Efficacy of biological therapies and small molecules in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in Ulcerative colitis: real-world data on Therapeutic drug monitoring and evaluation of current treatment targets (STRIDE II)

BACKGROUND

The benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and implementation of recommendations from the Selection of Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD, STRIDE) are discussed in the IBD community. We report real-world data in ulcerative colitis patients receiving first-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment followed by TDM, and assess how implementation of the STRIDE II recommendations might affect clinical practice.

METHODS

Adult, biologically naïve UC patients starting TNFi between 2014 and 2021 at Oslo University Hospital were included in a medical chart review study, and data were collected at three and twelve months after the start of treatment. Target serum drug levels were defined as ≥7.5 mg/L for adalimumab and ≥5 mg/L for infliximab.

RESULTS

Of 141 included patients, 36% were in clinical and biochemical (combined) remission after twelve months. Among 102 treatment persistent patients, 54% were in combined remission after twelve months. Target drug level at three months was associated with clinical remission at twelve months (OR = 2.97, 95% CI [1.24-7.12]) and biochemical remission at twelve months (OR = 2.64, 95% CI [1.03-6.77]). In total, 56% of recorded dosage adjustments were related only to serum drug levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined remission rates at twelve months for treatment persistent patients suggest that 46% should have been considered for a change of treatment according to the STRIDE II recommendations. A majority of dosage adjustments were made proactively. Target drug level at three months was associated with remission at twelve months and supports the use of proactive TDM.

First-line anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab and vedolizumab perform similarly in Crohn' disease, but not in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Real-word comparisons between first-line biologicals in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are scarce.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to compare drug persistence and patient reported outcome-2 (PRO-2) remission rates of first-line biological classes [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents vs anti-integrin vedolizumab vs IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab] in real life cohort.

METHODS

Individual level data of 946 adults (588 Crohn's disease and 358 ulcerative colitis) were retrieved from UR-CARE IBD platform. Adjusted drug survival curves using a pooled logistic model and PRO-2 remission rates for each class of biologicals were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

In Crohn's disease, no differences in drug survival were observed for anti-TNF agents vs vedolizumab vs ustekinumab as estimated survival with 95% confidence intervals were 0.81 (0.77-0.84) vs 0.89 (0.82-0.96) vs 0.88 (0.79-0.97) at year 1 and 0.52 (0.46-0.58) vs 0.58 (0.37-0.78) vs 0.58 (0.39-0.77) at year 4. In ulcerative colitis, however, anti-TNF agents had shorter drug survival than vedolizumab with estimated drug survival with 95% confidence intervals 0.60 (0.52-0.67) vs 0.76 (0.67-0.84) at year 1 and 0.37 (0.30-0.44) vs 0.50 (0.36-0.64) at year 4. No differences in PRO-2 remission rates were observed between drug classes in Crohn's disease ( P  = 0.95), but more patients enjoyed PRO-2 remission in ulcerative colitis treated with anti-TNF agents compared to vedolizumab (94.8 vs 78.9%, P  = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data suggest similar drug persistence and efficacy of first-line treatments with anti-TNF agents, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in Crohn's disease. In ulcerative colitis, however, drug persistence was higher for vedolizumab compared to anti-TNF agents, but on the cost of lower PRO-2 remission rates.

Efficacy and safety of advanced therapies for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in induction and maintenance: systematic literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Aim: Several therapies have recently been licensed for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). To provide comparative evidence of newly available treatments, Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted to compare their relative efficacy and safety profiles in both the induction and maintenance phases. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the available literature on randomized controlled trials for advanced treatments (AT) of moderately to severely active UC. Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to synthesize evidence on prespecified efficacy and safety outcomes. Primary efficacy end points clinical response and clinical remission were measured at the end of induction and clinical response and clinical remission among induction phase responders were assessed at the end of the maintenance period. Efficacy outcomes were analyzed separately for AT-naive and -experienced populations. Safety outcomes included serious infections over the induction period, and serious infections among others over the maintenance period. Treat-through trial outcomes were adjusted to align with responder rerandomized trial outcomes. Results: The systematic review identified 58 relevant trials of which 28 met criteria for inclusion in the main analysis networks. At the end of the induction period, all treatments were efficacious against placebo for both AT-naive and AT-experienced populations. Upadacitinib 45 mg demonstrated a higher likelihood of clinical response and remission compared with other treatments. Adalimumab had less favorable performance over the induction period. Among induction phase responders, most treatments demonstrated similar efficacy at the end of the maintenance period. Tofacitinib 10 mg was more likely to achieve clinical response and remission than several other treatments in the AT-naive population. In the AT-experienced population, upadacitinib 30 mg demonstrated a higher likelihood of clinical response and remission compared with other treatments. The safety outcomes among treatments were similar. Conclusion: This study provides an updated comparison of treatments for moderately to severely active UC. Most treatments demonstrated comparable efficacy at the end of maintenance. The findings from this study can inform decision making in treatment choice for patients with moderately to severely active UC.

Treat-to-target of endoscopic remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in symptomatic remission on advanced therapies (QUOTIENT): rationale, design and protocol for an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Targeted immunomodulators (eg, advanced therapies) effectively achieve symptomatic remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, ~25%-50% of patients with IBD achieving symptomatic remission with an advanced therapy may have continued endoscopically/radiologically active bowel inflammation, and it is uncertain whether changing alternative advanced therapies in asymptomatic patients with IBD will reduce bowel inflammation and achieve durable deep remission.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The QUality Outcomes Treating IBD to Target (QUOTIENT) study is an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of switching to an alternative advanced therapy targeting endoscopic/radiological remission (treat-to-target) versus continuing the initial, or index, advanced therapy, in asymptomatic patients with IBD with moderate-to-severe endoscopic/radiological bowel inflammation. Enrolment is planned for ~250 participants in Canada/USA, randomised 1:1 to switching to alternative advanced therapy or continuing index advanced therapy, and then followed 104 weeks within routine clinical practice. Patient-reported outcomes measure efficacy and quality of life/treatment burden/safety. Primary endpoint is the time from randomisation to treatment failure.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is conducted in compliance with the protocol, ICH Good Clinical Practice, applicable regulatory requirements and appropriate review boards/independent ethics committees (approval numbers: Pro00077486; Pro00061437; STUDY00002062; 22-004171; i22-01269; IRB22-0890; IRB_00154397; 2000032384; SHIRB#2022.095-2; STUDY00007146; MMC#2024-18; REB#125290; 17784; Pro00142214; 20240660-01H), with documented written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific presentations, and publicly available Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) websites, including lay summaries. The Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Education, Support, and Advocacy Department, and our patient advocacy stakeholder, will develop educational and marketing resources to communicate findings to a broad audience (>250 000 patients/caregivers/healthcare professionals).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05230173.

Durability of the First Biologic in Children and Adults With Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Study from the epi-IIRN

BACKGROUND

In this nationwide study, our objective was to compare the durability of first-line biologics in ulcerative colitis (UC), categorized into monotherapy and combotherapy with immunomodulators.

METHODS

We utilized data from the nationwide epi-IIRN cohort from 2005 to 2020. Durability was defined as consistent treatment without surgery. Comparisons were based on stringent propensity score-matching.

RESULTS

We included 15 111 patients with UC, of whom 2322 (15%) received biologics, with a median follow-up of 7.0 years (interquartile range, 3.8-11.0). The durability rate was similar between pediatric-onset and adults after 1 and 5 years from initiation of treatment (72% and 43% vs 71% and 43%, respectively; P = .8). Durability of adalimumab vs infliximab after 1 or 5 years was similar, whether prescribed as monotherapy (65%/46% vs 63%/33%, respectively; n = 182 matched pairs, P = .3) or combotherapy (78%/56% vs 91%/58%, respectively; n = 46 matched pairs, P = .4). Durability of infliximab was higher as combotherapy (85%/50%) vs monotherapy (69%/42%; n = 174 matched pairs, P = .007), while it was similar for adalimumab (80%/52% vs 74%/52%; n = 53 matched pairs, P = .4). The durability rate was similar for vedolizumab monotherapy (77%/56%) compared with adalimumab monotherapy (69%/52%; n = 125 matched patients, P = .1), and infliximab monotherapy (73%/55% vs 62%/44%; n = 78 matched patients, P = .1). However, combotherapy of antitumor necrosis factors (TNFs) had longer durability than vedolizumab (85%/50% vs 75%/43%, respectively; n = 131 matched pairs, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

After 5 years of treatment, 43% of the patients with UC sustained their first biologic, with similar durability in pediatric and adult-onset onset disease. Anti-TNFs had similar durability to vedolizumab and superior durability when prescribed as combotherapy.

