1
|
Bravo Iniguez A, Du M, Zhu MJ. α-Ketoglutarate for Preventing and Managing Intestinal Epithelial Dysfunction. Adv Nutr 2024; 15:100200. [PMID: 38438107 PMCID: PMC11016550 DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The epithelium lining the intestinal tract serves a multifaceted role. It plays a crucial role in nutrient absorption and immune regulation and also acts as a protective barrier, separating underlying tissues from the gut lumen content. Disruptions in the delicate balance of the gut epithelium trigger inflammatory responses, aggravate conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, and potentially lead to more severe complications such as colorectal cancer. Maintaining intestinal epithelial homeostasis is vital for overall health, and there is growing interest in identifying nutraceuticals that can strengthen the intestinal epithelium. α-Ketoglutarate, a metabolite of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, displays a variety of bioactive effects, including functioning as an antioxidant, a necessary cofactor for epigenetic modification, and exerting anti-inflammatory effects. This article presents a comprehensive overview of studies investigating the potential of α-ketoglutarate supplementation in preventing dysfunction of the intestinal epithelium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Min Du
- Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Mei-Jun Zhu
- School of Food Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2 and MSI Status in a Large Consecutive Series of Colorectal Carcinomas. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24054868. [PMID: 36902296 PMCID: PMC10003572 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze clinical and regional factors influencing the distribution of actionable genetic alterations in a large consecutive series of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations, HER2 amplification and overexpression, and microsatellite instability (MSI) were tested in 8355 CRC samples. KRAS mutations were detected in 4137/8355 (49.5%) CRCs, with 3913 belonging to 10 common substitutions affecting codons 12/13/61/146, 174 being represented by 21 rare hot-spot variants, and 35 located outside the "hot" codons. KRAS Q61K substitution, which leads to the aberrant splicing of the gene, was accompanied by the second function-rescuing mutation in all 19 tumors analyzed. NRAS mutations were detected in 389/8355 (4.7%) CRCs (379 hot-spot and 10 non-hot-spot substitutions). BRAF mutations were identified in 556/8355 (6.7%) CRCs (codon 600: 510; codons 594-596: 38; codons 597-602: 8). The frequency of HER2 activation and MSI was 99/8008 (1.2%) and 432/8355 (5.2%), respectively. Some of the above events demonstrated differences in distribution according to patients' age and gender. In contrast to other genetic alterations, BRAF mutation frequencies were subject to geographic variation, with a relatively low incidence in areas with an apparently warmer climate (83/1726 (4.8%) in Southern Russia and North Caucasus vs. 473/6629 (7.1%) in other regions of Russia, p = 0.0007). The simultaneous presence of two drug targets, BRAF mutation and MSI, was observed in 117/8355 cases (1.4%). Combined alterations of two driver genes were detected in 28/8355 (0.3%) tumors (KRAS/NRAS: 8; KRAS/BRAF: 4; KRAS/HER2: 12; NRAS/HER2: 4). This study demonstrates that a substantial portion of RAS alterations is represented by atypical mutations, KRAS Q61K substitution is always accompanied by the second gene-rescuing mutation, BRAF mutation frequency is a subject to geographical variations, and a small fraction of CRCs has simultaneous alterations in more than one driver gene.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang W, Ying J, Shi S, Ye Q, Zou S, Dong L, Lyu N. A modified screening strategy for Lynch syndrome among MLH1-deficient CRCs: Analysis from consecutive Chinese patients in a single center. Transl Oncol 2021; 14:101049. [PMID: 33676177 PMCID: PMC7933804 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The low prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation in colorectal cancers (CRCs) in Chinese populations has stimulated concern about the efficacy of BRAF mutation analysis for Lynch syndrome (LS) screening. METHODS In total, 169 of 4104 consecutive CRC patients with absent MLH1 staining were analyzed to compare the utility of the BRAF V600E mutation testing with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis in the Chinese population. Germline genetic testing was performed in patients with wild-type BRAF/methylated MLH1. RESULTS Compared with BRAF genotyping, the use of MLH1 methylation testing alone to evaluate patients with MLH1 deficiency reduced referral rates for germline testing by 1.8-fold (82.8% vs. 47.1%). However, 6 patients harboring MLH1 promoter methylation were verified to have LS through germline genetic testing. It is notable that all 6 patients had a family history of CRC in at least 1 first-degree relative (FDR) or second-degree relative (SDR). The combination of MLH1 promoter methylation analysis and a family history of CRC could preclude significantly more patients from germline genetic testing than from BRAF mutation testing alone (45.5% vs. 17.2%, p<0.001) and decrease the number of misdiagnosed LS patients with MLH1 promoter methylation. CONCLUSION The combination of a family history of CRC with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis showed better performance than BRAF mutation testing in the selection of patients in the Chinese population for germline genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenmiao Wang
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianming Ying
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Susheng Shi
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Qiurong Ye
- Department of Pathology, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, No. 6 Taoyuan Street, Qingxiu District, Nanning 530000, Guangxi, China
| | - Shuangmei Zou
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China.
| | - Lin Dong
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China.
| | - Ning Lyu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Labadie JD, Harrison TA, Banbury B, Amtay EL, Bernd S, Brenner H, Buchanan DD, Campbell PT, Cao Y, Chan AT, Chang-Claude J, English D, Figueiredo JC, Gallinger SJ, Giles GG, Gunter MJ, Hoffmeister M, Hsu L, Jenkins MA, Lin Y, Milne RL, Moreno V, Murphy N, Ogino S, Phipps AI, Sakoda LC, Slattery ML, Southey MC, Sun W, Thibodeau SN, Van Guelpen B, Zaidi SH, Peters U, Newcomb PA. Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Colorectal Cancer Risk by Molecularly Defined Subtypes and Tumor Location. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkaa042. [PMID: 32923935 PMCID: PMC7477374 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. As CRC is a heterogeneous disease, we evaluated whether the association of HT and CRC differs across etiologically relevant, molecularly defined tumor subtypes and tumor location. METHODS We pooled data on tumor subtypes (microsatellite instability status, CpG island methylator phenotype status, BRAF and KRAS mutations, pathway: adenoma-carcinoma, alternate, serrated), tumor location (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), and HT use among 8220 postmenopausal women (3898 CRC cases and 4322 controls) from 8 observational studies. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of ever vs never HT use with each tumor subtype compared with controls. Models were adjusted for study, age, body mass index, smoking status, and CRC family history. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Among postmenopausal women, ever HT use was associated with a 38% reduction in overall CRC risk (OR =0.62, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.69). This association was similar according to microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype and BRAF or KRAS status. However, the association was attenuated for tumors arising through the serrated pathway (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.01) compared with the adenoma-carcinoma pathway (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.73; P het =.04) and alternate pathway (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.72). Additionally, proximal colon tumors had a weaker association (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.80) compared with rectal (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.63) and distal colon (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.66; P het =.01) tumors. CONCLUSIONS We observed a strong inverse association between HT use and overall CRC risk, which may predominantly reflect a benefit of HT use for tumors arising through the adenoma-carcinoma and alternate pathways as well as distal colon and rectal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia D Labadie
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tabitha A Harrison
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Barbara Banbury
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Efrat L Amtay
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja Bernd
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter T Campbell
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yin Cao
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Centre Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dallas English
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane C Figueiredo
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven J Gallinger
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marc J Gunter
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Li Hsu
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yi Lin
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victor Moreno
- Oncology Data Analytics Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Neil Murphy
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda I Phipps
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lori C Sakoda
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Martha L Slattery
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wei Sun
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Division of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bethany Van Guelpen
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Syed H Zaidi
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ulrike Peters
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Polly A Newcomb
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cervena K, Siskova A, Buchler T, Vodicka P, Vymetalkova V. Methylation-Based Therapies for Colorectal Cancer. Cells 2020; 9:E1540. [PMID: 32599894 PMCID: PMC7349319 DOI: 10.3390/cells9061540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinogenesis (CRC) is caused by the gradual long-term accumulation of both genetic and epigenetic changes. Recently, epigenetic alterations have been included in the classification of the CRC molecular subtype, and this points out their prognostic impact. As epigenetic modifications are reversible, they may represent relevant therapeutic targets. DNA methylation, catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), regulates gene expression. For many years, the deregulation of DNA methylation has been considered to play a substantial part in CRC etiology and evolution. Despite considerable advances in CRC treatment, patient therapy response persists as limited, and their profit from systemic therapies are often hampered by the introduction of chemoresistance. In addition, inter-individual changes in therapy response in CRC patients can arise from their specific (epi)genetic compositions. In this review article, we summarize the options of CRC treatment based on DNA methylation status for their predictive value. This review also includes the therapy outcomes based on the patient's methylation status in CRC patients. In addition, the current challenge of research is to develop therapeutic inhibitors of DNMT. Based on the essential role of DNA methylation in CRC development, the application of DNMT inhibitors was recently proposed for the treatment of CRC patients, especially in patients with DNA hypermethylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Cervena
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Siskova
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Buchler
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Videnska 800, 140 59 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Pavel Vodicka
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Vymetalkova
