Two related low molecular mass polypeptide isoforms of amelogenin have distinct activities in mouse tooth germ differentiation in vitro

Neuroendocrinology of bone

The past decade has witnessed significant advances in our understanding of skeletal homeostasis and the mechanisms that mediate the loss of bone in primary and secondary osteoporosis. Recent breakthroughs have primarily emerged from identifying disease-causing mutations and phenocopying human bone disease in rodents. Notably, using genetically-modified rodent models, disrupting the reciprocal relationship with tropic pituitary hormone and effector hormones, we have learned that pituitary hormones have independent roles in skeletal physiology, beyond their effects exerted through target endocrine glands. The rise of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the late perimenopause may account, at least in part, for the rapid bone loss when estrogen is normal, while low thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels may contribute to the bone loss in thyrotoxicosis. Admittedly speculative, suppressed levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) may directly exacerbate bone loss in the setting of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Furthermore, beyond their established roles in reproduction and lactation, oxytocin and prolactin may affect intergenerational calcium transfer and therefore fetal skeletal mineralization, whereas elevated vasopressin levels in chronic hyponatremic states may increase the risk of bone loss.. Here, we discuss the interaction of each pituitary hormone in relation to its role in bone physiology and pathophysiology.

Histological Evaluation of Pulpal Response and Dentin Bridge Formation After Direct Pulp Capping Using Recombinant Amelogenin and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)

The purpose of the study was to compare and histologically investigate pulpal response and dentin bridge formation after direct pulp capping using recombinant amelogenin and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Recombinant amelogenin protein and MTA were used as pulp capping materials in 120 teeth from eight mongrel dogs. Dogs were sacrificed at two different evaluation times. Regenerative changes were evaluated histologically. At two weeks, in contrast to the MTA group, most of the amelogenin group showed moderately formed hard tissue formation and the pulp tissue was completely filling the entire pulp chamber. These results were statistically significant. At two months, all the samples of the amelogenin group showed complete dentin bridge formation and the pulp chamber was filled entirely with tissue-mimicking the authentic pulp in all the specimens of the amelogenin group. These results were statistically significant. In conclusion, direct pulp capping by recombinant amelogenin protein resulted in significantly better regeneration of the dentin-pulp complex than MTA.

Mutations Causing X-Linked Amelogenesis Imperfecta Alter miRNA Formation from Amelogenin Exon4

Amelogenin plays a crucial role in tooth enamel formation, and mutations on X-chromosomal amelogenin cause X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AI). Amelogenin pre-messenger RNA (mRNA) is highly alternatively spliced, and during alternative splicing, exon4 is mostly skipped, leading to the formation of a microRNA (miR-exon4) that has been suggested to function in enamel and bone formation. While delivering the functional variation of amelogenin proteins, alternative splicing of exon4 is the decisive first step to producing miR-exon4. However, the factors that regulate the splicing of exon4 are not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the association between known mutations in exon4 and exon5 of X chromosome amelogenin that causes X-linked AI, the splicing of exon4, and miR-exon4 formation. Our results showed mutations in exon4 and exon5 of the amelogenin gene, including c.120T>C, c.152C>T, c.155C>G, and c.155delC, significantly affected the splicing of exon4 and subsequent miR-exon4 production. Using an amelogenin minigene transfected in HEK-293 cells, we observed increased inclusion of exon4 in amelogenin mRNA and reduced miR-exon4 production with these mutations. In silico analysis predicted that Ser/Arg-rich RNA splicing factor (SRSF) 2 and SRSF5 were the regulatory factors for exon4 and exon5 splicing, respectively. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay confirmed that SRSF2 binds to exon4 and SRSF5 binds to exon5, and mutations in each exon can alter SRSF binding. Transfection of the amelogenin minigene to LS8 ameloblastic cells suppressed expression of the known miR-exon4 direct targets, Nfia and Prkch, related to multiple pathways. Given the mutations on the minigene, the expression of Prkch has been significantly upregulated with c.155C>G and c.155delC mutations. Together, we confirmed that exon4 splicing is critical for miR-exon4 production, and mutations causing X-linked AI in exon4 and exon5 significantly affect exon4 splicing and following miR-exon4 production. The change in miR-exon4 would be an additional etiology of enamel defects seen in some X-linked AI.

The Genes Involved in Dentinogenesis

The development and repair of dentin are strictly regulated by hundreds of genes. Abnormal dentin development is directly caused by gene mutations and dysregulation. Understanding and mastering this signal network is of great significance to the study of tooth development, tissue regeneration, aging, and repair and the treatment of dental diseases. It is necessary to understand the formation and repair mechanism of dentin in order to better treat the dentin lesions caused by various abnormal properties, whether it is to explore the reasons for the formation of dentin defects or to develop clinical drugs to strengthen the method of repairing dentin. Molecular biology of genes related to dentin development and repair are the most important basis for future research.

Amelogenin-Derived Peptides in Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review

Amelogenins are enamel matrix proteins currently used to treat bone defects in periodontal surgery. Recent studies have highlighted the relevance of amelogenin-derived peptides, named LRAP, TRAP, SP, and C11, in bone tissue engineering. Interestingly, these peptides seem to maintain or even improve the biological activity of the full-length protein, which has received attention in the field of bone regeneration. In this article, the authors combined a systematic and a narrative review. The former is focused on the existing scientific evidence on LRAP, TRAP, SP, and C11's ability to induce the production of mineralized extracellular matrix, while the latter is concentrated on the structure and function of amelogenin and amelogenin-derived peptides. Overall, the collected data suggest that LRAP and SP are able to induce stromal stem cell differentiation towards osteoblastic phenotypes; specifically, SP seems to be more reliable in bone regenerative approaches due to its osteoinduction and the absence of immunogenicity. However, even if some evidence is convincing, the limited number of studies and the scarcity of in vivo studies force us to wait for further investigations before drawing a solid final statement on the real potential of amelogenin-derived peptides in bone tissue engineering.

Epithelial loss of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation leads to disturbed enamel and impaired dentin matrix formation in postnatal developed mouse incisor

The formation of dentin and enamel matrix depends on reciprocal interactions between epithelial-mesenchymal cells. To assess the role of mitochondrial function in amelogenesis and dentinogenesis, we studied postnatal incisor development in K320E-Twinkle^Epi mice. In these mice, a loss of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), followed by a severe defect in the oxidative phosphorylation system is induced specifically in Keratin 14 (K14+) expressing epithelial cells. Histochemical staining showed severe reduction of cytochrome c oxidase activity only in K14+ epithelial cells. In mutant incisors, H&E staining showed severe defects in the ameloblasts, in the epithelial cells of the stratum intermedium and the papillary cell layer, but also a disturbed odontoblast layer. The lack of amelogenin in the enamel matrix of K320E-Twinkle^Epi mice indicated that defective ameloblasts are not able to form extracellular enamel matrix proteins. In comparison to control incisors, von Kossa staining showed enamel biomineralization defects and dentin matrix impairment. In mutant incisor, TUNEL staining and ultrastructural analyses revealed differentiation defects, while in hair follicle cells apoptosis is prevalent. We concluded that mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in epithelial cells of the developed incisor is required for Ca2+ homeostasis to regulate the formation of enamel matrix and induce the differentiation of ectomesenchymal cells into odontoblasts.

