1
|
Goodyear CS, Patel A, Barnes E, Willicombe M, Siebert S, de Silva TI, Snowden JA, Lim SH, Bowden SJ, Billingham L, Richter A, Carroll M, Carr EJ, Beale R, Rea D, Parry H, Pirrie S, Lim Z, Satsangi J, Dunachie SJ, Cook G, Miller P, Basu N, Gilmour A, Hodgkins AM, Evans L, Hughes A, Longet S, Meacham G, Yong KL, A'Hearne MJ, Koh MBC, Burns SO, Orchard K, Paterson C, McIlroy G, Murray SM, Thomson T, Dimitriadis S, Goulston L, Miller S, Keillor V, Prendecki M, Thomas D, Kirkham A, McInnes IB, Kearns P. Immunogenicity of third dose COVID-19 vaccine strategies in patients who are immunocompromised with suboptimal immunity following two doses (OCTAVE-DUO): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Rheumatol 2024:S2665-9913(24)00065-1. [PMID: 38734019 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00065-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The humoral and T-cell responses to booster COVID-19 vaccine types in multidisease immunocompromised individuals who do not generate adequate antibody responses to two COVID-19 vaccine doses, is not fully understood. The OCTAVE DUO trial aimed to determine the value of third vaccinations in a wide range of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies. METHODS OCTAVE-DUO was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial investigating humoral and T-cell responses in patients who are immunocompromised following a third vaccine dose with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, and of NVX-CoV2373 for those with lymphoid malignancies. We recruited patients who were immunocompromised from 11 UK hospitals, aged at least 18 years, with previous sub-optimal responses to two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 (1:1:1 for those with lymphoid malignancies), stratified by disease, previous vaccination type, and anti-spike antibody response following two doses. Individuals with lived experience of immune susceptibility were involved in the study design and implementation. The primary outcome was vaccine-specific immunity defined by anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (Roche Diagnostics UK and Ireland, Burgess Hill, UK) and T-cell responses (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK) before and 21 days after the third vaccine dose analysed by a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN 15354495, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2021-003632-87, and is complete. FINDINGS Between Aug 4, 2021 and Mar 31, 2022, 804 participants across nine disease cohorts were randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (n=377), mRNA-1273 (n=374), or NVX-CoV2373 (n=53). 356 (45%) of 789 participants were women, 433 (55%) were men, and 659 (85%) of 775 were White. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies measured 21 days after the third vaccine dose were significantly higher than baseline pre-third dose titres in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median 1384 arbitrary units [AU]/mL [IQR 4·3-7990·0] compared with median 11·5 AU/mL [0·4-63·1]; p<0·001). Of participants who were baseline low responders, 380 (90%) of 423 increased their antibody concentrations to more than 400 AU/mL. Conversely, 166 (54%) of 308 baseline non-responders had no response after the third dose. Detectable T-cell responses following the third vaccine dose were seen in 494 (80%) of 616 participants. There were 24 serious adverse events (BNT612b2 eight [33%] of 24, mRNA-1273 12 [50%], NVX-CoV2373 four [17%]), two (8%) of which were categorised as vaccine-related. There were seven deaths (1%) during the trial, none of which were vaccine-related. INTERPRETATION A third vaccine dose improved the serological and T-cell response in the majority of patients who are immunocompromised. Individuals with chronic renal disease, lymphoid malignancy, on B-cell targeted therapies, or with no serological response after two vaccine doses are at higher risk of poor response to a third vaccine dose. FUNDING Medical Research Council, Blood Cancer UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl S Goodyear
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Amit Patel
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eleanor Barnes
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michelle Willicombe
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Stefan Siebert
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Thushan I de Silva
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John A Snowden
- Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sean H Lim
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sarah J Bowden
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lucinda Billingham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alex Richter
- Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Miles Carroll
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen Parry
- Department of Haematology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundations Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah Pirrie
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zixiang Lim
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Gordon Cook
- National Institute for Health Research Leeds MIC, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Miller
- British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Neil Basu
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashley Gilmour
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Hodgkins
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lili Evans
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ana Hughes
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stephanie Longet
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP (Saint-Etienne), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, CNRS, Lyon, France
| | - Georgina Meacham
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kwee L Yong
- Cancer Institute, Department of Haematology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Mickey B C Koh
- Infection and Immunity Clinical Academic Group, St George's, University of London and Department of Haematology, St George's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Siobhan O Burns
- Clinical Immunology, Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead, London, UK; Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Hampstead, London, UK
| | - Kim Orchard
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Caron Paterson
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Graham McIlroy
- Department of Haematology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundations Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sam M Murray
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tina Thomson
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Lyndsey Goulston
- National Institute of Health Research, Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Samantha Miller
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Victoria Keillor
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Maria Prendecki
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - David Thomas
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amanda Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Iain B McInnes
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pamela Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Merli M, Costantini A, Tafuri S, Bavaro DF, Minoia C, Meli E, Luminari S, Gini G. Management of vaccinations in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2024; 204:1617-1634. [PMID: 38532527 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Vaccinations are fundamental tools in preventing infectious diseases, especially in immunocompromised patients like those affected by non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). The COVID-19 pandemic made clinicians increasingly aware of the importance of vaccinations in preventing potential life-threatening SARS-CoV-2-related complications in NHL patients. However, several studies have confirmed a significant reduction in vaccine-induced immune responses after anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment, thus underscoring the need for refined immunization strategies in NHL patients. In this review, we summarize the existing data about COVID-19 and other vaccine's efficacy in patients with NHL and propose multidisciplinary team-based recommendations for the management of vaccines in this specific group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Merli
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Costantini
- Clinical Immunology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche - Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Davide Fiore Bavaro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Carla Minoia
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Erika Meli
- Division of Hematology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Stefano Luminari
- Hematology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Surgical Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences Related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Guido Gini
- Clinic of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Delle Marche - Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu H, Lu X, Zhang X, Hua H, Zhang J, Miao Y, Gu W, Xu M, Lu X, Li B, Wang C, Ni H, Qian J, Shi J, Xu M, Wu G, Zhang Y, Shen Q, Wang Z, Zhu J, Cheng Z, Zhuang W, Lin G, Hu Y, Shan Q, Chen Y, Qiu H, Li J, Shi W. Multi-center study of COVID-19 infection in elderly patients with lymphoma: on behalf of Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG). Ann Hematol 2024:10.1007/s00277-024-05744-6. [PMID: 38649594 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05744-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Elderly patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (LPD) are vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Here, we retrospectively described the clinical features and outcomes of the first time infection of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 in 364 elderly patients with lymphoma enrolled in Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG) between November 2022 and April 2023 in China. Median age was 69 years (range 60-92). 54.4% (198/364) of patients were confirmed as severe and critical COVID-19 infection. In univariable analysis, Age > 70 years (OR 1.88, p = 0.003), with multiple comorbidities (OR 1.41, p = 0.005), aggressive lymphoma (OR 2.33, p < 0.001), active disease (progressive or relapsed/refractory, OR 2.02, p < 0.001), and active anti-lymphoma therapy (OR 1.90, p < 0.001) were associated with severe COVID-19. Multiple (three or more) lines of previous anti-lymphoma therapy (OR 3.84, p = 0.021) remained an adverse factor for severe COVID-19 in multivariable analysis. Moreover, CD20 antibody (Rituximab or Obinutuzumab)-based treatments within the last 6 months was associated with severe COVID-19 in the entire cohort (OR 3.42, p < 0.001). Continuous BTK inhibitors might be protective effect on the outcome of COVID-19 infection (OR 0.44, p = 0.043) in the indolent lymphoma cohort. Overall, 7.7% (28/364) of the patients ceased, multiple lines of previous anti-lymphoma therapy (OR 3.46, p = 0.016) remained an adverse factor for mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huayuan Zhu
- Department of Hematology, Lymphoma Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China.
| | - Xiao Lu
- Department of Hematology, Lymphoma Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoping Zhang
- Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Nanjing, 210044, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Haiying Hua
- Department of Hematology, Wuxi Third People's Hospital, Wuxi, 214045, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Yuqing Miao
- Department of Hematology, Yancheng First People's Hospital, Yancheng, 224006, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Weiying Gu
- Department of Hematology, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou and The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213004, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Min Xu
- Department of Hematology, Zhangjiagang First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Zhangjiagang, 215699, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Xuzhang Lu
- Department of Hematology, Affiliated Changzhou Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Bingzong Li
- Department of Hematology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Chunling Wang
- Department of Hematology, The First People's Hospital of Huai'an, Huai'an, 223399, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Haiwen Ni
- Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210004, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Qian
- Department of Hematology, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212002, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Jinning Shi
- Department of Hematology, the Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211199, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Maozhong Xu
- Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, 214433, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Guangqi Wu
- Department of Hematology, The First People's Hospital of Suqian, Suqian, 223812, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Yunping Zhang
- Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, 214206, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Qiudan Shen
- Department of Hematology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, 215008, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Zhi Wang
- Department of Hematology, Wuxi Second People's Hospital, Wuxi, 214001, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Jianfeng Zhu
- Department of Hematology, The People's Hospital of Taizhou, Taizhou, 225399, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Zhen Cheng
- Department of Hematology, Taicang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Taicang, 215488, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Wanchuan Zhuang
- Department of Hematology, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, 222002, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Guoqiang Lin
- Department of Hematology, Huai'an Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical College and Huai'an Second People's Hospital, Huai'an, 223022, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Yongjun Hu
- Department of Hematology, Huaiyin Hospital of Huai'an, Huai'an, 223399, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Qiurong Shan
- Department of Hematology, Shuyang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shuyang, 223614, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Yifei Chen
- Department of Hematology, Jiangdu People's Hospital of Yangzhou, Yangzhou, 225202, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Hongchun Qiu
- Department of Hematology, The Third People's Hospital of Kunshan, Kunshan, 215316, China
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China
| | - Jianyong Li
- Department of Hematology, Lymphoma Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China.