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Phipps AI, Alwers E, Harrison T, Banbury B, Brenner H, Campbell PT, Chang-Claude J, Buchanan D, Chan AT, Farris AB, Figueiredo JC, Gallinger S, Giles GG, Jenkins M, Milne RL, Newcomb PA, Slattery ML, Song M, Ogino S, Zaidi SH, Hoffmeister M, Peters U. Association Between Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Tumors and Patient Survival, Based on Pooled Analysis of 7 International Studies. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:2158-2168.e4. [PMID: 32088204 PMCID: PMC7282955 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The heterogeneity among colorectal tumors is probably due to differences in developmental pathways and might associate with patient survival times. We studied the relationship among markers of different subtypes of colorectal tumors and patient survival. METHODS We pooled data from 7 observational studies, comprising 5010 patients with colorectal cancer. All the studies collected information on microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and mutations in KRAS and BRAF in tumors. Tumors with complete marker data were classified as type 1 (MSI-high, CIMP-positive, with pathogenic mutations in BRAF but not KRAS), type 2 (not MSI-high, CIMP-positive, with pathogenic mutations in BRAF but not KRAS), type 3 (not MSI-high or CIMP, with pathogenic mutations in KRAS but not BRAF), type 4 (not MSI-high or CIMP, no pathogenic mutations in BRAF or KRAS), or type 5 (MSI-high, no CIMP, no pathogenic mutations in BRAF or KRAS). We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations of these subtypes and tumor markers with disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival times, adjusting for age, sex, stage at diagnosis, and study population. RESULTS Patients with type 2 colorectal tumors had significantly shorter time of DSS than patients with type 4 tumors (HRDSS 1.66; 95% CI 1.33-2.07), regardless of sex, age, or stage at diagnosis. Patients without MSI-high tumors had significantly shorter time of DSS compared with patients with MSI-high tumors (HRDSS 0.42; 95% CI 0.27-0.64), regardless of other tumor markers or stage, or patient sex or age. CONCLUSIONS In a pooled analysis of data from 7 observational studies of patients with colorectal cancer, we found that tumor subtypes, defined by combinations of 4 common tumor markers, were associated with differences in survival time. Colorectal tumor subtypes might therefore be used in determining patients' prognoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda I. Phipps
- Epidemiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA,Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Elizabeth Alwers
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tabitha Harrison
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Barbara Banbury
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter T. Campbell
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Buchanan
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew T. Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jane C. Figueiredo
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Polly A. Newcomb
- Epidemiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA,Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Mingyang Song
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA,Program in Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Syed H. Zaidi
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Peters
- Epidemiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA,Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kratz JD, Deming DA. The evolving treatment paradigm for BRAF V600 mutant colorectal cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S257. [PMID: 32015976 PMCID: PMC6976492 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy D. Kratz
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Dustin A. Deming
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Oncology, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu J, Tang L, Yi J, Li G, Lu Y, Xu Y, Zhao S, Mao R, Li X, Ren L, Wang K. Unique characteristics of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in a Chinese population with colorectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19:173. [PMID: 31690257 PMCID: PMC6833289 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1086-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Molecular characteristics of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer (CRC) have been well documented in Western, but not in Chinese, populations. Methods We investigated the incidence of CIMP, BRAF/KRAS mutation, and microsatellite instability (MSI) in a Chinese population with CRC (n = 401) and analysed associations between CIMP status and clinicopathological and molecular features. Results A total of 41 cases, 310 cases, and 40 cases were classified as CIMP-high, CIMP-low, and CIMP-negative, respectively. We detected a significantly low incidence of BRAF mutation in adenomas (2%) and CRC (0.7%), and a relatively low incidence of KRAS mutation (24.9%) compared with that in other populations. We also detected a relatively low incidence of CIMP-high (10.2%), which was significantly associated with younger age (≤49 years of age), female sex, and proximal tumour location. Conclusions This study revealed unique characteristics of CIMP in a Chinese population with colorectal cancer. Developing specific CIMP markers based on unique populations or ethnic groups will further help to fully elucidate CIMP pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Liu
- Department of Reproduction and Genetics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Yunnan Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Kunming Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China
| | - Li Tang
- Department of Reproduction and Genetics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China
| | - Jinhua Yi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Institute of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Yunnan Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Kunming Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China
| | - Guimei Li
- Public Technical Service Center, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Kunming Biological Diversity Regional Center of Large Apparatus and Equipments, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China
| | - Youwang Lu
- Department of Reproduction and Genetics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Yunnan Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Kunming Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Institute of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Yunnan Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Kunming Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China
| | - Shuhua Zhao
- Department of Reproduction and Genetics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China
| | - Rui Mao
- School of Stomatology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China
| | - Xiaolu Li
- Public Technical Service Center, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.,Kunming Biological Diversity Regional Center of Large Apparatus and Equipments, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China
| | - Li Ren
- Department of Reproductive Gynecology, the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, 650031, Yunnan, China
| | - Kunhua Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Institute of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China. .,Yunnan Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China. .,Kunming Engineering Technology Center of Digestive Disease, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Advani SM, Advani PS, Brown DW, DeSantis SM, Korphaisarn K, VonVille HM, Bressler J, Lopez DS, Davis JS, Daniel CR, Sarshekeh AM, Braithwaite D, Swartz MD, Kopetz S. Global differences in the prevalence of the CpG island methylator phenotype of colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:964. [PMID: 31623592 PMCID: PMC6796359 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6144-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) is an epigenetic phenotype in CRC characterized by hypermethylation of CpG islands in promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes, leading to their transcriptional silencing and loss of function. While the prevalence of CRC differs across geographical regions, no studies have compared prevalence of CIMP-High phenotype across regions. The purpose of this project was to compare the prevalence of CIMP across geographical regions after adjusting for variations in methodologies to measure CIMP in a meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed, Medline, and Embase for articles focusing on CIMP published from 2000 to 2018. Two reviewers independently identified 111 articles to be included in final meta-analysis. We classified methods used to quantify CIMP into 4 categories: a) Classical (MINT marker) Panel group b) Weisenberg-Ogino (W-O) group c) Human Methylation Arrays group and d) Miscellaneous group. We compared the prevalence of CIMP across geographical regions after correcting for methodological variations using meta-regression techniques. Results The pooled prevalence of CIMP-High across all studies was 22% (95% confidence interval:21–24%; I2 = 94.75%). Pooled prevalence of CIMP-H across Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America was 22, 21, 21, 27 and 25%, respectively. Meta-regression analysis identified no significant differences in the prevalence of CIMP-H across geographical regions after correction for methodological variations. In exploratory analysis, we observed variations in CIMP-H prevalence across countries. Conclusion Although no differences were found for CIMP-H prevalence across countries, further studies are needed to compare the influence of demographic, lifestyle and environmental factors in relation to the prevalence of CIMP across geographical regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shailesh Mahesh Advani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0426, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington DC, 20007, USA. .,Social Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| | - Pragati Shailesh Advani
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Derek W Brown
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Stacia M DeSantis
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Krittiya Korphaisarn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0426, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Helena M VonVille
- Library, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jan Bressler
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - David S Lopez
- Division of Urology- UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, UTMB Health-School of Medicine, Galveston, TX, 77555-1153, USA
| | - Jennifer S Davis
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Carrie R Daniel
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Amir Mehrvarz Sarshekeh
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0426, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Dejana Braithwaite
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington DC, 20007, USA
| | - Michael D Swartz
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0426, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Taieb J, Lapeyre-Prost A, Laurent Puig P, Zaanan A. Exploring the best treatment options for BRAF-mutant metastatic colon cancer. Br J Cancer 2019; 121:434-442. [PMID: 31353365 PMCID: PMC6738120 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0526-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The BRAFV600E mutation is a well-accepted poor prognostic factor in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), as it confers Ras-independent stimulation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway involved in proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and the suppression of apoptosis. Analysis of the potential predictive value of BRAF for treatment efficacy is inherently confounded by this known prognostic impact. Currently, approved therapeutic strategies for patients with BRAF-mutant (BRAF-mt) mCRC are suboptimal, and uncertainty exists regarding how to best treat these patients. Based on the available evidence, it is currently not possible to confirm the superiority of any available treatment options cited in European Society for Medical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (that is, doublet or triplet chemotherapy regimens plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or anti-epidermal growth factor receptors), even if triplet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is the most accepted standard regimen. In this review, we highlight still-emerging strategies that could be deployed to combat BRAF-mt mCRC, including triplet chemotherapy plus available biologic agents, rationally derived combinations of targeted agents and immunotherapy. While it is clear that the needs of patients with BRAF-mt mCRC are currently unmet, we are cautiously optimistic that the recently renewed research interest in these patients will yield clinically relevant insights and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Taieb
- Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris Descartes University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Gastro-enterology and GI Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
- INSERM UMR-S1138, CNRS SNC5014, Paris Descartes University, Equipe labellisée Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France.
