Safety and efficacy of long-term octreotide therapy of acromegaly: results of a multicenter trial in 103 patients--a clinical research center study

Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise

Simple Summary

Well-structured international guidelines are currently available regarding the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). However, in relation to the multiplicity of treatments and the relative rarity and heterogeneity of NENs, there are many controversial issues in which clinical evidence is insufficient and for which expert opinion can be of help. A group of experts selected 14 relevant topics and formulated relative statements concerning controversial issues in several areas on diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and patient follow-up. Specific statements have also been formulated regarding patient management on radioligand therapy (RLT), as well as in the presence of co-morbidities or bone metastases. All the statements were drafted, discussed, modified, and then approved. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) method was used to obtain consensus. The results of this paper can facilitate the clinical approach of patients with NENs in daily practice in areas where there is scarcity or absence of clinical evidence.

Abstract

Many treatment approaches are now available for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). While several societies have issued guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of NENs, there are still areas of controversy for which there is limited guidance. Expert opinion can thus be of support where firm recommendations are lacking. A group of experts met to formulate 14 statements relative to diagnosis and treatment of NENs and presented herein. The nominal group and estimate-talk-estimate techniques were used. The statements covered a broad range of topics from tools for diagnosis to follow-up, evaluation of response, treatment efficacy, therapeutic sequence, and watchful waiting. Initial prognostic characterization should be based on clinical information as well as histopathological analysis and morphological and functional imaging. It is also crucial to optimize RLT for patients with a NEN starting from accurate characterization of the patient and disease. Follow-up should be patient/tumor tailored with a shared plan about timing and type of imaging procedures to use to avoid safety issues. It is also stressed that patient-reported outcomes should receive greater attention, and that a multidisciplinary approach should be mandatory. Due to the clinical heterogeneity and relative lack of definitive evidence for NENs, personalization of diagnostic–therapeutic work-up is crucial.

A rare complication of cholecystolithiasis: perforation of the gallbladder

Common complications of cholelithiasis include gallbladder inflammation, cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. On the other hand, rare complications include gallbladder carcinoma, gallstone ileus, Mirizzi syndrome and gallbladder perforation. Some patients with cholecystitis do not require hospitalization. It is of key importance for proper further diagnosis and treatment to remember about the possible complications of cholecystitis, especially in oligosymptomatic patients. Therefore, ultrasound examinations in patients with a history of gallbladder stones should be performed with appropriate care. Ultrasound should be performed carefully in patients with a history of cholecystolithiasis, especially those oligosymptomatic, bearing in mind that there are some rare complications of this highly common clinical entity.

Biliary adverse events in acromegaly during somatostatin receptor ligands: predictors of onset and response to ursodeoxycholic acid treatment

PURPOSE

Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) are the first-line medical treatment for acromegaly. Gallbladder alterations are one of most important SRL side effect, but according to some authors growth hormone hypersecretion itself is a risk factor for gallstones. This single center, longitudinal retrospective study evaluated the incidence and the predictors of biliary adverse events (BAE) in acromegaly during SRL therapy and their response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

METHODS

91 acromegaly patients with indication to SRL were enrolled. Evaluations of acromegaly activity (GH, IGF-I, IGF-I/ULN) and metabolic profile were collected before starting treatment, yearly during follow-up and at BAE onset. In patients developing BAE we searched for predictors of UDCA effectiveness.

RESULTS

61.5% of patients developed BAE (58.9% cholelithiasis; 41.1% only sludge). IGF-I and IGF-I/ULN proved to be positive predictor of BAE, which occur about 5 years after SRL starting. None of metabolic markers proved to be associated with BAE. Only five patients (5.5%) underwent cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. 71% of patients started UDCA treatment, achieving regression of BAE in 60% of cases (88% in patients developing only sludge and 30% in patients affected by cholelithiasis, p < 0.001). BMI and obesity were negative predictors of UDCA efficacy. In 50% of the subjects BAE resolved after 36 months of therapy with a lower rate if cholelithiasis was present.

CONCLUSION

Biliary stone disease is a frequent SRL adverse event, although it is often symptomless. Ultrasound follow-up mainly in the first 5 years of therapy, early UDCA starting and proper lifestyle represent a valid strategy in their detection and management.

Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives of First-Generation Somatostatin Analogs in the Management of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Acromegaly: A Systematic Literature Review

Introduction

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are used to treat neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and acromegaly. Two first-generation SSAs, octreotide long-acting release (OCT LAR) and lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN), are available. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to investigate which characteristics beyond efficacy are most important in patient and healthcare practitioner (HCP) experience of LAN and OCT when used to treat acromegaly and NETs.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect were searched from database inception to January 2019 with terms for first-generation SSAs, NETs, acromegaly, preferences, decision-making, and human factors. Key congresses in 2016–2018 and SLR bibliographies were hand-searched. Two independent reviewers screened articles at title/abstract and full-text stage. Publications fulfilling pre-specified inclusion criteria reported patient or HCP perspectives of LAN or OCT, or any factors affecting treatment perspectives for NETs or acromegaly.

Results

A total of 1110 unique records were screened, of which 21 studies were included, reporting from the perspectives of patients (n = 18) and/or HCPs (n = 9). Perspectives were collected using shared decision-making frameworks, questionnaires, informal patient opinion, and a Delphi panel. Where patient preference was specifically reported, LAN was preferred in 4/5 studies and OCT LAR in 1/5. Common factors underlying treatment experience included technical problems with injections and associated pain, emotional quality/anxiety of injections, time and convenience of treatment administration, and independence. Immediate aspects of injections appeared most important to patients, though the possibilities of extended dosing intervals and self-/partner-injection with LAN were also notable factors.

Conclusions

Study outcomes favored LAN in this SLR, with factors surrounding injection administration most influential in treatment experience. The findings of this SLR provide a basis that could inform development of decision-making criteria, with patient and HCP treatment perspectives considered. Future studies should utilize a common method to report preference and associated drivers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-020-01600-x.

