Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Liver Allografts

Rejection in Liver Transplantation Recipients

Rejection following liver transplantation continues to impact transplant recipients although rates have decreased over time with advances in immunosuppression management. The diagnosis of rejection remains challenging with liver biopsy remaining the reference standard for diagnosis. Proper classification of rejection type and severity is imperative as this guides management and ultimately graft preservation. Future areas of promise include non-invasive testing for detection of rejection to reduce the morbidity associated with invasive testing and further advances in immunosuppression management to reduce toxicities associated with immunosuppression while minimizing rejection related morbidity.

Banff 2022 Liver Group Meeting report: Monitoring long-term allograft health

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference.

Noninvasive graft monitoring using donor-derived cell-free DNA in Japanese liver transplantation

AIM

To evaluate the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in diagnosing graft injuries in Japanese liver transplantation (LTx), including family-related living donors.

METHODS

A total of 321 samples from 10 newly operated LTx recipients were collected to monitor the early dynamics of dd-cfDNA levels after LTx. Fifty-five samples from 55 recipients were collected during protocol biopsies (PB), whereas 36 samples from 27 recipients were collected during event biopsies, consisting of 11 biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR), 20 acute dysfunctions without rejection (ADWR), and 5 chronic rejections. The levels of dd-cfDNA were quantified using a next-generation sequencer based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.

RESULTS

The dd-cfDNA levels were elevated significantly after LTx, followed by a rapid decline to the baseline in patients without graft injury within 30 days post-LTx. The dd-cfDNA levels were significantly higher in the 11 samples obtained during AR than those obtained during PB (p < 0.0001), which decreased promptly after treatment. The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis of diagnostic ability yielded areas under the curve of 0.975 and 0.897 for AR (rejection activity index [RAI] ≥3) versus PB and versus non-AR (ADWR + PB). The dd-cfDNA levels during AR were elevated earlier and correlated more strongly with the RAI (r = 0.740) than aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase. The dd-cfDNA levels were neither associated with graft fibrosis based on histology nor the status of donor-specific antibodies in PB samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-derived cell-free DNA serves as a sensitive biomarker for detecting graft injuries in LTx. Further large-scale cohort studies are warranted to optimize its use in differentiating various post-LTx etiologies.

Identification of liver transplant biopsy phenotypes associated with distinct liver biological markers and allograft survival

The intricate association between histologic lesions and circulating antihuman leucocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in liver transplantation (LT) requires further clarification. We conducted a probabilistic, unsupervised approach in a comprehensively well-annotated LT cohort to identify clinically relevant archetypes. We evaluated 490 pairs of LT biopsies with DSA testing from 325 recipients transplanted between 2010 and 2020 across 3 French centers and an external cohort of 202 biopsies from 128 recipients. Unsupervised archetypal analysis integrated all clinico-immuno-histologic parameters of each biopsy to identify biopsy archetypes. The median time after LT was 1.17 (interquartile range, 0.38-2.38) years. We identified 7 archetypes distinguished by clinico-immuno-histologic parameters: archetype #1: severe T cell-mediated rejection (15.9%); #2: chronic rejection with ductopenia (1.8%); #3: architectural and microvascular damages (3.5%); #4: (sub)normal (55.9%); #5: mild T cell-mediated rejection (4.9%); #6: acute antibody-mediated rejection (6.5%); and #7: chronic rejection with DSA (11.4%). Cell infiltrates vary in the archetype. These archetypes were associated with distinct liver biological markers and allograft outcomes. These findings remained consistent when stratified using the patient's age or indications for LT, with good performance in the external cohort (mean highest probability assignment = 0.58, standard deviation ± 0.17). In conclusion, we have identified clinically meaningful archetypes, providing valuable insights into the intricate DSA-histology association, which may help standardize liver allograft pathology classification.

Circulating exosomes from brain death and cardiac death donors have distinct molecular and immunologic properties: A pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Comparison of donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) lung tissue before transplantation have demonstrated activation of pro-inflammatory cytokine pathway in DBD donors. The molecular and immunological properties of circulating exosomes from DBD and DCD donors were not previously described.

METHODS

We collected plasma from 18 deceased donors (12 DBD and six DCD). Cytokines were analyzed by 30-Plex luminex Panels. Exosomes were analyzed for liver self-antigen (SAg), Transcription Factors and HLA class II (HLA-DR/DQ) using western blot. C57BL/6 animals were immunized with isolated exosomes to determine strength and magnitude of immune responses. Interferon (IFN)-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α producing cells were quantified by ELISPOT, specific antibodies to HLA class II antigens were measured by ELISA RESULTS: We demonstrate increased plasma levels of IFNγ, EGF, EOTAXIN, IP-10, MCP-1, RANTES, MIP-β, VEGF, and interleukins - 6/8 in DBD plasma versus DCD. MiRNA isolated from exosome of DBD donors demonstrated significant increase in miR-421, which has been reported to correlate with higher level of Interleukin-6. Higher levels of liver SAg Collagen III (p = .008), pro-inflammatory transcription factors (NF-κB, p < .05; HIF1α, p = .021), CIITA (p = .011), and HLA class II (HLA-DR, p = .0003 and HLA-DQ, p = .013) were detected in exosomes from DBD versus DCD plasma. The circulating exosomes isolated from DBD donors were immunogenic in mice and led to the development of Abs to HLA-DR/DQ.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides potential new mechanisms by which DBD organs release exosomes that can activate immune pathways leading to cytokine release and allo-immune response.

Detailed Analysis of Simultaneous Renal and Liver Allografts in the Presence of DSA

Liver allografts protect renal allografts from the same donor from some, but not all, preformed donor specific alloantibodies (DSA). However, the precise mechanisms of protection and the potential for more subtle alterations/injuries within the grafts resulting from DSA interactions require further study.

