Evaluation of the potential for steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between vildagliptin and simvastatin in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Vildagliptin is an orally active, potent and selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4), the enzyme responsible for the degradation of incretin hormones. By enhancing prandial levels of incretin hormones, vildagliptin improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Co-administration of vildagliptin and simva statin, an HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitor may be required to treat patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia. There fore, this study was conducted to determine the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between vildagliptin and simvastatin at steady-state.

METHODS

An open label, single center, multiple dose, three period, crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy subjects. All subjects received once daily doses of either vildagliptin 100 mg or simvastatin 80 mg or the combination for 7 days with an inter-period washout of 7 days. Plasma levels of vildagliptin, simvastatin, and its active metabolite, simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid (major active metabolite of simvastatin) were determined using validated LC/MS/MS methods. Pharmacokinetic and statistical analyses were performed using WinNonlin and SAS, respectively.

RESULTS

The 90% confidence intervals of C(max) and AUC(tau) of vildagliptin, simvastatin, and simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid were between 80 and 125% (bioequivalence range) when vildagliptin and simvastatin were admin istered alone and in combination. These data indicate that the rate and extent of absorption of vildagliptin and simvastatin were not affected when co-administered, nor was the metabolic conversion of simvastatin to its active metabolite. All treatments were safe and well tolerated in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin, simvastatin, and its active metabolite were not altered when vildagliptin and simvastatin were co-administered.

Pravastatin Inhibits Arrhythmias Induced by Coronary Artery Ischemia in Anesthetized Rats

We have reported that chronically administered pravastatin prevented coronary artery reperfusion-induced lethal ventricular fibrillation (VF) in anesthetized rats without lowering the serum cholesterol level. The present study was undertaken to evaluate whether pravastatin prevents ischemia-induced lethal VF, simultaneously examining myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in ischemic myocardial tissues. Anesthetized rats were subjected to 30-min ischemia and 60-min reperfusion after chronic administration of pravastatin (0.02, 0.2, and 2 mg/kg), fluvastatin (2 and 4 mg/kg), or vehicle for 22 days, orally, once daily. ECG and blood pressure were continually recorded, and MPO was measured by a spectrophotometer. Pravastatin and fluvastatin significantly (P<0.05) decreased MPO activities, but only pravastatin decreased the incidence of ischemia-induced lethal VF. Both statins had no significant effects on body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, and QT interval as we reported earlier. Our results prove further that pravastatin has benefits to decrease cardiovascular mortality beyond its cholesterol-lowering effect. Pravastatin is more potent than fluvastatin in prevention of arrhythmias. A decrease in the neutrophil infiltration may be partly involved in the inhibitory effect of pravastatin on the ischemia-induced VF.

Effects of pravastatin on progression of glucose intolerance and cardiovascular remodeling in a type II diabetes model

OBJECTIVES

We examined the effects of early treatment with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor pravastatin on the progression of glucose intolerance and cardiovascular remodeling in a model of spontaneously developing type II diabetes mellitus (DM), the Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats.

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials showed that pravastatin prevented new-onset DM in hypercholesterolemic patients, and that it was effective in prevention of cardiovascular events in diabetics.

METHODS

The OLETF rats were treated with pravastatin (100 mg/kg/day) from 5 weeks of age and compared with age-matched untreated OLETF rats and normal Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) rats on serial oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) and Doppler echocardiography and on histopathological/biochemical analyses of the heart at 30 weeks.

RESULTS

The OGTT revealed that 40% and 89% of untreated OLETF rats were diabetic at 20 and 30 weeks, respectively, but 0% and only 30%, respectively, were diabetic in the treated OLETF. Left ventricular diastolic function was found impaired from 20 weeks in untreated OLETF but remained normal in the treated-OLETF. The wall-to-lumen ratio and perivascular fibrosis of coronary arteries were increased in untreated-OLETF but were limited in the treated-OLETF at 30 weeks. Moreover, cardiac expressions of a fibrogenic growth factor, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), and a proinflammatory chemokine, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), were increased in untreated-OLETF. However, in the treated-OLETF, overexpressions of TGF-beta1 and MCP-1 were attenuated, which was associated with overexpression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (2.5-fold of control LETO).

CONCLUSIONS

Early pravastatin treatment prevented cardiovascular remodeling in the spontaneous DM model by retarding the progression of glucose intolerance, overexpressing cardiac eNOS, and inhibiting overexpressions of fibrogenic/proinflammatory cytokines.

