Reporting and Staging of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Testicular Cancer Consultation Conference Recommendations

Factors impacting tumor displacement artifact and pseudo-lymphovascular invasion in testicular germ cell tumors

OBJECTIVES

Testicular germ cell tumors are susceptible to tumor displacement artifact (TDA), which produces pseudo-lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and confounds the identification of true LVI. Our study aimed to evaluate tumor displacement artifact and pseudo-LVI in testicular germ cell tumors and determine if prolonged fixation improves histological quality.

METHODS

A retrospective search identified 121 orchiectomies with slides that were reviewed to assess TDA and pseudo-LVI.

RESULTS

Seminoma had more TDA (68% vs 45%, P = .01) and pseudo-LVI (53% vs 19%, P < .001) than mixed germ cell tumor. Seminoma and mixed germ cell tumor with TDA and pseudo-LVI were larger than those without. Mixed germ cell tumor with ≥50% composition of seminoma had a higher rate of TDA (89% vs 38%, P = .008) and pseudo-LVI (44% vs 15%, P = .06) than those with less. TDA was reduced in seminoma with >1 night fixation compared to no fixation (50% vs 82%, P = .046), with a similar trend in mixed germ cell tumor (31% vs 60%, P = .15). A trend in reduction of pseudo-LVI was seen with >1 night fixation compared to no fixation in seminoma (64% vs 39%, P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

Seminomas and larger germ cell tumors were more prone to TDA and pseudo-LVI. Prolonged formalin fixation improved histological quality in testicular germ cell tumors. Based on these data, we recommend fixation for at least 2 nights before sectioning orchiectomy specimens, particularly for larger tumors.

Incidence and Pitfalls of Intratesticular Adipose Tissue Encountered in Orchiectomy Specimens

Based on the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, postpubertal germ cell tumors (GCT) and malignant sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST) of the testis invading hilar soft tissue are of pathologic stage pT2. Adipose tissue is typically used as an anatomical landmark by pathologists for determining hilar soft tissue invasion. Herein, we evaluated for the presence, location, and extent of intratesticular fat in a multi-institutional cohort of orchiectomies. Consecutive orchiectomies from 3 academic institutions were reviewed (n = 605), including both benign and malignant specimens. Intratesticular fat was identified by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) evaluation in 11/605 (1.8%) orchiectomies, including the following diagnoses: mixed non-teratomatous GCT (n = 1), mixed GCT with a teratoma component (n = 2), pure teratoma (n = 2), Leydig cell hyperplasia (n = 1), regressed GCT (n = 1), hormone therapy effect (n = 1), atrophic changes (n = 1), fibrosis (n = 1), infarction (n = 1). Adipose tissue was located within the rete testis stroma (n = 2), just below the rete testis (n = 4), within nodules of Leydig hyperplasia between the seminiferous tubules (n = 1), or within the confines of testicular parenchyma (n = 4). Among the 4 specimens containing admixed neoplastic (teratomatous) fat, the extent of adipose tissue ranged from 3.0 to 11.0 mm (mean 6.8 mm). Among the 7 specimens with non-neoplastic adipose tissue within/near the rete, the extent ranged from 0.1 to 12.7 mm (mean 2.3 mm). Although uncommon, intratesticular fat can be found in orchiectomy specimens, which may represent a staging pitfall in GCT and SCST especially when located at the interface between the testicular parenchyma and hilum.

EHMT2/G9a and EZH2: Epimarkers in testicular germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

Testicular germ cell tumors remain the most frequent solid malignancies in young males. Despite excellent prognosis, the fact that only 60% of patients at diagnosis have elevated serum tumor markers (dependent on stage and histology) and the poor quality of life of patients who develop resistance to chemotherapy cannot be neglected. Consequently, it is mandatory to bring out novel biomarkers.

OBJECTIVES

The main goal was to evaluate EZH2 and EHMT2/G9a immunoexpression in a well-characterized patients' cohort of primary and metastatic testicular germ cell tumors, seeking associations with clinicopathological features and discovering differential immunoexpression patterns among specific subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, an in silico analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas database was performed regarding EZH2 and EHMT2/G9a. Then, immunohistochemistry for EZH2 and EHMT2/G9a was carried out in a cohort of testicular germ cell tumor patients, comprising 155 chemo-naïve primary tumors and 11 chemo-treated metastases. Immunoexpression was evaluated using a digital pathology analysis software.

RESULTS

Higher EZH2 and EHMT2/G9a expression levels were found in non-seminoma in the in silico analysis, particularly in embryonal carcinoma. Through digital pathology analysis, non-seminomas showed significantly higher EZH2 and EHMT2/G9a immunoexpression, with embryonal carcinoma showing higher expression. Moreover, mixed tumors with 50% or more of embryonal carcinoma component revealed the highest nuclei positivity for both biomarkers. Cisplatin-exposed metastases demonstrated a higher EZH2-positive nuclei and H-score, as well as higher EHMT2/G9a-positive nuclei.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Overall, our data suggest that EZH2 and EHMT2/G9a might be associated with greater aggressiveness and, eventually, involved in the metastatic setting, paving the way for testing targeted therapies.

Management of Small Testicular Masses: A Delphi Consensus Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The majority of small testicular masses (STMs) are benign and therefore radical orchidectomy (RO) may represent overtreatment. In appropriately selected patients, surveillance or testis-sparing surgery (TSS) is an alternative option to preserve testicular function. Since there are no clear guidelines, we aimed to develop consensus recommendations on the management of STMs.

METHODS

A four-round Delphi study was conducted by 24 experts representing multiple subspecialties to reach consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of the participants scoring within the same 3-point grouping (1-3, disagree; 4-6, uncertain; 7-9, agree.). The first two rounds were survey based, the third round was an online meeting to discuss uncertainties from the first two rounds, and the fourth round was a review of the final consensus statements from rounds 1-3.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The initial survey consisted of 126 statements. Following the four rounds of assessment, a list of 96 statements were produced, which focused on clinical and biochemical assessment, colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) characteristics, and management options including surveillance, RO, and TSS. Management should be personalised according to risk factors for testicular cancer, fertility status, uni- or bilateral tumours, status of the contralateral testis, and CDUS characteristics, with solid lesions displaying vascularity and hypoechogenicity being more suspicious for malignancy. The consensus statements are prone to a bias, and some may not reflect robust, randomised evidence.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The expert panel has produced consensus recommendations on the management of STMs, and TSS should be considered in patients with an STM. The recommendations could aid in the dissemination of best practice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

There are no clear guidelines on the management of small testicular masses. Excising the whole testicle (radical orchidectomy) with a small or an indeterminate mass may affect fertility and hormonal function. A panel of experts was formed, and consensus recommendations were developed on how to deal with small and indeterminate testicular masses, which include surveillance or testis-sparing surgery.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Testicular germ cell cancer

OBJECTIVE

To update the recommendations for the management of germ cell tumours of the testis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comprehensive PubMed review from 2022 on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell tumours (TGT), as well as safety of treatments. The level of evidence of the studies was assessed.