| | - Alexandra Lapeyre-Prost
- Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris Descartes University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Gastro-enterology and GI Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Laurent Puig
- INSERM UMR-S1138, CNRS SNC5014, Paris Descartes University, Equipe labellisée Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Biology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Aziz Zaanan
- Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris Descartes University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Gastro-enterology and GI Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S1138, CNRS SNC5014, Paris Descartes University, Equipe labellisée Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang J, Shen J, Huang C, Cao M, Shen L. Clinicopathological Significance of BRAFV600E Mutation in Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis. J Cancer 2019; 10:2332-2341. [PMID: 31258736 PMCID: PMC6584400 DOI: 10.7150/jca.30789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: Numerous studies have identified BRAFV600E mutation as a predictive factor of anti-EGFR antibodies in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association between BRAFV600E mutation and clinicopathological features remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to conduct an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the above issues. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PMC database examining the association between BRAFV600E mutation and clinicopathological features in CRC patients. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to estimate the effects of BRAFV600E mutation on each clinicopathological parameter with fixed-effect model or random-effect model. Results: Sixty-one studies published, including 32407 CRC patients from multiple countries, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall BRAFV600E mutation rate was 11.38%, and BRAFV600E mutation was positively related to high disease stage (OR=0.81; 95% CI=0.72-0.92; P=0.001), high T stage (OR=0.51; 95% CI=0.40-0.65; P<0.00001), proximal colon (OR=4.76; 95% CI=3.81-5.96; P<0.00001) or right colon (OR=5.15; 95% CI=4.35-6.10, P<0.00001) tumor location, poor tumor differentiation (OR=0.27; 95% CI=0.21-0.34; P<0.00001), mucinous histology (OR=2.97; 95% CI=2.37-3.72; P<0.00001), K-ras-wild type (OR=0.04; 95% CI=0.02-0.07; P<0.00001), TP53-wild type (OR=0.50; 95% CI=0.31-0.78; P=0.003), deficient DNA mismatch repair (OR=2.93; 95% CI=1.78-4.82; P<0.00001), high microsatellite instability (OR=11.15; 95% CI=8.51-14.61; P<0.00001) and high CpG island methylator phenotype (OR=0.04; 95% CI=0.03-0.08; P<0.00001). Conclusions: Our updated meta-analysis demonstrated that BRAFV600E mutation was related to poor prognosis of CRC and associated with the distinct molecular phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhua Wang
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.,Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China
| | - Jiajia Shen
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Chi Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China
| | - Meng Cao
- Lab of cellular and molecular biology, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China
| | - Lizong Shen
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Heath AK, Hodge AM, Ebeling PR, Eyles DW, Kvaskoff D, Buchanan DD, Giles GG, Williamson EJ, English DR. Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration and Risk of Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancers: The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:900-908. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-1155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
13
|
Gbolahan O, O’Neil B. Update on systemic therapy for colorectal cancer: biologics take sides. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:9. [PMID: 30976712 PMCID: PMC6414333 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.01.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last decade, progress in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has focused on the development of biologic therapy in addition to the back bone of combination chemotherapy. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies and agents targeting angiogenesis are widely used in the clinic, and more recently, in a subset of patients with mismatch repair (MMR) deficient cancer, immunotherapy with immune check point inhibitors have been integrated into clinical practice. The major challenge with the use of these biologic therapies is determining predictive biomarkers to optimize patient selection. In this review, we discuss the most recent updates in the use of biologic therapy in CRC. We review data on the role of primary tumor location (PTL) (sidedness) as predictive biomarker and recent advances in treatment of CRC with BRAF mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olumide Gbolahan
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Bert O’Neil
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abbass MA, Kalady MF. Serrated polyposis syndrome: Diagnosis and management. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2018. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2018.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
15
|
Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Characteristics of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Transl Oncol 2018; 11:1188-1201. [PMID: 30071442 PMCID: PMC6080640 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) tumors, comprising 20% of colorectal cancers, are associated with female sex, age, right-sided location, and BRAF mutations. However, other factors potentially associated with CIMP have not been robustly examined. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of the clinical, pathologic, and molecular characteristics that define CIMP tumors. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature from January 1999 through April 2018 and identified 122 articles, on which comprehensive data abstraction was performed on the clinical, pathologic, molecular, and mutational characteristics of CIMP subgroups, classified based on the extent of DNA methylation of tumor suppressor genes assessed using a variety of laboratory methods. Associations of CIMP with outcome parameters were estimated using pooled odds ratio or standardized mean differences using random-effects model. RESULTS: We confirmed prior associations including female sex, older age, right-sided tumor location, poor differentiation, and microsatellite instability. In addition to the recognized association with BRAF mutations, CIMP was also associated with PIK3CA mutations and lack of mutations in KRAS and TP53. Evidence of an activated immune response was seen with high rates of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (but not peritumoral lymphocytes), Crohn-like infiltrates, and infiltration with Fusobacterium nucleatum bacteria. Additionally, CIMP tumors were associated with advance T-stage and presence of perineural and lymphovascular invasion. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis highlights key features distinguishing CIMP in colorectal cancer, including molecular characteristics of an active immune response. Improved understanding of this unique molecular subtype of colorectal cancer may provide insights into prevention and treatment.
Collapse
|
16
|
Early onset sporadic colorectal cancer: Worrisome trends and oncogenic features. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:521-532. [PMID: 29615301 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Early onset colorectal cancers, defined as arising before 50 years of age, are a growing health hazard in western and eastern countries alike. The incidence of colon and rectal cancers in young individuals is projected to increase by as much as 90% and 140%, respectively, by 2030. Although several known cancer risk factors (e.g. smoking, alcohol, dietary habits) have been investigated, there is no single compelling explanation for this epidemiological trend. While some early onset colorectal cancers have been associated with germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes, genetic syndromes are implicated in only a fraction of these cancers (20%) and do not explain the rising incidence. Colorectal neoplasms develop through microsatellite instability or chromosomal instability pathways, with most of the early onset colorectal cancers exhibiting microsatellite stable phenotypes. Genome-wide hypomethylation is a feature of a subgroup of early onset cancers, which appears to be correlated with chromosomal instability and poor prognosis.
Collapse
|
17
|
Ursem C, Atreya CE, Van Loon K. Emerging treatment options for BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER : TARGETS AND THERAPY 2018; 8:13-23. [PMID: 29628780 PMCID: PMC5889076 DOI: 10.2147/gictt.s125940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The personalization of cancer care is rooted in the premise that there are subsets of patients with tumors harboring clinically relevant targets for patient-specific treatments. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a disease that has historically been notable for its dearth of biomarkers that are predictive of response to targeted therapies. In recent years, BRAFV600E-mutated CRC has emerged as a distinct biologic entity, typically refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens approved for the treatment of metastatic CRC and associated with a dismal prognosis. Multiple clinical trials sought to replicate the successes of targeted therapies seen in BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma without success; metastatic BRAFV600E-mutated CRC is clearly a distinct biologic entity. We review a number of recent studies demonstrating the evidence of modest responses to combinations of BRAF, EGFR, and/or MEK inhibition in patients with metastatic BRAFV600E-mutated CRC; however, despite advances, overall survival remains far inferior for these patients compared to their BRAF-wild-type counterparts. Development of combination therapies to impede signaling through the MAPK pathway through alternate targets remains an area of active investigation. Reflecting the rapid evolution of efforts for this small subset of CRC patients, the first-ever Phase III study is now underway evaluating the combination of BRAF, EGFR, and MEK inhibition. Immunotherapies are also an area of active research, particularly for the subset of patients with tumors that are also microsatellite instability (MSI) high. Here, we summarize the current landscape and emerging data on the molecular, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of BRAF-mutant CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carling Ursem
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Chloe E Atreya
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lifestyle, Diet, and Colorectal Cancer Risk According to (Epi)genetic Instability: Current Evidence and Future Directions of Molecular Pathological Epidemiology. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2017; 13:455-469. [PMID: 29249914 PMCID: PMC5725509 DOI: 10.1007/s11888-017-0395-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review In this review, we describe molecular pathological epidemiology (MPE) studies from around the world that have studied diet and/or lifestyle factors in relation to molecular markers of (epi)genetic pathways in colorectal cancer (CRC), and explore future perspectives in this realm of research. The main focus of this review is diet and lifestyle factors for which there is evidence for an association with CRC as identified by the World Cancer Research Fund reports. In addition, we review promising hypotheses, that warrant consideration in future studies. Recent Findings Associations between molecular characteristics of CRC have been published in relation to smoking, alcohol consumption; body mass index (BMI); waist:hip ratio; adult attained height; physical activity; early life energy restriction; dietary acrylamide, fiber, fat, methyl donors, omega 3 fatty acids; meat, including total protein, processed meat, and heme iron; and fruit and vegetable intake. Summary MPE studies help identify where associations between diet, lifestyle, and CRC risk may otherwise be masked and also shed light on how timing of exposure can influence etiology. Sample size is often an issue, but this may be addressed in the future by pooling data.
Collapse
|
19
|
Boeckx N, Janssens K, Van Camp G, Rasschaert M, Papadimitriou K, Peeters M, Op de Beeck K. The predictive value of primary tumor location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2017; 121:1-10. [PMID: 29279095 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. It has been reported that left- and right-sided CRC harbor varying disease characteristics, which leads to a difference in prognosis and response to therapy. Recently, there have been retrospective studies about tumor location in metastatic CRC (mCRC) and its potential to predict the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest trials studying the predictive value of primary tumor location in mCRC and discuss biomarkers that might be associated with the differences in treatment response. Although data need to be interpreted with caution due to the absence of randomized trials stratified based on tumor location, patients with left-sided CRC seem to benefit more from anti-EGFR therapy than patients with right-sided CRC. Further clinical trials, stratified for tumor location, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nele Boeckx
- Center of Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; Center of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43/6, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
| | - Katleen Janssens
- Center of Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - Guy Van Camp
- Center of Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; Center of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43/6, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
| | - Marika Rasschaert
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
| | | | - Marc Peeters
- Center of Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
| | - Ken Op de Beeck
- Center of Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; Center of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43/6, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Baik CS, Myall NJ, Wakelee HA. Targeting BRAF-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Molecular Profiling to Rationally Designed Therapy. Oncologist 2017; 22:786-796. [PMID: 28487464 PMCID: PMC5507646 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. However, the identification of oncogenic driver alterations involved in the initiation and maintenance of NSCLC, such as epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocation, has led to the development of novel therapies that directly target mutant proteins and associated signaling pathways, resulting in improved clinical outcomes. As sequencing techniques have improved, the molecular heterogeneity of NSCLC has become apparent, leading to the identification of a number of potentially actionable oncogenic driver mutations. Of these, one of the most promising therapeutic targets is B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF). Mutations in BRAF, observed in 2%-4% of NSCLCs, typically lead to constitutive activation of the protein and, as a consequence, lead to activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Direct inhibition of mutant BRAF and/or the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) has led to prolonged survival in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. This comprehensive review will discuss the clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of BRAF-mutant NSCLC, the clinical development of BRAF and MEK inhibitors from melanoma to NSCLC, and practical considerations for clinicians involving BRAF mutation screening and the choice of targeted therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Personalized medicine has begun to provide substantial benefit to patients with oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, treatment options for patients with oncogenic driver mutations lacking targeted treatment strategies remain limited. Direct inhibition of mutant B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) and/or downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) has the potential to change the course of the disease for patients with BRAF-mutant NSCLC, as it has in BRAF-mutant melanoma. Optimization of screening strategies for rare mutations and the choice of appropriate agents on an individual basis will be key to providing timely and successful intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina S Baik
