Viable Malignant Cells After Primary Chemotherapy for Disseminated Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Prognostic Factors and Role of Postsurgery Chemotherapy—Results From an International Study Group

Key Updates in Testicular Cancer: Optimizing Survivorship and Survival

Testicular cancer is a rare but highly curable malignancy, predominantly affecting young men. Advances in multimodal therapy, including cisplatin-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical interventions, have resulted in excellent cancer-specific survival. However, with improved survival rates, long-term health consequences and survivorship issues have emerged as critical concerns. Testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) are at risk of adverse health outcomes, including endocrine dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, secondary malignancies, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, and psychosocial challenges. Endocrine disturbances such as hypogonadism and infertility require careful monitoring, while cardiovascular risks necessitate long-term preventive strategies. Survivors also face an elevated risk of secondary malignancies, necessitating tailored follow-up. Recent advances in the de-escalation of therapy, particularly for stage II seminoma and metastatic germ cell tumors, aim to balance oncologic efficacy with minimizing toxicity. This review discusses the evolving landscape of testicular cancer survivorship, the impact of treatment-related complications, and contemporary management strategies, emphasizing a multidisciplinary approach to optimize long-term outcomes and quality of life.

SEOM-GG clinical guidelines for the management of germ-cell testicular cancer (2023)

Testicular germ cell tumors are the most common tumors in adolescent and young men. They are curable malignancies that should be treated with curative intent, minimizing acute and long-term side effects. Inguinal orchiectomy is the main diagnostic procedure, and is also curative for most localized tumors, while patients with unfavorable risk factors for recurrence, or those who are unable or unwilling to undergo close follow-up, may require adjuvant treatment. Patients with persistent markers after orchiectomy or advanced disease at diagnosis should be staged and classified according to the IGCCCG prognostic classification. BEP is the most recommended chemotherapy, but other schedules such as EP or VIP may be used to avoid bleomycin in some patients. Efforts should be made to avoid unnecessary delays and dose reductions wherever possible. Insufficient marker decline after each cycle is associated with poor prognosis. Management of residual masses after chemotherapy differs between patients with seminoma and non-seminoma tumors. Patients at high risk of relapse, those with refractory tumors, or those who relapse after chemotherapy should be managed by multidisciplinary teams in experienced centers. Salvage treatment for these patients includes conventional-dose chemotherapy (TIP) and/or high-dose chemotherapy, although the best regimen and strategy for each subgroup of patients is not yet well established. In late recurrences, early complete surgical resection should be performed when feasible. Given the high cure rate of TGCT, oncologists should work with patients to prevent and identify potential long-term side effects of the treatment. The above recommendations also apply to extragonadal retroperitoneal and mediastinal tumors.

miR-21, miR-29a, and miR-106b: serum and tissue biomarkers with diagnostic potential in metastatic testicular cancer

The imperative need for sensitive and precise tools is underscored in cancer diagnostics, with biomarkers playing a pivotal role in facilitating early detection and tumor diagnosis. Despite their classical pathological classification, testicular tumors lack valuable markers, emphasizing the necessity to identify and apply serum tumor markers in clinical management. Unfortunately, existing biomarkers exhibit limited sensitivities and specificities. Recent years have witnessed the discovery of novel RNA molecules, presenting a potential breakthrough as diagnostic tools and promising biomarkers. This report presents compelling evidence supporting the detection of early testicular cancer by applying a set of nine microRNAs (miRNAs), establishing them as valuable serum biomarkers for diagnosis. We developed a standardized serum-based measurement protocol and conducted comprehensive statistical analyses on the dataset to underscore the diagnostic accuracy of the miRNA pool. Notably, with a sensitivity exceeding 93%, miR-21, miR-29a, and miR-106b surpass classical serum tumor markers in the context of testicular cancer. Specifically, these miRNAs are poised to enhance clinical decision-making in testicular cancer detection and hold the potential for assessing tumor growth in monitoring chemotherapy outcomes.

Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors: A Single Institution Experience with Clinicopathological Correlation

Background. Extragonadal germ cell tumors (EGCTs) are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors without evidence of primary gonadal germ cell tumors. They account for 2%-5% of overall malignancies. EGCTs are often not clinically suspected, making them challenging for pathologists. In this retrospective observational study, we describe our institutional experience among EGCTs with clinicopathological correlation. Materials and methods. All patients diagnosed as EGCTs from January 2014 to April 2023 were collected. All relevant clinical data and serum markers were retrieved from hospital medical records. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry slides were reviewed. Results. The present study included a total of 56 patients; 34 (60%) men and 22 (40%) women with a men-to-women ratio of 1.5:1. Of them, 1 patient had congenital/neonatal EGCTs, 21 patients had prepubertal EGCTs, and 34 had post-pubertal EGCTs. The common sites included are mediastinum (45%), sacrococcyx (18%), retroperitoneum (14%), and central nervous system (12%). The other rare sites were the vagina, liver, colon, and duodenum. The common germ cell tumor included mature teratoma (34%), mixed germ cell tumor (27%), seminoma/germinoma (12%), pure yolk sac tumor (11%), immature teratoma (9%), mature teratoma with somatic tumor (5%), and embryonal carcinoma (2%). All histological diagnoses of germ cell tumors were confirmed with IHC markers like PLAP, CD117 (KIT), AFP, LIN28, CD30, and β-hCG. Pre and posttreatment serum tumor marker levels were available in 37 patients. All our treated patients had a decrease or normal tumor marker levels post-therapy. Conclusion. In our study, a heterogeneous group of germ cell tumors was seen. Most of them were seen in post-pubertal adolescents and young adults. Early intervention by platinum-based combination chemotherapy in seminoma and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors has significantly improved the prognosis of malignant EGCTs similar to their germ cell counterparts.

Testicular cancer in 2023: Current status and recent progress

Testicular germ cell tumor (GCT) is the most common solid tumor in adolescent and young adult men. Progress in the management of GCT has been made in the last 50 years, with a substantial improvement in cure rates for advanced disease, from 25% in the 1970s to nearly 80%. However, relapsed or platinum-refractory disease occurs in a proportion, 20% of whom will die from disease progression. This article reviews the current evidence-based treatments for extracranial GCT, the acute and chronic toxic effects that may result, and highlights contemporary advances and progress in the field.

Prolonged survival after thoracic metastasectomy in patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer

INTRODUCTION

Almost 20 % of patients with Non-Seminomatous Germinative Cell Tumors (NSGCT) will require intrathoracic metastasectomy after chemotherapy. The authors aim to determine their long-term survival rates.