Methods

We reevaluated allograft biopsies from simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients who had both allografts biopsied within 60 d of one another and within 30 d of DSA being positive in serum (positive: mean florescence intensity ≥5000). Routine histology, C4d staining, and specialized immunohistochemistry for Kupffer cells (KCs; CD163) and a C4d receptor immunoglobulin-like transcript-4 were carried out in 4 patients with 6 paired biopsies.

Results

Overt antibody-mediated rejection was found in 3 of 4 renal and liver allografts. One patient had biopsy-confirmed renal and liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection despite serum clearance of DSA. All biopsies showed KC hypertrophy (minimal: 1; mild: 2; moderate: 1; severe: 2) and cytoplasmic C4d KC staining was easily detected in 2 biopsies from 2 patients; minimal and negative in 2 biopsies each. Implications of which are discussed. Control 1-y protocol liver allograft biopsies from DSA- recipients showed neither KC hypertrophy nor KC C4d staining (n = 6).

Conclusions

Partial renal allograft protection by a liver allograft from the same donor may be partially mediated by phagocytosis/elimination of antibody and complement split products by KCs, as shown decades ago in controlled sensitized experimental animal experiments.

Morphologic and immunophenotypic evaluation of liver allograft biopsies with contemporaneous serum DSA measurements

BACKGROUND

Acute antibody mediated rejection is increasingly identified in liver allografts as a unique form of alloimmune injury associated with donor specific antibodies (DSA). This manifests pathologically as microvascular injury and C4d uptake. Despite the liver allograft's relative resistance to alloimmune injury, liver allografts are not impervious to cellular and antibody-mediated rejection.

METHODS

In this blinded control study, we evaluated CD163 immunohistochemistry and applied the Banff 2016 criteria for diagnosis of acute AMR on a group of indication allograft liver biopsies from DSA positive patients and compared them to indication biopsies from DSA negative controls.

RESULTS

Most DSA positive patients were females (75%, p = .027), and underwent transplantation for HCV infection. Significant histopathological predictors of serum DSA positivity were Banff H-score (p = .01), moderate to severe cholestasis (p = .03), and CD163 score > 2 (p = .029). Other morphologic features that showed a trend with DSA positivity include Banff portal C4d-score (p = .06), bile ductular reaction (p = .07), and central perivenulitis (p = .07). The odds of DSA sMFI ≥5000 was 12.5 times higher in those with a C4d score >1 than those with a C4d score ≤ 1 (p = .04). Incidence of definite for aAMR in the DSA positive cohort was 25% (n = 5), and 0% in the DSA negative cohort. A group of 5 DSA positive cases were not classifiable by the current scheme.

CONCLUSION

Sinusoidal CD163, Banff H-score, and diffuse C4d are predictors of serum DSA, and facilitate recognition of histopathological features associated with serum DSA and tissue-antibody interaction.

Evidence for Alloimmune Sinusoidal Injury in De Novo Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia After Liver Transplantation

Posttransplant nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) mostly remains unexplained. Microvascular injury due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is suspected, but lack of donor specific antibody (DSA) testing makes it difficult to prove. Centered around a 1-year period of routine DSA testing, concomitant protocol, and indicated posttransplant liver biopsies (LB), recipients with NRH (n = 18) were compared with a matched control group (n = 36). All index, previous, and subsequent LB were reviewed. Both groups were similar in terms of demographics, timing of index LB, and DSA. In the index LB, the NRH group had higher sinusoidal C4d positivity (p = 0.029) and perisinusoidal fibrosis (p = 0.034), both independently associated with NRH (p = 0.038 and 0.050, respectively). Features of "possible" chronic AMR were detected in 28.5% of the NRH group without a known cause and 0% of the control group (p = 0.009). The NRH group had more preceding indicated LB with increased incidence of rejection and biliary obstruction pattern. In the follow-up histology, overall, sinusoidal and portal C4d positivity, sinusoidal microvasculitis, and perisinusoidal fibrosis were also higher (all p < 0.050). In conclusion, we provide evidence towards the hypothesis that some cases of posttransplant NRH are related to preceding active and persistent AMR. Large multicenter studies with protocol DSA testing are required to confirm.

The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice

Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.

T-cell infiltrate intensity is associated with delayed response to treatment in late acute cellular rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Late acute cellular rejection (ACR) is associated with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) development, chronic rejection, and allograft loss. However, accurate predictors of late ACR treatment response are lacking. ACR is primarily T-cell mediated, yet B cells and plasma cells (PC) also infiltrate the portal areas during late ACR. To test the hypothesis that the inflammatory milieu is associated with delayed response (DR) to rejection therapy, we performed a single-center retrospective case-control study of pediatric late liver ACR using multiparameter immunofluorescence for CD4, CD8, CD68, CD20, and CD138 to identify immune cell subpopulations.

METHODS

Pediatric liver transplant recipients transplanted at <17 years of age and treated for biopsy-proven late ACR between January 2014 and 2019 were stratified into rapid response (RR) and DR based on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization within 30 days of diagnosis. All patients received IV methylprednisolone as an initial rejection treatment. Immunofluorescence was performed on archived formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) liver biopsy tissue.

RESULTS

Liver biopsies from 60 episodes of late ACR in 54 patients were included in the analysis, of which 33 were DR (55%). Anti-thymocyte globulin was only required in the DR group. The frequency of liver-infiltrating CD20+ and CD8+ lymphocytes and the prevalence of autoantibodies were higher in the DR group. In univariate logistic regression analysis, serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) level at diagnosis, but not ALT, Banff score or presence of DSA, predicted DR.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher serum GGT level, presence of autoantibodies, and increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration portends DR in late ACR treatment in children.

Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies: A Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk consensus document

Although anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are commonly measured in clinical practice and their relationship with transplant outcome is well established, clinical recommendations for anti-HLA antibody assessment are sparse. Supported by a careful and critical review of the current literature performed by the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 working group, this consensus report provides clinical practice recommendations in kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplantation based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The recommendations address 3 major clinical problems in transplantation and include guidance regarding posttransplant DSA assessment and application to diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics: (1) the clinical implications of positive posttransplant DSA detection according to DSA status (ie, preformed or de novo), (2) the relevance of posttransplant DSA assessment for precision diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and for treatment management, and (3) the relevance of posttransplant DSA for allograft prognosis and risk stratification. This consensus report also highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical investigations and trials in the future that will further refine the clinical utility of posttransplant DSA assessment, leading to improved transplant management and patient care.

Standardizing the histological assessment of late posttransplantation biopsies from pediatric liver allograft recipients

Excellent short-term survival after pediatric liver transplantation (LT) has shifted attention toward the optimization of long-term outcomes. Despite considerable progress in imaging and other noninvasive modalities, liver biopsies continue to be required to monitor allograft health and to titrate immunosuppression. However, a standardized approach to the detailed assessment of long-term graft histology is currently lacking. The aim of this study was to formulate a list of histopathological features relevant for the assessment of long-surviving liver allograft health and to develop an approach for assessing the presence and severity of these features in a standardized manner. Whole-slide digital images from 31 biopsies obtained ≥4 years after transplantation to determine eligibility for an immunosuppression withdrawal trial were selected to illustrate a range of typical histopathological findings seen in children with clinically stable grafts, including those associated with alloantibodies. Fifty histological features were independently assessed and, where appropriate, scored semiquantitatively by six pathologists to determine inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the histopathological features using unweighted and weighted kappa statistics; the latter metric enabled distinction between minor and major disagreements in parameter severity scoring. Weighted interobserver kappa statistics showed a high level of agreement for various parameters of inflammation, interface activity, fibrosis, and microvascular injury. Intraobserver agreement for these features was even more substantial. The results of this study will help to standardize the assessment of biopsies from long-surviving liver allografts, aid the recognition of important histological features, and facilitate international comparisons and clinical trials aiming to improve outcomes for children undergoing LT.

Long-term liver allograft fibrosis: A review with emphasis on idiopathic post-transplant hepatitis and chronic antibody mediated rejection

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving surgical procedure and the current standard of care for most patients with end stage liver disease. With improvements in organ preservation techniques, perioperative care, and immunosuppression, there is better patient and graft survival following LT, and assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors is becoming increasingly important. Recurrent or de novo viral or autoimmune injury remains the most common causes of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis following liver transplantation in adults. However, no obvious cause can be identified in many adults with controlled recurrent disease and the majority of pediatric LT recipients, as they have been transplanted for non-recurrent liver diseases. Serial surveillance liver biopsies post LT have been evaluated in several adult and pediatric centers to identify long-term pathological changes. Pathological findings are frequently present in liver biopsies obtained after a year post LT. The significance of these findings is uncertain as many of these are seen in protocol liver biopsies from patients with clinically good allograft function and normal liver chemistry parameters. This narrative review summaries the factors predisposing to long-term liver allograft fibrosis, highlighting the putative role of idiopathic post-LT hepatitis and chronic antibody mediated rejection in its pathogenesis.

The New Challenge in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of liver allograft transplantation was considered as anecdotal for many decades. However recently, AMR has gained clinical awareness as a potential cause of chronic liver injury, leading to liver allograft fibrosis and eventual graft failure. (1) Methods: Literature on chronic AMR (cAMR) in pediatric post-liver transplant patients was reviewed for epidemiologic data, physiopathology, diagnosis, and treatment approaches. (2) Results: Accurate incidence of cAMR in pediatric liver transplantation remains unknown. Diagnostic criteria of cAMR were suggested by the Banff Working Group in 2016 and are based on standardized histopathological findings, C4d staining pattern, associated with the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Physio-pathological mechanisms are not clear for the technically difficult-to-obtain animal models reproducing cAMR. Treatment protocols are not established, being limited to case reports and case series, based on experience in ABO incompatible transplantation and kidney transplantation. Immunosuppression compliance with adequate dose adjustment may prevent cAMR. Conversion of Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus may improve pathological findings if treated in early phase. The association of steroids, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and mTOR inhibitors have shown some synergistic effects. Second-line treatments such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasma exchange may decrease antibody titers based on ABO incompatible transplant protocols. The use of anti-CD20 (Rituximab) and proteasome inhibitors (Bortezomib) is controversial due to the lack of qualified studies. Therefore, multicenter randomized trials are needed to establish the best therapeutic strategy. In refractory cases, re-transplantation is the only treatment for allograft failure. (3) Conclusions: This literature review collects recent clinical, histopathological, and therapeutical advances of cAMR in liver allograft transplantation of pediatric patients. There are many physio-pathological aspects of cAMR to be clarified. Further efforts with multicenter prospective protocols to manage patients with cAMR are needed to improve its outcome.

Belatacept Treatment of Recurrent Late-onset T Cell-mediated Rejection/Antibody-mediated Rejection With De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies in a Liver Transplant Patient

T cell-mediated rejection that appears and persists late after transplantation is often associated with development of de novo donor-specific antibodies. Treatment of this condition often presents a conundrum because of the uncertainty regarding the trade-off between immunosuppression-related toxicities/complications and restoration of allograft function and structure.

Methods

Herein, we report an illustrative case of a young 20-y-old otherwise healthy woman who underwent liver replacement for Alagille's syndrome from an ABO-compatible, 6 antigen-mismatched crossmatch-negative 24-y-old man. Although triple baseline immunosuppression was used (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone), she developed rejection 3 d after liver replacement. Despite verified continual immunosuppression compliance, 1.5 y after liver replacement she experienced 6 more rejection episodes over the following 18 mo and development of de novo donor-specific antibody.