| | - Wenyu Shi
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
- Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, 20 Xisi Road, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
- Jiangsu Cooperative Lymphoma Group (JCLG), Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Starkey T, Ionescu MC, Tilby M, Little M, Burke E, Fittall MW, Khan S, Liu JKH, Platt JR, Mew R, Tripathy AR, Watts I, Williams ST, Appanna N, Al-Hajji Y, Barnard M, Benny L, Burnett A, Bytyci J, Cattell EL, Cheng V, Clark JJ, Eastlake L, Gerrand K, Ghafoor Q, Grumett S, Harper-Wynne C, Kahn R, Lee AJX, Lomas O, Lydon A, Mckenzie H, Panneerselvam H, Pascoe JS, Patel G, Patel V, Potter VA, Randle A, Rigg AS, Robinson TM, Roylance R, Roques TW, Rozmanowski S, Roux RL, Shah K, Sheehan R, Sintler M, Swarup S, Taylor H, Tillett T, Tuthill M, Williams S, Ying Y, Beggs A, Iveson T, Lee SM, Middleton G, Middleton M, Protheroe A, Fowler T, Johnson P, Lee LYW. A population-scale temporal case-control evaluation of COVID-19 disease phenotype and related outcome rates in patients with cancer in England (UKCCP). Sci Rep 2023; 13:11327. [PMID: 37491478 PMCID: PMC10368624 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36990-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer are at increased risk of hospitalisation and mortality following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, the SARS-CoV-2 phenotype evolution in patients with cancer since 2020 has not previously been described. We therefore evaluated SARS-CoV-2 on a UK populationscale from 01/11/2020-31/08/2022, assessing case-outcome rates of hospital assessment(s), intensive care admission and mortality. We observed that the SARS-CoV-2 disease phenotype has become less severe in patients with cancer and the non-cancer population. Case-hospitalisation rates for patients with cancer dropped from 30.58% in early 2021 to 7.45% in 2022 while case-mortality rates decreased from 20.53% to 3.25%. However, the risk of hospitalisation and mortality remains 2.10x and 2.54x higher in patients with cancer, respectively. Overall, the SARS-CoV-2 disease phenotype is less severe in 2022 compared to 2020 but patients with cancer remain at higher risk than the non-cancer population. Patients with cancer must therefore be empowered to live more normal lives, to see loved ones and families, while also being safeguarded with expanded measures to reduce the risk of transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Starkey
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Michael Tilby
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Emma Burke
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Sam Khan
- University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - James R Platt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Leeds, UK
| | - Rosie Mew
- Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Youssra Al-Hajji
- Birmingham Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jola Bytyci
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Qamar Ghafoor
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon Grumett
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Oliver Lomas
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Anna Lydon
- Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK
| | - Hayley Mckenzie
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Jennifer S Pascoe
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Vanessa A Potter
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Anne S Rigg
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Roylance
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tom W Roques
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | - René L Roux
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Ketan Shah
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Remarez Sheehan
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Martin Sintler
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Mark Tuthill
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Williams
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yuxin Ying
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Beggs
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tim Iveson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Siow Ming Lee
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark Middleton
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Protheroe
- Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Tom Fowler
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Lennard Y W Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barnes E, Goodyear CS, Willicombe M, Gaskell C, Siebert S, I de Silva T, Murray SM, Rea D, Snowden JA, Carroll M, Pirrie S, Bowden SJ, Dunachie SJ, Richter A, Lim Z, Satsangi J, Cook G, Pope A, Hughes A, Harrison M, Lim SH, Miller P, Klenerman P, Basu N, Gilmour A, Irwin S, Meacham G, Marjot T, Dimitriadis S, Kelleher P, Prendecki M, Clarke C, Mortimer P, McIntyre S, Selby R, Meardon N, Nguyen D, Tipton T, Longet S, Laidlaw S, Orchard K, Ireland G, Thomas D, Kearns P, Kirkham A, McInnes IB. SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses and clinical outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-suppressive disease. Nat Med 2023; 29:1760-1774. [PMID: 37414897 PMCID: PMC10353927 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02414-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immune responses and infection outcomes were evaluated in 2,686 patients with varying immune-suppressive disease states after administration of two Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Overall, 255 of 2,204 (12%) patients failed to develop anti-spike antibodies, with an additional 600 of 2,204 (27%) patients generating low levels (<380 AU ml-1). Vaccine failure rates were highest in ANCA-associated vasculitis on rituximab (21/29, 72%), hemodialysis on immunosuppressive therapy (6/30, 20%) and solid organ transplant recipients (20/81, 25% and 141/458, 31%). SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were detected in 513 of 580 (88%) patients, with lower T cell magnitude or proportion in hemodialysis, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and liver transplant recipients (versus healthy controls). Humoral responses against Omicron (BA.1) were reduced, although cross-reactive T cell responses were sustained in all participants for whom these data were available. BNT162b2 was associated with higher antibody but lower cellular responses compared to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. We report 474 SARS-CoV-2 infection episodes, including 48 individuals with hospitalization or death from COVID-19. Decreased magnitude of both the serological and the T cell response was associated with severe COVID-19. Overall, we identified clinical phenotypes that may benefit from targeted COVID-19 therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Barnes
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl S Goodyear
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michelle Willicombe
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Gaskell
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stefan Siebert
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Thushan I de Silva
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sam M Murray
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - John A Snowden
- Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Miles Carroll
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Pirrie
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah J Bowden
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Susanna J Dunachie
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alex Richter
- Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zixiang Lim
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- National Institute for Health Research, Leeds MIC, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ann Pope
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ana Hughes
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Molly Harrison
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sean H Lim
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Miller
- British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Paul Klenerman
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Neil Basu
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashley Gilmour
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sophie Irwin
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Georgina Meacham
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas Marjot
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Peter Kelleher
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, School of Medicine Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maria Prendecki
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Candice Clarke
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Paige Mortimer
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Stacey McIntyre
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Rachael Selby
- Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Naomi Meardon
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dung Nguyen
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tom Tipton
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephanie Longet
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen Laidlaw
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kim Orchard
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Georgina Ireland
- UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - David Thomas
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Pamela Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Amanda Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Iain B McInnes
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liatsou E, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Lykos S, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos A, Gavriatopoulou M, Psaltopoulou T, Sergentanis TN, Terpos E. Adult Patients with Cancer Have Impaired Humoral Responses to Complete and Booster COVID-19 Vaccination, Especially Those with Hematologic Cancer on Active Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082266. [PMID: 37190194 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The exclusion of patients with cancer in clinical trials evaluating COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety, in combination with the high rate of severe infections, highlights the need for optimizing vaccination strategies. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published available data from prospective and retrospective cohort studies that included patients with either solid or hematological malignancies according to the PRISMA Guidelines. A literature search was performed in the following databases: Medline (Pubmed), Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Google Scholar. Overall, 70 studies were included for the first and second vaccine dose and 60 studies for the third dose. The Effect Size (ES) of the seroconversion rate after the first dose was 0.41 (95%CI: 0.33-0.50) for hematological malignancies and 0.56 (95%CI: 0.47-0.64) for solid tumors. The seroconversion rates after the second dose were 0.62 (95%CI: 0.57-0.67) for hematological malignancies and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.82-0.93) for solid tumors. After the third dose, the ES for seroconversion was estimated at 0.63 (95%CI: 0.54-0.72) for hematological cancer and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.75-0.97) for solid tumors. A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate potential factors affecting immune response. Production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was found to be more affected in patients with hematological malignancies, which was attributed to the type of malignancy and treatment with monoclonal antibodies according to the subgroup analyses. Overall, this study highlights that patients with cancer present suboptimal humoral responses after COVID-19 vaccination. Several factors including timing of vaccination in relevance with active therapy, type of therapy, and type of cancer should be considered throughout the immunization process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstathia Liatsou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Stavros Lykos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Theodora Psaltopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Theodoros N Sergentanis
- Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, 12243 Aigaleo, Greece
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ishio T, Tsukamoto S, Yokoyama E, Izumiyama K, Saito M, Muraki H, Kobayashi M, Mori A, Morioka M, Kondo T. Anti-CD20 antibodies and bendamustine attenuate humoral immunity to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2023; 102:1421-1431. [PMID: 37041299 PMCID: PMC10089694 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05204-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Serologic responses of COVID-19 vaccine are impaired in patients with B-cell lymphoma, especially those who had recently been treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. However, it is still unclear whether those patients develop an immune response following vaccination. We investigated the efficacy of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in 171 patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) who received two doses of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine and we compared the efficacy of vaccination to that in 166 healthy controls. Antibody titers were measured 3 months after administration of the second vaccine dose. Patients with B-NHL showed a significantly lower seroconversion rate and a lower median antibody titer than those in healthy controls. The antibody titers showed correlations with the period from the last anti-CD20 antibody treatment to vaccination, the period from the last bendamustine treatment to vaccination and serum IgM level. The serologic response rates and median antibody titers were significantly different between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients in whom anti-CD20 antibody treatment was completed within 9 months before vaccination and follicular lymphoma (FL) patients in whom anti-CD20 antibody treatment was completed within 15 months before vaccination. Moreover, the serologic response rates and median antibody titers were significantly different among FL patients in whom bendamustine treatment was completed within 33 months before vaccination. We demonstrated that B-NHL patients who were recently treated with anti-CD20 antibodies and bendamustine had a diminished humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination. UMIN 000,045,267.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Ishio
- Blood Disorders Center, Aiiku Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
| | | | - Emi Yokoyama
- Blood Disorders Center, Aiiku Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koh Izumiyama
- Blood Disorders Center, Aiiku Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Makoto Saito
- Blood Disorders Center, Aiiku Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Haruna Muraki
- Division of Laboratory, Aiiku Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Akio Mori
- Blood Disorders Center, Aiiku Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Takeshi Kondo
- Blood Disorders Center, Aiiku Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Luque-Paz D, Sesques P, Wallet F, Bachy E, Ader F. B-cell malignancies and COVID-19: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023; 29:332-337. [PMID: 36336236 PMCID: PMC9633106 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 has been extensively characterized in immunocompetent hosts and to a lesser extent in immunocompromised populations. Among the latter, patients treated for B-cell malignancies have immunosuppression generated by B-cell lymphodepletion/aplasia resulting in an increased susceptibility to respiratory virus infections and poor response to vaccination. The consequence is that these patients are likely to develop severe or critical COVID-19. OBJECTIVES To examine the overall impact of COVID-19 in patients treated for a B-cell malignancy or receiving chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) immunotherapy administered in case of relapsed or refractory disease. SOURCES We searched in the MEDLINE database to identify relevant studies, trials, reviews, or meta-analyses focusing on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or COVID-19 management in patients treated for a B-cell malignancy or recipients of CAR-T cell therapy up to 8 July 2022. CONTENT The epidemiology and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with B-cell malignancy and CAR-T cell recipients are summarized. Vaccine efficacy in these subgroups is compiled. Considering the successive surges of variants of concern, we propose a critical appraisal of treatment strategies by discussing the use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma therapy, direct-acting antiviral drugs, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators. IMPLICATIONS For patients with B-cell malignancy, preventive vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 remains essential and the management of COVID-19 includes control of viral replication because of protracted SARS-CoV-2 shedding. Passive immunotherapy (monoclonal neutralizing antibody therapy and convalescent plasma therapy) and direct-active antivirals, such as remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir are the best currently available treatments. Real-world data and subgroup analyses in larger trials are warranted to assess COVID-19 therapeutics in B-cell depleted populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Luque-Paz
- Université Rennes-I, Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre Sesques
- Service d’Hématologie clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Florent Wallet
- Service d'Anesthésie, médecine intensive, réanimation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Emmanuel Bachy
- Service d’Hématologie clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Florence Ader
- Département des Maladies infectieuses et tropicales, Hospices Civils de Lyon, F-69004, Lyon, France; Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie (CIRI), Inserm 1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ Lyon, F-69007, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhao L, Fu L, He Y, Li H, Song Y, Liu S. Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Malignant Disease. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11. [PMID: 36851363 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
A novel virus named SARS-CoV-2 has caused a worldwide pandemic, resulting in a disastrous impact to the public health since 2019. The disease is much more lethal among patients with malignant disease. Vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of infection and subsequent severe COVID-19. However, the efficacy and safety of vaccines for cancer patients needs further investigation. Encouragingly, there have been important findings deduced from research so far. In this review, an overview of the immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safeness of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer to date is to be shown. We also highlight important questions to consider and directions that could be followed in future research.
Collapse
|
10
|
Passamonti F, Nicastri E, Di Rocco A, Guarini A, Ibatici A, Luminari S, Mikulska M, Visco C. Management of patients with lymphoma and COVID-19: Narrative review and evidence-based practical recommendations. Hematol Oncol 2023; 41:3-15. [PMID: 36251481 PMCID: PMC9874581 DOI: 10.1002/hon.3086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Patients with hematologic malignancies can be immunocompromized because of their disease, anti-cancer therapy, and concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. Furthermore, these patients are usually older than 60 years and have comorbidities. For all these reasons they are highly vulnerable to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and have an increased risk of developing severe/critical Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the general population. Although COVID-19 vaccination has proven effective in reducing the incidence of severe/critical disease, vaccinated patients with lymphoma may not be protected as they often fail to develop a sufficient antiviral immune response. There is therefore an urgent need to address the management of patients with lymphoma and COVID-19 in the setting of the ongoing pandemic. Passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is a currently available complementary drug strategy to active vaccination for lymphoma patients, while monoclonal antibodies and antiviral drugs (remdesivir, ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, and molnupiravir) have proven effective in preventing the progression to severe/critical COVID-19. In this narrative review we present the most recent data documenting the characteristics and outcomes of patients with concomitant lymphoma and COVID-19. Our ultimate goal is to provide practice-oriented guidance in the management of these vulnerable patients from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up of lymphoma. To this purpose, we will first provide an overview of the main data concerning prognostic factors and fatality rate of lymphoma patients who develop COVID-19; the outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination will also be addressed. We will then discuss current COVID-19 prophylaxis and treatment options for lymphoma patients. Finally, based on the literature and our multidisciplinary experience, we will summarize a set of indications on how to manage patients with lymphoma according to COVID-19 exposure, level of disease severity and former history of infection, as typically encountered in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Passamonti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.,Hematology, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | - Emanuele Nicastri
