Systematic review with meta-analysis: the growing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population-based studies

Biologics for eosinophilic oesophagitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Advancing the understanding of the pathophysiology of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) and other eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) has spurred research into targeted biological therapies, while the conclusive therapeutic efficacy of biologics remains uncertain. In this review, we conducted a meta-analysis of all RCTS of biologics in the treatment of EoE to evaluate their efficacy and safety and discussed their treatment of non-EoE EGIDs.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Double-blind randomized controlled trials comparing biologics with placebo in patients with EoE and non-EoE EGIDs were collected and further screened for inclusion and exclusion. The caliber of the included literature was evaluated using the Cochrane risk assessment tool findings. Data extraction and meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0. Clinical response and histological remission were the major endpoints.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 3,237 articles. There were seven trials in total, comprising 792 people with EoE. Key outcomes of this meta-analysis include the following: Anti-IL-5 biologics exhibited statistically significant benefits in histological remission (RR 2.03 [CI 1.45-2.85]; p < 0.0001) compared to the placebo, but there was no significant difference in symptom relief (RR 1.06 [CI 0.88 to 1.28]; p = 0.53); anti-IL-4/13 biologics had significant effects on histologic improvement (RR 10.48 [CI 5.54-19.82]; p < 0.00001) and symptom related score reduction (RR 1.44 [CI 1.08-1.93]; p = 0.01), with a better outcome for endoscopic remission than with placebo (SMD-1.06 [CI-1.26-0.86], p < 0.00001); no statistically significant differences in adverse effects were observed between the intervention and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the biologics currently being investigated are considered safe and effective treatments for EoE, while their efficiency varies. However, the discussion of biologics in non-pharyngitis EGID is hampered by a lack of research, necessitating more research in high-quality trials.

Prevalence of Ophthalmological Manifestations in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although some reports indicate ocular involvement in Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) patients, the characteristics of this association remain unclear. Increased awareness can facilitate early diagnosis and prevention of visual complications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and characterize ophthalmological manifestations in patients with IEI.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed across Embase, PubMed, and Lilacs. Observational studies with at least 10 IEI patients exhibiting ophthalmological manifestations were reviewed. A meta-analysis using a random effects model, weighted proportion, and 95% confidence intervals were reported as appropriate.

RESULTS

Sixty-two articles out of the 6,884 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of ocular manifestations in IEI patients was 54% (95%CI = 39-69), with a mean age of 11.1 ± 7.8 years and male predominance. Regarding the type of IEI with ocular involvement, the most frequently affected group was the Combined immunodeficiencies with associated or syndromic features (82%, 95%CI = 66-91), followed by the diseases of immune dysregulation (73%, 95%CI = 27-95), auto-inflammatory disorders (48%, 95%CI = 10-88), and congenital defects of phagocytes (39%, 95%CI = 11-76). Europe had the highest prevalence of patients with ocular manifestations (68%, 95%CI = 32-90). The most common ocular manifestations observed in IEI patients were those affecting ocular mobility, followed by those that involved the anterior segment, posterior segment, eyelids, and adnexal structures.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight a significant burden of ocular involvement in IEI patients, mainly during childhood and associated with amblyogenic factors. Therefore, ophthalmologists, pediatricians, and immunologists must be involved in early detection to prevent ocular complications and overall well-being.

Histological Outcomes of Pharmacological Interventions in Eosinophilic Esophagitis for Adults and Children: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Multiple pharmacological interventions have been studied for managing eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We performed a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCT) to assess the efficacy and safety of these interventions in EoE in adults and children.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE OVID, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science through May 10, 2023. We performed frequentist approach network meta-analysis using random effects model. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 25 RCTs with 25 discrete interventions and 2067 patients. Compared with placebo, the following interventions improved histology (using study definitions) in decreasing order on ranking: orodispersible budesonide (ODB) low dose, ODB high dose, oral viscous budesonide (OVB) high dose, fluticasone tablet 1.5 mg twice daily, fluticasone 3 mg twice daily, esomeprazole, dupilumab every 2 weeks, dupilumab weekly, OVB medium dose, fluticasone 3 mg daily, cendakimab 180 mg, prednisone, swallowed fluticasone, fluticasone tablet 1.5 mg daily, OVB low dose, reslizumab 3 mg/kg, reslizumab 1 mg/kg, and reslizumab 2 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

Network meta-analysis demonstrates histological efficacy of multiple medications for EoE. Because of the heterogeneity and large effect size, we recommend more trials comparing pharmacotherapeutic interventions with each other and placebo. An important limitation of this study is absence of clinical efficacy data due to insufficient data. Other limitations include heterogeneity of operator, population, and outcome analysis.

EndoFLIP distensibility index correlates with histologic findings in children with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS) is useful for diagnosing and characterizing eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). A limitation of the EoEHSS is that lamina propria fibrosis scores are infrequently determined due to challenges in sampling lamina propria. Low distensibility index (DI) measured by endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) is associated with fibrostenotic severity in pediatric patients with EoE. We investigated the correlation between DI and the EoEHSS to understand whether EndoFLIP could be a useful complementary tool for evaluating EoE-associated remodeling in children.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients <21 years of age who underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsy and EndoFLIP between October 2017 and July 2023 with histologic diagnoses of normal/reactive, reflux, or EoE. EoEHSS scores and luminal parameters were compared between groups. DI measured at 30 mL inflation was compared with EoEHSS scores.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six EGDs with biopsy and EndoFLIP were performed on 112 patients. There were 80 normal/reactive, 32 reflux, and 14 EoE biopsies. At 30 mL inflation, DI was lowest in the EoE group (p = 0.03). DI at 30 mL inflation negatively correlated with the EoEHSS overall grade score, as well as grade and stage scores for eosinophil abscesses, eosinophil surface layering, dilated intercellular spaces, and basal zone hyperplasia (all p < 0.05). DI at 30 mL inflation also negatively correlated with the eosinophilic inflammation stage score (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DI measured by EndoFLIP at 30 mL inflation shows a negative correlation with composite EoEHSS scores and subscores, suggestive of remodeling. EndoFLIP may complement the EoEHSS in evaluating EoE-associated esophageal remodeling.

Circulating Food Allergen-Specific Antibodies, Beyond IgG4, Are Elevated in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition with an incompletely understood immuno-pathogenesis involving a T2 response. EoE is triggered by food allergens although, unlike IgE-mediated allergies, it exhibits high IgG4 levels in oesophageal biopsies and in circulation. We investigated whether other antibody isotypes specific for food allergens are elevated in EoE and vary with disease activity.

METHODS

Plasma samples from patients with active EoE (n = 51), inactive EoE (n = 82) and non-EoE controls (n = 14) were analysed for food-specific IgG and IgA subclasses against casein, whey, wheat, egg and individual cow's milk allergens by ELISA. α-lactalbumin (Bos d 4)- and β-lactoglobulin (Bos d 5)-specific B cells were measured by flow cytometry in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Food allergen-specific antibodies in the plasma varied across EoE subgroups and non-EoE controls. Elevated IgG4 in EoE patients confirmed a strong antibody response to food allergens, including casein, wheat and egg. αS1-casein (Bos d 9)-specific IgG, IgG2, IgG4, IgA1 and IgA2 differed between EoE and non-EoE controls and between active and inactive EoE. β-casein (Bos d 11, A1 variant) measurements showed higher levels of specific IgG2 and IgG4 in both EoE groups, whereas whey-derived allergens showed opposing responses: Bos d 4 responses favoured IgG4, and Bos d 5 responses were elevated across multiple IgG and IgA subclasses in EoE. Allergen-specific B cells could not be isolated from the circulation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings reveal distinct antibody profiles in EoE plasma, with elevated IgG and IgA subclasses beyond IgG4, highlighting a complex immune response to food allergens. Differential antibody responses support their clinical relevance in dietary management strategies, while the absence of allergen-specific B cells in circulation likely restricts antibody production to the inflamed oesophagus. Future research should explore whether these antibody profiles can guide personalised treatment and novel therapeutic targets in EoE.