A rare case of a patient with a high grade neuroendocrine tumor developing neutropenic sepsis after receiving PRRT combined with Capecitabine or Temozolomide: A case report

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare and demonstrate variable clinical behavior depending on the degree of tumor differentiation. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors (NET G3) have a poor prognosis. Systemic treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy is considered to be the treatment of choice. In patients that are refractory or intolerant to first-line therapy, experts recommend peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in tumors that express somatostatin receptors. Recently, combinations of PRRT and chemotherapy were tested in patients with NET. Available data have reported promising tumor control rates and an excellent toxicity profile in cases where PRRT had been administered with capecitabine/temozolomide, even when administered as salvage therapy. The current study reported an exceptional case of advanced NET G3 with severe toxicity upon receiving PRRT in combination with capecitabine/temozolomide as third line therapy. The patient developed a life-threatening neutropenic fever, fungal pneumonia and necrotizing mastitis 23 days after the first cycle of therapy was administered. However, the treatment led to a significant reduction in tumor size. A total of 5 months after treatment initiation, the patient was alive and in excellent clinical condition with sustained tumor response. In summary, the current study presented a rare case of high grade NET exhibiting an almost complete response to PRRT in combination capecitabine/temozolomide, despite facing unexpected severe toxicity.

Nutritional and vitamin status in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms

Symptoms of gastroenteropancreatic located neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are often related to food intake and manifest as abdominal pain or diarrhoea which can influence patients nutritional status. Malnutrition is common in cancer patients and influences quality of life, treatment options and survival but is also present in up to 40% of patients with GEP-NENs. As part of malnutrition there are often deficiencies in fat-soluble vitamins, mainly vitamin D. Little knowledge exists on trace elements. Several factors influence the development of malnutrition such as size and localisation of the primary tumour as well as metastases, side effects from treatment but also hormone production of the tumour itself. One of the main influencing factors leading to malnutrition is diarrhoea which leads to dehydration and electrolyte disturbances. Treatment of diarrhoea should be guided by its cause. Screening for malnutrition should be part of routine care in every GEP-NEN patient. Multidisciplinary treatment including dietician support is necessary for all malnourished patients with GEP-NENs.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Personalized medicine in the treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is associated with high morbidity and elevated mortality when not adequately treated. Surgery is the first-line treatment for most patients as it is the only one that can lead to immediate cure. In patients who are not cured by surgery, treatment is currently based on a trial-and-error approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are initiated for most patients, although approximately 25% of patients present resistance to this drug class. Some biomarkers of treatment outcome are described in the literature, with the aim of categorizing patients into different groups to individualize their treatments using a personalized approach. In this review, we will discuss the current status of precision medicine for the treatment of acromegaly and future perspectives on the use of personalized medicine for this purpose.

Clinical applications of somatostatin analogs for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas

Excessive growth hormone (GH) is usually secreted by GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and causes gigantism in juveniles or acromegaly in adults. The clinical complications involving cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic systems lead to elevated morbidity in acromegaly. Control of serum GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 hypersecretion by surgery or pharmacotherapy can decrease morbidity. Current pharmacotherapy includes somatostatin analogs (SAs) and GH receptor antagonist; the former consists of lanreotide Autogel (ATG) and octreotide long-acting release (LAR), and the latter refers to pegvisomant. As primary medical therapy, lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR can be supplied in a long-lasting formulation to achieve biochemical control of GH and IGF-1 by subcutaneous injection every 4-6 weeks. Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR provide an effective medical treatment, whether as a primary or secondary therapy, for the treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenoma; however, to maximize benefits with the least cost, several points should be emphasized before the application of SAs. A comprehensive assessment, especially of the observation of clinical predictors and preselection of SA treatment, should be completed in advance. A treatment process lasting at least 3 months should be implemented to achieve a long-term stable blood concentration. More satisfactory surgical outcomes for noninvasive macroadenomas treated with presurgical SA may be achieved, although controversy of such adjuvant therapy exists. Combination of SA and pegvisomant or cabergoline shows advantages in some specific cases. Thus, an individual treatment program should be established for each patient under a full evaluation of the risks and benefits.

Low somatostatin receptor subtype 2, but not dopamine receptor subtype 2 expression predicts the lack of biochemical response of somatotropinomas to treatment with somatostatin analogs

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A) and dopamine receptor 2 (DR2) protein expression in somatotropinomas and to relate it to response to somatostatin analogues (SA).

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

SSTR2A and DR2 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 88 somatotropinomas from patients submitted to either pre-surgical or adjuvant SA treatment. Tumors were scored according to percentage of immunostained cells: 0 (< 25%), 1 (25-50%), and 2 (> 50%). Relation between protein expression and response to SA was performed in 66 patients. Response to SA was assessed by percent IGF-I reduction, being considered as an IGF-I per cent reduction higher than 50%. Disease control was also assessed (GH < 1.0 ng/ml and normal IGF-I).

RESULTS

SSTR2A and DR2 were expressed in 100% and 98% of tumors, respectively. Biochemical response and disease control rates were 48% and 32%, respectively. Median IGF-I percent reduction after 3 months of SA treatment was lower in the SSTR2A score 0 than in the scores 1 and 2 (p < 0.001, both), and after 6 months in the score 0 than in the score 1 (p = 0.001) and 2 (p < 0.001). Biochemical response and disease control were associated with SSTR2 expression (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). A negative predictive value for biochemical response of 100% was found when a SSTR2A expression < 25%of immunostained cells cut-off point was considered. No relation was found between DR2 expression and biochemical response and disease control.

CONCLUSION

SSTR2A and DR2 are highly expressed in somatotropinomas. Low SSTR2A, but not DR2, expression is a negative predictive factor to response to SA.

Incidence of gall stone formation in acromegalic patients on octreotide therapy

OBJECTIVE

Octreotide, a long-acting synthetic somatostatin analog, has been widely used for ac-romegalic patients. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects and gall stones are predominant side effects. We report incidence of gall stones in our cohort of acromegalic patients treated with octreotide therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective case observational study.

SETTING

Endocrinology Unit, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia, Hospital, New Delhi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients of acromegaly on primary or secondary octreotide therapy.

INTERVENTION

Patients were enquired regarding complaints related to the GI system and their medical records were reviewed. Ultrasound films at various intervals while on octerotide therapy were evaluated by the radiologist for presence of sludge and development of gall stones.

RESULTS

Of seven patients, five developed gallstones and sludge was seen in three patients at intervals ranging from 11 to 36 months postoctreotide initiation.

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of gall stone formation in the present study as compared to the West was noted, the reasons for which are not clear.

Treatment with somatostatin analogs and chemoembolization of liver metastases for severe hypoglycemia in malignant insulinomas

BACKGROUND

Preventing hypoglycemia is of vital importance and a major challenge in patients with severe symptomatic hypoglycemia related to malignant unresectable insulinomas, but there is no consensus treatment.