A multiple-dose pharmacodynamic, safety, and pharmacokinetic comparison of extended- and immediate-release formulations of lovastatin

BACKGROUND

Because lovastatin is efficiently extracted by the liver and because its administration in divided doses is associated with increased efficacy, an extended-release (ER) formulation may have the potential for a dose-sparing advantage relative to the immediate-release (IR) formulation in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the short-term pharmacodynamics, safety, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of lovastatin ER with those of lovastatin IR in patients with fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels between 130 and 250 mg/dL and fasting triglyceride levels < 350 mg/dL.

METHODS

The study had a randomized, single-blind, positive-controlled, 2-way crossover design, with a 4-week diet/placebo run-in period and two 4-week active-treatment periods. During period 1, patients received either lovastatin ER or lovastatin IR (both 40 mg OD). After 4 weeks of the initial study treatment and a 2-week washout period, patients were switched to the alternate treatment (period 2). Pharmacodynamic parameters (LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) were evaluated by combining data from weeks 3 and 4 of treatment. In a pharmacokinetic substudy, maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC(024)) were determined for lovastatin, lovastatin acid, and total and active inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase on days 1 and 28 of active treatment. The geometric mean ratio of AUC(0-24) (lovastatin ER/lovastatin IR) was also calculated for each of these substances.

RESULTS

Of 76 patients who entered the run-in period, 26 (12 men, 14 women; mean age, 56.2 years) were randomized to receive active treatment and 24 were included in the efficacy analysis; 13 patients were included in the pharmacokinetic substudy, 12 of whom had complete pharmacokinetic data. Compared with lovastatin IR, lovastatin ER produced a 3.9% greater reduction in LDL-C (P = 0.044). Changes in other lipid parameters were not statistically significant. In the pharmacokinetic substudy, C(max) values for lovastatin, lovastatin acid, and in hibitors of HMG-CoA reductase were lower at day 28 with lovastatin ER than with lovastatin IR. The AUC(0-24) ratio for lovastatin was 1.91 (90% CI, 1.77 - 3.35), reflecting higher bioavailability of the prodrug with lovastatin ER; in contrast, the ratios for lovastatin acid and active and total inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase were < 1.

CONCLUSIONS

In this short-term study in a small number of patients, lovastatin ER 40 mg produced significantly greater LDL-C lowering than did an equal dose of lovastatin IR, with a relatively low C(max) and comparable systemic exposure to lovastatin acid and active and total inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase. Lovastatin ER was well tolerated, with no discontinuations due to adverse events.

Effects of statins in thrombosis and aortic lesion development in a dyslipemic rabbit model

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are effective in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. The mechanism of action is mainly attributed to their plasma cholesterol lowering activity, although additional effects have been suggested. Our objective was to study whether atorvastatin and simvastatin exhibited an inhibitory effect on platelet deposition onto a triggering damaged vessel wall in addition to an antiatherosclerotic effect in the dyslipemic rabbit model. Statins were administered at identical doses of 2.5 mg/kg/day with a hyperlipidemic diet during 10 weeks. Both drugs similarly lowered total cholesterol and, moderately, triglycerides. Mural platelet deposition on damaged vessel wall placed in an ex-vivo flow perfusion system was reduced in atorvastatin treated animals (39.7+/-6.2 X 10(6) PLT/cm2) vs. controls (94.8+/-15.9 x 10(6) PLT/cm2, p <0.02). Simvastatin reduced aortic fatty streak surface coverage (31,7+/-5.3%) vs. controls (47.9+/-4.1%, p <0.005) and intimal thickening in thoracic aorta (0.15+/-0.05 intima to total area ratio in simvastatin treated animals vs. 0.36+/-0.03 in control animals, p <0.05). Atherosclerotic fatty streak coverage correlated positively with total cholesterol, tryglicerides and LDL-cholesterol levels in all groups. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors similarly lowered plasma lipids but exhibited significantly different effects in the modulation of atherosclerotic development and platelet response at the tested dose. Therefore, the effect of statins on the progression and manifestation of cardiovascular disease might be also mediated by regulating platelet response to vessel injury.

