), SLE-DAS score at baseline (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.04, 1.54) and immunosuppressants (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.43, 4.09). These predictors were equally significant for r-SFI and SLEDAI-2K flares. Remitted patients with no glucocorticoids presented a lower risk of SLE-DAS flares (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.37, 0.98).

CONCLUSION

In patients with LLDAS, anti-U1RNP, disease activity scored by SLE-DAS and SLE requiring maintenance immunosuppressants predict higher risk of flare. Remission with no glucocorticoids is associated with lower risk of flares.

Ultrasonographic non-radiographic erosions could predict the efficacy of belimumab in articular systemic lupus erythematosus

The aim of this study is to characterise lupus-related arthritis and assess if the presence of ultrasound-detected erosions could be associated with belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) articular manifestations. We performed a spontaneous, monocentric, retrospective, and observational study. We enrolled patients affected by SLE with articular involvement treated with belimumab. We excluded patients with positive rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA), Jaccoud's arthropathy, and radiographic erosions. Patients were assessed at baseline, 3, and 6 months. We collected laboratory and clinical data from electronic records. Joint disease activity was assessed using disease activity score on 28 joints based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), swollen and tender joints count. All patients underwent an ultrasound examination of the wrist, metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and metatarsal-phalangeal joints before the initiation of treatment with belimumab. We performed Student's T-test and Mann-Whitney's U-test to assess the difference between means and Fisher's exact test to assess difference in proportions, and linear univariate regression to investigate predictors of disease activity. We enrolled 23 patients (female 82.6%, mean age of 50.65 ± 14.1 years). Seven patients (30.4%) presented bone erosions at baseline. Patients with bone erosions were generally older (61 ± 16.1 vs 46.13 ± 10.7 years, p = 0.016), more frequently male (42.8 vs 6.2%, p = 0.03), with higher baseline CRP levels (10.29 ± 11.6 vs 2.25 ± 3.1 mg/L, p = 0.015) and C4 levels (0.19 ± 0.17 vs 0.1 ± 0.04 g/L, p = 0.05). After 6 months of treatment with belimumab, patients without erosions improved their DAS28-CRP significantly (2.95 ± 0.89 vs 2.26 ± 0.48, p = 0.01), while patients with erosions did not (3.6 ± 0.79 vs 3.2 ± 0.95, p = 0.413). DAS28-CRP did not differ between the two groups at baseline, while it was significantly lower at the other two time points in patients without erosions. The majority of patients achieved remission at 6 months follow-up based on DAS28-CRP criteria (73.9%), with a significant difference between patients with and without erosions (42.8 vs 87.5%, p = 0.045). The presence of articular ultrasound-detected erosions could be predictive of a decreased efficacy of belimumab in the articular manifestations of SLE. A possible explanation is a rheumatoid-like articular phenotype, despite the lack of ACPA-positivity and radiologic erosions. However, due to the small sample population, larger cohorts are needed to assess the possible predictive role of this finding.

Human Th17- and IgG3-associated autoimmunity induced by a translocating gut pathobiont

Extraintestinal autoimmune diseases are multifactorial with translocating gut pathobionts implicated as instigators and perpetuators in mice. However, the microbial contributions to autoimmunity in humans remain largely unclear, including whether specific pathological human adaptive immune responses are triggered by such pathobionts. We show here that the translocating pathobiont Enterococcus gallinarum induces human IFNγ ⁺ Th17 differentiation and IgG3 subclass switch of anti- E. gallinarum RNA and correlating anti-human RNA autoantibody responses in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune hepatitis. Human Th17 induction by E. gallinarum is cell-contact dependent and involves TLR8-mediated human monocyte activation. In murine gnotobiotic lupus models, E. gallinarum translocation triggers IgG3 anti-RNA autoantibody titers that correlate with renal autoimmune pathophysiology and with disease activity in patients. Overall, we define cellular mechanisms of how a translocating pathobiont induces human T- and B-cell-dependent autoimmune responses, providing a framework for developing host- and microbiota-derived biomarkers and targeted therapies in extraintestinal autoimmune diseases.

One Sentence Summary

Translocating pathobiont Enterococcus gallinarum promotes human Th17 and IgG3 autoantibody responses linked to disease activity in autoimmune patients.