PATIENTS

Five patients with malignant unresectable insulinomas were referred to our department for severe hypoglycemia. At referral the five patients were dependent on iv infusion of glucose solution. Patient 1 had a locally invasive 5-cm insulinoma, patients 2, 3 and 4 had multiple liver metastases and patient 5 had a 2.5-cm pancreatic tumor with multiple liver and lung metastases. Before referral to our department, 4/5 patients had been administered systemic chemotherapy and 3/5 therapeutic doses of radiolabeled octreotide without any benefit on blood glucose levels. Octreoscan scintigraphy was positive in 4 patients (patients 1-4). Diazoxide alone or combined with glucocorticoids had failed to control hypoglycemia. Continuous sc administration of octreotide (up to 1500 μg/day) resulted in normalization of blood glucose levels in patient 1. Chemoembolization of liver metastases normalized blood glucose levels in patient 2, minimized hypoglycemia in patients 3 and 4, and normalized blood glucose levels in patient 5 when followed by subcutaneous administration of octreotide (2000 μg/day). Chemoembolization had to be repeated four times in patient 3 to control blood glucose levels.

CONCLUSION

Chemoembolization of liver metastases and high-dose octreotide in responsive patients (alone or combined with chemoembolization) can control severe hypoglycemia in patients with symptomatic malignant unresectable insulinomas; the efficacy of octreotide can be improved after chemoembolization of liver metastases.

From somatostatin to octreotide LAR: evolution of a somatostatin analogue

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is characterized by overproduction of growth hormone (GH) by the pituitary gland. GH stimulates the synthesis of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and the somatic growth and metabolic dysfunction that characterize acromegaly are a consequence of elevated GH and IGF-I levels. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare, slow-growing neoplasms that have usually metastasized by the time of diagnosis. The majority of GEP-NETs are carcinoid tumors whose syndrome is caused by the hypersecretion of biogenic amines, peptides and polypeptides responsible for the principal symptoms of diarrhea and flushing.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for preclinical and clinical studies of octreotide (Sandostatin* ), a potent synthetic somatostatin analogue, in patients with acromegaly or GEP-NETs.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the 20 years of clinical experience with octreotide and the impact it has made in patients with acromegaly or GEP-NETs.

RESULTS

Octreotide has proven to be an essential component in the management strategy of acromegaly and GEP-NETs over the past 20 years. The multiple beneficial effects of octreotide throughout the body, combined with its established safety profile (the most common adverse effects are injection-site pain and gastrointestinal events), have made it an appealing option for clinicians. The advent of the long-acting release (LAR) formulation of octreotide provided additional benefits to patients through monthly administration, while maintaining the efficacy and tolerability profile of the daily subcutaneous formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide is a potent synthetic somatostatin analogue that has become the mainstay of medical therapy for tumor control in neuroendocrine disorders such as acromegaly and GEP-NETs. The development of octreotide LAR offered a further advancement; less frequent dosing provided valuable benefits in quality of life to patients, with equivalent efficacy and tolerability. Moreover, recent results from the PROMID study have confirmed the antiproliferative effect of octreotide LAR in patients with well-differentiated metastatic GEP-NETs of the midgut. New therapeutic uses of octreotide are currently under investigation in a variety of clinical settings.

Somatostatin receptors subtypes 2 and 5, dopamine receptor type 2 expression and gsp status as predictors of octreotide LAR® responsiveness in acromegaly

We present two acromegalic patients in which clinical and molecular data are discussed in regard to their ability to predict long term octreotide LAR® therapy response. Case reports: Patient 1: female, 36 years old at diagnosis. Basal GH and IGF-I at diagnosis were 133 ng/mL and 181% above the upper limit of reference values (ULRV), respectively. Growth hormone during acute test with subcutaneous octreotide decreased from 133 to 13 ng/mL. Patient started on primary octreotide LAR® therapy (20mg q28 days) and achieved biochemical parameters of disease control after 6 months. Molecular analysis of tumor fragments: gsp +; quantitative analysis of SSTR (somatostatin receptor) and DR (dopamine receptor) mRNA - SSTR2 23954; SSTR5 2407; DR2 total 17016 copies. Patient 2: male, 38 years old at diagnosis. Basal GH and IGF-I at diagnosis were 120 ng/mL and 114% ULRV, respectively. Patient underwent non-curative trans-sphenoidal surgery. Post-operative GH and IGF-I were 112 ng/mL and 137% ULRV, respectively. Growth hormone during acute test with subcutaneous octreotide decreased from 112 to 7 ng/mL. Octreotide LAR® therapy (20 mg q28 days) was then initiated. After 6 months of treatment, patient did not attain biochemical control of disease and displayed increased tumor volume. Molecular analysis of tumor fragments: gsp not done; quantitative analysis of SSTR and DR mRNA - SSTR2 416; SSTR5 3767; DR2 total 3439 copies. In conclusion, these two cases illustrate how laboratory data can be conflicting as predictors of octreotide LAR® responsiveness and how molecular analysis of tumor fragments can help explain different behaviors in clinically similar patients.

Phase III, double-blind study of depot octreotide versus placebo in the prevention of acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy: results of North Central Cancer Treatment Group N00CA

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of depot octreotide for the prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy (planned minimum dose, 45 Gy; 1.7 to 2.1 Gy daily) were eligible for the study. From May 10, 2002, through October 14, 2005, 125 patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to receive octreotide (100 microg, administered subcutaneously on day 1, followed by depot octreotide, 20 mg, administered intramuscularly on days 2 and 29; n = 62) or to receive a placebo (n = 63).

RESULTS

Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 diarrhea were observed in 18%, 31%, 31%, and 21% of patients in the octreotide arm, respectively, and in 25%, 32%, 22%, and 21% of patients in the placebo arm, respectively (P = .64). Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 abdominal cramps were observed in 32%, 45%, 21%, and 2% of patients receiving octreotide, respectively, and in 51%, 24%, 21%, and 5% of patients receiving the placebo, respectively (P = .053). Some patient-reported symptoms were worse in the octreotide group, including nocturnal bowel movements (70% v 45%; P = .004), clustering of bowel movements (90% v 69%; P = .004), and bleeding with bowel movements (57% v 35%; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

As administered in this study, octreotide did not decrease diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. Some gastrointestinal symptoms were worse in patients treated with octreotide. Octreotide is not indicated for prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy.

Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel

BACKGROUND

In acromegaly, expert surgery is curative in only about 60% of patients. Postoperative radiation therapy is associated with a high incidence of hypopituitarism and its effect on growth hormone (GH) production is slow, so that adjuvant medical treatment becomes of importance in the management of many patients.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the role of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly.

METHODS

Search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for clinical studies of lanreotide in acromegaly.

RESULTS

Treatment with lanreotide slow release and lanreotide Autogel((R)) normalized GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations in about 50% of patients. The efficacy of 120 mg lanreotide Autogel((R)) on GH and IGF-I levels was comparable with that of 20 mg octreotide LAR. There were no differences in improvement of cardiac function, decrease in pancreatic beta-cell function, or occurrence of side effects, including cholelithiasis, between octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel(R). When postoperative treatment with somatostatin analogs does not result in normalization of serum IGF-I and GH levels after noncurative surgery, pegvisomant alone or in combination with somatostatin analogs can control these levels in a substantial number of patients.

Octreotide-LAR-associated erythema multiforme in an acromegalic subject: case report

Long-acting somatostatin analogs are often used for treating acromegaly, either as adjuvant to surgery or radiotherapy or, more recently, as a primary therapeutic option. These drugs seem to be reasonably safe, but new adverse effects not yet described may occur during the use of the relatively new long-acting formulations. In this case report, we describe a severe cutaneous reaction (erythema multiforme) in a patient treated with long-acting release (LAR) octreotide, and also discuss the need of previous "testing" with short subcutaneous preparation of octreotide.

Medical therapy: options and uses

Since the initial use of medical treatment for acromegaly, several advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiology of growth hormone producing tumors, resulting in the development of multiple medical options and novel treatments. Currently there are three major classes of medication available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the treatment of choice for acromegaly due to their effectiveness in controlling growth hormone excess in approximately 60% of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of pegvisomant in up to 97% of patients, but long term data and safety have yet to be established. Dopamine agonists are inexpensive, but their use is hampered by their lack of efficacy compared to other medications. Medical therapy has an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, as well as primary therapy for selected patients unsuitable for surgical resection. Medical treatment to control growth hormone hypersecretion is often needed after radiation therapy until the effects are evident. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for medical treatment prior to surgical resection, surgical debulking to improve medical efficacy, and combination therapy with multiple medications from the three classes. More studies are required, however, to validate the utility of these approaches in treating acromegaly. With the available therapies, disease control can be achieved in nearly all patients with acromegaly.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is caused by growth hormone hypersecretion, mostly from a pituitary adenoma, driving insulin-like growth factor 1 overproduction. Manifestations include skeletal and soft tissue growth and deformities; and cardiac, respiratory, neuromuscular, endocrine, and metabolic complications. Increased morbidity and mortality require early and tight disease control. Surgery is the treatment of choice for microadenomas and well-defined intrasellar macroadenomas. Complete resection of large and invasive macroadenomas rarely is achieved; hence, their low rate of disease remission. Pharmacologic treatments, including long-acting somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and growth hormone receptor antagonists, have assumed more importance in achieving biochemical and symptomatic disease control.

Transsphenoidal surgery in a patient with acromegaly and McCune-Albright syndrome: application of neuronavigation

The McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) is characterized by a clinical triad of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, café-au-lait hyperpigmented macules, and hypersecretory endocrinopathies. Acromegaly is an uncommon manifestation of the endocrine disturbance associated with MAS, and the role of surgery in managing these cases has been a topic of debate. The authors present the case of a 35-year-old man with MAS who was also diagnosed with acromegaly, hyperprolactinemia, and pituitary macroadenoma. The patient had an 18-year history of fibrous dysplasia involving the right frontal bone and ribs as well as multiple endocrinopathies, but no cutaneous hyperpigmented macules. An oral glucose tolerance test demonstrated partial suppression of plasma levels of growth hormone (GH). The patient underwent transsphenoidal resection of the pituitary tumor, performed with assistance of neuronavigation, and tolerated the procedure well. After the surgery, both prolactin and GH levels returned to normal. These results suggest that neuronavigation-assisted transsphenoidal surgery can safely remove pituitary adenomas associated with MAS and successfully treat the underlying endocrine abnormalities.

SOM230, A New Somatostatin Analogue, Is Highly Effective in the Therapy of Growth Hormone/Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas

PURPOSE

We have previously shown that transgenic mice ubiquitously overexpressing the HMGA2 gene develop growth hormone/prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. This animal model has been used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of SOM230, a somatostatin analogue with high affinity for the somatostatin receptor subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5, on the growth of the pituitary adenomas.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Four groups of 3- and 9-month-old HMGA2 transgenic mice were treated for 3 months with a continuous s.c. injection of two different dosages of SOM230 (5 or 50 microg/kg/h), one dose of octreotide, corresponding to that used in human therapy, and a placebo, respectively. The development of the tumor before and after therapy was monitored by magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary region and evaluation of the serum prolactin levels.

RESULTS

The highest dose of SOM230 induced a drastic regression of the tumor, whereas octreotide was not able to induce any significant tumor regression, although tumor progression was significantly slowed down. No significant differences were observed between the animals treated with the lowest dose of SOM230 and those receiving placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

These results clearly support the efficacy of the SOM230 treatment in human pituitary adenomas secreting prolactin based on the dramatic tumor shrinkage and fall in prolactin levels. This beneficial effect could be of crucial clinical usefulness in patients bearing tumors resistant to dopaminergic drugs.

Immunohistochemical detection of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes 2A and 5 in pituitary adenoma from acromegalic patients: good correlation with preoperative response to octreotide

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the expression of somatostatin receptors by immunohistochemistry and the percent suppression of GH levels in the octreotide suppression test.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with acromegaly who underwent an octreotide suppression test before surgery were studied. We performed immunohistochemistry for Somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A) and Somatostatin receptor 5 (SSTR5) on the surgical specimens from all patients, which we scored according to the number of tumor cells staining positive at the surface membrane (3+: >50%, 2+: 25-50%, 1+: <25%). We sought correlations of percent suppression in the octreotide suppression test with these immunohistochemistry scores.

