A study to learn how well tucatinib plus trastuzumab works for treating participants with metastatic colorectal cancer, and how safe it is: a plain language summary of the MOUNTAINEER study

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This is a summary of an article describing an ongoing study called MOUNTAINEER. This article was published in The Lancet Oncology in 2023. The study included 117 adults with metastatic HER2-positive colorectal cancer. The researchers wanted to know whether a combination of 2 drugs called tucatinib and trastuzumab could shrink the participants' cancer. The researchers also wanted to know whether receiving tucatinib alone could also shrink the participants' cancer.

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

In this study, researchers found that 32 out of 84 participants had their tumors respond to treatment with tucatinib with trastuzumab. This was about 4 in 10 participants. This means that the tumors shrank by at least 30% or disappeared. Participants whose tumors responded to tucatinib with trastuzumab responded for a median of 12.4 months. 60 out of 84 participants had their tumors respond or remain about the same size after treatment with tucatinib with trastuzumab. This was about 7 in 10 participants. For those who received tucatinib with trastuzumab the median length of time participants lived during the study was 24.1 months and the median length of time participants lived during the study without their cancer growing or spreading was 8.2 months. 1 out of 30 participants had their tumors respond to treatment with tucatinib alone within 12 weeks. 19 out of 86 participants who received tucatinib with trastuzumab had serious medical problems, also called serious adverse events. This was about 2 in 10 participants. Not all of these serious adverse events were related to tucatinib with trastuzumab. 3 out of 30 participants who received tucatinib alone who had serious adverse events. This was 1 in 10 participants. Not all of these serious adverse events were related to tucatinib alone.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?

Tucatinib with trastuzumab could be a good treatment option for people with HER2-positive colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. On January 19, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to the combination of two targeted drugs, tucatinib (Tukysa) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) for people with HER2-positive colorectal cancer that is metastatic or that cannot be treated with surgery. The FDA can grant accelerated approval for new treatments that fill unmet needs for patients with serious medical conditions. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03043313 (MOUNTAINEER study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Racial and ethnic disparities in genomic testing among lung cancer patients: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Racial and ethnic disparities in genomic testing could exacerbate disparities in access to precision cancer therapies and survival-particularly in the context of lung cancer, where genomic testing has been recommended for the past decade. However, prior studies assessing disparities in genomic testing have yielded mixed results.

METHODS

We conducted a systemic review to examine racial and ethnic disparities in the use of genomic testing among lung cancer patients in the U.S. Two comprehensive searches in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were conducted (September 2022, May 2023). Original studies that assessed rates of genomic testing by race or ethnicity were included. Findings were narratively synthesized by outcome.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2,739 unique records, resulting in 18 included studies. All but one study was limited to patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. Diagnosis years ranged from 2007-2022. Eleven of 18 studies found statistically significant differences in the likelihood of genomic testing by race or ethnicity; in seven of these studies, testing was lower among Black patients compared to White or Asian patients. However, many studies lacked adjustment for key covariates and included patients with unclear eligibility for testing.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of studies, though not all, observed racial and ethnic disparities in the use of genomic testing among patients with lung cancer. Heterogeneity of study results throughout a period of changing clinical guidelines suggests that minoritized populations-Black patients in particular-have faced additional barriers to genomic testing, even if not universally observed at all institutions.

Targeting KRAS-Mutated Gastrointestinal Malignancies with Small-Molecule Inhibitors: A New Generation of Breakthrough Therapies

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) is one of the most important and frequently mutated oncogenes in cancer and the mutational prevalence is especially high in many gastrointestinal malignancies, including colorectal cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The KRAS protein is a small GTPase that functions as an "on/off" switch to activate downstream signaling, mainly through the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. KRAS was previously considered undruggable because of biochemical constraints; however, recent breakthroughs have enabled the development of small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS G12C. These drugs were initially approved in lung cancer and have now shown substantial clinical activity in KRAS G12C-mutated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma as well as colorectal cancer when combined with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Early data are encouraging for other gastrointestinal cancers as well and many other combination strategies are being investigated. Several new KRAS G12C inhibitors and novel inhibitors of other KRAS alterations have recently entered the clinic. These molecules employ a variety of innovative mechanisms and have generated intense interest. These novel drugs are especially important as KRAS G12C is rare in gastrointestinal malignancies compared with other KRAS alterations, representing potentially groundbreaking advances. Soon, the rapidly evolving landscape of novel KRAS inhibitors may substantially shift the therapeutic landscape for gastrointestinal cancers and offer meaningful survival improvements.

Management of Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Treatment of both early stage and advanced disease remains highly reliant on cytotoxic chemotherapy. About 4-24% of gastroesophageal cancers are microsatellite instability high (MSI-H). The MSI-H subtype is associated with favorable prognosis, resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Recent studies have demonstrated promising activity of ICIs in the MSI-H subtype, resulting in fundamental changes in the management of MSI-H gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE

In this review, we discuss the prevalence, characteristics, prognosis, and management of MSI-H gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, with a focus on recent and ongoing studies that have changed the landscape of treatment for the MSI-H subtype. We also discuss current challenges in the management of resectable and advanced MSI-H gastroesophageal cancer, including the need for more accurate biomarkers of response to ICI therapy.

Prevalence of KRAS G12C Mutation and Co-mutations and Associated Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE

A systematic literature review was conducted to estimate the global prevalence of Kirsten rat sarcoma virus gene (KRAS) mutations, with an emphasis on the clinically significant KRAS G12C mutation, and to estimate the prognostic significance of these mutations in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

DESIGN

Relevant English-language publications in the Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases (from 2009 to 2021) and congress presentations (from 2016 to 2021) were reviewed. Eligible studies were those that reported the prevalence and clinical outcomes of the KRAS G12C mutation in patients with CRC.

RESULTS

A total of 137 studies (interventional [n = 8], post hoc analyses of randomized clinical trials [n = 6], observational [n = 122], and longitudinal [n =1]) were reviewed. Sixty-eight studies reported the prevalence of KRAS mutations (KRASm) in 42 810 patients with CRC. The median global prevalence of KRASm was 38% (range, 13.3%-58.9%) and that of the KRAS G12C mutation (KRAS G12C) 3.1% (range, 0.7%-14%). Available evidence suggests that KRASm are possibly more common in tumors that develop on the right side of the colon. Limited evidence suggests a lower objective response rate and inferior disease-free/relapse-free survival in patients with KRAS G12C compared with patients with KRASwt or other KRASm.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis reveals that KRAS G12C is prevalent in 3% of patients with CRC. Available evidence suggests a poor prognosis for patients with KRAS G12C. Right-sided tumors were more likely to harbor KRASm; however, their role in determining clinical outcomes needs to be investigated further.

Identification of an optimal mutant allele frequency to detect activating KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in a commercial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing assay in colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinomas

Background

Evaluation for activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF in colorectal cancer (CRC) and in KRAS in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is essential for clinical care. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows convenient assessment of a tumor's molecular profile, however low tumor DNA shedding limits sensitivity. We investigated mutant allele frequency (MAF) of other oncogenic dominant genes to identify a threshold for accurate detection of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF (RAS/RAF) mutations in cfDNA.

Methods

Molecular and clinical data were obtained from the Duke Molecular Registry of Tumors and the SCRUM-Japan GOZILA study. Patients with CRC or PDAC and a KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF activating single nucleotide variant (SNV) present on tissue NGS and with available cfDNA assays were included. Recursive partitioning and Wilcoxon-rank statistics methods identified potential cut-points for discriminative MAF values.

Results

One hundred and thirty-five CRC and 30 PDAC cases with 198 total cfDNA assays met criteria. Greatest non-RAS/RAF dominant gene MAF of 0.34% provided maximum discrimination for predicting RAS/RAF SNV detection. Sensitivity for RAS/RAF SNVs increased with dominant gene MAF, with MAF ≥1% predicting sensitivity >98%, MAF between 0.34 and 1% predicting sensitivity of 84.0%, and MAF £0.34% predicting sensitivity of 50%. For 43 cfDNA assays that did not detect RAS/RAF SNVs, 18 assays detected 34 other oncogenic variants, of which 80.6% were not also detected on tissue.

Conclusions

Non-RAS/RAF dominant oncogenic mutation MAF ≥1% on cfDNA NGS predicts high sensitivity to detect RAS/RAF oncogenic SNVs in CRC and PDAC. MAF £0.34% indicates an assay may not reliably detect RAS/RAF SNVs, despite detection on tissue testing. Most variants from assays that did not detect RAS/RAF had MAF <1% and were not detected on tissue, suggesting potential confounding. These data suggest a practical approach to determining cfDNA assay adequacy, with implications for guiding clinical decisions in CRC and PDAC.

Impact of Anti-EGFR Therapies on HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may be associated with resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR therapies. Given the lack of comprehensive investigations into this association, we assessed the prognostic or predictive effect of HER2 amplification/overexpression on anti-EGFR treatment outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2001-2021) identified studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR treatments and whose HER2 status was known. Meta-analyses of proportions (ORR) and hazard ratios (PFS, OS) were performed using random-effect models with pre-specified sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Five high-quality retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analyses representing 594 patients with mCRC. All patients received anti-EGFR treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis of PFS demonstrated a 2.84-fold higher risk of death or progression (95% CI, 1.44-5.60) in patients with HER2-positive (vs. HER2-negative) RAS WT mCRC treated with anti-EGFR regimens. The odds of response to anti-EGFR treatment were 2-fold higher in HER2-negative vs. HER2-positive (odds ratio, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.10-3.48]). Differences in OS were not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

While this study could not account for all confounding factors, in patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy, HER2 overexpression/amplification was associated with worse PFS and ORR and may therefore predict poorer outcomes. HER2 testing is important to inform treatment decisions and could optimize outcomes for patients.

Real-World Treatment Patterns in Patients With HER2-Amplified Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Clinical-Genomic Database Study

BACKGROUND

HER2 amplification (HER2+) occurs in approximately 3% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Despite the recent addition of HER2-directed therapies to treatment recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines, until more recently there were no FDA-approved treatments. This study examined real-world treatment patterns in patients with HER2+ mCRC in the United States before and after the emerging awareness of HER2-directed therapies in 2018.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of patients with HER2+ mCRC from the GuardantINFORM database, which contains claims data for patients with Guardant360 genomic testing results. Patients were aged ≥18 years, were diagnosed with mCRC between January 2014 and September 2020, and had confirmed ERBB2 amplification via the blood-based Guardant360 test. Treatment patterns and real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT) were evaluated.

