Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab Following Anti-PD-1/L1 Failure in Melanoma

Durable responses upon short-term addition of targeted therapy to anti-PD1 in advanced melanoma patients: 5-year progression-free and overall survival update of the IMPemBra trial

BACKGROUND

The addition of targeted therapy (TT) to immune checkpoint inhibitors has been shown to transiently increase immune infiltration in melanoma. This formed the rationale for the IMPemBra trial, which showed a numerical increase in progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with short-term/intermittent TT and anti-PD1 compared to anti-PD1 alone. In this report, the final toxicity-analysis, 5-year PFS and exploratory analysis of overall survival (OS) will be reported, together with an analysis of subsequent therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

32 treatment-naïve patients with a BRAFV600E/K-mutated advanced melanoma were treated with 2 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks, followed by randomization to continue pembrolizumab monotherapy for six weeks in cohort-1 versus pembrolizumab plus intermittent dabrafenib 150 mg BID + trametinib 2 mg QD 2×1-week (cohort 2), 2×2-weeks (cohort 3), or 1×6-weeks (cohort 4). After week 12, all patients continued pembrolizumab monotherapy for a maximum of 2 years.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 73 months, final grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events are 12 % (cohort 1), 12 % (cohort 2), 38 % (cohort 3) and 63 % (cohort 4). Estimated 5-year PFS and OS rates were 25 % and 50 % for pembrolizumab monotherapy (cohort-1) and 46 % and 71 % for pembrolizumab + intermittent TT (cohorts 2-4). Estimated 5-year PFS and OS were 63 % and 63 % (cohort 2), 38 % and 75 % (cohort 3), and 38 % and 75 % (cohort 4), respectively. The subsequent therapies were balanced between cohorts. Patients treated with short-term/intermittent schemes achieved durable responses upon subsequent TT again.

CONCLUSION

This survival update from the IMPemBra trial demonstrates that combination of short-term TT and checkpoint inhibition can induce long-lasting responses, warranting further analyses in larger cohorts, and in a randomized design.

Beyond Checkpoint Inhibition: Keeping Therapeutic Options Open

Combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) with ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) + nivolumab (anti-PD-1) in untreated, metastatic melanoma has achieved a ten-year melanoma-specific survival of 52%. However, approximately 40%-55% of patients with metastatic melanoma have primary resistance and do not initially respond to anti-PD-1, and an additional 25% of patients develop secondary resistance, exhibiting an initial response followed by disease progression. In PD-1-refractory melanoma, treatment options are limited. Addition of ipilimumab, relatlimab (anti-LAG3), or lenvatinib (VEGFR TKI) has minimal to modest efficacy. Switching to targeted BRAF/MEK inhibition improves survival for BRAF-mutant disease. MEK and KIT inhibitors have limited activity in NRAS- and KIT-mutant metastatic melanoma, respectively. Recently, personalized, autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy has become a US Food and Drug Administration-approved second-line option; lifileucel demonstrates durable response (approximately 30%) in heavily pretreated, metastatic melanoma. Emerging therapeutics that show promising clinical benefit in ongoing clinical trials include novel engineered oncolytic viral and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-restricted immune-mediated T-cell therapies. As a therapy which is limited to patients who are HLA-A*02:01, T-cell receptor (TCR) engineered T cells (TCR-T) iterates on personalized adoptive cell transfer, and immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs against cancer are CD3 bispecifics that bind glycoprotein 100 (tebentafusp, approved for metastatic uveal melanoma) or PRAME to activate T cells. Finally, in patients at high risk for immune-related adverse events (irAEs), ICI should still be considered. ICI may be given with modified immunosuppression in patients with autoimmune disease or previous organ transplantation. Cumulative data support safe administration in older patients and in ICI rechallenge for patients with previous irAE.

Advances in cancer immunotherapy: historical perspectives, current developments, and future directions

Cancer immunotherapy, encompassing both experimental and standard-of-care therapies, has emerged as a promising approach to harnessing the immune system for tumor suppression. Experimental strategies, including novel immunotherapies and preclinical models, are actively being explored, while established treatments, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are widely implemented in clinical settings. This comprehensive review examines the historical evolution, underlying mechanisms, and diverse strategies of cancer immunotherapy, highlighting both its clinical applications and ongoing preclinical advancements. The review delves into the essential components of anticancer immunity, including dendritic cell activation, T cell priming, and immune surveillance, while addressing the challenges posed by immune evasion mechanisms. Key immunotherapeutic strategies, such as cancer vaccines, oncolytic viruses, adoptive cell transfer, and ICIs, are discussed in detail. Additionally, the role of nanotechnology, cytokines, chemokines, and adjuvants in enhancing the precision and efficacy of immunotherapies were explored. Combination therapies, particularly those integrating immunotherapy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, exhibit synergistic potential but necessitate careful management to reduce side effects. Emerging factors influencing immunotherapy outcomes, including tumor heterogeneity, gut microbiota composition, and genomic and epigenetic modifications, are also examined. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms underlying immune evasion and therapeutic resistance are analyzed, with a focus on the contributions of noncoding RNAs and epigenetic alterations, along with innovative intervention strategies. This review emphasizes recent preclinical and clinical advancements, with particular attention to biomarker-driven approaches aimed at optimizing patient prognosis. Challenges such as immunotherapy-related toxicity, limited efficacy in solid tumors, and production constraints are highlighted as critical areas for future research. Advancements in personalized therapies and novel delivery systems are proposed as avenues to enhance treatment effectiveness and accessibility. By incorporating insights from multiple disciplines, this review aims to deepen the understanding and application of cancer immunotherapy, ultimately fostering more effective and widely accessible therapeutic solutions.

Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Treatment Responsive Biomarkers for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), accounting for about 10%-20% of all breast cancer cases, is characterized by its aggressive nature, high recurrence rates, and poor prognosis. Unlike other breast cancer subtypes, TNBC lacks hormone receptors and specific molecular targets, limiting therapeutic options. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in treating TNBC by targeting immune evasion mechanisms. Despite these advancements, several issues remain unresolved, including low response rates in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) negative TNBC subtypes and the challenge of predicting which patients will benefit from ICIs. Consequently, there is growing interest in identifying reliable biomarkers beyond PD-L1 expression. This review synthesizes recent studies to provide a comprehensive perspective on ICI therapy in TNBC, clarifying the status of single-agent ICI therapies and combination strategies, emphasizing the need for further research into biomarkers. These insights provide clues for more personalized and effective treatment approaches, ultimately aiming to improve clinical outcomes for patients with TNBC.

Phase II Study of Niraparib in Patients With Advanced Melanoma With Homologous Recombination Pathway Gene Mutations

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic melanoma who progress on checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-targeting drugs have limited therapeutic options. Up to one third of melanomas harbor at least one molecular aberration in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, leading to HR deficiency.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-arm trial, we assessed the overall response rate to niraparib in patients with metastatic melanoma, harboring a genetic alteration in the HR pathway (ARID1A/B, ARID2, ATM, ATR, ATRX, BARD1, BRCA1/2, BAP1, BRIP1, CHEK2, FANCD2, MRE11A, RAD50, RAD51, RAD54B, or PALB2) who had disease progression after PD-1 blockade or BRAF/MEK inhibition if BRAF-mutant. Niraparib was administered orally at 300 mg or 200 mg daily, based on body weight and platelet count.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were accrued to the trial, which was discontinued because of slow accrual. The median age was 71 years. Nine patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. Eleven patients had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels. Ten patients had nonuveal melanoma and four had uveal melanoma. Two (14%) had a partial response and seven (50%) had stable disease, with a disease control rate of 64%. The median progression-free survival was 16 weeks. Among the patients with nonuveal melanoma, two (20%) achieved partial response with a time to progression of 32 and 24 weeks, while five (50%) had stable disease lasting 16-98 weeks. None of the four patients with uveal melanoma responded. There were no unexpected adverse events related to niraparib treatment. Notably, one responder with an ARID1A mutation had detectable circulating tumor DNA at baseline, which became undetectable during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Despite the small sample size, our results indicate a promising signal for single agent niraparib in patients with pretreated nonuveal metastatic melanoma with HR gene mutations.