METHODS

Retrospective study including patients with NSGCT and intrathoracic metastasis after systemic therapy from January 2011 to June 2022. Treatment outcomes and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven male patients were included with a median age of 31.8 years. Six presented with synchronous mediastinum and lung metastasis, nine had only lung, and 22 had mediastinal metastasis. Over half had retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. Twenty-two had dissimilar pathologies, with a discordance rate of 62 %. Teratoma and embryonal carcinoma were the prevalent primary tumor types, 40.5 % each, while teratoma was predominant (70.3 %) in the metastasis group. Thoracotomy was the main surgical approach (39.2 %) followed by VATS (37.2 %), cervico-sternotomy (9.8 %), sternotomy (5.8 %), and clamshell (3.9 %). Lung resection was performed in 40.5 % of cases. Overall, 10-year survival rates were 94.3 % with no surgical-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

Multimodality treatment with systemic therapy followed by radical surgery offers a high cure rate to patients with intrathoracic metastatic testicular germ cell tumors.

Risk Factors for Relapse in Nonseminomatous Testicular Cancer After Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection With Viable Residual Cancer

PURPOSE

No consensus exists on the management of men with nonseminoma and viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumor in the postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pcRPLND) specimen after first-line chemotherapy. We analyzed surveillance versus different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and the influence of time to pcRPLND on oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

Data on 117 men treated with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy between 1990 and 2018 were collected from 13 institutions. All patients had viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumor in the pcRPLND specimen. Surgery was performed after a median of 57 days, followed by either surveillance (n = 64) or adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 53). Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After controlling for International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group risk group and percent of viable malignant cells found at RPLND, no difference was observed between men managed with surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy regarding PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.32 to 1.6]; P = .4), CSS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.20 to 2.39; P = .6), and OS (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.25 to 2.44]; P = .7). No statistically significant differences for PFS, CSS, or OS were observed on the basis of chemotherapy regimen or in men treated with pcRPLND ≤57 versus >57 days after first-line chemotherapy. Residual disease with <10% versus ≥10% viable cancer cells were associated with a longer PFS (HR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.29 to 8]; P = .012). Relapse in the retroperitoneum was observed in 34 (29%) men.

CONCLUSION

Men with a complete resection at pcRPLND and <10% viable cells have favorable outcomes without further treatment. Complete retroperitoneal resection seems more important than early pcRPLND.

Critical elements of pediatric testicular germ cell tumors surgery

Children, adolescents and young adults with testicular germ cell tumors require appropriate surgical care to insure excellent outcomes. This article presents the most critical elements, and their basis in evidence, for surgery in this population. Specifically, the importance of inguinal radical orchiectomy for malignant tumors, partial orchiectomy for prepubertal tumors and normal serum tumor markers, and the appropriate use of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in those with residual retroperitoneal masses.

Management of Residual Nonretroperitoneal Disease in Postchemotherapy Nonseminomatous Germ-Cell Tumors

PURPOSE

The majority of patients with advanced nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor are cured with combination chemotherapy and surgical resection of residual disease when appropriate. In patients with both retroperitoneal (RP) and non-RP postchemotherapy residual disease, management of the non-RP disease is typically guided by pathologic findings at the time of RP resection. There are limited data to help guide management decisions in patients with non-RP postchemotherapy residual disease alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospectively maintained Indiana University testicular cancer database was queried for patients with metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor treated between 1990 and 2021 who had residual non-RP disease in the absence of residual RP disease after completing either first-line or salvage chemotherapy.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-nine patients met eligibility and were included in this analysis. Seventy-five patients had teratoma in the primary tumor site, while 54 did not. Of those with teratoma in the primary, 55% had at least one postchemotherapy non-RP surgical specimen with teratomatous elements compared with 17% of those without teratoma in the primary (P < .001). Of those without teratoma in the primary site, 56% had at least one postchemotherapy non-RP surgical specimen with active germ-cell tumor compared with 31% of those with teratoma in the primary (P = .0046).

CONCLUSION

The presence of teratoma in the primary tumor site is associated with a higher rate of teratoma in postchemotherapy residual non-RP disease. Patients without teratoma in the primary tumor should still be considered for resection of residual postchemotherapy disease that could harbor teratoma or active germ-cell tumor.

Resection of Residual Masses After Chemotherapy for Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors in Adolescents and Adults

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Optimal treatment of patients with testicular germ cell tumors requires a coordinated multidisciplinary approach, so that surgery, chemotherapy, and, when appropriate, radiation therapy can be integrated into a coherent and comprehensive treatment plan. Nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) are often a mixture of teratoma and cancer (choriocarcinoma, embryonal carcinoma, seminoma, and/or yolk sac tumor). While the cancers are highly sensitive to and often cured by chemotherapy, teratoma is resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy and generally must be resected surgically to be successfully treated. Therefore, the standard of care for metastatic NSGCT is to resect all resectable residual masses after chemotherapy. If such resection reveals only teratoma and/or necrosis/fibrosis, then patients are put on a surveillance schedule to monitor for relapse. If viable cancer is found and there are positive margins or 10% or more of any of the residual masses consists of viable cancer, then two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered.

Risk of residual cancer after complete response following first-line chemotherapy in men with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumour and International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group intermediate/poor prognosis: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines recommend surveillance in metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumour patients treated with first-line-chemotherapy and a complete clinical response (normalisation of serum tumour markers and residual masses <1 cm). However, this recommendation is based on a series including patients with good prognosis according to International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group prognostic group (IGCCCG-PG). The aim of this study was to analyse the proportion of residual teratoma and survival among patients with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG and a complete clinical response after first-line-chemotherapy.

MATERIAL & METHODS

This is a retrospective study of men with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG, who had a complete clinical response after first-line chemotherapy. Patients were either followed by surveillance or treated with post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pcRPLND).

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2018, 143 men with intermediate (n = 83) or poor (n = 60) IGCCCG-PG were treated at 11 international centres. Among 33 patients treated with pcRPLND, the specimen showed teratoma and viable cancer in 16 (48%) and 4 (12%). During a median a 7-year follow-up, 20/110 (18%) patients managed with surveillance relapsed, of whom seven (6%) had a retroperitoneal-only relapse versus 2/33 patients managed with pcRPLND relapsed. No difference was observed regarding overall survival (OS) among men treated with pcRPLND or surveillance (5-year OS, 93% and 89%, p-value = 0.35). The median time-to-recurrence among men on surveillance was 1.3 years (range: 0.3-9.1), and the most common sites of relapses included retroperitoneum (11%), chest (5%), and bones (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

While most men with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG harbour teratoma/cancer in the retroperitoneum despite a complete response to first-line-chemotherapy, only 6% managed with surveillance relapsed in the retroperitoneum. There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups.

