Sex differences in case fatality before and after admission to hospital after acute cardiac events: analysis of community based coronary heart disease register

Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death in Cameroon: the first population-based cohort survey in sub-Saharan Africa

Background

Incidence estimates of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are unknown.

Method

Over 12 months, the household administrative office and health community committee within neighbourhoods in two health areas of Douala, Cameroon, registered all deaths among 86 188 inhabitants aged >18 years. As part of an extended multi-source surveillance system, the Emergency Medical Service (EMS), local medical examiners and district hospital mortuaries were also surveyed. Whereas two physicians investigated every natural death, two cardiologists reviewed all unexpected natural deaths.

Results

There were 288 all-cause deaths and 27 (9.4%) were SCD. The crude incidence rate was 31.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 20.3–40.6]/100 000 person-years. The age-standardized rate by the African standard population was 33.6 (95% CI: 22.4–44.9)/100 000 person-years. Death occurred at night in 37% of cases, including 11% of patients who died while asleep. Out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest occurred in 63% of cases, 55.5% of which occurred at home. Of the 88.9% cases of witnessed cardiac arrest, 63% occurred in the presence of a family member and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was attempted only in 3.7%.

Conclusion

The burden of SCD in this African population is heavy with distinct characteristics, whereas awareness of SCD and prompt resuscitation efforts appear suboptimal. Larger epidemiological studies are required in SSA in order to implement preventive measures, especially in women and young people.

Integrated sensor-augmented pump therapy systems [the MiniMed® Paradigm™ Veo system and the Vibe™ and G4® PLATINUM CGM (continuous glucose monitoring) system] for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

In recent years, meters for continuous monitoring of interstitial fluid glucose have been introduced to help people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) to achieve better control of their disease.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this project was to summarise the evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the MiniMed(®) Paradigm™ Veo system (Medtronic Inc., Northridge, CA, USA) and the Vibe™ (Animas(®) Corporation, West Chester, PA, USA) and G4(®) PLATINUM CGM (continuous glucose monitoring) system (Dexcom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in comparison with multiple daily insulin injections (MDIs) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), both with either self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) or CGM, for the management of T1DM in adults and children.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Diagnostic Assessment Programme manual. We searched 14 databases, three trial registries and two conference proceedings from study inception up to September 2014. In addition, reference lists of relevant systematic reviews were checked. In the absence of randomised controlled trials directly comparing Veo or an integrated CSII + CGM system, such as Vibe, with comparator interventions, indirect treatment comparisons were performed if possible.

METHODS

A commercially available cost-effectiveness model, the IMS Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness diabetes model version 8.5 (IMS Health, Danbury, CT, USA), was used for this assessment. This model is an internet-based, interactive simulation model that predicts the long-term health outcomes and costs associated with the management of T1DM and type 2 diabetes. The model consists of 15 submodels designed to simulate diabetes-related complications, non-specific mortality and costs over time. As the model simulates individual patients over time, it updates risk factors and complications to account for disease progression.

RESULTS

Fifty-four publications resulting from 19 studies were included in the review. Overall, the evidence suggests that the Veo system reduces hypoglycaemic events more than other treatments, without any differences in other outcomes, including glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. We also found significant results in favour of the integrated CSII + CGM system over MDIs with SMBG with regard to HbA1c levels and quality of life. However, the evidence base was poor. The quality of the included studies was generally low, often with only one study comparing treatments in a specific population at a specific follow-up time. In particular, there was only one study comparing Veo with an integrated CSII + CGM system and only one study comparing Veo with a CSII + SMBG system in a mixed population. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicated that MDI + SMBG is the option most likely to be cost-effective, given the current threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, whereas integrated CSII + CGM systems and Veo are dominated and extendedly dominated, respectively, by stand-alone, non-integrated CSII with CGM. Scenario analyses did not alter these conclusions. No cost-effectiveness modelling was conducted for children or pregnant women.

CONCLUSIONS

The Veo system does appear to be better than the other systems considered at reducing hypoglycaemic events. However, in adults, it is unlikely to be cost-effective. Integrated systems are also generally unlikely to be cost-effective given that stand-alone systems are cheaper and, possibly, no less effective. However, evidence in this regard is generally lacking, in particular for children. Future trials in specific child, adolescent and adult populations should include longer term follow-up and ratings on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions scale at various time points with a view to informing improved cost-effectiveness modelling.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42014013764.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Effect of gender on outcome of out of hospital cardiac arrest in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the relationship between gender and outcomes of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

All eligible, consecutive, non-traumatic Emergency Medical Services (EMS) treated OHCA patients in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium between December 2005 and May 2007. Patient age was analyzed as a continuous variable and stratified in two age cohorts: 15-45 and >55 years of age (yoa). Unadjusted and adjusted (based on Utstein characteristics) chi square tests and logistic regression models were employed to examine the relationship between gender, age, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 14,690 patients: of which 36.4% were women with a mean age of 68.3 and 63.6% of them men with a mean age of 64.2. Women survived to hospital discharge less often than men (6.4% vs. 9.1%, p<0.001); the unadjusted OR was 0.69, 95%CI: 0.60, 0.77 whereas when adjusted for all Utstein predictors the difference was not significant (OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.98, 1.36, p=0.07). The adjusted survival rate for younger women (15-45 yoa) was 11.1% vs. 9.8% for younger men (OR: 1.66, 95%CI: 1.04, 2.64, p=0.03) but no difference in discharge rates was observed in the >55 cohort (OR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.78, 1.15, p=0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Women who suffer OHCAs have lower rates of survival and have unfavourable Utstein predictors. When survival is adjusted for these predictors survival is similar between men and women except in younger women suggesting that age modifies the association of gender and survival from OHCA; a result that supports a protective hormonal effect among premenopausal women.

Immediate effects of upper thoracic spine manipulation on hypertensive individuals

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to determine if there were any statistically significant immediate effects of upper thoracic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on cardiovascular physiology in hypertensive individuals.

INTRODUCTION

Preliminary research suggests that SMT to various regions of the spine may be capable of lowering systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive individuals. Further studies are warranted to corroborate or refute these findings as well as measure how other attributes of cardiovascular physiology are impacted by SMT.

METHODS

Fifty hypertensive participants (age = 45.5±13.9 years, height = 1.69±0.10 m, body mass = 93.9±21.5 kg: mean±standard deviation (SD)) were equally randomized into a single-blind, controlled trial involving two study groups: supine diversified anterior upper thoracic SMT of T1-4, or a 'no T-spine contact' control. Outcome measures were electrocardiogram, bilateral pulse oximetry, and bilateral blood pressure measurement performed at baseline, post 1-minute intervention, and post 10-minute intervention. An independent samples t-test was used to compare between-group differences at baseline. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare within-group changes over time.

RESULTS

Within-group changes in PR interval and QRS duration demonstrated that the atria were transiently less active post-SMT and the ventricles were more active post-SMT, however the changes were clinically minimal.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study, and the limited existing normotensive, thoracic-specific SMT research in this field, suggest that cardiovascular physiology, short-term, is not affected by upper thoracic spine SMT in hypertensive individuals to a clinically relevant level.