Clinical Applications of the Molecular Landscape of Melanoma: Integration of Research into Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

The molecular landscape of cutaneous melanoma is complex and heterogeneous, and a deeper understanding of the genesis and progression of the tumor driven by genetic alterations is essential for the development of effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Molecular diagnostics and the use of biomarkers are increasingly playing a role in treatment decisions. However, further research is urgently needed to elucidate the relationships between complex genetic alterations and the effectiveness of target therapies (although BRAF mutation is still the only targeted genetic alteration). Further research is required to exploit other targetable genetic alterations such as NRAS, KIT or rare mutations. Treatment guidelines for cutaneous melanoma are continually evolving based on data from recent and ongoing clinical trials. These advancements reflect changes mainly in the optimal timing of systemic therapy and the choice of combination therapies increasingly tailored to molecular profiles of individual tumors. Mono- or combination immunotherapies demonstrated unprecedented success of melanoma treatment; still, there is room for improvement: though several factors of primary or acquired resistance are known, they are not part of patient management as biomarkers. The novel developments of cancer vaccines to treat melanoma (melanoma-marker-based or personalized neoantigen-based) are encouraging; introduction of them into clinical practice without proper biomarkers would be the same mistake made in the case of first-generation immunotherapies.

Deciphering T-cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment: paving the way for innovative solid tumor therapies

In solid tumors, the tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex mix of tumor, immune, stromal cells, fibroblasts, and the extracellular matrix. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) constitute a fraction of immune cells that may infiltrate into the TME. The primary function of these T-cells is to detect and eliminate tumor cells. However, due to the immunosuppressive factors present in the TME primarily mediated by Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs), Tumor associated macrophages (TAMs), Cancer Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) as well as the tumor cells themselves, T-cells fail to differentiate into effector cells or become dysfunctional and are unable to eliminate the tumor. In addition, chronic antigen stimulation within the TME also leads to a phenomenon, first identified in chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection in mice, where the T-cells become exhausted and lose their effector functions. Exhausted T-cells (Tex) are characterized by the presence of remarkably conserved inhibitory receptors, transcription and signaling factors and the downregulation of key effector molecules. Tex cells have been identified in various malignancies, including melanoma, colorectal and hepatocellular cancers. Recent studies have indicated novel strategies to reverse T-cell exhaustion. These include checkpoint inhibitor blockade targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (Tim-3), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), or combinations of different immune checkpoint therapies (ICTs) or combination of ICTs with cytokine co-stimulation. In this review, we discuss aspects of T-cell dysfunction within the TME with a focus on T-cell exhaustion. We believe that gaining insight into the mechanisms of T-cell exhaustion within the TME of human solid tumors will pave the way for developing therapeutic strategies to target and potentially re-invigorate exhausted T-cells in cancer.

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma: From Patient Identification to Posttreatment Management

Adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was recently approved for patients with advanced melanoma (metastatic or unresectable) previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK targeted therapies (where appropriate). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes isolated from patient-derived tumor tissues enter the tumor microenvironment and recognize tumor-specific antigens, leading to the destruction of tumor cells. The multistep TIL cell therapy journey is led by a multidisciplinary health care team. Patients selected for TIL cell therapy undergo tumor tissue procurement for TIL generation, followed by preparative lymphodepletion before receiving a single-dose infusion of TIL and a short course of high-dose interleukin-2. Successful implementation of TIL cell therapy requires well-established procedures and workflows to select and screen patients, procure tumor tissue, administer TIL cell therapy, and monitor patients during treatment and after discharge. The advanced practice provider plays a central role in a patient's TIL treatment journey by planning and coordinating care across the health-care system, educating patients and staff, and providing direct and supportive patient care. Here, we review the treatment landscape for advanced melanoma and clinical data supporting TIL cell therapy. We also provide guidance related to patient selection, tumor tissue procurement, TIL cell therapy regimen, safety monitoring, symptom management, and post-discharge follow-up.

Efficacy and safety of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific) in combination with chemotherapy in anti-PD-1-resistant recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab (anti-PD-1 and CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) plus TPC chemotherapy (NAB-paclitaxel, cisplatin or lobaplatin, and capecitabine) in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) who failed to PD-1 inhibitor-containing regimens.

METHODS

In this single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, RM-NPC patients who failed to at least one line of systemic chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy were enrolled and received cadonilimab plus TPC chemotherapy every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles, followed by cadonilimab plus capecitabine every 3 weeks for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), and safety.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled (84% male; median age 44 years (range, 24-60)), with a median follow-up of 10.2 months. The ORR was 68%, with 3 complete responses, 14 partial responses, and 6 stable diseases. The median DoR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 3.8-14.5 months). The median PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI, 5.2-16.0 months). The 12-month OS was 75.6%. Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 12 (48%) patients. Fourteen patients (56%) experienced potentially immune-related adverse events (irAEs). One patient experienced a grade 3 immune-related rash and another patient had grade 3 immune-related lipase increased. No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Cadonilimab in combination with TPC chemotherapy demonstrated promising antitumoral efficacy and manageable toxicities in patients with RM-NPC who failed frontline immunotherapy. Further trials are warranted to confirm and expand these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2200067057).

Recent advances in immunotherapy for cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is the third most common malignant tumor in women worldwide in terms of both incidence and mortality. The field of cervical cancer treatment is rapidly evolving, and various combination therapies are being explored to enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and provide new treatment options for patients at different disease stages. Clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors are now being conducted following a phase 3 trial with cemiplimab, an ICI, which demonstrated a significant improvement in prognosis in advanced or metastatic cervical cancer patients. These trials include monotherapy and combination therapy with other immune therapies, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy. Furthermore, other approaches for controlling tumors via the immune system, such as therapeutic vaccination for specific tumor antigens or immune cell therapy including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are being investigated. Ongoing trials will continue to illuminate the optimal strategies for combining these therapies and addressing challenges associated with immune checkpoint failure in cervical cancer. Herein, we conducted a review of articles related to immunotherapy for cervical cancer and describe current treatment strategies for cervical cancer via immunotherapy.

An electrically activable nanochip to intensify gas-ionic-immunotherapy

Excess intracellular H2S induces destructive mitochondrial toxicity, while overload of Zn2+ results in cell pyroptosis and potentiates the tumor immunogenicity for immunotherapy. However, the precise delivery of both therapeutics remains a great challenge. Herein, an electrically activable ZnS nanochip for the controlled release of H2S and Zn2+ was developed for enhanced gas-ionic-immunotherapy (GIIT). Under an electric field, a locality with particularly high concentrations of H2S and Zn2+ was established by the voltage-controlled degradation of the ZnS nanoparticles (NPs). Consequently, the ZnS nanochip-mediated gas-ionic therapy (GIT) resulted in mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization, energy generation inhibition, and oxidative stress imbalance in tumor cells. Interestingly, the cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase-stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) signaling pathway was activated due to the mitochondrial destruction. Moreover, the released Zn2+ resulted in the increase of the intracellular Zn levels and cell pyroptosis, which enhanced the immunogenicity via the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). In vitro and in vivo studies revealed that the ZnS nanochip-based GIT effectively eliminated the tumors under an electric field and mobilized the cytotoxic T lymphocytes for immunotherapy. The combination with αCTLA-4 further promoted the adaptive immune response and inhibited tumor metastasis and long-term tumor recurrence. This work presented an electrically activable ZnS nanochip for combined immunotherapy, which might inspire the development of electric stimulation therapy.

Radiomic analysis of patient and interorgan heterogeneity in response to immunotherapies and BRAF-targeted therapy in metastatic melanoma

Variability in treatment response may be attributable to organ-level heterogeneity in tumor lesions. Radiomic analysis of medical images can elucidate non-invasive biomarkers of clinical outcome. Organ-specific radiomic comparison across immunotherapies and targeted therapies has not been previously reported. We queried the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center registry for patients with metastatic melanoma (MEL) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) (ipilimumab+nivolumab; I+N) or anti-PD-1 monotherapy) or BRAF-targeted therapy. The best overall response was measured using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Lesions were segmented into discrete volume-of-interest with 400 radiomics features extracted. Overall and organ-specific machine-learning models were constructed to predict disease control (DC) versus progressive disease (PD) using XGBoost. 291 patients with MEL were identified, including 242 ICI (91 I+N, 151 PD-1) and 49 BRAF. 667 metastases were analyzed, including 541 ICI (236 I+N, 305 PD-1) and 126 BRAF. Across cohorts, baseline demographics included 39-47% women, 24%-29% M1C, 24-46% M1D, and 61-80% with elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Among ICI patients experiencing DC, the organs with the greatest reduction were liver (-66%±8%; mean±SEM) and lung (-63%±5%). For patients with multiple same-organ target lesions, the highest interlesion heterogeneity was observed in brain among patients who received ICI while no intraorgan heterogeneity was observed in BRAF. 221 ICI patients were included for radiomic modeling, consisting of 86 I+N and 135 PD-1. Models consisting of optimized radiomic signatures classified DC/PD across I+N (area under curve (AUC)=0.85) and PD-1 (0.71) and within individual organ sites (AUC=0.72~0.94). Integration of clinical variables improved the models' performance. Comparison of models between treatments and across organ sites suggested mostly non-overlapping DC or PD features. Skewness, kurtosis, and informational measure of correlation (IMC) were among the radiomic features shared between overall response models. Kurtosis and IMC were also used by multiple organ-site models. In conclusion, differential organ-specific response was observed across BRAF and ICI with within organ heterogeneity observed for ICI but not for BRAF. Radiomic features of organ-specific response demonstrated little overlap. Integrating clinical factors with radiomics improves the prediction of disease course outcome and prediction of tumor heterogeneity.