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Alice Di Rocco
- Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Hematology Unit, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy
| | - Attilio Guarini
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Adalberto Ibatici
- Hematology Unit and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Luminari
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.,Dipartimento CHIMOMO, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Malgorzata Mikulska
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Visco
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee LYW, Tilby M, Starkey T, Ionescu MC, Burnett A, Hattersley R, Khan S, Little M, Liu JKH, Platt JR, Tripathy A, Watts I, Williams ST, Appanna N, Al-Hajji Y, Barnard M, Benny L, Buckley A, Cattell E, Cheng V, Clark J, Eastlake L, Gerrand K, Ghafoor Q, Grumett S, Harper-Wynne C, Kahn R, Lee AJX, Lydon A, McKenzie H, Panneerselvam H, Pascoe J, Patel G, Patel V, Potter V, Randle A, Rigg AS, Robinson T, Roylance R, Roques T, Rozmanowski S, Roux RL, Shah K, Sintler M, Taylor H, Tillett T, Tuthill M, Williams S, Beggs A, Iveson T, Lee SM, Middleton G, Middleton M, Protheroe AS, Fittall MW, Fowler T, Johnson P. Association of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Antibody Vaccine Response With Infection Severity in Patients With Cancer: A National COVID Cancer Cross-sectional Evaluation. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:188-196. [PMID: 36547970 PMCID: PMC9936347 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Accurate identification of patient groups with the lowest level of protection following COVID-19 vaccination is important to better target resources and interventions for the most vulnerable populations. It is not known whether SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing has clinical utility for high-risk groups, such as people with cancer. Objective To evaluate whether spike protein antibody vaccine response (COV-S) following COVID-19 vaccination is associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection or hospitalization among patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a population-based cross-sectional study of patients with cancer from the UK as part of the National COVID Cancer Antibody Survey. Adults with a known or reported cancer diagnosis who had completed their primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule were included. This analysis ran from September 1, 2021, to March 4, 2022, a period covering the expansion of the UK's third-dose vaccination booster program. Interventions Anti-SARS-CoV-2 COV-S antibody test (Elecsys; Roche). Main Outcomes and Measures Odds of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and COVID-19 hospitalization. Results The evaluation comprised 4249 antibody test results from 3555 patients with cancer and 294 230 test results from 225 272 individuals in the noncancer population. The overall cohort of 228 827 individuals (patients with cancer and the noncancer population) comprised 298 479 antibody tests. The median age of the cohort was in the age band of 40 and 49 years and included 182 741 test results (61.22%) from women and 115 737 (38.78%) from men. There were 279 721 tests (93.72%) taken by individuals identifying as White or White British. Patients with cancer were more likely to have undetectable anti-S antibody responses than the general population (199 of 4249 test results [4.68%] vs 376 of 294 230 [0.13%]; P < .001). Patients with leukemia or lymphoma had the lowest antibody titers. In the cancer cohort, following multivariable correction, patients who had an undetectable antibody response were at much greater risk for SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.05; 95% CI, 1.96-4.72; P < .001) and SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalization (OR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.31-12.67; P < .001) than individuals who had a positive antibody response. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that COV-S antibody testing allows the identification of patients with cancer who have the lowest level of antibody-derived protection from COVID-19. This study supports larger evaluations of SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to patients with cancer should be prioritized to minimize impact on cancer treatments and maximize quality of life for individuals with cancer during the ongoing pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennard Y. W. Lee
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Tilby
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Starkey
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alex Burnett
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Rosie Hattersley
- Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Khan
- University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Little
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - James R. Platt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Arvind Tripathy
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Youssra Al-Hajji
- Birmingham Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Liza Benny
- UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Vinton Cheng
- University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
| | - James Clark
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kate Gerrand
- UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Qamar Ghafoor
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Grumett
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Anna Lydon
- Torbay and South Devon NHS Trust, Torquay, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley McKenzie
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jennifer Pascoe
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Vanessa Potter
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anne S. Rigg
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rebecca Roylance
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Roques
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| | | | - René L. Roux
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ketan Shah
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Sintler
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Harriet Taylor
- Oxford Medical School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mark Tuthill
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Williams
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Beggs
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Iveson
- Department of Oncology, Southampton University Hospitals, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Siow Ming Lee
- UCLH/CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Middleton
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew S. Protheroe
- Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tom Fowler
- William Harvey Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Magen H, Avigdor A, Nevo L, Fried S, Gibori A, Levin EG, Lustig Y, Shkury E, Rahav G. Anti-RBD IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibody levels after the second BNT162b2 dose in patients with plasma cell disorders. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284925. [PMID: 37126496 PMCID: PMC10150979 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with plasma cell disorders (PCD) are at an increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19. Recent data have suggested that patients with hematological malignancies, including those with PCD, have suboptimal antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. We compared the antibody titers of 213 patients with PCD to those of 213 immunocompetent healthcare workers after the second vaccine dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Blood samples were taken 2-4 weeks after the second vaccination and analyzed for anti-receptor binding-domain immunoglobulin G (RBD-IgG) antibodies and neutralizing antibodies (NA). At a median of 20 days after the second vaccine dose, 172 patients (80.8%) developed anti-RBD-IgG antibodies with a geometric mean titer (GMT) of 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-3.1). In the control group 210 (98.9%) developed anti-RBD-IgG antibodies after a median of 21 days, with a GMT of 5.17 (95%CI, 4.8-5.6), p<0.0001. NA were observed in 151 patients with MM (70.9%) and in 210 controls (98.9%). The GMT of NA in patients with MM and controls was 84.4 (95% CI, 59.0-120.6), and 420.2 (95% CI, 341.4-517.1), respectively (p<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the number of prior therapy lines and age were significant predictors of poor humoral response among patients with MM. Injection site reaction, headache and fatigue were the most common adverse events after vaccination. Adverse events were less common in patients with MM than in controls. In conclusion, a significant percentage of patients with MM developed protecting NA to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, which appears to be safe in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hila Magen
- Division of Hematology and Bone-Marrow Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Abraham Avigdor
- Division of Hematology and Bone-Marrow Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Lee Nevo
- Division of Hematology and Bone-Marrow Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Shalev Fried
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amit Gibori
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Einav G Levin
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- The Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Yaniv Lustig
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Central Virology Laboratory, Israel Ministry of Health and Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Eden Shkury
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Galia Rahav
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Infectious Disease Unit and Laboratory, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Keshavarz S, Keshavarz S, Ziamajidi N, Daei S. Immune Response to COVID-19 Vaccination in Hematologic Malignancies: A Mini-Review. Chonnam Med J 2023; 59:24-30. [PMID: 36794237 PMCID: PMC9900228 DOI: 10.4068/cmj.2023.59.1.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The outbreak of the COVID-19 infection has led to the rapidity of vaccine usage in recent years. Emerging data indicate that the efficacy of vaccination against COVID-19 was about 95% in the general population, though its impact is impaired in patients with hematologic malignancies. As such, we decided to research the publications in which the authors reported the impacts of COVID-19 vaccination in patients suffering from hematologic malignancies. We concluded that patients with hematologic malignancies have lower responses, antibody titers as well as an impaired humoral response following vaccination, notably in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and lymphoma. Furthermore, it seems that the status of treatment can significantly affect the responses to the COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samaneh Keshavarz
- School of Paramedicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Somayeh Keshavarz
- School of Paramedicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Nasrin Ziamajidi
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| | - Sajedeh Daei
- School of Paramedicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.,Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Uaprasert N, Pitakkitnukun P, Tangcheewinsirikul N, Chiasakul T, Rojnuckarin P. Immunogenicity and risks associated with impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and booster in hematologic malignancy patients: an updated meta-analysis. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:173. [PMID: 36550105 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00776-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) have demonstrated impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Factors associated with poor immunogenicity remain largely undetermined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and medRxiv databases to identify studies that reported humoral or cellular immune responses (CIR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The primary aim was to estimate the seroconversion rate (SR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination across various subtypes of HM diseases and treatments. The secondary aims were to determine the rates of development of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and CIR following complete vaccination and SR following booster doses. A total of 170 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis of primary and secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis of 150 studies including 20,922 HM patients revealed a pooled SR following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8-70.4%; I2 = 94%). Meta-regression analysis showed that patients with lymphoid malignancies, but not myeloid malignancies, had lower seroconversion rates than those with solid cancers (R2 = 0.52, P < 0.0001). Patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART), B-cell targeted therapies or JAK inhibitors were associated with poor seroconversion (R2 = 0.39, P < 0.0001). The pooled NAb and CIR rates were 52.8% (95% CI; 45.8-59.7%, I2 = 87%) and 66.6% (95% CI, 57.1-74.9%; I2 = 86%), respectively. Approximately 20.9% (95% CI, 11.4-35.1%, I2 = 90%) of HM patients failed to elicit humoral and cellular immunity. Among non-seroconverted patients after primary vaccination, only 40.5% (95% CI, 33.0-48.4%; I2 = 87%) mounted seroconversion after the booster. In conclusion, HM patients, especially those with lymphoid malignancies and/or receiving CART, B-cell targeted therapies, or JAK inhibitors, showed poor SR after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A minority of patients attained seroconversion after booster vaccination. Strategies to improve immune response in these severely immunosuppressed patients are needed.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kakkassery H, Carpenter E, Patten PEM, Irshad S. Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with cancer. Trends Mol Med 2022; 28:1082-1099. [PMID: 35999131 PMCID: PMC9345889 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its corresponding disease (COVID-19) has been shown to impose a higher burden on cancer patients than on the general population. Approved vaccines for use include new technology mRNA vaccines such as BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and nonreplicating viral vector vaccines such as Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson) and AZD1222 (AstraZeneca). Impaired or delayed humoral and diminished T-cell responses are evident in patients with cancer, especially in patients with haematological cancers or those under active chemotherapy. Herein we review the current data on vaccine immunogenicity in cancer patients, including recommendations for current practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Kakkassery
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Esme Carpenter
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Piers E M Patten
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sheeba Irshad
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang X, Sima L. Antibody response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in adults with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2022:S0163-4453(22)00674-0. [PMID: 36417984 PMCID: PMC9675635 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have shown remarkable efficacy and thus constitute an important preventive option against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in fragile patients. We aimed to systematically analyze the outcomes of patients with hematological malignancies who received vaccination and to identify specific groups with differences in outcomes. The primary end point was antibody response after full vaccination (2 doses of mRNA or one dose of vector- based vaccines). We identified 49 studies comprising 11,086 individuals. Overall risk of bias was low. The pooled response for hematological malignancies was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59-69; I²=93%) versus 96% (95% CI: 92-97; I²=44%) for solid cancer and 98% (95% CI: 96-99; I²=55%) for healthy controls (P<0.001). Outcome was different across hematological malignancies (P<0.001). The pooled response was 50% (95% CI: 43-57; I²=84%) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 76% (95% CI: 67-83; I²=92%) for multiple myeloma, 83% (95% CI: 69-91; I²=85%) for myeloproliferative neoplasms, 91% (95% CI: 82-96; I²=12%) for Hodgkin lymphoma, and 58% (95% CI: 44-70; I²=84%) for aggressive and 61% (95% CI: 48-72; I²=85%) for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The pooled response for allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation was 82% and 83%, respectively. Being in remission and prior COVID-19 showed significantly higher responses. Low pooled response was identified for active treatment (35%), anti-CD20 therapy ≤1 year (15%), Bruton kinase inhibition (23%), venetoclax (26%), ruxolitinib (42%), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (42%). Studies on timing, value of boosters, and long-term efficacy are needed. This study is registered with PROSPERO (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: CRD42021279051).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Wang
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Laozei Sima
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee LYW, Ionescu MC, Starkey T, Little M, Tilby M, Tripathy AR, Mckenzie HS, Al-Hajji Y, Appanna N, Barnard M, Benny L, Burnett A, Cattell EL, Clark JJ, Khan S, Ghafoor Q, Panneerselvam H, Illsley G, Harper-Wynne C, Hattersley RJ, Lee AJ, Lomas O, Liu JK, McCauley A, Pang M, Pascoe JS, Platt JR, Patel G, Patel V, Potter VA, Randle A, Rigg AS, Robinson TM, Roques TW, Roux RL, Rozmanowski S, Taylor H, Tuthill MH, Watts I, Williams S, Beggs A, Iveson T, Lee SM, Middleton G, Middleton M, Protheroe A, Fittall MW, Fowler T, Johnson P. COVID-19: Third dose booster vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough coronavirus infection, hospitalisations and death in patients with cancer: A population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 175:1-10. [PMID: 36084618 PMCID: PMC9276646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE People living with cancer and haematological malignancies are at an increased risk of hospitalisation and death following infection with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Coronavirus third dose vaccine boosters are proposed to boost waning immune responses in immunocompromised individuals and increase coronavirus protection; however, their effectiveness has not yet been systematically evaluated. METHODS This study is a population-scale real-world evaluation of the United Kingdom's third dose vaccine booster programme for cancer patients from 8th December 2020 to 7th December 2021. The cancer cohort comprises individuals from Public Health England's national cancer dataset, excluding individuals less than 18 years. A test-negative case-control design was used to assess the third dose booster vaccine effectiveness. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to compare risk in the cancer cohort relative to the general population. RESULTS The cancer cohort comprised of 2,258,553 tests from 361,098 individuals. Third dose boosters were evaluated by reference to 87,039,743 polymerase chain reaction coronavirus tests. Vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough infections, symptomatic infections, coronavirus hospitalisation and death in cancer patients were 59.1%, 62.8%, 80.5% and 94.5%, respectively. Lower vaccine effectiveness was associated with a cancer diagnosis within 12 months, lymphoma, recent systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) or radiotherapy. Patients with lymphoma had low levels of protection from symptomatic disease. In spite of third dose boosters, following multivariable adjustment, individuals with cancer remain at an increased risk of coronavirus hospitalisation and death compared to the population control (OR 3.38, 3.01, respectively. p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS Third dose boosters are effective for most individuals with cancer, increasing protection from coronavirus. However, their effectiveness is heterogenous and lower than the general population. Many patients with cancer will remain at the increased risk of coronavirus infections even after 3 doses. In the case of patients with lymphoma, there is a particularly strong disparity of vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough infection and severe disease. Breakthrough infections will disrupt cancer care and treatment with potentially adverse consequences on survival outcomes. The data support the role of vaccine boosters in preventing severe disease, and further pharmacological intervention to prevent transmission and aid viral clearance to limit the disruption of cancer care as the delivery of care continues to evolve during the coronavirus pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennard Y W Lee
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham.