RESULTS

This study included 142 patients with a median age of 59 years; 31 (21.8%) patients with ERBB2 amplifications also had ERBB2 mutations. Treatment patterns were heterogeneous and evolved over time; before 2018, the most common regimen prescribed after detection of ERBB2 amplification was anti-VEGF therapy with or without chemotherapy (31.6%; n=25), and after 2018, HER2-directed therapies were the most commonly prescribed (36.5%; n=23). Median rwTTNT among the overall cohort was 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.5-10.0); rwTTNT was numerically longer in patients who received HER2-directed therapy compared with those who received non-HER2-directed therapies (11.0 months [95% CI, 6.3-12.3] vs 7.2 months [95% CI, 5.8-9.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study of the largest clinically annotated dataset of patients with HER2+ mCRC showed that many patients do not receive HER2-directed therapy despite its inclusion in NCCN Guidelines, with heterogeneous treatment patterns suggesting that standard of care remains undefined and targeted therapy remains underutilized. Greater awareness of the unmet need in this patient population, together with new effective therapies, will facilitate strategies for improved, targeted treatment approaches.

First-in-human study of oleclumab, a potent, selective anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody, alone or in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

CD73 upregulation in tumors leads to local immunosuppression. This phase I, first-in-human study evaluated oleclumab (MEDI9447), an anti-CD73 human IgG1λ monoclonal antibody, alone or with durvalumab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), or epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients received oleclumab 5-40 mg/kg (dose-escalation) or 40 mg/kg (dose-expansion) intravenously every 2 weeks (Q2W), alone (escalation only) or with durvalumab 10 mg/kg intravenously Q2W.

RESULTS

192 patients were enrolled, 66 during escalation and 126 (42 CRC, 42 PDAC, 42 NSCLC) during expansion. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred during escalation. In the monotherapy and combination therapy escalation cohorts, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 55 and 54%, respectively, the most common being fatigue (17 and 25%). In the CRC, PDAC, and NSCLC expansion cohorts, 60, 57, and 45% of patients had TRAEs, respectively; the most common were fatigue (15%), diarrhea (9%), and rash (7%). Free soluble CD73 and CD73 expression on peripheral T cells and tumor cells showed sustained decreases, accompanied by reduced CD73 enzymatic activity in tumor cells. Objective response rate during escalation was 0%. Response rates in the CRC, PDAC, and NSCLC expansion cohorts were 2.4% (1 complete response [CR]), 4.8% (1 CR, 1 partial response [PR]), and 9.5% (4 PRs), respectively; 6-month progression-free survival rates were 5.4, 13.2, and 16.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Oleclumab ± durvalumab had a manageable safety profile, with pharmacodynamic activity reflecting oleclumab's mechanism of action. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed in tumor types that are generally immunotherapy resistant.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02503774; date of registration, July 17, 2015.

Hepatic artery infusion for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: Palliation and conversion

Patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases are commonly treated with systemic chemotherapy to convert their disease to an operable state. Unfortunately, many patients remain unresectable after first-line chemotherapy and resort to second- and third-line regimens with poor results. Liver-directed strategies have historically been used in this setting. There has been a renewed interest in offering hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to improve resectability or palliate disease. Prospective studies over the past 2 decades have produced encouraging data, even in chemorefractory patients. This therapy has expanded to multiple centers across North America and worldwide with similar results. This review addresses these data, specifically focusing on conversion to resection and palliation of colorectal liver metastases after patients have received multiple lines of systemic chemotherapy.

Tucatinib plus trastuzumab for chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer (MOUNTAINEER): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

HER2 is an actionable target in metastatic colorectal cancer. We assessed the activity of tucatinib plus trastuzumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

MOUNTAINEER is a global, open-label, phase 2 study that enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer at 34 sites (clinics and hospitals) in five countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, and the USA). Initially, the study was designed as a single-cohort study, which was expanded following an interim analysis to include more patients. Initially, patients were given tucatinib (300 mg orally twice daily) plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg as an initial loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 21 days; cohort A) for the duration of treatment (until progression), and after expansion, patients were randomly assigned (4:3), using an interactive web response system and stratified by primary tumour location, to either tucatinib plus trastuzumab (cohort B) or tucatinib monotherapy (cohort C). The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate per blinded independent central review (BICR) for cohorts A and B combined and was assessed in patients in the full analysis set (ie, patients with HER2-positive disease who received at least one dose of study treatment). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043313, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 8, 2017, and Sept 22, 2021, 117 patients were enrolled (45 in cohort A, 41 in cohort B, and 31 in cohort C), of whom 114 patients had locally assessed HER2-positive disease and received treatment (45 in cohort A, 39 in cohort B, and 30 in cohort C; full analysis set), and 116 patients received at least one dose of study treatment (45 in cohort A, 41 in cohort B, and 30 in cohort C; safety population). In the full analysis set, median age was 56·0 years (IQR 47-64), 66 (58%) were male, 48 (42%) were female, 88 (77%) were White, and six (5%) were Black or African American. As of data cutoff (March 28, 2022), in 84 patients from cohorts A and B in the full analysis set, the confirmed objective response rate per BICR was 38·1% (95% CI 27·7-49·3; three patients had a complete response and 29 had a partial response). In cohorts A and B, the most common adverse event was diarrhoea (55 [64%] of 86), the most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was hypertension (six [7%] of 86), and three (3%) patients had tucatinib-related serious adverse events (acute kidney injury, colitis, and fatigue). In cohort C, the most common adverse event was diarrhoea (ten [33%] of 30), the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (both two [7%]), and one (3%) patient had a tucatinib-related serious adverse event (overdose). No deaths were attributed to adverse events. All deaths in treated patients were due to disease progression.

INTERPRETATION

Tucatinib plus trastuzumab had clinically meaningful anti-tumour activity and favourable tolerability. This treatment is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-HER2 regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer and is an important new treatment option for chemotherapy-refractory HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer.

FUNDING

Seagen and Merck & Co.

Phase Ib Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin in Combination With Erlotinib in Patients With c-Met Protein-Expressing Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Overexpression of c-Met protein and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations can co-occur in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), providing strong rationale for dual targeting. Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V), a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate targeting c-Met, has shown a tolerable safety profile and antitumor activity as monotherapy. Herein, we report the results of a phase Ib study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02099058) evaluating Teliso-V plus erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with c-Met-positive (+) NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study evaluated Teliso-V (2.7 mg/kg once every 21 days) plus erlotinib (150 mg once daily) in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with c-Met+ NSCLC. Later enrollment required presence of an EGFR-activating mutation (EGFR-M+) and progression on a prior EGFR TKI. End points included safety, pharmacokinetics, objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The efficacy-evaluable population consisted of c-Met+ patients (confirmed histology [H]-score ≥ 150) who had at least one postbaseline scan; c-Met+ patients with H-scores ≥ 225 were classified as c-Met high.

RESULTS

As of January 2020, 42 patients were enrolled (N = 36 efficacy-evaluable). Neuropathies were the most common any-grade adverse events reported, with 24 of 42 patients (57%) experiencing at least one event. The pharmacokinetic profile of Teliso-V plus erlotinib was similar to Teliso-V monotherapy. Median PFS for all efficacy-evaluable patients was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not reached). ORR for EGFR-M+ patients (n = 28) was 32.1%. Of EGFR-M+ patients, those who were c-Met high (n = 15) had an ORR of 52.6%. Median PFS was 6.8 months for non-T790M+ and for those whose T790M status was unknown, versus 3.7 months for T790M+.

CONCLUSION

Teliso-V plus erlotinib showed encouraging antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity in EGFR TKI-pretreated patients with EGFR-M+, c-Met+ NSCLC.

HER2 testing in colorectal cancer: Concordance analysis between breast and gastric scoring algorithms from the MOUNTAINEER trial

198

Background: HER2 overexpression/amplification (HER2+) occurs in 3%-5% of patients (pts) w/ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Rates of HER2+ can increase to ~10% in pts w/ RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC tumors. The MOUNTAINEER trial (NCT03043313) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the investigational combination of tucatinib with trastuzumab in pts with HER2+ and RAS wild-type mCRC. Established regional guidelines for mCRC recommend HER2 testing and HER2-directed treatment options; however, there is currently no established best practice for HER2 testing and interpretation in mCRC. Here, we present data from a concordance analysis comparing breast and gastric HER2 testing algorithms in the mCRC setting. Methods: The MOUNTAINEER trial enrolled pts w/ HER2+ mCRC identified using ≥1 method: tissue-based local immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. Archival or fresh tumor tissue was submitted to a sponsor-designated central laboratory for confirmatory HER2 testing w/ IHC/FISH per the package insert of the FDA approved assay and scored by both the breast and gastric algorithms for HER2 IHC. A positive result per the breast scoring criteria for IHC requires circumferential membrane staining for HER2, while the gastric criteria allows for circumferential, basolateral, or lateral staining patterns. Results: A total of 114 pts were enrolled with HER2+ tumors per ≥1 local testing methods; 69 pts were HER2+ by NGS, 46 by IHC 3+, and 36 by ISH. Of 105 pts who had tissue available for central HER2 testing w/IHC/FISH, 98 had valid HER2 results; 82/98 (83.7%) of pts had tumors centrally confirmed as HER2+ using both the breast and gastric algorithms. Tissue samples from pts in the MOUNTAINEER trial had 100% concordance between breast and gastric algorithms in HER2 status and 99% concordance in HER2 IHC score. Conclusions: Central pathology testing using both the breast and gastric criteria showed high concordance between these two commonly used algorithms. A high central confirmation rate of local HER2+ results was also observed. These data support the use of either the breast or gastric algorithms to identify HER2+ mCRC tumors until an FDA-approved HER2 assay is available for mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03043313 . [Table: see text]

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma confers no survival advantage

560

Background: Randomized data suggest improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy for biliary tract cancers, but subset analyses of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) show limited survival benefit. This study uses a large bi-institutional cohort of resected ICC patients to evaluate the impact of adjuvant therapy on recurrence patterns and overall survival (OS) and compares these findings to data from a national cancer registry. Methods: Patients with resected ICC were identified within a bi-institutional cohort (Duke and Memorial Sloan Kettering, 1997-2020) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB, 2010-2018). Patients were stratified by treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy (adj). Site of first recurrence was categorized as local (liver only), regional (liver and perihepatic nodes), nodal (perihepatic nodes only), distant, or mixed (both liver and distant). OS was compared with Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 367 patients underwent resection for ICC, and 163 (44%) patients received adjuvant therapy. Median follow-up was 33 vs. 44 months (adj vs observation (obs), p=0.15). 263 (72%) patients had recurrent disease, most commonly in the liver (72%). There was no difference in recurrence patterns stratified by treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy (% recurrence, adj vs obs; local: 42 vs 42; regional: 2 vs 2; nodal: 0 vs 3; distant only: 27 vs 26; mixed: 29 vs 27, p=0.5). OS was the same between groups (adj vs obs; 42 vs 49 months, p=0.3) and when stratified by recurrence site (p=0.5). Similarly, in an NCDB cohort of 1,159 ICC patients over the same time period, there was no association between adjuvant therapy and OS (adj vs obs; 49 vs 57 months, p=0.1). Conclusions: In this retrospective dual registry analysis, corroborated by national data, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with an improvement in OS in ICC patients subjected to curative intent resection. Further, adjuvant therapy had no impact on the high rate of hepatic recurrence, suggesting that alternative strategies, such as liver directed therapies, are needed to improve recurrence rates and OS.