Mechanisms of Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Melanoma and Strategies to Overcome It

Resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma remains a major obstacle in achieving effective and durable treatment outcomes, highlighting the need to understand and address the underlying mechanisms. The first key factor is innate anti-PD-1 resistance signature (IPRES), an expression of a group of genes associated with tumor plasticity and immune evasion. IPRES promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), increasing melanoma cells' invasiveness and survival. Overexpressed AXL, TWIST2, and WNT5a induce phenotypic changes. The upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines frequently coincides with EMT-related changes, further promoting a resistant and aggressive tumor phenotype. Inflamed tumor microenvironment may also drive the expression of resistance. The complexity of immune resistance development suggests that combination therapies are necessary to overcome it. Furthermore, targeting epigenetic regulation and exploring novel approaches such as miR-146a modulation may provide new strategies to counter resistance in melanoma.

Treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for advanced HCC, resulting in prolonged response and improved survival. With these results, a pressing question arises: what is the optimal treatment following first-line immunotherapy? Despite the benefits of immunotherapy, most patients will experience disease progression within six months and will require subsequent therapies. International guidelines recommend second-line multi-kinase inhibitors following progression on immunotherapy; however, this recommendation is primarily based on expert consensus rather than high-quality evidence. Nevertheless, real-world data indicate that these agents demonstrate similar efficacy and safety when used as first-line treatments. Conversely, it remains unclear whether continuing immunotherapy after progression is beneficial. In some cases, adding anti-CTLA-4 as salvage therapy has shown effectiveness. Molecular-directed therapies have also been tested, showing some initial promise, but further data is needed to confirm the benefits of this approach. Emerging evidence suggests that patients experiencing oligoprogression may benefit from local or locoregional therapies while continuing immunotherapy. In this review, we will discuss treatment strategies following progression after first-line immunotherapy.

Second-line treatment patterns and outcomes in advanced HCC after progression on atezolizumab/bevacizumab

Background & Aims

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B) is now a standard first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the optimal second-line regimen is not known. We evaluated real-world treatment patterns and outcomes to investigate factors associated with post-progression survival (PPS).

Methods

In this multicenter, international, retrospective study, we examined clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced HCC who progressed on first-line A/B. The primary outcome of PPS was defined as time from first radiographic progression on A/B to death.

Results

A total of 406 patients alive after progression on first-line A/B were included in the final analysis, of whom 45.3% (n = 184) received best supportive treatment (BST) and 54.7% (n = 222) continued active systemic treatment. In the second line, 155 patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 45 with immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO)-based regimens, and 3 had missing data. Median PPS of the whole cohort (mPPS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 5.2-7.2). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, absence of portal vein tumor thrombus, ECOG <2, and continued active treatment were predictors of better PPS. mPPS was significantly longer for patients who continued active treatment vs. BST (9.7 vs. 2.6 months; HR 0.41, p <0.001). In the second-line setting, patients treated with TKIs had a numerically shorter mPPS compared to those treated with IO (8.4 vs. 14.9 months; HR 1.37, p = 0.256).

Conclusions

Continuation of active therapy after A/B progression was independently associated with better survival even after adjusting for baseline disease characteristics. mPPS with IO-based therapy exceeded a year, suggesting that IO continuation post-progression may retain benefit. The precise sequencing of TKI and IO regimens warrants further investigation.

Impact and implications

There is currently a lack of level 1 data on second-line treatment options for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who progress after frontline atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, as all second-line approvals were established during the frontline sorafenib era. Our study aims to fill in some of the knowledge gap by investigating real-world patient outcomes in the second-line treatment setting. Findings from this study show that patients who continued active treatment had improved post-progression survival compared to those who received best supportive care, and medication regimens incorporating tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as immunotherapy agents were active. These results can help inform clinicians of possible treatment options for patients who progress after frontline atezolizumab plus bevacizumab while we await maturing data from randomized-controlled trials.

Co-Delivery of aPD-L1 and CD73 Inhibitor Using Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles for Enhanced Melanoma Immunotherapy with Reduced Toxicity

Melanoma, a malignant skin tumor, presents significant treatment challenges, particularly in unresectable and metastatic cases. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have brought new hope, their efficacy is limited by low response rates and significant immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs). Through multi-omics data analysis, it is discovered that the spatial co-localization of CD73 and PD-L1 in melanoma correlates with improved progression-free survival (PFS), suggesting a synergistic potential of their inhibitors. Building on these insights, a novel therapeutic strategy using calcium phosphate (CaP) nanoparticles is developed for the co-delivery of aPD-L1 and APCP, a CD73 inhibitor. These nanoparticles, constructed via a biomineralization method, exhibit high drug-loading capacity and pH-responsive drug release. Compared to free aPD-L1, the CaP-delivered aPD-L1 effectively avoids systemic side effects while significantly enhancing anti-tumor efficacy, surpassing even a 20-fold dose of free aPD-L1. Furthermore, the co-delivery of aPD-L1 and APCP via CaP nanoparticles demonstrates a synergistic anti-tumor effect, with substantial immune activation and prevention of tumor recurrence through immune memory effects. These findings suggest that the co-delivery of aPD-L1 and APCP using CaP nanoparticles is a promising approach for improving melanoma immunotherapy, achieving enhanced efficacy and reduced toxicity.

A humanized anti-MSLN×4-1BB bispecific antibody exhibits potent antitumour activity through 4-1BB signaling activation and fc function without systemic toxicity

BACKGROUND

Agonistic monoclonal antibodies targeting 4-1BB/CD137 have shown preclinical promise, but their clinical development has been limited by severe liver toxicity or limited efficacy. Therefore, a safe and efficient immunostimulatory molecule is urgently needed for cancer immunotherapy.

METHODS

A novel anti-MSLN×4-1BB bispecific antibody (bsAb) was generated via antibody engineering, and its affinity and activity were detected via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), flow cytometry, and T-cell activation and luciferase reporter assays. In vivo antitumour activity was assessed by establishing humanized mice bearing human MSLN-expressing MC38 (MC38/hMSLN) or CT26 (CT26/hMSLN) cells, and safety was further evaluated in cynomolgus monkeys.

RESULTS

We generated two humanized anti-MSLN×4-1BB bsAbs (HK013-G1/G4) by fusing an anti-4-1BB scFv to the C-terminus of an anti-MSLN VHH with an intact Fc fragment from human IgG1 or IgG4. The two bsAbs were able to block the binding of CA125 to MSLN and stimulate 4-1BB signaling pathway, which was strictly dependent on MSLN expression. In particular, HK013-G1 retained Fc function and induced ADCC effect in tumour cells, whereas HK013-G4 did not. Strikingly, HK013-G1 showed superior antitumour activity to HK013-G4 both in vitro and in vivo and remained effective even in the presence of soluble MSLN. HK013-G1 enhanced antitumour immunity and induced durable antigen-specific immune memory to prevent rechallenged tumour growth, even at a dose as low as 1 mg/kg. Furthermore, HK013-G1 did not induce nonspecific production of proinflammatory cytokines and showed good tolerability up to the highest tested dose (30 mg/kg weekly) for 5 weeks, with no HK013-G1-related adverse effects observed in cynomolgus monkeys. In addition, the mean half-life of HK013-G1 was approximately 61 and 97 h at single doses of 3 and 30 mg/kg, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The optimal anti-MSLN×4-1BB bsAb HK013-G1 exhibited synergistic antitumour effects by inducing an ADCC effect (innate immunity) and stimulating the 4-1BB signaling pathway (adaptive immunity) upon cross-bridging with MSLN with no systemic toxicity, which may offer the promise of an improved therapeutic window relative to that of 4-1BB agonists.