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wong S, Lidums I, Rosty C, Ruszkiewicz A, Parry S, Win AK, Tomita Y, Vatandoust S, Townsend A, Patel D, Hardingham JE, Roder D, Smith E, Drew P, Marker J, Uylaki W, Hewett P, Worthley DL, Symonds E, Young GP, Price TJ, Young JP. Findings in young adults at colonoscopy from a hospital service database audit. BMC Gastroenterol 2017; 17:56. [PMID: 28424049 PMCID: PMC5395776 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-017-0612-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed at <50 years is predominantly located in the distal colon and rectum. Little is known about which lesion subtypes may serve as CRC precursors in young adults. The aim of this work was to document the prevalence and histological subtype of lesions seen in patients aged <50 years, and any associated clinical features. METHODS An audit of the colonoscopy database at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Adelaide, South Australia over a 12-month period was undertaken. Findings were recorded from both colonoscopy reports and corresponding histological examination of excised lesions. RESULTS Data were extracted from colonoscopies in 2064 patients. Those aged <50 comprised 485 (24%) of the total. CRC precursor lesions (including sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P), traditional serrated adenomas, tubular adenomas ≥10 mm or with high-grade dysplasia, and conventional adenomas with villous histology) were seen in 4.3% of patients aged <50 and 12.9% of patients aged ≥50 (P <0.001). Among colonoscopies yielding CRC precursor lesions in patients under 50 years, SSA/P occurred in 52% of procedures (11/21), compared with 27% (55/204) of procedures in patients aged 50 and older (P = 0.02). SSA/P were proximally located in (10/11) 90% of patients aged under 50, and 80% (43/54) of those aged 50 and older (P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS SSA/P were the most frequently observed CRC precursor lesions in patients aged <50. Most CRCs in this age group are known to arise in the distal colon and rectum suggesting that lesions other than SSA/P may serve as the precursor for the majority of early-onset CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Wong
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ilmars Lidums
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Kelvin Grove 4059, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Department of Pathology, Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Ruszkiewicz
- Division of Anatomical Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan Parry
- Familial GI Cancer Service and Ministry of Health Bowel Cancer Programme, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Aung Ko Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Yoko Tomita
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sina Vatandoust
- Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 5042, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Amanda Townsend
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dainik Patel
- Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 5042, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jennifer E Hardingham
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - David Roder
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Eric Smith
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Paul Drew
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Basil Hetzel Institute, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Julie Marker
- Cancer Voices SA, Kensington Park 5068, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Wendy Uylaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Hewett
- University of Adelaide Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Daniel L Worthley
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia.,Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Erin Symonds
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Bowel Health Service, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park 5041, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Graeme P Young
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Timothy J Price
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Joanne P Young
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South 5011, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. .,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia, Australia. .,SAHMRI Colorectal Node, Basil Hetzel Institute, Woodville South, Adelaide, South Australia, 5011, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Li Y, Li W. BRAF mutation is associated with poor clinicopathological outcomes in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:144-149. [PMID: 28611337 PMCID: PMC5470373 DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.207712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The clinical relevance of the BRAF mutation in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) remains controversial. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the precise relationship of BRAF mutation to clinicopathological features. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search of the electronic databases, including PubMed, the Web of Knowledge, and the China Journal Net was performed between January 2005 and December 2015. Outcomes of interest included gender, tumor site, tumor differentiation, node involvement, tumor size, and AJCC stage. We calculated the pooled odds ratios (ORs) or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each study using a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS Twenty-five studies with a total of 13208 patients were included. BRAF mutation-positive CRC patients were 1464 (11.1%). Our meta-analysis revealed that, in patients with CRC, the BRAF mutation was associated with female, proximal site, poor differentiation, >5 cm size, and advanced AJCC stage. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis demonstrated that BRAF mutation was closely related to adverse pathological features and poor outcome of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujie Li
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ningbo NO. 2 Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Weier Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China,Address for correspondence: Dr. Weier Li, Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jayasekara H, MacInnis RJ, Williamson EJ, Hodge AM, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Walters R, Room R, Southey MC, Jenkins MA, Milne RL, Hopper JL, Giles GG, Buchanan DD, English DR. Lifetime alcohol intake is associated with an increased risk of KRAS+ and BRAF-/KRAS- but not BRAF+ colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2016; 140:1485-1493. [PMID: 27943267 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Ethanol in alcoholic beverages is a causative agent for colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer is a biologically heterogeneous disease, and molecular subtypes defined by the presence of somatic mutations in BRAF and KRAS are known to exist. We examined associations between lifetime alcohol intake and molecular and anatomic subtypes of colorectal cancer. We calculated usual alcohol intake for 10-year periods from age 20 using recalled frequency and quantity of beverage-specific consumption for 38,149 participants aged 40-69 years from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Cox regression was performed to derive hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between lifetime alcohol intake and colorectal cancer risk. Heterogeneity in the HRs across subtypes of colorectal cancer was assessed. A positive dose-dependent association between lifetime alcohol intake and overall colorectal cancer risk (mean follow-up = 14.6 years; n = 596 colon and n = 326 rectal cancer) was observed (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12 per 10 g/day increment). The risk was greater for rectal than colon cancer (phomogeneity = 0.02). Alcohol intake was associated with increased risks of KRAS+ (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00-1.15) and BRAF-/KRAS- (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.11) but not BRAF+ tumors (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.78-1.01; phomogeneity = 0.01). Alcohol intake is associated with an increased risk of KRAS+ and BRAF-/KRAS- tumors originating via specific molecular pathways including the traditional adenoma-carcinoma pathway but not with BRAF+ tumors originating via the serrated pathway. Therefore, limiting alcohol intake from a young age might reduce colorectal cancer originating via the traditional adenoma-carcinoma pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harindra Jayasekara
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Centre, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Centre, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Williamson
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, London, NW1 2DA, United Kingdom.,Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | - Allison M Hodge
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Centre, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Rhiannon Walters
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Robin Room
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SE-106 91, Sweden
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Centre, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Centre, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Centre, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Dallas R English
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Centre, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Manne U, Jadhav T, Putcha BDK, Samuel T, Soni S, Shanmugam C, Suswam EA. Molecular Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Disparities: Current Status and Perspective. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2016. [PMID: 28626361 DOI: 10.1007/s11888-016-0338-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
This review provides updates on the efforts for the development of prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer based on the race/ethnicity of patients. Since the clinical consequences of genetic and molecular alterations differ with patient race and ethnicity, the usefulness of these molecular alterations as biomarkers needs to be evaluated in different racial/ethnic groups. To accomplish personalized patient care, a combined analysis of multiple molecular alterations in DNA, RNA, microRNAs (miRNAs), metabolites, and proteins in a single test is required to assess disease status in a precise way. Therefore, a special emphasis is placed on issues related to utility of recently identified genetic and molecular alterations in genes, miRNAs, and various "-omes" (e.g., proteomes, kinomes, metabolomes, exomes, methylomes) as candidate molecular markers to determine cancer progression (disease recurrence/relapse and metastasis) and to assess the efficacy of therapy in colorectal cancer in relation to patient race and ethnicity. This review will be useful for oncologists, pathologists, and basic and translational researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Upender Manne
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wallace Tumor Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room # 420A, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Trafina Jadhav
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Wallace Tumor Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room # 430A, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.,Present address: Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University, 1215 21st Avenue South, Medical Center East, Suite 5050, Nashville, TN 37232-8802, USA
| | - Balananda-Dhurjati Kumar Putcha
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Wallace Tumor Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room # 430A, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.,Present address: 2502 East Woodlands, Saint Joseph, MO 64506, USA
| | - Temesgen Samuel
- Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nursing and Allied Health, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088, USA
| | - Shivani Soni
- Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Room # 325, Life Science Building, 1627, Hall Street, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA
| | - Chandrakumar Shanmugam
- Wallace Tumor Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room # 430A, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.,Present address: Department of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 038, India
| | - Esther A Suswam
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Department of Pathology, Wallace Tumor Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, # 410C, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zong L, Abe M, Ji J, Zhu WG, Yu D. Tracking the Correlation Between CpG Island Methylator Phenotype and Other Molecular Features and Clinicopathological Features in Human Colorectal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2016; 7:e151. [PMID: 26963001 PMCID: PMC4822093 DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2016.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The controversy of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancers (CRCs) persists, despite many studies that have been conducted on its correlation with molecular and clinicopathological features. To drive a more precise estimate of the strength of this postulated relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Methods: A comprehensive search for studies reporting molecular and clinicopathological features of CRCs stratified by CIMP was performed within the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. CIMP was defined by either one of the three panels of gene-specific CIMP markers (Weisenberger panel, classic panel, or a mixture panel of the previous two) or the genome-wide DNA methylation profile. The associations of CIMP with outcome parameters were estimated using odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study using a fixed effects or random effects model. Results: A total of 29 studies involving 9,393 CRC patients were included for analysis. We observed more BRAF mutations (OR 34.87; 95% CI, 22.49–54.06) and microsatellite instability (MSI) (OR 12.85 95% CI, 8.84–18.68) in CIMP-positive vs. -negative CRCs, whereas KRAS mutations were less frequent (OR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30–0.75). Subgroup analysis showed that only the genome-wide methylation profile-defined CIMP subset encompassed all BRAF-mutated CRCs. As expected, CIMP-positive CRCs displayed significant associations with female (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56–0.72), older age at diagnosis (WMD 2.77; 95% CI, 1.15–4.38), proximal location (OR 6.91; 95% CI, 5.17–9.23), mucinous histology (OR 3.81; 95% CI, 2.93–4.95), and poor differentiation (OR 4.22; 95% CI, 2.52–7.08). Although CIMP did not show a correlation with tumor stage (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.82–1.46), it was associated with shorter overall survival (HR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.27–2.37). Conclusions: The meta-analysis highlights that CIMP-positive CRCs take their own molecular feature, especially overlapping with BRAF mutations, and clinicopathological features and worse prognosis from CIMP-negative CRCs, suggesting CIMP could be used as an independent prognostic marker for CRCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Zong
