1
|
James ND, Tannock I, N'Dow J, Feng F, Gillessen S, Ali SA, Trujillo B, Al-Lazikani B, Attard G, Bray F, Compérat E, Eeles R, Fatiregun O, Grist E, Halabi S, Haran Á, Herchenhorn D, Hofman MS, Jalloh M, Loeb S, MacNair A, Mahal B, Mendes L, Moghul M, Moore C, Morgans A, Morris M, Murphy D, Murthy V, Nguyen PL, Padhani A, Parker C, Rush H, Sculpher M, Soule H, Sydes MR, Tilki D, Tunariu N, Villanti P, Xie LP. The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases. Lancet 2024; 403:1683-1722. [PMID: 38583453 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00651-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D James
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Ian Tannock
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Felix Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Syed Adnan Ali
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Freddie Bray
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Eva Compérat
- Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris; AKH Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ros Eeles
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Áine Haran
- The Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | | | | | | | - Stacy Loeb
- New York University, New York, NY, USA; Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Masood Moghul
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Michael Morris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Declan Murphy
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Li-Ping Xie
- First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gilbertson RJ, Behjati S, Böttcher AL, Bronner ME, Burridge M, Clausing H, Clifford H, Danaher T, Donovan LK, Drost J, Eggermont AMM, Emerson C, Flores MG, Hamerlik P, Jabado N, Jones A, Kaessmann H, Kleinman CL, Kool M, Kutscher LM, Lindberg G, Linnane E, Marioni JC, Maris JM, Monje M, Macaskill A, Niederer S, Northcott PA, Peeters E, Plieger-van Solkema W, Preußner L, Rios AC, Rippe K, Sandford P, Sgourakis NG, Shlien A, Smith P, Straathof K, Sullivan PJ, Suvà ML, Taylor MD, Thompson E, Vento-Tormo R, Wainwright BJ, Wechsler-Reya RJ, Westermann F, Winslade S, Al-Lazikani B, Pfister SM. The Virtual Child. Cancer Discov 2024; 14:663-668. [PMID: 38571421 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-1500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
SUMMARY We are building the world's first Virtual Child-a computer model of normal and cancerous human development at the level of each individual cell. The Virtual Child will "develop cancer" that we will subject to unlimited virtual clinical trials that pinpoint, predict, and prioritize potential new treatments, bringing forward the day when no child dies of cancer, giving each one the opportunity to lead a full and healthy life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Gilbertson
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Behjati
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anna-Lisa Böttcher
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marianne E Bronner
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | | | | | | | | | - Laura K Donovan
- University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, United Kingdom
| | - Jarno Drost
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Nada Jabado
- Department of Paediatrics, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Henrick Kaessmann
- Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia L Kleinman
- Lady Davis Research Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marcel Kool
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lena M Kutscher
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Developmental Origins of Pediatric Cancer Junior Research Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Emily Linnane
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - John C Marioni
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - John M Maris
- Division of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michelle Monje
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | - Steven Niederer
- Turing Research and Innovation Cluster in Digital Twins (TRIC: DT), The Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul A Northcott
- Department of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | - Anne C Rios
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karsten Rippe
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Chromatin Networks, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Nikolaos G Sgourakis
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam Shlien
- Genetics and Genomics Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Pete Smith
- Hula Therapeutics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karin Straathof
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mario L Suvà
- Department of Pathology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael D Taylor
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Hematology-Oncology Section and Department of Pediatrics - Hematology/Oncology and Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Brandon J Wainwright
- The University of Queensland Frazer Institute, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert J Wechsler-Reya
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Frank Westermann
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Neuroblastoma Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neeb A, Figueiredo I, Bogdan D, Cato L, Stober J, Jiménez-Vacas JM, Gourain V, Lee II, Seeger R, Muhle-Goll C, Gurel B, Welti J, Nava Rodrigues D, Rekowski J, Qiu X, Jiang Y, Di Micco P, Mateos B, Bielskutė S, Riisnaes R, Ferreira A, Miranda S, Crespo M, Buroni L, Ning J, Carreira S, Bräse S, Jung N, Gräßle S, Swain A, Salvatella X, Plymate SR, Al-Lazikani B, Long HW, Yuan W, Brown M, Cato ACB, de Bono JS, Sharp A. Thio-2 inhibits key signaling pathways required for the development and progression of castration resistant prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2024:734951. [PMID: 38412481 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Therapies that abrogate persistent androgen receptor (AR) signaling in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remain an unmet clinical need. The N-terminal domain (NTD) of the AR that drives transcriptional activity in CRPC remains a challenging therapeutic target. Herein we demonstrate that BAG-1 mRNA is highly expressed and associates with signaling pathways, including AR signaling, that are implicated in the development and progression of CRPC. In addition, interrogation of geometric and physiochemical properties of the BAG domain of BAG-1 isoforms identifies it to be a tractable but challenging drug target. Furthermore, through BAG-1 isoform mouse knockout studies we confirm that BAG-1 isoforms regulate hormone physiology and that therapies targeting the BAG domain will be associated with limited 'on-target' toxicity. Importantly, the postulated inhibitor of BAG-1 isoforms, Thio-2, suppressed AR signaling and other important pathways implicated in the development and progression of CRPC to reduce the growth of treatment resistant prostate cancer cell lines and patient derived models. However, the mechanism by which Thio-2 elicits the observed phenotype needs further elucidation since the genomic abrogation of BAG-1 isoforms was unable to recapitulate the Thio-2 mediated phenotype. Overall, these data support the interrogation of related compounds with improved drug-like properties as a novel therapeutic approach in CRPC, and further highlight the clinical potential of treatments that block persistent AR signaling which are currently undergoing clinical evaluation in CRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antje Neeb
- Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Ines Figueiredo
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Denisa Bogdan
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Cato
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Irene I Lee
- AbbVie (United States), North Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | | | - Bora Gurel
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Jan Rekowski
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Xintao Qiu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yija Jiang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
| | | | - Borja Mateos
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ruth Riisnaes
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Ferreira
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Susana Miranda
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Mateus Crespo
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jian Ning
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stefan Bräse
- KIT Campus South, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Nicole Jung
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Simone Gräßle
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Amanda Swain
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Henry W Long
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Wei Yuan
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Myles Brown
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrew C B Cato
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | | | - Adam Sharp
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Tashi Q, Saad MB, Sheshadri A, Wu CC, Chang JY, Al-Lazikani B, Gibbons C, Vokes NI, Zhang J, Lee JJ, Heymach JV, Jaffray D, Mirjalili S, Wu J. SwarmDeepSurv: swarm intelligence advances deep survival network for prognostic radiomics signatures in four solid cancers. Patterns (N Y) 2023; 4:100777. [PMID: 37602223 PMCID: PMC10435962 DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Survival models exist to study relationships between biomarkers and treatment effects. Deep learning-powered survival models supersede the classical Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) model, but substantial performance drops were observed on high-dimensional features because of irrelevant/redundant information. To fill this gap, we proposed SwarmDeepSurv by integrating swarm intelligence algorithms with the deep survival model. Furthermore, four objective functions were designed to optimize prognostic prediction while regularizing selected feature numbers. When testing on multicenter sets (n = 1,058) of four different cancer types, SwarmDeepSurv was less prone to overfitting and achieved optimal patient risk stratification compared with popular survival modeling algorithms. Strikingly, SwarmDeepSurv selected different features compared with classical feature selection algorithms, including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), with nearly no feature overlapping across these models. Taken together, SwarmDeepSurv offers an alternative approach to model relationships between radiomics features and survival endpoints, which can further extend to study other input data types including genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qasem Al-Tashi
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maliazurina B. Saad
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ajay Sheshadri
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Carol C. Wu
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joe Y. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Christopher Gibbons
- Section of Patient-Centered Analytics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Natalie I. Vokes
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J. Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - John V. Heymach
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David Jaffray
- Office of the Chief Technology and Digital Officer, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Seyedali Mirjalili
- Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Optimization, Torrens University Australia, Fortitude Valley, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
- Yonsei Frontier Lab, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
- University Research and Innovation Center, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jia Wu
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
di Micco P, Antolin AA, Mitsopoulos C, Villasclaras-Fernandez E, Sanfelice D, Dolciami D, Ramagiri P, Mica I, Tym J, Gingrich P, Hu H, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. canSAR: update to the cancer translational research and drug discovery knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 51:D1212-D1219. [PMID: 36624665 PMCID: PMC9825411 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
canSAR (https://cansar.ai) is the largest public cancer drug discovery and translational research knowledgebase. Now hosted in its new home at MD Anderson Cancer Center, canSAR integrates billions of experimental measurements from across molecular profiling, pharmacology, chemistry, structural and systems biology. Moreover, canSAR applies a unique suite of machine learning algorithms designed to inform drug discovery. Here, we describe the latest updates to the knowledgebase, including a focus on significant novel data. These include canSAR's ligandability assessment of AlphaFold; mapping of fragment-based screening data; and new chemical bioactivity data for novel targets. We also describe enhancements to the data and interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Costas Mitsopoulos
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery, The Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Domenico Sanfelice
- The Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK,Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery, The Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Daniela Dolciami
- The Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Pradeep Ramagiri
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery, The Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ioan L Mica
- The Department of Genomic Medicine & The Institute of Data Science in Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,The Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Joseph E Tym
- The Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Philip W Gingrich
- The Department of Genomic Medicine & The Institute of Data Science in Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Huabin Hu
- Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery, The Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Correspondence may also be addressed to Paul Workman.