Efficacy and prognostic factors of anti-PD1 and nivolumab-ipilimumab therapy in advanced melanoma patients resistant to prior ICI treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the five-year survival rate for advanced melanoma. However, many patients exhibit resistance to ICI therapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and prognostic factors of anti-PD-1 (Group A) and nivolumab-ipilimumab (Group B) therapy in patients with advanced melanoma who were resistant to prior ICI therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 56 patients with advanced melanoma who had previously shown resistance to ICI therapy. In the Group A (who have previously shown resistance to anti-CTLA-4, n = 28), the objective response rate (ORR) was 42.9%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 53%. In the Group B (previously shown resistance to anti-PD-1, n = 28), the ORR was 17.9%, and the DCR was 25%. The ORR was lower in two subgroups: patients who showed progression or relapse in the the initial radiological assessment of prior ICI therapy (ORR 10.5%) and patients who had previously received ICI in the adjuvant setting (ORR 8.3%). A Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score of 2-3 was a predictor of OS in both groups (Group A: HR 3.789, 95% CI 1.356-10.589, p = 0.011; Group B: HR 4.281, 95% CI 1.490-12.300, p = 0.007) and for PFS in the Group B (HR 3.167, 95% CI 1.062-9.442, p = 0.039). Anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated efficacy following resistance to anti-CTLA-4, whereas combination ICI therapy showed lower response rates in patients resistant to anti-PD-1. Further studies are needed to confirm the RMH scores and other prognostic markers and to evaluate subgroups with lower efficacy of nivolumab-ipilimumab therapy.

Next-generation combination approaches for immune checkpoint therapy

Immune checkpoint therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, leading to dramatic clinical outcomes for a subset of patients. However, many patients do not experience durable responses following immune checkpoint therapy owing to multiple resistance mechanisms, highlighting the need for effective combination strategies that target these resistance pathways and improve clinical responses. The development of combination strategies based on an understanding of the complex biology that regulates human antitumor immune responses has been a major challenge. In this Review, we describe the current landscape of combination therapies. We also discuss how the development of effective combination strategies will require the integration of small, tissue-rich clinical trials, to determine how therapy-driven perturbation of the human immune system affects downstream biological responses and eventual clinical outcomes, reverse translation of clinical observations to immunocompetent preclinical models, to interrogate specific biological pathways and their impact on antitumor immune responses, and novel computational methods and machine learning, to integrate multiple datasets across clinical and preclinical studies for the identification of the most relevant pathways that need to be targeted for successful combination strategies.

18 F-FDG PET/CT for Detection of Immunotherapy-Induced Hypophysitis-A Case-Control Study

PURPOSE

Hypophysitis occurs in up to 10% of patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). MRI shows no abnormalities of the pituitary gland in one third of patients. A delayed diagnosis increases the risk for life-threatening adrenal crisis, underscoring the need for early detection. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy FDG PET/CT in detecting ICI-induced hypophysitis in a cohort of melanoma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic melanoma and ICI-induced hypophysitis, who underwent FDG PET/CT 90 days before to 10 days after diagnosis, were compared with an age- and sex-matched control group of patients undergoing ICI treatment without signs of hypophysitis. The ratio of SUV max of the pituitary gland to the SUV mean of the blood pool (target-to-background ratio [TBR]) was calculated. Diagnostic accuracy of the TBR was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients was included. The majority of patients with hypophysitis received ipilimumab/nivolumab (64.3%, 9/14). Visual assessment of the TBR distribution demonstrated a positive correlation with decreasing time to diagnosis. To evaluate diagnostic performance, only patients with FDG PET/CT 50 days before to 8 days after diagnosis (11/14) were included. TBR was significantly higher in these compared with the control group (median [interquartile range], 2.78 [2.41] vs 1.59 [0.70], respectively; P = 0.034). A sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 90.9% were achieved at a TBR threshold of 2.41 (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve = 0.769).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that, in patients undergoing ICI treatment for metastatic melanoma, a pituitary TBR of approximately 2.4 may indicate impending ICI-induced hypophysitis.

Myriad factors and pathways influencing tumor radiotherapy resistance

Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of various tumors, yet radioresistance often leads to treatment failure and tumor recurrence. Several factors contribute to this resistance, including hypoxia, DNA repair mechanisms, and cancer stem cells. This review explores the diverse elements that drive tumor radiotherapy resistance. Historically, resistance has been attributed to cellular repair and tumor repopulation, but recent research has expanded this understanding. The tumor microenvironment - characterized by hypoxia, immune evasion, and stromal interactions - further complicates treatment. Additionally, molecular mechanisms such as aberrant signaling pathways, epigenetic modifications, and non-B-DNA structures play significant roles in mediating resistance. This review synthesizes current knowledge, highlighting the interplay of these factors and their clinical implications. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing strategies to overcome resistance and improve therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients.

Axl and EGFR Dual-Specific Binding Affibody for Targeted Therapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a tumor of the head and neck, with a higher incidence in southern China and Southeast Asia. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the main treatments; however, metastasis and recurrence remain the main causes of treatment failure. Further, the majority of patients are diagnosed in the late stage due to lack of tumor-specific biomarker for early diagnosis. Therefore, an effective treatment and early detection can improve the outcome of patient with NPC. Axl and EGFR are co-expressed in NPC tissues and play key roles in tumor proliferation, migration, and invasion, which are often correlated with poor prognosis and therapy resistance. In this study, we generated a novel bispecific affibody (Z239-1907) for the dual targeting and inhibition of Axl and EGFR expression in NPC-positive cells both in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro experiments demonstrated that Z239-1907 had more pronounced antitumor effects than either modality alone (ZAXL239 or ZEGFR1907) in NPC-positive cells. Further, mice bearing NPC-positive tumors showed significant inhibition in tumor growth after treatment with Z239-1907 compared to ZAXL239 and ZEGFR1907. The in vivo tumor targeting ability and imaging also showed that Z239-1907 specifically and selectively targeted NPC xenograft mice models and accumulate at tumor site as early as 30 min and disappeared within 24 h post-injection. Collectively, these results suggest that Z239-1907 dual-target affibody is a promising therapeutic agent and a molecular imaging probe for early diagnosis in NPC.

Blockade of CCR5+ T Cell Accumulation in the Tumor Microenvironment Optimizes Anti-TGF-β/PD-L1 Bispecific Antibody

In the previous studies, anti-TGF-β/PD-L1 bispecific antibody YM101 is demonstrated, with superior efficacy to anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in multiple tumor models. However, YM101 therapy can not achieve complete regression in most tumor-bearing mice, suggesting the presence of other immunosuppressive elements in the tumor microenvironment (TME) beyond TGF-β and PD-L1. Thoroughly exploring the TME is imperative to pave the way for the successful translation of anti-TGF-β/PD-L1 BsAb into clinical practice. In this work, scRNA-seq is employed to comprehensively profile the TME changes induced by YM101. The scRNA-seq analysis reveals an increase in immune cell populations associated with antitumor immunity and enhances cell-killing pathways. However, the analysis also uncovers the presence of immunosuppressive CCR5+ T cells in the TME after YM101 treatment. To overcome this hurdle, YM101 is combined with Maraviroc, a widely used CCR5 antagonist for treating HIV infection, suppressing CCR5+ T cell accumulation, and optimizing the immune response. Mechanistically, YM101-induced neutrophil activation recruits immunosuppressive CCR5+ T cells via CCR5 ligand secretion, creating a feedback loop that diminishes the antitumor response. Maraviroc then cleared these infiltrating cells and offset YM101-mediated immunosuppressive effects, further unleashing the antitumor immunity. These findings suggest selectively targeting CCR5 signaling with Maraviroc represents a promising and strategic approach to enhance YM101 efficacy.