Meta-Analysis: Inverse Association Between Helicobacter pylori Infection and Eosinophilic Oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Exposure to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been associated with a decreased risk of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).

AIM

The aim of this study is to determine the association between H. pylori infection and EoE in this updated meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and ISI Web of Science, through to November 2024. We included studies reporting the status of H. pylori infection in patients with and without EoE or oesophageal eosinophilia (EE). We used a random-effects model to pool estimates.

RESULTS

We analysed 19 studies including 1.704.821 subjects. H. pylori infection was associated with a 46% lower risk of EoE/EE (OR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.67). Comparable findings were observed when subgrouping studies by location or design. There was a nonsignificant decrease in odds for EoE in paediatric patients exposed to H. pylori (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24), and in studies using serology to diagnose H. pylori (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.04). We found lower odds of EoE compared with the overall findings in studies that diagnosed H. pylori only by gastric biopsy (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.74) and in those published after 2019 (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to H. pylori was significantly associated with decreased odds of EoE/EE. As a stronger protective effect was found in more recent studies, the epidemiology of this association may evolve and deserve to be further monitored.

The Association Between Helicobacter pylori Infection and Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Exposure to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been associated with reduced odds of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

AIMS

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies in order to quantify the association between H. pylori infection and EoE, and to assess the certainty of the evidence linking both conditions.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases (up to September 2024) to identify observational epidemiological studies that assessed the association between objectively measured H. pylori infection and EoE. The risk of study bias was assessed structurally using the ROBINS-E tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies comprising 30,650 patients and 291,908 controls were included. Exposure to H. pylori was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of EoE (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.70; I2 50%) [low-certainty evidence]. The protective effect of H. pylori was stronger in case-control studies (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.69) than in cohort studies (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98) and was statistically significant in retrospective studies (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.72) and studies with high or very high risk of bias (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42-0.64), but not in prospective studies (OR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27-1.18) or those with moderate to low risk of bias (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The association between H. pylori and EoE is mainly supported by retrospective studies with a high risk of bias. Further well-designed studies are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO number: CRD42024586653.

Incidence and Characteristics of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Midwestern State Analysis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease defined by esophageal dysfunction and >15 eosinophils per high-power-field on biopsy. Despite its increased incidence across the United States, studies evaluating its incidence at any state level are lacking.

METHODS

Record review of pediatric patients (<18 years) newly diagnosed with EoE based on ICD coding seen at the main two pediatric gastroenterology centers in the state: Children's Nebraska (1 January 2016-31 December 2022) and Boys Town National Research Hospital (1 January 2022-31 December 2022). Data included demographics, age, and zip codes. Descriptive analysis focused on Nebraska residents.

RESULTS

The average point incidence of EoE between 2016 and 2022 was 10.84/100,000 inhabitants based on data from Children's Nebraska. Considering both centers, the point incidence in Nebraska for 2022 was 32.45/100,000 inhabitants. Caucasians were 3.7 times more likely to be affected and older at time of diagnosis (average 9.7 years) compared to African Americans (7.0), Hispanics (7.4), and Asians (4.4).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study evaluating the incidence of EoE in a specific U.S.A state. Studies at the state level are important to direct policy and interventions aiming limit its burden in communities.

Questionnaire Survey on the Diagnosis and Treatments of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases in Asia

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) is divided into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (non-EoE-EGID), based on the involved gastrointestinal organs. The present survey was performed to provide an overview of the current status of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of EGID in Asia.

METHODS

Responses to the questionnaire were obtained from 228 doctors at various institutions in eight Asian countries. The questionnaire consisted of 52 questions on EoE and non-EoE EGID.

RESULTS

Responses to questionnaire were obtained from 228 doctors from eight countries. The most common participation facilities were university hospitals, followed by public hospitals, private hospitals, and private clinics. 1-10 were the most frequent patients per year in each institution for both EoE and non-EoE-EGID. The 30s and 40s are common age groups for both EoE and non-EoE-EGID. Although endoscopic findings vary among countries, 15 or more eosinophil infiltrations in high-power fields as a diagnostic criterion are used in all countries for EoE. As treatments, the prescription rates of Proton pump inhibitor, diet, topical and systemic steroids, and biologics were similar among the eight countries in EoE. Non-EoE-EGID showed a similar trend to EoE in epidemiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment.

CONCLUSION

The questionnaire survey partially revealed the current status of the epidemiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of EGID in Asian countries.

Management of Patients With Refractory Reflux-Like Symptoms Despite Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy: Evidence-Based Consensus Statements

BACKGROUND

Many patients diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have persistent symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy.

AIMS

The aim of this consensus is to provide evidence-based statements to guide clinicians caring for patients with refractory reflux-like symptoms (rRLS) or refractory GERD.

METHODS

This consensus was developed by the International Working Group for the Classification of Oesophagitis. The steering committee developed specific PICO questions pertaining to the management of PPI rRLS. Methodologists conducted systematic reviews of the literature. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 13 of 17 statements on diagnosis and management. For rRLS, suggested diagnostic strategies included endoscopy, ambulatory reflux testing and oesophageal manometry. The group did not reach consensus on the role of oesophageal biopsies or the use of reflux-symptom association in patients undergoing reflux testing. The group suggested against increasing the PPI dose in patients who had received 8 weeks of a twice-daily PPI. Adjunctive alginate or antacid therapy was suggested. There was no consensus on the role of adjunctive prokinetics. There was little role for adjunctive transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) inhibitors or bile acid sequestrants. Endoscopic or surgical anti-reflux procedures should not be performed in patients with rRLS in the absence of objectively confirmed GERD.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of rRLS should be personalised, based on shared decision-making regarding the role of diagnostic testing to confirm or rule out GERD as a basis for treatment optimisation. Anti-reflux procedures should not be performed without objective confirmation of GERD.

Temporal Trend of Incidence and Prevalence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

There are limited epidemiological studies on eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in Asia. We studied the temporal trend of EoE in Asia, the presenting symptoms, and association with atopic diseases.

METHODS

Literature search on PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed to retrieve studies published between 1980 and 2023 that reported the prevalence or incidence of EoE in Asia. We used a random-effects model to estimate the pooled incidence and prevalence. I2 index and Cochran Q test were used to assess heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted for study types, different regions, years of examination, and age groups. The proportion of atopic diseases among patients with EoE was presented.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies from Asia were included. The pooled prevalence of EoE was 33.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in population-based studies and 11.0 cases per 1,000 patients/visitors in hospital-based studies. The incidence rate among children was 12.3 cases per 1,000 patients/visitors, whereas for adults, it was only 0.2 cases per 1,000 patients/visitors. Among population-based studies, there was an increase in prevalence from 19.8 per 100,000 individuals in 2005-2009 to 73.0 per 100,000 individuals in 2015-2019. A similar upward trend was observed in hospital-based studies conducted during the same period. Patients with EoE commonly presented with dysphagia (36.3%) and nausea and vomiting (34.6%). History of atopy was reported in 57.2% of patients with EoE in Asia.

