The GIP receptor displays higher basal activity than the GLP-1 receptor but does not recruit GRK2 or arrestin3 effectively

Specific loss of GIPR signaling in GABAergic neurons enhances GLP-1R agonist-induced body weight loss

OBJECTIVES

Dual incretin agonists are among the most effective pharmaceutical treatments for obesity and type 2 diabetes to date. Such therapeutics can target two receptors, such as the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor in the case of tirzepatide, to improve glycemia and reduce body weight. Regarding body weight effects, GIPR signaling is thought to involve at least two relevant mechanisms: the enhancement of food intake reduction and the attenuation of aversive effects caused by GLP-1R agonists. Although it is known that dual GLP-1R-GIPR agonism produces greater weight loss than GLP-1R agonism alone, the precise mechanism is unknown.

METHODS

To address this question, we used mice lacking GIPR in the whole body, GABAergic neurons, or glutamatergic neurons. These mice were given various combinations of GLP-1R and GIPR agonist drugs with subsequent food intake and conditioned taste aversion measurements.

RESULTS

A GIPR knockout in either the whole body or selectively in inhibitory GABAergic neurons protects against diet-induced obesity, whereas a knockout in excitatory glutamatergic neurons had a negligible effect. Furthermore, we found that GIPR in GABAergic neurons is essential for the enhanced weight loss efficacy of dual incretin agonism, yet, surprisingly, its removal enhances the effect of GLP-1R agonism alone. Finally, GIPR knockout in GABAergic neurons prevents the anti-aversive effects of GIPR agonism.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are consistent with GIPR research at large in that both enhancement and removal of GIPR signaling are metabolically beneficial. Notably, however, our findings suggest that future obesity therapies designed to modulate GIPR signaling, whether by agonism or antagonism, would be best targeted towards GABAergic neurons.

The C-terminal regions of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors are not the key determinants of their differential arrestin recruitment but modulate the rate of receptor endocytosis

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism and mediate the incretin effect. This glucose-dependent potentiation of insulin secretion is severely impaired in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. While pharmacological doses of GLP-1 can overcome this impairment, the same is not true for GIP. The reasons for this are unclear. However, differences in the signalling profiles of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) may contribute. GLP-1R and GIPR are closely related G protein-coupled receptors but differ in their ability to recruit arrestin, GIPR being relatively poorer. Furthermore, these receptors have been reported to utilize different mechanisms to undergo agonist-induced internalization. Methods: This study aimed to identify the role of the C-terminal region of the two receptors in their differing signalling behaviour using chimeric receptors where the C-terminal tail of one receptor was replaced with that of the other. Results: Replacement of the C-terminal tail had only limited effects on G protein and arrestin recruitment to either receptor. GIP-stimulated internalisation of GIPR occurred at a significantly (P < 0.001) slower rate than GLP-1-stimulated internalisation of GLP-1R. Replacement of the C-terminal tail of GIPR with that of GLP-1R significantly (P < 0.05) increased the internalization rate but not to the rate of wild-type GLP-1R. The reciprocal substitution significantly (P < 0.005) decreased internalization rate. Conclusion: These data show that the C-terminal region of GLP-1R and GIPR is not the critical determinant of their differing ability to recruit arrestin but modulates receptor endocytosis.

Orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5B controls macrophage function by facilitating prostaglandin E receptor 2 signaling

Macrophages express numerous G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that regulate adhesion, migration, and activation, but the function of orphan receptor GPRC5B in macrophages is unknown. Both resident peritoneal and bone marrow-derived macrophages from myeloid-specific GPRC5B-deficient mice show increased migration and phagocytosis, resulting in improved bacterial clearance in a peritonitis model. In other models such as myocardial infarction, increased myeloid cell recruitment has adverse effects. Mechanistically, we found that GPRC5B physically interacts with GPCRs of the prostanoid receptor family, resulting in enhanced signaling through the prostaglandin E receptor 2 (EP2). In GPRC5B-deficient macrophages, EP2-mediated anti-inflammatory effects are diminished, resulting in hyperactivity. Using in silico modelling and docking, we identify residues potentially mediating GPRC5B/EP2 dimerization and show that their mutation results in loss of GPRC5B-mediated facilitation of EP2 signaling. Finally, we demonstrate that decoy peptides mimicking the interacting sequence are able to reduce GPRC5B-mediated facilitation of EP2-induced cAMP signaling in macrophages.

Reduced incretin receptor trafficking upon activation enhances glycemic control and reverses obesity in diet-induced obese mice

Activation of incretin receptors by their cognate agonist augments sustained cAMP generation both from the plasma membrane as well as from the endosome. To address the functional outcome of this spatiotemporal signaling, we developed a nonacylated glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor dual agonist I-M-150847 that reduced receptor internalization following activation of the incretin receptors. The incretin receptor dual agonist I-M-150847 was developed by replacing the tryptophan cage of exendin-4 tyrosine substituted at the amino terminus with the C-terminal undecapeptide sequence of oxyntomodulin that placed lysine 30 of I-M-150847 in frame with the corresponding lysine residue of GIP. The peptide I-M-150847 is a partial agonist of GLP-1R and GIPR; however, the receptors, upon activation by I-M-150847, undergo reduced internalization that promotes agonist-mediated iterative cAMP signaling and augments glucose-stimulated insulin exocytosis in pancreatic β cells. Chronic administration of I-M-150847 improved glycemic control, enhanced insulin sensitivity, and provided profound weight loss in diet-induced obese (DIO) mice. Our results demonstrated that despite being a partial agonist, I-M-150847, by reducing the receptor internalization upon activation, enhanced the incretin effect and reversed obesity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Replacement of the tryptophan cage (Trp-cage) with the C-terminal oxyntomodulin undecapeptide along with the tyrosine substitution at the amino terminus converts the selective glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist exendin-4 to a novel GLP-1R and GIPR dual agonist I-M-150847. Reduced internalization of incretin receptors upon activation by the GLP-1R and GIPR dual agonist I-M-150847 promotes iterative receptor signaling that enhances the incretin effect and reverses obesity.