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 713 794 4965; Fax: +1 713 745 2119;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Antolin AA, Sanfelice D, Crisp A, Villasclaras Fernandez E, Mica IL, Chen Y, Collins I, Edwards A, Müller S, Al-Lazikani B, Workman P. The Chemical Probes Portal: an expert review-based public resource to empower chemical probe assessment, selection and use. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 51:D1492-D1502. [PMID: 36268860 PMCID: PMC9825478 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
We describe the Chemical Probes Portal (https://www.chemicalprobes.org/), an expert review-based public resource to empower chemical probe assessment, selection and use. Chemical probes are high-quality small-molecule reagents, often inhibitors, that are important for exploring protein function and biological mechanisms, and for validating targets for drug discovery. The publication, dissemination and use of chemical probes provide an important means to accelerate the functional annotation of proteins, the study of proteins in cell biology, physiology, and disease pathology, and to inform and enable subsequent pioneering drug discovery and development efforts. However, the widespread use of small-molecule compounds that are claimed as chemical probes but are lacking sufficient quality, especially being inadequately selective for the desired target or even broadly promiscuous in behaviour, has resulted in many erroneous conclusions in the biomedical literature. The Chemical Probes Portal was established as a public resource to aid the selection and best-practice use of chemical probes in basic and translational biomedical research. We describe the background, principles and content of the Portal and its technical development, as well as examples of its applications and use. The Chemical Probes Portal is a community resource and we therefore describe how researchers can be involved in its content and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert A Antolin
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Chemical Probes Portal, www.chemicalprobes.org
| | - Domenico Sanfelice
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Chemical Probes Portal, www.chemicalprobes.org
| | - Alisa Crisp
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Chemical Probes Portal, www.chemicalprobes.org
| | - Eloy Villasclaras Fernandez
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Chemical Probes Portal, www.chemicalprobes.org
| | - Ioan L Mica
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Chemical Probes Portal, www.chemicalprobes.org
| | - Yi Chen
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Chemical Probes Portal, www.chemicalprobes.org
| | - Ian Collins
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK,Chemical Probes Portal, www.chemicalprobes.org
| | - Aled Edwards
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ONM5G 1L7, Canada,Chemical Probes Portal, www.chemicalprobes.org
| | | | | | - Paul Workman
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 2087224580;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coker EA, Stewart A, Ozer B, Minchom A, Pickard L, Ruddle R, Carreira S, Popat S, O'Brien M, Raynaud F, de Bono J, Al-Lazikani B, Banerji U. Individualized Prediction of Drug Response and Rational Combination Therapy in NSCLC Using Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Studies of Acute Phosphoproteomic Changes. Mol Cancer Ther 2022; 21:1020-1029. [PMID: 35368084 PMCID: PMC9381105 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-21-0442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
We hypothesize that the study of acute protein perturbation in signal transduction by targeted anticancer drugs can predict drug sensitivity of these agents used as single agents and rational combination therapy. We assayed dynamic changes in 52 phosphoproteins caused by an acute exposure (1 hour) to clinically relevant concentrations of seven targeted anticancer drugs in 35 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines and 16 samples of NSCLC cells isolated from pleural effusions. We studied drug sensitivities across 35 cell lines and synergy of combinations of all drugs in six cell lines (252 combinations). We developed orthogonal machine-learning approaches to predict drug response and rational combination therapy. Our methods predicted the most and least sensitive quartiles of drug sensitivity with an AUC of 0.79 and 0.78, respectively, whereas predictions based on mutations in three genes commonly known to predict response to the drug studied, for example, EGFR, PIK3CA, and KRAS, did not predict sensitivity (AUC of 0.5 across all quartiles). The machine-learning predictions of combinations that were compared with experimentally generated data showed a bias to the highest quartile of Bliss synergy scores (P = 0.0243). We confirmed feasibility of running such assays on 16 patient samples of freshly isolated NSCLC cells from pleural effusions. We have provided proof of concept for novel methods of using acute ex vivo exposure of cancer cells to targeted anticancer drugs to predict response as single agents or combinations. These approaches could complement current approaches using gene mutations/amplifications/rearrangements as biomarkers and demonstrate the utility of proteomics data to inform treatment selection in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Coker
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Healx Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Stewart
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bugra Ozer
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Healx Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Minchom
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Pickard
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Ruddle
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Carreira
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary O'Brien
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Florence Raynaud
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johann de Bono
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Udai Banerji
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dolciami D, Villasclaras-Fernandez E, Kannas C, Meniconi M, Al-Lazikani B, Antolin AA. canSAR chemistry registration and standardization pipeline. J Cheminform 2022; 14:28. [PMID: 35643512 PMCID: PMC9148294 DOI: 10.1186/s13321-022-00606-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Integration of medicinal chemistry data from numerous public resources is an increasingly important part of academic drug discovery and translational research because it can bring a wealth of important knowledge related to compounds in one place. However, different data sources can report the same or related compounds in various forms (e.g., tautomers, racemates, etc.), thus highlighting the need of organising related compounds in hierarchies that alert the user on important bioactivity data that may be relevant. To generate these compound hierarchies, we have developed and implemented canSARchem, a new compound registration and standardization pipeline as part of the canSAR public knowledgebase. canSARchem builds on previously developed ChEMBL and PubChem pipelines and is developed using KNIME. We describe the pipeline which we make publicly available, and we provide examples on the strengths and limitations of the use of hierarchies for bioactivity data exploration. Finally, we identify canonicalization enrichment in FDA-approved drugs, illustrating the benefits of our approach.
Results
We created a chemical registration and standardization pipeline in KNIME and made it freely available to the research community. The pipeline consists of five steps to register the compounds and create the compounds’ hierarchy: 1. Structure checker, 2. Standardization, 3. Generation of canonical tautomers and representative structures, 4. Salt strip, and 5. Generation of abstract structure to generate the compound hierarchy. Unlike ChEMBL’s RDKit pipeline, we carry out compound canonicalization ahead of getting the parent structure, similar to PubChem’s OpenEye pipeline. canSARchem has a lower rejection rate compared to both PubChem and ChEMBL. We use our pipeline to assess the impact of grouping the compounds in hierarchies for bioactivity data exploration. We find that FDA-approved drugs show statistically significant sensitivity to canonicalization compared to the majority of bioactive compounds which demonstrates the importance of this step.
Conclusions
We use canSARchem to standardize all the compounds uploaded in canSAR (> 3 million) enabling efficient data integration and the rapid identification of alternative compound forms with useful bioactivity data. Comparison with PubChem and ChEMBL pipelines evidenced comparable performances in compound standardization, but only PubChem and canSAR canonicalize tautomers and canSAR has a slightly lower rejection rate. Our results highlight the importance of compound hierarchies for bioactivity data exploration. We make canSARchem available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) at https://gitlab.icr.ac.uk/cansar-public/compound-registration-pipeline.
Collapse
|
9
|
Müller S, Ackloo S, Al Chawaf A, Al-Lazikani B, Antolin A, Baell JB, Beck H, Beedie S, Betz UAK, Bezerra GA, Brennan PE, Brown D, Brown PJ, Bullock AN, Carter AJ, Chaikuad A, Chaineau M, Ciulli A, Collins I, Dreher J, Drewry D, Edfeldt K, Edwards AM, Egner U, Frye SV, Fuchs SM, Hall MD, Hartung IV, Hillisch A, Hitchcock SH, Homan E, Kannan N, Kiefer JR, Knapp S, Kostic M, Kubicek S, Leach AR, Lindemann S, Marsden BD, Matsui H, Meier JL, Merk D, Michel M, Morgan MR, Mueller-Fahrnow A, Owen DR, Perry BG, Rosenberg SH, Saikatendu KS, Schapira M, Scholten C, Sharma S, Simeonov A, Sundström M, Superti-Furga G, Todd MH, Tredup C, Vedadi M, von Delft F, Willson TM, Winter GE, Workman P, Arrowsmith CH. Target 2035 - update on the quest for a probe for every protein. RSC Med Chem 2022; 13:13-21. [PMID: 35211674 PMCID: PMC8792830 DOI: 10.1039/d1md00228g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Twenty years after the publication of the first draft of the human genome, our knowledge of the human proteome is still fragmented. The challenge of translating the wealth of new knowledge from genomics into new medicines is that proteins, and not genes, are the primary executers of biological function. Therefore, much of how biology works in health and disease must be understood through the lens of protein function. Accordingly, a subset of human proteins has been at the heart of research interests of scientists over the centuries, and we have accumulated varying degrees of knowledge about approximately 65% of the human proteome. Nevertheless, a large proportion of proteins in the human proteome (∼35%) remains uncharacterized, and less than 5% of the human proteome has been successfully targeted for drug discovery. This highlights the profound disconnect between our abilities to obtain genetic information and subsequent development of effective medicines. Target 2035 is an international federation of biomedical scientists from the public and private sectors, which aims to address this gap by developing and applying new technologies to create by year 2035 chemogenomic libraries, chemical probes, and/or biological probes for the entire human proteome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Müller
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
- Structural Genomics Consortium, BMLS, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
| | - Suzanne Ackloo
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5G 1L7 Canada
| | | | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research London SM2 5NG UK
- CRUK ICR/Imperial Convergence Science Centre London SM2 5NG UK
| | - Albert Antolin
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research London SM2 5NG UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research London SM2 5NG UK
| | - Jonathan B Baell
- Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University Parkville Victoria 3052 Australia
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nanjing Tech University No. 30 South Puzhu Road Nanjing 211816 People's Republic of China
| | - Hartmut Beck
- Research and Development, Bayer AG, Pharmaceuticals 42103 Wuppertal Germany
| | - Shaunna Beedie
- Centre for Medicines Discovery, University of Oxford Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7DQ UK
| | | | - Gustavo Arruda Bezerra
- Centre for Medicines Discovery, University of Oxford Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7DQ UK
| | - Paul E Brennan
- Alzheimer's Research UK Oxford Drug Discovery Institute, Centre for Medicines Discovery, University of Oxford Oxford OX3 7FZ UK
| | - David Brown
- Institut Recherches de Servier 125 Chemin de Ronde 78290 Croissy France
| | - Peter J Brown
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5G 1L7 Canada
| | - Alex N Bullock
- Centre for Medicines Discovery, University of Oxford Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7DQ UK
| | - Adrian J Carter
- Discovery Research, Boehringer Ingelheim 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein Germany
| | - Apirat Chaikuad
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
- Structural Genomics Consortium, BMLS, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
| | - Mathilde Chaineau
- Early Drug Discovery Unit (EDDU), Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University Montreal QC Canada
| | - Alessio Ciulli
- School of Life Sciences, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, University of Dundee James Black Centre Dundee UK
| | - Ian Collins
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research London SM2 5NG UK
| | - Jan Dreher
- Research and Development, Bayer AG, Pharmaceuticals 42103 Wuppertal Germany
| | - David Drewry
- Structural Genomics Consortium, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy Chapel Hill NC USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA
| | - Kristina Edfeldt
- Structural Genomics Consortium, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| | - Aled M Edwards
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5G 1L7 Canada
| | - Ursula Egner
- Nuvisan Innovation Campus Berlin GmbH Müllerstraße 178 13353 Berlin Germany
| | - Stephen V Frye
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA
- Center for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA
| | | | - Matthew D Hall
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Rockville Maryland 20850 USA
| | - Ingo V Hartung
- Medicinal Chemistry, Global R&D, Merck Healthcare KGaA Frankfurter Straße 250 64293 Darmstadt Germany
| | - Alexander Hillisch
- Research and Development, Bayer AG, Pharmaceuticals 42103 Wuppertal Germany
| | | | - Evert Homan
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Oncology-Pathology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| | - Natarajan Kannan
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | - James R Kiefer
- Genentech, Inc. 1 DNA Way South San Francisco California 94080 USA
| | - Stefan Knapp
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
- Structural Genomics Consortium, BMLS, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
| | - Milka Kostic
- Department of Cancer Biology and Chemical Biology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 450 Brookline Ave Boston MA 02215 USA
| | - Stefan Kubicek
- CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences Vienna Austria
| | - Andrew R Leach
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD UK
| | - Sven Lindemann
- Strategic Innovation, Global R&D, Merck Healthcare KGaA Frankfurter Straße 250 64293 Darmstadt Germany
| | - Brian D Marsden
- Centre for Medicines Discovery, University of Oxford Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7DQ UK
- Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, NDORMS, University of Oxford UK
| | - Hisanori Matsui
- Neuroscience Drug Discovery Unit, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited Fujisawa Kanagawa Japan
| | - Jordan L Meier
- Chemical Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Frederick MD USA
| | - Daniel Merk
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
- LMU Munich, Department of Pharmacy, Chair of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry 81377 Munich Germany
| | - Maurice Michel
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Oncology-Pathology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| | - Maxwell R Morgan
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5G 1L7 Canada
| | | | - Dafydd R Owen
- Discovery Network Group, Pfizer Medicine Design Cambridge MA 02139 USA
| | - Benjamin G Perry
- Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative 15 Chemin Camille Vidart Geneva 1202 Switzerland
| | | | - Kumar Singh Saikatendu
- Global Research Externalization, Takeda California, Inc. 9625 Towne Center Drive San Diego CA 92121 USA
| | - Matthieu Schapira
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5G 1L7 Canada
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5S 1A8 Canada
| | - Cora Scholten
- Research and Development, Bayer AG, Pharmaceuticals 13353 Berlin Germany
| | - Sujata Sharma
- Structural & Protein Sciences, Discovery Sciences, Janssen Research & Development 1400 McKean Rd Spring House PA 19477 USA
| | - Anton Simeonov
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Rockville Maryland 20850 USA
| | - Michael Sundström
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| | - Giulio Superti-Furga
- CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences Vienna Austria
- Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Matthew H Todd
- School of Pharmacy, University College London London WC1N 1AX UK
| | - Claudia Tredup
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
- Structural Genomics Consortium, BMLS, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt 60438 Germany
| | - Masoud Vedadi
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5G 1L7 Canada
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5S 1A8 Canada
| | - Frank von Delft
- Centre for Medicines Discovery, University of Oxford Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7DQ UK
- Diamond Light Source Ltd Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot OX11 0QX UK
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Johannesburg Auckland Park 2006 South Africa
- Research Complex at Harwell Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot OX11 0FA UK
| | - Timothy M Willson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA
| | - Georg E Winter
- CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences Vienna Austria
| | - Paul Workman
- CRUK ICR/Imperial Convergence Science Centre London SM2 5NG UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research London SM2 5NG UK
| | - Cheryl H Arrowsmith
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5G 1L7 Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario M5G 1L7 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Varadi M, Anyango S, Armstrong D, Berrisford J, Choudhary P, Deshpande M, Nadzirin N, Nair SS, Pravda L, Tanweer A, Al-Lazikani B, Andreini C, Barton GJ, Bednar D, Berka K, Blundell T, Brock KP, Carazo JM, Damborsky J, David A, Dey S, Dunbrack R, Recio JF, Fraternali F, Gibson T, Helmer-Citterich M, Hoksza D, Hopf T, Jakubec D, Kannan N, Krivak R, Kumar M, Levy ED, London N, Macias JR, Srivatsan MM, Marks DS, Martens L, McGowan SA, McGreig JE, Modi V, Parra RG, Pepe G, Piovesan D, Prilusky J, Putignano V, Radusky LG, Ramasamy P, Rausch AO, Reuter N, Rodriguez LA, Rollins NJ, Rosato A, Rubach P, Serrano L, Singh G, Skoda P, Sorzano COS, Stourac J, Sulkowska JI, Svobodova R, Tichshenko N, Tosatto SCE, Vranken W, Wass MN, Xue D, Zaidman D, Thornton J, Sternberg M, Orengo C, Velankar S. PDBe-KB: collaboratively defining the biological context of structural data. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D534-D542. [PMID: 34755867 PMCID: PMC8728252 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The Protein Data Bank in Europe - Knowledge Base (PDBe-KB, https://pdbe-kb.org) is an open collaboration between world-leading specialist data resources contributing functional and biophysical annotations derived from or relevant to the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The goal of PDBe-KB is to place macromolecular structure data in their biological context by developing standardised data exchange formats and integrating functional annotations from the contributing partner resources into a knowledge graph that can provide valuable biological insights. Since we described PDBe-KB in 2019, there have been significant improvements in the variety of available annotation data sets and user functionality. Here, we provide an overview of the consortium, highlighting the addition of annotations such as predicted covalent binders, phosphorylation sites, effects of mutations on the protein structure and energetic local frustration. In addition, we describe a library of reusable web-based visualisation components and introduce new features such as a bulk download data service and a novel superposition service that generates clusters of superposed protein chains weekly for the whole PDB archive.
