High-Dose Once-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CALGB 30610 (Alliance)/RTOG 0538

Single-arm phase II study of consolidation serplulimab following hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with limited stage small-cell lung cancer: ASTRUM-LC01 study protocol

INTRODUCTION

With the inspiring results of the PACIFIC trial in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the CAPIAN and IMpower133 trials in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), immunotherapy has increasingly gained attention. Serplulimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, showed great antitumour activity in the ASTRUM-005 trial and has been recommended as first-line therapy in extensive-stage SCLC. Whether serplulimab following hypofractionation radiotherapy and chemotherapy could bring better outcomes in limited-stage SCLC remains to be answered.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a prospective multicentre single-arm phase II clinical trial to evaluate both the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy and consolidation by serplulimab in limited-stage SCLC. Eligible patients will receive standard chemotherapy for four cycles and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy with a total dose of 45 Gy in 3 weeks and a 3 Gy dose per fraction. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended for responding patients. Serplulimab will be delivered afterwards every 3 weeks for up to 1 year. Based on sample size estimation, 55 patients will be enrolled in total.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the Independent Ethics Committee of National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (22/236-3438).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05443646.

Unlocking the Radiosensitizing Potential of MYC Inhibition in Neuroendocrine Malignancies

The MYC family of transcription factors-comprising c-MYC, N-MYC, and L-MYC-plays a pivotal role in oncogenesis, driving cancer progression and resistance to therapy. While MYC proteins have long been considered challenging drug targets due to their intricate structures, recent advances have led to the development of promising inhibitors. This review explores the role of MYC overexpression in promoting radiation therapy resistance in aggressive neuroendocrine malignancies through multiple mechanisms, including increased tumor cell invasion, enhanced DNA damage repair and oxidative stress management, prosurvival autophagy, survival of circulating tumor cells, angiogenesis, awakening from dormancy, and modulation of chronic inflammation and host immunity. Paradoxically, MYC overexpression can also enhance radiosensitivity in certain cancer cells by driving proapoptotic pathways, such as reactive oxygen species-induced DNA damage that overwhelms cellular repair mechanisms, ultimately leading to cell death. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive summary of direct MYC inhibitors, detailing their current stage of preclinical and clinical development as novel anticancer therapeutics. This review highlights the role of MYC in cancer metastasis and radiation therapy resistance while examining the potential of MYC inhibitors as radiosensitizers in adult and pediatric neuroendocrine malignancies, including small cell lung cancer, large cell neuroendocrine lung cancer, Merkel cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine-differentiated prostate cancer, neuroblastoma, central nervous system embryonal tumors, and medulloblastoma.

Dose Planning and Radiation Optimization for Thoracic Conventional, Twice Daily, and Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: A Delphi Consensus From a National Survey of Practitioners

PURPOSE

We sent surveys to a large number of radiation oncologists with active thoracic cancer practices and applied the Delphi method over 3 rounds to generate consensus dose-volume histogram metrics. We used these results to create consensus-based organs-at-risk dose constraints and target goal templates for practical implementation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this institutional review board-approved study, data were collected using REDCap electronic data capture on a secure server. Radiation oncologists identified from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited departments' websites were asked to confirm their self-identification as thoracic radiation oncologists and nominate other respondents. All invitees were asked to complete 3 rounds of questions related to normal tissue constraints, target coverage metrics, prescribing practices, and other planning considerations. Preliminary consensus statements were presented in the second round of surveys for voting on a 5-point Likert scale. The third and last round of surveys presented the iterated consensus statements and target coverage metric statements for final voting. The high consensus was predefined as ≥ 75% agreement.

RESULTS

Eighty-three (42.8%) of 194 invitees completed at least 1 round of surveys. The group included a diversity of gender, geography, and clinical settings. Response rates were 83%, 57%, and 55%, respectively, for the 3 rounds. By the end of the process, 48 of 96 (50%) originally proposed normal tissue dose constraint statements were iterated to consensus, and 5 of 7 (71%) proposed target coverage metric statements achieved consensus. These were used to create crowdsourced treatment planning templates.

CONCLUSION

This study achieved broad-based consensus-building on ideal and acceptable dose constraints for conventional, twice-daily, and stereotactic thoracic radiation therapy. Future directions could include extending this approach to other disease sites, studying the influence of widespread implementation on treatment planning, or facilitating the development of community consensus around emergent or controversial questions.

High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited-Stage SCLC: Final Survival Data, Long-Term Toxicity, and Relapse Patterns in a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Trial

INTRODUCTION

Chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for limited-stage SCLC. However, most patients relapse and there is a need for better treatment. We investigated whether twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) of 60 Gy/40 fractions improves survival compared with the established schedule of 45 Gy/30 fractions. Here, we report final survival data and long-term toxicity.

METHODS

Randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Eligible patients had performance status of 0 to 2, were above or equal to 18 years of age, underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography and brain magnetic resonance imaging for staging, and were randomized 1:1 to TRT of 60 or 45 Gy. Patients were to receive four courses of platinum and etoposide chemotherapy, and responders were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients were randomized (60 Gy: n = 89, 45 Gy: n = 81). Median age was 65 years, 31% above or equal to 70 years, 57% women, 89% had performance status of 0 to 1, 83% stage III disease, median planning target volume was 305 cm3, and 67% were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Median overall survival in the 60 Gy group was significantly longer (43.5 versus 22.5 mo, hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.98, p = 0.037). The 60 Gy group did not experience more acute grades 3 to 4 esophagitis (60 Gy: 21%, 45 Gy: 18%, p = 0.83) or pneumonitis (60 Gy: 3%, 45 Gy: 0%, p = 0.39). Two patients, both in the 60 Gy group, developed esophageal strictures, whereas 11 patients (60 Gy: n = 5, 45 Gy: n = 6) developed severe long-term eating and swallowing dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Twice-daily TRT of 60 Gy/40 fractions was well tolerated and prolonged survival compared with 45 Gy/30 fractions in patients with limited-stage SCLC. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02041845.

Epidemiology of SCLC in the United States From 2000 to 2019: A Study Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry

Introduction

From the late 1980s to 2000, SCLC represented a decreasing proportion of lung cancer cases in the United States. Nevertheless, survival outcomes in SCLC did not improve, reflecting the paucity of treatment advances. We sought to determine whether these trends continued into more recent decades, before the Food and Drug Administration approval of immunotherapy for SCLC in 2019, by evaluating the incidence and survival of SCLC from 2000 to 2019 in the United States population, with attention to variance across gender and racial subgroups.

Methods

Using the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 17 database, we evaluated the incidence of SCLC and NSCLC from 2000 to 2019. Demographic, staging, and survival data were collected for patients with SCLC by comparing the incidence and outcomes across groups.