The multidisciplinary approach to eosinophilia

Eosinophilic granulocytes are normally present in low numbers in the bloodstream. Patients with an increased number of eosinophilic granulocytes in the differential count (eosinophilia) are common and can pose a clinical challenge because conditions with eosinophilia occur in all medical specialties. The diagnostic approach must be guided by a thorough medical history, supported by specific tests to guide individualized treatment. Neoplastic (primary) eosinophilia is identified by one of several unique acquired genetic causes. In contrast, reactive (secondary) eosinophilia is associated with a cytokine stimulus in a specific disease, while idiopathic eosinophilia is a diagnosis by exclusion. Rational treatment is disease-directed in secondary cases and has paved the way for targeted treatment against the driver in primary eosinophilia, whereas idiopathic cases are treated as needed by principles in eosinophilia originating from clonal drivers. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed with secondary eosinophilia and are managed by the relevant specialty-e.g., rheumatology, allergy, dermatology, gastroenterology, pulmonary medicine, hematology, or infectious disease. The overlap in symptoms and the risk of irreversible organ involvement in eosinophilia, irrespective of the cause, warrants that patients without a diagnostic clarification or who do not respond to adequate treatment should be referred to a multidisciplinary function anchored in a hematology department for evaluation. This review presents the pathophysiology, manifestations, differential diagnosis, diagnostic workup, and management of (adult) patients with eosinophilia. The purpose is to place eosinophilia in a clinical context, and therefore justify and inspire the establishment of a multidisciplinary team of experts from diagnostic and clinical specialties at the regional level to support the second opinion. The target patient population requires highly specialized laboratory analysis and therapy and occasionally has severe eosinophil-induced organ dysfunction. An added value of a centralized, clinical function is to serve as a platform for education and research to further improve the management of patients with eosinophilia. Primary and idiopathic eosinophilia are key topics in the review, which also address current research and discusses outstanding issues in the field.

PReS-endorsed international childhood lupus T2T task force definition of childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS)

OBJECTIVE

To achieve a consensus-based definition of Low Disease Activity (LDA) for use in cSLE trials.

METHODS

The International cSLE T2T Task Force, comprising of paediatric rheumatologists/nephrologists, and adult rheumatologists undertook a series of Delphi surveys/consensus meetings to discuss, refine, and vote upon cSLE LDA criteria.

RESULTS

The Task Force agreed that LDA should be based upon the adult-SLE Lupus Low Disease Activity State definition (LLDAS), with modifications to make it applicable to cSLE (cLLDAS). They agreed upon five cLLDAS criteria: (1) SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2 K ≤4, with no activity in major organ systems; (2) no new features of lupus disease activity compared with the last assessment; (3) Physician Global Assessment score of ≤1 (0-3 scale); (4) prednisolone dose of ≤0.15 mg/kg/day, 7.5 mg/day/maximum; while on (5) stable antimalarials, immunosuppressives, and biologics.

CONCLUSIONS

A cSLE-appropriate definition of cLLDAS has been generated, maintaining alignment with the adult-SLE definition to promote life-course research.

Evaluation of the LFA-REAL clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) and patient-reported outcome (PRO): prespecified analysis of the phase III ustekinumab trial in patients with SLE

OBJECTIVE

The Lupus Foundation of America Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) system is a novel and simple SLE disease activity instrument, consisting of a tandem clinician-reported (ClinRO) and patient-reported (PRO) outcome measure. The aim of this study was to compare the LFA-REAL system with other SLE activity measures in the phase III trial of ustekinumab in patients with active SLE.

METHODS

This was a prespecified analysis of data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted at 140 sites in 20 countries. Correlations were evaluated between the LFA-REAL ClinRO and PRO with a panel of clinician-reported and patient-reported disease activity measures commonly used in SLE clinical trials at baseline, week 24 and week 52. All p values are reported as nominal.