- Division of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Su Bei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Masanobu Abe
- Division for Health Service Promotion, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wei-Guo Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.,Peking-Tsinghua University Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Duonan Yu
- Non-coding RNA Center, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Prevention and Treatment of Senile Disease, Yangzhou, China.,Institute of Comparative Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.,Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonosis, Yangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tang Z, Yuan X, Du R, Cheung SH, Zhang G, Wei J, Zhao Y, Feng Y, Peng H, Zhang Y, Du Y, Hu X, Gong W, Liu Y, Gao Y, Liu Y, Hao R, Li S, Wang S, Ji J, Zhang L, Li S, Sutton D, Wei M, Zhou C, Wang L, Luo L. BGB-283, a Novel RAF Kinase and EGFR Inhibitor, Displays Potent Antitumor Activity in BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancers. Mol Cancer Ther 2015. [PMID: 26208524 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Oncogenic BRAF, which drives cell transformation and proliferation, has been detected in approximately 50% of human malignant melanomas and 5% to 15% of colorectal cancers. Despite the remarkable clinical activities achieved by vemurafenib and dabrafenib in treating BRAF(V600E) metastatic melanoma, their clinical efficacy in BRAF(V600E) colorectal cancer is far less impressive. Prior studies suggested that feedback activation of EGFR and MAPK signaling upon BRAF inhibition might contribute to the relative unresponsiveness of colorectal cancer to the first-generation BRAF inhibitors. Here, we report characterization of a dual RAF kinase/EGFR inhibitor, BGB-283, which is currently under clinical investigation. In vitro, BGB-283 potently inhibits BRAF(V600E)-activated ERK phosphorylation and cell proliferation. It demonstrates selective cytotoxicity and preferentially inhibits proliferation of cancer cells harboring BRAF(V600E) and EGFR mutation/amplification. In BRAF(V600E) colorectal cancer cell lines, BGB-283 effectively inhibits the reactivation of EGFR and EGFR-mediated cell proliferation. In vivo, BGB-283 treatment leads to dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition accompanied by partial and complete tumor regressions in both cell line-derived and primary human colorectal tumor xenografts bearing BRAF(V600E) mutation. These findings support BGB-283 as a potent antitumor drug candidate with clinical potential for treating colorectal cancer harboring BRAF(V600E) mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyu Tang
- Department of In Vivo Pharmacology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xi Yuan
- Department of Discovery Biology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Rong Du
- Department of Discovery Biology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Shing-Hu Cheung
- Department of Discovery Biology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Guoliang Zhang
- Department of Chemistry, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jing Wei
- Department of Discovery Biology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yuan Zhao
- Department of Discovery Biology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yingcai Feng
- Department of Molecular Sciences, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Hao Peng
- Department of Molecular Sciences, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of Molecular Sciences, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yunguang Du
- Department of Molecular Sciences, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoxia Hu
- Department of In Vivo Pharmacology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wenfeng Gong
- Department of In Vivo Pharmacology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yong Liu
- Department of In Vivo Pharmacology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yajuan Gao
- Department of In Vivo Pharmacology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Ye Liu
- Department of Molecular Sciences, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Rui Hao
- Department of Molecular Sciences, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Shengjian Li
- Department of Molecular Sciences, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Shaohui Wang
- Department of Chemistry, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Lianhai Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Shuangxi Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - David Sutton
- Department of In Vivo Pharmacology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Min Wei
- Department of Molecular Sciences, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Changyou Zhou
- Department of Chemistry, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Lai Wang
- Department of In Vivo Pharmacology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Lusong Luo
- Department of Discovery Biology, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Serrated polyps and their alternative pathway to the colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015:573814. [PMID: 25945086 PMCID: PMC4405010 DOI: 10.1155/2015/573814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Revised: 03/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer in the world. For a long time, only one pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis was known. In recent years, a new “alternative” pathway through serrated adenoma was described. Recent meta-analysis estimated these cancers as about 10% to 30% of all CRCs. Serrated polyps are the second most popular groups of polyps (after conventional adenomas) found during colonoscopy. Serrated polyps of the colon are clinically and molecularly diverse changes that have common feature as crypt luminal morphology characterized by glandular serration. Evidence suggests that subtypes of serrated polyps, particularly TSA and SSA/P, can lead to adenocarcinoma through the serrated pathway. Moreover, the data indicate that the SSA/P are the precursors of colorectal carcinoma by MSI and may be subject to rapid progression to malignancy. An important step to reduce the incidence of CRC initiated by the serrated pathway is to improve the detection of serrated polyps and to ensure their complete removal during endoscopy. Understanding of the so-called serrated carcinogenesis pathway is an important step forward in expanding possibilities in the prevention of CRC.
Collapse
|
28
|
Weisenberger DJ, Levine AJ, Long TI, Buchanan DD, Walters R, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Joshi AD, Stern MC, LeMarchand L, Lindor NM, Daftary D, Gallinger S, Selander T, Bapat B, Newcomb PA, Campbell PT, Casey G, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA, Haile RW, Hopper JL, Young JP, Laird PW, Siegmund KD. Association of the colorectal CpG island methylator phenotype with molecular features, risk factors, and family history. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 24:512-519. [PMID: 25587051 PMCID: PMC4355081 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) represents a subset of colorectal cancers characterized by widespread aberrant DNA hypermethylation at select CpG islands. The risk factors and environmental exposures contributing to etiologic heterogeneity between CIMP and non-CIMP tumors are not known. METHODS We measured the CIMP status of 3,119 primary population-based colorectal cancer tumors from the multinational Colon Cancer Family Registry. Etiologic heterogeneity was assessed by a case-case study comparing risk factor frequency of colorectal cancer cases with CIMP and non-CIMP tumors using logistic regression to estimate the case-case odds ratio (ccOR). RESULTS We found associations between tumor CIMP status and MSI-H (ccOR = 7.6), BRAF V600E mutation (ccOR = 59.8), proximal tumor site (ccOR = 9; all P < 0.0001), female sex [ccOR = 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5-2.1], older age (ccOR = 4.0 comparing over 70 years vs. under 50; 95% CI, 3.0-5.5), and family history of CRC (ccOR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7). While use of NSAIDs varied by tumor CIMP status for both males and females (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.02, respectively), use of multivitamin or calcium supplements did not. Only for female colorectal cancer was CIMP status associated with increased pack-years of smoking (Ptrend < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI; Ptrend = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The frequency of several colorectal cancer risk factors varied by CIMP status, and the associations of smoking and obesity with tumor subtype were evident only for females. IMPACT Differences in the associations of a unique DNA methylation-based subgroup of colorectal cancer with important lifestyle and environmental exposures increase understanding of the molecular pathologic epidemiology of this heavily methylated subset of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(3); 512-9. ©2015 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Weisenberger
- USC Epigenome Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - A. Joan Levine
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany I. Long
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Rhiannon Walters
- Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Amit D. Joshi
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mariana C. Stern
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Loic LeMarchand
- Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
| | | | - Darshana Daftary
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Samuel Lunenfield Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Samuel Lunenfield Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Teresa Selander
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Samuel Lunenfield Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bharati Bapat
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Samuel Lunenfield Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Polly A. Newcomb
- Epidemiology Department, University of Washington and Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Graham Casey
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dennis J. Ahnen
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
| | - John A. Baron
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Robert W. Haile
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne P. Young
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Peter W. Laird
- USC Epigenome Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly D. Siegmund
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bae JM, Lee TH, Cho NY, Kim TY, Kang GH. Loss of CDX2 expression is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:1457-1467. [PMID: 25663765 PMCID: PMC4316088 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2014] [Revised: 10/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic implications associated with loss of CDX2 expression in colorectal cancers (CRCs).
METHODS: We immunohistochemically evaluated CDX2 expression in 713 CRCs and paired our findings to clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of each individual. Endpoints included cytokeratin 7 and CK20 expression, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, and KRAS and BRAF mutation statuses. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed to reveal the prognostic value of CDX2 downregulation.
RESULTS: CDX2 expression was lost in 42 (5.9%) patients. Moreover, loss of CDX2 expression was associated with proximal location, infiltrative growth, advanced T, N, M and overall stage. On microscopic examination, loss of CDX2 expression was associated with poor differentiation, increased number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, luminal serration and mucin production. Loss of CDX2 expression was also associated with increased CK7 expression, decreased CK20 expression, CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation. In a univariate survival analysis, patients with loss of CDX2 expression showed worse overall survival (P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (P < 0.001). In a multivariate survival analysis, loss of CDX2 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor of overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.04-2.85, P = 0.034] and progression-free survival (HR = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.22-3.07, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Loss of CDX2 expression is associated with aggressive clinical behavior and can be used as a prognostic marker in CRCs.
Collapse
|
30
|
Epidemiology of goblet cell and microvesicular hyperplastic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:1922-32. [PMID: 25350766 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Serrated polyps compromise both typical hyperplastic polyps as well as sessile serrated adenomas and dysplastic serrated polyps. Hyperplastic polyps exhibit two histological patterns: microvesicular hyperplastic polyps (MVHPs) and goblet cell hyperplastic polyps (GCHPs). MVHPs and GCHPs differ in their molecular signature. MVHPs have been frequently found to have the BRAF(V600E) mutation as well as aberrant methylation. In contrast, GCHPs have been associated with the KRAS mutation (KRAS-mut), which are infrequently seen in dysplastic serrated sessile adenomas. The particular risk factors that are associated with development of the types of hyperplastic polyps have not been previously studied. The purpose of this study is to characterize the associations between particular risk factors and the development of goblet cell or microvesicular hyperplastic polyps. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 3,543 asymptomatic, mostly average risk patients 50 and 79 years of age undergoing open-access screening colonoscopy between March 2005 and January 2012. Each patient was given a survey regarding 25 reputed risk factors for colorectal neoplasia and the responses were correlated with findings at colonoscopy. Associations between putative risk factors for colorectal neoplasia and MVHPs and GSHPs were examined using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS MVHPS and GCHPs were identified in 5.3% and 8.7% of patients, respectively. The results of the statistical analysis indicate that a history of smoking greater than 20 years is associated with an increased risk of MVHPs (P<0.005) and GCHPs (P<0.005). An elevated BMI >30 kg/m(2) was also associated with the presence of MVHP at colonoscopy (P<0.005). Blacks and Asians appear to be protected from the development of MVHPs. In contrast, there was a positive association with the presence of GCHP at colonoscopy in blacks. CONCLUSIONS The study suggests that the development of the distinct histological types of hyperplastic polyps are associated with distinct modifiable and non-modifiable lifestyle factors.