Results

The percentage of SCLC among all newly diagnosed lung cancer cases decreased from 14.5% in 2000 to 11.8% in 2019. A decrease in SCLC incidence was observed in all sex and racial subgroups but was earlier and steeper in men than in women. This has resulted in a shift in the male-to-female ratio from 1.14:1 in 2000 to 0.93:1 in 2019. Among the racial subgroups, the incidence of SCLC declined most slowly in non-Hispanic Whites and most rapidly in non-Hispanic Asians and Pacific Islanders. There was a decline in limited-stage SCLC at diagnosis, from 31.1% in 2000 to 26.4% in 2019. Minimal improvement was observed in survival regardless of patient characteristics or stage.

Conclusions

In the preimmunotherapy era of 2000 to 2019, the incidence of SCLC continued to decline in both sexes and all racial subgroups. The male-to-female ratio continued to narrow with women outnumbering men in the most recent years. The proportion of patients with limited-stage disease continues to decline, likely because of improved staging procedures. The outcomes improved slightly but remained poor, highlighting the need for more effective treatment strategies.

Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review

Importance

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma with an incidence of 4.7 cases per 100 000 individuals in 2021 in the US and a 5-year overall survival of 12% to 30%.

Observations

Cigarette smoking is the primary risk factor for development of SCLC, as 95% of patients diagnosed with SCLC have a history of tobacco use. Patients with SCLC may present with respiratory symptoms such as cough (40%), shortness of breath (34%), hemoptysis (10%), or metastases with corresponding local symptoms (30%) such as pleuritis or bone pain; approximately 60% of patients with SCLC may be asymptomatic at diagnosis. Chest imaging may demonstrate central hilar (85%) or mediastinal lymphadenopathy (75%). At diagnosis, approximately 15% of patients have brain metastases, which may present as headache or focal weakness. Diagnosis is confirmed by biopsy of a primary lung mass, thoracic lymph node, or metastatic lesion. Small cell lung cancer is classified into limited stage (LS-SCLC; 30%) vs extensive stage (ES-SCLC; 70%) based on whether the disease can be treated within a radiation field that is typically confined to 1 hemithorax but may include contralateral mediastinal and supraclavicular nodes. For patients with LS-SCLC, surgery or concurrent chemotherapy with platinum-etoposide and radiotherapy is potentially curative in 30% of patients. More recently, median survival for LS-SCLC has reached up to 55.9 months with the addition of durvalumab, an immunotherapy. First-line treatment for ES-SCLC is combined treatment with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy and immunotherapy with the programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors durvalumab or atezolizumab followed by maintenance immunotherapy until disease progression or toxicity. Although initial rates of tumor shrinkage are 60% to 70% with platinum-etoposide and immunotherapy treatment, the median overall survival of patients treated for ES-SCLC is approximately 12 to 13 months, with 60% of patients relapsing within 3 months. Second-line therapy for patients with ES-SCLC includes the DNA-alkylating agent lurbinectedin (35% overall response rate; median progression-free survival, 3.7 months) and a bispecific T-cell engager against delta-like ligand 3, tarlatamab (40% overall response rate; median progression-free survival, 4.9 months).

Conclusions and Relevance

Small cell lung cancer is a smoking-related malignancy that presents at an advanced stage in 70% of patients. Three-year overall survival is approximately 56.5% for LS-SCLC and 17.6% for ES-SCLC. First-line treatment for LS-SCLC is radiation targeting the tumor given concurrently with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation immunotherapy. For ES-SCLC, first-line treatment is chemotherapy and immunotherapy followed by maintenance immunotherapy.

[New perspectives in the management of small cell bronchial cancer]

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains one of the most aggressive cancers, with an overall survival of approximately one year for patients with extensive stage SCLC, and we still have very few effective therapies, especially after the first line of treatment. A better understanding of SCLC and their mechanisms, especially molecular mechanisms, has led to the exploration of new therapeutic strategies. For example, transcriptomic analyses have identified 4 subtypes of CBPC, which could be predictive of response to treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited benefit in extensive stage SCLC, but appear to have a clear benefit for limited stage SCLC, in association with radio-chemotherapy. Anti- PARP molecules, involved in DNA repair and aberrantly expressed in CBPC, have been studied. New molecules have been developed, to bypass antigen presentation, which is defective in SCLC; such as bispecific T-cell engager molecules, that binds to SCLC cells and patient's cytotoxic T-cell, leading to T-cell activation and tumor lysis. These molecules target tumor cell's surface proteins, such as delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3), aberrantly expressed on the surface of most SCLC cells. Tarlamab, a DLL3-targeted immune therapy, has shown very promising durable responses in patients with previously treated SCLC. These new molecules lead to new side effects we will have to manage, such as the Cytokine Relargage Syndrome. Other molecules, targeting DLL3 or other pathways are still ungoing clinical evaluation, we should see further advances in the treatment of SCLC over the coming years.

Facility-Level Disparities in Radiation Use for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) with twice-a-day radiation therapy (RT) has remained the standard of care for many decades. Growing evidence suggests that outcomes with dose escalated twice-a-day RT may further improve outcomes. However, once-daily treatment remains common. The purpose of this study was to evaluate individual treatment facilities for utilization of twice-a-day RT.

METHODS

Patients with LS-SCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation from 2004 to 2019 were identified in the National Cancer Database. RT was classified as twice-a-day (45 Gy in 30 fractions) or once-daily (59.4-70.2 Gy in 30-39 fractions). Patients were excluded if surgery was performed. All patients received doublet chemotherapy. Unique treatment facilities delivering at least one twice-a-day treatment course during the study period were classified as BID-treating. Facilities not delivering any twice-a-day RT were classified as QD-only. The proportion of QD-only facilities was identified. Facility-level characteristics associated with QD-only classification were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 22,362 patients with LS-SCLC were treated at 1,222 unique facilities. A slight majority of facilities (n = 644, 52.7%) were BID-treating, whereas fewer (n = 578, 47.3%) were QD-only. A total of 73.9% of academic facilities were BID-treating versus 48.3% of nonacademic facility types (P < .001). Only 20.7% of low volume treatment facilities (lowest quartile of patients with LS-SCLC treated) used twice-a-day fractionation versus 78.2% of the highest quartile volume facilities (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, academic and high-volume facilities were statistically significantly associated with BID-treating classification (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5 [P < .001] and 4.2 [P < .001], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of facilities treating LS-SCLC with definitive chemoradiation do not use twice-a-day fractionation schedules despite ongoing and growing evidence of superiority to once-daily fractionation. High-volume, academic facilities were more likely to offer twice-a-day fractionation.

