Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

PURPOSE

The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy.

CONCLUSION

Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.

Evaluating nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin's cost-effectiveness for aUC in China

Aims

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of Nivolumab with Gemcitabine-Cisplatin for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (aUC) treatment from the perspective of Chinese payers.

Methods

A Markov model assessed economic outcomes, estimating health outcomes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of uncertainties on the results.

Results

The base-case analysis showed Nivolumab plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin yielded 0.59 QALYs at an extra cost of $78,780.61, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of $133,526.46/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis highlighted Nivolumab's cost as the key factor, while probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 0% chance of cost-effectiveness for Nivolumab plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in aUC treatment.

Conclusion

Nivolumab plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin is not cost-effective in the treatment of aUC.

Enfortumab Vedotin Following Platinum Chemotherapy and Avelumab Maintenance in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Data from the ARON-2EV Study

BACKGROUND

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) has been approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the pivotal clinical trials did not include patients previously treated with avelumab maintenance therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present retrospective analysis was to assess the effectiveness of EV following avelumab in patients with mUC enrolled in the ARON-2EV study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 182 patients with mUC treated with EV following avelumab maintenance. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR). Statistical analysis involved Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

Median OS and PFS were 12.7 (95% CI 10.2-14.1) and 7.9 (95% CI 6.4-9.9) months, respectively. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 5% and partial response (PR) in 34% of patients, with an ORR of 39%. The DoR in patients who achieved CR/PR was 10.9 months (95% CI 8.1-11.4). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy and skin rash was 9%, followed by 8% of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea and 4% of grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our large international retrospective study confirm the effectiveness of EV and endorse its use in the population of patients with mUC treated with EV following the frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and subsequent maintenance treatment with avelumab.

[Novel systemic treatment options for advanced bladder cancer]

Systemic treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder requires complex approaches and is constantly evolving. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy remains the current standard of care for muscle-invasive advanced bladder cancer. For patients ineligible for cisplatin, adjuvant treatment with nivolumab is recommended. Innovative perioperative combinations could transform the treatment landscape in the future. First-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has long been dominated by platinum-based combinations, recently followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitor avelumab as maintenance therapy; however, recent results on the use of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in the first-line setting are expected to fundamentally change the treatment options. In subsequent lines of treatment, the not yet approved erdafitinib, as the first targeted therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma, offers an important alternative and underscores the need for molecular testing.

An evaluation of durvalumab across the spectrum of urothelial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Urothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy affecting the urinary system, with the spectrum of disease encompassing non-muscle invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic disease. On a background of almost half a century of immunogenic management with BCG, various immune checkpoint inhibitors, including durvalumab, have now demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the available literature on durvalumab in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma for all stages of the disease including mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety and covers a broad portfolio of reported and ongoing trials.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of UC is rapidly evolving, which is reflected in the diverse range of upcoming pivotal trials incorporating durvalumab with additional immunomodulatory agents and therapeutics targeting key oncogenic pathways, each with the potential to change the standard of care. As the complexity of UC management increases, future efforts should be directed at identifying better predictive biomarkers and selecting rational synergistic combinations from the novel treatments available. This will allow the addressing of existing gaps, facilitate the exploitation of new techniques of treatment delivery and ultimately deliver more personalized and efficacious care to the individual patient.

Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been widely investigated in urothelial carcinoma; however, the utility of ICI therapy in the treatment of organ transplant recipients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is unclear. We herein report the first case of a first-line anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy for a kidney transplant patient with mUC.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 71-year-old woman who received a kidney transplant in 2003 was diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma in 2018. After operation of the tumor, the patient developed local recurrence at the site of the right kidney and bladder and multiple distant metastases in May 2020. Considering the intolerance of chemotherapy and high tumor mutation burden, we administered the anti-PD-1 agent tislelizumab (200 mg every three weeks). Partial response was achieved after two cycles of therapy and sustained until 18th cycles. There were no signs of kidney graft rejection. The immunotherapy was temporarily stopped after the 18th course because of a suspicious immune-related pneumonitis and was continued in December 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

This case demonstrates the feasibility of safely achieving stable cancer control in a kidney transplant patient with mUC without encountering graft rejection by using single-agent anti-PD-1 treatment.

Case report: Successful treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation using Tislelizumab and Disitamab vedotin

Background

Urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation represents an uncommon and aggressive malignancy for which there is currently no established standard treatment. Systemic chemotherapy as the main treatment has limited efficacy. However, recent research has demonstrated significant improvements in patient survival with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. To our knowledge, this case represents the first successful application of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (Tislelizumab) combined with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (Disitamab vedotin) in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation.

Case report

We describe the case of a 36-year-old male patient diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation, showing high expression of programmed death-ligand 1. Tumor progression occurred after six cycles of Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) followed by five cycles of Tislelizumab monotherapy. Re-biopsy confirmed metastatic urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation, now with epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression. Treatment with Disitamab vedotin in combination with Tislelizumab resulted in a biochemical and imaging complete response, leading to an overall survival exceeding 24 months. Notably, no grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed during treatment.

Discussion

The prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation is unfavorable, and the available therapeutic options are limited. Combining Tislelizumab with Disitamab vedotin presents a promising anti-tumor strategy that warrants further investigation.

[Paradigm shift in systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma-antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors]

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma face a poor prognosis. Standard first-line treatment involves platinum-based combinations followed by avelumab maintenance therapy. Follow-up therapies include enfortumab vedotin, vinflunine, and taxanes.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze new drug combinations in first-line and follow-up treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma concerning their clinical relevance, toxicities, and novel treatment sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of new study data from EV-302/KN-A39 (enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab) and CheckMate-901 (nivolumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin) for untreated metastatic patients as well as TROPHY-U-01 (sacituzumab govitecan) and THOR (erdafitinib) for later lines.

RESULTS

The new standard in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma is the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab. For cisplatin-eligible patients with contraindications to enfortumab vedotin, the combination of nivolumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin offers an alternative. Erdafitinib presents a new biomarker-based option in the follow-up treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

These novel combinations are revolutionizing the treatment standard for metastatic urothelial carcinoma and necessitate a new approach to managing side effects.

Immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an abridged Cochrane review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy as first- and second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Based on a published protocol, we performed a systematic search of multiple databases. Two review authors independently performed the literature selection, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, and extracted data. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of the evidence on a per-outcome basis according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

We included five randomised controlled trials and also identified seven single-arm studies. When used as first-line therapy, immunotherapy probably has little to no effect on the risk of death from any cause compared to chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.07; moderate-certainty evidence). immunotherapy probably has little to no effect on health-related quality of life (mean difference [MD] 4.10, 95% CI 3.83-4.37; moderate). Immunotherapy probably reduces grade 3-5 adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.75; moderate). In the second-line setting immunotherapy may reduce the risk of death from any cause (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.81; low). Immunotherapy may have little to no effect on health-related quality of life when compared to chemotherapy (MD 4.82, 95% CI -3.11 to 12.75; low). Immunotherapy may reduce grade 3-5 adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97; low).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to chemotherapy, immunotherapy has little to no effect on the risk of death from any cause in a first-line setting. Nevertheless, it may reduce the risk of death from any cause when used as second-line therapy. The health-related quality of life of participants receiving first- and second-line therapy does not appear to be affected by immunotherapy. Immunotherapy probably reduces or may reduce grade 3-5 adverse events when used as first- and second-line therapy, respectively.