RESULTS

Somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A) showed the highest frequency of score 3+ (13 of 22, 59.1%) by immunohistochemistry. Subtype 5 showed the highest frequency for score 2+ (9 of 22, 40.9%), and one (4.5%) was immunonegative. For subtype 2A, there was a significant correlation with percent decrease (P = 0.002 < 0.01). In contrast, there was no significant correlation for SSTR5.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemistry for SSTR2A in pathology specimens from acromegalic patients enabled selection of those experiencing clinical benefit from octreotide. Therefore, performing immunohistochemistry for detection of SSTR2A is recommended for all specimens obtained by surgery.

[Treatment of pituitary gland hyperfunction: from acromegaly to prolactinoma]

Evidence based drug therapy is currently available for the treatment of prolactinomas and growth hormone secreting adenomas (acromegaly). Dopamine agonists such as bromocriptine, quinagolide or cabergoline represent the standard therapy for the treatment of micro- and macro-prolaktinomas. In pregnancy, more differentiated, individual and patient-adapted therapeutic procedures have to be considered. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy is the treatment of choice for patients suffering from acromegaly. If biochemical cure (defined by normalized IGF-1 serum levels or by a GH nadir <1 microg/l during a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test) cannot be achieved, somatostatin analogues such as octreotide and lanreotide are effective. In some cases, dopamine agonists can be added. In therapy-resistant cases, growth hormone receptor antagonists can be used.

[Usefulness of subcutaneous or long-acting octreotide as a predictive test and in the treatment of acromegaly]

We evaluated GH, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations in ten acromegalic patients before and after treatment with subcutaneous octreotide (OCT-sc) and long-acting octreotide (OCT-LAR). We also evaluated the acute and short-period treatment (post 21 days) with octreotide as an index to test tolerance and responsiveness to both formulations. Patients were also evaluated after 6 months of treatment with each drug. Pre-treatment fasting GH (microg/l; IFMA), GH nadir during oGTT and IGF-1 (microg/l; IRMA) levels were 13.9+/-6.3; 11.4+/-6.3; 717+/-107, respectively. Fasting GH and IGF-1 were reduced after short treatment with OCT-sc or OCT-LAR (2.9+/-1.1 and 4.4+/-1.2; 491+/-80 and 512+/-80). All parameters were also reduced after a six-month period with OCT-sc or OCT-LAR (2.8+/-0.9 and 1.9+/-0.5; 1.6+/-0.4 and 1.6+/-0.5; 583+/-107 and 515+/-83), respectively. The efficacy of the two drugs was similar. IGFBP-3 was not a good parameter during follow-up of these patients. The acute test with OCT-sc was not a valuable index to predict tolerance, however, as well as the short-period test, it could predict the long-term GH responsiveness to OCT.

The immunohistochemical localisation of somatostatin receptors 1, 2, 3, and 5 in acoustic neuromas

AIMS

Acoustic neuroma is a benign tumour, which develops through an overproliferation of Schwann cells along the vestibular nerve. Somatostatin is a naturally occurring peptide, which exerts antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects via five membrane bound receptor subtypes. The aim of this study was to determine whether somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTRs) 1, 2, 3, and 5 are present in acoustic neuromas.

METHODS

The expression of SSTRs 1, 2, 3, and 5 was studied in both the Schwann cells and blood vessels of eight acoustic neuroma specimens, by means of immunohistochemistry using novel rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against human SSTR 1, 2, and 5 subtype specific peptides, and a commercial anti-SSTR3 antibody.

RESULTS

SSTR2 was the most prevalent subtype in Schwann cells (seven of eight), with intermediate expression of SSTR3 (six of eight), and lower expression of SSTRs 1 and 5 (four of eight and five of eight, respectively). There was ubiquitous vascular expression of SSTR2, with no evidence of SSTR 1, 3, or 5 expression in blood vessels.

CONCLUSION

SSTRs 1, 2, 3, and 5 are differentially expressed in acoustic neuromas. Somatostatin analogues may have a therapeutic role in the management of this rare and challenging condition.

Somatostatin analogs as primary medical therapy for acromegaly

Acromegaly is a debilitating disease usually caused by a growth-hormone secreting pituitary adenoma. Therapeutic goals include improvement of symptoms, reduction in tumor mass, biochemical normalization, and preservation of pituitary function. Treatment options include transsphenoidal surgery, radiation, and pharmacotherapy. In view of the good cure rate, surgery remains the therapeutic modality of choice for most patients with microadenomas or well-circumscribed macroadenomas. In contrast, >40% of patients with invasive macroadenomas (who make up the majority of patients with acromegaly) will have residual disease following surgery, and require additional therapeutic intervention. Somatostatin analogs result in biochemical normalization in >60% of non-operated patients, and are well tolerated. Therefore, somatostatin analogs have emerged as a rational first-line treatment for the appropriately selected patient with acromegaly.

Somatostatin analogs in medical treatment of acromegaly

Although acromegaly remains a disease primarily addressed by pituitary microsurgery, most patients require secondary treatment for persistent growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion and elevated serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations following adenomectomy. Persistently abnormal serum GH and IGF-1 can be reduced to normal concentrations in better than half of post-surgery acromegalics using the pharmacologic treatments available at present, the dopamine agonists (DA) and somatostatin (SST) analogs. The long-acting SST analogs octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR have become the mainstay of medical treatment for acromegaly, having largely supplanted DA agents since the introduction of bromocriptine for the suppression of GH secretion in the 1970s. The DA cabergoline may be effective in up to half of patients, however, in particular those patients whose tumors cosecrete prolactin. On the horizon is the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant, which is expected to enable the reduction of serum IGF-1 to the normal range in the vast majority of postoperative acromegaly patients, representing a revolutionary development in the medical treatment of this disease. We here review the choices available to the endocrinologist in the pharmacologic treatment of acromegaly, focusing upon the SST analogs.