RESULTS

Trial participants included 516 patients with SLE with a mean (SD) age of 43.5 (8.9), of whom 482 (93.4%) were female. The LFA-REAL ClinRO correlated with Physician Global Assessment (r=0.39, 0.65 and 0.74, p<0.001), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (r=0.43, 0.67 and 0.73, p<0.001) and SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (r=0.35, 0.60 and 0.62, p<0.001). The LFA-REAL ClinRO arthralgia/arthritis score correlated well with active joint counts (r=0.54, 0.73 and 0.68, p<0.001) and the mucocutaneous global score correlated strongly with Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index total activity (r=0.57, 0.77 and 0.81, p<0.001). The LFA-REAL PRO demonstrated a moderate correlation with Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (r=-0.60, -0.55 and -0.58, p<0.001), Lupus QoL physical health (r=-0.42, -0.47 and -0.46, p<0.001), SF-36v2 vitality (r=-0.40, -0.43 and -0.58, p<0.001) and SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary (r=-0.45, -0.53 and -0.53, p<0.001). The LFA-REAL ClinRO and PRO showed a moderate correlation with each other (r=0.32, 0.45 and 0.50, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The LFA-REAL ClinRO and PRO showed varied levels of correlations (weak to strong) with existing physician-based lupus disease activity measures and patient-reported outcome instruments, respectively and were able to more accurately capture organ-specific mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal manifestations. More analyses are needed to determine areas in which patient-reported outcomes are most similar or different to physician-reported end points and the basis for differences.

Association of Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index Attainment With Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: A Five-Year Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

In trials of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the SLE Responder Index (SRI) is the most commonly used primary efficacy end point but has limited validation against long-term outcomes. We aimed to investigate associations of attainment of a modified version of the SRI (mSRI) with key clinical outcomes in SLE patients with up to 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

We used data from a large multicenter, longitudinal SLE cohort in which patients received standard of care. The first visit with active disease (defined as SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2K] score ≥6) was designated as baseline, and mSRI attainment (defined as a reduction in SLEDAI-2K ≥4 points with no worsening in physician global assessment ≥0.3 points) was determined at annual intervals from baseline up to 5 years. Associations between mSRI attainment and outcomes including disease activity, glucocorticoid dose, flare, damage accrual, Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), and remission were studied.

RESULTS

We included 2,060 patients, with a median baseline SLEDAI-2K score of 8. An mSRI response was attained by 56% of patients at 1 year, with similar responder rates seen at subsequent annual time points. Compared to nonresponders, mSRI responders had significantly lower disease activity and prednisolone dose and higher proportions of LLDAS and remission attainment at each year, and less damage accrual at years 2 and 3. Furthermore, mSRI responder status at 1 year predicted clinical benefit at subsequent years across most outcomes, including damage accrual (odds ratio [OR] range 0.58-0.69, P < 0.05 for damage accrual ORs at all time points).

CONCLUSION

In SLE patients with active disease receiving standard of care, mSRI attainment predicts favorable outcomes over long-term follow-up, supporting the clinical meaningfulness of SRI attainment as an SLE trial end point.

Pilot Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using Pharmacy Refill Data

OBJECTIVE

Despite high rates of medication nonadherence among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), effective interventions to improve adherence in SLE are limited. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a pilot intervention and explore its effect on adherence.

METHODS

The intervention used pharmacy refill data to monitor nonadherence and prompt discussions surrounding SLE medications during clinic encounters. Over 12 weeks, the intervention was delivered through routine clinic visits by providers to patients with SLE who take SLE-specific medications. We measured acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility using provider surveys. We also measured acceptability by patient surveys and feasibility by medical record documentation. We explored change in adherence by comparing percent of patients with medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% 3 months before and after the intervention visit using the McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Six rheumatologists participated; 130 patients were included in the analysis (median age 43, 95% female, and 59% racial and ethnic minorities). Implementation of the intervention was documented in 89% of clinic notes. Provider surveys showed high scores for feasibility (4.7/5), acceptability (4.4/5), and appropriateness (4.6/5). Among patient surveys, the most common reactions to the intervention visit were feeling determined (32%), empowered (32%), and proud (19%). Proportion of patients with MPR ≥80% increased from 48% to 58% (P = 0.03) after the intervention visit.

CONCLUSION

Our intervention showed feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness and led to a statistically significant improvement in adherence. Future work should refine the intervention, assess its efficacy in a controlled setting, and adapt its use among other clinic settings.

Outcomes of achieving lupus low disease activity state and damage accrual in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

At present, the treat-to-target approach has been proposed with the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) as an achievable target.