Collapse
|
31
|
Rosty C, Williamson EJ, Clendenning M, Walters RJ, Win AK, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Winship IM, Southey MC, Giles GG, English DR, Buchanan DD. Should the grading of colorectal adenocarcinoma include microsatellite instability status? Hum Pathol 2014; 45:2077-84. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2014] [Revised: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 06/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
32
|
CpG island methylator phenotype and prognosis of colorectal cancer in Northeast China. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:236361. [PMID: 25243122 PMCID: PMC4163374 DOI: 10.1155/2014/236361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2014] [Accepted: 07/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Purpose. To investigate the association between CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and the overall survival of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) in Northeast China. Methods. 282 sporadic CRC patients were recruited in this study. We selected MLH1, MGMT, p16, APC, MINT1, MINT31, and RUNX3 as the CIMP panel markers. The promoter methylation was assessed by methylation sensitive high resolution melting (MS-HRM). Proportional hazards-regression models were fitted with computing hazard ratios (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results. 12.77% (36/282) of patients were CIMP-0, 74.1% (209/282) of patients were CIMP-L, and 13.12% (37/282) of patients were CIMP-H. The five-year survival of the 282 CRC patients was 58%. There was significant association between APC gene promoter methylation and CRC overall survival (HR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.05–2.46; P = 0.03). CIMP-H was significantly associated with worse prognosis compared to CIMP-0 (HR = 3.06; 95% CI: 1.19–7.89; P = 0.02) and CIMP-L (HR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.11–3.48; P = 0.02), respectively. While comparing with the combine of CIMP-L and CIMP-0 (CIMP-L/0), CIMP-H also presented a worse prognosis (HR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.02–5.24; P = 0.04). Conclusion. CIMP-H may be a predictor of a poor prognosis of CRC in Northeast China patients.
Collapse
|
33
|
Rosty C, Williamson EJ, Clendenning M, Walters RJ, Walsh MD, Win AK, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Winship I, Southey MC, Giles GG, English DR, Buchanan DD. Re: Microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation testing in colorectal cancer prognostication. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju180. [PMID: 25114271 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Rosty
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Elizabeth J Williamson
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Rhiannon J Walters
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Michael D Walsh
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Aung K Win
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - John L Hopper
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Dallas R English
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE)
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (CR, MC, RJW, MDW, DDB); Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (MC, DDB); University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Australia (CR); Envoi Pathology, Herston, Australia (CR); Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (EJW, AKW, MAJ, JLH, GGG, DRE, DDB); Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Australia (MDW); Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (JLH); Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (IW); Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia (MCS); Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia (GGG, DRE).
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Siraj AK, Bu R, Prabhakaran S, Bavi P, Beg S, Al Hazmi M, Al-Rasheed M, Alobaisi K, Al-Dayel F, AlManea H, Al-Sanea N, Uddin S, Al-Kuraya KS. A very low incidence of BRAF mutations in Middle Eastern colorectal carcinoma. Mol Cancer 2014; 13:168. [PMID: 25005754 PMCID: PMC4109832 DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2014] [Accepted: 06/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recent studies emphasize the role of BRAF as a genetic marker for prediction, prognosis and risk stratification in colorectal cancer. Earlier studies have reported the incidence of BRAF mutations in the range of 5-20% in colorectal carcinomas (CRC) and are predominantly seen in the serrated adenoma-carcinoma pathway characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene in the setting of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Due to the lack of data on the true incidence of BRAF mutations in Saudi Arabia, we sought to analyze the incidence of BRAF mutations in this ethnic group. Methods 770 CRC cases were analyzed for BRAF and KRAS mutations by direct DNA sequencing. Results BRAF gene mutations were seen in 2.5% (19/757) CRC analyzed and BRAF V600E somatic mutation constituted 90% (17/19) of all BRAF mutations. BRAF mutations were significantly associated with right sided tumors (p = 0.0019), MSI-H status (p = 0.0144), CIMP (p = 0.0017) and a high proliferative index of Ki67 expression (p = 0.0162). Incidence of KRAS mutations was 28.6% (216/755) and a mutual exclusivity was noted with BRAF mutations (p = 0.0518; a trend was seen). Conclusion Our results highlight the low incidence of BRAF mutations and CIMP in CRC from Saudi Arabia. This could be attributed to ethnic differences and warrant further investigation to elucidate the effect of other environmental and genetic factors. These findings indirectly suggest the possibility of a higher incidence of familial hereditary colorectal cancers especially Hereditary non polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome /Lynch Syndrome (LS) in Saudi Arabia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Khawla S Al-Kuraya
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, MBC#98-16, P,O, Box 3354 Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chen D, Huang JF, Liu K, Zhang LQ, Yang Z, Chuai ZR, Wang YX, Shi DC, Huang Q, Fu WL. BRAFV600E mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9:e90607. [PMID: 24594804 PMCID: PMC3940924 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2013] [Accepted: 02/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease with multiple underlying causative genetic mutations. The B-type Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) plays an important role in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade during CRC. The presence of BRAFV600E mutation can determine the response of a tumor to chemotherapy. However, the association between the BRAFV600E mutation and the clinicopathological features of CRC remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the effect of BRAFV600E mutation on the clinicopathological characteristics of CRC. Methods We identified studies that examined the effect of BRAFV600E mutation on CRC within the PubMed, ISI Science Citation Index, and Embase databases. The effect of BRAFV600E on outcome parameters was estimated by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each study using a fixed effects or random effects model. Results 25 studies with a total of 11,955 CRC patients met inclusion criteria. The rate of BRAFV600 was 10.8% (1288/11955). The BRAFV600E mutation in CRC was associated with advanced TNM stage, poor differentiation, mucinous histology, microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). This mutation was also associated with female gender, older age, proximal colon, and mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation. Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrated that BRAFV600E mutation was significantly correlated with adverse pathological features of CRC and distinct clinical characteristics. These data suggest that BRAFV600E mutation could be used to supplement standard clinical and pathological staging for the better management of individual CRC patients, and could be considered as a poor prognostic marker for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Chen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
| | - Jun-Fu Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
| | - Kai Liu
- Research Center for Nutrition and Food Safety, Institute of Military Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
| | - Li-Qun Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
| | - Zhao Yang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
| | - Zheng-Ran Chuai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
| | - Yun-Xia Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
| | - Da-Chuan Shi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
| | - Qing Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
- * E-mail: (FW); (HQ)
| | - Wei-Ling Fu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China
- * E-mail: (FW); (HQ)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vymetalkova VP, Slyskova J, Korenkova V, Bielik L, Langerova L, Prochazka P, Rejhova A, Schwarzova L, Pardini B, Naccarati A, Vodicka P. Molecular characteristics of mismatch repair genes in sporadic colorectal tumors in Czech patients. BMC MEDICAL GENETICS 2014; 15:17. [PMID: 24484585 PMCID: PMC3913626 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2013] [Accepted: 01/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mismatch repair (MMR) genes are known to be frequently altered in colorectal cancer (CRC). Both genetics and epigenetics modifications seems to be relevant in this phenomenon, however it is still not clear how these two aspects are interconnected. The present study aimed at characterizing of epigenetic and gene expression profiles of MMR genes in sporadic CRC patients from the Czech Republic, a country with one of the highest incidences of this cancer all over Europe. METHODS Expression levels and CpG promoter methylation status of all MMR genes were evaluated in DNA from tumor and adjacent mucosal samples of 53 incident CRC patients. RESULTS We have found significantly increased transcription levels in EXO1 gene in tumor tissues (P = 0.05) and significant over-expression of MSH3 gene in colon tumors when compared to adjacent mucosal tissues (P = 0.02). Interestingly, almost all MMR genes were differently expressed when localization of tumors was compared. In particular, colon tumors showed an up-regulation of EXO1, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, and PMS2 genes in comparison to rectal tumors (P = 0.02). Expression levels of all MMR genes positively correlated between each other. The promoter methylation of MLH1 gene was observed in 9% of CRC tissues only. CONCLUSIONS In our study, we have observed different pattern of MMR genes expression according to tumor localization. However, a lack of association between methylation in MMR genes and their corresponding expressions was noticed in this study, the relationship between these two aspects is worthy to be analyzed in larger population studies and in pre-malignant stages.