RESULTS

The initial assessment of a patient with a germ cell tumour of the testis is based on a clinical examination, biological evaluation (by measuring the serum markers AFP, total hCG, and LDH) and radiological evaluation (scrotal ultrasound and thoraco-abdomino-pelvic computed tomography [TAP]). Inguinal orchiectomy is the first therapeutic step, as it allows histological diagnosis and defines the local stage and risk factors for progression in stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs). For patients with pure stage I seminoma, the risk of progression is between 15 and 20%, so surveillance is preferred in compliant patients; adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin AUC 7 is an option; and the indications for lumbo-aortic radiotherapy are limited. For patients with stage I NSGCT, various options exist, namely, surveillance or a risk-adapted strategy (surveillance or 1 cycle of bleomycin etoposide cisplatin [BEP] depending on the presence or absence of vascular emboli within the tumour). Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for staging has a very limited role. Treatment of metastatic GCT consists of chemotherapy with BEP in the absence of contraindication to bleomycin, the number of cycles of which is defined according to the prognostic groups of the International Germ Cell Cancer Consortium Group (IGCCCG). Lumbo-aortic radiotherapy is still the standard treatment for stage IIA seminomatous germ cell tumours (SGCTs). At the end of chemotherapy, the size of any residual mass should be assessed via a TAP scan for SNGCTs, with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection recommended for any residual mass greater than 1cm, along with removal of all other metastatic sites. For SGCT, reassessment via 18FDG PET scans is necessary to determine the surgical indication for residual masses>3cm. Surgery remains rare in these situations.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the recommendations for the management of GCT results in excellent specific survival rates of 99% for patients with stage I disease and over 85% for patients with metastatic disease.

Prognostic Factors for Relapse in Patients With Clinical Stage I Testicular Seminoma: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Approximately 20% of patients with clinical stage I seminoma relapse. Tumor size and rete testis invasion have been identified as risk factors for relapse. However, the level of evidence supporting the use of these risk factors in clinical decision making is low. Previous studies have been hampered by selection bias and variable pathology reporting that limit interpretation and generalization of results. We assessed prognostic factors for relapse in an unselected nationwide population-based setting with centralized pathology review.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage I seminoma diagnosed from January 2013 to December 2018 were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. By linkage to the Danish National Pathology Registry, histologic slides from the orchiectomy specimens were retrieved and reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. Clinical data were obtained from medical records with follow-up until July 2022. The association between prespecified potential clinical and histopathologic prognostic factors and relapse was assessed by the use of Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 924 patients included, 148 (16%) patients relapsed during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Invasion of the testicular hilum (rete testis and hilar soft tissue), lymphovascular invasion, and elevated preorchiectomy levels of β-human chorionic gonadotropin and lactate dehydrogenase were independent predictors of relapse. The estimated 5-year risk of relapse ranged from 6% in patients with no risk factors to 62% in patients with all four risk factors with tumor extension into the hilar soft tissue of the testicular hilum. After internal model validation, the prognostic model had an overall concordance statistic of 0.70.

CONCLUSION

The provided prognostic factors could replace current risk factors in guidelines and be used in future studies investigating risk-adapted follow-up and treatment strategies.

Reprint of: Updates in 2022 on the staging of testicular germ cell tumors

Testicular cancer is the most common solid neoplasm of adult men between the ages of 20 and 40 years. Germ cell tumors account for 95% of all testicular tumors. The assessment of staging is essential to guide further management of patients with testicular cancer and to prognosticate cancer-related outcomes. Postradical orchiectomy treatment options, including adjuvant therapy and active surveillance, vary based on the anatomical extent of disease, serum tumor markers, pathologic diagnosis, and imaging. This review provides an update on the germ cell tumor staging system adopted by the 8th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, treatment implications, risk factors, and predictors of outcomes.

H&E and OCT4/CD34 for the assessment of lympho-vascular invasion in seminoma and embryonal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a relevant prognostic factor in germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTT), and it is included in the pT stage. However, its detection on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides is very challenging, and previous studies reported fair to moderate inter-observer agreement among dedicated uropathologists. In the present study, we tested H&E and a recently developed in-house double staining for OCT4/CD34 to detect LVI in GCTT.

METHODS

Nine authors [5 non-uropathologists and 4 uropathologists] independently evaluated 34 consecutive and retrospectively enrolled cases of GCTT. We assessed the inter-observer agreement (Fleiss's Kappa) with both H&E and OCT4/CD34. Besides, we compared the consensus diagnosis on both H&E and OCT4/CD34-stained sections with the original diagnosis to evaluate the pT re-staging (McNemar test) and identify the sources of disagreement.

RESULTS

The inter-observer agreement among uropathologists plus non-uropathologists was fair with both H&E (KF=0.398; p < 0.001) and OCT4/CD34 (KF=0.312; p < 0.001). OCT4/CD34 (KF=0.290; p < 0.001) slightly reduces the inter-observer agreement compared to H&E (KF=0.321; p < 0.001) for non-uropathologists; in contrast, OCT4/CD34 (KF=0.293; p < 0.001) significantly reduces the inter-observer agreement compared to H&E (KF=0.529; p < 0.001) for uropathologists, changing it from moderate to fair. Consensus diagnosis with H&E modified the LVI status of the original diagnosis in 8/34 (23.5 %) cases (p: 0.070), with pT re-staging in 2/34 (5.9 %) cases (p: 0.500). Consensus diagnosis with OCT4/CD34 modified the LVI status of the original diagnosis in 8/34 (23.5 %) cases (p: 0.289), with pT re-staging in 3/34 (8.8 %) cases (p: 0.250). The consensus diagnosis with OCT4/CD34 modified the consensus diagnosis with H&E in 8/34 (23.5 %) cases (p: 0.727), and these findings resulted in pT-restaging in 3/34 (8.8 %) cases (p: 0.500). The sources of disagreement among uropathologists were: H&E [artefactual clefts misinterpreted as LVI in 4/6 (66.7 %) cases and true foci of LVI misinterpreted as clusters of histiocytes within the vessels in 2/6 (33.3 %) cases], OCT4/CD34 [artefactual clefts misinterpreted as LVI in 2/8 (25 %) cases, true LVI misinterpreted as artefactual clefts in 2/8 (25 %) cases or floaters in 4/8 (50 %) cases].

