1
|
Laidsaar-Powell R, Giunta S, Butow P, Turner S, Costa D, Saunders C, Koczwara B, Kay J, Jefford M, Schofield P, Boyle F, Yates P, White K, Sundaresan P, Varadarajan S, Juraskova I. An online intervention to improve oncology health professional self-efficacy in communicating with carers: Hybrid effectiveness-implementation evaluation of the eTRIO program. Patient Educ Couns 2024; 124:108251. [PMID: 38626502 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many oncology health professionals (HPs) report communicating with carers as complex; and receive limited carer-relevant training. We developed an online HP education program for supporting and managing carer involvement (eTRIO). We aimed to assess whether HPs' self-efficacy in carer communication, knowledge, and decision-making preferences improve following eTRIO. Satisfaction and implementation potential were assessed. METHODS This type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study used a pre-post single arm intervention design. HPs completed baseline measures, the eTRIO online module, and measures at 1- and 12-weeks post-intervention. Measures included: self-efficacy in carer communication (13-items), applied knowledge (7-items), preference for carer involvement in decisions (1-item). Fifteen of participants completed feedback interviews which underwent thematic analysis. User analytics were collected and analysed. RESULTS Fifty-six HPs completed baseline measures, 42 completed post- and follow-up measures. At baseline mean self-efficacy score was 88. HPs showed a statistically significant increase in self-efficacy post-intervention (mean = 105.8, CI [12.99, 20.47]), maintained at 12-weeks (mean = 101.1, CI [8.00, 15.72]). There were no changes in knowledge or decision-making preferences. Program engagement and satisfaction were high, 86.7% participants rated eTRIO as very/extremely helpful. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS eTRIO provided HPs with confidence to effectively engage with carers and manage complex situations such as family dominance. These gains are noteworthy, as conflict with families/carers contributes to HP burnout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Australia; Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia.
| | - Sarah Giunta
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Australia; Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Australia; Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Sandra Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniel Costa
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Christobel Saunders
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bogda Koczwara
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia; Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Judy Kay
- School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Frances Boyle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia; Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care & Research, Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Patsy Yates
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing, The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Australia
| | - Puma Sundaresan
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, WSLHD, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Suganthy Varadarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Blacktown Cancer and Haematology Centre, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Australia; Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laidsaar-Powell R, Giunta S, Butow P, Keast R, Koczwara B, Kay J, Jefford M, Turner S, Saunders C, Schofield P, Boyle F, Yates P, White K, Miller A, Butt Z, Bonnaudet M, Juraskova I. Development of Web-Based Education Modules to Improve Carer Engagement in Cancer Care: Design and User Experience Evaluation of the e-Triadic Oncology (eTRIO) Modules for Clinicians, Patients, and Carers. JMIR Med Educ 2024; 10:e50118. [PMID: 38630531 PMCID: PMC11063882 DOI: 10.2196/50118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carers often assume key roles in cancer care. However, many carers report feeling disempowered and ill-equipped to support patients. Our group published evidence-based guidelines (the Triadic Oncology [TRIO] Guidelines) to improve oncology clinician engagement with carers and the management of challenging situations involving carers. OBJECTIVE To facilitate implementation of the TRIO Guidelines in clinical practice, we aimed to develop, iteratively refine, and conduct user testing of a suite of evidence-based and interactive web-based education modules for oncology clinicians (e-Triadic Oncology [eTRIO]), patients with cancer, and carers (eTRIO for Patients and Carers [eTRIO-pc]). These were designed to improve carer involvement, communication, and shared decision-making in the cancer management setting. METHODS The eTRIO education modules were based on extensive research, including systematic reviews, qualitative interviews, and consultation analyses. Guided by the person-based approach, module content and design were reviewed by an expert advisory group comprising academic and clinical experts (n=13) and consumers (n=5); content and design were continuously and iteratively refined. User experience testing (including "think-aloud" interviews and administration of the System Usability Scale [SUS]) of the modules was completed by additional clinicians (n=5), patients (n=3), and carers (n=3). RESULTS The final clinician module comprises 14 sections, requires approximately 1.5 to 2 hours to complete, and covers topics such as carer-inclusive communication and practices; supporting carer needs; and managing carer dominance, anger, and conflicting patient-carer wishes. The usability of the module was rated by 5 clinicians, with a mean SUS score of 75 (SD 5.3), which is interpreted as good. Clinicians often desired information in a concise format, divided into small "snackable" sections that could be easily recommenced if they were interrupted. The carer module features 11 sections; requires approximately 1.5 hours to complete; and includes topics such as the importance of carers, carer roles during consultations, and advocating for the patient. The patient module is an adaptation of the relevant carer module sections, comprising 7 sections and requiring 1 hour to complete. The average SUS score as rated by 6 patients and carers was 78 (SD 16.2), which is interpreted as good. Interactive activities, clinical vignette videos, and reflective learning exercises are incorporated into all modules. Patient and carer consumer advisers advocated for empathetic content and tone throughout their modules, with an easy-to-read and navigable module interface. CONCLUSIONS The eTRIO suite of modules were rigorously developed using a person-based design methodology to meet the unique information needs and learning requirements of clinicians, patients, and carers, with the goal of improving effective and supportive carer involvement in cancer consultations and cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sarah Giunta
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachael Keast
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bogda Koczwara
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Judy Kay
- School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandra Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christobel Saunders
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Frances Boyle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care & Research, Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Patsy Yates
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing, The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Annie Miller
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zoe Butt
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Melanie Bonnaudet
- School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holt J, Bhar S, Schofield P, Koder D, Owen P, Seitz D, Bhowmik J. Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of mental illness among nursing home residents. Syst Rev 2024; 13:109. [PMID: 38627826 PMCID: PMC11020180 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02516-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a high prevalence of mental illness in nursing home residents compared to older adults living in the community. This was highlighted in the most recent comprehensive systematic review on the topic, published in 2010. In the context of a rapidly aging population and increased numbers of older adults requiring residential care, this study aims to provide a contemporary account of the prevalence of mental illness among nursing home residents. METHODS This protocol was prepared in line with the PRISMA-P 2015 Statement. Systematic searches will be undertaken across six electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycNET, CINAHL, and Abstracts in Social Gerontology. Peer-reviewed studies published from 2009 onwards which report the prevalence of mental illness within nursing home populations will be included. Database searches will be supplemented by forward and backward citation searching. Titles and abstracts of records will be screened using a semi-automated process. The full text of selected records will be assessed to confirm inclusion criteria are met. Study selection will be recorded in a PRISMA flowchart. A pilot-tested form will be used to extract data from included studies, alongside the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. A study characteristics and results table will be prepared to present key details from each included study, supported by a narrative synthesis. Random-effects restricted maximum likelihood meta-analyses will be performed to compute pooled prevalence estimates for mental illnesses represented in the identified studies. Heterogeneity will be assessed using Cochran's Q and Higgins' I2 statistics. A Funnel plot and Egger's test will be used to assess publication bias. The GRADE approach will be used to assess the quality of the body of evidence identified. DISCUSSION The study will provide a comprehensive and contemporary account of the prevalence of mental illness among nursing home residents. Meta-analyses will provide robust prevalence estimates across a range of presentations. Key insights will be highlighted, including potential sources of heterogeneity. Implications for residents, researchers, care providers, and policymakers will be noted. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42023456226.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared Holt
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
| | - Sunil Bhar
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
- Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Deborah Koder
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Patrick Owen
- Eastern Health Emergency Medicine Program, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dallas Seitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Jahar Bhowmik
- Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dang TH, Wickramasinghe N, Forkan ARM, Jayaraman PP, Burbury K, O'Callaghan C, Whitechurch A, Schofield P. Co-Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Mobile Solution to Improve Medication Adherence in Cancer: Design Science Research Approach. JMIR Cancer 2024; 10:e46979. [PMID: 38569178 PMCID: PMC11024750 DOI: 10.2196/46979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication nonadherence negatively impacts the health outcomes of people with cancer as well as health care costs. Digital technologies present opportunities to address this health issue. However, there is limited evidence on how to develop digital interventions that meet the needs of people with cancer, are perceived as useful, and are potentially effective in improving medication adherence. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to co-design, develop, and preliminarily evaluate an innovative mobile health solution called Safety and Adherence to Medication and Self-Care Advice in Oncology (SAMSON) to improve medication adherence among people with cancer. METHODS Using the 4 cycles and 6 processes of design science research methodology, we co-designed and developed a medication adherence solution for people with cancer. First, we conducted a literature review on medication adherence in cancer and a systematic review of current interventions to address this issue. Behavioral science research was used to conceptualize the design features of SAMSON. Second, we conducted 2 design phases: prototype design and final feature design. Last, we conducted a mixed methods study on patients with hematological cancer over 6 weeks to evaluate the mobile solution. RESULTS The developed mobile solution, consisting of a mobile app, a web portal, and a cloud-based database, includes 5 modules: medication reminder and acknowledgment, symptom assessment and management, reinforcement, patient profile, and reporting. The quantitative study (n=30) showed that SAMSON was easy to use (21/27, 78%). The app was engaging (18/27, 67%), informative, increased user interactions, and well organized (19/27, 70%). Most of the participants (21/27, 78%) commented that SAMSON's activities could help to improve their adherence to cancer treatments, and more than half of them (17/27, 63%) would recommend the app to their peers. The qualitative study (n=25) revealed that SAMSON was perceived as helpful in terms of reminding, supporting, and informing patients. Possible barriers to using SAMSON include the app glitches and users' technical inexperience. Further needs to refine the solution were also identified. Technical improvements and design enhancements will be incorporated into the subsequent iteration. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the successful application of behavioral science research and design science research methodology to design and develop a mobile solution for patients with cancer to be more adherent. The study also highlights the importance of applying rigorous methodologies in developing effective and patient-centered digital intervention solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thu Ha Dang
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Cancer Care Innovation, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nilmini Wickramasinghe
- Department of Health and Bio Statistics, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Optus Chair Digital Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan
- Digital Innovation Lab, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, School Software and Electrical Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
| | - Prem Prakash Jayaraman
- Factory of the Future and Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate Burbury
- Digital and Healthcare Innovation, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clare O'Callaghan
- Caritas Christi and Psychosocial Cancer Care, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ashley Whitechurch
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Cancer Care Innovation, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuswanto CN, Stafford L, Schofield P, Sharp J. Self-compassion and parenting efficacy among mothers who are breast cancer survivors: Implications for psychological distress. J Health Psychol 2024; 29:425-437. [PMID: 38262920 PMCID: PMC11005311 DOI: 10.1177/13591053231222162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Mothers who are breast cancer survivors may experience psychological distress in relation to diminished parenting efficacy. Self-compassion may protect mothers from psychological distress, yet little is known about self-compassion in this population. The extent to which self-warmth (self-kindness, mindfulness and sense of common humanity) and self-coldness (self-judgement, isolation and over-identification) dimensions of self-compassion moderate parenting efficacy in predicting depression, anxiety and stress was examined in a sample of 95 mothers who were breast cancer survivors. Independently, poorer parenting efficacy was associated with more depression and stress symptoms. Within regression models, self-coldness was a direct predictor of depression, anxiety and stress, while self-warmth moderated the relationship between parenting efficacy and stress. Self-warmth presents as a potential protective factor for stress associated with poor parenting efficacy, while self-coldness is a potential direct risk factor for psychological distress. Mothers who are breast cancer survivors may benefit from self-compassion focused psychosocial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Penelope Schofield
- Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Allsop MJ, Epstein JB, Howell D, Rapoport BL, Schofield P, Van Sebille Y, Thong MSY, Walraven I, Ryan Wolf J, van den Hurk CJG. Patient-reported symptom monitoring: using (big) data to improve supportive care at the macro-, meso-, and micro-levels. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:182. [PMID: 38386101 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08373-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the need for continued development of symptom monitoring (SM) implementation, utilization, and data usage at the macro-, meso-, and micro-levels. METHODS Discussions from a patient-reported SM workshop at the MASCC/ISSO 2022 annual meeting were analyzed using a macro-meso-micro analytical framework of cancer care delivery. The workshop categories "initiation and implementation, barriers to adoption and utilization, and data usage" were integrated for each level. RESULTS At the macro-level, policy development could encourage data sharing and international collaboration, including the exchange of SM methods, supportive care models, and self-management modules. At the meso-level, institutions should adjust clinical workflow and service delivery and promote a thorough technical and clinical integration of SM. At the micro-level, SM should be individualized, with timely feedback for patients, and should foster trust and understanding of AI decision support tools amongst clinicians to improve supportive care. CONCLUSIONS The workshop reached a consensus among international experts on providing guidance on SM implementation, utilization, and (big) data usage pathways in cancer survivors across the cancer continuum and on macro-meso-micro levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Wang
- Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
- Mckinsey & Company, 1 PPG Pl # 2350, Pittsburgh, PA, 15222, USA
| | - Matthew J Allsop
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9LH, UK
| | - Joel B Epstein
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., Pavilion, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Doris Howell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Institute, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Bernardo L Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, 129 Oxford Road, Saxonwold, Johannesburg, 2196, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Corner Doctor Savage Road and Bophelo Road, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute Swinburne University, John St, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
- Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Ysabella Van Sebille
- University of South Australia, 61-68 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Melissa S Y Thong
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship (C071), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Iris Walraven
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Ryan Wolf
- Department of Dermatology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 697, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Corina J G van den Hurk
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Rijnkade 5, 3511, LC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Laporte D, Chilman N, Morgan C, Schofield P, Wykes T, Das-Munshi J. The association between area-level factors and mortality in severe mental illnesses: A systematic review. Schizophr Res 2024; 264:95-104. [PMID: 38118264 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Premature mortality is a well-documented adverse outcome for people living with severe mental illnesses (SMI). Emerging evidence suggests that area-level factors play a role that are experienced disproportionately by this population. This review assesses the potential association between area-level factors and mortality in people with SMI. METHOD We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Social Policy and Practice, Web of Science and OpenGrey databases. Literature searches were conducted in May 2020 and updated in June 2023. Reference lists were hand-searched and authors of included studies contacted to identify additional studies and minimise publication biases. Narrative synthesis was used to appraise the included studies. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019155447). RESULTS Our searches identified 7 studies (8 papers), which were included in the review, and indicated evidence of an association between deprivation and mortality. One study suggested an association between mortality in SMI and urbanicity in low to middle income settings which was not observed in studies from high income settings. One study suggested a protective association of area-level ethnic density with mortality within urbanised settings. CONCLUSION Consistent associations were reported between residence in areas of higher deprivation and increased risk of mortality in SMI. Two studies suggested an association between area-level ethnic density and urbanicity and mortality in SMI. Most studies were conducted across high income countries and therefore future research could benefit from similar investigations being conducted in low- and middle-income countries. These methods would inform health and social policies, including interventions to reduce premature mortality in SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Laporte
- King's College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neurosciences), London, United Kingdom; NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
| | - N Chilman
- King's College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neurosciences), London, United Kingdom; Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), KCL Centre for Society and Mental Health, United Kingdom
| | - C Morgan
- King's College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neurosciences), London, United Kingdom; Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), KCL Centre for Society and Mental Health, United Kingdom
| | - P Schofield
- School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - T Wykes
- King's College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neurosciences), London, United Kingdom; NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - J Das-Munshi
- King's College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neurosciences), London, United Kingdom; NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), KCL Centre for Society and Mental Health, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lindsay D, Schofield P, Nabukalu D, Roberts MJ, Yaxley J, Quinn S, Richards N, Frydenberg M, Gardiner R, Lawrentschuk N, Juraskova I, Murphy DG, Gordon LG. The impact of management option on out-of-pocket costs and perceived financial burden among men with localised prostate cancer in Australia within 6 months of diagnosis. AUST HEALTH REV 2024; 48:172-181. [PMID: 38342484 DOI: 10.1071/ah23231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to quantify the out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and perceived financial burden among Australian men with localised prostate cancer in the first 6 months after diagnosis, by primary management option. Methods This cost-analysis quantified OOP costs using administrative claims data and self-reported survey data. Financial burden was assessed using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) tool. Participants were recruited into a randomised control trial from public or private treatment centres in Victoria and Queensland. Generalised linear models were used to predict OOP costs and COST-FACIT scores. Results Median total OOP costs within 6 months of diagnosis for 256 Australian patients with localised prostate cancer was A$1172 (A$343-2548). Up to 50% of the sample reported A$0 costs for most medical services. Compared with those managed with active surveillance, men having active treatment had 6.4 (95% CI: 3.2-12.7) times greater total OOP costs. Management option, higher Gleason score at diagnosis and having multiple comorbidities were significant predictors of higher OOP costs. Overall high scores on the COST-FACIT indicated low levels of financial burden for the entire sample. Conclusion Largely attributable to being managed with active surveillance, Australian men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer reported relatively low OOP costs and financial burden in the first 6 months post-diagnosis. Together with clinical outcomes, clinicians can use this up to date evidence on costs and perceived financial burdens to assist localised prostate cancer patients and their families make informed decisions about their preferred management option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lindsay
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Doreen Nabukalu
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Qld, Australia
| | - John Yaxley
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Qld, Australia; and Wesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Qld, Australia
| | - Stephen Quinn
- Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Natalie Richards
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Urology, Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Robert Gardiner
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Qld, Australia; and Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Louisa G Gordon
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and School of Nursing and Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schofield P, Hyatt A, White A, White F, Frydenberg M, Chambers S, Gardiner R, Murphy DG, Cavedon L, Millar J, Richards N, Murphy B, Juraskova I. Co-designing an online treatment decision aid for men with low-risk prostate cancer: Navigate. BJUI Compass 2024; 5:121-141. [PMID: 38179019 PMCID: PMC10764164 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To develop an online treatment decision aid (OTDA) to assist patients with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) and their partners in making treatment decisions. Patients and methods Navigate, an OTDA for LRPC, was rigorously co-designed by patients with a confirmed diagnosis or at risk of LRPC and their partners, clinicians, researchers and website designers/developers. A theoretical model guided the development process. A mixed methods approach was used incorporating (1) evidence for essential design elements for OTDAs; (2) evidence for treatment options for LRPC; (3) an iterative co-design process involving stakeholder workshops and prototype review; and (4) expert rating using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Three co-design workshops with potential users (n = 12) and research and web-design team members (n = 10) were conducted. Results from each workshop informed OTDA modifications to the OTDA for testing in the subsequent workshop. Clinician (n = 6) and consumer (n = 9) feedback on usability and content on the penultimate version was collected. Results The initial workshops identified key content and design features that were incorporated into the draft OTDA, re-workshopped and incorporated into the penultimate OTDA. Expert feedback on usability and content was also incorporated into the final OTDA. The final OTDA was deemed comprehensive, clear and appropriate and met all IPDAS criteria. Conclusion Navigate is an interactive and acceptable OTDA for Australian men with LRPC designed by men for men using a co-design methodology. The effectiveness of Navigate in assisting patient decision-making is currently being assessed in a randomised controlled trial with patients with LRPC and their partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Schofield
- Department of PsychologySwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Health Services Research DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Amelia Hyatt
- Health Services Research DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Alan White
- Health Services Research DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Fiona White
- Health Services Research DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Urology, Cabrini InstituteCabrini HealthMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of SurgeryMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Faculty of Health SciencesAustralian Catholic UniversityBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- Faculty of HealthUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Menzies Health InstituteGriffith UniversityNathanQueenslandAustralia
| | - Robert Gardiner
- School of MedicineUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaQueenslandAustralia
- Department of UrologyRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalHerstonQueenslandAustralia
- Edith Cowan UniversityPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Declan G. Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Division of Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Lawrence Cavedon
- School of Computing TechnologiesRMIT UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Radiation Oncology, Alfred HealthMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Natalie Richards
- Health Services Research DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Barbara Murphy
- School of Psychological SciencesUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence‐based Decision‐making (CeMPED), School of PsychologyUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gore C, Lisy K, O'Callaghan C, Wood C, Emery J, Martin A, De Abreu Lourenco R, Schofield P, Jefford M. Colorectal cancer survivors' experiences and views of shared and telehealth models of survivorship care: A qualitative study. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6265. [PMID: 38072641 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The number of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors is increasing and current models of survivorship care are unsustainable. There is a drive to implement alternative models of care including shared care between general practitioners (GPs) and hospital-based providers. The primary objective of this study was to explore perspectives on facilitators and barriers to shared care. The secondary objective was to explore experiences of telehealth-delivered care. METHOD Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with participants in the Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors (SCORE) randomised controlled trial. Interviews explored patient experiences of usual and shared survivorship care during the SCORE trial. In response to the COVID pandemic, participant experiences of telehealth appointments were also explored. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. RESULTS Twenty survivors of CRC were interviewed with an even number in the shared and usual care arms; 14 (70%) were male. Facilitators to shared care included: good relationships with GPs; convenience of GPs; good communication between providers; desire to reduce public health system pressures. Barriers included: poor communication between clinicians; inaccessibility of GPs; beliefs about GP capacity; and a preference for follow-up care with the hospital after positive treatment experiences. Participants also commonly expressed a preference for telehealth-based follow-up when there was no need for a clinical examination. CONCLUSIONS This is one of few studies that have explored patient experiences with shared and telehealth-based survivorship care. Findings can guide the implementation of these models, particularly around care coordination, communication, preparation, and personalised pathways of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Gore
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Psychosocial Oncology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare O'Callaghan
- Departments of Psychosocial Cancer Care and Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Colin Wood
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Martin
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dang TH, O'Callaghan C, Alexander M, Burbury K, Jayaraman PP, Wickramasinghe N, Schofield P. "Take the tablet or don't take the tablet?"-A qualitative study of patients' experiences of self-administering anti-cancer medications related to adherence and managing side effects. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:680. [PMID: 37934298 PMCID: PMC10630231 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08122-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Medication non-adherence is a well-recognised problem in cancer care, negatively impacting health outcomes and healthcare resources. Patient-related factors influencing medication adherence (MA) are complicated and interrelated. There is a need for qualitative research to better understand their underlying interaction processes and patients' needs to facilitate the development of effective patient-tailored complex interventions. This study aimed to explore experiences, perceptions, and needs relating to MA and side effect management of patients who are self-administering anti-cancer treatment. METHODS Semi-structured audio-recorded interviews with patients who have haematological cancer were conducted. A comparative, iterative, and predominantly inductive thematic analysis approach was employed. RESULTS Twenty-five patients from a specialist cancer hospital were interviewed. While self-administering cancer medications at home, patients' motivation to adhere was affected by cancer-related physical reactions, fears, cancer literacy and beliefs, and healthcare professional (HCP) and informal support. Patients desired need for regular follow-ups from respectful, encouraging, informative, responsive, and consistent HCPs as part of routine care. Motivated patients can develop high adherence and side effect self-management over time, especially when being supported by HCPs and informal networks. CONCLUSION Patients with cancer need varied support to medically adhere to and manage side effects at home. HCPs should adapt their practices to meet the patients' expectations to further support them during treatment. We propose a multi-dimensional and technology- and theory-based intervention, which incorporates regular HCP consultations providing tailored education and support to facilitate and maintain patient MA and side effect self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thu Ha Dang