Evolving Field of Immunotherapy: Pioneering New Paths in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer that displays rapid proliferation and early metastatic potential. It accounts for approximately 15% of lung cancers and is strongly associated with tobacco carcinogens. Despite patients' initial response to systemic therapy, the majority develop early resistance and relapse. The outcomes of patients with metastatic SCLC are poor, prompting the need for new therapies. Over the past decade, the treatment landscape for NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) has significantly changed with the immergence of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, inroads of these therapies into SCLC have posed significant challenges due to its molecular and genomic heterogeneity. Despite the challenges of this disease, promising new first-in-class immunomodulatory agents have emerged and are currently undergoing extensive research. Herein, we review the current treatment paradigm of immunotherapy in SCLC and discuss future directions of this evolving field.

A simplified scoring system for predicting treatment response in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (EAST score)

AIMS

This study aimed at developing a scoring system (EAST score) to predict recurrence after chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

PATIENTS & METHODS

Treatment-naïve LS-SCLC patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (N = 234) or sequential chemoradiotherapy (N = 53) were retrospectively reviewed. Using data from CCRT population, clinical and radiological variables associated with disease progression were identified. Selected variables were assigned numerical scores based on their estimated hazard ratios (HRs), and the EAST score was established.

RESULTS

EAST score incorporated N3 disease and serum biomarkers (lactate dehydrogenase, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide, and cytokeratin-19 fragment). In the CCRT population, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in the high-risk group (EAST score ≥ 2) than the low-risk group (EAST score ≤ 1) (median, 9.4 months vs. 20.6 months; HR [95% confidence interval (CI)], 2.09 [1.50-2.91]). As for the model performance, the 1- and 2-year area under the curve values for PFS were 0.68 and 0.65, respectively. Overall survival was also shorter in the high-risk group (HR [95% CI], 1.49 [1.02-2.16]). Similar trends were observed in the sequential chemoradiotherapy population (HR for PFS [95% CI], 2.43 [1.07-5.53]).

CONCLUSIONS

EAST score effectively predicts recurrence risk in LS-SCLC, demonstrating the necessity for developing new treatment strategies for high-risk patients.

The role of radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a new paradigm for the radiation oncologist

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor that presents in most cases as a metastatic disease. The prognosis is poor, but the advent of immunotherapy has rekindled hopes for outcomes. Radiotherapy plays a crucial role in this oncological scenario, and there are still many open questions on the correct application of radiotherapy and its integration with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. These issues are of great interest to the oncology community; among these, in particular, there are the choice of optimal fractionation and total dose for thoracic radiotherapy in limited SCLC and its biological implications, the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation and thoracic consolidation in the context of modern treatments with chemoimmunotherapy in extensive SCLC, the role and indications of stereotactic radiotherapy in oligometastatic scenario and finally the complex clinical and multidisciplinary management of SCLC. This perspective article aims to describe the strengths and limitations of the role of radiotherapy in SCLC, highlighting the critical role of radiotherapy and the radiation oncologist, with the need to implement specific knowledge and skills on SCLC.

TRAIL agonists rescue mice from radiation-induced lung, skin, or esophageal injury

Radiotherapy can be limited by pneumonitis, which is impacted by innate immunity, including pathways regulated by TRAIL death receptor DR5. We investigated whether DR5 agonists could rescue mice from toxic effects of radiation and found that 2 different agonists, parenteral PEGylated trimeric TRAIL (TLY012) and oral TRAIL-inducing compound (TIC10/ONC201), could reduce pneumonitis, alveolar wall thickness, and oxygen desaturation. Lung protection extended to late effects of radiation including less fibrosis at 22 weeks in TLY012-rescued survivors versus unrescued surviving irradiated mice. Wild-type orthotopic breast tumor-bearing mice receiving 20 Gy thoracic radiation were protected from pneumonitis with disappearance of tumors. At the molecular level, radioprotection appeared to be due to inhibition of CCL22, a macrophage-derived chemokine previously associated with radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis. Treatment with anti-CCL22 reduced lung injury in vivo but less so than TLY012. Pneumonitis severity was worse in female versus male mice, and this was associated with increased expression of X-linked TLR7. Irradiated mice had reduced esophagitis characterized by reduced epithelial disruption and muscularis externa thickness following treatment with the ONC201 analog ONC212. The discovery that short-term treatment with TRAIL pathway agonists effectively rescues animals from pneumonitis, dermatitis, and esophagitis following high doses of thoracic radiation exposure has important translational implications.

Quality of life outcomes in patients participating in the CALGB 30610 trial (CALGB 70702): Alliance

BACKGROUND

CALGB 30610 trial demonstrated that once daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) was not superior compared to standard twice daily TRT, in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer. Quality of life outcomes may help oncologists decide the best treatment approach.

METHODS

A total of 417 patients on CALGB 30610 participated in the quality-of-life substudy (CALGB 70702), which included the FACT Trial Outcome Index-Lung Cancer (FACT-L TOI), FACT-Esophageal Cancer (FACT-E) Eating and Swallowing Indices, ECOG Acute Esophagitis Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), difficulty swallowing, EQ-5D, and treatment convenience assessment at baseline, 3, 5, 7, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after starting TRT. Primary end points included FACT-L TOI and FACT-E at 12 weeks. Mean changes from baseline were compared between arms using general linear mixed models.

RESULTS

FACT-L worsening was more in the twice daily arm at week 3 (-1.0 vs. -7.0). FACT-L TOI worsening was less at week 3 (-2.9 vs. -7.6) and greater at week 12 (-7.6 vs. -2.8) in the once daily arm. The once daily arm had a lower EQ-5D index worsening at 3 weeks (0.01 vs. -0.02). Increase in acute esophagitis score (1.06 vs. 2.89; p < .001) and difficulty swallowing (0.39 vs. 1.14) were greater in the twice daily arm at week 3. A total of 74.5% of patients on the once daily arm felt that treatment was convenient, compared to 67% of patients in the twice daily arm (p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

The once daily arm had better quality-of-life scores earlier during treatment and was perceived to be more convenient.

Immunotherapy for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Innovative Treatments and Future Perspectives

BackgroundLimited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is a highly aggressive tumor characterized by a poor prognosis. While concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) remains the standard treatment, the high rates of recurrence and poor long-term survival highlight the pressing need for novel therapeutic approaches.PurposeIn recent years, the introduction of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has opened new avenues for the treatment of LS-SCLC. This review highlights the clinical advancements of ICIs in CCRT, consolidation therapy, and neoadjuvant therapy, emphasizing their potential to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This review also discusses management of immunotherapy-related side effects.Research DesignThis is a review article that synthesizes recent research findings on immunotherapy for LS-SCLC.Study SampleNot applicable (review of existing literature).Data Collection and/or AnalysisThis review summarizes key studies exploring the application of immunotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer.Additionally, it examines the role of the tumor microenvironment, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1(PD-L1) as biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy.ResultsThis review emphasizes their potential to improve PFS and OS.ConclusionsDespite the significant advancements in research, the use of ICIs in LS-SCLC continues to face challenges, including the identification of optimal treatment regimens, validation of long-term efficacy, and development of personalized predictive biomarkers. Future research should prioritize large-scale, multicenter clinical trials to refine combination therapy strategies, establish customized treatment approaches, and enhance patient outcomes.

