Survival with nonmelanoma skin cancer in Germany

Exploring the role of surgical margins and reoperation in basal cell carcinoma recurrence: a study of 3036 cases

INTRODUCTION

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer globally, with its prevalence increasing due to chronic ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Although surgical excision remains the cornerstone of treatment, achieving optimal outcomes requires a careful balance between complete tumor removal and the preservation of cosmetic appearance.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the relationship between excision margins, reoperation rates, and BCC recurrence through a retrospective analysis of 3036 surgical excisions.

METHODS

Conducted at the Department of Plastic Surgery in Trieste, Italy, this study includes data from 2037 patients treated between 2014 and 2018. Excision procedures adhered to standardized hospital protocols. Tumor characteristics, excision margins, and involved anatomical sites were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study demonstrated an equal gender distribution (51.02% women), with the nodular subtype (45.85%) being the most common. The head was the most frequently affected site (54.74%). A complete excision rate of 93.3% was achieved, but incomplete excisions were more common in head and neck locations and certain histological subtypes. Surgical reinterventions were primarily performed for high-risk BCCs, significantly reducing recurrence rates (0.52%).

CONCLUSION

Reoperation, especially for high-risk BCCs, should be prioritized over conservative management to minimize recurrence. Narrow excision margins were associated with higher recurrence rates, highlighting the importance of adequate margin clearance. This study enhances understanding of the complex interplay between excision techniques, reoperation, and long-term outcomes in BCC management.

Novel Human Polyomaviruses Discovered From 2007 to the Present: An Update of Current Knowledge

Human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) are a diverse group of viruses that typically establish asymptomatic persistent infections in healthy individuals. However, they can lead to severe diseases in immunocompromised patients. The past 15 years have witnessed significant advancements in understanding HPyVs, leading to the discovery of several novel and highly divergent strains. This surge in knowledge raises critical questions about their evolution, tropism, and potential contributions to various diseases. Although HPyVs are generally benign, certain strains can lead to significant health issues under immunocompromised conditions. Since 2007, several novel PyVs have been isolated from humans: Karolinska Institute Polyomavirus (KIPyV), Washington University Polyomavirus (WUPyV), Merkel cell Polyomavirus (MCPyV), HPyV6, HPyV7, Trichodisplasia spinulosa polyomavirus (TSPyV), HPyV9, HPyV10, Saint Louis polyomavirus (STLPyV), HPyV12, New Jersey Polyomavirus (NJPyV), Lyon IARC polyomavirus (LIPyV), HPyV16 and Quebec polyomavirus (QPyV). This review summarises the available data regarding the biology, tissue tropism, epidemiology, and associated diseases of novel HPyVs discovered from 2007 to the present. While some HPyVs are well-characterised with clear associations to specific diseases, others remain enigmatic, warranting additional investigation into their biology and clinical implications.

Skin Cancer Diagnosis by Lesion, Physician, and Examination Type: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the US; accurate detection can minimize morbidity and mortality.

Objective

To assess the accuracy of skin cancer diagnosis by lesion type, physician specialty and experience, and physical examination method.

Data Sources

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.

Study Selection

Cross-sectional and case-control studies, randomized clinical trials, and nonrandomized controlled trials that used dermatologists or primary care physicians (PCPs) to examine keratinocytic and/or melanocytic skin lesions were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Search terms, study objectives, and protocol methods were defined before study initiation. Data extraction was performed by a reviewer, with verification by a second reviewer. A mixed-effects model was used in the data analysis. Data analyses were performed from May 2022 to December 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy comprised sensitivity and specificity by physician type (primary care physician or dermatologist; experienced or inexperienced) and examination method (in-person clinical examination and/or clinical images vs dermoscopy and/or dermoscopic images).

Results

In all, 100 studies were included in the analysis. With experienced dermatologists using clinical examination and clinical images, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing keratinocytic carcinomas were 79.0% and 89.1%, respectively; using dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, sensitivity and specificity were 83.7% and 87.4%, and for PCPs, 81.4% and 80.1%. Experienced dermatologists had 2.5-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of keratinocytic carcinomas using in-person dermoscopy and dermoscopic images compared with in-person clinical examination and images. When examining for melanoma using clinical examination and images, sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 89.1% for experienced dermatologists, 78.3% and 66.2% for inexperienced dermatologists, and 37.5% and 84.6% for PCPs, respectively; whereas when using dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 81.3%, 78.0% and 69.5%, and 49.5% and 91.3%, respectively. Experienced dermatologists had 5.7-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopy compared with clinical examination. Compared with PCPs, experienced dermatologists had 13.3-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopic images.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that there are significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for skin cancer when comparing physician specialty and experience, and examination methods. These summary metrics of clinician diagnostic accuracy could be useful benchmarks for clinical trials, practitioner training, and the performance of emerging technologies.

The hidden Australian skin cancer epidemic, high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review

Deaths from non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) have almost doubled in Australia in recent years. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) constitutes approximately 20% of NMSCs, but is responsible for most of the deaths. Most skin cancers are easy to diagnose and treat and therefore cSCC are often trivialised; however, there is a high-risk subgroup of cSCC (HRcSCC) that is associated with a high risk of metastasis and death. The definition of early HRcSCC and our ability to identify them is evolving. Many significant prognostic factors have been identified, but a universally accepted prognostic index does not exist. Guidelines for workup, treatment, and follow-up leave many important decisions open to broad interpretation by the treating physician or multidisciplinary team. Some of the treatments used for metastatic cSCC are not supported by robust evidence and the prognosis of metastatic cSCC is guarded. In this review, we highlight the rapid rise in NMSC deaths and discuss some of the deficiencies in our knowledge of how to define, diagnose, stage, and manage HRcSCC.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Integrating Epidemiology, Immunology, and Therapeutic Updates

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin cancer characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation. Its carcinogenesis is based either on the integration of the Merkel cell polyomavirus or on ultraviolet (UV) mutagenesis, both of which lead to high immunogenicity either through the expression of viral proteins or neoantigens. Despite this immunogenicity resulting from viral or UV-associated carcinogenesis, it exhibits highly aggressive behavior. However, owing to the rarity of MCC and the lack of epidemiologic registries with detailed clinical data, there is some uncertainty regarding the spontaneous course of the disease. Historically, advanced MCC patients were treated with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy yielding a median response duration of only 3 months. Starting in 2017, four programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors-avelumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab (utilized in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings), and retifanlimab-have demonstrated efficacy in treating patients with disseminated MCC on the basis of prospective clinical trials. However, generating clinical evidence for rare cancers, such as MCC, is challenging owing to difficulties in conducting large-scale trials, resulting in small sample sizes and therefore lacking statistical power. Thus, to comprehensively understand the available clinical evidence on various immunotherapy approaches for MCC, we also delve into the epidemiology and immune biology of this cancer. Nevertheless, while randomized studies directly comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in MCC are lacking, immunotherapy shows response rates comparable to those previously reported with chemotherapy but with more enduring responses. Notably, adjuvant nivolumab has proven superiority to the standard-of-care therapy (observation) in the adjuvant setting.