MOUNTAINEER-03: Phase 3 study of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment in HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer—Trial in progress

TPS261

Background: Current standard of care (SOC) for treatment (tx) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is multi-agent chemotherapy, w/ or w/o a VEGF- or EGFR-inhibitor. HER2 is a validated clinical target in breast and gastric cancers. HER2 amplification occurs in 3%-5% of patients (pts) w/ mCRC; the rate of HER2 amplification can increase to ~10% in pts w/ RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC tumors. Tucatinib (TUC), a highly selective, HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple regions for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and is being investigated in gastrointestinal cancers. MOUNTAINEER (NCT03043313) evaluated the safety and efficacy of TUC and trastuzumab (Tras) in pts w/ tx refractory RAS wild-type, HER2+ mCRC. Results from the primary endpoint analysis showed clinically meaningful activity (confirmed ORR of 38.1% and median DOR of 12.4 months) and demonstrated TUC + Tras was well tolerated with a low discontinuation rate (5.8%) and no deaths due to AEs. MOUNTAINEER-03 will further investigate TUC in combo w/ mFOLFOX and Tras in pts w/ RAS wild-type, HER2+ mCRC. Methods: MOUNTAINEER-03 (NCT05253651) is a global, open label, randomized, phase 3 study for 1L tx of HER2+ and RAS wild-type mCRC. Approximately 400 pts will be randomized 1:1 to the TUC experimental arm (TUC [300 mg PO BID] + Tras + mFOLFOX) or the SOC arm (mFOLFOX alone or in combo w/ either bevacizumab or cetuximab). HER2 status is determined centrally w/ tissue based HER2 immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays. Eligible pts must not have received prior tx in the metastatic setting but may have received adjuvant tx if completed > 6 months prior to enrollment. Pts must be ≥18 years of age w/ an ECOG performance status of ≤1 and RAS wild-type mCRC. Pts w/ treated stable central nervous system metastases are eligible. Randomization is stratified by primary tumor location (left-sided vs other) and liver metastases (presence/absence). Primary endpoint is progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1, assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Key secondary endpoints are overall survival and confirmed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 assessed by BICR. Enrollment is ongoing in the US, w/ global sites planned. Clinical trial information: NCT05253651 .

Randomized phase 2 study of DKN-01 plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX and bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX and bevacizumab as second-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (DeFianCe)

TPS275

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most prevalent cancer, and the prognosis of patients with advanced metastatic (mCRC) is poor. The efficacy of standard of care (SOC) second-line chemotherapy combinations with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies remains modest. Previously treated advanced mCRC that is microsatellite stable (MSS/pMMR) represents nearly 95% of the metastatic population and remains a high unmet medical need. DKN-01 is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeted against Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1), a regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway. DKK1 has been identified as a potential oncogenic driver in CRC and has been correlated with 5FU resistance. Therefore, DKK1 expression is a potential predictive biomarker for chemotherapeutic resistance in CRC. Methods: This is a phase 2 randomized, open-label, two-part, multicenter study with a safety run-in to evaluate safety and efficacy of DKN-01 plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX and bevacizumab versus SOC [FOLFIRI/FOLFOX and bevacizumab] as second-line treatment of advanced mCRC patients. In Parts A and B, approximately 150 advanced MSS, BRAF Wild Type mCRC patients with radiographic progression during or following 1 prior line of systemic treatment will be enrolled in the study. Part A is a safety run-in with DKN-01 plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX and bevacizumab in at least 20 safety evaluable patients. In Part B, approximately 130 patients will be randomized 1:1 to either the experimental (DKN-01 plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX and bevacizumab) or control arm (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX and bevacizumab), using a central stratified block randomization scheme and stratified based on DKK1 RNAscope tumor percentage score (TPS) (≥1% vs <1%). Primary endpoint is progression free survival and secondary endpoints include overall response rate, duration of response, overall survival and incidence of ≥Grade 3 related treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Exploratory endpoints will include evaluation of efficacy outcomes based upon tumoral DKK1 expression. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05480306 .

Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

Five systematic reviews and 10 randomized controlled trials met the systematic review inclusion criteria.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Doublet chemotherapy should be offered, or triplet therapy may be offered to patients with previously untreated, initially unresectable mCRC, on the basis of included studies of chemotherapy in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies. In the first-line setting, pembrolizumab is recommended for patients with mCRC and microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair tumors; chemotherapy and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair left-sided treatment-naive RAS wild-type mCRC; chemotherapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair RAS wild-type right-sided mCRC. Encorafenib plus cetuximab is recommended for patients with previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC that has progressed after at least one previous line of therapy. Cytoreductive surgery plus systemic chemotherapy may be recommended for selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases; however, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is not recommended. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be recommended following systemic therapy for patients with oligometastases of the liver who are not considered candidates for resection. Selective internal radiation therapy is not routinely recommended for patients with unilobar or bilobar metastases of the liver. Perioperative chemotherapy or surgery alone should be offered to patients with mCRC who are candidates for potentially curative resection of liver metastases. Multidisciplinary team management and shared decision making are recommended. Qualifying statements with further details related to implementation of guideline recommendations are also included.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Concordance Between Genomic Alterations Detected by Tumor and Germline Sequencing: Results from a Tertiary Care Academic Center Molecular Tumor Board

OBJECTIVE

The majority of tumor sequencing currently performed on cancer patients does not include a matched normal control, and in cases where germline testing is performed, it is usually run independently of tumor testing. The rates of concordance between variants identified via germline and tumor testing in this context are poorly understood. We compared tumor and germline sequencing results in patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer who were found to harbor alterations in genes associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and increased hereditary cancer risk. We then evaluated the potential for a computational somatic-germline-zygosity (SGZ) modeling algorithm to predict germline status based on tumor-only comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed using an academic cancer center's databases of somatic and germline sequencing tests, and concordance between tumor and germline results was assessed. SGZ modeling from tumor-only CGP was compared to germline results to assess this method's accuracy in determining germline mutation status.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients with 146 total alterations were identified. Concordance rates between somatic and germline alterations ranged from 0% to 85.7% depending on the gene and variant classification. After correcting for differences in variant classification and filtering practices, SGZ modeling was found to have 97.2% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity for the prediction of somatic versus germline origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutations in HRD genes identified by tumor-only sequencing are frequently germline. Providers should be aware that technical differences related to assay design, variant filtering, and variant classification can contribute to discordance between tumor-only and germline sequencing test results. In addition, SGZ modeling had high predictive power to distinguish between mutations of somatic and germline origin without the need for a matched normal control, and could potentially be considered to inform clinical decision-making.

Sotorasib in KRAS p.G12C-Mutated Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

KRAS p.G12C mutation occurs in approximately 1 to 2% of pancreatic cancers. The safety and efficacy of sotorasib, a KRAS G12C inhibitor, in previously treated patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated pancreatic cancer are unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a single-group, phase 1-2 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of sotorasib treatment in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated pancreatic cancer who had received at least one previous systemic therapy. The primary objective of phase 1 was to assess safety and to identify the recommended dose for phase 2. In phase 2, patients received sotorasib at a dose of 960 mg orally once daily. The primary end point for phase 2 was a centrally confirmed objective response (defined as a complete or partial response). Efficacy end points were assessed in the pooled population from both phases and included objective response, duration of response, time to objective response, disease control (defined as an objective response or stable disease), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

The pooled population from phases 1 and 2 consisted of 38 patients, all of whom had metastatic disease at enrollment and had previously received chemotherapy. At baseline, patients had received a median of 2 lines (range, 1 to 8) of therapy previously. All 38 patients received sotorasib in the trial. A total of 8 patients had a centrally confirmed objective response (21%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10 to 37). The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 5.6), and the median overall survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.0 to 9.1). Treatment-related adverse events of any grade were reported in 16 patients (42%); 6 patients (16%) had grade 3 adverse events. No treatment-related adverse events were fatal or led to treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Sotorasib showed anticancer activity and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced pancreatic cancer who had received previous treatment. (Funded by Amgen and others; CodeBreaK 100 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03600883.).

Circulating Tumor DNA Testing Overcomes Limitations of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling from Tumor Tissue

"Liquid biopsy" is an established technique for examining circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from a routine blood draw and detecting actionable biomarkers. Nonetheless, ctDNA testing is rarely utilized for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We report a case in which ctDNA testing uncovered an actionable biomarker that was not detected by comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor tissue. An 81-year-old woman with a remote history of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma presented with primary masses in the ascending colon and sigmoid colon. The ascending colon and sigmoid colon tumors were classified as microsatellite stable (MSS) and mismatch repair proficient (pMMR), and both ctDNA and tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) from the ascending colon mass were ordered. Because tissue NGS results indicated that the ascending colon tumor was MSS, palliative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy was started. However, the ctDNA NGS results that arrived after the start of FOLFOX found high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) disease with a serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF ^V600E ) mutation. To treat both her MSS/pMMR ascending colon and sigmoid colon tumors and MSI-H/dMMR metastatic disease, the immunotherapy nivolumab was added to FOLFOX. After 8 months of combined nivolumab and chemotherapy, the patient's metastatic disease had a complete clinical response. This case highlights the complementary role of ctDNA testing for biomarker identification. By performing simultaneous ctDNA testing at the time of diagnosis, an actionable biomarker was discovered that significantly altered this patient's prognosis and treatment options. Orthogonal testing of key molecular alterations offers significant advantages for identifying actionable biomarkers and improving management of metastatic CRC.

Phase I study of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody-drug conjugate serclutamab talirine: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in advanced glioblastoma

Background

Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T, formerly ABBV-321) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (AM-1-ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer. We investigated Ser-T monotherapy in a phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study in patients with advanced solid tumors associated with EGFR overexpression.

Methods

Eligible patients (≥18 years) had advanced, histologically confirmed solid tumors associated with EGFR overexpression (centralized testing). Patients received Ser-T intravenously once every 4 weeks (Q4W; 5-50 μg/kg) in the dose-escalation phase. Herein, preliminary antitumor activity at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is reported only for patients with glioblastoma (n = 24); additional assessments included all treated patients.

Results

Sixty-two patients (median age: 58 years) were enrolled within the dose-escalation (n = 43) and dose-expansion (n = 19) phases. One dose-limiting toxicity, grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase elevation, occurred at 20 μg/kg during dose escalation. The Ser-T RP2D regimen of 50 μg/kg × 1 (loading dose) followed by 25 μg/kg Q4W (maintenance dose) was administered during dose expansion. Fatigue (37%) was the only treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) occurring in >25% of patients. Two patients (3%) reported mild treatment-related ocular AEs (eye pruritus). Responses in patients with glioblastoma included 1 partial response (~33 months), 6 stable disease, and 14 progressive disease (not evaluable: n = 3).

