1
|
Lenz HJ, Parikh A, Spigel DR, Cohn AL, Yoshino T, Kochenderfer M, Elez E, Shao SH, Deming D, Holdridge R, Larson T, Chen E, Mahipal A, Ucar A, Cullen D, Baskin-Bey E, Kang T, Hammell AB, Yao J, Tabernero J. Modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with and without nivolumab for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 2 results from the CheckMate 9X8 randomized clinical trial. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008409. [PMID: 38485190 PMCID: PMC10941175 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard first-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include fluoropyrimidine-containing regimens with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan and a biologic agent. Immunotherapy may enhance antitumor activity in combination with standard therapies in patients with mCRC. Here, we present phase 2 results of nivolumab plus standard-of-care therapy (SOC; 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/bevacizumab) versus SOC in the first-line treatment of patients with mCRC (CheckMate 9X8). METHODS CheckMate 9X8 was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2/3 trial. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age with unresectable mCRC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab 240 mg plus SOC or SOC alone every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Secondary endpoints included PFS by investigator assessment; objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, duration of response, and time to response, all by BICR and investigator assessments; overall survival; and safety. Preplanned exploratory biomarker analyses were also performed. RESULTS From February 2018 through April 2019, 310 patients were enrolled, of which 195 patients were randomized to nivolumab plus SOC (n=127) or SOC (n=68). At 21.5-month minimum follow-up, PFS with nivolumab plus SOC versus SOC did not meet the prespecified threshold for statistical significance; median PFS by BICR was 11.9 months in both arms (HR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.23); p=0.30). Higher PFS rates after 12 months (18 months: 28% vs 9%), higher ORR (60% vs 46%), and durable responses (median 12.9 vs 9.3 months) were observed with nivolumab plus SOC versus SOC. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 75% versus 48% of patients; no new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS The CheckMate 9X8 trial investigating first-line nivolumab plus SOC versus SOC in patients with mCRC did not meet its primary endpoint of PFS by BICR. Nivolumab plus SOC showed numerically higher PFS rates after 12 months, a higher response rate, and more durable responses compared with SOC alone, with acceptable safety. Further investigation to identify subgroups of patients with mCRC that may benefit from nivolumab plus SOC versus SOC in the first-line setting is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03414983.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Department of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aparna Parikh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David R Spigel
- Department of Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Allen L Cohn
- Department of Medical Oncology, US Oncology Research, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center-Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Elena Elez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Dustin Deming
- Departments of Medicine and Oncology, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Regan Holdridge
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| | - Timothy Larson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Minnesota Oncology Hematology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Antonio Ucar
- Miami Cancer Institute (part of Baptist Health South Florida), Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Dana Cullen
- Oncology Clinical Science, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Tong Kang
- Biostatistics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Amy B Hammell
- Precision Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jin Yao
- Translational Bioinformatics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Makker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, Cohn AL, Brose MS, Simone CD, Cao ZA, Suttner L, Loboda A, Cristescu R, Jelinic P, Orlowski R, Dutta L, Matsui J, Dutcus CE, Minoshima Y, Messing MJ. Evaluation of potential biomarkers for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab among patients with advanced endometrial cancer: results from Study 111/KEYNOTE-146. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e007929. [PMID: 38242717 PMCID: PMC10806562 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit in patients with previously treated advanced endometrial carcinoma in Study 111/KEYNOTE-146 (NCT02501096). In these exploratory analyses from this study, we evaluated the associations between clinical outcomes and gene expression signature scores and descriptively summarized response in biomarker subpopulations defined by tumor mutational burden (TMB) and DNA variants for individual genes of interest. METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic endometrial carcinoma received oral lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for 35 cycles. Archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was obtained from all patients. T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP) and 11 other gene signatures were evaluated by RNA sequencing. TMB, hotspot mutations in PIK3CA (oncogene), and deleterious mutations in PTEN and TP53 (tumor suppressor genes) were evaluated by whole-exome sequencing (WES). RESULTS 93 and 79 patients were included in the RNA-sequencing-evaluable and WES-evaluable populations, respectively. No statistically significant associations were observed between any of the RNA-sequencing signature scores and objective response rate or progression-free survival. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for response ranged from 0.39 to 0.54; all 95% CIs included 0.50. Responses were seen regardless of TMB (≥175 or <175 mutations/exome) and mutation status. There were no correlations between TcellinfGEP and TMB, TcellinfGEP and microvessel density (MVD), or MVD and TMB. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrated efficacy for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab regardless of biomarker status. Results from this study do not support clinical utility of the evaluated biomarkers. Further investigation of biomarkers for this regimen is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02501096.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew H Taylor
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Allen L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Marcia S Brose
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fakih M, Raghav KPS, Chang DZ, Larson T, Cohn AL, Huyck TK, Cosgrove D, Fiorillo JA, Tam R, D'Adamo D, Sharma N, Brennan BJ, Wang YA, Coppieters S, Zebger-Gong H, Weispfenning A, Seidel H, Ploeger BA, Mueller U, Oliveira CSVD, Paulson AS. Regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-arm, open-label, multicentre phase 2 study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 58:101917. [PMID: 37090438 PMCID: PMC10119887 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies plus multikinase inhibitors have shown encouraging activity in several tumour types, including colorectal cancer. This study assessed regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods This single-arm, open-label, multicentre phase 2 study enrolled adults from 13 sites in the USA with previously treated advanced microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer. Eligible patients had known extended RAS and BRAF status, progression or intolerance to no more than two (for extended RAS mutant) or three (for extended RAS wild type) lines of systemic chemotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Regorafenib 80 mg/day was administered orally for 3 weeks on/1 week off (increased to 120 mg/day if 80 mg/day was well tolerated) with intravenous nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Exploratory endpoints included biomarkers associated with antitumour activity. Patients who received at least one dose of study intervention were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. Tumour assessments were carried out every 8 weeks for the first year, and every 12 weeks thereafter until progressive disease/end of the study, and objective response rate was analysed after all patients had met the criteria for primary completion of five post-baseline scans and either 10-months' follow-up or drop out. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04126733. Findings Between 14 October 2019 and 14 January 2020, 94 patients were enrolled, 70 received treatment. Five patients had a partial response, yielding an objective response rate of 7% (95% CI 2.4-15.9; p = 0.27). All responders had no liver metastases at baseline. Median overall survival (data immature) and progression-free survival were 11.9 months (95% CI 7.0-not evaluable) and 1.8 months (95% CI 1.8-2.4), respectively. Most patients (97%, 68/70) experienced a treatment-related adverse event; 51% were grade 1 or 2, 40% were grade 3, 3% were grade 4, and 3% were grade 5. The most common (≥20%) events were fatigue (26/70), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (19/70), maculopapular rash (17/70), increased blood bilirubin (14/70), and decreased appetite (14/70). Higher baseline expression of tumour biomarkers of immune sensitivity correlated with antitumour activity. Interpretation Further studies are warranted to identify subgroups of patients with clinical characteristics or biomarkers that would benefit most from treatment with regorafenib plus nivolumab. Funding Bayer/Bristol Myers Squibb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwan Fakih
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
- Corresponding author. City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| | - Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Tim Larson
- Minnesota Oncology/The US Oncology Network, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | - David Cosgrove
- Division of Medical Oncology, Vancouver Cancer Center, Compass Oncology, Vancouver, WA, USA
| | | | - Rachel Tam
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ying A. Wang
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Makker V, Aghajanian C, Cohn AL, Romeo M, Bratos R, Brose MS, Messing M, Dutta L, Dutcus CE, Huang J, Schmidt EV, Orlowski R, Taylor MH. A Phase Ib/II Study of Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma (Study 111/KEYNOTE-146): Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Update. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:974-979. [PMID: 36608305 PMCID: PMC9928628 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The open-label phase Ib/II Study 111/KEYNOTE-146 of daily lenvatinib 20 mg plus pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks showed promising efficacy and tolerable safety in patients with previously treated advanced endometrial carcinoma (EC; primary data cutoff date: January 10, 2019). This updated analysis reports long-term follow-up efficacy and safety data from 108 patients with previously treated EC included in the primary analysis. End points included objective response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Investigators performed tumor assessments per immune-related RECIST. At the updated data cutoff date (August 18, 2020), the median study follow-up duration was 34.7 months (95% CI, 30.9 to 41.2), the objective response rate was 39.8% (95% CI, 30.5 to 49.7), and the median duration of response was 22.9 months (95% CI, 10.2 to not estimable). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 8.7) and 17.7 months (95% CI, 15.5 to 25.8), respectively. Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade occurred in 104 (96.3%) patients. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were hypertension (33.3%), elevated lipase (9.3%), fatigue (8.3%), and diarrhea (7.4%). The results demonstrate extended efficacy and tolerability of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in this cohort of patients with previously treated advanced EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY,Vicky Makker, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th St, New York, NY 10065; e-mail:
