von Willebrand factor binds to the surface of dendritic cells and modulates peptide presentation of factor VIII

Disentangling effects of the DR and DQ isomers encoded by the HLA class II haplotype DRB1*15:01/DQB1*06:02 to help establish the true risk allele for FVIII inhibitor development in Hemophilia A

Introduction

Hemophilia A (HA) patients (HAPs) with the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-class-II (HLAII) haplotype DRB1*15:01/DQB1*06:02, and thus antigen presenting cells which express HLAII β-polypeptide chains that form heterodimers of DR15- and DQ6-serotypes, respectively, have an increased risk of developing factor (F)VIII inhibitors (FEIs)-neutralizing antibodies against the therapeutic-FVIII-proteins (tFVIIIs) infused to prevent/arrest bleeding. As DRB1*15:01 and DQB1*06:02 exist in strong linkage disequilibrium, association analysis cannot determine which is the actual risk allele.

Methods

To establish the true risk allele of this haplotype, we analyzed the tFVIII-derived peptides (tFVIII-dPs) bound to either the DR or DQ molecules that comprise the individual HLAII repertoires expressed by monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained from 25 normal blood donors and six HAPs, four without and two with FEIs. We performed log-linear mixed model analyses, where the dependent variable is the log of the measured peptide count. Under Model 1, we analyzed an HLAII allele predictor consisting of ten levels (four DRB1 and six DQB1 alleles) in the fixed effects and variables in the random effects to account for non-independence. Model 2-where the HLAII allele variable consisted of only DRB1*15:01 and DQB1*06:02-compares the HLAII alleles.

Results

Relative to the Model 1 reference, DRB1*15:01 and DQB1*06:02 significantly increased tFVIII-derived peptide counts, and DRB1*15:01 contributed significantly more than DQB1*06:02. Reported as risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) lower- (LB) and upper-bound (UB), we found a RR (95% CI-LB, -UB) of 14.16 (10.38, 19.33) and 1.76 (1.24, 2.50) for DRB1*15:01 and DQB1*06:02, respectively. Under Model 2, we found an RR for DRB1*15:01 against DQB1*06:02 of 7.00 (5.80, 8.44).

Discussion/conclusion

Our results suggest that DRB1*15:01 is the offending HLAII allele and that DR15 allotypes underlie the increased FEI risk in HAPs.

Binding Promiscuity of Therapeutic Factor VIII

The binding promiscuity of proteins defines their ability to indiscriminately bind multiple unrelated molecules. Binding promiscuity is implicated, at least in part, in the off-target reactivity, nonspecific biodistribution, immunogenicity, and/or short half-life of potentially efficacious protein drugs, thus affecting their clinical use. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for the binding promiscuity of factor VIII (FVIII), a protein used for the treatment of hemophilia A, which displays poor pharmacokinetics, and elevated immunogenicity. We summarize the different canonical and noncanonical interactions that FVIII may establish in the circulation and that could be responsible for its therapeutic liabilities. We also provide information suggesting that the FVIII light chain, and especially its C1 and C2 domains, could play an important role in the binding promiscuity. We believe that the knowledge accumulated over years of FVIII usage could be exploited for the development of strategies to predict protein binding promiscuity and therefore anticipate drug efficacy and toxicity. This would open a mutational space to reduce the binding promiscuity of emerging protein drugs while conserving their therapeutic potency.

Novel functions for von Willebrand factor

ABSTRACT

For many years, it has been known that von Willebrand factor (VWF) interacts with factor VIII, collagen, and platelets. In addition, the key roles played by VWF in regulating normal hemostasis have been well defined. However, accumulating recent evidence has shown that VWF can interact with a diverse array of other novel ligands. To date, over 60 different binding partners have been described, with interactions mapped to specific VWF domains in some cases. Although the biological significance of these VWF-binding interactions has not been fully elucidated, recent studies have identified some of these novel ligands as regulators of various aspects of VWF biology, including biosynthesis, proteolysis, and clearance. Conversely, VWF binding has been shown to directly affect the functional properties for some of its ligands. In keeping with those observations, exciting new roles for VWF in regulating a series of nonhemostatic biological functions have also emerged. These include inflammation, wound healing, angiogenesis, and bone metabolism. Finally, recent evidence supports the hypothesis that the nonhemostatic functions of VWF directly contribute to pathogenic mechanisms in a variety of diverse diseases including sepsis, malaria, sickle cell disease, and liver disease. In this manuscript, we review the accumulating data regarding novel ligand interactions for VWF and critically assess how these interactions may affect cellular biology. In addition, we consider the evidence that nonhemostatic VWF functions may contribute to the pathogenesis of human diseases beyond thrombosis and bleeding.

von Willebrand factor modulates immune complexes and the recall response against factor VIII in a murine hemophilia A model