| | | | - Thomas Starkey
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham
| | - Martin Little
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Michael Tilby
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Arvind R Tripathy
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Hayley S Mckenzie
- Oncology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Emma L Cattell
- Department of Cancer, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
| | - James J Clark
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London
| | - Sam Khan
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester
| | - Qamar Ghafoor
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - Alvin Jx Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London; University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Oliver Lomas
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Justin Kh Liu
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds
| | | | | | - Jennifer S Pascoe
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - James R Platt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds
| | - Grisma Patel
- Cancer Division, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London
| | | | - Vanessa A Potter
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire
| | | | - Anne S Rigg
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Tom W Roques
- Cancer Services, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - René L Roux
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - Mark H Tuthill
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Sarah Williams
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Andrew Beggs
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham
| | - Tim Iveson
- Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton
| | - Siow M Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London; University College London Hospitals NHS Trust; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham; Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Andrew Protheroe
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - Peter Johnson
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire; Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chang A, Akhtar A, Linderman SL, Lai L, Orellana-Noia VM, Valanparambil R, Ahmed H, Zarnitsyna VI, McCook-Veal AA, Switchenko JM, Koff JL, Blum KA, Ayers AA, O'Leary CB, Churnetski MC, Sulaiman S, Kives M, Sheng P, Davis CW, Nooka AK, Antia R, Dhodapkar MV, Suthar MS, Cohen JB, Ahmed R. Humoral Responses Against SARS-CoV-2 and Variants of Concern After mRNA Vaccines in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3020-3031. [PMID: 35436146 PMCID: PMC9470134 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (NHL/CLL) are at higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. We investigated vaccine-induced antibody responses in patients with NHL/CLL against the original SARS-CoV-2 strain and variants of concern including B.1.167.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron). MATERIALS AND METHODS Blood from 121 patients with NHL/CLL receiving two doses of vaccine were collected longitudinally. Antibody binding against the full-length spike protein, the receptor-binding, and N-terminal domains of the original strain and of variants was measured using a multiplex assay. Live-virus neutralization against Delta, Omicron, and the early WA1/2020 strains was measured using a focus reduction neutralization test. B cells were measured by flow cytometry. Correlation between vaccine response and clinical factors was determined. RESULTS Mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike immunoglobulin G-binding titers were 85-fold lower in patients with NHL/CLL compared with healthy controls, with seroconversion occurring in only 67% of patients. Neutralization titers were also lower and correlated with binding titers (P < .0001). Treatment with anti-CD20-directed therapies within 1 year resulted in 136-fold lower binding titers. Peripheral blood B-cell count also correlated with vaccine response. At 3 months from last anti-CD20-directed therapy, B-cell count ≥ 4.31/μL blood around the time of vaccination predicted response (OR 7.46, P = .04). Antibody responses also correlated with age. Importantly, neutralization titers against Delta and Omicron were reduced six- and 42-fold, respectively, with 67% of patients seropositive for WA1/2020 exhibiting seronegativity for Omicron. CONCLUSION Antibody binding and live-virus neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants of concern including Delta and Omicron were substantially lower in patients with NHL/CLL compared with healthy vaccinees. Anti-CD20-directed therapy < 1 year before vaccination and number of circulating B cells strongly predict vaccine response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Chang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Akil Akhtar
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Susanne L. Linderman
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Lilin Lai
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University Schools of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Victor M. Orellana-Noia
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rajesh Valanparambil
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hasan Ahmed
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Veronika I. Zarnitsyna
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ashley A. McCook-Veal
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jeffrey M. Switchenko
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jean L. Koff
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kristie A. Blum
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Amy A. Ayers
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Colin B. O'Leary
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Michael C. Churnetski
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Shahana Sulaiman
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Melissa Kives
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Preston Sheng
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Carl W. Davis
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ajay K. Nooka
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rustom Antia
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Madhav V. Dhodapkar
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Mehul S. Suthar
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University Schools of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jonathon B. Cohen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rafi Ahmed
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Noori M, Azizi S, Abbasi Varaki F, Nejadghaderi SA, Bashash D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of immune response against first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in adult patients with hematological malignancies. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 110:109046. [PMID: 35843148 PMCID: PMC9273573 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients particularly those with hematological malignancies are at higher risk of affecting by severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the immunocompromised nature of the disease and the immunosuppressive treatments, they are more likely to develop less antibody protection; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, as well as Google scholar search engine as of December 10, 2021. Our primary outcomes of interest comprised of estimating the antibody seropositive rate following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematological malignancies and to compare it with those who were affected by solid tumors or healthy subjects. The secondary outcomes were to assess the vaccine's immunogenicity based on different treatments, status of the disease, and type of vaccine. After the two-step screening, the data were extracted and the summary measures were calculated using a random-effect model. RESULTS A total of 82 articles recording 13,804 patients with a diagnosis of malignancy were included in the present review. The seropositive rates in patients with hematological malignancies after first and second vaccine doses were 30.0% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 11.9-52.0) and 62.3% (95%CI 56.0-68.5), respectively. These patients were less likely to develop antibody response as compared to cases with solid tumors (RR 0.73, 95%CI 0.67-0.79) and healthy subjects (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.54-0.71) following complete immunization. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients had the lowest response rate among all subtypes of hematological malignancies (first dose: 22.0%, 95%CI 13.5-31.8 and second dose: 47.8%, 95%CI 41.2-54.4). Besides, anti-CD20 therapies (5.7%, 95%CI 2.0-10.6) and bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (26.8%, 95%CI 16.9-37.8) represented the lowest seropositiveness post first and second doses, respectively. Notably, patients who were in active status of disease showed lower antibody detection rate compared to those on remission status (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76-0.99). Furthermore, lower rate of seropositivity was found in patients received BNT162.b2 compared to ones who received mRNA-1273 (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.79-0.99). CONCLUSION Our findings highlight the substantially low rate of seroprotection in patients with hematological malignancies with a wide range of rates among disease subgroups and different treatments; further highlighting the fact that booster doses might be acquired for these patients to improve immunity against SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Noori
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shadi Azizi
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farhan Abbasi Varaki
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi
- School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Davood Bashash
- Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ito Y, Honda A, Kurokawa M. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in Patients With Lymphoid Malignancy or Anti-CD20 Antibody Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2022; 22:e691-e707. [PMID: 35459624 PMCID: PMC8958822 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The humoral response to vaccination in individuals with lymphoid malignancies or those undergoing anti-CD20 antibody therapy is impaired, but details of the response to mRNA vaccines to protect against COVID-19 remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to characterize the response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in patients with lymphoid malignancies or those undergoing anti-CD20 antibody therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search retrieved 52 relevant articles, and random-effect models were used to analyze humoral and cellular responses. RESULTS Lymphoid malignancies and anti-CD20 antibody therapy for non-malignancies were significantly associated with lower seropositivity rates (risk ratio 0.60 [95% CI 0.53-0.69]; risk ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.39-0.52], respectively). Some subtypes (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia, myeloma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) exhibited impaired humoral response. Anti-CD20 antibody therapy within 6 months of vaccination decreased humoral response; moreover, therapy > 12 months before vaccination still impaired the humoral response. However, anti-CD20 antibody therapy in non-malignant patients did not attenuate T cell responses. CONCLUSION These data suggest that patients with lymphoid malignancies or those undergoing anti-CD20 antibody therapy experience an impaired humoral response, but cellular response can be detected independent of anti-CD20 antibody therapy. Studies with long-term follow-up of vaccine effectiveness are warranted (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021265780).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Ito
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Akira Honda
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mineo Kurokawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cell Therapy and Transplantation Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cancer patients, especially those with hematologic malignancies, are at increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related complications and mortality. We describe the incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of persistent COVID-19 infection in patients with hematologic malignancies. RECENT FINDINGS The syndrome of persistent COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancies manifests as a chronic protracted illness marked by waxing and waning or progressive respiratory symptoms and prolonged viral shedding. Immunosuppressed patients with lymphoid malignancies may serve as partially immune reservoirs for the generation of immune-evasive viral escape mutants. SUMMARY Persistent COVID-19 infection is a unique concern in patients with hematologic malignancies. While vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has reduced the overall burden of COVID-19 in patients with hematologic cancers, whether vaccination or other novel treatments for COVID-19 prevent or alleviate this syndrome remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C. Laracy
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Infection Control, Division of Quality and Safety, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mini Kamboj
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Infection Control, Division of Quality and Safety, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Santosha A. Vardhana
- Lymphoma Service, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Royo-Cebrecos C, Robert-Montaner Ï, Vilanova D, Bailles E, Serrano-Pons J, Valero O, Buldon JM, Bermudez-de-Castro L, Mahia E, Pujadas J, Cobo F, Piqué JM, Albiol S. Seroprevalence study prior and post vaccination in cancer patients in principality of Andorra (COVONCO study). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04141-8. [PMID: 35809113 PMCID: PMC10064610 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04141-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 serologic response in patients with cancer may be lower than in the general population and may be influenced by the type of tumor or anticancer treatment. This study aims to analyze serological response prior and after vaccination of COVID-19 within the oncological population in Andorra. We set out to identify risk factors for a higher or lower serological response. PATIENTS AND METHODS Observational, unicentric, prospective cohort study of oncologic patients in Andorra. We calculated the seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (May 2020-June 2021) and analyzed the main demographic, oncologic features and factors associated with being seropositive. RESULTS A total of 373 patients were analyzed, mainly with solid tumours (n = 334, 89.5%). At baseline, seroprevalence was 13%, increasing during follow-up to 19%; lower seroprevalence was observed in patients with hematologic malignancies (2.6% vs 14.2%; p = 0.041) and patients receiving biological therapies (0% vs 15%, p = 0.005). In the overall seroprevalence analysis, women (23% vs 11.9%; p = 0.006) and tumour-free patients (p = 0.034) showed higher seroprevalence. The multivariable analysis showed that odds of being seropositive were higher among women (OR: 2.44, 95% CI 1.28-4.64), and patients who underwent surgery (OR: 3.35, 95% CI 1.10-10.20). About 80% of the cohort received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination, showing a higher seroprevalence of patients who received ChAdOx1-S than those who received BNT162b2 (24.4% vs 6.4%: p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-COV-2 in oncologic patients in Andorra was higher among females and patients who received hormonal therapy and surgery while patients with hematologic malignancies and biologic therapies showed lower seropositivity without finding differences in the type of tumour or anticancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Royo-Cebrecos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Andorra Andorra Health Services (SAAS), Av. Fiter i Rosell 1-13, AD700, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra.
| | - Ïa Robert-Montaner
- University of Nottingham Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Eva Bailles
- Psychology Department, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, SAAS, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra
| | - Jordi Serrano-Pons
- Founder of UniversalDoctor: The Digital Global Health Company, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oliver Valero
- Servei d'Estadística Aplicada, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Maria Buldon
- Biostatistics, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, SAAS, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra
| | | | - Eva Mahia
- Oncology Department of Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, SAAS, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra
| | - Jaume Pujadas
- Oncology Department of Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, SAAS, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra
| | - Francesc Cobo
- Hematology Department of Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, SAAS, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra
| | | | - Santiago Albiol
- Oncology Department of Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, SAAS, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kamińska D, Dęborska-materkowska D, Kościelska-kasprzak K, Mazanowska O, Remiorz A, Poznański P, Durlik M, Krajewska M. Immunity after COVID-19 Recovery and Vaccination: Similarities and Differences. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1068. [PMID: 35891232 PMCID: PMC9322013 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10071068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is associated with a robust immune response. The development of systemic inflammation leads to a hyperinflammatory state due to cytokine release syndrome during severe COVID-19. The emergence of many new SARS-CoV-2 variants across the world deteriorates the protective antiviral immunity induced after infection or vaccination. The innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for determining the fate of COVID-19 symptomatology. T cell-mediated immunity is the main factor of the antiviral immune response; moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection initiates a rapid B-cell response. In this paper, we present the current state of knowledge on immunity after COVID-19 infection and vaccination. We discuss the mechanisms of immune response to various types of vaccines (nucleoside-modified, adenovirus-vectored, inactivated virus vaccines and recombinant protein adjuvanted formulations). This includes specific aspects of vaccination in selected patient populations with altered immune activity (the elderly, children, pregnant women, solid organ transplant recipients, patients with systemic rheumatic diseases or malignancies). We also present diagnostic and research tools available to study the anti-SARS-CoV-2 cellular and humoral immune responses.