Results

Treatment with belatacept began 3.5 y after transplantation, normalizing her liver tests with no further rejections. A biopsy obtained 6 y after transplantation (postoperative day 2221) was normal, appearing without inflammation or residual fibrosis.

Conclusions

Belatacept may be a useful treatment approach in this setting.

Recurrent Liver Allograft Injury in Patients With Donor-Derived Malignancy Treated With Immunosuppression Cessation and Retransplantation

OBJECTIVES

Donor-derived malignancy of the liver allograft is a rare but serious condition in the setting of necessary immunosuppression. Retransplantation after abrupt immunosuppression cessation has been performed with durable cancer-free survival.

METHODS

We present 2 cases of patients with donor-derived malignancy who were treated with complete immunosuppression cessation, which induced rapidly progressive liver allograft rejection and failure, with a need for subsequent retransplantation. We reviewed all serial liver biopsies and explants from both patients and performed C4d immunostaining.

RESULTS

Initial explants of both patients showed severe allograft rejection, with unusual features of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and C4d positivity. Malignant tumors in the explants were necrotic, related to rejection of donor-derived cancer cells and tissue. Follow-up of both patients has shown long-term cancer-free survival but issues with recurrent allograft failure requiring a third transplant. The reasons for retransplantation in both cases were related to allograft failure from antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of a potentially increased risk of rejection and recurrent allograft failure when strategizing treatment of donor-derived malignancy with immunosuppression cessation and retransplantation.

Intra-Liver Allograft C3d-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies Predict Rejection After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is no doubt that antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) brings a poor outcome for liver transplant recipients. However, the relationship between intragraft DSA (g-DSA), complement-binding abilities, and AMR remains unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled a total of 20 liver transplant recipients who underwent protocol or episode graft biopsies in the mid to long term after liver transplant (median 48.5, range 6-198 months), and their status of g-DSA and complement 3d (C3d)-binding abilities was assessed with the graft immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) technique.

RESULTS

The prevalence of g-DSA was 15.0 % in liver transplant recipients (3/20), and serum DSA (s-DSA) also existed in 15.0% of recipients. The number of g-DSA+/s-DSA+, g-DSA+/s-DSA-, g-DSA-/s-DSA+, and g-DSA-/s-DSA- cases are 1, 2, 2, and 15, respectively. The g-DSA+ group demonstrated a significant high rejection activity index: 3.67 ± 1.53, compared with the g-DSA- group: 1.24 ± 1.15 (P = .0045). Moreover, C3d-binding reaction was notably higher in the g-DSA+ group (C3d index: 1.87 ± 0.38 vs 0.76 ± 0.35) (P < .0001). Overall, the g-DSA+ group was more associated with liver allograft rejection-not only AMR, but also T cell-mediated rejection (P = .031).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the existence of g-DSA and intragraft C3d-binding reaction had a negative impact on the liver allografts, but in contrast s-DSA did not have any significant impact.

Chronic rejection after liver transplantation: Opening the Pandora’s box

Chronic rejection (CR) of liver allografts causes damage to intrahepatic vessels and bile ducts and may lead to graft failure after liver transplantation. Although its prevalence has declined steadily with the introduction of potent immunosuppressive therapy, CR still represents an important cause of graft injury, which might be irreversible, leading to graft loss requiring re-transplantation. To date, we still do not fully appreciate the mechanisms underlying this process. In addition to T cell-mediated CR, which was initially the only recognized type of CR, recently a new form of liver allograft CR, antibody-mediated CR, has been identified. This has indeed opened an era of thriving research and renewed interest in the field. Liver biopsy is needed for a definitive diagnosis of CR, but current research is aiming to identify new non-invasive tools for predicting patients at risk for CR after liver transplantation. Moreover, the minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy might influence the establishment of subclinical CR-related injury, which should not be disregarded. Therapies for CR may only be effective in the “early” phases, and a tailored management of the immunosuppression regimen is essential for preventing irreversible liver damage. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge and research on CR, focusing on early detection, identification of non-invasive biomarkers, immunosuppressive management, re-transplantation and future perspectives of CR.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective

Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.

The incidence and risk factors of chronic rejection in acutely rejected pediatric liver transplantation

Background. Chronic graft rejection (CR) represents an increasing concern in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). Risk factors of CR in this population are uncertain. In present study, we aimed to ascertain if clinical parameters could predict the occurrence of CR in LT children.

Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the results from 47 children who had experienced acute hepatic rejection in Namazee hospital, Shiraz, Iran during 2007–2017.

Results. Out of 47 children, 22 (46.8%) and 25 (53.2%) were boys and girls respectively. Ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were observed in 20 (44.4%), 14 (31.1%), and 4 (9.1%) respectively. Posttransplant vascular and biliary complications were observed in 3 (7%) and 4 (9.3%) cases respectively. The mean time from LT to normalization of liver enzymes was 14.2 ± 7.5 days. The mean of acute rejection episodes was 1.4 ± 0.6 (median = 1 (22, 46.8%), range of 1–3). Six (12.7%) patients experienced CR. The mean time from LT to CR was 75 ± 28.4 days. A significant association was found between CR and patients’ condition (being inpatient or outpatient) before surgery (P = 0.03). No significant relationship was found between CR and post-transplant parameters except for biliary complications (P = 0.01). Both biliary complication (RR = 33.7, 95% CI: 2.2–511, P = 0.01) and inpatient status (RR = 10.9, 95% CI: 1.1–102.5, P = 0.03) significantly increased the risk of CR.

Conclusion. Being hospitalized at the time of LT, and development of biliary complications might predict risk factors for development of CR in LT children.

The efficacy of rituximab treatment for antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation: A retrospective Japanese nationwide study

AIM

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been consistently elucidated in liver transplantation (LT); however, the treatment for AMR, including rituximab, has not been indicated as a strongly recommended therapeutic protocol.