Collapse
|
37
|
Kinno T, Tsuta K, Shiraishi K, Mizukami T, Suzuki M, Yoshida A, Suzuki K, Asamura H, Furuta K, Kohno T, Kushima R. Clinicopathological features of nonsmall cell lung carcinomas with BRAF mutations. Ann Oncol 2013; 25:138-42. [PMID: 24297085 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, driver tyrosine kinase gene mutations have been detected in malignant tumors, including lung tumors. Notwithstanding their attractiveness as targets for molecular therapy, limited information is available regarding BRAF-mutated lung carcinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS BRAF mutation status was determined in 2001 surgically resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases using high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) followed by Sanger sequencing and/or deep sequencing using next generation sequencer. RESULTS BRAF mutations were detected in 26 (1.3%) of 2001 NSCLC cases (25 adenocarcinomas and 1 squamous cell carcinoma). In the 26 cases, 13 mutation genotypes were identified, including V600E (8 of 26; 30.8%), G469A (6 of 26; 23.1%), K601E (4 of 26; 15.4%), and other residual mutations (1 of 26; 0.04%). Of the 13 genotypes, 4 genotypes (G464E, G596R, A598T, and G606R) had not been previously reported in lung cancer. The overall survival rate was not significantly different between patients with wild-type BRAF and those with V600E or non-V600E BRAF mutations (P = 0.49 and P = 0.15, respectively). Histomorphological analysis revealed that focal clear cell changes were present in 75% of V600E-mutated tumors. All V600E BRAF-mutated tumors were negative for other driver gene alterations including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene translocation, whereas five tumors with non-V600E BRAF mutations (four G469A and one G464E/G466R) showed concomitant EGFR mutations. CONCLUSION The frequency of BRAF mutations in lung cancer was low in an Asian cohort. Furthermore, BRAF mutation status lacked prognostic significance in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Kinno
- Division of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tutticci NJ, Hewett DG, Leggett BA. Prevalence of serrated polyps: implications for significance as colorectal cancer precursors. COLORECTAL CANCER 2013. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.13.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
39
|
Walsh MD, Clendenning M, Williamson E, Pearson SA, Walters RJ, Nagler B, Packenas D, Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA, Haydon AM, Rosty C, English DR, Giles GG, McGuckin MA, Young JP, Buchanan DD. Expression of MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC5B, and MUC6 mucins in colorectal cancers and their association with the CpG island methylator phenotype. Mod Pathol 2013; 26:1642-56. [PMID: 23807779 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2013] [Revised: 05/02/2013] [Accepted: 05/03/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Mucinous differentiation is associated with both CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. The mucinous phenotype derives from abundant expression of the colonic goblet cell mucin, MUC2, and de novo expression of gastric foveolar mucin, MUC5AC. We, therefore, investigated the protein expression levels of MUC2 and MUC5AC, as well as MUC5B and MUC6, in molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Seven-hundred and twenty-two incident colorectal carcinomas occurring in 702 participants of the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study were characterized for methylator status, MLH1 methylation, somatic BRAF and KRAS mutations, microsatellite-instability status, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 mismatch repair, and p53 protein expression, and their histopathology was reviewed. Protein expression levels of MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6, and the putative mucin regulator CDX2 were compared with molecular and clinicopathological features of colorectal cancers using odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. MUC2 overexpression (>25% positive tumor cells) was observed in 33% colorectal cancers, MUC5B expression in 53%, and de novo MUC5AC and MUC6 expression in 50% and 39%, respectively. Co-expression of two or more of the mucins was commonly observed. Expression of MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6 was strongly associated with features associated with tumorigenesis via the serrated neoplasia pathway, including methylator positivity, somatic BRAF p.V600E mutation, and mismatch repair deficiency, as well as proximal location, poor differentiation, lymphocytic response, and increased T stage (all P<0.001). Overexpression was observed in tumors with and without mucinous differentiation. There were inverse associations between expression of all four mucins and p53 overexpression. CDX2 expression was inversely associated with MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6 expression. Our results suggest that, in methylator-positive tumors, mucin genes on chromosome 11p15.5 region undergo increased expression via mechanisms other than direct regulation by CDX2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Walsh
- 1] Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD, Australia [2] Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Popovici V, Budinska E, Bosman FT, Tejpar S, Roth AD, Delorenzi M. Context-dependent interpretation of the prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:439. [PMID: 24073892 PMCID: PMC3849526 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2013] [Accepted: 09/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mutation status of the BRAF and KRAS genes has been proposed as prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer. Of them, only the BRAF V600E mutation has been validated independently as prognostic for overall survival and survival after relapse, while the prognostic value of KRAS mutation is still unclear. We investigated the prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutations in various contexts defined by stratifications of the patient population. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer from the PETACC-3 clinical trial (N = 1,423), by assessing the prognostic value of the BRAF and KRAS mutations in subpopulations defined by all possible combinations of the following clinico-pathological variables: T stage, N stage, tumor site, tumor grade and microsatellite instability status. In each such subpopulation, the prognostic value was assessed by log rank test for three endpoints: overall survival, relapse-free survival, and survival after relapse. The significance level was set to 0.01 for Bonferroni-adjusted p-values, and a second threshold for a trend towards statistical significance was set at 0.05 for unadjusted p-values. The significance of the interactions was tested by Wald test, with significance level of 0.05. RESULTS In stage II-III colorectal cancer, BRAF mutation was confirmed a marker of poor survival only in subpopulations involving microsatellite stable and left-sided tumors, with higher effects than in the whole population. There was no evidence for prognostic value in microsatellite instable or right-sided tumor groups. We found that BRAF was also prognostic for relapse-free survival in some subpopulations. We found no evidence that KRAS mutations had prognostic value, although a trend was observed in some stratifications. We also show evidence of heterogeneity in survival of patients with BRAF V600E mutation. CONCLUSIONS The BRAF mutation represents an additional risk factor only in some subpopulations of colorectal cancers, in others having limited prognostic value. However, in the subpopulations where it is prognostic, it represents a marker of much higher risk than previously considered. KRAS mutation status does not seem to represent a strong prognostic variable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlad Popovici
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hanna MC, Go C, Roden C, Jones RT, Pochanard P, Javed AY, Javed A, Mondal C, Palescandolo E, Van Hummelen P, Hatton C, Bass AJ, Chun SM, Na DC, Kim TI, Jang SJ, Osarogiagbon RU, Hahn WC, Meyerson M, Garraway LA, MacConaill LE. Colorectal cancers from distinct ancestral populations show variations in BRAF mutation frequency. PLoS One 2013; 8:e74950. [PMID: 24066160 PMCID: PMC3774610 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been demonstrated for some cancers that the frequency of somatic oncogenic mutations may vary in ancestral populations. To determine whether key driver alterations might occur at different frequencies in colorectal cancer, we applied a high-throughput genotyping platform (OncoMap) to query 385 mutations across 33 known cancer genes in colorectal cancer DNA from 83 Asian, 149 Black and 195 White patients. We found that Asian patients had fewer canonical oncogenic mutations in the genes tested (60% vs Black 79% (P = 0.011) and White 77% (P = 0.015)), and that BRAF mutations occurred at a higher frequency in White patients (17% vs Asian 4% (P = 0.004) and Black 7% (P = 0.014)). These results suggest that the use of genomic approaches to elucidate the different ancestral determinants harbored by patient populations may help to more precisely and effectively treat colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C. Hanna
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Christina Go
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Christine Roden
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Robert T. Jones
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Panisa Pochanard
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ahmed Yasir Javed
- Boston Baskin Cancer Foundation, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Awais Javed
- Boston Baskin Cancer Foundation, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Chandrani Mondal
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Emanuele Palescandolo
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Paul Van Hummelen
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Charles Hatton
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Adam J. Bass
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sung Min Chun
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Deuk Chae Na
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae-Im Kim
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Se Jin Jang
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Raymond U. Osarogiagbon
- Boston Baskin Cancer Foundation, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - William C. Hahn
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Matthew Meyerson
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Levi A. Garraway
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Laura E. MacConaill
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shi Y, Li J, Wu SY, Qin L, Jiao YF. BRAF mutation is associated with the unique morphology of traditional serrated adenoma of the colorectum. Int J Surg Pathol 2013; 21:442-8. [PMID: 23960272 DOI: 10.1177/1066896913499628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) consists of glands with tall cells and short cells. Two kinds of cells alternate to give a unique serrated configuration. The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between the alterations of both Wnt and serrated pathways and the unique morphology of TSAs. The tall and short cells in 28 TSAs were separated by microdissection. Semi-nested polymerase chain reaction was performed to detect the mutations of BRAF, β-catenin, APC, and KRAS. BRAF mutations were observed in 22 of 28 (78.6%) TSAs, and all mutations occurred at the tall cells. In conclusion, BRAF mutation is associated with the serrated morphology of TSAs. Genetic alterations in both the serrated pathway and the Wnt signaling pathway may both contribute to TSAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Shi
- 1The Second Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Clendenning M, Young JP, Walsh MD, Woodall S, Arnold J, Jenkins M, Win AK, Hopper JL, Sweet K, Gallinger S, Rosty C, Parry S, Buchanan DD. Germline Mutations in the Polyposis-Associated Genes BMPR1A, SMAD4, PTEN, MUTYH and GREM1 Are Not Common in Individuals with Serrated Polyposis Syndrome. PLoS One 2013; 8:e66705. [PMID: 23805267 PMCID: PMC3689730 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2013] [Accepted: 05/08/2013] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent reports have observed that individuals with serrated polyps, some of whom meet the clinical diagnostic criteria for Serrated Polyposis Syndrome (SPS), are among those who carry germline mutations in genes associated with polyposis syndromes including; (1) genes known to underlie hamartomatous polyposes (SMAD4, BMPR1A, and PTEN), (2) MUTYH-associated polyposis and (3) GREM1 in Hereditary Mixed Polyposis Syndrome (HMPS). The aim of this study was to characterise individuals fulfilling the current WHO criteria for SPS for germline mutations in these polyposis-associated genes. Methods A total of 65 individuals with SPS (fulfilling WHO criteria 1 or 3), were recruited to the Genetics of Serrated Neoplasia study between 2000 and 2012, through multiple Genetics or Family Cancer Clinics within Australia, or from the New Zealand Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Service. Individuals with SPS were tested for coding mutations and large deletions in the PTEN, SMAD4, and BMPR1A genes, for the MUTYH variants in exons 7 (Y179C) and 13 (G396D), and for the duplication upstream of GREM1. Results We found no variants that were likely to be deleterious germline mutations in the SPS cases in the PTEN, SMAD4, and BMPR1A genes. A novel variant in intron 2 (c.164+223T>C) of PTEN was identified in one individual and was predicted by in silico analysis to have no functional consequences. One further individual with SPS was found to be mono-allelic for the MUTYH G396D mutation. No individuals carried the recently reported duplication within GREM1. Conclusions Genes involved in the gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis, Hereditary Mixed Polyposis Syndrome and MUTYH-associated polyposis syndromes are not commonly altered in individuals with SPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Clendenning