Improving management of type 1 diabetes in the UK: the Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE) programme as a research test-bed. A mixed-method analysis of the barriers to and facilitators of successful diabetes self-management, a health economic analysis, a cluster randomised controlled trial of different models of delivery of an educational intervention and the potential of insulin pumps and additional educator input to improve outcomes

Background

Many adults with type 1 diabetes cannot self-manage their diabetes effectively and die prematurely with diabetic complications as a result of poor glucose control. Following the positive results obtained from a randomised controlled trial (RCT) by the Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE) group, published in 2002, structured training is recommended for all adults with type 1 diabetes in the UK.

Aim

With evidence that blood glucose control is not always improved or sustained, we sought to determine factors explaining why some patients benefit from training more than other patients, identifying barriers to successful self-management, while developing other models to make skills training more accessible and effective.

Findings

We confirmed that glycaemic outcomes are not always improved or sustained when the DAFNE programme is delivered routinely, although improvements in psychosocial outcomes are maintained. DAFNE courses and follow-up support is needed to help participants instil and habituate key self-management practices such as regular diary/record keeping. DAFNE graduates need structured professional support following training. This is currently either unavailable or provided ad hoc without a supporting evidence base. Demographic and psychosocial characteristics had minimal explanatory power in predicting glycaemic control but good explanatory power in predicting diabetes-specific quality of life over the following year. We developed a DAFNE course delivered for 1 day per week over 5 weeks. There were no major differences in outcomes between this and a standard 1-week DAFNE course; in both arms of a RCT, glycaemic control improved by less than in the original DAFNE trial. We piloted a course delivering both the DAFNE programme and pump training. The pilot demonstrated the feasibility of a full multicentre RCT and resulted in us obtaining subsequent Health Technology Assessment programme funding. In collaboration with the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Diabetes Research Programme at King’s College Hospital (RG-PG-0606-1142), London, an intervention for patients with hypoglycaemic problems, DAFNE HART (Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating Hypoglycaemia Awareness Restoration Training), improved impaired hypoglycaemia awareness and is worthy of a formal trial. The health economic work developed a new type 1 diabetes model and confirmed that the DAFNE programme is cost-effective compared with no structured education; indeed, it is cost-saving in the majority of our analyses despite limited glycated haemoglobin benefit. Users made important contributions but this could have been maximised by involving them with grant writing, delaying training until the group was established and funding users’ time off work to maximise attendance. Collecting routine clinical data to conduct continuing evaluated roll-out is possible but to do this effectively requires additional administrator support and/or routine electronic data capture.

Conclusions

We propose that, in future work, we should modify the current DAFNE curricula to incorporate emerging understanding of behaviour change principles to instil and habituate key self-management behaviours that include key DAFNE competencies. An assessment of numeracy, critical for insulin dose adjustment, may help to determine whether or not additional input/support is required both before and after training. Models of structured support involving professionals should be developed and evaluated, incorporating technological interventions to help overcome the barriers identified above and enable participants to build effective self-management behaviours into their everyday lives.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01069393.

Funding

The NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.

Gender differences in presentation, management and inhospital outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: data from 5000 patients included in the ORBI prospective French regional registry

BACKGROUND

Gender differences in presentation, management and outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been reported.

AIM

To determine whether female gender is associated with higher inhospital mortality.

METHODS

Data from ORBI, a regional STEMI registry of 5 years' standing, were analysed. The main data on presentation, management, inhospital outcome and prescription at discharge were compared between genders. Various adjusted hazard ratios were then calculated for inhospital mortality (women versus men).

RESULTS

The analysis included 5000 patients (mean age 62.6±13 years), with 1174 women (23.5%). Women were on average 8 years older than men, with more frequent co-morbidities. Median ischaemia time was 215 minutes (26 minutes longer in women; P<0.05). Reperfusion strategies in women less frequently involved fibrinolysis, coronary angiography, radial access and thrombo-aspiration. Female gender, especially in patients aged<60 years, was associated with poorer inhospital prognosis (including higher inhospital mortality: 9% vs. 4% in men; P<0.0001), and underutilization of recommended treatments at discharge. Moreover, excess female inhospital mortality was independent of presentation, revascularization time and reperfusion strategy (hazard ratio for women 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.76; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

One in four patients admitted for STEMI was female, with significant differences in presentation. Female gender was associated with less-optimal treatment, both in the acute-phase and at discharge. Efforts should be made to reduce these differences, especially as female gender was independently associated with an elevated risk of inhospital mortality.

A gender perspective on short- and long term mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction--a report from the SWEDEHEART register

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of patients admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] have indicated that women have a higher risk of early mortality than do men. These studies have presented limited information on gender related differences in the short term and almost no information on the long term.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed a prospective, consecutively included STEMI population consisting of 54,146 patients (35% women). This population consists of almost all patients hospitalised in Sweden between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2006 as recorded in the SWEDEHEART register (formerly RIKS-HIA). Follow-up time ranged from one to 13 years (mean 4.6). Women had a lower probability of being given reperfusion therapy, odds ratio [OR] 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.88). During the time these STEMI patients were in the hospital, 13% of the women and 7% of men died, multivariable adjusted OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.11-1.32). During the follow up period, 46% of the women died as compared with 32% of the men. There was, however, no gender difference in age-adjusted risk of long term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01) whereas the multivariable adjusted risk was lower in women (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.96). The long term risk of re-infarction was the same in men and women (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.03) whereas men in the youngest group had a higher risk than women in that age group (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94).

CONCLUSION

In STEMI, women had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality but the long-term risk of death was higher in men. More studies are needed in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) era that are designed to determine why women fare worse than men after STEMI during the first phase when they are in hospital.

Younger women have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality due to acute myocardial infarction in Chile

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Coronary heart disease is the second cause of death in Chilean women, with higher mortality among women, especially at younger ages. The objective was to analyze in-hospital case-fatality by sex and age in patients with acute myocardial infarction in Chile and to evaluate associated factors.

METHODS

From the nationwide hospital admissions database and the GEMI registry (a multicenter registry), we selected all cases of acute myocardial infarction (code: I.21) that occurred between 2001 and 2007 in Chile. We estimated odds ratios for in-hospital case-fatality in women by age (crude and adjusted for clinical characteristics and treatment).

RESULTS

In total, 49,287 cases of acute myocardial infarction were hospitalized, 31.3% of them women; 9278 patients were incorporated in the GEMI registry (27.1% women). In-hospital case-fatality was higher (P<.001) in women than men (national database, 20.4% vs 11.3%; GEMI, 14.2% vs 7.3%, irrespective of age. In-hospital case-fatality risk was higher in women aged<45 years: national odds ratio=2.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.3) and GEMI, odds ratio=2.7 (1.1-6.8). The estimated risk was lower in women aged 75 or more years in both databases, 1.3 (1.2-2.4) and 1.5 (1.2-1.9), respectively. Younger women less often received statins, odds ratio=0.7 (0.6-0.8); acetylsalicylic acid, odds ratio=0.4 (0.2-0.6); betablockers, odds ratio=0.8 (0.6-0.9), and thrombolytics, odds ratio=0.6 (0.5-0.8). An interaction was found between Killip class and sex. After adjusting for covariates, women aged<55 years with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and Killip class I-II, had the highest risk, odds ratio=4.3 (2.1-8.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of a Latin American country, women aged<55 years with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and Killip class I-II had a higher risk of death. Known risk factors do not completely explain this excess of risk.