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Margarita Romeo
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona-Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Marcia S. Brose
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthew H. Taylor
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jamshidi A, Liu MC, Klein EA, Venn O, Hubbell E, Beausang JF, Gross S, Melton C, Fields AP, Liu Q, Zhang N, Fung ET, Kurtzman KN, Amini H, Betts C, Civello D, Freese P, Calef R, Davydov K, Fayzullina S, Hou C, Jiang R, Jung B, Tang S, Demas V, Newman J, Sakarya O, Scott E, Shenoy A, Shojaee S, Steffen KK, Nicula V, Chien TC, Bagaria S, Hunkapiller N, Desai M, Dong Z, Richards DA, Yeatman TJ, Cohn AL, Thiel DD, Berry DA, Tummala MK, McIntyre K, Sekeres MA, Bryce A, Aravanis AM, Seiden MV, Swanton C. Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection. Cancer Cell 2022; 40:1537-1549.e12. [PMID: 36400018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
In the Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (NCT02889978) substudy 1, we evaluate several approaches for a circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test by defining clinical limit of detection (LOD) based on circulating tumor allele fraction (cTAF), enabling performance comparisons. Among 10 machine-learning classifiers trained on the same samples and independently validated, when evaluated at 98% specificity, those using whole-genome (WG) methylation, single nucleotide variants with paired white blood cell background removal, and combined scores from classifiers evaluated in this study show the highest cancer signal detection sensitivities. Compared with clinical stage and tumor type, cTAF is a more significant predictor of classifier performance and may more closely reflect tumor biology. Clinical LODs mirror relative sensitivities for all approaches. The WG methylation feature best predicts cancer signal origin. WG methylation is the most promising technology for MCED and informs development of a targeted methylation MCED test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Minetta C Liu
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nan Zhang
- GRAIL, LLC, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhao Dong
- GRAIL, LLC, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | | | - Timothy J Yeatman
- Gibbs Cancer Center and Research Institute, Spartanburg, SC 29303, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Allen L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO 80218, USA
| | - David D Thiel
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Donald A Berry
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Charles Swanton
- Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, London, WC1E 6DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peterfy C, Chen Y, Countryman P, Chmielowski B, Anthony SP, Healey JH, Wainberg ZA, Cohn AL, Shapiro GI, Keedy VL, Singh A, Puzanov I, Wagner AJ, Qian M, Sterba M, Hsu HH, Tong-Starksen S, Tap WD. CSF1 receptor inhibition of tenosynovial giant cell tumor using novel disease-specific MRI measures of tumor burden. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1449-1459. [PMID: 35040698 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Monitoring treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is complicated by the irregular shape and asymmetrical growth of the tumor. We compared responses to pexidartinib by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 with those by tumor volume score (TVS) and modified RECIST (m-RECIST). Materials & methods: MRIs acquired every two cycles were assessed centrally using RECIST 1.1, m-RECIST and TVS and tissue damage score (TDS). Results: Thirty-one evaluable TGCT patients were treated with pexidartinib. From baseline to last visit, 94% of patients (29/31) showed a decrease in tumor size (median change: -60% [RECIST], -66% [m-RECIST], -79% [TVS]). All methods showed 100% disease control rate. For TDS, improvements were seen in bone erosion (32%), bone marrow edema (58%) and knee effusion (46%). Conclusion: TVS and m-RECIST offer potentially superior alternatives to conventional RECIST for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in TGCT. TDS adds important information about joint damage associated with TGCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yan Chen
- Spire Sciences, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | | | - Bartosz Chmielowski
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | - John H Healey
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center & Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Allen L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO 80216, USA
| | - Geoffrey I Shapiro
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Vicki L Keedy
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Arun Singh
- UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Andrew J Wagner
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Meng Qian
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ 07920, USA
| | - Mike Sterba
- Plexxikon Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Henry H Hsu
- Plexxikon Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | | | - William D Tap
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center & Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Makker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, Oaknin A, Mier J, Cohn AL, Romeo M, Bratos R, Brose MS, DiSimone C, Messing M, Stepan DE, Dutcus CE, Wu J, Schmidt EV, Orlowski R, Sachdev P, Shumaker R, Casado Herraez A. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2981-2992. [PMID: 32167863 PMCID: PMC7479759 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 307] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma have limited treatment options. We report final primary efficacy analysis results for a patient cohort with advanced endometrial carcinoma receiving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in an ongoing phase Ib/II study of selected solid tumors. METHODS Patients took lenvatinib 20 mg once daily orally plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks, in 3-week cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks (ORRWk24); secondary efficacy end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Tumor assessments were evaluated by investigators per immune-related RECIST. RESULTS At data cutoff, 108 patients with previously treated endometrial carcinoma were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 18.7 months. The ORRWk24 was 38.0% (95% CI, 28.8% to 47.8%). Among subgroups, the ORRWk24 (95% CI) was 63.6% (30.8% to 89.1%) in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors (n = 11) and 36.2% (26.5% to 46.7%) in patients with microsatellite-stable tumors (n = 94). For previously treated patients, regardless of tumor MSI status, the median DOR was 21.2 months (95% CI, 7.6 months to not estimable), median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 8.7 months), and median OS was 16.7 months (15.0 months to not estimable). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 83/124 (66.9%) patients. CONCLUSION Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma who have experienced disease progression after prior systemic therapy, regardless of tumor MSI status. The combination therapy had a manageable toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Ana Oaknin
- Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - James Mier
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Marcia S. Brose
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yoon HH, Bendell JC, Braiteh FS, Firdaus I, Philip PA, Cohn AL, Lewis N, Anderson DM, Arrowsmith E, Schwartz JD, Gao L, Hsu Y, Xu Y, Ferry D, Alberts SR, Wainberg ZA. Ramucirumab combined with FOLFOX as front-line therapy for advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:2016. [PMID: 31893488 PMCID: PMC8902979 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
|
9
|
Makker V, Rasco D, Vogelzang NJ, Brose MS, Cohn AL, Mier J, Di Simone C, Hyman DM, Stepan DE, Dutcus CE, Schmidt EV, Guo M, Sachdev P, Shumaker R, Aghajanian C, Taylor M. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: an interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:711-718. [PMID: 30922731 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30020-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 331] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor of VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3, and other receptor tyrosine kinases. Pembrolizumab, an antibody targeting PD-1, has moderate efficacy in biomarker-unselected endometrial cancer. We aimed to assess the combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma, after establishing the maximum tolerated dose in a phase 1b study. METHODS In this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study done at 11 centres in the USA, eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had metastatic endometrial cancer (unselected for microsatellite instability or PD-L1), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had received no more than two previous systemic therapies, had measurable disease according to the immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (irRECIST), and had a life expectancy of 12 weeks or longer. Patients received 20 mg oral lenvatinib daily plus 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab every 3 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint of this interim analysis was the proportion of patients with an objective response at week 24 as assessed by investigators according to irRECIST in the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02501096. FINDINGS Between Sept 10, 2015, and July 24, 2017, 54 patients were enrolled, 53 of whom were included in the analysis. At the cutoff date for anti-tumour activity data (Dec 15, 2017), median study follow-up was 13·3 months (IQR 6·7-20·1). 21 (39·6% [95% CI 26·5-54·0]) patients had an objective response at week 24. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16 (30%) patients, and one treatment-related death was reported (intracranial haemorrhage). The most frequently reported any-grade treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (31 [58%]), fatigue (29 [55%]), diarrhoea (27 [51%]), and hypothyroidism (25 [47%]). The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (18 [34%]) and diarrhoea (four [8%]). No grade 4 treatment-related adverse events were reported. Five (9%) patients discontinued study treatment because of treatment-related adverse events. INTERPRETATION Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed anti-tumour activity in patients with advanced recurrent endometrial cancer with a safety profile that was similar to those previously reported for lenvatinib and pembrolizumab monotherapies, apart from an increased frequency of hypothyroidism. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab could represent a new potential treatment option for this patient population, and is being investigated in a randomised phase 3 study. FUNDING Eisai and Merck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Nicholas J Vogelzang
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada and US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Marcia S Brose
- Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Allen L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center and US Oncology Research, Denver, CO, USA
| | - James Mier
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - David M Hyman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Taylor
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yoshino T, Portnoy DC, Obermannová R, Bodoky G, Prausová J, Garcia-Carbonero R, Ciuleanu T, García-Alfonso P, Cohn AL, Van Cutsem E, Yamazaki K, Lonardi S, Muro K, Kim TW, Yamaguchi K, Grothey A, O'Connor J, Taieb J, Wijayawardana SR, Hozak RR, Nasroulah F, Tabernero J. Biomarker analysis beyond angiogenesis: RAS/RAF mutation status, tumour sidedness, and second-line ramucirumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma from RAISE-a global phase III study. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:124-131. [PMID: 30339194 PMCID: PMC6336001 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background : Second-line treatment with ramucirumab+FOLFIRI improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo+FOLFIRI for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) [hazard ratio (HR)=0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.98, P = 0.022]. Post hoc analyses of RAISE patient data examined the association of RAS/RAF mutation status and the anatomical location of the primary CRC tumour (left versus right) with efficacy parameters. Patients and methods Patient tumour tissue was classified as BRAF mutant, KRAS/NRAS (RAS) mutant, or RAS/BRAF wild-type. Left-CRC was defined as the splenic flexure, descending and sigmoid colon, and rectum; right-CRC included transverse, ascending colon, and cecum. Results RAS/RAF mutation status was available for 85% of patients (912/1072) and primary tumour location was known for 94.4% of patients (1012/1072). A favourable and comparable ramucirumab treatment effect was observed for patients with RAS mutations (OS HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.04) and patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type tumours (OS HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.14). Among the 41 patients with BRAF-mutated tumours, the ramucirumab benefit was more notable (OS HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.25-1.13), although, as with the other genetic sub-group analyses, differences were not statistically significant. Progression-free survival (PFS) data followed the same trend. Treatment-by-mutation status interaction tests (OS P = 0.523, PFS P = 0.655) indicated that the ramucirumab benefit was not statistically different among the mutation sub-groups, although the small sample size of the BRAF group limited the analysis. Addition of ramucirumab to FOLFIRI improved left-CRC median OS by 2.5 month over placebo (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97); median OS for ramucirumab-treated patients with right-CRC was 1.1 month over placebo (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.75-1.26). The treatment-by-sub-group interaction was not statistically significant for tumour sidedness (P = 0.276). Conclusions In the RAISE study, the addition of ramucirumab to FOLFIRI improved patient outcomes, regardless of RAS/RAF mutation status, and tumour sidedness. Ramucirumab treatment provided a numerically substantial benefit in BRAF-mutated tumours, although the P-values were not statistically significant. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01183780.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Yoshino
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
| | | | | | - G Bodoky
- St. Laszlo Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - J Prausová
- Fakultni Nemocnice v MOTOLE, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - R Garcia-Carbonero
- Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, IIS imas12, UCM, CNIO, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - T Ciuleanu
- Institutul Oncologic Ion Chiricuta and UMF Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - A L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, LLP, Denver, USA
| | - E Van Cutsem
- Univ Hospital Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - S Lonardi
- Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - K Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - T W Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - K Yamaguchi
- The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - J O'Connor
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J Taieb
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - R R Hozak
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - F Nasroulah
- Eli Lilly and Company, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tabernero J, Hozak RR, Yoshino T, Cohn AL, Obermannova R, Bodoky G, Garcia-Carbonero R, Ciuleanu TE, Portnoy DC, Prausová J, Muro K, Siegel RW, Konrad RJ, Ouyang H, Melemed SA, Ferry D, Nasroulah F, Van Cutsem E. Analysis of angiogenesis biomarkers for ramucirumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from RAISE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase III study. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:602-609. [PMID: 29228087 PMCID: PMC5888948 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The phase III RAISE trial (NCT01183780) demonstrated that the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor (VEGFR)-2 binding monoclonal antibody ramucirumab plus 5-fluororuracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo + FOLFIRI as second-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. To identify patients who benefit the most from VEGFR-2 blockade, the RAISE trial design included a prospective and comprehensive biomarker program that assessed the association of biomarkers with ramucirumab efficacy outcomes. Patients and methods Plasma and tumor tissue collection was mandatory. Overall, 1072 patients were randomized 1 : 1 to the addition of ramucirumab or placebo to FOLFIRI chemotherapy. Patients were then randomized 1 : 2, for the biomarker program, to marker exploratory (ME) and marker confirmatory (MC) groups. Analyses were carried out using exploratory assays to assess the correlations of baseline marker levels [VEGF-C, VEGF-D, sVEGFR-1, sVEGFR-2, sVEGFR-3 (plasma), and VEGFR-2 (tumor tissue)] with clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were carried out for each candidate biomarker with stratification factor adjustment. Results Biomarker results were available from >80% (n = 894) of patients. Analysis of the ME subset determined a VEGF-D level of 115 pg/ml was appropriate for high/low subgroup analyses. Evaluation of the combined ME + MC populations found that the median OS in the ramucirumab + FOLFIRI arm compared with placebo + FOLFIRI showed an improvement of 2.4 months in the high VEGF-D subgroup [13.9 months (95% CI 12.5-15.6) versus 11.5 months (95% CI 10.1-12.4), respectively], and a decrease of 0.5 month in the low VEGF-D subgroup [12.6 months (95% CI 10.7-14.0) versus 13.1 months (95% CI 11.8-17.0), respectively]. PFS results were consistent with OS. No trends were evident with the other antiangiogenic candidate biomarkers. Conclusions The RAISE biomarker program identified VEGF-D as a potential predictive biomarker for ramucirumab efficacy in second-line mCRC. Development of an assay appropriate for testing in clinical practice is currently ongoing. Clinical trials registration NCT01183780.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; CIBERONC, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - R R Hozak
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - T Yoshino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology/Digestive Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - A L Cohn
- Medical Oncology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center/US Oncology, Denver, USA
| | - R Obermannova
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - G Bodoky
- Oncology, Szent László Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - R Garcia-Carbonero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CNIO; CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - T-E Ciuleanu
- Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuţă Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - J Prausová
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - K Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - R W Siegel
- Laboratory for Experimental Medicine, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - R J Konrad
- Laboratory for Experimental Medicine, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - H Ouyang
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - S A Melemed
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - D Ferry
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | - E Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kelley RK, Verslype C, Cohn AL, Yang TS, Su WC, Burris H, Braiteh F, Vogelzang N, Spira A, Foster P, Lee Y, Van Cutsem E. Cabozantinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a phase 2 placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation study. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:528-534. [PMID: 28426123 PMCID: PMC5391701 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cabozantinib, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, AXL, and VEGF receptors, was assessed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as part of a phase 2 randomized discontinuation trial with nine tumor-type cohorts. Patients and methods Eligible patients had Child-Pugh A liver function and ≤1 prior systemic anticancer regimen, completed ≥4 weeks before study entry. The cabozantinib starting dose was 100 mg daily. After an initial 12-week cabozantinib treatment period, patients with stable disease (SD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 were randomized to cabozantinib or placebo. The primary endpoint of the lead-in stage was objective response rate (ORR) at week 12, and the primary endpoint of the randomized stage was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among the 41 HCC patients enrolled, the week 12 ORR was 5%, with 2 patients achieving a confirmed partial response (PR). The week 12 disease control rate (PR or SD) was 66% (Asian subgroup: 73%). Of patients with ≥1 post-baseline scan, 78% had tumor regression, with no apparent relationship to prior sorafenib therapy. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response (>50% reduction from baseline) occurred in 9 of the 26 (35%) patients with elevated baseline AFP and ≥1 post-baseline measurement. Twenty-two patients with SD at week 12 were randomized. Median PFS after randomization was 2.5 months with cabozantinib and 1.4 months with placebo, although this difference was not statistically significant. Median PFS and overall survival from Day 1 in all patients were 5.2 and 11.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events, regardless of attribution, were diarrhea (20%), hand-foot syndrome (15%), and thrombocytopenia (15%). Dose reductions were utilized in 59% of patients. Conclusions Cabozantinib has clinical activity in HCC patients, including objective tumor responses, disease stabilization, and reductions in AFP. Adverse events were managed with dose reductions. Trial registration number NCT00940225.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R K Kelley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - C Verslype
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospitals and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, LLP, Denver, USA
| | - T-S Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan
| | - W-C Su
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - H Burris
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, USA,Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, USA
| | - F Braiteh
- US Oncology Research/Comprehensive Cancer Centers NV, Las Vegas, USA
| | - N Vogelzang
- US Oncology Research/Comprehensive Cancer Centers NV, Las Vegas, USA
| | - A Spira