High Smad7 marks inflammation in patients with chronic pouchitis

Background and aim

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) undergoing colectomy with ileal-anal pouch anastomosis can develop chronic pouchitis (CP). Since treatment options are very limited for patients with CP, identification of factors/mechanisms that amplify the CP-associated inflammatory response could help develop novel treatments. We here assessed the expression of Smad7, an inhibitor of TGF-β1 signaling and positive regulator of gut inflammation, in CP.

Methods

Mucosal samples were taken from the inflamed pouch of patients with CP, whose activity was evaluated by the modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI). Controls included mucosal biopsy samples taken from the uninflamed pouch of patients with a history of CP and ileal samples taken from normal/inflamed pre-pouch of patients with CP and normal controls. Smad7 expression was assessed by Western blotting and immunofluorescence, and the Smad7-expressing lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMCs) were evaluated by flow cytometry. Mucosal samples taken from the inflamed pouch of CP patients were cultured with a Smad7 antisense (AS) or sense oligonucleotide and TNF-α and interleukin (IL)-8 were evaluated by real-time PCR and ELISA.

Results

Enhanced Smad7 expression was seen in the inflamed pouch of patients with CP compared to the normal or inflamed ileum of the same patients and the uninflamed pouch of patients with no pouchitis and normal controls. In the inflamed mucosa of patients with CP, Smad7 was more abundant in LPMCs, mainly in T lymphocytes. Knockdown of Smad7 in ex vivo mucosal explants taken from CP patients was associated with a reduction in TNF-α and IL-8 expression.

Conclusions

High Smad7 occurs in the inflamed mucosa of patients with CP, further supporting the pathogenic role of Smad7 in the gut.

The Successful Use of Upadacitinib as Monotherapy for Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Ulcerative Colitis in the Setting of Refractory Disease

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are associated chronic inflammatory conditions with complex disease courses and potential for overlapping therapeutic management. We describe a case of severe pediatric HS and UC that were poorly controlled despite several standard-of-care therapies, including infliximab and ustekinumab. Transitioning the patient to upadacitinib monotherapy resulted in clinical improvement of both her UC and HS within 3 months, and she was then able to be weaned off her other systemic therapies. While upadacitinib is not currently FDA-approved for HS or pediatric UC, this case report shows promise for upadacitinib monotherapy for both of these complex inflammatory disorders.

[Position paper of the Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (GPGE) on the off-label use of biologics and signal inhibitors in children and adolescents with IBD that have already been approved for adults]

Therapy for children and adolescents with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is basically no different from that for adult patients. However, of the steadily increasing number of biologics and signalling inhibitors for adults, only two TNFα antibodies are currently approved in Germany for the treatment of IBD from the age of 6. This means that a large proportion of the drugs authorised for adults with IBD are not available for children and adolescents with moderate to severe disease. The small number of approved drugs also makes it difficult to achieve the prognostically important goal of achieving a sustained remission of IBD soon after diagnosis, which is characterised by the patient being free of symptoms and also the objectifiable goal of mucosa healing. This position paper is intended to present the current study situation on the drug treatment of children and adolescents with IBD outside the age limit and to serve as a basis for information and decision-making for the Medical Service in the assessment of individual case applications as well as for the treating physicians, the cost bearers, health policy and social court decision-makers.

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Maintenance of remission is essential in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in terms of disease course and long-term prognosis. The thiopurines azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine have longstanding merit in ulcerative colitis, but more therapeutic options have been developed. This review is an update and extension of a review last published in 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in monotherapy or combined therapy regimens compared to placebo or active controls for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (until May 2023), ClinicalTrials.gov (until May 2023), Embase (until August 2022), MEDLINE (until May 2023), and WHO ICTRP (until May 2023). We checked reference lists of the included studies and, if needed, contacted the authors to request more data or information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 24 weeks' duration comparing azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine with placebo or any other medication, or comparing different treatment modalities of azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine, in persons of any age with quiescent ulcerative colitis were eligible. We only considered studies with mixed IBD populations or with a preceding induction period if separate results on participants with ulcerative colitis in remission were available or could be calculated. The primary outcome was failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission (relapse). Secondary outcomes included change in disease activity, quality of life, hospitalization, need for surgery, days off work, adverse events, and withdrawal due to adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data using standard forms, resolved any disagreements by consensus, and assessed study quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2). We conducted separate analyses by type of control, calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) or risk differences (RDs) using the fixed-effect model unless heterogeneity was likely, and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 studies in the review, including 468 adult participants with ulcerative colitis. The risk of bias across these was low for most outcomes, but we considered some outcomes to have some concerns or high risk of bias due to insufficient information on concealment of allocation and outcome measurement. Based on five placebo-controlled studies, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine may reduce the risk of failing to maintain remission. In the thiopurine group, 45% (64/143) of participants failed to maintain remission compared to 67% (96/143) of participants receiving placebo (RR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.82; 5 studies, 286 participants; low-certainty evidence). Three studies reported withdrawals due to adverse events. Among participants on azathioprine, 4% (3/80) withdrew due to adverse events compared to 0% (0/82) of placebo participants (RD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.09; 3 studies, 162 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is of low certainty when comparing 6-mercaptopurine to 5-aminosalicylate. Based on one three-armed trial, 27% (3/11) of 6-mercaptopurine participants failed to maintain remission compared to 100% (2/2) of 5-aminosalicylate participants (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.97; 1 study, 13 participants; low-certainty evidence). This trial also involved an induction phase; we only included the results for participants in remission. The single trial comparing 6-mercaptopurine to 5-aminosalicylate did not report separate data on adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events for the subgroup with successful induction of remission, so we could not analyze these outcomes for this comparison.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-certainty evidence suggests that azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine therapy may be more effective than placebo for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. More research is needed to evaluate the value of therapeutic drug monitoring and the effects of various treatment modalities on long-term safety.

Temporal Trends in the Use of Biological Agents in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real-World Data from a Tertiary Inflammatory Bowel Disease Greek Center During a 5-Year Period

Background/Objectives: Therapeutic management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is rapidly evolving in the era of novel biological therapies. However, real-world data relating to the usage trends and treatment persistence remain inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate trends in biological use, dose intensification, and treatment persistence in IBD patients, who received treatment in a large tertiary center in Greece. Methods: Patients with IBD who underwent at least one biological treatment between 2018 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Data on patients' demographics, type of disease, use of biologicals, dose intensification, and treatment persistence were analyzed for time trends. Results: Data from 409 patients with IBD (mean age 39 (range 17-87), female 51%, 56.9% CD, mean duration of disease: 9.3 years) were included in the study. The number of patients on biologics was raised from 133 in 2018 to 368 in 2022 (a 28.1% yearly increase), while the percentage of patients who were treated with anti-TNF biosimilars increased to >60% of the total anti-TNF population in 2022. We observed a gradual increase in non-anti-TNF therapies in bio-naïve patients, in particular vedolizumab (46% of all biologicals in UC; 16% in CD) and ustekinumab (16.3% of all biologicals in UC, 31% in CD). The 3-year persistence rate of IFX was 64% in CD and 56% in UC, whereas it was 61% for ADA in CD. Dose intensification of anti-TNF was efficient in >50% of CD patients and >30% of UC patients; however, the majority of patients who required dose escalation within the first year eventually became unresponsive. The 3-year persistence of vedolizumab as a first-line treatment was 82% for CD and 69% for UC, respectively. The 3-year persistence of ustekinumab as first-line treatment for CD was 65%. No significant differences regarding the efficacy of anti-TNF, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab were detected when they were used as first-line treatments for Crohn's disease; similarly, no significant differences were detected between infliximab and vedolizumab as first-line treatments for UC. Conclusions: There was a gradual increase in the use of biologicals, including biosimilars, between the years 2018-2022, reflecting adherence to current guidance with adoption of an early escalation strategy. Newer, post-anti-TNF biologics such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab have been rapidly incorporated into therapeutic approaches for both CD and UC.

Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Treatment options for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) are increasing rapidly, but the lack of comparative efficacy trials makes treatment choices a clinical challenge. This network-meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative efficacy of biologics and small molecules in achieving remission in patients with moderate to severe UC.