Long-term efficacy with fluvastatin as monotherapy and combined with cholestyramine (a 156-week multicenter study). French-Dutch Fluvastatin Study Group

Fluvastatin monotherapy up to 40 mg/day over 52 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia decreased plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 28%, with varying decreases in plasma triglycerides and increases in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Patients completing the 52-week study participated in a further trial to assess whether the efficacy of fluvastatin (20-40 mg/day), either as monotherapy or in combination with cholestyramine (CME; 4-16 g/day), taken at least 4 hours prior to fluvastatin, is sustained for up to 3 years. Patients were assessed every 12 weeks on average for safety and efficacy, the latter being calculated as a percent change from baseline of lipids or lipoproteins. During the second year (endpoint up to week 104), 147 patients received monotherapy (estimated mean dose, 30.2 mg/day) and 127 received additional CME (38.1 mg/day fluvastatin plus 10.1 g/day CME). During the third year (endpoint up to week 156), 140 patients received monotherapy (32.5 mg/day) and 67 received additional CME (39.3 mg/day fluvastatin plus 10.3 mg/day CME). Statistically significant reductions in mean total cholesterol and LDL-C and increases in mean HDL-C were achieved in both treatment groups and maintained throughout the study. A significant reduction in triglyceride levels was only observed at the second year endpoint in patients receiving monotherapy (-10.0%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical efficacy of fluvastatin in the long-term treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia

The long-term clinical efficacy of fluvastatin was assessed in 24 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia over a total treatment period of 104 weeks. Patients received an initial fluvastatin dose of 20 mg/day for 8 weeks, which was increased to 30 mg/day for a further 16 weeks. From week 24, if serum total cholesterol remained > or = 230 mg/dL, the fluvastatin dose could be increased to 40 or 60 mg/day, as necessary. By the end of treatment, 4 patients were receiving 30 mg/day fluvastatin, 1 patient was receiving 40 mg/day, and 19 patients were receiving 60 mg/day. Serum total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels showed a significant decrease from baseline at week 104 (total cholesterol, -26.8 +/- 2.4%; LDL-C, -33.1 +/- 3.3%; p < 0.001). The reductions in total cholesterol and LDL-C were dose-related. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases in serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were observed at week 24 (12.1 +/- 5.0%) and at week 76 (11.0 +/- 3.3%), although the effect was variable. Nevertherless, at the end of treatment the LDL-C: HDL-C ratio showed a 35% reduction from baseline. Changes in triglyceride levels failed to achieve statistical significance, with a reduction from baseline of -13.9 +/- 7.3% at week 104. Changes in apolipoprotein A-I were variable, with statistically significant (p < 0.01) increases observed at week 24 (7.6 +/- 2.3%) and week 76 (8.4 +/- 2.7%). By contrast, a significant reduction from baseline in apolipoprotein B was achieved by week 12 (-15.0 +/- 2.3%; p < 0.001) and was maintained throughout the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Open-label study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fluvastatin versus bezafibrate for hypercholesterolemia

Increased levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with the development of coronary artery disease, which has become a worldwide public health problem. Clinical trials show that, in the long term, effective lowering of total cholesterol and raising of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) can slow atherosclerosis progression and reduce coronary artery disease risk. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fluvastatin versus bezafibrate (slow release) in patients with cholesterol > 241 mg/dL (6.2 mmol/liter) not responding to dietary treatment alone (cholesterol < 300 mg/day for 8 weeks). Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (13 women, 7 men; mean age, 47.8 +/- 9.7 years; range, 30-70) received 40 mg fluvastatin once daily with their evening meal; group B (14 women, 6 men; mean age, 45 +/- 11 years, range, 25-68) received 400 mg bezafibrate once daily with either breakfast or their evening meal. After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean cholesterol decrease in group A was 27% (from 271 +/- 51.4 to 197.4 +/- 24.3 mg/dL; p < 0.001) versus 8% (from 278.6 +/- 33.2 to 255.8 +/- 20.3 mg/dL; p < 0.005) in group B. At the same time point, LDL-C was significantly decreased in group A (from 197.9 +/- 49 to 107.5 +/- 27.6 mg/dL; p < 0.001) but not in group B (from 181.6 +/- 39.6 to 173.3 +/- 24.3 mg/dL).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Changes in plasma apolipoprotein B-containing lipoparticle levels following therapy with fluvastatin and cholestyramine. European Fluvastatin Study Group

Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing lipoparticles (LpE:B, LpC-III:B) are associated with the risk of coronary artery disease whereas apo A-1-containing lipoparticles (LpA-I) are protective against coronary artery disease. The effect on lipoparticle levels of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor fluvastatin, in combination with cholestyramine, was assessed in a double-blind randomized study. A total of 144 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were recruited, who had successfully completed an original study comparing the effects of fluvastatin and cholestyramine on plasma lipoparticle levels. All subjects fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > 160 mg/dL, with premature coronary artery disease and 2 associated risk factors; or LDL-C > 190 mg/dL, no coronary artery disease, and triglycerides < 300 mg/dL, after a lipid-lowering diet. Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 combination therapy groups: fluvastatin 20 mg/day plus cholestyramine 4 g/day; fluvastatin 20 mg/day plus cholestyramine 8 g/day; and fluvastatin 20 mg/day plus cholestyramine 16 g/day. The study length was 6 weeks and patients were examined at 3-week intervals. Fluvastatin plus cholestyramine produced a significant (p < 0.001), dose-dependent reduction in levels of cholesterol (range, -29 to -34%), LDL-C (range, -30 to -44%), apo B (range, -23 to -34%), and apo E (range, -33 to -43%). LpE:B levels were also reduced (range, -19 to -26%), but not significantly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fluvastatin in severe hypercholesterolemia: analysis of a clinical trial database