Incidence and Relative Survival of Patients with Merkel Cell Carcinoma in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 2008-2021

BACKGROUND

To date, only a few population-representative studies have been carried out on the rare Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). We provide incidence and survival estimates of MCC, including the conditional relative survival.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the cancer registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 2008-2021, covering a population of 18 million. We included all newly diagnosed MCCs and calculated age-standardized (old European Standard population) incidence rates and unconditional and conditional relative survival.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 2164 MCC patients. The age-standardized incidence of MCC was 5.2 (men) and 3.8 (women) per million person-years. The 5-year relative survival was 58.8% (men) and 70.7% (women). Survival was lower among men than women in all age-sex groups and was highest for MCC of the upper extremity in both men (68.2%) and women (79.3%). The sex difference in survival is particularly due to the better survival of women with MCC of the head and neck. In terms of survival, the first two years are particularly critical.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data validate the worse survival among men and highlights a more favorable prognosis for MCCs located on the limbs. The first two years after diagnosis of MCC are the years with the highest excess mortality.

The Naples prognostic score serves as a predictor and prognostic indicator for cancer survivors in the community

OBJECTIVE

Inflammation, malnutrition, and cancer are intricately interconnected. Despite this, only a few studies have delved into the relationship between inflammatory malnutrition and the risk of death among cancer survivors. This study aimed to specifically investigate the association between the categorically defined Naples prognostic score (NPS) and the prognosis of cancer survivors.

METHODS

Data from 42,582 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999-2018) were subjected to analysis. Naples prognostic scores (NPS) were computed based on serum albumin (ALB), total cholesterol (TC), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), and participants were stratified into three groups accordingly. Cancer status was ascertained through a self-administered questionnaire, while mortality data were sourced from the National Death Index up to December 31, 2019. Multiple logistic regression was employed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) between NPS and cancer prevalence within the U.S. community population. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Log-rank test were utilized to compare survival disparities among the three groups. Additionally, Cox proportional regression was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI.

RESULTS

The incidence of cancers was 9.86%. Among the participants, 8140 individuals (19.1%) were classified into Group 0 (NPS 0), 29,433 participants (69.1%) into Group 1 (NPS 1 or 2), and 5009 participants (11.8%) into Group 2 (NPS 3 or 4). After adjusting for confounding factors, the cancer prevalence for the highest NPS score yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 1.64 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.97) (P(for trend) < 0.05). In comparison to cancer survivors in Group 0, those with the highest NPS had adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.57 (95% CI: 1.73, 3.84) for all-cause mortality, 3.44 (95% CI: 1.64, 7.21) for cardiovascular mortality, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.01, 2.56) for cancer mortality, and 3.15 (95% CI: 1.74, 5.69) for other causes of mortality (All P(for trend) < 0.05). These associations remained consistent when stratified by age, sex, race, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the Naples prognostic score (NPS), serving as a novel prognostic metric integrating inflammation and nutritional status, is closely linked to cancer prognosis within the general population.

[Periocular Merkel Cell Carcinoma - an overview of clinical aspects and current therapeutic options]

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive and rapidly expanding malignant skin tumor. It affects the periocular region in approximately 10% of cases. The current treatment recommendation for resectable non-metastatic MCC comprises total surgical excision; however, lymph node or distant metastases are often already present by the time of the diagnosis. Since an immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with avelumab was first approved for MCC in 2016, there has been considerable improvement in mean survival compared to cytostatic therapy; at the same time, there has been a reduction in serious treatment-associated adverse events. Other immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently still in clinical trials, with very promising initial results. Because of the complexity of the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, it is essential that MCC patients receive interdisciplinary care in a specialized center including consultation with a tumor review board.

Incidence, mortality and survival of Merkel cell carcinoma: a systematic review of population-based studies

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer that most commonly occurs in ultraviolet-exposed body sites. The epidemiology of MCC in different geographies and populations is not well characterized.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review is to summarize evidence on the incidence, mortality and survival rates of MCC from population-based studies.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to 6 June 2023. No geographic, age or date exclusions were applied. We included population-based studies of MCC that reported the incidence, survival or mortality rate, and also considered systematic reviews. A data-charting form was created and validated to identify variables to extract. Two reviewers then independently charted the data for each included study with patient characteristics, and estimates of incidence rate, mortality rate, and survival rate and assessed the quality of included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence studies, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews. We abstracted age-, sex-, stage- and race-stratified outcomes, and synthesized comparisons between strata narratively and using vote counting. We assessed the certainty of evidence for those comparisons using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments and Evaluations framework.

RESULTS

We identified 11 472 citations, of which 52 studies from 24 countries met our inclusion criteria. Stage I and the head and neck were the most frequently reported stage and location at diagnosis. The incidence of MCC is increasing over time (high certainty), with the highest reported incidences reported in southern hemisphere countries [Australia (2.5 per 100 000); New Zealand (0.96 per 100 000) (high certainty)]. Male patients generally had higher incidence rates compared with female patients (high certainty), although there were some variations over time periods. Survival rates varied, with lower survival and/or higher mortality associated with male sex (moderate certainty), higher stage at diagnosis (moderate-to-high certainty), older age (moderate certainty), and immunosuppression (low-to-moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

MCC is increasing in incidence and may increase further given the ageing population of many countries. The prognosis of MCC is poor, particularly for male patients, those who are immunosuppressed, and patients diagnosed at higher stages or at an older age.

Diagnosis of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, imaging and staging

The assessment of patients with a lesion raising the suspicion of an invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a frequent clinical scenario. The management of patients with cSCC is a multistep approach, starting with the correct diagnosis. The two main diagnostic goals are to differentiate from other possible diagnoses and correctly recognize the lesion as cSCC, and then to determine the tumor spread (perform staging), that is if the patient has a common primary cSCC or a locally advanced cSCC, or a metastatic cSCC (with in-transit, regional lymph nodal, or rarely distant metastasis). The multistep diagnostic approach begins with the clinical characteristics of the primary cSCC, it is complemented with features with dermoscopy and, if available, reflectance confocal microscopy and is confirmed with histopathology. The tumor spread is assessed by physical examination and, in some cases, ultrasound and/or computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, mainly to investigate for regional lymph node metastasis or for local infiltration into deeper structures. In the last step, the clinical, histologic and radiologic findings are incorporated into staging systems.

High-volume facilities are significantly more likely to use guideline-adherent systemic immunotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: implications for cancer care regionalization

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a neuroendocrine skin cancer with a high rate of mortality. While still relatively rare, the incidence of MCC has been rapidly rising in the US and around the world. Since 2017, two immunotherapeutic drugs, avelumab and pembrolizumab, have been FDA-approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC and have revolutionized outcomes for MCC. However, real-world outcomes can differ from clinical trial data, and the adoption of novel therapeutics can be gradual. We aimed to characterize the treatment practices and outcomes of patients with metastatic MCC across the US. A retrospective cohort study of adult cases of MCC in the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2019 was performed. Multivariable logistic regressions to determine the association of a variety of patient, tumor, and system factors with likelihood of receipt of systemic therapies were performed. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox survival regressions were performed. We identified 1017 cases of metastatic MCC. From 2017 to 2019, 54.2% of patients received immunotherapy. This increased from 45.1% in 2017 to 63.0% in 2019. High-volume centers were significantly more likely to use immunotherapy (odds ratio 3.235, p = 0.002). On univariate analysis, patients receiving systemic immunotherapy had significantly improved overall survival (p < 0.001). One-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 47.2% (standard error [SE] 1.8%), 21.8% (SE 1.5%), and 16.5% (SE 1.4%), respectively, for patients who did not receive immunotherapy versus 62.7% (SE 3.5%), 34.4% (SE 3.9%), and 23.6% (SE 4.4%), respectively, for those who did (Fig. 1). In our multivariable survival regression, receipt of immunotherapy was associated with an approximately 35% reduction in hazard of death (hazard ratio 0.665, p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.548-0.808). Our results demonstrate that the real-world survival advantage of immunotherapy for metastatic MCC is similar to clinical trial data. However, many patients with metastatic disease did not receive this guideline-recommended therapy in our most recent study year, and use of immunotherapy is higher at high-volume centers. This suggests that regionalization of care to high-volume centers or dissemination of their practices, may ultimately improve patient survival.