Age-specific gender differences in in-hospital mortality by type of acute myocardial infarction

Younger women hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction (MI) have a poorer prognosis than men. Whether this is true for patients with acute ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) is not extensively studied. Using the MarketScan 2004 to 2007 Commercial and Medicare supplemental admission databases, we assessed gender differences in in-hospital mortality according to age in 91,088 patients (35,899 with STEMI, 55,189 with NSTEMI) who were 18 to 89 years old and had acute MI as their primary diagnosis. Patients with STEMI had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than those with NSTEMI (4.35% vs 3.53%, p <0.0001). Compared to men women were older, had higher co-morbidity scores, and were less likely to undergo revascularization during hospitalization in the STEMI and NSTEMI populations. In patients with STEMI the unadjusted women-to-men odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 2.29 (95% confidence interval 1.48 to 3.55) for the 18- to 49-year age group, 1.68 (1.28 to 2.21) for 50 to 59, 1.48 (1.17 to 1.88) for 60 to 69, 1.28 (1.06 to 1.57) for 70 to 79, and 1.01 (0.83 to 1.23) for 80 to 89. Corresponding unadjusted odds ratios were 1.51 (0.87 to 2.61), 1.46 (1.11 to 1.92), 1.29 (1.04 to 1.61), 0.83 (0.70 to 0.99) and 0.82 (0.70 to 0.94) for patients with NSTEMI. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, excess risk for in-hospital mortality in younger women versus their men counterparts (<60 years old) persisted in STEMI. In patients with NSTEMI the difference between younger women and younger men was not statistically significant; however, older women (≥70 years old) had better survival than men. In conclusion, higher risk of in-hospital mortality in younger women compared to younger men is more evident in patients with STEMI.

Sex differences in short- and long-term case-fatality of myocardial infarction

Declining trends in case fatality (CF) of MI events have been generally reported in western countries. It is, however, not clear whether the development has been equally beneficial in both sexes. Data from two large population based registers, FINAMI and the Finnish National Cardiovascular Disease Register (CVDR) were used to determine whether the CF of incident MI events has declined less in women than in men. All patients aged 35 and over were included. CF was calculated for different time periods after the onset of the MI event, the main emphasis was in pre-hospital, 28-day, and 1-year CF. Figures were compared between two study periods: 1994-1996 and 2000-2002. A total of 6,342 incident MI events were recorded in FINAMI and 117,632 events in CVDR during the study periods. Comparison between the two study periods showed that the CF was generally declining. However, a slower decline in short-term CF was seen among young (aged<55 years) women (P for sex by study period interaction in pre-hospital CF=0.028 in FINAMI and 0.003 in CVDR, and for 28-day CF P=0.016 in FINAMI and <0.0001 in CVDR). In conclusion, the short and long-term prognosis of MI events has improved in both sexes. Pre-hospital CF has declined less among younger women than among men and among older women. This slower decline in early CF was responsible for the slower improvement in 28-day and 1-year prognosis in young women.

Comparison of hospital versus out of hospital coronary death rates in women and men

Young women hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (MI) have greater in-hospital mortality than young men. However, the reasons for this difference have not been well characterized. We analyzed the data from 423,067 patients (247,701 men and 175,366 women) who were discharged with the diagnosis of MI from nonfederal hospitals in New Jersey and 355,569 coronary heart disease (CHD) deaths in New Jersey from 1990 to 2004 in 4 age strata: 35 to 54, 55 to 64, 65 to 74 and > or =75 years. Of the patients hospitalized for MI, young (35 to 54 years) women had greater in-hospital mortality than young men (5.2% vs 2.5%, adjusted odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 1.81, p <0.0001). However, in a community-wide analysis, when the total out-of-hospital CHD deaths in New Jersey were examined, young women had a lower out-of-hospital death rate than young men (11 vs 55/100,000). Statewide, young women were 4 times less likely to be hospitalized for MI (78 vs 297/100,000, relative risk 0.26), but they were only 1/2 as likely to die from MI in the hospital (7 vs 17/100,000, relative risk 0.41). Thus, women had a greater odds ratio for in-hospital mortality but a lower odds ratio for out-of-hospital CHD death than men. In conclusion, the greater in-hospital mortality of young women hospitalized for MI compared to young men could be explained in part by the finding that young men were more likely to have out-of-hospital CHD death.

Estrogen: a novel therapeutic adjunct for the treatment of trauma-hemorrhage-induced immunological alterations

Trauma-hemorrhage leads to prolonged immune suppression, sepsis, and multiple organ failure. The condition affects all compartments of the immune system, and extensive studies have been carried out elucidating the immunological events following trauma-hemorrhage. The immune alteration observed following trauma-hemorrhage is gender dependent in both animal models and humans, though some studies in humans are contradictory. Within 30 min after trauma-hemorrhage, splenic and peritoneal macrophages, as well as T-cell function, are depressed in male animals, but not in proestrus females. Studies have also shown that the mortality [corrected] rate and the induction of subsequent sepsis following trauma-hemorrhage are significantly higher in males and ovariectomized females compared with proestrus females. These and other investigations show that sex hormones form the basis of this gender dichotomy, and administration of estrogen can ameliorate the immune depression and increase the survival rate after trauma-hemorrhage. This review specifically elaborates the studies carried out thus far demonstrating immunological alteration after trauma-hemorrhage and its modulation by estrogen. Also, estrogen was shown to produce its salutary effects through nuclear as well as extranuclear receptors. Estrogen rapidly activates several protein kinases and phosphatases, as well as the release of calcium in different cell types. The results of the studies exemplify the promise of estrogen as a therapeutic adjunct in treating adverse pathophysiological conditions following trauma-hemorrhage.

Hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome: differences related to gender and use of percutaneous coronary procedures

Background

To identify differences among men and women with acute coronary syndrome in terms of in-hospital mortality, and to assess whether these differences are related to the use of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures.

Methods

Observational study based on the Minimum Basic Data Set. This encompassed all episodes of emergency hospital admissions (46,007 cases, including 16,391 women and 29,616 men) with a main diagnosis of either myocardial infarction or unstable angina at 32 hospitals within the Andalusian Public Health System over a four-year period (2000–2003). The relationship between gender and mortality was examined for the population as a whole and for stratified groups depending on the type of procedures used (diagnostic coronary catheterisation and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). These combinations were then adjusted for age group, main diagnosis and co-morbidityharlson score).

Results

During hospitalisation, mortality was 9.6% (4,401 cases out of 46,007), with 11.8% for women and 8.3% for men. There were more deaths among older patients with acute myocardial infarction and greater co-morbidity. Lower mortality was shown in patients undergoing diagnostic catheterisation and/or PTCA. After adjusting for age, diagnosis and co-morbidity, mortality affected women more than men in the overall population (OR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06–1.22) and in the subgroup of patients where no procedure was performed (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07–1.24). Gender was not an explanatory variable in the subgroups of patients who underwent some kind of procedure.

Conclusion

Gender has not been associated to in-hospital mortality in patients who undergo some kind of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure. However, in the group of patients without either diagnostic catheterisation or angioplasty, mortality was higher in women than in men.

Does diabetes mellitus explain the higher hospital mortality of women with acute myocardial infarction? Results from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry

BACKGROUND

Women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) exhibit greater hospital mortality than do men. In general, diabetes mellitus is one of the major factors influencing the outcome of patients with AMI. The aim of this study was to analyze the interaction between diabetes and gender, specifically with regard to the higher hospital mortality of female AMI patients aged < or = 75 years.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from 3,715 patients aged < or = 75 (2,794 men, 921 women) with acute myocardial infarction who were treated in 25 hospitals in Berlin, Germany, from 1999 to 2002. In a multivariate analysis, we specifically studied the interaction between the factors diabetes mellitus and gender in their effects on hospital mortality.