Collapse
|
11
|
Antolin AA, Clarke PA, Collins I, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. Evolution of kinase polypharmacology across HSP90 drug discovery. Cell Chem Biol 2021; 28:1433-1445.e3. [PMID: 34077750 PMCID: PMC8550792 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Most small molecules interact with several target proteins but this polypharmacology is seldom comprehensively investigated or explicitly exploited during drug discovery. Here, we use computational and experimental methods to identify and systematically characterize the kinase cross-pharmacology of representative HSP90 inhibitors. We demonstrate that the resorcinol clinical candidates ganetespib and, to a lesser extent, luminespib, display unique off-target kinase pharmacology as compared with other HSP90 inhibitors. We also demonstrate that polypharmacology evolved during the optimization to discover luminespib and that the hit, leads, and clinical candidate all have different polypharmacological profiles. We therefore recommend the computational and experimental characterization of polypharmacology earlier in drug discovery projects to unlock new multi-target drug design opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert A Antolin
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK; Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Paul A Clarke
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ian Collins
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK; Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
High-quality small molecule chemical probes are extremely valuable for biological research and target validation. However, frequent use of flawed small-molecule inhibitors produces misleading results and diminishes the robustness of biomedical research. Several public resources are available to facilitate assessment and selection of better chemical probes for specific protein targets. Here, we review chemical probe resources, discuss their current strengths and limitations, and make recommendations for further improvements. Expert review resources provide in-depth analysis but currently cover only a limited portion of the liganded proteome. Computational resources encompass more proteins and are regularly updated, but have limitations in data availability and curation. We show how biomedical scientists may use these resources to choose the best available chemical probes for their research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert A Antolin
- The Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
- CRUK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
- CRUK ICR/Imperial Convergence Science Centre, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- CRUK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
- CRUK ICR/Imperial Convergence Science Centre, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- The Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
- CRUK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
- CRUK ICR/Imperial Convergence Science Centre, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Paschalis A, Welti J, Neeb AJ, Yuan W, Figueiredo I, Pereira R, Ferreira A, Riisnaes R, Rodrigues DN, Jiménez-Vacas JM, Kim S, Uo T, Micco PD, Tumber A, Islam MS, Moesser MA, Abboud M, Kawamura A, Gurel B, Christova R, Gil VS, Buroni L, Crespo M, Miranda S, Lambros MB, Carreira S, Tunariu N, Alimonti A, Al-Lazikani B, Schofield CJ, Plymate SR, Sharp A, de Bono JS. JMJD6 Is a Druggable Oxygenase That Regulates AR-V7 Expression in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res 2021; 81:1087-1100. [PMID: 33822745 PMCID: PMC8025710 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-1807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Endocrine resistance (EnR) in advanced prostate cancer is fatal. EnR can be mediated by androgen receptor (AR) splice variants, with AR splice variant 7 (AR-V7) arguably the most clinically important variant. In this study, we determined proteins key to generating AR-V7, validated our findings using clinical samples, and studied splicing regulatory mechanisms in prostate cancer models. Triangulation studies identified JMJD6 as a key regulator of AR-V7, as evidenced by its upregulation with in vitro EnR, its downregulation alongside AR-V7 by bromodomain inhibition, and its identification as a top hit of a targeted siRNA screen of spliceosome-related genes. JMJD6 protein levels increased (P < 0.001) with castration resistance and were associated with higher AR-V7 levels and shorter survival (P = 0.048). JMJD6 knockdown reduced prostate cancer cell growth, AR-V7 levels, and recruitment of U2AF65 to AR pre-mRNA. Mutagenesis studies suggested that JMJD6 activity is key to the generation of AR-V7, with the catalytic machinery residing within a druggable pocket. Taken together, these data highlight the relationship between JMJD6 and AR-V7 in advanced prostate cancer and support further evaluation of JMJD6 as a therapeutic target in this disease. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies JMJD6 as being critical for the generation of AR-V7 in prostate cancer, where it may serve as a tractable target for therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Paschalis
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Welti
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antje J Neeb
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wei Yuan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rita Pereira
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Ferreira
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Riisnaes
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Juan M Jiménez-Vacas
- Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Cordoba, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (HURS), Cordoba, Spain
| | - Soojin Kim
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and VAPSHCS-GRECC, Seattle, Washington
| | - Takuma Uo
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and VAPSHCS-GRECC, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Anthony Tumber
- Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Md Saiful Islam
- Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marc A Moesser
- Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Martine Abboud
- Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Akane Kawamura
- Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Bora Gurel
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Veronica S Gil
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lorenzo Buroni
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mateus Crespo
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susana Miranda
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Nina Tunariu
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Christopher J Schofield
- Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen R Plymate
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and VAPSHCS-GRECC, Seattle, Washington
| | - Adam Sharp
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Spitaleri A, Zia SR, Di Micco P, Al-Lazikani B, Soler MA, Rocchia W. Tuning Local Hydration Enables a Deeper Understanding of Protein-Ligand Binding: The PP1-Src Kinase Case. J Phys Chem Lett 2021; 12:49-58. [PMID: 33300337 PMCID: PMC7812613 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Water plays a key role in biomolecular recognition and binding. Despite the development of several computational and experimental approaches, it is still challenging to comprehensively characterize water-mediated effects on the binding process. Here, we investigate how water affects the binding of Src kinase to one of its inhibitors, PP1. Src kinase is a target for treating several diseases, including cancer. We use biased molecular dynamics simulations, where the hydration of predetermined regions is tuned at will. This computational technique efficiently accelerates the SRC-PP1 binding simulation and allows us to identify several key and yet unexplored aspects of the solvent's role. This study provides a further perspective on the binding phenomenon, which may advance the current drug design approaches for the development of new kinase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Spitaleri
- CONCEPT
Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego 30, Genoa I-16163, Italy
- Center
for Omics Sciences, Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Syeda R. Zia
- CONCEPT
Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego 30, Genoa I-16163, Italy
- Dr.
Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International
Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
| | - Patrizio Di Micco
- Cancer
Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The
Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, U.K.
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer
Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The
Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, U.K.
| | - Miguel A. Soler
- CONCEPT
Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego 30, Genoa I-16163, Italy
| | - Walter Rocchia
- CONCEPT
Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego 30, Genoa I-16163, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mitsopoulos C, Di Micco P, Fernandez EV, Dolciami D, Holt E, Mica IL, Coker EA, Tym JE, Campbell J, Che KH, Ozer B, Kannas C, Antolin AA, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. canSAR: update to the cancer translational research and drug discovery knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D1074-D1082. [PMID: 33219674 PMCID: PMC7778970 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
canSAR (http://cansar.icr.ac.uk) is the largest, public, freely available, integrative translational research and drug discovery knowledgebase for oncology. canSAR integrates vast multidisciplinary data from across genomic, protein, pharmacological, drug and chemical data with structural biology, protein networks and more. It also provides unique data, curation and annotation and crucially, AI-informed target assessment for drug discovery. canSAR is widely used internationally by academia and industry. Here we describe significant developments and enhancements to the data, web interface and infrastructure of canSAR in the form of the new implementation of the system: canSARblack. We demonstrate new functionality in aiding translation hypothesis generation and experimental design, and show how canSAR can be adapted and utilised outside oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costas Mitsopoulos
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Patrizio Di Micco
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | | | - Daniela Dolciami
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Esty Holt
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ioan L Mica
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Coker
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Joseph E Tym
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - James Campbell
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ka Hing Che
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Bugra Ozer
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Christos Kannas
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Albert A Antolin
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Darby JF, Vidler LR, Simpson PJ, Al-Lazikani B, Matthews SJ, Sharp SY, Pearl LH, Hoelder S, Workman P. Solution structure of the Hop TPR2A domain and investigation of target druggability by NMR, biochemical and in silico approaches. Sci Rep 2020; 10:16000. [PMID: 32994435 PMCID: PMC7524759 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71969-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a molecular chaperone that plays an important role in tumour biology by promoting the stabilisation and activity of oncogenic 'client' proteins. Inhibition of Hsp90 by small-molecule drugs, acting via its ATP hydrolysis site, has shown promise as a molecularly targeted cancer therapy. Owing to the importance of Hop and other tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-containing cochaperones in regulating Hsp90 activity, the Hsp90-TPR domain interface is an alternative site for inhibitors, which could result in effects distinct from ATP site binders. The TPR binding site of Hsp90 cochaperones includes a shallow, positively charged groove that poses a significant challenge for druggability. Herein, we report the apo, solution-state structure of Hop TPR2A which enables this target for NMR-based screening approaches. We have designed prototype TPR ligands that mimic key native 'carboxylate clamp' interactions between Hsp90 and its TPR cochaperones and show that they block binding between Hop TPR2A and the Hsp90 C-terminal MEEVD peptide. We confirm direct TPR-binding of these ligands by mapping 1H-15N HSQC chemical shift perturbations to our new NMR structure. Our work provides a novel structure, a thorough assessment of druggability and robust screening approaches that may offer a potential route, albeit difficult, to address the chemically challenging nature of the Hop TPR2A target, with relevance to other TPR domain interactors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Darby
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Lewis R Vidler
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Peter J Simpson
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
- Bruker UK Ltd, Banner Lane, Coventry, CV4 9GH, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Stephen J Matthews
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Swee Y Sharp
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Laurence H Pearl
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK
- Division of Structural Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Swen Hoelder
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
- Cancer Research UK Convergence Science Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang C, Stockwell SR, Elbanna M, Ketteler R, Freeman J, Al-Lazikani B, Eccles S, De Haven Brandon A, Raynaud F, Hayes A, Clarke PA, Workman P, Mittnacht S. Correction: Signalling involving MET and FAK supports cell division independent of the activity of the cell cycle-regulating CDK4/6 kinases. Oncogene 2020; 39:3411-3412. [PMID: 32094403 PMCID: PMC7160058 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-1221-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Zhang
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Simon R Stockwell
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - May Elbanna
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Robin Ketteler
- MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Jamie Freeman
- MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Suzanne Eccles
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Alexis De Haven Brandon
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Florence Raynaud
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Angela Hayes
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul A Clarke
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Sibylle Mittnacht
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Antolin AA, Ameratunga M, Banerji U, Clarke PA, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. The kinase polypharmacology landscape of clinical PARP inhibitors. Sci Rep 2020; 10:2585. [PMID: 32066817 PMCID: PMC7026418 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59074-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Polypharmacology plays an important role in defining response and adverse effects of drugs. For some mechanisms, experimentally mapping polypharmacology is commonplace, although this is typically done within the same protein class. Four PARP inhibitors have been approved by the FDA as cancer therapeutics, yet a precise mechanistic rationale to guide clinicians on which to choose for a particular patient is lacking. The four drugs have largely similar PARP family inhibition profiles, but several differences at the molecular and clinical level have been reported that remain poorly understood. Here, we report the first comprehensive characterization of the off-target kinase landscape of four FDA-approved PARP drugs. We demonstrate that all four PARP inhibitors have a unique polypharmacological profile across the kinome. Niraparib and rucaparib inhibit DYRK1s, CDK16 and PIM3 at clinically achievable, submicromolar concentrations. These kinases represent the most potently inhibited off-targets of PARP inhibitors identified to date and should be investigated further to clarify their potential implications for efficacy and safety in the clinic. Moreover, broad kinome profiling is recommended for the development of PARP inhibitors as PARP-kinase polypharmacology could potentially be exploited to modulate efficacy and side-effect profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert A Antolin