CONCLUSIONS

OCT4/CD34 does not improve the inter-observer agreement for the assessment of LVI in OCT4(+) GCTT. Consensus diagnosis with H&E modifies the LVI status in a significant number of cases, resulting in changes of the pT stage in a relatively small subgroup. Consensus diagnosis with OCT4/CD34 provides little additional benefit since it cannot exclude mimickers of LVI such as floaters and artefactual clefts. These results argue against the adoption of this diagnostic tool for the routine assessment of OCT4(+) GCTT.

An update on computational pathology tools for genitourinary pathology practice: A review paper from the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS)

Machine learning has been leveraged for image analysis applications throughout a multitude of subspecialties. This position paper provides a perspective on the evolutionary trajectory of practical deep learning tools for genitourinary pathology through evaluating the most recent iterations of such algorithmic devices. Deep learning tools for genitourinary pathology demonstrate potential to enhance prognostic and predictive capacity for tumor assessment including grading, staging, and subtype identification, yet limitations in data availability, regulation, and standardization have stymied their implementation.

Germ cell neoplasms of the testis: Update for 2022

Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) is the precursor of both seminomatous and non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. It consists of distended tubules that may have either intratubular seminoma or intratubular embryonal carcinoma cells. Many invasive non-seminomatous tumors contain a mixture of tumor types, which are reviewed here. Morphology, aided by a panel of immunostains, can determine the presence and percent of embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, choriocarcinoma, or teratoma in such tumors. Use of immunostains, required for diagnosis in perhaps 25% of testicular neoplasms, is reviewed. Changes of classification in the AJCC (8^th edition) in 2016 are discussed, including the partitioning of two tumor types: the central role of chromosome 12p amplification allows both teratoma and yolk sac tumor to be divided into prepubertal types (lacking amplification) and post-pubertal types. Occasionally, sex cord-stromal tumors, hematolymphoid tumors, or epididymal adenomatoid tumors enter the differential diagnosis of germ cell neoplasms.

Testicular Cancer: Contemporary Updates in Staging

Testicular tumors are the most common solid tumors in young men, the vast majority of which are of germ cell origin. The staging of human cancers is paramount to correct patient management. Staging systems have passed through several developments leading to the release of the most recent 8th edition of the American Joint Committee for Cancer (AJCC) staging manual, which is based on the current understanding of tumor behavior and spread. In this review, the authors summarize the current AJCC staging of the germ cell tumors, highlight essential concepts, and provide insight into the most important parameters of testicular tumors.

Biomarkers of disease recurrence in stage I testicular germ cell tumours

Stage I testicular cancer is a disease restricted to the testicle. After orchiectomy, patients are considered to be without disease; however, the tumour is prone to relapse in ~4-50% of patients. Current predictive markers of relapse, which are tumour size and invasion to rete testis (in seminoma) or lymphovascular invasion (in non-seminoma), have limited clinical utility and are unable to correctly predict relapse in a substantial proportion of patients. Adjuvant therapeutic strategies based on available biomarkers can lead to overtreatment of 50-85% of patients. Discovery and implementation of novel biomarkers into treatment decision making will help to reduce the burden of adjuvant treatments and improve patient selection for adjuvant therapy.

Updates in 2022 on the Staging of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

Testicular cancer is the most common solid neoplasm of adult men between the ages of 20 and 40 years. Germ cell tumors account for 95% of all testicular tumors. The assessment of staging is essential to guide further management of patients with testicular cancer and to prognosticate cancer-related outcomes. Postradical orchiectomy treatment options, including adjuvant therapy and active surveillance, vary based on the anatomical extent of disease, serum tumor markers, pathologic diagnosis, and imaging. This review provides an update on the germ cell tumor staging system adopted by the 8th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, treatment implications, risk factors, and predictors of outcomes.

Total embedding of spermatic cord and hilar soft tissue in orchiectomy for seminoma: does the extensive sampling improve pathologic risk factors?

Pure seminomas represent the majority of testicular germ cell tumors and accurate diagnosis and staging require an accurate sampling of radical orchiectomy specimens. The aim of our study is to find the most informative gross sampling method for orchiectomy specimens. We performed the extensive sampling of 88 radical orchiectomy specimens embedding in their entirety testicular hilum, rete testis, hilar soft tissue, and spermatic cord. We examined the impact of this procedure on tumor stage, prognostic parameters (lymphovascular invasion and infiltration of rete testis, epididymis, tunica vaginalis, and spermatic cord), and their relationship with recurrence. Eighty-eight seminomas from 88 radical orchiectomies were sampled. Seventy-seven cases (87.5%) presented as clinical stage I and 11 cases (12.5%) as clinical stage II. The follow-up period range was 18-54 months and 82 patients (93.2%) had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 16 cm (mean 3.6) requiring a mean of 7.1 sections for entire tumoral sampling. Epididymis required 2 to 8 sections (mean 3.3), and hilum and hilar soft tissues 2 to 9 sections (mean 3.4). Epididymal infiltration and lymphovascular invasion resulted significant at multivariate analysis generating a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with area under curve of 0.778. All the other parameters (except for pagetoid rete testis infiltration) were significant to predict metastasis only at univariate analysis. Extensive sampling of radical orchiectomy specimens does not improve the accuracy of staging in pure seminomas. Lymphovascular invasion and epididymal infiltration are useful to predict metastasis.

Decoding germ cell tumours for clinicians

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Germ-cell tumours of the testis affect predominantly younger males aged between 15 and 40 years, with nearly 74,500 new cases estimated globally in 2020. Their rarity and the complex morphology, mean that, in nonexpert hands, there is a significant risk of misdiagnosis of both type and staging of these neoplasms.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been significant changes in the 2016 WHO classification of Testicular tumours that need to be understood by both pathologists and clinicians for streamlining management. Standardised structured reporting guidelines and discussion at the multidisciplinary-team meetings lead to subsequently better health outcomes and patient safety.