Achieving tolerance toward factor VIII (FVIII) remains an important goal of hemophilia treatment. Up to 40% of patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) develop neutralizing antibodies against FVIII, and the only proven treatment to achieve tolerance is infusion of FVIII over prolonged periods in the context of immune tolerance induction. Here, we addressed the role of von Willebrand factor (VWF) as a modulator of anti-FVIII antibody effector functions and the FVIII-specific recall response in an HA mouse model. Analytical ultracentrifugation was used to demonstrate formation of FVIII-containing immune complexes (FVIII-ICs). VWF did not fully prevent FVIII-IC formation but was rather incorporated into larger macromolecular complexes. VWF prevented binding of FVIII-ICs to complement C1q, most efficiently when it was preincubated with FVIII before the addition of antibodies. It also prevented binding to immobilized Fc-γ receptor and to bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. An in vitro model of the anti-FVIII recall response demonstrated that addition of VWF to FVIII abolished the proliferation of FVIII-specific antibody-secreting cells. After adoptive transfer of sensitized splenocytes into immunocompetent HA mice, the FVIII recall response was diminished by VWF. In summary, these data indicate that VWF modulates the formation and effector functions of FVIII-ICs and attenuates the secondary immune response to FVIII in HA mice.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Factor VIII antibody immune complexes modulate the humoral response to factor VIII in an epitope-dependent manner

Introduction

Soluble antigens complexed with immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies can induce robust adaptive immune responses in vitro and in animal models of disease. Factor VIII immune complexes (FVIII-ICs) have been detected in individuals with hemophilia A and severe von Willebrand disease following FVIII infusions. Yet, it is unclear if and how FVIII-ICs affect antibody development over time.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed internalization of FVIII complexed with epitope-mapped FVIII-specific IgG monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) by murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) in vitro and antibody development in hemophilia A (FVIII-/-) mice injected with FVIII-IC over time.

Results

FVIII complexed with 2-116 (A1 domain MAb), 2-113 (A3 domain MAb), and I55 (C2 domain MAb) significantly increased FVIII uptake by BMDC but only FVIII/2-116 enhanced antibody titers in FVIII-/- mice compared to FVIII alone. FVIII/4A4 (A2 domain MAb) showed similar FVIII uptake by BMDC to that of isolated FVIII yet significantly increased antibody titers when injected in FVIII-/- mice. Enhanced antibody responses observed with FVIII/2-116 and FVIII/4A4 complexes in vivo were abrogated in the absence of the FVIII carrier protein von Willebrand factor.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that a subset of FVIII-IC modulates the humoral response to FVIII in an epitope-dependent manner, which may provide insight into the antibody response observed in some patients with hemophilia A.

Modulating the microenvironment during FVIII uptake influences the nature of FVIII-peptides presented by antigen-presenting cells

Background and aims

Hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder caused by the deficiency of functionally active coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The induction of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies is a major complication in the treatment of hemophilia A patients with FVIII replacement therapies. Why some patients develop neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) while others do not is not well understood. Previous studies indicated that the induction of FVIII inhibitors requires cognate interactions between FVIII-specific B cells and FVIII-specific CD4+ T cells in germinal center reactions. In this study, we investigated the FVIII peptide repertoire presented by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) under different microenvironment conditions that are expected to alter the uptake of FVIII by APCs. The aim of this study was to better understand the association between different microenvironment conditions during FVIII uptake and the FVIII peptide patterns presented by APCs.

Methods

We used a FVIII-specific CD4+ T cell hybridoma library derived from humanized HLA-DRB1*1501 (human MHC class II) hemophilic mice that were treated with human FVIII. APCs obtained from the same mouse strain were preincubated with FVIII under different conditions which are expected to alter the uptake of FVIII by APCs. Subsequently, these preincubated APCs were used to stimulate the FVIII-specific CD4+ T cell hybridoma library. Stimulation of peptide-specific CD4+ T-cell hybridoma clones was assessed by analyzing the IL-2 release into cell culture supernatants.

Results

The results of this study indicate that the specific microenvironment conditions during FVIII uptake by APCs determine the peptide specificities of subsequently activated FVIII-specific CD4+ T cell hybridoma clones. Incubation of APCs with FVIII complexed with von Willebrand Factor, FVIII activated by thrombin or FVIII combined with a blockade of receptors on APCs previously associated with FVIII uptake and clearance, resulted in distinct peptide repertoires of subsequently activated hybridoma clones.

Conclusion

Based on our data we conclude that the specific microenvironment during FVIII uptake by APCs determines the FVIII peptide repertoire presented on MHC class II expressed by APCs and the peptide specificity of subsequently activated FVIII-specific CD4+ T cell hybridoma clones.

BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of inhibitors in children with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia A (HA) is an x-linked recessive disease due to deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against infused FVIII is a major concern. B cell activating factor (BAFF) has been implicated in several autoimmune diseases.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the possible association of BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of FVIII inhibitor in children with severe HA.

METHODS

This cohort study was carried out on 100 newly diagnosed boys with severe HA who were never treated before with FVIII concentrate. Assessment of serum levels of BAFF and BAFF rs9514828 genotyping at first diagnosis was performed and the patients were followed up for the completion of a total of 50 exposure days or the development of inhibitors whichever occurred first. The patients were divided as positive or negative according to the presence or absence of inhibitors.

RESULTS

The risk allele for BAFF rs9514828 (T) was significantly more frequent in the inhibitor positive patients than the inhibitor negative patients (P = .003). In addition, CT+TT genotypes were associated with increased risk of FVIII inhibitor development. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that BAFF levels could predict the development of FVIII inhibitors at a cut-off value of ≥ .92 with a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 80.2%.

CONCLUSION

BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism could be independent risk factor and elevated BAFF levels might be useful prognostic marker for the development of FVIII inhibitor in newly diagnosed children with severe HA.

Development of a novel fully functional coagulation factor VIII with reduced immunogenicity utilizing an in silico prediction and deimmunization approach

BACKGROUND

Up to 30% of hemophilia A patients develop inhibitory antibodies against the infused factor VIII (FVIII). The development of a deimmunized FVIII is an unmet high medical need. Although improved recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products evolved within the last years, the immunogenicity has not been solved. A deimmunized FVIII could reduce the probability of inhibitor development, providing safer therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a deimmunized FVIII molecule by modifying major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II presentation, leading to a functional but less immunogenic molecule.

METHODS

We performed (1) in silico prediction of potentially immunogenic T cell epitopes and their modification by amino acid substitutions in the FVIII sequence, (2) evaluation of functional and structural similarity of the modified rFVIII to unmodified FVIII and registered products, and (3) confirmation of the reduced immunogenicity by in vitro testing.

RESULTS

A partially deimmunized fully functional FVIII molecule incorporating 19 amino acid substitutions was generated. The substitutions led to a reduction of the immunogenicity score, indicating a reduced immunogenicity based on in silico calculations. This was confirmed in an in vitro dendritic cell (DC)--T cell assay. Using this assay, cells from healthy donors proved the significantly reduced immunogenicity of the modified FVIII variant by revealing less proliferation of T helper cells to this variant than to the unmodified FVIII.

CONCLUSION

In silico predictions resulted in a partially deimmunized FVIII. This FVIII is fully functional and was demonstrated to be less immunogenic in in vitro testing. This approach may result in a reduction of the inhibitor risk for patients with hemophilia A.

Immune Responses to Plasma-Derived Versus Recombinant FVIII Products

The most severe side effect of hemophilia treatment is the inhibitor development occurring in 30% of patients, during the earliest stages of treatment with factor (F)VIII concentrates. These catastrophic immune responses rapidly inactivate the infused FVIII, rendering the treatment ineffective. This complication is associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality. The risk factors involved in the onset of the inhibitors are both genetic and environmental. The source of FVIII products, i.e. plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII products, is considered one of the most relevant factors for inhibitor development. Numerous studies in the literature report conflicting data on the different immunogenicity of the products. The SIPPET randomized trial showed an increased in the inhibitor rate in patients using recombinant FVIII products than those receiving plasma-derived products in the first exposure days. The SIPPET randomized trial showed an increase in the inhibitor rate in patients using recombinant FVIII products compared to those treated with plasma-derived products in the first days of exposure. The potential increase in the immunogenicity of recombinant products can be attributed to several factors such as: the different post-translational modification in different cell lines, the presence of protein aggregates, and the role played by the chaperon protein of FVIII, the von Willebrand factor, which modulates the uptake of FVIII by antigen presenting cells (APCs). Furthermore, the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies against FVIII has shown to be in increased inhibitor development as demonstrated in a sub-analysis of the SIPPET study. In addition, the presence of the specific subclasses of the immunoglobulins may also be an important biomarker to indicate whether the inhibitor will evolve into a persistent neutralizing antibody or a transient one that would disappear without any specific treatment. Recently, the availability of novel non-replacement therapies as well as emicizumab, administered by weekly subcutaneous infusion, have significantly changed the quality of life of patients with inhibitors showing a considerable reduction of the annual bleeding rate and in most patients the absence of bleeding. Although, these novel drugs improve patients' quality of life, they do not abolish the need to infuse FVIII during acute bleeding or surgery. Therefore, the issue of immunogenicity against FVIII still remains an important side effect of hemophilia treatment.