CTLA4 blockade abrogates KEAP1/STK11-related resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibitors

For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with CTLA4 inhibitors and PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (hereafter, PD-(L)1 inhibitors) is associated with higher rates of anti-tumour activity and immune-related toxicities, when compared with treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone. However, there are currently no validated biomarkers to identify which patients will benefit from dual ICB1,2. Here we show that patients with NSCLC who have mutations in the STK11 and/or KEAP1 tumour suppressor genes derived clinical benefit from dual ICB with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab and the CTLA4 inhibitor tremelimumab, but not from durvalumab alone, when added to chemotherapy in the randomized phase III POSEIDON trial3. Unbiased genetic screens identified loss of both of these tumour suppressor genes as independent drivers of resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibition, and showed that loss of Keap1 was the strongest genomic predictor of dual ICB efficacy-a finding that was confirmed in several mouse models of Kras-driven NSCLC. In both mouse models and patients, KEAP1 and STK11 alterations were associated with an adverse tumour microenvironment, which was characterized by a preponderance of suppressive myeloid cells and the depletion of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, but relative sparing of CD4+ effector subsets. Dual ICB potently engaged CD4+ effector cells and reprogrammed the tumour myeloid cell compartment towards inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-expressing tumoricidal phenotypes that-together with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells-contributed to anti-tumour efficacy. These data support the use of chemo-immunotherapy with dual ICB to mitigate resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibition in patients with NSCLC who have STK11 and/or KEAP1 alterations.

Copper-64 Based PET-Radiopharmaceuticals: Ways to Clinical Translational

Positron emission tomography (PET) as an advanced noninvasive imaging technique, provides unprecedented insights into the study of physiological and biochemical processes in vivo. Copper-64 (64Cu) has a ideal half-life of 12.7 hours, with β+ and β-dual decay modes and abundant coordination chemistry, enabling the development of a wide variety of radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging and radionuclide therapy.This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest advances in Copper-64 (64Cu)-based PET radionuclides, covering their production, radiolabeling strategies, and clinical applications. It highlights the role of 64Cu-PET in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic outcomes across various tumor types. Additionally, future research directions and the evolving clinical applications of 64Cu-based radiopharmaceuticals are discussed, offering insights into their potential impact on clinical practice.

Nature and management of melanoma recurrences following adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 50 % of resected stage II-IV melanoma patients develop recurrent disease by 5 years despite adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. Data to define best management of recurrences is lacking.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study. Patients with resected stage II-IV melanoma who commenced adjuvant anti-PD-1-based therapy before January 2022 and later recurred were identified. Data on demographics, disease characteristics, recurrence patterns, management and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

711 patients from 17 sites were included. Median age was 60 [range 16-92], 64 % were male, 2 % stage II, 91 % were stage III, 7 % stage IV. Median time to recurrence was 6.2 months (0-68.5) and median follow up time from recurrence was 19.8 months (range 0.2-73.1). 63 % recurred on anti-PD-1 therapy, 36 % off therapy [3 % < 6 months, 33 % > 6 months]. Initial recurrences were locoregional (LR) alone in 44 %, distant alone (DR) in 43 %, and 11 % in both sites. LR recurrences were managed with local therapy, alone (62 %) or with "second adjuvant" anti-PD-1 (14 %) or BRAF/MEK therapy (23 %); 12 m RFS2 was 25 %, 29 % and 69 % respectively (p = 0.0045). Definitive systemic therapy at first recurrence was given in 16 % LR and 86 % DR, with best outcomes for anti-CTLA4 + anti-PD-1 and trial combinations (24 m PFS 63 % and 69 %, respectively). The 24 m OS for the entire cohort was 65 %.

CONCLUSION

Most recurrences following adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy occur early and while still on drug. Outcomes are poor, regardless of site, timing of recurrence, and subsequent treatment.

The efficacy and safety of a novel PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody cadonilimab (AK104) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received frontline immunochemotherapy, subsequent treatment options are limited. As the first dual programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 bispecific antibody approved globally, cadonilimab demonstrated potential antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients resistant to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected efficacy and safety data from advanced NSCLC patients treated with cadonilimab-based regimens in later therapy lines.

RESULTS

A total of 41 advanced NSCLC patients refractory to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy were enrolled. More than half of the patients received cadonilimab-based regimen as a fourth or later line of treatment. At the data cutoff date, treatment efficacy could be evaluated in 23 patients. One patient (4.3%) achieved partial response, eight patients (34.8%) experienced stable disease, and 14 patients (60.9%) progressed. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 4.3% and 39.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival for all evaluated patients was 108.0 days. Due to the short follow-up period, the median overall survival has not yet been reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and immune-related AEs occurred in 63.4% and 22% patients, respectively. The most common TRAEs included gamma-glutamyl transferase elevation (17.1%), coughing (14.6%), and fatigue (12.2%). Five patients (12.2%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this heavily pretreated cohort of advanced NSCLC patients, cadonilimab-based regimens showed moderate antitumor efficacy with a generally tolerable and manageable safety profile. However, more evidence is needed to support the administration of cadonilimab in NSCLC patients refractory to previous anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Companion diagnostics and predictive biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in malignant melanoma

Programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1), when bound to the ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), can suppress cellular immunity and play a critical role in the initiation and development of cancer. Immune drugs targeting these two sites have been developed for different cancers, including malignant melanoma. The accompanying diagnostic method has been approved by the FDA to guide patient medication. However, the method of immunohistochemical staining, which varies widely due to the antibody and staining cut-off values, has certain limitations in application and does not benefit all patients. Increasing researches begin to focus on new biomarkers to improve objective response rates and survival in cancer patients. In this article, we enumerated three major groups, including tumour microenvironment, peripheral circulation, and gene mutation, which covered the current main research directions. In the future, we hope those biomarkers may be used to guide the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma.

Amelanotic Melanoma-Biochemical and Molecular Induction Pathways

Amelanotic melanoma (AM) is a subtype of hypomelanotic or completely amelanotic melanoma. AM is a rare subtype of melanoma that exhibits a higher recurrence rate and aggressiveness as well as worse surveillance than typical melanoma. AM shows a dysregulation of melanin production, cell cycle control, and apoptosis pathways. Knowing these pathways has an application in medicine due to targeted therapies based on the inhibiting elements of the abovementioned pathways. Therefore, we summarized and discussed AM biochemical and molecular induction pathways and personalized medicine approaches, clinical management, and future directions due to the fact that AM is relatively rare. AM is commonly misdiagnosed. Hence, the role of biomarkers is becoming significant. Nonetheless, there is a shortage of biomarkers specific to AM. BRAF, NRAS, and c-KIT genes are the main targets of therapy. However, the role of BRAF and KIT in AM varied among studies. BRAF inhibitors combined with MAK inhibitors demonstrate better results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 combined with a programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) show better outcomes than separately. Fecal microbiota transplantation may overcome resistance to immune checkpoint therapy of AM. Immune-modulatory vaccines against indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and PD ligand (PD-L1) combined with nivolumab may be efficient in melanoma treatment.

Targeting STING signaling for the optimal cancer immunotherapy

Despite the transformative impact of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies, challenges such as low response rates persist. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway, a crucial element of innate immunity, emerges as a strategic target to overcome these limitations. Understanding its multifaceted functions in cancer, including antigen presentation and response to DNA damage, provides valuable insights. STING agonists, categorized into cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) and non-CDNs, exhibit promising safety and efficacy profiles. Innovative delivery systems, including antibody-drug conjugates, nanocarriers, and exosome-based therapies, address challenges associated with systemic administration and enhance targeted tumor delivery. Personalized vaccines, such as DT-Exo-STING, showcase the adaptability of STING agonists for individualized treatment. These advancements not only offer new prospects for combination therapies but also pave the way for overcoming resistance mechanisms. This review focuses on the potential of targeting STING pathway to enhance cancer immunotherapy. The integration of STING agonists into cancer immunotherapy holds promise for more effective, personalized, and successful approaches against malignancies, presenting a beacon of hope for the future of cancer treatment.

Toripalimab in combination with HBM4003, an anti-CTLA-4 heavy chain-only antibody, in advanced melanoma and other solid tumors: an open-label phase I trial

BACKGROUND

HBM4003 is a novel anti-CTLA-4 heavy chain-only antibody, designed to enhance Treg ablation and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity while ensuring a manageable safety profile. This phase I trial investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of HBM4003 plus with anti-PD-1 antibody toripalimab in patients with advanced solid tumors, especially focusing on melanoma.