Survival of patients with basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma in situ: A whole population study

BACKGROUND

Keratinocyte carcinoma (KC) is the commonest type of malignancy in humans; however, the impact of KC on survival is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

This study characterizes the impact of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCis) on the survival of Icelanders.

METHODS

This whole population study evaluated relative survival of KC in Iceland by using a cancer registry containing records of all BCC, SCCis, and SCC cases recorded in Iceland between 1981 and 2015.

RESULTS

Between 1981 and 2015, 8767 Icelanders were diagnosed with their first localized KC. A total of 6473 individuals with BCC, 1194 with SCCis, and 1100 with invasive SCC, respectively. BCC was not associated with decreased survival except for men diagnosed with BCC between 1981 and 1995 for whom decreased 10-year relative survival was observed (85.3, 95% CI [77.9-92.7]). SCC and SCCis were both associated with a decrease in relative survival for certain population subgroups such as individuals <50 years of age at time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our whole population cohort survival study examining the Icelandic Cancer Registry supports prior studies demonstrating that BCC is not associated with a reduction in relative survival and that SCC and SCCis are associated with comparatively poor relative survival in certain population subgroups.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Part 1: Diagnostics and prevention-Update 2023

Invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common cancers in white populations, accounting for 20% of all cutaneous malignancies. Overall, cSCC mostly has very good prognosis after treatment, with 5-year cure rates greater than 90%. Despite the overall favourable prognosis and the proportionally rare deaths, cSCC is associated with a high total number of deaths due to its high incidence. A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), was formed to update recommendations on cSCC, based on current literature and expert consensus. Part 1 of the guidelines addresses the updates on classification, epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, staging and prevention in immunocompetent as well as immunosuppressed patients.

Second primary malignancies in patients with lymphoma in Denmark after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Second primary malignancies (SPMs) are known complications after chemotherapy, but the risk is not well characterised for patients with lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to investigate the rate of SPMs in this population relative to matched control individuals from the general population.

METHODS

In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, patients aged 18 years or older with an aggressive lymphoma who received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT in Denmark between Jan 1, 2001, and Dec 31, 2017, were included from the Danish Lymphoma Registry and matched (1:5) to control individuals from the general population on birth year and sex via the Danish Civil Registration System. Patients were eligible if they had a registered date of autologous HSCT and patients with primary CNS lymphoma were excluded. Exclusion criteria for both patients and matched control individuals were HIV infection, organ transplantation, or other malignancies before inclusion. The key endpoint was the incidence of SPMs assessed in all study participants. The effect of treatment on SPMs was also investigated in patients who were followed up from first lymphoma diagnosis, with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT as a time-dependent exposure.

FINDINGS

Of 910 patients with lymphoma assessed, 803 were included (537 [67%] were male and 266 [33%] were female); 4015 matched control individuals were included (2685 [67%] were male and 1330 [33%] were female). Ethnicity data were not available. Median follow-up was 7·76 years (IQR 4·77-11·73). The SPM rate was higher among patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT than matched control individuals (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2·35, 95% CI 1·93-2·87, p<0·0001). Patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT had a higher rate of non-melanoma skin cancer (2·94, 2·10-4·11, p<0·0001) and of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML; 41·13, 15·77-107·30, p<0·0001) than matched control individuals, but there was no significant difference in the rate of solid tumours (1·21, 0·89-1·64, p=0·24). The cumulative risk of SPMs at 10 years was 20% (95% CI 17-23) in patients compared with 14% (13-15) in matched control individuals. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT was associated with an increased risk of SPMs when analysed as a time-dependent exposure from first lymphoma diagnosis (adjusted HR 1·58, 95% CI 1·14-2·17, p=0·0054).

INTERPRETATION

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT was associated with an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer and myelodysplastic syndrome or AML but not with increased risk of solid tumours in patients treated for lymphoma. These findings are relevant for future individualised risk-benefit assessments when choosing between high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in this setting.

FUNDING

Danish Cancer Society.

Evaluation of prognostic prediction ability of the novel Japanese risk factor scoring system in a Japanese cohort of resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Japanese patients with very high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs), based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, have been reported to display a higher cumulative incidence of relapse and disease-specific death (DSD) than those with high-risk cSCC. Therefore, prognosis prediction is crucial for Japanese patients with very high-risk cSCCs. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic prediction ability of our novel Japanese Risk Factor Scoring Systems (JARF scoring) in a Japanese cohort of cSSC patients. Data of 424 Japanese patients with resectable very high-risk cSCCs were analysed. We compared the prognostic ability of the following three staging systems: Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) tumour staging, number of NCCN very high-risk factors, and JARF scoring, including recurrent tumour, high-risk histological features, deep tumour invasion and lymphatic or vascular involvement as risk factors. The prognostic ability of these staging systems was evaluated according to the cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR), regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM), DSD, and overall survival (OS). When BWH staging was used, high T stage led to significantly poor outcomes only in the cumulative incidence of RLNM (p = 0.01). The presence of very high-risk NCCN factors led to significantly poor outcomes in terms of RLNM (p = 0.03) and OS (p = 0.02). Meanwhile, a high number of risk factors in the JARF scoring system clearly led to poor outcomes in terms of LR (p = 0.01), RLNM (p < 0.01), DSD (p = 0.03), and OS (p < 0.01). The JARF scoring system may accurately predict the risk of recurrence and death in very high-risk cSCC patients in Japan.

[Current Management of Basal Cell Carcinoma]

For the management of basal cell carcinoma, the primary performance of a risk stratification, which is decisive for the further diagnostic and therapeutic steps, is becoming increasingly important.Various non-invasive methods are available to confirm the clinical diagnosis. Histological confirmation of the diagnosis is recommended in unclear cases. In poorly displaced lesions, preoperative cross-sectional imaging of the tumor area should be performed to exclude osseous infiltration.The gold standard in treatment remains surgery, which should be performed by means of micrographically controlled surgery if possible. In addition, there are other therapeutic methods such as radiotherapy or a number of topical therapy options (photodynamic therapy, cryotherapy or application of 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod), which can be used in certain cases. Also for advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma, effective drugs are available in the form of the hedgehog inhibitors, for which there is now several years of application experience with regard to efficacy and handling of adverse events. With the PD-1 inhibitor cemiplimab, a further therapeutic option for non-operable or metastatic tumors has been available since June 2021.The most important preventive measure is consistent textile or chemical UV protection in already affected individuals. In addition, nicotinamide and celecoxib can be used orally for prevention. For follow-up, the current S2k guideline recommends regular self-monitoring and standardized medical check-ups.