DISCUSSION

The prevalence and incidence of EoE in Asia have been rising over the past decades. Because of the limited number of Asian studies and variations in patient sources, caution should be exercised when interpreting these results.

The clinical impact of conventional therapies for adults and adolescents suffering from eosinophilic esophagitis, a type 2 inflammatory chronic disease, and their economic consequences in Italy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder marked by eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. Despite advances in understanding and management, optimal therapeutic strategies remain unclear, with conflicting guidelines.

Objective

We sought to evaluate effectiveness and safety of topical corticosteroids (TCSs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in managing EoE and their economic implications in Italy.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to December 2023 and 78 publications were included, covering treatment outcomes and adverse events. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate treatment efficacy and safety across various patient populations and study designs.

Results

TCSs showed superior efficacy over PPIs in achieving histologic, endoscopic, and partial clinical responses. Older patients responded better to both treatments. Treatment outcomes varied by sex and presence of atopic conditions. TCSs discontinuation increased the risk of clinical relapse (0.70 cases per person-year), whereas continuous use was linked to a rise in nonserious adverse events (dilation, infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and skin disorders). Economic analysis indicated cost variations based on treatment regimens and follow-up protocols, with dilation and relapse being significant cost drivers in Italy.

Conclusions

This review provides insights into efficacy, safety, and economic impact of TCSs and PPIs in managing EoE. TCSs were more effective in achieving histologic and endoscopic responses, whereas PPIs were effective in reducing symptoms. Standardized treatment guidelines are needed because of varied treatment efficacy across studies. Future research and new therapies may enhance outcomes and reduce health care costs, improving patient quality of life.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Related Food Impaction: Distinct Demographics, Interventions, and Promising Predictive Models

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common cause of food impaction.

AIMS

This study aims to provide a nationwide analysis of food impaction in patients with or without EoE diagnosis, concentrating on patient demographics, interventions, outcomes, and development of predictive machine-learning models.

METHODS

A retrospective assessment was conducted using Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. We compared patients with food impaction with an associated EoE diagnosis to those without EoE and derived machine-learning models to predict EoE using International Classification of Diseases codes at discharge for identification.

RESULTS

Of 286,886,714 emergency department visits, 146,084 were for food impaction, with 7093 cases coinciding with an EoE diagnosis (4.9%). Patients with EoE were more commonly young men with fewer overall comorbidities but higher incidences of obesity, asthma, gastritis, and allergic rhinitis. A significantly larger proportion in the EoE group (89.6%) underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy compared to the non-EoE group (51.1%; P < 0.001) and had a higher rate of biopsy during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the emergency department (54.9% vs 13.4%; P < 0.001). Our machine-learning models, incorporating patient demographics, hospital attributes, and comorbidities, had a sensitivity of 86.1% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.828.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide study demonstrates that EoE in food impaction is associated with specific patient demographics, comorbidities, and elevated interventions. Our machine-learning models hold promise as screening tools for EoE, aiding medical practitioners in determining the need for biopsy.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in children: A multicenter study evaluating current practices in Mexico

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated condition characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus, leading to symptoms such as food impaction and growth delays. Despite its increasing recognition, there is significant variability in diagnostic and treatment practices, particularly in pediatric populations.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the current diagnostic and treatment practices for EoE in children across multiple centers in Mexico, identify common clinical presentations, and assess the role of IgG4 in EoE.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 pediatric patients diagnosed with EoE. Data on clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, histologic analysis, allergy assessments, and treatment approaches were collected. The presence of IgG4-positive plasma cells was also evaluated.

Results

The median age was 10.6 years, with a diagnostic delay of 15.5 months. Acute food impaction was the most common symptom, and 82% had a personal history of atopy. Endoscopic abnormalities were observed in 71% of patients. Histologic analysis confirmed EoE in 83.8% of biopsy samples, with eosinophil counts averaging 17 to 24 per high-power field. IgG4-positive plasma cells were present in 76.5% of patients. Treatment varied, with many receiving proton pump inhibitors and topical corticosteroids, but patients treated with dupilumab showed significant improvement.

Conclusions

The study highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing EoE in children, emphasizing the need for standardized practices and comprehensive evaluations. The presence of IgG4-positive plasma cells suggests a potential role in EoE pathophysiology. Further research is needed to establish effective treatment guidelines and confirm the potential of dupilumab as a therapeutic option.

Increase Incidence and Prevalence of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders in Israel During the Last Decade

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are primary immune-mediated disorders, with significant morbidity and long-term sequelae. Temporal trends in incidence and prevalence are on the rise, but studies outside Europe and North America are sparse.

METHODS

Based on retrospective Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data, we studied a large population cohort during the years 2014-2021 of all patients diagnosed with EGIDs. Incidence rate and prevalence were calculated for each year during the study cohort stratified by disease location, age, and sex.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2021, among a population of 2.4 million persons, the incidence rate of EGIDs tripled from 2.51 (95% CI: 1.78-3.23) to 7.88 (95% CI: 6.75-9.01) per 100 000 person-years. Most (85.1%) were patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The increased temporal trend was almost identical among all subgroups, including patients with EoE, patients with non-EoE EGIDs, and patients with EGIDs with esophageal involvement. The prevalence of EGIDs increased from 14.53 (95% CI: 12.80-16.26) to 51.43 (95% CI: 48.60-54.26) per 100 000 persons. In 2021, at the end of the study, the prevalence of EoE was 39.54 (95% CI: 37.05-42.02) per 100 000 persons, and the prevalence of non-EoE EGID was 11.89 (95% CI: 10.53-13.26) per 100 000 persons.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and prevalence of EGIDs in Israel have risen steeply during the last decade. The main contribution came from the increased incidence rate of patients with EoE. By the end of the surveillance period, the increased temporal trends did not reach a plateau.

Satisfaction With and Adherence to Off-Label Corticosteroids in Adolescents and Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Results of a Web-Based Survey in the United States

GOALS

We assessed satisfaction with and adherence to off-label corticosteroids in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in the United States.

BACKGROUND

EoE is a chronic inflammatory disease for which there are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved swallowed topical corticosteroids.

STUDY

This noninterventional, cross-sectional, web-based survey included caregivers of adolescents (aged 11 to 17 y) and adults (aged 18 years or older) with a self-reported [or caregiver-reported (adolescents)] physician diagnosis of EoE who were receiving corticosteroids. Participants were recruited through 2 nonprofit, patient advocacy groups. The 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) was used to assess satisfaction across effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction domains (scale: 1 to 100 per domain); higher scores indicated greater satisfaction. The 4-item Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale (MGL-4) was used to assess adherence; an MGL-4 score of <3 indicated adherence. Participants also reported reasons for nonadherence.

RESULTS

Overall, 201 participants (caregivers of adolescents, n=98; adults, n=103) were included in this study. Mean TSQM-9 scores indicated low satisfaction with off-label corticosteroids across all 3 satisfaction domains in adolescents (≤61.1) and adults (≤55.7). Slightly fewer adolescents (37.1%) than adults (40.8%) were considered adherent. Forgetfulness was the most frequently reported reason for nonadherence; some patients chose not to take their medications, owing to poor palatability (adolescents), difficulty taking medications at specific times (adults), or feeling depressed/overwhelmed (adolescents and adults).

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfaction with and adherence to off-label corticosteroids were low in this web-based survey of adolescents and adults with EoE in the United States.