GIP-derived GIP receptor antagonists - a review of their role in GIP receptor pharmacology

Surprisingly, agonists, as well as antagonists of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), are currently being used or investigated as treatment options for type 2 diabetes and obesity - and both, when combined with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonism, enhance GLP-1-induced glycemia and weight loss further. This paradox raises several questions regarding not only the mechanisms of actions of GIP but also the processes engaged during the activation of both the GIP and GLP-1 receptors. Here, we provide an overview of studies of the properties and actions of peptide-derived GIPR antagonists, focusing on GIP(3-30)NH2, a naturally occurring N- and C-terminal truncation of GIP(1-42). GIP(3-30)NH2 was the first GIPR antagonist administered to humans. GIP(3-30)NH2 and a few additional antagonists, like Pro3-GIP, have been used in both in vitro and in vivo studies to elucidate the molecular and cellular consequences of GIPR inhibition, desensitization, and internalization and, at a larger scale, the role of the GIP system in health and disease. We provide an overview of these studies combined with recent knowledge regarding the effects of naturally occurring variants of the GIPR system and species differences within the GIP system to enhance our understanding of the GIPR as a drug target.

GLP-1 and GIP receptors signal through distinct β-arrestin 2-dependent pathways to regulate pancreatic β cell function

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1R) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIPR) receptors are G-protein-coupled receptors involved in glucose homeostasis. Diabetogenic conditions decrease β-arrestin 2 (ARRB2) levels in human islets. In mouse β cells, ARRB2 dampens insulin secretion by partially uncoupling cyclic AMP (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA) signaling at physiological doses of GLP-1, whereas at pharmacological doses, the activation of extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK)/cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) requires ARRB2. In contrast, GIP-potentiated insulin secretion needs ARRB2 in mouse and human islets. The GIPR-ARRB2 axis is not involved in cAMP/PKA or ERK signaling but does mediate GIP-induced F-actin depolymerization. Finally, the dual GLP-1/GIP agonist tirzepatide does not require ARRB2 for the potentiation of insulin secretion. Thus, ARRB2 plays distinct roles in regulating GLP-1R and GIPR signaling, and we highlight (1) its role in the physiological context and the possible functional consequences of its decreased expression in pathological situations such as diabetes and (2) the importance of assessing the signaling pathways engaged by the agonists (biased/dual) for therapeutic purposes.

Enhanced Endosomal Signaling and Desensitization of GLP-1R vs GIPR in Pancreatic Beta Cells

The incretin receptors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), are prime therapeutic targets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. They are expressed in pancreatic beta cells where they potentiate insulin release in response to food intake. Despite GIP being the main incretin in healthy individuals, GLP-1R has been favored as a therapeutic target due to blunted GIPR responses in T2D patients and conflicting effects of GIPR agonists and antagonists in improving glucose tolerance and preventing weight gain. There is, however, a recently renewed interest in GIPR biology, following the realization that GIPR responses can be restored after an initial period of blood glucose normalization and the recent development of dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonists with superior capacity for controlling blood glucose levels and weight. The importance of GLP-1R trafficking and subcellular signaling in the control of receptor outputs is well established, but little is known about the pattern of spatiotemporal signaling from the GIPR in beta cells. Here, we have directly compared surface expression, trafficking, and signaling characteristics of both incretin receptors in pancreatic beta cells to identify potential differences that might underlie distinct pharmacological responses associated with each receptor. Our results indicate increased cell surface levels, internalization, degradation, and endosomal vs plasma membrane activity for the GLP-1R, while the GIPR is instead associated with increased plasma membrane recycling, reduced desensitization, and enhanced downstream signal amplification. These differences might have potential implications for the capacity of each incretin receptor to control beta cell function.

Intersection of the Orphan G Protein-Coupled Receptor, GPR19, with the Aging Process

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one of the most functionally diverse classes of transmembrane proteins. GPCRs and their associated signaling systems have been linked to nearly every physiological process. They also constitute nearly 40% of the current pharmacopeia as direct targets of remedial therapies. Hence, their place as a functional nexus in the interface between physiological and pathophysiological processes suggests that GPCRs may play a central role in the generation of nearly all types of human disease. Perhaps one mechanism through which GPCRs can mediate this pivotal function is through the control of the molecular aging process. It is now appreciated that, indeed, many human disorders/diseases are induced by GPCR signaling processes linked to pathological aging. Here we discuss one such novel member of the GPCR family, GPR19, that may represent an important new target for novel remedial strategies for the aging process. The molecular signaling pathways (metabolic control, circadian rhythm regulation and stress responsiveness) associated with this recently characterized receptor suggest an important role in aging-related disease etiology.

Differential effects of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor heteromerization on cell signaling when expressed in HEK-293 cells

The incretin hormones: glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are important regulators of many aspects of metabolism including insulin secretion. Their receptors (GIPR and GLP-1R) are closely related members of the secretin class of G-protein-coupled receptors. As both receptors are expressed on pancreatic β-cells there is at least the hypothetical possibility that they may form heteromers. In the present study, we investigated GIPR/GLP-1R heteromerization and the impact of GIPR on GLP-1R-mediated signaling and vice versa in HEK-293 cells. Real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) saturation experiments confirm that GLP-1R and GIPR form heteromers. Stimulation with 1 μM GLP-1 caused an increase in both FRET and BRET ratio, whereas stimulation with 1 μM GIP caused a decrease. The only other ligand tested to cause a significant change in BRET signal was the GLP-1 metabolite, GLP-1 (9-36). GIPR expression had no significant effect on mini-Gs recruitment to GLP-1R but significantly inhibited GLP-1 stimulated mini-Gq and arrestin recruitment. In contrast, the presence of GLP-1R improved GIP stimulated mini-Gs and mini-Gq recruitment to GIPR. These data support the hypothesis that GIPR and GLP-1R form heteromers with differential consequences on cell signaling.