SUMMARY

Therefore, communication with high-quality reports and understanding of clinicians of what constitutes an adequate report, is the key to ensure proper management of these patients. We attempt to discuss the key updates and pathological features that influence management and need to be communicated with clarity and precision.

Trends in disagreement with outside genitourinary pathology diagnoses at an academic center

AIMS

To evaluate the frequencies and types of disagreements in a contemporary urological second-opinion consult service in order to improve pathologist awareness.

METHODS

For 7 years ending 30 October 2021, records were kept of our department's total urologic outside consultation and disagreed-upon cases. Disagreements were categorized according to specimen type and nature of conflict. All grading and staging assignments used International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) criteria. Statistical analyses for each specimen type included the percent disagreement. Cohen's kappa analysis was done to measure interrater reliability on the prostate biopsies, prostatectomies, and the bladder biopsies/resections. In addition, for the prostate biopsies, the potential for change in treatment candidacy calculation (CTC), was assessed as sum of changes from cancer to non-malignant tissue or the reverse, plus changes from Gleason Grade group (GG)1 to GG ≥ 2 (3 +4 =7) or the reverse.

RESULTS

Overall mean disagreement rate for all specimens was 15.2%. The highest rate was among 1545 prostate biopsy cases, where 410 contained disagreements (26.5%). 118 (7.6%) met criteria for CTC: 10 cases were altered from cancer to non-cancer, 38 cases downgraded from GG≥ 2 to GG1, and 70 upgraded from GG1 to GG≥ 2. Second opinion downgraded the overall highest GG more often than it upgraded it, with downgrade:upgrade ratios of 64:37 for the GG1/GG2 threshold, 79:67 for the GG2/GG3, and 14:0 for the GG3/GG4. 146 specimen parts had disagreements as to cancer vs. suspicious vs. benign, with 85 undercalled and 61 overcalled. Other rates of disagreement included: prostatectomy 34/198 (17.2%); bladder resection or biopsy 68/591 (11.5%); kidney 27/175 (15.4%); and orchiectomy 9/82 (11.0%). In bladder specimens, overgrading was 6X more frequent than undergrading; and overstaging muscularis propria invasion was 6X more frequent than understaging.

CONCLUSIONS

The review of uropathologic materials before definitive therapy can lead to changes that impact clinical decisions significantly. As an example, for prostate biopsies, candidacy for active surveillance versus definitive treatment hinges on GG1 versus 2 and this distinction constituted most CTC cases. The above findings highlight aspects of urological pathology to be emphasized to residents in training, and pathologists in practice.

Hematoxylin and eosin or double stain for CD34/SOX10: Which is better for the detection of lymphovascular invasion in cutaneous melanoma?

BACKGROUND

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is considered an unfavorable prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma (CM). However, its detection by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) is challenging, with discordant data about its association with clinical-pathological features and no previous studies investigating the inter- (IrOA) and intra-observer (IaOA) agreement. Herein, we tested H&E and double staining (DS) for CD34/SOX10 to detect the LVI in a cohort of 92 CMs, evaluating the IrOA, the IaOA, and the association with the other clinical-pathological features.

METHODS

Five authors independently evaluated 92 consecutive and retrospectively enrolled cases of CMs. We assessed the IrOA (Fleiss's Kappa/FK and intraclass correlation coefficient/ICC) and the IaOA (Cohen's Kappa/CK) with both H&E and CD34/SOX10. Furthermore, we compared the LVI assessment with the two stains and analyzed the association with other clinical-pathological features [χ2 tests for dichotomous and categorical data; Student t-test (normal distribution) and Mann-Whitney U-test (non-normal distribution) for continuous data].

RESULTS

The IrOA was almost identical with H&E (FK=0.446; ICC=0.805) and CD34/SOX10 (FK=0.454; ICC=0.810); by contrast, the IaOA was higher with H&E for one pathologist (CK: 0.809) and with CD34/SOX10 for the other one (CK: 0.563). Applying previously defined criteria, LVI was detected in 10 (9.2%) and 11 (10.1%) cases with H&E and CD34/SOX10, respectively (p = 1.000). Both H&E and CD34/SOX10 were significantly associated with vertical growth phase (H&E, p: 0.014; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.010), mitosis ≥ 1/mm2 (H&E, p: 0.000; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.004), pT (H&E, p: 0.000; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.001), Breslow thickness (H&E, p: 0.000; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.001), and lymph node and/or distant metastasis (H&E, p: 0.005; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.000); only H&E was associated with ulceration (p: 0.002) and distant metastasis (p: 0.000), conversely, only CD34/SOX10 was associated with lymph node metastasis (p: 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

CD34/SOX10 does not improve the IrOA and the IaOA of the LVI assessment in CM; furthermore, H&E and CD34/SOX10 show a similar profile of association with the other unfavorable clinical-pathological features of CM. As result, CD34/SOX10 could be a redundant diagnostic tool if applied for the prognostic characterization of not-selected CM in a routine diagnostic scenario.

Testicular Germ-Cell Tumors with Spermatic Cord Involvement: A Retrospective International Multi-Institutional Experience

The 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual designates discontinuous involvement of spermatic cord soft tissue by testicular germ cell tumors as a metastatic deposit. We conducted a retrospective international multi-institutional study to validate the current recommendations. Thirty-three (72%) nonseminomatous and 13 (28%) seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors were collected from 15 institutions in America, Europe, and Asia. Testicular tumor size ranged from 1.3 to 18.0 cm (mean: 6.1). Cases were classified as discontinuous involvement of spermatic cord soft tissue (n = 26), continuous cord involvement (n = 17), or cord lymphovascular invasion (n = 3). The mean follow-up was 39 months. Clinical stage for discontinuous involvement of spermatic cord soft-tissue patients was I (local disease) in 2/24 (8%), II (regional disease) in 6/24 (25%), and III (distant disease) in 16/24 (67%) cases; 16 (67%) patients presented with distant metastasis. Clinical stage for continuous cord involvement patients was I in 9/17 (53%), II in 4/17 (23%), and III in 4/17 (23%); 4 (23%) patients presented with distant metastasis. Disease progression was seen in 4 patients with discontinuous involvement of spermatic cord soft tissue and 5 with continuous cord-involvement (p = 0.699). When comparing discontinuous and continuous cord involvement, a significant difference was found in cord margin status (p = 0.044), spermatic cord tumor size (p = 0.016), lymph-node involvement (p = 0.037), distant metastasis (p = 0.010), individual clinical stage (p = 0.003), and nonadvanced vs. advanced disease (p = 0.003) at presentation. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, histology, testicular tumor size, percent of embryonal carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, and cord margin status, discontinuous involvement of spermatic cord soft tissue was significantly associated (p = 0.011) with advanced clinical stage at presentation. Our findings support the designation of metastatic disease for discontinuous involvement of spermatic cord soft tissue, as introduced by the 8th edition of the AJCC staging.