OBJECTIVES

To determine damage accrual and baseline clinical characteristics associated with achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the largest university-based tertiary referral center in Thailand. Data of c-SLE patients (≤ 18 years) at diagnosis who were followed ≥ 12 months during January 2009 to December 2019 were collected. SLE disease status was categorized into LLDAS and non-optimally controlled state. SLEDAI-2K score was used to assess disease activity. Damage accrual was assessed by a pediatric version of the SLICC/ACR damage index.

RESULTS

A total of 232 c-SLE patients (85.8% female) were included. At 12 months of treatment, 109 (47%) patients achieved LLDAS. Damage accrual was observed in 93 (40.1%) patients at the mean follow-up time of 6.2 ± 3.7 years. Damage accrual was significantly lower in patients who achieved LLDAS within 12 months than in those non-optimally controlled (p = 0.002). The median time to achieving LLDAS was 12.6 months (95%CI: 11.19-13.97). The median time to achieving LLDAS was significantly shorter in those without renal involvement (10.8 months, 95%CI: 9.62-12.00 vs. 15.6 months, 95%CI: 13.76-17.52, respectively; p = 0.044). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed absence of renal involvement as the predictor of achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment (aOR: 2.430, 95%CI: 1.420-4.158; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment was associated with lower damage accrual. Absence of renal involvement was the predictor of achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment. Key Points • LLDAS is a promising and achievable treatment target in c-SLE. • Achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment is associated with lower damage accrual. • Absence of renal involvement is the predictor of achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment.

Patient and Physician Global Assessments of Disease Status in Systemic Sclerosis

Global assessments of disease by both patients and physicians are widely used in clinical studies of systemic sclerosis (SSc). They are commonly secondary end points in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and are considered important items in composite measures of treatment response. A comprehensive literature review was conducted of the formats, wording, and clinimetric properties of the patient global assessment of disease status (PtGA) and physician global assessment of disease status (PhGA) used in RCTs of SSc. Marked heterogeneity was found in the wording and measurement scales of the global assessments applied in RCTs. These instruments were not developed using rigorous methodology and have not been fully validated. There is a pressing need for standardization and validation of patient and physician global assessment tools in SSc to enable universal application of these measures across RCTs in SSc.

Remission and low disease activity (LDA) prevent damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort

OBJECTIVE

To determine the independent impact of different definitions of remission and low disease activity (LDA) on damage accrual.

METHODS

Patients with ≥2 annual assessments from a longitudinal multinational inception lupus cohort were studied. Five mutually exclusive disease activity states were defined: remission off-treatment: clinical Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (cSLEDAI)-2K=0, without prednisone or immunosuppressants; remission on-treatment: cSLEDAI-2K score=0, prednisone ≤5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants; low disease activity Toronto cohort (LDA-TC): cSLEDAI-2K score of ≤2, without prednisone or immunosuppressants; modified lupus low disease activity (mLLDAS): Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2K score of 4 with no activity in major organ/systems, no new disease activity, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants; active: all remaining visits. Only the most stringent definition was used per visit. Antimalarials were allowed in all. The proportion of time that patients were in a specific state at each visit since cohort entry was determined. Damage accrual was ascertained with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). Univariable and multivariable generalised estimated equation negative binomial regression models were used. Time-dependent covariates were determined at the same annual visit as the disease activity state but the SDI at the subsequent visit.

RESULTS

There were 1652 patients, 1464 (88.6%) female, mean age at diagnosis 34.2 (SD 13.4) years and mean follow-up time of 7.7 (SD 4.8) years. Being in remission off-treatment, remission on-treatment, LDA-TC and mLLDAS (per 25% increase) were each associated with a lower probability of damage accrual (remission off-treatment: incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.75, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.81; remission on-treatment: IRR=0.68, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.75; LDA: IRR=0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92; and mLLDAS: IRR=0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.89)).

CONCLUSIONS

Remission on-treatment and off-treatment, LDA-TC and mLLDAS were associated with less damage accrual, even adjusting for possible confounders and effect modifiers.

Diet and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): From Supplementation to Intervention

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease characterised by immune dysregulation affecting multiple organs. Current anti-inflammatory treatments used in SLE are associated with unwanted side-effects. Dietary supplementation has been suggested as a safe and effective addition to conventional treatment, but evidence of efficacy in SLE or preventing associated comorbidities is uncertain.