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Malaka Ameratunga
- Drug Development Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Udai Banerji
- Drug Development Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul A Clarke
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Varadi M, Berrisford J, Deshpande M, Nair SS, Gutmanas A, Armstrong D, Pravda L, Al-Lazikani B, Anyango S, Barton GJ, Berka K, Blundell T, Borkakoti N, Dana J, Das S, Dey S, Micco PD, Fraternali F, Gibson T, Helmer-Citterich M, Hoksza D, Huang LC, Jain R, Jubb H, Kannas C, Kannan N, Koca J, Krivak R, Kumar M, Levy ED, Madeira F, Madhusudhan MS, Martell HJ, MacGowan S, McGreig JE, Mir S, Mukhopadhyay A, Parca L, Paysan-Lafosse T, Radusky L, Ribeiro A, Serrano L, Sillitoe I, Singh G, Skoda P, Svobodova R, Tyzack J, Valencia A, Fernandez EV, Vranken W, Wass M, Thornton J, Sternberg M, Orengo C, Velankar S. PDBe-KB: a community-driven resource for structural and functional annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D344-D353. [PMID: 31584092 PMCID: PMC6943075 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The Protein Data Bank in Europe-Knowledge Base (PDBe-KB, https://pdbe-kb.org) is a community-driven, collaborative resource for literature-derived, manually curated and computationally predicted structural and functional annotations of macromolecular structure data, contained in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The goal of PDBe-KB is two-fold: (i) to increase the visibility and reduce the fragmentation of annotations contributed by specialist data resources, and to make these data more findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) and (ii) to place macromolecular structure data in their biological context, thus facilitating their use by the broader scientific community in fundamental and applied research. Here, we describe the guidelines of this collaborative effort, the current status of contributed data, and the PDBe-KB infrastructure, which includes the data exchange format, the deposition system for added value annotations, the distributable database containing the assembled data, and programmatic access endpoints. We also describe a series of novel web-pages-the PDBe-KB aggregated views of structure data-which combine information on macromolecular structures from many PDB entries. We have recently released the first set of pages in this series, which provide an overview of available structural and functional information for a protein of interest, referenced by a UniProtKB accession.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mihaly Varadi
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - John Berrisford
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Mandar Deshpande
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Sreenath S Nair
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Aleksandras Gutmanas
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - David Armstrong
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Lukas Pravda
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stephen Anyango
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Karel Berka
- Department of Physical Chemistry, Palacky University, Olomouc
| | | | - Neera Borkakoti
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jose Dana
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Sayoni Das
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | | | - Patrizio Di Micco
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Franca Fraternali
- Randall Centre for Cell & Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Toby Gibson
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuela Helmer-Citterich
- Centre for Molecular Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica snc, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - David Hoksza
- Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg
| | - Liang-Chin Huang
- Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Rishabh Jain
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Christos Kannas
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Natarajan Kannan
- Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Jaroslav Koca
- CEITEC, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Manjeet Kumar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - F Madeira
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - M S Madhusudhan
- Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune 411008, India
| | | | | | | | - Saqib Mir
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Abhik Mukhopadhyay
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Luca Parca
- Centre for Molecular Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica snc, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Typhaine Paysan-Lafosse
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Antonio Ribeiro
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Luis Serrano
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ian Sillitoe
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Gulzar Singh
- Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune 411008, India
| | - Petr Skoda
- Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Radka Svobodova
- CEITEC, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jonathan Tyzack
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Eloy Villasclaras Fernandez
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Wim Vranken
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mark Wass
- University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NJ, UK
| | - Janet Thornton
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Christine Orengo
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Antolin AA, Ameratunga M, Banerji U, Clarke P, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. Abstract LB-C01: The kinase polypharmacology landscape of clinical PARP inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-19-lb-c01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Polypharmacology plays an important role in defining response and adverse effects of drugs. For some mechanisms, experimentally mapping polypharmacology is commonplace, although often this is done within the same protein class. Four PARP inhibitors have been approved by the FDA as cancer therapeutics, yet a precise mechanistic rationale to guide clinicians on which to choose for a particular patient is lacking. The four drugs have largely similar PARP family inhibition profiles, but several differences at the molecular and clinical level have been reported that remain poorly understood. Here, we report the first comprehensive characterization of the off-target kinase landscape of four FDA-approved PARP drugs. We demonstrate that all four PARP inhibitors have a unique polypharmacological profile across the kinome. Niraparib and rucaparib inhibit DYRK1s, CDK16 and PIM3 at clinically achievable, submicromolar concentrations. The most potently inhibited off-targets are CDK16 for rucaparib (IC50 = 381 nM) and DYRK1B for niraparib (IC50 = 254 nM). These kinases represent the most potently inhibited off-targets of PARP inhibitors identified to date and should be investigated further to clarify their potential implications for efficacy and safety in the clinic.
Citation Format: Albert A Antolin, Malaka Ameratunga, Udai Banerji, Paul Clarke, Paul Workman, Bissan Al-Lazikani. The kinase polypharmacology landscape of clinical PARP inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-C01. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-LB-C01
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Udai Banerji
- THE INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH (LONDON, UK), London
| | - Paul Clarke
- THE INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH (LONDON, UK), London
| | - Paul Workman
- THE INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH (LONDON, UK), London
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Workman
- The Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research , London , UK
| | - Albert A Antolin
- The Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research , London , UK
- The Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research , London , UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- The Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research , London , UK
- The Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
George SL, Izquierdo E, Campbell J, Koutroumanidou E, Proszek P, Jamal S, Hughes D, Yuan L, Marshall LV, Carceller F, Chisholm JC, Vaidya S, Mandeville H, Angelini P, Wasti A, Bexelius T, Thway K, Gatz SA, Clarke M, Al-Lazikani B, Barone G, Anderson J, Tweddle DA, Gonzalez D, Walker BA, Barton J, Depani S, Eze J, Ahmed SW, Moreno L, Pearson A, Shipley J, Jones C, Hargrave D, Jacques TS, Hubank M, Chesler L. A tailored molecular profiling programme for children with cancer to identify clinically actionable genetic alterations. Eur J Cancer 2019; 121:224-235. [PMID: 31543384 PMCID: PMC6839402 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For children with cancer, the clinical integration of precision medicine to enable predictive biomarker-based therapeutic stratification is urgently needed. METHODS We have developed a hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, specifically designed to detect genetic alterations in paediatric solid tumours, which gives reliable results from as little as 50 ng of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. In this study, we offered an NGS panel, with clinical reporting via a molecular tumour board for children with solid tumours. Furthermore, for a cohort of 12 patients, we used a circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)-specific panel to sequence ctDNA from matched plasma samples and compared plasma and tumour findings. RESULTS A total of 255 samples were submitted from 223 patients for the NGS panel. Using FFPE tissue, 82% of all submitted samples passed quality control for clinical reporting. At least one genetic alteration was detected in 70% of sequenced samples. The overall detection rate of clinically actionable alterations, defined by modified OncoKB criteria, for all sequenced samples was 51%. A total of 8 patients were sequenced at different stages of treatment. In 6 of these, there were differences in the genetic alterations detected between time points. Sequencing of matched ctDNA in a cohort of extracranial paediatric solid tumours also identified a high detection rate of somatic alterations in plasma. CONCLUSION We demonstrate that tailored clinical molecular profiling of both tumour DNA and plasma-derived ctDNA is feasible for children with solid tumours. Furthermore, we show that a targeted NGS panel-based approach can identify actionable genetic alterations in a high proportion of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally L George
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Elisa Izquierdo
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK; Glioma Team, Division of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - James Campbell
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Eleni Koutroumanidou
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Paula Proszek
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Sabri Jamal
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Deborah Hughes
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Lina Yuan
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Lynley V Marshall
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fernando Carceller
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Julia C Chisholm
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sucheta Vaidya
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Henry Mandeville
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paola Angelini
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ajla Wasti
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tomas Bexelius
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Khin Thway
- Pathology Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susanne A Gatz
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Sarcoma Molecular Pathology Team, Divisions of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew Clarke
- Glioma Team, Division of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Barone
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Anderson
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Deborah A Tweddle
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - David Gonzalez
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK; Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Brian A Walker
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK; Myeloma Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Jack Barton
- Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Sarita Depani
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jessica Eze
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Histology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Saira W Ahmed
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Histology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lucas Moreno
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; HNJ-CNIO Clinical Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Nino Jesus, Madrid, Spain; Paediatric Oncology & Haematology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrew Pearson
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Janet Shipley
- Sarcoma Molecular Pathology Team, Divisions of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Chris Jones
- Glioma Team, Division of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Darren Hargrave
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Haematology and Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas S Jacques
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Histology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Hubank
- Molecular Diagnostics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research and Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Louis Chesler
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stewart A, Coker EA, Pölsterl S, Georgiou A, Minchom AR, Carreira S, Cunningham D, O'Brien ME, Raynaud FI, de Bono JS, Al-Lazikani B, Banerji U. Differences in Signaling Patterns on PI3K Inhibition Reveal Context Specificity in KRAS-Mutant Cancers. Mol Cancer Ther 2019; 18:1396-1404. [PMID: 31262731 PMCID: PMC6679718 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-18-0727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
It is increasingly appreciated that drug response to different cancers driven by the same oncogene is different and may relate to differences in rewiring of signal transduction. We aimed to study differences in dynamic signaling changes within mutant KRAS (KRAS MT), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells. We used an antibody-based phosphoproteomic platform to study changes in 50 phosphoproteins caused by seven targeted anticancer drugs in a panel of 30 KRAS MT cell lines and cancer cells isolated from 10 patients with KRAS MT cancers. We report for the first time significant differences in dynamic signaling between colorectal cancer and NSCLC cell lines exposed to clinically relevant equimolar concentrations of the pan-PI3K inhibitor pictilisib including a lack of reduction of p-AKTser473 in colorectal cancer cell lines (P = 0.037) and lack of compensatory increase in p-MEK in NSCLC cell lines (P = 0.036). Differences in rewiring of signal transduction between tumor types driven by KRAS MT cancers exist and influence response to combination therapy using targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Stewart
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth A Coker
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian Pölsterl
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandros Georgiou
