1
|
Rabinovich NR, Steketee RW. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses to Inform Recommendations for the Final Phase of Elimination and Prevention of Re-Establishment of Malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2024; 110:1-2. [PMID: 38574553 PMCID: PMC10993796 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N Regina Rabinovich
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- ExxonMobil Scholar in Residence, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bridges DJ, Miller JM, Chalwe V, Moonga H, Hamainza B, Steketee RW, Mambwe B, Mulube C, Wu L, Tetteh KKA, Drakeley C, Chishimba S, Mwenda M, Silumbe K, Larsen DA. Reactive focal drug administration associated with decreased malaria transmission in an elimination setting: Serological evidence from the cluster-randomized CoRE study. PLOS Glob Public Health 2022; 2:e0001295. [PMID: 36962857 PMCID: PMC10021141 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Efforts to eliminate malaria transmission need evidence-based strategies. However, accurately assessing end-game malaria elimination strategies is challenging due to the low level of transmission and the rarity of infections. We hypothesised that presumptively treating individuals during reactive case detection (RCD) would reduce transmission and that serology would more sensitively detect this change over standard approaches. We conducted a cluster randomised control trial (NCT02654912) of presumptive reactive focal drug administration (RFDA-intervention) compared to the standard of care, reactive focal test and treat (RFTAT-control) in Southern Province, Zambia-an area of low seasonal transmission (overall incidence of ~3 per 1,000). We measured routine malaria incidence from health facilities as well as PCR parasite prevalence / antimalarial seroprevalence in an endline cross-sectional population survey. No significant difference was identified from routine incidence data and endline prevalence by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had insufficient numbers of malaria infections (i.e., 16 infections among 6,276 children) to assess the intervention. Comparing long-term serological markers, we found a 19% (95% CI = 4-32%) reduction in seropositivity for the RFDA intervention using a difference in differences approach incorporating serological positivity and age. We also found a 37% (95% CI = 2-59%) reduction in seropositivity to short-term serological markers in a post-only comparison. These serological analyses provide compelling evidence that RFDA both has an impact on malaria transmission and is an appropriate end-game malaria elimination strategy. Furthermore, serology provides a more sensitive approach to measure changes in transmission that other approaches miss, particularly in very low transmission settings. Trial Registration: Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02654912, 13/1/2016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Bridges
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Elimination Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - John M Miller
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Elimination Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Victor Chalwe
- National Health Research Authority, Paediatric Centre of Excellence, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Richard W Steketee
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Brenda Mambwe
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Elimination Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Conceptor Mulube
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Elimination Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Lindsey Wu
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin K A Tetteh
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Drakeley
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sandra Chishimba
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Elimination Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mulenga Mwenda
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Elimination Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Elimination Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - David A Larsen
- Syracuse University Department of Public Health, Syracuse, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Steketee RW, Choi M, Linn A, Florey L, Murphy M, Panjabi R. World Malaria Day 2021: Commemorating 15 Years of Contribution by the United States President's Malaria Initiative. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2021; 104:1955-1959. [PMID: 33891560 PMCID: PMC8176495 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
World Malaria Day 2021 coincides with the 15th anniversary of the United States President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI) and follows the first anniversary of the declaration of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. From 2006 to the present, the PMI has led to considerable country-managed progress in malaria prevention, care, and treatment in 24 of the highest-burden countries in sub-Saharan Africa and three countries in the Southeast Asia Greater Mekong subregion. Furthermore, it has contributed to a 29% reduction in malaria cases and a 60% reduction in the death rates in sub-Saharan Africa. In this context of progress, substantial heterogeneity persists within and between countries, such that malaria control programs can seek subnational elimination in some populations but others still experience substantial malaria disease and death. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most malaria programs have shown resilience in delivering prevention campaigns, but many experienced important disruptions in their care and treatment of malaria illness. Confronting the COVID-19 pandemic and building on the progress against malaria will require fortitude, including strengthening the quality and ensuring the safety and resiliency of the existing programs, extending services to those currently not reached, and supporting the people and partners closest to those in need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Steketee
- 1United States President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Misun Choi
- 2United States President's Malaria Initiative, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Anne Linn
- 2United States President's Malaria Initiative, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Lia Florey
- 2United States President's Malaria Initiative, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Matthew Murphy
- 1United States President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rajesh Panjabi
- 2United States President's Malaria Initiative, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Conner RO, Dieye Y, Hainsworth M, Tall A, Cissé B, Faye F, Sy MD, Ba A, Sene D, Ba S, Doucouré E, Thiam T, Diop M, Schneider K, Cissé M, Ba M, Earle D, Guinot P, Steketee RW, Guinovart C. Mass testing and treatment for malaria followed by weekly fever screening, testing and treatment in Northern Senegal: feasibility, cost and impact. Malar J 2020; 19:252. [PMID: 32664939 PMCID: PMC7362450 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03313-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Population-wide interventions using malaria testing and treatment might decrease the reservoir of Plasmodium falciparum infection and accelerate towards elimination. Questions remain about their effectiveness and evidence from different transmission settings is needed.
Methods
A pilot quasi-experimental study to evaluate a package of population-wide test and treat interventions was conducted in six health facility catchment areas (HFCA) in the districts of Kanel, Linguère, and Ranérou (Senegal). Seven adjacent HFCAs were selected as comparison. Villages within the intervention HFCAs were stratified according to the 2013 incidences of passively detected malaria cases, and those with an incidence ≥ 15 cases/1000/year were targeted for a mass test and treat (MTAT) in September 2014. All households were visited, all consenting individuals were tested with a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and, if positive, treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. This was followed by weekly screening, testing and treatment of fever cases (PECADOM++) until the end of the transmission season in January 2015. Villages with lower incidence received only PECADOM++ or case investigation. To evaluate the impact of the interventions over that transmission season, the incidence of passively detected, RDT-confirmed malaria cases was compared between the intervention and comparison groups with a difference-in-difference analysis using negative binomial regression with random effects on HFCA.
Results
During MTAT, 89% (2225/2503) of households were visited and 86% (18,992/22,170) of individuals were tested, for a combined 77% effective coverage. Among those tested, 291 (1.5%) were RDT positive (range 0–10.8 by village), of whom 82% were < 20 years old and 70% were afebrile. During the PECADOM++ 40,002 visits were conducted to find 2784 individuals reporting fever, with an RDT positivity of 6.5% (170/2612). The combination of interventions resulted in an estimated 38% larger decrease in malaria case incidence in the intervention compared to the comparison group (adjusted incidence risk ratio = 0.62, 95% CI 0.45–0.84, p = 0.002). The cost of the MTAT was $14.3 per person.
Conclusions
It was operationally feasible to conduct MTAT and PECADOM++ with high coverage, although PECADOM++ was not an efficient strategy to complement MTAT. The modest impact of the intervention package suggests a need for alternative or complementary strategies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Conner RO, Dieye Y, Hainsworth M, Tall A, Cissé B, Faye F, Sy MD, Ba A, Sene D, Ba S, Doucouré E, Thiam T, Diop M, Schneider K, Cissé M, Ba M, Scott CA, Kumar R, Asfaw E, Earle D, Guinot P, Steketee RW, Guinovart C. Correction to: Mass testing and treatment for malaria followed by weekly fever screening, testing and treatment in Northern Senegal: feasibility, cost and impact. Malar J 2020; 19:443. [PMID: 33256751 PMCID: PMC7706200 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03484-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben O Conner
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Yakou Dieye
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Michael Hainsworth
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Adama Tall
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Badara Cissé
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Farba Faye
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Mame Demba Sy
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Amadou Ba
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Doudou Sene
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Souleymane Ba
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Elhadji Doucouré
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Tidiane Thiam
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Moussa Diop
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Kammerle Schneider
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Moustapha Cissé
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Mady Ba
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Callie A Scott
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Ritu Kumar
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Elias Asfaw
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Duncan Earle
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Philippe Guinot
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Richard W Steketee
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Caterina Guinovart
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA. .,Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Rosselló 132, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eisele TP, Bennett A, Silumbe K, Finn TP, Porter TR, Chalwe V, Hamainza B, Moonga H, Kooma E, Chizema Kawesha E, Kamuliwo M, Yukich JO, Keating J, Schneider K, Conner RO, Earle D, Slutsker L, Steketee RW, Miller JM. Impact of Four Rounds of Mass Drug Administration with Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine Implemented in Southern Province, Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:7-18. [PMID: 32618247 PMCID: PMC7416977 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, Zambia has made substantial progress against malaria and has recently set the ambitious goal of eliminating by 2021. In the context of very high vector control and improved access to malaria diagnosis and treatment in Southern Province, we implemented a community-randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of four rounds of community-wide mass drug administration (MDA) and household-level MDA (focal MDA) with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAP) implemented between December 2014 and February 2016. The mass treatment campaigns achieved relatively good household coverage (63-79%), were widely accepted by the community (ranging from 87% to 94%), and achieved very high adherence to the DHAP regimen (81-96%). Significant declines in all malaria study end points were observed, irrespective of the exposure group, with the overall parasite prevalence during the peak transmission season declining by 87.2% from 31.3% at baseline to 4.0% in 2016 at the end of the trial. Children in areas of lower transmission (< 10% prevalence at baseline) that received four MDA rounds had a 72% (95% CI = 12-91%) reduction in malaria parasite prevalence as compared with those with the standard of care without any mass treatment. Mass drug administration consistently had the largest short-term effect size across study end points in areas of lower transmission following the first two MDA rounds. In the context of achieving very high vector control coverage and improved access to diagnosis and treatment for malaria, our results suggest that MDA should be considered for implementation in African settings for rapidly reducing malaria outcomes in lower transmission settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Timothy P Finn
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Travis R Porter
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Victor Chalwe
- Institute for Medical Research and Training, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Emmanuel Kooma
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Mulakwa Kamuliwo
- Zambia Ministry of Health, Southern Provincial Health Office, Choma, Zambia
| | - Joshua O Yukich
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Joseph Keating
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | | | - Duncan Earle