Association of dietary total antioxidant capacity and its distribution across three meals with all-cause, cancer, and non-cancer mortality among cancer survivors: the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2018

The effect of the antioxidant capacity of diet and its distribution across three meals on mortality risk among cancer patients remains unexplored. We aimed to prospectively investigate the association of dietary total antioxidant capacity (DAC) and its distribution across three meals with all-cause, cancer, and noncancer mortality among cancer survivors. We included 5,009 patients with cancer from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted between 1999 and 2018. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was estimated using the survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards model. During a median follow-up of 7.9 years, 1811 deaths, including 575 cancer-related deaths, were recorded. Among cancer survivors, compared with participants in the lowest quartile of total DAC from three meals, those in the highest quartile had a 24% decreased risk of noncancer mortality (aHR = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.92), but not of all-cause and cancer mortality (each p trend >0.1). However, this association became insignificant for total DAC after excluding dinner DAC. In addition, higher dinner DAC rather than breakfast or lunch DAC was associated with a 21% lower risk of all-cause mortality (aHR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98) and 28% lower risk of noncancer mortality (aHR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.90). Similar associations were found for ΔDAC (dinner DAC - breakfast DAC) with noncancer mortality (aHR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83), but DAC was not associated with cancer mortality (p trend >0.3). Among cancer survivors, total DAC from three meals was associated with reduced noncancer mortality, with the primary effect attributable to increased DAC intake from dinner. Our findings emphasize that DAC consumption from dinner should be advocated to reduce mortality risk in cancer survivors.

Current and preclinical treatment options for Merkel cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive form of skin cancer with neuroendocrine features. The origin of this cancer is still unclear, but research in the last 15 years has demonstrated that MCC arises via two distinct etiologic pathways, i.e. virus and UV-induced. Considering the high mortality rate and the limited therapeutic options available, this review aims to highlight the significance of MCC research and the need for advancement in MCC treatment.

AREAS COVERED

With the advent of the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies, we now have treatment options providing a survival benefit for patients with advanced MCC. However, the issue of primary and acquired resistance to these therapies remains a significant concern. Therefore, ongoing efforts seeking additional therapeutic targets and approaches for MCC therapy are a necessity. Through a comprehensive literature search, we provide an overview on recent preclinical and clinical studies with respect to MCC therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, the only evidence-based therapy for MCC is immune checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for advanced patients. Neoadjuvant, adjuvant and combined immune checkpoint blockade are promising treatment options.

S2k Guideline - Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin) - Update 2022

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, ICD-O M8247/3) is a rare, malignant, primary skin tumor with epithelial and neuroendocrine differentiation. The tumor cells share many morphologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features with cutaneous Merkel cells. Nevertheless, the cell of origin of MCC is unclear. MCC appears clinically as a reddish to purple spherical tumor with a smooth, shiny surface and a soft to turgid, elastic consistency, usually showing rapid growth. Spontaneous and often complete regressions of the tumor are observed. These likely immunologically-mediated regressions explain the cases in which only lymph node or distant metastases are found at the time of initial diagnosis and why the tumor responds very well to immunomodulatory therapies even at advanced stages. Due to its aggressiveness, the usually given indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy, the indication of adjuvant therapies to be evaluated, as well as the complexity of the necessary diagnostics, clinical management should already be determined by an interdisciplinary tumor board at the time of initial diagnosis.

Merkel Cell Polyomavirus: Infection, Genome, Transcripts and Its Role in Development of Merkel Cell Carcinoma

The best characterized polyomavirus family member, i.e., simian virus 40 (SV40), can cause different tumors in hamsters and can transform murine and human cells in vitro. Hence, the SV40 contamination of millions of polio vaccine doses administered from 1955-1963 raised fears that this may cause increased tumor incidence in the vaccinated population. This is, however, not the case. Indeed, up to now, the only polyomavirus family member known to be the most important cause of a specific human tumor entity is Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). MCC is a highly deadly form of skin cancer for which the cellular origin is still uncertain, and which appears as two clinically very similar but molecularly highly different variants. While approximately 80% of cases are found to be associated with MCPyV the remaining MCCs carry a high mutational load. Here, we present an overview of the multitude of molecular functions described for the MCPyV encoded oncoproteins and non-coding RNAs, present the available MCC mouse models and discuss the increasing evidence that both, virus-negative and -positive MCC constitute epithelial tumors.

Periocular Merkel Cell Carcinoma - An Overview of Clinical Aspects and Current Treatment Options

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive and rapidly expanding malignant skin tumor. It affects the periocular region in approximately 10% of cases. The current treatment recommendation for resectable non-metastatic MCC comprises total surgical excision; however, lymph node or distant metastases are often already present by the time of the diagnosis. Since an immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with avelumab was first approved for MCC in 2016, there has been considerable improvement in mean survival compared to cytostatic therapy; at the same time, there has been a reduction in serious treatment-associated adverse events. Other immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently still in clinical trials, with very promising initial results. Because of the complexity of the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, it is essential that MCC patients receive interdisciplinary care in a specialized center including consultation with a tumor review board.

[Current Management of Basal Cell Carcinoma]

AIM OF STUDY

We present the current standard in diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Useful procedures for clinical management should be derived from this.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in the PubMed online database. The collected information was analyzed and evaluated. An overall concept was created from the gained knowledge.

RESULTS

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common tumor in humans and its incidence is expected to increase in the future. When managing the disease, a one-dimensional orientation towards the clinical or histological subtype is not sufficient because of the heterogeneity of the tumor. The primary implementation of risk stratification, which is decisive for the further diagnostic and therapeutic steps, is becoming increasingly important. The gold standard in treatment continues to be the surgical procedure, which should be carried out using micrographically controlled surgery if possible. In addition, there are other therapeutic methods such as radiotherapy or a number of topical therapy options (photodynamic therapy, cryotherapy, application of 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod), which can be used in certain cases. Hedgehog inhibitors are also effective drugs for advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma. Practitioners have gained several years of experience with regard to effectiveness and handling of adverse events. With the PD-1 inhibitor cemiplimab, another therapeutic option for inoperable or metastatic tumors has been available since June 2021.

CONCLUSION

Basal cell carcinoma will continue to gain in relevance in daily dermatological practice in the coming years. A structured approach to the assessment of the existing risk category of the tumor and the subsequent determination of the optimal therapy regimen are of central importance. Advanced or metastatic tumors no longer represent a hopeless situation for the patient. With long-termhedgehog therapy, an adapted dosage scheme can avoid discontinuation of therapy due to side effects. The therapeutic potential of the PD-1 inhibitor cemiplimab can also be used with the side effect profile known from other types of skin cancer.

Narrower clinical margin in high or very high-risk squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter study of 1,000 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), adherence to guideline-recommended fixed surgical margins is often difficult, and narrower margins are preferable. This study aimed to evaluate relapse and disease-specific death with narrower margins for high or very high-risk cSCC.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We retrospectively investigated high or very high-risk cSCC patients who underwent tumor excision. Patients were divided into guideline-recommended standard margin group (SMG) and narrower-margin group (NMG). Co-primary outcomes were local relapse, SCC relapse, and SCC death. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) was used to describe SCC death probability and competing risk mortality. Gray's test was used to compare differences in CIF between the groups.

RESULTS

In total, 1,000 patients with cSCC (high-risk, 570; very high-risk, 430) were included. In the high-risk cohort, there were no significant differences in incomplete excision rate (IER) between SMG and NMG (2.6 % vs. 3.0 %, P > 0.99). However, in the very high-risk cohort, IER in SMG was significantly lower than in NMG (8.9 % vs. 16.2 %, P = 0.03). No significant differences were observed between SMG and NMG for local relapse (high-risk, P = 0.56; very high-risk, P = 0.70), SCC relapse (high-risk, P = 0.30; very high-risk, P = 0.47), and SCC death (high-risk, P = 0.23; very high-risk, P = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical margin size has limited impact on margin control, relapse, and disease-specific death in high-risk cSCC.