RESULTS

After adjustment in multivariate analysis, the interaction between gender and diabetes was statistically significant, and the estimated odds ratios were as follows: female diabetic patients compared with male diabetic patients, odds ratio (OR) = 2.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-3.68); female diabetic patients compared with male nondiabetic patients, OR = 2.90 (95% CI 1.90-4.42); and female diabetic patients compared with female nondiabetic patients, OR = 2.92 (95% CI 1.75-4.87). There was no statistically significant difference between the risk of dying for female nondiabetic patients or for male diabetic patients when compared with male nondiabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In AMI patients aged < or = 75 years, female gender alone is not an independent predictor of hospital mortality. Detailed, multivariate analysis reveals that specifically diabetic women demonstrate higher hospital mortality than do men. Special attention should be provided to these female diabetic patients.

Secular trends in deaths from cardiovascular diseases: a 25-year community study

BACKGROUND

Although age-adjusted cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality has declined over the past decades, controversies remain about whether this trend was similar across locations of death and disease categories and about the existence of age and sex disparities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined CVD mortality trends in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between 1979 and 2003 using the categories defined by the American Heart Association, including coronary heart disease (CHD), non-CHD diseases of the heart, and noncardiac circulatory diseases. Data on demographics, cause, and location of death of all 6378 residents who died of CVD were analyzed. Although decreases in the age-adjusted rates occurred in all groups, the magnitude of the decline varied widely. Lesser annual declines were noted in out-of-hospital than in-hospital deaths (1.8% versus 4.8%; P<0.001), in older than in younger persons (1.5% at age > or =85 years versus 3.9% for those < or =74 years of age; P<0.001), and in women relative to men (2.5% versus 3.3%; P=0.007). Furthermore, although CHD showed a marked annual decrease (3.3%), more modest decrements were found for non-CHD diseases of the heart (2.1%) and noncardiac circulatory diseases (2.4%) (P=0.02 and P=0.04 for the comparison with CHD decline, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 25 years, CVD mortality declined markedly in the community, but there were large disparities in the magnitude of the decline, resulting in a shift in the distribution toward out-of-hospital and non-CHD deaths. Further reduction in CVD mortality will require strategies directed at elderly persons and women, in whom out-of-hospital rates have improved only minimally.

Preconditioning: Gender Effects1

Preconditioning is injury induced protection from subsequent injury. During preconditioning protective cellular responses to injury are up regulated resulting in acute and delayed defense against further damage. Several studies indicate that females experience a protective advantage after acute insult compared to males. Despite evidence of gender differences in acute injury, relatively few studies have evaluated whether there are sex differences in preconditioning. Variations in patients' pre-morbid preconditioning status may explain outcome variations that are not apparent in small animal studies. This review discusses the differences in response to acute injury experienced by males and females, the basic mechanisms of preconditioning, and the sex differences in the mechanisms of preconditioning.

Influence of gender on treatment and short-term mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Berlin

AIMS

Previous studies have shown higher hospital mortality rates in women, especially younger women, than in men. In light of the fact that myocardial infarction therapy is rapidly developing, and since gender-specific aspects have been discussed in detail during recent years, it was our goal to re-evaluate factors influencing hospital mortality rate, especially those involving gender-specific differences, in the city of Berlin, Germany.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from 5133 patients (3330 men and 1803 women) with acute myocardial infarction who were treated in 25 hospitals in Berlin during the years 1999 to 2002.

RESULTS

During hospitalization the overall mortality rate was 18.6% among women and 8.4% among men. Women were older (mean age for men 62 years; women 73 years) and less likely to be married (men 74.6%; women 36.9%) than men. Women generally took longer to arrive at the hospital after infarction than did men (median time: men 2.0 h; women 2.6 h). Women furthermore demonstrated a higher proportion of diabetes (men 22.8%; women 36.5%) and hypertension (men 58.0%; women 69.3%). Reperfusion therapy (men 68.8%; women 49.7%) and administration of beta-blockers (men 76.0%; women 66.0%) took place less often for women than for men. A multivariate analysis revealed the following factors to be independent predictors of hospital mortality: age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, pre-existing heart failure, pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiogenic shock and pulmonary congestion on admission, admission to a hospital with >600 beds, ST-elevation in the initial ECG, reperfusion therapy, as well as beta-blocker and ACE inhibitor treatment within 48 h of hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Even after adjustment in multivariate analysis, women with acute myocardial infarction still demonstrate a higher risk for in-hospital death than men.

Influence of Gender on Baseline Features and Clinical Outcomes among 17,370 Patients with Confirmed Ischaemic Stroke in the International Stroke Trial

AIM

We sought to determine whether there were differences between men and women with acute stroke in their baseline characteristics and outcome in a large cohort of patients randomized in the International Stroke Trial (IST).

METHODS

Of the 19,435 patients randomized in the IST, 17,370 had an ischemic stroke confirmed by CT scan or autopsy (8,003 female and 9,367 male). In males and females, we compared baseline characteristics (age, frequency of atrial fibrillation, pre-stroke administration of aspirin and systolic blood pressure, conscious level, stroke syndrome) and outcome at 14 days and 6 months (death, complications, dependency, recovery, place of residence). We developed a specific logistic regression model to adjust for case-mix in order to evaluate the separate influence of gender on outcome.

RESULTS

Female patients were older, suffered more frequently from atrial fibrillation, had higher systolic blood pressure at randomization and generally had more severe strokes (a higher proportion were unconscious or drowsy or had a total anterior circulation syndrome). Females had higher 14-day and 6-month case fatality and were more likely to be dead or dependent at six months (and consequently more likely to require institutional or residential care). Gender was an independent predictor of death or dependency at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The adverse effect of female gender on outcome indicates that further research to explore the underlying biological mechanism is justified, and that more intensive acute and long-term treatment may be needed to improve outcome among female patients with stroke.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE MYOCARDIAL INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE TO ACUTE INJURY

Hemorrhage, trauma, ischemia/reperfusion, burn, and sepsis each lead to cardiac dysfunction. These insults lead to an inflammatory cascade, which plays an important role in this process. Gender has been shown to influence the inflammatory response, as well as outcomes after acute injury. The mechanisms by which gender affects the inflammatory response to and the outcome of acute injury are being actively investigated. We searched PubMed for articles in the English language by using the search words sex, gender, estrogen, testosterone, inflammation, acute injury, ischemia reperfusion, sepsis, trauma, and burns. These were used in various combinations. We read the abstracts of the relevant titles to confirm their relevance, and the full articles were then extracted. References from extracted articles were checked for any additional relevant articles. This review will examine evidence for gender differences in the outcome to acute injury, explain the myocardial inflammatory response to acute injury, and elucidate the various mechanisms by which gender affects the myocardial response to acute injury.

The absolute risk of recurrent myocardial infarction is similar amongst both sexes: MONICA Iceland Study 1981-1999

BACKGROUND

To do a gender comparison of absolute risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI).

DESIGN

Registration of all first and second MI amongst Icelandic males and females 1981-1999.

METHODS

The whole of Icelandic population, 40-74 years of age.