Conclusions

Ser-T monotherapy at doses up to 50 μg/kg initial dose, followed by 25 μg/kg Q4W demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with minimal antitumor activity observed in patients with glioblastoma. The glioblastoma dose-expansion cohort was closed due to a lack of efficacy (NCT03234712).

Genomic analysis of early-stage lung cancer reveals a role for TP53 mutations in distant metastasis

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have distant metastases have a poor prognosis. To determine which genomic factors of the primary tumor are associated with metastasis, we analyzed data from 759 patients originally diagnosed with stage I-III NSCLC as part of the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative consortium. We found that TP53 mutations were significantly associated with the development of new distant metastases. TP53 mutations were also more prevalent in patients with a history of smoking, suggesting that these patients may be at increased risk for distant metastasis. Our results suggest that additional investigation of the optimal management of patients with early-stage NSCLC harboring TP53 mutations at diagnosis is warranted in light of their higher likelihood of developing new distant metastases.

BRAF-Mutated Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Rapidly Changing Therapeutic Landscape

BRAF-mutated advanced colorectal cancer is a relatively small but critical subset of this tumor type on the basis of prognostic and predictive implications. BRAF alterations in colorectal cancer are classified into three functional categories on the basis of signaling mechanisms, with the class I BRAFV600E mutation occurring most frequently in colorectal cancer. Functional categorization of BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer demonstrates distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway signaling. On the basis of recent clinical trials, current standard-of-care therapies for patients with BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer include first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy plus bevacizumab and subsequent therapy with the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib and antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody cetuximab. Treatment regimens currently under exploration in BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer include combinatorial options of various pathway-targeted therapies, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and/or immune checkpoint blockade, among others. Circumvention of adaptive and acquired resistance to BRAF-targeted therapies is a significant challenge to be overcome in BRAF-mutated advanced colorectal cancer.

Efficacy and safety of dilpacimab (ABT-165) versus bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study

Aim: This phase II study investigated safety and efficacy of dilpacimab or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Materials & methods: Overall, 66 patients were treated (n = 34 dilpacimab + FOLFIRI; n = 32 bevacizumab + FOLFIRI). Progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates and tolerability were assessed. Results: Median progression-free survival for dilpacimab + FOLFIRI compared with bevacizumab + FOLFIRI was 3.78 months (95% CI: 2.07-7.20) versus 7.36 months (95% CI: 5.68-10.55) (hazard ratio: 3.57; 95% CI: 1.57-8.11; stratified). Median overall survival: 7.95 months for dilpacimab + FOLFIRI; not reached for bevacizumab + FOLFIRI. Objective response rates: 5.6% for dilpacimab + FOLFIRI and 14.7% for bevacizumab + FOLFIRI. Patients treated with dilpacimab + FOLFIRI experienced serious treatment-related adverse events (n = 4; 11.8%), including one case of intestinal perforation leading to death; none were reported for bevacizumab + FOLFIRI. Conclusion: Treatment with dilpacimab + FOLFIRI was not well tolerated and did not provide clinical benefit to patients with mCRC compared with bevacizumab + FOLFIRI. Trial Registration Number: NCT03368859 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

Identification of an optimal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shedding threshold to detect actionable driver mutations in colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma

3571

Background: In colorectal cancer (CRC), mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), ~90% of patients harbor KRAS mutations, while KRAS wild-type tumors often have clinically actionable fusion alterations. Thus, in both cancers, the accurate ascertainment of RAS and BRAF driver status is essential. Sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma allows convenient assessment of a tumor’s molecular profile, but sensitivity can be limited by low ctDNA shedding. We sought to establish a ctDNA shedding threshold at which actionable driver mutations can be reliably detected. Methods: Molecular reports and matched clinical data were obtained from the Duke Molecular Registry of Tumors and the SCRUM-Japan GOZILA and GI-SCREEN. CRC or PDAC patients with a pathogenic KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF activating point mutation (“driver”) present on tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays and who also had cfDNA assay available were included. Tissue NGS included Foundation One CDx and Oncomine Comprehensive Assay. Guardant 360 (G360) was the sole plasma cfDNA assay. 131 CRC and 24 PDAC cases with 189 total G360 assays met criteria and were included. Samples were analyzed according to detection of the driver mutation and the maximum mutant allele frequency (MAF) of non-driver mutations on G360. An optimal cut-point for max MAF was explored among the CRC and PDAC patients using a maximally selected Wilcoxon rank statistic method. Results: 76.8% of driver mutations were in KRAS, 22.6% in BRAF, and 1.9% in NRAS with an overlap of 1 BRAF and 1 NRAS mutation with a KRAS mutation. Overall sensitivity of G360 for drivers was 83.0% for CRC and 54.2% for PDAC. No variants were detected on G360 in 9.1% of CRC and 37.5% of PDAC. Sensitivity for driver mutations increased with higher maximum non-driver MAF, with MAF > 1% predicting sensitivity > 98% (Table). Optimal cut-point analysis identified MAF of > 0.34% (p < 0.0001), above which the driver was identified in 97% of patients and below which only 27%. Conclusions: In our study, non-driver MAF > 1% on cfDNA NGS predicts high sensitivity for RAS and BRAF mutations and thus is adequate to guide clinical decisions such as anti-EGFR therapy in CRC, evaluation for fusions in PDAC, and validity in clinical trials. MAF ≤0.34% is a clear threshold to consider an assay inadequate and thus seek alternative testing. Sensitivity rises for MAF between 0.35 and 1% but will require greater patient numbers to establish clinically relevant sensitivity thresholds. These results will be updated with additional data for final presentation. [Table: see text]

Largest evaluation of acquired resistance to sotorasib in KRAS p.G12C-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC): Plasma biomarker analysis of CodeBreaK100

102

Background: Sotorasib, a specific, irreversible KRASG12C inhibitor, has been approved in multiple countries for adults with KRAS p.G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received prior systemic therapy based on the global phase 1/2 CodeBreaK100 trial. Here we describe putative mechanisms of acquired resistance to sotorasib from the largest single dataset evaluated to-date. Methods: Patients with advanced KRAS p.G12C-mutated NSCLC or CRC from the CodeBreaK100 Ph1/2 trial who received sotorasib monotherapy at 960 mg once daily were analyzed for efficacy. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by central review. To investigate biomarkers of resistance to sotorasib, an exploratory endpoint was defined to examine acquired genomic alterations at disease progression. Plasma samples collected at baseline and progression were analyzed for genomic alterations with the 23-gene Resolution Bioscience ctDx Lung test for NSCLC and the 74-gene Guardant 360 ctDNA test for CRC. Acquired genomic alterations were defined by their absence at baseline and presence at progression. Results: In 174 pts with NSCLC and 91 pts with CRC-treated with sotorasib, the ORR were 41% and 12% respectively. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.3 months (mos) and 12.5 mos for NSCLC pts and 4.2 mos and 13.4 mos for CRC pts (median follow-up: 22.5 mos NSCLC; 12.5 mos CRC). A total of 67 NSCLC pts and 45 CRC pts had a plasma sample sequenced both at baseline and at progression. At least one new acquired genomic alteration at progression was detected in 19 (28%) NSCLC pts and in 33 (73%) CRC pts (Table). The acquired genomic alterations were heterogeneous in both NSCLC and CRC, with variants detected across multiple genes and pathways. The most prevalent putative pathway of resistance in both NSCLC and CRC was the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathway. Secondary RAS alterations occurred more frequently in CRC versus NSCLC pts (16% vs. 3%). Conclusions: Based on the largest descriptive dataset to-date, diverse mechanisms of acquired resistance occur in KRAS p.G12C-mutated NSCLC and CRC pts treated with sotorasib. New RTK pathway alterations frequently emerged at progression, highlighting the potential role for combining sotorasib with upstream inhibitors of RTK, such as SHP2 or EGFR inhibitors. Serial plasma DNA analysis revealed acquired resistance patterns that support the development of KRASG12C inhibitor combination therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT03600883. [Table: see text]

Frequency of practice-changing findings identified by comprehensive genomic profiling in non-myeloid hematologic malignancies

3060

Background: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly used to guide management of myeloid and advanced solid malignancies, but its role in non-myeloid hematologic malignancies is less clear. Studies have found a high rate of potentially actionable variants by CGP in this population, but these do not always translate into clinical practice changes. We aimed to determine the rate at which variants found on CGP changed clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 101 consecutive patients with non-myeloid hematologic malignancies at Duke, comprising a total of 105 samples that were sent for CGP by FoundationOne Heme (104) or HemeComplete (1) in 2014–2021. We identified variants of clinical significance and classified them by evidence level according to the AMP/ASCO/CAP 2017 guidelines (e.g., for therapies, level A: FDA-approved / in guidelines; B: expert consensus; C: clinical trial / FDA-approved in different tumor type; D: preclinical data). We further identified documented changes in clinical practice that occurred in direct response to CGP results. Results: Commonly cited reasons for CGP included guiding therapy selection (27), identifying resistance mutations (19), refining prognosis (14), and clarifying diagnosis (11). Of the 105 samples sent for sequencing, 92 (88%) yielded at least one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. CGP resulted after death in 12 patients and within 1 month of death in another 11 patients. Seventy-three out of 101 patients (72%) had at least one variant with therapy sensitizing, diagnostic, or prognostic significance (levels A–C) or associated with therapy resistance (levels A/D). While 61 patients (60%) had a therapy sensitizing variant, only 6 patients (10%) were offered a biomarker-directed therapy. In contrast, the presence of a resistance mutation led to discontinuation of current therapy or influenced future therapy selection in 9 of 13 patients (69%). The absence of a resistance mutation influenced choice of therapy in another 4 patients. Sequencing results also helped clarify a previously uncertain diagnosis in 4 patients and led to medical genetics referrals in 3 patients. Conclusions: Comprehensive genomic profiling of non-myeloid hematologic malignancies identified variants of clinical significance in 72% of patients and led to changes in practice in 22% of patients. CGP was often sent late in the clinical course. [Table: see text]

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy among Veterans Affairs patients with colorectal cancer and discordant dMMR/MSI-H status

3534

Background: Clinical trials have demonstrated improvements in survival with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced colorectal cancer patients with MSI-H/dMMR detected using PCR-based assays (PCR) or immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively. MSI-H can also be assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Evaluation of real-world outcomes among MSI-H patients by NGS treated with ICIs are warranted, particularly when results are discordant between these tests. Methods: The VA National Precision Oncology Program Database was accessed to select veterans with colorectal cancer and an MSI-H biomarker by NGS. Baseline patient variables, disease characteristics, and duration of ICI treatment were obtained from the VA’s Corporate Data Warehouse. Concordance between NGS and IHC or PCR testing was computed, and the response rate and duration of ICI treatment in patients with discordant test results were recorded from chart review. Results: Among 1,276 colorectal cancer patients, 71 (5.6%) were found to have MSI-H by NGS. Of these, 22 (30.1%) received ICI. Among 49 patients who did not receive ICI, 36 had stage I-III disease, 5 had limited performance status, 5 were actively being treated with chemotherapy and 3 had completely resected stage IV disease. Of the 71 patients, 29 had dMMR IHC testing, 8 had MSI-H PCR testing, 1 had both IHC and PCR testing, and 34 patients had only NGS testing. No PCR tests were discordant with NGS but 8 of 29 IHC tests were discordant. Among these 8 patients with discordant IHC MMR and MSI-H by NGS, 5 received pembrolizumab. There were 3 partial responses, 1 stable disease and 1 progressive disease. Durable responses were seen with 3 of 5 patients remaining on therapy without progression at the time of this analysis at a median follow up of 8.5 months. Conclusions: In a cohort of NGS MSI-H colorectal cancer patients, there was a high rate of discordant IHC results. Clinical benefit is seen in patients treated with ICI with discordant testing results, suggesting that NGS testing identifies patients with false negative dMMR IHC testing in the real-world clinical setting.