Characterization of inter-crystallite peptides in human enamel rods reveals contribution by the Y allele of amelogenin

Proteins of the inter-rod sheath and peptides within the narrow inter-crystallite space of the rod structure are considered largely responsible for visco-elastic and visco-plastic properties of enamel. The present study was designed to investigate putative peptides of the inter-crystallite space. Entities of 1-6 kDa extracted from enamel rods of erupted permanent teeth were analysed by mass spectrometry (MS) and shown to comprise N-terminal amelogenin (AMEL) peptides either containing or not containing exon 4 product. Other dominant entities consisted of an N-terminal peptide from ameloblastin (AMBN) and a series of the most hydrophobic peptides from serum albumin (ALBN). Amelogenin peptides encoded by the Y-chromosome allele were strongly detected in Enamel from male teeth. Location of N-terminal AMEL peptides as well as AMBN and ALBN, between apatite crystallites, was disclosed by immunogold scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Density plots confirmed the relative abundance of these products including exon 4+ AMEL peptides that have greater capacity for binding to hydroxyapatite. Hydrophilic X and Y peptides encoded in exon 4 differ only in substitution of non-polar isoleucine in Y for polar threonine in X with reduced disruption of the hydrophobic N-terminal structure in the Y form. Despite similarity of X and Y alleles of AMEL the non-coding region upstream from exon 4 shows significant variation with implications for segregation of processing of transcripts from exon 4. Detection of fragments from multiple additional proteins including keratins (KER), fetuin A (FETUA), proteinases and proteinase inhibitors, likely reflect biochemical events during enamel formation.

Phosphorylated and Non-phosphorylated Leucine Rich Amelogenin Peptide Differentially Affect Ameloblast Mineralization

The Leucine Rich Amelogenin Peptide (LRAP) is a product of alternative splicing of the amelogenin gene. As full length amelogenin, LRAP has been shown, in precipitation experiments, to regulate hydroxyapatite (HAP) crystal formation depending on its phosphorylation status. However, very few studies have questioned the impact of its phosphorylation status on enamel mineralization in biological models. Therefore, we have analyzed the effect of phosphorylated (+P) or non-phosphorylated (−P) LRAP on enamel formation in ameloblast-like cell lines and ex vivo cultures of murine postnatal day 1 molar germs. To this end, the mineral formed was analyzed by micro-computed tomography, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Selected Area Electon Diffraction imaging. Amelogenin gene transcription was evaluated by qPCR analysis. Our data show that, in both cells and germ cultures, LRAP is able to induce an up-regulation of amelogenin transcription independently of its phosphorylation status. Mineral formation is promoted by LRAP(+P) in all models, while LRAP(–P) essentially affects HAP crystal formation through an increase in crystal length and organization in ameloblast-like cells. Altogether, these data suggest a differential effect of LRAP depending on its phosphorylation status and on the ameloblast stage at the time of treatment. Therefore, LRAP isoforms can be envisioned as potential candidates for treatment of enamel lesions or defects and their action should be further evaluated in pathological models.

Recombinant Amelogenin Protein Induces Apical Closure and Pulp Regeneration in Open-apex, Nonvital Permanent Canine Teeth

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant DNA-produced amelogenin protein was compared with calcium hydroxide in a study of immature apex closure conducted in 24 young mongrel dogs.

METHODS

Root canals of maxillary and mandibular right premolars (n = 240) were instrumented and left open for 14 days. Canals were cleansed, irrigated, and split equally for treatment with recombinant mouse amelogenin (n = 120) or calcium hydroxide (n = 120).

RESULTS

After 1, 3, and 6 months, the animals were sacrificed and the treated teeth recovered for histologic assessment and immunodetection of protein markers associated with odontogenic cells. After 1 month, amelogenin-treated canals revealed calcified tissue formed at the apical foramen and a pulp chamber containing soft connective tissue and hard tissue; amelogenin-treated canals assessed after 3- and 6-month intervals further included apical tissue functionally attached to bone by a periodontal ligament. In contrast, calcified apical tissue was poorly formed in the calcium hydroxide group, and soft connective tissue within the pulp chamber was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this experimental strategy suggest recombinant amelogenin protein can signal cells to enhance apex formation in nonvital immature teeth and promote soft connective tissue regeneration.

Full-length amelogenin influences the differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells

Background

Amelogenin is an extracellular matrix protein well known for its role in the organization and mineralization of enamel. Clinically, it is used for periodontal regeneration and, due to its finding also in predentin and intercellular spaces of dental pulp cells, it has recently been suggested for pulp capping procedures. The aim of this study was to analyse in vitro the effect of the recombinant human full-length amelogenin on the growth and differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs).

Methods

Human DPSCs were treated with a supplement of amelogenin at a concentration of 10 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml and 1000 ng/ml. The groups were compared to the unstimulated control in terms of cell morphology and proliferation, mineralization and gene expression for ALP (alkaline phosphatase), DMP1 (dentin matrix protein-1) and DSPP (dentin sialophosphoprotein).

Results

Amelogenin affects hDPSCs differently than PDL (periodontal ligament) cells and other cell lines. The proliferation rate at two weeks is significantly reduced in presence of the highest concentration of amelogenin as compared to the unstimulated control. hDPSCs treated with low concentrations present a downregulation of DMP1 and DSPP, which is significant for DSPP (p = 0.011), but not for DMP1 (p = 0.395).

Conclusions

These finding suggest that the role of full-length amelogenin is not restricted to participation in tooth structure. It influences the differentiation of hDPSC according to various concentrations and this might impair the clinical results of pulp capping.

Influence of enamel matrix derivative on cells at different maturation stages of differentiation

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD), a porcine extract harvested from developing porcine teeth, has been shown to promote formation of new cementum, periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. Despite its widespread use, an incredibly large variability among in vitro studies has been observed. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of EMD on cells at different maturation stages of osteoblast differentiation by testing 6 cell types to determine if cell phenotype plays a role in cell behaviour following treatment with EMD. Six cell types including MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts, rat calvarial osteoblasts, human periodontal ligament (PDL) cells, ROS cells, MG63 cells and human alveolar osteoblasts were cultured in the presence or absence of EMD and proliferation rates were quantified by an MTS assay. Gene expression of collagen1(COL1), alkaline phosphate(ALP) and osteocalcin(OC) were investigated by real-time PCR. While EMD significantly increased cell proliferation of all cell types, its effect on osteoblast differentiation was more variable. EMD significantly up-regulated gene expression of COL1, ALP and OC in cells early in their differentiation process when compared to osteoblasts at later stages of maturation. Furthermore, the effect of cell passaging of primary human PDL cells (passage 2 to 15) was tested in response to treatment with EMD. EMD significantly increased cell proliferation and differentiation of cells at passages 2-5 however had completely lost their ability to respond to EMD by passages 10+. The results from the present study suggest that cell stimulation with EMD has a more pronounced effect on cells earlier in their differentiation process and may partially explain why treatment with EMD primarily favors regeneration of periodontal defects (where the periodontal ligament contains a higher number of undifferentiated progenitor cells) over regeneration of pure alveolar bone defects containing no periodontal ligament and a more limited number of osteoprogenitor cells.