- US Oncology Research and Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, USA
| | - P Foster
- Exelixis, Inc, South San Francisco, USA
| | - Y Lee
- Exelixis, Inc, South San Francisco, USA
| | - E Van Cutsem
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospitals and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bendell JC, Hochster H, Hart LL, Firdaus I, Mace JR, McFarlane JJ, Kozloff M, Catenacci D, Hsu JJ, Hack SP, Shames DS, Phan SC, Koeppen H, Cohn AL. A Phase II Randomized Trial (GO27827) of First-Line FOLFOX Plus Bevacizumab with or Without the MET Inhibitor Onartuzumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Oncologist 2017; 22:264-271. [PMID: 28209746 PMCID: PMC5344636 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysregulated hepatocyte growth factor/mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) signaling is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We report outcomes from a double-blind, multicenter phase II trial of the MET inhibitor onartuzumab in combination with mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab for mCRC (GO27827; NCT01418222). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive onartuzumab (10 mg/kg intravenously [IV]) or placebo plus mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg IV). Oxaliplatin was given for 8-12 cycles; other agents were continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and MET immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression-positive populations. RESULTS Between September 2011 and November 2012, 194 patients were enrolled. In September 2013, an interim analysis recommended stopping onartuzumab treatment due to lack of efficacy. At the time of the final analysis in February 2014, no significant improvement in PFS was seen with onartuzumab versus placebo in either the ITT or MET IHC-positive populations. An improvement in PFS was noted in the MET IHC-negative population. Neither overall survival nor response rate was improved with onartuzumab. The incidence of fatigue, peripheral edema, and deep vein thrombosis was increased with onartuzumab relative to placebo. CONCLUSION Onartuzumab combined with mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab did not significantly improve efficacy outcomes in either the ITT or MET IHC-positive populations. MET expression by IHC was not a predictive biomarker in this setting. The Oncologist 2017;22:264-271 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The addition of onartuzumab to mFOLFOX-6 plus bevacizumab did not improve outcomes in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer in this randomized, phase II study. Although initial results with onartuzumab were promising, a number of phase II/III clinical trials have reported a lack of improvement in efficacy with onartuzumab combined with standard-of-care therapies in several tumor types. Furthermore, negative study data have been published for rilotumumab and ficlatuzumab, both of which block hepatocyte growth factor binding to the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) receptor. MET immunohistochemistry was not a predictive biomarker. It remains to be seen if other biomarkers or small molecule inhibitors may be more appropriate for inhibiting this oncogenic pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna C Bendell
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Lowell L Hart
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, Florida, USA
| | - Irfan Firdaus
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Oncology Hematology Care, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph R Mace
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Florida Cancer Specialists, St Petersburg, Florida, USA
| | - Joshua J McFarlane
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | | | - Jessie J Hsu
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - See-Chun Phan
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Allen L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cohn AL, Day BM, Abhyankar S, McKenna E, Riehl T, Puzanov I. BRAFV600 mutations in solid tumors, other than metastatic melanoma and papillary thyroid cancer, or multiple myeloma: a screening study. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:965-971. [PMID: 28255242 PMCID: PMC5322838 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s120440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mutations in the BRAF gene have been implicated in several human cancers. The objective of this screening study was to identify patients with solid tumors (other than metastatic melanoma or papillary thyroid cancer) or multiple myeloma harboring activating BRAFV600 mutations for enrollment in a vemurafenib clinical study. Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples were collected and sent to a central laboratory to identify activating BRAFV600 mutations by bidirectional direct Sanger sequencing. Results Overall incidence of BRAFV600E mutation in evaluable patients (n=548) was 3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7–4.7): 11% in colorectal tumors (n=75), 6% in biliary tract tumors (n=16), 3% in non-small cell lung cancers (n=71), 2% in other types of solid tumors (n=180), and 3% in multiple myeloma (n=31). There were no BRAFV600 mutations in this cohort of patients with ovarian tumors (n=68), breast cancer (n=86), or prostate cancer (n=21). Conclusion This multicenter, national screening study confirms previously reported incidences of BRAFV600 mutations from single-center studies. Patients identified with BRAFV600 mutations were potentially eligible for enrollment in the VE-BASKET study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen L Cohn
- Medical Research, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO
| | | | | | | | - Todd Riehl
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Melanoma Section, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yoon HH, Bendell JC, Braiteh FS, Firdaus I, Philip PA, Cohn AL, Lewis N, Anderson DM, Arrowsmith E, Schwartz JD, Gao L, Hsu Y, Xu Y, Ferry D, Alberts SR, Wainberg ZA. Ramucirumab combined with FOLFOX as front-line therapy for advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:2196-2203. [PMID: 27765757 PMCID: PMC7360144 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report the first randomized, Phase II trial of ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 monoclonal antibody, as front-line therapy in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients from the USA with advanced esophageal, gastric, or GEJ adenocarcinoma randomly received (1:1) mFOLFOX6 plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or mFOLFOX6 plus placebo every 2 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) with 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 (one-sided α = 0.15). Secondary end points included evaluation of response and overall survival (OS); an exploratory ramucirumab exposure-response analysis was undertaken. RESULTS Of 168 randomized patients, 52% of tumors were located in the stomach/GEJ and 48% in the esophagus. The trial did not meet the primary end point of PFS [6.4 versus 6.7 months, HR 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.69-1.37)] or the secondary end point of OS (11.7 versus 11.5 months) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Objective response rates (45.2% versus 46.4%) were similar between arms. Most Grade ≥3 toxicities did not differ significantly between arms, yet premature discontinuation of FOLFOX and ramucirumab (for reasons other than progressive disease) was more common among ramucirumab- versus placebo-treated patients. In an exploratory analysis that censored for premature discontinuation, the HR for PFS favored the ramucirumab arm (HR 0.76), particularly in patients with gastric/GEJ cancer. An exploratory exposure-response analysis indicated that patients with higher ramucirumab exposure had longer OS. CONCLUSION The addition of ramucirumab to front-line mFOLFOX6 did not improve PFS in the ITT population. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT01246960.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H H Yoon
- Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J C Bendell
- GI Cancer Research Program, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville
| | - F S Braiteh
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas
| | - I Firdaus
- Medical Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Oncology Hematology Care, Inc., Cincinnati
| | - P A Philip
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University, Detroit
| | - A L Cohn
- Medical Oncology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers/US Oncology, Denver
| | - N Lewis
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia
| | - D M Anderson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Metro-Minnesota Community Clinical Oncology Program, St. Louis Park
| | - E Arrowsmith
- Medical Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Chattanooga
| | | | - L Gao
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater
| | - Y Hsu
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater
| | - Y Xu
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater
| | - D Ferry
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater
| | - S R Alberts
- Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Z A Wainberg
- Division of Hematology Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Piha-Paul SA, Knost JA, Raez LE, Cohn AL, Tawbi HA, Parasuraman S, Kang BP, Matys RM, Slosberg ED. Abstract B22: Outcomes and genomic mutational profiling results in patients with cancers of the head and neck treated with dovitinib in the Signature Program. Mol Cancer Ther 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-15-b22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
In the Signature Program, patients with advanced solid and hematologic cancers without other standard treatment options are enrolled in 1 of 8 tissue-agnostic, mutation-specific protocols. With no predetermined study sites, the program is able to bring the protocol to the patient through local enrollment via physician-directed genomic profiling of tumors. The primary endpoint of each study is clinical benefit, including complete response, partial response, or stable disease [SD], at 16 weeks by investigator assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or appropriate hematologic criteria. This novel design allows rapid matching of patients to a relevant targeted therapy. Dovitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, is currently in clinical development. Eighty patients were accrued in the dovitinib (TKI258) protocol from May 2013 to January 2015. Here, we describe a head and neck cancer subset of this population, including adenoid cystic carcinoma (ADC; n = 6), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC; n = 5), and salivary gland cancer (n = 1). The median age was 62 years, and patients had a median of 2 prior lines of therapy; 69% of patients were male, 85% were Caucasian, and 31% and 69% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 and 1, respectively. Patients met mutational inclusion criteria, with mutations in PDGFRα/β, c-KIT, VEGFR2, FGFR1/2, and RET. There were no confirmed responses; however, 5 patients had SD on study. Of the 5 patients with SD, 4 had clinical benefit at 16 weeks (1 patient with SD at 8 weeks discontinued before 16 weeks). Consistent with other studies of dovitinib monotherapy, gastrointestinal adverse events (fatigue [69%], nausea [69%], diarrhea [54%], and vomiting [54%]) were the most common. In addition, pretreatment tissue biopsies from all patients were analyzed by a large multigene next-generation sequencing assay. Results to date indicate that the ADC cohort has a lower mutational load and fewer prior therapies than the HNSCC cohort. Further analysis of a correlation between clinical benefit and specific mutational profile is ongoing.