Clinical impact of MAPK pathway alterations in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC): SCRUM-Japan GOZILA and COLOMATE international collaboration

4086

Background: Abnormalities in the MAPK pathway are potential therapeutic targets in various cancers. However, the clinical impact of alterations in the MAPK pathway in BTC have not been elucidated, especially outside of canonical mutations in KRAS and BRAF. We investigated the clinical outcomes of advanced BTC with MAPK pathway alterations treated with chemotherapy in Japan and the United States. Methods: Patients with advanced BTC who received gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy were included from the GOZILA study in Japan and Duke Molecular Registry of Tumors in the US. Genetic abnormalities were detected by Guardant360, a cell-free DNA assay, in Japan and by blood or tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) at Duke University. Two hundred and seven patients with BTC from Japan were included in an exploratory cohort to evaluate the association of MAPK alterations with overall survival (OS) according to MAPK alteration status. One hundred and ten patients with BTC from both Japan and the US harboring oncogenic alterations in the MAPK pathway were included in a biomarker selected cohort to assess the association of specific MAPK alterations with OS. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox regression model based on a univariate p-value < 0.2. Results: MAPK pathway-related oncogenic alterations detected in each cohort are shown in the table below. In the exploratory cohort, median OS was shorter for patients with MAPK alterations vs. no MAPK alteration (15.9 m vs. 24.9 m, log-rank p = 0.001). Based on univariate analysis, the following covariates were selected for multivariate analyses: age, prior resection, and MAPK pathway alteration in the exploratory cohort; country, the timing of NGS, distant metastasis, KRAS amplification, and BRAF class 2 mutation in the biomarker selected cohort. In the exploratory cohort, multivariate analysis identified MAPK pathway alterations as an independent predictor of shorter OS with a HR of 1.92 (95% CI = 1.28-2.87, p = 0.001). In the biomarker selected cohort, multivariate analysis identified BRAF class 2 mutations and KRAS amplification as independent predictors of shorter OS with a HR of 16.2 (95% CI = 3.26-80.8, p = 0.001) and 5.97 (95% CI = 1.74-19.3, p = 0.002) respectively. Conclusions: MAPK pathway alterations, especially BRAF class 2 mutation and KRAS amplification, had a significant negative impact on clinical outcomes in BTC receiving first-line chemotherapy. These results are newly confirmed in BTC. [Table: see text]

Diagnosis and Treatment of ERBB2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review

Importance

Amplification of ERBB2 (formerly referred to as HER2) is present in nearly 3% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer overall and 5% of patients with KRAS and NRAS wild-type tumors. Despite the availability of several ERBB2-targeted therapeutic options for patients with ERBB2-positive breast and gastric/gastroesophageal tumors, to date, there are currently no approved therapies for patients with ERBB2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer, although ERBB2-targeted therapies are recommended in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Recent evidence indicates that anti-ERBB2 therapeutic strategies are active in patients with ERBB2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer and could potentially represent a new standard-of-care.

Observations

The protein ERBB2 is a member of a family of epidermal growth factor receptors that also includes epidermal growth factor receptor (ERBB1), ERBB3, and ERBB4. Amplification of ERBB2 leads to overexpression of the ERBB2 tyrosine kinase receptor, resulting in aberrant signaling and cell migration, growth, adhesion, and differentiation. Colorectal tumors that harbor ERBB2 amplification are more likely to originate on the left side of the colon, are associated with primary and acquired resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies, and have increased incidence of central nervous system metastases. Using immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, next-generation sequencing, and liquid biopsy techniques, several randomized clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of ERBB2-targeted therapies in patients with ERBB2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer. These therapies include monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, many of which were associated with favorable efficacy and safety profiles when treating patients with ERBB2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this review suggest the ERBB2 receptor is a promising target for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer; however, to date, no therapies are approved for use in this patient population. Therefore, it is imperative to continue to work to address this unmet need so that patients with ERBB2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer have therapeutic options should they become refractory to treatment with standard therapies.

First data for sotorasib in patients with pancreatic cancer with KRAS p.G12C mutation: A phase I/II study evaluating efficacy and safety

360490

Background: KRAS mutation is present in 90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas with p.G12C accounting for 1% to 2% of these mutations. Sotorasib, a small molecule that specifically and irreversibly inhibits KRASG12C, has been investigated in the CodeBreaK100 trial in patients with KRASG12C-mutated advanced solid tumors. Herein, we report on the largest dataset evaluating efficacy and safety of a KRASG12C inhibitor in patients with pretreated KRASG12C-mutated pancreatic cancer. Methods: CodeBreaK100 (NCT03600883) is an international, single arm, phase I/II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sotorasib in patients with KRASG12C-mutated advanced solid tumors with ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy unless intolerant or ineligible for available therapies. The primary efficacy endpoint is confirmed objective response rate (ORR), assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: As of November 1, 2021, 38 patients with pancreatic cancer (mean age: 65 years, 76.3% male) from the combined phase I/II study received sotorasib 960 mg once daily. Stage IV disease was present in 55.3% of patients at diagnosis, and in all patients at enrollment. Baseline ECOG scores were 0, 1, or 2 in 31.6%, 57.9%, and 10.5% of patients, respectively. Most patients (79%) had ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (median: 2 [range: 1-8]). Median treatment duration was 4.1 months with a median follow-up of 16.8 months. Eight patients had confirmed partial response by BICR with a resulting ORR of 21.1% (95% CI: 9.55%-37.32%). DCR was 84.2% (Table 1). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 16 (42.1%) patients. Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 6 patients: diarrhea (2); fatigue (2); abdominal pain, ALT increase, AST increase, pleural effusion, and pulmonary embolism (1 each). No TRAEs were fatal or resulted in sotorasib discontinuation. Conclusions: Sotorasib demonstrated clinically meaningful anticancer activity and tolerability in patients with heavily pretreated KRASG12C-mutated advanced pancreatic cancer, who have limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Clinical trial information: NCT03600883. [Table: see text]

Cabozantinib with or without Panitumumab for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: impact of MET amplification on clinical outcomes and circulating biomarkers

PURPOSE

Acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a hurdle for effective treatment. MET amplification has been indicated as a driver of acquired resistance. Clinical activity has been demonstrated for the combination of EGFR and MET inhibitors in mCRC. But the impact of this regimen on angiogenesis and inflammation remains largely unknown.

METHODS

In this non-randomized, open-label phase Ib/II study, four patients were treated with cabozantinib alone and 25 patients received the combination of cabozantinib and panitumumab. MET amplification was detected in blood in all four patients treated with cabozantinib monotherapy and 5/25 patients treated with cabozantinib and panitumumab combination therapy. Plasma samples from 28 patients were available for biomarker analysis.

RESULTS

A panel of circulating protein biomarkers was assessed in patient plasma at baseline and on-treatment. Baseline marker levels were analyzed for prognostic value for clinical outcomes, including MET amplification as a covariate. HGF and OPN were prognostic for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while six markers (IL-6, VCAM-1, VEGF-R1, TSP-2, TIMP-1, ICAM-1) were prognostic only for OS. In patients with MET amplification, baseline PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, TGF-β1, and VEGF-C levels were significantly higher, whereas baseline TGFβ-R3 levels were significantly lower than MET non-amplified patients. On-treatment change of four markers (CD73, PlGF, PDGF-BB, VEGF) were significantly different between MET amplified and non-amplified subpopulations.

CONCLUSION

This study identified circulating HGF and several inflammatory and angiogenic proteins as prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, MET amplification status is associated with both baseline expression and on-treatment modulation of members of angiogenesis and TGF-β pathway proteins.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008383.

Phase 1b/2, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion trial of tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab with and without oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2+ gastrointestinal cancers (trial in progress)

TPS376

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2) gene amplification or protein overexpression (HER2+) occurs in many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers; thus, there is interest in evaluating HER2-targeted therapies in these tumor types. Tucatinib (TUC) is a highly selective HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor with minimal EGFR inhibition, approved in multiple regions for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. In patient-derived xenograft models of HER2+ tumors (including esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers), TUC + trastuzumab showed superior anti-tumor activity compared with either agent alone (Kulukian 2020). In the MOUNTAINEER study, TUC + trastuzumab in HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) resulted in an objective response rate of 52% and a median duration of response of 10.4 months (interim results, Strickler 2019). The SGNTUC-024 study (NCT04430738) will evaluate TUC + trastuzumab with and without oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic GI cancers. Methods: SGNTUC-024 is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion phase 1b/2 trial. Phase 1b assesses the safety and tolerability of TUC + trastuzumab + either FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) with or without pembrolizumab. One chemotherapy-free cohort is planned (TUC + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab). The initial phase 1b cohort enrolled patients with gastric, esophageal, and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas; cholangiocarcinoma; gallbladder carcinoma; and CRC to receive TUC (150 mg oral [PO] twice daily [BID]) + trastuzumab + FOLFOX. Subsequent phase 1b cohorts will receive TUC (300 mg PO BID) + trastuzumab + either FOLFOX or CAPOX. Once the recommended dose for use with oxaliplatin is identified, cohorts enrolling patients with gastric, esophageal, and GEJ adenocarcinomas will open with patients receiving TUC (300 mg PO BID) + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab with or without either FOLFOX or CAPOX. Phase 2 will expand the assessment of safety and efficacy and enroll 2 cohorts: patients with gastric, esophageal, and GEJ adenocarcinomas (to receive TUC + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab + either FOLFOX or CAPOX, Cohort A) and patients with CRC (to receive TUC + trastuzumab + FOLFOX, Cohort B). Safety and efficacy will be summarized with descriptive statistics. Patients that receive chemotherapy must be eligible for an oxaliplatin-based regimen as standard of care. Patients with irradiated or resected central nervous system (CNS) lesions may enroll, and patients with known active CNS lesions may be eligible for phase 2. The phase 1b portion of the trial is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT04430738.