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | | | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Finn TP, Porter TR, Moonga H, Silumbe K, Daniels RF, Volkman SK, Yukich JO, Keating J, Bennett A, Steketee RW, Miller JM, Eisele TP. Adherence to Mass Drug Administration with Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine and Plasmodium falciparum Clearance in Southern Province, Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:37-45. [PMID: 32618267 PMCID: PMC7416972 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Mass drug administration (MDA) with artemisinin combination therapy is a potentially useful tool for malaria elimination programs, but its success depends partly on drug effectiveness and treatment coverage in the targeted population. As part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Southern Province, Zambia evaluating the impact of MDA and household focal MDA (fMDA) with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAp), sub-studies were conducted investigating population drug adherence rates and effectiveness of DHAp as administered in clearing Plasmodium falciparum infections following household mass administration. Adherence information was reported for 181,534 of 336,821 DHAp (53.9%) treatments administered during four rounds of MDA/fMDA, of which 153,197 (84.4%) reported completing the full course of DHAp. The proportion of participants fully adhering to the treatment regimen differed by MDA modality (MDA versus fMDA), RDT status, and whether the first dose was observed by those administering treatments. Among a subset of participants receiving DHAp and selected for longitudinal follow-up, 58 were positive for asexual-stage P. falciparum infection by microscopy at baseline. None of the 45 participants followed up at days 3 and/or 7 were slide positive for asexual-stage parasitemia. For those with longer term follow-up, one participant was positive 47 days after treatment, and two additional participants were positive after 69 days, although these two were determined to be new infections by genotyping. High completion of a 3-day course of DHAp and parasite clearance in the context of household MDA are promising as Zambia's National Malaria Programme continues to weigh appropriate interventions for malaria elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P Finn
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Travis R Porter
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Rachel F Daniels
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah K Volkman
- Simmons University, Boston, Massachusetts.,The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua O Yukich
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Joseph Keating
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Daniels RF, Schaffner SF, Bennett A, Porter TR, Yukich JO, Mulube C, Mambwe B, Mwenda MC, Chishimba S, Bridges DJ, Moonga H, Hamainza B, Chizema Kawesha E, Miller JM, Steketee RW, Wirth DF, Eisele TP, Hartl DL, Volkman SK. Evidence for Reduced Malaria Parasite Population after Application of Population-Level Antimalarial Drug Strategies in Southern Province, Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:66-73. [PMID: 32618255 PMCID: PMC7416975 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A mass drug administration trial was carried out in Southern Province, Zambia, between 2014 and 2016, in conjunction with a standard of care package that included improved surveillance, increased access to malaria case management, and sustained high levels of vector control coverage. This was preceded by mass test and treatment in the same area from 2011 to 2013. Concordant decreases in malaria prevalence in Southern Province and deaths attributed to malaria in Zambia over this time suggest that these strategies successfully reduced the malaria burden. Genetic epidemiological studies were used to assess the consequences of these interventions on parasite population structure. Analysis of parasite material derived from 1,620 rapid diagnostic test (RDT)-positive individuals obtained from studies to evaluate trial outcomes revealed a reduction in the average complexity of infection and consequential increase in the proportion of infections that harbored a single parasite genome (monogenomic infections). Highly related parasites, consistent with inbreeding, were detected after interventions were deployed. Geographical analysis indicated that the highly related infections were both clustered focally and dispersed across the study area. These findings provide genetic evidence for a reduced parasite population, with indications of inbreeding following the application of comprehensive interventions, including drug-based campaigns, that reduced the malaria burden in Southern Province. Genetic data additionally revealed the relationship between individual infections in the context of these population-level patterns, which has the potential to provide useful data for stratification and targeting of interventions to reduce the malaria burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel F Daniels
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen F Schaffner
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Travis R Porter
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Joshua O Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Conceptor Mulube
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Brenda Mambwe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mulenga C Mwenda
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Sandra Chishimba
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Daniel J Bridges
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Dyann F Wirth
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Daniel L Hartl
- Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah K Volkman
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Simmons University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yukich JO, Scott C, Silumbe K, Larson BA, Bennett A, Finn TP, Hamainza B, Conner RO, Porter TR, Keating J, Steketee RW, Eisele TP, Miller JM. Cost-Effectiveness of Focal Mass Drug Administration and Mass Drug Administration with Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Malaria Prevention in Southern Province, Zambia: Results of a Community-Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:46-53. [PMID: 32618249 PMCID: PMC7416981 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Community-wide administration of antimalarial drugs in therapeutic doses is a potential tool to prevent malaria infection and reduce the malaria parasite reservoir. To measure the effectiveness and cost of using the antimalarial drug combination dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (DHAp) through different community-wide distribution strategies, Zambia’s National Malaria Control Centre conducted a three-armed community-randomized controlled trial. The trial arms were as follows: 1) standard of care (SoC) malaria interventions, 2) SoC plus focal mass drug administration (fMDA), and 3) SoC plus MDA. Mass drug administration consisted of offering all eligible individuals DHAP, irrespective of a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) result. Focal mass drug administration consisted of offering DHAP to all eligible individuals who resided in a household where anyone tested positive by RDT. Results indicate that the costs of fMDA and MDA per person targeted and reached are similar (US$9.01 versus US$8.49 per person, respectively, P = 0.87), but that MDA was superior in all cost-effectiveness measures, including cost per infection averted, cost per case averted, cost per death averted, and cost per disability-adjusted life year averted. Subsequent costing of the MDA intervention in a non-trial, operational setting yielded significantly lower costs per person reached (US$2.90). Mass drug administration with DHAp also met the WHO thresholds for “cost-effective interventions” in the Zambian setting in 90% of simulations conducted using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on trial costs, whereas fMDA met these criteria in approximately 50% of simulations. A sensitivity analysis using costs from operational deployment and trial effectiveness yielded improved cost-effectiveness estimates. Mass drug administration may be a cost-effective intervention in the Zambian context and can help reduce the parasite reservoir substantially. Mass drug administration was more cost-effective in relatively higher transmission settings. In all scenarios examined, the cost-effectiveness of MDA was superior to that of fMDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua O Yukich
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Callie Scott
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Bruce A Larson
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Timothy P Finn
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Control Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Ruben O Conner
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | - Travis R Porter
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Joseph Keating
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Richard W Steketee
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bennett A, Porter TR, Mwenda MC, Yukich JO, Finn TP, Lungu C, Silumbe K, Mambwe B, Chishimba S, Mulube C, Bridges DJ, Hamainza B, Slutsker L, Steketee RW, Miller JM, Eisele TP. A Longitudinal Cohort to Monitor Malaria Infection Incidence during Mass Drug Administration in Southern Province, Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:54-65. [PMID: 32618245 PMCID: PMC7416973 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Rigorous evidence of effectiveness is needed to determine where and when to apply mass drug administration (MDA) or focal MDA (fMDA) as part of a malaria elimination strategy. The Zambia National Malaria Elimination Centre recently completed a community-randomized controlled trial in Southern Province to evaluate MDA and fMDA for transmission reduction. To assess the role of MDA and fMDA on infection incidence, we enrolled a longitudinal cohort for an 18-month period of data collection including monthly malaria parasite infection detection based on polymerase chain reaction and compared time to first infection and cumulative infection incidence outcomes across study arms using Cox proportional hazards and negative binomial models. A total of 2,026 individuals from 733 households were enrolled and completed sufficient follow-up for inclusion in analysis. Infection incidence declined dramatically across all study arms during the period of study, and MDA was associated with reduced risk of first infection (hazards ratio: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16–0.80) and cumulative infection incidence during the first rainy season (first 5 months of follow-up) (incidence rate ratio: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12–0.95). No significant effect was found for fMDA or for either arm over the full study period. Polymerase chain reaction infection status at baseline was strongly associated with follow-up infection. The short-term effects of MDA suggest it may be an impactful accelerator of transmission reduction in areas with high coverage of case management and vector control and should be considered as part of a malaria elimination strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Travis R Porter
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Mulenga C Mwenda
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joshua O Yukich
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Timothy P Finn
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Chris Lungu
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Brenda Mambwe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Sandra Chishimba
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Conceptor Mulube
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Daniel J Bridges
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | | | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Porter TR, Finn TP, Silumbe K, Chalwe V, Hamainza B, Kooma E, Moonga H, Bennett A, Yukich JO, Steketee RW, Keating J, Miller JM, Eisele TP. Recent Travel History and Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Infection in a Region of Heterogenous Transmission in Southern Province, Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:74-81. [PMID: 32618250 PMCID: PMC7416974 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
As Zambia continues to reduce its malaria incidence and target elimination in Southern Province, there is a need to identify factors that can reintroduce parasites and sustain malaria transmission. To examine the relative contributions of types of human mobility on malaria prevalence, this analysis quantifies the proportion of the population having recently traveled during both peak and nonpeak transmission seasons over the course of 2 years and assesses the relationship between short-term travel and malaria infection status. Among all residents targeted by mass drug administration in the Lake Kariba region of Southern Province, 602,620 rapid diagnostic tests and recent travel histories were collected during four campaign rounds occurring between December 2014 and February 2016. Rates of short-term travel in the previous 2 weeks fluctuated seasonally from 0.3% to 1.2%. Travel was significantly associated with prevalent malaria infection both seasonally and overall (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.55; 95% CI: 2.28-2.85). The strength of association between travel and malaria infection varied by travelers' origin and destination, with those recently traveling to high-prevalence areas from low-prevalence areas experiencing the highest odds of malaria infection (AOR: 7.38). Long-lasting insecticidal net usage while traveling was associated with a relative reduction in infections (AOR: 0.74) compared with travelers not using a net. Although travel was directly associated with only a small fraction of infections, importation of malaria via human movement may play an increasingly important role in this elimination setting as transmission rates continue to decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis R Porter
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Timothy P Finn
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Victor Chalwe
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Emmanuel Kooma
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Joshua O Yukich
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Joseph Keating