Citation Format: Sarina A. Piha-Paul, James A. Knost, Luis E. Raez, Allen L. Cohn, Hussein A. Tawbi, Sudha Parasuraman, Barinder P. Kang, Renata M. Matys, Eric D. Slosberg. Outcomes and genomic mutational profiling results in patients with cancers of the head and neck treated with dovitinib in the Signature Program. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B22.
Collapse
|
17
|
Borad MJ, Reddy SG, Bahary N, Uronis HE, Sigal D, Cohn AL, Schelman WR, Stephenson J, Chiorean EG, Rosen PJ, Ulrich B, Dragovich T, Del Prete SA, Rarick M, Eng C, Kroll S, Ryan DP. Randomized Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine Plus TH-302 Versus Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:1475-81. [PMID: 25512461 PMCID: PMC4881365 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.55.7504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE TH-302 is an investigational hypoxia-activated prodrug that releases the DNA alkylator bromo-isophosphoramide mustard in hypoxic settings. This phase II study (NCT01144455) evaluated gemcitabine plus TH-302 in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)), gemcitabine plus TH-302 240 mg/m(2) (G+T240), or gemcitabine plus TH-302 340 mg/m(2) (G+T340). Randomized crossover after progression on gemcitabine was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), tumor response, CA 19-9 response, and safety. RESULTS Two hundred fourteen patients (77% with metastatic disease) were enrolled between June 2010 and July 2011. PFS was significantly longer with gemcitabine plus TH-302 (pooled combination arms) compared with gemcitabine alone (median PFS, 5.6 v 3.6 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87; P = .005; median PFS for metastatic disease, 5.1 v 3.4 months, respectively). Median PFS times for G+T240 and G+T340 were 5.6 and 6.0 months, respectively. Tumor response was 12%, 17%, and 26% in the gemcitabine, G+T240, and G+T340 arms, respectively (G+T340 v gemcitabine, P = .04). CA 19-9 decrease was greater with G+T340 versus gemcitabine (-5,398 v -549 U/mL, respectively; P = .008). Median OS times for gemcitabine, G+T240, and G+T340 were 6.9, 8.7, and 9.2 months, respectively (P = not significant). The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, nausea, and peripheral edema (frequencies similar across arms). Skin and mucosal toxicities (2% grade 3) and myelosuppression (55% grade 3 or 4) were the most common TH-302-related AEs but were not associated with treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION PFS, tumor response, and CA 19-9 response were significantly improved with G+TH-302. G+T340 is being investigated further in the phase III MAESTRO study (NCT01746979).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitesh J Borad
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
| | - Shantan G Reddy
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Hope E Uronis
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Darren Sigal
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Allen L Cohn
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - William R Schelman
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Joe Stephenson
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - E Gabriela Chiorean
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Peter J Rosen
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Brian Ulrich
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Tomislav Dragovich
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Salvatore A Del Prete
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Mark Rarick
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Clarence Eng
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Stew Kroll
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - David P Ryan
- Mitesh J. Borad, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Tomislav Dragovich, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Shantan G. Reddy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla; Peter J. Rosen, Disney Family Cancer Center, Burbank; Clarence Eng and Stew Kroll, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA; Allen L. Cohn, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; William R. Schelman, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Joe Stephenson Jr, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC; E. Gabriela Chiorean, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brian Ulrich, Texas Oncology, Wichita Falls, TX; Salvatore A. Del Prete, Hematology Oncology PC, Stamford, CT; Mark Rarick, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology, Portland, OR; and David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grothey A, Flick ED, Cohn AL, Bekaii-Saab TS, Bendell JC, Kozloff M, Roach N, Mun Y, Fish S, Hurwitz HI. Bevacizumab exposure beyond first disease progression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: analyses of the ARIES observational cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2014; 23:726-34. [PMID: 24830357 DOI: 10.1002/pds.3633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2013] [Revised: 03/14/2014] [Accepted: 04/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This analysis from Avastin® Registries: Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety (ARIES) examined the association between exposure to bevacizumab after disease progression (PD) and postprogression survival (PPS) in bevacizumab-exposed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through the application of time-dependent and time-fixed analytical methods. METHODS Patients with mCRC who were treated with first-line bevacizumab and who survived first PD (PD1) were included. A time-dependent Cox regression model was fitted to assess the effect of cumulative bevacizumab exposure on PPS, while controlling for potential confounders. In addition to support findings from previous studies, a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis compared PPS in patients who received bevacizumab beyond disease progression (BBP) with those who did not (No-BBP). RESULTS Of 1550 patients, 1199 survived PD1 and had a median PPS of 13.4 months. Cumulative bevacizumab exposure was associated with improved PPS (p = 0.0040). After adjusting for confounders, the hazard ratios (HRs) for PPS decreased, on average, by 1.2% (range, 1.1-1.3%) with each additional dose of bevacizumab. In the mITT analysis, the median PPS for BBP (n = 438) was 14.4 months vs 10.6 months with for No-BBP (n = 667). BBP was found to be independently associated with longer PPS in a multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.97). Protocol-specified adverse events suspected to be associated with bevacizumab occurred in 13.0% of patients with BBP. CONCLUSION This analysis supports the observation that bevacizumab exposure after PD1 is associated with longer PPS in mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Grothey
- Mayo Clinic, Medical Oncology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hurwitz HI, Bekaii-Saab TS, Bendell JC, Cohn AL, Kozloff M, Roach N, Mun Y, Fish S, Flick ED, Grothey A. Safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: final results from the Avastin(®) Registry - Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety (ARIES) observational cohort study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26:323-32. [PMID: 24686090 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2013] [Revised: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 01/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The Avastin(®) Registry - Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety (ARIES) observational cohort study (OCS) was designed to prospectively examine outcomes associated with bevacizumab-containing treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a community-based setting, where patient populations are less restricted than those in randomised trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with mCRC who were eligible for bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in first- or second-line treatment were enrolled from November 2006 to September 2008. There were no protocol-specified treatment regimens; the dose and schedule of bevacizumab and chemotherapy were at the treating physician's discretion. The objectives in the ARIES OCS included analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, treatment patterns and safety in each of the first- and second-line treatment cohorts. RESULTS ARIES enrolled 1550 patients with mCRC receiving first-line therapy with bevacizumab. The median follow-up time was 20.6 months. The median PFS in this cohort was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval 9.8-10.6) and the median overall survival was 23.2 months (95% confidence interval 21.2-24.8). In a separate cohort of 482 patients with second-line mCRC, the median follow-up time was 16.9 months, the median PFS and overall survival from the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval 7.2-8.3) and 17.8 months (95% confidence interval 16.5-20.7), respectively. Incidences of known bevacizumab-associated adverse events in ARIES were generally consistent with those previously reported in OCSs and randomised trials. CONCLUSION Results from the prospective ARIES OCS add further evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab when added to first- and second-line treatment regimens for patients with mCRC in community treatment settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H I Hurwitz
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - T S Bekaii-Saab
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - J C Bendell
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - A L Cohn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - M Kozloff
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Ingalls Hospital and University of Chicago, Harvey, IL, USA
| | - N Roach
- Patient Advocacy, FightColorectalCancer.org, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Y Mun
- U.S. Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Fish
- U.S. Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - E D Flick