The Dynamic Evolution of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory condition of the esophagus characterized by eosinophilic infiltration, and hallmark symptoms of esophageal dysfunction such as dysphagia and food impaction. Over the past three decades, EoE has been recognized as a distinct clinical entity, distinguished from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) through advancements in diagnostic techniques, particularly endoscopy with biopsy. The rising global prevalence of EoE reflects enhanced diagnostic awareness, evolving criteria, and environmental along with lifestyle changes. The etiology of EoE is multifactorial, involving genetic predispositions, immune dysregulation, the gut microbiome, and environmental triggers, including dietary allergens and aeroallergens. Key mechanisms include a type 2 helper T-cell (Th2)-driven immune response, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and genetic variants such as CAPN14 and TSLP. Chronic inflammation leads to tissue remodeling, fibrosis, and esophageal narrowing, contributing to disease progression and complications. Management strategies have evolved to include dietary elimination, proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, biologics, and endoscopic interventions for fibrostenotic complications. Emerging therapies targeting cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13, alongside novel diagnostic tools like the esophageal string test and Cytosponge, offer promising avenues for improved disease control and non-invasive monitoring. Long-term surveillance combining endoscopic and histological evaluations with biomarkers and non-invasive tools is critical to optimizing outcomes and preventing complications. Future research should address gaps in understanding the role of the esophageal microbiome, refine therapeutic approaches, and develop personalized strategies to improve disease management and patient quality of life.

Impact of cannabis use on presentation and treatment response in eosinophilic esophagitis

Cannabis use is becoming increasingly common, both for recreational and medical purposes. However, there is a paucity of data regarding cannabis use in the context of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to determine the impact of cannabis use on presentation and treatment response in EoE. To this end, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at a large academic medical center of newly diagnosed EoE patients age ≥ 12 years. Self-reported cannabis use status, baseline characteristics, and treatment response to topical corticosteroids and dietary therapy data were extracted. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to compare cannabis users and non-users at time of EoE diagnosis and to assess treatment response. Of 983 EoE patients, 80 reported using cannabis, with the majority reporting daily use and administration by inhalation. Baseline symptoms and peak eosinophil count were similar between cannabis users and non-users; cannabis users were less likely to have baseline endoscopic findings of exudates, edema, and stricture, and lower total Endoscopic Reference Score. On multivariable analysis, younger age, male sex, non-White race, and psychiatric diagnosis were independently associated with history of cannabis use at EoE presentation and stricture was independently associated with cannabis non-use. Post-treatment symptom and histologic responses were similar between cannabis users and non-users though there was a higher odds of post-treatment endoscopic inflammatory features with cannabis use. In conclusion, despite presenting with milder initial endoscopic findings, cannabis users exhibited greater inflammatory findings after treatment, highlighting a potential negative influence of cannabis use on EoE management.

The epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis in Sweden - a nationwide population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects the esophagus. Previous studies have indicated a substantial increase of EoE over the last decades. The aim of the current study was to describe the incidence and prevalence of EoE over time and by geographical regions in Sweden, utilizing nationwide population-based registries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The number of hospital admissions (in-patient and out-patient) for patients were identified using ICD-10-SE code K20.9A from the National Patient Registry between 1st January 2011 and 31st December 2021. Crude incidence and prevalence numbers were presented per 100,000 person years and persons, respectively.

RESULTS

In 2011, no hospital visits of EoE were recorded. A total of 3,243 incident patients (2,379 (73.4%) men and 864 (26.6%) women) had a record of EoE between 2012 and 2021. The incidence increased over calendar year in where the incidence was from 1.59 per 100,000 person years in 2012 to 5.34 per 100,000 person years in 2021. The prevalence was 1.29 per 100,000 person years and 31.02 per 100,000 person years in 2012 and 2021, respectively. Major differences in the prevalence between geographical regions in Sweden were observed, e.g. in 2021, the prevalence was 12.24 in Västernorrland compared to 43.26 in Västra Götaland per 100,000 person years, which is similar to the prevalence in the Stockholm region.

CONCLUSION

The incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis has significantly increased over calendar year but differs between geographical regions in Sweden. These differences should be further investigated.

Dupilumab is efficacious for eosinophilic esophagitis irrespective of prior swallowed budesonide or fluticasone, or prior treatments used alongside swallowed topical corticosteroids: results from the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, LIBERTY EoE TREET trial

BACKGROUND

Standard treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may present adherence, tolerance, and efficacy challenges. Dupilumab 300 mg weekly is approved for the treatment of EoE in patients ≥ 1 year old, weighing ≥ 15 kg. This analysis aimed to evaluate dupilumab efficacy in patients from the LIBERTY EoE TREET trial (NCT03633617), with prior history of different EoE interventions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This analysis included patients from Parts B/B - C of LIBERTY EoE TREET. Dupilumab efficacy was analyzed according to prior swallowed budesonide or fluticasone use and in those patients with previously trialed food elimination diet, esophageal dilation, or baseline proton pump inhibitor use, as stratified by prior swallowed topical corticosteroid (STC) use or STC inadequate response/intolerance/contraindication.

RESULTS

Dupilumab improved the proportion of patients achieving peak intraepithelial eosinophil count ≤ 6 eosinophils/high-power field, absolute change in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire score, and other histologic, symptomatic, and endoscopic endpoints vs. placebo at Week (W) 24, irrespective of prior swallowed budesonide/fluticasone use. Improvements were maintained at W52. Similar results were observed across the other subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab was efficacious in patients with EoE irrespective of prior treatments/interventions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT03633617.

Epidemiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Really a Novel and Evolving Disease?

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been described as a chronic allergen/immune-mediated disease characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophilic infiltration of the mucosa.

Summary

Over the past decades, EoE has been increasingly recognized in various geographical areas with a high socioeconomic development (mostly industrialized countries) and has evolved from an unknown to a clinically distinct disease with increasing prevalence and incidence. An average age at diagnosis between 30 and 50 years and a male predominance have been consistently observed. In both children and adults, EoE is clearly associated with allergies, predominantly food - but also aeroallergens. Most EoE patients present with a personal allergic background such as asthma, rhino-conjunctivitis, and oral allergy syndrome.

Key Message

Knowledge of epidemiological characteristics is crucial for identifying risk factors and understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms.

Sex-related differences in the presentation, management and response to treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis: Cross sectional analysis of EoE CONNECT registry

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) predominantly affects males across all ages; however, little is known about sex differences for other aspects of EoE.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between sex and clinical presentation, endoscopic features, treatment choice and response in EoE patients in real-world practice.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of the multicenter EoE CONNECT registry. The independent contribution of patients' sex and other relevant variables were statistically assessed by multivariate models.

RESULTS

A total of 2976 patients (76% male) were evaluated. Males were diagnosed at a younger age compared to females (32.7 ± 14.8 vs. 34.8 ± 15.6 years, respectively; p = 0.002) with similar diagnostic delay. EoE symptoms varied significantly between sexes, with food impaction predominating in males and dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation and abdominal and epigastric pain in females. However, female sex contributed to higher symptom severity at diagnosis as measured with Dysphagia Symptom Score (R2 = 0.57; p = 0.013) and presented higher peak eosinophil count in esophageal biopsies (p = 0.005). Males showed increased risk of stricturing or mixed phenotypes (adjusted OR 1.43, 95%CI:1.05-1.96; p = 0.024). No association was found between patients' sex and first-line treatment modality: proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were preferred over topical corticosteroids in patients with inflammatory phenotypes instead of stricturing or mixed phenotypes, and in patients who did not present food impaction. Both topical corticosteroids and dietary interventions were preferred over PPI in pediatric patients regardless of sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex is associated with clinical and phenotypical presentation of EoE at diagnosis, with more fibrotic findings in males but higher symptom score in females.