A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor

Peptide agonists of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) have revolutionized diabetes therapy, but their use has been limited because they require injection. Herein, we describe the discovery of the orally bioavailable, small-molecule, GLP-1R agonist PF-06882961 (danuglipron). A sensitized high-throughput screen was used to identify 5-fluoropyrimidine-based GLP-1R agonists that were optimized to promote endogenous GLP-1R signaling with nanomolar potency. Incorporation of a carboxylic acid moiety provided considerable GLP-1R potency gains with improved off-target pharmacology and reduced metabolic clearance, ultimately resulting in the identification of danuglipron. Danuglipron increased insulin levels in primates but not rodents, which was explained by receptor mutagensis studies and a cryogenic electron microscope structure that revealed a binding pocket requiring a primate-specific tryptophan 33 residue. Oral administration of danuglipron to healthy humans produced dose-proportional increases in systemic exposure (NCT03309241). This opens an opportunity for oral small-molecule therapies that target the well-validated GLP-1R for metabolic health.

[G proteins: privileged transducers of 7-transmembrane spanning receptors]

G protein-coupled receptors or GPCR are the most abundant membrane receptors in our genome with around 800 members. They play an essential role in most physiological and pathophysiological phenomena. In addition, they constitute 30% of the targets of currently marketed drugs and remain an important reservoir for new innovative therapies. Their main effectors are heterotrimeric G proteins. These are composed of 3 subunits, α, β and γ, which, upon coupling with a GPCR, dissociate into G_α and G_βγ to activate numerous signaling pathways. This article describes some of the recent advances in understanding the function and role of heterotrimeric G proteins. After a short introduction to GPCRs, the history of the discovery of G proteins is briefly described. Then, the fundamental mechanisms of activation, signaling and regulation of G proteins are reviewed. New paradigms concerning intracellular signaling, specific recognition of G proteins by GPCRs as well as biased signaling are also discussed.

Functionality of Melatonin Receptors: Recruitment of β-Arrestin at MT1

The main process of downregulation of G protein-coupled receptors is desensitization by which the receptor is extruded from the plasma membrane and directed to the endosomal compartment for recycling. Typically, the first step of this phenomenon consists in the recruitment of the protein β-arrestin induced by the agonist. Melatonin receptors undergo the same process: melatonin leads to the recruitment of β-arrestin and is subsequently sent away from the membrane, leading to a de facto stop of the melatonin receptor-mediated G protein signaling, because the receptors are not at the membrane level to receive the message brought by melatonin. The way one can measure this recruitment is based on the elegant technique of enzyme fragment complementation by which two parts of an enzyme are fused to two partners and reform an active enzyme upon the formation of the complex between these two partners. The basic way to set up this technique is presented here.

Evaluation of efficacy- versus affinity-driven agonism with biased GLP-1R ligands P5 and exendin-F1

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is an important regulator of glucose homeostasis and has been successfully targeted for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Recently described biased GLP-1R agonists with selective reductions in β-arrestin versus G protein coupling show improved metabolic actions in vivo. However, two prototypical G protein-favouring GLP-1R agonists, P5 and exendin-F1, are reported to show divergent effects on insulin secretion. In this study we aimed to resolve this discrepancy by performing a side-by-side characterisation of these two ligands across a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays. Exendin-F1 showed reduced acute efficacy versus P5 for several readouts, including recruitment of mini-G proteins, G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestin-2. Maximal responses were also lower for both GLP-1R internalisation and the presence of active GLP-1R-mini-Gs complexes in early endosomes with exendin-F1 treatment. In contrast, prolonged insulin secretion in vitro and sustained anti-hyperglycaemic efficacy in mice were both greater with exendin-F1 than with P5. We conclude that the particularly low acute efficacy of exendin-F1 and associated reductions in GLP-1R downregulation appear to be more important than preservation of endosomal signalling to allow sustained insulin secretion responses. This has implications for the ongoing development of affinity- versus efficacy-driven biased GLP-1R agonists as treatments for metabolic disease.

Glucose-induced cAMP elevation in β-cells involves amplification of constitutive and glucagon-activated GLP-1 receptor signalling

Aim

cAMP typically signals downstream of G_s‐coupled receptors and regulates numerous cell functions. In β‐cells, cAMP amplifies Ca²⁺‐triggered exocytosis of insulin granules. Glucose‐induced insulin secretion is associated with Ca²⁺‐ and metabolism‐dependent increases of the sub‐plasma‐membrane cAMP concentration ([cAMP]_pm) in β‐cells, but potential links to canonical receptor signalling are unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the role of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptors (GLP1Rs) for glucose‐induced cAMP signalling in β‐cells.

Methods

Total internal reflection microscopy and fluorescent reporters were used to monitor changes in cAMP, Ca²⁺ and ATP concentrations as well as insulin secretion in MIN6 cells and mouse and human β‐cells. Insulin release from mouse and human islets was also measured with ELISA.