METHODS

The literature was searched up to May 2024. Phase 3 placebo or active comparator randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome was induction and maintenance of endoscopic improvement (Mayo Endoscopic Score [MES] ≤1). Secondary outcomes were the induction and maintenance of clinical remission, endoscopic (MES = 0) and histological remission. A sub-analysis was performed based on the randomized controlled trial design and previous exposure to biologic therapy.

RESULTS

We identified 36 studies that met our inclusion criteria, with 14,270 patients with UC. Upadacitinib ranked highest in inducing clinical remission (99.6%), and endoscopic improvement (99.2%), followed by risankizumab (91.4%) and (82.3%), respectively. In maintenance of endoscopic improvement, upadacitinib ranked first (98.6%) followed by filgotinib 200 mg (79.2%). Risankizumab ranked first in the induction of histological remission (89.4%), followed by guselkumab (88.3%). Upadacitinib ranked first (93.1%) in maintaining histological remission, followed by guselkumab (89.5%).

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib appears to be superior to other therapies in achieving clinical remission, endoscopic improvement and remission, and histological remission. Furthermore, novel biologics such as risankizumab and guselkumab ranked high in achieving these outcomes. This study highlights the efficacy of small molecule drugs and novel selective interleukin-23s as alternatives to other biologics.

Effectiveness and Safety of Adalimumab in Patients With Very Early-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study on Behalf of the Porto Inflammatory Bowel Disease Working Group of European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with very early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD), with an age of onset < 6 years, can present with severe manifestations and may require biologic therapy. Infliximab and adalimumab are approved for induction and maintenance in pediatric IBD patients but are licensed only above the age of 6 years. Effectiveness and safety data on adalimumab in this patient population are lacking. We assessed the therapeutic response to help close this gap.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 30 sites worldwide. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from patients with VEO-IBD who commenced adalimumab therapy before the age of 6 years.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients (37 Crohn's disease, 26 ulcerative colitis, and 15 with IBD-unclassified) were included. Median age of IBD onset was 2.6 (1.3-4.1) years, with 30 (38.5%) patients diagnosed at age <2 years. Median age at adalimumab initiation was 4.2 (2.8-5.1) years. Adalimumab was used as second-line biologic therapy in 45 (57.7%) patients after infliximab. The median time to last follow-up was 63 (22-124) weeks. Significant improvement in clinical scores, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and weight Z-score were observed by Week 52. Adalimumab durability rates were 61.9%, 48.1%, and 35.6% after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Drug discontinuation rates were not dependent on IBD type, age, prior anti-TNF exposure, or concomitant immunomodulatory treatment. Four (5.1%) patients developed serious infections, including 1 patient with TTC7A deficiency who died following adenovirus sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab therapy is a viable therapeutic option in patients with VEO-IBD with an acceptable safety profile.

Re-evaluating Methods for Assessing Differences in Response in Ileal vs Colonic Crohn's Disease: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FITZROY Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The ileum is the most commonly affected segment of the gastrointestinal tract in Crohn's disease [CD]. We aimed to determine whether disease location affects response to filgotinib, a Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitor, in patients with moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease [CD] and applying appropriate methods to account for differences in measuring disease activity in the ileum compared with the colon.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis of data from the FITZROY phase 2 trial [NCT02048618] compared changes in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] among patients with ileal-dominant and isolated colonic CD treated with 10 weeks of filgotinib 200 mg daily or placebo. A mixed effects model for repeated measures was used to test whether ileal disease responded differently when compared with colonic disease, by evaluating for effect modification using the interaction term of treatment assignment-by-disease location.

RESULTS

Numerically greater proportions of patients with isolated colonic disease compared to ileal-dominant CD achieved clinical remission [CDAI < 150, 75.9% vs 41.6%] and endoscopic response [SES-CD reduction by 50%, 52.5% vs 15.5%] at Week 10. However, after adjusting for baseline disease activity by disease location and within-patient clustering effects, there was no significant difference in treatment response by disease location [mean difference in ΔCDAI between ileal-dominant vs isolated colonic disease + 9.24 [95% CI: -87.19, +105.67], p = 0.85; mean difference in ΔSES-CD -1.93 [95% CI: -7.03, +3.44], p = 0.48.

CONCLUSIONS

Filgotinib demonstrated similar efficacy in ileal-dominant and isolated colonic CD when controlling for baseline disease activity and clustering effects.

[Application of advanced treatment in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases]

BACKGROUND

The treatment options for chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have been greatly expanded due to a better understanding of the underlying pathogenesis. A total of five classes of advanced treatment are available.

OBJECTIVE

A practical overview of advanced treatment of IBD.

METHODS

Narrative review.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Advanced treatments are indicated for moderate to severe IBD. A timely use is recommended to achieve better response rates and to avoid irreversible bowel damage. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have a broad efficacy, also for extraintestinal disease manifestations. The risk of reactivation of varicella zoster virus is increased with JAK inhibitors. In high-risk patients and an age >65 years there is possibly a moderately elevated cardiovascular risk and neoplastic side effects. The integrin alpha4beta7 inhibitor vedolizumab and the interleukin (IL) 12 and 23 inhibitor ustekinumab have very good safety profiles. Selective IL-23 inhibitors are sometimes superior to ustekinumab with comparable safety profiles with respect to efficacy. The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators ozanimod and etrasimod are approved for oral treatment of ulcerative colitis. The treatment success of the medications remains still limited and a minority of patients will not respond to every individual treatment. Thus, sequential administration of several treatments is often needed. Due to the lack of comparative studies, the personalized choice, sequence and decision for treatments are usually based on personal experience and should take patient preferences, efficacy, safety and individual patient profiles into consideration.

Comparative Efficacy of Advanced Therapies for Management of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: 2024 American Gastroenterological Association Evidence Synthesis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis to inform the 2024 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Guidelines on the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases through November 21, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials in adults with moderate-to-severe UC, comparing different advanced therapies (tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, interleukin 12/23 or selective interleukin 23 antagonists, and Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors) against placebo or another active comparator. Our primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of clinical remission, and our secondary outcome was endoscopic improvement. We performed a network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to appraise certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

After excluding JAK inhibitors as potential first-line treatment (in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration), low-certainty evidence supports clinically important benefit with infliximab, ozanimod, risankizumab, and guselkumab over adalimumab and mirikizumab for achieving remission with induction therapy in biologically naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC, with risankizumab and ozanimod being ranked the highest for induction of clinical remission. With the inclusion of JAK inhibitors as first-line therapy, upadacitinib was more efficacious compared with all other medications except ozanimod and risankizumab, with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In patients with prior biologic exposure, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and ustekinumab were ranked highest for achieving remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to appraise quality of evidence, this updated network meta-analysis will be used to inform comparative efficacy and positioning of advanced therapies for the treatment of biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Single-center Experience With Upadacitinib for Adolescents With Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib (UPA) is a novel selective JAK inhibitor approved for adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) and with positive phase 3 data for Crohn's disease (CD). Pediatric off-label use is common due to delays in pediatric approvals; real-world data on UPA are needed to understand the safety and effectiveness in pediatric IBD.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective case series study of adolescents (12-17 years) with inflammatory bowel disease IBD on UPA. The primary outcome was postinduction steroid-free clinical remission (SF-CR) defined as Pediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI) or Pediatric CD Activity Index (PCDAI) ≤10. Secondary outcomes include postinduction clinical response (decrease ≥12.5 in PUCAI/PCDAI), postinduction C-reactive protein (CRP) normalization, 6-month SF-CR, and intestinal ultrasound response and remission. Adverse events were recorded through last follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (9 CD, 10 UC, 1 IBD-U; 55% female; median age 15 years, 90% ≥2 biologics) were treated with UPA for ≥12 weeks (median 51 [43-63] weeks). Upadacitinib was used as monotherapy in 55% and as combination with ustekinumab and vedolizumab in 35% and 10%, respectively. Week 12 SF-CR was achieved in 75% (15/20) and 80% (16/20) with CRP normalization. About 3/4 (14/19) achieved SF-CR at 6 months. Adverse event occurred in 2 patients (10%): Cytomegalovirus colitis requiring hospitalization and hyperlipidemia requiring no treatment. In the 75% with ultrasound monitoring, response and remission were achieved in 77% and 60%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While awaiting pediatric registration trials, our data suggest that UPA is effective in inducing and maintaining SF-CR in adolescents with highly-refractory IBD with an acceptable safety profile.