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna R Minchom
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Carreira
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Er O'Brien
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Florence I Raynaud
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johann S de Bono
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Udai Banerji
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhang C, Stockwell SR, Elbanna M, Ketteler R, Freeman J, Al-Lazikani B, Eccles S, De Haven Brandon A, Raynaud F, Hayes A, Clarke PA, Workman P, Mittnacht S. Signalling involving MET and FAK supports cell division independent of the activity of the cell cycle-regulating CDK4/6 kinases. Oncogene 2019; 38:5905-5920. [PMID: 31296956 PMCID: PMC6756076 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-019-0850-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Deregulation of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) is highly prevalent in cancer; yet, inhibitors against these kinases are currently used only in restricted tumour contexts. The extent to which cancers depend on CDK4/6 and the mechanisms that may undermine such dependency are poorly understood. Here, we report that signalling engaging the MET proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) axis leads to CDK4/6-independent CDK2 activation, involving as critical mechanistic events loss of the CDKI p21CIP1 and gain of its regulator, the ubiquitin ligase subunit SKP2. Combined inhibition of MET/FAK and CDK4/6 eliminates the proliferation capacity of cancer cells in culture, and enhances tumour growth inhibition in vivo. Activation of the MET/FAK axis is known to arise through cancer extrinsic and intrinsic cues. Our work predicts that such cues support cell division independent of the activity of the cell cycle-regulating CDK4/6 kinases and identifies MET/FAK as a tractable route to broaden the utility of CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapies in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Zhang
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Simon R Stockwell
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - May Elbanna
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Robin Ketteler
- MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Jamie Freeman
- MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Suzanne Eccles
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Alexis De Haven Brandon
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Florence Raynaud
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Angela Hayes
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul A Clarke
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Sibylle Mittnacht
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Coker EA, Mitsopoulos C, Tym JE, Komianou A, Kannas C, Di Micco P, Villasclaras Fernandez E, Ozer B, Antolin AA, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. canSAR: update to the cancer translational research and drug discovery knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D917-D922. [PMID: 30496479 PMCID: PMC6323893 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
canSAR (http://cansar.icr.ac.uk) is a public, freely available, integrative translational research and drug discovery knowlegebase. canSAR informs researchers to help solve key bottlenecks in cancer translation and drug discovery. It integrates genomic, protein, pharmacological, drug and chemical data with structural biology, protein networks and unique, comprehensive and orthogonal 'druggability' assessments. canSAR is widely used internationally by academia and industry. Here we describe major enhancements to canSAR including new and expanded data. We also describe the first components of canSARblack-an advanced, responsive, multi-device compatible redesign of canSAR with a question-led interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Coker
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Costas Mitsopoulos
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Joesph E Tym
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Angeliki Komianou
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Christos Kannas
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Patrizio Di Micco
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | | | - Bugra Ozer
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Albert A Antolin
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kinnersley B, Sud A, Coker EA, Tym JE, Di Micco P, Al-Lazikani B, Houlston RS. Leveraging Human Genetics to Guide Cancer Drug Development. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2018; 2:1-11. [PMID: 30652614 PMCID: PMC6874034 DOI: 10.1200/cci.18.00077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The high attrition rate of cancer drug development programs is a barrier to realizing the promise of precision oncology. We have examined whether the genetic insights from genome-wide association studies of cancer can guide drug development and repurposing in oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS Across 37 cancers, we identified 955 genetic risk variants from the National Human Genome Research Institute-European Bioinformatics Institute genome-wide association study catalog. We linked these variants to target genes using strategies that were based on linkage disequilibrium, DNA three-dimensional structure, and integration of predicted gene function and expression. With the use of the Informa Pharmaprojects database, we identified genes that are targets of unique drugs and assessed the level of enrichment that would be afforded by incorporation of genetic information in preclinical and phase II studies. For targets not under development, we implemented machine learning approaches to assess druggability. RESULTS For all preclinical targets incorporating genetic information, a 2.00-fold enrichment of a drug being successfully approved could be achieved (95% CI, 1.14- to 3.48-fold; P = .02). For phase II targets, a 2.75-fold enrichment could be achieved (95% CI, 1.42- to 5.35-fold; P < .001). Application of genetic information suggests potential repurposing of 15 approved nononcology drugs. CONCLUSION The findings illustrate the value of using insights from the genetics of inherited cancer susceptibility discovery projects as part of a data-driven strategy to inform drug discovery. Support for cancer germline genetic information for prospective targets is available online from the Institute of Cancer Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Kinnersley
- All authors: The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amit Sud
- All authors: The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Joseph E. Tym
- All authors: The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patrizio Di Micco
- All authors: The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Georgiou A, Stewart A, Thavasu P, Coker E, Poelsterl S, Al-Lazikani B, Cunningham D, Whittaker S, Banerji U. KRAS mutant and RAS/BRAF wild type colorectal cancer cells exhibit differences in the rewiring of signal transduction that can impact on future therapeutic strategies. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Sharp A, Welti J, Yuan W, Figueiredo I, Gil V, Rodrigues DN, Lambros M, Knight E, Ning J, Francis J, Dolling D, Pope L, Neeb A, Boysen G, Zhu Y, Crespo M, Paschalis A, Luo J, Plymate S, Al-Lazikani B, Swain A, Bono JD. Abstract A067: Targeting the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) family proteins and beyond in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Overcoming aberrant androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.prca2017-a067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Despite robust responses to androgen deprivation therapy and AR targeting therapies (including abiraterone and enzalutamide), nearly all cases of advanced prostate cancer progress to lethal mCRPC and develop therapeutic resistance. This progression is associated with persistent AR signaling, in part due to expression of constitutively active AR splice variants that include AR variant 7 (AR-V7). We show that AR-V7 expression in patient biopsies (protein) and circulating tumor cells (RNA) associates with poor outcome from mCRPC. Therapies that regulate AR-V7 and induce robust anticancer responses are required to confirm the clinical importance of AR-V7 in mCRPC. One such promising approach, currently in clinical trials, is inhibitors of BET family proteins, which include BRD2, BRD3, and BRD4. Preclinical studies have shown that BRD4 binds to AR at the androgen response element and facilitates the recruitment of the transcriptional machinery. We show that BRD4 protein expression increases as patients develop mCRPC and at diagnosis associates with patient outcome and more advanced disease. In addition, through RNAseq analysis we show that expression levels of BRD2, 3, and 4 in mCRPC associated with degree of AR activity. We, and others, have shown that the use of BET inhibitors (BETi) in vitro on AR/AR-V7 expressing cell lines not only decreased AR activity but also preferentially decreased the production on AR-V7 mRNA. In light of BETi having efficacy against BRD2, 3, and 4, and all isoforms being expressed in mCRPC, we explored the effect of genetic knockdown of each isoform. We show that BETi treatment is sufficient to decrease AR-V7 mRNA and protein in CRPC cell lines. Moreover, we demonstrate that BRD4 knockdown, and to a greater extent, the combination of BRD2, 3, and 4 knockdown blocked AR and AR-V7 signaling. Furthermore, C-MYC knockdown did not recapitulate the effect of BETi and led to an increase in AR signaling. Consistent with these findings, BETi and the combination of BRD2, 3, and 4 knockdown reduced the growth of CRPC cell lines. To further investigate whether BETi is sufficient to inhibit AR-V7 production in patients with mCRPC, we treated patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and a mouse xenograft (PDX) grown from patient metastatic biopsies who had progressed on enzalutamide and/or abiraterone. In this study 4 out of 9 PDOs were sensitive to BETi. Consistent with cell culture experiments, BETi treatment of PDO and PDX led to downregulation of both AR-V7 mRNA and protein expression, and growth inhibition. In light of the pleotropic effects of BETi on cancer cell biology and potential for treatment-related toxicities, we explored whether we could identify critical factors for BETi mediated AR-V7 regulation in CRPC. The ability of BETi to regulate AR-V7 may suggest an effect of BETi on pre-mRNA splicing of AR resulting in the observed decrease of AR-V7 expression. RNAseq analysis of the AR-V7 expressing CRPC cell line LNCaP95 treated with BETi demonstrated an increase in total splicing. Despite this, focused analysis of splicing factors and spliceosome components identified a subset of eight splicing factors being downregulated by BETi treatment, including one yet-uncharacterized factor (splicing factor B; Sf-B) that is crucial for AR-V7 expression and LNCaP95 cell growth. In addition, mCRPC patients who express high levels of Sf-B had a significantly poorer outcome and the protein structure of Sf-B is druggable using the drug discovery knowledgebase canSAR. Based on our results, we propose that inhibition of Sf-B may lead to decreased splicing and expression of AR-V7; providing a novel approach to target AR-V7 in mCRPC.
Citation Format: Adam Sharp, Jon Welti, Wei Yuan, Ines Figueiredo, Veronica Gil, Daniel Nava Rodrigues, Maryou Lambros, Eleanor Knight, Jian Ning, Jeff Francis, David Dolling, Lorna Pope, Antje Neeb, Gunther Boysen, Yezi Zhu, Mateus Crespo, Alec Paschalis, Jun Luo, Stephen Plymate, Bissan Al-Lazikani, Amanda Swain, Johann de Bono. Targeting the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) family proteins and beyond in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Overcoming aberrant androgen receptor (AR) signaling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Prostate Cancer: Advances in Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research; 2017 Dec 2-5; Orlando, Florida. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(16 Suppl):Abstract nr A067.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Sharp
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | - Jon Welti
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | - Wei Yuan
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | | | - Veronica Gil
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | | | | | | | - Jian Ning
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | - Jeff Francis
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | - David Dolling
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | - Lorna Pope
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | - Antje Neeb
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | | | - Yezi Zhu
- 2Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD,
| | - Mateus Crespo
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | | | - Jun Luo
- 2Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD,
| | | | | | - Amanda Swain
- 1Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom,
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Coker EA, Kinnersley B, Sud A, Micco PD, Al-Lazikani B, Houlston R. Abstract 776: Utilising genetic susceptibility and big data to inform novel cancer therapies. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Despite a move towards personalised medicine, attrition rates for new cancer drugs remain unacceptably high. The pharmaceutical industry has also shown a preference for well-studied targets and pathways, as evidenced by ‘me too' drugs. Together with the challenge of inadequate pre-clinical models, this indicates a need for novel, evidence-based therapeutic targets. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 450 robust genetic variants associated with increased cancer risk. Genes implicated through GWAS are often mutated somatically and therefore represent attractive therapeutic targets. Examples include the target of venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, BCL2.
We exploit this principle more generally by integrating genetic associations for common cancers with drug target data and druggability using the canSAR drug discovery knowledgebase (https://cansar.icr.ac.uk). By harnessing the power of Big Data we aim to both identify opportunities for repurposing of existing drugs, and prioritise novel targets for cancer drug discovery.
We mined the NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published GWAS for all cancer risk SNPs. We annotated candidate target genes through overlapping topologically associating domains (TADs), a more sensitive technique than previously published methods using linkage disequilibrium. We used canSAR to identify target genes for which there is no FDA-approved small molecule drug, and the resource Probe Miner to identify targets for which high-quality chemical probes exist. We also utilised canSAR's machine learning algorithms to assess the druggability of target genes by structure-, ligand-, precedence- and network-based approaches.
We additionally analysed results from cancer drug databases to ascertain whether there is an enrichment of ‘drug target-indication pairs' at successive stages of the drug development pathway for which supporting evidence from GWAS exists: this indicates potential ‘stumbling blocks' that may present a risk for future drug development projects.
7 257 protein-coding genes mapped within TADs overlapping cancer risk SNPs. Of these, 98 were pre-existing targets for which there is an FDA-approved small molecule drug. For the remaining 7 159 genes we performed multi-faceted druggability analyses incorporating assessments of the 3D structure of the target and any protein complexes it exists in, chemical properties of known ligands of the target, and the target's position and role within the human interactome. We comprehensively rank our target-indication pairings by criteria including novelty relative to existing targets and predicted attrition risk.
Mapping approved drug targets back to cancer GWAS signals enables identification of both novel drug targets and patient populations. Collectively our findings show the value of investigating germline cancer genetics as part of interdisciplinary, data-driven approaches to inform drug discovery.