Collapse
|
24
|
Cheok KPL, Kirkwood AA, Menne T, Tholouli E, Chaganti S, Mathew A, Uttenthal B, Russell J, Irvine D, Johnson R, Nicholson E, Bazin J, Townsend W, Kuhnl A, O’Reilly M, Sanderson R, Patel A, Roddie C. Severe presentations and high mortality from SARS-CoV-2 in patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) therapy: a UK NCCP analysis. Leuk Lymphoma 2022; 63:1980-1984. [DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2057487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen P. L. Cheok
- Department of Hematology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Hematology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Amy A. Kirkwood
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tobias Menne
- Department of Hematology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Eleni Tholouli
- Department of Hematology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Sridhar Chaganti
- Department of Hematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Amrith Mathew
- Department of Hematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ben Uttenthal
- Department of Hematology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - James Russell
- Department of Hematology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Irvine
- Department of Hematology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rod Johnson
- Department of Hematology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Emma Nicholson
- Department of Hematology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jessica Bazin
- Department of Hematology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - William Townsend
- Department of Hematology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andrea Kuhnl
- Department of Hematology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maeve O’Reilly
- Department of Hematology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Robin Sanderson
- Department of Hematology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Amit Patel
- Department of Hematology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Roddie
- Department of Hematology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Hematology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ni B, Yanis A, Dee K, Chappell JD, Dulek DE, Kassim AA, Kitko CL, Thomas LD, Halasa N. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine safety and immunogenicity in patients with hematologic malignancies, transplantation, and cellular therapies. Blood Rev 2022;:100984. [PMID: 35752546 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2022.100984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Individuals with hematological malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients are immunologically heterogenous groups with varying degrees of immunosuppression at increased risk of severe disease and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are key interventions to preventing severe COVID-19 and its complications. While these individuals were excluded from initial vaccine trials, there is now a growing body of acceptable safety and immunogenicity data among these individuals. A consistent signal for new or worsening graft versus host disease in allogeneic HCT recipients has not been demonstrated post-vaccination. Immunogenicity in these populations is variable depending on disease and treatment factors. However, serological responses may not accurately reflect vaccine protection as correlates of protection within these populations are not yet established. Large-scale studies powered to identify rare serious events, resolve differences in vaccine responses between different vaccination strategies, and identify immune correlates of protection within these populations are needed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Waickman AT, Lu J, Chase C, Fang H, Mcdowell E, Bingham E, Bogart J, Graziano S, Thomas SJ, Gentile T. Systemic Cancer Therapy Does Not Significantly Impact Early Vaccine-Elicited SARS-CoV-2 Immunity in Patients with Solid Tumors. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:738. [PMID: 35632494 PMCID: PMC9144031 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
mRNA vaccines have been shown to be safe and effective in individuals with cancer. It is unclear, however, if systemic anti-cancer therapy impacts the coordinated cellular and humoral immune responses elicited by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. To fill this knowledge gap, we assessed SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-elicited immunity in a cohort of patients with advanced solid tumors either under observation or receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy. This analysis revealed that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-elicited cellular and humoral immunity was not significantly different in individuals with cancer receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy relative to individuals under observation. Furthermore, even though some patients exhibited suboptimal antibody titers after vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 specific cellular immune responses were still detected. These data suggest that antibody titers offer an incomplete picture of vaccine-elicited SARS-CoV-2 immunity in cancer patients undergoing active systemic anti-cancer therapy, and that vaccine-elicited cellular immunity exists even in the absence of significant quantities of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lim SH, Stuart B, Joseph-Pietras D, Johnson M, Campbell N, Kelly A, Jeffrey D, Turaj AH, Rolfvondenbaumen K, Galloway C, Wynn T, Coleman AR, Ward B, Long K, Coleman H, Mundy C, Bates AT, Ayres D, Lown R, Falconer J, Brake O, Batchelor J, Willimott V, Bowzyk Al-Naeeb A, Robinson L, O'Callaghan A, Collins GP, Menne T, Faust SN, Fox CP, Ahearne M, Johnson PWM, Davies AJ, Goldblatt D. Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants after two and three doses of vaccine in B-cell malignancies: UK PROSECO study. Nat Cancer 2022; 3:552-564. [PMID: 35332334 PMCID: PMC9135622 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-022-00364-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients with hematological malignancies are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes due to compromised immune responses, but the insights of these studies have been compromised due to intrinsic limitations in study design. Here we present the PROSECO prospective observational study ( NCT04858568 ) on 457 patients with lymphoma that received two or three COVID-19 vaccine doses. We show undetectable humoral responses following two vaccine doses in 52% of patients undergoing active anticancer treatment. Moreover, 60% of patients on anti-CD20 therapy had undetectable antibodies following full vaccination within 12 months of receiving their anticancer therapy. However, 70% of individuals with indolent B-cell lymphoma displayed improved antibody responses following booster vaccination. Notably, 63% of all patients displayed antigen-specific T-cell responses, which increased after a third dose irrespective of their cancer treatment status. Our results emphasize the urgency of careful monitoring of COVID-19-specific immune responses to guide vaccination schemes in these vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean H Lim
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| | - Beth Stuart
- Cancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Debora Joseph-Pietras
- Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Marina Johnson
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola Campbell
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Adam Kelly
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Danielle Jeffrey
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Anna H Turaj
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Rolfvondenbaumen
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Celine Galloway
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Thomas Wynn
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Adam R Coleman
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Benjamin Ward
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Karen Long
- University of Southampton Clinical Informatics Research Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Helen Coleman
- Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Carina Mundy
- Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew T Bates
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Diana Ayres
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Robert Lown
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Janlyn Falconer
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Oliver Brake
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - James Batchelor
- University of Southampton Clinical Informatics Research Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Victoria Willimott
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Lisa Robinson
- Department of Haematology, County Hospital Hereford, Hereford, UK
| | | | - Graham P Collins
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Tobias Menne
- Department of Haematology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Saul N Faust
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Peter W M Johnson
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew J Davies
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR/Cancer Research UK Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, WISH Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - David Goldblatt
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Fromowitz
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Blood Cancer Institute, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Amit Verma
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Blood Cancer Institute, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heudel P, Favier B, Solodky ML, Assaad S, Chaumard N, Tredan O, Bachelot T, Ray-Coquard I, Russias B, Fournier ML, Mastroianni B, Avrillon V, Michallet AS, Zrounba P, Chabaud S, Perol D, Blay JY. Survival and risk of COVID-19 after SARS-COV-2 vaccination in a series of 2391 cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2022; 165:174-183. [PMID: 35245864 PMCID: PMC8828434 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer are at high risk of severe or lethal COVID-19. The impact of SARS-COV-2 vaccination on the risk of developing COVID-19 was investigated in an exhaustive series of patients from a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS This is a study of the exhaustive population of 2391 cancer patients who were prescribed SARS-COV-2 vaccination until 09/21. Patient characteristics, documented SARS-COV-2 infection with RT-PCR, and survival were collected. The primary endpoint was the rate of COVID-19 after vaccination. Secondary endpoints included risk factors to develop COVID-19 after vaccination, with a comparison with the cohort of vaccinated health care workers (HCW), and risk factors for death. RESULTS From January to September 2021, among 2391 patients with cancer under active treatment in whom a SARS-COV-2 vaccine was prescribed, 659 (28%), 1498 (63%) and 139 (6%) received 1, 2, and 3 doses, respectively. Ninety five patients received a single dose of vaccine after a previous COVID-19. Two thousand two hundred eighty five health care workers (HCW) received one (N = 17, 0.7%), 2-3 (N = 2026, 88.7%) vaccine doses and one dose after COVID-19 (N = 242, 10.6%). With a median follow-up of 142 and 199 days for patients and HCW, respectively. Thirty nine (1.6%) patients and 35 (1.5%) HCW developed COVID-19 after vaccination. Six of 39 cancer patients and no HCW died because ofCOVID-19 within 50 days after diagnosis. Independent risk factors for COVID-19 in vaccinated patients were age, single dose of vaccine without previous COVID-19 and anti-CD20 treatment in the last three months. Independent risk factors for death included metastatic disease, gender, cancer type, but also documented COVID-19 before vaccination. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving two or more doses of COVID-19 vaccine have reduced risk of COVID-19. The risk of death of vaccinated cancer patients presenting COVID-19 remains high. COVID-19 before vaccination is associated with an increased overall risk of death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Heudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Bertrand Favier
- Department of Pharmacy, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Marie-Laure Solodky
- Department of Medecine of Health Care Workers, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Souad Assaad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Natacha Chaumard
- Department of Pharmacy, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Tredan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | | - Bruno Russias
- Department DCSEI, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Virginie Avrillon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | | - Philippe Zrounba
- Department of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Department of Clinical Research, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - David Perol
- Department of Clinical Research, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France; Presidence, Unicancer, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Buske C, Dreyling M, Alvarez-Larrán A, Apperley J, Arcaini L, Besson C, Bullinger L, Corradini P, Giovanni Della Porta M, Dimopoulos M, D'Sa S, Eich HT, Foà R, Ghia P, da Silva MG, Gribben J, Hajek R, Harrison C, Heuser M, Kiesewetter B, Kiladjian JJ, Kröger N, Moreau P, Passweg JR, Peyvandi F, Rea D, Ribera JM, Robak T, San-Miguel JF, Santini V, Sanz G, Sonneveld P, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Wendtner C, Pentheroudakis G, Passamonti F. Managing hematological cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO-EHA Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100403. [PMID: 35272130 PMCID: PMC8795783 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has created enormous challenges for the clinical management of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), raising questions about the optimal care of this patient group. METHODS This consensus manuscript aims at discussing clinical evidence and providing expert advice on statements related to the management of HMs in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an international consortium was established including a steering committee, which prepared six working packages addressing significant clinical questions from the COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation strategies to specific HMs management in the pandemic. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Hematology Association, statements were discussed and voted upon. When a consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements to develop consensual clinical guidance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The expert panel agreed on 33 statements, reflecting a consensus, which will guide clinical decision making for patients with hematological neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Buske
- Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
| | - M Dreyling
- Department of Medicine III at LMU Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - A Alvarez-Larrán
- Hematology Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Apperley
- Centre for Haematology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - L Arcaini
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - C Besson
- Service d'Hématologie Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France; UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - L Bullinger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumorimmunology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Corradini
- Hematology Division, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Giovanni Della Porta
- Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - M Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S D'Sa
- UCLH Centre for Waldenström and Neurohaematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H T Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | - R Foà
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - P Ghia
- Strategic Research Program on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Laboratory of B Cell Neoplasia, Division of Molecular Oncology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - M G da Silva
- Department Of Hematology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - J Gribben
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - R Hajek
- Department of Hematooncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - C Harrison
- Clinical Director - Haematology, Haemostasis, Palliative Care, Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Heuser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - B Kiesewetter
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J J Kiladjian
- Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques, Paris, France
| | - N Kröger
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - P Moreau
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - J R Passweg
- Hematology Division, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - F Peyvandi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - D Rea
- University Medical Department of Hematology and Immunology, France Intergroupe des Leucémies Myéloïdes Chroniques (Fi-LMC), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - J-M Ribera
- Clinical Hematology Department, ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - T Robak
- Department of Hematology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - J F San-Miguel
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Centro de Investigación Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - V Santini
- MDS Unit, Hematology, DMSC, AOUC, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - G Sanz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Univesitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia; CIBERONC, IS Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Sonneveld
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Haematology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany
| | - C Wendtner
- Munich Clinic Schwabing, Academic Teaching Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - F Passamonti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected over 220 million individuals worldwide,
and has been shown to cause increased disease severity and mortality in patients
with active cancer versus healthy individuals. Vaccination is important in
reducing COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. Thus, the aim of this
article was to review the existing knowledge on effectiveness, immunogenicity
and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer. Fifty-four articles
were included following a search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases for
studies published between January 2020 and September 2021 that investigated
humoral and cell-mediated immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in
patients with cancer. Immunogenicity of vaccines was found to be lower in
patients with cancer versus healthy individuals, and humoral immune responses
were inferior in those with haematological versus solid cancers. Patient-,
disease-, and treatment-related factors associated with poorer vaccine responses
should be identified and corrected or mitigated when possible. Consideration