METHODS

We identified literature on clinical trials focused on nutritional interventions in SLE aiming to improve inflammation and comorbidities. A systematic-type search on Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify nutritional interventions among SLE patients in the past 15 years that met our inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 2754 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion based on our set criteria and were subsequently quality assessed. Vitamin D or E supplementation was associated with respective improvement of inflammatory markers or antibody production, but not disease activity scores in most studies. Despite their expected synergistic actions, the addition of curcumin on vitamin D supplementation had no additional effects on disease activity or inflammatory markers. Trials of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation presented significant reductions in ESR, CRP, disease activity, inflammatory markers, and oxidative stress, and improved lipid levels and endothelial function, while a low glycaemic index (GI) diet showed evidence of reduced weight and improved fatigue in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Different dietary guidelines can therefore be implicated to target specific SLE symptoms or therapeutic side-effects. This systematic review highlights the scarcity of larger and longer in duration trials with homogenous methodologies and verifiable outcomes to assess disease progression.

Fatigue is independently associated with disease activity assessed using the Physician Global Assessment but not the SLEDAI in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To analyse whether reported fatigue, one of the most challenging manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), may bias the assessment of disease activity in SLE according to the Physician Global Assessment (PGA).

METHODS

Patients from the Lupus BioBank of the upper Rhein database, a cross-sectional multicentre collection of detailed clinical and biological data from patients with SLE, were included. Patients had to fulfil the 1997 American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE and the PGA (0-3 scale) at the time of inclusion had to be available. Fatigue was assessed according to the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions. Univariate and multivariate regression models were built to determine which variables were associated with the PGA.

RESULTS

A total of 350 patients (89% female; median age: 42 years, IQR: 34-52) were included. The median Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score was 4 (IQR: 2-6). Of these 350 patients, 257 (73%) reported significant fatigue. The PGA (p=0.004) but not the SELENA-SLEDAI (p=0.43) was significantly associated with fatigue. Both fatigue and SELENA-SLEDAI were independently associated with the PGA in two different multivariate models.

CONCLUSION

Fatigue is independently associated with disease activity assessed using the PGA but not the SLEDAI. These findings highlight the fact that the PGA should capture only objectively active disease manifestations in order to improve its reliability.

Caveats and pitfalls in defining low disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

The treat-to-target strategy has been recently suggested in the management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and Definitions Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) remission were outlined as two concentric targets. The achievement of LLDAS was shown to be associated with lower frequency of SLE flare, decreased damage progression, better quality of life, and reduced mortality. In addition, LLDAS has successfully been tested in post-hoc analyses of a number of randomized controlled trials. However, it has been recently underlined that LLDAS includes a high proportion of patients in remission, raising the question if these endpoints are sufficiently distinct to consider their separation clinically relevant. Some studies suggest that the protective effect of LLDAS on damage might be due to the inclusion of patients who are in remission. Notably, clinical low disease activity (LDA) seems to be uncommon in SLE due to the relapsing-remitting pattern of the disease, in which low level of activity only occurs transiently. Moreover, since the domains included in LLDAS have several limitations, such as the use of a binomial disease activity index, the exclusion of some mild manifestations and the consideration of items subjected to variability (physician global assessment and glucocorticoids dose), not all patients in LDA are adequately represented by LLDAS.

Physician Global Assessment International Standardisation COnsensus in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: the PISCOS study

The Physician Global Assessment International Standardisation COnsensus in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (PISCOS) study aimed to obtain an evidence-based and expert-based consensus standardisation of the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scoring of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An international panel of 79 SLE experts participated in a three-round Delphi consensus process, in which 41 statements related to the PGA in SLE were rated, using a 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree) numerical rating scale. Statements with agreement of 75% or greater were selected and further validated by the expert panel. Consensus was reached on 27 statements, grouped in 14 recommendations, for the use of the PGA in SLE, design of the PGA scale, practical considerations for PGA scoring, and the relationship between PGA values and levels of disease activity. Among these recommendations, the expert panel agreed that the PGA should consist of a 0-3 visual analogue scale for measuring disease activity in patients with SLE in the preceding month. The PGA is intended to rate the overall disease activity, taking into account the severity of active manifestations and clinical laboratory results, but excluding organ damage, serology, and subjective findings unrelated to disease activity. The PGA scale ranges from "no disease activity" (0) to the "most severe disease activity" (3) and incorporates the values 1 and 2 as inner markers to categorise disease activity as mild (≥0·5 to 1), moderate (>1 and ≤2) and severe (>2 to 3). Only experienced physicians can rate the PGA, and it should be preferably scored by the same rater at each visit. The PISCOS results will allow for increased homogeneity and reliability of PGA ratings in routine clinical practice, definitions of remission and low disease activity, and future SLE trials.