Primary Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumors: A Thorough Literature Review

Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (PMGCTs) are a rare type of cancer affecting young adults. They have different molecular and clinical features compared to testicular germ cell tumors. Non-seminoma PMGCTs have the shortest 5-year overall survival and the poorest prognosis among all of the germ cell tumor presentations, while seminomas share the same survival and prognosis as their testicular counterparts. There is an unmet need for better treatment options for patients with non-seminoma PMGCTs in both first-line and salvage therapy, as the available options are associated with underwhelming outcomes. Identifying biological and genetic factors to predict treatment responses would be helpful in improving the survival of these patients.

[Multimodal treatment of testicular cancer: chemotherapy, surgery or radiotherapy?]

BACKGROUND

Metastatic testicular germ cell tumors patients require histology- and stage-appropriate therapy to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This work focuses on the interdisciplinary presentation of current recommendations for the treatment of metastatic germ cell tumor patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The interdisciplinary recommendations were formulated based on the German S3 guideline and supplemented by recent literature.

RESULTS

Using a stage-specific and guideline-based treatment approach, interdisciplinary cooperation between urology, oncology, and radiotherapy is mandatory to successfully achieve a high rate of cure and, in the case of complex advanced tumors, also the most effective therapy possible. The question of optimal treatment approaches for seminoma in cSII A/B remains particularly challenging.

CONCLUSION

Since treatment of advanced or multiple relapsed germ cell tumor patients remains complex, patients should be referred for an online second opinion ( https://urologie.ekonsil.org ).

Hodentumoren aus klinischer Sicht

Hintergrund

Keimzelltumoren des Hodens sind die häufigste maligne Tumorerkrankung bei Männern im Alter von 15–40 Jahren. Die Unterscheidung von Seminomen und Nichtseminomen hat prognostische Bedeutung und ist für Therapieplanung und Nachsorge essenziell. Durch interdisziplinäre, stadiengerechte Therapie haben Keimzelltumoren generell eine sehr gute Prognose. Eine Übertherapie sollte wegen möglicher Langzeitfolgen vermieden werden. Hierbei hilft die Risikobeurteilung anhand klinischer und pathologischer Faktoren.

Ziel der Arbeit

Darstellung der (histo-)pathologischen Charakteristika, die die uroonkologische Therapieplanung maßgeblich beeinflussen.

Material und Methoden

Nichtsystematischer Übersichtsartikel über die relevanten (histo-)pathologischen Befunde für die klinische Therapieplanung im interdisziplinären Kontext.

Ergebnisse

Zentrale Pathologiebefunde für Kliniker:Innen sind: (i) Identifikation eines Keimzelltumors, ggf. durch Nachweis eines Chromosom-12p-Zugewinns, (ii) Subtypenspezifizierung und (iii) Angabe von Risikofaktoren (insbesondere Invasion von Lymphgefäßen und/oder Rete testis und Tumorgröße). Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen i. S. von Mutationsanalysen sind angesichts einer sehr geringen Mutationslast und bislang fehlender prädiktiver Marker und zielgerichteter Therapieoptionen nicht Teil der Routinediagnostik.

Diskussion

Ein detaillierter, idealerweise synoptischer histopathologischer Befundbericht ist Grundlage der Planung und Durchführung einer leitlinienkonformen, risikoadaptierten Therapie und neben der bildgebenden Diagnostik und der Bestimmung der Serumtumormarker AFP und β‑HCG (letztere insbesondere bei Nichtseminomen) mitentscheidend, um die guten Heilungsaussichten zu wahren und eine Übertherapie zu vermeiden.

Decoding germ cell tumours for clinicians

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Germ-cell tumours of the testis affect predominantly younger males aged between 15 and 40 years, with nearly 74,500 new cases estimated globally in 2020. Their rarity and the complex morphology, mean that, in nonexpert hands, there is a significant risk of misdiagnosis of both type and staging of these neoplasms.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been significant changes in the 2016 WHO classification of Testicular tumours that need to be understood by both pathologists and clinicians for streamlining management. Standardised structured reporting guidelines and discussion at the multidisciplinary-team meetings lead to subsequently better health outcomes and patient safety.

SUMMARY

Therefore, communication with high-quality reports and understanding of clinicians of what constitutes an adequate report, is the key to ensure proper management of these patients. We attempt to discuss the key updates and pathological features that influence management and need to be communicated with clarity and precision.

Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin in Patients with Poor-prognosis Disseminated Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors with Unfavorable Serum Tumor Marker Decline After First Cycle of Chemotherapy. The GCT-SK-003 Phase II Trial

Background

Germ cell tumors represent highly curable disease even in metastatic stage. However, poor-risk patients with an unfavorable serum tumor marker (STM) decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy represent a subgroup with dismal prognosis, with approximately 50% cure rate using bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP).

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) in this patient population.

Design, setting, and participants

This was an open-labeled, nonrandomized, single-center phase II trial to study the efficacy and toxicity of TIP in the first-line treatment of germ cell tumor patients with an unfavorable decline of STMs. Nineteen patients with a poor prognosis according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group classification and an unfavorable STM decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy were included in this phase II study (NCT02414685). The treatment regimen consisted of paclitaxel 250 mg/m² on day 1, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m² on days 1–5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m² on days 1–5, totally for four cycles.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate. An optimal Simon two-stage design was used with a type I error of 5% and study power of 80%. If fewer than six CRs to study therapy have been observed among the first 19 patients, the study was to be terminated.

Results and limitations

A CR was achieved in four (21.1%) patients; therefore, the study was terminated in the first stage. A favorable response rate (CR or partial remission with negative tumor markers) was observed in 14 (78.9%) patients. At a median follow-up period of 35.2 mo (range, 5.6–62.1 mo), ten (52.6%) patients experienced disease progression and eight patients (42.1%) died. The 2-yr progression-free and overall survival was 41.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8–65.7) and 72.7% (95% CI 48.9–96.4), respectively. TIP was well tolerated, and no unexpected toxicity was observed. No informative biomarkers, including miR-371a-3p was identified.