should be given to offering patients with cancer second doses of COVID vaccine
at shorter intervals than in healthy individuals. Patients with cancer warrant a
third vaccine dose and must be prioritized in vaccination schedules. Vaccine
adverse effect profiles are comparable between patients with cancer and healthy
individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suranjith L Seneviratne
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Nawaloka Hospital Research and Education Foundation, Nawaloka Hospitals, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Pamodh Yasawardene
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Buddhika Somawardana
- Department of Haemato-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Guven DC, Sahin TK, Akın S, Uckun FM. Impact of Therapy in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies on Seroconversion Rates After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination. Oncologist 2022; 27:e357-e361. [PMID: 35274729 PMCID: PMC8982368 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The leading professional organizations in the field of hematology have recommended severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) vaccination for all patients with hematologic malignancies notwithstanding efficacy concerns. Here we report a systematic literature review regarding the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with hematologic malignancies and its key determinants. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of original articles evaluating the seroconversion rates with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in hematological malignancies from the PubMed database published between April 1, 2021 and December 4, 2021. Calculated risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare seroconversion rates between patients with hematologic malignancies versus healthy control subjects used the Review Manager software, version 5.3. RESULTS In our meta-analysis, we included 26 studies with control arms. After the first dose of vaccination, patients with hematologic malignancies had significantly lower seroconversion rates than controls (33.3% vs 74.9%; RD: -0.48%, 95% CI: -0.60%, -0.36%, P < .001). The seroconversion rates increased after the second dose, although a significant difference remained between these 2 groups (65.3% vs 97.8%; RD: -0.35%, 95% CI: -0.42%, -0.28%, P < .001). This difference in seroconversion rates was particularly pronounced for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients (RD: -0.46%, 95% CI: -0.56, -0.37, P < .001), and for patients with B-lineage leukemia/lymphoma treated with anti-CD20 antibodies (RD: -0.70%, 95% CI: -0.88%, -0.51%, P < .001) or Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (BTKi; RD: -0.63%, 95% CI: -0.85%, -0.41%, P < .001). The RD was lower for patients under remission (RD: -0.10%, 95% CI: -0.18%, -0.02%, P = .01). CONCLUSION The seroconversion rates following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with hematologic malignancies, especially in CLL patients and patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies or BTKi, were significantly lower than the seroconversion rates in healthy control subjects. Effective strategies capable of improving vaccine efficacy in these vulnerable patient populations are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz C Guven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey,Corresponding author: Deniz Can Guven, Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, 06100 Sıhhıye, Ankara, Turkey. Tel: +90 312 305 43 30;
| | - Taha K Sahin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serkan Akın
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey,Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatih M Uckun
- Immuno-Oncology Program and COVID-19 Task Force, Ares Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, MN 55110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lee ARYB, Wong SY, Chai LYA, Lee SC, Lee MX, Muthiah MD, Tay SH, Teo CB, Tan BKJ, Chan YH, Sundar R, Soon YY. Efficacy of covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2022; 376:e068632. [PMID: 35236664 PMCID: PMC8889026 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 199] [Impact Index Per Article: 99.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of covid-19 vaccines between immunocompromised and immunocompetent people. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, Central Register of Controlled Trials, COVID-19 Open Research Dataset Challenge (CORD-19), and WHO covid-19 databases for studies published between 1 December 2020 and 5 November 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched in November 2021 to identify registered but as yet unpublished or ongoing studies. STUDY SELECTION Prospective observational studies comparing the efficacy of covid-19 vaccination in immunocompromised and immunocompetent participants. METHODS A frequentist random effects meta-analysis was used to separately pool relative and absolute risks of seroconversion after the first and second doses of a covid-19 vaccine. Systematic review without meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibody titre levels was performed after first, second, and third vaccine doses and the seroconversion rate after a third dose. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. RESULTS 82 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 77 (94%) used mRNA vaccines, 16 (20%) viral vector vaccines, and 4 (5%) inactivated whole virus vaccines. 63 studies were assessed to be at low risk of bias and 19 at moderate risk of bias. After one vaccine dose, seroconversion was about half as likely in patients with haematological cancers (risk ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.50, I2=80%; absolute risk 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.40, I2=89%), immune mediated inflammatory disorders (0.53, 0.39 to 0.71, I2=89%; 0.29, 0.11 to 0.58, I2=97%), and solid cancers (0.55, 0.46 to 0.65, I2=78%; 0.44, 0.36 to 0.53, I2=84%) compared with immunocompetent controls, whereas organ transplant recipients were 16 times less likely to seroconvert (0.06, 0.04 to 0.09, I2=0%; 0.06, 0.04 to 0.08, I2=0%). After a second dose, seroconversion remained least likely in transplant recipients (0.39, 0.32 to 0.46, I2=92%; 0.35, 0.26 to 0.46), with only a third achieving seroconversion. Seroconversion was increasingly likely in patients with haematological cancers (0.63, 0.57 to 0.69, I2=88%; 0.62, 0.54 to 0.70, I2=90%), immune mediated inflammatory disorders (0.75, 0.69 to 0.82, I2=92%; 0.77, 0.66 to 0.85, I2=93%), and solid cancers (0.90, 0.88 to 0.93, I2=51%; 0.89, 0.86 to 0.91, I2=49%). Seroconversion was similar between people with HIV and immunocompetent controls (1.00, 0.98 to 1.01, I2=0%; 0.97, 0.83 to 1.00, I2=89%). Systematic review of 11 studies showed that a third dose of a covid-19 mRNA vaccine was associated with seroconversion among vaccine non-responders with solid cancers, haematological cancers, and immune mediated inflammatory disorders, although response was variable in transplant recipients and inadequately studied in people with HIV and those receiving non-mRNA vaccines. CONCLUSION Seroconversion rates after covid-19 vaccination were significantly lower in immunocompromised patients, especially organ transplant recipients. A second dose was associated with consistently improved seroconversion across all patient groups, albeit at a lower magnitude for organ transplant recipients. Targeted interventions for immunocompromised patients, including a third (booster) dose, should be performed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021272088.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shi Yin Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Louis Yi Ann Chai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Soo Chin Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, 119228, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Matilda Xinwei Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, 119228, Singapore
| | - Mark Dhinesh Muthiah
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, Singapore
| | - Sen Hee Tay
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Chong Boon Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Yiong Huak Chan
- Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Raghav Sundar
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, 119228, Singapore
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Singapore Gastric Cancer Consortium, Singapore
| | - Yu Yang Soon
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Marra AR, Kobayashi T, Suzuki H, Alsuhaibani M, Tofaneto BM, Bariani LM, Auler MDA, Salinas JL, Edmond MB, Doll M, Kutner JM, Pinho JRR, Rizzo LV, Miraglia JL, Schweizer ML. Short-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2022; 84:297-310. [PMID: 34982962 PMCID: PMC8720049 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to assess the short-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among immunocompromised patients to prevent laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 infection. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis. We calculated the pooled diagnostic odds ratio [DOR] (95% CI) for COVID-19 infection between immunocompromised patients and healthy people or those with stable chronic medical conditions. VE was estimated as 100% x (1-DOR). We also investigated the rates of developing anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG between the 2 groups. RESULTS Twenty studies evaluating COVID-19 vaccine response, and four studies evaluating VE were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled DOR for symptomatic COVID-19 infection in immunocompromised patients was 0.296 (95% CI: 0.108-0.811) with an estimated VE of 70.4% (95% CI: 18.9%- 89.2%). When stratified by diagnosis, IgG antibody levels were much higher in the control group compared to immunocompromised patients with solid organ transplant (pOR 232.3; 95% Cl: 66.98-806.03), malignant diseases (pOR 42.0, 95% Cl: 11.68-151.03), and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (pOR 19.06; 95% Cl: 5.00-72.62). CONCLUSIONS We found COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were effective against symptomatic COVID-19 among the immunocompromised patients but had lower VE compared to the controls. Further research is needed to understand the discordance between antibody production and protection against symptomatic COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre R Marra
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa, IA, USA.
| | - Takaaki Kobayashi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Suzuki
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa, IA, USA
| | - Mohammed Alsuhaibani
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael B Edmond
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Michelle Doll
- Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | | | - Luiz Vicente Rizzo
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - João Luiz Miraglia
- Saúde Populacional, Diretoria de Medicina Diagnóstica Ambulatorial, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marin L Schweizer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Varelas C, Gavriilaki E, Sakellari I, Klonizakis P, Koravou E, Christodoulou I, Mavrikou I, Kourelis A, Chatzopoulou F, Chatzidimitriou D, Touloumenidou T, Papalexandri A, Anagnostopoulos A, Vlachaki E. Immune Response of Adult Sickle Cell Disease Patients after COVID-19 Vaccination: The Experience of a Greek Center. J Clin Med 2022; 11:937. [PMID: 35207208 PMCID: PMC8879313 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11040937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are essential weapons to control the spread of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic and protect immunocompromised patients. With a greater susceptibility to infection, sickle cell disease (SCD) patients are considered as “high risk” patients during the current COVID-19 pandemic. In our study, we try to determine the immune response of adult SCD patients monitored at our center after the first and second dose of the qualified mRNA vaccines available and correlate them to several disease-specific markers, as well as complement activation. The results demonstrate that the levels of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 were adequate for most patients studied after the second dose and there seemed to be a certain association with complement activation. Further studies are critical to determine the durability of this immune response and the potential benefit of a third dose.
Collapse
|
37
|
Booth S, Curley HM, Varnai C, Arnold R, Lee LYW, Campton NA, Cook G, Purshouse K, Aries J, Innes A, Cook LB, Tomkins O, Oram HS, Tilby M, Kulasekararaj A, Wrench D, Dolly S, Newsom‐Davies T, Pettengell R, Gault A, Moody S, Mittal S, Altohami M, Tillet T, Illingworth J, Mukherjee L, Apperly J, Ashcroft J, Rabin N, Carmichael J, Cazier J, Kerr R, Middleton G, Collins GP, Palles C. Key findings from the UKCCMP cohort of 877 patients with haematological malignancy and COVID-19: disease control as an important factor relative to recent chemotherapy or anti-CD20 therapy. Br J Haematol 2022; 196:892-901. [PMID: 34761389 PMCID: PMC8652610 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Patients with haematological malignancies have a high risk of severe infection and death from SARS-CoV-2. In this prospective observational study, we investigated the impact of cancer type, disease activity, and treatment in 877 unvaccinated UK patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and active haematological cancer. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities, the highest mortality was in patients with acute leukaemia [odds ratio (OR) = 1·73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·1-2·72, P = 0·017] and myeloma (OR 1·3, 95% CI 0·96-1·76, P = 0·08). Having uncontrolled cancer (newly diagnosed awaiting treatment as well as relapsed or progressive disease) was associated with increased mortality risk (OR = 2·45, 95% CI 1·09-5·5, P = 0·03), as was receiving second or beyond line of treatment (OR = 1·7, 95% CI 1·08-2·67, P = 0·023). We found no association between recent cytotoxic chemotherapy or anti-CD19/anti-CD20 treatment and increased risk of death within the limitations of the cohort size. Therefore, disease control is an important factor predicting mortality in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection alongside the possible risks of therapies such as cytotoxic treatment or anti-CD19/anti-CD20 treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Booth
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreDepartment of HaematologyChurchill HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Helen M. Curley
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Csilla Varnai
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Centre for Computational BiologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Roland Arnold
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Lennard Y. W. Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of OncologyOxford UniversityOxfordUK
| | - Naomi A. Campton
- Institute of Translational MedicineBirmingham Health PartnersBirminghamUK
| | - Gordon Cook
- NIHR (Leeds) MIC, LeedsSt James's Teaching Hospital, University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Edinburgh Cancer Research CentreUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Wrench
- Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | | | - Ruth Pettengell
- St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Abigail Gault
- NCCC Northern Centre for Cancer CareThe Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation TrustNewcastleUK
| | - Sam Moody
- NCCC Northern Centre for Cancer CareThe Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation TrustNewcastleUK
| | | | | | | | - Jack Illingworth
- BarkingHavering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS TrustEssexUK
| | | | | | - John Ashcroft
- NIHR (Leeds) MIC, LeedsSt James's Teaching Hospital, University of LeedsLeedsUK
- Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS TrustWakefieldUK
| | - Neil Rabin
- University College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Jonathan Carmichael
- NIHR (Leeds) MIC, LeedsSt James's Teaching Hospital, University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Jean‐Baptiste Cazier
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Centre for Computational BiologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of OncologyOxford UniversityOxfordUK
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and ImmunotherapyUniversity of BirminghamEdgbastonBirminghamUK
| | - Graham P. Collins
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreDepartment of HaematologyChurchill HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Claire Palles
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Galmiche S, Luong Nguyen LB, Tartour E, de Lamballerie X, Wittkop L, Loubet P, Launay O. Immunological and clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 28:163-177. [PMID: 35020589 PMCID: PMC8595936 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Available data show that COVID-19 vaccines may be less effective in immunocompromised populations, who are at increased risk of severe COVID-19. OBJECTIVES We conducted a systematic review of literature to assess immunogenicity, efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations. DATA SOURCES We searched Medline and Embase databases. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS We included studies of COVID-19 vaccines after complete vaccination in immunocompromised patients until 31 August 2021. Studies with <10 patients, safety data only and case series of breakthrough infections were excluded. METHODS Risk of bias was assessed via the tool developed by the National Institutes of Health on interventional and observational studies. Immunogenicity was assessed through non-response rate defined as no anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies, efficacy and effectiveness by the relative reduction in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19. We collected factors associated with the risk of non-response. We presented collected data by immunosuppression type. RESULTS We screened 5917 results, included 162 studies. There were 157 on immunogenicity in 25 209 participants, including 7835 cancer or haematological malignancy patients (31.1%), 6302 patients on dialysis (25.0%), 5974 solid organ transplant recipients (23.7%) and 4680 immune-mediated disease patients (18.6%). Proportion of non-responders seemed higher among solid organ transplant recipients (range 18-100%) and patients with haematological malignancy (range 14-61%), and lower in patients with cancer (range 2-36%) and patients on dialysis (range 2-30%). Risk factors for non-response included older age, use of corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or anti-CD20 agent. Ten studies evaluated immunogenicity of an additional dose. Five studies evaluated vaccine efficacy or effectiveness: three on SARS-CoV-2 infection (range 71-81%), one on COVID-19-related hospitalization (62.9%), one had a too small sample size. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights the risk of low immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations, especially solid organ transplant recipients and patients with haematological malignancy. Despite lack of vaccine effectiveness data, enhanced vaccine regimens may be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Galmiche