Development of inhibitors in hemophilia A: An illustrated review

This illustrated review focuses on the development of inhibitors in patients with congenital hemophilia, which is the most serious treatment-related complication in these patients. Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disorder affecting 1:5000-10 000 newborn males worldwide. It results from the deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), due to mutation(s) in its coding gene (F8). Treatment requires administration of FVIII-containing products either on demand or as prophylaxis, which can induce inhibitor development in 20%-35% of patients. Inhibitors are alloantibodies that neutralize the procoagulant activity of exogenous FVIII. During the initial administration of FVIII-containing products, patients with HA can develop a proinflammatory immune response with synthesis of anti-FVIII IgG1, which has no FVIII inhibitory activity. However, in patients with inhibitors, immune response shifts toward an anti-inflammatory/regulatory pattern favoring the synthesis of anti- FVIII IgG4 antibodies. Patients with inhibitors present with bleeding episodes that are difficult to control, and they have reduced response to FVIII replacement. Currently, immune tolerance induction is the available treatment for eradication of persistent high-titer inhibitors. Despite the clinical relevance, the immunological mechanisms for inhibitor development in patients with HA remains unexplained.

Platelet-Targeted FVIII Gene Therapy Restores Hemostasis and Induces Immune Tolerance for Hemophilia A

Platelets are small anucleated blood components primarily described as playing a fundamental role in hemostasis and thrombosis. Over the last decades, increasing evidence has demonstrated the role of platelets in modulating inflammatory reactions and immune responses. Platelets harbor several specialized organelles: granules, endosomes, lysosomes, and mitochondria that can synthesize proteins with pre-stored mRNAs when needed. While the functions of platelets in the immune response are well-recognized, little is known about the potential role of platelets in immune tolerance. Recent studies demonstrate that platelet-specific FVIII gene therapy can restore hemostasis and induce immune tolerance in hemophilia A mice, even mice with preexisting anti-FVIII immunity. Here, we review the potential mechanisms by which platelet-targeted FVIII gene therapy restores hemostasis in the presence of anti-FVIII inhibitory antibodies and induces immune tolerance in hemophilia A.

Unexpected enhancement of FVIII immunogenicity by endothelial expression in lentivirus-transduced and transgenic mice

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy for hemophilia A is complicated by development of inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors) in ∼30% of patients. Because endothelial cells (ECs) are the primary physiologic expression site, we probed the therapeutic potential of genetically restoring FVIII expression selectively in ECs in hemophilia A mice (FVIIInull). Expression of FVIII was driven by the Tie2 promoter in the context of lentivirus (LV)-mediated in situ transduction (T2F8LV) or embryonic stem cell-mediated transgenesis (T2F8Tg). Both endothelial expression approaches were associated with a strikingly robust immune response. Following in situ T2F8LV-mediated EC transduction, all FVIIInull mice developed inhibitors but had no detectable plasma FVIII. In the transgenic approach, the T2F8Tg mice had normalized plasma FVIII levels, but showed strong sensitivity to developing an FVIII immune response upon FVIII immunization. A single injection of FVIII with incomplete Freund adjuvant led to high titers of inhibitors and reduction of plasma FVIII to undetectable levels. Because ECs are putative major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII)-expressing nonhematopoietic, "semiprofessional" antigen-presenting cells (APCs), we asked whether they might directly influence the FVIII immune responses. Imaging and flow cytometric studies confirmed that both murine and human ECs express MHCII and efficiently bind and take up FVIII protein in vitro. Moreover, microvascular ECs preconditioned ex vivo with inflammatory cytokines could functionally present exogenously taken-up FVIII to previously primed CD4+/CXCR5+ T follicular helper (Tfh) cells to drive FVIII-specific proliferation. Our results show an unanticipated immunogenicity of EC-expressed FVIII and suggest a context-dependent role for ECs in the regulation of inhibitors as auxiliary APCs for Tfh cells.

Peptides identified on monocyte-derived dendritic cells: a marker for clinical immunogenicity to FVIII products

The immunogenicity of protein therapeutics is an important safety and efficacy concern during drug development and regulation. Strategies to identify individuals and subpopulations at risk for an undesirable immune response represent an important unmet need. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs) assay directly identifies the presence of peptides derived from a specific protein therapeutic on a donor's MHC class II (MHC-II) proteins. We applied this technique to address several questions related to the use of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in the treatment of hemophilia A (HA). Although >12 FVIII therapeutics are marketed, most fall into 3 categories: (i) human plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII), (ii) full-length (FL)-recombinant FVIII (rFVIII; FL-rFVIII), and (iii) B-domain-deleted rFVIII. Here, we investigated whether there are differences between the FVIII peptides found on the MHC-II proteins of the same individual when incubated with these 3 classes. Based on several observational studies and a prospective, randomized, clinical trial showing that the originally approved rFVIII products may be more immunogenic than the pdFVIII products containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) in molar excess, it has been hypothesized that the pdFVIII molecules yield/present fewer peptides (ie, potential T-cell epitopes). We have experimentally tested this hypothesis and found that dendritic cells from HA patients and healthy donors present fewer FVIII peptides when administered pdFVIII vs FL-rFVIII, despite both containing the same molar VWF excess. Our results support the hypothesis that synthesis of pdFVIII under physiological conditions could result in reduced heterogeneity and/or subtle differences in structure/conformation which, in turn, may result in reduced FVIII proteolytic processing relative to FL-rFVIII.