Design of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cendakimab in adult and adolescent patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory condition that interferes with normal food ingestion, negatively impacting quality of life (QoL). Treatment options include proton pump inhibitors, corticosteroids, biologics, or dietary elimination; however, ∼1/3 of patients remain insufficiently controlled. The pathogenesis of EoE involves interleukin-13 (IL-13); therefore, targeted IL-13 inhibition may be beneficial. In a phase 2 study, cendakimab, a recombinant, humanized anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibody, significantly reduced mean esophageal eosinophil counts and improved other inflammatory parameters in patients with EoE. These findings prompted further investigation of the efficacy and safety of cendakimab in adults and adolescents with EoE in a phase 3 registrational study (NCT04753697), the design of which is presented here.

METHODS

This multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week, treat-through study plans to enroll 399 adults and adolescents. Randomized patients (1:1:1) will receive subcutaneous administration of 1) cendakimab 360 mg once weekly (QW) for 48 weeks, 2) cendakimab 360 mg QW for 24 weeks followed by cendakimab 360 mg every other week (with matching placebo on alternative weeks to maintain the blind) for 24 weeks, or 3) placebo QW for 48 weeks. Co-primary endpoints are mean change from baseline in dysphagia days and proportion of patients with eosinophil histologic response, defined as peak esophageal eosinophil count ≤6 per high-power field, at 24 weeks. Secondary and exploratory endpoints will address endoscopic and histologic features, QoL, safety, and pharmacokinetic assessments.

CONCLUSION

This phase 3 pivotal study will determine whether cendakimab provides an effective, safe, targeted treatment for patients with EoE.

Dupilumab Improves Health-Related Quality of Life and a Range of Symptoms in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

INTRODUCTION

Improvements in symptomatic experience and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are among the most important treatment benefits in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We assessed the impact of dupilumab treatment on HRQoL, patients' impression of dysphagia, and symptoms beyond dysphagia in adults/adolescents (≥12 years) with EoE in parts A and B of the LIBERTY EoE TREET (NCT03633617) study.

METHODS

The EoE Symptom Questionnaire (EoE-SQ; frequency and severity of nondysphagia symptoms), EoE Impact Questionnaire (impact of EoE on HRQoL), and Patient Global Impression of Severity and Patient Global Impression of Change of dysphagia were used to assess the efficacy of weekly dupilumab 300 mg vs placebo.

RESULTS

At week 24, dupilumab reduced EoE-SQ Frequency (least squares mean difference vs placebo [95% confidence interval] part A -1.7 [-2.9, -0.5], part B -1.4 [-2.3, -0.5]; both P < 0.01) and EoE-SQ Severity (part A -2.0 [-3.9, 0.0], P < 0.05, part B -1.5 [-3.0, 0.1], P = 0.07) overall scores, and improved scores across all individual items. Improvement in the dupilumab group was clinically meaningful to patients. Dupilumab also meaningfully improved EoE Impact Questionnaire average scores and improved individual item scores at week 24, particularly emotional and sleep disturbance. More dupilumab-treated patients reported improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change of dysphagia vs placebo or reported having no symptoms per the Patient Global Impression of Severity of dysphagia at week 24.

DISCUSSION

Dupilumab reduced the impact of EoE on multiple aspects of HRQoL, patients' impression of dysphagia, and frequency and severity of symptoms beyond dysphagia in adults/adolescents with EoE.

The Esophageal Microbiota in Esophageal Health and Disease

The esophagus, traditionally viewed as a sterile conduit, is now recognized as a dynamic habitat for diverse microbial communities. The emerging evidence suggests that the esophageal microbiota plays an important role in maintaining esophageal health and contributing to disease. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the current knowledge on the esophageal microbiota composition, its variation between healthy individuals and those with esophageal diseases, and the potential mechanisms through which these microorganisms influence esophageal pathology. A systematic literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies published up to July 2024. The inclusion criteria encompassed original research articles that used molecular techniques to characterize the esophageal microbiota in human subjects, comparing healthy individuals with patients affected by esophageal conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett’s esophagus, eosinophilic esophagitis, and esophageal cancer. The primary outcomes were the composition and diversity of the esophageal microbiota, and the secondary outcomes included the correlations between microbial profiles and disease states. The esophageal microbiota of healthy individuals was dominated by Gram-positive bacteria, particularly Streptococcus. Conversely, the esophageal microbiota is considerably altered in disease states, with decreased microbial diversity and specific microbial signatures associated with these conditions, which may serve as biomarkers for disease progression and as targets for therapeutic intervention. However, the heterogeneous study designs, populations, and analytical methods underscore the need for standardized approaches in future research. Understanding the esophageal microbiota’s role in health and disease could guide microbiota-based diagnostics and treatments, offering novel avenues for managing esophageal conditions.

Current Review of Comorbidities in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogenous disease with a significant impact on patient quality of life and a substantial economic burden. CRS is associated with several systemic inflammatory conditions. We provide an updated review of CRS comorbidities as a springboard for future comorbidity mapping and potential therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

The link between environmental allergies and CRS is most evident for central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) subtypes but remains inconclusive for CRS overall. The association between asthma and CRS, reinforced by the unified airway theory, is evidenced by their response to similar biologic therapies. Another lower respiratory tract disease, COPD, has up to a 50% co-occurrence with CRS and warrants careful screening and treatment. Eosinophilic esophagitis and CRS share eosinophilic inflammation in different sites, meriting further research. Obesity not only presents physiological challenges but also correlates with a more severe subset of CRS. Diabetes mellitus is associated with CRSwNP, possibly secondary to therapeutics with steroids. Autoimmunity may contribute to nasal polyp formation through cytokines such as B-cell activating factor (BAFF), offering potential for future therapeutics.  This review illustrates the need to employ a macroscopic approach in clinical decision making and treatment of CRS. Comorbidities may contribute to an overall proinflammatory state, magnify severity of symptoms, be a source of treatment resistance, and even an opportunity for future therapeutics.

Advancements in Biologic Therapies for Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases: A Comprehensive Review

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) encompass a group of disorders characterized by an abnormal accumulation of eosinophils in various parts of the gastrointestinal tract. EGIDs present with a wide range of symptoms such as abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, difficulty swallowing, and food impaction. Monoclonal antibodies, targeting inflammatory cytokines or eosinophils, are the next emerging therapy for EGIDs. The only Food and Drug Administration-approved monoclonal antibody is dupilumab, and it has been approved for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). In this article, the authors will discuss biologics that have been used in the treatment of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Patients with cardinal symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis. Prejudice affects clinical practice…

INTRODUCTION

Dysphagia and bolus impaction are the cardinal manifestations of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal biopsy sampling is mandatory for EoE diagnosis, data though suggest that clinician do not always obtain biopsies from patients with cardinal EoE symptoms during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy even if no other entity than EoE can explain patients symptoms. We aimed to search for the esophageal biopsy procurement rate as also for factors that drive clinicians to obtain esophageal biopsies among patients with cardinal EoE symptoms.