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Liem Binh Luong Nguyen
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Eric Tartour
- AP-HP, Immunologie Biologique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Xavier de Lamballerie
- Aix Marseille Université, IRD 190, INSERM 1207, Unité des Virus Emergents, UVE, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France
| | - Linda Wittkop
- Institut de Santé Publique d'Epidémiologie et de Développement, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Epidémiologie Clinique 1401, University of Bordeaux, Service d'Information Médicale, CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Loubet
- INSERM U1047, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, CHU Nîmes, Université Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - Odile Launay
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, AP-PH, Inserm, CIC Cochin Pasteur, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gounant V, Ferré VM, Soussi G, Charpentier C, Flament H, Fidouh N, Collin G, Namour C, Assoun S, Bizot A, Brouk Z, Vicaut E, Teixeira L, Descamps D, Zalcman G. Efficacy of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Vaccine in Patients With Thoracic Cancer: A Prospective Study Supporting a Third Dose in Patients With Minimal Serologic Response After Two Vaccine Doses. J Thorac Oncol 2022; 17:239-251. [PMID: 34798306 PMCID: PMC8593625 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Coronavirus disease 2019 resulted in a 30% mortality rate in patients with thoracic cancer. Given that patients with cancer were excluded from serum antisevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine registration trials, it is still unknown whether they would develop a protective antispike antibody response after vaccination. This prospective vaccine monitoring study primarily aimed to assess humoral responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with thoracic cancer. METHODS SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies were measured using the Abbot Architect SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G immunoassay before the first injection of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, at week 4, and 2 to 16 weeks after the second vaccine dose administration. The factors associated with antibody response were analyzed. RESULTS Overall, 306 patients, with a median age of 67.0 years (interquartile range: 58-74), were vaccinated. Of these, 283 patients received two vaccine doses at 28-day intervals. After a 6.7-month median follow-up, eight patients (2.6%) contracted proven symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, with rapid favorable evolution. Of the 269 serologic results available beyond day 14 after the second vaccine dose administration, 17 patients (6.3%) were still negative (<50 arbitrary units/mL, whereas 34 (11%) were less than 300 arbitrary units/mL (12.5th percentile). In multivariate analysis, only age (p < 0.01) and long-term corticosteroid treatment (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with a lack of immunization. A total of 30 patients received a third vaccine dose, with only three patients showing persistently negative serology thereafter, whereas the others exhibited clear seroconversion. CONCLUSIONS SARS-CoV2 vaccines were found to be efficient in patients with thoracic cancer, most of them being immunized after two doses. A third shot given to 1% of patients with persistent low antibody titers resulted in an 88% immunization rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie Gounant
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Université de Paris, North-Paris Cancer University Institute, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Valentine Marie Ferré
- Virology Department, Université de Paris, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1137 Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Ghassen Soussi
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Université de Paris, North-Paris Cancer University Institute, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Charlotte Charpentier
- Virology Department, Université de Paris, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1137 Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Héloïse Flament
- Hematology, and Immunology Department, Université de Paris, INSERM-U1149, Research Center on Inflammation (CRI) Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Nadhira Fidouh
- Virology Department, Université de Paris, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1137 Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Gilles Collin
- Virology Department, Université de Paris, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1137 Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Céline Namour
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Université de Paris, North-Paris Cancer University Institute, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Sandra Assoun
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Université de Paris, North-Paris Cancer University Institute, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Bizot
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Université de Paris, North-Paris Cancer University Institute, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Zohra Brouk
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Université de Paris, North-Paris Cancer University Institute, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Eric Vicaut
- Biostatistics and Clinical Research Department, Université de Paris, Lariboisière Hospital (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Luis Teixeira
- Breast Diseases Centre, North-Paris Cancer University Institute, Université de Paris, INSERM U976 Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy (HIPI) (Pathophysiology of Breast Cancer Team), Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Diane Descamps
- Virology Department, Université de Paris, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1137 Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France
| | - Gérard Zalcman
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Université de Paris, North-Paris Cancer University Institute, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP.Nord), Paris, France; INSERM U830 Cancer, Heterogeneity Plasticity, Curie Institute Research Centre, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Borgogna C, Bruna R, Griffante G, Martuscelli L, De Andrea M, Ferrante D, Patriarca A, Mahmoud AM, Gaidano V, Marchetti M, Rapezzi D, Lai M, Pistello M, Ladetto M, Massaia M, Gaidano G, Gariglio M. Patterns of neutralizing humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection among hematologic malignancy patients reveal a robust immune response in anti-cancer therapy-naive patients. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:8. [PMID: 35042847 PMCID: PMC8764505 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00608-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding antibody-based SARS-CoV-2 immunity in hematologic malignancy (HM) patients following infection is crucial to inform vaccination strategies for this highly vulnerable population. This cross-sectional study documents the anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral response and serum neutralizing activity in 189 HM patients recovering from a PCR-confirmed infection. The overall seroconversion rate was 85.7%, with the lowest values in patients with lymphoid malignancies or undergoing chemotherapy. Therapy-naive patients in the "watch and wait" status were more likely to seroconvert and display increased anti-s IgG titers. Enhanced serum neutralizing activity was observed in the following SARS-CoV-2-infected HM patient groups: (i) males; (ii) severe COVID-19; and (iii) "watch and wait" or "complete/partial response". The geometric mean (GeoMean) ID50 neutralization titers in patients analyzed before or after 6 months post-infection were 299.1 and 306.3, respectively, indicating that >50% of the patients in either group had a neutralization titer sufficient to provide 50% protection from symptomatic COVID-19. Altogether, our findings suggest that therapy-naive HM patients mount a far more robust immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. patients receiving anti-cancer treatment, raising the important question as to whether HM patients should be vaccinated before therapy and/or receive vaccine formats capable of better recapitulating the natural infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Borgogna
- Virology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bruna
- Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Gloria Griffante
- Virology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Licia Martuscelli
- Virology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco De Andrea
- CAAD Center for Translational Research on Autoimmune and Allergic Disease, Novara, Italy
- Viral Pathogenesis Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniela Ferrante
- Medical Statistics, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Andrea Patriarca
- Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Abdurraouf Mokhtar Mahmoud
- Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Valentina Gaidano
- Division of Hematology, University of Piemonte Orientale and "SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo" Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Monia Marchetti
- Division of Hematology, University of Piemonte Orientale and "SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo" Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Davide Rapezzi
- Division of Hematology, "Santa Croce e Carle di Cuneo" Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Michele Lai
- Retrovirus Centre, Department of Translational Medicine and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mauro Pistello
- Retrovirus Centre, Department of Translational Medicine and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Ladetto
- Division of Hematology, University of Piemonte Orientale and "SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo" Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Massimo Massaia
- Division of Hematology, "Santa Croce e Carle di Cuneo" Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Gaidano
- Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Marisa Gariglio
- Virology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Thomas SJ, Perez JL, Lockhart SP, Hariharan S, Kitchin N, Bailey R, Liau K, Lagkadinou E, Türeci Ö, Şahin U, Xu X, Koury K, Dychter SS, Lu C, Gentile TC, Gruber WC. Efficacy and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in participants with a history of cancer: subgroup analysis of a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Vaccine 2021:S0264-410X(21)01652-2. [PMID: 35131133 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Individuals with an underlying malignancy have high risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes. In clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious against infection, hospitalization, and death, but most trials excluded participants with cancer. We report results from participants with a history of past or active neoplasm (malignant or benign/unknown) and up to 6 months’ follow-up post-dose 2 from the placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial of the 2-dose BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Patients and methods Between July 2020–January 2021, 46,429 participants aged ≥ 12 years were randomized at 152 sites in 6 countries. Healthy participants with pre-existing stable neoplasm could participate; those receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Data are reported for participants, aged ≥ 16 years for safety and ≥ 12 years for efficacy, who had any history of neoplasm at baseline (data cut-off: March 13, 2021). Adverse-event (AE) data are controlled for follow-up time before unblinding and reported as incidence rates (IRs) per 100 person-years follow-up. Results At baseline, 3813 participants had a history of neoplasm; most common malignancies were breast (n = 460), prostate (n = 362), and melanoma (n = 223). Four BNT162b2 and 71 placebo recipients developed COVID-19 from 7 days post-dose 2; vaccine efficacy was 94.4% (95% CI: 85.2, 98.5) after up to 6 months’ follow-up post-dose 2. This compares favorably with vaccine efficacy of 91.1% in the overall trial population after the same follow-up. AEs were reported at IRs of 95.4 (BNT162b2) and 48.3 (placebo) per 100 person-years. Most common AEs were reactogenicity events (injection-site pain, fatigue, pyrexia). Three BNT162b2 and 1 placebo recipients withdrew because of vaccine-related AEs. No vaccine-related deaths were reported. Conclusion In participants with past or active neoplasms, BNT162b2 vaccine has a similar efficacy and safety profile as in the overall trial population. These results can inform BNT162b2 use during the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials in participants with cancer. Clinical trial number: NCT04368728.
Collapse
|
42
|
Gagelmann N, Passamonti F, Wolschke C, Massoud R, Niederwieser C, Adjallé R, Mora B, Ayuk F, Kröger N. Antibody response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in adults with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Haematologica 2021; 107:1840-1849. [PMID: 34911284 PMCID: PMC9335098 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.280163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have shown remarkable efficacy and thus constitute an important preventive option against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in fragile patients. We aimed to systematically analyze the outcomes of patients with hematological malignancies who received vaccination and to identify specific groups with differences in outcomes. The primary end point was antibody response after full vaccination (2 doses of mRNA or one dose of vectorbased vaccines). We identified 49 studies comprising 11,086 individuals. Overall risk of bias was low. The pooled response for hematological malignancies was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59-69; I²=93%) versus 96% (95% CI: 92-97; I²=44%) for solid cancer and 98% (95% CI: 96-99; I²=55%) for healthy controls (P<0.001). Outcome was different across hematological malignancies (P<0.001). The pooled response was 50% (95% CI: 43-57; I²=84%) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 76% (95% CI: 67-83; I²=92%) for multiple myeloma, 83% (95% CI: 69-91; I²=85%) for myeloproliferative neoplasms, 91% (95% CI: 82-96; I²=12%) for Hodgkin lymphoma, and 58% (95% CI: 44-70; I²=84%) for aggressive and 61% (95% CI: 48-72; I²=85%) for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The pooled response for allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation was 82% and 83%, respectively. Being in remission and prior COVID-19 showed significantly higher responses. Low pooled response was identified for active treatment (35%), anti-CD20 therapy ≤1 year (15%), Bruton kinase inhibition (23%), venetoclax (26%), ruxolitinib (42%), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (42%). Studies on timing, value of boosters, and long-term efficacy are needed. This study is registered with PROSPERO (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: CRD42021279051).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Gagelmann
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
| | | | - Christine Wolschke
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Radwan Massoud
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Niederwieser
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Raissa Adjallé
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Francis Ayuk
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Kröger
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tamariz-Amador LE, Battaglia AM, Maia C, Zherniakova A, Guerrero C, Zabaleta A, Burgos L, Botta C, Fortuño MA, Grande C, Manubens A, Arguiñano JM, Gomez C, Perez-Persona E, Olazabal I, Oiartzabal I, Panizo C, Prosper F, San-Miguel JF, Rodriguez-Otero P, Martín-Sánchez E, Paiva B. Immune biomarkers to predict SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness in patients with hematological malignancies. Blood Cancer J 2021; 11:202. [PMID: 34907159 PMCID: PMC8669666 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00594-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is evidence of reduced SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness in patients with hematological malignancies. We hypothesized that tumor and treatment-related immunosuppression can be depicted in peripheral blood, and that immune profiling prior to vaccination can help predict immunogenicity. We performed a comprehensive immunological characterization of 83 hematological patients before vaccination and measured IgM, IgG, and IgA antibody response to four viral antigens at day +7 after second-dose COVID-19 vaccination using multidimensional and computational flow cytometry. Health care practitioners of similar age were the control group (n = 102). Forty-four out of 59 immune cell types were significantly altered in patients; those with monoclonal gammopathies showed greater immunosuppression than patients with B-cell disorders and Hodgkin lymphoma. Immune dysregulation emerged before treatment, peaked while on-therapy, and did not return to normalcy after stopping treatment. We identified an immunotype that was significantly associated with poor antibody response and uncovered that the frequency of neutrophils, classical monocytes, CD4, and CD8 effector memory CD127low T cells, as well as naive CD21+ and IgM+D+ memory B cells, were independently associated with immunogenicity. Thus, we provide novel immune biomarkers to predict COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in hematological patients, which are complementary to treatment-related factors and may help tailoring possible vaccine boosters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis-Esteban Tamariz-Amador
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Anna Martina Battaglia
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia", University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Catarina Maia
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Anastasiia Zherniakova
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
- Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Camila Guerrero
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Aintzane Zabaleta
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Leire Burgos
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cirino Botta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia", University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Maria-Antonia Fortuño
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carlos Grande
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Andrea Manubens
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Clara Gomez
- Hospital Universitario de Galdakao, Galdakano, Spain
| | | | - Iñigo Olazabal
- Hospital Universitario de Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | - Carlos Panizo
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Felipe Prosper
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jesus F San-Miguel
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Paula Rodriguez-Otero
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Esperanza Martín-Sánchez
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain.