- U.S. Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - A Grothey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fuchs CS, Fakih M, Schwartzberg L, Cohn AL, Yee L, Dreisbach L, Kozloff MF, Hei YJ, Galimi F, Pan Y, Haddad V, Hsu CP, Sabin A, Saltz L. TRAIL receptor agonist conatumumab with modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomized phase 1b/2 trial. Cancer 2013; 119:4290-8. [PMID: 24122767 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2013] [Revised: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 07/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), we conducted a phase 1b/randomized phase 2 trial to define the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab (mFOLFOX6/bev) with conatumumab, an investigational, fully human monoclonal IgG1 antibody that specifically activates death receptor 5 (DR5). METHODS Twelve patients were enrolled in a phase 1b open-label dose-escalation trial of conatumumab with mFOLFOX6/bev; thereafter, 190 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive mFOLFOX6/bev in combination with 2 mg/kg conatumumab, 10 mg/kg conatumumab, or placebo. Therapy cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS In phase 1b, conatumumab with mFOLFOX6/bev was tolerated without apparent added toxicity over mFOLFOX6/bev alone. In phase 2, conatumumab with mFOLFOX6/bev did not confer a benefit in progression-free survival when compared with placebo with mFOLFOX6/bev. Toxicity was similar in all treatment arms. Following treatment, similar increases in circulating caspase-3 levels were observed in all arms. CONCLUSIONS Conatumumab with mFOLFOX6/bev did not offer improved efficacy over the same chemotherapy with placebo in first-line treatment of patients with mCRC. These data do not support further development of conatumumab in advanced CRC.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cohn AL, Tabernero J, Maurel J, Nowara E, Sastre J, Chuah BYS, Kopp MV, Sakaeva DD, Mitchell EP, Dubey S, Suzuki S, Hei YJ, Galimi F, McCaffery I, Pan Y, Loberg R, Cottrell S, Choo SP. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab or conatumumab in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:1777-1785. [PMID: 23510984 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted agents presently available for mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are bevacizumab and aflibercept. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of conatumumab (an agonistic monoclonal antibody against human death receptor 5) and ganitumab (a monoclonal antibody against the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor) combined with standard FOLFIRI chemotherapy as a second-line treatment in patients with mutant KRAS mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with mutant KRAS metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum refractory to fluoropyrimidine- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive intravenous FOLFIRI plus conatumumab 10 mg/kg (Arm A), ganitumab 12 mg/kg (Arm B), or placebo (Arm C) Q2W. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS In total, 155 patients were randomized. Median PFS in Arms A, B, and C was 6.5 months (HR, 0.69; P = 0.147), 4.5 months (HR, 1.01; P = 0.998), and 4.6 months, respectively; median overall survival was 12.3 months (HR, 0.89; P = 0.650), 12.4 months (HR, 1.27; P = 0.357), and 12.0 months; and objective response rate was 14%, 8%, and 2%. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events in Arms A/B/C included neutropenia (30%/25%/18%) and diarrhea (18%/2%/10%). CONCLUSIONS Conatumumab, but not ganitumab, plus FOLFIRI was associated with a trend toward improved PFS. Both combinations had acceptable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, USA.
| | - J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
| | - J Maurel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Nowara
- Maria Skodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - J Sastre
- Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Servicio de Oncologíca Medíca, Madrid, and Instituto Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Y S Chuah
- Department of Internal Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - M V Kopp
- Samara Regional Oncology Dispensary, Samara
| | - D D Sakaeva
- Clinical Oncology Dispensary of the Republic of Bashkortostan, Ufa, Russia
| | - E P Mitchell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia
| | - S Dubey
- Amgen Inc., South San Francisco
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S-P Choo
- Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Infante JR, Reid TR, Cohn AL, Edenfield WJ, Cescon TP, Hamm JT, Malik IA, Rado TA, McGee PJ, Richards DA, Tarazi J, Rosbrook B, Kim S, Cartwright TH. Axitinib and/or bevacizumab with modified FOLFOX-6 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 2 study. Cancer 2013; 119:2555-63. [PMID: 23605883 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2012] [Revised: 02/12/2013] [Accepted: 02/19/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 trial, the authors evaluated the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor axitinib, bevacizumab, or both in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS Patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomized 1:1:1 to receive continuous axitinib 5 mg twice daily, bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or axitinib 5 mg twice daily plus bevacizumab 2 mg/kg every 2 weeks, each in combination with modified 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS In all, 126 patients were enrolled from August 2007 to September 2008. The ORR was numerically inferior in the axitinib arm (n = 42) versus the bevacizumab arm (n = 43; 28.6% vs 48.8%; 1-sided P = .97). Progression-free survival (PFS) (11.0 months vs 15.9 months; 1-sided P = .57) and overall survival (OS) (18.1 months vs 21.6 months; 1-sided P = .69) also were numerically inferior in the axitinib arm. Similarly, efficacy endpoints for the axitinib/bevacizumab arm (n = 41) were numerically inferior (ORR, 39%; PFS, 12.5 months; OS, 19.7 months). The patients who received axitinib had fewer treatment cycles compared with other arms. Common all-grade adverse events across all 3 treatment arms were fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea (all ≥49%). Hypertension and headache were more frequent in the patients who received axitinib. Patients in the bevacizumab arm had the longest treatment exposures and the highest rates of peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS Neither the addition of continuous axitinib nor the axitinib/bevacizumab combination to FOLFOX-6 improved ORR, PFS, or OS compared with bevacizumab as first-line treatment of mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey R Infante
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bendell JC, Bekaii-Saab TS, Cohn AL, Hurwitz HI, Kozloff M, Tezcan H, Roach N, Mun Y, Fish S, Flick ED, Dalal D, Grothey A. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer initially treated with FOLFOX-bevacizumab or FOLFIRI-bevacizumab: results from ARIES, a bevacizumab observational cohort study. Oncologist 2012; 17:1486-95. [PMID: 23015662 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Avastin Registry: Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety (ARIES) study is a prospective, community-based observational cohort study that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of first-line treatment patterns, assessing the impact of chemotherapy choice and treatment duration. METHODS The ARIES study enrolled patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab and followed them longitudinally. The protocol did not specify treatment regimens or assessments. Analyses included all patients who initiated bevacizumab in combination with either first-line oxaliplatin with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS In total, 1,550 patients with first-line mCRC were enrolled (median follow-up, 21 months) and most received FOLFOX-bevacizumab (n = 968) or FOLFIRI-bevacizumab (n = 243) as first-line therapy. The baseline characteristics and median treatment duration were generally similar between subgroups. There were no significant differences in the median PFS (10.3 months vs. 10.2 months) or OS (23.7 months vs. 25.5 months) time between the FOLFOX-bevacizumab and FOLFIRI-bevacizumab subgroups, respectively, by unadjusted analyses. Multivariate analyses showed FOLFIRI-bevacizumab resulted in a similar PFS (HR, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.21) and OS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16) outcome as with FOLFOX-bevacizumab. The incidence proportions of bevacizumab-associated adverse events were similar for FOLFOX- and FOLFIRI-based therapies. CONCLUSIONS In first-line mCRC patients, the FOLFOX-bevacizumab and FOLFIRI-bevacizumab regimens were associated with similar treatment patterns and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna C Bendell
- GI Oncology Research and Drug Development Unit, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, 250 25th Avenue N, Suite 100, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Oratz R, Paul D, Cohn AL, Sedlacek SM. Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 2011; 3:182-6. [PMID: 20859407 DOI: 10.1200/jop.0742001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether recurrence score (RS) as determined using a commercial reference laboratory test influences clinicians' treatment recommendations and eventual treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 74 patients from a community-based oncology practice with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive, lymph node (LN) -negative stage I or II breast cancer for which RS was obtained. Demographic and pathology information was extracted from medical records. Ten-year relapse-free survival was calculated using Adjuvant! Online. Treatment recommendations before the RS knowledge were compared with treatment recommendations after RS knowledge and to the treatment eventually administered. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION A weak correlation was found between RS and both patient age and tumor size, modest correlation between RS and tumor grade, and modest correlation between RS and 10-year recurrence as determined by Adjuvant! Online. For 21% and 25% of patients, knowledge of the RS changed the clinicians' treatment recommendations and eventual treatment, respectively. The decision to change from hormone therapy to chemotherapy (with or without hormone therapy) was generally associated with high RS (high distant recurrence risk as determined by the commercial reference laboratory test), whereas the decision to change from chemotherapy to hormone therapy was generally associated with low RS (low distant recurrence risk as determined by the commercial reference laboratory test). Knowledge of the RS changed treatment recommendations and eventual treatment in patients with ER-positive/LN-negative early-stage breast cancer. Use of genomic-based prognosis may result in more accurate estimates of true recurrence risk than currently possible with commonly used prognostic factors (such as patient age, tumor size, and tumor grade) alone and thus lead to an increase in appropriate adjuvant therapy decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Oratz
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-US Oncology Research Network, Denver, CO