Amelogenin Peptide Extract Increases Differentiation and Angiogenic and Local Factor Production and Inhibits Apoptosis in Human Osteoblasts

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD), a decellularized porcine extracellular matrix (ECM), is used clinically in periodontal tissue regeneration. Amelogenin, EMD’s principal component, spontaneously assembles into nanospheres in vivo, forming an ECM complex that releases proteolytically cleaved peptides. However, the role of amelogenin or amelogenin peptides in mediating osteoblast response to EMD is not clear. Human MG63 osteoblast-like cells or normal human osteoblasts were treated with recombinant human amelogenin or a 5 kDa tyrosine-rich amelogenin peptide (TRAP) isolated from EMD and the effect on osteogenesis, local factor production, and apoptosis assessed. Treated MG63 cells increased alkaline phosphatase specific activity and levels of osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin, prostaglandin E2, and active/latent TGF-β1, an effect sensitive to the effector and concentration. Primary osteoblasts exhibited similar, but less robust, effects. TRAP-rich 5 kDa peptides yielded more mineralization than rhAmelogenin in osteoblasts in vitro. Both amelogenin and 5 kDa peptides protected MG63s from chelerythrine-induced apoptosis. The data suggest that the 5 kDa TRAP-rich sequence is an active amelogenin peptide that regulates osteoblast differentiation and local factor production and prevents osteoblast apoptosis.

Leucine rich amelogenin peptide alters ameloblast differentiation in vivo

Highly mineralized tooth enamel develops from an extracellular matrix chiefly comprised of amelogenins formed by splicing of 7 (human) or 9 (rodent) exons secreted from specialized epithelial cells known as ameloblasts. Here we examined the role of the 59 amino acid alternatively spliced amelogenin known as leucine rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP) on enamel formation, using transgenic murine models in which LRAP overexpression is driven by an amelogenin promoter (TgLRAP). Beginning in the secretory stage of mouse amelogenesis, we found a reduced thickness of enamel matrix and a loss of Tomes' processes, followed by upregulated amelogenin mRNA expression, inhibited amelogenin secretion and loss of cell polarity. In the presecretory stage (P0) amelogenin m180 mRNA expression was increased 58 fold along with a 203 fold increase in MMP-20 expression and 3.5 and 3.2 fold increased in respectively enamelin and ameloblastin. When LRAP was overexpressed on an amelogenin knockout mouse model, the ameloblasts were not affected. Further, expression of the global chromatin organizer and transcription factor SATB1 was reduced in secretory stage TgLRAP ameloblasts. These findings identify a cellular role for LRAP in enamel formation that is not directly related to directing enamel crystal formation as is reported to be the primary function of full length amelogenins. The effect of LRAP overexpression in upregulating amelogenins, MMP-20 and SATB1, suggests a role in protein regulation critical to ameloblast secretion and matrix processing, to form a mineralized enamel matrix.

Hyperthyroid-associated osteoporosis is exacerbated by the loss of TSH signaling

The osteoporosis associated with human hyperthyroidism has traditionally been attributed to elevated thyroid hormone levels. There is evidence, however, that thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), which is low in most hyperthyroid states, directly affects the skeleton. Importantly, Tshr-knockout mice are osteopenic. In order to determine whether low TSH levels contribute to bone loss in hyperthyroidism, we compared the skeletal phenotypes of wild-type and Tshr-knockout mice that were rendered hyperthyroid. We found that hyperthyroid mice lacking TSHR had greater bone loss and resorption than hyperthyroid wild-type mice, thereby demonstrating that the absence of TSH signaling contributes to bone loss. Further, we identified a TSH-like factor that may confer osteoprotection. These studies suggest that therapeutic suppression of TSH to very low levels may contribute to bone loss in people.

Cellular uptake and processing of enamel matrix derivative by human periodontal ligament fibroblasts

OBJECTIVE

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD), is an extract of porcine developing enamel matrix. Its commercialised form Emdogain, is claimed to stimulate periodontal regeneration by recapitulating original developmental processes, although the mechanism remains unclear. Our objective was to investigate interactions between EMD and human periodontal ligament (HPDL) fibroblasts in vitro.

DESIGN

HPDL fibroblasts were cultured in the presence of fluorescently labelled EMD and cellular EMD uptake was monitored using confocal laser scanning microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Internalised EMD proteins were characterised using SDS-PAGE.

RESULTS

EMD was internalised by HPDL fibroblasts leading to the appearance of multiple, vesicle-like structure in the cytoplasm. The internalised protein was composed mainly of the major 20kDa amelogenin component of EMD which was subsequently processed with time to generate a cumulative 5kDa component.

CONCLUSIONS

Cellular uptake and subsequent intracellular processing of EMD components by dental mesenchymal cells may play a role in EMD bioactivity and in part explain the turnover of Emdogain when placed clinically.

Amelogenin exons 8 and 9 encoded peptide enhances leucine rich amelogenin peptide mediated dental pulp repair

Amelogenins containing exons 8 and 9 are alternatively spliced variants of amelogenin. Some amelogenin spliced variants have been found to promote pulp regeneration following pulp exposure. The function of the amelogenin spliced variants with the exons 8 and 9 remains unknown. In this study, we synthesized recombinant leucine rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP, A-4), LRAP plus exons 8 and 9 peptide (LRAP 8, 9) or exons 8 and 9 peptide (P89), to determine their effects on odontoblasts. In vivo analyses were completed following the insertion of agarose beads containing LRAP or LRAP 8, 9 into exposed cavity preparations of rat molars. After 8, 15 or 30 days' exposure, the pulp tissues were analyzed for changes in histomorphometry and cell proliferation by PCNA stainings. In vitro analyses included the effects of the addition of the recombinant proteins or peptide on cell proliferation, differentiation and adhesion of postnatal human dental pulp cells (DPCs). These studies showed that in vivo LRAP 8, 9 enhanced the reparative dentin formation as compared to LRAP. In vitro LRAP 8, 9 promoted DPC proliferation and differentiation to a greater extent than LRAP. These data suggest that amelogenin exons 8 and 9 may be useful in amelogenin-mediated pulp repair.

Enamel matrix derivative: a review of cellular effects in vitro and a model of molecular arrangement and functioning

BACKGROUND

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD), the active component of Emdogain®, is a viable option in the treatment of periodontal disease owing to its ability to regenerate lost tissue. It is believed to mimic odontogenesis, though the details of its functioning remain the focus of current research.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to review all relevant literature reporting on the composition/characterization of EMD as well as the effects of EMD, and its components amelogenin and ameloblastin, on the behavior of various cell types in vitro. In this way, insight into the underlying mechanism of regeneration will be garnered and utilized to propose a model for the molecular arrangement and functioning of EMD.