Results

The GLP1R antagonist exendin‐(9‐39) (ex‐9) prevented both GLP1‐ and glucagon‐induced elevations of [cAMP]_pm, consistent with GLP1Rs being involved in the action of glucagon. This conclusion was supported by lack of unspecific effects of the antagonist in a reporter cell‐line. Ex‐9 also suppressed IBMX‐ and glucose‐induced [cAMP]_pm elevations. Depolarization with K⁺ triggered Ca²⁺‐dependent [cAMP]_pm elevation, an effect that was amplified by high glucose. Ex‐9 inhibited both the Ca²⁺ and glucose‐metabolism‐dependent actions on [cAMP]_pm. The drug remained effective after minimizing paracrine signalling by dispersing the islets and it reduced basal [cAMP]_pm in a cell‐line heterologously expressing GLP1Rs, indicating that there is constitutive GLP1R signalling. The ex‐9‐induced reduction of [cAMP]_pm in glucose‐stimulated β‐cells was paralleled by suppression of insulin secretion.

Conclusion

Agonist‐independent and glucagon‐stimulated GLP1R signalling in β‐cells contributes to basal and glucose‐induced cAMP production and insulin secretion.

GRK2 regulates GLP-1R-mediated early phase insulin secretion in vivo

BACKGROUND

Insulin secretion from the pancreatic β-cell is finely modulated by different signals to allow an adequate control of glucose homeostasis. Incretin hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) act as key physiological potentiators of insulin release through binding to the G protein-coupled receptor GLP-1R. Another key regulator of insulin signaling is the Ser/Thr kinase G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2). However, whether GRK2 affects insulin secretion or if GRK2 can control incretin actions in vivo remains to be analyzed.

RESULTS

Using GRK2 hemizygous mice, isolated pancreatic islets, and model β-cell lines, we have uncovered a relevant physiological role for GRK2 as a regulator of incretin-mediated insulin secretion in vivo. Feeding, oral glucose gavage, or administration of GLP-1R agonists in animals with reduced GRK2 levels (GRK2+/- mice) resulted in enhanced early phase insulin release without affecting late phase secretion. In contrast, intraperitoneal glucose-induced insulin release was not affected. This effect was recapitulated in isolated islets and correlated with the increased size or priming efficacy of the readily releasable pool (RRP) of insulin granules that was observed in GRK2+/- mice. Using nanoBRET in β-cell lines, we found that stimulation of GLP-1R promoted GRK2 association to this receptor and that GRK2 protein and kinase activity were required for subsequent β-arrestin recruitment.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our data suggest that GRK2 is an important negative modulator of GLP-1R-mediated insulin secretion and that GRK2-interfering strategies may favor β-cell insulin secretion specifically during the early phase, an effect that may carry interesting therapeutic applications.

GRK Inhibition Potentiates Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Action

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) whose activation results in suppression of food intake and improvement of glucose metabolism. Several receptor interacting proteins regulate the signaling of GLP-1R such as G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK) and β-arrestins. Here we evaluated the physiological and pharmacological impact of GRK inhibition on GLP-1R activity leveraging small molecule inhibitors of GRK2 and GRK3. We demonstrated that inhibition of GRK: i) inhibited GLP-1-mediated β-arrestin recruitment, ii) enhanced GLP-1-induced insulin secretion in isolated islets and iii) has additive effect with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 in mediating suppression of glucose excursion in mice. These findings highlight the importance of GRK to modulate GLP-1R function in vitro and in vivo. GRK inhibition is a potential therapeutic approach to enhance endogenous and pharmacologically stimulated GLP-1R signaling.

Genetic and biased agonist-mediated reductions in β-arrestin recruitment prolong cAMP signaling at glucagon family receptors

Receptors for the peptide hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1R), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIPR), and glucagon (GCGR) are important regulators of insulin secretion and energy metabolism. GLP-1R agonists have been successfully deployed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, but it has been suggested that their efficacy is limited by target receptor desensitization and downregulation due to recruitment of β-arrestins. Indeed, recently described GLP-1R agonists with reduced β-arrestin-2 recruitment have delivered promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. We therefore aimed to determine if the same phenomenon could apply to the closely related GIPR and GCGR. In HEK293 cells depleted of both β-arrestin isoforms the duration of G protein-dependent cAMP/PKA signaling was increased in response to the endogenous ligand for each receptor. Moreover, in wildtype cells, "biased" GLP-1, GCG, and GIP analogs with selective reductions in β-arrestin-2 recruitment led to reduced receptor endocytosis and increased insulin secretion over a prolonged stimulation period, although the latter effect was only seen at high agonist concentrations. Biased GCG analogs increased the duration of cAMP signaling, but this did not lead to increased glucose output from hepatocytes. Our study provides a rationale for the development of GLP-1R, GIPR, and GCGR agonists with reduced β-arrestin recruitment, but further work is needed to maximally exploit this strategy for therapeutic purposes.

Aging-related modifications to G protein-coupled receptor signaling diversity

Aging is a highly complex molecular process, affecting nearly all tissue systems in humans and is the highest risk factor in developing neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The intense complexity of the aging process creates an incentive to develop more specific drugs that attenuate or even reverse some of the features of premature aging. As our current pharmacopeia is dominated by therapeutics that target members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily it may be prudent to search for effective anti-aging therapeutics in this fertile domain. Since the first demonstration of GPCR-based β-arrestin signaling, it has become clear that an enhanced appreciation of GPCR signaling diversity may facilitate the creation of therapeutics with selective signaling activities. Such 'biased' ligand signaling profiles can be effectively investigated using both standard molecular biological techniques as well as high-dimensionality data analyses. Through a more nuanced appreciation of the quantitative nature across the multiple dimensions of signaling bias that drugs possess, researchers may be able to further refine the efficacy of GPCR modulators to impact the complex aberrations that constitute the aging process. Identifying novel effector profiles could expand the effective pharmacopeia and assist in the design of precision medicines. This review discusses potential non-G protein effectors, and specifically their potential therapeutic suitability in aging and age-related disorders.