METHODS

The multicenter, open-label phase I trial was divided into two parts: dose-escalation phase (part 1) and dose-expansion phase (part 2). In part 1, HBM4003 was administered at doses of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 mg/kg in combination with toripalimab with fixed dosage of 240 mg every 3 weeks. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was used in the expansion phase. Primary endpoints were safety and RP2D in part 1 and objective response rate (ORR) in part 2. Biomarkers based on cytokines and multiplex immunofluorescence staining were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients received study treatment, including 36 patients treated with RP2D of HBM4003 0.3 mg/kg plus toripalimab 240 mg every 3 week. 36 participants (90.0%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), of which 10 (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs and 5 (12.5%) experienced immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs) with maximum severity of grade 3. No grade 4 or 5 irAEs occurred. Efficacy analysis set included 32 melanoma patients treated with RP2D and with available post-baseline imaging data. The ORRs of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment-naïve subgroup and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment-failed subgroup were 33.3% and 5.9%, respectively. In mucosal melanoma, the ORR of the two subgroups were 40.0% and 10.0%, respectively. Baseline high Treg/CD4+ratio in the tumor serves as an independent predictive factor for the efficacy of immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HBM4003 0.3 mg/kg plus toripalimab 240 mg every 3 week demonstrated manageable safety in solid tumors and no new safety signal. Limited data demonstrated promising antitumor activity, especially in PD-1 treatment-naïve mucosal melanoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04727164.

Adjuvant anti-PD1 immunotherapy of resected skin melanoma: an example of non-personalized medicine with no overall survival benefit

Randomized clinical trials demonstrated a recurrence-free survival benefit with adjuvant anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) inhibitors of resected stage IIB-IV melanoma. However, no improvement in overall survival has been observed thus far. Furthermore, there are no predictive markers for immunotherapy response in melanoma, therefore adjuvant treatment is offered to all comers based exclusively on the pathological and clinical stages. Additionally, one year of treatment duration and the risk of chronic immune-related adverse effects may negatively impact patients´ quality of life. In this review, we will try to answer whether the currently available data on adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy of stage IIB-IV resected melanoma is sufficient to make this strategy available to all patients. We will also discuss the economic impact of this therapy on healthcare system budgets. Recent studies suggest that the high cost of cancer drugs may affect access to these agents globally by raising questions of sustainability for patients and society.

Efficacy of TIL therapy in advanced cutaneous melanoma in the current immuno-oncology era: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL-ACT) has consistently shown efficacy in advanced melanoma. New results in the field provide now the opportunity to assess overall survival (OS) after TIL-ACT and to examine the effect of prior anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-PD-(L)1] therapy on its efficacy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed up to 29 February 2024. Ιn this meta-analysis we focused on studies including high-dose interleukin 2, doubling the patient numbers from our previous meta-analysis conducted up to December 2018 and using OS as the primary endpoint. Objective response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and duration of response were secondary endpoints. Findings are synthesized using tables, Kaplan-Meier plots, and forest plots. Pooled estimates for ORR and CRR were derived from fixed or random effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 13 high-dose interleukin 2 studies were included in this updated meta-analysis, with OS information available for 617 patients. No difference was found in median OS between studies with prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment {n = 238; 17.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.8-20.5 months]} and without [n = 379; 16.3 months (95% CI 14.2-20.6 months)] (log-rank P = 0.53). ORR was estimated to be 34% (95% CI 16%-52%) and 44% (95% CI 37%-51%), for the studies with and without prior anti-PD-(L)1, respectively. The pooled estimate for CRR was 10% for both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups, either for ORR (P = 0.15) or CRR (P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment has no effect on the clinical response or survival benefit from TIL-ACT in advanced cutaneous melanoma. The benefit of TIL therapy in the second-line setting is also present after anti-PD-(L)1 treatment. Our data reinforce the evidence that TIL-ACT should be considered as a treatment of choice in second line for metastatic melanoma patients failing anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.

Treatment response to durvalumab plus tremelimumab after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether sequential ICI treatment-durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)-is effective for HCC. In this nationwide multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DT treatment based on the timing of treatment. A total of 85 patients receiving DT treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 8 among patients receiving first-line DT treatment, those receiving second-line or later treatment without prior AB therapy, and those receiving second-line or later treatment with prior AB therapy. Objective response rates (ORRs) in patients with first-line treatment, second-line treatment without AB, and second-line treatment with prior AB were 44%, 54%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, disease control rates (DCRs) were 69%, 91%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.001). ORR and DCR were significantly lower in patients with prior AB treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in patients receiving second-line therapy following prior AB treatment and an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in those patients for PFS, using first-line therapy as a reference, was 2.35 (1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the impact of DT sequencing following AB treatment was limited. However, even after second-line treatment, the treatment effect can be equivalent to that of first-line treatment in cases with no history of AB treatment. Thus, prior treatment history should be taken into account when initiating DT treatment.

Polypeptides-Based Nanocarriers in Tumor Therapy

Cancer remains a worldwide problem, and new treatment strategies are being actively developed. Peptides have the characteristics of good biocompatibility, strong targeting, functional diversity, modifiability, membrane permeable ability, and low immunogenicity, and they have been widely used to construct targeted drug delivery systems (DDSs). In addition, peptides, as endogenous substances, have a high affinity, which can not only regulate immune cells but also work synergistically with drugs to kill tumor cells, demonstrating significant potential for application. In this review, the latest progress of polypeptides-based nanocarriers in tumor therapy has been outlined, focusing on their applications in killing tumor cells and regulating immune cells. Additionally, peptides as carriers were found to primarily provide a transport function, which was also a subject of interest to us. At the end of the paper, the shortcomings in the construction of peptide nano-delivery system have been summarized, and possible solutions are proposed therein. The application of peptides provides a promising outlook for cancer treatment, and we hope this article can provide in-depth insights into possible future avenues of exploration.

Evolving cancer resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in melanoma: Comprehensive insights with future prospects

Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of advanced melanoma. However, up to two-thirds of patients experience disease progression after initially achieving a response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, most research has focused on cutaneous melanoma rather than acral or mucosal melanoma, although the latter predominates in Asian populations. In this review, we examine and summarize current definitions of resistance to immunotherapy and the epidemiology of resistance to PD-1 inhibition. We also review the available literature on molecular mechanisms of resistance, including how the tumor mutational landscape and tumor microenvironments of immunotherapy-resistant acral and mucosal melanomas may influence resistance. Finally, we review strategies for overcoming resistance to PD-1 inhibition and summarize completed studies and ongoing clinical trials. Our review highlights that improving the understanding of resistance mechanisms, optimizing existing therapies and further studying high-risk populations would maximize the potential of immunotherapy and result in optimized treatment outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Phase I Study of Fianlimab, a Human Lymphocyte Activation Gene-3 (LAG-3) Monoclonal Antibody, in Combination With Cemiplimab in Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Coblockade of lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) and PD-1 receptors could provide significant clinical benefit for patients with advanced melanoma. Fianlimab and cemiplimab are high-affinity, human, hinge-stabilized IgG4 monoclonal antibodies, targeting LAG-3 and PD-1, respectively. We report results from a first-in-human phase-I study of fianlimab and cemiplimab safety and efficacy in various malignancies including advanced melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma were eligible for enrollment into four cohorts: three for patients without and one for patients with previous anti-PD-1 therapy in the advanced disease setting. Patients were treated with fianlimab 1,600 mg and cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 51 weeks, with an optional additional 51 weeks if clinically indicated. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria.

RESULTS

ORRs were 63% for patients with anti-PD-1-naïve melanoma (cohort-6; n = 40; median follow-up 20.8 months), 63% for patients with systemic treatment-naïve melanoma (cohort-15; n = 40; 11.5 months), and 56% for patients with previous neo/adjuvant treatment melanoma (cohort-16; n = 18, 9.7 months). At a median follow-up of 12.6 months for the combined cohorts (6 + 15 + 16), the ORR was 61.2% and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) 13.3 months (95% CI, 7.5 to not estimated [NE]). In patients (n = 13) with previous anti-PD-1 adjuvant therapy, ORR was 61.5% and mPFS 12 months (95% CI, 1.4 to NE). ORR in patients with previous anti-PD-1 therapy for advanced disease (n = 15) was 13.3% and mPFS 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.3 to 7.7). Treatment-emergent and treatment-related adverse events ≥grade 3 (G3) were observed in 44% and 22% of patients, respectively. Except for increased incidence of adrenal insufficiency (12%-G1-4, 4%-G3-4), no new safety signals were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The current results show a promising benefit-risk profile of fianlimab/cemiplimab combination for patients with advanced melanoma, including those with previous anti-PD-1 therapy in the adjuvant, but not advanced, setting.