RESULTS

The mean recurrence rate (second attack) for men was 45.7/1000 MI survivors/year and for women 39.0/1000 per year. The male/female (M/F) ratio was 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.37, P = 0.05 and did not change significantly with age. The M/F ratio for first MI in comparison was two to seven, lowest in the oldest group. The recurrence rate decreased significantly and similarly in both sexes during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

The absolute risk of MI is closely similar amongst both sexes and has decreased similarly suggesting that the same kind of secondary intervention is effective amongst both sexes in a general population.

Comparison of Baseline Characteristics, Clinical Features, Angiographic Results, and Early Outcomes in Men vs Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Women have had a higher early mortality rate than men after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the prethrombolytic and thrombolytic eras. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to significantly improve survival of patients with AMI, and to be superior to thrombolytic therapy in terms of immediate restoration of normal flow in the infarct-related artery and reduction of recurrent ischemic events. However, the effect of primary PCI on early outcomes of women vs men remains unknown. Therefore, we examined whether there was any difference in term of 30-day mortality between women and men after primary PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between May 1993 and April 2002, primary PCI was performed in 1,032 consecutive patients (15.3% women and 84.7% men) with AMI. The overall successful reperfusion (final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow) and 30-day morality rates were 84.0% and 8.5%, respectively. The rate of successful reperfusion did not differ between women and men (84.8% vs 83.9%, p = 0.77). However, mortality at 30 days was significantly higher in women than in men (14.6% vs 7.4%, p = 0.003). In comparison with men, women were older; had significantly higher incidences of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, complete atrioventricular block, and right ventricular infarction; and had longer times of reperfusion (all p values < 0.05). During hospitalization, advanced congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class 3 or greater), free wall rupture, and major bleeding complications were more likely to occur in women than in men (all p values < 0.05). Compared with men, the unadjusted odds ratio for 30-day death among women was 2.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27 to 3.53). After adjusting for age, the odds ratio was substantially reduced to 1.66 (95% CI, 0.98 to 2.79). Further adjustment for age and other variables further reduced the odds ratio to 1.06 (95% CI, 0.53 to 2.14).

CONCLUSIONS

A gender gap of 30-day mortality existed between women and men with AMI that could not be altered by primary PCI. However, this gap was only an apparent one, and was not truly related to gender alone. In comparison with men, women were older, had significantly higher incidences of comorbidities and major untoward clinical events, and had longer times of reperfusion, which could help explain why the 30-day mortality rate was higher in women than in men.

[Myocardial infarction. Population case-fatality in seven Spanish autonomous communities: the IBERICA Study]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The magnitude of the problem of myocardial infarction (MI) is better understood by assessing the population case-fatality than by analyzing only the number of patients attending hospitals.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Our data come from the IBERICA Study (Investigation, Specific Search and Registry of Acute Myocardial Ischemic Syndrome). Twenty eight-day MI population case-fatality is described in the population aged 25 to 74 years during 1997 and 1998 in the following Spanish autonomous communities: Castilla-La Mancha (Toledo and Albacete), Catalonia (Girona), Valencia Community (Valencia), Balearic Islands (Majorca), Murcia, Navarra and Basque Country. The relationship between case-fatality and other variables such as sex, age and geographic area is also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10,660 MI cases were registered, 4,106 of whom died within the period of 28 days following the onset of symptoms (38.5%; CI 95%, 37.6-39.4%). The overall case-fatality was 37.0% (CI 95%, 35.9-38.0%) in men and 44.3% (CI 95%, 42.3-46.4%) in women. Death occurred out of hospitals in 2,869 (69.9%) cases. An increased case-fatality in women was associated with a higher in-hospital case-fatality (45% higher than men). The proportion of patients who died before reaching a hospital was similar in both genders. Classical symptoms of MI were more common among men than women (82.7% vs. 77.6%, p < 0,001). The interval between symptoms' onset and hospitalization was 30 minute longer among hospitalized women as compared with men (p < 0,001).

CONCLUSIONS

Population MI case-fatality is high in the seven Spanish autonomous communities studied. Approximately 2 out of 3 deaths occur without patients being able to reach a hospital. These results emphasize the importance of primary and secondary prevention measures and the necessity to design ready-access systems to defibrillation and resuscitation manoeuvres for patients with cardiopulmonary arrest.

The pursuit of equity in NHS resource allocation: should morbidity replace utilisation as the basis for setting health care capitations?

Although the English NHS has been described as a world leader in pioneering methods of distributing expenditure in relation to population needs, concerns about the legitimacy of using the current utilisation-based model to allocate health service resources are mounting. In this paper, we present a critical review of NHS resource allocation in England and demonstrate the feasibility and impact of using direct health estimates as a basis for setting health care capitations. Comparing target allocations for the inpatient treatment of coronary heart disease in a sample of 34 primary care trusts in contrasting locations in England, we find that a morbidity-based model would result in a significant shift in hospital resources away from deprived areas, towards areas with older demographic profiles and towards rural areas. Discussing the findings in relation to a wider policy context that is generally concerned to direct more health care resources towards the poor, the paper concludes by calling for greater clarity between the goals of health care equity and health equity. Whilst the former demands that the legitimate needs of demographically older populations for more health care resources are acknowledged, the goal of health equity requires real political commitment to resource broader social policy initiatives.

Is female sex associated with increased survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?

AIM

To evaluate survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to sex.

METHODS

All patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest included in the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Registry between 1990 and 2000 in whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was attempted and who did not have a crew witnessed arrest were included. The registry covers 85% of the inhabitants of Sweden (approximately 8 million inhabitants). P-values were adjusted to differences in age. Survival was defined as patients being hospitalised alive and being alive one month after cardiac arrest. In all, 23,797 patients participated in the survey of which 27.9% were women.

RESULTS

Among women 16.4% were hospitalised alive versus 13.2% among men ( P<0.001). After one month 3.0% among women were alive versus 3.4% among men (NS). In a multivariate analysis considering differences in age and various factors at resuscitation female sex was an independent predictor for patients being hospitalised alive (odds ratio 1.66; 95% confidence limits 1.49-1.84) and for being alive after one month (odds ratio 1.27; 95% confidence limits 1.03-1.56). Women differed from men as they were older ( P<0.001 ), had a lower prevalence of witnessed cardiac arrest ( P=0.01), a lower occurrence of bystander CPR (P<0.001), a lower occurrence of ventricular fibrillation as initial arrhythmia (P<0.001) and a lower occurrence of cardiac disease judged to be the cause of cardiac arrest ( P<0.0001 ). On the other hand they had a cardiac arrest at home more frequently ( P<0.001 ).

CONCLUSION

Among patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden which was not crew witnessed and in whom resuscitation efforts were attempted, female sex was associated with an increased survival.

Exploring sex differences in case fatality in acute myocardial infarction or coronary death events in the northern Sweden MONICA Project

OBJECTIVES

To investigate sex differences in reaching diagnosis, medical management and case fatality (CF) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the population aged 35-64 years in northern Sweden.

METHODS

Within the framework of the World Health Organization Multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Diseases (MONICA) Project, definite AMI was monitored in people aged 35-64 years from 1989 through 1995 (target population 510 000 in 1991).

SETTING

In a population based coronary register, all coronary events were recorded in nine hospitals in 1989-95.