METHODS

A review of in vitro studies of EMD, or components of EMD, was performed using key words "enamel matrix proteins" OR "EMD" OR "Emdogain" OR "amelogenin" OR "ameloblastin" OR "sheath proteins" AND "cells." Results of this analysis, together with current knowledge on the molecular composition of EMD and the structure and regulation of its components, are then used to present a model of EMD functioning.

RESULTS

Characterization of the molecular composition of EMD confirmed that amelogenin proteins, including their enzymatically cleaved and alternatively spliced fragments, dominate the protein complex (>90%). A small presence of ameloblastin has also been reported. Analysis of the effects of EMD indicated that gene expression, protein production, proliferation, and differentiation of various cell types are affected and often enhanced by EMD, particularly for periodontal ligament and osteoblastic cell types. EMD also stimulated angiogenesis. In contrast, EMD had a cytostatic effect on epithelial cells. Full-length amelogenin elicited similar effects to EMD, though to a lesser extent. Both the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide and the ameloblastin peptides demonstrated osteogenic effects. A model for molecular structure and functioning of EMD involving nanosphere formation, aggregation, and dissolution is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

EMD elicits a regenerative response in periodontal tissues that is only partly replicated by amelogenin or ameloblastin components. A synergistic effect among the various proteins and with the cells, as well as a temporal effect, may prove important aspects of the EMD response in vivo.

Wnt proteins in mineralized tissue development and homeostasis

The past decade has seen rapid advancement in the dissection of the molecular events and players in the development and homeostasis of mineralized tissues, that is, teeth and bones. Much of this is due to research efforts toward the regeneration of these organs and also to develop treatments for pathologies of bone, especially osteoporosis. Of late, great interest has been focused on the Wnt family of proteins and their involvement in tooth and bone development and in the regulation of postnatal bone mass. The purpose of this review is to summarize these findings and to explore new areas of Wnt research such as Wnt?bone morphogenetic protein interactions and the exciting revelation of systemic serotonin being involved in bone mass regulation.

An amelogenin mutation leads to disruption of the odontogenic apparatus and aberrant expression of Notch1

BACKGROUND

Amelogenins are highly conserved proteins secreted by ameloblasts in the dental organ of developing teeth. These proteins regulate dental enamel thickness and structure in humans and mice. Mice that express an amelogenin transgene with a P70T mutation (TgP70T) develop abnormal epithelial proliferation in an amelogenin null (KO) background. Some of these cellular masses have the appearance of proliferating stratum intermedium, which is the layer adjacent to the ameloblasts in unerupted teeth. As Notch proteins are thought to constitute the developmental switch that separates ameloblasts from stratum intermedium, these signaling proteins were evaluated in normal and proliferating tissues.

METHODS

Mandibles were dissected for histology and immunohistochemistry using Notch1 antibodies. Molar teeth were dissected for western blotting and RT-PCR for evaluation of Notch levels through imaging and statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Notch1 was immunolocalized to ameloblasts of TgP70TKO mice, KO ameloblasts stained, but less strongly, and wild-type teeth had minimal staining. Cells within the proliferating epithelial cell masses were positive for Notch1 and had an appearance reminiscent of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor with amyloid-like deposits. Notch1 protein and mRNA were elevated in molar teeth from TgP70TKO mice.

CONCLUSION

Expression of TgP70T leads to abnormal structures in mandibles and maxillae of mice with the KO genetic background and these mice have elevated levels of Notch 1 in developing molars. As cells within the masses also express transgenic amelogenins, development of the abnormal proliferations suggests communication between amelogenin producing cells and the proliferating cells, dependent on the presence of the mutated amelogenin protein.

Combined effect of fluoride and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on mouse dental hard tissue formation in vitro

Fluoride interferes with enamel matrix secretion and mineralization and dentin mineralization. The most toxic dioxin congener, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), also impairs dental hard tissue formation and mineralization in vitro and in vivo. Our aim was to investigate in vitro whether the combined effect of sodium fluoride (NaF) and TCDD on dental hard tissue formation is potentiative. For this purpose, mandibular first and second molar tooth germs of E18 mouse embryos were cultured for 5-12 days with NaF and TCDD alone at various concentrations (2.5, 5, 10, 12.5, 15, and 20 μM and 5, 10, 12.5, and 15 nM, respectively) to determine the highest concentrations, which alone cause no or negligible effects. Morphological changes were studied from the whole tooth photographs and histological tissue sections. The concentrations found were 15 μM for NaF and 10 nM for TCDD. While at these concentrations, the effects of NaF and TCDD alone were barely detectable, the effect of simultaneous exposure on dentin and enamel formation was overt; mineralization of predentin to dentin and enamel matrix secretion and mineralization were impaired. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the combined exposure modified amelogenin expression by odontoblasts. Morphology of ameloblasts and the expression of amelogenin indicated that ameloblasts were still secretory. The results show that NaF and TCDD have potentiative, harmful effects on the formation of dental hard tissues. Since children can be exposed to subclinical levels of fluoride and dioxins during early childhood, coincidently with mineralization of the first permanent teeth, this finding may have clinical significance.

Regeneration of bone and periodontal ligament induced by recombinant amelogenin after periodontitis

Regeneration of mineralized tissues affected by chronic diseases comprises a major scientific and clinical challenge. Periodontitis, one such prevalent disease, involves destruction of the tooth-supporting tissues, alveolar bone, periodontal-ligament and cementum, often leading to tooth loss. In 1997, it became clear that, in addition to their function in enamel formation, the hydrophobic ectodermal enamel matrix proteins (EMPs) play a role in the regeneration of these periodontal tissues. The epithelial EMPs are a heterogeneous mixture of polypeptides encoded by several genes. It was not clear, however, which of these many EMPs induces the regeneration and what mechanisms are involved. Here we show that a single recombinant human amelogenin protein (rHAM(+)), induced in vivo regeneration of all tooth-supporting tissues after creation of experimental periodontitis in a dog model. To further understand the regeneration process, amelogenin expression was detected in normal and regenerating cells of the alveolar bone (osteocytes, osteoblasts and osteoclasts), periodontal ligament, cementum and in bone marrow stromal cells. Amelogenin expression was highest in areas of high bone turnover and activity. Further studies showed that during the first 2 weeks after application, rHAM(+) induced, directly or indirectly, significant recruitment of mesenchymal progenitor cells, which later differentiated to form the regenerated periodontal tissues. The ability of a single protein to bring about regeneration of all periodontal tissues, in the correct spatio-temporal order, through recruitment of mesenchymal progenitor cells, could pave the way for development of new therapeutic devices for treatment of periodontal, bone and ligament diseases based on rHAM(+).

Cellular effects of enamel matrix derivative are associated with different molecular weight fractions following separation by size-exclusion chromatography

BACKGROUND

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) was shown to enhance soft tissue healing and regeneration of the periodontium; however, the mechanisms of this action are unknown. It is assumed that amelogenin, the most abundant protein in EMD, is the protein primarily responsible for the effects of EMD. The purpose of this study was to fractionate EMD and associate its specific cellular effects with different molecular weight fractions following size-exclusion chromatography.