Role of consolidative thoracic and prophylactic cranial radiation in extensive stage small cell lung cancer in chemo-immunotherapy era

INTRODUCTION

The role of consolidative thoracic and prophylactic brain radiation for extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients is controversial. We investigated the factors associated with the use of any radiation therapy (RT) and whether RT has a benefit to overall survival (OS) in patients receiving any systemic therapy and whether this benefit is the same if Chemotherapy (CT) or chemo-immunotherapy (CT-IO) is used.

MATERIAL/METHODS

The NCDB database was queried from years 2017-2019. Patients receiving systemic therapy- STX (CT or CT-IO) had to have at least 6 months of follow-up and have no brain metastases at diagnosis. All RT patients had to receive upfront systemic therapy, be treated 2-6 months from diagnosis, and if treated to the brain received 25 Gy in 10 fractions only. Multi-variable analyses (MVA) were used to determine factors associated with OS and selection for any radiation. Propensity matching for factors affecting OS were used to generate Kaplan-Meier OS curves. Log-rank tests were used to determine differences in Kaplan Meier survival curves for the effects of RT on OS.

RESULTS

The total number of patients receiving RT/STX or STX alone as well as their median follow-up (months) were (890, 17.0 mn) and (6898, 14.0mn). The median time to the start of STX and RT were 22.9 days and 152 days, respectively. MVA noted that RT had a greater effect on OS (Thorax, Brain, Both Brain/Thorax - HRs = 0.80, 0.77, 0.70) than other interventions including IO (HR 0.87) and palliative care without RT (HR 1.06). Selection for radiation depended significantly upon factors affecting OS (HR) including lack of liver metastases, females, age and Charlson co-morbidity index, but did not depend upon insurance status, race, or county income/high school graduation rates. Propensity-score matched OS curves noted the same significant effects of RT on OS in those receiving CT +/- IO, CT-IO, and CT alone with HRs of 0.68/0.68/0.68 for thoracic RT, 0.72/0.72/0.70 for brain RT, and 0.60/0.60/0.60 for brain/thoracic RT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient with extensive stage small cell lung cancer who reach candidacy and receive RT may have a significant improvement in OS compared to the patients treated only with CT or CT-IO. Combined thoracic and prophylactic brain RT seems to be better than either one alone. The impact of radiation whether given to one or two sites may be more beneficial than immunotherapy added to chemotherapy.

Systemic Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update

ASCO Rapid Recommendation Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).

Associations Between Patient-Reported Nutritional Status, Toxicity, and Survival in Limited-Stage SCLC

Introduction

In general, malnutrition is associated with more treatment toxicity and shorter survival in patients with cancer, but little is known about its impact on limited-stage (LS) SCLC. We investigated whether nutritional status and weight loss were associated with treatment outcomes in a randomized trial of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in LS SCLC (NCT02041845, N = 170).

Methods

Patients received platinum-etoposide-chemotherapy and were randomized to receive TRT of 60 Gy in 40 fractions or 45 Gy in 30 fractions. They reported nutritional status on the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) and were categorized as having low (PG-SGA SF score 0-3), intermediate (score 4-8), or high (score ≥ 9) malnutrition risk.

Results

In total, 113 patients who completed the PG-SGA SF at baseline and received one or more fractions of TRT were analyzed. Median PG-SGA SF score was 3.0; 52.2% had low, 29.2% intermediate, and 18.6% had high malnutrition risk; and 22.1% had 5% or more weight loss three months before enrolment. There were no significant differences in grade 3 to 4 toxicity (low: 88.1%, intermediate: 90.9%, high: 85.7%; p = 0.86), median progression-free survival (low: 15.8 months, intermediate: 11.8 months, high: 47.0 months; p = 0.25) or median OS (low: 35.5 months, intermediate: 26.8 months, high: 47.0 months; p = 0.24) across malnutrition categories. Weight loss was not significantly associated with grade 3 to 4 toxicity (≥5%: 92.0%, <5%: 87.0%; p = 0.73), median progression-free survival (≥5%: 24.0 months, <5%: 15.9 months; p = 0.51) or median OS (≥5%: 30.6 months, <5%: 35.5 months; p = 0.74).

Conclusion

Patient-reported nutritional status and weight loss before concurrent chemoradiotherapy were neither associated with toxicity nor survival.

A Phase I First-in-Human Study of ABBV-011, a Seizure-Related Homolog Protein 6-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Seizure-related homolog protein 6 (SEZ6) is a novel target expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). ABBV-011, a SEZ6-targeted antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, was evaluated in a phase I study (NCT03639194) in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. We report initial outcomes of ABBV-011 monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ABBV-011 was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks during dose escalation (0.3-2 mg/kg) and expansion. Patients with SEZ6-positive tumors (≥25% of tumor cells with ≥1+ staining intensity by IHC) were preselected for expansion. Safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated.

RESULTS

As of August 2022, 99 patients received ABBV-011 monotherapy [dose escalation, n = 36; Japanese dose evaluation, n = 3; dose expansion, n = 60 (1 mg/kg, n = 40)]; the median age was 63 years (range, 41-79 years). Also, 32%, 41%, and 26% of patients received 1, 2, and ≥3 prior therapies, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached through 2.0 mg/kg. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (50%), nausea (42%), and thrombocytopenia (41%). The most common hepatic treatment-emergent adverse events were increased aspartate aminotransferase (22%), increased γ-glutamyltransferase (21%), and hyperbilirubinemia (17%); two patients experienced veno-occlusive liver disease. The objective response rate was 19% (19/98). In the 1-mg/kg dose-expansion cohort (n = 40), the objective response rate was 25%; the median response duration was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval, 2.6-6.7); and the median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.2).

CONCLUSIONS

ABBV-011 1.0 mg/kg every 3 weeks monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. SEZ6 is a promising novel SCLC target and warrants further investigation.

Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy with durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, may have efficacy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer who do not have disease progression after standard concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients to receive durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg, durvalumab (1500 mg) plus tremelimumab at a dose of 75 mg (four doses only), or placebo every 4 weeks for up to 24 months. Randomization was stratified according to disease stage (I or II vs. III) and receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation (yes vs. no). Results of the first planned interim analysis of the two primary end points of overall survival and progression-free survival (assessed on the basis of blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) with durvalumab as compared with placebo (data cutoff date, January 15, 2024) are reported; results in the durvalumab-tremelimumab group remain blinded.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients were assigned to the durvalumab group, 200 to the durvalumab-tremelimumab group, and 266 to the placebo group. Durvalumab therapy led to significantly longer overall survival than placebo (median, 55.9 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 37.3 to not reached] vs. 33.4 months [95% CI, 25.5 to 39.9]; hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 98.321% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = 0.01), as well as to significantly longer progression-free survival (median 16.6 months [95% CI, 10.2 to 28.2] vs. 9.2 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.9]; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.76; 97.195% CI, 0.59 to 0.98; P = 0.02). The incidence of adverse events with a maximum grade of 3 or 4 was 24.4% among patients receiving durvalumab and 24.2% among patients receiving placebo; adverse events led to discontinuation in 16.4% and 10.6% of the patients, respectively, and led to death in 2.7% and 1.9%. Pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis with a maximum grade of 3 or 4 occurred in 3.1% of the patients in the durvalumab group and in 2.6% of those in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant therapy with durvalumab led to significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo among patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ADRIATIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03703297.).

Prognostic Factors in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of CALGB 30610-RTOG 0538

Importance

The impact of patient-specific, disease-related, and social factors on outcomes in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is not well defined. A post hoc secondary analysis of such factors from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 30610-Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0538 trial may impact future trial design.

Objective

To assess the comprehensive demographic, disease-related, treatment-related, and social factors for potential associations with survival outcomes and understand whether specific subpopulations may benefit from radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation in LS-SCLC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This post hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 638 adults with LS-SCLC treated at 186 unique treatment sites with at least 1 accrual for all patients from March 15, 2008, to December 1, 2019; 313 patients were randomized to receive RT twice daily to a dosage of 45 Gy for 3 weeks and 325 to receive RT once daily to a dosage of 70 Gy for 7 weeks. Data were locked February 28, 2022, and analyzed from November 28, 2022, to June 4, 2024.

Interventions

Twice-daily RT or once-daily RT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of treatment groups and other risk factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patient-specific factors included age, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Disease-related factors included tumor, nodal, and overall cancer stages. Treatment-related factors included type of chemotherapy, timing of concurrent RT, RT technique, and prophylactic cranial irradiation. Social factors included marital status and treatment center accrual volume.

Results

Among 507 patients (260 [51.3%] female and 247 [48.7%] male; mean [SD] age, 62.6 [7.9] years) included in the multivariate survival analysis, with a median follow-up of 4.7 (IQR, 3.7-7.1) years, female sex was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.58-0.91]; P = .006), while being 70 years or older was associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.14-1.98]; P = .004). Neither age nor sex was associated with PFS. When compared with those with N1 disease, OS and PFS were worse in patients with N2 (HRs, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.19-2.26]; P = .002 and 1.36 [95% CI, 1.02-1.81]; P = .04, respectively) and N3 (HRs, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.40-2.93]; P < .001 and 1.63 [95% CI, 1.17-2.26]; P = .004) disease. Compared with stage II cancer, OS was worse for stage IIIA (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.17-2.31]; P = .004) and stage IIIB (HR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.34-2.83]; P < .001). Compared with high-volume accrual centers, treatment at low- or middle-volume accrual centers was associated with worse PFS (HRs, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.33-2.82; P < .001] and 1.44 [95% CI, 1.15-1.82; P = .002], respectively) and worse OS (HRs, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.03-2.32; P = .03] and 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.70; P = .02], respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance

This secondary analysis of the CALGB 30610-RTOG 0538 randomized clinical trial of patients with LS-SCLC found associations between female sex or being younger than 70 years and improved overall survival and between advanced nodal stage or treatment at low- or middle-volume accrual centers and worse outcomes. These findings suggest that stratification by nodal stage, clinical stage, and age should be considered in future randomized trials.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00632853.

Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans in a Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing 2 Schedules of Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

There is limited clinical data for recommendations on how to deliver thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) concurrently with chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer. We reviewed radiation therapy treatment plans in a randomized phase 2 trial comparing high-dose with standard-dose twice-daily TRT to assess treatment planning techniques, dose-volume data for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs), evaluate compliance with the protocol, associations with radiation-induced toxicity, and whether an imbalance in treatment planning parameters might be a reason for the large survival benefit of the higher dose (median overall survival 43.6 vs 22.6 months).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In the study, 170 patients were to receive 4 courses of platinum/etoposide and were randomized to receive twice-daily TRT of 60 Gy/40 fractions (fx) or 45 Gy/30 fx. TRT treatment plans for those who received 1 or more fx of TRT (n = 166) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The most common treatment planning technique was 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (67%). The 75th percentile of the reported dose-volume parameters for the OARs were within the protocol-recommended limits for both groups. Mean doses to the esophagus of 25.5 Gy (IQR, 20.2-31.3; 60 Gy/40 fx) and 24.3 Gy (IQR, 20.3-27.5; 45 Gy/30 fx) were associated with 21% and 18% ≥ grade 3 acute esophagitis, respectively. In the 60 Gy/40 fx group, a mean dose to the lungs of 16.5 Gy (IQR, 15.8-16.9), V20 Gy of 29.5% (IQR, 28.8-30.4), and V5 Gy of 65.6% (IQR, 61.5-68.7) led to ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in 4% of the patients. There was no ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in the 45 Gy/30 fx group. The treatment planning techniques, the percentage change in volumes between original and redelineated OARs, planning target volumes, relative doses, and laterality were well balanced between the randomly assigned groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the incidences of severe radiation-induced toxicities were within the range of other recent trials, the reported doses to the OARs appear to be safe. Treatment planning parameters were well balanced between the randomly assigned groups, supporting that the survival benefit of the twice-daily 60 Gy/40 fx TRT schedule was due to the higher dose.

High-dose hyperfractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy versus standard-dose radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in China: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

For the past 20 years, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy has been the treatment of choice for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), which has a poor prognosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose, accelerated, hyperfractionated, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (54 Gy in 30 fractions) versus standard-dose radiotherapy (45 Gy in 30 fractions) as a first-line treatment for LS-SCLC.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was performed at 16 public hospitals in China. The key inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 years, with histologically or cytologically confirmed LS-SCLC, who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and who were previously untreated or had received one course of cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) of 45 Gy in 30 fractions to the gross tumour volume or VMAT with a simultaneous integrated boost of 54 Gy in 30 fractions to the gross tumour volume starting 0-42 days after the first chemotherapy course. Both groups received 10 fractions of twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy per week. The planning target volume was 45 Gy in 30 fractions in both groups. Patients with responsive disease received prophylactic cranial radiotherapy (25 Gy in 10 fractions). Randomisation was performed using a centralised interactive web response system, stratified by ECOG performance status, disease stage, previous chemotherapy course, and chemotherapy choice. The primary outcome was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in the as-treated population. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03214003.