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Finn TP, Yukich JO, Bennett A, Porter TR, Lungu C, Hamainza B, Chizema Kawesha E, Conner RO, Silumbe K, Steketee RW, Miller JM, Keating J, Eisele TP. Treatment Coverage Estimation for Mass Drug Administration for Malaria with Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine in Southern Province, Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:19-27. [PMID: 32618251 PMCID: PMC7416979 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Mass drug administration (MDA) is currently being considered as an intervention in low-transmission areas to complement existing malaria control and elimination efforts. The effectiveness of any MDA strategy is dependent on achieving high epidemiologic coverage and participant adherence rates. A community-randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2014 to March 2016 to evaluate the impact of four rounds of MDA or focal MDA (fMDA)—where treatment was given to all eligible household members if anyone in the household had a positive malaria rapid diagnostic test—on malaria outcomes in Southern Province, Zambia (population approximately 300,000). This study examined epidemiologic coverage and program reach using capture–recapture and satellite enumeration methods to estimate the degree to which the trial reached targeted individuals. Overall, it was found that the percentage of households visited by campaign teams ranged from 62.9% (95% CI: 60.0–65.8) to a high of 77.4% (95% CI: 73.8–81.0) across four rounds of treatment. When the maximum number of visited households across all campaign rounds was used as the numerator, program reach for at least one visit would have been 86.4% (95% CI: 80.8–92.0) in MDA and 83.5% (95% CI: 78.0–89.1) in fMDA trial arms. As per the protocol, the trial provided dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine treatment to an average of 58.8% and 13.3% of the estimated population based on capture–recapture in MDA and fMDA, respectively, across the four rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P Finn
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Joshua O Yukich
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Travis R Porter
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Christopher Lungu
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | | | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joseph Keating
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Daniels RF, Schaffner SF, Dieye Y, Dieng G, Hainsworth M, Fall FB, Diouf CN, Ndiop M, Cisse M, Gueye AB, Sarr O, Guinot P, Deme AB, Bei AK, Sy M, Thwing J, MacInnis B, Earle D, Guinovart C, Sene D, Hartl DL, Ndiaye D, Steketee RW, Wirth DF, Volkman SK. Genetic evidence for imported malaria and local transmission in Richard Toll, Senegal. Malar J 2020; 19:276. [PMID: 32746830 PMCID: PMC7397603 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03346-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malaria elimination efforts can be undermined by imported malaria infections. Imported infections are classified based on travel history. METHODS A genetic strategy was applied to better understand the contribution of imported infections and to test for local transmission in the very low prevalence region of Richard Toll, Senegal. RESULTS Genetic relatedness analysis, based upon molecular barcode genotyping data derived from diagnostic material, provided evidence for both imported infections and ongoing local transmission in Richard Toll. Evidence for imported malaria included finding that a large proportion of Richard Toll parasites were genetically related to parasites from Thiès, Senegal, a region of moderate transmission with extensive available genotyping data. Evidence for ongoing local transmission included finding parasites of identical genotype that persisted across multiple transmission seasons as well as enrichment of highly related infections within the households of non-travellers compared to travellers. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that, while a large number of infections may have been imported, there remains ongoing local malaria transmission in Richard Toll. These proof-of-concept findings underscore the value of genetic data to identify parasite relatedness and patterns of transmission to inform optimal intervention selection and placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel F. Daniels
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA ,grid.66859.34Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Fatou B. Fall
- Senegal National Malaria Control Programme, Dakar, Senegal
| | | | - Medoune Ndiop
- Senegal National Malaria Control Programme, Dakar, Senegal
| | | | | | - Oumar Sarr
- Senegal National Malaria Control Programme, Dakar, Senegal
| | | | - Awa B. Deme
- Dantec Teaching and Research Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Amy K. Bei
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | - Mouhamad Sy
- Dantec Teaching and Research Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Julie Thwing
- grid.416738.f0000 0001 2163 0069Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | | | | | - Doudou Sene
- Senegal National Malaria Control Programme, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Daniel L. Hartl
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Daouda Ndiaye
- grid.8191.10000 0001 2186 9619Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
| | | | - Dyann F. Wirth
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA ,grid.66859.34Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Sarah K. Volkman
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA ,grid.66859.34Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.28203.3b0000 0004 0378 6053Simmons University, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chishimba S, Mwenda M, Mambwe B, Mulube C, Chalwe V, Moonga H, Hamainza B, Chizema-Kawesha E, Steketee RW, Domingo G, Fraser M, Kahn M, Pal S, Silumbe K, Conner RO, Bennett A, Porter TR, Eisele TP, Miller JM, Bridges DJ. Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum and Non- falciparum Infections by Photo-Induced Electron Transfer-PCR in a Longitudinal Cohort of Individuals Enrolled in a Mass Drug Administration Trial in Southern Province, Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:82-89. [PMID: 32618252 PMCID: PMC7416980 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Malaria burden in Zambia has significantly declined over the last decade because of improved coverage of several key malaria interventions (e.g., vector control, case management, bed net distributions, and enhanced surveillance/responses). Campaign-based mass drug administration (MDA) and focal MDA (fMDA) were assessed in a trial in Southern Province, Zambia, to identify its utility in elimination efforts. As part of the study, a longitudinal cohort was visited and tested (by PCR targeting the 18s rRNA and a Plasmodium falciparum–specific rapid diagnostic test [RDT] from SD Bioline) every month for the trial duration (18 months). Overall, there was high concordance (> 97%) between the PCR and RDT results, using the PCR as the gold standard. The RDTs had high specificity and negative predictive values (98.5% and 98.6%, respectively) but low sensitivity (53.0%) and a low positive predictive value (53.8%). There was evidence for persistent antigenemia affecting the low specificity of the RDT, while false-negative RDTs were associated with a lower parasite density than true positive RDTs. Plasmodium falciparum was the dominant species identified, with 98.3% of all positive samples containing P. falciparum. Of these, 97.5% were mono-infections and 0.8% coinfections with one other species. Plasmodium malariae was found in 1.4% of all positive samples (50% mono-infections and 50% coinfections with P. falciparum), whereas Plasmodium ovale was found in 1.1% of all positive samples (90% mono-infections and 10% coinfections with P. falciparum). Although MDA/fMDA appeared to reduce P. malariae prevalence, P. ovale prevalence appeared unchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Chishimba
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mulenga Mwenda
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Brenda Mambwe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Conceptor Mulube
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Victor Chalwe
- Zambia Ministry of Health Provincial Medical Office, Mansa, Zambia
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Richard W Steketee
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | - Gonzalo Domingo
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | - Maya Fraser
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | - Maria Kahn
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | - Sampa Pal
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Ruben O Conner
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Seattle, Washington
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Travis R Porter
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Daniel J Bridges
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chanda J, Saili K, Phiri F, Stevenson JC, Mwenda M, Chishimba S, Mulube C, Mambwe B, Lungu C, Earle D, Bennett A, Eisele TP, Kamuliwo M, Steketee RW, Keating J, Miller JM, Sikaala CH. Pyrethroid and Carbamate Resistance in Anopheles funestus Giles along Lake Kariba in Southern Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:90-97. [PMID: 32618244 PMCID: PMC7416976 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Whereas data on insecticide resistance and its underlying mechanisms exist for parts of Zambia, data remain limited in the southern part of the country. This study investigated the status of insecticide resistance, metabolic mechanisms, and parasite infection in Anopheles funestus along Lake Kariba in southern Zambia. Indoor-resting mosquitoes were collected from 20 randomly selected houses within clusters where a mass drug administration trial was conducted and raised to F1 progeny. Non–blood-fed 2- to 5-day-old female An. funestus were exposed to WHO insecticide-impregnated papers with 0.05% deltamethrin, 0.1% bendiocarb, 0.25% pirimiphos-methyl, or 4% dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT). In separate assays, An. funestus were pre-exposed to piperonyl butoxide (PBO) to determine the presence of monooxygenases. Wild-caught An. funestus that had laid eggs for susceptibility assays were screened for circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum by ELISA, and sibling species were identified by polymerase chain reaction. Anopheles funestus showed resistance to deltamethrin and bendiocarb but remained susceptible to pirimiphos-methyl and DDT. The pre-exposure of An. funestus to PBO restored full susceptibility to deltamethrin but not to bendiocarb. The overall sporozoite infection rate in An. funestus populations was 5.8%. Detection of pyrethroid and carbamate resistance in An. funestus calls for increased insecticide resistance monitoring to guide planning and selection of effective insecticide resistance management strategies. To prevent the development of resistance and reduce the underlying vectorial capacity of mosquitoes in areas targeted for malaria elimination, an effective integrated vector management strategy is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javan Chanda
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Kochelani Saili
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Foustina Phiri
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Jennifer C Stevenson
- W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.,Macha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia
| | - Mulenga Mwenda
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Sandra Chishimba
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Conceptor Mulube
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Brenda Mambwe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Christopher Lungu
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Duncan Earle
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Mulakwa Kamuliwo
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Joseph Keating
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Chadwick H Sikaala
- SADC Malaria Elimination Eight Secretariat, Windhoek, Namibia.,National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Silumbe K, Finn TP, Jennings T, Sikombe C, Chiyende E, Hamainza B, Chizema Kawesha E, Eisele TP, Earle D, Steketee RW, Miller JM. Assessment of the Acceptability of Testing and Treatment during a Mass Drug Administration Trial for Malaria in Zambia Using Mixed Methods. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:28-36. [PMID: 32618242 PMCID: PMC7416978 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
From 2014 to 2016, a community-randomized controlled trial in Southern Province, Zambia, compared mass drug administration (MDA) and focal MDA (fMDA) with the standard of care. Acceptability of the intervention was assessed quantitatively using closed-ended and Likert scale-based questions posed during three household surveys conducted from April to May in 2014, 2015, and 2016 in 40 health catchments that implemented MDA and fMDA and 20 catchments that served as trial controls. In 2014 and 2015, 47 households per catchment were selected, targeting 1,880 households in MDA and fMDA trial arms; in 2016, 55 households per catchment were selected for a target of 2,200 households in MDA and fMDA trial arms. Concurrently, 27 focus group discussions and 23 in-depth interviews with 248 participants were conducted on reasons for testing and treatment refusal, reasons for nonadherence, and community perception of the MDA campaign. Results demonstrated that the MDA campaign was highly accepted with more than 99% of respondents stating that they would take treatment if positive for malaria. High acceptability at baseline could be associated with test-and-treat campaigns recently conducted in the study area. There was a large increase in the acceptability of prophylactic treatment if negative for malaria from the baseline to follow-up survey for adults and children, from 62% to 96% for each. This likely resulted from an intensive community-wide sensitization program that occurred before the first treatment round at each household during community health worker visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kafula Silumbe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Timothy P Finn
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Todd Jennings
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Chilumba Sikombe
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Elizabeth Chiyende
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Duncan Earle
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Richard W Steketee
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Steketee RW, Miller JM, Chizema Kawesha E. Implications of the MDA Trial in Southern Province, Zambia, for Malaria Control and Elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:98-101. [PMID: 32618248 PMCID: PMC7416969 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Steketee