Many patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia--low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 240 mg/dL--have heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. In such familial hypercholesterolemic patients, the lipid-lowering efficacy of fluvastatin is related to genetic factors, and it is of interest whether the response to treatment differs from that in patients with more moderate hypercholesterolemia. Thus an exploratory analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials and their open-label extensions (12-78 weeks), conducted worldwide with fluvastatin > or = 20 mg/day (n = 1810) and placebo (n = 783), assessed whether, apart from the potential differences between familial hypercholesterolemic and nonfamilial hypercholesterolemic patients, the response to 40 mg of fluvastatin is influenced by baseline plasma lipid levels in relation to disease severity. Entry criteria included LDL-C > or = 190 mg/dL with < or = 1 risk factor and no coronary artery disease, or > or = 160 mg/dL with > 1 risk factor or definite coronary artery disease. Of these patients, 591 (33%) given fluvastatin (20-40 mg/day) and 187 (24%) given placebo had severe hypercholesterolemia with baseline LDL-C > 240 mg/dL. In controlled studies, the mean +/- SD duration of exposure was 21.1 +/- 16.1 and 19.4 +/- 15.5 weeks for fluvastatin and placebo, respectively, whereas long-term efficacy was assessed after 55.3 +/- 21.7 weeks (fluvastatin) and 21.1 +/- 12.3 weeks (fluvastatin + cholestyramine, after previous monotherapy). In summary, fluvastatin at 40 mg/day lowered LDL-C by 25-26% from baseline in controlled studies (n = 622), and by 27% in long-term studies (32-33% with fluvastatin + cholestyramine; n = 386), irrespective of severity of cholesterolemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of the combination of fluvastatin and gemfibrozil

High-risk patients with dyslipidemias resistant to diet and single-agent pharmacotherapy may require combination therapy to achieve target levels of low density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and high density lipoprotein. Combinations of fibrates and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors are effective, but because of safety concerns related to myopathy and rhabdomyolysis, it is important to consider the possibility of pharmacokinetic interactions when such combinations are used. In this study, the area under the curve, maximum plasma concentration, and time to maximum concentration for fluvastatin and gemfibrozil are compared, when used alone and in combination, in patients with hyperlipidemia and either coronary or carotid atherosclerosis, or a family history of coronary artery disease. A total of 17 patients were studied in a random sequence, open-label, crossover study of fluvastatin at 20 mg twice daily, gemfibrozil at 600 mg twice daily, and the combination of the 2 drugs. No significant difference was observed in area under the curve, maximum plasma concentration, and time to maximum concentration when comparing the combination with each drug alone. These pharmacokinetic data add support to the clinical observations that the combination of fluvastatin and gemfibrozil is both effective and safe.

Effect of fluvastatin for safely lowering atherogenic lipids in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine

The lipophilic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have been associated with rhabdomyolysis in cyclosporine-treated treated patients, indicating an interaction of drugs. We therefore studied the safety and efficacy of the hydrophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin in 14 cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients. To qualify for inclusion, total cholesterol after dietary stabilization had to be > 240 mg/dL. Prior to starting active medication, patients underwent a 4-week placebo period. Fluvastatin was given in a dose of 20 mg once daily for 12 weeks, which was increased to 20 mg twice daily for a further 8 weeks. Fluvastatin reduced total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol in all patients at both dosages whereas no effect on high density lipoprotein cholesterol was observed. Triglyceride levels were lowered at week 20. Incremental dosages of fluvastatin did not affect cyclosporine concentration and no adjustment of cyclosporine dosage was necessary. The higher doses of fluvastatin also had no effect on renal function as judged by serum creatinine levels. Creatine phosphokinase remained unchanged throughout the study. No serious side-effects were observed. In conclusion, the hydrophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin at either 20 or 40 mg/day appears to be both safe and effective in lowering atherogenic lipids in renal transplant patients.