Somatostatin receptors in pituitary and development of somatostatin receptor subtype-selective analogs

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes 1, 2, and 5 are expressed in the normal human pituitary. SSTR2 and SSTR5 are expressed in almost all growth hormone (GH) cell adenomas, and prolactin (PRL)-secreting tumors express SSTR5 more than SSTR2. SSTR4 is not detected in all pituitary adenoma subtypes, and SSTR1 and SSTR3 are expressed in about 50% of tumors. Human GH is regulated through ligand binding to both SSTR2 and SSTR5, but octreotide and lanreotide, the two clinically available somatostatin analogs, bind to human SSTR2 much better than to SSTR5. Novel SSTR2- and SSTR5- selective analogs with improved binding affinity for these receptor subtypes are highly potent in suppressing GH release from cultures of human fetal pituitaries or GH-cell adenomas. Only SSTR5-selective analogs suppress in vitro PRL secretion from cultured prolactinomas. A new SSTR2+5 bispecific analog with high affinity and selectivity for both SSTR2 and SSTR5, and a somatostatin analog with a unique broad receptor (SSTR1, 2, 3, and 5) binding profile, are both able to inhibit in vitro GH release in GH cell adenomas partially sensitive to octreotide. Recently, a somatostatindopamine hybrid molecule was introduced with potentially functional synergy on GH and PRL release. Using the expanding knowledge on SSTRs and their ligand activation, the development of novel pharmacologic concepts may open new opportunities for effective manipulation of this complex intracellular signaling system. These concepts may achieve better control of pituitary hormone hypersecretion, pituitary size, as well as antitumor effects in patients with SSTR-expressing tumors.

The treatment of de novo acromegalic patients with octreotide-LAR: efficacy, tolerability and cardiovascular effects

AIM

Somatostatin analogues are normally used as adjunctive therapy to surgery and radiotherapy in management of acromegaly. We studied the effects of de novo OCT-LAR treatment on growth hormone (GH) suppression, tumour size, cardiovascular function, clinical symptoms, signs and quality of life in 9 newly diagnosed acromegalic patients.

METHODS

Patients commenced OCT-LAR 20 mg IM monthly for 2 months. Dose increased to 30 mg monthly if mean serum GH (MGH) > 5 mU/l (2 microg/litre) (7 patients). Treatment continued for 6 months. Cardiac function assessed by echocardiography at baseline and day 169. Left ventricular (LV) mass and ejection fraction (EF) calculated from 2D M-mode studies.

RESULTS

Serum GH demonstrated suppression in 8/9 patients (mean suppression 64.9% +/- 29.7%, range; 4-95.2%). MGH suppressed < 5 mU/ (2 microg/litre) in 3 (33%) patients. IGF-I and IGFBP3 normalised in 1 (12.5%) and 3 (38%) patients respectively. Tumour shrinkage seen in 30% patients. Eight patients were assessed by echocardiography. At baseline, 7 patients demonstrated abnormalities in LV mass and EF. At day 169, 6 patients demonstrated a fall and 1 an increase in LV mass. Overall there was no significant change in LV mass. A significant increase in EF was observed (p = 0.02). There were significant improvements in health perception (p = 0.01), fatigue (p < 0.05) and perspiration (p = 0.0039).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate OCT-LAR provides adequate control of acromegaly in a proportion of patients treated over 6 months. This is associated with improved LV function, evidenced by increased EF. Improved results are expected with longer-term treatment. OCT-LAR may be considered as primary treatment for acromegaly in selected patients.

Improvement of acromegaly after octreotide LAR treatment

Octreotide is a somatostatin analog that inhibits growth hormone release showing higher potency than natural somatostatin so it has proved to be effective in acromegaly treatment. The objective of present study was to establish the effects of octreotide LAR (long acting release) preparation in patients with active acromegaly. The following parameters were assessed: clinical response, safety of medication, GH and IGF-1 serum concentrations and pituitary tumor size. Eleven patients (6 men and 5 women) range 41.4 years old with diagnosis of active acromegaly were included. Octreotide was administered at 0.1 mg subcutaneusly dose three times daily for four weeks to test the drug tolerability. Afterwards patients received octreotide LAR 20 mg intramuscularly separated by 28 days periods with an option to continue for 8 months. Basal average GH serum concentrations was 27.6 ng/mL. After 6 months treatment reduction to 5.03 +/- 5.38 ng/mL in 9 patients (p < 0.001) was observed. Basal IGF-1 average serum concentration was 889.55 +/- 167.29 ng/mL with a reduction value to 483.00 +/- 239.71 ng/mL in 9 of 11 patients after 6 months treatment (p < 0.005). The drug was well tolerated with few adverse effects Diarrhea, flatulence and steatorrhea were observed during the administration of subcutaneous octreotide in 18.2% of patients. Two patients had symptomatic biliary lithiasis that was successfully removed by surgery. Clinical symptoms improved and some of them dissapeared such as headaches and sweatings. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 66.7% of cases. Monthly injections of 20 mg of octreotide LAR were effective to reduce GH and IGF-1 levels in patients with active acromegaly accompanied by improvement of clinical symptoms and significant tumor size reduction.

Medical management of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas

The primary treatment of acromegaly remains transsphenoidal adenomectomy, yet the tissue overgrowth of acromegaly often progresses following surgery, and responds to radiotherapy only after significant delay. Persistently elevated serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations can be normalized in about half of post-surgery acromegalics using the pharmacologic alternatives presently available, the dopamine agonists (DA) and somatostatin (SST) analogs. Cabergoline, the most efficacious DA, normalizes IGF-I in approximately 37% of patients, whereas the long-acting SST analogs, Octreotide LAR and Lanreotide SR, do so in 66%. Significant tumor shrinkage may be attained with SST analogs in particular, and when necessary, the primary medical treatment of acromegaly may be successfully addressed with this class of drugs. Greatly enhanced efficacy is expected from the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant, which is nearing market availability and will enable the normalization of serum IGF-I in virtually all patients treated. We review here the pharmacologic treatments of excessive GH secretion.

Current status and future opportunities for controlling acromegaly

Growth-hormone (GH) secreting adenomas, including acromegaly, account for approximately one-sixth of all pituitary adenomas and are associated with mortality rates at least twice that of the general population. The ultimate goal of therapy for acromegaly is normalization of morbidity and mortality rates achieved through removal or reduction of the tumor mass and normalization of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels. Previously published efficacy results of current treatment modalities (surgery, conventional radiation, and medical therapy with dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs) are often difficult to compare because of the different criteria used to define cure (some of which are now considered inadequate). For each of these modalities, pooled data from a series of acromegaly studies were reviewed for rates of IGF-I normalization, a currently accepted definition of cure. The results showed overall cure rates of approximately 10% for bromocriptine, 34% for cabergoline, 36% for conventional radiation, 50-90% for surgery for microadenomas and less than 50% for macroadenomas, and 54-66% for octreotide. These cure rates based on IGF-I normalization are generally less than those reported for cure based solely on GH levels. Novel new therapies for acromegaly include the somatostatin analog, lanreotide, Gamma Knife radiosurgery, and pegvisomant, the first in its class of new GH receptor antagonists. Although it does not appear that Gamma Knife radiosurgery results in significantly higher cure rates or fewer complications, it does provide a notable improvement in delivery compared with conventional radiation. Early studies have reported IGF-I normalization in 48% of lanreotide-treated patients and up to 97% of pegvisomant-treated.