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Elizabeth Chizema Kawesha
- National Malaria Control Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Burton RA, Chévez JER, Sauerbrey M, Guinovart C, Hartley A, Kirkwood G, Boslego M, Gavidia ME, Alemán Escobar JE, Turkel R, Steketee RW, Slutsker L, Schneider K, Campbell CCK. Factors Associated with the Rapid and Durable Decline in Malaria Incidence in El Salvador, 1980-2017. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018; 99:33-42. [PMID: 29761766 PMCID: PMC6085812 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A decade after the Global Malaria Eradication Program, El Salvador had the highest burden of malaria in Mesoamerica, with approximately 20% due to Plasmodium falciparum. A resurgence of malaria in the 1970s led El Salvador to alter its national malaria control strategy. By 1995, El Salvador recorded its last autochthonous P. falciparum case with fewer than 20 Plasmodium vivax cases annually since 2011. By contrast, its immediate neighbors continue to have the highest incidences of malaria in the region. We reviewed and evaluated the policies and interventions implemented by the Salvadoran National Malaria Program that likely contributed to this progress toward malaria elimination. Decentralization of the malaria program, early regional stratification by risk, and data-driven stratum-specific actions resulted in the timely and targeted allocation of resources for vector control, surveillance, case detection, and treatment. Weekly reporting by health workers and volunteer collaborators—distributed throughout the country by strata and informed via the national surveillance system—enabled local malaria teams to provide rapid, adaptive, and focalized program actions. Sustained investments in surveillance and response have led to a dramatic reduction in local transmission, with most current malaria cases in El Salvador due to importation from neighboring countries. Additional support for systematic elimination efforts in neighboring countries would benefit the region and may be needed for El Salvador to achieve and maintain malaria elimination. El Salvador’s experience provides a relevant case study that can guide the application of similar strategies in other countries committed to malaria elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Caterina Guinovart
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA)/ISGlobal Collaboration, Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steketee RW, Nahlen BL. The Future of Measuring Impact against Malaria: From Saving Lives to Eliminating Transmission. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2017; 97:3-5. [PMID: 28990919 PMCID: PMC5619938 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W. Steketee
- Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bernard L. Nahlen
- President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI), US Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yukich J, Bennett A, Yukich R, Stuck L, Hamainza B, Silumbe K, Smith T, Chitnis N, Steketee RW, Finn T, Eisele TP, Miller JM. Estimation of malaria parasite reservoir coverage using reactive case detection and active community fever screening from census data with rapid diagnostic tests in southern Zambia: a re-sampling approach. Malar J 2017; 16:317. [PMID: 28784122 PMCID: PMC5547485 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1962-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and methods In areas where malaria transmission has been suppressed by vector control interventions many malaria control and elimination programmes are actively seeking new interventions to further reduce malaria prevalence, incidence and transmission. Malaria infection prevalence and incidence has been shown to cluster geographically, especially at lower transmission levels, and as such a reactive strategy is frequently used, by which index cases presenting to a passive surveillance system are used to target small areas for testing and treatment, reactive case detection (RCD), or focal drug administration (fDA). This study utilizes geo-located data from a census with parasitological testing with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and treatment-seeking data collection conducted in southern Zambia to estimate the coverage of RCD or fDA in terms of the population and parasite reservoir as well as the operational requirements of such strategies, using a re-sampling algorithm developed exclusively for this purpose. This re-sampling algorithm allows for the specification of several parameters, such that different operational variants of these reactive strategies can be examined, including varying the search radius, screening for fever, or presumptive treatment (fDA). Results Results indicate that RCD, fDA and active fever screening followed by RCD, even with search radii over several hundered meters will only yield limited coverage of the RDT positive parasite reservoir during a short period. Long-term use of these strategies may increase this proportion. Reactive strategies detect a higher proportion of the reservoir of infections than random searches, but this effect appears to be greater in areas of low, but not moderate malaria prevalence in southern Zambia. Discussion Increases in the sensitivity of RDTs could also affect these results. The number of individuals and households that need to be searched increase rapidly, but approximately linearly with search radius. Conclusions Reactive strategies in southern Zambia yield improved identification of the parasite reservoir when targeted to areas with prevalence less than 10%. The operational requirements of delivering reactive strategies routinely are likely to prevent their uptake until prevalence falls far below this level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation (CAMRE), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States.
| | - Adam Bennett
- Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Rudy Yukich
- Sensorstar Inc., Ellicott City, MD, United States
| | - Logan Stuck
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation (CAMRE), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Tom Smith
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, and University of Basel, Basel, CH, Switzerland
| | - Nakul Chitnis
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, and University of Basel, Basel, CH, Switzerland
| | - Richard W Steketee
- Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Timothy Finn
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation (CAMRE), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation (CAMRE), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States
| | - John M Miller
- Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yalew WG, Pal S, Bansil P, Dabbs R, Tetteh K, Guinovart C, Kalnoky M, Serda BA, Tesfay BH, Beyene BB, Seneviratne C, Littrell M, Yokobe L, Noland GS, Domingo GJ, Getachew A, Drakeley C, Steketee RW. Current and cumulative malaria infections in a setting embarking on elimination: Amhara, Ethiopia. Malar J 2017; 16:242. [PMID: 28595603 PMCID: PMC5465535 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1884-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since 2005, Ethiopia has aggressively scaled up malaria prevention and case management. As a result, the number of malaria cases and deaths has significantly declined. In order to track progress towards the elimination of malaria in Amhara Region, coverage of malaria control tools and current malaria transmission need to be documented. Methods A cross-sectional household survey oversampling children under 5 years of age was conducted during the dry season in 2013. A bivalent rapid diagnostic test (RDT) detecting both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax and serology assays using merozoite antigens from both these species were used to assess the prevalence of malaria infections and exposure to malaria parasites in 16 woredas (districts) in Amhara Region. Results 7878 participants were included, with a mean age of 16.8 years (range 0.5–102.8 years) and 42.0% being children under 5 years of age. The age-adjusted RDT-positivity for P. falciparum and P. vivax infection was 1.5 and 0.4%, respectively, of which 0.05% presented as co-infections. Overall age-adjusted seroprevalence was 30.0% for P. falciparum, 21.8% for P. vivax, and seroprevalence for any malaria species was 39.4%. The prevalence of RDT-positive infections varied by woreda, ranging from 0.0 to 8.3% and by altitude with rates of 3.2, 0.7, and 0.4% at under 2000, 2000–2500, and >2500 m, respectively. Serological analysis showed heterogeneity in transmission intensity by area and altitude and evidence for a change in the force of infection in the mid-2000s. Conclusions Current and historic malaria transmission across Amhara Region show substantial variation by age and altitude with some settings showing very low or near-zero transmission. Plasmodium vivax infections appear to be lower but relatively more stable across geography and altitude, while P. falciparum is the dominant infection in the higher transmission, low-altitude areas. Age-dependent seroprevalence analyses indicates a drop in transmission occurred in the mid-2000s, coinciding with malaria control scale-up efforts. As malaria parasitaemia rates get very low with elimination efforts, serological evaluation may help track progress to elimination. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1884-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woyneshet G Yalew
- Regional Health Research Laboratory Center, Amhara National Regional State Health Bureau, P.O. Box 495, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Sampa Pal
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Pooja Bansil
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Rebecca Dabbs
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Keppel Street, London, WCIE 7HT, UK
| | - Kevin Tetteh
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Keppel Street, London, WCIE 7HT, UK
| | | | - Michael Kalnoky
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | | | | | - Belay B Beyene
- Regional Health Research Laboratory Center, Amhara National Regional State Health Bureau, P.O. Box 495, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | | | - Megan Littrell
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Lindsay Yokobe
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | | | | | - Asefaw Getachew
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Chris Drakeley
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Keppel Street, London, WCIE 7HT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Eisele TP, Bennett A, Silumbe K, Finn TP, Chalwe V, Kamuliwo M, Hamainza B, Moonga H, Kooma E, Chizema Kawesha E, Yukich J, Keating J, Porter T, Conner RO, Earle D, Steketee RW, Miller JM. Short-term Impact of Mass Drug Administration With Dihydroartemisinin Plus Piperaquine on Malaria in Southern Province Zambia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. J Infect Dis 2017; 214:1831-1839. [PMID: 27923947 PMCID: PMC5142084 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mass drug administration (MDA) using dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine (DHAp) represents a potential strategy to clear Plasmodium falciparum infections and reduce the human parasite reservoir. Methods A cluster-randomized controlled trial in Southern Province, Zambia, was used to assess the short-term impact of 2 rounds of community-wide MDA and household-level (focal) MDA with DHAp compared with no mass treatment. Study end points included parasite prevalence in children, infection incidence, and confirmed malaria case incidence. Results All end points significantly decreased after intervention, irrespective of treatment group. Parasite prevalence from 7.71% at baseline to 0.54% after MDA in lower-transmission areas, resulting in an 87% reduction compared with control (adjusted odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, .02–.92;P = .04). No difference between treatment groups was observed in areas of high transmission. The 5-month cumulative infection incidence was 70% lower (crude incidence rate ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, .06–1.49; P = .14) and 58% lower (0.42; .18–.98;P = .046) after MDA compared with control in lower- and higher-transmission areas, respectively. No significant impact of focal MDA was observed for any end point. Conclusions Two rounds of MDA with DHAp rapidly reduced infection prevalence, infection incidence, and confirmed case incidence rates, especially in low-transmission areas. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02329301.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Eisele
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Control Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds
| | - Timothy P Finn
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Victor Chalwe
- Institute for Medical Research and Training, University Teaching Hospital
| | - Mulakwa Kamuliwo
- National Malaria Control Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Control Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Control Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka
| | - Emmanuel Kooma
- Zambia Ministry of Health, Southern Provincial Health Office, Choma
| | | | - Joshua Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Joseph Keating
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Travis Porter
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Duncan Earle
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Control Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds
| | | | - John M Miller
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Control Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Steketee RW, Eisele TP. Watching the availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). Malar J 2017; 16:165. [PMID: 28434397 PMCID: PMC5402046 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1821-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
At the turn of this new century and after much debate, the malaria community reckoned with failing first line therapies and moved to a global recommendation for deployment of an artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) to treat infections due to Plasmodium falciparum. No one said it was going to be easy. This series in the Malaria Journal reports longitudinal snapshots of how the core pillar of malaria elimination of ensuring universal access to malaria diagnosis and treatment is faring—it is safe to say “not so well”. Core issues that must be addressed to ensure universal access to diagnosis and treatment, and achieve elimination, include lack of access to these essential services for those with malaria and the lack of a common effective service delivery approach to ensure high quality diagnosis and treatment, especially in the private sector which provides the bulk of malaria case management services in many settings. The barriers to universal access to high quality diagnosis and treatment for malaria will need to be addressed if malaria elimination is to remain a real possibility in the foreseeable future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Steketee
- Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bennett A, Yukich J, Miller JM, Keating J, Moonga H, Hamainza B, Kamuliwo M, Andrade-Pacheco R, Vounatsou P, Steketee RW, Eisele TP. The relative contribution of climate variability and vector control coverage to changes in malaria parasite prevalence in Zambia 2006-2012. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9:431. [PMID: 27496161 PMCID: PMC4974721 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1693-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Four malaria indicator surveys (MIS) were conducted in Zambia between 2006 and 2012 to evaluate malaria control scale-up. Nationally, coverage of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) increased over this period, while parasite prevalence in children 1–59 months decreased dramatically between 2006 and 2008, but then increased from 2008 to 2010. We assessed the relative effects of vector control coverage and climate variability on malaria parasite prevalence over this period. Methods Nationally-representative MISs were conducted in April-June of 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012 to collect household-level information on malaria control interventions such as IRS, ITN ownership and use, and child parasite prevalence by microscopic examination of blood smears. We fitted Bayesian geostatistical models to assess the association between IRS and ITN coverage and climate variability and malaria parasite prevalence. We created predictions of the spatial distribution of malaria prevalence at each time point and compared results of varying IRS, ITN, and climate inputs to assess their relative contributions to changes in prevalence. Results Nationally, the proportion of households owning an ITN increased from 37.8 % in 2006 to 64.3 % in 2010 and 68.1 % in 2012, with substantial heterogeneity sub-nationally. The population-adjusted predicted child malaria parasite prevalence decreased from 19.6 % in 2006 to 10.4 % in 2008, but rose to 15.3 % in 2010 and 13.5 % in 2012. We estimated that the majority of this prevalence increase at the national level between 2008 and 2010 was due to climate effects on transmission, although there was substantial heterogeneity at the provincial level in the relative contribution of changing climate and ITN availability. We predict that if climate factors preceding the 2010 survey were the same as in 2008, the population-adjusted prevalence would have fallen to 9.9 % nationally. Conclusions These results suggest that a combination of climate factors and reduced intervention coverage in parts of the country contributed to both the reduction and rebound in malaria parasite prevalence. Unusual rainfall patterns, perhaps related to moderate El Niño conditions, may have contributed to this variation. Zambia has demonstrated considerable success in scaling up vector control. This analysis highlights the importance of accounting for climate variability when using cross-sectional data for evaluation of malaria control efforts. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1693-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, 500 16th St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. .,Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Josh Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joseph Keating
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mulakwa Kamuliwo
- National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Ricardo Andrade-Pacheco
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, 500 16th St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Penelope Vounatsou
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Richard W Steketee
- PATH Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Scott CA, Yeshiwondim AK, Serda B, Guinovart C, Tesfay BH, Agmas A, Zeleke MT, Guesses GS, Ayenew AL, Workie WM, Steketee RW, Earle D, Bezabih B, Getachew A. Mass testing and treatment for malaria in low transmission areas in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Malar J 2016; 15:305. [PMID: 27255330 PMCID: PMC4890322 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1333-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In areas with ongoing malaria transmission, strategies to clear parasites from populations can reduce infection and transmission. The objective of this paper was to describe a malaria mass testing and treatment (MTAT) intervention implemented in six kebeles (villages) in Amhara Region, Ethiopia, at the beginning of the 2014 transmission season. METHODS Intervention kebeles were selected based on incidence of passively detected Plasmodium falciparum and mixed (P. falciparum and P. vivax) malaria cases during the 2013 malaria transmission season. All households in intervention kebeles were targeted; consenting residents received a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and RDT-positive individuals received artemether-lumefantrine for P. falciparum/mixed infections or chloroquine for P. vivax. Data were collected on MTAT participation, sociodemographic characteristics, malaria risk factors, and RDT positivity. RESULTS Of 9162 households targeted, 7974 (87.0 %) participated in the MTAT. Among the 35,389 residents of these households, 30,712 (86.8 %) received an RDT. RDT-positivity was 1.4 % (0.3 % P. vivax, 0.7 % P. falciparum, 0.3 % mixed), ranging from 0.3 to 5.1 % by kebele; 39.4 % of RDT-positive individuals were febrile, 28.5 % resided in the same household with another RDT-positive individual, 23.0 % were not protected by vector control interventions [mosquito net or indoor residual spray (IRS)], and 7.1 % had travel history. For individuals under 10 years of age, the odds of being RDT-positive was significantly higher for those with fever, recent use of anti-malarial drugs or residing in the same household with another RDT-positive individual; 59.0 % of RDT-positive individuals had at least one of these risk factors. For individuals 10 years of age and older, the odds of being RDT positive was significantly higher for those with reported travel, fever, recent use of anti-malarial drugs, no use of vector control, and those residing in the same household as another RDT-positive individual; 71.2 % of RDT-positive individuals had at least one of these risk factors. CONCLUSIONS In the Ethiopia setting, an MTAT intervention is operationally feasible and can be conducted with high coverage. RDT-positivity is low and varies widely by kebele. While several risk factors are significantly associated with RDT-positivity, there are still many RDT-positive individuals who do not have any of these risk factors. Strategies that target populations for testing and treatment based on these risk factors alone are likely to leave many infections undetected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callie A Scott
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Asnakew K Yeshiwondim
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Belendia Serda
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Caterina Guinovart
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
| | - Berhane H Tesfay
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Adem Agmas
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Melkamu T Zeleke
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Girma S Guesses
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Asmamaw L Ayenew
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Worku M Workie
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Richard W Steketee
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | - Duncan Earle
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Stand #16806, Trinity Park, Alick Nkhata Road, Mass Media Area, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Belay Bezabih
- Amhara National Regional State Health Bureau, P.O. Box 495, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Asefaw Getachew
- PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Getu Commercial Center, Rear Side, 1st-4th Floors, PO Box 493, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Eisele TP, Silumbe K, Finn T, Chalwe V, Kamuliwo M, Hamainza B, Moonga H, Bennett A, Yukich J, Keating J, Steketee RW, Miller JM. Assessing the effectiveness of household-level focal mass drug administration and community-wide mass drug administration for reducing malaria parasite infection prevalence and incidence in Southern Province, Zambia: study protocol for a community randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16:347. [PMID: 26268804 PMCID: PMC4535296 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0862-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2015] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mass drug administration (MDA) and focal MDA (fMDA) using dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine (DHAp), represent two strategies to maximize the use of existing information to achieve greater clearance of human infection and reduce the parasite reservoir, and provide longer chemoprophylactic protection against new infections. The primary aim of this study is to quantify the relative effectiveness of MDA and fMDA with DHAp against no mass treatment (standard of care) for reducing Plasmodium falciparum prevalence and incidence. Methods/design The study will be conducted along Lake Kariba in Southern Province, Zambia; an area of low to moderate malaria transmission and high coverage of vector control. A community randomized controlled trial (CRCT) of 60 health facility catchment areas (HFCAs) will be used to evaluate the impact of two rounds of MDA and fMDA interventions, relative to a control of no mass treatment, stratified by high and low transmission. Community residents in MDA HFCAs will be treated with DHAp at the end of the dry season (round one: November to December 2014) and the beginning of the rainy season (round two: February to March 2015). Community residents in fMDA HFCAs will be tested during the same two rounds for malaria parasites with a rapid diagnostic test; all positive individuals and all individuals living in their household will be treated with DHAp. Primary outcomes include malaria parasite prevalence (n = 5,640 children aged one month to under five-years-old), as measured by pre- and post-surveys, and malaria parasite infection incidence (n = 2,250 person-years among individuals aged three months and older), as measured by a monthly longitudinal cohort. The study is powered to detect approximately a 50 % relative reduction in these outcomes between each intervention group versus the control. Discussion Strengths of this trial include: a robust study design (CRCT); cross-sectional parasite surveys as well as a longitudinal cohort; and stratification of high and low transmission areas. Primary limitations include: statistical power to detect only a 50 % reduction in primary outcomes within high and low transmission strata; potential for contamination; and potential for misclassification of exposure. Trial registration Identifier: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02329301. Registration date: 30 December 2014. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0862-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Eisele
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Kafula Silumbe
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Control Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Timothy Finn
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Victor Chalwe
- Institute for Medical Research and Training, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Mukalwa Kamuliwo
- National Malaria Control Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Control Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Hawela Moonga
- National Malaria Control Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Josh Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Joseph Keating
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | | | - John M Miller
- PATH-Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), National Malaria Control Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Silumbe K, Yukich JO, Hamainza B, Bennett A, Earle D, Kamuliwo M, Steketee RW, Eisele TP, Miller JM. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a large-scale mass testing and treatment intervention for malaria in Southern Province, Zambia. Malar J 2015; 14:211. [PMID: 25985992 PMCID: PMC4490652 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0722-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A cluster, randomized, control trial of three dry-season rounds of a mass testing and treatment intervention (MTAT) using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) was conducted in four districts in Southern Province, Zambia. Methods Data were collected on the costs and logistics of the intervention and paired with effectiveness estimated from a community randomized control trial for the purpose of conducting a provider perspective cost-effectiveness analysis of MTAT vs no MTAT (Standard of Care). Results Dry-season MTAT in this setting did not reduce malaria transmission sufficiently to permit transition to a case-investigation strategy to then pursue malaria elimination, however, the intervention did substantially reduce malaria illness and was a highly cost-effective intervention for malaria burden reduction in this moderate transmission area. The cost per RDT administered was estimated to be USD4.39 (range: USD1.62-13.96) while the cost per AL treatment administered was estimated to be USD34.74 (range: USD3.87-3,835). The net cost per disability adjusted life year averted (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) was estimated to be USD804. Conclusions The intervention appears to be highly cost-effective relative to World Health Organization thresholds for malaria burden reduction in Zambia as compared to no MTAT. However, it was estimated that population-wide mass drug administration is likely to be more cost-effective for burden reduction and for transmission reduction compared to MTAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kafula Silumbe
- Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (PATH-MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Joshua O Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | | | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
| | - Duncan Earle
- Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (PATH-MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia.