Use of Upadacitinib in 16 Tofacitinib-refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Single-center Case 2Series

We present a case series of 16 patients with ulcerative colitis who received upadacitinib after failing tofacitinib. Five patients (36%) achieved steroid-free clinical remission. Five (62%) demonstrated endoscopic response, while 2 patients (25%) achieved endoscopic remission. Adverse events were low.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomised placebo-controlled trials for the induction of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remission involve potential harms to those receiving placebo. Whether these harms are also apparent with placebo during maintenance of remission trials in IBD is unclear. We aimed to examine the potential harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched several medical literature databases including MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to May 31, 2024), Embase and Embase Classic (Jan 1, 1947, to May 31, 2024), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 31, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission in adults with IBD reporting data on adverse events over a period of 20 weeks or more. There were no language restrictions or prespecified exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of IBD activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events, reporting relative risks (RRs) for placebo versus active drug with 95% CIs for each outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542624).

FINDINGS

Our search identified 10 826 citations, of which 45 trials including 16 562 patients (10 319 [62·3%] receiving active drug and 6243 [37·7%] placebo) were eligible. The risks of any treatment-emergent adverse event (7297/9546 [76·4%] patients on active drug vs 4415/5850 [75·5%] on placebo; RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·99-1·04; I2 =47%), serious infection (260/10 242 [2·5%] vs 155/6149 [2·5%]; 0·97, 0·79-1·19; I2 =0%), or venous thromboembolic event (12/4729 [0·3%] vs 9/2691 [0·3%]; 0·72, 0·31-1·66; I2 =0%) were not significantly lower with active drug than placebo. The risks of any infection (3208/8038 [39·9%] vs 1713/4809 [35·6%]; 1·14, 1·05-1·23; I2 =60%) or any drug-related adverse event (1094/2997 [36·5%] vs 609/1950 [31·2%]; 1·24, 1·02-1·50; I2 =75%) were higher with active drug than placebo. However, the risks of any worsening of IBD activity (1038/8090 [12·8%] vs 1181/5191 [22·8%]; 0·58, 0·52-0·64; I2 =40%), any withdrawal due to adverse events (610/10 282 [5·9%] vs 561/6207 [9·0%]; 0·71, 0·60-0·84; I2 =43%), any serious adverse events (1066/10 292 [10·4%] vs 742/6198 [12·0%]; 0·85, 0·77-0·94; I2 =17%), or any serious worsening of IBD activity (101/5707 [1·8%] vs 143/3640 [3·9%]; 0·55, 0·42-0·71; I2 =0%) were lower with active drug than placebo. 21 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains.

INTERPRETATION

In maintenance of remission trials in IBD, placebo was associated with some clinically significant potential harms. Patients should be counselled about these before participating in clinical trials and consideration given to alternative designs to test novel drugs in IBD.

FUNDING

None.

A longitudinal single-cell atlas of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment in inflammatory bowel disease

Precision medicine in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) requires a cellular understanding of treatment response. We describe a therapeutic atlas for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) following adalimumab, an anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment. We generated ~1 million single-cell transcriptomes, organised into 109 cell states, from 216 gut biopsies (41 subjects), revealing disease-specific differences. A systems biology-spatial analysis identified granuloma signatures in CD and interferon (IFN)-response signatures localising to T cell aggregates and epithelial damage in CD and UC. Pretreatment differences in epithelial and myeloid compartments were associated with remission outcomes in both diseases. Longitudinal comparisons demonstrated disease progression in nonremission: myeloid and T cell perturbations in CD and increased multi-cellular IFN signalling in UC. IFN signalling was also observed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovium with a lymphoid pathotype. Our therapeutic atlas represents the largest cellular census of perturbation with the most common biologic treatment, anti-TNF, across multiple inflammatory diseases.

Review article: The role of the gut-brain axis in inflammatory bowel disease and its therapeutic implications

BACKGROUND

Treatments targeting the gut-brain axis (GBA) are effective at reducing symptom burden in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The prevalence of common mental disorders and IBS-type symptom reporting is significantly higher in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) than would be expected, suggesting potential GBA effects in this setting. Manipulation of the GBA may offer novel treatment strategies in selected patients with IBD. We present a narrative review of the bi-directional effects of the GBA in IBD and explore the potential for GBA-targeted therapies in this setting.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant articles published by March 2024.

RESULTS

The bi-directional relationship between psychological well-being and adverse longitudinal disease activity outcomes, and the high prevalence of IBS-type symptom reporting highlight the presence of GBA-mediated effects in IBD. Treatments targeting gut-brain interactions including brain-gut behavioural treatments, neuromodulators, and dietary interventions appear to be useful adjunctive treatments in a subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychological morbidity is prevalent in patients with IBD. The relationship between longitudinal disease activity outcomes, IBS-type symptom reporting, and poor psychological health is mediated via the GBA. Proactive management of psychological health should be integrated into routine care. Further clinical trials of GBA-targeted therapies, conducted in selected groups of patients with co-existent common mental disorders, or those who report IBS-type symptoms, are required to inform effective integrated models of care in the future.

Ulcerative colitis: molecular insights and intervention therapy

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by abdominal pain, diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. The pathogenesis and treatment of UC remain key areas of research interest. Various factors, including genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, and alterations in the gut microbiota, are believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of UC. Current treatments for UC include 5-aminosalicylic acids, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and biologics. However, study reported that the one-year clinical remission rate is only around 40%. It is necessary to prompt the exploration of new treatment modalities. Biologic therapies, such as anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody and JAK inhibitor, primarily consist of small molecules targeting specific pathways, effectively inducing and maintaining remission. Given the significant role of the gut microbiota, research into intestinal microecologics, such as probiotics and prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) shows promising potential in UC treatment. Additionally, medicinal herbs, such as chili pepper and turmeric, used in complementary therapy have shown promising results in UC management. This article reviews recent findings on the mechanisms of UC, including genetic susceptibility, immune cell dynamics and cytokine regulation, and gut microbiota alterations. It also discusses current applications of biologic therapy, herbal therapy, microecologics, and FMT, along with their prospects and challenges.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs. Vedolizumab, Ustekinumab, and Tofacitinib After Induction and Maintenance for Ulcerative Colitis: Three Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons

INTRODUCTION

Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited.

METHODS

Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30 mg, VEDO 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks (Q8W), UST 90 mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5 mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit-risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15 mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30 mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2-8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators.

CONCLUSION

In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1 year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.

Successful Remission with Upadacitinib in Two Patients with Anti-TNF-Refractory Macular Edema Associated with Behçet's Uveitis

PURPOSE

Behçet's syndrome (BS) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the small and large vessels of the venous and arterial systems and is characterized by recurrent oral and genital ulcers. Uveitis represents the most typical ocular manifestation and completes the triple symptom complex originally described. Recognized treatments for Behçet's uveitis (BU) include systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. No study has reported on the use of upadacitinib for BS with panuveitis. Herein, we report the use of upadacitinib in two patients with BU suffering from macular edema and persistent inflammation, which was refractory to systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents.

METHODS

We retrospectively followed-up two cases, including an adolescent girl and a man in his thirties, with a 2- and 10-year history of BS, respectively.

RESULTS

Upadacitinib successfully treated BU, leading to improved visual acuity, controlled intraocular inflammation, and the disappearance of macular edema in both patients. The patients in this study were either recalcitrant to or intolerant to conventional therapy and adalimumab. Only the female patient revealed a mildly abnormal blood picture and slight transaminitis after 6 months of upadacitinib administration. However, no serious adverse events were reported in either of the two patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib can be considered an important future option for managing recurrent and recalcitrant cases of BU, especially in those with chronic ocular inflammation and macular edema, which are refractory to conventional therapies.

A personalised algorithm predicting the risk of intravenous corticosteroid failure in acute ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

An episode of acute ulcerative colitis (UC) represents an important watershed moment in a patient's disease course.

AIMS

To derive a personalised algorithm for identifying patients at high risk of corticosteroid non-response from variables available at hospital presentation using a large prospectively collected acute UC patient database and machine learning-based techniques.

METHODS

We analysed data from 682 consecutive presentations of acute UC. We used an Akaike information criterion-based elastic net model to select variables based on the 419 earliest presentations of acute UC (1996-2017). We constructed two risk-scoring algorithms, with and without utilising additional endoscopic variables, using logistic regression models. We validated these risk scores on separate cohorts of 181 (2018-2022) and 82 (2015-2022) acute UC presentations.

