Oral high-dose sucrosomial iron vs intravenous iron in sideropenic anemia patients intolerant/refractory to iron sulfate: a multicentric randomized study

Iron deficiency anemia is among the most frequent causes of disability. Intravenous iron is the quickest way to correct iron deficiency, bypassing the bottleneck of iron intestinal absorption, the only true mechanism of iron balance regulation in human body. Intravenous iron administration is suggested in patients who are refractory/intolerant to oral iron sulfate. However, the intravenous way of iron administration requires several precautions; as the in-hospital administration requires a resuscitation service, as imposed in Europe by the European Medicine Agency, it is very expensive and negatively affects patient's perceived quality of life. A new oral iron formulation, Sucrosomial iron, bypassing the normal way of absorption, seems to be cost-effective in correcting iron deficiency anemia at doses higher than those usually effective with other oral iron formulations. In this multicentric randomized study, we analyze the cost-effectiveness of intravenous sodium ferrigluconate vs oral Sucrosomial iron in patients with iron deficiency anemia refractory/intolerant to oral iron sulfate without other interfering factors on iron absorption.

Efficacy and cost effectiveness of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus iron sucrose in adult patients with iron deficiency anaemia

Background

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a major health issues and common type of nutritional deficiency worldwide. For IDA treatment, intravenous (IV) iron is a useful therapy.

Objective

To determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness (CE) of intravenous (IV) Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) versus IV Iron Sucrose (IS) in treating IDA.

Data sources

Electronic medical record i.e. Cerner^® system.

Target population

Adults patients with iron deficiency anaemia.

Time horizon

A 12-month period (01/01/2018–31/12/2018).

Perspective

Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC, a public hospital).

Intervention

IV Ferric Carboxymaltose versus IV Iron Sucrose.

Outcome measures

With regard to responses to treatment i.e., efficacy of treatment with FCM & IS in IDA patients, hemoglobin (Hgb), ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels were the primary outcomes. Additionally, the researchers also collected levels of iron, platelet, white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV). The costs i.e. resources consumed (obtained from NCCCR-HMC) and the CE of FCM versus IS were the secondary outcomes.

Results of base-case analysis

There was a significant improvement in Hgb, RBC and MCH levels in the IS group than the FCM group. The overall cost of IS therapy was significantly higher than FCM. The medication cost for FCM was approximately 6.5 times higher than IS, nonetheless, it is cheaper in terms of bed cost and nursing cost. The cost effectiveness (CE) ratio illustrated that FCM and IS were significantly different in terms of Hgb, ferritin and MCH levels. Further, Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) indicated that further justifications and decisions need to be made for FCM when using Hgb, iron, TSAT, MCH and MCV levels as surrogate outcomes.

Results of sensitivity analysis

Not applicable.

Limitations

The study did not consider the clinical or humanistic outcome.

Conclusions

The higher cost of FCM versus IS can be offset by savings in healthcare personnel time and bed space. ICER indicated that further justifications and decisions need to be made for FCM when using Hgb, iron, TSAT, MCH and MCV levels as surrogate outcomes.

The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy (IDAP) affects 11-18% of Australian pregnancies and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. National prescribing data suggests the use of intravenous iron in pregnancy is increasingly common. This study aimed to: 1) Establish the current patterns of intravenous iron use by Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians (FRANZCOG) when treating iron deficiency and IDAP including immediately postpartum and; 2) Assess FRANZCOG opinions regarding potential trial of intravenous iron for first-line treatment of IDAP.

METHODS

An online survey of RANZCOG Fellows practicing obstetrics was distributed in September 2018. Results were analysed descriptively and responses compared by clinician demographics using Chi-squared testing.

RESULTS

Of 484 respondents (21% of FRANZCOG), 457 were currently practicing obstetrics. Most prescribed intravenous iron in pregnancy (96%) and/or postpartum (85%). Most intravenous iron was prescribed for IDAP (98%) rather than iron deficiency without anaemia (53%), and for IDAP most commonly second-line to failed oral iron supplementation and first-line in special circumstances (59%). Intravenous iron prescribing was associated with shorter time since FRANZCOG completion (p = 0.01), public hospital practice (p = 0.008) and higher hospital birth numbers (p = 0.01). Most respondents (90%) would consider a randomised controlled trial of first-line intravenous iron for IDAP, although views on appropriate thresholds differed.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all respondents prescribed intravenous iron for IDAP, and while mostly used for second-line treatment over half sometimes used it first-line. With accelerating intravenous iron use, further research is required into its optimal use in pregnancy, recognizing important clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.

[Economic impact of ferric carboxymaltose in haemodialysis patients]

Intravenous iron supplementation is essential in hemodialysis (HD) patients to recover blood loss and to meet the requirements for erythropoiesis and, in patients receiving erythropoietin, to avert the development of iron deficiency. In a recent real-world study, Hofman et al. showed that a therapeutic shift from iron sucrose (IS) to ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in HD patients improves iron parameters while reducing use of iron and erythropoietin. The objective of this economic analysis is to compare the weekly cost of treatment of FCM vs IS in hemodialysis patients in Italy. The consumption of drugs (iron and erythropoietin) was derived from Hofman’s data, while the value was calculated at Italian ex-factory prices. The analysis was carried on the total patient sample and in two subgroups: patients with iron deficiency and patients anemic at baseline. In addition, specific sensitivity analyses considered prices currently applied at the regional level, simulating the use of IS vs iron gluconate (FG) and epoetin beta vs epoetin alfa. In the base-case analysis, the switch to FCM generates savings of -€12.47 per patient/week (-21%) in all patients, and even greater savings in the subgroups with iron deficiency -€17.28 (-27%) and in anemic patients -€23.08 (-32%). Sensitivity analyses were always favorable to FCM and confirmed the robustness of the analysis. FCM may represent a cost-saving option for the NHS, and Italian real-world studies are needed to quantify the real consumption of resources in dialysis patients.