METHODS

Freshly dissolved EMD was fractionated by gel filtration, and forty-five 7-ml fractions were collected, desalted, lyophilized, and resuspended. These fractions were analyzed for their effects on the differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells (C2C12) and the proliferation and differentiation of human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVECs). Alkaline phosphatase activity (C2C12) was measured as a marker for osteogenic differentiation before and after preincubation of the fractions with the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) decoy receptor, noggin. Angiogenesis (HMVEC) was evaluated as a marker for endothelial cell differentiation. Enzymographic assays used polyacrylamide gels copolymerized with denatured type I collagen to determine gelatinolytic activities in each fraction.

RESULTS

EMD fractionated into three major protein peaks following size exclusion chromatography with cross-linked dextran particle matrix. Peak I was associated with the column void volume, whereas peak III eluted near the salt volume. Peak II eluted between these two peaks. Proliferation and angiogenic activities were associated with peaks II and III for the microvascular cells. The differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells, indicated by alkaline phosphatase activity, was induced by EMD components present in peak I and the leading edge of peak II. The additional observation that this differentiation was inhibited by prior treatment of the fractions with noggin suggested the activity was induced by BMP rather than amelogenin or other unknown proteins. Gelatinolytic activities were detected in the early fractions of peaks I and II of gel-fractionated EMD.

CONCLUSIONS

The cellular activities stimulated by EMD are not associated with a single molecular weight species. The fact that noggin abolishes C2C12 alkaline phosphatase activity suggests that effects on osteoprogenitor cell differentiation are the result of a BMP-like protein(s), whereas effects on proliferation and angiogenesis are associated with lower molecular weight species present in peaks II and III. Finally, unheated EMD displays gelatinolytic activities that are also detectable following size-exclusion separation of its constituents. The masses of these activities were consistent with those reported for latent and active matrix metalloproteinase-20.

In vivo application of amelogenin suppresses root resorption

Amelogenin is recognized as an enamel protein associated with enamel formation. Besides this well-known function, remarkable root resorption has been seen in amelogenin-null mutant mice. Moreover, in vitro culture studies showed that amelogenin suppressed osteoclast differentiation. These studies raised the hypothesis that amelogenin can inhibit root resorption by reducing odontoclast number. To examine this hypothesis, we applied porcine amelogenins in a rat root resorption model, in which maxillary first molars were replanted after being air-dried. Compared with untreated and carrier-treated tooth roots, the application dramatically reduced the odontoclast number on root surfaces and inhibited cementum and root dentin resorption. Amelogenin significantly reduced the number of human odontoclastic cells in culture. It also inhibited RANKL expression in mouse bone marrow cell cultures. All these findings support our hypothesis that amelogenin application suppresses root resorption by inhibiting odontoclast number, and suggest that this is mediated by the regulation of RANKL expression.

The effects of LAMP1 and LAMP3 on M180 amelogenin uptake, localization and amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein

We previously demonstrated that the uptake of M180 amelogenin protein in dental epithelial cells (HAT-7) results in increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through enhanced mRNA stabilization. To determine the processes involved in the uptake of extracellular M180 amelogenin by cells and in amelogenin intracellular trafficking in the amelogenin protein-mediated amelogenin mRNA expression pathway, we investigated the effects of LAMP1 and LAMP3, which are candidate M180 amelogenin receptors, on M180 amelogenin uptake, localization and amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein, using anti-LAMP-1 and anti-LAMP-3 antibodies and siRNA analysis. The results indicate that LAMP3 blocking by anti-LAMP-3 decreases M180 amelogenin uptake, but does not affect amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein, suggesting that LAMP3 is related to amelogenin degradation. Down-regulation by siRNA of LAMP1, which is the receptor for small amelogenin protein (LRAP), does not affect M180 amelogenin uptake, localization or amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein. Thus, while LAMP1 is the specific receptor for LRAP, it is not a receptor for M180 amelogenin. These findings will aid further research into the understanding of M180 amelogenin function and expression.

Identification of the functional activity of the [A-4] amelogenin gene splice product in newborn mouse ameloblasts

In the mouse tooth organ, shortly after birth, ameloblasts acquire their secretory phenotype, which is characterized by the prominent expression and subsequent secretion of two isoforms of amelogenin, M180 and M59 (LRAP, [A-4]). Amelogenin deposition into the ameloblast extracellular matrix promotes enamel biomineralization. A complex set of intercellular signaling events, reciprocal communications between the developing oral epithelium and its underlying dental mesenchyme, guide the expression of amelogenin mRNA, and limit it to a defined period of tooth development. In tooth germ organ culture, addition of the [A-4] isoform, lacking amelogenin exon 4 and exon 6 segments a, b, c, was shown to affect ameloblast development. To understand the basis for this regulatory activity, we have studied the effects of r[A-4] on ameloblast-like LS8 cells, and the role of the putative [A-4] cell surface receptor, LAMP1, as well as the related receptor LAMP3. In the LS8 cells, the expression of the spliced isoforms of amelogenin, LAMP1, and LAMP3 were identified by RT-PCR, and real-time PCR semi-quantitative analysis assessed the modulation of M180 message. M180 mRNA was up-regulated by exogenous [A-4], and this was further increased by blockade of LAMP1, suggesting additive effects between the intracellular signaling pathways activated by the discrete agonists. Immunofluorescence staining identified the patterns of [A-4] and LAMP1 localization in LS8 cells. Internalized r[A-4] was co-localized with LAMP1 in late endosomal/lysosomal compartments. Thus, the LAMP1 and [A-4] intracellular sorting pathways are interrelated. The nitric oxide (NO) signaling pathway was activated by exogenous [A-4]. [A-4] modulated inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS, NOS2) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS, NOS3) expression, albeit, to different extents. NOS2 was significantly up-regulated after 4 h, while NOS3 increased slightly after 24 h. Co-treatment of LS8 cells with r[A-4] and anti-LAMP1 antibodies further enhanced NOS2 expression. Anti-LAMP1 antibodies did not abrogate NO production in LS8 cells treated for 4 h with r[A-4], but the iNOS inhibitor, l-Nil, down-regulated both NO production and the expression of M180 mRNA. These data suggest that [A-4] modulates M180 mRNA expression, partly, via the NO signaling pathway.

An In vivo Model for Short-Term Evaluation of the Implantation Effects of Biomolecules or Stem Cells in the Dental Pulp

The continuously growing rodent incisor is a widely used model to investigate odontogenesis and mineralized tissue formation. This study focused on evaluating the mouse mandibular incisor as an experimental biological tool for analyzing in vivo the capacity of odontoblast-like progenitors or bioactive molecules to contribute to reparative dentinogenesis. We describe here a surgical procedure allowing direct access to the forming part of the incisor dental pulp Amelogenin peptide A+4 adsorbed on agarose beads, or dental pulp progenitor cells were implanted in the pulp following this procedure. After 10 days A+4 induced the formation of an osteodentin occluding almost the totality of the pulp compartment. Implantation of progenitor cells leads to formation of islets of osteodentin-like structures located centrally in the pulp. These pilot studies validate the incisor as an experimental model to test the capacity of progenitor cells or bioactive molecules to induce the formation of reparative dentin.