Screening for the Key Proteins Associated with Rete Testis Invasion in Clinical Stage I Seminoma via Label-Free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry

Rete testis invasion (RTI) is an unfavourable prognostic factor for the risk of relapse in clinical stage I (CS I) seminoma patients. Notably, no evidence of difference in the proteome of RTI-positive vs. -negative CS I seminomas has been reported yet. Here, a quantitative proteomic approach was used to investigate RTI-associated proteins. 64 proteins were differentially expressed in RTI-positive compared to -negative CS I seminomas. Of them, 14-3-3γ, ezrin, filamin A, Parkinsonism-associated deglycase 7 (PARK7), vimentin and vinculin, were validated in CS I seminoma patient cohort. As shown by multivariate analysis controlling for clinical confounders, PARK7 and filamin A expression lowered the risk of RTI, while 14-3-3γ expression increased it. Therefore, we suggest that in real clinical biopsy specimens, the expression level of these proteins may reflect prognosis in CS I seminoma patients.

A preliminary study investigating the detection of lymphovascular invasion in germ cell tumors of the testis with double staining for OCT4/CD34

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a relevant prognostic factor in germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTT) and it has been included in the AJCC staging system. Nevertheless, its histological assessment is challenging, with low/moderate interobserver agreement also among expert uropathologists. Few studies focused on the potential role of immunohistochemistry to solve this critical issue; as result, in current guidelines there is no indication for additional staining to detect this histological feature. In the present study, we investigated the detection of LVI invasion in a small cohort of GCTT with double staining for OCT4/CD34. Although our results need to be validated in larger case series with follow-up data, they suggest as OCT4/CD34 could be a useful tool for the histological assessment of these tumors, helping to identify some histological mimickers of LVI and modifying the pT/stage in a significant percentage of patients.

The absence of spermatogenesis in radical orchiectomy specimen is associated with advanced-stage nonseminomatous testicular cancer

BACKGROUND

To assess if clinical, pathological, and spermatogenesis factors are associated with clinical staging in patients with testicular germ cell tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the pathology reports and slides from 267 men who underwent radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer at our institution during 1998-2019. Histologic slides were reviewed and the presence of mature spermatozoa was documented. Clinical, laboratory and radiographic characteristics were recorded. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with advanced disease stage at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 267 male patients, 115 (43%) patients had testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) and 152 (57%) seminomatous germ cell tumors (SGCT). Among NSGCT patients, those presenting with metastatic disease had a higher proportion of predominant (>50%) embryonal carcinoma (64% vs. 43%, respectively, P = 0.03), and lymphovascular invasion (45.8% vs. 26.6%, respectively, P = 0.03) than non-metastatic patients. Spermatogenesis was observed in 56/65 (86.2%) and 36/49 (73.5%) of non-metastatic and metastatic NSGCT patients, respectively (P = 0.09). On semen analysis, severe oligospermia (<5 million/ml) was more common in metastatic than in non-metastatic NSGCT (26.5% vs. 8.3%, respectively, P = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, predominant embryonal carcinoma and lack of spermatogenesis in pathological specimens were associated with metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

The absence of spermatogenesis and a high proportion of embryonal carcinoma was associated with advanced disease in patients with NSGCT. Whether it may also translate as a predictor of oncologic outcome needs further evaluation.

Pathological predictors of metastatic disease in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: which tumor-node-metastasis staging system?

Pathological risk factors for metastatic disease in patients with testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors are debated. The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification eighth edition for testicular cancers includes divergent versions, by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) and by the American Joint Committee for cancer (AJCC). We investigated pathological predictors of metastatic disease at presentation in 219 non-seminomatous germ cell tumors with reference to both classifications. Age, tumor size, percentage of embryonal carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, invasion of stromal rete testis, hilar soft tissue, epididymis, spermatic cord, and tunica vaginalis, as well as tumor at spermatic cord margin, were assessed and correlated with clinical stage at presentation. Of the 219 NSGCT cases, 151 (69%) were clinical stage I, 68 (31%) were clinical stage II/III. On univariate analysis, tumor size (P = 0.028), percentage of embryonal carcinoma (P = 0.004), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.001), stromal rete testis invasion (P = 0.001), hilar soft tissue invasion (P = 0.010), epididymis invasion (P = 0.010), direct spermatic cord invasion (P = 0.001), and tumor at spermatic cord margin ((P = 0.009) were associated with higher clinical stage. On multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.003), tumor size (P = 0.005), percentage of embryonal carcinoma (P = 0.005), stromal rete testis invasion (P = 0.008) remained significant. A tumor size of 6 cm and an embryonal carcinoma percentage of 70% were the significant cut-off values. We conclude that in addition to lymphovascular invasion, stromal rete testis invasion, tumor size, and embryonal carcinoma percentage are strong predictors of metastatic disease at presentation and their inclusion should be considered in any future TNM revision. Further, our results support the changes in the AJCC TNM eighth edition as invasion of the epididymis and hilar soft tissue were both univariately significant.

Testicular seminoma with pagetoid spread into the vas deferens: A rare histopathological presentation

Testicular cancer, in particular testicular germ cell tumours, is the most common malignancy in young adult men. Defining prognosis and the best therapeutic strategy is challenging since accurate staging could be controversial. We report an unusual case of seminoma with pagetoid spread into the rete testis and, unexpectedly, also within the epithelium of the vas deferens, up to the margin of excision of the spermatic cord. Focussing on the extremely rare pathological finding and the challenge in defining the stage and the best post-surgical management, we would like to raise some issues about the knowledge gap on this topic.