A patient-level cost-effectiveness analysis of iron isomaltoside versus ferric carboxymaltose for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in the United Kingdom

Objectives: Intravenous iron is the recommended treatment for patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) where oral iron is ineffective or rapid iron replenishment is required. Two high-dose, rapid-administration intravenous iron formulations are currently available in the UK: iron isomaltoside 1000/ferric derisomaltose (IIM) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). An indirect treatment comparison (ITC) recently showed that improvement from baseline hemoglobin was significantly larger with IIM than FCM. The objective was to use the ITC findings to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of IIM versus FCM from the UK healthcare payer perspective.Methods: A patient-level simulation model was developed in R to evaluate the cost per patient experiencing hematological response with IIM versus FCM. The model generated a simulated cohort from parametric distributions of baseline hemoglobin and bodyweight. Changes in hemoglobin were modeled based on data from the ITC, covaried with baseline hemoglobin based on patient-level data from a randomized controlled trial. Posological models of the iron formulations were developed based on the summaries of product characteristics. UK-specific costs were based on healthcare resource groups.Results: The proportion of patients experiencing hematological response was 9.0% higher with IIM relative to FCM (79.0% versus 70.0%), based on modeling of clinically realistic, correlated distributions of baseline hemoglobin and change from baseline hemoglobin. The mean number of infusions needed to administer the required dose was 1.92 with FCM, versus 1.38 with IIM, resulting in costs of £637 and £457 per treated patient with FCM and IIM respectively, corresponding to respective costs of £910 and £579 per responder.Conclusions: The analysis showed that using IIM rather than FCM in patients with IDA was dominant and would reduce the number of iron infusions required to correct iron deficiency, thereby reducing the costs associated with IDA treatment and simultaneously increasing the proportion of patients with IDA experiencing a clinically meaningful hematological response.

Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency in children with or without anemia: consensus recommendations of the SPOG Pediatric Hematology Working Group

Iron deficiency is the most prevalent nutritional deficiency affecting children and adolescents worldwide. A consistent body of epidemiological data demonstrates an increased incidence of iron deficiency at three timepoints: in the neonatal period, in preschool children, and in adolescents, where it particularly affects females.Conclusion: This narrative review focuses on the most suggestive symptoms of iron deficiency in childhood, describes the diagnostic procedures in situations with or without anemia, and provides Swiss expert-based management recommendations for the pediatric context.What is Known:• Iron deficiency (ID) is one of the most common challenges faced by pediatricians.• Significant progress in the diagnosis and therapy of ID has been made over the last decade.What is New:• Our expert panel provides ID management recommendations based on the best available evidence.• They include strategies for ID diagnosis and therapy, both oral and intravenous.

Oral Sucrosomial® iron versus intravenous iron for recovering iron deficiency anaemia in ND-CKD patients: a cost- minimization analysis

BACKGROUND

Oral iron is recommended as first line treatment of anemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) patients. Sucrosomial® iron, a new generation oral iron with high absorption and bioavailability and a low incidence of side effects, has shown to be not inferior to intravenous (IV) iron in the replacement of iron deficiency anemia in patients with ND-CKD. Besides the clinical benefit, it is also important to determine the comparative total costs of oral versus IV iron administrations. The aim of this study was to perform a cost-minimization analysis of oral Sucrosomial iron, compared with IV iron gluconate from an Italian societal perspective.

METHODS

Cost analysis was performed on the 99 patients with ND-CKD and iron-deficiency anemia of the randomized trial by Pisani et al. Human and material resources utilization was recorded during each iron administration. According to study perspective, direct and indirect costs were considered. Costs for each resource unit were taken from official Italian sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

The base case analysis showed an average cost/cycle per patient of € 111 for oral iron and € 1302 for IV iron. Thus, the potential saving was equal to € 1191 per patient/cycle. The sensitivity analysis showed that the most sensitive driver is the time loss by patient and caregivers for the therapy and related-care, followed by the minutes of nursing care and the number of kilometres travelled to reach the referral centre.

DISCUSSION

This study showed that oral Sucrosomial® iron could offer specific advantages in terms of potential savings, and allowed identifying some implications for future research. Such advantages still persist with the new single dose IV iron formulation available in the market, although to a lesser extent.

Economic Evaluation of Ferric Carboxymaltose for the Management of Hemodialysis Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia in Italy

Introduction

Patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of developing both iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The administration of intravenous iron therefore represents the standard of care for the management of anemia in this patient setting.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 38 HD patients in Italy was analyzed to assess the clinical and economic implications of switching from intravenous ferric gluconate (FG) to ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) on achievement of adequate hemoglobin (Hb) values and iron balance. The total observational period for each patient was 12 months, 6 months before and 6 months after switching to iron FCM. The pharmacoeconomic analysis considered the hospital perspective and the consumption of iron, blood transfusions and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), including healthcare personnel time.

Results

Switching from FG to FCM in dialysis adult patients with IDA allows a cost reduction per patient/month in the range €14–46, considering the use of biosimilar ESA or originator ESA, respectively. The percentage of patients with Hb target values increased from 63% to 82%, considering the entire observation period. In addition, other clinical parameters (ferritin, transferrin saturation, erythropoietin resistance index) improved after switching from FG to FCM.

Conclusion

FCM in HD patients was shown to provide a favorable efficacy profile over FG, with a lower cost per patient, mainly driven by a consistent reduction of ESA consumption.

Funding

Vifor Pharma Italia Srl.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01089-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

An Economic Evaluation of Iron Isomaltoside 1000 Versus Ferric Carboxymaltose in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Iron Deficiency Anemia in Denmark

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Denmark is among the highest in the world, with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis occurring at rates of 9.1 and 18.6 per 100,000 person-years respectively in 2010-2013. Anemia is the most prevalent extraintestinal complication of IBD, most commonly caused by iron deficiency. In treating IBD-associated iron deficiency anemia (IDA), intravenous iron is more effective and better tolerated and shows a faster response than oral iron. The present study evaluated resource use and costs associated with using iron isomaltoside (Monofer; IIM) versus ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject; FCM) in patients with IDA and IBD in Denmark.