FINDINGS

From June 30, 2017, to April 6, 2021, 224 patients (102 [46%] females and 122 [54%] males; median age 64 years [IQR 58-68]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the 54 Gy group (n=108) or 45 Gy (n=116) group. The median follow-up was 46 months (IQR 33-56). The median overall survival was significantly longer in the 54 Gy group (60·7 months [95% CI 49·2-62·0]) than in the 45 Gy group (39·5 months [27·5-51·4]; hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·37-0·72]; p=0·003). Treatment was tolerable, and the chemotherapy-related and radiotherapy-related toxicities were similar between the groups. The grade 3-4 radiotherapy toxicities were oesophagitis (14 [13%] of 108 patients in the 54 Gy group vs 14 [12%] of 116 patients in the 45 Gy group; p=0·84) and pneumonitis (five [5%] of 108 patients vs seven [6%] of 116 patients; p=0·663). Only one treatment-related death occurred in the 54 Gy group (myocardial infarction). The study was prematurely terminated by an independent data safety monitoring board on April 30, 2021, based on evidence of sufficient clinical benefit.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with standard-dose thoracic radiotherapy (45 Gy), high-dose radiotherapy (54 Gy) improved overall survival without increasing toxicity in a cohort of patients aged 18-70 years with LS-SCLC. Our results support the use of twice-daily accelerated thoracic radiotherapy (54 Gy) with concurrent chemotherapy as an alternative first-line LS-SCLC treatment option.

FUNDING

Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology-Linghang Cancer Research, the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation, and Clinical Research Fund For Distinguished Young Scholars of Peking University Cancer Hospital and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program.

Evidenced-Based Prior for Estimating the Treatment Effect of Phase III Randomized Trials in Oncology

PURPOSE

The primary results of phase III oncology trials may be challenging to interpret, given that results are generally based on P value thresholds. The probability of whether a treatment is beneficial, although more intuitive, is not usually provided. Here, we developed and released a user-friendly tool that calculates the probability of treatment benefit using trial summary statistics.

METHODS

We curated 415 phase III randomized trials enrolling 338,600 patients published between 2004 and 2020. A phase III prior probability distribution for the treatment effect was developed on the basis of a three-component zero-mean mixture distribution of the observed z-scores. Using this prior, we computed the probability of clinically meaningful benefit (hazard ratio [HR] <0.8). The distribution of signal-to-noise ratios and power of phase III oncology trials were compared with that of 23,551 randomized trials from the Cochrane Database.

RESULTS

The signal-to-noise ratios of phase III oncology trials tended to be much larger than randomized trials from the Cochrane Database. Still, the median power of phase III oncology trials was only 49% (IQR, 14%-95%), and the power was <80% in 65% of trials. Using the phase III oncology-specific prior, only 53% of trials claiming superiority (114 of 216) had a ≥90% probability of clinically meaningful benefits. Conversely, the probability that the experimental arm was superior to the control arm (HR <1) exceeded 90% in 17% of trials interpreted as having no benefit (34 of 199).

CONCLUSION

By enabling computation of contextual probabilities for the treatment effect from summary statistics, our robust, highly practical tool, now posted on a user-friendly webpage, can aid the wider oncology community in the interpretation of phase III trials.

Effect of FDG PET-CT for Staging and Radiotherapy Planning - A Comparison of Cohorts From Two Randomized Trials of Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited-Stage SCLC

Introduction

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is recommended for staging and defining target volume in limited-stage SCLC, though the impact on outcomes compared with CT staging and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) is not well documented. We analyzed patients receiving 45 Gy/30 fractions in two randomized trials of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited-stage SCLC (HAST and THORA trials) to evaluate whether PET-CT for staging and radiotherapy planning reduces radiotoxicity and improves survival.

Methods

Patients in HAST were staged with CT of the thorax and upper abdomen and brain magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Patients in THORA were staged with PET-CT in addition. All patients were to receive four courses of platinum/etoposide chemotherapy and concurrent TRT starting three to four weeks after the first chemotherapy course. In HAST, target volumes included pathological lesions on CT plus ENI of lymph node stations 4-7 (bilateral). In THORA, target volumes were limited to PET-CT-positive lesions (selective nodal irradiation [SNI]).

Results

A total of 149 patients were included (PET-CT/SNI: n = 76, CT/ENI: n=73); the median age was 64 years, 56% were women, 85% had PS 0 to 1, and 81% had stage III disease. The PET-CT/SNI group experienced less grade 3-4 esophagitis (18% versus 33%, p = 0.043), less grade >=1 pneumonitis (5% versus 16%, p = 0.028), and less dysphagia after TRT (mean scores on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 13-item lung cancer module: 45 versus 72). There was no difference in median overall survival (24 versus 25 mo, p = 0.59) or progression-free survival (11 versus 11 mo, p = 0.23).

Conclusions

Using PET-CT for staging and target volume definition of TRT reduces acute radiotoxicity but does not improve overall or progression-free survival in limited-stage SCLC.

Long-Term Outcomes After Concurrent Once- or Twice-Daily Chemoradiation in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Brief Report From the CONVERT Trial

PURPOSE

CONVERT was a phase 3 international randomized clinical trial comparing once-daily (OD) and twice-daily (BD) radiation therapy (RT). This updated analysis describes the 6.5-year outcomes of these regimens delivered with conformal techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

CONVERT (NCT00433563) randomized patients 1:1 between OD RT (66 Gy/33 fractions/6.5 weeks) and BD RT (45 Gy/30 fractions/3 weeks), both delivered with concurrent cisplatin/etoposide. Three-dimensional conformal RT was mandatory, intensity-modulated RT was permitted, and elective nodal irradiation was not allowed. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was delivered at the discretion of treating clinicians. RT treatment planning was subject to central quality assurance.

RESULTS

Five hundred forty-seven patients were recruited at 73 centers. The median follow-up for the surviving cohort (n = 164) was 81.2 months. The median survival for the OD and BD arms were 25.4 months (95% CI, 21.1-30.9) and 30.0 months (95% CI, 25.3-36.5; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.92-1.38; P = .247). Performance status and tumor volume were associated with survival on multivariate analysis. No treatment-related deaths occurred subsequent to the initial analysis performed in 2017. Regarding late toxicity, 7 patients in the OD arm developed grade 3 esophagitis, 4 of which went on to develop stricture or fistulation, compared with no patients in the BD arm. Grade 3 pulmonary fibrosis occurred in 2 and 3 patients in the OD and BD arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As the CONVERT trial did not demonstrate the superiority of OD RT and this regimen had a slightly worse toxicity profile after 80 months of follow-up, 45 Gy BD should remain the standard of care in limited stage small cell lung cancer.

The changing landscape of small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by rapid proliferation and early dissemination. The objective of this study was to examine the demographic trends and outcomes in SCLC.