Efficacy of fluvastatin, a totally synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. FLUENT Study Group. Fluvastatin Long-Term Extension Trial

The Fluvastatin Long-Term Extension Trial (FLUENT) was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluvastatin over a prolonged period of time. In this way, FLUENT represents a clinical scenario that is closer to office-based chronic treatment of hyperlipidemic patients. A total of 918 patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia (mean baseline low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], 227 mg/dL) were enrolled into the study and received open-label fluvastatin, 20 or 40 mg daily, depending on response. Results of the first year of treatment have been published previously and showed statistically significant changes in LDL-C (-30.7%), total cholesterol (-21.9%), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; +3.5%). Of the original number of patients completing the 1-year study, 761 completed a second year of evaluation; the results are presented here. Any patient who did not achieve LDL-C levels of < or = 130 mg/dL could receive cholestyramine (usually 8 g/day) or fluvastatin up to 80 mg/day. At the end of the 2-year period there were significant changes in LDL-C with fluvastatin (20 mg/day, -25.4%; 40 mg/day, -30.6%; 80 mg/day, -33.7%; p < 0.001 vs baseline for all values). The combination of fluvastatin and cholestyramine changed LDL-C by -34.6%. Similar dose-response results were seen with reductions in total cholesterol and the LDL-C: HDL-C ratio. There were no unexpected or severe adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. In conclusion, fluvastatin offers a range of LDL-C reduction (25-34%) similar to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, that conforms with guideline recommendations for over 90% of hypercholesterolemic patients.

Efficacy and safety of triple therapy (fluvastatin-bezafibrate-cholestyramine) for severe familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia carries a markedly increased risk of coronary artery disease. Reduction of plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to the normal range may prevent premature atherosclerosis and usually requires a combination of cholesterol-lowering drugs such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors plus resins or fibrates. The current, 60-week, open-label investigation involved 22 patients whose plasma LDL-C had not reached the target level for prevention of coronary artery disease in 3 previous studies using fluvastatin alone and in combination with other cholesterol-lowering medications. At the beginning of the current study, patients were stabilized on fluvastatin monotherapy at 40 mg/day. After 6 weeks, the daily treatment changed to a combination of fluvastatin 40 mg/day in the evening and bezafibrate 400 mg/day in the morning. After a further 6 weeks, a lunchtime dose of cholestyramine 8 g/day was added, to form triple cholesterol-lowering therapy. Efficacy was determined by plasma lipid/lipoprotein analysis. Baseline levels were assessed after 4 weeks of placebo treatment, prior to active treatment, in the first fluvastatin study. Safety analyses included liver and renal function tests, creatine phosphokinase levels and blood counts. Compliance was determined by counting the fluvastatin capsules, bezafibrate tablets, and cholestyramine sachets returned by the patients at each visit. The triple-drug combination used in this study was more effective than the double therapy and resulted in stabilization of the LDL-C:high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio, at a reduction from baseline ranging from -40.4 to -52.5%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Improvement of myocardial perfusion by short-term fluvastatin therapy in coronary artery disease

Patients with hypercholesterolemia have impaired coronary and peripheral endothelial function. In patients with coronary artery disease, intracoronary acetylcholine infusion or mental stress causes paradoxical vasoconstriction, whereas lowering cholesterol restores endothelial function. The impact of lipid lowering by fluvastatin on myocardial perfusion in hypercholesterolemic patients with perfusion abnormalities was assessed by thallium-201 single photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). A total of 22 patients were treated with fluvastatin (40 mg once daily) for 6 weeks, followed by 40 mg twice daily if low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were decreased by < or = 30%. During the 12-week treatment period, myocardial perfusion was measured by quantitative SPECT after standardized stress testing at baseline and after 12 weeks. Preliminary results for 17 male patients (mean age, 59.3 +/- 6.7 years) are presented here. LDL-C decreased from 191 +/- 26 to 146 +/- 28 mg/dL (p < 0.001). In ischemic segments myocardial perfusion increased by 30% (280 +/- 100 to 365 +/- 110 counts per matrix; p < 0.001). In normal segments perfusion increased by only 5% (451 +/- 74 to 473 +/- 69 counts per matrix; p < 0.005). The change in perfusion rate between ischemic and normal segments was significant (p < 0.005). In conclusion, LDL-C lowering with short-term fluvastatin therapy improved myocardial perfusion, especially in areas of ischemia. This suggests that improvement is due to functional restoration of coronary endothelium by fluvastatin, before anatomic regression of stenosis can occur following long-term treatment.

