Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-analysis

Temporal correlations between RBD-ACE2 blocking and binding antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants in CoronaVac-vaccinated individuals and their persistence in COVID-19 patients

Antibodies play a crucial role in protection against SARS-CoV-2. Understanding the correlation between binding and functional antibodies is essential to determine whether binding antibody levels can reliably predict neutralizing activity. We assessed antibody responses in 111 individuals vaccinated with the inactivated vaccine CoronaVac and 111 COVID-19 patients in Thailand. Plasma levels of ACE2-blocking antibodies targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-Co-V2 variants were measured before vaccination and at 14 and 28 days after the second dose using a multiplex surrogate virus neutralization test. Anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies were quantified by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, and anti-RBD IgG by ELISA. After vaccination, blocking, anti-spike, and IgG antibody levels increased but declined rapidly within a month, whereas antibody levels in COVID-19 patients increased and persisted. Blocking and anti-spike antibody correlated at day 14 post-vaccination but not at day 28. In COVID-19 patients, correlations were moderate at day 14, and stronger at day 28. Correlations were weaker for Omicron subvariants than for the ancestral strain and non-Omicron variants. The weak correlation between blocking and anti-RBD IgG suggests binding antibodies might not predict neutralizing activity. These findings highlight the temporal nature of CoronaVac-induced immunity and the need for booster doses and variant-adapted vaccine.

B cells modulate lung antiviral inflammatory responses via the neurotransmitter acetylcholine

The rapid onset of innate immune defenses is critical for early control of viral replication in an infected host and yet it can also lead to irreversible tissue damage, especially in the respiratory tract. Sensitive regulators must exist that modulate inflammation, while controlling the infection. In the present study, we identified acetylcholine (ACh)-producing B cells as such early regulators. B cells are the most prevalent ACh-producing leukocyte population in the respiratory tract demonstrated with choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter mice, both before and after infection with influenza A virus. Mice lacking ChAT in B cells, disabling their ability to generate ACh (ChatBKO), but not those lacking ChAT in T cells, significantly, selectively and directly suppressed α7-nicotinic-ACh receptor-expressing interstitial, but not alveolar, macrophage activation and their ability to secrete tumor necrosis factor (TNF), while better controlling virus replication at 1 d postinfection. Conversely, TNF blockade via monoclonal antibody treatment increased viral loads at that time. By day 10 of infection, ChatBKO mice showed increased local and systemic inflammation and reduced signs of lung epithelial repair despite similar viral loads and viral clearance. Thus, B cells are key participants of an immediate early regulatory cascade that controls lung tissue damage after viral infection, shifting the balance toward reduced inflammation at the cost of enhanced early viral replication.

Effectiveness of drugs employed in the treatment of COVID-19: real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Drugs used to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection have been tested in different clinical trials but less in real-life studies. Our goal was to assess the effectiveness of several specific COVID-19 drugs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective study of all patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection between 1 March 2020 and 9 January 2022. We extracted sociodemographic, basal comorbidities, specific medication for their COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccination data, and outcomes such as death and admission to hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) during the different periods of the pandemic.

RESULTS

The prescription of corticosteroids to out-of-hospital patients was related to a higher likelihood of hospital admission. Among the hospitalized patients, all of the drugs studied (dexamethasone, prednisone, methylprednisolone, remdesivir, ritonavir/lopinavir, and tocilizumab) were related to a higher likelihood of dying at 90 days or being admitted to an ICU. In patients admitted to an ICU, corticosteroids prevented intrahospital mortality (Odds ratio: 0.73; 95% confident intervals: 0.554-0.969). All drugs were related to longer length of hospital admission and ICU stays.

CONCLUSIONS

Most drugs used for COVID-19 patients had no clear benefit except in the case of corticosteroids, associated with a reduced risk of intrahospital mortality among ICU patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT04463706).

Severe Pneumonia

Severe pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Being a complex condition caused by a variety of microorganisms including bacteria, viruses, and fungi, it requires intensive care. A combination of early initiation of antimicrobial therapy and adjunctive nonantimicrobial interventions improve patient outcomes. This article reviews the most recent data on the epidemiology, microbiology, diagnosis, and management of severe pneumonia.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid could help to personalize corticosteroid therapy in severe COVID-19 pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the response to high-dose corticosteroids according to bronchoalveolar neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (BAL-NLR) in critically-ill COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a single-center cohort of adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 pneumonia between 2020 and 2022, who had a bronchoalveolar lavage and received systemic corticosteroids. We defined high-dose corticosteroid therapy as the administration of at least 1mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone.