The effect of LRAP on enamel organ epithelial cell differentiation

Leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP) is an alternatively spliced amelogenin found in the developing enamel organ. LRAP functions to regulate the development of mesenchymal-derived cells; however, its effect on cells of the enamel organ remains unclear. The hypothesis tested in this study is that LRAP also regulates human enamel organ epithelial cells. Recombinant human LRAP (rH58) was synthesized in E. coli, purified, and exogenously added to cultures of human primary enamel epithelial cells, which were analyzed for changes in cell proliferation and differentiation. rH58 had no effect on cell proliferation, but altered enamel epithelial cell morphology, resulting in larger, more rounded cells. Immunofluorescence showed that rH58 treatment increased amelogenin synthesis, but down-regulated Notch1 expression in enamel epithelial cells. LAMP-1, a membrane receptor for LRAP in mesenchymal cells, was identified and was up-regulated in the presence of rH58. These results suggest that rH58 promotes differentiation of human enamel organ epithelial cells.

Advances in defining regulators of cementum development and periodontal regeneration

Substantial advancements have been made in defining the cells and molecular signals that guide tooth crown morphogenesis and development. As a result, very encouraging progress has been made in regenerating crown tissues by using dental stem cells and recombining epithelial and mesenchymal tissues of specific developmental ages. To date, attempts to regenerate a complete tooth, including the critical periodontal tissues of the tooth root, have not been successful. This may be in part due to a lesser degree of understanding of the events leading to the initiation and development of root and periodontal tissues. Controversies still exist regarding the formation of periodontal tissues, including the origins and contributions of cells, the cues that direct root development, and the potential of these factors to direct regeneration of periodontal tissues when they are lost to disease. In recent years, great strides have been made in beginning to identify and characterize factors contributing to formation of the root and surrounding tissues, that is, cementum, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. This review focuses on the most exciting and important developments over the last 5 years toward defining the regulators of tooth root and periodontal tissue development, with special focus on cementogenesis and the potential for applying this knowledge toward developing regenerative therapies. Cells, genes, and proteins regulating root development are reviewed in a question-answer format in order to highlight areas of progress as well as areas of remaining uncertainty that warrant further study.

The exon 6ABC region of amelogenin mRNA contribute to increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through amelogenin protein-enhanced mRNA stabilization

We recently demonstrated that the reuptake of full-length amelogenin protein results in increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through enhanced mRNA stabilization (Xu, L., Harada, H., Tamaki, T. Y., Matsumoto, S., Tanaka, J., and Taniguchi, A. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 2257-2262). Here, we examined the molecular mechanism of enhanced amelogenin mRNA stabilization. To identify the cis-regulatory region within amelogenin mRNA, we tested various reporter systems using a deletion series of reporter plasmids. A deletion at exon 6ABC of amelogenin mRNA resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in the amelogenin mRNA expression level when compared with that of full-length mRNA, indicating that a cis-element exists in exon 6ABC of amelogenin mRNA. Furthermore, Northwestern analysis demonstrated that amelogenin protein binds directly to its mRNA in vitro, suggesting that amelogenin protein acts as a trans-acting protein that specifically binds to this cis-element. Moreover, recombinant mouse amelogenin protein extended the half-life of full-length amelogenin mRNA but did not significantly alter the half-life of exon 6ABC-deletion mutant mRNA. The splice products produced by deletion of exon 6ABC are known as leucine-rich amelogenin peptides and have signaling effects on cells. Our findings also suggest that the regulation of full-length amelogenin protein expression differs from the regulation of leucine-rich amelogenin peptide expression.

Amelogenins in human developing and mature dental pulp

Amelogenins are a group of heterogenous proteins first identified in developing tooth enamel and reported to be present in odontoblasts. The objective of this study was to elucidate the expression and function of amelogenins in the human dentin-pulp complex. Developing human tooth buds were immunostained for amelogenin, and mRNA was detected by in situ hybridization. The effects of recombinant amelogenins on pulp and papilla cell proliferation were measured by Brd U immunoassay, and differentiation was monitored by alkaline phosphatase expression. Amelogenin protein was found in the forming dentin matrix, and amelogenin mRNA was localized in the dentin, presumably in the odontoblast processes. Proliferation of papilla cells was enhanced by recombinant human amelogenin rH72 (LRAP+ exon 4), while pulp cells responded to both rH72 and rH58 (LRAP), with no effect by rH174. These studies suggest that odontoblasts actively synthesize and secrete amelogenin protein during human tooth development, and that low-molecular-weight amelogenins can enhance pulp cell proliferation.

Evidence for direct amelogenin-target cell interactions using dynamic force spectroscopy

Increasing evidence suggests that amelogenin, long held to be a structural protein of developing enamel matrix, may also have cell signaling functions. However, a mechanism for amelogenin cell signaling has yet to be described. The aim of the present study was to use dynamic chemical force spectroscopy to measure amelogenin interactions with possible target cells. Full-length amelogenin (rM179) was covalently attached to silicon nitride AFM tips. Synthetic RGD peptides and unmodified AFM tips were used as controls. Amelogenin-RGD cell binding force measurements were carried out using human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPDF) from primary explants and a commercially available osteoblast-like human sarcoma cell line as the targets. Results indicated a linear logarithmic dependence between loading rate and unbinding force for amelogenin-RGD target cells across the range of loading rates used. For RGD controls, binding events measured at 5.5 nN s-1 force loading rate resulted in a mean force of 60 pN. Values for amelogenin-fibroblast and amelogenin-osteoblast-like cell unbinding forces, measured at similar loading rates, were 50 and 55 pN, respectively. These data suggest that amelogenin interacts with potential target cells with forces characteristic of specific ligand-receptor binding, suggesting a direct effect for amelogenin at target cell membranes.

Amelogenin, a major structural protein in mineralizing enamel, is also expressed in soft tissues: brain and cells of the hematopoietic system

The amelogenin protein is considered as the major molecular marker of developing and mineralizing ectodermal enamel. It regulates the shape, size, and direction of growth of the enamel mineral crystallite. Recent data suggest other roles for amelogenin beyond regulation of enamel mineral crystal growth. The present study describes our recent discovery of amelogenin expression in soft tissues: in brain and in cells of the hematopoietic system, such as macrophages, megakaryocytes and in some of the hematopoietic stem cells. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) followed by cDNA sequencing revealed, in mouse brain, two amelogenin mRNA isoforms: the full-length amelogenin including exon 4, and the isoform lacking exon 4. Immunohistochemistry revealed amelogenin expression in brain glial cells. Mouse macrophages were found to express the full-length amelogenin sequence lacking exon 4. Confocal microscopy revealed colocalization of amelogenin and CD41 (a megakaryocyte marker), as well as amelogenin and CD34 (a hematopoietic stem cell marker) in some of the bone marrow cells. The expression of amelogenin, a major structural protein of the mineralizing extracellular enamel matrix, also in cells of non-mineralizing soft tissues, suggests that amelogenin is multifunctional. Several different potential functions of amelogenin are discussed.