Dual mTOR1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib (FTH-003/TAK-228) in Combination With Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Phase II Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently altered at genomic level in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Since mTOR is the last protein in the PI3K signaling cascade, it may have the largest impact on the pathway and has been a focus of targeted therapies. Sapanisertib (FTH-003/TAK-228) is an oral highly selective mTOR1 and mTOR2 inhibitor. NFE2L2 mutations have been described as predictive biomarkers of response in patients with advanced squamous cell lung cancer treated with sapanisertib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an open-label, investigator-initiated phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of sapanisertib plus paclitaxel in patients with mUC who had progressed to prior platinum therapy, and the correlation with NFE2L2 mutations in responders. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients were treated with weekly paclitaxel at dose of 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with sapanisertib 4 mg administered orally 3 days per week on days 2-4, 9-11, 16-18, and 23-25 of a 28-day cycle. NFE2L2 mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing in responders.

RESULTS

22 patients were enrolled from May 2018 to April 2020; the trial was halted early due to slow accrual and the COVID-19 pandemic. ORR was 18.2% (n = 4). Disease control rate was 50% (7 SD and 4 PR). Median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI: 1.8-6.1) and median OS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 1.8-13.4). Adverse events (AE) of grade 3-4 were seen in 86% of patients, but no patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. NFE2L2 mutations were not found in responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary endpoint was no met, sapanisertib and paclitaxel combination demonstrated clinical activity in a heavily pretreated population of mUC. This trial generates insight for future combination of sapaniserib with immunotherapy and/or antibody drug conjugates.

Biomarkers of treatment response in bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

There have been many recent advancements in the treatment of bladder cancer including the approval of novel intravesical agents for non-muscle-invasive disease and systemic-targeted therapeutics for muscle-invasive and advanced disease. However, treatment strategies for bladder cancer are still largely based on clinicopathologic characteristics.

AREAS COVERED

Based on primary literature sourced from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, we review the current status of molecular markers and biomarker panels with respective to their value in predicting response to standard chemotherapeutics and novel agents in non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive, and advanced bladder cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Several biomarkers based on molecular characterization of tumors and quantification of circulating tumor DNA have been associated with response or resistance to standard chemotherapeutics. More recent investigations have reported on predictive biomarkers for novel therapeutics in bladder cancer, although large-scale validation is still needed. Given the increasing therapeutic options for this disease, employment of such predictive biomarkers may help guide treatment selection and sequencing.

Immunohistochemical Expression of p53 and FGFR3 Predicts Response to Enfortumab Vedotin in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is a genomically and molecularly heterogeneous disease associated with various clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the association between the status of p53/FGFR3 expression and the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We evaluated the association between p53 (abnormal vs. wild-type) or FGFR3 (high vs. low) expression determined by immunohistochemistry and response to EV in 28 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Overall, 60.7% showed abnormal p53, and 17.9% had high FGFR3 expression. The rates of objective response to EV were statistically higher in patients with abnormal p53 than in those with wild-type p53 (p = 0.038). Patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (n = 18) and low FGFR3 showed significantly better response to EV than those with high FGFR3. When the statuses of p53 and FGFR3 were combined, abnormal p53/low FGFR3 (vs. wild-type p53/high FGFR3) was strongly associated with favorable outcomes in both the entire cohort (p = 0.002) and in cases of pure urothelial carcinoma only (p = 0.023). Immunohistochemically abnormal p53 tumors were found to respond well to EV, while high FGFR3 tumors had a poorer response. Thus, p53 and FGFR3 are potential biomarkers for predicting response to EV treatment in patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Natural Killer Cell Dysfunction In Human Bladder Cancer Is Caused By Tissue-Specific Suppression of SLAMF6 Signaling

NK cells are innate lymphocytes critical for surveillance of viruses and tumors, however the mechanisms underlying NK cell dysfunction in cancer are incompletely understood. We assessed the effector function of NK cells from bladder cancer patients and found severe dysfunction in NK cells derived from tumors versus peripheral blood. While both peripheral and tumor-infiltrating NK cells exhibited conserved patterns of inhibitory receptor over-expression, this did not explain the observed defects in NK surveillance in bladder tumors. Rather, TME-specific TGF-β and metabolic perturbations such as hypoxia directly suppressed NK cell function. Specifically, an oxygen-dependent reduction in signaling through SLAMF6 was mechanistically responsible for poor NK cell function, as tumor-infiltrating NK cells cultured ex vivo under normoxic conditions exhibited complete restoration of function, while deletion of SLAMF6 abrogated NK cell cytolytic function even under normoxic conditions. Collectively, this work highlights the role of tissue-specific factors in dictating NK cell function, and implicates SLAMF6 signaling as a rational target for immuno-modulation to improve NK cell function in bladder cancer.

Patient-derived Organoids in Bladder Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Bladder cancer (BLCa) remains a prevalent malignancy with high recurrence rates and limited treatment options. In recent years, patient-derived organoids (PDOs) have emerged as a promising platform for studying cancer biology and therapeutic responses in a personalized manner. Using drug screening, PDOs facilitate the identification of novel therapeutic agents and translational treatment strategies. Moreover, their ability to model patient-specific responses to treatments holds promise for predicting clinical outcomes and guiding treatment decisions. This exploratory review aims to investigate the potential of PDOs in advancing BLCa research and treatment, with an emphasis on translational clinical approaches. Furthermore, we analyze the feasibility of deriving PDOs from minimally invasive blood and urine samples.

METHODS

In addition to exploring hypothetical applications of PDOs for predicting patient outcomes and their ability to model different stages of BLCa, we conducted a comprehensive PubMed search on already published data as well as comprehensive screening of currently ongoing trials implementing PDOs in precision medicine in cancer patients irrespective of the tumor entity.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

While the research on BLCa PDOs is advancing rapidly, data on both BLCa PDO research and their clinical application are scarce. Owing to this fact, a narrative review format was chosen for this publication.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

BLCa PDOs have the potential to influence the domain of precision medicine and enhance personalized cancer treatment strategies. However, standardized protocols for PDO generation, their ideal clinical application, as well as their impact on outcomes remain to be determined.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this review, we discuss the current state and future needs for the use of patient-derived organoids, small three-dimensional avatars of tumor cells, in bladder cancer. Patient-derived bladder cancer organoids offer a more personalized approach to studying and treating bladder cancer, providing a model that closely resembles the patient's own tumor. These organoids can help researchers identify new treatment options and predict how individual patients may respond to standard therapies. By using minimally invasive samples such as blood and urine, patients can participate in research studies more easily, potentially leading to improved outcomes in bladder cancer treatment.

HLA-E and NKG2A Mediate Resistance to M. bovis BCG Immunotherapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the primary treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), known to stimulate inflammatory cytokines, notably interferon (IFN)-γ. We observed that prolonged IFN-γ exposure fosters adaptive resistance in recurrent tumors, aiding immune evasion and tumor proliferation. We identify HLA-E and NKG2A, part of a novel NK and T cell checkpoint pathway, as key mediators of resistance in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. IFN-γ enhances HLA-E and PD-L1 expression in recurrent tumors, with an enrichment of intra-tumoral NKG2A-expressing NK and CD8 T cells. CXCL9+ macrophages and dendritic cells and CXCL12-expressing stromal cells likely recruit CXCR3/CXCR4-expressing NK and T cells and CXCR7+ HLA-EHIGH tumor cells. NK and CD8 T cells remain functional within BCG-unresponsive tumors but are inhibited by HLA-E and PD-L1, providing a framework for combined NKG2A and PD-L1 blockade strategy for bladder-sparing treatment of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

Immunophenotypic and molecular changes during progression of papillary urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

Urothelial carcinoma has various molecular subtypes, each with different tumor characteristics. Although it is known that molecular changes occur during tumor progression, little is known about the specifics of these changes. In this study, we performed transcriptional analysis to understand the molecular changes during tumor progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were obtained from 12 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The invasive and non-invasive papillary areas were identified in papillary urothelial carcinoma specimens. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and mRNA sequencing were performed for each tumor area.