Signalling, trafficking and glucoregulatory properties of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists exendin-4 and lixisenatide

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Amino acid substitutions at the N-termini of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist peptides result in distinct patterns of intracellular signalling, sub-cellular trafficking and efficacy in vivo. Here, we to determine whether sequence differences at the ligand C-termini of clinically approved GLP-1 receptor agonists exendin-4 and lixisenatide lead to similar phenomena.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Exendin-4, lixisenatide and N-terminally substituted analogues with biased signalling characteristics were compared across a range of in vitro trafficking and signalling assays in different cell types. Fluorescent ligands and new time-resolved FRET approaches were developed to study agonist behaviours at the cellular and sub-cellular level. Anti-hyperglycaemic and anorectic effects of each parent ligand and their biased derivatives were assessed in mice.

KEY RESULTS

Lixisenatide and exendin-4 showed equal binding affinity, but lixisenatide was fivefold less potent for cAMP signalling. Both peptides induced extensive GLP-1 receptor clustering in the plasma membrane and were rapidly endocytosed, but the GLP-1 receptor recycled more slowly to the cell surface after lixisenatide treatment. These combined deficits resulted in reduced maximal sustained insulin secretion and reduced anti-hyperglycaemic and anorectic effects in mice with lixisenatide. N-terminal substitution of His1 by Phe1 to both ligands had favourable effects on their pharmacology, resulting in improved insulin release and lowering of blood glucose.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Changes to the C-terminus of exendin-4 affect signalling potency and GLP-1 receptor trafficking via mechanisms unrelated to GLP-1 receptor occupancy. These differences were associated with changes in their ability to control blood glucose and therefore may be therapeutically relevant.

The Effect of Cell Surface Expression and Linker Sequence on the Recruitment of Arrestin to the GIP Receptor

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor are important targets in the treatment of both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Originally identified for their role in desensitization, internalization and recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), arrestins have since been shown to act as scaffolding proteins that allow GPCRs to signal in a G protein-independent manner. While GLP-1R has been reported to interact with arrestins, this aspect of cell signaling remains controversial for GIPR. Using a (FRET)-based assay we have previously shown that yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-labeled GIPR does not recruit arrestin. This GIPR-YFP construct contained a 10 amino acid linker between the receptor and a XbaI restriction site upstream of the YFP. This linker was not present in the modified GIPR-SYFP2 used in subsequent FRET and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assays. However, its removal results in the introduction of a serine residue adjacent to the end of GIPR’s C-terminal tail which could potentially be a phosphorylation site. The resulting receptor was indeed able to recruit arrestin. To find out whether the serine/arginine (SR) coded by the XbaI site was indeed the source of the problem, it was substituted with glycine/glycine (GG) by site-directed mutagenesis. This substitution abolished arrestin recruitment in the BRET assay but only significantly reduced it in the FRET assay. In addition, we show that the presence of a N-terminal FLAG epitope and influenza hemagglutinin signal peptide were also required to detect arrestin recruitment to the GIPR, most likely by increasing receptor cell surface expression. These results demonstrate how arrestin recruitment assay configuration can dramatically alter the result. This becomes relevant when drug discovery programs aim to identify ligands with “biased agonist” properties.

Perspective: Implications of Ligand-Receptor Binding Kinetics for Therapeutic Targeting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors

The concept of ligand-receptor binding kinetics has been broadly applied in drug development pipelines focusing on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The ligand residence time (RT) for a receptor describes how long a ligand-receptor complex exists, and is defined as the reciprocal of the dissociation rate constant (k _off). RT has turned out to be a valuable parameter for GPCR researchers focusing on drug development as a good predictor of in vivo efficacy. The positive correlation between RT and in vivo efficacy has been established for several drugs targeting class A GPCRs (e.g., the neurokinin-1 receptor (NK₁R), the β₂ adrenergic receptor (β₂AR), and the muscarinic 3 receptor (M₃R)) and for drugs targeting class B1 (e.g., the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R)). Recently, the association rate constant (k _on) has gained similar attention as another parameter affecting in vivo efficacy. In the current perspective, we address the importance of studying ligand-receptor binding kinetics for therapeutic targeting of GPCRs, with an emphasis on how binding kinetics can be altered by subtle molecular changes in the ligands and/or the receptors and how such changes affect treatment outcome. Moreover, we speculate on the impact of binding kinetic parameters for functional selectivity and sustained receptor signaling from endosomal compartments; phenomena that have gained increasing interest in attempts to improve therapeutic targeting of GPCRs.

GIP receptor: Expression in neuroendocrine tumours, internalization, signalling from endosomes and structure-function relationship studies

GIP is well known as a peptide regulating metabolic functions. In this review paper, we summarize a series of data on GIP receptor (GIPR). First, expression study of GIPR in human neuroendocrine tumours showed a very high incidence (nearly 100%) and a high density in both functional and non functional pancreatic tumours, ileal tumours, bronchial tumours and medullary thyroid carcinomas. Then, data on internalization of GIPR following stimulation by GIP are reported. Rapid and abundant internalization of GIPR also found in tumor pancreatic endocrine cells opens the possibility of tumor imaging and eradication using radiolabeled GIP. Interestingly, internalized GIPR continues to signal in early endosomes stimulating production of cAMP and activation of PKA, thus, supporting the view that GIPR signals from both plasma membrane and vesicles of internalization. At last, we summarize data from studies using in synergy molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis, which identified crucial amino acids of transmembrane domains of GIPR involved in GIPR binding site of GIP and/or in its activation and coupling to Gs protein. All together, these last molecular data may help to better understand structure-activity relationship data on GIP and GIPR.