RESULTS

The partial risk of rescue (ROR) score included the admission indices of oral corticosteroid treatment, bowel frequency ≥6/24 h, albumin, CRP ≥12 mg/mL and log10CRP. The full ROR score incorporates the same variables with the addition of the Mayo endoscopic subscore and disease extent. The AUCs in the main validation cohort were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85) for the partial and full ROR scores, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These pragmatic personalised risk scores (available at www.severecolitis.com) have comparably strong performance characteristics and usability enabling the identification of individuals at high risk of corticosteroid non-response before or after endoscopic assessment. The ROR scores have the potential to challenge conventional acute UC treatment paradigms by identifying patients who may benefit from early rescue therapy or participation in relevant clinical trials.

Game changer: How Janus kinase inhibitors are reshaping the landscape of ulcerative colitis management

Recent advancements in the treatment landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC) have ushered in a new era of possibilities, particularly with the introduction of Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription inhibitors. These novel agents offer a paradigm shift in UC management by targeting key signaling pathways involved in inflammatory processes. With approved JAK inhibitors (JAKis), such as tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, clinicians now have powerful tools to modulate immune responses and gene expression, potentially revolutionizing the treatment algorithm for UC. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of JAKis in inducing and maintaining remission, presenting viable options for patients who have failed conventional therapies. Real-world data support the use of JAKis not only as first-line treatments but also in subsequent lines of therapy, particularly in patients with aggressive disease phenotypes or refractory to biologic agents. The rapid onset of action and potency of JAKis have broadened the possibilities in the management strategies of UC, offering timely relief for patients with active disease and facilitating personalized treatment approaches. Despite safety concerns, including cardiovascular risks and infections, ongoing research and post-marketing surveillance will continue to refine our understanding of the risk-benefit profile of JAKis in UC management.

[Small Molecule Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: JAK Inhibitors and S1PR Modulators]

Small molecules, including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs), are promising new treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Small molecules exhibit more predictable pharmacokinetics than biologics, are less likely to induce immune responses, and can be administered orally. JAK inhibitors function by blocking the activity of JAK enzymes, which prevents the subsequent phosphorylation and activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins. Tofacitinib and filgotinib are approved for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), while upadacitinib is approved for UC and Crohn's disease. Nevertheless, JAK inhibitors can increase the risk of herpes zoster, cancer, major adverse cardiovascular events, and venous thromboembolism. S1PRMs bind to S1PRs, particularly S1PR1, on lymphocytes. This interaction inhibits lymphocytes from exiting the lymph nodes and migrating to the gut, thereby reducing inflammation and the immune response in the intestinal mucosa. Ozanimod and etrasimod are S1PRMs approved for the treatment of UC, but they can cause side effects such as bradycardia, conduction disorder, and macular edema. Overall, JAK inhibitors and S1PRMs offer significant benefits in managing IBD, although their potential side effects require careful monitoring.

[Old and New Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Anti-interleukins]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract. The introduction of biologics, particularly anti-interleukin (IL) agents, has revolutionized IBD treatment. This review summarizes the role of ILs in IBD pathophysiology and describes the efficacy and positioning of anti-IL therapies. We discuss the functions of key ILs in IBD and their potential as therapeutic targets. The review then discusses anti-IL therapies, focusing primarily on ustekinumab (anti-IL-12/23), risankizumab (anti-IL-23), and mirikizumab (anti-IL-23). Clinical trial data demonstrate their efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The safety profiles of these agents are generally favorable. However, long-term safety data for newer agents are still limited. The review also briefly discusses emerging therapies such as guselkumab and brazikumab. Network meta-analyses suggest that anti-IL therapies perform well compared to other biological agents. These agents may be considered first- or second-line therapies for many patients, especially those with comorbidities or safety concerns. Anti-IL therapies represent a significant advancement in IBD treatment, offering effective and relatively safe options for patients with moderate to severe disease.

A practical guide to selecting and using new ulcerative colitis therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several new biologics (mirizikizumab) and small molecules (upadacitinib, ozanimod, etrasimod) are approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. To date, there are no head-to-head trials to guide positioning and use of these newer agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

From phase III clinical trials, in the biologic experienced patient, induction with ozanimod, etrasimod, and mirizikizumab had lower clinical remission rates, whereas upadacitinib's clinical remission rates remained similar. Indirect evidence using network meta-analysis suggests upadacitinib may be more efficacious than other advanced therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in both the bio-naive and experienced patient. Upadacitinib was found to have the highest risk for adverse events.

SUMMARY

These newer agents add novel mechanisms of action to the expanding therapeutic armamentarium of advanced therapies to treat ulcerative colitis. Based on expert opinion and available data to date, we propose a practical guide on positioning of these new agents for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. In mild-to-moderate disease, one should consider using ozanimod or etrasimod as first-line agents. In moderate-to-severe disease, we favor using mirizikizumab as first-line agent. In patients who have failed an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent, upadacitinib or mirizikizumab should be considered using patient factors and safety to guide one's decision between these two agents.

Real-world effectiveness of upadacitinib in Crohn's disease: a UK multicentre retrospective cohort study

Background

Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor, which has recently been approved for treating Crohn's disease. There are limited real-world studies on the outcomes of upadacitinib in Crohn's disease.

Objective

Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of upadacitinib in a real-world Crohn's disease cohort.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study over a 2-year period across National Health Service (NHS) Lothian and Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. The primary outcome was treatment persistence at week 24. Secondary endpoints were corticosteroid-free clinical remission (Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI)<5) and biomarker remission (C-reactive protein (CRP)≤5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin (FCAL)<250 µg/g) at 12, 24 and 52 weeks. We recorded adverse events.

Results

135 patients commenced upadacitinib as of the 1 January 2024, of which 93 patients with active Crohn's disease were included with a minimum of 12 weeks follow-up. The median follow-up time was 25 weeks (IQR 15-42 weeks). 82% of the cohort had exposure to at least two classes of advanced therapies, and 52% had exposure to at least three classes of advanced therapies. Treatment persistence was 87.1% at week 12, 81.7% at week 24 and 62.8% at week 52. Rates of clinical remission were 64% (42/66), 48% (22/46) and 38% (8/21) at weeks 12, 24 and 52, respectively. Significant reductions in HBI, CRP and FCAL were observed during follow-up. 14% (13/91) had a hospitalisation due to Crohn's disease. Adverse events occurred in 40% (37/93) of the cohort, of which 12% (11/93) were serious.

Conclusion

Upadacitinib was effective in a real-world, highly refractory, Crohn's disease cohort with good persistence.

Case of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, possibly secondary to vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis, successfully treated with rituximab

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA), autoimmune destruction of erythrocytes is most commonly secondary to immunomodulated conditions. The association between AIHA and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been poorly investigated. We aim to report a case of AIHA in a patient with ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with vedolizumab.A case of a woman in her 30s with UC that after the initiation of vedolizumab developed severe anaemia. Due to the absence of visible blood losses and a positive Coombs direct test, the diagnosis of AIHA was established. The patient initially initiated prednisolone with no response. Rituximab had to be introduced. After a few days with this therapy, there was a clinical and analytical improvement.AIHA must be taken into account as a possible cause of anaemia in patients with IBD. The differential diagnosis between IBD or drug-related (namely vedolizumab) as the cause of the AIHA is complex and almost impossible to establish.

Quantitative evaluation of the time-course and efficacy of targeted agents for ulcerative colitis

Background

Targeted agents are widely utilized in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Hence, a comprehensive understanding of comparative drug efficacy in UC is of great importance for drug development and clinical practice. Our objective was the quantitative evaluation of the comparative efficacy of targeted agents for UC.

Methods

Three mathematical models were developed based on data from randomized controlled trials in patients with moderate-to-severe UC to describe the time-course and dose-response of efficacy defined as clinical remission, clinical response, and endoscopic improvement, as well as the placebo effect. The covariate effects were further evaluated. Model simulation was performed in a hypothetical population to compare the efficacies across different drugs.

Results

The analysis dataset was composed of data from 35 trials of 12 drugs in UC. Time-response relationships were evaluated that indicated a gradual onset of drug efficacy in adalimumab, ozanimod, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. The dose-response relationships were estimated for each drug respectively. Patient age, disease duration, baseline weight, prior tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor exposure, and current treatment with corticosteroid showed an impact on efficacy, suggesting that younger patients with shorter UC duration without prior anti-TNF treatment and current corticosteroids therapy tend to display greater treatment effects.