METHODS

The authors queried the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to assess the trends in incidence, demographics, staging, and survival for SCLC from 1975 to 2019. Trends were determined using joinpoint analysis according to the year of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among the 530,198 patients with lung cancer, there were 73,362 (13.8%) with SCLC. The incidence per 100,000 population peaked at 15.3 in 1986 followed by a decline to 6.5 in 2019. The percentage of SCLC among all lung tumors increased from 13.3% in 1975 to a peak of 17.5% in 1986, declining to 11.1% by 2019. There was an increased median age at diagnosis from 63 to 69 years and an increased percentage of women from 31.4% to 51.2%. The percentage of stage IV increased from 58.6% in 1988 to 70.8% in 2010, without further increase. The most common sites of metastasis at diagnosis were mediastinal lymph nodes (75.3%) liver (31.6%), bone (23.7%), and brain (16.4%). The 1-year and 5-year overall survival rate increased from 23% and 3.6%, respectively, in 1975-1979 to 30.8% and 6.8%, respectively, in 2010-2019.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of SCLC peaked in 1988 followed by a gradual decline. Other notable changes include increased median age at diagnosis, the percentage of women, and the percentage of stage IV at diagnosis. The improvement in 5-year overall survival has been statistically significant but clinically modest.

Tumor mutation burden and FAT3 mutation influence long-term survival in surgically resected small cell lung cancer

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly malignant and has a higher risk of recurrence even in patients who undergo early surgery. However, a subgroup of patients survived for many years. So far, the factors that determine the long-term survivorship remain largely unknown. To determine the genetic characteristics of long-term survival (LTS) after surgery in SCLC, we performed comprehensive comparative genomic profiling and tumor mutation burden (TMB) analysis of resected tumor tissues from patients with LTS and short-term survival (STS) after surgery.

Methods

The present study screened 11 patients from 52 patients with SCLC who underwent surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from April 2008 to December 2017. A total of six LTS patients (≥4 years) with stage IIB or IIIA SCLC and five STS patients (<2 years) with stage IA or IB SCLC were included in the study. The STS patients were used as a control. All the patients underwent resection without neoadjuvant therapy. We assessed the genomic profiles of the resected tumor tissues and calculated the TMB using next-generation sequencing. We then analyzed and compared the molecular characteristics between the LTS and STS groups.

Results

Our data indicated that tumor tissues from patients with LTS harbor a high TMB. The median TMB for LTS patients was high (approximately 16.4 mutations/Mb), while that for STS patients was low (approximately 8.5 mutations/Mb). The median TMB of patients with LTS and STS showed a trend of significant difference (P=0.08). Gene alterations characterized the survival differences between the two groups. The FAT3 mutation was only found in the LTS group, and the P value determined by Fisher's exact test was 0.06.

Conclusions

A high non-synonymous TMB and the FAT3 mutation could potentially influence LTS after SCLC resection. This study provides valuable information about the molecular differences between LTS and STS patients. Studies with larger sample sizes need to be conducted to confirm our findings in the future.

The Dose/Fractionation Debate in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

To explore the most suitable dosage regimen for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) and provide references for clinical selection, strict inclusion criteria were applied, and studies were screened from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Subsequently, data on two-year overall survival rates and dosage regimens were collected, and scatter plots were constructed to provide a comprehensive perspective. The survival benefits of various dosage regimens were evaluated, and a linear quadratic equation was utilized to fit the relationship between the biologically effective dose (BED10) and the two-year overall survival rate. Among the five randomized controlled trials, the two-year overall survival rate of ConvTRT regimens with BED10 > 60 Gy (rough value) was only at or below the median of all ConvTRT regimens or all included study regimens, indicating that increasing the number and total dose of ConvTRT does not necessarily lead to better prognosis. In the exploration of HypoTRT regimens, there was a linear positive correlation between BED10 and the two-year overall survival rate (p < 0.0001), while the exploration of HyperTRT regimens was relatively limited, with the majority focused on the 45 Gy/30 F regimen. However, the current 45 Gy/30 F regimen is not sufficient to control LS-SCLC, resulting in a high local recurrence rate. High-dose ConvTRT regimens have long treatment durations and may induce tumor regrowth which may cause reduced efficacy. Under reasonable toxicity reactions, HyperTRT or HypoTRT with higher radiotherapy doses is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.

Six versus four or five cycles of first-line etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis of a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

The recommended treatment for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is a combination of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) chemotherapy, typically administered over 4-6 cycles. Nonetheless, the optimal duration of chemotherapy is still not determined. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with LS-SCLC who received either 6 cycles or 4-5 cycles of EP chemotherapy combined with TRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we utilized data from our prior prospective trial to analyze the outcomes of 265 LS-SCLC patients who received 4-6 courses of EP combined with concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated TRT between 2002 and 2017. Patients were categorized into two groups depending on their number of chemotherapy cycles: 6 or 4-5 cycles. To assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), we employed the Kaplan-Meier method after conducting propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Among the 265 LS-SCLC patients, 60 (22.6%) received 6 cycles of EP chemotherapy, while 205 (77.4%) underwent 4-5 cycles. Following PSM (53 patients for each group), the patients in the 6 cycles group exhibited a significant improvement in OS and PFS in comparison to those in the 4-5 cycles group [median OS: 29.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.6-53.1 months) vs. 22.7 months (95% CI, 20.8-29.1 months), respectively, p = 0.019; median PFS: 17.9 months (95% CI, 13.7-30.5 months) vs. 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.8-14.2 months), respectively, p = 0.006]. The two-year and five-year OS rates were 60.38% and 29.87% in the 6 cycles group, whereas 47.17% and 15.72% in the 4-5 cycles group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC who were treated with EP regimen chemotherapy combined with TRT exhibited notably enhanced survival when administered 6 cycles of chemotherapy, as compared to those who underwent only 4-5 cycles.

Challenges, Complexities, and Considerations in the Design and Interpretation of Late-Phase Oncology Trials

Optimal management of cancer patients relies heavily on late-phase oncology randomized controlled trials. A comprehensive understanding of the key considerations in designing and interpreting late-phase trials is crucial for improving subsequent trial design, execution, and clinical decision-making. In this review, we explore important aspects of late-phase oncology trial design. We begin by examining the selection of primary endpoints, including the advantages and disadvantages of using surrogate endpoints. We address the challenges involved in assessing tumor progression and discuss strategies to mitigate bias. We define informative censoring bias and its impact on trial results, including illustrative examples of scenarios that may lead to informative censoring. We highlight the traditional roles of the log-rank test and hazard ratio in survival analyses, along with their limitations in the presence of nonproportional hazards as well as an introduction to alternative survival estimands, such as restricted mean survival time or MaxCombo. We emphasize the distinctions between the design and interpretation of superiority and noninferiority trials, and compare Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches. Finally, we discuss appropriate utilization of phase II and phase III trial results in shaping clinical management recommendations and evaluate the inherent risks and benefits associated with relying on phase II data for treatment decisions.