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joanne P. Young
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael D. Walsh
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sonja Woodall
- New Zealand Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Service, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Julie Arnold
- New Zealand Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Service, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for MEGA Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aung Ko Win
- Centre for MEGA Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for MEGA Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kevin Sweet
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University Medical Centre, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Susan Parry
- New Zealand Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Service, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rosty C, Young JP, Walsh MD, Clendenning M, Sanderson K, Walters RJ, Parry S, Jenkins MA, Win AK, Southey MC, Hopper JL, Giles GG, Williamson EJ, English DR, Buchanan DD. PIK3CA activating mutation in colorectal carcinoma: associations with molecular features and survival. PLoS One 2013; 8:e65479. [PMID: 23785428 PMCID: PMC3681782 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2013] [Accepted: 04/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in PIK3CA are present in 10 to 15% of colorectal carcinomas. We aimed to examine how PIK3CA mutations relate to other molecular alterations in colorectal carcinoma, to pathologic phenotype and survival. PIK3CA mutation testing was carried out using direct sequencing on 757 incident tumors from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. The status of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) was assessed using both immunohistochemistry and methyLight techniques. Microsatellite instability, CpG island phenotype (CIMP), KRAS and BRAF V600E mutation status, and pathology review features were derived from previous reports. PIK3CA mutation was observed in 105 of 757 (14%) of carcinomas, characterized by location in the proximal colon (54% vs. 34%; P<0.001) and an increased frequency of KRAS mutation (48% vs. 25%; P<0.001). High-levels of CIMP were more frequently found in PIK3CA-mutated tumors compared with PIK3CA wild-type tumors (22% vs. 11%; P = 0.004). There was no difference in the prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation between these two tumor groups. PIK3CA-mutated tumors were associated with loss of MGMT expression (35% vs. 20%; P = 0.001) and the presence of tumor mucinous differentiation (54% vs. 32%; P<0.001). In patients with wild-type BRAF tumors, PIK3CA mutation was associated with poor survival (HR 1.51 95% CI 1.04-2.19, P = 0.03). In summary, PIK3CA-mutated colorectal carcinomas are more likely to develop in the proximal colon, to demonstrate high levels of CIMP, KRAS mutation and loss of MGMT expression. PIK3CA mutation also contributes to significantly decreased survival for patients with wild-type BRAF tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Rosty
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rosty C, Young JP, Walsh MD, Clendenning M, Walters RJ, Pearson S, Pavluk E, Nagler B, Pakenas D, Jass JR, Jenkins MA, Win AK, Southey MC, Parry S, Hopper JL, Giles GG, Williamson E, English DR, Buchanan DD. Colorectal carcinomas with KRAS mutation are associated with distinctive morphological and molecular features. Mod Pathol 2013; 26:825-34. [PMID: 23348904 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
KRAS-mutated carcinomas comprise 35-40% of all colorectal carcinomas but little is known about their characteristics. The aim of this study was to examine the pathological and molecular features of KRAS-mutated colorectal carcinomas and to compare them with other carcinoma subgroups. KRAS mutation testing was performed in 776 incident tumors from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status was assessed using both immunohistochemistry and MethyLight techniques. Microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype and BRAF V600E mutation status were derived from earlier studies. Mutation in KRAS codon 12 or codon 13 was present in 28% of colorectal carcinomas. Compared with KRAS wild-type carcinomas, KRAS-mutated carcinomas were more frequently observed in contiguity with a residual polyp (38 vs 21%; P<0.001), demonstrated mucinous differentiation (46 vs 31%; P=0.001) and were associated with different MSI status (P<0.001) and with MGMT methylation (47 vs 21%; P=0.001). Compared with tumors demonstrating neither BRAF nor KRAS mutation, KRAS-mutated carcinomas showed more frequent location in the proximal colon (41 vs 27%; P=0.001), mucinous differentiation (46 vs 25%; P<0.001), presence of a contiguous polyp (38 vs 22%; P<0.001), MGMT methylation (47 vs 26%; P=0.01) and loss of MGMT immunohistochemical expression (27 vs 19%; P=0.02). KRAS-mutated carcinomas were distributed in a bimodal pattern along the proximal-distal axis of the colorectum. Compared with male subjects, female subjects were more likely to have KRAS-mutated carcinoma in the transverse colon and descending colon (39 vs 15%; P=0.02). No difference in overall survival was observed in patients according to their tumor KRAS mutation status. In summary, KRAS-mutated carcinomas frequently develop in contiguity with a residual polyp and show molecular features distinct from other colorectal carcinomas, in particular from tumors with neither BRAF nor KRAS mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Rosty
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Affolter K, Samowitz W, Tripp S, Bronner MP. BRAF V600E mutation detection by immunohistochemistry in colorectal carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2013; 52:748-52. [PMID: 23650027 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Revised: 04/08/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf (BRAF) is an oncogene mutated in various neoplasms, including 5-15% of colorectal carcinomas. The T1799A point mutation, responsible for a large majority of these alterations, results in an amino acid substitution (V600E) causing the constitutive activation of a protein kinase cascade. BRAF V600E in MLH1 deficient tumors implicates somatic tumor-only methylation of the MLH1 promoter region instead of a germline MLH1 mutation. BRAF V600E also predicts poor prognosis in microsatellite stable colorectal cancers and may be a marker of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic disease. Currently, only molecular methods are available for assessing BRAF mutational status. An immunohistochemical approach is evaluated here. Colon cancers from 2008 to 2012 tested by pyrosequencing for BRAF V600E mutation were selected. A total of 31 tumors with (n = 14) and without (n = 17) the BRAF V600E mutation were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using a commercially available antibody specific to the V600E-mutated protein. All 14 colorectal carcinomas with the BRAF V600E mutation demonstrated cytoplasmic positivity in tumor cells with the anti-BRAF antibody. In a minority of cases, staining intensity for the mutated tumor samples was weak (n = 2) or heterogeneous (n = 4); however, the majority of cases showed diffuse, strong cytoplasmic positivity (8 of 14 cases). None of the 17 BRAF wild-type colorectal cancers showed immunoreactivity to the antibody. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the immunohistochemical BRAF V600E assay was 100%. Detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in colorectal cancer by immunohistochemistry is a viable alternative to molecular methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kajsa Affolter
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Department of Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Multiplicity and molecular heterogeneity of colorectal carcinomas in individuals with serrated polyposis. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37:434-42. [PMID: 23211288 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e318270f748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Serrated polyposis (SP) is a clinically defined syndrome characterized by the occurrence of multiple serrated polyps in the large intestine. Individuals with SP and their relatives are at increased risk of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). We aimed to determine the pathologic and molecular profiles of CRCs in individuals fulfilling World Health Organization criteria for SP. A total of 45 CRCs were obtained from 38 individuals with SP (27 female and 11 male patients; median age at CRC diagnosis, 58.5 y) attending genetics clinics. Tumor samples were pathologically reviewed, screened for somatic BRAF and KRAS mutations, and analyzed immunohistochemically for mismatch repair protein (MMR) expression. Tumors were spread throughout the large intestine, with 64% located in the proximal colon. Mutations in BRAF and KRAS and immunohistochemical evidence of MMR deficiency were found in 46%, 5%, and 38%, respectively. Nearly half of CRCs were BRAF/KRAS wild type, and these were associated with distal location (63%) and MMR proficiency (84%). Overexpression of p53 and/or evidence of β-catenin activation were identified in 13 CRCs. Ten patients (26%) had synchronous or metachronous CRCs. In conclusion, the majority of CRCs arising in individuals with SP do not harbor molecular hallmarks of serrated pathway CRCs but show a diverse range of molecular profiles. The high proportion of multiple CRCs suggests that individuals with SP would benefit from frequent colonoscopic surveillance and from a consideration of a more extensive colectomy at the time of CRC diagnosis.
Collapse
|
48
|
Burnett-Hartman AN, Newcomb PA, Potter JD, Passarelli MN, Phipps AI, Wurscher MA, Grady WM, Zhu LC, Upton MP, Makar KW. Genomic aberrations occurring in subsets of serrated colorectal lesions but not conventional adenomas. Cancer Res 2013; 73:2863-72. [PMID: 23539450 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-3462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A subset of aggressive colorectal cancers exhibit BRAF mutation, MLH1 methylation, and a CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), but precursors are poorly established. In this study, we determined the status of these markers in colorectal polyps and evaluated associated risk factors. The study included 771 polyp cases and 1,027 controls who were ages 24 to 80 years, part of a group health program, received a colonoscopy from 1998 to 2007, and completed a structured questionnaire assessing risk factors. Following standard pathology review, polyps were assayed for BRAF mutation (V600E) and tested for MLH1 and CIMP methylation, the latter including the genes, CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3, and SOCS1. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals for the association between molecularly defined subsets of polyps and potential risk factors. There were 580 conventional adenomas and 419 serrated lesions successfully assayed. For adenomas, the prevalence of each marker was ≤1%. In contrast, 55% of serrated lesions harbored mutant BRAF, 26% were CIMP-high, and 5% had methylated MLH1. In these lesions, the highest prevalence of markers was in sessile-serrated polyps (SSP) of ≥10 mm that were in the right-side/cecal regions of the colon. Risk factors for CIMP-high-serrated lesions included Caucasian race, current smoking status, and a history of polyps, whereas for serrated lesions with mutant BRAF, the significant risk factors were male sex, current smoking status, obesity, and a history of polyps. Our results suggest that SSPs and other large, right-sided serrated lesions have a unique molecular profile that is similar to CIMP-high, BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers.
Collapse
|
49
|
Muhammad S, Jiang Z, Liu Z, Kaur K, Wang X. The role of EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoABs) cetuximab/panitumab, and BRAF inhibitors in BRAF mutated colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2013; 4:72-81. [PMID: 23451330 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2012] [Accepted: 08/26/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Muhammad
- Colorectal surgery department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; ; Colorectal Cancer Institute of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rosty C, Hewett DG, Brown IS, Leggett BA, Whitehall VLJ. Serrated polyps of the large intestine: current understanding of diagnosis, pathogenesis, and clinical management. J Gastroenterol 2013; 48:287-302. [PMID: 23208018 PMCID: PMC3698429 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-012-0720-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2012] [Accepted: 11/11/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 30% of colorectal carcinomas develop via the serrated neoplasia pathway characterized by widespread DNA methylation and frequent BRAF mutation. Serrated polyps represent a heterogeneous group of polyps which are the precursor lesions to serrated pathway colorectal carcinomas. The histological classification of serrated polyps has evolved over the last two decades to distinguish three separate entities: hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated adenoma (SSA), and traditional serrated adenoma (TSA). The malignant potential of SSAs and TSAs has been clearly demonstrated. SSAs are more challenging to detect by colonoscopy and are likely to account for some interval carcinomas of the proximal colon. Serrated polyposis syndrome is now widely recognized as conferring a high risk of colorectal carcinoma although its cause remains elusive. The current understanding of the actual malignant potential of each serrated polyp subtype is still limited due to the lack of large-scale prospective studies. Patient management guidelines have been recently updated although high-level evidence to support them is still required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Rosty
- Envoi Pathology, 1/49 Butterfield Street, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|