Conclusion

This study developed three longitudinal models for UC to quantitatively describe the efficacy of targeted agents, as well as the influencing factors of efficacy. Infliximab and upadacitinib were determined to be the most effective biological and small targeted molecules, respectively. These findings may provide valuable implications for guiding future decision-making in clinical practice and drug development for UC.

Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Impact of Drug Sequencing in 13 222 Patients within the UK IBD BioResource

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study compares the effectiveness of different biologic therapies and sequences in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] using real-world data from a large cohort with long exposure.

METHODS

Demographic, disease, treatment, and outcome data were retrieved for patients in the UK IBD BioResource. Effectiveness of treatment was based on persistence free of discontinuation or failure, analysed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for differences between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 13 222 evaluable patients received at least one biologic. In ulcerative colitis [UC] first-line vedolizumab [VDZ] demonstrated superior effectiveness over 5 years compared to anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] agents [p = 0.006]. VDZ was superior to both infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA] after ADA and IFX failure respectively [p < 0.001 and p < 0.001]. Anti-TNF therapy showed similar effectiveness when used as first-line treatment, or after failure of VDZ. In Crohn's disease [CD] we found significant differences between first-line treatments over 10 years [p = 0.045], with superior effectiveness of IFX compared to ADA in perianal CD. Non-anti-TNF biologics were superior to a second anti-TNF after first-line anti-TNF failure in CD [p = 0.035]. Patients with UC or CD experiencing TNF failure due to delayed loss of response or intolerance had superior outcomes when switching to a non-anti-TNF biologic, rather than a second anti-TNF.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide real-world evidence to guide biologic selection and sequencing in a range of common scenarios. Our findings challenge current guidelines regarding drug selection after loss of response to first anti-TNF treatment.

Systematic Review with Meta-analysis: Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Managing Moderate-to-Severe Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

In the panorama of therapeutic strategies for inflammatory bowel diseases, oral upadacitinib stands out for its potential to improve short-term and long-term patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aspires to collate and assess the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in managing moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted using studies sourced from MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase, published from January 2010 to March 2024. Peer-reviewed articles that reported data on the effects of upadacitinib in adult patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis were included based on established inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Eight studies, encompassing a total of 2818 patients treated with upadacitinib, were included. In primary outcomes, for patients with Crohn's disease who were using upadacitinib, the weighted pooled clinical remission rate was found to be 45.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.52), while for patients with ulcerative colitis who were using upadacitinib, the rate was 25.4% (95% CI 0.17-0.36). The pooled clinical response rate for Crohn's disease was 53.6% (95% CI 0.50-0.57), and for ulcerative colitis it was 72.6% (95% CI 0.69-0.76). The pooled serious adverse event rate was 6.0% (95% CI 0.07-0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib demonstrates significant efficacy in achieving clinical remission and response in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, as shown by clinical remission rates of 44.9% and 36.0%, respectively. The treatment also maintains a favorable safety profile with a serious adverse event rate of 7.8%, making it an effective option for those resistant or intolerant to traditional immunosuppressants or tumor necrosis factor antagonists.

Real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in TNF-exposed pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES

Vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are second-line treatments in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Pediatric studies comparing the effectiveness of these medications are lacking. Using a registry from ImproveCareNow (ICN), a global research network in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, we compared the effectiveness of UST and VDZ in anti-TNF refractory UC.

METHODS

We performed a propensity-score weighted regression analysis to compare corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) at 6 months from starting second-line therapy. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of our findings to different ways of handling missing outcome data. Secondary analyses evaluated alternative proxies of response and infection risk.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 262 patients on VDZ and 74 patients on UST. At baseline, the two groups differed on their mean pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) (p = 0.03) but were otherwise similar. At Month 6, 28.3% of patients on VDZ and 25.8% of those on UST achieved CFCR (p = 0.76). Our primary model showed no difference in CFCR (odds ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.59) (p = 0.54). The time to biologic discontinuation was similar in both groups (hazard ratio: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.76-2.08) (p = 0.36), with the reference group being VDZ, and we found no differences in clinical response, growth parameters, hospitalizations, surgeries, infections, or malignancy risk. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings of similar effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

UST and VDZ are similarly effective for inducing clinical remission in anti-TNF refractory UC in pediatric patients. Providers should consider safety, tolerability, cost, and comorbidities when deciding between these therapies.

Comparative maintenance performance of all biologic agents and small molecules in ulcerative colitis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Βiologic agents and small molecules have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, their comparative efficacy and safety performance as maintenance treatments have not been sufficiently explored. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NWM) to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of all approved and emerging treatments for maintenance in moderate to severe UC.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant RCTs through April 2023. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at the end of the maintenance therapy. Data were analyzed by means of a Bayesian NWM. The ranking probability concerning efficacy and safety was evaluated by means of surfaces under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values.

RESULTS

There were 20 eligible RCTs with 7660 patients randomized to 20 treatments. RCTs were grouped into two study designs, that is, re-randomization of patients after an induction period and treat-through patients. Concerning efficacy, in re-randomized patients, upadacitinib 30 mg/day was ranked first (SUCRA 94.9%) whereas in treat-through patients etrasimod 2 mg/day was ranked first (SUCRA 91.1%). The integrated efficacy-safety hierarchical analysis, showed that tofacitinib 10 mg had the best efficacy-safety therapeutic profile in re-randomized patients, whereas in treat-through patients infliximab 3.5 mg/Kg Q8W showed the best efficacy-safety profile.

CONCLUSION

For maintenance treatment, in moderate to severe UC, this NWM showed that upadacitinib 30 mg/day and etrasimod 2 mg/day were ranked best for efficacy in re-randomized and treat-through patients respectively. Tofacitinib 10 mg/day and infliximab 3.5 mg/Kg Q8W showed the best efficacy-safety therapeutic profile in re-randomized and treat-through patients respectively.

Effectiveness of Upadacitinib for Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter Experience

INTRODUCTION

A significant proportion of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) require colectomy.

METHODS

Patients with ASUC treated with upadacitinib and intravenous corticosteroids at 5 hospitals are presented. The primary outcome was 90-day colectomy rate. Secondary outcomes included frequency of steroid-free clinical remission, adverse events, and all-cause readmissions.

RESULTS

Of the 25 patients with ASUC treated with upadacitinib, 6 (24%) patients underwent colectomy, 15 (83%) of the 18 patients with available data and who did not undergo colectomy experienced steroid-free clinical remission (1 patient did not have complete data), 1 (4%) patient experienced a venous thromboembolic event, while 5 (20%) patients were readmitted.

DISCUSSION

Upadacitinib along with intravenous corticosteroids may be an effective treatment for ASUC.

Integrating Evidence to Guide Use of Biologics and Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Advances in science have led to the development of multiple biologics and small molecules for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). This growth in advanced medical therapies has been accompanied by an increase in methodological innovation to study and compare therapies. Guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to integrating therapies into routine practice, but they are often unable to provide timely recommendations as new therapies come to market, and they have limited incorporation of real-world evidence when making recommendations. This limits the scope and usability of guidelines, and a gap remains in defining how best to position and integrate advanced medical therapies for IBD. In this review, we provide a framework for clinicians and researchers to understand key differences in sources of evidence, how different methodologies are applied to study the comparative effectiveness of advanced medical therapies in IBD, and considerations for how these sources of evidence can be used to better integrate current guideline recommendations. Over time, we anticipate this framework will allow for a transition to living guidelines and/or practice recommendations.

Bifidobacterium breve Protects the Intestinal Epithelium and Mitigates Inflammation in Colitis via Regulating the Gut Microbiota-Cholic Acid Pathway

In this study, we aimed to explore the protective effects of Bifidobacterium in colitis mice and the potential mechanisms. Results showed that Bifidobacterium breve (B. breve) effectively colonized the intestinal tract and alleviated colitis symptoms by reducing the disease activity index. Moreover, B. breve mitigated intestinal epithelial cell damage, inhibited the pro-inflammatory factors, and upregulated tight junction (TJ)-proteins. Gut microbiota and metabolome analysis found that B. breve boosted bile acid-regulating genera (such as Bifidobacterium and Clostridium sensu stricto 1), which promoted bile acid deconjugation in the intestine. Notably, cholic acid (CA) was closely associated with the expression levels of inflammatory factors and TJ-proteins (p < 0.05). Our in vitro cell experiments further confirmed that CA (20.24 ± 4.53 pg/mL) contributed to the inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-α expression (49.32 ± 5.27 pg/mL) and enhanced the expression of TJ-proteins (Occludin and Claudin-1) and MUC2. This study suggested that B. breve could be a probiotic candidate for use in infant foods.