RESULTS

The number of events included in the definite coronary myocardial infarction register was 2483 men and 669 women. On admission, a higher proportion of men with definite AMI had chest pain or ECG changes typical for AMI (P < 0.0001). Disagreement between clinical diagnosis and classification by MONICA criteria occurred more often in women (P=0.008). A significantly higher proportion of men was admitted in the coronary care unit and they were significantly more often treated with thrombolytics, nitroglycerine, beta-blockers, or antiplatelet agents. Women received significantly more diuretics, inotropics or calcium antagonists. Diabetes, conferring a worse prognosis, was more common in women (20 vs. 15%; P=0.003). Prehospital CF was significantly higher in men (24.1 vs. 18.3%; P=0.005), but in patients treated in hospital, the CF was significantly lower in men (12.7 vs. 21.2%; P < 0.001). Total CF was equal in men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors contributing to the excess in-hospital CF in women were identified, including greater problems in diagnosis of AMI in women which may be one of the reasons for less intensive treatment in women. Differences in co-morbidity, most notably diabetes and medical treatment between men and women with acute AMI may also have played a part.

Differences in thrombolytic treatment and in-hospital mortality between women and men after acute myocardial infarction

There is evidence for gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, little data exist about these differences in patients from the Arab Middle East. Therefore, we studied the influence of patient gender on the presentation, the use of thrombolytic therapy, and in-hospital mortality after AMI in Kuwaiti nationals. This is a retrospective study of all consecutive Kuwaiti patients admitted to the coronary care unit of a university hospital with the diagnosis of AMI between June 1994 and May 1997. A total of 89 women and 267 men were included. Women were older than men and had significantly higher rates of diabetes (72% vs 46%), hypertension (58% vs 33%) and hypercholesterolemia (80% vs 53%). Women were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy (40% vs 62%, p=0.001). Fewer women were eligible for thrombolytic therapy (50% vs 66%, p<0.05). Of those who were eligible for thrombolysis there was no sex difference in receiving such treatment. The in-hospital mortality among women younger than 70 years was 2.5 times higher than among men in the same age group, while there was no difference in mortality between women and men aged 70 years and older. We conclude that women and men with AMI have different clinical characteristics and outcomes following AMI. There was no gender bias for the use of thrombolytic therapy. The higher in-hospital mortality in younger women, i.e. less than 70 years, compared to younger men, indicates that younger women with AMI should be considered as a high-risk group.

Geographical pattern of female deaths from myocardial infarction in an urban population: fatal outcome out-of-hospital related to socio-economic deprivation

OBJECTIVE

This study of myocardial infarction (MI) amongst urban women has sought to assess whether there are differences in fatal outcome, in-hospital respectively out-of-hospital, between residential areas defined in terms of socio-economic circumstances.

DESIGN

Register-based surveillance study 1986-95.

SETTING

Seventeen residential areas in the city of Malmö, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

Women 20-74 years of age.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in fatal outcome, in-hospital respectively out-of-hospital, between residential areas were expressed in terms of age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs), calculated by means of logistic regression. Socio-economic circumstances in the areas were expressed in terms of a composite score.

RESULTS

Between residential areas there were marked and statistically significant differences in incidence (range 124-328/10(5), P < 0.001, d.f.=16) and mortality (range 38-132/10(5), P < 0.005, d.f.=16). Area rates of mortality covaried with incidence (r=0.85, P < 0.001) and with odds ratios of fatal outcome out-of-hospital (r=0.52, P=0.031) but not in-hospital. The odds ratios of fatal outcome out-of-hospital decreased in a statistically significant stepwise fashion from areas in the lowest socio-economic quintile (reference) to areas in the highest socio-economic quintile (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94). There was no corresponding association with the odds ratios of fatal outcome in-hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The high rate of mortality from MI amongst women in areas with deprived socio-economic circumstances was related to deaths occurring out-of-hospital. In order to assess the preventive potential there is a need for further studies that may clarify to what extent the association with socio-economic circumstances can be explained by other factors and conditions known to influence the probability of survival.

Role of age and sex in short-term and long term mortality after a first Q wave myocardial infarction

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyse whether the risk of death within 28 days and three years after a first Q wave myocardial infarction was higher in hospitalised women than in men.

DESIGN

Follow up study.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

All consecutive first Q wave myocardial infarction patients aged 25 to 74 years (447 women and 2322 men) admitted to a tertiary hospital in Gerona, Spain, from 1978 to 1997 were registered and followed up for three years.

MAIN RESULTS

Women were older, presented more comorbidity and developed more severe myocardial infarctions than men. A significant interaction was found between sex and age. Women aged 65-74 had higher early mortality risk than men of the same age (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.01, 2.66) after adjusting for age, comorbidity and acute complications including heart failure. Women under 65 tended to be at lower risk of early mortality than men (0.45 (95% CI 0.19, 1.04). Three year mortality of 28 day survivors did not differ between sexes.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the idea that the higher 28 day mortality in hospitalised women with a first Q wave myocardial infarction is mainly attributable to the large number of patients aged 65 to 74 years in whom the risk is higher than that in men. Women under 65 with myocardial infarction do not seem to be a special group of risk.

Myocardial infarction in men and women under 65 years of age: no evidence of gender bias

We examined short and long term outcomes of MI in a consecutive series of 169 men and 50 women who were followed for an average of 3.5 years. Similar percentages of men and women were admitted to medical intensive care, received in-patient cardiac rehabilitation, quit smoking at one year, were still smoking, were taking a lipid lowering drug or had returned to work at one year, underwent coronary angiography at 3.5 years or had died by 3.5 years. The lack of gender difference in outcome may reflect an absence of gender bias in the management of men and women with MI in southwest Scotland.

Is there a difference between women and men in characteristics and outcome after in hospital cardiac arrest?

AIM

To describe the characteristics and outcome among patients suffering from an in-hospital cardiac arrest in women and men.

METHODS

All patients who suffered an in-hospital cardiac arrest during a 4 year period in Sahlgrenska Hospital Göteborg, Sweden, where the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) team was called, were recorded and described prospectively in terms of characteristics and outcome.

RESULTS

There were 557 patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest in whom the CPR-team was alerted. Among them, 217 (39%) were women. Women differed from men having a lower prevalence of earlier myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, renal disease and a higher prevalence of rheumatic disease. In terms of aetiology of the cardiac arrest, 47% men and 48% women were judged to have had a confirmed or possible AMI. More men than women were found in ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) (57 vs. 41%; P<0.001), whereas more women were found in pulseless electrical activity (30 vs. 15%; P<0.0001). Cerebral performance categories (CPC)-score at discharge did not differ between men and women. Among women, 36.4% survived to discharge as compared with 38.0% among men (NS). Survival from VF/VT was 64.3% in women and 52.7% in men (NS). When correcting for dissimilarities at baseline, the adjusted odd ratio for being discharged alive from hospital among women as compared with men was 1.66 (95% confidence limit 1.06-2.62; P=0.028).

CONCLUSION

Thirty nine percent of patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest for whom the CPR-team was alerted, were women. Women were less frequently found in VF/VT than men. After correcting for dissimilarities at baseline, female gender was associated with a small improvement in survival.

Sex differences in risk factors, treatment and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease is the major cause of death of postmenopausal women in industrialised countries. Although acute myocardial infarction (AMI) affects men in greater numbers, the short-term outcomes for women are worse. In the longer term, studies suggest that mortality risk for women is lower or similar to that of men. However, length of follow up and adjustment for confounding factors have varied and more importantly, the association between treatment and outcomes has not been examined.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between sex differences in risk factors and hospital treatment and mortality after AMI.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study collecting demographic and clinical data on cases of AMI admitted to hospitals in Yorkshire. The main outcome measures were mortality status at discharge from hospital and two years later.