Knapperer Resektionsrand bei Plattenepithelkarzinomen mit hohem oder sehr hohem Risiko: eine retrospektive multizentrische Studie mit 1000 Patienten

HINTERGRUND UND ZIELE

Bei kutanen Plattenepithelkarzinomen (PEK) ist die Einhaltung der in Leitlinien empfohlenen festen Resektionsränder oft schwierig und knappere Ränder sind wünschenswert. Ziel dieser Studie war die Bewertung des Auftretens von Rezidiven und krankheitsspezifischen Todesfällen bei knapperen Resektionsrändern für PEK mit hohem oder sehr hohem Risiko.

PATIENTEN/METHODEN

PEK-Patienten mit hohem oder sehr hohem Risiko, bei denen eine Tumorexzision durchgeführt wurde, wurden retrospektiv untersucht. Die Patienten wurden in eine Gruppe mit Standardrand gemäß Leitlinienempfehlung (standard margin group, SMG) und eine Gruppe mit knapperen Rändern (narrower-margin group, NMG) eingeteilt. Gemeinsame primäre Endpunkte waren lokales Rezidiv, PEK-Rezidiv und PEK-bedingter Tod. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines PEK-bedingten Tods und konkurrierender Mortalitätsrisiken wurde mittels kumulativer Inzidenzfunktion (CIF) beschrieben. Unterschiede bei der CIF zwischen den Gruppen wurden mit dem Test nach Gray verglichen.

ERGEBNISSE

Insgesamt wurden 1.000 Patienten mit PEK (hohes Risiko, 570; sehr hohes Risiko, 430) eingeschlossen. In der Kohorte mit hohem Risiko gab es keine signifikanten Unterschiede bei der unvollständigen Exzisionsrate (IER) zwischen SMG und NMG (2,6 % vs. 3,0 %, P > 0,99). In der Kohorte mit sehr hohem Risiko war die IER in der SMG jedoch signifikant geringer als in der NMG (8.9 % vs. 16.2 %, P = 0,03). Keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen SMG und NMG wurden für Lokalrezidiv (hohes Risiko, P = 0.56; sehr hohes Risiko, P = 0,70), PEK-Rezidiv (hohes Risiko, P = 0,30; sehr hohes Risiko, P = 0,47) und PEK-bedingtem Tod (hohes Risiko, P = 0,23; sehr hohes Risiko, P = 0,83) beobachtet.

SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN

Die Größe des Resektionsrands hat einen begrenzten Einfluss auf Randkontrolle, Rezidive und krankheitsspezifischen Tod bei PEK mit hohem Risiko.

Surgery combined with photodynamic therapy vs. surgery alone for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer and actinic keratosis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for some non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) and actinic keratosis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates between surgery alone and surgery with postoperative PDT in patients with NMSC in China.

METHODS & MATERIALS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with pathologically confirmed NMSC or actinic keratosis treated by surgical excision with/without PDT. A total of 125 patients were included, including 72 patients (43 females) aged 57-75 years in the surgery alone group and 53 patients (32 females) aged 61-76 years in the surgery+PDT group.

RESULTS

The most common NMSC types were squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma, the most common lesion site was the head and neck, and the vast majority of patients had a primary disease and solitary lesions. There were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics. RFS rates in the surgery alone and surgery+PDT groups were, respectively, 100.0% and 98.1% at 1 week, 98.6% and 98.1% at 4 weeks, 97.2% and 98.1% at 8 weeks, 97.2% and 98.1% at 12 weeks, and 90.3% and 90.4% at 24 weeks, with no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant PDT after surgical excision of NMSC or actinic keratosis does not provide short-term improvement in RFS, but the results need to be confirmed by a formal randomized controlled trial.

Lymph node ratio predicts efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy in nonmetastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: A population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

After radical resection of a nonmetastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (M0 MCC), postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is recommended as it improves survival. However, the role of RT in specific subgroups of M0 MCC is unclear. We sought to identify whether there is a differential survival benefit from RT in specific M0 MCC patient subgroups.

METHODS

M0 MCC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database registry were collected. The best prognostic age, tumor size, and lymph node ratio (LNR, ratio between positive lymph nodes and resected lymph nodes) cutoffs were calculated. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 5644 M0 MCC patients (median age 77 years, 62% male) were included: 4022 (71%) node-negative (N0) and 1551 (28%) node-positive (N+). Overall, 2682 patients (48%) received RT. Age > 76.5 years, tumor size >13.5 mm, and LNR >0.215 were associated with worse OS. RT was associated with longer OS in the M0 MCC, N0, and N+ group and independently associated with a 25%, 27%, and 26% reduction in the risk for death, respectively. RT benefit on survival was increased in tumor size >13.5 mm in the N0 group and LNR >0.215 in the N+ group. No OS benefit from RT was observed in T4 tumors (N0 and N+ groups).

CONCLUSIONS

RT was associated with improved survival in M0 MCC, irrespective of the nodal status. LNR >0.215 is a useful prognostic factor for clinical decision-making and for stratification and interpretation of clinical trials.

Aktuelles Management des Basalzellkarzinoms

Ziel der Studie Der aktuelle Standard von Diagnostik und Therapie des Basalzellkarzinoms soll dargestellt werden. Hieraus sollen sinnvolle Vorgehensweisen für das klinische Management abgeleitet werden.

Methodik Es erfolgte eine systematische Literaturrecherche in der Online-Datenbank PubMed. Die gesammelten Informationen wurden analysiert und bewertet. Aus den gewonnenen Erkenntnissen wurde ein Gesamtkonzept erstellt.

Ergebnisse Das Basalzellkarzinom ist der häufigste Tumor des Menschen und die Inzidenz wird voraussichtlich künftig weiter zunehmen. Beim Management der Erkrankung wird eine eindimensionale Orientierung am klinischen bzw. histologischen Basalzellkarzinom-Subtyp der Heterogenität des Tumors nicht gerecht. Zunehmende Bedeutung gewinnt die primäre Durchführung einer Risikostratifizierung, die für die weiteren diagnostischen und therapeutischen Schritte maßgeblich ist. Goldstandard in der Behandlung bleibt weiterhin das operative Vorgehen, welches möglichst mittels mikrografisch kontrollierter Chirurgie erfolgen sollte. Daneben existieren weitere Therapieverfahren wie die Radiotherapie oder eine Reihe an topischen Therapieoptionen (photodynamische Therapie, Kryotherapie oder Applikation von 5-Fluoruracil bzw. Imiquimod), die in bestimmten Fällen zur Anwendung kommen können. Auch für fortgeschrittene oder metastasierte Basalzellkarzinome stehen mit den Hedgehog-Inhibitoren wirksame Medikamente zur Verfügung, für die inzwischen eine mehrjährige Anwendungserfahrung hinsichtlich Wirksamkeit und Umgang mit unerwünschten Ereignissen vorliegt. Mit den PD-1-Inhibitoren steht eine weitere systemische Therapieoption in Aussicht, deren Nutzen aktuell noch in klinischen Studien überprüft wird.