Long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist

BACKGROUND

Pegvisomant is a new growth hormone receptor antagonist that improves symptoms and normalises insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in a high proportion of patients with acromegaly treated for up to 12 weeks. We assessed the effects of pegvisomant in 160 patients with acromegaly treated for an average of 425 days.

METHODS

Treatment efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in tumour volume by magnetic resonance imaging, and serum growth hormone and IGF-1 concentrations in 152 patients who received pegvisomant by daily subcutaneous injection for up to 18 months. The safety analysis included 160 patients some of whom received weekly injections and are excluded from the efficacy analysis.

FINDINGS

Mean serum IGF-1 concentrations fell by at least 50%: 467 mg/L (SE 24), 526 mg/L (29), and 523 mg/L (40) in patients treated for 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively (p<0.001), whereas growth hormone increased by 12.5 mg/L (2.1), 12.5 mg/L (3.0), and 14.2 mg/L (5.7) (p<0.001). Of the patients treated for 12 months or more, 87 of 90 (97%) achieved a normal serum IGF-1 concentration. In patients withdrawn from pegvisomant (n=45), serum growth hormone concentrations were 8.0 mg/L (2.5) at baseline, rose to 15.2 mg/L (2.4) on drug, and fell back within 30 days of withdrawal to 8.3 mg/L (2.7). Antibodies to growth hormone were detected in 27 (16.9%) of patients, but no tachyphylaxis was seen. Serum insulin and glucose concentrations were significantly decreased (p<0.05). Two patients experienced progressive growth of their pituitary tumours, and two other patients had increased alanine and asparate aminotransferase concentrations requiring withdrawal from treatment. Mean pituitary tumour volume in 131 patients followed for a mean of 11.46 months (0.70) decreased by 0.033 cm(3) (0.057; p=0.353).

INTERPRETATION

Pegvisomant is an effective medical treatment for acromegaly.

Hepatolithiasis (intrahepatic stone) during octreotide therapy for acromegaly: a case report

We report a case of hepatolithiasis (intrahepatic stone) complicated by gram-negative sepsis in a 37 year old male with acromegaly being treated with octreotide. As a child, he had suffered a traumatic injury to his liver requiring the surgical repair of a laceration. This is the first reported case of hepatolithiasis during octreotide therapy. Gallstones and bile sludge are common side effects of octreotide therapy but rarely become symptomatic or require treatment. Hepatolithiasis is uncommon in western countries but is quite prevalent in East Asia and is often associated with a predisposing condition that causes intrahepatic bile stasis (eg. bile duct stricture). In addition to its known effect on gallbladder stasis, octreotide alters bile acid composition and may thus hasten intrahepatic sludge and stone formation. Extra caution should be taken in using octreotide or its long-acting analog in patients otherwise predisposed to intrahepatic bile stasis.

Long-acting octreotide LAR compared with lanreotide SR in the treatment of acromegaly

The use of somatostatin analogues for the treatment of acromegaly is now well established. Recently long-acting preparations of octreotide and lanreotide have been introduced. In this study we have assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the long acting somatostatin analogue octreotide LAR in patients with acromegaly, and compared it with lanreotide SR. Five patients with active acromegaly were recruited; they were treated with lanreotide SR for 6 months and then, following a wash-out period, received octreotide LAR for 6 months. They were assessed at baseline, 3- and 6-months, by clinical score, GH and IGF1. Adverse effects were carefully monitored. Both treatments effectively reduced GH and IGF1 levels. Four of five patients achieved a mean GH level of < 2.5 ng/ml with both drugs; with octreotide LAR only, these patients also had GH < 1 ng/ml after oral glucose loading. The clinical symptoms score improved significantly with octreotide LAR, as did the ring size; the clinical score correlated significantly with GH. Blood glucose was not adversely affected. All patients experienced minor GI symptoms with lanreotide SR, but less frequently with octreotide LAR. Both drugs caused biliary stasis and had a tendency to form biliary sludge. Octreotide LAR proved effective for the treatment of acromegaly and was well tolerated. Octreotide LAR had some advantages over lanreotide SR, although the differences were not great.

Efficacy and tolerability of the long-acting somatostatin analog lanreotide in acromegaly. A 12-month multicenter study of 58 acromegalic patients. French Multicenter Study Group on Lanreotide in Acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of the new somatostatin analogue, lanreotide, in its prolonged released form (PR), in patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN

Prospective open multicenter non comparative study.

SETTING

Thirty-three university-affiliated medical centers.

PATIENTS

One hundred sixteen acromegalic patients with active disease, of whom 58 patients complied with the protocol and completed the 12-month period treatment.

INTERVENTION

Lanreotide PR treatment was started at a dose of 30 mg intramuscularly every 14 days. If integrated mean plasma GH levels were not below 5 micrograms/L and/or IGF-I levels were not normalized after one month of treatment, injections were given every 10 days. The duration of the study was 12 months.

RESULTS

After one month of treatment mean plasma GH and IGF-I levels had fallen from 10.7 +/- 11.1 micrograms/L (mean +/- SD; range, 2.6-74.8 micrograms/L; median, 7 micrograms/L) and 718 +/- 270 micrograms/L (range 338-1440 micrograms/L; median, 645 micrograms/L), respectively, to 7.8 +/- 10.1 micrograms/L and 575 +/- 252 micrograms/L, respectively. Thirty patients (22%) had plasma GH levels below 2.5 micrograms/L, and 8 patients (16%) had age-adjusted normal plasma IGF-I levels. At the sixth month of treatment mean plasma GH levels of 2.5 micrograms/L or less, and normal plasma IGF-I levels were observed in 33%, and 33% of patients, respectively. At the twelvth month of treatment, these percentages were 41%, and 41%, respectively. The interval between two injections was shortened (one injection every 10 days) in 8 of the 58 patients (13%) at the second month of treatment, and at the end of the study, 70% of patients required 3 injections per month. The most frequent adverse event elicited by enquiry was transient diarrhea (76% of patients), followed by abdominal pain (62%) and pain at the injection site (59%). Based on the analysis of a subgroup of 46 patients who had at least a measurement of fecal fat content after day 0 of the study, a non significant increase (from 4.2 +/- 3.4 to 5.1 +/- 4.3 g/24 h, p = 0.3) in mean steatorrhea was observed during treatment. Before treatment, steatorrhea was present in 9 (19%) patients. During the study, 15 additional patients (32%) developed persistent steatorrhea, and there was a transient increase in fecal fat content above 6 g/24 h in another 11 patients. After exclusion of the 7 patients (12%) with gallstones at enrollment, new gall-stones were diagnosed in 6 out of 50 patients (12%) during the study.