A phase 1b study of sotorasib, a specific and irreversible KRASG12C inhibitor, in combination with other anticancer therapies in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and other solid tumors (CodeBreaK 101)

TPS214

Background: Approximately 3% of patients (pts) with CRC have the oncogenic Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) p.G12C mutation. Sotorasib, a small molecule that specifically and irreversibly inhibits the KRAS G12C mutant protein, has demonstrated modest clinical activity and no dose-limiting toxicities as a single agent in heavily pretreated pts with KRAS p.G12C-mutated CRC. The combination of sotorasib with other anticancer therapies, such as EGFR or MEK inhibitors, may enhance antitumor efficacy and counteract potential escape mechanisms. Other attractive partners for sotorasib in CRC include biologics and chemotherapy combinations. The CodeBreaK 101 master protocol is designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of multiple sotorasib-based combinations in pts with KRAS p.G12C mutated solid tumors. Key subprotocols with CRC combination treatment arms are highlighted here. Methods: This is a phase 1b, open-label study evaluating sotorasib alone and in combination regimens in pts with advanced KRAS p.G12C mutated CRC, NSCLC, and other solid tumors. Key regimens being explored in CRC include (1) Subprotocol A: Sotorasib + trametinib (MEK inhibitor) +/- panitumumab (EGFR inhibitor), (2) Subprotocol H: Sotorasib + panitumumab and sotorasib + panitumumab + FOLFIRI, and (3) Subprotocol M: Sotorasib + bevacizumab-awwb + FOLFIRI or FOLFOX. Key eligibility criteria include advanced or metastatic solid tumor with KRAS p.G12C mutation identified through molecular testing in treatment-naïve and pretreated patients depending on cohort. Primary endpoints include dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-emergent or treatment-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints include PK profile of combination regimens and efficacy (objective response, disease control, duration of response, time to response, and progression-free survival assessed per RECIST 1.1, and overall survival). Enrollment is ongoing. Contact Amgen Medical Information for more information: medinfo@amgen.com (NCT04185883). Abbreviations: EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; FOLFIRI = 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin + irinotecan; FOLFOX = 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin + oxaliplatin; MEK = mitogen-activated protein kinase. Clinical trial information: NCT04185883.

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of hepatic artery infusion pump therapy at an expanding HAI program

120

Background: Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) is a liver directed therapy to treat unresectable or resected colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Historically, HAI has only been performed at few specialized centers; however, there is increasing expansion to new centers. We previously reported safety outcomes of our index year of HAI therapy. We now report safety, feasibility, efficacy and oncologic outcomes for an expanded cohort of 62 patients in an established HAI program. Methods: Patients selected for HAI by multidisciplinary review were evaluated for demographics and perioperative outcomes. Objective hepatic response was calculated according to RECIST 1.1. Overall, hepatic and extrahepatic progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method on an intent-to-treat basis. Results: 62 patients were treated with HAI from November 2018-September 2021: 46 for unresectable CRLM, 8 as adjuvant HAI for resected CRLM, and 8 for unresectable ICC. Median age was 54.5 years (range 32-80), 58% were male, and 97% received prior chemotherapy (median 12 cycles, range 0-66). Hepatectomy (18, 29%) and/or colectomy/proctectomy (27, 43.5%) was performed concurrently with pump placement, and 19 (30.6%) were performed robotically. Median operating time was 265 minutes (range 130-526), estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range 22-1000) and length of stay was 5 days (range 1-19). HAI-specific complications occurred in 14% (Table). Floxuridine (FUDR) was initiated in 95% of patients a median of 18.5 days after surgery. Of the 38 patients who received HAI for unresectable CRLM and had measurable disease on imaging, 3- and 6-month hepatic disease control was achieved in 86% (8 partial response [PR], 22 stable disease [SD], 5 progressed [PD]) and 89% (1 complete response, 8 PR, 8 SD, 2 PD), respectively. For patients with at least 3 months follow-up, median PFS, hepatic PFS and extrahepatic PFS were 13 months, 13 months, and 13 months, respectively. Conclusions: HAI can be safely and effectively delivered to well-selected patients with CRLM and ICC. Response rates, disease control and PFS in heavily treated patients with unresectable CRLM comparable to high-volume centers can be achieved at new programs with appropriate expertise. These data support the mission of the newly formed HAI Consortium to critically evaluate efficacy and innovation in HAI therapy through multi-institutional collaboration and contemporary prospective trials.[Table: see text]

REVERCEII (ACCRU-GI-1809): A randomized phase II study of regorafenib followed by anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy versus the reverse sequencing for metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan

TPS213

Background: Regorafenib (R) is an oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks several protein kinases involved in angiogenesis and oncogenesis; it has a survival benefit in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The current standard (std) treatment in patients (pts) with RAS wildtype (WT) mCRC is sequential treatment with an anti-EGFR antibody (AEA) followed by R. However, R, which is orally administered once daily, may be more convenient and thus preferable for pts than AEA. REVERCE, a Japanese trial, demonstrated a significant 5.8 month (mo.) survival benefit with regorafenib administered prior to AEA compared to the std sequence. Based off these findings, the proposed phase II trial is to confirm the observed survival benefit from regorafenib sequencing prior to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in REVERCE in a US patient population. Methods: REVERCEII is an Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) network-led randomized phase II study of R (dose escalation from 80mg to 160mg based on tolerance) prior to AEA (R+AEA) compared to standard sequencing (AEA+R) in pts with refractory RAS WT mCRC. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive R (Arm A) vs. AEA (with or without irinotecan per investigator choice) (Arm B). At the time of disease progression or intolerance, patients will receive sequential treatment until disease progression. Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed mCRC, ECOG ≤ 2, acceptable organ function, and patients must have had prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and no prior AEA nor R. The primary objective is to compare the overall survival (OS), the primary endpoint, between evaluable patients (eligible, consented, started protocol treatment) who were randomized to R+AEA (arm A) and AEA+R (arm B). With 83 OS events, we have 87% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 9 months to 14.5 mo., assuming 1-sided significance level of 0.15, and exponential distribution. The total sample size is 124 patients. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, objective response, and adverse events. The total study duration is expected to be 3 years. Clinical trial information: NCT04117945. Clinical trial information: 04117945.

MOUNTAINEER-02: Phase 2/3 study of tucatinib, trastuzumab, ramucirumab, and paclitaxel in previously treated HER2+ gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma—Trial in progress

TPS371

Background: Tucatinib (TUC), a highly selective HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in multiple regions for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, is being developed as a novel therapy for patients (pts) with GI tumors including gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEC). While trastuzumab (Tras) with chemotherapy is standard in the 1st-line setting for metastatic HER2+ GEC, no anti-HER2 therapy has demonstrated an OS benefit over chemotherapy as 2nd-line therapy, possibly due to loss of HER2 expression following Tras-based therapy. In GEC xenograft models, dual targeting of HER2 with TUC and Tras showed superior activity to either agent alone.(Kulukian 2020) Interim results from the MOUNTAINEER study have shown promising activity for TUC and Tras for HER2+ mCRC.(Strickler 2019) The MOUNTAINEER-02 study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of TUC with Tras, ramucirumab (Ram), and paclitaxel (Pac) in pts with HER2+ GEC in the 2nd-line setting. Methods: MOUNTAINEER-02 (NCT04499924) is a phase 2/3 study evaluating TUC + Tras with Ram and Pac. Pts receive TUC 300 mg or placebo PO BID, Tras (6 then 4 mg/kg) or placebo (IV on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle), Pac (IV on Days 1, 8, 15), and Ram (IV on Days 1 and 15). Eligible pts have locally-advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GEC and have received a HER2-directed antibody and 1 prior line of therapy for advanced disease. Pts must be ≥18 years of age, with an ECOG ≤1, and have had no prior exposure to Ram, anti-HER2 or anti-EGFR TKI, HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, or taxanes ≤12 months before enrollment. Due to the potential impact of TUC on Pac metabolism, the study will include an initial Pac dose optimization stage. The open-label phase 2 part will determine the recommended dose of Pac (60 or 80 mg/m²) combined with TUC, Tras, and Ram in 6-18 pts, and evaluate safety and activity of the regimen in Cohorts 2A and 2B (30 pts each). The randomized, double-blind, phase 3 part will compare the efficacy and safety of TUC and Tras (Arm 3A; ̃235 pts) vs. placebo (Arm 3B; ̃235 pts), both in combination with Ram and Pac, and also evaluate activity of TUC with Ram and Pac (Arm 3C; ̃30 pts). The dual primary phase 3 endpoints are OS and PFS per investigator, with confirmed ORR as a key secondary endpoint. HER2 status is determined at baseline using a blood-based NGS assay, and IHC/ISH of fresh or archival tumor biopsies, if available. Pts must be HER2+ by blood-based NGS in Cohort 2A and phase 3; in Cohort 2B, pts must be HER2+ in a biopsy taken post-progression during/after 1st-line therapy, but HER2-negative by blood-based NGS. Disease assessments per RECISTv1.1 will occur q6 weeks for 36 weeks, then q9 weeks. The pharmacokinetics of TUC, Pac, and their metabolites will be evaluated in a subset of pts, including a cohort with gastrectomies. Enrollment in phase 2 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04499924.

A narrative review of the evolving role of immunotherapy in the management of esophageal and gastric cancer

Background and Objective

Despite recent advances in the multidisciplinary management of esophagogastric cancer, overall prognosis remains poor. There is a need for improved treatment options, along with predictive biomarkers that improve therapeutic decision-making.

Methods

We conducted an extensive review of immunotherapy articles in the PubMed database between December 2013 and October 2021. Articles in English were included. We included phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials for immunotherapy review, and prospective, retrospective, and meta-analyses for biomarker review.

Key Content and Findings

Initial studies of immunotherapy were performed in patients with relapsed refractory metastatic disease and demonstrated a modest survival benefit. Subsequent studies have evaluated the use of these agents in combination with first line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Finally, recent data indicates that immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting after concurrent chemoradiation and surgery improves disease free survival. Both microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity predict response to immunotherapy, but many patients without these biomarkers still benefit. The predictive impact of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) have been variable, and the optimal cutoff point for these biomarkers remains poorly defined.

Conclusions

While immunotherapy agents have demonstrated clinical benefit and are now incorporated into the current standard of care, novel immunotherapy approaches such as dual immunotherapy combinations, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and tumor vaccines need to be further investigated. As the era of precision medicine beckons, refined biomarkers to predict benefit are needed.

Sotorasib for previously treated colorectal cancers with KRASG12C mutation (CodeBreaK100): a prespecified analysis of a single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Sotorasib, a specific, irreversible KRAS^G12C protein inhibitor, has shown monotherapy clinical activity in KRAS^G12C-mutated solid tumours, including colorectal cancer, in the CodeBreaK100 phase 1 trial. We aimed to investigate the activity and safety of sotorasib in phase 2 of the trial.