METHODS

We retrospectively searched for patients with cardinal EoE symptoms submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between 1/2018 and 12/2023 in our department. Epidemiologic, clinical, endoscopic, and histological data were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total 163 patients with cardinal EoE symptoms (dysphagia: 63 and bolus impaction: 100) were included in the study (M/F: 100/63, mean age: 54 ± 22 years). Biopsy sampling was obtained in 77/163 (47.2%) patients and sampling rates did not differ between patients with bolus impaction or dysphagia (47/100, 47% vs 30/63, 47.6%, P  = 0.553). Higher rates of sampling were observed in males ( P  = 0.045), those younger than 65 years old ( P  < 0.001) and patients with endoscopic EoE signs ( P  = 0.004). Age and endoscopic findings compatible to EoE were independently correlated to biopsy sampling. EoE was diagnosed in 35/74 patients (47.3%); the majority of patients were male, with a bolus impaction episode, compatible endoscopic findings and all were younger than 65 years old.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians take esophageal biopsies in half of patients with cardinal EoE. Age and supportive endoscopic evidence drive clinicians' decision to obtain esophageal biopsies.

Advances in omics data for eosinophilic esophagitis: moving towards multi-omics analyses

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, allergic inflammatory disease of the esophagus characterized by eosinophil accumulation and has a growing global prevalence. EoE significantly impairs quality of life and poses a substantial burden on healthcare resources. Currently, only two FDA-approved medications exist for EoE, highlighting the need for broader research into its management and prevention. Recent advancements in omics technologies, such as genomics, epigenetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and others, offer new insights into the genetic and immunologic mechanisms underlying EoE. Genomic studies have identified genetic loci and mutations associated with EoE, revealing predispositions that vary by ancestry and indicating EoE's complex genetic basis. Epigenetic studies have uncovered changes in DNA methylation and chromatin structure that affect gene expression, influencing EoE pathology. Transcriptomic analyses have revealed a distinct gene expression profile in EoE, dominated by genes involved in activated type 2 immunity and epithelial barrier function. Proteomic approaches have furthered the understanding of EoE mechanisms, identifying potential new biomarkers and therapeutic targets. However, challenges in integrating diverse omics data persist, largely due to their complexity and the need for advanced computational methods. Machine learning is emerging as a valuable tool for analyzing extensive and intricate datasets, potentially revealing new aspects of EoE pathogenesis. The integration of multi-omics data through sophisticated computational approaches promises significant advancements in our understanding of EoE, improving diagnostics, and enhancing treatment effectiveness. This review synthesizes current omics research and explores future directions for comprehensively understanding the disease mechanisms in EoE.

Quality of Life Factors in Adults with Eosinophilic Oesophagitis in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated oesophageal disorder causing dysphagia. Patients with EoE experience reduced QoL due to symptoms; however, this has not been assessed in the New Zealand population. The aim of this study was to assess QoL in patients with EoE in New Zealand.

METHODS

This observational study recruited participants from two New Zealand hospitals. Records were reviewed to confirm diagnoses, and consenting participants completed an electronic survey, consisting of the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) score and the QoL-specific EoE (EoE-QoL-A) questionnaire score. Correlation analysis examined the relationship between the DSQ and EoE-QoL-A scores. Differences in baseline variables were assessed. Univariate logistic regression assessed the association of variables with disease activity and QoL.

RESULTS

Fifty-four participants responded, and four were excluded due to incomplete surveys. The majority (76%) were male, and the median age was 47 years (IQR 42-58). The median DSQ was 49 (IQR 0-60), and the median EoE-QoL-A score was 68 (IQR 48-80). A reduced EoE-QoL-A score was associated with active disease (OR = 0.96,95% CI 0.926-0.995). Significant associations were found between disease activity and overall EoE-QoL-A score (r = -0.37, p < 0.01) as well as the sub-categories eating and diet (r = -0.54, p < 0.001), social (r = 0.30, p < 0.05), and emotional impact (r = -0.44, p < 0.01). The EOE-QoL-A score was higher in those on PPI (75 vs. 60, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study identified a decreased quality of life (QoL) in individuals with EoE in New Zealand, aligning with international literature. The increased DSQ scores suggest a possible gap in current management approaches. The correlation between the DSQ and QoL highlights the need for improved care models of care for EoE.

Odynophagia and Retrosternal Pain Are Common in Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Associated with an Increased Overall Symptom Severity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dysphagia is the hallmark symptom in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, data are limited regarding the overall prevalence and potential implications of atypical symptoms like odynophagia and retrosternal pain.

METHODS

Patients enrolled into the Swiss EoE cohort study (SEECS) were analyzed regarding the presence of odynophagia and retrosternal pain. Demographics, other EoE-related symptoms, histologic and endoscopic activity were compared between EoE-patients with vs. without odynophagia and/or retrosternal pain.

RESULTS

474 patients (75.2% male) were analyzed. In their individual course of disease 110 (23.2%) patients stated to have ever experienced odynophagia and 64 (13.5%) retrosternal pain independent of food intake, 24 (5%) patients complained about both symptoms. Patients with odynophagia consistently scored higher in symptom severity (p < 0.001), EREFS score (median 3.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.006), histologic activity and a lower quality of life (p = 0.001) compared to patients without odynophagia. Sex, age at diagnosis, EoE-specific treatment, complications such as candida or viral esophagitis and disease duration were similar in patients with vs. without odynophagia. Also patients with retrosternal pain scored higher in symptom severity (2.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.001 and 2.0 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001 in physician and patient questionnaire assessment, respectively). However, there was neither a difference in endoscopic/histologic disease activity nor in quality of life according to presence or absence of retrosternal pain. Due to logistic reasons, a stratification regarding the presence of concomitant dysphagia was not possible.

CONCLUSION

Odynophagia and swallowing-independent retrosternal pain are common symptoms in patients with EoE, associate with an overall higher EoE-related symptom severity and for the case of odynophagia lower quality of life. However, the influence of concomitant dysphagia and its severity remains unclear and needs to be included in future analyses.

Children with eosinophilic esophagitis non-responsive to combination therapy have distinct esophageal transcriptomic and microbiome profile

BACKGROUND

A combination of proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and topical steroids (TS) is used to treat children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, a subset of children do not respond to this combination therapy. We aimed to identify the esophageal transcriptional, cell composition, and microbial differences between the non-responders (EoE-PPI-TSnr; n = 7) and responders (EoE-PPI-TSr; n = 7) to the combination therapy for EoE and controls (n = 9) using metatranscriptomics.

METHODS

Differential gene expression analysis was used to identify transcriptional differences, validated using the EoE diagnostic panel (EDP). Deconvolution analysis was performed to identify differences in their cell type composition. Microbiome analysis was conducted from esophageal biopsies RNAseq data, and microbial abundance was correlated with esophageal gene expression.

RESULTS

In all, 3164 upregulated and 3154 downregulated genes distinguished EoE-PPI-TSnr from EoE-PPI-TSr. Eosinophilic inflammatory response, cytokine signaling, and collagen formation pathways were significantly upregulated in EoE-PPI-TSnr. There was a 56% overlap in dysregulated genes between EoE-PPI-TSnr and EDP, with a perfect agreement in the directionality of modulation. Eosinophils, dendritic cells (DCs), immature DCs, megakaryocytic-erythroid progenitors, and T helper type 1 cells were significantly higher in EoE-PPI-TSnr. There was no significant difference in microbiome diversity. The relative abundance of Fusobacterium sp. and Acinetobacter sp. notably differed in EoE-PPI-TSnr and correlated with the key pathways.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide critical insights into the molecular, cellular, and microbial factors associated with the lack of response to PPI and TS combination therapy in children with EoE. This study advances our understanding of the pathobiology of EoE while guiding personalized treatment strategies.

Contribution of T cell subsets to different food allergic diseases

Food allergies occur due to a lack of tolerance to the proteins found in foods. While IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergies have different clinical manifestations, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management, they share dysregulated T cell responses. Recent studies have shed light on the contributions of different T cell subsets to the development and persistence of different food allergic diseases. This review discusses the role of T cells in both IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergies and considers the potential future investigations in this context.