Effects on pancreatic Beta and other Islet cells of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a gut-derived incretin that, in common with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), has both insulin releasing and extra-pancreatic glucoregulatory actions. GIP is released in response to glucose or fat absorption and acts on the GIP receptor (GIPR) to potentiate insulin release from pancreatic beta cells. GIP has also been shown to promote beta cell survival and stimulate the release of GLP-1 from islet alpha cells. There is now evidence to suggest that low levels of GIP are secreted from alpha cells and may act in a paracrine manner to prime neighboring beta cells for insulin release. In addition, GIP acts on adipocytes to stimulate fat storage and can exert anorexigenic effects via actions in the hypothalamus. Contrary to GLP-1, the development of effective GIP-based T2D treatments has been hindered by poor bioavailability and attenuation of beta cell responses to GIP in some patients with sub-optimally controlled T2D. Recently, longer-acting GIP agonists that exhibit enzymatic stability, as well as dual GLP-1/GIP agonists which provide simultaneous improvement in glucose and weight control have been generated and successfully tested in animal T2D models. This, together with reports on GIP antagonists that may protect against obesity, has revived the interest on the GIP/GIPR axis as a potential anti-diabetic pathway. In this review, we summarize the known aspects of the effects of GIP on beta and other islet cells and discuss the most recent developments on GIP-based therapeutic agents for the improvement of beta cell function in T2D patients.

Agonist-induced membrane nanodomain clustering drives GLP-1 receptor responses in pancreatic beta cells

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), a key pharmacological target in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity, undergoes rapid endocytosis after stimulation by endogenous and therapeutic agonists. We have previously highlighted the relevance of this process in fine-tuning GLP-1R responses in pancreatic beta cells to control insulin secretion. In the present study, we demonstrate an important role for the translocation of active GLP-1Rs into liquid-ordered plasma membrane nanodomains, which act as hotspots for optimal coordination of intracellular signaling and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. This process is dynamically regulated by agonist binding through palmitoylation of the GLP-1R at its carboxyl-terminal tail. Biased GLP-1R agonists and small molecule allosteric modulation both influence GLP-1R palmitoylation, clustering, nanodomain signaling, and internalization. Downstream effects on insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells indicate that these processes are relevant to GLP-1R physiological actions and might be therapeutically targetable.

Nanodomain segregation and clustering of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor, a key target for type 2 diabetes therapy, is regulated by agonist binding, leading to compartmentalization of downstream signaling and clathrin-dependent internalization and impacting pancreatic beta cell responses.

A free-energy landscape for the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor GLP1R

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are among the most important receptors in human physiology and pathology. They serve as master regulators of numerous key processes and are involved in as well as cause debilitating diseases. Consequently, GPCRs are among the most attractive targets for drug design and pharmaceutical interventions (>30% of drugs on the market). The glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) hormone receptor GLP1R is closely involved in insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells and constitutes a major druggable target for the development of anti-diabetes and obesity agents. GLP1R structure was recently solved, with ligands, allosteric modulators and as part of a complex with its cognate G protein. However, the translation of this structural data into structure/function understanding remains limited. The current study functionally characterizes GLP1R with special emphasis on ligand and cellular partner binding interactions and presents a free-energy landscape as well as a functional model of the activation cycle of GLP1R. Our results should facilitate a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying GLP1R activation, forming a basis for improved development of targeted therapeutics for diabetes and related disorders.

A Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonist Does Not Antagonize Glucagon at Its Receptor but May Act as a Biased Agonist at the GLP-1 Receptor

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism, making their receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) attractive targets in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GLP-1R agonists are used clinically to treat T2DM but the use of GIPR agonists remains controversial. Recent studies suggest that simultaneous activation of GLP-1R and GIPR with a single peptide provides superior glycemic control with fewer adverse effects than activation of GLP-1R alone. We investigated the signaling properties of a recently reported dual-incretin receptor agonist (P18). GLP-1R, GIPR, and the closely related glucagon receptor (GCGR) were expressed in HEK-293 cells. Activation of adenylate cyclase via Gα_s was monitored using a luciferase-linked reporter gene (CRE-Luc) assay. Arrestin recruitment was monitored using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assay. GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon displayed exquisite selectivity for their receptors in the CRE-Luc assay. P18 activated GLP-1R with similar potency to GLP-1 and GIPR with higher potency than GIP. Interestingly, P18 was less effective than GLP-1 at recruiting arrestin to GLP-1R and was inactive at GCGR. These data suggest that P18 can act as both a dual-incretin receptor agonist, and as a G protein-biased agonist at GLP-1R.

β-Arrestin Based Receptor Signaling Paradigms: Potential Therapeutic Targets for Complex Age-Related Disorders

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) were first characterized as signal transducers that elicit downstream effects through modulation of guanine (G) nucleotide-binding proteins. The pharmacotherapeutic exploitation of this signaling paradigm has created a drug-based field covering nearly 50% of the current pharmacopeia. Since the groundbreaking discoveries of the late 1990s to the present day, it is now clear however that GPCRs can also generate productive signaling cascades through the modulation of β-arrestin functionality. β-Arrestins were first thought to only regulate receptor desensitization and internalization - exemplified by the action of visual arrestin with respect to rhodopsin desensitization. Nearly 20 years ago, it was found that rather than controlling GPCR signal termination, productive β-arrestin dependent GPCR signaling paradigms were highly dependent on multi-protein complex formation and generated long-lasting cellular effects, in contrast to G protein signaling which is transient and functions through soluble second messenger systems. β-Arrestin signaling was then first shown to activate mitogen activated protein kinase signaling in a G protein-independent manner and eventually initiate protein transcription - thus controlling expression patterns of downstream proteins. While the possibility of developing β-arrestin biased or functionally selective ligands is now being investigated, no additional research has been performed on its possible contextual specificity in treating age-related disorders. The ability of β-arrestin-dependent signaling to control complex and multidimensional protein expression patterns makes this therapeutic strategy feasible, as treating complex age-related disorders will likely require therapeutics that can exert network-level efficacy profiles. It is our understanding that therapeutically targeting G protein-independent effectors such as β-arrestin will aid in the development of precision medicines with tailored efficacy profiles for disease/age-specific contextualities.