Conclusions

Treatment modification from the BEP to the TIP regimen in patients with an unfavorable STM decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy was not associated with improved outcome, and four cycles of BEP remain the standard treatment option in this patient population.

Patient summary

Poor-risk patients with an unfavorable serum tumor marker decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy represent a subgroup with dismal prognosis, with an approximately 50% cure rate using bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP). Treatment modification from the BEP regimen to the paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin regimen in patients with an unfavorable serum tumor marker decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy was not associated with improved outcome, and four cycles of BEP remain the standard treatment option in this patient population.

Preoperative clinical and radiographic predictors of major vascular surgery in patients with testicular cancer undergoing post-chemotherapy residual tumor resection (PC-RPLND)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the probability to correctly predict major vascular surgery (MVS) in patients undergoing postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for testicular cancer.

METHODS

From a database of 504 RPLNDs performed in 434 patients (2008-2018), 78 patients submitted to PC-RPLND for non-seminoma germ-cell cancer after cisplatin-based chemotherapy with available preoperative CT scans were identified. Second PC-PLNDs (Re-Dos), salvage RPLNDs, or RPLNDs for late-relapse were excluded as well as thoraco-abdominal approaches. Preoperative imaging was reviewed by a urologist and a radiologist blinded to operative details.

RESULTS

Of 78 patients, 16 (20.5%) underwent MVS (caval and/or aortic replacement or reconstruction). On univariable analyses, transversal diameter, sagittal diameter, tumor volume, aorta- and cava-tumor contact angle, poor IGCCCG score, clinical stage III and preoperative positive markers were predictors of MVS (all p values ≤ 0.01). At multivariable analyses aorta- (cut-off 64°) and cava-tumor contact angle (cut-off 98°) and poor IGCCCG score represented the three most important predictors of MVS (all p values ≤ 0.05). The model constructed has a PPV 100%, NPV 87% and an accuracy of 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of aorta-tumor contact angle ≥ 64°, cava-tumor contact angle ≥ 98° and poor IGCCCG score identify correctly 9 out of 10 patients requiring MVS at the time of first PC-RPLND.

Nomograms for Predicting Prognosis of Primary Mediastinal Seminoma: A Population-Based Study

Objectives

Primary mediastinal seminoma (PMS) was an uncommon carcinoma, and the appropriate treatment remained controversial due to the low incidence. We aimed to investigate the demographics and tumor biological characteristics to determine the potential effective treatment and predict the prognosis.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PMS were selected between 1975 and 2016 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were conducted to determine the prognostic factors, and nomograms were employed to visually predict the prognosis. Concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were conducted to validate the prediction model.

Results

A total of 476 patients were included with a median age of 31 years (range, 2–76 years), and a median size of the tumor was 11.6 cm (range, 0.2–24.0 cm). The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.4% and 68.4%, respectively. Age, the extent of the primary site, metastatic status, and surgery performance were independent prognostic factors. Not received surgery was considered a poor prognostic factor for OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.13–3.03; P=0.013). The C-index was 0.733 (95% CI, 0.685–0.781) and 0.819 (95% CI, 0.737–0.901) for internal and external validation for predicting OS, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.743 (95% CI, 0.681–0.804) for predicting OS (sensitivity, 0.532; specificity, 0.887) in the training cohort.

Conclusions

The nomogram could efficiently predict the survival of patients with PMS. Surgery was the potential effective treatment, and chemotherapy was strongly recommended for patients over 40 years.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in germ cell tumors and prostate cancer

Pulmonary oligo-metastases and oligo-recurrences are terms used to define a set of clinical conditions consisting of limited metastatic malignant disease characterized by an intermediate aggressive behavior compared to diffuse metastatic conditions. If the primary tumor has been controlled and extra-thoracic lesions are excluded, there is a suggestion in the medical literature that removal of such lesions could potentially prolong survival. The lungs are a common metastatic spreading site, especially from epithelial malignancies and sarcomas; pulmonary surgical or interventional metastasectomy have been proposed with curative intent in case of limited tumor load (usually less than 5 lesions). There are many series reporting data about colorectal, renal or breast lung metastasectomy, but the absence of multi centric prospective trials determines a lack of definitive evidence, especially for less common tumors such as metastatic germ cell and prostate cancer. They rarely present in the oligo-metastatic form and their management is often based on personal experience. The aim of our article is to review the latest evidence in the treatment of pulmonary metastatic germ cell and prostate tumors. We cover the full range of treatments: from surgery to ablative radiotherapy and combination of local and systemic therapy. Despite the absence of evidence based guidelines, it emerges that pulmonary metastasectomy should always be considered when general criteria for resection have been met. In germ cell tumors surgery should be mainly reserved for residual disease after chemotherapy, whereas in prostate cancer, pulmonary metastasectomy should be preferred to avoid or delay hormonal deprivation therapy and its side effects.

Melphalan, Etoposide, and Carboplatin Megatherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with Relapsing or Therapy-Resistant Extracranial Germ-Cell Tumors-A Retrospective Analysis

Simple Summary

Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are malignancies derived from germ cells that originate in gonads or extragonadal localizations. They are considered highly curable in both children and adults even if distant metastases are present, but therapy-resistant or relapsing patients have a worse prognosis. The aim of our retrospective study was to analyze the outcome of 18 children with GCT treated with melphalan–etoposide–carboplatin high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. To date, this is one of the largest reported pediatric cohorts of GCT patients treated with megatherapy. We observed high survival rates—a five-year overall survival of 76%, and event-free survival of 70.8% without therapy-associated mortality. We concluded that this megatherapy protocol is feasible in heavily pretreated children, but the issue of precise indications for high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is evident and must be answered in a well-designed controlled study to avoid unnecessary overtreatment.