| | | | - Richard W Steketee
- Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (PATH-MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - John M Miller
- Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (PATH-MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Larsen DA, Bennett A, Silumbe K, Hamainza B, Yukich JO, Keating J, Littrell M, Miller JM, Steketee RW, Eisele TP. Population-wide malaria testing and treatment with rapid diagnostic tests and artemether-lumefantrine in southern Zambia: a community randomized step-wedge control trial design. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015; 92:913-921. [PMID: 25802434 PMCID: PMC4426577 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Reducing the human reservoir of malaria parasites is critical for elimination. We conducted a community randomized controlled trial in Southern Province, Zambia to assess the impact of three rounds of a mass test and treatment (MTAT) intervention on malaria prevalence and health facility outpatient case incidence using random effects logistic regression and negative binomial regression, respectively. Following the intervention, children in the intervention group had lower odds of a malaria infection than individuals in the control group (adjusted odds ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24–0.90). Malaria outpatient case incidence decreased 17% in the intervention group relative to the control group (incidence rate ratio = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.68–1.01). Although a single year of MTAT reduced malaria prevalence and incidence, the impact of the intervention was insufficient to reduce transmission to a level approaching elimination where a strategy of aggressive case investigations could be used. Mass drug administration, more sensitive diagnostics, and gametocidal drugs may potentially improve interventions targeting the human reservoir of malaria parasites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas P. Eisele
- *Address correspondence to Thomas P. Eisele, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bennett A, Yukich J, Miller JM, Vounatsou P, Hamainza B, Ingwe MM, Moonga HB, Kamuliwo M, Keating J, Smith TA, Steketee RW, Eisele TP. A methodological framework for the improved use of routine health system data to evaluate national malaria control programs: evidence from Zambia. Popul Health Metr 2014; 12:30. [PMID: 25435815 PMCID: PMC4247605 DOI: 10.1186/s12963-014-0030-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2013] [Accepted: 10/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Due to challenges in laboratory confirmation, reporting completeness, timeliness, and health access, routine incidence data from health management information systems (HMIS) have rarely been used for the rigorous evaluation of malaria control program scale-up in Africa. Methods We used data from the Zambia HMIS for 2009–2011, a period of rapid diagnostic and reporting scale-up, to evaluate the association between insecticide-treated net (ITN) program intensity and district-level monthly confirmed outpatient malaria incidence using a dose–response national platform approach with district-time units as the unit of analysis. A Bayesian geostatistical model was employed to estimate longitudinal district-level ITN coverage from household survey and programmatic data, and a conditional autoregressive model (CAR) was used to impute missing HMIS data. The association between confirmed malaria case incidence and ITN program intensity was modeled while controlling for known confounding factors, including climate variability, reporting, testing, treatment-seeking, and access to health care, and additionally accounting for spatial and temporal autocorrelation. Results An increase in district level ITN coverage of one ITN per household was associated with an estimated 27% reduction in confirmed case incidence overall (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0 · 73, 95% Bayesian Credible Interval (BCI): 0 · 65–0 · 81), and a 41% reduction in areas of lower malaria burden. Conclusions When improved through comprehensive parasitologically confirmed case reporting, HMIS data can become a valuable tool for evaluating malaria program scale-up. Using this approach we provide further evidence that increased ITN coverage is associated with decreased malaria morbidity and use of health services for malaria illness in Zambia. These methods and results are broadly relevant for malaria program evaluations currently ongoing in sub-Saharan Africa, especially as routine confirmed case data improve. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12963-014-0030-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA ; Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St., Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
| | - Joshua Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St., Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
| | - John M Miller
- PATH Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Penelope Vounatsou
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland ; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mercy M Ingwe
- National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Hawela B Moonga
- National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mulakwo Kamuliwo
- National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joseph Keating
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St., Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
| | - Thomas A Smith
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland ; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Richard W Steketee
- PATH Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St., Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Abstract
Jenny Hill and colleagues discuss the importance of antenatal care services in providing pregnant women with a long-lasting insecticide treated net for the prevention of malaria in both the mother and infant. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Hill
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Jenna Hoyt
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Maria van Eijk
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Feiko O. ter Kuile
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jayne Webster
- Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard W. Steketee
- Malaria Control and Elimination Program, PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Steketee RW. Measuring malaria transmission reduction en route to elimination. Malar J 2014. [PMCID: PMC4179241 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-s1-o26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
33
|
Abstract
Richard Steketee discusses the two studies by Clara Menendez and colleagues that describe using mefloquine for the intermittent preventative therapy of malaria in both HIV positive and HIV negative pregnant women and outlines the next steps. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W. Steketee
- Malaria Control and Elimination Program at PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Littrell M, Miller JM, Ndhlovu M, Hamainza B, Hawela M, Kamuliwo M, Hamer DH, Steketee RW. Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach. Malar J 2013; 12:371. [PMID: 24160186 PMCID: PMC3842626 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2013] [Accepted: 10/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND National malaria control programmes and their partners must document progress associated with investments in malaria control. While documentation has been achieved through population-based surveys for most interventions, measuring changes in malaria case management has been challenging because the increasing use of diagnostic tests reduces the denominator of febrile children who should receive anti-malarial treatment. Thus the widely used indicator, "proportion of children under five with fever in the last two weeks who received anti-malarial treatment according to national policy within 24 hours from onset of fever" is no longer relevant. METHODS An alternative sequence of indicators using a systems effectiveness approach was examined using data from nationally representative surveys in Zambia: the 2012 population-based Malaria Indictor Survey (MIS) and the 2011 Health Facility Survey (HFS). The MIS measured fever treatment-seeking behaviour among 972 children under five years (CU5) and 1,848 people age five years and above. The HFS assessed management of 435 CU5 and 429 people age five and above with fever/history of fever seeking care at 149 health facilities. Consultation observation and exit interviews measured use of diagnostic tests, artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) prescription, and patient comprehension of prescribed regimens. RESULTS Systems effectiveness for malaria case management among CU5 was estimated as follows: [100% ACT efficacy] x [55% fever treatment-seeking from an appropriate provider (MIS)] x [71% malaria blood testing (HFS)] x [86% ACT prescription for positive cases (HFS)] x [73% patient comprehension of prescribed ACT drug regimens (HFS)] = 25%. Systems effectiveness for malaria case management among people age five and above was estimated at 15%. CONCLUSIONS Tracking progress in malaria case management coverage can no longer rely solely on population-based surveys; the way forward likely entails household surveys to track trends in fever treatment-seeking behaviour, and facility/provider data to track appropriate management of febrile patients. Applying health facility and population-based data to the systems effectiveness framework provides a cogent and feasible approach to documenting malaria case management coverage and identifying gaps to direct program action. In Zambia, this approach identified treatment-seeking behaviour as the largest contributor to reduction in systems effectiveness for malaria case management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Littrell
- PATH Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership (MACEPA), Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Eijk AM, Hill J, Larsen DA, Webster J, Steketee RW, Eisele TP, ter Kuile FO. Coverage of intermittent preventive treatment and insecticide-treated nets for the control of malaria during pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis and meta-analysis of national survey data, 2009-11. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13:1029-42. [PMID: 24054085 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70199-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women in malaria-endemic countries in sub-Saharan Africa are especially vulnerable to malaria. Recommended prevention strategies include intermittent preventive treatment with two doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and the use of insecticide-treated nets. However, progress with implementation has been slow and the Roll Back Malaria Partnership target of 80% coverage of both interventions by 2010 has not been met. We aimed to review the coverage of intermittent preventive treatment, insecticide-treated nets, and antenatal care for pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa and to explore associations between coverage and individual and country-level factors, including the role of funding for malaria prevention. METHODS We used data from nationally representative household surveys from 2009-11 to estimate coverage of intermittent preventive treatment, use of insecticide-treated nets, and attendance at antenatal clinics by pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. Using demographic data for births and published data for malaria exposure, we also estimated the number of malaria-exposed births (livebirths and stillbirths combined) for 2010 by country. We used meta-regression analysis to investigate the factors associated with coverage of intermittent preventive treatment and use of insecticide-treated nets. RESULTS Of the 21·4 million estimated malaria-exposed births across 27 countries in 2010, an estimated 4·6 million (21·5%, 95% CI 19·3-23·7) were born to mothers who received intermittent preventive treatment. Insecticide-treated nets were used during pregnancy for 10·5 million of 26·9 million births across 37 countries (38·8%, 34·6-43·0). Antenatal care was attended at least once by 16·3 of 20·8 million women in 2010 (78·3%, 75·2-81·4; n=26 countries) and at least twice by 14·7 of 19·6 million women (75·1%, 72·9-77·3; n=22 countries). For the countries with previous estimates for 2007, coverage of intermittent preventive treatment increased from 13·1% (11·9-14·3) to 21·2% (18·9-23·5; n=14 countries) and use of insecticide-treated nets increased from 17·9% (15·1-20·7) to 41·6% (37·2-46·0; n=24 countries) in 2010. A fall in coverage by more than 10% was seen in two of 24 countries for intermittent preventive treatment and in three of 30 countries for insecticide-treated nets. High disbursement of funds for malaria control and a long time interval since adoption of the relevant policy were associated with the highest coverage of intermittent preventive treatment. High disbursement of funds for malaria control and high total fertility rate were associated with the greatest use of insecticide-treated nets, whereas a high per-head gross domestic product (GDP) was associated with less use of nets than was a lower GDP. Coverage of intermittent preventive treatment showed greater inequity overall than use of insecticide-treated nets, with richer, educated, and urban women more likely to receive preventive treatment than their poorer, uneducated, rural counterparts. INTERPRETATION Although coverage of intermittent preventive treatment and use of insecticide-treated nets by pregnant women has increased in most countries, coverage remains far below international targets, despite fairly high rates of attendance at antenatal clinics. The effect of the implementation of WHO's 2012 policy update for intermittent preventive treatment, which aims to simplify the message and align preventive treatment with the focused antenatal care schedule, should be assessed to find out whether it leads to improvements in coverage. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria van Eijk