The Potential of Artificial Intelligence to Detect Lymphovascular Invasion in Testicular Cancer

Testicular cancer is the most common cancer in men aged from 15 to 34 years. Lymphovascular invasion refers to the presence of tumours within endothelial-lined lymphatic or vascular channels, and has been shown to have prognostic significance in testicular germ cell tumours. In non-seminomatous tumours, lymphovascular invasion is the most powerful prognostic factor for stage 1 disease. For the pathologist, searching multiple slides for lymphovascular invasion can be highly time-consuming. The aim of this retrospective study was to develop and assess an artificial intelligence algorithm that can identify areas suspicious for lymphovascular invasion in histological digital whole slide images. Areas of possible lymphovascular invasion were annotated in a total of 184 whole slide images of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue from 19 patients with testicular germ cell tumours, including a mixture of seminoma and non-seminomatous cases. Following consensus review by specialist uropathologists, we trained a deep learning classifier for automatic segmentation of areas suspicious for lymphovascular invasion. The classifier identified 34 areas within a validation set of 118 whole slide images from 10 patients, each of which was reviewed by three expert pathologists to form a majority consensus. The precision was 0.68 for areas which were considered to be appropriate to flag, and 0.56 for areas considered to be definite lymphovascular invasion. An artificial intelligence tool which highlights areas of possible lymphovascular invasion to reporting pathologists, who then make a final judgement on its presence or absence, has been demonstrated as feasible in this proof-of-concept study. Further development is required before clinical deployment.

Basic Histopathologic Assessment of Germ Cell Tumors for Clinic and Research

This chapter introduces the macroscopic and light microscopic features of testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) commonly encountered in clinical practice. Accurate diagnosis of these histologically diverse neoplasms is essential not only for clinical management but also for serving as the basis for interpretation of research findings. We will focus on general histopathologic concepts and discuss the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as an aid to the diagnosis.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: testicular germ cell tumors]

OBJECTIVE

- To update French guidelines concerning testicular germ cell cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

- Comprehensive Medline search between 2018 and 2020 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer and treatments toxicities. Level of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

- Testicular Germ cell tumor diagnosis is based on physical examination, biology tests (serum tumor markers AFP, hCGt, LDH) and radiological assessment (scrotal ultrasound and chest, abdomen and pelvis computerized tomography). Total inguinal orchiectomy is the first-line treatment allowing characterization of the histological type, local staging and identification of risk factors for micrometastases. In case of several therapeutic options, one must inform his patient balancing risks and benefits. Surveillance is usually chosen in stage I seminoma compliant patients as the evolution rate is low between 15 to 20%. Carboplatin AUC7 is an alternative option. Radiotherapy indication should be avoided. In stage I non seminomatous patients, either surveillance or risk-adapted strategy can be applied. Staging retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has restricted indications. Metastatic germ cell tumors are usually treated by PEB chemotherapy according to IGCCCG prognostic classification. Lombo-aortic radiotherapy is still a standard treatment for stage IIA. Residual masses should be evaluated by biological and radiological assessment 3 to 4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is advocated for every non seminomatous residual mass more than one cm. 18FDG uptake should be evaluated for each seminoma residual mass more than 3 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

- A rigorous use of classifications is mandatory to define staging since initial diagnosis. Applying treatments based on these classifications leads to excellent survival rates (99% in CSI, 85% in CSII+).

Grossing and reporting of testicular tumor specimens : An evidence-based approach

The majority of testicular tumors are germ cell tumors (GCTs), but there are numerous other types, making testicular tumors one of the most diverse areas of human pathology, despite their relative rarity. Testicular tumors are usually diagnosed only after radical surgery, as biopsies are not performed. Further management of the patient is dependent on the diagnosis at microscopy, which itself is based on the sections taken at the time of grossing the specimen. Many pathologists often aren't well versed with guidelines for handling of orchiectomy specimens and for microscopy. This article discusses, in detail, the approach to grossing of a testicular tumor specimen and elaborates of the reasons as to why we do what we do at the initial "cut-up". It explains the logic behind the reporting guidelines for testicular tumors and offer a clinical primer to the pathologist as to why we do what we do while grossing testicular tumor specimens.

Clinical implications of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition update in seminoma pT1 subclassification

Background

Seminoma accounts for 30–50% of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT)—the most common solid malignancy in men aged 15–35 years. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition (2018) created the subclassifications pT1a (tumor size < 3 cm) and pT1b (≥ 3 cm), despite not being universally recognized. Rete testis invasion (RTI) and tumor size > 4 cm are considered features associated with a higher recurrence risk, but not formally used for staging. The authors propose further understanding the subclassification’s potential impact in clinical practice, by summarizing current evidence and reviewing clinical cases in their institutions.

Methods

All consecutive cases of seminoma stage I, pT1 treated in two institutions between January 2005 and December 2016 were included. Clinical data were retrieved, and variables were analyzed using SPSS. Relevant literature on the topic was reviewed.

Results

Seminoma pT1 was identified in 58 patients. By using newly AJCC criteria, 29 (50%) would have been staged as pT1a and 29 (50%) pT1b. Median age at diagnosis was similar (33 in pT1a vs 32 in pT1b). Median follow-up time 5.8 years. Almost half (45%) of pT1b patients had a tumor size < 4 cm. The majority of either pT1a or pT1b were treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, reflecting more intensive approaches in the past. Three retroperitoneal recurrences were recorded (two in pT1a, one in pT1b, all under surveillance protocol); no deaths occurred. RTI and extensive necrosis (EN) were associated with pT1b (P <  0.0001 and P = 0.023, respectively), known adverse biological features.

Conclusions

In our population, the exploratory analysis of the newly created AJCC criteria showed no significant difference in recurrence or death, although pT1b was associated with adverse biomarkers, such as RTI and EN, but its clinical relevance remains incompletely understood. Our results confirm an excellent prognosis, regardless of subcategorization, thus a larger population and a longer follow-up time are needed to understand prospectively the impact of the recently updated criteria. We would recommend using the latest AJCC staging system, although the individual risk of relapse, long-term toxicities and patient preferences should be taken into account when considering surveillance or active treatment adjuvant options.

Updates in Staging and Reporting of Genitourinary Malignancies

CONTEXT.—

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual changed the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification systems of genitourinary malignancies in 2017. However, some of the changes appear not well appreciated or recognized by practicing pathologists.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the major changes compared with the 7th edition in cancers of the prostate, penis, testis, bladder, urethra, renal pelvis/ureter, and kidney and discuss the challenges that pathologists may encounter.

DATA SOURCES.—

Peer-reviewed publications and the 8th and 7th editions of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This article summarizes the updated staging of genitourinary malignancies, specifically highlighting changes from the 7th edition that are relevant to the pathologic staging system. Pathologists should be aware of the updates made in hopes of providing clarification and the remaining diagnostic challenges associated with these changes.