METHODS

This study was conducted as the Japanese multicenter retrospective study to accumulate data on the use of rituximab for AMR among patients undergoing LT between August 2001 and December 2016. Thirteen patients (five children and eight adults) were enrolled.

RESULTS

The types of AMR in the pediatric cases were chronic AMR in four cases and indeterminate AMR in one case. Among the pediatric cases, rituximab treatment only showed therapeutic efficacy in two patients with chronic AMR. Among the adult patients, five patients had chronic AMR, and three had acute AMR. Although two patients with chronic AMR died due to graft failure, liver function tests revealed improvement after rituximab treatment in the other patients. Two of the three patients with acute AMR died due to graft failure; rituximab treatment showed no therapeutic efficacy in these cases. Although bacterial infections occurred within 3 months after rituximab administration in three patients, rituximab treatment could be safely administered without any direct adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The indication of rituximab therapy as an additional treatment for mild acute AMR and chronic AMR may be feasible; however, a prospective randomized control study is needed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of rituximab treatment for AMR.

Donor-Specific Antibodies Against Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen are Associated with Graft Inflammation but Not with Fibrosis Long-Term After Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of Protocol Biopsies

Background

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against donor human leukocyte antigen after liver transplantation, which are associated with histological changes, have been widely studied with respect to their sustained impact on transplant function. However, their long-term impact after liver transplantation remains unclear.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis from June 2016 to July 2017 that included all patients who presented themselves for scheduled follow-up after receiving a liver transplantation between September 1989 and December 2016. In addition to a liver protocol biopsy, patients were screened for human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLAab) and donor-specific antibodies. Subsequently, the association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies, donor-specific antibodies, histologic and clinical features, and immunosuppression was analyzed.

Results

Analysis for human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was performed for 291 and 271 patients. A significant association between higher inflammation grades and the presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies was detected, while fibrosis stages remained unaffected. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression for inflammation showing a significant increase for presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies (OR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.67–12.6; p=0.0035). Furthermore, the use of everolimus in combination with tacrolimus was significantly associated with the status of negative human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies. Viral etiology for liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and higher steatosis grades of the graft were significantly associated with a lower rate of human leukocyte antigen antibodies. The impact of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was associated with higher levels of laboratory parameters, such as transaminases and bilirubin.

Conclusion

Donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen are associated with histological and biochemical graft inflammation after liver transplantation, while fibrosis seems to be unaffected. Future studies should validate these findings for longer observation periods and specific subgroups.

Expression of fibrosis-related genes in liver allografts: Association with histology and long-term outcome after pediatric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Unexplained graft fibrosis and inflammation are common after pediatric liver transplantation (LT).

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the graft expression of fibrogenic genes and correlated the findings with transplant histopathology and outcome.

METHODS

Liver biopsies from 29 recipients were obtained at a median of 13.1 (IQR: 5.0-18.4) years after pediatric LT. Control samples were from six liver-healthy subjects. Hepatic expression of 40 fibrosis-related genes was correlated to histological findings: normal histology, fibrosis with no inflammation, and fibrosis with inflammation. Liver function was evaluated after a subsequent follow-up of 9.0 years (IQR: 8.0-9.4).

RESULTS

Patients with fibrosis and no inflammation had significantly increased gene expression of profibrotic TGF-β3 (1.17 vs. 1.02 p = .005), CTGF (1.64 vs. 0.66 p = .014), PDGF-α (1.79 vs. 0.98 p = .049), PDGF -β (0.99 vs. 0.76 p = .006), integrin-subunit-β1 (1.19 vs. 1.02 p = .045), α-SMA (1.12 vs. 0.58 p = .013), type I collagen (0.82 vs. 0.53 p = .005) and antifibrotic decorin (1.15 vs. 0.99 p = .045) compared to patients with normal histology. mRNA expression of VEGF A (0.84 vs. 1.06 p = .049) was lower. Only a few of the studied genes were upregulated in patients with both fibrosis and inflammation. The gene expression levels showed no association with later graft outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Altered hepatic expression of fibrosis-related genes is associated with graft fibrosis without concurrent inflammation.

Presence of donor specific HLA class 2 antibodies (DSA class 2) is associated with development of graft fibrosis more than 10 years after liver transplantation-a retrospective single center study

Here the impact of donor specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class 2 antibodies (DSA cl 2) on long term outcome after liver transplantation (LT) was investigated. Altogether 156 (44 pediatric and 112 adult) LT recipients were included in the study. Graft fibrosis was assessed by liver elastography and biopsy. DSA cl 2 were determined by Luminex technology. 46% of LT recipients were positive for DSA cl 2 after a median follow-up of 15 years. In the multivariate analysis DSA cl 2 were significantly associated with immunosuppressive monotherapy (OR 5.42; 95% CI: 1.02-28.90; p = .048). Compared to DSA cl 2 negative patients, positive recipients had significantly more graft fibrosis based on the liver stiffness (mean 9.4 ± 9.0 kPa vs. 6.5 ± 6.3 kPa; p < .002) and fibrosis stages determined by liver elastography (p = .016) and the performed liver biopsies (p = .002). Also, a significantly higher incidence of chronic rejections (11% vs. 2%; p = .045) and graft losses (6% vs. 0%; p = .043) were found. In the multivariate regression analysis DSA cl 2 were significantly associated with graft fibrosis (OR 4.57; 95% CI 1.59-13.10; p = .005). So, these data suggest that development of DSA cl 2 occurs more often with immunosuppressive monotherapy and may ultimately result in chronic rejection and graft fibrosis.