Citation Format: Elizabeth A. Coker, Ben Kinnersley, Amit Sud, Patrizio Di Micco, Bissan Al-Lazikani, Richard Houlston. Utilising genetic susceptibility and big data to inform novel cancer therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 776.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amit Sud
- Inst. of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wasti A, Carceller F, George S, Koutroumanidou E, Izquierdo E, Guerra P, Zarowiecki M, Campbell J, Al-Lazikani B, Marshall L, Jones C, Clarke M, Powell K, Crowe T, Rogers T, Chisholm J, Vaidya S, Mandeville H, Saran F, Zebian B, Hettige S, Al-Sarraj S, Bridges L, Jacques T, Hargrave D, Pearson A, Walker B, de Castro DG, Hubank M, Chesler L. EAPH-05. MOLECULAR PROFILING AND IDENTIFICATION OF TARGETED THERAPIES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS WITH PRIMARY CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMOURS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Neuro Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy059.174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fernando Carceller
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Sally George
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lynley Marshall
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Chris Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Julia Chisholm
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Sucheta Vaidya
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Henry Mandeville
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Frank Saran
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andy Pearson
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Brian Walker
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | | | - Louis Chesler
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wedge DC, Gundem G, Mitchell T, Woodcock DJ, Martincorena I, Ghori M, Zamora J, Butler A, Whitaker H, Kote-Jarai Z, Alexandrov LB, Van Loo P, Massie CE, Dentro S, Warren AY, Verrill C, Berney DM, Dennis N, Merson S, Hawkins S, Howat W, Lu YJ, Lambert A, Kay J, Kremeyer B, Karaszi K, Luxton H, Camacho N, Marsden L, Edwards S, Matthews L, Bo V, Leongamornlert D, McLaren S, Ng A, Yu Y, Zhang H, Dadaev T, Thomas S, Easton DF, Ahmed M, Bancroft E, Fisher C, Livni N, Nicol D, Tavaré S, Gill P, Greenman C, Khoo V, Van As N, Kumar P, Ogden C, Cahill D, Thompson A, Mayer E, Rowe E, Dudderidge T, Gnanapragasam V, Shah NC, Raine K, Jones D, Menzies A, Stebbings L, Teague J, Hazell S, Corbishley C, de Bono J, Attard G, Isaacs W, Visakorpi T, Fraser M, Boutros PC, Bristow RG, Workman P, Sander C, Hamdy FC, Futreal A, McDermott U, Al-Lazikani B, Lynch AG, Bova GS, Foster CS, Brewer DS, Neal DE, Cooper CS, Eeles RA. Sequencing of prostate cancers identifies new cancer genes, routes of progression and drug targets. Nat Genet 2018; 50:682-692. [PMID: 29662167 PMCID: PMC6372064 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0086-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer represents a substantial clinical challenge because it is difficult to predict outcome and advanced disease is often fatal. We sequenced the whole genomes of 112 primary and metastatic prostate cancer samples. From joint analysis of these cancers with those from previous studies (930 cancers in total), we found evidence for 22 previously unidentified putative driver genes harboring coding mutations, as well as evidence for NEAT1 and FOXA1 acting as drivers through noncoding mutations. Through the temporal dissection of aberrations, we identified driver mutations specifically associated with steps in the progression of prostate cancer, establishing, for example, loss of CHD1 and BRCA2 as early events in cancer development of ETS fusion-negative cancers. Computational chemogenomic (canSAR) analysis of prostate cancer mutations identified 11 targets of approved drugs, 7 targets of investigational drugs, and 62 targets of compounds that may be active and should be considered candidates for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Wedge
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
| | - Gunes Gundem
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Mitchell
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Dan J Woodcock
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Mohammed Ghori
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jorge Zamora
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Adam Butler
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Hayley Whitaker
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Van Loo
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Cancer Genomics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Charlie E Massie
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Early Detection Programme, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefan Dentro
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Cancer Genomics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Clare Verrill
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dan M Berney
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Nening Dennis
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Sue Merson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Steve Hawkins
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - William Howat
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yong-Jie Lu
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Adam Lambert
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Barbara Kremeyer
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Katalin Karaszi
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hayley Luxton
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Niedzica Camacho
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Luke Marsden
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Lucy Matthews
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Valeria Bo
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel Leongamornlert
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stuart McLaren
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Anthony Ng
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yongwei Yu
- Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | - Sarah Thomas
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Bancroft
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Naomi Livni
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - David Nicol
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Simon Tavaré
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pelvender Gill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Vincent Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - Pardeep Kumar
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - Declan Cahill
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Alan Thompson
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Erik Mayer
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nimish C Shah
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Keiran Raine
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - David Jones
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew Menzies
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Lucy Stebbings
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jon Teague
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Steven Hazell
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Tapio Visakorpi
- Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, BioMediTech, University of Tampere and Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Michael Fraser
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Chris Sander
- cBio Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Ultan McDermott
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Andrew G Lynch
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- School of Mathematics and Statistics/School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, Fife, UK
| | - G Steven Bova
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, BioMediTech, University of Tampere and Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Daniel S Brewer
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Colin S Cooper
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Banerji U, Stewart A, Coker E, Minchom A, Pölsterl S, Georgiou A, Al-Lazikani B. Unravelling the context specificity of signalling in KRAS mutant cancers: Implications for design of clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy048.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
33
|
Antolin AA, Tym JE, Komianou A, Collins I, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. Objective, Quantitative, Data-Driven Assessment of Chemical Probes. Cell Chem Biol 2018; 25:194-205.e5. [PMID: 29249694 PMCID: PMC5814752 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Chemical probes are essential tools for understanding biological systems and for target validation, yet selecting probes for biomedical research is rarely based on objective assessment of all potential compounds. Here, we describe the Probe Miner: Chemical Probes Objective Assessment resource, capitalizing on the plethora of public medicinal chemistry data to empower quantitative, objective, data-driven evaluation of chemical probes. We assess >1.8 million compounds for their suitability as chemical tools against 2,220 human targets and dissect the biases and limitations encountered. Probe Miner represents a valuable resource to aid the identification of potential chemical probes, particularly when used alongside expert curation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert A Antolin
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK; Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Joseph E Tym
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Angeliki Komianou
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ian Collins
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK; Department of Data Science, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Coker EA, Di Micco P, Tym JE, Mitsopoulos C, Komianou A, Antolin AA, Al-Lazikani B. Abstract B096: canSAR, a cancer research and drug discovery knowledgebase. Mol Cancer Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-b096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
canSAR (http://cansar.icr.ac.uk) is a freely available, multidisciplinary, cancer-focused knowledgebase developed to bring together information from genomic, transcriptomic, protein, pathway, chemical, pharmacologic, and 3D structural data. canSAR provides a powerful, uniqu,e and user-friendly portal to enable translational research and to help generate and test hypotheses and support scientific decision-making in drug discovery both before and after target selection. With its three alternative approaches to examine druggability, canSAR represents the most comprehensive public druggability assessment resource. canSAR provides 3D-structure-based druggability assessment for more than 3,100,000 cavities on more than 391,000 protein chains; ligand-based druggability assessment for 8,197 human proteins; and, more recently, protein network-based druggability results for 13,345 human proteins. Together these provide a powerful enabler for target selection and validation for drug discovery. Druggability assessments are presented alongside data from resources including 224,000 clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, drug indications from Cancer.gov, target gene expression from TCGA for cell lines, and patient samples to provide a detailed picture of the target’s biologic context. Recent updates to canSAR include integration of ChEMBL 23 and additional curation of a protein-protein interaction network of 13,500 nodes. canSAR is currently used by more than 65,000 users annually from both academia and industry, and we will illustrate how canSAR can empower decision making in translational drug discovery.
Citation Format: Elizabeth A. Coker, Patrizio Di Micco, Joesph E. Tym, Costas Mitsopoulos, Angeliki Komianou, Albert A. Antolin, Bissan Al-Lazikani. canSAR, a cancer research and drug discovery knowledgebase [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B096.
Collapse
|
35
|
Antolin AA, Tym JE, Komianou A, Collins I, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. Abstract A024: Probe Miner: objective, quantitative, data-driven assessment of chemical probes for target validation. Mol Cancer Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-a024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Chemical probes are important, widely used reagents for understanding biologic systems and for target validation. However, selection of chemical probes is largely subjective and prone to historical and commercial biases. Despite many publications discussing the aspirational properties of chemical probes and the proposal of "fitness factors" to be considered when assessing chemical tools, scientists often select probes through web-based searchers or previous literature that are heavily biased towards older and often flawed probes or use vendor catalogues that do not discriminate between probes. Here, we analyze the scope and quality of published bioactive molecules and uncover large biases and limitations of chemical tools in public databases that need to be urgently addressed and should be always considered when using chemical tools. We also provide the online Probe Miner resource (http://probeminer.icr.ac.uk) capitalizing on the plethora of public pharmacologic data to enable quantitative, unbiased, objective, Big Data-driven assessment of chemical probes and complement expert-curated approaches. We assess >1.8m compounds for their suitability as chemical tools against 2,220 human targets, demonstrating that large-scale public data can contribute to improving chemical probe assessment and prioritization to empower researchers in the selection of chemical tools for biomedical research and target validation.
Citation Format: Albert A. Antolin, Joe E. Tym, Angeliki Komianou, Ian Collins, Paul Workman, Bissan Al-Lazikani. Probe Miner: objective, quantitative, data-driven assessment of chemical probes for target validation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joe E. Tym
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ian Collins
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Workman
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cato L, Neeb A, Sharp A, Buzón V, Ficarro SB, Yang L, Muhle-Goll C, Kuznik NC, Riisnaes R, Nava Rodrigues D, Armant O, Gourain V, Adelmant G, Ntim EA, Westerling T, Dolling D, Rescigno P, Figueiredo I, Fauser F, Wu J, Rottenberg JT, Shatkina L, Ester C, Luy B, Puchta H, Troppmair J, Jung N, Bräse S, Strähle U, Marto JA, Nienhaus GU, Al-Lazikani B, Salvatella X, de Bono JS, Cato ACB, Brown M. Development of Bag-1L as a therapeutic target in androgen receptor-dependent prostate cancer. eLife 2017; 6:e27159. [PMID: 28826504 PMCID: PMC5629025 DOI: 10.7554/elife.27159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeting the activation function-1 (AF-1) domain located in the N-terminus of the androgen receptor (AR) is an attractive therapeutic alternative to the current approaches to inhibit AR action in prostate cancer (PCa). Here we show that the AR AF-1 is bound by the cochaperone Bag-1L. Mutations in the AR interaction domain or loss of Bag-1L abrogate AR signaling and reduce PCa growth. Clinically, Bag-1L protein levels increase with progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) and high levels of Bag-1L in primary PCa associate with a reduced clinical benefit from abiraterone when these tumors progress. Intriguingly, residues in Bag-1L important for its interaction with the AR AF-1 are within a potentially druggable pocket, implicating Bag-1L as a potential therapeutic target in PCa.
Collapse
|
37
|
Stewart A, Coker EA, Minchom A, Pölsterl S, Georgiou A, Huang P, Al-Lazikani B, Banerji U. Abstract 996: A translational phosphoproteomic approach to study differences in KRAS signaling in pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aims To understand any context-dependent differences in signaling pathways between pancreatic (PAN), colorectal (CR) and lung (LU) cancers with KRAS mutations using a targeted phosphoproteomic approach in cell lines and patient-derived cancer cells exposed to targeted anticancer drugs ex-vivo.
Materials and Methods We studied a panel of 30 KRAS mutant cell lines: 10 PAN, 10 CR and 10 LU cell lines. Cancer cells were also immuno-magnetically isolated from pleural effusions and ascites of patients with KRAS mutant CR and LU cancer and exposed to a DMSO control and clinically relevant concentrations of PI3K (pictilisib), AKT (AZD5363), mTOR (everolimus), EGFR (gefitinib), BRAF (vemurafenib), MEK (trametinib) and HSP90 (luminespib) inhibitors for 1 hr. Dynamic changes in a panel of 52 relevant phosphoproteins were studied using the Luminex 200 platform. Hierarchical clustering and logistic regression were used to find differences in dynamic changes in phosphoproteins between KRAS mutant, PAN, CR and LU cancer cells.