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cohn AL, Shumaker GC, Khandelwal P, Smith DA, Neubauer MA, Mehta N, Richards D, Watkins DL, Zhang K, Yassine MR. An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial of panitumumab plus FOLFIRI as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2011; 10:171-7. [PMID: 21855038 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2010] [Revised: 11/24/2010] [Accepted: 12/21/2010] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This prospective analysis evaluated the effect of tumor KRAS status on efficacy of second-line panitumumab plus folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan (FOLFIRI). METHODS This phase 2, open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients with unresectable, measurable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of first-line treatment with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Patients received panitumumab 6 mg/kg plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerability. Tumor assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) were performed by the investigators every 8 weeks from weeks 8-32 and every 12 weeks thereafter. KRAS status was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on DNA extracted from fixed tumor sections. Efficacy endpoints included objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events (AEs). Endpoints were evaluated by tumor KRAS status. RESULTS Of 116 patients enrolled, 109 patients with known tumor KRAS status received treatment; 59% had wild-type KRAS, and 41% had mutant KRAS. Fifteen patients (23%) with wild-type KRAS and 7 patients (16%) with mutant KRAS had a complete or partial response to treatment. Median PFS was 26 weeks (95% CI, 19-33 weeks) and 19 weeks (95% CI, 12-25 weeks) in the wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS strata, respectively. Median OS was 50 weeks (95% CI, 39-76 weeks) and 31 weeks (95% CI, 23-47 weeks) in wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS strata, respectively. Skin-related toxicities (86% of all patients) and diarrhea (74%) were the most common AEs. CONCLUSION Panitumumab plus FOLFIRI numerically improved objective response rate, PFS, and OS in favor of patients with wild-type KRAS tumors. The safety profile was consistent with panitumumab plus FOLFIRI trials in similar patient populations.
Collapse
|
26
|
Lyons RM, Cosgriff TM, Modi SS, Gersh RH, Hainsworth JD, Cohn AL, McIntyre HJ, Fernando IJ, Backstrom JT, Beach CL. Hematologic response to three alternative dosing schedules of azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1850-6. [PMID: 19255328 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.17.1058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Azacitidine (AZA) is effective treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) at a dosing schedule of 75 mg/m(2)/d subcutaneously for 7 days every 4 weeks. The initial phase of this ongoing multicenter, community-based, open-label study evaluated three alternative AZA dosing schedules without weekend dosing. PATIENTS AND METHODS MDS patients were randomly assigned to one of three regimens every 4 weeks for six cycles: AZA 5-2-2 (75 mg/m(2)/d subcutaneously for 5 days, followed by 2 days no treatment, then 75 mg/m(2)/d for 2 days); AZA 5-2-5 (50 mg/m(2)/d subcutaneously for 5 days, followed by 2 days no treatment, then 50 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days); or AZA 5 (75 mg/m(2)/d subcutaneously for 5 days). RESULTS Of patients randomly assigned to AZA 5-2-2 (n = 50), AZA 5-2-5 (n = 51), or AZA 5 (n = 50), most were French-American-British (FAB) lower risk (refractory anemia [RA]/RA with ringed sideroblasts/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with < 5% bone marrow blasts, 63%) or RA with excess blasts (30%), and 79 (52%) completed > or = six treatment cycles. Hematologic improvement (HI) was achieved by 44% (22 of 50), 45% (23 of 51), and 56% (28 of 50) of AZA 5-2-2, AZA 5-2-5, and AZA 5 arms, respectively. Proportions of RBC transfusion-dependent patients who achieved transfusion independence were 50% (12 of 24), 55% (12 of 22), and 64% (16 of 25), and of FAB lower-risk transfusion-dependent patients were 53% (nine of 17), 50% (six of 12), and 61% (11 of 18), respectively. In the AZA 5-2-2, AZA 5-2-5, and AZA 5 groups, 84%, 77%, and 58%, respectively, experienced > or = 1 grade 3 to 4 adverse events. CONCLUSION All three alternative dosing regimens produced HI, RBC transfusion independence, and safety responses consistent with the currently approved AZA regimen. These results support AZA benefits in transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger M Lyons
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas and US Oncology, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Blumenthal DT, Rankin C, Eyre HJ, Livingston RB, Spence AM, Stelzer KJ, Rushing EJ, Berger MS, Rivkin SE, Cohn AL, Petersdorf SH. External beam irradiation and the combination of cisplatin and carmustine followed by carmustine alone for the treatment of high-grade glioma: a phase 2 Southwest Oncology Group trial. Cancer 2008; 113:559-65. [PMID: 18521920 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The poor prognosis reported for patients with high-grade glial neoplasms indicates a need for the development of multimodality therapeutic approaches. The addition of chemotherapy has contributed variably to increased survival. The objective of the current study (Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG] 9016) was to determine whether concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy with the combination of carmustine and cisplatin could be given safely in a cooperative group setting. Additional objectives included the estimation of response rate, the rate of disease stabilization, and the probability of 1-year survival. METHODS SWOG 9016 study included 59 eligible patients with grade III or IV astrocytoma who received radiotherapy concurrently with carmustine/cisplatin chemotherapy. Patients were required to have either measurable or evaluable disease. The therapeutic endpoints were comprised of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or progressive disease (PD). RESULTS Six patients achieved a CR (CR rate of 10%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4-21%), 4 achieved a PR (PR rate of 7%; 95% CI, 2-16%), and 2 patients (3%) experienced an unconfirmed response. Twenty-four patients (41%; 95% CI, 28-54%) had stable disease and 10 patients (17%) demonstrated PD. The overall disease stabilization rate (CR + PR + stable disease, excluding unconfirmed response) was 58% (95% CI, 44-70%). CONCLUSIONS Despite the presence of a cohort of long-term survivors, the results of the current study do not appear to support the additional study or routine use of concurrent cisplatin and carmustine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah T Blumenthal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hochster HS, Hart LL, Ramanathan RK, Childs BH, Hainsworth JD, Cohn AL, Wong L, Fehrenbacher L, Abubakr Y, Saif MW, Schwartzberg L, Hedrick E. Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the TREE Study. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:3523-9. [PMID: 18640933 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.15.4138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 433] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of three oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens, with or without bevacizumab, as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically documented metastatic or recurrent CRC and no prior treatment for advanced disease were randomly assigned to mFOLFOX6 (bolus and infusion fluorouracil [FU] and leucovorin [LV] with oxaliplatin), bFOL (bolus FU and low-dose LV with oxaliplatin), or CapeOx (capecitabine with oxaliplatin), respectively (Three Regimens of Eloxatin Evaluation [TREE-1]). The study was later modified such that subsequent patients were randomized to the same regimens plus bevacizumab (TREE-2). RESULTS A total of 150 and 223 patients were randomly assigned in the TREE-1 and TREE-2 cohorts, respectively. Incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events during the first 12 weeks of treatment were 59%, 36%, and 67% for mFOLFOX6, bFOL, and CapeOx, respectively, (TREE-1) and 59%, 51%, and 56% for the corresponding treatments plus bevacizumab (TREE-2; primary end point). CapeOx toxicity in TREE-1 included grade 3/4 diarrhea (31%) and dehydration (27%); capecitabine dose reduction to 1,700 mg/m(2)/d in TREE-2 resulted in improved tolerance. Overall response rates were 41%, 20%, and 27% (TREE-1) and 52%, 39%, and 46% (TREE-2); median overall survival (OS) was 19.2, 17.9, and 17.2 months (TREE-1) and 26.1, 20.4, and 24.6 months (TREE-2). For all treated patients, median OS was 18.2 months (95% CI, 14.5 to 21.6; TREE-1) and 23.7 months (95% CI, 21.3 to 26.8; TREE-2). CONCLUSION The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens is well tolerated as first-line treatment of mCRC and does not markedly change overall toxicity. CapeOx tolerability and efficacy is improved with reduced-dose capecitabine. First-line oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine-based therapy plus bevacizumab resulted in a median OS of approximately 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard S Hochster
- New York University Cancer Institute, 160 East 34th St, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cohn AL, Myers JW, Mamus S, Deur C, Nicol S, Hood K, Khan MM, Ilegbodu D, Asmar L. A phase II study of pemetrexed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 2008; 26:381-6. [PMID: 18305899 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-008-9124-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2007] [Accepted: 02/05/2008] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Pemetrexed has demonstrated activity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines, and has a manageable toxicity profile in clinical trials, suggesting its potential as a treatment for HCC patients. A multicenter, Phase II community-based study was conducted to assess the response rate and toxicity profile of single-agent pemetrexed in first-line patients with advanced or metastatic HCC. Patients premedicated with folic acid, vitamin B(12), and dexamethasone were administered pemetrexed 600 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression. This nonrandomized study employed Simon's 2-stage design, enrolling 21 eligible patients in the first stage, stopping accrual if < or =2 responders were observed. Responses were four stable disease, 14 progressive disease, and three not evaluable: two had early toxicities (renal/liver failure, sepsis) and one was noncompliant. The most common grade 3 hematological toxicities were neutropenia 6 of 21 (29%) and thrombocytopenia 3 of 21 (14%); with no grade 4 toxicities. Thirteen patients died on-study: 12 PD and one liver failure; none were drug-related. The median survival was 5.2 months (range, <1-12.2). The planned second stage was cancelled, and the trial was closed owing to lack of response. While pemetrexed was tolerated in this patient population, it was not active.