Self-assembly and effect on crystal growth of the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide

Amelogenins are a unique group of alternatively spliced proteins. While the full-length amelogenin is known to assemble into nanospheres and alter apatite crystal growth and alignment, the function of the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP) in biomineralization is not understood. This study tested the hypothesis that LRAP self-assembles into a supramolecular structure and guides crystal growth similarly to the full-length protein. Synthetic LRAP and recombinant full-length amelogenin (rH175) were used at different concentrations and either immobilized onto fluoroapatite substrates (FAP) or immersed into saturated calcium-phosphate solutions. The structure of the assembled protein and the height of apatite crystals formed on the FAP template were determined using atomic force microscopy. Both LRAP and rH175 assembled into nanospheres. LRAP self-assembly, however, was only observed at concentrations of >0.5 mg ml-1 and limited to sizes between 5 and 30 nm. Apatite crystal growth was not significantly affected by LRAP, while rH175 accelerated crystal growth by up to 50-fold. The increased growth rate was only observed when rH175 precipitated at concentrations of >0.8 mg ml-1. It was concluded that the ability of amelogenins to self-assemble into nanospheres and to bind to apatite in vitro is not inevitably an indication for the ability to control apatite crystal growth.

Early in vivo and in vitro effects of amelogenin gene splice products on pulp cells

Recombinant amelogenin gene splice products A+4 and A-4, implanted in the pulp, induce the recruitment, proliferation, and differentiation of reparative cells. Our aim was to investigate the precocious events occurring in the pulp 1 d and 3 d after implantation of agarose beads alone or loaded with A+4 or A-4. Proliferation and cell recruitment towards an odonto/osteogenic phenotype were visualized by detection of the proliferation cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and RP59. After implantation of beads alone or loaded with A+4, at day 3, pulp cells were moderately immunopositive for osteopontin (OP), whereas labeling was strongly positive upon treatment with A-4. Dentin sialoprotein (DSP) labeling was not detectable. Parallel in vitro studies were carried out on odontoblastic and mesenchymal progenitor cells in order to evaluate the effect of the amelogenin peptides on the expression of a series of marker genes involved in the odontoblastic/osteogenic/chondrogenic differentiation pathways. Altogether, our results suggest that the 'signaling' effects of the amelogenin peptides A+4 and A-4 may differ according to the type of target cells, their stage of differentiation, the time of treatment, and the type of amelogenin peptide (A+4 or A-4).

ADAM28 participates in the regulation of tooth development

Disintegrin and metalloprotease (ADAM) proteins are a family of membrane-anchored glycoproteins with diverse functions in fertilisation, development, neurogenesis and protein ectodomain shedding. ADAM28 is a newly discovered member of the ADAM family in humans and murine with autocatalytic activity. Recently, the authors screened ADAM28 genes from patients with congenital hypoplasia of tooth root, and studied the relationship between ADAM28 and tooth development. A polyclonal antibody (pAb) against ADAM28 was preparared, and the expression and localisation of ADAM28 were detected in tooth germ and dental mesenchymal cells. The results indicated that the prokaryotic expression vector pGEX-4T-ADAM28 was constructed successfully. Glutathione S-transferase-ADAM28 fusion protein was generated after inducement by isopropylthio-beta-d-galactoside and isolated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The purified fusion protein was used as an antigen for production of antibody. Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analyses verified that the antibody had a high specificity and titre. Immunohistochemistry and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction showed that ADAM28 was expressed at each stage of tooth germ development at different levels. Moreover, it was expressed in human dental follicle cells, human dental papilla cells, human dental pulp stem cells, human periodontal ligament cells and human dental cervical loop epithelial cells at transcription level. In conclusion, it is reasonable to suggest that ADAM28 may participate in tooth development and the regulation of odontogenic mesenchymal cells through progressive reciprocal inductive interactions between the epithelium and the mesenchyme.

Identification of temporal and spatial expression patterns of amelogenin isoforms during mouse molar development

Amelogenin synthesis is initiated in a restricted time frame during odontogenesis. Polypeptides translated from several alternatively spliced isoforms of amelogenin mRNA have been identified in ameloblasts and odontoblasts. Recent studies suggest that the isoforms deleting exons 6a, 6b, and 6c produce polypeptides that might exert regulatory functions governing the late stages of ameloblast and odontoblast differentiation. Herein, the spatial and temporal expression of mouse amelogenin mRNA isoforms M194, M180, M73, and M59 have been determined around the perinatal development period using splice form-specific probes. Expression levels and distribution patterns varied with developmental stage and cell location. Amelogenin mRNA expression was most prominent within the enamel organ at boundaries between cell layers, beginning at the newborn stage (PN0.5). Odontoblasts supported the expression of M73 and M59 mRNA from developmental stages PN0.5 to PN1.5 (1 d of age). In contrast, ameloblasts expressed predominantly the M180 mRNA isoform with full exon 6 but devoid of exon 4. In the enamel organ, the stratum intermediun cells supported expression of the full-length isoform, M194, including the full exon 6 and exon 4 sequences, and strikingly, expression of M180 message was inhibited. In conclusion, ameloblasts, odontoblasts, and stratum intermedium cells demonstrate selective alternative splicing patterns of the amelogenin pre-mRNA transcript.

The effect of the amelogenin fraction of enamel matrix proteins on fibroblast-mediated collagen matrix reorganization

Enamel matrix proteins (EMP), extracted from developing porcine teeth, promote not only periodontal regeneration but also cutaneous wound healing presumably via the amelogenin fraction. Because it is unclear whether the effect of EMP can be ascribed to amelogenins, we compared EMP with recombinant amelogenin in the relaxed dermal equivalent (DE) in vitro model for early wound contraction. EMP and recombinant porcine amelogenin (rP172) at 1 mg/ml were incorporated into DEs composed of human dermal fibroblasts and a type I collagen matrix. The area reduction, as a measure of contraction, as well as fibroblast numbers and TGF-beta1 levels, were quantified over 7 days in culture in the presence of 10% foetal bovine serum. Both EMP and recombinant amelogenin increased contraction (p < 0.005) and fibroblast numbers (p < 0.005) compared with controls (acetic acid vehicle and 1mg/ml porcine serum albumin) and the positive control TGF-beta1 added at 10 ng/ml. Increased contraction with EMP and recombinant amelogenin was most pronounced after the first day of incubation and was associated with elevated (p < 0.005) TGF-beta1 levels in conditioned medium. In conclusion, the amelogenin component of EMP augmented fibroblast-driven collagen matrix remodelling, at least partially, by increasing the endogenous production of TGF-beta1. These effects of EMP/amelogenin may be beneficial for cutaneous wound healing.