Results Supervised clustering studying exposure to different drugs revealed that when exposed to the PI3K inhibitor, pictilisib, KRAS mutant LU cancers did not significantly cluster together; p=0.008, p=0.104 following Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Independently, logistic regression showed significant differences in signaling of KRAS mutant cells when exposed to the PI3K inhibitor, pictilisib. PAN and CR cancers showed an increase in p-MEK while LU cancer cells did not; p=0.0195. LU cancer cell lines showed significantly more reduction of p-AKT compared to PAN and CR cell lines when exposed to the PI3K inhibitor; p=0.0423. As expected, exposure to vemurafenib increased p-MEK levels across the majority of the KRAS mutant cell lines, however compensatory reductions in p-mTOR levels were seen significantly more in PAN and CR cell lines and not in LU cell lines; p=0.0084. The dynamic phosphoprotein changes caused by pictilisib were validated in cancer cells isolated from serous effusions of 3 KRAS mutant LU and 4 KRAS mutant CR cancer patients. Validation of these findings using multiple other inhibitors and time-points is ongoing.
Interpretation/conclusions We hypothesise that the significantly greater reduction in p-AKT and less increase of compensatory p-MEK caused by PI3K inhibition in KRAS mutant LU cells compared to KRAS mutant PAN and CR cell lines represents preferential signaling of these cells through the PI3K pathway. Increase in p-MEK driven by BRAF inhibitors caused a reduction in p-mTOR in PAN and CR but not in LU cell lines also indicating preferential dependence of signaling in KRAS mutant lung cancer cells through the PI3K pathway. These findings are important while designing clinical trials of KRAS mutant cancers and more broadly to precision medicine where mutation status independent of tissue context is often used.
Citation Format: Adam Stewart, Elizabeth A. Coker, Anna Minchom, Sebastian Pölsterl, Alexandros Georgiou, Paul Huang, Bissan Al-Lazikani, Udai Banerji. A translational phosphoproteomic approach to study differences in KRAS signaling in pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 996. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-996
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Stewart
- 1The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anna Minchom
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandros Georgiou
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Huang
- 1The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Udai Banerji
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Coker EA, Mitsopoulos C, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. SiGNet: A signaling network data simulator to enable signaling network inference. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0177701. [PMID: 28545060 PMCID: PMC5435248 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Network models are widely used to describe complex signaling systems. Cellular wiring varies in different cellular contexts and numerous inference techniques have been developed to infer the structure of a network from experimental data of the network's behavior. To objectively identify which inference strategy is best suited to a specific network, a gold standard network and dataset are required. However, suitable datasets for benchmarking are difficult to find. Numerous tools exist that can simulate data for transcriptional networks, but these are of limited use for the study of signaling networks. Here, we describe SiGNet (Signal Generator for Networks): a Cytoscape app that simulates experimental data for a signaling network of known structure. SiGNet has been developed and tested against published experimental data, incorporating information on network architecture, and the directionality and strength of interactions to create biological data in silico. SiGNet is the first tool to simulate biological signaling data, enabling an accurate and systematic assessment of inference strategies. SiGNet can also be used to produce preliminary models of key biological pathways following perturbation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Coker
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Costas Mitsopoulos
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Martínez-Jiménez F, Overington JP, Al-Lazikani B, Marti-Renom MA. Rational design of non-resistant targeted cancer therapies. Sci Rep 2017; 7:46632. [PMID: 28436422 PMCID: PMC5402386 DOI: 10.1038/srep46632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug resistance is one of the major problems in targeted cancer therapy. A major cause of resistance is changes in the amino acids that form the drug-target binding site. Despite of the numerous efforts made to individually understand and overcome these mutations, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis of the mutational landscape that can prospectively estimate drug-resistance mutations. Here we describe and computationally validate a framework that combines the cancer-specific likelihood with the resistance impact to enable the detection of single point mutations with the highest chance to be responsible of resistance to a particular targeted cancer therapy. Moreover, for these treatment-threatening mutations, the model proposes alternative therapies overcoming the resistance. We exemplified the applicability of the model using EGFR-gefitinib treatment for Lung Adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and Lung Squamous Cell Cancer (LSCC) and the ERK2-VTX11e treatment for melanoma and colorectal cancer. Our model correctly identified the phenotype known resistance mutations, including the classic EGFR-T790M and the ERK2-P58L/S/T mutations. Moreover, the model predicted new previously undescribed mutations as potentially responsible of drug resistance. Finally, we provided a map of the predicted sensitivity of alternative ERK2 and EGFR inhibitors, with a particular highlight of two molecules with a low predicted resistance impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Martínez-Jiménez
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Gene Regulation, Stem Cells and Cancer Program, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - John P. Overington
- Medicines Discovery Catapult Block 35, Mereside, Alderley Park, Alderley Edge, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, UK
| | | | - Marc A. Marti-Renom
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Gene Regulation, Stem Cells and Cancer Program, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Santos R, Ursu O, Gaulton A, Bento AP, Donadi RS, Bologa CG, Karlsson A, Al-Lazikani B, Hersey A, Oprea TI, Overington JP. A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017; 16:19-34. [PMID: 27910877 PMCID: PMC6314433 DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2016.230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1281] [Impact Index Per Article: 183.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The success of mechanism-based drug discovery depends on the definition of the drug target. This definition becomes even more important as we try to link drug response to genetic variation, understand stratified clinical efficacy and safety, rationalize the differences between drugs in the same therapeutic class and predict drug utility in patient subgroups. However, drug targets are often poorly defined in the literature, both for launched drugs and for potential therapeutic agents in discovery and development. Here, we present an updated comprehensive map of molecular targets of approved drugs. We curate a total of 893 human and pathogen-derived biomolecules through which 1,578 US FDA-approved drugs act. These biomolecules include 667 human-genome-derived proteins targeted by drugs for human disease. Analysis of these drug targets indicates the continued dominance of privileged target families across disease areas, but also the growth of novel first-in-class mechanisms, particularly in oncology. We explore the relationships between bioactivity class and clinical success, as well as the presence of orthologues between human and animal models and between pathogen and human genomes. Through the collaboration of three independent teams, we highlight some of the ongoing challenges in accurately defining the targets of molecular therapeutics and present conventions for deconvoluting the complexities of molecular pharmacology and drug efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Santos
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
- Computational Biology and Target Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, UK
| | - Oleg Ursu
- Translational Informatics Division, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSC09 5025, 700 Camino de Salud NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
| | - Anna Gaulton
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - A Patrícia Bento
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Ramesh S Donadi
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Cristian G Bologa
- Translational Informatics Division, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSC09 5025, 700 Camino de Salud NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
| | - Anneli Karlsson
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
- BenevolentAI, 40 Churchway, London NW1 1LW, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Anne Hersey
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Tudor I Oprea
- Translational Informatics Division, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSC09 5025, 700 Camino de Salud NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
| | - John P Overington
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
- BenevolentAI, 40 Churchway, London NW1 1LW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
It is now recognised that genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic heterogeneity within individual human cancers is responsible for therapeutic resistance – knowledge that is having a profound impact on current thinking and experimentation. There has been concern that molecularly targeted therapy is doomed to failure, with resistant clones emerging in response to the Darwinian selective pressure of any drug treatment. However, two studies have shown that the evolution of drug resistance can be restrained by co-administration of a pharmacologic inhibitor of the HSP90 molecular chaperone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Paul A Clarke
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yap TA, Smith AD, Ferraldeschi R, Al-Lazikani B, Workman P, de Bono JS. Drug discovery in advanced prostate cancer: translating biology into therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016; 15:699-718. [DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2016.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
43
|
Coker EA, Stewart A, Minchom A, O’Brien M, Yap T, Workman P, Banerji U, Al-Lazikani B. Abstract 4383: SOCRATES: integrating ex vivo and in silico analysis to identify optimal drug combinations for patients. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-4383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Recent work on cancer heterogeneity and evolution has greatly enhanced our understanding of drivers of drug resistance, but this has also highlighted the need to move away from generic, “one-size-fits-all” treatment regimes. It is clear that we should tailor therapy to individual patients at different stages of disease based on the current behaviour of their tumour cells, yet detailed experimental characterisation and analysis of patient tissue is impractical and costly. Predictive computational models that can produce patient-specific recommendations of drug combinations would therefore be of great value to the field of personalised medicine. In silico modelling has already been used to successfully predict synergistic drug combinations in single cell lines in the lab, but such approaches have not yet been translated to dynamic, real patient data in the clinic.
The SOCRATES project (Signalling output to rationalise combinations of targeted anticancer therapies) integrates experimental data and computational analysis to predict context-specific synergistic drug combinations. Here we present ambitious computational modelling of dynamic signalling network changes in response to ex vivo exposure of seven targeted drugs used singly at clinically appropriate concentrations. We also apply our adaptive modelling to genomics and proteomics data from 54 proteins in over 30 non small-cell lung cancer cell lines and ten patient samples to predict and experimentally validate personalised, context specific drug combinations. We will describe our adaptive, in silico modelling for predicting response to drug combinations, including novel methods utilizing network topology. We have predicted over 50 synergistic drug combinations and will present our predictions alongside initial results of experimental validation in the lab. We will also illustrate the differences observed in various cell lines and patient derived cells depending on genetic context.
SOCRATES is, to our knowledge, the first project of its kind and is a prototype for the future of adaptive, individualised cancer treatment.
Citation Format: Elizabeth A. Coker, Adam Stewart, Anna Minchom, Mary O’Brien, Timothy Yap, Paul Workman, Udai Banerji, Bissan Al-Lazikani. SOCRATES: integrating ex vivo and in silico analysis to identify optimal drug combinations for patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4383.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam Stewart
- 1The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Minchom
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Timothy Yap
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Workman
- 1The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Udai Banerji
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Stewart A, Coker E, Minchom A, Thavasu P, Georgiou A, Sadanandam A, Yap TA, de Bono JS, Al-Lazikani B, Banerji U. Abstract 3099: KRAS and clinical context: Differential dynamic signaling output of KRAS mutant lung, colorectal and pancreatic cancer cell lines when exposed to targeted anticancer drugs. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-3099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Clinical trials have shown that cancers originating from different tissues driven by the same oncogene respond differently to targeted anticancer drugs. We aimed to understand different signaling patterns in KRAS mutant cells derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC) and pancreatic cancer.
Materials and methods
We optimized a 50 phosphoprotein antibody-based assay on the Luminex 200 platform. We then exposed a panel of 15 KRAS mutant cell lines (5 cell lines each originating in the lung, pancreas and colon) to a DMSO control (n = 3) and clinically significant concentrations (Cmax achieved in humans adjusted for protein binding in culture medium) of a PI3K (GDC-0941), AKT (AZD5363), m-TOR (everolimus), BRAF (vemurafenib), EGFR (gefitinib), MEK (trametinib) and an HSP90 inhibitor (luminespib) for 1 hr. We quantified the change in phosphorylation of proteins for each drug compared to control. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse differences between KRAS-driven cell lines originating from different anatomical sites.
Results
There were changes in phosphorylation related to the pharmacodynamic effects of the drug independent of cell line of origin; however, there were interesting differences between KRAS mutant cells originating from different anatomical sites. In NSCLC cell lines, p-EGFR levels changed significantly less when exposed to PI3K, AKT and m-TOR inhibitors (p = 0.047, 0.022 and 0.047, respectively) when compared to cells originating from CRC and pancreatic cancer. CRC cell lines, when compared to NSCLC and pancreatic cancer cell lines, showed significantly less changes in phosphorylation of key cell cycle regulators such as CHK1 when exposed to PI3K, AKT and m-TOR inhibitors, (p = 0.001, 0.047 and 0.047, respectively) and RB when exposed to an AKT and m-TOR inhibitor (p = 0.047 and 0.047, respectively). Interestingly, pancreatic cell lines showed significantly more changes in p-m-TOR compared to CRC and NSCLC cell lines following exposure to PI3K and AKT inhibitors (p = 0.0095 and 0.022, respectively). Of note, drugs not directly targeting the PI3K pathway differentially regulated different nodes in the PI3K pathway, for example, BRAF inhibitors significantly differentially changed levels of phosphorylation at different nodes in the PI3K pathway such as AKT in NSCLC cell lines, p = 0.047, p70S6K in CRC cell lines, p = 0.0472 and PRAS40 in the pancreatic cancer cell lines, p = 0.022.