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Clare O'Callaghan
- Caritas Christi and Psychosocial Cancer Care, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marliese Alexander
- Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kate Burbury
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Digital and Healthcare Innovation, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Prem Prakash Jayaraman
- Factory of the Future and Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nilmini Wickramasinghe
- Optus Digital Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health and Bio Statistics, School of Health Sciences and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychological Sciences and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Digital Cancer Care Innovation, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guccione L, Gough K, Drosdowsky A, Price T, Pavlakis N, Wyld D, Ransom D, Michael M, Schofield P. The unmet information needs, quality of life, and care experiences of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) at follow-up: 6 months from diagnosis. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:577. [PMID: 37712997 PMCID: PMC10504214 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08034-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify changes in the healthcare preferences, patient experiences, and quality of life of patients with NETs at 6-month follow-up, informing the design of supportive care services. METHODS This study presents 6-month follow-up data of a mixed-methods multi-site study. Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome questionnaire data was collected. RESULTS High percentages of suboptimal experiences of care were reported. Patients reported less positive experiences with being involved in decisions about their care and treatment; their family or someone close to them having the opportunity to talk to their cancer doctor, or having their family or someone close to them receive all the information they need to help care for them at home. Patients also reported negative experiences for on the information about their cancer accessible online and the usefulness of the information they accessed. Differences between baseline and follow-up scores were mostly not significant apart from anxiety and sleep disturbance scales, CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NETs report difficulties in accessing and understanding written information that is persistent over time. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Outcomes will inform the design and development of an informational resource aimed at facilitating improved understanding for patients with NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Guccione
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Karla Gough
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Allison Drosdowsky
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Timothy Price
- Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia Australia
| | - Nick Pavlakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales Australia
| | - David Wyld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David Ransom
- Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bhar S, Davison TE, Schofield P, Quinn S, Ratcliffe J, Waloszek JM, Dunkerley S, Silver M, Linossier J, Koder D, Collins R, Milte R. Study protocol for ELders AT Ease (ELATE): a cluster randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy to reduce depressive symptoms in aged care residents. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:555. [PMID: 37700236 PMCID: PMC10498637 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04257-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This protocol describes a study of the effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for reducing depressive symptoms in older adults living in residential aged care (RAC) facilities in Australia. Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent in this population, yet the benefits of CBT for reducing such symptoms in RAC facilities have not been widely investigated. Elders at Ease (ELATE) is a 16-session CBT intervention designed for implementation in RAC facilities. The intervention includes cognitive, behavioural and reminiscence strategies and is delivered by mental health trainees (MHTs) in collaboration with RAC facility staff and residents' family. METHODS AND ANALYSIS ELATE will be evaluated using a cluster randomised trial comparing outcomes for residents who participate in the intervention with those living in usual care control facilities. The participants are RAC residents aged 65 years or above, with depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 ≥ 3) and normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (Standardised Mini Mental Status Examination ≥ 21). They are assessed at four time points: baseline prior to randomisation (T1), mid-treatment (T2; 2.5 months post randomisation), post-treatment (T3; 5 months post-randomisation) and 3-month follow-up (T4; 8 months post randomisation). The primary outcome is change in depressive symptoms between T1 and T3. Secondary outcomes are depressive symptoms at T4, anxiety, suicide ideation, sleep problems, quality of life, staff and family knowledge of late-life depression, stress levels and efficacy in caring for residents, and MHT levels of geropsychology competencies. Residents receiving the intervention are hypothesised to report a greater decrease in depressive symptoms between T1 and T3 compared to residents receiving usual care. The primary analysis is a regression, clustered over site to account for correlated readings, and independent variables are condition and depressive symptoms at T1. A cost-utility analysis is also undertaken. DISCUSSION ELATE is a comprehensive CBT intervention for reducing depressive symptoms in RAC residents. It is designed to be implemented in collaboration with facility staff and residents' families, individually tailored to residents with normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment and delivered by trainee therapists. ELATE offers a model that may be widely applicable across the RAC sector. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) Number ACTRN12619001037190, prospectively registered on 22 July 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Bhar
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
| | - Tanya E Davison
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
- Silverchain, Osborne Park, WA, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
- Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen Quinn
- Department of Health Sciences and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Joanna M Waloszek
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Sofie Dunkerley
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Mark Silver
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Jennifer Linossier
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Deborah Koder
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Rebecca Collins
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, H99, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Mourik A, Tonkin-Hill G, O'Farrell J, Waller S, Tan L, Tothill RW, Bowtell D, Fox S, Fellowes A, Fedele C, Schofield P, Sivakumaran T, Wong HL, Mileshkin L. Six-year experience of Australia's first dedicated cancer of unknown primary clinic. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:301-308. [PMID: 37225894 PMCID: PMC10338450 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02254-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis and management of cancers of unknown primary (CUP) remain challenging. This study examines the referral patterns, management and outcomes of patients referred to Australia's first dedicated CUP clinic. METHODS Retrospective medical record review was conducted for patients seen at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre CUP clinic between July 2014 and August 2020. Overall survival (OS) was analysed for patients with a CUP diagnosis where treatment information was available. RESULTS Of 361 patients referred, fewer than half had completed diagnostic work-up at the time of referral. A diagnosis of CUP was established in 137 (38%), malignancy other than CUP in 177 (49%) and benign pathology in 36 (10%) patients. Genomic testing was successfully completed in 62% of patients with initial provisional CUP and impacted management in 32% by identifying a tissue of origin or actionable genomic alteration. The use of site-specific, targeted therapy or immunotherapy was independently associated with longer OS compared to empirical chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Our specialised CUP clinic facilitated diagnostic work-up among patients with suspected malignancy and provided access to genomic testing and clinical trials for patients with a CUP diagnosis, all of which are important to improve outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle van Mourik
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gina Tonkin-Hill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John O'Farrell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shohei Waller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lavinia Tan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard W Tothill
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - David Bowtell
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen Fox
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Fellowes
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Penelope Schofield
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tharani Sivakumaran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Hui-Li Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Todio E, Schofield P, Sharp J. A Qualitative Study of Men's Experiences Using Navigate: A Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Aid. MDM Policy Pract 2023; 8:23814683231198003. [PMID: 37719768 PMCID: PMC10501076 DOI: 10.1177/23814683231198003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (LPC) often face a dilemma in choosing between available treatment options that have similar survival rates but for which the perceived advantages and disadvantages of each treatment differ. The Navigate decision aid was created to assist Australian men with LPC in making informed decisions about treatment that align with their personal values and preferences. Navigate presents current, unbiased information, including an interactive values clarification exercise. Objective. This study was a qualitative investigation of men's treatment decision making for LPC, and their experiences using the Navigate Web site, to identify areas for improvement and inform implementation. Methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 men diagnosed with LPC who completed the intervention arm of the Navigate randomized controlled trial. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: Five main themes emerged: 1) diagnosis experiences varied, although men were strongly influenced by their clinician to make an early initial treatment decision; 2) men sought resources and support they trusted; 3) men valued Navigate's multiformatted content and design; 4) men suggested more content was needed on a) the diagnosis journey and b) new treatment updates; and 5) men identified design flaws in the values clarification exercise on Navigate but appreciated the tool being available. Conclusions. Specialist authority influenced men to make an early treatment decision. However, Navigate was helpful in supporting men's ongoing treatment decision making, particularly men on active surveillance who may face further treatment decisions if their cancer progresses. To gain trust and improve engagement from Navigate users, credentials and sources of information need to be prominent. Trustworthiness, timing of access, and the clinician's role in empowering men to use available decision aids are crucial elements to be considered when implementing Navigate in clinical settings. Highlights The Navigate decision aid Web site was created to help Australian men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (LPC) make an informed decision about their treatment.Navigate was helpful in supporting men's ongoing treatment decision making for LPC.Men's treatment decision making for LPC was greatly influenced by perceived authority and trust in their clinician.Trustworthiness, timing of access, and the clinician's role in empowering men to use available decision aids are crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Todio
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica Sharp
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jefford M, Emery JD, Martin AJ, De Abreu Lourenco R, Lisy K, Mohamed MA, King D, Tebbutt NC, Lee M, Mehrnejad A, Burgess A, Marker J, Eggins R, Carrello J, Schofield P. SCORE: A multisite randomised controlled trial evaluating shared care for colorectal cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
84 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivorship is rising. Few studies have considered shared follow up (FU) care (SC) between oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs). SCORE is the first large RCT of SC for CRC survivors. Aim: to compare SC with usual care (UC) for CRC survivors. Primary objective: assess the effect of SC vs UC on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHQ-QoL) scale to 12 months (mo). Secondary objectives: assess the effect of SC vs UC on QoL; pt perceptions of care; costs; clinical care processes (CEA tests, recurrences); and feasibility (recruitment, completion rate). Methods: Pts had stage I-III CRC, completed all treatments within 3 mo, spoke English, had a PCP, and no prior cancer. After pt consent, PCP could opt out. Pts were randomised 1 to 1 to SC or UC. SC replaced 2 routine oncologist visits with PCP visits and included a survivorship care plan, concerns checklist and management guidelines for the PCP. PCPs were asked to request CEA tests at 3 and 9 mo visits. Pts completed measures at baseline (BL) and at 6 and 12 mo FU. An estimate of the difference (diff) between groups on GHQ-QoL to 12 mo was obtained from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The test of non-inferiority was performed by evaluating the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the estimated diff (SC–UC) against a pre-specified non-inferiority margin (NIM) of -10 points. All randomised pts with available data were included in the primary analysis. Per-protocol population (PPP) comprised all randomised pts with ≥ 1 post-BL questionnaire (6 +/or 12 mo) and, for SC, ≥ 1 of the PCP visits. Results: 150 pts were randomised to SC (N=74) or UC (N=76); 11 PCPs declined. Median age 63 years, 39% women, 24% had radiotherapy. Primary: colon (59%), rectum (32%), overlapping (9%). 138/150 (92%) had BL and ≥1 post-BL GHQ-QoL score. 65/74 (88%) of SC pts attended 3- and/or 9-mo PCP visit. The mean (SD) GHQ-QoL scores at baseline / 6 mo / 12 mo were: 69 (18.7) / 69 (21.2) / 72 (20.2) for SC versus 68 (20.0) / 73 (15.1) / 73 (17.2) for UC. The MMRM mean estimate of GHQ-QoL across the 6 mo and 12 mo FU was 69 for SC and 73 for UC, mean diff -4.0 (95% CI: -9.0 to 0.9). The lower limit of the 95% CI did not cross the NIM. For the PPP (N=130/150), mean diff was -5.0 (95% CI: -10.1 to 0.2). No clear evidence of between group diffs on other C30 scales (accounting for multiplicity). At 12 mo, most popular preferences for FU were: SC for 40/63 (63%) in the SC group, similar preferences for SC 22/62 (35%) and ‘Hospital-based care with the doctors that treated the cancer’ 22/62 (35%) in UC. CEA completion was 89% at 3 and 83% at 9 mo in SC; 63% and 68% in UC. 5 recurrences in SC and 6 in UC arms. Conclusions: SCORE was highly feasible with high participation and retention, few PCPs declined. Compared to UC, pts having SC had non-inferior QoL. Adherence to CEA testing was higher in SC. Pts exposed to SC prefer this model of FU. Cost and implementation analyses will follow. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12617000004369 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jon D. Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Dorothy King