Disease Burden and Spectrum of Symptoms that Impact Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a progressive type 2 inflammatory disease characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and significant esophageal eosinophilic infiltration. It can affect patients from infancy through adulthood. Pediatric EoE has a multidimensional impact on the quality of life of both patients and their families. Nonspecific symptoms mimicking other gastrointestinal conditions, such as food refusal, failure to thrive, and feeding difficulties, may profoundly affect young children's eating skills, growth, and psychosocial status, as well as impact family financial conditions. In adolescence, dysphagia and esophageal food impactions often lead to feeding-related anxiety and influence social lives. Delays in diagnosis, arising from lack of awareness among families and clinicians and compensatory eating behaviors, could increase the risk of fibrostenotic complications, which may ultimately add to the symptom burden. Currently available treatment options include proton pump inhibitors, dietary therapies, swallowed topical steroids, esophageal dilation, and biologic therapy. Despite the efficacy of these approaches, disease burden may be further impacted by their limitations, including poor adherence rates, refractory disease, potential long-term safety concerns, and high costs for care. Thus, there is a need for more timely diagnosis in clinical practice and novel targeted disease-modifying therapies better tailored to treat various phenotypes of EoE, aimed at reducing the physical and psychosocial burdens on patients and their caregivers.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Are the Differences?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, with EoE predominantly provoked by food and aeroallergens, whereas IBD is driven by a broader spectrum of immunopathological and environmental triggers. This review presents a comprehensive comparison of the pathophysiological and therapeutic strategies for EoE and IBD. We examine the current understanding of their underlying mechanisms, particularly the interplay between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility. A crucial element in both diseases is the integrity of the epithelial barrier, whose disruption plays a central role in their pathogenesis. The involvement of eosinophils, mast cells, B cells, T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and their associated cytokines is examined, highlighting the importance of targeting cytokine signaling pathways to modulate immune-epithelial interactions. We propose that advances in computation tools will uncover the significance of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in connecting immune and epithelial cells, leading to novel therapies for EoE and IBD.

Long-term Outcome of Asymptomatic Esophageal Eosinophilia

Background/Aims

: Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE), characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus without clinical symptoms, has been reported as a precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nevertheless, no report exists on the long-term clinical course of the disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical course of aEE over 5 years, including the symptomatic conversion rate and the effect of treatments.

Methods

: We reviewed 28 patients with aEE who had been followed up for over 5 years with endoscopic monitoring. The basal characteristics of patients were compared with those of 58 patients diagnosed with EoE during the same period. Patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined.

Results

: No significant differences in basal characteristics and histopathological findings were observed between the patients with aEE and those with EoE. The median follow-up duration was 64 months. Among the 28 patients with aEE, seven were treated with proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker and the remaining 21 opted for follow-up with no medication. Among the treated patients, six (85.7%) exhibited endoscopic and pathologic improvements. Among the cases followed up without medication, the findings worsened in two (9.5%), improved spontaneously in seven (33.3%), and were unchanged in 12 (57.1%), and three (14.3%) developed symptoms at a mean time of 40 months. Symptoms developed in cases where endoscopic and pathologic findings remained unchanged or worsened during follow-up.

Conclusions

: Some patients with aEE had improved findings without treatment, whereas others developed symptoms, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring and individualized treatment decisions.

Epidemiology and Racial Differences of EoE Patients in a U.S. Veterans Population

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is increasing in prevalence but there is a lack of population-based studies. We sought to determine the prevalence, demographics, and associated atopic diseases in the Veterans Affairs (VA) population.

METHODS

A nationwide analysis of data from the VA patient population was done using a Veterans Health Administration database. EoE was identified using ICD9 (530.13) and ICD10 (K20.0) codes from October 2008 to June 2020. Demographic data, smoking status, BMI, treatment, and ICD codes for atopic diagnoses were collected. Two sample proportion z-tests, Chi-square tests, two-sample t tests, and one-way ANOVA were used to assess associations across demographic categories.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 11,775 patients with an EoE diagnosis: 91% male, 83% White, 8.6% Black, and 5% were of Hispanic ethnicity. The prevalence of EoE increased over time. At diagnosis, the mean age was 48.5 years overall, 51.6 years for Black patients, 45.3 years for Hispanic patients, and 48.2 years for Whites. Dysphagia was the most common symptom overall, but a higher percentage of Blacks and females were found to report chest pain (p < 0.0001, h = 0.32). With the exception of urticaria and atopic dermatitis, both Blacks and Hispanics had a higher incidence of atopic conditions compared to other races and ethnicities (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

While EoE is seen primarily in White males, our study shows that a notable percentage of patients were Black or Hispanic, suggesting that EoE should be considered in non-white patients. The later age of diagnosis in this group could represent a lack of awareness about EoE among non-white patients. More research is needed to study these associations.

Eosinophilic esophagitis and risk of incident major adverse cardiovascular events: a nationwide matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory diseases have been associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. However, data on incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) from large population-based cohorts of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is lacking.

METHODS

This study included all Swedish adults with EoE without a record of previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) (1990-2017, N = 1546) with follow-up until 2019. Individuals with EoE were identified from prospectively recorded histopathology reports from all Swedish pathology departments (n = 28). EoE patients were matched at index date for age, sex, calendar year and county with up to five general population reference individuals (N = 7281) without EoE or CVD. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for MACE (ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, stroke and cardiovascular mortality) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Full sibling comparisons and adjustment for cardiovascular medication were performed.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 6.0 years, we observed 65 incident MACE in patients with EoE (6.4/1000 person-years (PY)) and 225 in reference individuals (4.7/1000 PY). EoE was not associated with a higher risk of MACE (aHR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.86-1.51) or any of its components. No differences between age, sex and follow-up time were observed. The results remained stable in sensitivity analyses, including when adjusting for relevant cardiovascular medications and a full sibling comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large population-based cohort study, patients with EoE had no increased risk of MACE compared to reference individuals and full siblings. The results are reassuring for patients with EoE.

Natural Histories and Disease Complications in a Cohort of 151 Children With Gastric or Duodenal Eosinophilia

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) and duodenitis (EoD) are rare conditions that are poorly understood. Our aim was to describe the natural history of children with varying degrees of gastric or duodenal eosinophilia with respect to disease complications and histologic and endoscopic longitudinal trajectories.

METHODS

The electronic medical record at a tertiary children's hospital was queried to identify patients with EoG, EoD, or EoG + EoD who were cared for between January 2010 and 2022. Multiple logistic regression was performed to explore associations between baseline features and persistence/recurrence of eosinophilia or complications remote from diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 151 patients: 92 with EoG, 24 with EoD, 12 with EoG + EoD, and 23 with tissue eosinophilia but did not meet histologic criteria for EoG or EoD (low grade). The average age at diagnosis was 10.6 years, and average follow-up was 5.8 years. Twenty-five percent of patients with EoG or EoD had persistence/recurrence of eosinophilia; this was associated with increases in the EoG Endoscopic Reference Score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.34, confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.74) on diagnostic endoscopy. Eighteen percent suffered from disease complications, and development of late complications was associated with presenting with a complication (aOR 9.63, CI 1.09-85.20), severity of duodenal endoscopic abnormalities (aOR 8.74, CI 1.67-45.60), and increases in the EoG Endoscopic Reference Score (aOR 1.70, CI 1.11-2.63).