Understanding, predicting and achieving liver transplant tolerance: from bench to bedside

In the past 40 years, liver transplantation has evolved from a high-risk procedure to one that offers high success rates for reversal of liver dysfunction and excellent patient and graft survival. The liver is the most tolerogenic of transplanted organs; indeed, immunosuppressive therapy can be completely withdrawn without rejection of the graft in carefully selected, stable long-term liver recipients. However, in other recipients, chronic allograft injury, late graft failure and the adverse effects of anti-rejection therapy remain important obstacles to improved success. The liver has a unique composition of parenchymal and immune cells that regulate innate and adaptive immunity and that can promote antigen-specific tolerance. Although the mechanisms underlying liver transplant tolerance are not well understood, important insights have been gained into how the local microenvironment, hepatic immune cells and specific molecular pathways can promote donor-specific tolerance. These insights provide a basis for the identification of potential clinical biomarkers that might correlate with tolerance or rejection and for the development of novel therapeutic targets. Innovative approaches aimed at promoting immunosuppressive drug minimization or withdrawal include the adoptive transfer of donor-derived or recipient-derived regulatory immune cells to promote liver transplant tolerance. In this Review, we summarize and discuss these developments and their implications for liver transplantation.

Long-term outcomes and clinical impact of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation: a prospective study in a pilot cohort

INTRODUCTION

the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is thought to affect survival of the allograft and patient after liver transplantation (LT). However, their significance is not well understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

a prospective study was performed of 32 adult patients who underwent LT in 2011 to analyze the existence of DSA, associated risk factors and medium-term impact. Immunological determinations were performed immediately before LT and at three, six, 12 months and five years after LT.

RESULTS

eight patients (24.2 %) presented pre-formed DSA. However, titers were negative in all patients five years after LT and there were no associated events. Eight out of 24 patients (33.3 %) developed de novo DSA. After five years, only two remained positive; both were class II with high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values at diagnosis (over 15,000). No association was found between the development of DSA and the risk of rejection, graft loss or death. However, an increase in liver stiffness values was observed in patients with persistent DSA, and focal sinusoidal deposition of C4d and moderate liver fibrosis were reported.

CONCLUSION

the incidence of DSA is high after LT. In addition, the persistence of de novo DSA could be associated with silent liver fibrosis with a potential impact on graft outcomes.

Current Challenges in the Post-Transplant Care of Liver Transplant Recipients in Germany

Improving long-term patient and graft survival after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major challenge. Compared to the early phase after LT, long-term morbidity and mortality of the recipients not only depends on complications immediately related to the graft function, infections, or rejection, but also on medical factors such as de novo malignancies, metabolic disorders (e.g., new-onset diabetes, osteoporosis), psychiatric conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression), renal failure, and cardiovascular diseases. While a comprehensive post-transplant care at the LT center and the connected regional networks may improve outcome, there is currently no generally accepted standard to the post-transplant management of LT recipients in Germany. We therefore described the structure and standards of post-LT care by conducting a survey at 12 German LT centers including transplant hepatologists and surgeons. Aftercare structures and form of cost reimbursement considerably varied between LT centers across Germany. Further discussions and studies are required to define optimal structure and content of post-LT care systems, aiming at improving the long-term outcomes of LT recipients.

Donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation: challenges in diagnosis and determining clinical impact

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our understanding of the clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies in liver transplant recipients has evolved in recent years as outcomes for liver allografts have improved and advances in diagnostic testing have made recognition of antibody mediated rejection in transplant patients more sensitive.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two main types of donor-specific antibodies - preformed and de novo - have been reported in the literature to have a negative impact on graft survival, and researchers have been able to further identify subclasses of class II donor-specific antibodies as being the most clinically impactful. Furthermore, there is evidence that donor-specific antibody formation can augment cellular rejection in liver grafts and lead to worsened clinical outcomes. Recent data have shown a higher prevalence of donor-specific antibody formation than previously reported.

SUMMARY

This review explores the most recent literature regarding the clinical impact of both preformed and de-novo donor-specific antibodies and potential management guidelines for patients undergoing liver transplantation. The best practice guidelines for undergoing monitoring for donor-specific antibody formation and protocol biopsies in sensitized patients will depend on further multiinstitutional studies.

Role of Innate Immunity in Pediatric Post-transplant Idiopathic Liver Fibrosis

Pediatric post-transplant idiopathic liver fibrosis is an unexplained graft fibrosis that occurs in symptom-free children without acute rejection and surgical complications. Despite a lack of consensus on the subject, the development of pediatric post-transplant idiopathic liver fibrosis is believed to be the result of multiple potential factors, including ischemia-reperfusion injury, allogeneic acute and chronic rejection, viral hepatitis recurrence, opportunistic infection, and drug-induced liver damage. Among them, there is growing evidence that innate immunity may also have a unique role in this progression. This study reviews the features of pediatric post-transplant idiopathic liver fibrosis and discusses current studies illustrating the potential mechanisms of liver allograft tolerance induced by intrahepatic innate immunity, the role of components including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), interferons (IFN), dendritic cells (DC), natural killer cells (NK cells), NKT cells, neutrophils, and Kupffer cells, as well as their possibly relevant role in the development of pediatric post-transplant idiopathic liver fibrosis.

Non-invasive screening for subclinical liver graft injury in adults via donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies

The majority of liver grafts exhibit abnormal histological findings late after transplantation, even when liver enzymes are normal. Such subclinical graft injuries were associated with rejection and fibrosis progression in recent studies. The identification of non-invasive biomarkers for subclinical graft injury might help to individualize immunosuppression. Therefore, graft injury was assessed in 133 liver biopsies with normal/near normal liver enzymes from a prospective liver biopsy program. Cytokeratin-18 cell death marker (M65) and donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) were measured as non-invasive markers in paired plasma samples in addition to routine parameters. M65 was associated with subclinical graft injury but this association was too weak for reasonable clinical application. DSA positivity was associated with more graft inflammation (OR = 5.4) and more fibrosis (OR = 4.2). Absence of DSA excluded fibrosis in 87–89%, while presence of DSA excluded histological criteria for immunosuppression minimization attempts in 92–97%. While CK18 cell death marker had no diagnostic value for the detection of subclinical liver graft injury, DSA testing can help to preselect patients for immunosuppression reduction in case of DSA negativity, while DSA positivity should prompt elastography or liver biopsy for the assessment of subclinical graft injury.