Report From the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consultation Conference on Molecular Pathology of Urogenital Cancers: IV: Current and Future Utilization of Molecular-Genetic Tests for Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) organized a Consultation Conference in March 2019 dealing with applications of molecular pathology in Urogenital Pathology, including testicular tumors (with a focus on germ cell tumors [GCTs]), preceded by a survey among its members to get insight into current practices in testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) diagnostics and adoption of the ISUP immunohistochemical guidelines published in 2014. On the basis of the premeeting survey, the most commonly used immunomarker panel includes OCT3/4, placental alkaline phosphate, D2-40, SALL4, CD117, and CD30 for GCTs and the documentation of germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS). Molecular testing, specifically 12p copy gain, is informative to distinguish non-GCNIS versus GCNIS related GCTs, and establishing germ cell origin of tumors both in the context of primary and metastatic lesions. Other molecular methodologies currently available but not widely utilized for TGCTs include genome-wide and targeted approaches for specific genetic anomalies, P53 mutations, genomic MDM2 amplification, and detection of the p53 inactivating miR-371a-3p. The latter also holds promise as a serum marker for malignant TGCTs. This manuscript provides an update on the classification of TGCTs, and describes the current and future role of molecular-genetic testing. The following recommendations are made: (1) Presence of GCNIS should be documented in all cases along with extent of spermatogenesis; (2) Immunohistochemical staining is optional in the following scenarios: identification of GCNIS, distinguishing embryonal carcinoma from seminoma, confirming presence of yolk sac tumor and/or choriocarcinoma, and differentiating spermatocytic tumor from potential mimics; (3) Detection of gain of the short arm of chromosome 12 is diagnostic to differentiate between non-GCNIS versus GCNIS related GCTs and supportive to the germ cell origin of both primary and metastatic tumors.

Cisplatin Resistance in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Current Challenges from Various Perspectives

Testicular germ cell tumors share a marked sensitivity to cisplatin, contributing to their overall good prognosis. However, a subset of patients develop resistance to platinum-based treatments, by still-elusive mechanisms, experiencing poor quality of life due to multiple (often ineffective) interventions and, eventually, dying from disease. Currently, there is a lack of defined treatment opportunities for these patients that tackle the mechanism(s) underlying the emergence of resistance. Herein, we aim to provide a multifaceted overview of cisplatin resistance in testicular germ cell tumors, from the clinical perspective, to the pathobiology (including mechanisms contributing to induction of the resistant phenotype), to experimental models available for studying this occurrence. We provide a systematic summary of pre-target, on-target, post-target, and off-target mechanisms putatively involved in cisplatin resistance, providing data from preclinical studies and from those attempting validation in clinical samples, including those exploring specific alterations as therapeutic targets, some of them included in ongoing clinical trials. We briefly discuss the specificities of resistance related to teratoma (differentiated) phenotype, including the phenomena of growing teratoma syndrome and development of somatic-type malignancy. Cisplatin resistance is most likely multifactorial, and a combination of therapeutic strategies will most likely produce the best clinical benefit.

Interobserver Agreement in Vascular Invasion Scoring and the Added Value of Immunohistochemistry for Vascular Markers to Predict Disease Relapse in Stage I Testicular Nonseminomas

Vascular invasion has been identified as an informative risk factor for relapse in stage I testicular nonseminomas, used to tailor treatment. We investigated interobserver agreement in vascular invasion reporting and studied the potential additional value of immunohistochemistry for vascular markers for predicting relapse. Patients (n=52) with stage I testicular nonseminomas undergoing surveillance (1993-2006) were included (median follow-up of 66 mo). Two formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks with >1 cm tissue and tumor/normal parenchyma interface were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and CD31, FVIII, and D2-40. Slides were assessed by 3 independent testicular germ cell tumor-dedicated pathologists, and agreement was assessed using Cohen κ statistic. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of vascular invasion scoring in predicting relapse were calculated. Agreement among testicular germ cell tumor-dedicated pathologists was moderate (κ=0.49 to 0.54), as was performance in predicting disease relapse (particularly, specificity of 86%). Immunohistochemistry increased overall sensitivity (71%), but decreased specificity (71%) in predicting relapse. All patients (n=8) with both blood and lymphatic vascular invasion developed a relapse. In multivariable analysis (including age, tumor size, rete testis invasion, and serum tumor markers), only vascular invasion had an independent impact in predicting relapse. Assessment of vascular invasion by testicular germ cell tumor-dedicated pathologists is good and is clinically meaningful, predicting disease relapse. Immunohistochemistry for vascular markers improves sensitivity of detecting disease relapse and allows for the identification of high-risk patients with both blood and lymphatic vascular invasion simultaneously, potentially of interest for tailored chemotherapy.

Effects of 4% paraformaldehyde and modified Davidson's fluid on the morphology and immunohistochemistry of Xiang pig testes

Modified Davidson’s fluid (mDF) is a good fixative for morphological and antigen preservation. However, recent studies have shown that 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) can better preserve the actin structure in rodent testes. It remains controversial which of these fixatives is best for testicular tissue. This study investigated the effects of both mDF and 4% PFA on the morphology and antigen preservation of Xiang pig testes using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The stronger testis penetration of mDF compared with that of 4% PFA was primarily manifested as testicular color change and decrease in tissue weight loss. Testes fixed with 4% PFA displayed a severe shrinkage of both the tubular and interstitial compartments and the seminiferous tubule area decreased by 12.02% compared with that in mDF-fixed tissues. In contrast, IHC results showed that 4% PFA fixation achieved better IHC-positive performance than mDF fixation for antigens specifically expressed in germ cells, Leydig cells and Sertoli cells. Due to this improved antigen preservation by 4% PFA fixation, the relative immunoreactions intensity significantly increased by 39.8%, 27.8%, and 76.4%, respectively, compared with that in mDF fixation. In summary, fixation of Xiang pig testes with mDF was suitable for HE staining, while fixation with 4% PFA was more suitable for IHC.

Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer: protocol for a Danish nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Approximately one-fourth of patients with clinical stage I testicular germ cell cancer will relapse within 5 years of follow-up. Certain histopathological features in the primary tumour have been associated with an increased risk of relapse. The available evidence on the prognostic value of the risk factors, however, is hampered by heterogeneity of the study populations included and variable reporting of the histopathological features. The aim of this study is to identify pathological risk factors for relapse in an unselected large nationwide cohort of patients with stage I disease.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

All incident cases of stage I testicular germ cell cancer diagnosed in Denmark between 2013 and 2018 will be identified using the nationwide prospective Danish Testicular Cancer (DaTeCa) database. Archived microscopic slides from the orchiectomy specimens will be retrieved through linkage to the Danish Pathology Data Bank and reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. The DaTeCa database includes 960 stage I seminoma patients with expected 185 relapses and 480 patients with stage I non-seminoma with expected 150 relapses. A minimum follow-up period of 3 years of all patients will be ensured. Predefined prognostic variables will be investigated with regard to relapse in univariable and multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (Region Zealand, Denmark) and the Danish Data Protection Agency. All data will be managed confidentially according to legislation. Study results will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-review journals.

[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Testicular germ cell tumors]

OBJECTIVE

To update French guidelines concerning testicular germ cell cancer.

METHODS

Comprehensive Medline search between 2016 and 2018 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer and treatments toxicities. Level of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

Testicular Germ cell tumor diagnosis is based on physical examination, biology tests (serum tumor markers AFP, hCGt, LDH) and radiological assessment (scrotal ultrasound and chest, abdomen and pelvis computerized tomography). Total inguinal orchiectomy is the first- line treatment allowing characterization of the histological type, local staging and identification of risk factors for micrometastases. In case of several therapeutic options, one must inform his patient balancing risks and benefits. Surveillance is usually chosen in stage I seminoma compliant patients as the evolution rate is low between 15 to 20 %. Carboplatin AUC7 is an alternative option. Radiotherapy indication should be avoided. In stage I non-seminomatous patients, either surveillance or risk-adapted strategy can be applied. Staging retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has restricted indications. Metastatic germ cell tumors are usually treated by PEB chemotherapy according to IGCCCG prognostic classification. Lombo-aortic radiotherapy is still a standard treatment for stage IIA. Residual masses should be evaluated by biological and radiological assessment 3 to 4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is advocated for every non-seminomatous residual mass more than one cm. 18FDG uptake should be evaluated for each seminoma residual mass more than 3cm.

CONCLUSIONS

A rigorous use of classifications is mandatory to define staging since initial diagnosis. Applying treatments based on these classifications leads to excellent survival rates (99 % in CSI, 85 % in CSII+).

Rete Testis Invasion Is Consistent With Pathologic Stage T1 in Germ Cell Tumors

OBJECTIVES

Rete testis invasion by germ cell tumors is frequently concomitant with lymphovascular or spermatic cord invasion (LVI/SCI); independent implications for staging are uncertain.

METHODS

In total, 171 seminomas and 178 nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs; 46 had 1%-60% seminoma component) came from five institutions. Metastatic status at presentation, as a proxy for severity, was available for all; relapse data were unavailable for 152. Rete direct invasion (ReteD) and rete pagetoid spread (ReteP) were assessed.

RESULTS

ReteP and ReteD were more frequent in seminoma than NSGCT. In seminoma, tumor size bifurcated at 3 cm or more or less than 3 cm predicted metastatic status. Tumors with ReteP or ReteD did not differ in size from those without invasions but were less than with LVI/SCI; metastatic status or relapse did not show differences. In NSGCT, ReteP/ReteD did not correlate with size, metastatic status, or relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support retaining American Joint Committee for Cancer pathologic T1 stage designation for rete testis invasion and pT1a/pT1b substaging of seminoma.

Datasets for the reporting of neoplasia of the testis: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting

We here describe the development of an evidence-based cancer dataset by an International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting expert panel for the reporting of primary testicular neoplasia, and present the 'required' and 'recommended' elements to be included in the pathology report, as well as a commentary. This dataset encompasses the updated 2016 World Health Organisation classification of urological tumours, the results of an International Society of Urological Pathology consultation, and also staging with our preferred method: the American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8. Implementation of this dataset will facilitate consistent and accurate data collection between different cohorts, facilitate research, and hopefully result in improved patient management.

Updates in Staging and Reporting of Testicular Cancer

The American Joint Committee for Cancer eighth edition staging manual incorporated several critical changes regarding staging of testis germ cell tumors, and these changes are summarized and discussed in this article. Further challenges, however, remain, and these are also highlighted.

Genitourinary Pathology Reporting Parameters Most Relevant to the Medical Oncologist

Pathologic variables play an important role in prognostication in urologic malignancies. Histologic subtype, histologic grade, and anatomic extent of disease (pathologic tumor and nodal staging) influence treatment decisions in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. This article discusses treatment paradigms for the most common urologic malignancies, followed by the evidence base to support the relationship between pathologic assessment and decision making by the medical oncologist.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : tumeurs germinales du testicule French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Testicular germ cell tumors

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.009. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.009. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

Testicular germ cell tumors: revisiting a series in light of the new WHO classification and AJCC staging systems, focusing on challenges for pathologists

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are strikingly heterogeneous, reflecting a complex tumor model, posing serious challenges for pathologists. Accurate classification and staging, according to most recent systems, is fundamental. We aimed to revise a series of consecutively diagnosed TGCTs (2005-2016) in light of the new World Health Organization (WHO) classification and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems, discussing dilemmas imposed to pathologists. All 164 patients' clinical files/histological slides were reviewed. Follow-up was last updated on November 2017. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS (v24). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Non-seminomatous tumors (NSTs) showed more frequently cysts, necrosis, hemorrhage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and higher stage than seminomas (SEs) (P < .001, P = .015, P < .001, P = .001, P = .007). Embryonal carcinoma (EC), yolk sac tumor (YST) and teratoma (TE) were the most frequent components in mixed tumors (82.5%, 82.5% and 80.7%). SEs with "atypical features" showed more LVI, higher mitotic count and more extensive necrosis (P = .030, P < .001, P = .016). LVI and >50%EC component, but not rete testis invasion, were associated with higher stage (P < .001, P = .009). Regarding SEs, there was an association between tumor size and both stage (P = .004) and LVI (P < .001). Only four patients disclosed altered stage group when AJCC 8th Edition was employed. Disease recurrence/progression occurred in 5.4% of cases. In two cases, tumor components in metastasectomy specimens were not present in the primary TGCT. Overall survival at 5 years was 98.6%. TGCTs are challenging neoplasms, and pathologists and clinicians alike must be aware of recent updates in classification and staging for adequately tailoring treatment strategies.