Abstract

Pediatric germ cell tumors (GCTs) are a group of chemosensitive malignancies with a 90% curability rate. We report a series of children with relapsing or therapy-resistant GCT treated with melphalan–etoposide–carboplatin high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. This consisted of 18 children, either with GCTs after relapse (nine patients) or with an unsatisfactory response to first-line chemotherapy (nine patients), who underwent HDCT. The HDCT regimens MEC1 (carboplatin 1500 mg/m², etoposide 1800 mg/m², and melphalan 140 mg/m²) and MEC2 (carboplatin 800 mg/m², etoposide 800 mg/m², and melphalan 140 mg/m²) were each used in nine patients. The median observation time was 81 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 76%, and the event-free survival (EFS) was 70.8%. Non-relapse mortality was 0%, and four patients died after HDCT due to progression of the malignancy. No difference in OS or EFS was noted between the MEC1 and MEC2 protocols. The 5-year OS and 5-year EFS were higher in children treated with autologous stem cell transplantation before the age of four years. The presence of metastatic disease or time of HDCT consolidation during first/subsequent line chemotherapy did not affect patient survival. The melphalan–etoposide–carboplatin protocol is feasible in pediatric GCT, but is associated with potentially life-threatening complications. In conclusion, the use of HDCT must be examined in well-designed clinical trials, and the identification of patients who can benefit from this approach is critical to avoid overtreatment.

Determination of risk factors for progression in patients with viable tumor at post-chemotherapy lymph node dissection due to disseminated non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors

BACKGROUND

To assess the clinical variables that effect progression in patients with viable tumor after post-chemotherapy lymph node dissection due to disseminated non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 32 patients with viable tumor after PC-RPLND, operated between 1990 and 2016. Patients were categorized into 2 groups as favorable and non-favorable (intermedia and poor) according to International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC). Tumor size was determined as the largest dimension of retroperitoneal mass. Clinical factors and adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated to impact on recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median age of the patients and follow-up duration were 28.5 (17-51) years and 51.5 (4-253) months, respectively. 5-year RFS and OS were 57.8-66.8%, respectively. On univariate analysis, percentage of viable tumor, IGCCC risk group, primary site, second-line chemotherapy and surgical margin status were significant for RFS (p = 0.034, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p = 0.011 and p < 0.001, respectively), while IGCCC risk group, second-line chemotherapy and surgical margin status were significant for OS (p = 0.004, p = 0.010 and p < 0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, second-line chemotherapy and surgical margin were independent risk factors for RFS (p = 0.016, HR 4.927 95% CI 1.34-18.02 and p < 0.001, OR 9.147 95% CI 2.61-31.98, respectively) and surgical margin status was the only predictor of OS (p = 0.038, HR 3.874 95% CI 1.07-13.69).

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with negative surgical margin is essential for patients with viable residual tumor after chemotherapy. Need for second-line chemotherapy shows risk of progression.

Simultaneous Vs Sequential Retroperitoneal, Thoracic and Cervical Resection of Post Chemotherapy Residual Masses in Patients With Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors of the Testis

OBJECTIVE

To compare a simultaneous vs sequential approach to residual post chemotherapy mass resections in metastatic testis cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent retroperitoneal and thoracic/cervical resection of post chemotherapy residual masses between 2002 and 2018. Group 1: "Simultaneous" (Combined Retroperitoneal and Thoracic/Cervical resections on the same date); Group 2: "Sequential" (Retroperitoneal and Thoracic/Cervical resections at separate dates).

RESULTS

During the study period, 35 simultaneous and 17 sequential resections were performed. The median age at surgery was 28 years (Range 16-61). The median follow-up from last surgical procedure was 62.7 months (Range 0.4-194). Histology revealed teratoma in 38 (73.1%) patients, necrosis in 8 (15.4%) and viable tumor in 6 (11.5%). Discordant pathology findings between thoracic/cervical and abdominal resections were noted in 16 (30.8%) patients. No differences were observed between the simultaneous vs sequential groups in median operating time (585 minutes vs 545 minutes, P = .64), blood loss (1300 vs 1300 mls, P = .42), or length of stay (9 vs 11 days, P = .14). There was no difference between the 5-year (65.7% vs 68.6%) relapse-free survival between the 2 groups (P = .84) or the 5-year (88.6% vs 100%) overall and disease-specific survival (P = .25).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous resection of retroperitoneal and thoracic/cervical post chemotherapy metastases is a feasible in some patients. It requires multidisciplinary collaboration and a longer primary procedure.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in primary mediastinal germ cell tumors: A retrospective analysis of >20 years single institution experience

OBJECTIVES

To obtain information on outcome stratified by histology, extent and primary treatment patients' data with primary malignant mediastinal germ cell tumors treated between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.

METHODS

The primary treatment for localized malignant mediastinal germ cell tumors was neoadjuvant bleomycin + etoposid + cisplatin (BEP) ± surgery (n = 22); or surgery ± adjuvant BEP (n = 16). For disseminated disease (n = 21) first line BEP ± second line chemotherapy were administered. For nonseminomas (NS) the NLR at start of BEP was analyzed in relation to disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After neoadjuvant treatment the 5-year DFS was 100% for seminomas (S), and 63.4% for NS. The 5-year OS was 100% for S, and 76.9% for NS. The 5-year DFS and OS after surgery ± BEP for S was 72.9% and 100%, for NS was 75% and 87.5%, respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS of metastatic patients for S was 60% and 80%, while the median PFS and OS of NS were 5.7 and 11.1 months, respectively. Objective response (P = 0.006) and low NLR (P = 0.043) were independent prognostic markers of longer OS.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the good outcome of BEP-treated S, while NS had poorer prognosis. Previously published prognostic models for NS were validated. Based on NLR and response a new prognostic model was developed.

Prediction models for the viability of pulmonary metastatic lesions after chemotherapy in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

OBJECTIVES

To analyze predictors associated with viable cells in pulmonary residual lesions after chemotherapy for metastatic testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors and to develop models to prioritize pulmonary resection.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2017, 40 patients underwent pulmonary metastasectomy after chemotherapy for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. We evaluated these patients, and 326 pulmonary residual lesions were confirmed using computed tomography and pathological evaluations. Relationships with outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. Risk prediction models were developed, and predictive probabilities for the risk of viable cells were estimated.

RESULTS

Histological examinations showed that 73 (22%) pulmonary residual lesions contained viable cells: teratomas, 46 (14%); and cancer cells, 37 (11%). Multivariate analyses showed that the predictors associated with cancer cells in the residual lesions were elevated tumor marker levels, multiregimen chemotherapy, increased tumor size 6 months before surgery and the histological composition of the primary lesion, including yolk sac tumors. Additional predictors associated with teratomas were aspect ratio and histological composition of the primary lesion, including teratomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral heterogeneity contributes to nonseminomatous germ cell tumor chemoresistance, and primary lesion site yolk sac tumors and teratomas are associated with greater risks of viable cells. Increased residual lesion size during chemotherapy could also be a predictor. Our simple model can predict the presence of viable cells in residual lesions after chemotherapy, and it might assist in decision-making and prioritizing pulmonary residual lesion resection.