ALK5/VEGFR2 dual inhibitor TU2218 alone or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors enhances immune-mediated antitumor effects

Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) is present in blood of patients who do not respond to anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] treatment, and through synergy with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), it helps to create an environment that promotes tumor immune evasion and immune tolerance. Therefore, simultaneous inhibition of TGFβ/VEGF is more effective than targeting TGFβ alone. In this study, the dual inhibitory mechanism of TU2218 was identified through in vitro analysis mimicking the tumor microenvironment, and its antitumor effects were analyzed using mouse syngeneic tumor models. TU2218 directly restored the activity of damaged cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer cells inhibited by TGFβ and suppressed the activity and viability of regulatory T cells. The inactivation of endothelial cells induced by VEGF stimulation was completely ameliorated by TU2218, an effect not observed with vactosertib, which inhibits only TGFβ signaling. The combination of TU2218 and anti-PD1 therapy had a significantly greater antitumor effect than either drug alone in the poorly immunogenic B16F10 syngeneic tumor model. The mechanism of tumor reduction was confirmed by flow cytometry, which showed upregulated VCAM-1 expression in vascular cells and increased influx of CD8 + CTLs into the tumor. As another strategy, combination of anti-CTLA4 therapy and TU2218 resulted in high complete regression (CR) rates in CT26 and WEHI-164 tumor models. In particular, immunological memory generated by the combination of anti-CTLA4 and TU2218 in the CT26 model prevented the development of tumors after additional tumor cell transplantation, suggesting that the TU2218-based combination has therapeutic potential in immunotherapy.

A viable remedy for overcoming resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy: Fecal microbiota transplantation

Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy is a cancer therapy that focuses explicitly on the PD-1 receptor found on the surface of immune cells. This targeted therapeutic strategy is specifically designed to amplify the immune system's innate capacity to detect and subsequently eliminate cells that have become cancerous. Nevertheless, it should be noted that not all patients exhibit a favourable response to this particular therapeutic modality, necessitating the exploration of novel strategies to augment the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Previous studies have shown that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced melanoma patients. To investigate this intriguing possibility further, we turned to PubMed and conducted a comprehensive search for studies that analyzed the interplay between FMT and anti-PD-1 therapy in the context of tumor treatment. Our search criteria were centred around two key phrases: "fecal microbiota transplantation" and "anti-PD-1 therapy." The studies we uncovered all echo a similar sentiment. They pointed towards the potential of FMT to improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy. FMT may enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy by altering the gut microbiota and boosting the patient's immunological response. Although promising, additional investigation is needed to improve the efficacy of FMT in the context of cancer therapy and attain a comprehensive understanding of the possible advantages and drawbacks associated with this therapeutic strategy.

Open-label, phase II study of talimogene laherparepvec plus pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced melanoma that progressed on prior anti-PD-1 therapy: MASTERKEY-115

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for immunotherapy-refractory melanoma are an unmet need. The MASTERKEY-115 phase II, open-label, multicenter trial evaluated talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma that progressed on prior programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors.

METHODS

Cohorts 1 and 2 comprised patients (unresectable/metastatic melanoma) who had primary or acquired resistance, respectively, and disease progression within 12 weeks of their last anti-PD-1 dose. Cohorts 3 and 4 comprised patients (resectable disease) who underwent complete surgery, received adjuvant anti-PD-1, and experienced recurrence. Cohort 3 were disease-free for < 6 months and cohort 4 for ≥ 6 months after starting the adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy and before confirmed recurrence. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included complete response rate (CRR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 and irRC-RECIST, and safety.

RESULTS

Of the 72 enrolled patients, 71 were treated. The ORR (95% CI) was 0%, 6.7% (0.2-32.0), 40.0% (16.3-67.7), and 46.7% (21.3-73.4) in cohorts 1-4, respectively; iORR was 3.8% (0.1-19.6), 6.7% (0.2-32.0), 53.3% (26.6-78.7), and 46.7% (21.3-73.4). iCRR was 0%, 0%, 13.3%, and 13.3%. Median iPFS (months) was 5.5, 8.2, not estimable [NE], and NE for cohorts 1-4, respectively; iDCR was 50.0%, 40.0%, 73.3%, and 86.7%. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), grade ≥ 3 TRAEs, serious AEs, and fatal AEs occurred in 54 (76.1%), 9 (12.7%), 24 (33.8%), and 10 (14.1%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

T-VEC-pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity and tolerability in PD-1-refractory melanoma, specifically in patients with disease recurrence on or after adjuvant anti-PD-1.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier - NCT04068181.

Immune responses and immunotherapeutic approaches in the treatment against cancer

Cancer cells within a population are heterogeneous due to genomic mutations or epigenetic changes. The immune response to cancer especially the T cell repertoire within the cancer microenvionment is important to the control and growth of cancer cells. When a cancer clone breaks through the surveillance of the immune system, it wins the battle to overcome the host's immune system. In this review, the complicated profile of the cancer microenvironment is emphasized. The molecular evidence of immune responses to cancer has been recently established. Based on these molecular mechanisms of immune interactions with cancer, clinical trials based on checkpoint inhibition therapy against CTLA-4 and/or PD-1 versus PD-L1 have been successful in the treatment of melanoma, lung cancer and other types of cancer. The diversity of the T cell repertoire is described and the tumor infiltrating lymphocytes within the cancer may be expanded ex vivo and infused back to the patient as a treatment modality for adoptive immunotherapy.

Recent advances in immunotherapy and its combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a review

The incidence of melanoma is increasing year by year and is highly malignant, with a poor prognosis. Its treatment has always attracted much attention. Among the more clinically applied immunotherapies are immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer therapy, and oncolytic virotherapy. With the continuous development of technology and trials, in addition to immune monotherapy, combinations of immunotherapy and radiotherapy have shown surprising efficacy. In this article, we review the research progress of immune monotherapy and combination therapy for advanced melanoma, with the aim of providing new ideas for the treatment strategy for advanced melanoma.

Prognostic value of inflammatory markers NLR, PLR, and LMR in gastric cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a groundbreaking approach to cancer therapy. Inflammatory markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have emerged as potential indicators strongly associated with tumor prognosis, albeit their prognostic significance remains contentious. The predictive value of NLR, PLR, LMR in patients with gastric cancer (GC) treated with ICIs has not been fully explored; therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the potential of inflammatory markers NLR, PLR, and LMR as survival predictors in this population.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, with the search cut-off date set as March 2024. Hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the prognostic significance of NLR, PLR, and LMR for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Fifteen cohort studies involving 1336 gastric cancer patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that high levels of NLR were associated with poorer OS and PFS in GC patients receiving ICIs, with combined HRs of OS [HR=2.01, 95%CI (1.72,2.34), P<0.01], and PFS PFS[HR=1.59, 95%CI (1.37,1.86), P<0.01], respectively; high levels of PLR were associated with poorer OS and PFS, and the combined HR was OS [HR=1.57, 95%CI (1.25,1.96), P<0.01], PFS [HR=1.52,95%CI (1.20, 1.94), P<0.01], respectively; and there was an association between elevated LMR and prolonged OS and PFS, and the combined HR was OS [HR=0.62, 95%CI (0.47,0.81), P<0.01], and PFS [HR=0.69, 95%CI (0.50,0.95), P<0.01].

Conclusion

In gastric cancer (GC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while high lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was linked to improved OS and PFS. Subgroup analyses suggested that NLR might be particularly pertinent to the prognosis of GC patients. In conclusion, the inflammatory markers NLR, PLR, and LMR serve as effective biomarkers for prognostic assessment in GC patients, offering valuable insights for therapeutic decision-making in the realm of GC immunotherapy. Prospective studies of high quality are eagerly awaited to validate these findings in the future.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero, identifier CRD42024524321.

Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors aimed at nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

During the first stage of the study, using 40 patients with stage III/IVa NPC treated with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemoradiotherapy as a first-line treatment (observation group) and 70 patients with NPC treated with chemoradiotherapy alone (control group). In the second stage of the study, 88 patients with NPC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were grouped according to the number of lines of immunotherapy, the number of times, and the types of application.

RESULTS

Observation of the short-term effects in the first stage indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) of the observation group and the control group against primary foci of NPC was 75.0% versus 40.0%; the mortality rate of the observation group was much lower than that of the control group. The overall first-line treatment evaluation of the observation vs. control groups were as follows: ORR (67.5% vs. 38.6%); median PFS (17.52 vs. 17.21 months); and median OS (18.68 vs. 18.14 months), respectively (p < 0.05). The second stage of the study had an ORR of 53.4%, and the efficacy of immunotherapy was related to staging, timing, and frequency.