Schlussfolgerung Das Basalzellkarzinom wird in den kommenden Jahren weiter an Relevanz in der täglichen dermatologischen Praxis gewinnen. Eine strukturierte Herangehensweise zur Einschätzung der vorliegenden Risikokategorie des Tumors und die anschließende Festlegung des optimalen Therapieregimes sind von zentraler Bedeutung. Fortgeschrittene oder metastasierte Tumoren stellen keine aussichtslose Situation für den Patienten mehr dar. Durch adaptierte Dosierschemata kann ein nebenwirkungsbedingter Therapieabbruch unter langfristiger Hedgehog-Therapie vermieden werden. Das therapeutische Potenzial von PD-1-Inhibitoren könnte bald auch beim Basalzellkarzinom genutzt werden.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Squamous Cell Skin Cancer, Version 1.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Squamous Cell Skin Cancer provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical stage, and treatment options for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. The NCCN panel meets annually to discuss updates to the guidelines based on comments from panel members and the Institutional Review, as well as submissions from within NCCN and external organizations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the introduction of a new surgical recommendation terminology (peripheral and deep en face margin assessment), as well as recent updates on topical prophylaxis, immunotherapy for regional and metastatic disease, and radiation therapy.

Treatment of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Special Populations

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) may develop in patients with dysregulated immune activation (pre-existing autoimmune diseases or immunosuppression due to hematopoietic/solid organ transplant recipients), patients with a compromised immune function (long-term immunosuppression), and patients carrying chronic viral infections, or those affected by lymphoproliferative diseases. It should be also considered that patients presenting with immunosuppression have a high incidence of cSCC (65-250-times higher than general population), highlighting the central role played by the immune system in the development of cSCC. All these cases must be considered as "special populations" for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as the safety and activity of these drugs have not been studied on these specific cases, since these patients were excluded from clinical trials leading to approval of ICIs. It is therefore important to gain as much information as possible from the analysis of real-life data, to derive an indication to be adopted in everyday clinical setting. Moreover, therapeutic alternatives other than ICIs are scarce, mainly consisting in chemotherapy and anti-EGFR agents, whose activity is lower than immunotherapy and whose toxicity (particularly with chemotherapy) are not sustainable by this frail population. Here, we describe the current evidence of treatment with ICIs in special populations and conclude that it is necessary to find a balance between treatment risks (toxicities) and benefits (efficacy), as well as engaging a multidisciplinary team of experts to thoroughly manage and treat these patients.

Post-Transplant Malignancies following Pancreas Transplantation: Incidence and Implications on Long-Term Outcome from a Single-Center Perspective

Chronic immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk of malignancy. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence and effect of post-transplant malignancies (PTMs) following pancreas transplantation. The 348 first pancreas transplants performed between 1985 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Incidences of PTMs, as well as patient and graft survival, were evaluated. Out of 348 patients, 71 (20.4%) developed a PTM. Median time to diagnosis was 130 months. Thirty-six patients (50.7%) developed skin cancers (four patients with melanoma, 32 with NMSCs). Solid organ malignancy occurred in 25 (35.2%), hematologic malignancy in ten patients (14.1%). Affected patients were transplanted earlier [2000 (IQR 1993−2004) vs. 2003 (IQR 1999−2008); p < 0.001]. No differences in induction therapy were seen, both groups demonstrated comparable patient and graft survival. Pancreas transplant recipients with solid organ and hematologic malignancies had a three- and six-fold increased hazard of death compared to those with skin cancers [aHR 3.04 (IQR 1.17–7.91); p = 0.023; aHR 6.07 (IQR 1.87–19.71); p = 0.003]. PTMs affect every fifth patient following pancreas transplantation. Skin cancers are the most common malignancies accounting for 50% of all PTMs. These results underscore the importance of close dermatologic follow-up.

Epidemiology of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Cutaneous invasive squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) most commonly presents as a typically indolent tumour with five-year cure rates of >90%. Advanced cSCC has been defined as locally advanced or metastatic (locoregional or distant) cSCC. The epidemiological data on advanced cSCC are rare due to underreporting or exclusion of cSCC from national cancer registries. Although the frequency of local recurrence has been reported, there is no clear evidence on the incidence or mortality of locally advanced cSCCs, e.g. locally infiltrating or locally recurrent cSCCs that are not further amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy. This gap of knowledge on the epidemiology of locally advanced cSCC, highlights the need for standardisation in defining and reporting both locally advanced and metastatic cSCC. Even though metastatic cSCCs are a small part of cSCCs (3%-5%), their aggressive characteristics contribute to significant morbidity, higher mortality and are those likely to require systemic treatments. Locally recurrent and metastatic cSCC may occur more frequently in high-risk cSCCs (up to 35%). The site of metastasis involves in the vast majority the regional lymph nodes, with the head and neck lymph nodes or parotid most commonly affected. Metastasis occurs mostly within 2-3 years of the primary cSCC diagnosis. The knowledge of the incidence and prognosis of advanced cSCC and the risk stratification of patients, who may progress to advanced cSCC, emerge as pressing research areas with important implications for cost-efficiency planning and optimisation of patient care.

A machine-learning modified CART algorithm informs Merkel cell carcinoma prognosis

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine skin cancer with a high mortality rate. MCC staging is currently based on tumour primary size, clinical detectability of lymph node metastases, performance of a lymph node biopsy, and presence of distant metastases.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to use a modified classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm using available data points in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to elucidate novel prognostic factors for MCC.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of the NCDB and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. Cases from the NCDB were randomly assigned to either the training or validation cohorts. A modified CART algorithm was created with data from the training cohort and used to identify prognostic groups that were validated in the NCDB validation and SEER cohorts.

RESULTS

A modified CART algorithm using tumour variables available in the NCDB identified prognostic strata as follows: I: local disease, II: ≤3 positive nodes, III: ≥4 positive nodes, and IV: presence of distant metastases. Three-year survival for these groups in the NCDB validation cohort were 81.2% (SE: 1.7), 59.6% (SE: 3.0), 38.0% (SE: 6.0), and 20.2% (SE: 7.0), respectively. These strata were exhibited greater within-group homogeneity than AJCC groups and were more predictive of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-stratified grouping of MCC patients incorporating positive lymph node count were strongly predictive of survival and demonstrated a high degree of within-group homogeneity and survival prediction. Incorporation of positive lymph node count within overall staging or sub-staging may help to improve future MCC staging criteria.

Improved survival in women versus men with merkel cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Studies have observed that women have better outcomes than men in melanoma, but less is known about the influence of sex differences on outcomes for other aggressive cutaneous malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether women and men have disparate outcomes in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

METHODS

Patients with nonmetastatic MCC undergoing surgery and lymph node evaluation were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for overall survival, and competing-risks analysis and Fine-Gray models were used for cause-specific and other-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The NCDB cohort (n = 4178) included 1516 (36%) women. Women had a consistent survival advantage compared with men in propensity score-matched analysis (66.0% vs 56.8% at 5 years, P < .001) and multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.75; P < .001). Similarly, women had a survival advantage in the SEER validation cohort (n = 1202) with 457 (38.0%) women, which was entirely due to differences in MCC-specific mortality (5-year cumulative incidence: 16.4% vs 26.7%, P = .002), with no difference in other-cause mortality (16.8% vs 17.8%, P = .43) observed in propensity score-matched patients.

LIMITATIONS

Potential selection bias from a retrospective data set.

CONCLUSION

In MCC, women have improved survival compared with men, driven by MCC-related mortality.