Tolerating Factor VIII: Recent Progress

Development of neutralizing antibodies against biotherapeutic agents administered to prevent or treat various clinical conditions is a longstanding and growing problem faced by patients, medical providers and pharmaceutical companies. The hemophilia A community has deep experience with attempting to manage such deleterious immune responses, as the lifesaving protein drug factor VIII (FVIII) has been in use for decades. Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder caused by genetic mutations that result in absent or dysfunctional FVIII. Prophylactic treatment consists of regular intravenous FVIII infusions. Unfortunately, 1/4 to 1/3 of patients develop neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies, referred to clinically as “inhibitors,” which result in a serious bleeding diathesis. Until recently, the only therapeutic option for these patients was “Immune Tolerance Induction,” consisting of intensive FVIII administration, which is extraordinarily expensive and fails in ~30% of cases. There has been tremendous recent progress in developing novel potential clinical alternatives for the treatment of hemophilia A, ranging from encouraging results of gene therapy trials, to use of other hemostatic agents (either promoting coagulation or slowing down anti-coagulant or fibrinolytic pathways) to “bypass” the need for FVIII or supplement FVIII replacement therapy. Although these approaches are promising, there is widespread agreement that preventing or reversing inhibitors remains a high priority. Risk profiles of novel therapies are still unknown or incomplete, and FVIII will likely continue to be considered the optimal hemostatic agent to support surgery and manage trauma, or to combine with other therapies. We describe here recent exciting studies, most still pre-clinical, that address FVIII immunogenicity and suggest novel interventions to prevent or reverse inhibitor development. Studies of FVIII uptake, processing and presentation on antigen-presenting cells, epitope mapping, and the roles of complement, heme, von Willebrand factor, glycans, and the microbiome in FVIII immunogenicity are elucidating mechanisms of primary and secondary immune responses and suggesting additional novel targets. Promising tolerogenic therapies include development of FVIII-Fc fusion proteins, nanoparticle-based therapies, oral tolerance, and engineering of regulatory or cytotoxic T cells to render them FVIII-specific. Importantly, these studies are highly applicable to other scenarios where establishing immune tolerance to a defined antigen is a clinical priority.

Quantitative HLA-class-II/factor VIII (FVIII) peptidomic variation in dendritic cells correlates with the immunogenic potential of therapeutic FVIII proteins in hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Plasma-derived (pd) or recombinant (r) therapeutic factor VIII proteins (FVIIIs) are infused to arrest/prevent bleeding in patients with hemophilia A (PWHA). However, FVIIIs are neutralized if anti-FVIII-antibodies (inhibitors) develop. Accumulating evidence suggests that pdFVIIIs with von Willebrand factor (VWF) are less immunogenic than rFVIIIs and that distinct rFVIIIs are differentially immunogenic. Since inhibitor development is T-helper-cell-dependent, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-class-II (HLAcII) molecules constitute an important early determinant.

OBJECTIVES

Use dendritic cell (DC)-protein processing/presentation assays with mass-spectrometric and peptide-proteomic analyses to quantify the DP-bound, DQ-bound, and DR-bound FVIII-derived peptides in individual HLAcII repertoires and compare the immunogenic potential of six distinct FVIIIs based on their measured peptide counts.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Monocyte-derived DCs from normal donors and/or PWHA were cultured with either: Mix-rFVIII, a VWF-free equimolar mixture of a full-length (FL)-rFVIII [Advate® (Takeda)] and four distinct B-domain-deleted (BDD)-rFVIIIs [Xyntha® (Pfizer), NovoEight® (Novo-Nordisk), Nuwiq® (Octapharma), and Afstyla® (CSL Behring GmBH)]; a pdFVIII + pdVWF [Beriate® (CSL Behring GmBH)]; Advate ± pdVWF; Afstyla ± pdVWF; and Xyntha + pdVWF.

RESULTS

We showed that (i) Beriate had a significantly lower immunogenic potential than Advate ± pdVWF, Afstyla - pdVWF, and Mix-rFVIII; (ii) distinct FVIIIs differed significantly in their immunogenic potential in that, in addition to (i), Afstyla + pdVWF had a significantly lower immunogenic potential than Beriate, while the immunogenic potential of Beriate was not significantly different from that of Xyntha + pdVWF; and (iii) rFVIIIs with pdVWF had significantly lower immunogenic potentials than the same rFVIIIs without pdVWF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide HLAcII peptidomic level explanations for several important clinical observations/issues including the differential immunogenicity of distinct FVIIIs and the role of HLAcII genetics in inhibitor development.