RESULTS

Patients with CK5/6-negative and CK20-positive non-invasive papillary areas were selected and classified into the IHC switch subgroup (CK5/6-positive and CK20-negative in the invasive area) and the IHC unchanged subgroup (CK5/6-negative and CK20-positive in the invasive area) according to the IHC results of the invasive area. We identified differences in the mRNA expression between the non-invasive papillary and invasive areas of the papillary MIBC tissue samples. In both the non-invasive papillary and invasive areas, the IHC switch subgroup showed basal subtype gene expression, while the IHC unchanged subgroup demonstrated luminal subtype gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-invasive papillary area showed a gene expression pattern similar to that of the invasive area. Therefore, even if the non-invasive papillary area exhibits a luminal phenotype on IHC, it can have a basal subtype gene expression depending on the invasive area.

Efficacy of trametinib in a metastatic urothelial carcinoma patient with a BRAF mutation

Introduction

BRAF mutations in bladder cancer are rare. MEK inhibitors have excellent clinical benefits in the treatment of melanoma.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old male was diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and underwent total cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. Despite 4 cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy and 3 courses of pembrolizumab, the left obturator lymph node enlarged. Cancer multi-gene panel testing confirmed the BRAF G469A mutation and trametinib was recommended. Three months after the initiation of trametinib (2 mg, qd), the left obturator lymph node shrank by more than 50%. The disease has remained stable for more than 18 months.

Conclusion

The present case indicates the potential of trametinib to treat mBUC patients with the BRAF G469A mutation in this setting.

Prolonged in-use physicochemical and biological stability of nivolumab and pembrolizumab diluted in saline infusion bags and in partially used medication vials

AIM/BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine long-term physicochemical and biological stability of nivolumab and pembrolizumab diluted in saline infusion bags and partially used medication vials. This may enable the prolonged clinical use of these expensive monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to minimize the economic loss.

METHODS

Sterile nivolumab and pembrolizumab concentrates in partially used medication vials and compounded nivolumab and pembrolizumab infusion solutions were stored for two and four weeks, respectively, at 2-8°C in the dark. Subsequently, concentrates and compounded solutions were stored for an additional two weeks under ambient temperature and light conditions. A panel of validated and complementary methods, consisting of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, size exclusion chromatography, and dynamic light scattering, were used to assess the biological and physiochemical stability of these mAbs.

RESULTS

All samples showed that purity and concentration had remained within the criteria of <5% as stated in the European Pharmacopoeia. Diluted in infusion bags, nivolumab and pembrolizumab remained biologically and physiochemically stable for up to four weeks when stored at 2-8°C in the dark with an additional two weeks of ambient temperature and light. Stability in partially used medication vials was demonstrated for at least two weeks when stored at 2-8°C in the dark with an additional two weeks of ambient temperature and light.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study justify the storage and clinical re-use of sterile nivolumab and pembrolizumab in partially used medication vials and compounded IV infusion bags for up to six weeks. This minimizes the risk of economic loss due to waste. Moreover, these findings support the batch-wise compounding of fixed-dose and dose-banded nivolumab and pembrolizumab infusion bags.

Emerging molecular therapies in the treatment of bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is a leading cancer type in men. The complexity of treatment in late-stage bladder cancer after systemic spread through the lymphatic system highlights the importance of modulating disease-free progression as early as possible in cancer staging. With current therapies relying on previous standards, such as platinum-based chemotherapeutics and immunomodulation with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, researchers, and clinicians are looking for targeted therapies to stop bladder cancer at its source early in progression. A new era of molecular therapies that target specific features upregulated in bladder cancer cell lines is surfacing, which may be able to provide clinicians and patients with better control of disease progression. Here, we discuss multiple emerging therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway, antibody-drug conjugates, modulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) cell proliferation pathway, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and fibroblast growth factor receptor targeting. Together, these modern treatments provide potentially promising results for bladder cancer patients with the possibility of increasing remission and survival rates.

Urine scRNAseq reveals new insights into the bladder tumor immune microenvironment

Due to bladder tumors' contact with urine, urine-derived cells (UDCs) may serve as a surrogate for monitoring the tumor microenvironment (TME) in bladder cancer (BC). However, the composition of UDCs and the extent to which they mirror the tumor remain poorly characterized. We generated the first single-cell RNA-sequencing of BC patient UDCs with matched tumor and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). BC urine was more cellular than healthy donor (HD) urine, containing multiple immune populations including myeloid cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, B cells, and dendritic cells (DCs) in addition to tumor and stromal cells. Immune UDCs were transcriptionally more similar to tumor than blood. UDCs encompassed cytotoxic and activated CD4+ T cells, exhausted and tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells, macrophages, germinal-center-like B cells, tissue-resident and adaptive NK cells, and regulatory DCs found in tumor but lacking or absent in blood. Our findings suggest BC UDCs may be surrogates for the TME and serve as therapeutic biomarkers.

Recent developments and future directions of first-line systemic therapy combined with immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a historical perspective on treatment evolution

Urothelial carcinoma presents significant treatment challenges, especially in advanced stages. Traditionally managed with platinum-based chemotherapy, the advent of immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized urothelial carcinoma treatment. This review explores the evolution of urothelial carcinoma management, focusing on the transition from immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy to innovative combination therapies. Pembrolizumab, following the KEYNOTE-045 trial, emerged as a pivotal ICI in pretreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma, outperforming traditional chemotherapy. However, limitations surfaced in untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients, particularly in those with low PD-L1 expression, as evidenced by trials like IMvigor130 and KEYNOTE-361. These challenges led to the exploration of combination therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors with platinum-based chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Notably, the CheckMate 901 trial demonstrated improved outcomes with a nivolumab-chemotherapy combination. A significant breakthrough was achieved with the combination of enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugates, and pembrolizumab, setting a new standard in first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Future directions involve further exploration of antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors, as seen in the TROPHY-U-01 and TROPiCS-4 trials. The review concludes that the locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treatment landscape is rapidly evolving, with combination therapies offering promising avenues for improved patient outcomes, signaling a new era in urothelial carcinoma management.

PrECOG PrE0807: A Phase 1b Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Without and with Lirilumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Ineligible for or Refusing Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) improves overall survival (OS) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, many patients are cisplatin ineligible; therefore, new treatment options are needed. Nivolumab without/with lirilumab prior to RC was investigated in cisplatin-ineligible patients in this phase 1b trial (NCT03532451) to determine its safety/feasibility.

METHODS

Patients with localized MIBC received two doses of nivolumab (480 mg) alone (cohort 1) or with lirilumab (240 mg; cohort 2) prior to RC. Cohorts were enrolled sequentially. The key eligibility criteria were cT2-4aN0-1M0 stage and cisplatin ineligibility/refusal. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade (G) ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who underwent RC >6 wk after the last dose, CD8+ T-cell density change between pretreatment transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and post-treatment RC, ypT0N0,

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Among 43 patients enrolled (n = 13, cohort 1; n = 30, cohort 2), 13 and 29 completed intended neoadjuvant therapy, respectively, in cohorts 1 and 2, and 41 underwent RC. The median time from the last dose to RC was 4 wk. The G3 TRAEs occurred in 0% (90% confidence interval [CI] 0-21%) of patients in cohort 1 and 7% (90% CI 1-20%) in cohort 2; all these TRAEs resolved and no G4/5 TRAEs occurred. No patient had delayed RC for >6 wk. In cohorts 1 and 2, ypT0N0 rates for patients with MIBC and RC were 17% and 21%,

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Neoadjuvant nivolumab-based immunotherapy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC. Although ypT0N0 rates were lower than expected, 2-yr survival rates seem to be comparable with those of other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials. Nivolumab is being evaluated in the CA-017-078 trial (NCT03661320).

PATIENT SUMMARY

For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer unable to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, treatment with nivolumab without and with lirilumab prior to radical cystectomy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated. Nivolumab-based immunotherapy showed lower pathologic response rates than but similar survival rates to other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials.