[Management of residual masses of testis germ cell tumors]

A residual mass (RM) is an abnormal image with a transverse axis of more than 1cm trans that remains visible on the CT scan performed after chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumors. Their management depends on the histology of the initial tumor. In the case of a non-seminomatous germ cell tumor, all residual lesions must be resected if the tumor markers are negative. The surgery usually begins with a retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. This lymphadenectomy is a programed regional surgery and not the only resection of visible masses. All RM must be resected, regardless of their location, and may require successive actions. In order to limit its morbidity, modifications on the extent of the lymphadenectomy and the use of minimally invasive approaches are proposed by some center. When the initial tumor is a pure seminoma the attitude is different: the decay of the masses in post chemotherapy is often postponed. If lesions less than 3cm can be monitored, the others benefit from 18FDG PET at the end of chemotherapy: a positive attachment to PET is suspected of the presence of residual active tissue. The surgery of these RM is curative. If its extent is precise in the case of non-seminomatous tumor, it is more controversial in the case of seminoma. In the case of residual markers, surgery has a place in very specific situations.

Management of residual masses in testicular germ cell tumors

INTRODUCTION

About 50% of all patients with advanced testicular cancer demonstrate residual retroperitoneal or extraretroperitoneal masses. About two thirds of the masses harbour necrosis/fibrosis only whereas as about 10% and 40% harbour vital cancer or teratoma. Appropriate therapy will result in a high cure rate if performed properly. Areas covered: This review article covers the indication, the surgical technique and the oncological outcome of PC-RPLND and resection of extraretroperitoneal residual masses following chemotherapy in patients with advanced testis cancer. Expert commentary: Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) plays an integral part of the multimodality treatment in patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumours. Patients with nonseminomas, residual masses < 1cm and good prognosis can undergo active surveillance. In all other cases, PC-RPLND with or without resection of adjacent organs needs to be performed for curative intent. PC-RPLND requires a complex surgical approach and should be performed in experienced, tertiary referral centres only.

Resection of retrocrural germ cell tumor metastases: Two surgical approaches

OBJECTIVES

The goals of retrocrural metastasectomy are complete resection with preservation of the diaphragmatic function while avoiding phrenic nerve injury and spinal cord ischemia. We describe 2 approaches for metastasectomy depending on the pattern of metastases.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2017, 44 patients underwent 50 retrocrural metastasectomies. In case of lower retrocrural, bilateral retrocrural, and or additional retroperitoneal and abdominal metastases, an abdominal approach with mobilization of the liver and the kidney followed by longitudinal incision of the diaphragmatic crus was performed. In case of upper retrocrural metastases and additional thoracic disease, a thoracic approach was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze survival and prognosticators.

RESULTS

The minor morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality were 16.6%, 0%, and 0% for the abdominal approach, respectively, and 15.4%, 3.8%, and 0% for the thoracic approach. There was no phrenic nerve palsy, diaphragmatic hernia, or spinal cord ischemia. Additional retroperitoneal, mediastinal, pulmonary, or further resection was necessary in 10, 25, 9, and 6 cases, respectively. In all cases, a R0 resection was achieved. The 15-year survival rate was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Depending on the pattern of metastases, a complete retrocrural metastasectomy with low morbidity and without mortality by thoracic or abdominal approach is possible. Both approaches preserve diaphragmatic function. Furthermore, the lateral abdominal approach provides a good view and might lead to less tension at the spinal arteries and therefore might reduce the risk of paresis. Good long-term survival is achievable. These patients should be operated on in specialized centers.

Management of Residual Mass in Germ Cell Tumors After Chemotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to educate medical oncologists on the management of patients with residual germ cell tumors and the role of surgical resection after platinum-based chemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with non-seminomatous testicular cancer and residual enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes > 1 cm following induction chemotherapy with normal tumor markers should undergo a post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. All patients with primary mediastinal non-seminoma should undergo surgical resection of the mediastinal mass post-chemotherapy. These are complex surgeries and require expert surgeons in high-volume centers. Patients with advanced testicular seminoma who have residual masses less than 3 cm after chemotherapy can be observed without further intervention. Patients with a residual mass > 3 cm should be evaluated with PET scan after 6 weeks of chemotherapy. Residual mass with negative PET scan can be followed by surveillance while a positive PET scan requires further work up to rule out active disease.

Management of extraretroperitoneal masses in germ cell tumor

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of extraretroperitoneal (ERP) germ cell tumor (GCT) is a complex clinical scenario faced by urologic oncologists. This article reviews the indications and approach to management of ERP GCT masses.

RECENT FINDINGS

ERP GCT management starts with chemotherapy, and for any residual masses, a careful consideration of surgical intervention versus salvage chemotherapy. Decision-making regarding residual ERP masses hinges on tumor markers, and also the anatomical location. These factors should be contextualized by the patient's risk for teratoma or active GCT, which will impact outcome and thus weigh on decision-making conversations with patients who have advanced disease. Technical challenges of surgical management in the postchemotherapy setting also apply in ERP mass resection. The risks of surgical management in the lung and liver, in particular, add special considerations for morbidity. Surgical resection is often the only recourse for a patient who may have chemoresistant disease and may be an important step in achieving cure.

SUMMARY

Surgical management of ERP GCT requires multidisciplinary input, and the urologic oncologist can help guide management with particular emphasis on the indication, timing, and approach to surgical resection.

Aggressive Phenotype of Intravascular Lymphoma Relative to Other Malignant Intraabdominal Tumors Requiring Vascular Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Safe resection of intraabdominal and retroperitoneal malignancies with a goal of negative margins may require vascular surgical assistance with grafting of the aorta and/or vena cava. The current report reviews malignancies associated with major vascular reconstructions at a single tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Adults with abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors involving the aorta, vena cava, or iliac arteries that underwent reconstruction with vascular grafts at the University of Michigan from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The initial presentation, surgical management, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with tumors involving the abdominal aorta, vena cava, or iliac arteries underwent major vascular reconstruction in this seven-year study period. Tumor pathology included solid tumors (leiomyosarcoma [n = 7], germ cell tumor [n = 3], and intravascular lymphoma [n = 2]). Surgical treatment included grafting of the vena cava (n = 6), aorta (n = 3), iliac artery (n = 4), or both the aorta and vena cava (n = 1). Patients with intravascular lymphoma were identified incidentally during treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm or on pathological analysis of thromboembolism from an aortic source. Other patients had planned resection. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 86 months (median: 28.9). There were no graft occlusions. Tumor metastasized or recurred in patients with sarcoma (n = 2; 28.6%), germ cell tumor (n = 1; 33.3%), and intravascular lymphoma (n = 2; 100%). Both patients with lymphoma had multiple anastomotic or tumor-embolic pseudoaneurysms for <14 months after vascular reconstruction. Both lymphoma patients died during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-center review suggests that sarcoma and germ cell tumors may be safely resected in conjunction with major vascular reconstruction in carefully selected patients. In comparison, intravascular lymphoma identified incidentally at the time of aortic reconstruction resulted in a more malignant course with pseudoaneurysm formation of anastomoses or native vessels, cancer recurrence, and 100% mortality. Aneurysm contents and emboli should be carefully reviewed perioperatively by pathologists.