Improving patient pathways for systemic lupus erythematosus: a multistakeholder pathway optimisation study

Objective

Among the most significant challenges in SLE are the excessive diagnosis delay and the lack of coordinated care. The aim of the study was to investigate patient pathways in SLE in order to improve clinical and organisational challenges in the management of those with suspected and confirmed SLE.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with SLE, healthcare providers and other representative stakeholders. Focus groups were conducted, and based on the collected data the most impactful disruption points in SLE patient pathways were identified. A novel framework to improve individual patient pathways in SLE was developed, discussed and validated during a consensus meeting with representative stakeholders.

Results

Six thematic clusters regarding disruption in optimal patient pathways in SLE were identified: appropriate and timely referral strategy for SLE diagnosis; the need for a dedicated consultation during which the diagnosis of SLE would be announced, and following which clarifications and psychological support offered; individualised patient pathways with coordinated care based on organ involvement, disease severity and patient preference; improved therapeutic patient education; prevention of complications such as infections, osteoporosis and cancer; and additional patient support. During the consensus meeting, the broader panel of stakeholders achieved consensus on these attributes and a framework for optimising SLE patient pathways was developed.

Conclusions

We have identified significant disruption points and developed a novel conceptual framework to improve individual patient pathways in SLE. These data may be of valuable interest to patients with SLE, their physicians, health organisations as well as policy makers.

'Not at target': prevalence and consequences of inadequate disease control in systemic lupus erythematosus-a multinational observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The unmet need in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with the current standard of care is widely recognised, but few studies have quantified this. The recent definition of treat-to-target endpoints and other thresholds of uncontrolled disease activity provide an opportunity to formally define unmet need in SLE. In this study, we enumerated the prevalence of these states and examined their association with adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively in a 13-country longitudinal SLE cohort between 2013 and 2019. Unmet need was defined as never attaining lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), a time-adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K (AMS) > 4, or ever experiencing high disease activity status (HDAS; SLEDAI-2K ≥10). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using SF36 (v2) and damage accrual using the SLICC-ACR SLE Damage Index (SDI).

RESULTS

A total of 3384 SLE patients were followed over 30,313 visits (median [IQR] follow-up 2.4 [0.4, 4.3] years). Eight hundred thirteen patients (24%) never achieved LLDAS. Median AMS was 3.0 [1.4, 4.9]; 34% of patients had AMS > 4. Twenty-five per cent of patients had episodes of HDAS. Each of LLDAS-never, AMS>4, and HDAS-ever was strongly associated with damage accrual, higher glucocorticoid use, and worse HRQoL. Mortality was significantly increased in LLDAS-never (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 4.98 [2.07, 12.0], p<0.001) and HDAS-ever (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] = 5.45 [2.75, 10.8], p<0.001) patients.

CONCLUSION

Failure to achieve LLDAS, high average disease activity, and episodes of HDAS were prevalent in SLE and were significantly associated with poor outcomes including organ damage, glucocorticoid exposure, poor quality of life, and mortality.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Can Lupus Patients Take the Driver's Seat in Their Disease Monitoring?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that has detrimental effects on patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Owing to its immense heterogeneity of symptoms and its complexity regarding comorbidity burden, management of SLE necessitates interdisciplinary care, with the goal being the best possible HRQoL and long-term outcomes. Current definitions of remission, low disease activity, and response to treatment do not incorporate self-reported patient evaluation, while it has been argued that the physician’s global assessment should capture the patient’s perspective. However, even the judgment of a very well-trained physician might not replace a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), not only owing to the multidimensionality of self-perceived health experience but also since this notion would constitute a direct contradiction to the definition of PROMs. The proper use of PROMs is not only an important conceptual issue but also an opportunity to build bridges in the partnership between patients and physicians. These points of consideration adhere to the overall framework that there will seldom be one single best marker that helps interpret the activity, severity, and impact of SLE at the same time. For optimal outcomes, we not only stress the importance of the use of PROMs but also emphasize the urgency of adoption of the conception of forming alliances with patients and facilitating patient participation in surveillance and management processes. Nevertheless, this should not be misinterpreted as a transfer of responsibility from healthcare professionals to patients but rather a step towards shared decision-making.