Differences in site-specific incidence and relative survival of cutaneous and mucocutaneous genital squamous cell carcinoma in Germany, 2007-2015

Direct comparisons of the incidence and survival of cutaneous vs mucocutaneous genital squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) are lacking even though they may bring important insights. We aimed to compare incidence rates and survival of cutaneous and mucocutaneous genital SCCs head-to-head, using the same source population, cancer registry methodology and statistical methods in a population of predominantly white Caucasian descent. Using data (2007-2015) from the population-based cancer registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, (population of 18 million people), we estimated age-specific and age-standardized (old European standard) incidence rates and age-standardized relative 5-year survival of SCC with the period approach for the period 2012 to 2015. Overall, 83 650 SCC cases were registered. The age-standardized incidence rates (per 100 000 person-years) of cutaneous SCCs were 36.5 (SE 0.17) and 17.0 (SE 0.11) among men and women, respectively, with corresponding rates for mucocutaneous genital skin, 1.3 (SE 0.03) and 4.5 (SE 0.06) for men and women, respectively. In all age groups, incidence rates of mucocutaneous genital SCCs were higher in women than men. Men had higher cutaneous SCC incidence at all nongenital subsites than women, with the exception of the lower extremities. Five-year relative survival was considerably lower for mucocutaneous genital SCCs (men: 71%, women: 75%), especially of the scrotal skin (67%) and labia majora (62%) than for SCC of nongenital skin (men: 93%, women: 97%). Given their relatively high incidence together with a lower survival probability, future studies are warranted to establish therapies for advanced mucocutaneous genital SCC, such as immune checkpoint inhibition.

Anti-PD-1 antibody therapy for epithelial skin malignancies: An investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial (NMSC-PD1 Study)

INTRODUCTION

Malignant cutaneous epithelial tumors comprise various skin malignancies originating from the cutaneous epithelium, including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and malignant cutaneous adnexal tumors. Treatment options are limited, as the rarity of these tumors, especially among Asians, renders well-controlled clinical trials extremely challenging to conduct. Thus, we designed a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody nivolumab in patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas and other rare metastatic cutaneous epithelial tumors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial involving patients with metastatic malignant cutaneous epithelial tumors. Nivolumab (480 mg) will be administered intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of 26 doses. The primary outcome of the study will be the response rate based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1. Assuming a null hypothesis of a response rate ≤5% and an alternative hypothesis of a 25% response rate, a minimum of 26 patients are required to achieve a 5% two-sided type I error and 80% power based on the exact binomial distribution. Finally, a target cohort size of 30 patients was determined as some patient dropout will be expected.

DISCUSSION

This is the first phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in Asian patients with metastatic malignant cutaneous epithelial tumors. The findings of the study will contribute to the development of novel treatment approaches for patients with rare cutaneous malignancies, which remains an unmet clinical need.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry number: jRCT 2031190048.

Identifying risk factors for the prognosis of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In this study, we sought to identify the potential impacts of disease characteristics on the prognosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). We searched the PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception until February 2020 to identify studies that investigated the prognosis of cSCC. The pooled effect estimates were applied using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and were calculated using the random-effects model. Forty-three studies including a total of 21,530 patients and reporting 28,627 cases of cSCC were selected for the final meta-analysis. Poor differentiation (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.30–5.46; P < 0.001), perineural invasion (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.60–6.67; P = 0.001), Breslow greater than 2 mm (OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 2.63–11.37; P < 0.001), diameter greater than 20 mm (OR, 4.62; 95% CI, 2.95–7.23; P < 0.001), and location on temple (OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.12–9.15; P = 0.030) were associated with an increased risk of recurrence, whereas immunosuppression status and location on cheek, ear, or lip were not associated with the risk of recurrence. Poor differentiation (OR, 6.82; 95% CI, 4.66–9.99; P < 0.001); perineural invasion (OR, 7.15; 95% CI, 4.73–10.83; P < 0.001); Breslow greater than 2 mm (OR, 6.11; 95% CI, 4.05–9.21; P < 0.001); diameter greater than 20 mm (OR, 5.01; 95% CI, 2.56–9.80; P < 0.001); and location on ear (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.39–4.09; P = 0.002), lip (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.26–3.68; P = 0.005), and temple (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.20–6.40; P = 0.017) were associated with an increased risk of metastasis, whereas immunosuppression status and location on cheek did not affect the risk of metastasis. Finally, poor differentiation (OR, 5.97; 95% CI, 1.82–19.62; P = 0.003), perineural invasion (OR, 6.64; 95% CI, 3.63–12.12; P < 0.001), and Breslow greater than 2 mm (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.76–6.66; P < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of disease-specific death, whereas diameter; immunosuppression status; and location on ear, lip, and temple did not affect the risk of disease-specific death. We found that differentiation, perineural invasion, depth, diameter, and location could affect the prognosis of cSCC. The potential role of other patient characteristics on the prognosis of cSCC should be identified in further large-scale prospective studies.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Description of 11 Cases

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a malignant neuroendocrine tumor. Metastasis or lymph node spread is often detected at diagnosis. We performed a descriptive, retrospective study of patients diagnosed with MMC at Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón in the Community of Madrid, Spain between January 1998 and December 2018. Eleven patients (7 men [63%] and 4 women [36%]; mean age, 77.6 years) were diagnosed with MCC during this 21-year period; 45% of patients had stage IIIB disease (pTNM) at diagnosis. All patients but one underwent local surgery, and lymphovascular invasion was detected in 7 cases. Eight patients received adjuvant therapy after surgery (radiation therapy in 5 cases and chemotherapy in 3). Six patients (54%) died of MCC (mean survival, 14.5 months). MCC is an uncommon malignant tumor with an annual incidence of around 0.18 to 0.41 cases per 100 000 inhabitants; this is similar to the rate of 0.29 to 0.32 cases per 100 000 inhabitants a year detected in our series. Results with avelumab, a drug recently approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC; have been promising.

Nationwide Incidence of Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in England

Importance

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the most common skin cancer with metastatic potential, but epidemiologic data are poor. Changes to the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) in England have allowed more accurate data analysis of primary and metastatic cSCC since 2013.

Objective

To assess the national incidence of cSCC and metastatic cSCC (mcSCC) in England from 2013 through 2015.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This national population-based study identified a cohort of patients with cSCC and mcSCC in England from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015. Patients were identified using diagnostic codes derived from pathology reports in the NCRAS. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2017, through March 1, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Incidence rates across sex and risk factors for cSCC were derived from the NCRAS data. Risk of occurrence of mcSCC among the population with cSCC was assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to determine indicators of mcSCC.

Results

Among the 76 977 patients with first primary cSCC in 2013 through 2015 (62.7% male; median age, 80 years [interquartile range, 72-86 years]), the age-standardized rates for the first registered cSCC in England from 2013 through 2015 were 77.3 per 100 000 person-years (PY) (95% CI, 76.6-78.0) in male patients and 34.1 per 100 000 PY (95% CI, 33.7-34.5) in female patients. Increased primary cSCC tumor count was observed in older, white male patients in lower deprivation quintiles. After a maximum follow-up of 36 months, cumulative incidence of mcSCC developed in 1.1% of women and 2.4% of men with a primary cSCC. Significant increases in the risk of metastasis with adjusted hazard rates of approximately 2.00 were observed in patients who were aged 80 to 89 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.43), 90 years or older (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.09-1.66), male (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.52-2.10), immunosuppressed (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.64-2.42), and in higher deprivation quintiles (HR for highest quintile, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.35-2.00). Primary cSCC located on the ear (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.42-2.03) and lip (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.29-2.63) were at highest risk of metastasis.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study presents the first national study of the incidence of mcSCC. With limited health care resources and an aging population, accurate epidemiologic data are essential for informing future health care planning, identifying high-risk patients, and evaluating skin cancer prevention policies.