Treatment of combined hyperlipidemia with fluvastatin and gemfibrozil, alone or in combination, does not induce muscle damage

Although combination therapy using 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-Co-A) reductase inhibitors and fibrates is efficacious in combined hyperlipidemia, such treatment has been associated with myopathy. For this reason, we studied the effects of fluvastatin and gemfibrozil, alone or in combination, on muscle. A total of 21 patients with combined hyperlipidemia were recruited who were matched for age, body mass index, and baseline levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, creatine phosphokinase, and myoglobin. Patients were randomized to three groups for 6-week treatment with fluvastatin at 40 mg/day, gemfibrozil at 600 mg twice daily, or a combination of the two drugs. Parameters for muscle damage were rises in levels of serum creatine phosphokinase and myoglobin compared with pre-exercise levels; these were assessed 1 hr and 8 hr after a 45 min lean body mass standardized ergometer test, which was performed before and after treatment in all patients. Biopsies from the quadriceps muscle were taken 48 hr after each test. Fluvastatin lowered total cholesterol and LDL-C by 23% and 35%, respectively (p < 0.01), with no effects on triglycerides and HDL-C. Gemfibrozil lowered triglycerides by 40% (p < 0.01) but did not lower total cholesterol or LDL-C significantly. The combination therapy decreased total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides by 28%, 29%, and 39%, respectively (p < 0.05). Pre-exercise creatine phosphokinase and myoglobin levels were not affected by treatment in any group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of fluvastatin on growth of porcine and human vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro

The effects of fluvastatin, a new fully synthetic inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, on growth and cell-cycle kinetics of porcine and human vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) were studied by growth curves and flow cytometric determination of cell-cycle distribution. Growth curves were obtained from counting after 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, and 14 days of incubation in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). For cell-cycle phase determination, cells were synchronized in G0 by 48 hours of incubation in serum-free medium, then stimulated by incubation in 10% FCS, with or without fluvastatin. There was a concentration-dependent decrease in the proliferation of human and porcine SMC when cells were incubated in the presence of fluvastatin. The reduction in the number of cells was significant with 10(-5) M and 10(-4) M fluvastatin. The G/S-phase transition of human and porcine vascular SMC was reduced to 50% of controls by 10(-4) M fluvastatin, as revealed by cell-cycle analysis. The effects of fluvastatin on growth kinetics and cell-cycle distribution could be completely reversed by the addition of 1 mM mevalonolactone, indicating that the fluvastatin effects are due to specific inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. The addition of low density lipoprotein as a source of cholesterol failed to support SMC growth and phase transition. Addition of squalene or cholesterol to the culture medium also failed to normalize cell growth. It is concluded that nonsterol products synthesized from mevalonate are necessary for the growth of SMC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of fluvastatin versus pravastatin treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. French Fluvastatin Study Group

Following a 6-week placebo period, 134 patients with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or = 160 mg/dL and plasma triglyceride < or = 400 mg/dL, despite following a standard lipid-lowering diet, were randomized to double-blind, double-placebo treatment with fluvastatin (22 women, 46 men; age 21-71 years) or pravastatin (25 women, 41 men; age 19-76 years). Fluvastatin at 40 mg and pravastatin at 20 mg were given for the first 4 weeks, both once daily with the evening meal. For the following 12 weeks, fluvastatin at 40 mg twice daily and pravastatin at 40 mg once daily were given with the evening meal. Both drugs were equally effective in lowering LDL-C after 4 weeks of treatment (-24.0% with fluvastatin, -24.1% with pravastatin) but, after 16 weeks, LDL-C reduction was -30.4% with fluvastatin and -26.6% with pravastatin. This further lowering of LDL-C between week 4 and week 16 was significant (p < 0.001) for fluvastatin but not pravastatin. Adverse events were reported by 23 fluvastatin patients and 22 pravastatin patients: 3 patients in each group withdrew from the study because of these. No notable abnormalities in levels of alanine or aspartate aminotransferase values (defined as > 3 times the upper limit of normal on 2 consecutive occasions) or of creatine phosphokinase (defined as > 10 times the upper limit of normal on any occasion) were observed in either treatment group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

High-dose fluvastatin and bezafibrate combination treatment for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