Collapse

Key Words

• Anti-KIR antibody
• Bladder cancer
• Immune checkpoint inhibitors
• Neoadjuvant therapy
• Urothelial carcinoma

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
• Male
• Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
• Female
• Aged
• Cisplatin/therapeutic use
• Cisplatin/administration & dosage
• Feasibility Studies
• Nivolumab/therapeutic use
• Middle Aged
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Cystectomy/methods

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Petros Grivas Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vadim S Koshkin Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Xiangying Chu Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
Suzanne Cole University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Rohit K Jain H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
Robert Dreicer University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Jeremy P Cetnar Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Debasish Sundi Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
Benjamin A Gartrell Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
Matthew D Galsky Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Brianna Woo Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Elsa Li-Ning-Tapia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Noah M Hahn Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Michael A Carducci Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

A Phase 2 Study of Sitravatinib in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) has demonstrated survival benefits in urothelial carcinoma (UC); however, not all patients benefit from CPI due to resistance. Combining sitravatinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of TYRO3, AXL, and MERTK (TAM) receptors and VEGFR2, with CPI may improve antitumor responses. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC.

METHODS

The 516-003 trial (NCT03606174) is an open-label, multicohort phase 2 study evaluating sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC enrolled in eight cohorts depending on prior treatment with CPI, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), or antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Overall, 244 patients were enrolled and treated with sitravatinib plus nivolumab (median follow-up 14.1-38.2 mo). Sitravatinib (free-base capsules 120 mg once daily [QD] or malate capsule 100 mg QD) plus nivolumab (240 mg every 2 wk/480 mg every 4 wk intravenously).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. The Predictive probability design and confidence interval methods were used. Among patients previously treated with PBC, ORR, and median PFS were 32.1% and 3.9 mo in CPI-naïve patients (n = 53), 14.9% and 3.9 mo in CPI-refractory patients (n = 67), and 5.4% and 3.7 mo in CPI- and ADC-refractory patients (n = 56), respectively. Across all cohorts, grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 51.2% patients and grade 4 in 3.3%, with one treatment-related death (cardiac failure). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 50.4% patients. TRAEs led to sitravatinib/nivolumab discontinuation in 6.1% patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Sitravatinib plus nivolumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile but did not result in clinically meaningful ORRs in patients with advanced/metastatic UC in the eight cohorts studied.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, the combination of two anticancer drugs, sitravatinib and nivolumab, resulted in manageable side effects but no meaningful responses in patients with bladder cancer.

The rapidly changing treatment landscape of first-line advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)

The landscape of treatment for first-line therapy in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) and metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) has rapidly changed in the last year alone. Maintenance avelumab remains a viable treatment option for many patients across the globe for those who have responded or have achieved stable disease after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the recent FDA approvals based on EV-302 for enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab, as well as CheckMate-904 with gemcitabine and cisplatin with nivolumab (GC+N) followed by maintenance nivolumab have left clinicians with the complicated decision of determining which regimen is most appropriate for their individual patients with untreated aUC. This commentary highlights the key trials that have set the standard-of-care for front-line aUC treatment and suggestions for choosing different regimens for the appropriate patient.

Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 study

BACKGROUND

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) levels correlate with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are often co-expressed. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In a subgroup analysis of patients with advanced UC participating in a phase I/II study, epacadostat-pembrolizumab treatment produced an objective response rate (ORR) of 35%.

METHODS

ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 was a double-blinded, randomized phase III study of adults with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced UC with recurrence or progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomized to epacadostat 100 mg twice daily (BID) plus pembrolizumab or placebo plus pembrolizumab until completion of 35 pembrolizumab infusions, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

Target enrollment was 648 patients; enrollment was halted early based on efficacy results from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study in metastatic melanoma. Forty-two patients were randomized to each treatment arm. Median duration of follow-up was 62 days in each arm. The investigator-assessed ORR (unconfirmed) was 26.2% (95% CI 16.35-48.11) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 11.9% (95% CI 4.67-29.50) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Two complete responses were reported, both in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Circulating kynurenine levels increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and numerically decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. The safety profile of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab was similar to that of pembrolizumab monotherapy, although a numerically greater proportion of patients in the combination vs. control arm experienced treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (16.7% vs. 7.3%). One patient in each arm died due to cardiovascular events, which were not deemed drug-related. No new safety concerns were identified for either agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity and was generally tolerable as second-line treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/progressive metastatic UC. Epacadostat 100 mg BID, when administered with pembrolizumab, did not normalize circulating kynurenine in most patients. Further study of combined IDO1/PD-L1 inhibition in this patient population, particularly with epacadostat doses that result in durable normalization of circulating kynurenine, may be warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03374488. Registered 12/15/2017.

The upregulation of POLR3G correlates with increased malignancy of bladder urothelium

Bladder cancer remains a significant health challenge due to its high recurrence and progression rates. This study aims to evaluate the role of POLR3G in the development and progression of bladder cancer and the potential of POLR3G to serve as a novel therapeutic target. We constructed a bladder cancer model in Wistar rats by administering N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine (BBN), which successfully induced a transition from normal mucosa to hyperplasia and ultimately to urothelial carcinoma. We observed a progressive upregulation of POLR3G expression during the bladder cancer development and progression. To investigate the functional role of POLR3G, we performed functional experiments in bladder cancer cell lines. The results demonstrated that knocking down POLR3G significantly inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. We further conducted RNA sequencing on POLR3G-knockdown bladder cancer cells, and Metascape was employed to perform the functional enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Enrichment analysis revealed the enrichment of DEGs in the RNA polymerase and apoptotic cleavage of cellular proteins pathways, as well as their involvement in the Wnt and MAPK signaling pathways. The downregulation of Wnt pathway-related proteins such as Wnt5a/b, DVL2, LRP-6, and phosphorylated LRP-6 upon POLR3G knockdown was further confirmed by Western blotting, indicating that POLR3G might influence bladder cancer behavior through the Wnt signaling pathway. Our findings suggest that POLR3G plays a crucial role in bladder cancer progression and could serve as a potential therapeutic target. Future studies should focus on the detailed mechanisms by which POLR3G regulates these signaling pathways and its potential as a biomarker for early detection and prognosis of bladder cancer.

PD-L1 expression and its correlation with tumor biomarkers in Chinese urothelial bladder cancer

Data on prevalence of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and its correlation with tumor biomarkers in Chinese patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIUBC) are scarce. We investigated the prevalence of PD-L1 expression, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TC) and immune cells (IC), and its correlation with tumor biomarkers (CD8+ T cells and tumor mutation burden [TMB]) in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed MIUBC (NCT03433924). Of 248 patients enrolled, 229 with PD-L1 data available were analysed. High PD-L1 expression (≥ 25% of TC or IC with PD-L1 expression) was observed in 120 (52.4%) patients. 59 cases showed positive staining in ≥ 25% of TC, and 82 cases had positive staining in ≥ 25% of IC. High expression of CD8+ T cell and TMB (> 10 mutations/megabase) was observed in 44.5% and 54.1% patients, respectively. A positive correlation was observed between percentage of TC with membrane PD-L1 positivity and CD8+ T cells (0.34; P < 0.001) and between IC with membrane PD-L1 positivity and CD8+ T cells (0.44; P < 0.001). There is high prevalence of PD-L1 expression in Chinese patients with MIUBC, suggesting that a sizable subset of patients could benefit from immunotherapy. The correlation of PD-L1 expression with tumor biomarkers provide clues for mechanisms underlying the effects of biomarkers for predicting efficacy.

Identification of tumor-specific T cell signature predicting cancer immunotherapy response in bladder cancer by multi-omics analysis and experimental verification

BACKGROUND

Numerous gene signatures predicting the prognosis of bladder cancer have been identified. However, a tumor-specific T cell signature related to immunotherapy response in bladder cancer remains under investigation.