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Littrell M, Sow GD, Ngom A, Ba M, Mboup BM, Dieye Y, Mutombo B, Earle D, Steketee RW. Case investigation and reactive case detection for malaria elimination in northern Senegal. Malar J 2013; 12:331. [PMID: 24044506 PMCID: PMC3848815 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2013] [Accepted: 09/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Given progress in malaria control in recent years, many control programmes in sub-Saharan Africa will soon be required to strengthen systems for surveillance in order to further drive transmission to zero. Yet few practical experiences are available to guide control programmes in designing surveillance system components in low transmission, pre-elimination, and elimination phases. Methods A malaria case investigation programme was piloted for 12 weeks in 2012 in Richard Toll district of northern Senegal. Malaria infections (N = 110) were identified through facility-based passive case detection and investigated within three days. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and a brief questionnaire were administered to 5,520 individuals living within the index case compound or within five neighbouring compounds. Results In comparison with family and neighbours, index cases were more likely to be male, age 15–49, and to report travel within the past 15 days that entailed an overnight stay. Twenty-three (0.4%) of family/neighbours were RDT-positive. Potential risk factors for infection among family and neighbours were examined, including: sex, age, occupation, travel history, bed net usage, and residence (index vs neighbouring compound). Adjusting for all factors, relative risk (RR) of infection was associated with residence in the index case household (RR = 3.18, p < 0.05) and recent travel, including travel to Dakar (RR = 19.93, p < 0.001), travel within the region (RR = 9.57, p < 0.01), and to other regions in Senegal (RR = 94.30, p < 0.001). Recent fever among RDT-positive family/neighbours was uncommon (30%). Modifications to testing criteria were examined to optimize the efficiency of secondary case investigations in this population. Limiting blood testing to residents of the index case compound and neighbours with recent travel or fever would have identified 20/23 (87%) of the infections through testing 1,173 individuals. Information on the remaining three infections suggests that additional screening for boarding school attendees may facilitate identification of all cases. Conclusions The primary risk factor for malaria infection in the low transmission district of Richard Toll is travel. Additional intervention and monitoring strategies to target travellers at risk of malaria infection are needed in this region. Optimizing case investigation with specific targeted testing and treatment of at-risk family and neighbours strengthens the systems needed for continued progress towards malaria elimination in northern Senegal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Littrell
- PATH Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership (MACEPA), Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Eisele TP, Larsen DA, Anglewicz PA, Keating J, Yukich J, Bennett A, Steketee RW. Weighing for results: assessing the effect of IPTp - authors' reply. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13:292-3. [PMID: 23538219 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70060-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
39
|
Sedlmayr R, Fink G, Miller JM, Earle D, Steketee RW. Health impact and cost-effectiveness of a private sector bed net distribution: experimental evidence from Zambia. Malar J 2013; 12:102. [PMID: 23506170 PMCID: PMC3606619 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2012] [Accepted: 02/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Relatively few programmes have attempted to actively engage the private sector in national malaria control efforts. This paper evaluates the health impact of a large-scale distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) conducted in partnership with a Zambian agribusiness, and its cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP). Methods The study was designed as a cluster-randomized controlled trial. A list of 81,597 cotton farmers was obtained from Dunavant, a contract farming company in Zambia’s cotton sector, in December 2010. 39,963 (49%) were randomly selected to obtain one ITN each. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 438 farmers in the treatment and 458 farmers in the control group in June and July 2011. Treatment and control households were compared with respect to bed net ownership, bed net usage, self-reported fever, and self-reported confirmed malaria. Cost data was collected throughout the programme. Results The distribution effectively reached target beneficiaries, with approximately 95% of households in the treatment group reporting that they had received an ITN through the programme. The average increase in the fraction of household members sleeping under an ITN the night prior to the interview was 14.6 percentage points (p-value <0.001). Treatment was associated with a 42 percent reduction in the odds of self-reported fever (p-value <0.001) and with a 49 percent reduction in the odds of self-reported malaria (p-value 0.002). This was accomplished at a cost of approximately five US$ per ITN to Zambia’s NMCP. Conclusions The results illustrate that existing private sector networks can efficiently control malaria in remote rural regions. The intra-household allocation of ITNs distributed through this channel was comparable to that of ITNs received from other sources, and the health impact remained substantial.
Collapse
|
40
|
Chanda E, Kamuliwo M, Steketee RW, Macdonald MB, Babaniyi O, Mukonka VM. An overview of the malaria control programme in zambia. ISRN Prev Med 2012; 2013:495037. [PMID: 24967138 PMCID: PMC4062855 DOI: 10.5402/2013/495037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2012] [Accepted: 11/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The Zambian national malaria control programme has made great progress in the fight against Malaria. The country has solid, consistent, and coordinated policies, strategies, and guidelines for malaria control, with government prioritizing malaria in both the National Health Strategic Plan and the National Development Plan. This has translated into high coverage of proven and effective key preventive, curative, and supportive interventions with concomitant marked reduction in both malaria cases and deaths. The achievements attained can be attributed to increased advocacy, communication and behaviour changes, efficient partnership coordination including strong community engagement, increased financial resources, and evidence-based deployment of key technical interventions in accordance with the national malaria control programme policy and strategic direction. The three-ones strategy has been key for increased and successful public-private sector partner coordination, strengthening, and mobilization. However, maintaining the momentum and the gains is critical as the programme strives to achieve universal coverage of evidence-based and proven interventions. The malaria control programme's focus is to maintain the accomplishments, by mobilizing more resources and partners, increasing the government funding towards malaria control, scaling up and directing interventions based on epidemiological evidence, and strengthen active malaria surveillance and response to reduce transmission and to begin considering elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Chanda
- Directorate of Public Health and Research, National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 32509, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mulakwa Kamuliwo
- Directorate of Public Health and Research, National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 32509, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Richard W Steketee
- Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa, PATH, P.O. Box 900922, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Michael B Macdonald
- Global Malaria Programme, WHO Headquarters, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olusegun Babaniyi
- WHO Country Office, World Health Organization, P.O. Box 51449, Ridgeway, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Victor M Mukonka
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Copperbelt University, P.O. Box 71191, Ndola, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Steketee RW. Eliminating malaria in a sub-Saharan Africa: debate it or just do it? Malar J 2012. [PMCID: PMC3472264 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-s1-o52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
42
|
Eisele TP, Larsen DA, Anglewicz PA, Keating J, Yukich J, Bennett A, Hutchinson P, Steketee RW. Malaria prevention in pregnancy, birthweight, and neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis of 32 national cross-sectional datasets in Africa. Lancet Infect Dis 2012; 12:942-9. [PMID: 22995852 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70222-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low birthweight is a significant risk factor for neonatal and infant death. A prominent cause of low birthweight is infection with Plasmodium falciparum during pregnancy. Antimalarial intermittent preventive therapy in pregnancy (IPTp) and insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs) significantly reduce the risk of low birthweight in regions of stable malaria transmission. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of malaria prevention in pregnancy (IPTp or ITNs) at preventing low birthweight and neonatal mortality under routine programme conditions in malaria endemic countries of Africa. METHODS We used a retrospective birth cohort from national cross-sectional datasets in 25 African countries from 2000-10. We used all available datasets from multiple indicator cluster surveys, demographic and health surveys, malaria indicator surveys, and AIDS indicator surveys that were publically available as of 2011. We tried to limit confounding bias through exact matching on potential confounding factors associated with both exposure to malaria prevention (ITNs or IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine) in pregnancy and birth outcomes, including local malaria transmission, neonatal tetanus vaccination, maternal age and education, and household wealth. We used a logistic regression model to test for associations between malaria prevention in pregnancy and low birthweight, and a Poisson model for the outcome of neonatal mortality. Both models incorporated the matched strata as a random effect, while accounting for additional potential confounding factors with fixed effect covariates. FINDINGS We analysed 32 national cross-sectional datasets. Exposure of women in their first or second pregnancy to full malaria prevention with IPTp or ITNs was significantly associated with decreased risk of neonatal mortality (protective efficacy [PE] 18%, 95% CI 4-30; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·820, 95% CI 0·698-0·962), compared with newborn babies of mothers with no protection, after exact matching and controlling for potential confounding factors. Compared with women with no protection, exposure of pregnant women during their first two pregnancies to full malaria prevention in pregnancy through IPTp or ITNs was significantly associated with reduced odds of low birthweight (PE 21%, 14-27; IRR 0·792, 0·732-0·857), as measured by a combination of weight and birth size perceived by the mother, after exact matching and controlling for potential confounding factors. INTERPRETATION Malaria prevention in pregnancy is associated with substantial reductions in neonatal mortality and low birthweight under routine malaria control programme conditions. Malaria control programmes should strive to achieve full protection in pregnant women by both IPTp and ITNs to maximise their benefits. Despite an attempt to mitigate bias and potential confounding by matching women on factors thought to be associated with access to malaria prevention in pregnancy and birth outcomes, some