[Liver transplantation. Current aspects of pretransplantation diagnosis and rejection]

Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease. The therapy management of these patients is interdisciplinary and requires pathologists to have both clinical and immunological knowledge. Continuous advances in treatment and increasing clinical experience are accompanied by the further development of pathological transplant diagnostics. This article presents and discusses the latest classification of T‑cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and aspects of pretransplant diagnostics.

Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring

Traditional histopathological allograft biopsy evaluation provides, within hours, diagnoses, prognostic information, and mechanistic insights into disease processes. However, proponents of an array of alternative monitoring platforms, broadly classified as "invasive" or "noninvasive" depending on whether allograft tissue is needed, question the value proposition of tissue histopathology. The authors explore the pros and cons of current analytical methods relative to the value of traditional and illustrate advancements of next-generation histopathological evaluation of tissue biopsies. We describe the continuing value of traditional histopathological tissue assessment and "next-generation pathology (NGP)," broadly defined as staining/labeling techniques coupled with digital imaging and automated image analysis. Noninvasive imaging and fluid (blood and urine) analyses promote low-risk, global organ assessment, and "molecular" data output, respectively; invasive alternatives promote objective, "mechanistic" insights by creating gene lists with variably increased/decreased expression compared with steady state/baseline. Proponents of alternative approaches contrast their preferred methods with traditional histopathology and: (1) fail to cite the main value of traditional and NGP-retention of spatial and inferred temporal context available for innumerable objective analyses and (2) belie an unfamiliarity with the impact of advances in imaging and software-guided analytics on emerging histopathology practices. Illustrative NGP examples demonstrate the value of multidimensional data that preserve tissue-based spatial and temporal contexts. We outline a path forward for clinical NGP implementation where "software-assisted sign-out" will enable pathologists to conduct objective analyses that can be incorporated into their final reports and improve patient care.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Recurrent Idiopathic Liver Allograft Failure

OBJECTIVES

Many transplant programs have had patients who develop idiopathic recurrent liver allograft failure, necessitating serial transplants, and are deemed to have refractory or recurrent rejection. The frequency and the etiology of this immunologic dysfunction have not been well characterized.

METHODS

Herein, we illustrate the case of a patient who required three retransplants over a period of 20 years for recurrent liver allograft failure. By extensively compiling the patient's many liver biopsy specimens and explants over time, we demonstrate that antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was a major contributing factor from the outset. We conducted a review of the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients database to estimate the potential frequency of AMR.

RESULTS

As illustrated by this case, AMR has varied histologic findings in the setting of elevated donor-specific antibody titers.

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of recurrent allograft failure in this patient was likely a combination of acute cellular rejection and AMR, manifestations of likely underlying immune dysregulation. Pathologists and transplant physicians should recognize the variable histologic presentations of AMR, which is imperative for its timely intervention. This case demonstrates how difficult the diagnosis of AMR can be to make, highlighting the need for strong clinical suspicion in patients having difficult-to-treat rejection and recurrent allograft failure.

Histological findings in protocol biopsies following pediatric liver transplant: Low incidence of abnormalities at 5 years

Histological abnormalities, including chronic hepatitis, fibrosis, and steatosis, are increasingly reported in liver biopsies of children after LT. These changes may be progressive and represent a form of rejection. Liver biochemistry is often initially normal. Our LT program began in 2002, utilizing tacrolimus and low-dose steroids for the first year post-LT. Patients undergo a protocol biopsy at 1 year post-LT prior to stopping steroids, then at 5 years and every 5 years thereafter. Target tacrolimus levels are 5-8 μg/L and 3-5 μg/L after 3 and 12 months, respectively. Between 2002 and 2009, 51 LT were performed; 50 (98%) and 49 (96%) patients survived for 1 and 5 years, respectively. A total of 43 patients (median age at LT 2.3 years) underwent a protocol biopsy at 1 year (16 male; median time post-LT 12.5 months), and 44 (20 male; median time post-LT 5.1 years) at 5 years. By 5 years, 3 had transferred to adult services; 1 was re-transplanted for graft failure and 1 moved overseas. Biopsies were reviewed by 2 pathologists. Most patients (31/44) were on tacrolimus monotherapy at 5 years. At 1 and 5 years, 29 of 43 (67.5%) and 31 of 44 (71%) biopsies were normal, respectively. Two of 44 had chronic allograft hepatitis at 5 years. Two of 43 and 1 of 44 had isolated fibrosis, 3 of 43 and 3 of 44 steatosis, and 3 of 43 and 4 of 44 acute rejection at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Other findings included predominantly biliary changes (6/43 & 3/44 at 1 and 5 years, respectively). Tacrolimus levels at 5 years were slightly higher than anticipated (median trough level 5.8 μg/L). With an immunosuppressive regimen of tacrolimus and low-dose steroids for 1 year followed by tacrolimus monotherapy thereafter, the majority of PLB were normal and no progressive changes were observed at 5 years. Compared to other LT programs, we have lower rates of chronic allograft hepatitis, steatosis, and fibrosis at 5 years. However, the tacrolimus levels at 5 years were higher than planned and this may have played a role. Further evaluation is also required to determine the potential long-term adverse effects of corticosteroid use on linear growth and bone mineral density.