A factor VIII–nanobody fusion protein forming an ultrastable complex with VWF: effect on clearance and antibody formation

The fusion between FVIII and anti-VWF nanobodies increases affinity for VWF 25-fold without compromising FVIII activity. Stabilized VWF binding results in a twofold enhanced circulatory survival of FVIII and reduced anti-FVIII antibody formation.

Early cellular interactions and immune transcriptome profiles in human factor VIII-exposed hemophilia A mice

Essentials Initial immune cell interactions leading to factor (F) VIII immunity are not well characterized. We assessed cellular interactions and expression profiles in hemophilia A mice. MARCO+, followed by SIGLEC1+ and SIGNR1+ macrophages co-localize most with human FVIII. The splenic transcriptome highlights potential therapeutic targets to prevent inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Background Developing factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibodies is the most serious complication in hemophilia A treatment, representing a significant health and economic burden. A better understanding of the early events in an immune response leading to this outcome may provide insight into inhibitor development. Objective To identify early mediators of FVIII immunity and to detail immune expression profiles in the spleen and liver. Methods C57Bl/6 F8 E16 knockout mice were infused with 5-20 μg (2000-8000 IU kg-1 ) of recombinant FVIII. Spleens were frozen at various time-points post-infusion and stained for FVIII and cellular markers. Splenic and liver RNA expression analysis was performed 3 h post-infusion of 0.6 μg (240 IU kg-1 ) FVIII by nCounter technology using a 561-gene immunology panel. Results FVIII localization in the spleen did not change over 2.5 h. We observed significantly higher co-localization of FVIII with MARCO+ cells compared with SIGLEC1+ and SIGNR1+ in the splenic marginal zone. FVIII exhibited little co-localization with CD11c+ dendritic cells and the macrophage mannose receptor, CD206. Following FVIII infusion, the splenic mRNA profiling identified genes such as Tnfaip6 and Il23r, which are implicated in chemotaxis and a proinflammatory Th17 response, respectively. In contrast, an upregulation of Gfi1 in the liver suggests an anti-inflammatory environment. Conclusions FVIII co-localizes predominantly with marginal zone macrophages (MARCO+ ) in the murine spleen following intravenous infusion. Targeting pathways that are implicated in the early FVIII innate immune response in the spleen may lead to therapeutic interventions to prevent inhibitor formation.

Complement C3 is a novel modulator of the anti-factor VIII immune response

Development of neutralizing antibodies against therapeutic Factor VIII (FVIII) is the most serious complication of the treatment of hemophilia A. There is growing evidence to show the multifactorial origin of the anti-FVIII immune response, combining both genetic and environmental factors. While a role for the complement system on innate as well as adaptive immunity has been documented, the implication of complement activation on the onset of the anti-FVIII immune response is unknown. Here, using in vitro assays for FVIII endocytosis by human monocyte-derived dendritic cells and presentation to T cells, as well as in vivo complement depletion in FVIII-deficient mice, we show a novel role for complement C3 in enhancing the immune response against therapeutic FVIII. In vitro, complement C3 and its cleavage product C3b enhanced FVIII endocytosis by dendritic cells and presentation to a FVIII-specific CD4⁺ T-cell hybridoma. The C1 domain of FVIII had previously been shown to play an important role in FVIII endocytosis, and alanine substitutions of the K2092, F2093 and R2090 C1 residues drastically reduce FVIII uptake in vitro. Interestingly, complement activation rescued the endocytosis of the FVIII C1 domain triple mutant. In a mouse model of severe hemophilia A, transient complement C3 depletion by humanized cobra venom factor, which does not generate anaphylatoxin C5a, significantly reduced the primary anti-FVIII immune response, but did not affect anti-FVIII recall immune responses. Taken together, our results suggest an important adjuvant role for the complement cascade in the initiation of the immune response to therapeutic FVIII.