level of confounding bias possibly remains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Eisele TP, Larsen DA, Walker N, Cibulskis RE, Yukich JO, Zikusooka CM, Steketee RW. Estimates of child deaths prevented from malaria prevention scale-up in Africa 2001-2010. Malar J 2012; 11:93. [PMID: 22455864 PMCID: PMC3350413 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2011] [Accepted: 03/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Funding from external agencies for malaria control in Africa has increased dramatically over the past decade resulting in substantial increases in population coverage by effective malaria prevention interventions. This unprecedented effort to scale-up malaria interventions is likely improving child survival and will likely contribute to meeting Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 4 to reduce the < 5 mortality rate by two thirds between 1990 and 2015. METHODS The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) model was used to quantify the likely impact that malaria prevention intervention scale-up has had on malaria mortality over the past decade (2001-2010) across 43 malaria endemic countries in sub-Saharan African. The likely impact of ITNs and malaria prevention interventions in pregnancy (intermittent preventive treatment [IPTp] and ITNs used during pregnancy) over this period was assessed. RESULTS The LiST model conservatively estimates that malaria prevention intervention scale-up over the past decade has prevented 842,800 (uncertainty: 562,800-1,364,645) child deaths due to malaria across 43 malaria-endemic countries in Africa, compared to a baseline of the year 2000. Over the entire decade, this represents an 8.2% decrease in the number of malaria-caused child deaths that would have occurred over this period had malaria prevention coverage remained unchanged since 2000. The biggest impact occurred in 2010 with a 24.4% decrease in malaria-caused child deaths compared to what would have happened had malaria prevention interventions not been scaled-up beyond 2000 coverage levels. ITNs accounted for 99% of the lives saved. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that funding for malaria prevention in Africa over the past decade has had a substantial impact on decreasing child deaths due to malaria. Rapidly achieving and then maintaining universal coverage of these interventions should be an urgent priority for malaria control programmes in the future. Successful scale-up in many African countries will likely contribute substantially to meeting MDG 4, as well as succeed in meeting MDG 6 (Target 1) to halt and reverse malaria incidence by 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - David A Larsen
- Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Neff Walker
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | | | - Joshua O Yukich
- Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | | | - Richard W Steketee
- Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), a program at PATH, 2001 Westlake Ave, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Steketee
- Malaria Control Program and MACEPA, PATH, PO Box 900922, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
A concerted effort to control malaria in Africa has produced dramatic reductions in childhood death in the past decade. This early success has prompted the global community to commit to eradication of malaria deaths and eventually all transmission. Evidence suggests that this is a feasible goal using currently available interventions, augmented with newer tools such as vaccines, which are in development. Malaria deaths are entirely preventable now, and our sustained political and financial commitment to continue to prevent these deaths hangs in the balance.
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Thomas Eisele and Richard Steketee discuss new research in PLoS Medicine by Stephen Lim and colleagues that examined the association of insecticide-treated nets with the reduction of P. falciparum prevalence in children under 5 and all-cause post-neonatal mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Eisele
- Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Thigpen MC, Filler SJ, Kazembe PN, Parise ME, Macheso A, Campbell CH, Newman RD, Steketee RW, Hamel M. Associations between peripheral Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasitemia, human immunodeficiency virus, and concurrent helminthic infection among pregnant women in Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2011; 84:379-85. [PMID: 21363973 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 2 billion persons worldwide are infected with schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths (STH), many in areas where endemic malaria transmission coexists. Few data exist on associations between these infections. Nested within a larger clinical trial, primigravid and secundigravid women provided blood samples for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing and peripheral malaria films and stool and urine for evaluation of STH and Schistosoma spp. during their initial antenatal clinic visit. The most common parasitic infections were malaria (37.6%), S. haematobium (32.3%), and hookworm (14.4%); 14.2% of women were HIV-infected. S. haematobium infection was associated with lower malarial parasite densities (344 versus 557 parasites/μL blood; P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, HIV and hookworm infection were independently associated with malaria infection (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9 and 95% confidence interval = 1.2-3.0 for HIV; adjusted odds ratio = 1.9 and 95% confidence interval = 1.03-3.5 for hookworm). Concurrent helminthic infection had both positive and negative effects on malaria parasitemia among pregnant women in Malawi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Thigpen
- Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Thwing J, Eisele TP, Steketee RW. Protective efficacy of malaria case management and intermittent preventive treatment for preventing malaria mortality in children: a systematic review for the Lives Saved Tool. BMC Public Health 2011; 11 Suppl 3:S14. [PMID: 21501431 PMCID: PMC3231887 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s3-s14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) model was developed to estimate the impact of the scale-up of child survival interventions on child mortality. New advances in antimalarials have improved their efficacy of treating uncomplicated and severe malaria. Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and parenteral or rectal artemisinin or quinine for severe malaria syndromes have been shown to be very effective for the treatment of malaria in children. These interventions are now being considered for inclusion in the LiST model. However, for obvious ethical reasons, their protective efficacy (PE) compared to placebo is unknown and their impact on reducing malaria-attributable mortality has not been quantified. Methods We performed systematic literature reviews of published studies in P. falciparum endemic settings to determine the protective efficacy (PE) of ACT treatment against malaria deaths among children with uncomplicated malaria, as well as the PE of effective case management including parenteral quinine against malaria deaths among all hospitalized children. As no randomized placebo-controlled trials of malaria treatment have been conducted, we used multiple data sources to ascertain estimates of PE, including a previously performed Delphi estimate for treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Results Based on multiple data sources, we estimate the PE of ACT treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria on reducing malaria mortality in children 1–23 months to be 99% (range: 94-100%), and in children 24-59 months to be 97% (range: 86-99%). We estimate the PE of treatment of severe P. falciparum malaria with effective case management including intravenous quinine on reducing malaria mortality in children 1-59 months to be 82% (range: 63-94%) compared to no treatment. Conclusions This systematic review quantifies the PE of ACT used for treating uncomplicated malaria and effective case management including parenteral quinine for treating severe P. falciparum malaria for preventing malaria mortality in children <5. These data will be used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) model for estimating the impact of scaling-up these interventions against malaria. However, in order to estimate the reduction in child mortality due to scale-up of these interventions, it is imperative to develop standardized indicators to measure population coverage of these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Thwing
- Malaria Branch, Malaria Branch, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Steketee RW, Campbell CC. Impact of national malaria control scale-up programmes in Africa: magnitude and attribution of effects. Malar J 2010; 9:299. [PMID: 20979634 PMCID: PMC2988827 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2010] [Accepted: 10/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2005, malaria control scale-up has progressed in many African countries. Controlled studies of insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) and malaria case management suggested that when incorporated into national programmes a dramatic health impact, likely more than a 20% decrease in all-cause childhood mortality, was possible. To assess the extent to which national malaria programmes are achieving impact the authors reviewed African country programme data available through 2009. METHODS National survey data, published literature, and organization or country reports produced during 2000-2009 were reviewed to assess available malaria financing, intervention delivery, household or target population coverage, and reported health benefits including infection, illness, severe anaemia, and death. RESULTS By the end of 2009, reports were available for ITN household ownership (n = 34) and IPTp use (n = 27) in malaria-endemic countries in Africa, with at least two estimates (pre-2005 and post-2005 intervals). Information linking IRS and case management coverage to impact were more limited. There was generally at least a three-fold increase in household ITN ownership across these countries between pre-2005 (median of 2.4% of households with at least one ITN) and post-2005 (median of 32.5% of households with at least one ITN). Ten countries had temporal data to assess programme impact, and all reported progress on at least one impact indicator (typically on mortality); in under-five year mortality rates most observed a decline of more than 20%. The causal relationship between malaria programme scale-up and reduced child illness and mortality rates is supported by biologic plausibility including mortality declines consistent with experience from intervention efficacy trials, consistency of findings across multiple countries and different epidemiologic settings, and temporal congruity where morbidity and mortality declines have been documented in the 18 to 36 months following intervention scale-up. CONCLUSIONS Several factors potentially have contributed to recent health improvement in African countries, but there is substantial evidence that achieving high malaria control intervention coverage, especially with ITNs and targeted IRS, has been the leading contributor to reduced child mortality. The documented impact provides the evidence required to support a global commitment to the expansion and long-term investment in malaria control to sustain and increase the health impact that malaria control is producing in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Steketee
- Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
| | - Carlos C Campbell
- Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chizema-Kawesha E, Miller JM, Steketee RW, Mukonka VM, Mukuka C, Mohamed AD, Miti SK, Campbell CC. Scaling up malaria control in Zambia: progress and impact 2005-2008. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010; 83:480-8. [PMID: 20810807 PMCID: PMC2929038 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Zambia national survey, administrative, health facility, and special study data were used to assess progress and impact in national malaria control between 2000 and 2008. Zambia malaria financial support expanded from US$9 million in 2003 to US$ ~40 million in 2008. High malaria prevention coverage was achieved and extended to poor and rural areas. Increasing coverage was consistent in time and location with reductions in child (age 6–59 months) parasitemia and severe anemia (53% and 68% reductions, respectively, from 2006 to 2008) and with lower post-neonatal infant and 1–4 years of age child mortality (38% and 36% reductions between 2001/2 and 2007 survey estimates). Zambia has dramatically reduced malaria transmission, disease, and child mortality burden through rapid national scale-up of effective interventions. Sustained progress toward malaria elimination will require maintaining high prevention coverage and further reducing transmission by actively searching for and treating infected people who harbor malaria parasites.
Collapse
|