[Internalized receptor for glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide stimulates adenylyl cyclase on early endosomes]

G-protein coupled receptors represent the largest family of membrane receptors. G-protein dependent signal of GPCR is classically thought to originate exclusively from the plasma membrane and, until very recently, internalized GPCRs were considered silent. At present, experimental proofs exist showing that GPCR can continue to signal via G proteins after internalization. We demonstrated that, once internalized in early endosomes, Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Peptide Receptor (GIPR) continues to stimulate production of cAMP and activate PKA. In addition to indirect proofs showing that kinetics of cAMP production and PKA activation depend on internalization and GIPR trafficking, we identified the active form of Gαs on early endosomes containing GIPR and detected a distinct FRET signal accounting for cAMP production at the surface of endosomes containing GIP, relative to endosomes without GIP.

The G protein-coupled receptors deorphanization landscape

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are usually highlighted as being both the largest family of membrane proteins and the most productive source of drug targets. However, most of the GPCRs are understudied and hence cannot be used immediately for innovative therapeutic strategies. Besides, there are still around 100 orphan receptors, with no described endogenous ligand and no clearly defined function. The race to discover new ligands for these elusive receptors seems to be less intense than before. Here, we present an update of the various strategies employed to assign a function to these receptors and to discover new ligands. We focus on the recent advances in the identification of endogenous ligands with a detailed description of newly deorphanized receptors. Replication being a key parameter in these endeavors, we also discuss the latest controversies about problematic ligand-receptor pairings. In this context, we propose several recommendations in order to strengthen the reporting of new ligand-receptor pairs.

β-arrestin signalling and bias in hormone-responsive GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play crucial roles in the ability of target organs to respond to hormonal cues. GPCRs' activation mechanisms have long been considered as a two-state process connecting the agonist-bound receptor to heterotrimeric G proteins. This view is now challenged as mounting evidence point to GPCRs being connected to large arrays of transduction mechanisms involving heterotrimeric G proteins as well as other players. Amongst the G protein-independent transduction mechanisms, those elicited by β-arrestins upon their recruitment to the active receptors are by far the best characterized and apply to most GPCRs. These concepts, in conjunction with remarkable advances made in the field of GPCR structural biology and biophysics, have supported the notion of ligand-selective signalling also known as pharmacological bias. Interestingly, recent reports have opened intriguing prospects to the way β-arrestins control GPCR-mediated signalling in space and time within the cells. In the present paper, we review the existing evidence linking endocrine-related GPCRs to β-arrestin recruitement, signalling, pathophysiological implications and selective activation by biased ligands and/or receptor modifications. Emerging concepts surrounding β-arrestin-mediated transduction are discussed in the light of the peculiarities of endocrine systems.

Purification of family B G protein-coupled receptors using nanodiscs: Application to human glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor

Family B G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play vital roles in hormone-regulated homeostasis. They are drug targets for metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis. Despite their importance, the signaling mechanisms for family B GPCRs at the molecular level remain largely unexplored due to the challenges in purification of functional receptors in sufficient amount for biophysical characterization. Here, we purified the family B GPCR human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP1R), whose agonists, e.g. exendin-4, are used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The receptor was expressed in HEK293S GnTl- cells using our recently developed protocol. The protocol incorporates the receptor into the native-like lipid environment of reconstituted high density lipoprotein (rHDL) particles, also known as nanodiscs, immediately after the membrane solubilization step followed by chromatographic purification, minimizing detergent contact with the target receptor to reduce denaturation and prolonging stabilization of receptor in lipid bilayers without extra steps of reconstitution. This method yielded purified GLP1R in nanodiscs that could bind to GLP-1 and exendin-4 and activate Gs protein. This nanodisc purification method can potentially be a general strategy to routinely obtain purified family B GPCRs in the 10s of microgram amounts useful for spectroscopic analysis of receptor functions and activation mechanisms.

Activation of the Orphan G Protein-Coupled Receptor GPR27 by Surrogate Ligands Promotes β-Arrestin 2 Recruitment

G protein-coupled receptors are the most important drug targets for human diseases. An important number of them remain devoid of confirmed ligands. GPR27 is one of these orphan receptors, characterized by a high level of conservation among vertebrates and a predominant expression in the central nervous system. In addition, it has recently been linked to insulin secretion. However, the absence of endogenous or surrogate ligands for GPR27 complicates the examination of its biologic function. Our aim was to validate GPR27 signaling pathways, and therefore we sought to screen a diversity-oriented synthesis library to identify GPR27-specific surrogate agonists. To select an optimal screening assay, we investigated GPR27 ligand-independent activity. Both in G protein-mediated pathways and in β-arrestin 2 recruitment, no ligand-independent activity could be measured. However, we observed a recruitment of β-arrestin 2 to a GPR27V2 chimera in the presence of membrane-anchored G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2. Therefore, we optimized a firefly luciferase complementation assay to screen against this chimeric receptor. We identified two compounds [N-[4-(anilinocarbonyl)phenyl]-2,4-dichlorobenzamide (ChemBridge, San Diego, CA; ID5128535) and 2,4-dichloro-N-{4-[(1,3-thiazol-2-ylamino)sulfonyl]phenyl}benzamide (ChemBridge ID5217941)] sharing a N-phenyl-2,4-dichlorobenzamide scaffold, which were selective for GPR27 over its closely related family members GPR85 and GPR173. The specificity of the activity was confirmed with a NanoLuc Binary Technology β-arrestin 2 assay, imaging of green fluorescent protein-tagged β-arrestin 2, and PathHunter β-arrestin 2 assay. Interestingly, no G protein activation was detected upon activation of GPR27 by these compounds. Our study provides the first selective surrogate agonists for the orphan GPR27.