METHODS

In this single-arm, phase 2 trial, adult patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated advanced solid tumours were enrolled, from 59 medical centres in 11 countries, if they were aged 18 years or older, had at least one measurable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or lower. Only data for patients with colorectal cancer, enrolled at 33 medical centres in nine countries, are presented from this basket trial. To be enrolled, the patients had to have progressed after receiving fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan treatment. These patients were administered 960 mg sotorasib orally once per day until disease progression, development of unacceptable side-effects, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was objective response (complete or partial response) as assessed by blinded independent central review. Response was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of sotorasib and had at least one measurable lesion at baseline; safety was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of sotorasib. This analysis is a prespecified analysis triggered by the phase 2 colorectal cancer cohort. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03600883, and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

On March 1, 2021, at data cutoff, 62 patients with KRAS^G12C-mutant colorectal cancer had been enrolled between Aug 14, 2019, and May 21, 2020, and had received at least one dose of sotorasib monotherapy. Objective response was observed in six (9·7%, 95% CI 3·6-19·9) of 62 patients, all with partial response. Treatment-related adverse events at grade 3 occurred in six (10%) patients, the most common of which was diarrhoea (two [3%] of 62 patients), and at grade 4 occurred in one (2%) patient (blood creatine phosphokinase increase); no fatal events were recorded. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (3%) patients (back pain and acute kidney injury).

INTERPRETATION

Although the 9·7% overall response rate did not reach the benchmark, oral administration of sotorasib once per day showed modest anti-tumour activity and manageable safety in these heavily pretreated chemorefractory patients. Sotorasib is under evaluation in combination with other therapeutics to increase potential activity and overcome potential resistance mechanisms.

FUNDING

Amgen.

A Phase 1a/b Open‑Label, Dose‑Escalation Study of Etigilimab Alone or in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

TIGIT is a co-inhibitory receptor of T cell and natural killer cell activity. Targeting TIGIT with or without PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition may enhance anti-tumor immunity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This Phase 1a/b trial was a first-in-human, open label, multicenter, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Using 3+3 design, patients underwent 14-day treatment cycles with anti-TIGIT antibody etigilimab alone (phase 1a; 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 20.0 mg/kg intravenously) or in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab (phase 1b; 3.0, 10.0, 20.0 mg/kg etigilimab and 240 mg nivolumab). Primary objective was safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled (Phase 1a, n=23; Phase 1b, n=10). There were no DLTs. MTD for single and combination therapy was not determined; maximum administered dose was 20 mg/kg. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were rash (43.5%), nausea (34.8%) and fatigue (30.4%) in Phase 1a and decreased appetite (50.0%), nausea (50.0%) and rash (40%) in Phase 1b. Six patients experienced Grade {greater than or equal to}3 treatment-related AEs. In phase 1a, 7 patients (30.0%) had stable disease. In Phase 1b, 1 patient had a partial response; 1 patient had prolonged stable disease of nearly 8 months. Median progression-free survival was 56.0 days (Phase 1a) and 57.5 days (Phase 1b). Biomarker correlative analyses demonstrated evidence of clear dose-dependent target engagement by etigilimab.

CONCLUSION

Etigilimab had an acceptable safety profile with preliminary evidence of clinical benefit alone and in combination with nivolumab and warrants further investigation in clinical trials.

Phase I Study of 2- or 3-Week Dosing of Telisotuzumab Vedotin, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting c-Met, Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is an anti-c-Met-directed antibody-drug conjugate. Here, we present safety and efficacy data from a phase I/Ib study of Teliso-V monotherapy evaluated in once every 2 weeks/once every 3 weeks schedules in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During dose escalation, patients received Teliso-V monotherapy intravenously once every 3 weeks (0.15-3.3 mg/kg) or once every 2 weeks (1.6-2.2 mg/kg). The dose-expansion phase enrolled patients with NSCLC and c-Met H-score ≥150 (c-Met+) or MET amplification/exon 14 skipping mutations. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy were assessed. Herein, the analysis of patients receiving ≥1.6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or ≥2.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks Teliso-V is reported.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients with NSCLC were enrolled and received ≥1.6 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 2 weeks (n = 28) or ≥2.4 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 3 weeks (n = 24). The most common adverse events were fatigue (54%), peripheral neuropathy (42%), and nausea (38%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed for Teliso-V once every 2 weeks and once every 3 weeks up to 2.2 and 2.7 mg/kg, respectively. The recommended phase II dose was established at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks and 2.7 mg/kg once every 3 weeks on the basis of overall safety and pharmacokinetics. Forty of 52 patients were c-Met+ (33 nonsquamous, 6 squamous, 1 mixed histology) and were included in the efficacy-evaluable population. Of those, 9 (23%) had objective responses with median duration of response of 8.7 months; median progression-free survival was 5.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Teliso-V monotherapy was tolerated and showed antitumor activity in c-Met+ NSCLC. On the basis of overall safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy outcomes, 1.9 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 2 weeks and 2.7 mg/kg once every 3 weeks schedules were selected for further clinical development.

Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Results from a Phase Ib Study of the Anti-DKK1 Antibody DKN-01 in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Advanced Esophagogastric Cancers

Therapeutic combinations targeting innate and adaptive immunity and predictive biomarkers of response in esophagogastric cancer (EGC) are needed. We assessed safety and clinical utility of DKN-01 (a novel DKK1-neutralizing IgG4 antibody) combined with pembrolizumab and retrospectively determined DKK1 tumoral expression as a biomarker. Patients with advanced EGC received intravenous DKN-01 (150 or 300 mg) on days 1 and 15 with pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 in 21-day cycles. Clinical response was assessed by RECIST v1.1. Association of tumoral DKK1 mRNA expression (H-score: high ≥ upper-tertile, low < upper-tertile) with response was assessed with PD-L1 levels as a covariate. Sixty-three patients received DKN-01 150 mg (n = 2) or 300 mg (n = 61) plus pembrolizumab. Common adverse events were fatigue, anemia, blood alkaline phosphatase elevation, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, and hyponatremia. Among evaluable anti-PD-1/PD-L1-naïve patients receiving DKN-01 300 mg and pembrolizumab, objective response rate (ORR) was 11.4% (5/44) and 18.5% (5/27) in patients with gastroesophageal junction or gastric cancer (GEJ/GC). Among response-evaluable anti-PD-1/PD-L1-naïve patients with GEJ/GC and known tumoral DKK1 expression, ORR was 50% in DKK1-high and 0% in DKK1-low patients, median PFS was 22.1 vs. 5.9 weeks (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.67), respectively, and median OS was 31.6 weeks vs. 17.4 weeks (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.16-1.07), respectively. Association of DKK1 expression with PFS was independent of PD-L1 expression (adjusted HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69). DKN-01 combined with pembrolizumab was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Antitumor activity was enriched in anti-PD-1/PD-L1-naïve patients with GEJ/GC whose tumors expressed high DKK1.

Phase I Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Dilpacimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Dilpacimab (formerly ABT-165), a novel dual-variable domain immunoglobulin, targets both delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4) and VEGF pathways. Here, we present safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and preliminary efficacy data from a phase I study (trial registration ID: NCT01946074) of dilpacimab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients (≥18 years) received dilpacimab intravenously on days 1 and 15 in 28-day cycles at escalating dose levels (range, 1.25-7.5 mg/kg) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. As of August 2018, 55 patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the dilpacimab monotherapy dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) included hypertension (60.0%), headache (30.9%), and fatigue (21.8%). A TRAE of special interest was gastrointestinal perforation, occurring in 2 patients (3.6%; 1 with ovarian and 1 with prostate cancer) and resulting in 1 death. The PK of dilpacimab showed a half-life ranging from 4.9 to 9.5 days, and biomarker analysis demonstrated that the drug bound to both VEGF and DLL4 targets. The recommended phase II dose for dilpacimab monotherapy was established as 3.75 mg/kg, primarily on the basis of tolerability through multiple cycles. A partial response was achieved in 10.9% of patients (including 4 of 16 patients with ovarian cancer). The remaining patients had either stable disease (52.7%), progressive disease (23.6%), or were deemed unevaluable (12.7%). These results demonstrate that dilpacimab monotherapy has an acceptable safety profile, with clinical activity observed in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Implementation of a Molecular Tumor Registry to Support the Adoption of Precision Oncology Within an Academic Medical Center: The Duke University Experience

Comprehensive genomic profiling to inform targeted therapy selection is a central part of oncology care. However, the volume and complexity of alterations uncovered through genomic profiling make it difficult for oncologists to choose the most appropriate therapy for their patients. Here, we present a solution to this problem, The Molecular Registry of Tumors (MRT) and our Molecular Tumor Board (MTB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MRT is an internally developed system that aggregates and normalizes genomic profiling results from multiple sources. MRT serves as the foundation for our MTB, a team that reviews genomic results for all Duke University Health System cancer patients, provides notifications for targeted therapies, matches patients to biomarker-driven trials, and monitors the molecular landscape of tumors at our institution.

RESULTS

Among 215 patients reviewed by our MTB over a 6-month period, we identified 176 alterations associated with therapeutic sensitivity, 15 resistance alterations, and 51 alterations with potential germline implications. Of reviewed patients, 17% were subsequently treated with a targeted therapy. For 12 molecular therapies approved during the course of this work, we identified between two and 71 patients who could qualify for treatment based on retrospective MRT data. An analysis of 14 biomarker-driven clinical trials found that MRT successfully identified 42% of patients who ultimately enrolled. Finally, an analysis of 4,130 comprehensive genomic profiles from 3,771 patients revealed that the frequency of clinically significant therapeutic alterations varied from approximately 20% to 70% depending on the tumor type and sequencing test used.

CONCLUSION

With robust informatics tools, such as MRT, and the right MTB structure, a precision cancer medicine program can be developed, which provides great benefit to providers and patients with cancer.

First-In-Human, First-In-Class, Phase I Trial of the Fucosylation Inhibitor SGN-2FF in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

LESSONS LEARNED

Inhibition of glycoprotein fucosylation, as monotherapy and in combination with immune checkpoint blockade, is a promising therapeutic strategy for treating a broad range of cancers. In this first-in-human, first-in-class, phase I study in advanced solid tumors, SGN-2FF demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, evidence of pharmacodynamic target inhibition of glycoprotein fucosylation, and preliminary antitumor activity. SGN-2FF was associated with thromboembolic events that led to study termination.