To serve and protect: The modulatory role of von Willebrand factor on factor VIII immunogenicity

Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder characterized by the absence or dysfunction of blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Patients are treated with regular infusions of FVIII concentrate. In response to treatment, approximately 30% of patients with severe hemophilia A develop inhibitory antibodies targeting FVIII. Both patient and treatment related risk factors for inhibitor development have been described. Multiple studies comparing the immunogenicity of recombinant and plasma-derived FVIII have yielded conflicting results. The randomized controlled SIPPET (Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers) trial demonstrated an increased risk of inhibitor development of recombinant FVIII when compared to von Willebrand factor (VWF)-containing plasma-derived FVIII. Presently, it is unclear which mechanism underlies the reduced immunogenicity of plasma-derived FVIII. In this review we address the potential role of VWF on FVIII immunogenicity and we discuss how VWF affects the immune recognition, processing and presentation of FVIII. We also briefly discuss the potential impact of glycan-composition on FVIII immunogenicity. It is well established that VWF shields the uptake of FVIII by antigen presenting cells. We have recently shown that VWF binds to the surface of dendritic cells. Here, we present a novel model in which surface bound FVIII-VWF complexes regulate the internalization of FVIII. Binding of FVIII to VWF is critically dependent on sulfation of Tyr1699 (HVGS numbering) in the light chain of FVIII. Incomplete sulfation of Tyr1699 has been suggested to occur in several recombinant FVIII products resulting in a loss of VWF binding. We hypothesize that this results in alternative pathways of FVIII internalization by antigen presenting cells which are not regulated by VWF. This hypothetical mechanism may explain the reduced immunogenicity of VWF containing plasma-derived FVIII concentrates as found in the SIPPET study.

Many factor VIII products available in the treatment of hemophilia A: an embarrassment of riches?

Hemophilia A (HA) is a common bleeding disorder caused by the deficiency of factor VIII (FVIII) with an incidence of ~1 in 5000 male births. Replacement of FVIII is necessary to prevent and treat bleeding episodes. However, with multiple new drugs in addition to old standards, choosing among the different FVIII treatment options is harder than ever. There are FVIII products that are plasma derived or recombinant, FVIII products designed to extend the half-life of FVIII, and the first single-chain FVIII product, recombinant factor VIII single chain (rFVIII-SC). As development of inhibitors to FVIII continues to be a major problem in the care of HA patients, recent studies showing lower rates of inhibitor development with plasma-derived FVIIII products versus recombinant FVIII products have made choosing among the many options now available even more complex. Although still unproven, extended half-life (EHL) products may provide the hope of decreased immunogenicity but need further testing in previously untreated patients (PUPs). This review highlights some of the differences between FVIII products currently available and hopefully assists the clinician to decide which FVIII product to choose for their patients.

Biological considerations of plasma-derived and recombinant factor VIII immunogenicity

In hemophilia A, the most severe complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy involves the formation of FVIII neutralizing antibodies, also known as inhibitors, in 25% to 30% of patients. This adverse event is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and economic burden, thus highlighting the need to identify methods to limit FVIII immunogenicity. Inhibitor development is regulated by a complex balance of genetic factors, such as FVIII genotype, and environmental variables, such as coexistent inflammation. One of the hypothesized risk factors of inhibitor development is the source of the FVIII concentrate, which could be either recombinant or plasma derived. Differential immunogenicity of these concentrates has been documented in several recent epidemiologic studies, thus generating significant debate within the hemophilia treatment community. To date, these discussions have been unable to reach a consensus regarding how these outcomes might be integrated into enhancing clinical care. Moreover, the biological mechanistic explanations for the observed differences are poorly understood. In this article, we complement the existing epidemiologic investigations with an overview of the range of possible biochemical and immunologic mechanisms that may contribute to the different immune outcomes observed with plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII products.

Innovating immune tolerance induction for haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia A is an X-linked bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency of coagulation protein factor VIII (FVIII). A challenging complication of therapeutic FVIII infusions is the formation of neutralizing alloantibodies against the FVIII protein defined as inhibitors. The development of FVIII inhibitors drastically alters the quality of life of the patients and is associated with tremendous increases in morbidity as well as treatment costs.

AIM

Current clinical immune tolerance induction protocols to reverse inhibitors are lengthy, costly and not effective in all patients. Prophylactic protocols to prevent inhibitor formation have not yet been developed in the clinical setting. However, there has been ample progress towards this goal in recent years in preclinical studies using animal models of haemophilia.

METHODS

Here, we review the mechanisms that lead to inhibitor formation against FVIII and two promising new strategies for antigen-specific tolerance induction.

RESULTS

CD4+ T cells play an important role in the FVIII-specific B cell response. Immune tolerance can be induced based on transplacental delivery of FVIII domains fused to Fc or on oral delivery of leaf cells from chloroplast transgenic crop plants.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent literature suggests that prophylactic tolerance induction protocols for FVIII may be feasible in haemophilia A patients.

Enhanced uptake of blood coagulation factor VIII containing immune complexes by antigen presenting cells

Essentials Anti-factor (F) VIII antibody formation is a major complication in the treatment of hemophilia A. We investigated uptake of FVIII and FVIII immune complex by bone marrow derived dendritic cells. Immune complex formation increased uptake of FVIII 3-4 fold in a Fcγ receptor dependent manner. FVIII immune complex binding to Fcγ receptors may modulate immune tolerance induction.