METHODS

A budget impact model was developed to evaluate the cost of IIM compared with FCM from a Danish healthcare payer perspective. Iron deficits were modeled using dosing tables and a joint distribution of bodyweight [mean 75.4 kg, standard deviation (SD) 17.4 kg] and hemoglobin (mean 10.8 g/dL, SD 1.4 g/dl) based on observational data from patients with IBD. Retreatment frequency was modeled using a pooled retrospective analysis of randomized trial data, and costs were modeled using diagnosis-related groups with an outpatient infusion cost of DKK 2855.

RESULTS

Using IIM required 1.2 infusions (per treatment) to correct the mean iron deficit compared with 1.6 with FCM. Treating 2.54 patients with IIM would therefore avoid one infusion compared with FCM. Patients using IIM required multiple infusions in 25.0% of cases compared with 64.3% with FCM. Over 5 years, total estimated costs were DKK 21,406 per patient with IIM compared with DKK 28,137 with FCM, corresponding to savings of DKK 6731 with IIM.

CONCLUSION

Using IIM in place of FCM markedly reduced the number of iron infusions required in patients with IBD and IDA in Denmark. The reduction in infusions was accompanied by reductions in cost compared with FCM.

FUNDING

Pharmacosmos A/S.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ferric carboxymaltose in pre-operative haemoglobin optimisation in patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

An analytic-decision model was built to estimate the cost-effectiveness of using ferric carboxymaltose for pre-operative haemoglobin optimisation in patients with iron deficiency anaemia undergoing primary knee arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We simulated 20,000 patients who were randomly assigned to the haemoglobin optimisation arm or the non-optimisation control arm in a strict 1:1 ratio. The main outcomes were cost per patient transfusion avoided and red blood cell units spared. The analyses were performed from the hospital perspective with length of stay as the time horizon.

RESULTS

In the reference case scenario, pre-operative haemoglobin optimisation led to fewer patients being exposed to allogeneic red blood cell transfusion (2,212 vs 6,595 out of 10,000 patients) and a relevant decrease in the number of red blood cell units transfused (4.342 vs 13.336). The costs of avoiding one patient transfusion and sparing one red blood cell unit were € 831 and € 405, respectively. Increased costs in the optimisation arm were mostly associated with the outpatient day hospital visit (54%) and ferric carboxymaltose treatment (40%).

DISCUSSION

In primary knee arthroplasty, pre-operative haemoglobin optimisation with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose is less expensive than other reported patient blood management modalities and must be considered in patients with iron deficiency anaemia.

A strategy to reduce inflammation and anemia treatment's related costs in dialysis patients

This is a post-hoc analysis evaluating erythropoiesis stimulating agents' (ESA) related costs while using an additional ultrafilter (Estorclean PLUS) to produce ultrapure dialysis water located within the fluid pathway after the treatment with reverse osmosis and before the dialysis machine. Twenty-nine patients (19 treated with epoetin alfa and 10 with darboepoetin alfa) were included in the analysis. We showed to gain savings of 210 € per patient (35 € per patient each month) with epoetin alfa during the experimental period of 6 months, compared to the control period and of 545 € per patient (90 € per patient each month) with darboepoetin alfa. Estorclean PLUS had a cost of 600 € (25 € per month per each patient) and was used for 6 months. Intravenous iron therapy with sodium ferrigluconate had a cost of 0,545 €/62,5 mg. In conclusion, during the experimental period with the use of Estorclean, we obtained global savings of 11 € per patient per month with epoetin alfa and 30 € per patient per month with darboepoetin alfa to treat anemia in dialysis patients.

Net Budgetary Impact of Ferric Citrate as a First-Line Phosphate Binder for the Treatment of Hyperphosphatemia: A Markov Microsimulation Model

Ferric citrate (FC) has demonstrated efficacy as a phosphate binder and reduces the requirements for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (IV) iron in dialysis patients. We developed a net budgetary impact model to evaluate FC vs. other phosphate binders from the vantage of a large dialysis provider. We used a Markov microsimulation model to simulate mutually referential longitudinal effects between serum phosphate and phosphate binder dose; categories of these defined health states. Health states probabilistically determined treatment attendance and utilization of ESA and IV iron. We derived model inputs from a retrospective analysis of incident phosphate binder users from a large dialysis organization (January 2011-June 2013) and incorporated treatment effects of FC from a phase III trial. The model was run over a 1-year time horizon. We considered fixed costs of providing dialysis; costs of administering ESA and IV iron; and payment rates for dialysis, ESAs, and IV iron. In the base-case model, FC had a net budgetary impact (savings) of +US$213,223/year per 100 patients treated vs. standard of care. One-way sensitivity analyses showed a net budgetary impact of up to +US$316,296/year per 100 patients treated when higher hemoglobin levels observed with FC translated into a 30% additional ESA dose reduction, and up to +US$223,281/year per 100 patients treated when effects on missed treatment rates were varied. Two-way sensitivity analyses in which acquisition costs for ESA and IV iron were varied showed a net budgetary impact of +US$104,840 to +US$213,223/year per 100 patients treated. FC as a first-line phosphate binder would likely yield substantive savings vs. standard of care under current reimbursement.

Cost Effectiveness of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Compared with Sevelamer Carbonate in the Treatment of Hyperphosphataemia in Patients Receiving Dialysis, from the Perspective of the National Health Service in Scotland

BACKGROUND

Hyperphosphataemia is common and harmful in patients receiving dialysis. Treatment options include noncalcium-based phosphate binders such as sevelamer carbonate (SC) and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the health economic impact of PA21-based strategies compared with SC-based strategies, from the perspective of the Scottish National Health Service (NHS).