Definition of Low Disease Activity State based on the SLE-DAS: Derivation and validation in a multicentre real-life cohort

OBJECTIVES

To derive and validate a definition of low disease activity (LDA) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS), in a real-life multicentre cohort of SLE patients.

METHODS

Derivation was conducted using data from a monocentric cohort of SLE (Portugal), and validation was performed in a multicentre cohort (Italy, France, and Spain). The Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) was used as comparator. We applied receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis against the LLDAS to determine the cut-off of SLE-DAS for LDA using bootstrap methodology. In a second step, we tested a definition of SLE-DAS LDA that included: (i) the statistically derived SLE-DAS upper threshold for LDA, and (ii) prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day. In the multicentre validation cohort, we assessed the classification performance of this SLE-DAS LDA definition.

RESULTS

We included 774 patients, 300 in the derivation and 474 in the validation cohorts, respectively. In the derivation cohort, the optimal cut-off to identify patients in LLDAS was SLE-DAS ≤2.48, presenting an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.965 (95%CI 0.935-0.994). When applied to the multicentre validation cohort, the SLE-DAS LDA definition showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and a specificity of 97.7% for LLDAS and an almost perfect agreement (Cohen's Kappa =0.933; p< 0.001). McNemar's test found no significant differences between the two definitions (p= 0.092).

CONCLUSION

The SLE-DAS LDA is a validated, accurate, and easy-to-use definition for classifying SLE patients in LDA state.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) enables accurate and user-friendly definitions of clinical remission and categories of disease activity

OBJECTIVES

There is an unmet need for accurate and user-friendly definitions of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and remission. We aimed to derive and validate the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) definitions for disease activity categories and clinical remission state.

METHODS

Derivation was conducted at Padova Lupus Clinic (Italy). Validation was prospectively performed at Cochin Lupus Clinic (France) and by post hoc analysis of BLISS-76 trial. At each clinic, an expert classified patients in three categories: remission, mild or moderate/severe activity. The SLE-DAS cut-offs were derived using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in Padova cohort; its performance was assessed against expert classification in Cochin cohort and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index in BLISS-76. Gold standard for clinical remission state was the fulfilment of Definition Of Remission In SLE. A Boolean and an index-based definitions of remission were sustained by chi-square automatic interaction detection algorithm. An SLE-DAS online calculator was developed and tested.

RESULTS

We included 1190 patients with SLE: 221 in the derivation cohort and 969 in the validation cohorts (150 from Cochin; 819 from BLISS-76). Derived cut-offs were: remission, SLE-DAS ≤2.08; mild activity, 2.087.64. Regarding validation in Cochin cohort, sensitivity and specificity are above 90%, 82% and 95% for remission, mild and moderate/severe activity, respectively. The SLE-DAS Boolean-based and index-based remission showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity above 97%.

CONCLUSION

The SLE-DAS is an accurate and easy-to-use tool for defining SLE clinical remission state and disease activity categories, validated against expert assessment and BILAG.

Lack of Association between Serum Interleukin-23 and Interleukin-27 Levels and Disease Activity in Patients with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the production of multiple autoantibodies, resulting in tissue and organ damage. Recent studies have revealed that interleukin-23 (IL-23) and interleukin-27 (IL-27) may be therapeutically relevant in selected SLE manifestations. This study aimed to identify associations between serum IL-27 and IL-23 levels and disease activity in Polish patients with different manifestations of SLE: neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE), and lupus nephritis (LN). Associations between interleukin levels and oligo-specific antibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), dose of glucocorticoids, and type of treatment were also analyzed. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to assess anti-dsDNA antibodies and analyze the serum concentration of IL-27 and IL-23 from 72 patients aged 19-74 years with confirmed active SLE. Disease activity was measured using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2-K). No significant correlations between interleukin levels and SLEDAI score, anti-dsDNA, corticosteroid dose, or type of treatment were noted. Patients with NPSLE and LN presented the highest median scores of SLEDAI.