Safety of Upadacitinib in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of Indirect and Direct Treatment Comparisons of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), non-radiographic axial spondylarthritis (nr-axSpA), atopic dermatitis (AD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn's disease (CD) pose a substantial burden on patients and their quality of life. Upadacitinib is an orally administered, selective, and reversible Janus kinase inhibitor indicated for seven conditions, but data on its safety versus other active treatments are limited. A systematic literature review of indirect and direct treatment comparisons of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the safety profile of upadacitinib.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for indirect and direct treatment comparisons of RCTs that (1) included licensed upadacitinib dosages; (2) studied any of the seven conditions; (3) reported any adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, major adverse cardiovascular event, venous thromboembolism, malignancies, infections or serious infections, and death; and (4) were published between January 2018 and August 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies were eligible for inclusion. SAEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, and any AEs were commonly studied. RA was the most studied condition, followed by AD and UC. Most studies (16/25, 64%) reported no statistically significant difference in the studied safety outcomes between upadacitinib and other active treatments (e.g., tumor necrosis factor blockers, interleukin receptor antagonists, integrin receptor antagonists, T cell co-stimulation modulator), or placebo (placebo ± methotrexate or topical corticosteroids). Other studies (9/25, 36%) reported mixed results of no statistically significant difference and either statistically higher (8/25, 32%) or lower rates (1/25, 4%) on upadacitinib.

CONCLUSION

Most studies suggested that upadacitinib has no statistically significant difference in the studied safety outcomes compared to active treatments or placebo in patients with RA, PsA, AS, AD, UC, and CD. A few studies reported higher rates, but findings were inconsistent with limited interpretation.

Construction of a molecular inflammatory predictive model with histone modification-related genes and identification of CAMK2D as a potential response signature to infliximab in ulcerative colitis

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a lifelong inflammatory disease affecting the rectum and colon with numerous treatment options that require an individualized treatment plan. Histone modifications regulate chromosome structure and gene expression, resulting in effects on inflammatory and immune responses. However, the relationship between histone modification-related genes and UC remains unclear.

Methods

Transcriptomic data from GSE59071 and GSE66407 were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), encompassing colonic biopsy expression profiles of UC patients in inflamed and non-inflamed status. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analyses, functional enrichment analyses, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and random forest were performed to identify histone modification-related core genes associated with UC inflammation. Features were screened through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), establishing a molecular inflammatory predictive model using logistic regression. The model was validated in the GSE107499 dataset, and the performance of the features was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of colonic biopsy tissues from UC patients treated with infliximab was used to further confirm the clinical application value. Univariate logistic regression on GSE14580 highlighted features linked to infliximab response.

Results

A total of 253 histone modification-related DEGs were identified between inflammatory and non-inflammatory patients with UC. Seven key genes (IL-1β, MSL3, HDAC7, IRF4, CAMK2D, AUTS2, and PADI2) were selected using WGCNA and random forest. Through univariate logistic regression, three core genes (CAMK2D, AUTS2, and IL-1β) were further incorporated to construct the molecular inflammatory predictive model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.943 in the independent validation dataset. A significant association between CAMK2D protein expression and infliximab response was observed, which was validated in another independent verification set of GSE14580 from the GEO database.

Conclusion

The molecular inflammatory predictive model based on CAMK2D, AUTS2, and IL-1β could reliably distinguish the mucosal inflammatory status of UC patients. We further revealed that CAMK2D was a predictive marker of infliximab response. These findings are expected to provide a new evidence base for personalized treatment and management strategies for UC patients.

Costo per Number Needed to Treat (NNT) di upadacitinib nel trattamento dei pazienti bio-exposed con rettocolite ulcerosa attiva da moderata a grave

Background:

Only limited information is available on cost efficacy of the advanced therapies for the treatment of ulcerative rectocolitis. We evaluated the efficacy and the treatment costs of these advanced therapies in the treatment of bio-exposed (primary failure to a biological agent) patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative rectocolitis.

Methods:

Data from a previous network meta-analysis (NMA) in the treatment of bio-exposed patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative rectocolitis was used. The analysis involved three therapies approved in Italy for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative rectocolitis: upadacitinib (UPA), ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ). According to the NMA results, the analysis was conducted considering two different timepoints: induction and maintenance. The pharmacoeconomic comparison between advanced therapies was carried out to estimate the respective cost for the NNT (Number Needed to Treat) compared to placebo using the clinical response (CRes) for the induction and clinical remission (CRem) and endoscopic improvement (EI) for the maintenance. Only the ex-factory price of each advanced therapy was considered. The cost per NNT was adopted as a cost-effectiveness indicator.

Results:

Independently of the timepoint considered (induction or maintenance) and the clinical (CRem and CRes) or endoscopic endpoint (EI) evaluated, UPA had always the lower cost per NNT than UST and VDZ. For example, considering the induction and the CRes, the cost per NNT for upadacitinib (45 mg) was € 7,862.07 compared to € 30,459.38 for ustekinumab (6 mg/kg) and to € 67,868.00 for vedolizumab.

Conclusion:

Upadacitinib is a cost-effective therapeutic option compared to ustekinumab and vedolizumab in the treatment of bio-exposed patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative rectocolitis.

AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Pouchitis and Inflammatory Pouch Disorders

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Pouchitis is the most common complication after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guideline is intended to support practitioners in the management of pouchitis and inflammatory pouch disorders.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, conduct an evidence synthesis, and develop recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pouchitis, Crohn's-like disease of the pouch, and cuffitis.

RESULTS

The AGA guideline panel made 9 conditional recommendations. In patients with ulcerative colitis who have undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and experience intermittent symptoms of pouchitis, the AGA suggests using antibiotics for the treatment of pouchitis. In patients who experience recurrent episodes of pouchitis that respond to antibiotics, the AGA suggests using probiotics for the prevention of recurrent pouchitis. In patients who experience recurrent pouchitis that responds to antibiotics but relapses shortly after stopping antibiotics (also known as "chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis"), the AGA suggests using chronic antibiotic therapy to prevent recurrent pouchitis; however, in patients who are intolerant to antibiotics or who are concerned about the risks of long-term antibiotic therapy, the AGA suggests using advanced immunosuppressive therapies (eg, biologics and/or oral small molecule drugs) approved for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. In patients who experience recurrent pouchitis with inadequate response to antibiotics (also known as "chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis"), the AGA suggests using advanced immunosuppressive therapies; corticosteroids can also be considered in these patients. In patients who develop symptoms due to Crohn's-like disease of the pouch, the AGA suggests using corticosteroids and advanced immunosuppressive therapies. In patients who experience symptoms due to cuffitis, the AGA suggests using therapies that have been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, starting with topical mesalamine or topical corticosteroids. The panel also proposed key implementation considerations for optimal management of pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch and identified several knowledge gaps and areas for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides a comprehensive, patient-centered approach to the management of patients with pouchitis and other inflammatory conditions of the pouch.

JAK inhibitors for inflammatory bowel disease: recent advances

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly requires immunosuppressive treatments to induce and maintain durable remission. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are a novel group of orally administered, small molecule drugs that work by attenuating multiple cytokine signalling pathways to mediate dysregulated immune responses involved in the pathogenesis of IBD. Tofacitinib, filgotinib and upadacitinib have demonstrated efficacy against placebo and are licensed for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis; upadacitinib is the only JAKi also currently approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Safety concerns stratified by age have led to class-wide regulatory restrictions for JAKi use across all inflammatory diseases. It is important for gastroenterologists managing patients with IBD to be aware of the key pivotal trial outcomes, to identify appropriate patients in whom to commence a JAKi, and to understand the safety considerations and ways to mitigate these risks in the patients they treat. This review provides a contemporaneous overview of this emerging therapeutic class and provides a practical guide for healthcare practitioners for initiating and monitoring JAKi in IBD.