Influence of family history on risk of second primary cancers and survival in patients with squamous cell skin cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with squamous cell skin cancer (SCC) have an excellent prognosis but second primary cancers (SPCs) weaken survival prospects. Family history is a known risk factor for cancer but whether it is a risk factor for SPC in patients with SCC is not known.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the risk of family history on SPCs in patients with SCC and estimate survival probabilities of patients with SPCs depending on family history.

METHODS

With 13 945 histologically verified SCCs, relative risks (RRs) were estimated for family history using a generalized regression model. For survival analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) were assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

Family history of invasive SCC increased risk of second invasive SCC [RR = 42·92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 33·69-50·32] compared with risk without family history (RR 19·12, 95% CI 17·88-21·08). Family history of any nonskin cancer in invasive SCC increased risk of the same cancers to be diagnosed as SPC (RRF_H = 1·48, 95% CI 1·35-1·61 vs. RR_{no FH} = 1·40, 95% CI 1·32-1·48); significant increases were observed for seven different nonskin cancers. Most results were replicated for in situ SCC. SPC was deleterious for survival irrespective of family history; HR for patients with SPC was 4·28 (95% CI 3·83-4·72) vs. those without SPC (1·04).

CONCLUSIONS

Family history of nonskin cancer was associated with approximately a doubling of risk for SPCs in patients with SCC. SPC increases the death rate in patients with SCC 3-4 times, irrespective of family history. Taking family history into account at SCC diagnosis may help prevention or early detection of SPCs. What's already known about this topic? Second primary cancers (SPCs) are frequently diagnosed in patients with invasive and in situ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC); some epidemiological studies suggest a link to immune dysfunction. Family history of cancer is a risk factor for practically all first primary cancers but whether it also influences risk of SPCs in patients with SCC is not known. The possible influence of family history on survival in patients with SCC remains to be established. Linked Comment: Youlden and Baade. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:414-415.

Epidemiology of Skin Cancer: Update 2019

Melanoma and keratinocyte skin cancer (KSC) are the most common types of cancer in White-skinned populations. Both tumor entities showed increasing incidence rates worldwide but stable or decreasing mortality rates. Rising incidence rates of cutaneous melanoma (CM) and KSC are largely attributed to increasing exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, the main causal risk factor for skin cancer.Incidence rates of KSC, comprising of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), are much higher than that of melanoma. BCC development is mainly the cause of an intensive UV exposure in childhood and adolescence, while SCC development is related to chronic, cumulative UV exposure over decades. Although mortality is relatively low, KSC is an increasing problem for health care services causing significant morbidity.Cutaneous melanoma is rapidly increasing in White populations, with an estimated annual increase of around 3-7% over the past decades. In contrast to SCC, melanoma risk is associated with intermittent and chronic exposure to sunlight. The frequency of its occurrence is closely associated with the constitutive color of the skin and the geographical zone. Changes in outdoor activities and exposure to sunlight during the past 70 years are an important factor for the increasing incidence of melanoma. Mortality rates of melanoma show stabilization in the USA, Australia, and in European countries. In the USA even dropping numbers of death cases were recently reported, probably reflecting efficacy of the new systemic treatments.Among younger cohorts in some populations (e.g., Australia and New Zealand,), stabilizing or declining incidence rates of CM are observed, potentially caused by primary prevention campaigns aimed at reducing UV exposure. In contrast, incidence rates of CM are still rising in most European countries and in the USA. Ongoing trends towards thinner melanoma are largely ascribed to earlier detection.

Facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma - microscopic safety margins and their impact on developing local recurrences

OBJECTIVES

Surgical excision remains the treatment of choice for facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) despite there being no generally accepted diameter of clear margins. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of microscopic clear margins diameter (mCMD) with respect to the development of local recurrences (LR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 99 patients with a total of 142 cases of facial cSCC, who underwent surgical treatment between January 2010 and December 2015, were reviewed for demographic data and clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

100 cases were diagnosed as primary cSCC and 42 cases as secondary cSCC. Of these, nine (6.3%) developed LR. Mean time to LR was 20 months, with the cheek as the predominant site 55.5% (n = 5). Wound closure was either primary (56%) or secondary (44%), depending on the site. Although no significant correlation between mCMD and LR was found (r_Pearson = 0.029; r_Pearson = 0.015), >4.1 mm was shown to be a negative cut-off-value (horizontally and vertically) without LR (100% vs 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, however descriptive they are, the authors consider histological confirmation of clear margins to be necessary for reducing the formation of LR. Thus, consistent testing and histopathological reporting, in a multicentered effort, are needed to further clarify the role of mCMD in the development of cSCC-LR.

Estimating prevalence and incidence of skin cancer in Germany

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence and incidence of skin cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We calculated prevalence and incidence for cutaneous melanoma (CM) and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in 2012 in Germany, using claims data of 2.1 million insured persons. In order to allow statements concerning differences between subgroups, we calculated 95 % confidence intervals. Finally, we standardized prevalence and incidence with regard to the German population.

RESULTS

The prevalence and incidence of CM amounted to 0.12 % and 0.04 % and increased with age. For NMSC these measures were 0.65 % and 0.15 %. Of the prevalent and incident patients, 88.9 % and 87.4 % (CM) and 99.4 % and 98.8 % (NMSC) respectively were at early stages. A projection on the whole population resulted in 75,419 persons affected by CM and 376,004 persons affected by NMSC, including 24,075 (CM) and 84,618 (NMSC) incident patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we defined epidemiological measures according to the number of patients affected by skin cancer and having a medical consultation indicating a need for treatment. These results can serve in future research as a data basis for analysis of health service demand in skin cancer patients and the associated costs.

Epidemiology of basal and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the U.K. 2013-15: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), together known as keratinocyte cancers (KCs), are the commonest cancer in white ethnic populations. Recent improvements to registry data collection in England has allowed more accurate analysis of the epidemiology of BCC and cSCC and for the first time we are able to provide an accurate (representative) tumour burden for KC in the U.K.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the incidence of BCC and cSCC in the U.K.

METHODS

A cohort of patients with KCs between 2013 and 2015 were identified using linkage to diagnostic codes derived from pathology reports collected into the national cancer registry. Data from England's cancer registry were combined with data from Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. European age-standardized incidence rates (EASRs) of the first BCC and cSCC per patient per annum (PPPA) were calculated.

RESULTS

In the U.K, the EASR of the first BCC and cSCC PPPA in 2013-15 were 285 and 77 per 100 000 person years, respectively (211 120 KCs total in 2015). The mean annual percentage increase was 5% between 2013 and 2015 for both BCC and cSCC. By counting the first KC PPPA, we include an additional 51% KCs compared with the previous reporting technique which counts only the first BCC and cSCC in a patient's lifetime, yet it represents a probable underestimation of 5-11% of the true tumour count.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on an improved methodology, a more representative incidence of KC is presented, which is essential to healthcare planning and will lead to improved understanding of the epidemiology of KC. What's already known about this topic? Keratinocyte cancers (KCs) are the most common cancers affecting white ethnic populations. The incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is increasing worldwide including the U.K., most commonly in elderly male Caucasian patients. These cancers are traditionally substantially underreported and frequently excluded from national cancer statistics. What does this study add? Using improved data collection methods in England and validated tumour-reporting techniques, we report the most accurate BCC and cSCC incidence data for the U.K. ever published. Identifying the first BCC and cSCC per patient per annum, the incidence of BCC and cSCC in the U.K. (excluding Wales) was 285 and 77 per 100 000 person years, respectively, between 2013 and 2015, with more than 210 000 KCs in the U.K. in 2015.