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemoradiotherapy as the first-line treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma may improve patient outcomes significantly. Timing, frequency, and the type of immunotherapy exerted an effect on the efficacy of immunotherapy. Adverse effects that occurred during treatment were tolerable and controllable.

Five-Year Follow-Up of POLARIS-01 Phase II Trial: Toripalimab as Salvage Monotherapy in Chinese Patients With Advanced Melanoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity after long-term follow-up of anti-PD-1 antibody in advanced melanoma with predominantly acral and mucosal subtypes.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

In the POLARIS-01 phase II trial, 128 Chinese patients with advanced melanoma refractory to standard therapy received toripalimab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for ≤2 years. For those who progressed after discontinuation due to 2-year treatment completion, rechallenge was allowed. The primary objectives were safety and overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

As of February 8, 2021, ORR was 17.3% (95% CI: 11.2-25.0) evaluated by the independent radiologic review committee. The median overall survival (OS) for patients with known melanoma subtypes was 16.3 m for acral, 41.5 m for nonacral cutaneous, and 10.3 m for mucosal melanoma. Thereafter, the evaluation was continued by investigators. As of November 4, 2022, 5 years after the last enrollment, median duration of response was 15.6 months (range, 3.7-64.5+), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.2-5.3), and 60-month OS rate was 28.5% (95% CI: 20.2-37.2). Thirteen patients completed a 2-year treatment of toripalimab, with the subtypes of acral (2/13), non-acral cutaneous (4/13), mucosal (3/13) and unknown primary (4/13). Five patients were rechallenged. Four of them, all of whom were non-mucosal, completed the rechallenge course of 2 years with PFS ≥ 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest prospective anti-PD-1 trial with mature data in advanced melanoma in China. Toripalimab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and durable clinical response in Chinese patients with metastatic melanoma who had failed in standard therapy. Immunotherapy seems less efficacious for long-term responders with mucosal primaries as rechallenge therapy.

Real-world outcomes of patients with resected stage III melanoma treated with adjuvant therapies

BACKGROUND

Both immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) are used as adjuvant (adj) treatment for stage III melanoma, however, data describing real-world outcomes are limited. In addition, a significant proportion of patients relapse, for whom best management is unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, and safety of adj anti-PD1 IO and TT in a real-world cohort of patients with resected stage III melanoma, and further delineate patterns of recurrence and treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 130 patients who received adj therapy (100 anti-PD1 IO and 30 TT).

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 30 months, median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 24.6 (95% CI, 17-not reached [NR]) versus 64 (95% CI, 29.5-NR) months for the TT and IO groups, respectively (p = 0.26). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for either subgroup. At data cutoff, 77% and 82% of patients in TT and IO arms were alive. A higher number of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were noted in the IO group (11% vs. 3%), however, a higher proportion of patients permanently discontinued adj therapy in the TT group (43% vs. 11%) due to toxicity. Strategies at relapse and outcomes were variable based on location and timing of recurrence. A significant number of patients who relapsed after adj IO received a second round of IO. Among them, patients who were off adj IO at relapse had superior second median RFS (mRFS2), compared to those who relapsed while on adj IO; mRFS2 was NR versus 5.1 months (95% CI, 2.5-NR), respectively, p = 0.02.

CONCLUSION

In summary, both TT and IO yielded prolonged RFS in a real-world setting, however, longer follow-up is needed to determine any potential OS benefit. Adj therapy, particularly TT, may not be as well tolerated as suggested in clinical trials, with lower completion rates (59% vs. 74%) in a real-life setting. Overall, patients who relapse during adj therapy have poor outcomes, while patients who relapse after discontinuation of adj IO therapy appear to benefit from IO re-treatment.

Benefit, recurrence pattern, and toxicity to adjuvant anti-PD-1 monotherapy varies by ethnicity and melanoma subtype: An international multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Anti-Program-Death-1 (PD-1) is a standard adjuvant therapy for patients with resected melanoma. We hypothesized that there are discrepancies in survival, recurrence pattern and toxicity to adjuvant PD-1 between different ethnicities and melanoma subtypes.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a multicenter cohort study incorporating 6 independent institutions in Australia, China, Japan, and the United States. The primary outcomes were recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease recurrence patterns and toxicities.

RESULTS

In total 534 patients were included. East-Asian/Hispanic/African reported significantly poorer RFS/OS. Nonacral cutaneous or melanoma of unknown primary reported the best RFS/OS, followed by acral, and mucosal was the poorest. Within the nonacral cutaneous or melanoma of unknown primary subtypes, East-Asian/Hispanic/African reported significantly poorer RFS/OS than Caucasian. In the multivariate analysis incorporating ethnicity/melanoma-subtype/age/sex/stage/lactate dehydrogenase/BRAF (v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B)-mutation/adjuvant radiotherapy, East-Asian/Hispanic/African had independently significantly poorer outcomes (RFS: HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.19-2.44 and OS: HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.39-3.95), as was mucosal subtype (RFS: HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.04-5.17 and OS: HR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.68-6.08). Mucosal melanoma was an independent risk factor for distant metastasis, especially liver metastasis. East-Asian/Hispanic/African had significantly lower incidence of gastrointestinal/musculoskeletal/respiratory/other-rare-type-toxicities; but higher incidences of liver toxicities.

LIMITATIONS

A retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnicity and melanoma subtype are associated with survival and recurrence pattern in melanoma patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1. Toxicity profile differs by ethnicity and may require a precision toxicity surveillance strategy.

Dual CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first-in-human, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.

METHODS

The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose-escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3.

RESULTS

Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high-dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low-dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%).

CONCLUSION

CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)-naive and IO-refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA-4 with its ligands and increases T-cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD-1 and its ligands. In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti-programmed cell death protein (ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1)-naive microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti-PD-(L)1-refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CS1002 in combination with CS1003 had manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range and showed promising antitumor activities across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003. This supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.

Fatostatin promotes anti-tumor immunity by reducing SREBP2 mediated cholesterol metabolism in tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes

Aberrant lipid metabolism impacts intratumoral T cell-mediated immune response and tumor growth. Fatostatin functions as an inhibitor of sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) activation. However, the complex effects of fatostatin on cholesterol metabolism in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its influence on T cell anti-tumor immunity remain unclear. In this study, fatostatin effectively suppressed B16 melanoma, MC38 colon cancer, and Lewis lung cancer (LLC) transplanted tumor growth in immunocompetent mice by reducing SREBPs-mediated lipid metabolism, especially cholesterol levels. Mechanistically, fatostatin decreased intracellular cholesterol accumulation and inhibited X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1)-mediated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, reducing Treg cells and alleviating CD8+ T cell exhaustion in the TME, exerting anti-tumor activity. Nevertheless， this effect was impaired in immunodeficient nude mice, suggesting fatostatin's anti-tumor efficacy in transplanted tumors partly relies on T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity. Our study highlights SREBP2-mediated cholesterol metabolism as a potential strategy for anti-tumor immunotherapy, and confirms fatostatin's promise in tumor immunotherapy.

Cancer Immunotherapy and Medical Imaging Research Trends from 2003 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis

Purpose

With the rapid development of immunotherapy, cancer treatment has entered a new phase. Medical imaging, as a primary diagnostic method, is closely related to cancer immunotherapy. However, until now, there has been no systematic bibliometric analysis of the state of this field. Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to clarify the past research trajectory, summarize current research hotspots, reveal dynamic scientific developments, and explore future research directions.

Patients and Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database to identify publications related to immunotherapy specifically for the medical imaging of carcinoma. The search spanned the period from the year 2003 to 2023. Several analytical tools were employed. These included CiteSpace (6.2.4), and the Microsoft Office Excel (2016).

Results

By searching the database, a total of 704 English articles published between 2003 and 2023 were obtained. We have observed a rapid increase in the number of publications since 2018. The two most active countries are the United States (n=265) and China (n=170). Pittock, Sean J and Abu-sbeih, Hamzah are very concerned about the relationship between cancer immunotherapy and medical images and have published more academic papers (n = 5; n = 4). Among the top 10 co-cited authors, Topalian Sl (n=43) cited ranked first, followed by Graus F (n=40) cited. According to clustering, timeline, and burst word analysis, the results show that the current research focus is on "MRI", "deep learning", "tumor microenvironment" and so on.

Conclusion

Medical imaging and cancer immunotherapy are hot topics. The United States is the country with the most publications and the greatest influence in this field, followed by China. "MRI", "PET/PET-CT", "deep learning", "immune-related adverse events" and "tumor microenvironment" are currently hot research topics and potential targets.