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed based on data from a randomised clinical trial comparing PA21 and SC. Model input parameters were derived from published literature, national statistics and unpublished sources. Costs (price year 2012) and effects were discounted at 3.5 %. Analysis with a lifelong time horizon yielded the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost or savings per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained or forgone. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore uncertainties around assumptions and model input parameters.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, phosphorus reductions for PA21 and SC were 1.93 and 1.95 mg/dL. Average undiscounted survival was estimated to be 7.61 years per patient in both strategies. PA21 patients accrued less QALYs (2.826) than SC patients (2.835), partially due to differential occurrence of side effects. Total costs were ₤ 13,119 and ₤ 14,728 for PA21 and SC, respectively (difference per patient of ₤ 1609). By using PA21 versus SC, one would save ₤ 174,999 (or ₤ 123,463 when including dialysis and transplantation costs) for one QALY forgone. A scenario modelling the nonsignificant reduction in mortality (relative risk 0.714) observed in the trial yielded an ICER for PA21 of ₤ 22,621 per QALY gained. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis of the base-case, PA21 was dominant in 11 %, and at least cost-effective in 53 %, of iterations, using a threshold of ₤ 20,000 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PA21 versus SC in hyperphosphataemic patients being intolerant of calcium-based phosphate binders may be cost saving and yields only very limited disadvantages in terms of quality-adjusted survival. PA21 appears to be cost-effective from the perspective of the Scottish NHS.

Ferric Citrate, an Iron-Based Phosphate Binder, Reduces Health Care Costs in Patients on Dialysis Based on Randomized Clinical Trial Data

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) require phosphate binders for hyperphosphatemia and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (i.v.) iron for anemia. Ferric citrate (FC) is a novel, iron-based phosphate binder that increases iron stores and decreases i.v. iron and ESA usage while maintaining hemoglobin levels, and may decrease the cost of ESRD care. The study objectives were to (1) quantify differences in ESA and i.v. iron usage among ESRD patients receiving FC compared with active control (AC) (sevelamer carbonate and/or calcium acetate) on the basis of data from a 52-week phase III clinical trial and (2) standardize trial data to the general United States (US) ESRD population and calculate the potential impact of FC on ESRD cost/patient/year in the USA.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

SETTING AND POPULATION

A total of 441 adult subjects with ESRD who received FC or AC for 52 weeks were included.

MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, AND TIMELINE

Differences in ESA and i.v. iron usage between the treatment groups were modeled over time using generalized linear mixed models and zero-inflated Poisson models. Trends were modeled via logarithmic curves, and utilization patterns were applied to the general dialysis population to estimate expected resource savings.

OUTCOMES

Study outcomes were costs saved/patient/year using FC versus AC (US dollars).

RESULTS

Our model suggests an annual decrease of 129,106 U of ESAs and 1960 mg of i.v. iron per patient in the second year after a switch from AC to FC. Applying 2013 Medicare pricing, this would save $1585 in ESAs and $516 in i.v. iron: a total of $2101/patient/year; these savings would be expected to double for managed care plans.

LIMITATIONS

The projections were made on 1 year of trial data.

CONCLUSIONS

Phosphate binding with FC reduces i.v. iron and ESA usage. Given the high cost burden of ESRD, our model demonstrates significant potential cost savings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01191255) http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01191255 .

PREVENTT: preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia in major surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is common in patients undergoing major surgery. The current standard of care for patients with low haemoglobin in the peri-operative period is blood transfusion. The presence of preoperative anaemia is associated with an increased likelihood of the patient receiving peri-operative transfusion and worsened outcomes following surgery, more post-operative complications, delayed recovery and greater length of hospital stay. Intravenous iron, if applied in the preoperative setting, may correct anaemia by the time of surgery and reduce the need for blood transfusion and improve outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN

PREVENTT is a phase III double-blind randomised controlled trial that will compare the use of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (dose 1000 mg) with placebo 10-42 days before major open abdominal surgery in 500 patients with anaemia (haemoglobin < 120 g/L). The primary outcome measure will be the need for blood transfusion and secondary endpoints will include post-operative recovery, length of hospital stay, health care utilisation and cost analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN67322816--registered 9 October 2012. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01692418.

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Patients With Iron Deficiency and Chronic Heart Failure in Spain

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Treatment with ferric carboxymaltose improves symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of ferric carboxymaltose treatment vs no treatment in these patients.

METHODS

We used an economic model based on the Spanish National Health System, with a time horizon of 24 weeks. Patient characteristics and ferric carboxymaltose effectiveness (quality-adjusted life years) were taken from the Ferinject® Assessment in patients with IRon deficiency and chronic Heart Failure trial. Health care resource use and unit costs were taken either from Spanish sources, or from the above mentioned trial.

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, patients treated with and without ferric carboxymaltose treatment acquired 0.335 and 0.298 quality-adjusted life years, respectively, representing a gain of 0.037 quality-adjusted life years for each treated patient. The cost per patient was €824.17 and €597.59, respectively, resulting in an additional cost of €226.58 for each treated patient. The cost of gaining 1 quality adjusted life year with ferric carboxymaltose was €6123.78. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model. The probability of ferric carboxymaltose being cost-effective (< €30 000 per quality-adjusted life year) and dominant (more effective and lower cost than no treatment) was 93.0% and 6.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ferric carboxymaltose in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency, with or without anemia, is cost-effective in Spain.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ferric carboxymaltose in iron-deficient patients with chronic heart failure in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

Iron deficiency is a common but treatable comorbidity in chronic heart failure (CHF) that is associated with impaired health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the intravenous iron preparation ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) for the treatment of iron deficiency in CHF from a Swedish healthcare perspective.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis with a time horizon of 24 weeks was performed to compare FCM treatment with placebo. Data on health outcomes and medical resource use were mainly taken from the FAIR-HF trial and combined with Swedish cost data. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as well as the change in per-patient costs for primary care and hospital care.

RESULTS

In the FCM group compared with placebo, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) are higher (difference = 0.037 QALYs), but so are per-patient costs [(difference = SEK 2789 (€303)]. Primary care and hospital care equally share the additional costs, but within hospitals there is a major shift of costs from inpatient care to outpatient care. The ICER is SEK 75,389 (€8194) per QALY. The robustness of the result is supported by sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of iron deficiency in CHF with FCM compared with placebo is estimated to be cost-effective. The ICER in the base case scenario is twice as high as previously thought, but noticeably below SEK 500,000 (€54,300) per QALY, an informal average reference value used by the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency. Increased HRQoL and fewer hospitalizations are the key drivers of this result.