Maintenance of clinical remission with biologics and small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease according to trial design: Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Design of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining maintenance of clinical remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) varies, with some trials re-randomising patients who have responded to active drug during induction to either active drug or placebo and others treating patients through with active drug or placebo from baseline. Whether this influences therapeutic gain of drug over placebo is unknown.

METHODS

We searched the literature to January 2023 for maintenance of remission trials of biologics or small molecules versus placebo in IBD. We extracted maintenance of remission rates according to trial design; either trials re-randomising patients or trials treating patients through. We pooled data in a meta-analysis for all patients, and according to type of IBD. We calculated the number needed to treat (NNT), with a 95% confidence interval (CI), to assess therapeutic gain of active drug over placebo according to trial design.

RESULTS

We identified 37 maintenance of remission trials (12,075 patients). Rates of maintenance of clinical remission were higher (41.9% with active drug, versus 20.3% with placebo), and NNT lowest (5; 95% CI 4-6), in trials re-randomising patients compared with those treating through (maintenance of remission rate 30.9% with active drug versus 14.6% with placebo, NNT = 7; 95% CI 5-9). Results were similar when trials were analysed according to IBD type but were more marked in ulcerative colitis RCTs (maintenance of remission rates in re-randomised trials 39.4% with active drug versus 17.8% with placebo, NNT = 5; 95% CI 3-7; treat-through trials 27.3% with active drug versus 11.9% with placebo, NNT = 7; 95% CI 5-11.5).

CONCLUSION

Trials re-randomising patients had generally higher maintenance of remission rates, lower NNTs, and greater therapeutic gains over placebo.

The assessment of segmental healing by the Modified Mayo Endoscopic Score (MMES) complements the prediction of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Current endoscopic scoring systems for ulcerative colitis (UC) do not consider the extent of mucosal inflammation. The modified Mayo endoscopic score (MMES) was developed to detect segmental endoscopic improvement. We evaluated the ability of the MMES to predict long-term clinical outcomes and compared it to the widely used Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with moderate to severe UC starting biological therapy were enrolled between January 2014 and September 2017 in this prospective observational study. A clinical and endoscopic evaluation was performed at baseline and at week 8/14. A modified Mayo score was used to grade clinical activity, MES and MMES were used to evaluate endoscopic activity. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the evolution of endoscopic activity, namely endoscopic improvement (MES ≤ 1), segmental endoscopic response only (MES > 1, but decrease in MMES ≥ 30%) or no endoscopic response (all others). Over the follow-up period clinical relapse-, discontinuation- and colectomy-free survival were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were included (48% female, median age 42 years, median disease duration 7 years) with a median follow-up of 61 months. We identified 69 patients with endoscopic improvement, 27 with segmental endoscopic response and 54 without endoscopic response. Patients with segmental endoscopic response showed intermediate long-term clinical outcomes as compared to the other two groups (log rank p = 0.003 for clinical relapse-, and p < 0.001 for both discontinuation- and colectomy-free survival).

CONCLUSIONS

The MMES exhibited a benefit in predicting long-term outcome in UC even though endoscopic improvement remains the strongest predictor.

TNF-α Mediated the Disruption of Hepatic Tight Junction Expression in Blood-Biliary Barrier of Colitis via Downregulating PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway

Hepatocyte tight junctions (TJ) constituted blood-biliary barrier is the most important hepatic barrier for separating bile from the bloodstream, disruption or dysfunction of TJ barrier is involved in hepatobiliary manifestations of colitis, but the underlying mechanism is still not clear. This study aims to investigate the effect and underlying mechanism of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) on hepatic TJ protein expression in blood-biliary barrier and identify its role in the pathogenesis of acute colitis-related cholestasis. Acute colitis rat model was induced by trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) intra-colonic administration. TJs expression of blood-biliary barrier was tested in colitis rats, the serum TNF-α level was also determined in order to elucidate the correlation of TNF-α and TJs. HepaRG cells were used to investigate the effect of TNF-α on TJs, and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) signaling pathway were also evaluated in rats and TNF-α treated HepaRG cells. Acute colitis was induced in rats at 5 d post TNBS, which is accompanied with cholestasis-like alteration. Serum TNF-α level was increased in colitis rats and positively correlated with the alteration of total bile acids and bilirubin, marked decrease in TJs was found in TNF-α treated HepaRG cells and the rats, down-regulated PI3K/AKT signaling pathway were also identified in TNF-α treated HepaRG cells and the rats. The study concluded that serum TNF-α mediated the down-regulation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, which contributed to the reduction of TJ protein expression in acute colitis-related intrahepatic cholestasis. These findings suggest that TNF-α plays an important role in the pathogenesis of intrahepatic cholestasis of colitis.

Rate of Colectomy Increases Within 12 Months of Sequential Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis who previously would have undergone surgery can now elect for subsequent medical therapy.

METHODS

In a commercially insured population, we evaluated the proportion of patients initiating second-line, third-line, or fourth-line treatment who underwent colectomy in the following 12 months.

RESULTS

Among 3,325 patients with ulcerative colitis, the colectomy rate within 12 months of a switch in therapy increased from 12% with the first switch to 17% and 19% with the second and third switches, respectively ( P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Treatment effectiveness declines with successive switching; however, even after initiating fourth-line therapy, most patients remain surgery-free.

Management of Specific Clinical Profiles in Axial Spondyloarthritis: An Expert's Document Based on a Systematic Literature Review and Extended Delphi Process

INTRODUCTION

The management of specific clinical scenarios is not adequately addressed in national and international guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Expert opinions could serve as a valuable complement to these documents.

METHODS

Seven expert rheumatologists identified controversial areas or gaps of current recommendations for the management of patients with axSpA. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to analyze the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs, b/tsDMARDs) in axSpA regarding controversial areas or gaps. In a nominal group meeting, the results of the SLR were discussed and a set of statements were proposed. A Delphi process inviting 150 rheumatologists was followed to define the final statements. Agreement was defined as if at least 70% of the participants voted ≥ 7 (from 1, totally disagree, to 10, totally agree).

RESULTS

Three overarching principles and 17 recommendations were generated. All reached agreement. According to them, axSpA care should be holistic and individualized, taking into account objective findings, comorbidities, and patients' opinions and preferences. Integrating imaging and clinical assessment with biomarker analysis could also help in decision-making. Connected to treatments, in refractory enthesitis, b/tsDMARDs are recommended. If active peripheral arthritis, csDMARD might be considered before b/tsDMARDs. The presence of significant structural damage, long disease duration, or HLA-B27-negative status do not contraindicate for the use of b/tsDMARDs.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations are intended to complement guidelines by helping health professionals address and manage specific groups of patients, particular clinical scenarios, and gaps in axSpA.

10 years of biologic use patterns in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: treatment persistence, switching and dose intensification - a nationwide population-based study

Background

Treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have evolved in the era of biologics. However, the real-world data on their usage patterns and sequencing are still limited.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate treatment persistence and dose intensification of first- and second-line biologics in patients with IBD.

Design

In this retrospective, cohort study using nationwide claims data, 13,087 patients with IBD initiating biologic therapy between 2010 and 2020 were identified.

Methods

Treatment persistence and dose intensification during the first 2 years and switching patterns of biologics were analysed while identifying predictors of non-persistence.

Results

As a first-line treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), ustekinumab had a lower risk for non-persistence compared to infliximab [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.69, p = 0.048]. Second-line ustekinumab and vedolizumab showed the highest and lowest persistence (79.2% and 54.9%), respectively. As a first-line treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), golimumab had a higher risk for non-persistence compared to infliximab (aHR, 1.68, p < 0.001). Second-line golimumab also showed a significantly lower persistence rate than adalimumab and vedolizumab. The risk of non-persistence was higher in UC than in CD (first line: aHR, 1.97; second line: aHR, 1.39; p < 0.001), and in the second-line treatment than in the first-line treatment for CD (aHR, 1.55; p < 0.001). The cumulative rate of dose intensification was highest with ustekinumab for CD (first line, 43.3%, second line, 69.1%) and adalimumab for second-line UC (40.7%). It was significantly increased in second-line therapy in CD, but not in UC. Among switchers of first-line anti-tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy, after all biologics were approved, 69% of CD patients and 78.4% of UC patients switched to other classes of second-line treatment.

Conclusion

Ustekinumab had higher persistence in the first-line treatment of CD, while golimumab had lower persistence for first- and second-line treatments of UC. Dose intensification rates varied, with the highest cumulative rates observed for ustekinumab in CD and adalimumab in second-line UC.