Practice Patterns and Impact of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection on Testicular Cancer Outcomes

Background

Owing to surgical complexity and controversy regarding indications, there are wide practice variations in the use of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND).

Objective

To evaluate patterns of PC-RPLND use in the USA and evaluate the association between PC-RPLND and survival in advanced nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs).

Design setting and participants

A retrospective, observational study using National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data from 2004-2014 for 5062 men diagnosed with stage II/III NSGCT.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

In a comparative analysis based on receipt of PC-RPLND, the primary outcome of interest was factors associated with omission of PC-RPLND as explored via logistic regression. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the association between PC-RPLND and overall survival (OS) via multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching (PSM).

Results and limitations

Patients undergoing PC-RPLND were more likely to be younger, white, privately insured, and reside in more educated/wealthier regions (p < 0.001). Insurance status was independently associated with receipt of PC-RPLND; compared to patients with private insurance, those without insurance were significantly less likely to receive PC-RPLND (odds ratio 0.49; p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, age, comorbidity, non-private insurance, distance from hospital, clinical stage, and risk group were independently associated with all-cause mortality. In addition, omission of PC-RPLND remained associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.98; p < 0.001). After PSM, the 5-yr OS was significantly lower among those not undergoing PC-RPLND (72% vs 77%; p = 0.007).

Conclusions

PC-RPLND represents a critical part of the multidisciplinary management of NSGCT. Patients with non-private insurance are less likely to undergo PC-RPLND, and omission of PC-RPLND is associated with lower OS.

Patient summary

We evaluated the practice patterns for advanced testicular cancer management and found that patients who did not undergo a postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were more likely to have worse survival outcomes. Patients with unfavorable insurance were less likely to receive this surgical treatment.

Histologic and Oncologic Outcomes Following Liver Mass Resection With Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the oncologic outcomes and histologic concordance of postchemotherapy residual liver mass resection with postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND).

METHODS

Retrospective review of our prospectively maintained germ cell tumor (GCT) surgical database identified patients with nonseminomatous GCT who underwent both postchemotherapy residual liver mass resection and PC-RPLND between 1990 and 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients were identified, of whom 29 (81%) presented with a liver mass at initial diagnosis and 17 (47%) received second-line chemotherapy before liver resection. Teratoma was found in 8 (22%) and 5 (14%) of PC-RPLND and liver resection specimens, respectively. Viable GCT was found in 5 (14%) and 4 (11%) of PC-RPLND and liver resection specimens, respectively. Histologic discordance was observed in 4 of 19 patients (21%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.1%-46%); in all cases, liver resection specimens contained teratoma or viable GCT while PC-RPLND revealed only fibrosis or necrosis. At 3 years after surgical intervention, the Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of cancer-specific survival was 75% (95% CI 55%-85%) and the probability of progression-free survival was 75% (95% CI 56%-87%).

CONCLUSION

In this contemporary cohort, clinically significant discordance was observed between the histology of metastatic liver masses and that of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. The benefit of postchemotherapy liver mass resection for patients with advanced nonseminomatous GCT is supported by favorable survival outcomes. Until more reliable predictors of postchemotherapy histology exist, complete surgical resection of all sites of residual disease should be performed whenever feasible.

IGG* Practice Guidelines on Germ Cell Tumor in Adult Male Patients

Germ cell tumors are rare neoplasms that affect young males. Nearly 99% of patients with localized stage I disease and nearly 80% of patients with metastatic disease can be cured. Even patients who relapse following chemotherapy can achieve a long-term survival in approximately 30–40% of cases. The main objective in early stages and in good prognosis patients has changed in recent years, and it has become of major importance to reduce treatment-related morbidity without compromising the excellent long-term survival rate. In poor prognosis patients, there is a correlation between the experience of the treating institution and the long-term clinical outcome of the patients, particularly when the most sophisticated therapies are needed. So far, of utmost importance is the information from updated practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumors. The Italian Germ cell cancer Group (IGG) has developed the following clinical recommendations, which identify the current standards in diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumors in adult males.

Long-Term Survival of Good-Risk Germ Cell Tumor Patients After Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison of BEP × 3 vs. EP × 4 and Treating Institution

BACKGROUND

Patients with International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) good-risk testicular cancer might receive either 4 cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EP × 4) or 3 cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP × 3). We sought to examine differences in survival after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) between patients who received EP × 4 compared with BEP × 3.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Indiana University Testis Cancer database was queried to identify IGCCCG good-risk PC-RPLND patients who received either EP × 4 or BEP × 3 induction chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier plots were generated for the EP × 4 and BEP × 3 groups and compared using the log rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to determine risk of mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 223 patients met inclusion criteria between 1985 and 2011. Induction chemotherapy consisted of EP × 4 in 45 (20%) patients and BEP × 3 in 178 (80%). Most patients (78%) received their chemotherapy at outside institutions and were subsequently referred for PC-RPLND. The location of treating institution did not influence outcomes significantly when similar chemotherapy regimens were compared in this good-risk cohort. The 10-year OS for the EP × 4 and BEP × 3 groups were 91% and 98%, respectively (log rank P < .01). The adjusted risk of death in the EP × 4 group showed a nonsignificant trend of 3 times greater compared with the BEP × 3 group (hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-12.0; P = .10).

CONCLUSION

The regimen of BEP × 3 resulted in a trend toward improved survival, however, this did not reach statistical significance. The location of treating institution seems less important in this risk group of patients.