Budget impact of parenteral iron treatment of iron deficiency: methodological issues raised by using real-life data

OBJECTIVES

Iron deficiency is common in pregnancy, postpartum, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure, heavy uterine bleeding, cancer and following surgery. We estimate the budget impact (BI) on the Swiss mandatory health insurance associated with substituting iron sucrose (standard) with ferric carboxymaltose (new treatment) using real-life data.

METHODS

Resource use was based on recent primary data (Polyquest Prescriber Analysis, Anemia Patient Record Study in Switzerland). Personnel costs were estimated using the Swiss Tarmed fee-for-service reimbursement system. Drug costs and costs of materials used were based on official tariffs (Spezialitätenliste, MiGeL). Actual IMS sales data of both products were used to verify the BI model (1 CHF ≈ 1 USD, Jan 2013).

RESULTS

Ferric carboxymaltose was associated with cost savings of 30-44 % per patient per treatment cycle compared to iron sucrose. Costs per 200/500/1,000 mg total dosage treatment cycle were CHF 101/210/420 for ferric carboxymaltose and CHF 144/375/721 for iron sucrose. This results in cost savings of CHF 22-31 million across all indications in 2009. Savings were driven by personnel cost reductions (application time and number of applications). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these cost savings, even for the higher application costs of ferric carboxymaltose, with minimum savings of CHF 17 million per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating iron deficiency involves substantial costs to the Swiss MHI which may be reduced by substituting iron sucrose with ferric carboxymaltose. The use of real-life data raises methodological questions about the fundamental compatibility of this data with the conceptual framework of BI analysis.

An analysis of the health service efficiency and patient experience with two different intravenous iron preparations in a UK anaemia clinic

BACKGROUND

Historically, the Renal Unit at King's College Hospital used intravenous (IV) iron sucrose (IS) to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease who were not on dialysis (CKD-ND). As part of a service initiative to improve patient experience, new products were considered as alternatives. This study investigated the potential impact on patient experience and service costs by switching from IS to ferric carboxymaltose (FCM).

METHODS

A decision analytical model was used to calculate the impact of switching from IS to FCM for a cohort of CKD-ND patients. Service provision data were collected for 365 patients who received 600 mg IS within a 12 month period, creating the IS data set. The service provision data, along with a clinically relevant FCM administration protocol (stipulating total doses of 500 mg FCM), were used to calculate a corresponding theoretical data set for FCM for the same cohort of patients.

RESULTS

The FCM protocol saved each patient two hospital visits and 2.66 hours of time (equating to approximately a saving of £36.21 in loss of earnings) and £19 in travel costs. Direct attributable costs for iron administration (which included drug, disposables, nursing staff, and hospital-provided patient transport costs) were £58,646 for IS vs £46,473 for FCM. Direct overhead costs (which included nursing preparation time, administration staff, clinic space, and consultant time costs) were £40,172 for the IS service vs £15,174 for the FCM service.

LIMITATIONS

Based on clinical experience with the products, this analysis assumes that 500 mg FCM is therapeutically equivalent to 600 mg IS. Consultant time costs are assumed to be the same between the two treatment groups. IV iron administration protocols and data are specific to King's College Hospital. The design is retrospective and changes to the management of the clinic, including service delivery optimization, may also affect real costs.

CONCLUSION

FCM was associated with fewer hospital visits and reduced transport costs for CKD-ND patients receiving IV iron and has the potential to save 19-37% in service costs. Owing to increased administration efficiency, FCM can improve the overall patient experience while reducing the total cost of the King's College Hospital IV iron service for CKD-ND patients, compared with treatment with IS.

Health economic assessment of ferric carboxymaltose in patients with iron deficiency and chronic heart failure based on the FAIR-HF trial: an analysis for the UK

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of iron repletion using intravenous (i.v.) ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with iron deficiency with or without anaemia. Cost-effectiveness was studied from the perspective of the National Health Service in the UK.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis was used to compare iron repletion with FCM with no iron treatment. Using data from the FAIR-HF trial and publicly available sources and publications, per patient costs and clinical effectiveness of FCM were estimated compared with placebo. Cost assessment was based on study drug and administration costs, cost of CHF treatment, and hospital length of stay. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of FCM use was expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and sensitivity analyses were performed on the base case. The time horizon of the analysis was 24 weeks. Mean QALYs were higher in the FCM arm (difference 0.037 QALYs; bootstrap-based 95% confidence interval 0.017-0.060). The ICER of FCM compared with placebo was €4414 per QALY gained for the FAIR-HF dosing regimen. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the base case result to be robust.

CONCLUSION

From the UK payers' perspective, managing iron deficiency in CHF patients using i.v. FCM was cost-effective in this analysis. The base case ICER was clearly below the threshold of €22 200-€33 300/QALY gained (£20 000-£30 000) typically used by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and proved to be robust in sensitivity analysis. Improved symptoms and better quality of life contributed to this result.

Evaluation of cost savings with ferric carboxymaltose in anemia treatment through its impact on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and blood transfusion: French healthcare payer perspective

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the economic impact of intravenous iron (in the form of intravenous iron preparation of ferric carboxymaltose) in three different clinical settings of iron deficiency anemia: chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancer, chemotherapy-induced anemia in digestive cancer, and perioperative anemia in knee and hip surgery.

METHODS

The economic model compared the usual therapeutic strategies of anemia without intravenous iron and strategies including intravenous iron, in each of the three clinical settings selected. Costs related to anemia treatment by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), blood transfusion, and intravenous iron were estimated and compared inside each setting. Cost savings were calculated from the French healthcare payer perspective. Data included in the economic model were obtained from scientific literature, public health agencies, and medical experts.

RESULTS

The most prominent annual cost savings were observed in chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancer (€997 and €360 per patient for metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancers, respectively; global cost saving, €33.6 million). This large impact of intravenous iron on costs was mainly explained by both a lower number of women treated and lower ESA dosing. Mean annual cost saving in digestive cancers and knee and hip surgery were estimated to €168 and €216 per patient and global cost savings of €7.5 and €12.1 million, respectively. Overall, annual cost savings in these three settings were estimated to €53 million including €39 million for ESA cost savings. Sensitivity analysis showed that strategies including intravenous iron remained cost-effective even with wide variations in the assumptions, particularly for cost savings on ESA.