SETTING

All district and university hospitals accepting emergency admissions in the former Yorkshire National Health Service (NHS) region of northern England.

PARTICIPANTS

3684 consecutive patients with a possible diagnosis of AMI admitted to hospitals in Yorkshire between 1 September and 30 November 1995.

MAIN RESULTS

AMI was confirmed by the attending consultant for 2196 admissions (2153 people, 850 women and 1303 men). Women were older and less likely than men to be smokers or have a history of ischaemic heart disease. Crude inhospital mortality was higher for women (30% versus 19% for men, crude odds ratio of death before discharge for women 1.78, 95% confidence intervals 1.46, 2.18, p=0.00). This difference persisted after adjustment for age, risk factors and comorbidities (adjusted OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04, 1.63, p=0.02), but was not significant when treatment was taken into account. Women were less likely to be given thrombolysis (37% versus 46%, p<0.01) and aspirin (83% versus 90%, p<0.01), discharged with beta blockers (33% versus 47%, p<0.01) and aspirin (82% versus 88% p<0.01) or be scheduled for angiography, exercise testing or revascularisation. Adjustment for age removed much of the disparity in treatment. Crude mortality rate at two years was higher for women (OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.41, 2.31, p=0.00). Age, existing risk factors and acute treatment accounted for most of this difference, with treatment on discharge having little additional influence.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted to hospital with AMI should be offered optimal treatment irrespective of age or sex. Women have a worse prognosis after AMI and under-treatment of older people with aspirin and thrombolysis may be contributing to this.

Acute myocardial infarction in women: contribution of treatment variables to adverse outcome

BACKGROUND

Women have excessive mortality rates after acute myocardial infarction compared with men. The extent to which this increased risk can be attributed to differences in treatment is not well-understood.

METHODS

This was an observational follow-up study of 1737 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction for coronary care between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1997.

RESULTS

Compared with men, women took longer to arrive at the hospital (132.5 minutes [range 76 to 291 minutes] vs 120 minutes [range 60 to 240 minutes]; P =.006), were less likely to receive aspirin acutely (87.8% vs 91.3%; P =.03), had longer door-to-needle times (90 minutes [range 60 to 143.5 minutes] vs 78 minutes [range 50 to 131 minutes]; P =.004), and were less likely to be given beta-blockers at hospital discharge (31.6% vs 44.9%; P <.0001). Estimated survival (95% confidence interval [CI]) at 30 days was only 78.4% (range 74.4% to 81.9%) for women compared with 88.0% (range 86.1% to 89.7%) for men. Women were older and more often white, but their excess risk (hazard ratio 2.09; 95% CI, 1.59-2.75) persisted after adjustment for age, racial group, and diabetes (hazard ratio 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15-2.01). Additional adjustment for emergency thrombolytic and aspirin therapy caused a further small reduction in the excess risk for women (hazard ratio 1.46; 95% CI, 1. 09-1.98), but with adjustment for aspirin and beta-blockers prescribed at discharge, the excess risk attributable to being female disappeared as the hazard ratio fell to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.31-1. 84). Estimated 30-day survival free of reinfarction and unstable angina was also lower for women than for men (75% [range 71% to 79%] vs 86% [range 84% to 88%]); again, the excess risk for women persisted despite adjustment for age and racial group before disappearing as treatment variables were introduced into the model. The influence of treatment variables on the differential risks for women and men disappeared at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that women with acute myocardial infarction arrived later at the hospital, were less likely to be given aspirin therapy acutely, had longer door-to-needle times, and, on discharge from the hospital, were less likely to be prescribed beta-blockers for secondary prevention. The data suggest that the failure to treat women as vigorously as men made a significant contribution to their worse outcome.

Patient preference-based treatment thresholds and recommendations: a comparison of decision-analytic modeling with the probability-tradeoff technique

BACKGROUND

Decision analysis (DA) and the probability-tradeoff technique (PTOT) are patient preference-based methods of determining optimal therapy for individuals. Using aspirin therapy for the primary prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) in elderly persons as an example, the objective of this study was to determine whether group-level treatment thresholds and individual-level treatment recommendations derived using PTOT are identical to those of DA incorporating the patients' own values.

METHODS

Persons in a pilot study of the efficacy of aspirin in the prevention of stroke and MI were asked to participate. Participant values and utilities for pertinent health states (e.g., minor and major stroke, MI, major bleeding episode) were determined. Then, in three hypothetical clinical situations in which the chance of stroke or MI was varied, PTOT was used to directly determine treatment thresholds for aspirin therapy (i.e., the smallest reduction in MI or stroke risk for which participants would be willing to take aspirin). Using DA modeling, with the same probabilities of events as in the PTOT exercise and incorporating participants' own values, treatment thresholds for the three clinical situations were determined. The thresholds determined by the two approaches were compared. Finally, based on these treatment thresholds, using the best estimates of the efficacy of aspirin to prevent first-time stroke and MI, PTOT and DA treatment recommendations for individual participants were compared.

RESULTS

The 42 participants reported that a major stroke was the least desirable health state, followed by MI, minor stroke, and major bleeding. The minimum risk reduction required to take aspirin was greater for MI prevention compared with stroke prevention. For the two clinical situations in which the hypothetical efficacy of aspirin to prevent stroke was varied, treatment thresholds for the PTOT versus DA approaches differed (p < 0.04), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.19) for the MI-based clinical situation. Using the best estimate of the efficacy of aspirin to prevent first-time stroke and MI, PTOT and DA treatment recommendations whether or not to take aspirin were discordant for 38% of participants (16 of 42) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient preference-based group-level treatment thresholds and individual-level treatment recommendations can differ significantly depending on whether PTOT or DA is used, apparently because the two emphasize different aspects of the decision-making process. DA theory assumes that effective therapeutic decision making should maximize both quality and quantity of life; with PTOT, the emphasis for effective clinical decision making allows patients to be fully engaged in the process, thus hopefully leading to fully informed decisions that may result in satisfaction and compliance.

When should hypertension be treated? The different perspectives of Canadian family physicians and patients

BACKGROUND

Hypertension guidelines from different organizations often specify different treatment thresholds, and none explicitly state how these thresholds were chosen. This study was undertaken to determine the treatment thresholds of family physicians and hypertensive patients for mild, uncomplicated essential hypertension. A subject's treatment threshold can be determined by eliciting the minimum reduction in cardiovascular risk that he or she feels outweighs the inconvenience, costs and side effects of antihypertensive therapy (the minimal clinically important difference [MCID]).

METHODS

The study subjects consisted of a random sample of family physicians and a consecutive sample of hypertensive patients without overt cardiovascular disease from Ottawa and Edmonton. To determine participants' MCIDs, we used a survey employing hypothetical scenarios (each depicting a different baseline cardiovascular risk) and a probability trade-off tool.