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Teh JSK, Coussement J, Neoh ZCF, Spelman T, Lazarakis S, Slavin MA, Teh BW. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Adv 2021:bloodadvances. [PMID: 34852173 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to assess the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematologic malignancies. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies of immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination stratified by underlying malignancy and published from January 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021, was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Primary outcome was the rate of seropositivity after 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine with rates of seropositivity after 1 dose, rates of positive neutralizing antibodies, cellular responses, and adverse events as secondary outcomes. Rates were pooled from single-arm studies while rates of seropositivity were compared against the rate in healthy controls for comparator studies using a random effects model and expressed as a pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Forty-four studies (16 mixed group, 28 disease specific) with 7064 patients were included in the analysis (2331 after first dose, 4733 after second dose). Overall seropositivity rates were 62% to 66% after 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine and 37% to 51% after 1 dose. The lowest seropositivity rate was 51% in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and was highest in patients with acute leukemia (93%). After 2 doses, neutralizing antibody response rates were 57% to 60%, and cellular response rates were 40% to 75%. Active treatment, ongoing or recent treatment with targeted and CD-20 monoclonal antibody therapies within 12 months were associated with poor immune responses to COVID-19 vaccine. New approaches to prevention are urgently required to reduce COVID-19 infection morbidity and mortality in high-risk patient groups that respond poorly to COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
|
45
|
Fendler A, Shepherd ST, Au L, Wilkinson KA, Wu M, Byrne F, Cerrone M, Schmitt AM, Joharatnam-Hogan N, Shum B, Tippu Z, Rzeniewicz K, Boos LA, Harvey R, Carlyle E, Edmonds K, Del Rosario L, Sarker S, Lingard K, Mangwende M, Holt L, Ahmod H, Korteweg J, Foley T, Bazin J, Gordon W, Barber T, Emslie-Henry A, Xie W, Gerard CL, Deng D, Wall EC, Agua-Doce A, Namjou S, Caidan S, Gavrielides M, MacRae JI, Kelly G, Peat K, Kelly D, Murra A, Kelly K, O’Flaherty M, Dowdie L, Ash N, Gronthoud F, Shea RL, Gardner G, Murray D, Kinnaird F, Cui W, Pascual J, Rodney S, Mencel J, Curtis O, Stephenson C, Robinson A, Oza B, Farag S, Leslie I, Rogiers A, Iyengar S, Ethell M, Messiou C, Cunningham D, Chau I, Starling N, Turner N, Welsh L, van As N, Jones RL, Droney J, Banerjee S, Tatham KC, O’Brien M, Harrington K, Bhide S, Okines A, Reid A, Young K, Furness AJ, Pickering L, Swanton C, Gandhi S, Gamblin S, Bauer DLV, Kassiotis G, Kumar S, Yousaf N, Jhanji S, Nicholson E, Howell M, Walker S, Wilkinson RJ, Larkin J, Turajlic S. Adaptive immunity and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern following vaccination in patients with cancer: The CAPTURE study. Nat Cancer 2021; 2:1321-1337. [PMID: 34950880 PMCID: PMC7612125 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-021-00274-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
CAPTURE (NCT03226886) is a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 immunity in patients with cancer. Here we evaluated 585 patients following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines, administered 12 weeks apart. Seroconversion rates after two doses were 85% and 59% in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. A lower proportion of patients had detectable neutralizing antibody titers (NAbT) against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) vs wildtype (WT). Patients with hematological malignancies were more likely to have undetectable NAbT and had lower median NAbT vs solid cancers against both WT and VOCs. In comparison with individuals without cancer, patients with haematological, but not solid, malignancies had reduced NAb responses. Seroconversion showed poor concordance with NAbT against VOCs. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted NAb response including against VOCs, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with undetectable NAbT. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses were detected in 80% of patients, and were comparable between vaccines or cancer types. Our results have implications for the management of cancer patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Fendler
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Scott T.C. Shepherd
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Lewis Au
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Katalin A. Wilkinson
- Tuberculosis Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Wellcome Center for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
| | - Mary Wu
- Wellcome Center for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
| | - Fiona Byrne
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Maddalena Cerrone
- Tuberculosis Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andreas M. Schmitt
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | | | - Benjamin Shum
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Zayd Tippu
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Karolina Rzeniewicz
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Laura Amanda Boos
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Ruth Harvey
- Worldwide Influenza Centre, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Eleanor Carlyle
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Kim Edmonds
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Lyra Del Rosario
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Sarah Sarker
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Karla Lingard
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Mary Mangwende
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Lucy Holt
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Hamid Ahmod
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Justine Korteweg
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Tara Foley
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Jessica Bazin
- Haemato-oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - William Gordon
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Taja Barber
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Andrea Emslie-Henry
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Wenyi Xie
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Camille L. Gerard
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Daqi Deng
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Emma C. Wall
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Structural Biology of Disease Processes Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK; Experimental Histopathology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Ana Agua-Doce
- Flow Cytometry Scientific Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Sina Namjou
- Safety, Health & Sustainability, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Simon Caidan
- Safety, Health & Sustainability, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Mike Gavrielides
- Scientific Computing Scientific Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - James I MacRae
- Metabolomics Scientific Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Gavin Kelly
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Kema Peat
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Denise Kelly
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Aida Murra
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Kayleigh Kelly
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Molly O’Flaherty
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Lauren Dowdie
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Natalie Ash
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Firza Gronthoud
- Department of Pathology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Robyn L. Shea
- Department of Pathology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Translational Cancer Biochemistry Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Gail Gardner
- Department of Pathology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Darren Murray
- Department of Pathology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Fiona Kinnaird
- Clinical Trials Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Wanyuan Cui
- Lung Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Javier Pascual
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Simon Rodney
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Justin Mencel
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey SM2 5PT
| | - Olivia Curtis
- Lung Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Clemency Stephenson
- Haemato-oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Anna Robinson
- Haemato-oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Bhavna Oza
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Sheima Farag
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Isla Leslie
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Aljosja Rogiers
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Sunil Iyengar
- Haemato-oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Mark Ethell
- Haemato-oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Christina Messiou
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - David Cunningham
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey SM2 5PT
| | - Ian Chau
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey SM2 5PT
| | - Naureen Starling
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey SM2 5PT
| | - Nicholas Turner
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Liam Welsh
- Neuro-oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Nicholas van As
- Clinical Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Robin L. Jones
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Joanne Droney
- Palliative Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Susana Banerjee
- Gynaecology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Kate C. Tatham
- Anaesthetics, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Mary O’Brien
- Lung Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Kevin Harrington
- Head and Neck, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Targeted Therapy Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Shreerang Bhide
- Head and Neck, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Targeted Therapy Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Alicia Okines
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Acute Oncology Service, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Alison Reid
- Uro-oncology unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, SM2 5PT
| | - Kate Young
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Andrew J.S. Furness
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Lisa Pickering
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- University College London Cancer Institute, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | | | - Sonia Gandhi
- Neurodegeneration Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG
| | - Steve Gamblin
- Structural Biology of Disease Processes Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK; Experimental Histopathology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - David LV Bauer
- RNA Virus Replication Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - George Kassiotis
- Retroviral Immunology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Sacheen Kumar
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey SM2 5PT
| | - Nadia Yousaf
- Lung Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Acute Oncology Service, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Shaman Jhanji
- Anaesthetics, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Emma Nicholson
- Haemato-oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Michael Howell
- High Throughput Screening Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Susanna Walker
- Anaesthetics, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Robert J. Wilkinson
- Tuberculosis Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Wellcome Center for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James Larkin
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Shields AM, Venkatachalam S, Shafeek S, Paneesha S, Ford M, Sheeran T, Kelly M, Qureshi I, Salhan B, Karim F, De Silva N, Stones J, Lee S, Khawaja J, Kaudlay PK, Whitmill R, Kakepoto GN, Parry HM, Moss P, Faustini SE, Richter AG, Drayson MT, Basu S. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses following CD20-depletion treatment in patients with haematological and rheumatological disease: a West Midlands Research Consortium study. Clin Exp Immunol 2021; 207:3-10. [PMID: 35020852 PMCID: PMC8767851 DOI: 10.1093/cei/uxab018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
B-cell-depleting agents are among the most commonly used drugs to treat haemato-oncological and autoimmune diseases. They rapidly induce a state of peripheral B-cell aplasia with the potential to interfere with nascent vaccine responses, particularly to novel antigens. We have examined the relationship between B-cell reconstitution and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in two cohorts of patients previously exposed to B-cell-depleting agents: a cohort of patients treated for haematological B-cell malignancy and another treated for rheumatological disease. B-cell depletion severely impairs vaccine responsiveness in the first 6 months after administration: SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence was 42.2% and 33.3% in the haemato-oncological patients and rheumatology patients, respectively and 22.7% in patients vaccinated while actively receiving anti-lymphoma chemotherapy. After the first 6 months, vaccine responsiveness significantly improved during early B-cell reconstitution; however, the kinetics of reconstitution was significantly faster in haemato-oncology patients. The AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and the Pfizer BioNTech 162b vaccine induced equivalent vaccine responses; however, shorter intervals between vaccine doses (<1 m) improved the magnitude of the antibody response in haeamto-oncology patients. In a subgroup of haemato-oncology patients, with historic exposure to B-cell-depleting agents (>36 m previously), vaccine non-responsiveness was independent of peripheral B-cell reconstitution. The findings have important implications for primary vaccination and booster vaccination strategies in individuals clinically vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian M Shields
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK,Correspondence: Adrian M. Shields, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | - Salim Shafeek
- Department of Haematology, Worcestershire Acute NHS Trust, Worcester, UK
| | - Shankara Paneesha
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark Ford
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Tom Sheeran
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Melanie Kelly
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Iman Qureshi
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Beena Salhan
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Farheen Karim
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Neelakshi De Silva
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Jacqueline Stones
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Sophie Lee
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Jahanzeb Khawaja
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | | | - Richard Whitmill
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | | | - Helen M Parry
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Department of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Moss
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Department of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sian E Faustini
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alex G Richter
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK,Mark T. Drayson, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Supratik Basu
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK,Faculty of Science & Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK,Supratik Basu, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jiménez M, Roldan E, Fernández-Naval C, Villacampa G, Martinez-Gallo M, Medina-Gil D, Peralta-Garzón S, Pujadas G, Hernández C, Pagès Geli C, Gironella M, Fox ML, Orti G, Barba P, Pumarola T, Cabirta A, Catalá E, Valentín M, Marín-Niebla A, Orfao A, González M, Campins M, Ruiz-Camps I, Valcárcel D, Bosch F, Hernández M, Crespo M, Esperalba J, Abrisqueta P. Cellular and humoral immunogenicity of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv 2021:bloodadvances. [PMID: 34844263 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine induces an impaired humoral response in patients under anti-CD20 therapy, but cellular response is preserved. Immunosuppressive therapy for GVHD reduces cellular response with no impact in humoral immunogenicity.
Recent studies have shown a suboptimal humoral response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies; however, data about cellular immunogenicity are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate both the humoral and cellular immunogenicity 1 month after the second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Antibody titers were measured by using the Elecsys and LIAISON anti–SARS-CoV-2 S assays, and T-cell response was assessed by using interferon-γ release immunoassay technology. Overall, 76.3% (184 of 241) of patients developed humoral immunity, and the cellular response rate was 79% (184 of 233). Hypogammaglobulinemia, lymphopenia, active hematologic treatment, and anti-CD20 therapy during the previous 6 months were associated with an inferior humoral response. Conversely, age >65 years, active disease, lymphopenia, and immunosuppressive treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were associated with an impaired cellular response. A significant dissociation between the humoral and cellular responses was observed in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy (the humoral response was 17.5%, whereas the cellular response was 71.1%). In these patients, B-cell aplasia was confirmed while T-cell counts were preserved. In contrast, humoral response was observed in 77.3% of patients undergoing immunosuppressive treatment of GVHD, whereas only 52.4% had a cellular response. The cellular and humoral responses to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in patients with hematologic malignancies are highly influenced by the presence of treatments such as anti-CD20 therapy and immunosuppressive agents. This observation has implications for the further management of these patients.
Collapse
|
48
|
Pagano L, Salmanton-García J, Marchesi F, Lopez-Garcia A, Lamure S, Itri F, Gomes da Silva M, Dragonetti G, Falces-Romero I, van Doesum J, Sili U, Labrador J, Calbacho M, Bilgin Y, Weinbergerová B, Serrano Gomez LM, Ribera JM, Malak S, Loureiro-Amigo J, Glenthøj A, Cordoba R, Nunes Rodrigues R, Gonzalez-Lopez TJ, Karlsson LK, Jimenez MJ, Hernández-Rivas JÁ, Jaksic O, Racil Z, Busca A, Corradini P, Hoenigl M, Klimko N, Koehler P, Pagliuca A, Passamonti F, Cornely O. COVID-19 in vaccinated adult patients with hematological malignancies. Preliminary results from EPICOVIDEHA. Blood 2021:blood. [PMID: 34748627 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021014124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
49
|
Guven DC, Sahin TK, Kilickap S, Uckun FM. Antibody Responses to COVID-19 Vaccination in Cancer: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:759108. [PMID: 34804957 PMCID: PMC8599356 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After the results of phase III vaccine studies became available, the leading oncology societies recommended two doses of COVID-19 vaccination to all patients with cancer with no specific recommendation for tumor type and active treatments. However, the data on the COVID-19 vaccine efficacy in cancer patients is limited due to exclusion of cancer patients from most vaccine clinical trials. Therefore, we systemically reviewed the available evidence evaluating the antibody responses in cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic search from the Pubmed database and calculated risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare seroconversion rates between cancer patients and controls using the Review Manager software, version 5.3. RESULTS Our systematic search retrieved a total 27 studies and we included 17 studies with control arms in the analyses. Cancer patients had significantly lower seroconversion rates (37.3%) than controls (74.1%) (RD: -0.44, 95% CI: -0.52, -0.35, p<0.001) with first vaccine dose. After two doses, the seroconversion rates were 99.6% in control arm and 78.3% in cancer patients (RD: -0.19, 95% CI: -0.28, -0.10, p<0.001). The difference in seroconversion rates was more pronounced patients with hematologic malignancies (72.6%) (RD: -0.25, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.22, p<0.001) than patients with solid tumors (91.6%) (RD: -0.09, 95% CI: -0.13, -0.04, p<0.003) and patients in remission (RD: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.14, -0.06, p<0.001). CONCLUSION In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccine seroconversion rates were significantly lower in patients with hematological malignancies and patients under active treatment. Further research focusing on the approaches to improve vaccine efficacy and exploration of novel treatment options is urgently needed for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz C. Guven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taha K. Sahin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kilickap
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatih M. Uckun
- Department of Immunology and Inflammatory Disorders, Reven Pharmaceuticals, Westminster, CO, United States
- Immuno-Oncology Program and COVID-19 Task Force, Ares Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ribas A, Dhodapkar MV, Campbell KM, Davies FE, Gore SD, Levy R, Greenberger LM. How to Provide the Needed Protection from COVID-19 to Patients with Hematologic Malignancies. Blood Cancer Discov 2021; 2:562-567. [PMID: 34778796 PMCID: PMC8580613 DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with hematologic malignancies are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 infections, and upon a pooled data analysis of 24 publications, there is evidence that they have suboptimal antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccination and boosters. To provide them the needed additional protection from COVID-19, it is imperative to achieve a 100% full immunization rate in health care workers and adult caretakers, and to foster research to test higher doses and repeated rounds of COVID-19 vaccines and the use of passive immune prophylaxis and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoni Ribas
- Department of Medicine and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Madhav V Dhodapkar
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katie M Campbell
- Department of Medicine and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Faith E Davies
- Department of Medicine and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York
- AACR Hematologic Malignancies Task Force, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven D Gore
- AACR Hematologic Malignancies Task Force, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ronald Levy
- AACR Hematologic Malignancies Task Force, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | | |
Collapse
|