LIMITATIONS

Economic model based on literature data and expert opinions.

CONCLUSIONS

The present economic model suggests that use of intravenous iron, according to recommendations of international guidelines, is cost saving, particularly in chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancers.

The health care cost of intravenous iron treatment in IBD patients depends on the economic evaluation perspective

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Anemia is common in IBD patients and intravenous iron treatment is preferred. The drug cost of intravenous iron carboxymaltose is approximately twice the cost of intravenous iron sucrose. The aim was to evaluate the health care costs of intravenous iron sucrose (Venofer®, Vifor) and intravenous iron carboxymaltose (Ferinject®, Vifor) treatment to IBD patients in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

Based on data from 111 IBD patients treated with intravenous iron in an outpatient setting health care costs were evaluated by means of Budget Impact Analysis, Cost Effective Analysis and Cost Benefit Analysis.

RESULTS

The Cost Effective Analysis showed that iron carboxymaltose was more cost-effective than iron sucrose, due to fewer outpatient setting visits. Even a sensitivity analysis using a reduced patient income (50%) in the Cost Effective Analysis showed iron carboxymaltose to be the most cost effective treatment. The Budget Impact Analysis from a hospital perspective showed that iron carboxymaltose was more expensive than iron sucrose regardless of the dose given. In contrast the Cost Benefit Analysis showed that the average patients' 'willingness to pay' for a total of iron dose of 1400 mg was €233 in order to reduce the number of infusions from 7 to 2 by using iron carboxymaltose rather than iron sucrose.

CONCLUSION

Both the Cost Effective Analysis and the Cost Benefit Analysis showed clearly that iron carboxymaltose is a more cost effective way of giving intravenous iron than iron sucrose in IBD patients. Only the Budget Impact Analysis showed that intravenous iron sucrose was the cheapest choice if only direct cost was included in the analysis.

Iron replacement therapy: assessing today's options to prepare for bundling

New Medicare rules that set forth a revised reimbursement scheme for dialysis services will introduce significant changes for providers. The new rules will abandon the current system of separate reimbursement for drugs associated with the hemodialysis services, including erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (i.v.) iron. These rules will "bundle" these agents and related laboratory tests into a single, case-mix adjusted composite rate. These bundling rules will be gradually phased-in, beginning in 2011. One of the primary effects of the new reimbursement policy will be to discourage over-utilization of ESAs that comprise nearly one-quarter of hemodialysis-related Medicare expenditures. As a result, hemodialysis providers will be challenged to make hemodialysis services more cost-effective, while ensuring that Medicare clinical performance measures are met and patient care is not compromised. i.v. iron has an integral role in making anemia care more cost-effective in the hemodialysis setting by improving measures of iron-deficiency anemia, maintaining necessary iron balance, and reducing the utilization of ESAs. This review discusses the potential benefits of i.v. iron in the management of hemodialysis patients with iron-deficiency anemia. It also focuses on the available i.v. iron options, particularly the established efficacy and safety profile of i.v. iron dextran compared with other i.v. iron formulations as well as cost considerations.

Results of an anemia management program to reduce high epoetin doses by targeted use of i.v. ferric gluconate

Intravenous (i.v.) iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are important therapies in the management of anemia in patients on hemodialysis. However, there is a consensus that ESAs need to be used judiciously--a result of mounting evidence reporting increased risks when targeting higher hemoglobin (Hb) levels with higher ESA doses. Adding i.v. iron to an ESA regimen can be a cost-effective strategy to improve Hb levels and reduce ESA doses, as observed in the Dialysis Patients' Response to i.v. Iron with Elevated Ferritin (DRIVE) study. In the authors' dialysis facility, lessons learned from DRIVE were applied to the facility's anemia management program. An i.v. iron-loading dose of 500 mg to 1,000 mg of sodium ferric gluconate for patients on hemodialysis receiving at least 18,000 units/week of Epoetin, had a serum ferritin less than 1,500 ng/mL and a transferrin saturation (TSAT) less than 30%, and had not received a loading dose of i.v. iron in the previous 6 months was considered As a result, it was observed that a 1 gram course of ferric gluconate appears to be a cost-effective way to improve Hb and TSAT levels and reduce Epoetin doses, without a significant increase in serum ferritin.

Blood conservation in the critically ill

PURPOSE

Anemia of critical illness is common among intensive care unit patients. A blood management pilot program was initiated to study the pharmacodynamic response of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients and assess the impact of the use of a standardized order set of pharmaceuticals, including epoetin alfa and intravenous iron sucrose, on the quantity of red blood cell units transfused in the adult intensive care unit.

SUMMARY

A pre-printed order set was developed which included baseline and follow-up laboratory monitoring and pharmaceutical options for iron, either intravenous and/or oral, folic acid, ascorbic acid, cyancobalamin, and weight-based epoietin alfa. Laboratory studies included: hemoglobin/hematocrit, reticulocyte count, absolute reticulocyte count, immature reticulocyte fraction obtained at baseline, and on day three and day five; in addition, iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, and ferritin were obtained at baseline and on day five. An average hemoglobin response of 0.8 g/dL five days after administration of epoetin alfa was demonstrated in a diverse population of critically ill patients. Patients who received intravenous iron did not have a difference in mortality as compared to those patients who did not receive intravenous iron; however, there was a significantly longer length of stay. The cost of epoetin alfa was $64,000 over 10 months (approximately 8-10 patients/month). Transfusions of RBCs in adult intensive care unit decreased over the initial five months of the pilot study.

CONCLUSION

Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in the critically ill is controversial. Implementing a standardized approach in the pharmaceutical management of anemia in the critically ill patient is possible. Limitations with the order set and standardized protocol included errors in selection of dose/weight, incomplete laboratory/monitoring, and inconsistent prospective/concurrent review to guide therapy. The determination of the cost-effectiveness of epoetin alfa therapy in anemia of critical illness was not the purpose of this project, but will be the focus of future studies.