Rate of Homologous Desensitization and Internalization of the GLP-1 Receptor

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is an important target in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of agonist stimulated desensitization and internalization of GLP-1R. To this end, an N-terminally myc-tagged GLP-1R was stably expressed in HEK-293 cells. Homologous desensitization was assessed by measuring the cAMP response to agonist stimulation following pre-incubation with agonist for up to 120 min. Receptor internalization was monitored using an indirect ELISA-based method and confocal microscopy. Pre-incubation with GLP-1 resulted in a time-dependent loss of response to a second stimulation. Washing cells following pre-incubation failed to bring cAMP levels back to basal. Taking this into account, two desensitization rates were calculated: “apparent” (t_1/2 = 19.27 min) and “net” (t_1/2 = 2.99 min). Incubation of cells with GLP-1 also resulted in a time-dependent loss of receptor cell surface expression (t_1/2 = 2.05 min). Rapid agonist-stimulated internalization of GLP-1R was confirmed using confocal microscopy. Stimulation of GLP-1R with GLP-1 results in rapid desensitization and internalization of the receptor. Interestingly, the rate of “net” desensitization closely matches the rate of internalization. Our results suggest that agonist-bound GLP-1R continues to generate cAMP after it has been internalized.

Internalized Receptor for Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Peptide stimulates adenylyl cyclase on early endosomes

Until very recently, G-protein dependent signal of GPCRs was thought to originate exclusively from the plasma membrane and internalized GPCRs were considered silent. Here, we demonstrated that, once internalized and located in the membrane of early endosomes, glucose-dependent Insulinotropic receptor (GIPR) continues to trigger production of cAMP and PKA activation. Direct evidence is based on identification of the active form of Gαs in early endosomes containing GIPR using a genetically encoded GFP tagged nanobody, and on detection of a distinct FRET signal accounting for cAMP production at the surface of endosomes containing GIP, compared to endosomes without GIP. Furthermore, decrease of the sustained phase of cAMP production and PKA activation kinetics as well as reversibility of cAMP production and PKA activity following GIP washout in cells treated with a pharmacological inhibitor of GIPR internalization, and continuous increase of cAMP level over time in the presence of dominant-negative Rab7, which causes accumulation of early endosomes in cells, were noticed. Hence the GIPR joins the few GPCRs which signal through G-proteins both at plasma membrane and on endosomes.

Molecular Pharmacology of the Incretin Receptors

The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are important regulators of insulin and glucagon secretion as well as lipid metabolism and appetite. These biological functions make their respective receptors (GIPR and GLP-1R) attractive targets in the treatment of both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. The use of these native peptides in the treatment of these conditions is limited by their short half-lives. However, long-acting GLP-1R agonists and inhibitors of the enzyme that rapidly inactivates GIP and GLP-1 (dipeptidyl peptidase IV) are in clinical use. Although there is a loss of response to both hormones in T2DM, this effect appears to be more pronounced for GIP. This has made targeting GIPR less successful than GLP-1R. Furthermore, results demonstrating that GIPR knockout mice were resistant to diet-induced obesity suggested that GIPR antagonists may prove to be useful therapeutics. More recently, molecules that activate both receptors have shown promise in terms of glycemic and body weight control. This review focused on recent advances in the understanding of the signaling mechanisms and regulation of these two clinically important receptors.

Internalization and desensitization of the human glucose-dependent-insulinotropic receptor is affected by N-terminal acetylation of the agonist

How incretins regulate presence of their receptors at the cell surface and their activity is of paramount importance for the development of therapeutic strategies targeting these receptors. We have studied internalization of the human Glucose-Insulinotropic Polypeptide receptor (GIPR). GIP stimulated rapid robust internalization of the GIPR, the major part being directed to lysosomes. GIPR internalization involved mainly clathrin-coated pits, AP-2 and dynamin. However, neither GIPR C-terminal region nor β-arrestin1/2 was required. Finally, N-acetyl-GIP recognized as a dipeptidyl-IV resistant analogue, fully stimulated cAMP production with a ∼15-fold lower potency than GIP and weakly stimulated GIPR internalization and desensitization of cAMP response. Furthermore, docking N-acetyl-GIP in the binding site of modeled GIPR showed slighter interactions with residues of helices 6 and 7 of GIPR compared to GIP. Therefore, incomplete or partial activity of N-acetyl-GIP on signaling involved in GIPR desensitization and internalization contributes to the enhanced incretin activity of this peptide.

Forskolin-free cAMP assay for Gi-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the most successful receptor family for treating human diseases. Many are poorly characterized with few ligands reported or remain completely orphans. Therefore, there is a growing need for screening-compatible and sensitive assays. Measurement of intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels is a validated strategy for measuring GPCRs activation. However, agonist ligands for Gi-coupled receptors are difficult to track because inducers such as forskolin (FSK) must be used and are sources of variations and errors. We developed a method based on the GloSensor system, a kinetic assay that consists in a luciferase fused with cAMP binding domain. As a proof of concept, we selected the succinate receptor 1 (SUCNR1 or GPR91) which could be an attractive drug target. It has never been validated as such because very few ligands have been described. Following analyses of SUCNR1 signaling pathways, we show that the GloSensor system allows real time, FSK-free detection of an agonist effect. This FSK-free agonist signal was confirmed on other Gi-coupled receptors such as CXCR4. In a test screening on SUCNR1, we compared the results obtained with a FSK vs FSK-free protocol and were able to identify agonists with both methods but with fewer false positives when measuring the basal levels. In this report, we validate a cAMP-inducer free method for the detection of Gi-coupled receptors agonists compatible with high-throughput screening. This method will facilitate the study and screening of Gi-coupled receptors for active ligands.