RESULTS

Of 94 family physicians and 146 patients approached for the study, 72 and 74 participated respectively. There was marked variability in the MCIDs of both groups. In general, patients were less likely to want antihypertensive therapy than physicians, particularly when baseline cardiovascular risks were low: 49% v. 64% (p = 0.06), 68% v. 92% (p < 0.001) and 86% v. 100% (p = 0.001) for 5-year cardiovascular risks of 2%, 5% and 10% respectively. Moreover, patients expressed larger MCIDs (i.e., wanted greater benefits before accepting therapy) than physicians. However, a subgroup of patients (15% to 26%, depending on the scenario) wanted treatment even if there was no anticipated benefit. Multivariate analysis showed that no sociodemographic factors strongly predicted the MCIDs of either group.

INTERPRETATION

Guidelines that set treatment thresholds on the basis of physician or expert opinion may not accurately reflect the preferences of hypertensive patients. There is a need for patient decision aids and attention to patient preferences when initiation of antihypertensive therapy is considered for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Further research is needed to define treatment thresholds for other chronic conditions and in other groups.

Marked improvement in survival after acute myocardial infarction in middle-aged men but not in women. The Northern Sweden MONICA study 1985-94

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyse time trends in survival after acute myocardial infarction with special emphasis on sex differences.

DESIGN

Within the framework of the population-based WHO MONICA Project, all acute myocardial infarction events were recorded in the age group 25-64 years in northern Sweden during the period 1985-94. All first-ever myocardial infarction patients were followed for information on vital status.

SUBJECTS

A total of 3397 men and 860 women with acute myocardial infarction, during the period between 1985 and 1994.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Case fatality rates after first-ever acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

When compared with the 1985-86 cohort, the age-adjusted odds ratio for death within 1 year after acute myocardial infarction was 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.76) in the 1993-94 male cohort but 0.99 (95% CI 0.61-1.60) in the female 1993-94 cohort. Corresponding age-adjusted proportions of death within 1 year were 33.3% and 22.9% in men and 27.5% and 27.3% in women in 1985-86 and 1993-94, respectively. The odds ratio for 3-year case fatality amongst those who survived the first 28 days was 0.34 (95% CI 0.21-0.55) in 1991-92 compared with 1985-86 in men and 0.91 (0.43-1.94) in women.

CONCLUSION

Both short- and long-term survival after AMI have improved markedly in men over the last decade. There is a disturbing sex difference in that, during the same period, survival in women with AMI has not improved at all. This sex difference was not explained by differences in conventional prognostic factors.

Clinical trial (GUSTO-1 and INJECT) evidence of earlier death for men than women after acute myocardial infarction

Epidemiologic studies of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have described gender differences in the time of death after infarction, with greater numbers of men dying before hospitalization than women. However, in controlled, hospital-based clinical trials, women die at higher rates than men. We hypothesized that evidence of a gender difference in the time of death following AMI may be found in controlled studies of hospitalized AMI patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-1) and International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics (INJECT) trial databases using logistic regression modeling and time-to-death analyses. The age-adjusted female-to-male odds ratio for mortality was 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.5) in GUSTO-1 and 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.8) in INJECT. GUSTO-1 showed that among patients dying during the first 24 hours after symptom onset, men died an average of 1.7 hours earlier than women (p<0.001). This difference was due to earlier deaths among men < or =65 years of age. Furthermore, in GUSTO-1, the analysis of time to death in hour increments demonstrated that greater proportions of men died at earlier time points than women and a disproportionate number of early deaths occurred among younger men than among women of any age or older men. In INJECT, where time to death could only be analyzed in 1-day increments, no gender differences were evident. These results raise the possibility that the pattern of earlier death for men in thrombolytic clinical trials represents the continuation of a gender-specific mortality pattern that began before hospitalization. The death of a disproportionate number of men before hospitalization may represent an inherent gender bias for clinical studies enrolling only hospitalized patients. More high-risk men would be excluded from these studies than women because of death before hospitalization. Hence, gender comparisons of in-hospital mortality rates may artificially inflate values for women.

Evidence against a role of physiological concentrations of estrogen in post-myocardial infarction remodeling

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine whether endogenous estrogen deficiency induced by ovariectomy affects chronic left ventricular dysfunction post-myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic findings suggest that mortality of postmenopausal women is increased after MI, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown.

METHODS

Rats were either not ovariectomized (non-OVX), ovariectomized (OVX) or ovariectomized and treated with subcutaneous 17-beta-estradiol (E2) pellets (OVX + E2). Two weeks later, animals were sham-operated (Sham) or left coronary artery ligated (MI). Eight weeks later, in vivo echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements were performed. Thereafter, hearts were isolated and perfused isovolumically.

RESULTS

Mean infarct size was similar among the three MI groups. Ovariectomy decreased serum E2 levels (11 +/- 4 vs. 49 +/- 11 pg/ml in non-OVX, p < 0.01) and increased body weight. These changes were reversed by E2 replacement. The degree of cardiac hypertrophy was similar for all groups post-MI. Left ventricular diameters were increased post-MI (8.9 +/- 0.4 in non-OVX + MI vs. 6.7 +/- 0.2 mm in non-OVX + Sham hearts, p < 0.0001), but OVX or OVX + E2 replacement did not alter left ventricular diameters in post-MI and Sham hearts. Left ventricular fractional shortening was severely impaired post-MI (19 +/- 2% vs. 50 +/- 3 in non-OVX + Sham hearts, p < 0.0001) with no influence of hormonal status. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, measured in vivo, was increased in all MI groups without significant differences between groups. Pressure-volume curves, obtained in perfused hearts, demonstrated a right and downward shift with reduced maximum left ventricular developed pressure post-MI (75 +/- 6 vs. 108 +/- 3 mm Hg in non-OVX + Sham hearts, p < 0.001) and were also unaffected by either OVX or E2 replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic endogenous estrogen deficiency does not have major effects on the development of cardiac hypertrophy, dysfunction and dilation post-MI.

Helicobacter pylori infection and early onset myocardial infarction: case-control and sibling pairs study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between coronary heart disease and chronic Helicobacter pylori infection.

DESIGN

Case-control study of myocardial infarction at young ages and study of sibling pairs with one member affected and the other not.

SETTING

United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

1122 survivors of suspected acute myocardial infarction at ages 30-49 (mean age 44 years) and 1122 age and sex matched controls with no history of coronary heart disease; 510 age and sex matched pairs of siblings (mean age 59 years) in which one sibling had survived myocardial infarction and one had no history of coronary heart disease.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serological evidence of chronic infection with H pylori.

RESULTS

472 (42%) of the 1122 cases with early onset myocardial infarction were seropositive for H pylori antibodies compared with 272 (24%) of the 1122 age and sex matched controls, giving an odds ratio of 2.28 (99% confidence interval 1.80 to 2.90). This odds ratio fell to 1.87 (1.42 to 2.47; P<0.0001) after smoking and indicators of socioeconomic status were adjusted for and to 1.75 (1.29 to 2.36) after additional adjustment for blood lipid concentrations and obesity. Only 158 of the 510 pairs of siblings were discordant for H pylori status; among these, 91 cases and 67 controls were seropositive (odds ratio 1.33 (0.86 to 2.05)). No strong correlations were observed between H pylori seropositivity and measurements of other risk factors for coronary heart disease (plasma lipids, fibrinogen, C reactive protein, albumin, etc).

CONCLUSION

In the context of results from other relevant studies, these two studies suggest a moderate association between coronary heart disease and H pylori seropositivity that cannot be fully accounted for by other risk factors. But even if this association is causal and largely reversible by eradication of chronic infection, very large randomised trials would be needed to show this.