Comparison of efficacy, tolerability, and cost of iron polymaltose complex with ferrous sulphate in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of iron polymaltose complex (IPC) in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) during pregnancy has not been well established, and the evidence is inconclusive.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to compare efficacy, safety, compliance, and cost-effectiveness of IPC with ferrous sulphate (FS) in pregnant patients.

SETTINGS AND DESIGNS

The randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology in collaboration with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

METHODS

One hundred pregnant women aged 20-40 years at 14 to 27 weeks' gestation, with hemoglobin (Hb) < 9 g/dL, and serum ferritin < 12 mcg/L, were classified into 2 groups. One group received IPC (100 mg elemental iron), and the other group received FS (120 mg elemental iron) daily for 8 weeks. At Week 0 and Week 8, Hb, packed cell volume (PCV), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), serum iron, and serum ferritin were measured. Compliance with study medication was determined by pill counting at each visit. Cost minimization analysis was done to compare the costs of the 2 treatments.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data are expressed as mean -/+ SD. Paired and unpaired 't' test were used to analyze differences within groups and between groups. Chi-square (x2) test was used to analyze primary efficacy parameters and adverse drug reactions (ADR).

RESULTS

Statistically significant increases in Hb, PCV, MCV, MCH, MCHC, serum iron, and serum ferritin levels were seen at the end of 8 weeks of treatment in both groups. The overall adverse effects were more common in the FS group compared with the IPC group [41 (78%) vs 15 (31%), P < .001]. The compliance rate was significantly (P < .05) higher for the IPC (91%) group than for the FS (87%) group. The average total cost (direct + indirect) of treatment of anemia was comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study suggest that IPC can be considered as a useful alternative formulation for the treatment of IDA during pregnancy for those patients who cannot tolerate other iron preparations (ferrous form); this is an important finding, as compliance is a significant concern during pregnancy.

Introducing biological phosphorus removal in an alternating plant by means of control: a full scale study

In this paper, a control strategy for introducing enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) in an alternating plant designed for enhanced biological nitrogen removal (EBNR) is presented. Alternating aerobic and anaerobic conditions to promote EBPR are provided by controlling the phases of the operational cycle, instead of a separate anaerobic volume. By utilising the control schemes already built in the STAR control system for nitrogen removal, the control strategy is fully integrated in the system. The control system relies on on-line measurements of nitrogen (ammonia and/or nitrate) and orthophosphate. The control strategy has been implemented in full-scale operation at the Avedøre wastewater treatment plant in Denmark and the results show clear indications of success. The control strategy has operated robustly for several months with a 60% decrease in use of precipitation chemicals.

[Treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnant, puerperal and gynaecological patients--different drugs, different approaches]

According to WHO about 50 per cent of women of fertile age have iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). Iron loss > 80 mg per month, with menstruation in 22 per cent of women cause a negative iron balance in the course of time. About 40 per cent of women have data of prelatent iron deficiency still before conception, and if the demands of occured pregnancy are added, IDA is quickly reached. Over 30 per cent of puerperal women are affected by anaemia.

PURPOSE

To make a pharmacoeconomic assessment of peroral antianaemic drugs used for treatment of IDA in pregnant, puerperal and gynaecologically ill women.

MATERIALS

There are presented- daily intake of drugs, number of drug package taken, the price of a drug package, value of treatment a month, reimbursement of the drugs below: Ferro Gradumet, Maltofer Fol, Sorbifer Durules, Tot'hema, Legofer, Ferro-Folgamma, Tardiferon.

RESULTS

The survey made and the data of own studies show that the most important in treatment of IDA are the choice of iron- containing drug and the correct therapeutic approach. The choice of peroral iron- containing therapy is determined by: high "patient compliance"--good tolerance, independence on food intake, once daily intake, low frequency of adverse effects and treatment with low price (economic effect).

CONCLUSION

The most suitable for treatment of IDA in pregnant and puerperal women are Maltofer Fol and Sorbifer Durules. Maltofer Fol is with the best correlation price: "patient compliance". Tot'hema and Legofer have a good tolerance, a few adverse effects, but they are with high price. Ferro folgamma has not a high "patient compliance" and it has comparatively high price. Ferro gradumet has a low price and low "patient compliance".

The Potential Role of NaFeEDTA as an Iron Fortificant

Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a hexadentate chelator, which can combine with virtually every metal in the periodic table. CaNa2EDTA and Na2EDTA (ADI 2.5 mg EDTA/kg body weight/day) are widely used as sequestering agents in canned products, while NaFeEDTA is a promising iron fortificant. Binding of EDTA with iron is favored in the acid milieu of the stomach, irrespective of whether the EDTA is administered as CaNa2EDTA, Na2EDTA, or NaFeEDTA, but in the more alkaline medium of the duodenum the iron is exchanged, in part, with other metals. The iron released from EDTA is absorbed by the normal physiological mechanisms. When NaFeEDTA is present in a meal, the iron moiety exchanges with the intrinsic food iron and the EDTA partially protects the iron in this common non-heme iron pool from the effects of inhibitors of iron absorption, such as phytates and polyphenols. When iron is added as NaFeEDTA to an inhibitory meal, it is two to three times better absorbed than is iron added as ferrous sulfate. It also has a similar effect on the intrinsic food iron in the meal. Fortification with NaFeEDTA is most efficacious when administered with cereal- and legume-based diets but offers no advantages over other fortificants when added to meals of high bioavailability. Its potential as a fortificant has been confirmed in five extended fortification trials carried out in developing countries. There is no evidence that NaFeEDTA in the dose range proposed for food fortificants (5 to 10 mg iron daily) will have any direct toxic effects. Na2EDTA and CaNa2EDTA have proved safe over a number of years, while the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives concluded in 1999 that NaFeEDTA "could be considered safe when used in supervised fortification programs". Animal and human studies, including the results of two fortification trials, suggest that NaFeEDTA has little or no effect on overall zinc metabolism. Indeed, if anything, it increases zinc and possibly copper absorption. Data on potentially toxic metals, such as lead mercury, aluminum, and manganese, are limited but the evidence that is available is uniformly negative thus far. Further studies in this field are desirable. The long-term potential of NaFeEDTA fortification to cause iron overload is conjectural but the available evidence suggests that homeostatic controls would prevent excess iron accumulation in the normal population. NaFeEDTA, which is pale yellow in color, causes fewer organoleptic changes in a number of stored vehicles, including cereals, than do other soluble iron salts. Other potential vehicles include condiments, several of which have been successfully used in fortification trials. What is currently lacking is a consolidated body of published evidence on the stability of NaFeEDTA during processing, storage, and household cooking in widely consumed food vehicles, coupled with standardized testing of consumer acceptance of each fortified vehicle. While NaFeEDTA seems to be an appropriate fortificant for developing countries, its cost is about six to eight times that of ferrous sulfate in terms of equivalent amounts of iron. Its better absorption (a factor of 2–3) might make it possible to halve the daily fortification level but, it still remains expensive and there is a pressing need for food grade NaFeEDTA at more affordable prices. Another possible option is the use of other salts of EDTA (Na2EDTA or Ca Na2EDTA) together with a soluble source of iron, such as ferrous sulfate. The combination has been shown to be as effective as NaFeEDTA when the EDTA:Fe molar ratio is between 1:2 and 1:1. This approach is, however, only feasible with vehicles that are stored for short periods because of ferrous sulfate's propensity to cause organoleptic changes. The search for an iron source that is more stable but at the same time available to combine with EDTA has been unsuccessful thus far. Target populations for fortification with NaFeEDTA include all those that subsist on cereal- and legume-based diets, with the most appropriate vehicles being cereal products and condiments. The fortification of infant milk and cereal formulas with NaFeEDTA does not seem appropriate, since the amounts of NaFeEDTA required for effective fortification would be close to the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 2.5 mg EDTA/kg body weight/day.