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Niall C. Tebbutt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer, Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret Lee
- Eastern Health, Western Health, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Julie Marker
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renee Eggins
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kuswanto CN, Sharp J, Stafford L, Schofield P. Fear of cancer recurrence as a pathway from fatigue to psychological distress in mothers who are breast cancer survivors. Stress Health 2023; 39:197-208. [PMID: 35751136 PMCID: PMC10084015 DOI: 10.1002/smi.3180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Fatigue is prevalent and pervasive among breast cancer survivors. Mothers are particularly susceptible to fatigue due to the ongoing demands of their caring role. While fatigue has been associated with psychological distress in prior research, the pathway by which fatigue translates into psychological distress is unclear. Given the theoretical and empirical links between fatigue, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and psychological distress, the role of FCR in mediating the relationship between fatigue and psychological distress in mothers who are breast cancer survivors was investigated. Ninety-two mothers who were breast cancer survivors completed the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, PROMIS-Cancer Fatigue Short Form and Concerns About Cancer Recurrence scale in an online survey. Mediation analysis via PROCESS was used to examine whether fatigue predicted depression, anxiety or stress through FCR. Fear of cancer recurrence mediated the relationships between fatigue and anxiety and fatigue and stress, while fatigue directly predicted depression. This study highlights FCR as a potential pathway to anxiety and stress in response to ongoing fatigue, and as a mechanism of action to reduce psychological distress among mothers who are breast cancer survivors. Future research examining this pathway from fatigue to psychological distress should also explore the nature of mothers' fears about their cancer recurring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa Nadia Kuswanto
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Sharp
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lesley Stafford
- Women's Mental Health Team, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.,Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wolyniec K, O'Callaghan C, Fisher K, Jessica S, Tothill RW, Bowtell D, Linda M, Schofield P, Wolyniec K, O'Callaghan C, Fisher K, Sharp J, Tothill R, Bowtell D, Mileshkin L, Schofield P. A qualitative study of patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary: Perceptions of communication, understanding of diagnosis and genomic testing, and information needs. Psychooncology 2023; 32:589-596. [PMID: 36690922 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) commonly report poor understanding of their illness and high levels of psychological distress. Despite the potential benefits to CUP patients, there is a paucity of research exploring the reasons behind poor understanding of a CUP diagnosis. The aim of this study was to understand patients' experiences of communication with doctors, their understanding of diagnosis and the role of genomic testing, as well as their information needs. METHODS Semi-structured interviews explored CUP patients' perceptions of communication with their doctors, understanding of their illness, and their needs regarding medical information. Qualitative inductive thematic analysis of transcribed audio-recordings was employed. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Nineteen patients were recruited from within a prospective cohort study involving routine genomic testing of CUP patients. RESULTS CUP patients had varied perceptions of communication with doctors as well as different levels of need, readiness, and capacity for information. Some patients felt well understood and supported by their doctors while others did not. Many patients reported feeling overwhelmed and shocked when receiving their cancer diagnosis and emphasized the importance of family support in receiving and understanding medical information. While patients understood the implications of genomic testing for treatment and diagnosis, few had a detailed understanding of genomic testing. CONCLUSIONS Patients' experience of communication and understanding of CUP could be potentially improved by clinicians' assessment of the communication style preferred by each patient and their family and the development of online resources to meet their evolving information needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Wolyniec
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare O'Callaghan
- Caritas Christi and Psychosocial Cancer Care, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Krista Fisher
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharp Jessica
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard W Tothill
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology and University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mileshkin Linda
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kamil Wolyniec
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare O'Callaghan
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Krista Fisher
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Sharp
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard Tothill
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Caritas Christi and Psychosocial Cancer Care, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sharp J, Mulcare H, Schofield P. Trajectories of distress in women with gynaecological cancer treated with curative-intent radiotherapy. Psychol Health 2023:1-19. [PMID: 36628613 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2162555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to investigate trajectories of anxiety and depression symptoms among gynaecological cancer (GC) patients having curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) treatment and identify which patient characteristics predict anxiety and depression trajectories. METHODS AND MEASURES Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify unique trajectories of anxiety and depression symptoms, spanning prior to the start of RT until 12-month post-RT, among 151 GC patients in the PeNTAGOn randomized control trial. Demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed at baseline, and anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed five times over 12 months. A bias-adjusted 3-step maximum likelihood approach was used to identify demographic and clinical predictors of trajectory profiles. RESULTS Four latent profiles each were identified for anxiety and depression trajectories. Most patients had minimal to mild levels of anxiety or depression that remained steady or declined over 12 months following treatment. A minority of patients were in profiles that exhibited clinically significant distress; either 'High fluctuating' anxiety or 'Mild-moderate fluctuating' depression. Anxiety and depression profiles were predicted by clinical and demographic factors, such as age, living arrangements, RT type, cancer stage, physical symptom distress and use of support services. CONCLUSIONS Psychological care of patients in the higher distress trajectories is paramount and, importantly, they could be identified prior to treatment based on the factors identified. Review for at least a month post-RT is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Sharp
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hunter Mulcare
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Psychology Department, Western Health, St Albans, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Service Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Todio E, Sharp J, Morrow A, Taylor N, Schofield P, Mazariego C. Examining the effectiveness and implementation of patient treatment decision-aid tools for men with localised prostate cancer: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2023; 32:469-491. [PMID: 36610001 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer (LPC) often face a difficult process deciding on a treatment choice that suits their personal preferences. This systematic review examines the impact of patient treatment decision-aids (DAs) on decisional outcomes and treatment choice for men diagnosed with LPC. Our secondary aim was to examine how DAs have been implemented into routine clinical practice. METHODS A systematic search was conducted up to June 2022 using the following databases: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science. Articles were included if they evaluated the effectiveness of treatment DAs for LPC patients on various decisional outcomes and treatment choice. The Mixed-Method Appraisal Tool was used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias. Data on implementation outcomes were also extracted if reported. RESULTS Twenty-four articles were included for the analysis (seven non-randomised studies, 16 randomised control trials, and one qualitative study). Results showed DAs have the potential to improve patient knowledge but revealed no effects on decisional regret or preparedness in decision-making. Due to the variability in methodology among studies, results varied widely for treatment choice, decision-making involvement, decisional conflict, and treatment decision satisfaction. At least one implementation outcome was reported in 11 of the included studies, with the most commonly assessed outcomes being acceptability and appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS While DAs appear to improve knowledge, further qualitative evaluations and standardised assessments are needed to better understand men's experiences using DAs and to determine advantages and optimal ways to implement DAs into the treatment decision-making pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Todio
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Sharp
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - April Morrow
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carolyn Mazariego
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Posner A, Sivakumaran T, Pattison A, Etemadmoghadam D, Thio N, Wood C, Fisher K, Webb S, DeFazio A, Wilcken N, Gao B, Karapetis CS, Singh M, Collins IM, Richardson G, Steer C, Warren M, Karanth N, Fellowes A, Fox SB, Hicks RJ, Schofield P, Bowtell D, Prall OWJ, Tothill RW, Mileshkin L. Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:jitc-2022-005809. [PMID: 36720497 PMCID: PMC10098268 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs. METHODS Patients with CUP were subject to gene-expression profiling (GEP) and DNA panel sequencing. Immune and stromal-related gene expression was explored by NanoString, including genes associated with immunotherapy response (IR) in other solid malignancies. ICI responsive cancer types were assigned based on Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and either detection of a latent primary tumor or the TOO was suspected based on genomics informed pathology review. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene mutations were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 219 patients with CUP were included, 215 assessed for TOO in a previous study, with the majority (163) receiving both RNA and DNA tests. Of GEP profiled cases, 33% (59/175) had a high IR gene-expression score. Of the DNA sequenced cases, 16% (32/203) had high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb), including two with mismatch repair deficiency. Low correlation was observed between TMB and an IR score (R=0.26, p<0.001). Among 110 CUPs with a latent primary or suspected TOO, 47% (52/110) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. More than half of the CUPs had at least one feature that may predict ICI response (high IR score, high TMB, ICI-responsive cancer type). Among patients with CUP treated with ICIs, 8/28 (29%) responded (2 complete responses and 6 partial responses). Among non-responders, 9 had stable and 11 had progressive disease. All responders had a high IR score (7/8) and/or high TMB (3/8), while most (5/8) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. These features were detected at a lower frequency in non-responders and mostly in patients with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS A significant fraction of CUP tumors had genomic features previously associated with ICI response. High IR score was the most sensitive predictive feature of ICI response, warranting evaluation in a larger patient series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atara Posner
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tharani Sivakumaran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Pattison
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Niko Thio
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Colin Wood
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Krista Fisher
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samantha Webb
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Wilcken
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bo Gao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christos S Karapetis
- Department of Medical Oncology and Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Madhu Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barwon Health Cancer Services, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian M Collins
- Department of Medical Oncology and SouthWest HealthCare, Deakin University - Warrnambool Campus, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gary Richardson
- Medical Oncology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Steer
- Border Medical Oncology, Albury Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Warren
- Medical Oncology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Narayan Karanth
- Division of Medicine, Top End Health and Hospital Services, Alan Walker Cancer Centre, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Andrew Fellowes
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Bowtell
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Owen W J Prall
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard William Tothill
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gordon LG, Wood C, Tothill RW, Webb PM, Schofield P, Mileshkin L. Healthcare Costs Before and After Diagnosis of Cancer of Unknown Primary Versus Ovarian Cancer in Australia. Pharmacoecon Open 2023; 7:111-120. [PMID: 36253664 PMCID: PMC9929003 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-022-00371-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the healthcare resource usage and costs for patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe and quantify healthcare resource use and costs in Australia, 6 months prior to and after a diagnosis of CUP, and compare to those of women with ovarian cancer. METHODS Individual-level data combining baseline surveys, clinical records and Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) claim records were analysed for 149 patients with CUP and 480 patients with ovarian cancer from two prospective cohort studies. MBS data were aggregated for the period 6 months prior to diagnosis date and 6 months after diagnosis. Data included doctor consultations, pathology, diagnostics, therapeutic procedures, imaging, allied health and medicines. Generalised linear models were used to evaluate the cost differences between CUP and ovarian cancer using gamma family and log link functions. Models were adjusted for age, employment, marital status, surgery, chemotherapy and number of comorbidities. RESULTS The mean healthcare costs in the 6 months prior to diagnosis of CUP were Australian (AU) $3903 versus AU$1327 for ovarian cancer (adjusted cost ratio 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-4.15). Mean healthcare costs 6 months post-diagnosis were higher for patients with CUP versus ovarian cancer (AU$20,339 vs AU$13,819, adjusted cost ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.92). Higher costs for patients with CUP were driven by imaging (AU$1937 vs AU$1387), procedures (AU$5403 vs AU$2702) and prescribed medicines for all conditions (AU$10,111 vs AU$6717). CONCLUSIONS Pre-diagnosis costs for patients with CUP are nearly triple those for ovarian cancer. Six months after diagnosis, healthcare costs for CUP remained higher than for ovarian cancer due to imaging, procedures and medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa G Gordon
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Department, Locked Bag 2000, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.
- Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Nursing, Kelvin Grove, Australia.