DISCUSSION

Patients with gastric and duodenal eosinophilia should be followed closely to monitor for recurrence and complications, especially those presenting with endoscopic abnormalities or complications.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Review for the Primary Care Practitioner

This chapter presents an overview of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) for the Primary Care Practitioner (PCP). The focus is on helping PCPs keep it in their differential diagnosis by discussing the spectrum of clinical presentations, how to screen for EoE in at-risk populations and subsequently manage the patient with this condition. The authors review epidemiology, risk factors and associated conditions, pathology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management options.

Comparison of budesonide vehicles in inducing histologic remission in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis

OBJECTIVES

Oral viscous budesonide (OVB) is a common medication used to treat eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). It is typically mixed with Splenda to produce a slurry, but other delivery vehicles have been used in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of pediatric EoE patients treated with OVB using different drug delivery vehicles.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of pediatric EoE patients treated with OVB. The primary aim was to evaluate rates of histologic remission (defined by <15 eosinophils per high power field in both mid and distal esophagus) after 6-12 weeks of OVB treatment for each delivery vehicle. Secondary aims were to evaluate histologic response and endoscopic response and remission of different delivery vehicles, and to compare the efficacy of different treatment regimens.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients were included in the study. Median treatment duration was 3.4 months. Overall rate of histologic remission with OVB was 52.6%. There was no difference in rates of histologic remission (p = 0.313) or response (p = 0.195 and p = 0.681 in mid and distal esophagus, respectively) among the different vehicle types or treatment regimens. Similarly, there was no difference in endoscopic remission and response among the different vehicle types (p = 0.853 and p = 0.727) or treatment regimens (p = 0.244 and p = 0.157). Patients who achieve histologic remission were more likely to be non-Hispanic Caucasian.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest there is no difference in histologic and endoscopic outcomes with various delivery vehicles or combination therapy with OVB in the treatment of EoE. More palatable and cost-effective vehicles can be used to treat EoE.

Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients 1 to 11 Years of Age

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathways and has shown efficacy in five different atopic diseases marked by type 2 inflammation, including eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and adolescents.

METHODS

In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 2:2:1:1 ratio, patients 1 to 11 years of age with active eosinophilic esophagitis who had had no response to proton-pump inhibitors to 16 weeks of a higher-exposure or lower-exposure subcutaneous dupilumab regimen or to placebo (two groups) (Part A). At the end of Part A, eligible patients in each dupilumab group continued the same regimen and those in the placebo groups were assigned to higher-exposure or lower-exposure dupilumab for 36 weeks (Part B). At each level of exposure, dupilumab was administered in one of four doses tiered according to baseline body weight. The primary end point was histologic remission (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count, ≤6 per high-power field) at week 16. Key secondary end points were tested hierarchically.

RESULTS

In Part A, histologic remission occurred in 25 of the 37 patients (68%) in the higher-exposure group, in 18 of the 31 patients (58%) in the lower-exposure group, and in 1 of the 34 patients (3%) in the placebo group (difference between the higher-exposure regimen and placebo, 65 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, 48 to 81; P<0.001]; difference between the lower-exposure regimen and placebo, 55 percentage points [95% CI, 37 to 73; P<0.001]). The higher-exposure dupilumab regimen led to significant improvements in histologic, endoscopic, and transcriptomic measures as compared with placebo. The improvements in histologic, endoscopic, and transcriptomic measures between baseline and week 52 in all the patients were generally similar to the improvements between baseline and week 16 in the patients who received dupilumab in Part A. In Part A, the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019, nausea, injection-site pain, and headache was at least 10 percentage points higher among the patients who received dupilumab (at either dose) than among those who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported in 3 patients who received dupilumab during Part A and in 6 patients overall during Part B.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab resulted in histologic remission in a significantly higher percentage of children with eosinophilic esophagitis than placebo. The higher-exposure dupilumab regimen also led to improvements in measures of key secondary end points as compared with placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; EoE KIDS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04394351.).

Wheat-Related Disorders in Children: A 360-Degree View

Immunological illnesses related to wheat represent an epidemiologically relevant phenomenon at a pediatric age. The term "Wheat-related disorders" involves a spectrum of diseases: celiac disease, IgE-mediated wheat allergy, non-IgE mediated wheat allergy, wheat-related eosinophilic esophagitis, and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Their pathogenesis is different. At the same time, wheat represents their common point. This article aims to the state-of-the-art and new clinical evidence in pediatric age.

Patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis in Denmark have higher use of psychotropic drugs: A Danish nationwide study of psychotropic drug use in 3367 patients and 16,835 matched comparators

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease of the oesophagus. Eosinophilic oesophagitis is associated with a substantial disease burden affecting the quality of life and affecting mental health. There are limited data describing the incidence of psychiatric disorders and the use of psychotropic drugs (PDs) in EoE patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to investigate whether EoE patients in Denmark have higher use of PDs, contacts with the department of psychiatry, and attempts of suicide or intentional self-harm compared with the general population after being diagnosed with EoE.

METHODS

This study was a nationwide, population-based register study including 3367 EoE patients and 16,835 age- and sex-matched comparators. A register-based EoE definition was used to identify cases. Incident PD use was extracted from the prescription register and information regarding psychiatric contacts was retrieved from the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register.

RESULTS

The 5-year incidence of PD use in EoE patients was 13.8% compared to 7.1% of the matched comparators (Hazard ratio 1.83; confidence interval 1.6-2.0; p ≤ 0.001). Antidepressants were the most frequently prescribed PD, whereas antipsychotics were the least prescribed PD. Increasing age, lower educational level, and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥1) were associated with the prescription of PDs. The risk of PD use was lower in men than in women with EoE.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with PDs were more common in EoE patients after they were diagnosed than in the general Danish population, indicating that EoE patients have an increased risk of psychiatric disorders.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and adolescents: epidemiology, diagnostic challenges, and management strategies for a type 2 inflammatory disease

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is recognized as a chronic type 2 inflammatory disease characterized by the eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal tissue, posing a significant disease burden and highlighting the necessity for novel management strategies to address unmet clinical needs.

Objectives

To critically evaluate the existing literature on the epidemiology and management of EoE, identify evidence gaps, and assess the efficacy of current and emerging treatment modalities.

Design

An extensive literature review was conducted, focusing on the epidemiological trends, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic interventions for EoE. This was complemented by a survey among physicians and consultations with a scientific expert panel, including a patient's association (ESEO Italia), to enrich the study findings.

Data sources and methods

The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, scrutinizing epidemiological studies and management research to compile comprehensive insights into the disease's landscape. The physician survey and expert panel discussions aimed to bridge identified evidence gaps.

Results

The review included 59 epidemiological and 51 management studies, uncovering variable incidence and prevalence rates of EoE globally, with an estimated diagnosed prevalence of 41 per 100,000 in Italy. Diagnostic challenges were identified, including nonspecific symptoms and the lack of definitive biomarkers, which complicate the use of endoscopy. Treatment options such as elimination diets, proton-pump inhibitors, and swallowed corticosteroids were found to have varying success rates, while Dupilumab, an emerging therapy targeting interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, shows promise.

Conclusion

Despite advancements in understanding and managing EoE, significant unmet clinical needs remain, particularly in biomarker identification, therapy personalization, and cost-effectiveness evaluation. A comprehensive, multidimensional approach to patient management is required, emphasizing the importance of early symptom recognition, accurate diagnosis, and tailored treatment strategies. Dupilumab offers potential as a novel treatment, underscoring the need for future research to explore the economic and social dimensions of EoE care pathways.