Patient Experiences, Satisfaction, and Expectations with Current Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment: Results of the SLE-UPDATE Survey

OBJECTIVES

To provide information on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients' experiences, satisfaction, and expectations with treatments and examine the association between treatment satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

METHODS

A cross-sectional, non-interventional, online survey of US adult patients with SLE was conducted in 2019. The survey consisted of 104 questions about SLE and the following PRO instruments: LupusPRO™, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), an 11-point Worst Pain Numerical Rating scale (NRS), and an 11-point Worst Joint Pain NRS.

RESULTS

Five hundred participants (75% female, 76% White/Caucasian, mean age 42.6 ± 12.7 years, 63% with an associate degree or higher) completed the survey. Most participants were "completely" or "somewhat satisfied" with their treatments, although satisfaction rates were lower for corticosteroids (65%), immunosuppressants (71%), and anti-malarials (55%) than for belimumab (intravenous or subcutaneous) (86%) and rituximab (94%). Treatments were more often considered "burdensome" or "very burdensome" for belimumab (67%) and rituximab (63%) than for corticosteroids (48%), immunosuppressants (49%), and anti-malarials (30%). Pain and productivity assessments supported substantial impairment for the majority of participants, even those who indicated that they were completely satisfied with treatments. The treatment goals most commonly reported as "very important" were reducing fatigue, pain, and the frequency or severity of flares. Three-quarters of participants (76.6%) indicated that their physician's goals for their therapy matched their own goals "very" or "somewhat closely." Despite high levels of satisfaction, most participants (63.0%) indicated that their physicians had not asked about their treatment goals during the past 3 months.

CONCLUSION

SLE patients reported high rates of satisfaction with current therapies despite identifying substantial treatment burdens, residual pain, and fatigue. Reduced fatigue, pain, and flares were the most important treatment goals for these patients.

Physician Global Assessment as a Disease Activity Measure for Relapsing Polychondritis

OBJECTIVE

Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is a systemic inflammatory disorder of cartilage that lacks validated disease activity measures. Physician global assessment (PhGA), a measure of disease activity commonly used in rheumatologic diseases, has not been tested in a cohort of patients with RP.

METHODS

Adult patients in an observational cohort of RP underwent standardized, comprehensive evaluation at approximately 6-month intervals. PhGA was scored by three physicians from the evaluating institution on a scale of 0 to 10 for each visit. A random subset of twenty visits was scored by three, independent physicians not affiliated with the evaluating institution. Treatment change between consecutive visits was categorized as increased, decreased or unchanged.

RESULTS

78 patients were evaluated over 164 visits. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2, 1) for the three raters from the evaluating institution was excellent (0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84) but was poor in the subset of cases scored by the additional raters (ICC (2,1) = 0.27, 95% CI: -0.01-0.53). Median PhGA was 3 (range 0-7). PhGA weakly correlated with CRP (r_s = 0.30, p< 0.01). In response to increased treatment, median PhGA decreased from 3 (IQR: 2-4) to 2 (IQR: 2-3) (p< 0.01) but rarely went to 0.

CONCLUSION

Within a single-center, PhGA can be used to quantify disease activity and monitor disease response in RP. Persistent disease activity despite treatment, rather than a relapsing-remitting pattern, is observed for most patients with RP. Reliability of PhGA may not generalize across different institutions. A validated disease-specific activity index is needed in RP.

The Main Challenges in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Where Do We Stand?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an immune-mediated multi-systemic disease characterized by a wide variability of clinical manifestations and a course frequently subject to unpredictable flares. Despite significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology and optimization of medical care, patients with SLE still have significant mortality and carry a risk of progressive organ damage accrual and reduced health-related quality of life. New tools allow earlier classification of SLE, whereas tailored early intervention and treatment strategies targeted to clinical remission or low disease activity could offer the opportunity to reduce damage, thus improving long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, the early diagnosis of SLE is still an unmet need for many patients. Further disentangling the SLE susceptibility and complex pathogenesis will allow to identify more accurate biomarkers and implement new ways to measure disease activity. This could represent a major step forward to find new trials modalities for developing new drugs, optimizing the use of currently available therapeutics and minimizing glucocorticoids. Preventing and treating comorbidities in SLE, improving the management of hard-to-treat manifestations including management of SLE during pregnancy are among the remaining major unmet needs. This review provides insights and a research agenda for the main challenges in SLE.