Comparative calcium binding of leucine-rich amelogenin peptide and full-length amelogenin

Leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP) is an alternately spliced amelogenin. LRAP is known to bind to hydroxyapatite, and has been shown to signal mesenchymal cells to proliferate, but its function in enamel formation is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the calcium-binding properties and structure of recombinant human LRAP (rLRAP) compared with full-length amelogenin (rH174). rLRAP and rH174 were synthesized in Escherichia coli and purified by affinity chromatography and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Calcium binding was measured by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) at pH 7.5 and 25 degrees C, and raw data were analyzed by origin 7.0 software. The structure of rLRAP was analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and circular dichroism (CD) in the absence or presence of Ca2+, pH 7.5 and 4.0, at 25 degrees C. Thermodynamic values showed that rLRAP had a Ca2+-binding affinity approximately 6.4-times greater than rH174. NMR and CD data revealed that rLRAP was randomly coiled, and that this structure was not altered by Ca2+, which bound to rLRAP and rH174 via ionic interactions. Unlike r174 (beta-spiral), rLRAP had a random-coiled structure. The calcium binding and structural differences between rLRAP and rH174 suggest that these proteins have different functions in enamel biomineralization.

Characterization of a mouse amelogenin [A-4]/M59 cell surface receptor

Amelogenin proteins comprise up to 90% of the organic matrix of developing enamel in the vertebrate tooth. Alternative splicing of mouse amelogenin pre-mRNA leads to the production of more than 14 protein isoforms, the functions of which are not totally understood. The smaller splice products, [A + 4] or M73 and [A - 4] or M59, have been shown to act differently as signaling molecules affecting odontogenic and other cell types. The mechanisms of these signaling processes, beginning with receptor identification, are not well understood. Utilizing radiolabeled [A - 4], we show here that 3H[A - 4] binds in a saturable fashion to the cell surface of C2C12 mouse fetal myoblasts at 4 degrees C, and not only binds at the surface but is internalized at 37 degrees C. "Far Western" immunohistochemistry performed on sections of E18 mouse incisors and molars with biotin-labeled [A - 4] as the primary ligand demonstrates [A - 4]-biotin binding to polarizing ameloblasts and odontoblasts, cells of the dental follicle, and along the stratum intermedium. Using [A - 4] affinity column chromatography and [A - 4]-biotin label transfer reaction, we have identified a 95 kDa C2C12 cell surface protein which bound [A - 4]. Utilizing Tandem MS (MS/MS) sequencing, we report the novel finding of the 95 kDa murine transmembrane protein, LAMP-1, originally identified as a lysosomal membrane protein that is also found at the cell surface, as an [A - 4] cell binding protein.

Immunocytochemical Study of Amelogenin Deposition during the Early Odontogenesis of Molars in Alendronate-treated Newborn Rats

Newborn rats were treated with sodium alendronate to study how enamel is formed and the effect of alendronate during early odontogenesis. Ultrastructural analysis combined with high-resolution immunocytochemistry for amelogenin was carried out. Twelve rats were subjected to daily SC injections of sodium alendronate (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 3 days on their dorsal region, whereas three rats were daily injected with saline solution as a control. Molar tooth germs from 3-day-old rats were fixed under microwave irradiation in 0.1% glutaraldehyde + 4% formaldehyde buffered at pH 7.2 with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate. The specimens were left undecalcified, postfixed with osmium tetroxide, dehydrated, and embedded in LR White resin. Ultrathin sections were incubated with a chicken anti-24-kDa rat amelogenin antibody, a secondary antibody, and finally with a protein A-gold complex. Large patches of amelogenin were present over the unmineralized mantle dentin and at early secretory ameloblasts. At more advanced stages, they were also detected at the enamel matrix, as well as in the mineralized dentin, at the periodontoblastic space of the dentinal tubules, and at the predentin. It is likely that the main effect of alendronate at early stages of odontogenesis is the increase of synthesis/secretion of amelogenin, promoting its deposition within the forming dentin and enamel.

Protein–Protein Interactions of the Developing Enamel Matrix

Extracellular matrix proteins control the formation of the inorganic component of hard tissues including bone, dentin, and enamel. The structural proteins expressed primarily in the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, enamelin, and amelotin. Other proteins, like biglycan, are also present in the enamel matrix as well as in other mineralizing and nonmineralizing tissues of mammals. In addition, the presence of sulfated enamel proteins, and "tuft" proteins has been examined and discussed in relation to enamel formation. The structural proteins of the enamel matrix must have specific protein-protein interactions to produce a matrix capable of directing the highly ordered structure of the enamel crystallites. Protein-protein interactions are also likely to occur between the secreted enamel proteins and the plasma membrane of the enamel producing cells, the ameloblasts. Such protein-protein interactions are hypothesized to influence the secretion of enamel proteins, establish short-term order of the forming matrix, and to mediate feedback signals to the transcriptional machinery of these cells. Membrane-bound proteins identified in ameloblasts, and which interact with the structural enamel proteins, include Cd63 (cluster of differentiation 63 antigen), annexin A2 (Anxa2), and lysosomal-associated glycoprotein 1 (Lamp1). These and related data help explain the molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for the removal of the organic enamel matrix during the events of enamel mineralization, and how the enamel matrix influences its own fate through signaling initiated at the cell surface. The knowledge gained from enamel developmental studies may lead to better dental and nondental materials, or materials inspired by Nature. These data will be critical to scientists, engineers, and dentists in their pursuits to regenerate an entire tooth. For tooth regeneration to become a reality, the protein-protein interactions involving the key dental proteins must be identified and understood. The scope of this review is to discuss the current understanding of protein-protein interactions of the developing enamel matrix, and relate this knowledge to enamel biomineralization.

Molecular mechanisms of cytodifferentiation in mammalian tooth development

The morphological stages of tooth development--bud, cap, bell, and terminal differentiation--have been known for decades. The past 10 years have seen the elucidation of many of the molecular events driving these morphogenetic stages. Signaling via the fibroblast growth factor (FGF), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), hedgehog, and wingless protein families and their downstream transcription factors have been identified as key players in the epithelial-mesenchymal signaling loops driving tooth development. Currently the most complete description of the mechanisms in tooth development extends only through the cap stage. The body of work concerning the mechanisms directing the bell and cytodifferentiation stages is growing. This has mainly, but not exclusively, focused on the expression and effects of FGFs and BMPs in these latter stages, and is reviewed here. Additionally, recent results suggest that phenotypic proteins of both ameloblasts and odontoblasts, such as amelogenin and dentin matrix protein 2 may act as the final instructive signals in cytodifferentiation.

Apatite/amelogenin coating on titanium promotes osteogenic gene expression

Osteoblast differentiation and extracellular matrix production are pivotal processes for implant osseointegration or bone tissue engineering. We hypothesized that a biomimetic coating on titanium surfaces, consisting of apatite and amelogenin, would promote such processes. Human Embryonic Palatal Mesenchymal pre-osteoblasts were used as a model for the evaluation of cell adhesion and spreading patterns, as well as mRNA expression of certain osteoblastic gene products. Real-time PCR showed significant (p < 0.05) increase in expression of type I collagen, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin from cells grown on titanium with an apatite/amelogenin composite, as compared with that from cells grown on a pure titanium or apatite coating only. Osteocalcin expression was specifically stimulated by amelogenin added to the culture media. Enhanced attachment and cell spreading were also observed. The biomimetic coating promoting cell adhesion and osteoblast differentiation may have great potential for future dental and biomedical applications.