This study assessed the long-term use of fluvastatin, alone or in combination with bezafibrate, in patients with severe familial hypercholesterolemia who, in a previous study, did not achieve target levels (European Atherosclerosis Society) of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with fluvastatin at 60 mg/day plus bezafibrate 200 mg/day, with or without cholestyramine (CME) at 8 g/day. This open-label study comprised 3 periods: period I, 6 weeks of fluvastatin at 40 mg twice daily (at breakfast and at bedtime); period II, fluvastatin at 80 mg/day (40 mg at breakfast, 40 mg at bedtime), and bezafibrate at 200 mg/day (at lunchtime) for 6 weeks in patients not achieving LDL-C target levels; and period III, force-titration of fluvastatin to 800 mg/day (as in period II) and bezafibrate at 400 mg/day (slow release) in patients receiving combination treatment. Patients were excluded if, during the previous study, they had experienced a serious drug-related adverse event or deterioration in liver or kidney function (liver enzymes > 3 times upper limit of normal). The standard physical and laboratory evaluations were performed at regular intervals. Lipid profiles were determined from 12-hour fasting blood samples. All adverse events occurring or worsening during the study, whether spontaneously reported or elicited by questioning, and regardless of relationship to study medication, were recorded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Outcome monitoring of fluvastatin in a Department of Veterans Affairs lipid clinic

The aggressive lipid-lowering goals recommended by the second Adult Treatment Panel (ATP II) have created an increasing demand for treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors. Fluvastatin is the first completely synthetic agent in this class and offers a considerable price advantage over the other HMG-CoA therapies. In May 1994, the Buffalo Veterans Affairs Medical Center Lipid Clinic adopted a fluvastatin-preferred program in which all patients who were recommended for an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor would be treated with fluvastatin as a first-line agent. Fluvastatin was started at 20 mg daily and titrated to goal. Patients who were stable with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were converted to fluvastatin as just described. Preliminary analysis shows that, for new patients, 20 mg of fluvastatin daily at bedtime reduced low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by an average of 22% (range, 5-32%). Preliminary results for patients converted from another HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor showed that fluvastatin produced an additional LDL-C reduction of 18% (range, 5-30%). With a daily dose of 20 mg fluvastatin, patients with no heart disease (primary prevention) achieved ATP II goals in 60% of cases. For patients with established heart disease (secondary prevention), the goals of ATP II are lower but, despite this, 30% of patients taking fluvastatin at 20 mg daily achieved these goals. The patients in both groups who failed to achieve ATP II goals were titrated to a 40 mg daily dose, but the results of this titration are not yet available. Pharmacoeconomic outcomes were favorable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of fluvastatin on human biliary lipids

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have rapidly become widespread in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and are known to be variable in efficacy. To investigate the effect on biliary lipids, a 3-month study using fluvastatin was devised. A total of 19 patients were enrolled in this study: all had hypercholesterolemia (7 men, 12 women; 13 with type IIa, 6 with type IIb). After an observation period of 4-6 weeks with placebo, fluvastatin at a daily dose of 30 mg was administered for 3 months. Fasting blood samples were taken early in the morning, before, and once a month during 3 months of fluvastatin treatment, for measurement of serum lipids. Cerulein-stimulated bile in the gallbladder was sampled using a duodenal tube, and the changes in biliary lipids were assessed. There was a marked decrease in serum total cholesterol after 12 weeks of treatment (21%; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the bile cholesterol saturation index (CSI): values before and after 3 months of drug administration were 0.93 and 0.99, respectively (Admirand-Small method). There were no significant changes in either the fatty acid composition of biliary lecithin or in the bile acid composition of bile. In conclusion, on the basis of these results, short-term (3 months) administration of fluvastatin does not appear to affect CSI.

Clinical efficacy of fluvastatin for hyperlipidemia in Japanese patients

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia, including heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, in a 1-year study (a 12-week open assessment, followed by 40 weeks of active treatment). Of the 337 patients enrolled in the study, the effects of fluvastatin were analyzed in 296 patients at baseline and at 12 weeks. Of these, 265 were receiving 20 mg/day fluvastatin at week 12 and in 20 patients the dose had been increased to 30 mg/day; 11 patients violated the dosing protocol. A total of 229 patients continued into the 40-week, long-term phase, and 212 patients were analyzed at baseline and after 24 and 52 weeks. At the end of treatment, 153 evaluable patients were still taking 20 mg/day fluvastatin, 1 was taking 10 mg/day, and 48 patients were taking 30 mg/day, and 10 were taking 40 mg/day. In the 20 mg/day fluvastatin group, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels decreased by 24.1% at week 12 and by 29.3% at week 52. In those patients requiring the higher doses, the corresponding reductions in LDL-C were 20.2% (week 12) and 26.7% (week 52). Total cholesterol was also reduced at week 12 by 17.0% (20 mg/day) and 15.7% (20-30 mg/day), and at week 52 by 20.4% (< or = 20 mg/day) and 19.2% (> or = 30 mg/day). Throughout the study, fluvastatin was generally well tolerated and no serious clinical adverse events were observed. In conclusion, long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemia with fluvastatin at dosages of 20-40 mg daily can be considered both safe and effective.