BACKGROUND

We conducted a first-in-human, first-in-class, phase I study of SGN-2FF, a potent small molecule inhibitor of glycoprotein fucosylation, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

The study consisted of four parts: SGN-2FF monotherapy dose-escalation (Part A) and expansion (Part B), and SGN-2FF + pembrolizumab dose-escalation (Part C) and expansion (Part D). The objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity of SGN-2FF monotherapy and SGN-2FF + pembrolizumab.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were enrolled (Part A, n=33; Part B, n=6; Part C, n=7; Part D did not enroll any patients). During Part A (n=32) exploring 1-15 g QD and 2-5 g BID, grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea (2 g and 15 g QD) and increased lipase (2 g QD). The MTD was 10 g daily. In Part A, common toxicities were grades 1-2 diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea (each 47%); thromboembolic events (grades 2-5) occurred in 5/32 patients (16%). Safety measures implemented included concurrent prophylactic anticoagulation with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). In Part C, despite the safety measures implemented, a thromboembolic event occurred in 1/7 patients (14%) during the SGN-2FF lead-in period. Of 28 evaluable patients in Part A, 1 patient with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma achieved RECIST v1.1 complete response (CR) and 10 (36%) had RECIST v1.1 stable disease, including 1 patient with advanced triple negative breast cancer with 51% tumor burden reduction. SGN-2FF administration led to dose-proportional increases in exposure and PD reduction in protein fucosylation.

CONCLUSION

SGN-2FF demonstrated proof-of-mechanism and preliminary antitumor activity but was associated with thromboembolic events leading to study termination.

Assessment of HER2 (ERBB2) amplification (HER2amp) using blood-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next generation sequencing (NGS) and correlation with tissue-based testing in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

3589

Background: HER2 amplified mCRC has emerged as a unique clinical subset, characterized by resistance to anti-EGFR therapy and response to anti-HER2 strategies. Accurate identification and quantification of HER2amp has predictive value for efficacy of anti-HER2 therapies and appropriate patient selection. Despite availability and use of various tumor tissue-based and blood-based assays for detecting HER2amp, data on cross-performance of these platforms are lacking. Methods: Leveraging a multicenter international consortium (Italy, Japan and USA), we generated a large cohort (N = 353) of mCRC patients (pts), tested for HER2amp using both tissue and blood. Tissue testing was done using immunohistochemistry (IHC), in-situ hybridization (ISH) and (NGS). ctDNA NGS was performed using CLIA-certified Guardant360 ctDNA assay, capable of detecting HER2 copy number (CN) variations. The primary endpoint was to correlate HER2 gene CNs in tissue (tCN) and plasma (pCN). Descriptive statistics, spearman correlation (r) and Fisher’s exact test were used. Results: Baseline tumors characteristics included right-sided primary in 234 (23%), proficient mismatch repair in 264 (98%) and RAS/BRAF wild type (WT) genotype in 194 (67%) pts. Tissue testing was done by IHC, ISH and NGS in 76%, 64% and 74% pts, respectively. A total of 177 pts had HER2amp detected by at least one test: 116 (66%), 157 (89%) and 96 (54%) of which had tissue +, ctDNA +, and both tissue and ctDNA + disease, respectively. Discordant cases consisted of 20 (6%) with positivity in tumor only and 61 (17%) in ctDNA only. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ctDNA assay (vis-à-vis tissue) were 83%, 74%, 61% and 90% respectively. Among HER2amp pts, median (range) HER2/CEP17 (ISH) ratio, tCN and pCN were 5.2 (2–12), 11.6 (2–700) and 3.5 (2–122), respectively. The pCN showed strong correlation with ISH ratio (r = 0.69) and tCN (r = 0.68) (P < 0.001). Median pCN differed significantly between pts with HER2 IHC 3+ (12.0), 2+ (2.2) and 0/1+ (2.0) tumors (P < 0.001). High HER2amp (pCN > 4.0) appeared to be enriched with tissue + cases (69% vs 8% [OR 24.6, P < 0.001]), tumor tissue HER2 + status (IHC3+ [75%] vs IHC2+ISH+ [50%] vs IHC2+/ISH- or IHC0/1+ [12%], P < 0.001), HER2 tCN > 6 (79% vs 31% [OR 8.7, P < 0.001]) and RAS/BRAF WT tumors (41% vs 17% [OR 3.5, P = 0.064) but not left sidedness (41% vs 38%; OR 1.1; P = 0.82). Conclusions: In this large diverse cohort of mCRC, we demonstrated correlation of HER2 tCN and pCN obtained by tissue-based and blood-based ctDNA assay. Further prospective efforts are needed to standardize this cross-platform quantification of HER2amp to facilitate robust clinical application of HER2 therapies. This effort shows the value of strategic international partnership in furthering research for rare cancer subsets.

Clonal hematopoiesis association with cardiac function and mortality in patients with solid tumors

10586

Background: Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is the presence of expanded somatic clones in hematopoietic cells and is associated with higher overall mortality (OM). Studies suggest atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease may drive mortality, but the detailed mechanisms remain unclear. CH mutations can be detected in solid tumor sequencing, often confounding genomic tumor analysis. We evaluated the association of CH in solid tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) with echocardiographic findings and OM. Methods: Sequential adult patients treated at the Duke Cancer Institute with solid tumor NGS analysis by FoundationOne were captured retrospectively. CH mutations present at a variant allele fraction ≥2% across 57 genes previously associated with hematologic malignancies were included. Patients with echocardiograms between 2 years before NGS testing and up to 5 years afterward were analyzed. Association between CH mutations with cardiomyopathy (CM, left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was determined using logistic and linear regression, respectively. In a subset of patients with detailed cancer diagnosis date and clinical follow-up, Cox proportional hazard models were used to associate CH mutations with OM, with or without TP53/ KRAS (included in most CH analyses but highly prevalent in solid tumors). Analyses were adjusted for age, gender and race. Results: Of 3029 patients with NGS testing, 2212 (73.0%) carried at least one CH related mutation, the majority of which were in TP53/ KRAS. When excluding TP53/ KRAS, CH mutations were observed in 806 of 3029 (26.6%) patients. CH mutations were associated with age (est 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, p < 0.001). Excluding TP53/ KRAS strengthened the association between CH and age (est 2.8, 95% CI 1.8-3.9, p < 0.001). Echocardiogram data were available in 828 patients, of whom 48 (5.8%) had CM. CH mutations were not associated with CM (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.6-2.6, p = 0.5), however when excluding TP53 and KRAS, CH mutations were associated with lower odds of (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-0.9, p = 0.03). GLS was available in 423 patients and was not associated with CH mutations (p = 0.8 with TP53/ KRAS; p = 0.4 without TP53/ KRAS as CH). In 222 patients with clinical information, OM did not differ between the CH vs no CH cohorts (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6 = 1.2, p = 0.3 inclusive of TP53/KRAS). When excluding TP53/ KRAS mutations, in this population of patients with cancer, non- TP53/ KRAS CH was associated with less OM (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9, p = 0.01). Conclusions: In this patient population with cancer, CH mutations did not associate with higher CM. In contrast to prior studies, CH detected in solid tumor does not associate with OM in this population. CH mutations confound tumor sequencing and these findings support the value of paired tumor-blood sequencing to determine true CH. Consensus around CH variants should be undertaken in future studies.

Trial in progress: A phase 1b study of sotorasib, a specific and irreversible KRASG12C inhibitor, as monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastasis and in combination with other anticancer therapies in advanced solid tumors (CodeBreaK 101)

TPS2669

Background: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS) p.G12C mutation is an oncogenic driver mutation in several solid tumors. Sotorasib is a specific, irreversible, small molecule inhibitor of KRASG12C that has demonstrated durable clinical benefit in NSCLC, with mild and manageable toxicities. The combination of sotorasib with other anticancer therapies may enhance antitumor efficacy. This master protocol is designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of multiple sotorasib combinations in patients (pts) with KRASp.G12C mutated solid tumors. Herein, we overview 1 monotherapy and 11 combination cohorts. Methods: This is a phase 1b, open-label study evaluating sotorasib alone and in combination regimens (Table) in pts with advanced KRAS p.G12C mutated solid tumors. Dose exploration will evaluate the safety and tolerability of sotorasib alone and in combination regimens; dose expansion will then verify the safety and tolerability profile of sotorasib regimens and assess antitumor efficacy. Key eligibility criteria include locally-advanced or metastatic solid tumor with KRAS p.G12C mutation identified through molecular testing in pts who have received ≥1 lines of prior systemic therapy. Primary endpoints include dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-emergent or treatment-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints include PK profile of combination regimens and efficacy (eg, objective response, disease control, duration of response, progression-free survival, and duration of stable disease assessed per RECIST 1.1). Enrollment began in December 2019 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04185883. [Table: see text]

Preliminary clinical and biologic results of GB1275, a first-in-class oral CD11b modulator, alone and with pembrolizumab, in advanced solid tumors (KEYNOTE A36)

2505

Background: GB1275 is a first-in-class, oral CD11b modulator that reduced myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs), repolarized M2 immunosuppressive TAMs to an M1 phenotype, resulting in increased tumor infiltration of activated CD8+ T cells and antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. Here, we report preliminary results from an ongoing, first-in-human dose-escalation study in specific advanced tumors using GB1275 alone or with pembrolizumab. (NCT04060342) Methods: Phase 1 comprises dose escalation and expansion. During dose escalation, cohorts of 3 to 6 subjects were sequentially assigned to ascending dose levels of GB1275 from 100 mg to 1200 mg BID in one of two dosing regimens: Regimen A [GB1275 monotherapy orally (PO) twice a day (BID)] and Regimen B [GB1275 PO BID plus pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks (q3wks)]. Dose escalation was based on safety including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Following dose escalation, up to 40 subjects with specific tumor types are to be treated in expansion with the selected GB1275 dose plus pembrolizumab to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical and biomarker activity. Results: As of January 8, 2021, 45 subjects were treated [44 in dose escalation: 23, Regimen A; 21, Regimen B. 1 in expansion, Regimen B], with median (range) GB1275 exposure of 42.0 days (4-263). No DLTs were reported. GB1275-related adverse events occurred in 24/45 (53.3%) subjects; photosensitivity reaction (20.0%), dysesthesia (13.3%) and pruritus (13.3%) were most frequent (≥10%). Stable disease was reported in 6/19 (31.6%) response-evaluable subjects in Regimen A and 9/16 (56.3%) in Regimen B. In Regimen B (800 mg), one partial response was reported in a subject with MSS-CRC treated for 263 days, and one prolonged stable disease (227 days) was reported in a gastric cancer (GC) subject previously treated with pembrolizumab plus bavituximab for less than 3 months due to progression; both subjects are continuing study treatment. A dose-dependent increase in GB1275 systemic exposure was observed up to 800 mg BID. Down-regulation of peripheral MDSCs was seen with both regimens. Regimen-dependent gene clusters in whole blood were noted. An increase in tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) counts was noted in both Regimens A and B. Conclusions: Dose escalation of GB1275, up to 1200 mg in Regimens A and B, demonstrated tolerability as monotherapy and combined with pembrolizumab in subjects with advanced cancers. Encouraging antitumor activity in Regimen B (800 mg) was observed in subjects with MSS-CRC and GC. Biological activity reflected by MDSC modulations in blood and TIL Increases in tumor biopsies with GB1275 alone and with pembrolizumab supports the mechanism of GB1275. GB1275 800 mg BID plus pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q3wks was selected for evaluation in the expansion phase. Clinical trial information: NCT04060342.