SUMMARY

Background A major complication in the treatment of hemophilia A is the development of inhibitory antibodies targeting coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Eradication of these inhibitors can be established by immune tolerance induction (ITI), which consists of daily administration of high dosages of FVIII. FVIII immune complexes (FVIII-IC) could be formed following FVIII infusion in patients with pre-existing anti-FVIII antibodies. Objectives Here we studied endocytosis of FVIII-IC by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs). Methods BMDCs were pulsed with FVIII/FVIII-IC and uptake was assessed by flow cytometry and confocal imaging. Results BMDCs were able to efficiently internalize FVIII-IC in a dose-dependent manner, 3-4-fold more efficiently when compared with equimolar concentrations of non-complexed FVIII. Uptake of FVIII-IC, but not FVIII alone, could be inhibited with anti-Fcγ receptor (FcγR) antibody 2.4G2, indicating functional involvement of FcγR. No internalization of FVIII-IC was observed in BMDCs lacking FcγRI, FcγRIIb, FcγRIII and FcγRIV. Genetic ablation of FcγRIIb, FcγRIII or FcγRIV individually did not affect the ability of anti-FVIII IgG to promote the uptake of FVIII. BMDCs lacking FcγRI showed lower FVIII-IC uptake levels when compared with other single FcγR null BMDCs. Expression of the inhibitory FcγRIIb alone was sufficient to internalize FVIII-IC more efficiently than FVIII. Conclusions FcγR are critical in the internalization of FVIII-IC by BMDCs and multiple FcγR can contribute independently to this process. Our findings provide a basis for future studies to address whether the outcome of ITI is dependent on the interplay between FVIII-IC and inhibitory and activating FcγR.

The C1 and C2 domains of blood coagulation factor VIII mediate its endocytosis by dendritic cells

The development of inhibitory antibodies to therapeutic factor VIII is the major complication of replacement therapy in patients with hemophilia A. The first step in the initiation of the anti-factor VIII immune response is factor VIII interaction with receptor(s) on antigen-presenting cells, followed by endocytosis and presentation to naïve CD4⁺ T cells. Recent studies indicate a role for the C1 domain in factor VIII uptake. We investigated whether charged residues in the C2 domain participate in immunogenic factor VIII uptake. Co-incubation of factor VIII with BO2C11, a monoclonal C2-specific immunoglobulin G, reduced factor VIII endocytosis by dendritic cells and presentation to CD4⁺ T cells, and diminished factor VIII immunogenicity in factor VIII-deficient mice. The mutation of basic residues within the BO2C11 epitope of C2 replicated reduced in vitro immunogenic uptake, but failed to prevent factor VIII immunogenicity in mice. BO2C11 prevents factor VIII binding to von Willebrand factor, thus potentially biasing factor VIII immunogenicity by perturbing its half-life. Interestingly, a factor VIII^Y1680C mutant, that does not bind von Willebrand factor, demonstrated unaltered endocytosis by dendritic cells as well as immunogenicity in factor VIII-deficient mice. Co-incubation of factor VIII^Y1680C with BO2C11, however, resulted in decreased factor VIII immunogenicity in vivo In addition, a previously described triple C1 mutant showed decreased uptake in vitro, and reduced immunogenicity in vivo, but only in the absence of endogenous von Willebrand factor. Taken together, the results indicate that residues in the C1 and/or C2 domains of factor VIII are implicated in immunogenic factor VIII uptake, at least in vitro Conversely, in vivo, the binding to endogenous von Willebrand factor masks the reducing effect of mutations in the C domains on factor VIII immunogenicity.

Life in the shadow of a dominant partner: the FVIII-VWF association and its clinical implications for hemophilia A

A normal hemostatic response to vascular injury requires both factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF). In plasma, VWF and FVIII normally circulate as a noncovalent complex, and each has a critical function in the maintenance of hemostasis. Furthermore, the interaction between VWF and FVIII plays a crucial role in FVIII function, immunogenicity, and clearance, with VWF essentially serving as a chaperone for FVIII. Several novel recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) therapies for hemophilia A have been in clinical development, which aim to increase the half-life of FVIII (∼12 hours) and reduce dosing frequency by utilizing bioengineering techniques including PEGylation, Fc fusion, and single-chain design. However, these approaches have achieved only moderate increases in half-life of 1.5- to 2-fold compared with marketed FVIII products. Clearance of PEGylated rFVIII, rFVIIIFc, and rVIII-SingleChain is still regulated to a large extent by interaction with VWF. Therefore, the half-life of VWF (∼15 hours) appears to be the limiting factor that has confounded attempts to extend the half-life of rFVIII. A greater understanding of the interaction between FVIII and VWF is required to drive novel bioengineering strategies for products that either prolong the survival of VWF or limit VWF-mediated clearance of FVIII.