Simvastatin in severe primary hypercholesterolemia: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in 595 patients over 18 weeks. The Principal Investigators

We report the results of an open multicenter study which evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of simvastatin in a large cohort of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Against a background of standard dietary advice, the study enrolled 595 patients with total cholesterol > or = 6.5 mmol/l and triglycerides < 6.0 mmol/l across 20 centers. After 4 weeks on placebo, treatment began with simvastatin 10 mg each night, titrating to 20 mg after 6 weeks, and then to 40 mg after 12 weeks if cholesterol levels still exceeded 5.5 mmol/l. By Week 18, 70% of patients were using 40 mg/day. After 18 weeks of treatment, the mean reductions (95% confidence interval) in total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were 30% (29-31%) and 38% (37-39%), respectively. There was a mean increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol of 12% (10-13%), while triglycerides were reduced by a median 19% (16-23%). From a mean entry total cholesterol of 9.31 +/- 2.15 mmol/l, 52% of patients achieved cholesterol levels < or = 6.2 mmol/l on treatment. The changes noted were essentially independent of gender, age, or lipid phenotype (IIa vs. IIb). Compliance with prescribed medication was very good and the drug was well tolerated; only 3% of patients manifested a clinical adverse experience requiring discontinuation or a clinical adverse experience described as serious (associated with hospitalization or serious disability). Isolated laboratory adverse experience required discontinuation in 0.2% of patients. One in 3 patients manifested a clinical adverse experience and 1 in 10 a laboratory adverse experience.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin after single and multiple doses in normal volunteers

The pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, a potent inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase and thus cholesterol synthesis, have been studied in 24 normal male volunteers who received [3H] fluvastatin in three different studies: a single-dose study using oral doses of 2 or 10 mg, an absolute bioavailability study using doses of 2 mg intravenously or 10 mg orally, and a multiple-dose study using 40 mg orally once daily for 6 days. Serial blood and plasma samples and complete urine and feces were collected and analyzed for total radioactivity as well as for intact fluvastatin. Fluvastatin was rapidly and almost completely (greater than 90%) absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, although the estimated bioavailability from the 2- and 10-mg doses was only 19 to 29% because of extensive first-pass metabolism. Fluvastatin pharmacokinetics appeared to be linear over the 2- to 10-mg dose range, as indicated by dose-proportional blood levels of total radioactivity and the parent drug. Absorbed fluvastatin was completely metabolized before excretion, the biliary/fecal route being the major excretory pathway. The recovery of radioactivity after a single dose was virtually complete within 120 hours. The terminal half-lives of fluvastatin and total radioactivity averaged 0.5 to 1 hour and 55 to 71 hours, respectively, whereas the total body clearance of fluvastatin was 0.97 L/hour/kg. Repeated oral administration of 40-mg doses of [3H]fluvastatin resulted in no time-related change in pharmacokinetic characteristics, but this dose yielded greater than proportional increases in circulating levels of the parent drug, thus suggesting a saturable first-pass effect on fluvastatin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Simvastatin therapy for hypercholesterolaemia in patients with coronary heart disease

The efficacy of simvastatin therapy for hypercholesterolaemia was evaluated in 26 patients with coronary heart disease, 20 of whom had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. Simvastatin reduced total- and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from 8.3 to 5.1 (38%) and 6.3 to 3.3 mmol/L (48%) respectively, p less than 0.001; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased from 1.19 to 1.24 mmol/L, p = NS. The changes in apoproteins A1 and B paralleled those of HDL- and LDL-cholesterol. There were no clinically important adverse effects. We conclude that simvastatin is effective lipid lowering therapy and can be used safely, in the short term, in patients with coronary heart disease.

Combination drug therapy with HMG CoA reductase inhibitors and bile acid sequestrants for hypercholesterolemia

Single-drug therapy is often not sufficient to lower total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia to desirable or target levels. Therefore, combination drug therapy is often necessary. The most potent therapy to achieve this goal is a combination of a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor, which reduces cholesterol synthesis, and a bile acid sequestrant, which indirectly depletes the intrahepatic cholesterol pool. LDL cholesterol reductions reportedly vary between 52 and 54% in short-term trials. Combining a bile acid sequestrant with nicotinic acid reduces LDL cholesterol 34-55%, and with a fibrate, 12-42%. The triple-drug regimen of bile acid sequestrant, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, and nicotinic acid is even more effective, achieving reductions of 59-67%. All these regimens elevate high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels concomitantly by 2-37%.