1
|
Schneider KR, Fanzo J, Haddad L, Herrero M, Moncayo JR, Herforth A, Remans R, Guarin A, Resnick D, Covic N, Béné C, Cattaneo A, Aburto N, Ambikapathi R, Aytekin D, Barquera S, Battersby J, Beal T, Molina PB, Cafiero C, Campeau C, Caron P, Conforti P, Damerau K, Di Girolamo M, DeClerck F, Dewi D, Elouafi I, Fabi C, Foley P, Frazier TJ, Gephart J, Golden C, Fischer CG, Hendriks S, Honorati M, Huang J, Kennedy G, Laar A, Lal R, Lidder P, Loken B, Marshall Q, Masuda YJ, McLaren R, Miachon L, Muñoz H, Nordhagen S, Qayyum N, Saisana M, Suhardiman D, Sumaila UR, Cullen MT, Tubiello FN, Vivero-Pol JL, Webb P, Wiebe K. The state of food systems worldwide in the countdown to 2030. Nat Food 2023; 4:1090-1110. [PMID: 38114693 PMCID: PMC10730405 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00885-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
This Analysis presents a recently developed food system indicator framework and holistic monitoring architecture to track food system transformation towards global development, health and sustainability goals. Five themes are considered: (1) diets, nutrition and health; (2) environment, natural resources and production; (3) livelihoods, poverty and equity; (4) governance; and (5) resilience. Each theme is divided into three to five indicator domains, and indicators were selected to reflect each domain through a consultative process. In total, 50 indicators were selected, with at least one indicator available for every domain. Harmonized data of these 50 indicators provide a baseline assessment of the world's food systems. We show that every country can claim positive outcomes in some parts of food systems, but none are among the highest ranked across all domains. Furthermore, some indicators are independent of national income, and each highlights a specific aspiration for healthy, sustainable and just food systems. The Food Systems Countdown Initiative will track food systems annually to 2030, amending the framework as new indicators or better data emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate R Schneider
- School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Jessica Fanzo
- Columbia Climate School, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Mario Herrero
- College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | | | - Anna Herforth
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roseline Remans
- Glocolearning, Genk, Belgium
- Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT, Cali, Colombia
| | - Alejandro Guarin
- International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK
| | - Danielle Resnick
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Namukolo Covic
- International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- CGIAR, Montpellier, France
| | - Christophe Béné
- Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT, Cali, Colombia
- Wageningen Economic Research Group, Wageningen University, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Cattaneo
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
| | - Nancy Aburto
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
| | - Ramya Ambikapathi
- College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Destan Aytekin
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Simon Barquera
- Research Center of Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, México
| | | | - Ty Beal
- Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Carlo Cafiero
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Patrick Caron
- University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Cirad, Montpellier, France
- ART-DEV, Montpellier, France
| | - Piero Conforti
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
| | - Kerstin Damerau
- College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Michael Di Girolamo
- School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Fabrice DeClerck
- Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT, Cali, Colombia
- EAT Forum, Montpellier, France
| | - Deviana Dewi
- School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Carola Fabi
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
| | - Pat Foley
- Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean, World Food Programme, Panama City, Panama
| | | | | | | | - Carlos Gonzalez Fischer
- College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Sheryl Hendriks
- Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Kent, UK
| | | | - Jikun Huang
- School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Amos Laar
- School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Rattan Lal
- Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Quinn Marshall
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Lais Miachon
- Columbia Climate School, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hernán Muñoz
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
- University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Naina Qayyum
- Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Diana Suhardiman
- Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies/KITLV, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - U Rashid Sumaila
- School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Patrick Webb
- Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keith Wiebe
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Love DC, Asche F, Fry J, Nguyen L, Gephart J, Garlock TM, Jenkins LD, Anderson JL, Brown M, Viglia S, Nussbaumer EM, Neff R. Aquatic food loss and waste rate in the United States is half of earlier estimates. Nat Food 2023; 4:1058-1069. [PMID: 38093119 PMCID: PMC10727981 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00881-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Food loss and waste (FLW) is a major challenge to food system sustainability, including aquatic foods. We investigated aquatic FLW in the food supply of the United States, the largest importer of aquatic food globally, using primary and secondary data and life cycle methodology. We show that there are significant differences in FLW among species, production technology, origin and stage of supply chain. We estimate total aquatic FLW was 22.7%, which is 43-55% lower than earlier estimates reported in the literature, illustrating the importance of applying a disaggregated approach. Production losses associated with imported food contribute over a quarter of total FLW, and addressing these losses requires multinational efforts to implement interventions along the supply chain. These findings inform prioritization of solutions-including areas of need for innovations, government incentives, policy change, infrastructure and equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Love
- Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Frank Asche
- School of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jillian Fry
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Health Professions, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA
| | - Ly Nguyen
- Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jessica Gephart
- Department of Environmental Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Taryn M Garlock
- School of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Lekelia D Jenkins
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - James L Anderson
- Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mark Brown
- Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Silvio Viglia
- Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Centre, Rome, Italy
| | - Elizabeth M Nussbaumer
- Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roni Neff
- Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muth MK, Birney C, Cuéllar A, Finn SM, Freeman M, Galloway JN, Gee I, Gephart J, Jones K, Low L, Meyer E, Read Q, Smith T, Weitz K, Zoubek S. A systems approach to assessing environmental and economic effects of food loss and waste interventions in the United States. Sci Total Environ 2019; 685:1240-1254. [PMID: 31390713 PMCID: PMC7343133 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Reducing food loss and waste (FLW) is critical for achieving healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Within the United States, 30% to 50% of food produced is lost or wasted. These losses occur throughout multiple stages of the food supply chain from production to consumption. Reducing FLW prevents the waste of land, water, energy, and other resources embedded in food and is therefore essential to improving the sustainability of food systems. Despite the increasing number of studies identifying FLW reduction as a societal imperative, we lack the information needed to assess fully the effectiveness of interventions along the supply chain. In this paper, we synthesize the available literature, data, and methods for estimating the volume of FLW and assessing the full environmental and economic effects of interventions to prevent or reduce FLW in the United States. We describe potential FLW interventions in detail, including policy changes, technological solutions, and changes in practices and behaviors at all stages of the food system from farms to consumers and approaches to conducting economic analyses of the effects of interventions. In summary, this paper comprehensively reviews available information on the causes and consequences of FLW in the United States and lays the groundwork for prioritizing FLW interventions to benefit the environment and stakeholders in the food system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary K Muth
- RTI International, United States of America.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Isabella Gee
- University of Texas, Austin, United States of America
| | | | | | - Linda Low
- Duke-UNC Rotary Peace Fellow Alumna, United States of America
| | - Ellen Meyer
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cascorbi I, Henning S, Brockmöller J, Gephart J, Meisel C, Müller JM, Loddenkemper R, Roots I. Substantially reduced risk of cancer of the aerodigestive tract in subjects with variant--463A of the myeloperoxidase gene. Cancer Res 2000; 60:644-9. [PMID: 10676648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Myeloperoxidase (MPO), an enzyme that is highly expressed in neutrophil leukocytes, transforms precarcinogens such as benzo(a)pyrene and aromatic amines to highly reactive intermediates. A G/A polymorphism located 463 bp upstream of exon 1 in the promoter region strongly reduces MPO mRNA expression. In a matched case-control study, 196 lung cancer, 245 laryngeal cancer, and 255 pharyngeal cancer patients from the Berlin area were investigated for frequency of the G-463A polymorphism by PCR/RFLP, using AciI. They were matched by age and gender to hospital patients without known malignancies. Moreover, 270 healthy volunteers were genotyped, obtaining 61.1% of individuals with MPO genotype -463G/G, 34.8% of individuals with genotype G/A, and 4.1% of individuals with genotype A/A. In lung and laryngeal cancer patients, but not in pharyngeal cancer patients, mutant genotypes were significantly less frequent. Crude odds ratios for carriers of one or two A alleles, compared to wild-type G/G, were 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38-0.88; P = 0.011] for lung cancer patients, 0.63 (95% CI, 0.43-0.92; P = 0.017) for laryngeal cancer patients, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-1.17; P = 0.27) for pharyngeal cancer patients. The relative risks, adjusted for age, gender, and extent of cigarette smoking were 0.47 (95% CI, 0.28-0.79; P = 0.004), 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44-1.01; P = 0.054), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.51-1.12; P = 0.16) for lung, larynx, and pharyngeal cancer, respectively. Strikingly, relative risk for carriers of -463A among adenocarcinoma of the lung was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.10-0.58; P = 0.002). Two cases with larynx cancer, one case with lung cancer, and one reference subject displayed novel G/A mutations at -297 nucleotide and -296 nucleotide, destroying a constitutive AciI cleavage site. Our data finally suggest that the MPO -463A variant is a protective factor in the etiology of lung and larynx cancer, but possibly not of pharyngeal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Cascorbi
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Charité, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|