- The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - C Wood
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R W Tothill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P M Webb
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Department, Locked Bag 2000, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - L Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Than TNH, Nguyen TTT, Nguyen TC, Vu LTD, Vo PT, TTruong K, Schofield P, Nguyen TA. Smartphone app-based intervention for reducing stress, depression, and anxiety in caregivers of people with dementia in Vietnam: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231163786. [PMID: 36937692 PMCID: PMC10014987 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231163786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to: (1) identify the information required by family caregivers of people with dementia to be targeted within our dementia family caregiver intervention and (2) test the feasibility of the intervention and methodology to underpin a fully powered randomized controlled trial. Methods The study setting will be the Department of Geriatrics at Gia Dinh People's Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City. Inclusion criteria will be the family caregivers of people with dementia living in the community, who attend the Department and use smartphones. In phase 1, we will identify the intervention content with family caregivers of people with dementia through 20 in-depth interviews to determine what information and skills they need. In phase 2, a pilot randomized control trial design will be conducted, with 60 family caregivers of people with dementia being assigned to the intervention or control group by the block randomization method with a ratio of 1:1. The intervention will include weekly, online, psycho-educational, group sessions hosted on the Zalo app. The participants will complete questionnaires at baseline, immediately postintervention, and 3-month postintervention. The feasibility of the intervention and methodology will be assessed, including the rates of recruitment, retention, completion of assessments, and acceptability of the intervention. Results The required information and skills in phase 1 may include dealing with worrying behavior changes in people with dementia, emotional support, and seeking support sources. The rates of recruitment, retention, completion of assessments, and acceptability of the intervention will be obtained in phase 2. The scores of symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety in the intervention group may be lower than those in the control group at postintervention and 3-month postintervention. Conclusion The study will provide a foundation for a fully powered clinical trial for the smartphone app-based intervention to reduce stress, depression, and anxiety among family caregivers of people with dementia in Vietnam.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- The NH Than
- Department of Geriatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho
Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, University of Medicine
and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Tran TT Nguyen
- Department of Geriatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho
Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Department of Geriatrics, Gia Dinh People's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Tuan C Nguyen
- Department of Rheumatology, Ho Chi Minh City University Medical
Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Lan TD Vu
- Department of Geriatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho
Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Phong T Vo
- Department of Geriatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho
Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Khoa TTruong
- Department of Geriatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho
Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer
Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department on Oncology, Faculty of Medicine,
Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne,
Australia
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research
Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tuan A Nguyen
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research
Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research
Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia,
Adelaide, Australia
- Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Ministry of Health, Hanoi,
Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Posner A, Prall OW, Sivakumaran T, Etemadamoghadam D, Thio N, Pattison A, Balachander S, Fisher K, Webb S, Wood C, DeFazio A, Wilcken N, Gao B, Karapetis CS, Singh M, Collins IM, Richardson G, Steer C, Warren M, Karanth N, Wright G, Williams S, George J, Hicks RJ, Boussioutas A, Gill AJ, Solomon BJ, Xu H, Fellowes A, Fox SB, Schofield P, Bowtell D, Mileshkin L, Tothill RW. A comparison of DNA sequencing and gene expression profiling to assist tissue of origin diagnosis in cancer of unknown primary. J Pathol 2023; 259:81-92. [PMID: 36287571 PMCID: PMC10099529 DOI: 10.1002/path.6022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a syndrome defined by clinical absence of a primary cancer after standardised investigations. Gene expression profiling (GEP) and DNA sequencing have been used to predict primary tissue of origin (TOO) in CUP and find molecularly guided treatments; however, a detailed comparison of the diagnostic yield from these two tests has not been described. Here, we compared the diagnostic utility of RNA and DNA tests in 215 CUP patients (82% received both tests) in a prospective Australian study. Based on retrospective assessment of clinicopathological data, 77% (166/215) of CUPs had insufficient evidence to support TOO diagnosis (clinicopathology unresolved). The remainder had either a latent primary diagnosis (10%) or clinicopathological evidence to support a likely TOO diagnosis (13%) (clinicopathology resolved). We applied a microarray (CUPGuide) or custom NanoString 18-class GEP test to 191 CUPs with an accuracy of 91.5% in known metastatic cancers for high-medium confidence predictions. Classification performance was similar in clinicopathology-resolved CUPs - 80% had high-medium predictions and 94% were concordant with pathology. Notably, only 56% of the clinicopathology-unresolved CUPs had high-medium confidence GEP predictions. Diagnostic DNA features were interrogated in 201 CUP tumours guided by the cancer type specificity of mutations observed across 22 cancer types from the AACR Project GENIE database (77,058 tumours) as well as mutational signatures (e.g. smoking). Among the clinicopathology-unresolved CUPs, mutations and mutational signatures provided additional diagnostic evidence in 31% of cases. GEP classification was useful in only 13% of cases and oncoviral detection in 4%. Among CUPs where genomics informed TOO, lung and biliary cancers were the most frequently identified types, while kidney tumours were another identifiable subset. In conclusion, DNA and RNA profiling supported an unconfirmed TOO diagnosis in one-third of CUPs otherwise unresolved by clinicopathology assessment alone. DNA mutation profiling was the more diagnostically informative assay. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atara Posner
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Owen Wj Prall
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tharani Sivakumaran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Niko Thio
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Pattison
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shiva Balachander
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Krista Fisher
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samantha Webb
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Colin Wood
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Wilcken
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bo Gao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christos S Karapetis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Madhu Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barwon Health Cancer Services, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Ian M Collins
- Department of Medical Oncology, SouthWest HealthCare, Warrnambool and Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Gary Richardson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Steer
- Border Medical Oncology, Albury Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Warren
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
| | - Narayan Karanth
- Division of Medicine, Alan Walker Cancer Centre, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Gavin Wright
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Scott Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joshy George
- Department of Computational Sciences, The Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- The St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alex Boussioutas
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony J Gill
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical, Research and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Benjamin J Solomon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Huiling Xu
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Fellowes
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Bowtell
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard W Tothill
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Beatty L, Kemp E, Butow P, Girgis A, Hulbert-Williams N, Kaambwa B, Schofield P, Turner J, Woodman R, Boyle F, Daly A, Jones A, Kiely B, Zdenkowski N, Koczwara B. Finding My Way-Advanced: can a web-based psychosocial intervention improve the mental quality of life for women with metastatic breast cancer vs attention-control? Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1353. [PMID: 36566189 PMCID: PMC9789659 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10410-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are at risk of significantly impaired quality of life (QOL), symptom burden, distress and fear of progression, and unmet needs, yet they face barriers to accessing evidence-based psychosocial treatments. Our group therefore developed Finding My Way-Advanced (FMW-A), a web-based self-guided psychosocial program for women with MBC. This study aims to assess its efficacy in improving mental and other QOL domains, distress, fear of progression, unmet needs, and health service utilisation. METHODS The multi-site randomised controlled trial (RCT) will enrol 370 Australian participants. Eligible participants are adult (18 years +) women diagnosed with MBC, with a life expectancy of 6 months or more, with sufficient English-language literacy to provide informed consent. Participants will be identified, screened and referred from one of 10 Australian sites, or via self-referral in response to advertisements. Participants complete four online questionnaires: prior to accessing their program ('baseline'), 6 weeks later ('post-intervention'), then 3 months and 6 months post-intervention. Consenting participants will be randomised to either FMW-A (intervention), or Breast Cancer Network Australia's (BCNA) online/app resource My Journey (minimal intervention attention-control). This is a single-blind study, with randomisation computer-generated and stratified by site. FMW-A is a 6-module program addressing some of the most common issues experienced by women with MBC, with BCNA control resources integrated within the 'resources' section. All modules are immediately accessible, with an additional booster module released 10 weeks later. The primary outcome is mental QOL; statistical criteria for superiority is defined as a 4-point difference between groups at post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include other QOL domains, distress, fear of progression, health service use, intervention adherence, and user satisfaction. DISCUSSION This will be the first adequately powered RCT of a self-directed online intervention for women with MBC. If efficacious, FMW-A will help address two national key priorities for management of MBC - enhancing QOL and reducing symptom burden. FMW-A has the potential to address unmet needs and overcome access barriers for this overlooked population, while reducing health system burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered prospectively with the ANZCTR on 29/10/2021. Trial ID ACTRN12621001482853p. https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=382714&isReview=true.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Beatty
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Emma Kemp
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Penelope Schofield
- grid.1027.40000 0004 0409 2862Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia ,grid.1055.10000000403978434Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Turner
- grid.1003.20000 0000 9320 7537University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Richard Woodman
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Anthony Daly
- grid.492269.20000 0001 2233 2629Cancer Council South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Amanda Jones
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, Australia
| | - Belinda Kiely
- grid.460708.d0000 0004 0640 3353Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, Australia
| | - Nicholas Zdenkowski
- grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | | | - Bogda Koczwara
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia ,Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wolyniec K, Sharp J, Fisher K, Tothill RW, Bowtell D, Mileshkin L, Schofield P. Psychological distress, understanding of cancer and illness uncertainty in patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary. Psychooncology 2022; 31:1869-1876. [PMID: 35765251 PMCID: PMC9796856 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients diagnosed with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) experience high levels of psychological distress and report poor understanding of their cancer. We aimed to investigate: (1) if CUP patients with poorer understanding of their cancer diagnosis and testing experience more symptoms of psychological distress than those with better understanding; (2) if the relationship between patients' understanding of their cancer and psychological distress is mediated by illness uncertainty; and (3) explore whether patients' degree of understanding of their cancer can be predicted by clinical and socio-demographic factors. METHODS 209 CUP patients completed a questionnaire measuring anxiety, depression, illness uncertainty, fatigue, pain, sleep and understanding of their cancer. Using an apriori theoretical framework, we employed structural equation modelling to investigate predictors of patient's understanding of their cancer and psychological distress and the relationships between understanding, illness uncertainty and distress. RESULTS The structural equation model displayed good fit indices and supported the hypothesised relationship of patient's understanding of their cancer and the extent of psychological distress, which was mediated via illness uncertainty. Physical symptoms were positively associated with psychological distress and illness uncertainty. Younger age was predictive of lower patient's understanding of their cancer and higher levels of psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CUP, particularly those who are younger and experiencing more physical symptoms, report higher levels of psychological distress and may require additional mental health support. Our findings highlight a need to improve CUP patient's understanding about their illness, which could help reduce their illness uncertainty and alleviate psychological distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Wolyniec
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Department of Psychological SciencesSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jessica Sharp
- Department of Psychological SciencesSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Krista Fisher
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Richard W. Tothill
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Department of Clinical PathologyUniversity of Melbourne Centre for Cancer ResearchMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - David Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - Penelope Schofield
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Department of Psychological SciencesSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dunham M, Bacon L, Cottom S, McCrone P, Mehrpouya H, Spyridonis F, Thompson T, Schofield P. Chronic pain through COVID. Front Pain Res 2022; 3:937652. [PMID: 36341152 PMCID: PMC9629777 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.937652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To identify good practice in the community management of chronic pain, and to understand the perspective of a group of healthcare service users towards the management of chronic pain using technology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Forty-five people, recruited via social media and Pain Association Scotland, participated in three focus groups hosted over Zoom. Focus groups were conducted using semi-structured questions to guide the conversation. Data were analysed using Ritchie / Spencer's Framework Analysis. Results The participants shared observations of their experiences of remotely supported chronic pain services and insights into the potential for future chronic pain care provision. Experiences were in the majority positive with some describing their rapid engagement with technology during the COVID pandemic. Conclusion Results suggest there is strong potential for telehealth to complement and support existing provision of pain management services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Dunham
- School of Health / Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Correspondence: M. Dunham
| | - L. Bacon
- School of Design and Informatics, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - S. Cottom
- Pain Association Scotland, Perth, United Kingdom
| | - P. McCrone
- Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
| | - H. Mehrpouya
- School of Design and Informatics, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - F. Spyridonis
- Department of Computer Science, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - T. Thompson
- School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
| | - P. Schofield