METHODS

Single-cell RNA and TCR sequencing from the Gene expression omnibus (GEO) database were used to identify tumor-specific T cell-related genes in bladder cancer. Subsequently, we constructed a tumor-specific T cell signature (TstcSig) and validated its clinical relevance for predicting immunotherapy response in multiple immunotherapy cohorts. Further analyses explored the immune characteristics of TstcSig in bladder cancer patients from other cohorts in the TCGA and GEO databases. Western blot (WB), multicolor immunofluorescence (MIF), qRT-PCR and flow cytometry assays were performed to validate the results of bioinformatics analysis.

RESULTS

The established TstcSig, based on five tumor-specific T cell-related genes, could predict outcomes in a bladder cancer immunotherapy cohort. This was verified using two additional immunotherapy cohorts and showed better predictive performance compared to 109 published T cell signatures. TstcSig was strongly correlated with immune characteristics such as immune checkpoint gene expression, tumor mutation burden, and T cell infiltration, as validated by single-cell and spatial transcriptomics datasets. Notably, the positive correlation between TstcSig and T cell infiltration was confirmed in the TCGA cohort. Furthermore, pan-cancer analysis demonstrated the heterogeneity of the prognostic value of TstcSig. Tumor-specific T cells highly expressed CD27, IFNG, GZMB and CXCL13 and secreted more effector cytokines for tumor cell killing, as validated experimentally.

CONCLUSION

We developed a five-gene signature (including VAMP5, TIGIT, LCK, CD27 and CACYBP) based on tumor-specific T cell-related genes to predict the immunotherapy response in bladder cancer patients.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Fundamental Mechanisms, Current Status and Future Directions

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a promising form of immunotherapy that have significantly changed the therapeutic landscape for many advanced cancers. They have shown unique clinical benefit against a broad range of tumour types and a strong overall impact on survival in studied patient populations. However, there are still many limitations holding back this immunotherapy from reaching its full potential as a possible curative option for advanced cancer patients. A great deal of research is being undertaken in the hope of driving advancements in this area, building a better understanding of the mechanisms behind immune checkpoint inhibition and ultimately developing more effective, safer, and wider-reaching agents. Taking into account the current literature on this topic, this review aims to explore in depth the basis of the use of ICIs in the treatment of advanced cancers, evaluate its efficacy and safety, consider its current limitations, and finally reflect on what the future holds for this very promising form of cancer immunotherapy.

Gut microbiota Parabacteroides distasonis enchances the efficacy of immunotherapy for bladder cancer by activating anti-tumor immune responses

OBJECTIVE

Bladder cancer(BCa) was a disease that seriously affects patients' quality of life and prognosis. To address this issue, many researches suggested that the gut microbiota modulated tumor response to treatment; however, this had not been well-characterized in bladder cancer. In this study, our objective was to determine whether the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota or the density of specific bacterial genera influence the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer.

METHODS

We collected fecal samples from a total of 50 bladder cancer patients and 22 matched non-cancer individuals for 16S rDNA sequencing to investigate the distribution of Parabacteroides in these two groups. Further we conducted follow-up with cancer patients to access the impact of different genera of microorganisms on patients survival. We conducted a Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) and mono-colonization experiment with Parabacteroides distasonis to explore its potential enhancement of the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in MB49 tumor-bearing mice. Immunohistochemistry, transcriptomics and molecular experiment analyses were employed to uncover the underlying mechanisms.

RESULTS

The 16S rDNA showed that abundance of the genus Parabacteroides was elevated in the non-cancer control group compared to bladder cancer group. The results of tumor growth curves showed that a combination therapy of P. distasonis and ICIs treatment significantly delayed tumor growth and increased the intratumoral densities of both CD4+T and CD8+T cells. The results of transcriptome analysis demonstrated that the pathways associated with antitumoral immune response were remarkably upregulated in the P. distasonis gavage group.

CONCLUSION

P. distasonis delivery combined with α-PD-1 mAb could be a new strategy to enhance the effect of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. This effect might be achieved by activating immune and antitumor related pathways.

Open-label, dose-escalation FIGHT-101 study of pemigatinib combined with targeted therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

Pemigatinib is an oral, potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor. FIGHT-101, a three-part, open-label, first-in-human, phase I/II study (NCT02393248), evaluated pemigatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. In parts 1 and 2, pemigatinib monotherapy had a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in FGFR-altered tumors. Part 3 (pemigatinib combination therapies) results are presented here.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received 9, 13.5, or 20 mg oral once-daily pemigatinib on continuous or intermittent schedules with gemcitabine and cisplatin (pemi/gem/cis), docetaxel (pemi/doc), trastuzumab (pemi/tras), pembrolizumab (pemi/pembro), or retifanlimab (pemi/reti) irrespective of whether the tumor was confirmed as FGFR altered. Primary endpoints were safety and pharmacodynamics. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed tumor objective response rates (ORRs) and pharmacokinetics (PK).

RESULTS

Of 65 enrolled patients (pemi/gem/cis, n = 8; pemi/doc, n = 7; pemi/tras, n = 6; pemi/pembro, n = 26; pemi/reti, n = 18), all discontinued. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally consistent with individual drug AEs. Serious and grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 0%-85.7% and 33.3%-100.0% of patients across treatment groups, respectively. All pemigatinib combinations demonstrated steady-state PK comparable to monotherapy. Pharmacodynamic effects in all pemigatinib combinations, except pemi/gem/cis, were consistent with monotherapy. Less inhibition of FGFR2α phosphorylation was observed with this combination. ORRs (95% confidence interval) were 37.5% [8.5% to 75.5% (pemi/gem/cis)], 14.3% [0.4% to 57.9% (pemi/doc)], 0% (pemi/tras), 26.9% [11.6% to 47.8% (pemi/pembro)], and 11.1% [1.4% to 34.7% (pemi/reti)]. All groups had instances of tumor shrinkage. ORRs in assessable patients with FGFR rearrangements and mutations were 50% and 33%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemigatinib combination therapy showed no unexpected toxicities. PK and pharmacodynamics were mostly consistent with pemigatinib monotherapy. Pemi/gem/cis (37.5%) and pemi/pembro (26.9%) had the highest ORR; most responders had FGFR alterations.

A single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 clinical study of recombinant humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-MMAE conjugate (MRG002) in HER2-positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

MRG002 is a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate being investigated in the MRG002-006 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety in HER2-positive urothelial carcinoma patients.

METHODS

This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase II study. Eligibility criteria included: histologically confirmed HER2 IHC 2 + or 3 + UC, prior received ≥ 1 standard treatment. Patients in this study received MRG002 every 3 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was confirmed ORR per RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

As of February 24, 2023, a total of 43 patients were enrolled. The median age was 60. 9 patients were dosed at 2.6 mg/kg and 34 patients were dosed at 2.2 mg/kg. At baseline, most patients (29/43) received ≥ 2 lines of treatment and 35 (81.4%) patients had prior ICI therapy. FISH test was performed in 41 patients and 9 (22.0%) were positive. By the cut-off date, 41 patients were evaluable and the ORR was 53% (95%CI：38.9%-67.5%), with 6.9% CR, and the DCR was 83.7% (95%CI：70.0%-91.9%). The median PFS and OS for the 43 patients were 7.0 months (95%CI：5.4-NE) and 14.9 months (95%CI：11.9-NE), respectively. The ORR was 77.8% in 9 patients with positive HER2 FISH results. Most common treatment-related AEs were anemia (51.2%), alopecia (44.2%) and neutropenia (39.5%); most were grade 1 or 2.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary results of MRG002 demonstrated a clinically meaningful response in pretreated HER-2 positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC patients. MRG002 at 2.2 mg/kg was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity.