Metalloantimalarials: targeting of P. falciparum strains with novel iron(III) and gallium(III) complexes of an amine phenol ligand

Emergence of chloroquine (CQ)-resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains necessitates discovery of potent and inexpensive antimalarial drugs. The high cost of new drugs negatively impacts their access and distribution in the regions of the world with scarce economic resources. While exploring structure-activity relationships, using gallium(III) as a surrogate marker for iron(III), we found cationic, and moderately hydrophobic, compounds, [[1,12-bis(2-hydroxy-3-ethyl-benzyl)-1,5,8,12-tetraazadodecane]metal(III)](+) (metal = Fe(III) and Ga(III); [Fe-3-Eadd](+), 3; [Ga-3-Eadd](+), 4), that possessed antimalarial activity. Crystal structure analyses revealed octahedral geometry for these complexes. The RP-HPLC analysis, after incubation in PBS or HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 degrees C for 3 days, detected only parental compounds thereby providing evidence for stability under physiological conditions. Both 3 and 4 demonstrated promising half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) values of approximately 80 and 86 nM in the CQ-sensitive HB-3 line, respectively. However, both 3 and 4 were found to possess elevated IC(50) values of 2.5 and 0.8 microM, respectively, in the CQ-resistant Dd2 line, thus displaying preferential cytotoxicity toward the CQ-sensitive HB3 line. In cultured parasites, 3 and 4 targeted hemozoin formation. Thus, these compounds acted similarly to chloroquine with regard to action and resistance, despite the lack of structural similarity to quinolines. Finally, similarity in coordination chemistry, stability, and antimalarial cytotoxicity profiles indicated that gallium(III) ion can serve as a template for iron(III) in structure elucidation of active molecules in solution.

[Use of venofer for iron deficiency correction in patients undergoing programmed hemodialysis]

AIM

To study iron metabolism in patients on programmed hemodialysis (PH) in oral and intravenous administration of iron drugs; to compare clinical and financial results of using such drugs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A two-stage trial studied iron metabolism in 158 PH patients on replacement therapy with erythropoetin. They received correction of iron deficiency with oral drugs (stage I) and venofer (stage II).

RESULTS

The study of iron metabolism has found its deficiency in 2/3 patients receiving oral iron: absolute (48%) and relative (20%). Administration of venofer led to a 2-fold increase in the number of patients with normal iron metabolism. The target Hb and Ht were achieved in 2.5 times more patients than before venofer treatment. The dose of erythpoetin in such cases was reduced by 40%. Side effects were not observed. The week cost of venofer treatment per patient was lower by 22.5$ than the cost of treatment with oral iron drugs.

CONCLUSION

Venofer correction of iron deficiency in PH patients is more effective both clinically and financially than use of oral iron preparations.

Benefits of early utilization of intravenous iron

Better anemia management has dramatically improved the lives of many patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Nephrology professionals frequently use two tools--erythropoietin and supplemental iron--to manage anemia. The National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) suggests that most ESRD patients will need intravenous (i.v.) iron to optimize their response to erythropoietin. In this report, the author reviews published studies showing that i.v. iron reduces erythropoietin dose requirements, resulting in cost savings. She presents data from her center illustrating that i.v. administration of the newly approved Ferrlecit (sodium ferric gluconate) also improves anemia management and reduces erythropoietin dose requirements. The author reviews studies showing the efficacy of i.v. iron as monotherapy for anemia in ESRD patients. These data support the importance of i.v. iron as an agent to be used alone or in conjunction with erythropoietin in the management of anemia in patients with ESRD.

Achieving target hematocrit in dialysis patients: new concepts in iron management

The management of anemia in dialysis patients involves a comprehensive understanding of the role of erythropoietin deficiency and of the importance of adequate available iron. It is clear that iron and recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in concert allow the clinician to achieve a given target hematocrit in dialysis patients. By first repleting and then maintaining iron stores, and with an appreciation of the concept of functional iron deficiency, the nephrologist can achieve target hematocrits with the lowest necessary dose of rHuEPO. Iron repletion and maintenance is difficult to achieve with oral iron, and parenteral iron is needed in most cases. New protocols for ongoing parenteral maintenance therapy with iron dextran or iron gluconate, a form of iron likely to be available soon in the United States, should lead to achievement of target hematocrits in a greater number of patients and be cost-effective in improving patient outcomes.