Morphological characterization of chronic antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-identical or ABO-compatible pediatric liver graft recipients

This study aims to define the morphological profile associated with the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and/or C4d immunostaining in ABO-identical or compatible pediatric liver grafts. Ten-year protocol liver graft biopsies performed at 131.3 ± 15.3 months after transplantation in 53 pediatric liver graft recipients were reviewed. Immunostaining for C4d was systematically performed and semiquantitatively analyzed. DSAs were concurrently quantified, and results were available for 44 patients. All biopsies demonstrated fibrotic changes with a mean liver allograft fibrosis score (LAFSc) of 5.1 ± 2.2. A total of 31 (58%) biopsies exhibited C4d positivity. DSAs were detected in 20 (45%) patients, and mean maximal mean fluorescence intensity was 12,977 ± 6731. LAFSc (6.3 ± 1.3 versus 3.9 ± 2.2; P = 0.008), perivenular fibrosis (2.7 ± 0.5 versus 1.3 ± 1.0; P < 0.001), and portal inflammation (1.4 ± 0.8 versus 0.3 ± 0.5; P = 0.009) were significantly higher in the double-DSA and C4d-positive group versus the double-negative group. We defined a histological scoring system from these results, which was integrated with the 2016 Banff definition and allowed reclassifying patients for the diagnosis of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR; 11/53 versus 13/53). Diagnoses of probable cAMR according to Banff 2016 (n = 4) were unchanged, but 2 among the 9 patients classified as possible cAMR according to the 2016 Banff definition were excluded for this diagnostic when using our histological score. In conclusion, our results confirmed that perivenular fibrosis and portal inflammation in late pediatric liver graft biopsies are features of cAMR. Our histological score could improve the accuracy of the 2016 Banff definition for the diagnosis of cAMR. Liver Transplantation 24 897-907 2018 AASLD.

Acute, Chronic, and Humoral Rejection: Pathologic Features Under Current Immunosuppressive Regimes

Under current immunosuppressive regimes, T-cell-mediated acute and chronic rejection remain common and important posttransplant complications. The definition of humoral (antibody-mediated) rejection has been greatly expanded in recent years. The histopathologic assessment of allograft biopsies continues to serve an important role in the diagnosis of rejection and to facilitate patient management. The diagnosis of both acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection requires integration of the results of donor-specific antibody testing and C4d immunostaining, as well as exclusion of other potential etiologies of allograft dysfunction. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection should also be included in the differential diagnosis for unexplained allograft fibrosis.

Isolated vascular "v" lesions in liver allografts: How to approach this unusual finding

According to the Banff criteria for kidney allografts, isolated vascular or "v" lesions are defined as intimal inflammation, age-inappropriate fibro-intimal hyperplasia, or both, without the presence of associated interstitial T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In general, these lesions portend a worse outcome for kidney allografts, particularly in those where the "v" lesions are identified in patients with coexistent donor specific antibodies (DSA) or later after transplantation. Although affected arteries are rarely sampled in liver allograft biopsies, we identified nine patients at a mean of 1805 days posttransplantation and compared these to matched controls. Almost half (4 of 9) of the study patient biopsies showed inflammatory arteritis associated with focal or diffuse C4d positivity, which was not observed in matched controls. One "v" lesion patient progressed to rejection-related graft failure and two developed moderate/severe TCMR in subsequent biopsies, whereas only one rejection episode occurred in follow-up biopsies, and no rejection-related deaths or graft failures were detected in controls. In conclusion, patients with liver allograft isolated "v" lesions should undergo further evaluation and closer follow-up for impending TCMR and/or underlying co-existent chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

Successful management of living donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia with single ventricle physiology-from peri-transplant through total cavopulmonary connection: A case report

Children with single ventricle physiology have complete mixing of the pulmonary and systemic circulations, requiring staged procedures to achieve a separation of these circulations, or Fontan circulation. The single ventricle physiology significantly increases the risk of mortality in children undergoing non-cardiac surgery. As liver transplantation for patients with single ventricle physiology is particularly challenging, only a few reports have been published. We herein report a case of successful LDLTx for an 8-month-old pediatric patient with biliary atresia, heterotaxy, and complex heart disease of single ventricle physiology. The cardiac anomalies included total anomalous pulmonary venous return type IIb, intermediate atrioventricular septal defect, tricuspid regurgitation grade III, coarctation of aorta, interrupted inferior vena cava, bilateral superior vena cava, and polysplenia syndrome. Following LDLTx, the patient sequentially underwent total cavopulmonary shunt + Damus-Kaye-Stansel at 3 years of age and extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection (EC-TCPC) completion at 5 years of age; 7 years have now passed since LDLTx (2 years post-EC-TCPC). We describe the details of the management of LTx in the presence of cardiac anomalies and report the long-term cardiac and liver function, from peri-LDLTx through EC-TCPC completion.

High tacrolimus intra-patient variability is associated with graft rejection, and de novo donor-specific antibodies occurrence after liver transplantation

AIM

To investigate the role of tacrolimus intra-patient variability (IPV) in adult liver-transplant recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed tacrolimus variability in a cohort of liver-transplant recipients and analyzed its effect on the occurrence of graft rejection and de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), as well as graft survival during the first 2 years posttransplantation. Between 02/08 and 06/2015, 116 patients that received tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (with or without steroids) were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (18.5%) experienced at least one acute-rejection episode (BPAR). Predictive factors for a BPAR were a tacrolimus IPV of > 35% [OR = 3.07 95%CI (1.14-8.24), P = 0.03] or > 40% [OR = 4.16 (1.38-12.50), P = 0.01), and a tacrolimus trough level of < 5 ng/mL [OR=3.68 (1.3-10.4), P =0.014]. Thirteen patients (11.2%) developed at least one dnDSA during the follow-up. Tacrolimus IPV [coded as a continuous variable: OR = 1.1, 95%CI (1.0-1.12), P = 0.006] of > 35% [OR = 4.83, 95%CI (1.39-16.72), P = 0.01] and > 40% [OR = 9.73, 95%CI (2.65-35.76), P = 0.001] were identified as predictors to detect dnDSAs. IPV did not impact on patient- or graft-survival rates during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus-IPV could be a useful tool to identify patients with a greater risk of graft rejection and of developing a de novo DSA after liver transplantation