BRAFV600E Metastatic Melanoma Journey: A Perspective from a Patient and his Oncologist

BACKGROUND

This article is co-authored by a patient with BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma and his treating oncologist.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The patient describes how he coped with his diagnosis and treatment. He details the pathway of his melanoma treatment, which has spanned over 10 years, including surgical interventions, medical treatment, and participation in clinical trials. He relates his experience of living with the disease-and the adverse effects of treatment-in the long term. The clinical perspective of his treating oncologist reviews the diagnostic process and explains how the therapeutic options were selected for and with the patient. The oncologist also addresses the integration of the patient into clinical trials involving programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Challenges related to the adverse effects that occurred and the personalised treatment of the patient are also discussed. Finally, the article evaluates current advances in treatment and future therapeutic approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the challenges of identifying which therapeutic options are most appropriate for individual patients with BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma.

A Podcast on Platinum Eligibility and Treatment Sequencing in Platinum-Eligible Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

The treatment landscape for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma continues to evolve. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has received Food and Drug Administration approval based on recent phase 3 trial data showing superior efficacy compared with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, its distinct toxicity profile may make it less suitable for some patients, and availability in some countries may be limited by cost considerations. Consequently, platinum-based chemotherapy is expected to remain an important first-line treatment option. Choice of platinum regimen (cisplatin- or carboplatin-based) is informed by assessment of clinical characteristics, including performance status, kidney function, and presence of peripheral neuropathy or heart failure. For patients without disease progression after completing platinum-based chemotherapy, avelumab first-line maintenance treatment is recommended by international guidelines. For patients who have disease progression, pembrolizumab is the preferred approach. Additionally, following results from a recent phase 3 trial, nivolumab plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy has also received Food and Drug Administration approval and is an additional first-line treatment option for cisplatin-eligible patients. Later-line options for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, depending on prior treatment, may include enfortumab vedotin, erdafitinib (for patients with FGFR2/3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements), sacituzumab govitecan, and platinum rechallenge. For the small proportion of patients ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy (i.e., unsuitable for cisplatin or carboplatin), immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab is a first-line treatment option, although approved agents vary between countries. In summary, this podcast discusses recent developments in the treatment landscape for advanced urothelial carcinoma, eligibility for platinum-based chemotherapy, potential first-line treatment options, and treatment sequencing. Supplementary file1 (MP4 246907 KB).

Nanoplatform-Based In Vivo Gene Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy

Gene therapy uses modern molecular biology methods to repair disease-causing genes. As a burgeoning therapeutic, it has been widely applied for cancer therapy. Since 1989, there have been numerous clinical gene therapy cases worldwide. However, a few are successful. The main challenge of clinical gene therapy is the lack of efficient and safe vectors. Although viral vectors show high transfection efficiency, their application is still limited by immune rejection and packaging capacity. Therefore, the development of non-viral vectors is overwhelming. Nanoplatform-based non-viral vectors become a hotspot in gene therapy. The reasons are mainly as follows. 1) Non-viral vectors can be engineered to be uptaken by specific types of cells or tissues, providing effective targeting capability. 2) Non-viral vectors can protect goods that need to be delivered from degradation. 3) Nanoparticles can transport large-sized cargo such as CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids and nucleoprotein complexes. 4) Nanoparticles are highly biosafe, and they are not mutagenic in themselves compared to viral vectors. 5) Nanoparticles are easy to scale preparation, which is conducive to clinical conversion and application. Here, an overview of the categories of nanoplatform-based non-viral gene vectors, the limitations on their development, and their applications in cancer therapy.

Bladder-sparing treatment using tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine/cisplatin in selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a real-world study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the tislelizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy combined with gemcitabine/cisplatin for bladder-sparing in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

Forty-five patients who received bladder-sparing treatment or radical cystectomy (RC) for MIBC (cT2-T4a, NxM0) were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (mTURBT), followed by four cycles of chemo-immunotherapy with tislelizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor), gemcitabine, and cisplatin. Clinical efficacy was evaluated to compare the benefit of bladder-sparing treatment on clinical CR (cCR) and RC for non-cCR patients. The primary outcomes were bladder intact disease-free survival (BIDFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were adverse effects. The PD-L1 status and molecular subtypes of tumors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 88.8% (95%CI: 79.6%, 98.0%) at 12 months, 85.7% (95%CI: 74.9%, 96.5%) at 18 months, and 66.6% (95%CI: 45.2%, 88.0%) at 24 months. Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) achieved cCR and their OS rate was 96.6% (95%CI: 89.9%, 100%). Sixteen patients were in the non-cCR group, and their OS rate was 75.0% (95%CI: 53.8%, 96.2%) at 12 months, 65.6% (95%CI: 40.3%, 90.9%) at 18 months, and 52.5% (95%CI: 21.9%, 83.1%) at 24 months. The BIDFS rate for patients who received bladder-sparing treatment was 96.0% (95%CI: 88.4%, 100%) from 12 to 24 months. Four patients (8.8%) were PD-L1 positive and 41 patients (91.2%) were PD-L1 negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study of patients with MIBC suggests that tislelizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy was a safe and effective bladder-sparing treatment.

What's new about the tumor microenvironment of urothelial carcinoma?

Urothelial carcinoma is a significant global health concern that accounts for a substantial part of cancer diagnoses and deaths worldwide. The tumor microenvironment is a complex ecosystem composed of stromal cells, soluble factors, and altered extracellular matrix, that mutually interact in a highly immunomodulated environment, with a prominent role in tumor development, progression, and treatment resistance. This article reviews the current state of knowledge of the different cell populations that compose the tumor microenvironment of urothelial carcinoma, its main functions, and distinct interactions with other cellular and non-cellular components, molecular alterations and aberrant signaling pathways already identified. It also focuses on the clinical implications of these findings, and its potential to translate into improved quality of life and overall survival. Determining new targets or defining prognostic signatures for urothelial carcinoma is an ongoing challenge that could be accelerated through a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment.

Single-cell transcriptomic-informed deconvolution of bulk data identifies immune checkpoint blockade resistance in urothelial cancer

Interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME) significantly influence tumor progression and treatment responses. While single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial genomics facilitate TME exploration, many clinical cohorts are assessed at the bulk tissue level. Integrating scRNA-seq and bulk tissue RNA-seq data through computational deconvolution is essential for obtaining clinically relevant insights. Our method, ProM, enables the examination of major and minor cell types. Through evaluation against existing methods using paired single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing of human urothelial cancer (UC) samples, ProM demonstrates superiority. Application to UC cohorts treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors reveals pre-treatment cellular features associated with poor outcomes, such as elevated SPP1 expression in macrophage/monocytes (MM). Our deconvolution method and paired single-cell and bulk tissue RNA-seq dataset contribute novel insights into TME heterogeneity and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of urogenital tumors: a review insights from phase 2 and 3 studies

With the high incidence of urogenital tumors worldwide, urinary system tumors are among the top 10 most common tumors in men, with prostate cancer ranking first and bladder cancer fourth. Patients with resistant urogenital tumors often have poor prognosis. In recent years, researchers have discovered numerous specific cancer antigens, which has led to the development of several new anti-cancer drugs. Using protein analysis techniques, researchers developed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs) for the treatment of advanced urogenital tumors. However, tumor resistance often leads to the failure of monotherapy. Therefore, clinical trials of the combination of ICIs and ADCs have been carried out in numerous centers around the world. This article reviewed phase 2 and 3 clinical studies of ICIs, ADCs, and their combination in the treatment of urogenital tumors to highlight safe and effective methods for selecting individualized therapeutic strategies for patients. ICIs activate the immune system, whereas ADCs link monoclonal antibodies to toxins, which can achieve a synergistic effect when the two drugs are combined. This synergistic effect provides multiple advantages for the treatment of urogenital tumors.