Primary mediastinal and retroperitoneal malignant germ cell tumors in children and adolescents: Results of the TGM95 trial, a study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology (Société Française des Cancers de l'Enfant)

PURPOSE

To examine the clinical presentation, treatment and results in children and adolescents with primary mediastinal (PM) and retroperitoneal (RP) germ cell tumors (GCTs).

METHODS

The TGM95 trial for malignant GCTs was conducted in France between 1995 and 2005 to evaluate a strategy adapted to prognostic factors with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgical management. We reviewed patients with TGCTs at PM and RP sites.

RESULTS

Among 239 patients, there were 16 patients with PM and 5 with RP tumors, which represent 9% of all patients, highlighting the rarity of these extragonadal locations. A bimodal demographic distribution was observed (11/21 patients <5 years old and 7/21 patients >12 years old). A majority of patients presented with bulky tumors that required urgent care with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In all patients, elevation of alpha-fetoprotein indicated a yolk sac tumor component. Human chorionic gonadotrophin was elevated in five patients (four adolescents), suggesting a choriocarcinoma or seminoma component. The diagnosis was based on elevation of these tumor markers in addition to imaging. Chemosensitivity was observed for a majority of patients. An aggressive surgical approach allowed a microscopic complete resection in 12/15 patients with PM tumors and 4/5 with RP tumors. Overall, 14/16 and 4/5 patients survived, respectively. Three adolescents died of tumor progression.

CONCLUSION

In children with mediastinal or RP GCTs, the prognosis is favorable when a strategy of delayed aggressive surgery is performed after cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Younger patients have a better prognosis. Relapses were observed only in adolescents and could not be cured.

ZBTB16 is a sensitive and specific marker in detection of metastatic and extragonadal yolk sac tumour

AIMS

Accurate histological diagnosis and classification of germ cell tumours (GCTs) is key to informing successful therapeutic and surveillance strategy. The modern therapeutic approach for yolk sac tumour (YST) is highly curative. Because YST takes on a large morphological spectrum, it can be confused for other GCT subtypes as well as somatic carcinomas, particularly when YST presents in an extragonadal or a metastatic setting. Currently available immunohistochemical markers are limited by suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. We reported recently that ZBTB16 is a sensitive and specific marker for testicular YST. ZBTB16 is absent in other GCTs and in most common somatic carcinomas, including those of gastrointestinal, pancreatobillary, respiratory, genitourinary and gynaecological tracts. The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic utility of ZBTB16 in the settings of metastatic and extragonadal YST.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 32 archived metastatic and four extragonadal primary YSTs as well as 51 somatic malignancies for their immunohistochemical expression of ZBTB16. For comparison, α-fetoprotein (AFP) and glypican-3 were also studied in parallel. Our results demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 91.6% for ZBTB16 in detecting metastatic and extragonadal YSTs. The non-YST elements (teratoma and embryonal carcinoma) in 15 YST-containing metastatic mixed GCTs were non-reactive. With the exception of occasional myoepithelial cells of salivary gland carcinoma, all the 51 somatic malignancies were negative for ZBTB16.

CONCLUSIONS

ZBTB16 is a sensitive and specific marker for YST and is diagnostically superior to AFP and glypican-3 in metastatic and extragonadal settings.

Clinico-pathological outcomes of post- primary and salvage chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for mixed germ cell tumors, King Hussein Cancer Center experience

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize clinical and pathologic outcomes of advanced mixed germ cell tumors after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for post-chemotherapy residual masses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2006 and November 2015, 56 patients underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for residual masses of greater than 1 cm after receiving either primary chemotherapy or salvage chemotherapy. Retrospective review of the patients' characteristics, clinical, pathological, and treatment outcomes were performed after institutional review board (IRB) and ethics committee approval.

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnosis was 30 years. Ninety percent of the patients received 3-4 cycles of BEP (bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin) as primary chemotherapy, and 29% of them salvage chemotherapy prior to lymph node dissection. The mean size of the residual masses after chemotherapy was 6 cm. The histological findings were necrosis in 30%, viable tumor in 34% and teratoma in 36% of the retroperitoneal masses. The mean time to relapse after RPLND was 11 months, out of 9 relapses, 6 were in the retroperitoneum, 1 in the lung and 1 in the kidney and 1 in the contralateral testicle.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated higher incidence of viable germ cell tumor in the retroperitoneal residual masses after primary and salvage chemotherapy when compared with previously reported global incidence rates.

ZBTB16: a novel sensitive and specific biomarker for yolk sac tumor

Although the function of zinc finger and BTB domain containing 16 (ZBTB16) in spermatogenesis is well documented, expression of ZBTB16 in germ cell tumors has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression and diagnostic utility of ZBTB16 in germ cell tumors. A total of 67 adult germ cell tumors were studied (62 testicular germ cell tumors, 2 ovarian yolk sac tumors, 1 mediastinal yolk sac tumor, and 2 retroperitoneal metastatic yolk sac tumors). The 62 testicular primary germ cell tumors are as follows: 34 pure germ cell tumors (20 seminomas, 8 embryonal carcinomas, 2 teratomas, 1 choriocarcinoma, 1 carcinoid, and 2 spermatocytic tumors) and 28 mixed germ cell tumors (composed of 13 embryonal carcinomas, 15 yolk sac tumors, 15 teratomas, 7 seminomas, and 3 choriocarcinomas in various combinations). Thirty-five cases contained germ cell neoplasia in situ. Yolk sac tumor was consistently reactive for ZBTB16. Among the 15 testicular yolk sac tumors in mixed germ cell tumors, all displayed moderate to diffuse ZBTB16 staining. ZBTB16 reactivity was present regardless of the histologic patterns of yolk sac tumor and ZBTB16 was able to pick up small foci of yolk sac tumor intermixed/embedded in other germ cell tumor subtype elements. Diffuse ZBTB16 immunoreactivity was also observed in 2/2 metastatic yolk sac tumors, 1/1 mediastinal yolk sac tumor, 2/2 ovarian yolk sac tumors, 2/2 spermatocytic tumors, 1/1 carcinoid, and the spermatogonial cells. All the other non-yolk sac germ cell tumors were nonreactive, including seminoma (n=27), embryonal carcinoma (n=21), teratoma (n=17), choriocarcinoma (n=4), and germ cell neoplasia in situ (n=35). The sensitivity and specificity of ZBTB16 in detecting yolk sac tumor among the germ cell tumors was 100% (20/20) and 96% (66/69), respectively. In conclusion, ZBTB16 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for yolk sac tumor.