Outcome of dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for limited disease small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

An optimal once-daily radiotherapy (RT) regimen is under investigation for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We compared the efficacy and safety of dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and March 2021, patients treated with definitive CCRT for LD-SCLC with IMRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received a total dose <50 Gy or those with a history of thoracic RT or surgery were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups (standard and dose-escalated) based on the total biologically effective dose (BED, α/β = 10) of 70 Gy. The chemotherapeutic regimen comprised four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two patients were analyzed and the median follow-up was 27.8 months (range, 4.4 to 76.9 months). The median age of the patients was 63 years (range, 35 to 78 years) and the majority had a history of smoking (86.0%). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates of the escalated dose group were significantly higher than those of the standard group (93.5% and 50.5% vs. 76.7% and 33.3%, respectively; p = 0.008), as were the 1- and 3-year freedom from in-field failure rates (91.4% and 66.5% vs. 73.8% and 46.9%, respectively; p = 0.018). The incidence of grade 2 or higher acute and late pneumonitis was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.062, 0.185).

CONCLUSION

Dose-escalated once-daily CCRT with IMRT led to improved locoregional control and survival, with no increase in toxicity.

Progress in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor that is prone to spread extensively. Compared to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SCLC treatment progresses slowly. Although SCLC is highly sensitive to chemotherapy during the initial treatment, most patients still experience resistance and recurrence after receiving chemotherapy. A meta-analysis demonstrated that thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) improves overall survival in SCLC. The results of the CALGB and CONVERT trials provide evidence for the efficacy of once-daily high-dose TRT. TRT at 60 Gy administered twice daily significantly improved survival without increasing toxicity. The long-standing debate over the optimal timing of radiotherapy has not been fully resolved. SBRT has excellent local control rates and is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with stage I or II SCLC. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is used to reduce treatment-related neurotoxicity to the extent that there has been a recent discussion on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) monitoring can replace PCI. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy significantly improves the survival rate of patients with NSCLC; however, its clinical effectiveness has not been systematically explored in patients with SCLC. Therefore, we summarize the evolving therapeutic strategies, (TRT for limited stage-SCLC and consolidative TRT for extensive stage-SCLC) and improved radiotherapy techniques (role of SBRT in stage I or II node-negative SCLC, progress of PCI, and stereotactic radiosurgery), and discuss the possibilities and prospects of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for SCLC.

The development and validation of a nomogram for predicting brain metastases after chemotherapy and radiotherapy in male small cell lung cancer patients with stage III

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to develop a model for brain metastasis (BM) in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients and to help in the early identification of high-risk patients and the selection of individualized therapies.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate logic regression was applied to identify the independent risk factors of BM. A receiver operating curve (ROC) and nomogram for predicting the incidence of BM were then conducted based on the independent risk factors. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the clinical benefit of prediction model.

RESULTS

Univariate regression analysis showed that the CCRT, RT dose, PNI, LLR, and dNLR were the significant factors for the incidence of BM. Multivariate analysis showed that CCRT, RT dose, and PNI were independent risk factors of BM and were included in the nomogram model. The ROC curves revealed the area under the ROC (AUC) of the model was 0.764 (95% CI, 0.658-0.869), which was much higher than individual variable alone. The calibration curve revealed favorable consistency between the observed probability and predicted probability for BM in LS-SCLC patients. Finally, the DCA demonstrated that the nomogram provides a satisfactory positive net benefit across the majority of threshold probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, we established and verified a nomogram model that combines clinical variables and nutritional index characteristics to predict the incidence of BM in male SCLC patients with stage III. Since the model has high reliability and clinical applicability, it can provide clinicians with theoretical guidance and treatment strategy making.

No survival benefit with early incorporation of thoracic radiotherapy using daily fractionation in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy in the modern era: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

When concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is administered for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), the early incorporation of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is generally recommended. However, it is controversial if this approach is really beneficial with most commonly used daily fractionated TRT in the modern era.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using several databases following the PRISMA guidelines from Jan 2000 to Nov 2022. We excluded twice-daily TRT-based studies. The hazard ratio (HR) for survival following late TRT as a primary effect size was pooled from comparisons within individual studies according to the timing of daily fractionated TRT (early vs. late).

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies including 10,164 analyzable patients met all inclusion criteria. 'Early' timing usually referred to TRT within 1-2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. The pooled results demonstrated that the risk of death was not significantly increased following late TRT compared with early TRT (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.84-1.20, p = 0.94). All sensitivity analysis and planned subgroup analyses showed similar results. In comparison with early TRT, late TRT did not significantly increase the risk of progression (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80-1.11, p = 0.48). Furthermore, late TRT was beneficial in alleviating grade 3 or higher esophagitis (OR 0.42, p = 0.01), but no significant differences was found in pneumonitis (OR 0.62, p = 0.38), and neutropenia (OR 0.57, p = 0.11). No evidence of publication bias was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first meta-analysis to support the late incorporation of TRT in managing patients with LS-SCLC undergoing daily fractionated CCRT in the modern era. This approach may not compromise survival and can prevent severe acute toxicities. Further prospective studies of the daily fractionated TRT timing are warranted.

Mechanistic rationales for combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy

Immunotherapy consisted mainly of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to significantly improved antitumor response. However, such response has been observed only in tumors possessing an overall responsive tumor immune micro-environment (TIME), in which the presence of functional tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is critical. Various mechanisms of immune escape from immunosurveillance exist, leading to different TIME phenotypes in correlation with primary or acquired resistance to ICIs. Radiotherapy has been shown to induce antitumor immunity not only in the irradiated primary tumor, but also at unirradiated distant sites of metastases. Such antitumor immunity is mainly elicited by radiation's stimulatory effects on antigenicity and adjuvanticity. Furthermore, it may be significantly augmented when irradiation is combined with immunotherapy, such as ICIs. Therefore, radiotherapy represents one potential therapeutic strategy to restore anti-tumor immunity in tumors presenting with an unresponsive TIME. In this review, the generation of anti-tumor immunity, its impairment, radiation's immunogenic properties, and the antitumor effects of combining radiation with immunotherapy will be comprehensively discussed.

Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a pillar of cancer treatment has emphasized the immune system's integral role in tumor control and progression through cancer immune surveillance. ICIs are being investigated and incorporated into the treatment paradigm for lung cancers across stages and histology. To date, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidative durvalumab is the only National Comprehensive Cancer Network's recommended treatment paradigm including radiotherapy with ICI in lung cancers, although there are other recommendations for ICI with chemotherapy and/or surgery. This narrative review provides an overall view of the evolving integration and synergistic role of immunotherapy and radiotherapy and outlines the use of immunotherapy with radiotherapy for the management of small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. It also reviews selected, practice-changing clinical trials that led to the current standard of care for lung cancers.