Frequency of next-generation sequencing, prevalence of targetable mutations and response to targeted therapies amongst patients with metastatic urothelial cancer in Ireland: a multi-centre retrospective study of real-world data

BACKGROUND

The genomic knowledge on urothelial carcinoma is expanding. It is recognised that urothelial carcinoma is a disease with a high somatic mutation rate and a high prevalence of genetic alterations, as discussed by Thomas and Sonpavde (2022). In the context of a disease rich with somatic alterations, continuing efforts to better identify which patients may benefit most from targeted therapy, immunotherapy and combination therapy may ultimately lead to improved outcomes for patients with this disease.

AIMS

We aimed to ascertain the frequency of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the prevalence of genomic alterations amongst patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) in Ireland. We studied patients who received a targeted therapy following the detection of an oncogenic alteration on NGS and assessed their outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of mUC between 2017 and 2022 were identified from Urology MDT databases as well as pharmacy databases across three Irish cancer centres. A retrospective review of patient notes including a comprehensive review of histopathology, radiology data, prior therapies and NGS reports was carried out for each patient.

RESULTS

111 patients diagnosed with mUC between 2017 and 2022 were identified for inclusion across three hospital sites. NGS was carried out on the tumour specimens of 66 patients (59%). Thirty-six potentially therapeutically targetable alterations were identified amongst thirty-five patients. The most frequent alterations identified were PIK3CA mutations, FGFR3 mutations or fusions and ERBB2 somatic mutations. Fifteen patients (13.5%) received therapy directed at a genetic alteration. The most common targeted therapy received was erdafitinib (60%) followed by trastuzumab (33%) with one patient receiving alpelisib monotherapy. The median duration of treatment with targeted therapy was 3 months (range 1-34 months). Two patients were observed to have durable responses to erdafitinib approaching 3 years duration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an understanding of the use of NGS and prevalence of genomic alterations in an Irish patient population.

Prognostic Value of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Genetic Alterations in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Evidence is limited on whether fibroblast growth factor receptor gene alterations (FGFRalt) impact clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). This study evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with mUC based on FGFRalt status in the first-line setting (1L).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on mUC patients were retrieved via convenience sampling of oncologists/urologists surveyed between August and September 2020 who treated at least 1 FGFRalt patient between July 2017 and June 2019. The questionnaire included information on patient demographics, FGFR status, treatment, and clinical and radiographic measures of progression. Primary endpoint was time from metastatic diagnosis to disease progression from initial treatment for FGFRalt and FGFRwt (wild-type) mUC. Cox proportional hazards models quantified adjusted risk of FGFR status relating to PFS.

RESULTS

A total of 414 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 64.5 years, 73.9% were male, and 52.7% had an FGFRalt. Among FGFRalt, 47.2% received chemotherapy, 27.5% immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), 11.5% chemotherapy+ICI, and 13.8% other treatments in 1L. FGFR status did not influence PFS from time of mUC diagnosis or among 224 stratified patients receiving either chemotherapy or chemotherapy+ICI. However, among 97 patients with an FGFRalt receiving 1L ICI therapy only, adjusted risk of progression was twice that of FGFRwt (HR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.13-4.00).

CONCLUSION

Although FGFRalt did not predict outcomes in the overall cohort, for patients treated with 1L ICI, FGFRalt had significantly higher rates of progression than FGFRwt patients. Further validation is needed to determine whether FGFRalt has a decreased benefit from ICI therapy.

Nivolumab + Ipilimumab as Immunotherapeutic Boost in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Studies with nivolumab, an approved therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after platinum-based chemotherapy, demonstrate improved outcomes with added high-dose ipilimumab.

Objective

To assess efficacy and safety of a tailored approach using nivolumab + ipilimumab as an immunotherapeutic boost for mUC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this phase 2 nonrandomized trial, patients with mUC composed 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 received first-line or second-/third-line nivolumab with escalating doses of ipilimumab, and cohort 2 received second-/third-line nivolumab with high-dose ipilimumab. Recruitment spanned 26 sites in Germany and Austria from August 8, 2017, to February 18, 2021. All patients had a 70% or higher Karnofsky Performance Score and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1.

Interventions

All patients initiated 4 doses of 240-mg nivolumab (1× every 2 wk). Week 8 nonresponders received nivolumab + ipilimumab (1× every 3 wk). Cohort 1 received 2 doses of 3-mg/kg nivolumab + 1-mg/kg ipilimumab followed by 2 doses of 1-mg/kg nivolumab + 3-mg/kg ipilimumab if no response. Due to safety concerns, cohort 1 treatment was halted, and first-line cohort 2 treatment was not pursued. Cohort 2 received 2 to 4 doses of 1-mg/kg nivolumab + 3-mg/kg ipilimumab. Responders continued with nivolumab maintenance but could receive nivolumab + ipilimumab for later progression.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was objective response rate.

Results

The study comprised 169 patients (118 [69.8%] men; median [range] age, 68 [37-84] years): 86 in cohort 1 (42 first-line; 44 second-/third-line) and 83 in cohort 2. The median (IQR) follow-up times were 10.4 (4.2-23.5) months (first-line cohort 1), 7.5 (3.1-23.8) months (second-/third-line cohort 1), and 6.2 (3.2-22.7) months (cohort 2). Response rates to nivolumab induction were 12/42 (29%, first-line cohort 1), 10/44 (23%, second-/third-line cohort 1), and 17/83 (20%, cohort 2). Response rates to a tailored approach were 20/42 (48% [90% CI, 34%-61%], first-line cohort 1), 12/44 (27% [90% CI, 17%-40%], second-/third-line cohort 1), and 27/83 (33% [90% CI, 23%-42%], cohort 2). Three-year overall survival rates for first-line cohort 1, second-/third-line cohort 1, and cohort 2 using the Kaplan-Meier method were 32% (95% CI, 17%-49%), 19% (95% CI, 8%-33%), and 34% (95% CI, 23%-44%), respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this nonrandomized trial, although first-line cohort 1 treatment improved objective response rates, considerable progression events urge caution with this as a first-line therapy. Second-/third-line cohort 1 treatment did not improve response rates compared with nivolumab monotherapy. However, added high-dose ipilimumab may improve tumor response and survival in patients with mUC.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03219775.

Advancements in Urothelial Cancer Care: Optimizing Treatment for Your Patient

The standard treatment paradigm for muscle invasive bladder cancer has been neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. However, efforts are ongoing to personalize treatment by incorporating biomarkers to better guide treatment selection. In addition, bladder preservation strategies are aimed at avoiding cystectomy in well-selected patients. Similarly, in the metastatic urothelial cancer space, the standard frontline treatment option of platinum-based chemotherapy has changed with the availability of data from EV-302 trial, making the combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab the preferred first-line treatment option. Here, we examine the optimization of treatment intensity and sequencing, focusing on the challenges and opportunities associated with EV/pembrolizumab therapy, including managing toxicities and exploring alternative dosing approaches. Together, these articles provide a comprehensive overview of contemporary strategies in bladder cancer management, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment approaches, ongoing research, and multidisciplinary collaboration to improve patient outcomes in this complex disease landscape.

FBXO22 is a potential therapeutic target for recurrent chondrosarcoma

Chondrosarcoma (CHS) is a malignant bone tumor with insensitivity to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and a high recurrence rate. However, the latent mechanism of recurrent CHS (Re-CHS) remains elusive. Here, we discovered that FBXO22 was highly expressed in clinical samples of Re-CHS. FBXO22 played a significant role in various cancers. However, the role of FBXO22 in Re-CHS remained unclear. Our research demonstrated that suppressing FBXO22 abated the proliferation and migration of CHS cells and facilitated their apoptosis. In addition, suppressing FBXO22 raised the expression of PD-L1 in Re-CHS. All these findings provide new evidence for using FBXO22 and PD-L1 as combined targets to prevent and treat Re-CHS, which may prove to be a novel strategy for immunotherapy of CHS, especially Re-CHS.