- University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kosowicz L, Tran K, Khanh TT, Dang TH, Pham VA, Ta Thi Kim H, Thi Bach Duong H, Nguyen TD, Phuong AT, Le TH, Ta VA, Wickramasinghe N, Schofield P, Zelcer J, Pham Le T, Nguyen TA. Lessons for Vietnam on the use of digital technologies to support patient-centred care in low- and middle-income countries in the Asia Pacific Region: A scoping review (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e43224. [PMID: 37018013 PMCID: PMC10132046 DOI: 10.2196/43224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A rapidly aging population, a shifting disease burden and the ongoing threat of infectious disease outbreaks pose major concerns for Vietnam's health care system. Health disparities are evident in many parts of the country, especially in rural areas, and the population faces inequitable access to patient-centered health care. Vietnam must therefore explore and implement advanced solutions to the provision of patient-centered care, with a view to reducing pressures on the health care system simultaneously. The use of digital health technologies (DHTs) may be one of these solutions. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify the application of DHTs to support the provision of patient-centered care in low- and middle-income countries in the Asia-Pacific region (APR) and to draw lessons for Vietnam. METHODS A scoping review was undertaken. Systematic searches of 7 databases were conducted in January 2022 to identify publications on DHTs and patient-centered care in the APR. Thematic analysis was conducted, and DHTs were classified using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence evidence standards framework for DHTs (tiers A, B, and C). Reporting was in line with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. RESULTS Of the 264 publications identified, 45 (17%) met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the DHTs were classified as tier C (15/33, 45%), followed by tier B (14/33, 42%) and tier A (4/33, 12%). At an individual level, DHTs increased accessibility of health care and health-related information, supported individuals in self-management, and led to improvements in clinical and quality-of-life outcomes. At a systems level, DHTs supported patient-centered outcomes by increasing efficiency, reducing strain on health care resources, and supporting patient-centered clinical practice. The most frequently reported enablers for the use of DHTs for patient-centered care included alignment of DHTs with users' individual needs, ease of use, availability of direct support from health care professionals, provision of technical support as well as user education and training, appropriate governance of privacy and security, and cross-sectorial collaboration. Common barriers included low user literacy and digital literacy, limited user access to DHT infrastructure, and a lack of policies and protocols to guide the implementation and use of DHTs. CONCLUSIONS The use of DHTs is a viable option to increase equitable access to quality, patient-centered care across Vietnam and simultaneously reduce pressures on the health care system. Vietnam can take advantage of the lessons learned by other low- and middle-income countries in the APR when developing a national road map to digital health transformation. Recommendations that Vietnamese policy makers may consider include emphasizing stakeholder engagement, strengthening digital literacy, supporting the improvement of DHT infrastructure, increasing cross-sectorial collaboration, strengthening governance of cybersecurity, and leading the way in DHT uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leona Kosowicz
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Kham Tran
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Toan Tran Khanh
- Department of Family Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Thu Ha Dang
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Hue Ta Thi Kim
- New Horizon Palliative Care Company Limited, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | | | - Van Anh Ta
- New Horizon Palliative Care Company Limited, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Nilmini Wickramasinghe
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John Zelcer
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tuan Pham Le
- Department of Family Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Military and Civil Medical Association of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Tuan Anh Nguyen
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Ministry of Health of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gough K, Bergin RJ, Drosdowsky A, Aranda S, Mileshkin L, Jackson M, Kinnane N, Bernshaw D, Juraskova I, White K, Mohamed M, Schofield P. Women with gynaecological cancer awaiting radiotherapy: Self-reported wellbeing, general psychological distress, symptom distress, sexual function, and supportive care needs. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:42-50. [PMID: 36064679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better serve women with gynaecological cancers, we need a sound understanding of their health, wellbeing and needs. This study sought to explore these issues in a sample of Australian women before commencing curative radiotherapy. METHODS We undertook a secondary analysis of baseline data from a supportive care trial (n = 311). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise responses to measures of wellbeing, general psychological distress, symptom distress, sexual function and vaginal changes, and supportive care needs. Pre-specified regression models were used to examine sources of variation in wellbeing and sexual function. RESULTS Women reported lower emotional, functional and physical wellbeing than population norms (all p < 0.001). The prevalence of general psychological distress was 31% (95% CI 26-36%). Distress caused by physical symptoms was typically low. Health system and information needs comprised eight of the top ten moderate-to-high supportive care needs. Most women reported no change in interest for physical contact or sex compared to pre-diagnosis, but some sexually active women (16-24%) reported smaller vaginal size, increased dryness, and more pain on intercourse. General psychological distress was a robust marker of poorer wellbeing and sexual function. CONCLUSIONS Before radiotherapy, a substantial minority of women with gynaecological cancers experience general psychological distress, reduced wellbeing and moderate-to-high health system and information needs. A model of comprehensive care incorporating assessment of unmet needs, general psychological distress, and sexual issues is recommended. Healthcare providers may require training to elicit and respond to a constellation of interrelated issues and access relevant services for women requiring additional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla Gough
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Rebecca Jane Bergin
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allison Drosdowsky
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sanchia Aranda
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Jackson
- School of Clinical Medicine, Randwick Campus, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Kinnane
- Gynaecology Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Bernshaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre of Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Cancer Care Research Unit, Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mustafa Mohamed
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Psychological Sciences, Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hyatt A, Lipson-Smith R, Gough K, Butow P, Jefford M, Hack TF, Hale S, Zucchi E, White S, Ozolins U, Schofield P. Including migrant oncology patients in research: A multisite pilot randomised controlled trial testing consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 28:100932. [PMID: 35677588 PMCID: PMC9167883 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Oncology patients who are migrants or refugees face worse outcomes due to language and communication barriers impacting care. Interventions such as consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists may prove beneficial in mediating communication challenges. However, designing robust research inclusive of patients who do not speak English is challenging. This study therefore aimed to: a) pilot test and assess the appropriateness of the proposed research design and methods for engaging migrant populations, and b) determine whether a multi-site RCT efficacy assessment of the communication intervention utilising these methods is feasible. Methods This study is a mixed-methods parallel-group, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial. Feasibility outcomes comprised assessment of: i) screening and recruitment processes, ii) design and procedures, and iii) research time and costing. The communication intervention comprised audio-recordings of a key medical consultation with an interpreter, and question prompt lists and cancer information translated into Arabic, Greek, Traditional, and Simplified Chinese. Results Assessment of feasibility parameters revealed that despite barriers, methods utilised in this study supported the inclusion of migrant oncology patients in research. A future multi-site RCT efficacy assessment of the INFORM communication intervention using these methods is feasible if recommendations to strengthen screening and recruitment are adopted. Importantly, hiring of bilingual research assistants, and engagement with community and consumer advocates is essential. Early involvement of clinical and interpreting staff as key stakeholders is likewise recommended. Conclusion Results from this feasibility RCT help us better understand and overcome the challenges and misconceptions about including migrant patients in clinical research. Migrant oncology patients face worse health outcomes due to language barriers. Consultation recording and question prompt lists are effective communication interventions. Designing robust research methods which overcome language barriers is important and achievable. Engaging with community advocates and hiring of bilingual staff are research design strategies.
Collapse
|
31
|
Gough K, Pascoe MC, Bergin R, Drosdowsky A, Schofield P. Differential adherence to peer and nurse components of a supportive care package-The appeal of peer support may be related to women's health and psychological status. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:762-768. [PMID: 34244032 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Knowledge of factors associated with intervention non-adherence may provide insights into the clinical utility of non-pharmacologic interventions. METHODS This study compared complete and incomplete adherers to two separate components of a novel intervention package for women undergoing curative intent radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer on socio-demographic, clinical and pre-radiotherapy patient-reported outcomes data. RESULTS Adherence to the tailored specialist nurse consultations was satisfactory (71% participated in all available sessions, 19% participated in all but one). Adherence to the telephone peer support sessions was less satisfactory (47% participated in all available sessions, 24% participated in all but one session). Complete adherers to the peer sessions reported significantly lower levels of psychological distress and significantly higher levels of physical, emotional and functional wellbeing before radiotherapy. No other statistically significant differences were observed between complete and incomplete adherers to the nurse- or peer-led sessions. CONCLUSION Women's ability or motivation to engage with peer support may be influenced by their health and psychological status. Further, the extent of intervention non-adherence to the peer-led component may have compromised the assessment of its efficacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Peer support may be less acceptable or appropriate for women with more complex care needs. Such women may prefer specialised care from trained professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla Gough
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Michaela C Pascoe
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia.
| | - Rebecca Bergin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Allison Drosdowsky
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Guccione L, Gough K, Drosdowsky A, Price T, Pavlakis N, Wyld D, Ransom D, Michael M, Schofield P. The unmet supportive care needs, quality of life, and care experiences of patients with functioning and non-functioning Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) at early diagnosis. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:212-220. [PMID: 34030927 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Healthcare experiences, quality of life and psychosocial needs of patients with Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) will be assessed to identify differences between NET sub-groups and inform the design of supportive care services. METHODS This study constitutes phase one of a three-phase mixed-methods multi-site study with NET patients (n = 123). Demographic, clinical and patient reported outcome questionnaire data was collected. RESULTS No differences in patient reported outcomes were found beyond symptoms of diarrhoea and flushing between NET sub-groups. For combined NET patients, the majority reported negative experiences in their understanding of the explanation of what was wrong with them (67%); receiving written information about their cancer (69%), their family/carer receiving all the information required to care for them (61%); and the usefulness of information about NETs online (66%). NET patients reported at least one moderate-to-high need for disease specific information (63%). Medium- to large-sized differences in quality of life subscales were also observed with the functioning group reporting more anxiety compared to population norms. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to improve the current provision of information for people with NETs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These findings will inform the design and development of an informational resource to facilitate improved understanding for patients with NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Guccione
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department on Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Karla Gough
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Allison Drosdowsky
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Timothy Price
- Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Nick Pavlakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - David Wyld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - David Ransom
- Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Michael Michael
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Neuroendocrine Unit, an ENETs Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department on Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nguyen TA, Tran K, Esterman A, Brijnath B, Xiao LD, Schofield P, Bhar S, Wickramasinghe N, Sinclair R, Dang TH, Cullum S, Turana Y, Hinton L, Seeher K, Andrade AQ, Crotty M, Kurrle S, Freel S, Pham T, Nguyen TB, Brodaty H. Empowering Dementia Carers With an iSupport Virtual Assistant (e-DiVA) in Asia-Pacific Regional Countries: Protocol for a Pilot Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e33572. [PMID: 34783660 PMCID: PMC8663455 DOI: 10.2196/33572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dementia is a global public health priority with an estimated prevalence of 150 million by 2050, nearly two-thirds of whom will live in the Asia-Pacific region. Dementia creates significant care needs for people with the disease, their families, and carers. iSupport is a self-help platform developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to provide education, skills training, and support to dementia carers. It has been adapted in some contexts (Australia, India, the Netherlands, and Portugal). Carers using the existing adapted versions have identified the need to have a more user-friendly version that enables them to identify solutions for immediate problems quickly in real time. The iSupport virtual assistant (iSupport VA) is being developed to address this gap and will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Objective This paper reports the protocol of a pilot RCT evaluating the iSupport VA. Methods Seven versions of iSupport VA will be evaluated in Australia, Indonesia, New Zealand, and Vietnam in a pilot RCT. Feasibility, acceptability, intention to use, and preliminary impact on carer-perceived stress of the iSupport VA intervention will be assessed. Results This study was funded by the e-ASIA Joint Research Program in November 2020. From January to July 2023, we will enroll 140 dementia carers (20 carers per iSupport VA version) for the pilot RCT. The study has been approved by the Human Research Committee, University of South Australia, Australia (203455). Conclusions This protocol outlines how a technologically enhanced version of the WHO iSupport program—the iSupport VA—will be evaluated. The findings from this intervention study will provide evidence on the feasibility and acceptability of the iSupport VA intervention, which will be the basis for conducting a full RCT to assess the effectiveness of the iSupport VA. The study will be an important reference for countries planning to adapt and enhance the WHO iSupport program using digital health solutions. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001452886; https://tinyurl.com/afum5tjz International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/33572
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuan Anh Nguyen
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Kham Tran
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Adrian Esterman
- UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Bianca Brijnath
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lily Dongxia Xiao
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sunil Bhar
- Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nilmini Wickramasinghe
- Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ronald Sinclair
- Faculty of Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Thu Ha Dang
- Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah Cullum
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Yuda Turana
- School of Medicine, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ladson Hinton
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Katrin Seeher
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andre Q Andrade
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Susan Kurrle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stefanie Freel
- Department of Germanic Languages and Literature, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thang Pham
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Disease, Vietnam National Geriatric Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Thanh Binh Nguyen
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Disease, Vietnam National Geriatric Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Dang TH, Forkan ARM, Wickramasinghe N, Jayaraman PP, Alexander M, Burbury K, Schofield P. Investigation of intervention solutions to enhance adherence to oral anti-cancer medicines in adults: an overview of reviews (Preprint). JMIR Cancer 2021; 8:e34833. [PMID: 35475978 PMCID: PMC9096640 DOI: 10.2196/34833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adherence to anticancer medicines is critical for the success of cancer treatments; however, nonadherence remains challenging, and there is limited evidence of interventions to improve adherence to medicines in patients with cancer. Objective This overview of reviews aimed to identify and summarize available reviews of interventions to improve adherence to oral anticancer medicines in adult cancer survivors. Methods A comprehensive search of 7 electronic databases was conducted by 2 reviewers who independently conducted the study selection, quality assessment using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2, and data extraction. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist was adapted to report the results. Results A total of 29 reviews were included in the narrative synthesis. The overall quality of the systematic reviews was low. The 4 main strategies to promote adherence were focused on education, reminders, behavior and monitoring, and multicomponent approaches. Digital technology–based interventions were reported in most reviews (27/29, 93%). A few interventions applied theories (10/29, 34%), design frameworks (2/29, 7%), or engaged stakeholders (1/29, 3%) in the development processes. The effectiveness of interventions was inconsistent between and within reviews. However, interventions using multiple strategies to promote adherence were more likely to be effective than single-strategy interventions (12/29, 41% reviews). Unidirectional communication (7/29, 24% reviews) and technology alone (11/29, 38% reviews) were not sufficient to demonstrate improvement in adherence outcomes. Nurses and pharmacists played a critical role in promoting patient adherence to oral cancer therapies, especially with the support of digital technologies (7/29, 24% reviews). Conclusions Multicomponent interventions are potentially effective in promoting patient adherence to oral anticancer medicines. The seamless integration of digital solutions with direct clinical contacts is likely to be effective in promoting adherence. Future research for developing comprehensive digital adherence interventions should be evidence-based, theory-based, and rigorously evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thu Ha Dang
- Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan
- Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nilmini Wickramasinghe
- Department Health and Bio Statistics, School of Health Sciences and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Prem Prakash Jayaraman
- Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marliese Alexander
- Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate Burbury
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital and Healthcare Innovation, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Perera SM, O'Callaghan C, Ugalde A, Santin O, Beer C, Prue G, Lane K, Hanna GG, Schofield P. Codesigning a supportive online resource for Australian cancer carers: a thematic analysis of informal carers' and healthcare professionals' perspectives about carers' responsibilities and content needs. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055026. [PMID: 34598994 PMCID: PMC8488722 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To gather preliminary qualitative data that will assist in the codesign and development of a new informational and supportive website to assist informal cancer carers in Australia. DESIGN AND SETTING Utilising a previously tested codesign process, informal carers' experiences and perspectives, including those of healthcare professionals', were examined via focus groups and/or interviews. Data were analysed via thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS Rural (n=9) and urban (n=11) carers', and healthcare professionals' (n=8) perspectives were collected. Carers participated in a focus group (n=9) or telephone interview (n=11). Healthcare professionals completed an interview (n=6) or online survey (n=2). RESULTS Rural and urban carers typically felt ill prepared for their multitudinal caregiving responsibilities. Supporting patient-to-healthcare professional liaisons could especially challenge. Carers' biopsychosocial and fiscal strains were affected by patients' hardships and available informal supports. Rural carers described greater social support than urban carers. Both rural and urban carers also described discontentment related to a carer neglecting healthcare system. Both carers and healthcare professionals endorsed the need for a user-friendly, carer-specific website encompassing practical information and resources, peer-driven advice and evidence-based illness information, tailored to the Australian context. CONCLUSIONS Carers and healthcare professionals recognise the pressing need for an Australian, cancer carer-specific online resource. Findings will inform the next phase, where a resource will be designed, developed and tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharnel Miriam Perera
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
- Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare O'Callaghan
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Caritas Christi Hospice and Department of Psychosocial Cancer Care, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Olinda Santin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Cassandra Beer
- Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prevention and Wellbeing, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - G Prue
- Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast School of Nursing and Midwifery, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Katherine Lane
- Cancer Information and Support Services, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
- Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dang TH, Nguyen TA, Hoang Van M, Santin O, Tran OMT, Schofield P. Patient-Centered Care: Transforming the Health Care System in Vietnam With Support of Digital Health Technology. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e24601. [PMID: 34085939 PMCID: PMC8214185 DOI: 10.2196/24601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Over the recent decades, Vietnam has attained remarkable achievements in all areas of health care. However, shortcomings including health disparities persist particularly with a rapidly aging population. This has resulted in a shift in the disease burden from communicable to noncommunicable diseases such as dementia, cancer, and diabetes. These medical conditions require long-term care, which causes an accelerating crisis for the health sector and society. The current health care system in Vietnam is unlikely to cope with these challenges. Objective The aim of this paper was to explore the opportunities, challenges, and necessary conditions for Vietnam in transforming toward a patient-centered care model to produce better health for people and reduce health care costs. Methods We examine the applicability of a personalized and integrated Bespoke Health Care System (BHS) for Vietnam using a strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat analysis and examining the successes or failures of digital health care innovations in Vietnam. We then make suggestions for successful adoption of the BHS model in Vietnam. Results The BHS model of patient-centered care empowers patients to become active participants in their own health care. Vietnam’s current policy, social, technological, and economic environment favors the transition of its health care system toward the BHS model. Nevertheless, the country is in an early stage of health care digitalization. The legal and regulatory system to protect patient privacy and information security is still lacking. The readiness to implement electronic medical records, a core element of the BHS, varies across health providers and clinical practices. The scarcity of empirical evidence and evaluation regarding the effectiveness and sustainability of digital health initiatives is an obstacle to the Vietnamese government in policymaking, development, and implementation of health care digitalization. Conclusions Implementing a personalized and integrated health care system may help Vietnam to address health care needs, reduce pressure on the health care system and society, improve health care delivery, and promote health equity. However, in order to adopt the patient-centered care system and digitalized health care, a whole-system approach in transformation and operation with a co-design in the whole span of a digital health initiative developing process are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thu Ha Dang
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tuan Anh Nguyen
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.,Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Quality Use of Medicines & Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Minh Hoang Van
- Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.,National Institute of Health Sciences, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Olinda Santin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | | | - Penelope Schofield
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Juraskova I, Laidsaar-Powell R, Keast R, Schofield P, Costa DS, Kay J, Turner S, Koczwara B, Saunders C, Jefford M, Yates P, Boyle F, White K, Miller A, Morton RL, Butt Z, Butow P. eTRIO trial: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of online education modules to facilitate effective family caregiver involvement in oncology. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e043224. [PMID: 34049902 PMCID: PMC8166623 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Informal family caregivers play a crucial role in cancer care. Effective caregiver involvement in cancer care can improve both patient and caregiver outcomes. Despite this, interventions improving the caregiver involvement are sparse. This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial evaluating the combined effectiveness of novel online caregiver communication education modules for: (1) oncology clinicians (eTRIO) and (2) patients with cancer and caregivers (eTRIO-pc). METHODS AND ANALYSIS Thirty medical/radiation/surgical oncology or haematology doctors and nurses will be randomly allocated to either intervention (eTRIO) or control (an Australian State Government Health website on caregivers) education conditions. Following completion of education, each clinician will recruit nine patient-caregiver pairs, who will be allocated to the same condition as their recruiting clinician. Eligibility includes any new adult patient diagnosed with any type/stage cancer attending consultations with a caregiver. Approximately 270 patient-caregiver pairs will be recruited. The primary outcome is caregiver self-efficacy in triadic (clinician-patient-caregiver) communication. Patient and clinician self-efficacy in triadic communication are secondary outcomes. Additional secondary outcomes for clinicians include preferences for caregiver involvement, perceived module usability/acceptability, analysis of module use, satisfaction with the module, knowledge of strategies and feedback interviews. Secondary outcomes for caregivers and patients include preferences for caregiver involvement, satisfaction with clinician communication, distress, quality of life, healthcare expenditure, perceived module usability/acceptability and analysis of module use. A subset of patients and caregivers will complete feedback interviews. Secondary outcomes for caregivers include preparedness for caregiving, patient-caregiver communication and caring experience. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, and 1 week, 12 weeks and 26 weeks post-intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been received by the Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (REGIS project ID number: 2019/PID09787), with site-specific approval from each recruitment site. Protocol V.7 (dated 1 September 2020) is currently approved and reported in this manuscript. Findings will be disseminated via presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Engagement with clinicians, media, government, consumers and peak cancer groups will facilitate widespread dissemination and long-term availability of the educational modules. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12619001507178.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilona Juraskova
- School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - R Laidsaar-Powell
- School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachael Keast
- School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Sj Costa
- Pain Management Research Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Judy Kay
- School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Engineering, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sandra Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bogda Koczwara
- Flinders University School of Medicine, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christobel Saunders
- Division of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patsy Yates
- Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Frances Boyle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care & Research, Mater Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit, University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annie Miller
- Cancer Information and Support Services Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zoe Butt
- School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Berg MN, Ngune I, Schofield P, Grech L, Juraskova I, Strasser M, Butt Z, Halkett GKB. Effectiveness of online communication skills training for cancer and palliative care health professionals: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2021; 30:1405-1419. [PMID: 33909328 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the reported effect of online communication skills training (CST) on health professional (HP) communication skills and patient care outcomes in cancer and palliative care. METHODS Primary research published in English between January 2003 and April 2019 was identified in bibliographic databases including Medline, Embase and Proquest (Prospero: CRD42018088681). An integrated mixed-method approach included studies describing a CST intervention and its effect, for cancer or palliative care HPs, delivered online or blended with an online component. Included studies' outcomes were categorised then findings were stratified by an evaluation framework and synthesised in an effect direction plot. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute's tools. RESULTS Nineteen included studies (five randomised controlled trials, 11 pre-post, two post-test and one qualitative study) evaluated a CST intervention (median duration = 3.75 h; range 0.66-96 h) involving 1116 HPs, 422 students and 732 patients. Most interventions taught communication skills for specific scenarios and approximately half were delivered solely online and did not involve role plays. Online CST improved HPs' self-assessed communication skills (three studies, 215 participants), confidence (four studies, 533 participants), and objective knowledge (five studies, 753 participants). While few studies evaluated patient outcomes, CST may benefit observed communication skills in care settings (two studies, 595 participants). CONCLUSIONS Online CST benefits oncology HPs' subjectively-reported communication skills and confidence, and objective knowledge. Translation to patient outcomes requires further investigation. The quality of research varied and few studies had a control group. We recommend improvements to study design, evaluation and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa N Berg
- Curtin School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Irene Ngune
- Curtin School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Grech
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Strasser
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zoe Butt
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgia K B Halkett
- Curtin School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Stafford L, Sinclair M, Rauch P, Turner J, Mann GB, Newman L, Wakefield CE, Gilham L, Mason K, Cannell J, Little R, Schofield P. Feasibility of Enhancing Parenting in Cancer, a psychoeducational intervention for communicating with children about parental cancer. Psychooncology 2021; 30:1172-1177. [PMID: 33599354 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Stafford
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Sinclair
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paula Rauch
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jane Turner
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - G Bruce Mann
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,The Breast Service, The Royal Melbourne and Royal Women's Hospitals, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Newman
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leslie Gilham
- Consumer Representative, Breast Cancer Network Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kylie Mason
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julia Cannell
- Consumer Representative, Breast Cancer Network Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ruth Little
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schofield P, Gough K, Hyatt A, White A, Frydenberg M, Chambers S, Gordon LG, Gardiner R, Murphy DG, Cavedon L, Richards N, Murphy B, Quinn S, Juraskova I. Correction to: Navigate: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an online treatment decision aid for men with low-risk prostate cancer and their partners. Trials 2021; 22:97. [PMID: 33504356 PMCID: PMC7839185 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05070-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. .,Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, Australia.
| | - Karla Gough
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amelia Hyatt
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alan White
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Urology, Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia
| | - Louisa G Gordon
- Population Health Department, Health Economics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert Gardiner
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lawrence Cavedon
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Richards
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Barbara Murphy
- Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Quinn
- Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schofield P, Gough K, Hyatt A, White A, Frydenberg M, Chambers S, Gordon LG, Gardiner R, Murphy DG, Cavedon L, Richards N, Murphy B, Quinn S, Juraskova I. Navigate: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an online treatment decision aid for men with low-risk prostate cancer and their partners. Trials 2021; 22:49. [PMID: 33430950 PMCID: PMC7802237 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04986-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is the disease management option of choice for low-risk prostate cancer. Despite this, men with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) find management decisions distressing and confusing. We developed Navigate, an online decision aid to help men and their partners make management decisions consistent with their values. The aims are to evaluate the impact of Navigate on uptake of AS; decision-making preparedness; decisional conflict, regret and satisfaction; quality of illness communication; and prostate cancer-specific quality of life and anxiety. In addition, the healthcare cost impact, cost-effectiveness and patterns of use of Navigate will be assessed. This paper describes the study protocol. METHODS Three hundred four men and their partners are randomly assigned one-to-one to Navigate or to the control arm. Randomisation is electronically generated and stratified by site. Navigate is an online decision aid that presents up-to-date, unbiased information on LRPC tailored to Australian men and their partners including each management option and potential side-effects, and an interactive values clarification exercise. Participants in the control arm will be directed to the website of Australia's peak national body for prostate cancer. Eligible patients will be men within 3 months of being diagnosed with LRPC, aged 18 years or older, and who are yet to make a treatment decision, who are deemed eligible for AS by their treating clinician and who have Internet access and sufficient English to participate. The primary outcome is self-reported uptake of AS as the first-line management option. Secondary outcomes include self-reported preparedness for decision-making; decisional conflict, regret and satisfaction; quality of illness communication; and prostate cancer-specific quality of life. Uptake of AS 1 month after consent will be determined through patient self-report. Men and their partners will complete study outcome measures before randomisation and 1, 3 and 6 months after study consent. DISCUSSION The Navigate online decision aid has the potential to increase the choice of AS in LRPC, avoiding or delaying unnecessary radical treatments and associated side effects. In addition, Navigate is likely to reduce patients' and partners' confusion and distress in management decision-making and increase their quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12616001665426 . Registered on 2 December 2016. All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data set can be found in this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. .,Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, Australia.