Conclusion
These results suggest that there are significant differences in signaling patterns caused by PI3K pathway inhibitors in KRAS mutant NSCLC, CRC and pancreatic cancer cell lines. Our findings shed light on the putative use of PI3K pathway inhibitors in KRAS mutant cancers. They also question the universal application of solely using genetic mutations to stratify patients in ‘basket’ clinical studies.
Citation Format: Adam Stewart, Elizabeth Coker, Anna Minchom, Parames Thavasu, Alexandros Georgiou, Anguraj Sadanandam, Timothy A. Yap, Johann S. de Bono, Bissan Al-Lazikani, Udai Banerji. KRAS and clinical context: Differential dynamic signaling output of KRAS mutant lung, colorectal and pancreatic cancer cell lines when exposed to targeted anticancer drugs. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3099.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Stewart
- 1The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anna Minchom
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandros Georgiou
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Timothy A. Yap
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johann S. de Bono
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Udai Banerji
- 2The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Campbell J, Ryan CJ, Brough R, Bajrami I, Pemberton HN, Chong IY, Costa-Cabral S, Frankum J, Gulati A, Holme H, Miller R, Postel-Vinay S, Rafiq R, Wei W, Williamson CT, Quigley DA, Tym J, Al-Lazikani B, Fenton T, Natrajan R, Strauss SJ, Ashworth A, Lord CJ. Large-Scale Profiling of Kinase Dependencies in Cancer Cell Lines. Cell Rep 2016; 14:2490-501. [PMID: 26947069 PMCID: PMC4802229 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Revised: 11/07/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
One approach to identifying cancer-specific vulnerabilities and therapeutic targets is to profile genetic dependencies in cancer cell lines. Here, we describe data from a series of siRNA screens that identify the kinase genetic dependencies in 117 cancer cell lines from ten cancer types. By integrating the siRNA screen data with molecular profiling data, including exome sequencing data, we show how vulnerabilities/genetic dependencies that are associated with mutations in specific cancer driver genes can be identified. By integrating additional data sets into this analysis, including protein-protein interaction data, we also demonstrate that the genetic dependencies associated with many cancer driver genes form dense connections on functional interaction networks. We demonstrate the utility of this resource by using it to predict the drug sensitivity of genetically or histologically defined subsets of tumor cell lines, including an increased sensitivity of osteosarcoma cell lines to FGFR inhibitors and SMAD4 mutant tumor cells to mitotic inhibitors.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Gene Expression Profiling
- Humans
- Mutation
- Neoplasms/enzymology
- Neoplasms/genetics
- Neoplasms/pathology
- Protein Kinases/chemistry
- Protein Kinases/genetics
- Protein Kinases/metabolism
- RNA Interference
- RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism
- Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/genetics
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/metabolism
- Smad4 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors
- Smad4 Protein/genetics
- Smad4 Protein/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Campbell
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Colm J Ryan
- Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Rachel Brough
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Ilirjana Bajrami
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Helen N Pemberton
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Irene Y Chong
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Sara Costa-Cabral
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Jessica Frankum
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Aditi Gulati
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Harriet Holme
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Rowan Miller
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Sophie Postel-Vinay
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Rumana Rafiq
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Wenbin Wei
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Chris T Williamson
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - David A Quigley
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Joe Tym
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Timothy Fenton
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Rachael Natrajan
- Functional Genomics Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Sandra J Strauss
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Alan Ashworth
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK.
| | - Christopher J Lord
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre and CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tym JE, Mitsopoulos C, Coker EA, Razaz P, Schierz AC, Antolin AA, Al-Lazikani B. canSAR: an updated cancer research and drug discovery knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D938-43. [PMID: 26673713 PMCID: PMC4702774 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
canSAR (http://cansar.icr.ac.uk) is a publicly available, multidisciplinary, cancer-focused knowledgebase developed to support cancer translational research and drug discovery. canSAR integrates genomic, protein, pharmacological, drug and chemical data with structural biology, protein networks and druggability data. canSAR is widely used to rapidly access information and help interpret experimental data in a translational and drug discovery context. Here we describe major enhancements to canSAR including new data, improved search and browsing capabilities, new disease and cancer cell line summaries and new and enhanced batch analysis tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E Tym
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Costas Mitsopoulos
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Coker
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Parisa Razaz
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Amanda C Schierz
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Albert A Antolin
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Antolin AA, Workman P, Mestres J, Al-Lazikani B. Polypharmacology in Precision Oncology: Current Applications and Future Prospects. Curr Pharm Des 2016; 22:6935-6945. [PMID: 27669965 PMCID: PMC5403974 DOI: 10.2174/1381612822666160923115828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, a more comprehensive, large-scale approach to studying cancer genetics and biology has revealed the challenges of tumor heterogeneity, adaption, evolution and drug resistance, while systems-based pharmacology and chemical biology strategies have uncovered a much more complex interaction between drugs and the human proteome than was previously anticipated. In this mini-review we assess the progress and potential of drug polypharmacology in biomarker-driven precision oncology. Polypharmacology not only provides great opportunities for drug repurposing to exploit off-target effects in a new single-target indication but through simultaneous blockade of multiple targets or pathways offers exciting opportunities to slow, overcome or even prevent inherent or adaptive drug resistance. We highlight the many challenges associated with exploiting known or desired polypharmacology in drug design and development, and assess computational and experimental methods to uncover unknown polypharmacology. A comprehensive understanding of the intricate links between polypharmacology, efficacy and safety is urgently needed if we are to tackle the enduring challenge of cancer drug resistance and to fully exploit polypharmacology for the ultimate benefit of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert A. Antolin
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Systems Pharmacology, Research Program on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), IMIM Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute and University Pompeu Fabra, Parc de Recerca Biomèdica, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jordi Mestres
- Systems Pharmacology, Research Program on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), IMIM Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute and University Pompeu Fabra, Parc de Recerca Biomèdica, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mitsopoulos C, Schierz AC, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. Distinctive Behaviors of Druggable Proteins in Cellular Networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11:e1004597. [PMID: 26699810 PMCID: PMC4689399 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The interaction environment of a protein in a cellular network is important in defining the role that the protein plays in the system as a whole, and thus its potential suitability as a drug target. Despite the importance of the network environment, it is neglected during target selection for drug discovery. Here, we present the first systematic, comprehensive computational analysis of topological, community and graphical network parameters of the human interactome and identify discriminatory network patterns that strongly distinguish drug targets from the interactome as a whole. Importantly, we identify striking differences in the network behavior of targets of cancer drugs versus targets from other therapeutic areas and explore how they may relate to successful drug combinations to overcome acquired resistance to cancer drugs. We develop, computationally validate and provide the first public domain predictive algorithm for identifying druggable neighborhoods based on network parameters. We also make available full predictions for 13,345 proteins to aid target selection for drug discovery. All target predictions are available through canSAR.icr.ac.uk. Underlying data and tools are available at https://cansar.icr.ac.uk/cansar/publications/druggable_network_neighbourhoods/. The need for well-validated targets for drug discovery is more pressing than ever, especially in cancer in view of resistance to current therapeutics coupled with late stage drug failures. Target prioritization and selection methodologies have typically not taken the protein interaction environment into account. Here we analyze a large representation of the human interactome comprising almost 90,000 interactions between 13,345 proteins. We assess these interactions using an extensive set of topological, graphical and community parameters, and we identify behaviors that distinguish the protein interaction environments of drug targets from the general interactome. Moreover, we identify clear distinctions between the network environment of cancer-drug targets and targets from other therapeutics areas. We use these distinguishing properties to build a predictive methodology to prioritize potential drug targets based on network parameters alone and we validate our predictive models using current FDA-approved drug targets. Our models provide an objective, interactome-based target prioritization methodology to complement existing structure-based and ligand-based prioritization methods. We provide our interactome-based predictions alongside other druggability predictors within the public canSAR resource (cansar.icr.ac.uk).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costas Mitsopoulos
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda C. Schierz
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Workman
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
The DNA damage response (DDR) is essential for maintaining the genomic integrity of the cell, and its disruption is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Classically, defects in the DDR have been exploited therapeutically in the treatment of cancer with radiation therapies or genotoxic chemotherapies. More recently, protein components of the DDR systems have been identified as promising avenues for targeted cancer therapeutics. Here, we present an in-depth analysis of the function, role in cancer and therapeutic potential of 450 expert-curated human DDR genes. We discuss the DDR drugs that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or that are under clinical investigation. We examine large-scale genomic and expression data for 15 cancers to identify deregulated components of the DDR, and we apply systematic computational analysis to identify DDR proteins that are amenable to modulation by small molecules, highlighting potential novel therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence H Pearl
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Amanda C Schierz
- 1] Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK. [2] Bluefool Innovations, 4 May Close, Sandhurst, Berkshire GU47 0UG, UK
| | - Simon E Ward
- Translational Drug Discovery Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK
| | - Bissan Al-Lazikani
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Frances M G Pearl
- 1] Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK. [2] Translational Drug Discovery Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Howes J, Lu BF, Powers M, Mitsopoulos C, Al-Lazikani B, Linardopoulos S, Clarke P, Workman P. Abstract 2730: RNAi knockdown or chemical inhibition of anaphase-promoting complex components is synthetic lethal with HSP90 inhibition. Cancer Res 2014. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-2730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) maintains the conformation, stability and function of oncogenic client proteins, many of which are mutated or overexpressed. Therefore, HSP90 is an important cancer therapeutic target. To further increase the efficacy of HSP90 inhibitors, combinatorial therapeutic strategies may be beneficial. Here we report an unbiased global screening approach to identify genes that encode potentially druggable proteins that modulate cellular responses to HSP90 inhibition. From the 7,593 genes that were tested, three components of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) were among the genes which when silenced caused significant HSP90 inhibitor sensitisation. siRNA knockdown of ANAPC1, -8 or -4 produced up to three-fold sensitisation to HSP90 inhibitors 17-AAG and AUY922 in human colon cancer cells. Intriguingly, we show that combinatorial siRNA-mediated ANAPC1 knockdown and HSP90 inhibition induced an accumulation of mitotic cells exhibiting a tri-polar spindle formation. A marked increase in cyclin B1 and aurora A protein levels was observed in response to combinatorial ANAPC1 knockdown and HSP90 inhibition. These effects may have been responsible for the observed formation of aberrations in the mitotic spindle architecture. Furthermore, after a period of prolonged mitotic arrest, cancer cells treated with combinational ANAPC1 knockdown and HSP90 inhibition were committed to apoptosis. Mimicking siRNA knockdown, treatment with the APC/C inhibitor proTAME synergistically sensitised human colon carcinoma cells to HSP90 inhibition. These exciting results provide a mechanistic explanation underlying the HSP90 inhibitor sensitisation phenotype, and suggest that the APC/C may represent an interesting therapeutic target to exploit in combination with HSP90 inhibitors. Furthermore, therapeutic approaches may be developed which exploit the vulnerability of mitotic cancer cells in the context of HSP90 inhibition.
Citation Format: Jennifer Howes, Bing-Feng Lu, Marissa Powers, Costas Mitsopoulos, Bissan Al-Lazikani, Spiros Linardopoulos, Paul Clarke, Paul Workman. RNAi knockdown or chemical inhibition of anaphase-promoting complex components is synthetic lethal with HSP90 inhibition. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2730. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2730
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bing-Feng Lu
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul Clarke
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Workman
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|