The Evolving Landscape of Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Genitourinary Cancers

In the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved for treatment of genitourinary malignancies and have revolutionized the treatment landscape of these tumors. However, despite the remarkable success of these therapies in some GU malignancies, many patients' tumors do not respond to these therapies, and others may experience significant side effects, such as immune-related adverse events (iRAEs). Accordingly, biomarkers and improved prognostic tools are critically needed to help predict which patients will respond to ICI, predict and mitigate risk of developing immune-related adverse events, and inform personalized choice of therapy for each patient. Ongoing clinical and preclinical studies continue to provide an increasingly robust understanding of the mechanisms of the response to immunotherapy, which continue to inform biomarker development and validation. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of biomarkers of the response to immunotherapy in GU tumors and their role in selection of therapy and disease monitoring.

The role of immunotherapy in urological cancers

Immunotherapy is defined as a therapeutic approach that targets or manipulates the immune system. A deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular composition of the tumour environment, as well as the mechanisms controlling the immune system, has made possible the development and clinical investigation of many innovative cancer therapies. Historically, immunotherapy has played an essential role in treating urologic malignancies, while in the modern era, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been critical to urology. Urothelial carcinoma is a common type of cancer in the genitourinary system, and treatment strategies in this area are constantly evolving. Intravesical and systemic immunotherapeutic agents have begun to be used increasingly frequently in treating urothelial carcinoma. These agents increase the anti-tumour response by affecting the body's defence mechanisms. Immunotherapeutic agents used in urothelial carcinoma include various options such as BCG, interferon, anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been known for many years as a tumour with unique sensitivity to immunotherapies. The recent emergence of ICIs that block PD-1/PD-L1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab) or CTLA4 (ipilimumab) signalling pathways has reestablished systemic immunotherapy as central to the treatment of advanced RCC. In light of randomized clinical trials conducted with increasing interest in the application of immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting, combination therapies (nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, pembrolizumab/ axitinib, pembrolizumab/lenvantinib) have become the standard first-line treatment of metastatic RCC. Prostate cancer is in the immunologically "cold" tumour category; on the contrary, in recent years, immunotherapeutic agents have come to the fore as an essential area in the treatment of this disease. Especially in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, immunotherapeutic agents constitute an alternative treatment method besides androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy. Ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and Sipuleucel T (Vaccine-based) are promising alternative treatment options. Considering ongoing randomized clinical trials, immunotherapeutic agents promise to transform the uro-oncology field significantly. In this review, we aimed to summarize the role of immunotherapy in urothelial, renal and prostate cancer in the light of randomized clinical trials.

IL4I1: a novel molecular biomarker represents an inflamed tumor microenvironment and precisely predicts the molecular subtype and immunotherapy response of bladder cancer

Introduction: IL4I1, also known as Interleukin-4-induced gene 1, is an enzyme that can modulate the immune system by acting as a L-amino acid oxidase. Nevertheless, a precise understanding of the correlation of IL4I1 with immunological features and immunotherapy efficacy in bladder cancer (BLCA) remains incomplete. Methods: We analyzed RNA sequencing data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate the immune function and prognostic importance of IL4I1 across different cancer types. We further examined the TCGA-BLCA cohort for correlations between IL4I1 and various immunological characteristics of tumor microenvironment (TME), such as cancer immune cycle, immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoint expression and T cell inflamed score. Validation was conducted using two independent cohort, GSE48075 and E-MTAB-4321. Finally, RNA sequencing data from the IMvigor210 cohort and immunohistochemistry assays were employed to validate the predictive value of IL4I1 for the TME and immunotherapy efficacy. Results: In our findings, a positive correlation was observed between IL4I1 expression and immunomodulators expression, immune cell infiltration, the cancer immune cycle, and T cell inflamed score in BLCA, suggesting a significant link to the inflamed TME. In addition, studies have shown that IL4I1 elevated levels of individuals tend to be more performance for basal subtype and exhibit enhanced response rates to diverse treatment modalities, specifically immunotherapy. Clinical data from the IMvigor 210 cohort confirmed a higher rate of response to immunotherapy and better survival benefits in patients with high IL4I1 expression. Discussion: To summarize, our research showed that elevated IL4I1 levels are indicative of an inflamed TME, the basal subtype, and a more favorable response to various treatment methods, especially immune checkpoint blockade therapy in BLCA.

Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC): Prevalence, Impact and Management Challenge

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an aggressive and difficult malignancy to treat. Owing to its rarity and the lack of specific high-level data, management mirrors that of urothelial cancer of the bladder (UCB). Over the past decade, UTUC has shown minimal improvement in survival rates. Its location makes the diagnosis and staging of UTUC more complex. Moreover, surgery often leads to a decline in renal function, rendering a proportion of patients ineligible for cisplatin. There is debate as to how best manage locally advanced UTUC perioperatively. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment landscape for UCB, the response to ICIs in UTUC has been variable. With new technologies, our understanding of the molecular biology of UTUC has grown, helping to identify key molecular differences from UCB. This review summarises the evidence available on UTUC as a disease entity, discusses treatment in perioperative and metastatic settings, and considers future directions for the management of patients diagnosed with UTUC.

How Immunotherapy Has Redefined the Treatment Paradigm of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic bladder cancer has expanded considerably, with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, and anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor agents. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvants, adjuvants, or first- or second-line treatments have produced conflicting results. However, first-line therapeutic strategies have been redefined by the recent publication of results from two clinical trials: CheckMate-901, which demonstrated the superiority of combined treatment with nivolumab and chemotherapy in extending overall survival, and EV-302, which demonstrated that combined treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin reduced the risk of death by 53%. In this review, we discuss the role of ICIs, alone or in combination, in bladder cancer management in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in 2024, considering the latest published trials. The potential role of ICIs as neoadjuvants is also discussed.

Frequency and Nature of Genomic Alterations in ERBB2-Altered Urothelial Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) overexpression is an oncogenic driver in many solid tumors, including urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). In addition, activating mutations in the ERBB2 gene have been shown to play an oncogenic role similar to ERBB2 amplification.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and compare the frequency and nature of genomic alterations (GA) of ERBB2-altered (mutations, amplification) and ERBB2 wild-type UBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a hybrid capture-based comprehensive profiling assay, 9518 UBC cases were grouped by ERBB2 alteration and evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations (GA), tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), and genomic mutational signature. PD-L1 expression was measured by immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3). Categorical statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

A total of 602 (6.3%) UBC cases featured ERBB2 extracellular domain short variant (SV) GA (ECDmut+), 253 (2.7%) cases featured ERBB2 kinase domain SV GA (KDmut+), 866 (9.1%) cases had ERBB2 amplification (amp+), and 7797 (81.9%) cases were ERBB2 wild-type (wt). European genetic ancestry of ECDmut+ was higher than ERBB2wt. Numerous significant associations were observed when comparing GA by group. Notably among these, CDKN2A/MTAP loss were more frequent in ERBB2wt versus ECDmut+ and amp+. ERBB3 GA were more frequent in ECDmut+ and KDmut+ than ERBB2wt. TERT GA were more frequent in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ versus ERBB2wt. TOP2A amplification was significantly more common in ECDmut+ and amp+ versus ERBB2wt, and TP53 SV GA were significantly higher in ERBB2 amp+ versus ERBB2wt. Mean TMB levels were significantly higher in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ than in ERBB2wt. Apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptides (APOBEC) signature was more frequent in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ versus ERBB2wt. No significant differences were observed in PD-L1 status between groups, while gLOH-high status was more common in amp+ versus ERBB2wt. MSI-high status was more frequent in KDmut+ versus ERBB2wt, and in ERBB2wt than in amp+.

CONCLUSIONS

We noted important differences in co-occurring GA in ERBB2-altered (ECDmut+, KDmut+, amp+) versus ERBB2wt UBC, as well as higher mean TMB and higher APOBEC mutational signature in the ERBB2-altered groups. Our results can help refine future clinical trial designs and elucidate possible response and resistance mechanisms for ERBB2-altered UBC.