| | - Karla Gough
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amelia Hyatt
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alan White
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Urology, Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia
| | - Louisa G Gordon
- Population Health Department, Health Economics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert Gardiner
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lawrence Cavedon
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Richards
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Barbara Murphy
- Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Quinn
- Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hegel J, Halkett GKB, Schofield P, Rees CS, Heritage B, Suleman S, Inhestern L, Butler T, Fitch MI, Breen LJ. The Relationship Between Present-Centered Awareness and Attention, Burnout, and Compassion Fatigue in Oncology Health Professionals. Mindfulness (N Y) 2021; 12:1224-1233. [PMID: 33425059 PMCID: PMC7782572 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-020-01591-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Oncology health professionals experience high levels of burnout and compassion fatigue, affecting their health and the care they provide. This study aimed to establish whether present-centered awareness and attention (a component of mindfulness) is uniquely associated with burnout and compassion fatigue in oncology professionals. Methods An international sample of oncology professionals (n = 118) completed an online questionnaire with validated measures of present-centered awareness and attention, empathy, compassion fatigue, and burnout. Hierarchical multiple regressions were used to model relations among the independent variable (present-centered awareness and attention) and the criterion variables of burnout (disengagement, exhaustion) and compassion fatigue (compassion satisfaction, compassion burnout, secondary traumatic stress) after statistically controlling for empathy, age, gender, years of experience, and patient contact hours. Results Mean hours of patient contact per week was 23.52 (SD = 13.62), with 26 (22.03%) reporting 40 h or more. Higher hours of patient contact per week were positively associated with secondary traumatic stress. Present-centered awareness and attention was associated with lower disengagement, lower emotional exhaustion, higher compassion satisfaction, lower secondary traumatic stress, and lower compassion burnout. In each model, present-centered awareness accounted for unique variance after controlling for age, gender, years of experience, patient contact hours per week, and empathy scores. The amount of unique variance accounted for by present-centered awareness ranged from 4 to 10%. Conclusions Oncology professionals reporting higher levels of present-centered awareness and attention reported higher compassion satisfaction and lower secondary traumatic stress, compassion burnout, exhaustion, and disengagement. Promoting present-centered awareness may be a mechanism that contributes to less burnout in oncology professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Hegel
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia
| | - Georgia K B Halkett
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria Australia.,Department of Behavioural Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Clare S Rees
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia
| | - Brody Heritage
- School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia Australia
| | - Sahil Suleman
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Inhestern
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Butler
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama United States of America
| | - Margaret I Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lauren J Breen
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kirk R, Ratcliffe A, Noonan G, Uosis-Martin M, Lyth D, Bardell-Cox O, Massam J, Schofield P, Hindley S, Jones DR, Maclean J, Smith A, Savage V, Mohmed S, Charrier C, Salisbury AM, Moyo E, Metzger R, Chalam-Judge N, Cheung J, Stokes NR, Best S, Craighead M, Armer R, Huxley A. Rational design, synthesis and testing of novel tricyclic topoisomerase inhibitors for the treatment of bacterial infections part 1. RSC Med Chem 2020; 11:1366-1378. [PMID: 34095844 DOI: 10.1039/d0md00174k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The alarming reduction in drug effectiveness against bacterial infections has created an urgent need for the development of new antibacterial agents that circumvent bacterial resistance mechanisms. We report here a series of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV inhibitors that demonstrate potent activity against a range of Gram-positive and selected Gram-negative organisms, including clinically-relevant and drug-resistant strains. In part 1, we present a detailed structure activity relationship (SAR) analysis that led to the discovery of our previously disclosed compound, REDX05931, which has a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.06 μg mL-1 against fluoroquinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Although in vitro hERG and CYP inhibition precluded further development, it validates a rational design approach to address this urgent unmet medical need and provides a scaffold for further optimisation, which is presented in part 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Kirk
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - A Ratcliffe
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - G Noonan
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - M Uosis-Martin
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - D Lyth
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - O Bardell-Cox
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - J Massam
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - P Schofield
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - S Hindley
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - D R Jones
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - J Maclean
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - A Smith
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - V Savage
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - S Mohmed
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - C Charrier
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - A-M Salisbury
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - E Moyo
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - R Metzger
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - N Chalam-Judge
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - J Cheung
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - N R Stokes
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - S Best
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - M Craighead
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - R Armer
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| | - A Huxley
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd, Alderley Park, Mereside Macclesfield SK10 4TG UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kirk R, Ratcliffe A, Noonan G, Uosis-Martin M, Lyth D, Bardell-Cox O, Massam J, Schofield P, Lyons A, Clare D, Maclean J, Smith A, Savage V, Mohmed S, Charrier C, Salisbury AM, Moyo E, Ooi N, Chalam-Judge N, Cheung J, Stokes NR, Best S, Craighead M, Armer R, Huxley A. Rational design, synthesis and testing of novel tricyclic topoisomerase inhibitors for the treatment of bacterial infections part 2. RSC Med Chem 2020; 11:1379-1385. [PMID: 34095845 PMCID: PMC8126889 DOI: 10.1039/d0md00175a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Building on our previously-reported novel tricyclic topoisomerase inhibitors (NTTIs), we disclose the discovery of REDX07965, which has an MIC90 of 0.5 μg mL-1 against Staphylococcus aureus, favourable in vitro pharmacokinetic properties, selectivity versus human topoisomerase II and an acceptable toxicity profile. The results herein validate a rational design approach to address the urgent unmet medical need for novel antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Kirk
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - A Ratcliffe
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - G Noonan
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - M Uosis-Martin
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - D Lyth
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - O Bardell-Cox
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - J Massam
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - P Schofield
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - A Lyons
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - D Clare
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - J Maclean
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - A Smith
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - V Savage
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - S Mohmed
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - C Charrier
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - A-M Salisbury
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - E Moyo
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - N Ooi
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - N Chalam-Judge
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - J Cheung
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - N R Stokes
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - S Best
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - M Craighead
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - R Armer
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| | - A Huxley
- Redx Anti-Infectives Ltd Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TG Cheshire UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schofield P, Gough K, Pascoe M, Bergin R, White K, Mileshkin L, Bernshaw D, Kinnane N, Jackson M, Do V, Brand A, Aranda S, Cheuk R, Drosdowsky A, Penberthy S, Juraskova I. A nurse- and peer-led psycho-educational intervention to support women with gynaecological cancers receiving curative radiotherapy: The PeNTAGOn randomised controlled trial – ANZGOG 1102. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:785-793. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
46
|
Kuswanto CN, Sharp J, Stafford L, Schofield P. Posttraumatic growth as a buffer and a vulnerability for psychological distress in mothers who are breast cancer survivors. J Affect Disord 2020; 275:31-37. [PMID: 32658820 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the role of posttraumatic growth (PTG) in moderating the associations between parenting efficacy and psychological distress, and between fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and psychological distress, in mothers who are breast cancer survivors. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, mothers who were breast cancer survivors (N = 91) completed the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), Cancer-Related Parenting Self-Efficacy (CaPSE), Concerns About Cancer Recurrence (CARS) and Posttraumatic Growth Inventory Short Form (PTGI-SF). Hierarchical multiple linear regressions and simple-slope tests were used to examine the main effects of the predictors (CaPSE and CARS) and moderator (PTGI-SF), and interaction effects of CaPSExPTGI-SF and CARSxPTGI-SF. The analyses were repeated for each outcome variable: Depression, Anxiety and Stress. RESULTS Higher CARS significantly predicted higher Depression, Anxiety and Stress, and lower CaPSE significantly predicted higher Depression and Stress. Significant CaPSExPTGI-SF and CARSxPTGI-SF interactions predicted Depression. Simple-slopes tests indicated a significant positive association between CARS and Depression for mothers with high levels of PTG, but not with low levels of PTG. A negative association was indicated between CaPSE and Depression for mothers with low levels of PTGI-SF, though neither slope was significant. LIMITATIONS Our results are only generalisable to mothers with similar socio-demographic backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS PTG may serve as both a protective and a risk factor for depression in mothers who are breast cancer survivors. Debate remains whether PTG is best conceptualised as a perceived positive outcome or an ongoing coping mechanism in the face of parenting challenges and cancer-related threats such as FCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa Nadia Kuswanto
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, 3122, Australia
| | - Jessica Sharp
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, 3122, Australia; Department of Statistics, Data Sciences and Epidemiology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, 3122, Australia
| | - Lesley Stafford
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, 3122, Australia; Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Head A, Fleming K, Kypridemos C, Schofield P, O'Flaherty M. Dynamics of multimorbidity in England between 2004 and 2019: a descriptive epidemiology study. Eur J Public Health 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
An estimated 25% of GP patients within the UK have multimorbidity, a large proportion of which is attributable to non-communicable diseases, many of them preventable. The heterogeneity of existing study methodologies limits comparisons to assess temporal trends. This study aims to use a large population-representative dataset to describe changes over time in multimorbidity incidence and prevalence.
Methods
We used two measures of multimorbidity a) basic: two or more chronic conditions; b) complex: at least three chronic conditions affecting at least three body systems. Chronic conditions for inclusion were discussed by a multidisciplinary team. A 1m random sample of patients registered between 2004 and 2019 at GP practices in England were drawn from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We calculated crude and age-sex standardised annual multimorbidity prevalence and incidence using standard formulae. Analyses were conducted using R v3.6.3. Participants will be linked to the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation to describe equity trends over time.
Results
Preliminary results show that age-sex standardised annual prevalence increased from 32.9% (95% CI: 32.7% - 33.1%) with basic multimorbidity and 14.9% (95% CI: 14.7%-15.0%) with complex multimorbidity in 2004 to 51.0% (95% CI: 50.8% - 51.3%) and 29.9% (95% CI: 29.7% - 30.1%) in 2019. Basic multimorbidity incidence per 10,000 person-years showed little change, however there was an increase in the incidence of complex multimorbidity from 322 (95% CI: 315- 330) to 418 (95% CI: 407 - 430).
Conclusions
The burden of multimorbidity has increased substantially over the last 15 years. Complex multimorbidity incidence and prevalence have increased more rapidly than for basic multimorbidity. This highlights the need for improved population-level prevention strategies to postpone and prevent the onset of long-term conditions. Next, we will assess whether there are socioeconomic differences in these temporal trends.
Key messages
The burden of multimorbidity increased between 2004 and 2019. The increase in incidence and prevalence of complex multimorbidity was greater than for basic multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Head
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - K Fleming
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Halkett GK, Merchant S, Smith SK, O’Connor M, Jefford M, Aranda S, Schofield P. Supporting and preparing patients for radiotherapy: Patients’ and radiation therapists’ perspectives on their one‐to‐one consultations. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 29:e13284. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia K.B. Halkett
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine Faculty of Health Sciences Curtin University Perth WA Australia
| | - Susan Merchant
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine Faculty of Health Sciences Curtin University Perth WA Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide SA Australia
| | - Sian K. Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group Prince of Wales Clinical School Faculty of Medicine UNSW Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
- Bath Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement Information, Decisions and Operations School of Management University of Bath Somerset UK
| | - Moira O’Connor
- School of Psychology Faculty of Health Sciences Curtin University Perth WA Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology The University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Sanchia Aranda
- Cancer Council Australia Sydney NSW Australia
- Department of Nursing The University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology The University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Psychology Swinburne University of Technology Hawthorn Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ugalde A, Blaschke SM, Schofield P, Lambert SD, Aranda S, Boltong A, Chambers SK, Krishnasamy M, Livingston P. Priorities for cancer caregiver intervention research: A three-round modified Delphi study to inform priorities for participants, interventions, outcomes, and study design characteristics. Psychooncology 2020; 29:2091-2096. [PMID: 32364654 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ugalde
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah-May Blaschke
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychology, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sylvie D Lambert
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sanchia Aranda
- Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Boltong
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzanne K Chambers
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meinir Krishnasamy
- Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patricia Livingston
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Witt CM, Helmer SM, Schofield P, Wastell M, Canella C, Thomae AV, Rogge AA. Training oncology physicians to advise their patients on complementary and integrative medicine: An implementation study for a manual‐guided consultation. Cancer 2020; 126:3031-3041. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia M. Witt
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics Charite ‐ University Medicine Berlin, Humboldt University Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Stefanie M. Helmer
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics Charite ‐ University Medicine Berlin, Humboldt University Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute Swinburne University Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Cancer Experiences Research Peter MacCallum Cancer Center Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Marisa Wastell
- Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences Institute of Sociology University of Technology Chemnitz Germany
| | - Claudia Canella
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Anita V. Thomae
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Alizé A. Rogge
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics Charite ‐ University Medicine Berlin, Humboldt University Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|