Collapse
|
30
|
Lenz HJ, Van Cutsem E, Khambata-Ford S, Mayer RJ, Gold P, Stella P, Mirtsching B, Cohn AL, Pippas AW, Azarnia N, Tsuchihashi Z, Mauro DJ, Rowinsky EK. Multicenter phase II and translational study of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal carcinoma refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:4914-21. [PMID: 17050875 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.06.7595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 427] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This multicenter study evaluated the antitumor activity of cetuximab, an immunoglobulin G1 antibody directed at the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine. It also evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunokinetics, and biologic determinants of activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic CRC, whose tumors demonstrated EGFR immunostaining and were refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines, were treated with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly. An independent review committee (IRC) reviewed responses. Blood was collected for cetuximab pharmacokinetics and to detect antibodies to cetuximab. EGFR gene sequencing of the tyrosine kinase domain and gene copy number assessments were performed. RESULTS The response rates in 346 patients, as determined by the investigators and IRC, were 12.4% (95% CI, 9.1 to 16.4) and 11.6% (95% CI, 8.4 to 16.4). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and survival times were 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.1) and 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 7.6), respectively. An acneiform rash occurred in 82.9% of patients; grade 3 rash was observed in 4.9%. Response and survival related strongly to the severity of the rash. In contrast, clinical benefit did not relate to EGFR immunostaining. EGFR tyrosine kinase domain mutations were not identified, and EGFR gene copy number did not relate to response or PFS, but to survival (P = .03). CONCLUSION Cetuximab is active and well tolerated in metastatic CRC refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. The severity of rash was related to efficacy. Neither EGFR kinase domain mutations nor EGFR gene amplification appear to be essential for response to cetuximab in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stiegmann GV, Cohn AL, Nakano S. Cryodestruction of hepatic tumors. Surg Technol Int 1994; 3:61-66. [PMID: 21319074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Cryodestruction of hepatic tumors is done by freezing the tumor and an appropriate amount of surrounding normal tissue in situ. The goal is complete destruction of malignant tissue. Local and systemic host mechanisms activated by the cold injury complete the process. Resorption of devitalized tissue and stabilization of the residual scar occurs during the ensuing months. Immune factors may contribute to the long-term process of cryodestruction although such effects are inconstant and ill defined. The purpose of this overview is to delineate the mechanisms of cryodestruction, briefly summarize clinical results and discuss the technique for treatment of hepatic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Stiegmann
- Associate Professor of Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and Denver Veterans Affairs Hospital, Denver, CO
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Cohn AL, Sandoz JW. Multiple splenic lymphoid cell subpopulations regulate H-2 antigen expression on teratocarcinoma cells in vivo. J Immunol 1983; 130:2969-73. [PMID: 6133895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Undifferentiated murine 402AX teratocarcinoma cells do not express MHC antigens when passaged in vitro or in vivo in genetically susceptible host mice. When passaged in vivo in genetically resistant mice, however, the tumor cells become H-2b antigen positive regardless of the H-2 haplotype of the resistant host mouse. The present studies use monoclonal anti-H-2b antibodies to corroborate these earlier findings, which were performed with conventional antisera. Previous studies have established that host bone marrow plus lymphoid cells from resistant primed donors regulate tumor cell H-2b antigen expression. Using bone marrow and mature lymphoid cell reconstitution techniques, the present studies indicate that splenic Ig- cells from genetically resistant host mice are the most efficient lymphoid cell subpopulation in tumor cell H-2b antigen induction. Ig+ spleen cells also reconstitute the capacity to induce teratocarcinoma cell H-2 antigens but are less effective than Ig- spleen cells. Tumor cell H-2 antigen induction in C57BL/6 beige mice is impaired compared to C57BL/6 hosts, which suggests that host NK cells may also be involved in tumor cell H-2 antigen induction. Reconstitution of lethally irradiated resistant hosts for teratocarcinoma cell H-2 antigen expression requires bone marrow plus resistant primed lymphoid cell subpopulations; bone marrow alone is insufficient. These results indicate that multiple splenic lymphoid cell subpopulations requiring a radiosensitive host environment and/or factor for differentiation regulate teratocarcinoma 402AX H-2b antigen expression in vivo in genetically resistant mice.
Collapse
|
33
|
Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Cohn AL, Sandoz JW. Multiple splenic lymphoid cell subpopulations regulate H-2 antigen expression on teratocarcinoma cells in vivo. The Journal of Immunology 1983. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.130.6.2969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Undifferentiated murine 402AX teratocarcinoma cells do not express MHC antigens when passaged in vitro or in vivo in genetically susceptible host mice. When passaged in vivo in genetically resistant mice, however, the tumor cells become H-2b antigen positive regardless of the H-2 haplotype of the resistant host mouse. The present studies use monoclonal anti-H-2b antibodies to corroborate these earlier findings, which were performed with conventional antisera. Previous studies have established that host bone marrow plus lymphoid cells from resistant primed donors regulate tumor cell H-2b antigen expression. Using bone marrow and mature lymphoid cell reconstitution techniques, the present studies indicate that splenic Ig- cells from genetically resistant host mice are the most efficient lymphoid cell subpopulation in tumor cell H-2b antigen induction. Ig+ spleen cells also reconstitute the capacity to induce teratocarcinoma cell H-2 antigens but are less effective than Ig- spleen cells. Tumor cell H-2 antigen induction in C57BL/6 beige mice is impaired compared to C57BL/6 hosts, which suggests that host NK cells may also be involved in tumor cell H-2 antigen induction. Reconstitution of lethally irradiated resistant hosts for teratocarcinoma cell H-2 antigen expression requires bone marrow plus resistant primed lymphoid cell subpopulations; bone marrow alone is insufficient. These results indicate that multiple splenic lymphoid cell subpopulations requiring a radiosensitive host environment and/or factor for differentiation regulate teratocarcinoma 402AX H-2b antigen expression in vivo in genetically resistant mice.
Collapse
|
34
|
Cohn AL. Diagnostic Value of Gastroscopy. Cal West Med 1940; 52:161-166. [PMID: 18745521 PMCID: PMC1660323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
|