CONCLUSION

Two or three monthly injections of lanreotide PR decreased GH concentration to less than 2.5 micrograms/L and normalized IGF-I levels in 41% of patients treated during 12 months. The good tolerability of this treatment, and the reduction in the frequency of injections, plus the sustained drug serum concentrations, confirm the usefulness of this new somatostatin analog formulation.

New medical treatment for acromegaly

The available somatostatin analogs for subcutaneous administration lower growth hormone (GH) levels in more than 90% of patients and Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels in up to 60%. They are also capable of reducing tumor size in up to 50%. Recently long-acting somatostatin analogs were introduced. The use of these application forms can result in normalization of IGF-1 in 60% of patients after 1 year and in 75% after 3 years. The development of selective analogs for the somatostatin receptor subtype-5 potentially will enhance the potency and the spectrum of the medical treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analogs. The new generation of dopaminergic drugs also form a potentially effective and well tolerated therapy that should be considered in the management of those acromegalic patients, which have relative low serum IGF-I concentrations, along with high serum prolactine levels. Finally, growth hormone receptor (GHR) antagonists are under development for the use in humans. Preliminary results look promising, when biochemical parameters are concerned. Interim analysis of a phase 3 study with B2036-PEG in 38 patients does show that normalization of IGF-I concentrations is reached in at least 92% of the treated patients.

Epidemiology of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a consequence of chronic growth hormone (GH) excess, due in the majority of cases to a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma, and occurring with a population prevalence of 60 per million and an incidence of 3-4 per million per year. Males and females appear to be equally affected with an average age of presentation of 44 years. Younger patients may have more aggressive tumours and higher GH concentrations. There is co-existent hyperprolactinaemia in about one third of cases, and a variable proportion of [figure: see text] tumours appear to have activating mutations of the gsp gene or other genetic abnormalities. Acute complications such as carpal tunnel syndrome, sweating and obstructive sleep apnoea are usually readily reversible with treatment of the condition, but chronic complications such as hypertension, diabetes and heart disease are less readily corrected and post-treatment GH levels of < 2.5 ug/L (5 mU/L) are needed to achieve the prevalence found in the general community. Such 'curative' levels of GH are achieved in only about 50% of patients with current therapies, and as a result there is an ongoing excess of patients with chronic complications of acromegaly leading to increased morbidity and mortality from the disorder, with observed-to-expected mortality ratios ranging from 1.6-3.3 and only approaching unity in those with growth hormone levels < 2.5 ug/L following treatment. Prognostic factors include in some studies the presence of diabetes and [table: see text] hypertension prior to diagnosis as well as measures of exposure to excessive growth hormone derived from the product of preoperative serum GH and the time from first symptoms to treatment. Overall, however, the most important prognostic variable appears to be the serum GH concentration achieved by treatment, with an increasing consensus that this needs to be < 2.5 ug/L (5 mU/L) to achieve cure of the condition.

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtype-selective analogues differentially suppress in vitro growth hormone and prolactin in human pituitary adenomas. Novel potential therapy for functional pituitary tumors

Previously, we have shown somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtype-specific regulation of growth hormone (GH), thyroid-stimulating hormone, and prolactin (PRL) secretion in human fetal pituitary cultures, where GH and thyroid-stimulating hormone are mediated by both SSTR2 and SSTR5, whereas SSTR2 preferentially mediates PRL secretion. We now tested SSTR subtype-selective analogues in primary human GH- and PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma cultures. Analogue affinities determined by membrane radioligand binding in cells stably expressing human SSTR forms were either SSTR2 or SSTR5-selective. Analogues preferential either for SSTR2, including octreotide, lanreotide, and novel compounds with improved affinity for SSTR2, or new SSTR5-selective compounds suppressed GH in tumor cell cultures (up to 44% of control; P < 0.0005). However, novel analogues from both groups were 30-40% more potent than octreotide and lanreotide in suppressing GH (P < 0.05). Heterologous analogue combinations containing both SSTR2- and SSTR5-selective compounds were more potent in decreasing GH than analogues used alone (P < 0.05), or than combinations of compounds specific for the same receptor subtype (P < 0.005). In contrast, SSTR2-selective analogues did not suppress PRL release from six cultured prolactinomas studied. However, new SSTR5-selective analogues suppressed in vitro PRL secretion (30-40%; P < 0.05) in four of six prolactinomas. These results suggest that both SSTR2 and SSTR5 are involved in GH regulation in somatotroph adenoma cells, whereas SSTR5 exclusively regulates PRL secretion from prolactinoma cells. Thus, somatostatin analogues with improved selective binding affinity for these receptor subtypes may be effective in the treatment of either GH- or PRL-secreting adenomas.

Clinical uses of gut peptides

OBJECTIVE

The authors review clinical applications of gut-derived peptides as diagnostic and therapeutic agents.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

An increasing number of gut peptides have been evaluated for clinical use. Earlier uses as diagnostic agents have been complemented more recently by increasing application of gut peptides as therapeutic agents.

METHOD

The authors conducted a literature review.

RESULTS

Current experience with clinical use of gut peptides is described. Initial clinical applications focused on using secretomotor effects of gut peptides in diagnostic tests, many of which have now fallen into disuse. More recently, attention has been directed toward harnessing these secretomotor effects for therapeutic use in a variety of disorders, and also using the trophic effects of gut peptides to modulate gut mucosal growth in benign and malignant disease. Gut peptides have been evaluated in a variety of other clinical situations including use as adjuncts to imaging techniques, and modification of behaviors such as feeding and panic disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Gut peptides have been used successfully in an increasing variety of clinical conditions. Further refinements in analogue and antagonist design are likely to lead to even more selective agents that may have important clinical applications. Further studies are needed to identity and evaluate these new agents.