RESULTS

Among 161 patients, 56 had LOWBAL-NLR (<0.8), 55 MILDBAL-NLR (0.8-3.5), and 50 HIGHBAL-NLR (>3.5). A quarter of patients received high-dose corticosteroid therapy. In the HIGHBAL-NLR group, those receiving high-dose corticosteroid therapy had a lower (27 % versus 43 %, p = 0.23) 90-day mortality rate than those receiving a standard dose. In the LOWBAL-NLR group, those receiving high-dose corticosteroid therapy had a higher (31 % versus 12 %, p = 0.12) 90-day mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that bronchoalveolar cellular phenotype influences therapeutic response to high-dose corticosteroid therapy.

Corticosteroids and long-term pulmonary function after critical illness due to COVID-19- a single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Early in the pandemic, corticosteroids became standard treatment for patients with critical COVID-19 infections. This study aimed to investigate the possible long-term pulmonary consequences after corticosteroid treatment in patients with critical COVID-19 requiring ventilatory support.

METHODS

This observational single-center cohort study included patients treated for critical COVID-19 requiring ventilatory support between March 1, 2020, and August 1, 2021, with a 6-month follow-up after discharge from the intensive care unit. Corticosteroid treatment was defined according to the RECOVERY trial (6 mg dexamethasone daily or equivalent dose of another corticosteroid, initiated within eight days of hospital admittance and continued for at least one day) Pulmonary function was assessed by diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide. Health-related quality of life was measured with the questionnaire RAND-36. General linear regression was used to present mean score differences with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Among the 456 (69%) critically ill COVID-19 patients who survived at least 90 days after ICU discharge, 286 (63%) attended the follow-up six months later. The groups were balanced regarding invasive ventilation; 47% received invasive ventilation in both groups. Corticosteroid treatment was associated with a lower diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (MSD - 8.3, 95% CI: -14.2 to -2.4) 6 months after ICU discharge (change > 10% were regarded as clinically significant). There were no differences in health-related quality of life between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids might negatively impact pulmonary function after critical COVID-19. The decrease did not seem to influence health-related quality of life. Future studies are needed to confirm the results.

Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis: updated guidance

Our previous guide to estimating hazard ratios (HRs) from published summary (aggregate) data has become very widely used, but many still have difficulties knowing when and how to apply the methods. Informed by our increased experience of applying them across a range of settings, the queries we have received and results of a survey of Cochrane editors on the methods, we have updated the guidance comprehensively. Previously, we described a range of scenarios for deriving a HR and logrank variance (V) from published time-to-event analyses. They are incorporated in this update, together with clarification of ambiguities and additional scenarios. We also provide further guidance on extracting and using data from publications and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, raise some of the challenges, and discuss recent alternatives to the "Parmar" KM methods. A new calculations spreadsheet will perform all possible calculations given the data that are entered and includes new features to enhance the user experience. This updated guidance and associated spreadsheet represent valuable additional tools for those conducting meta-analyses based on published, summary, time-to-event data.

The impact of insulin requirement on mortality and morbidity in non-diabetic covid-19 patients in the intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 ranges from asymptomatic cases to severe disease with high mortality. Corticosteroids are crucial in treatment, reducing mortality and morbidity. However, the use of corticosteroids poses additional challenges in maintaining glycemic control in COVID-19 patients This study aims to eva-luate the impact of insulin requirement on mortality and morbidity in non-diabetic ICU patients and investigate its correlation with disease severity.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included non-diabetic COVID-19 patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted to the ICU of Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital (Turkey) between September 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021. Patients requiring ≥ 24 h of insulin therapy were compared with those who did not need insulin. Data on demographics, severity scores (SOFA, APACHE II, SAPS II), insulin initiation and duration, corticosteroid therapy, mechanical ventilation, antiviral and immunomodulatory treatments, laboratory markers, and infection parameters were analyzed. Mortality and incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus within the first six months post-discharge were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v22.0, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients with insulin requirements had higher SOFA (p = 0.001), APACHE II (p < 0.001), and SAPS II (p = 0.041) scores, along with increased mechanical ventilation duration (p < 0.001). While corticosteroid type had no effect, > 1 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone or equivalent dexamethasone significantly increased insulin demand (p = 0.002). Among laboratory markers, only peak CRP levels were significantly higher in insulin-requiring patients (p = 0.001). ICU and total hospital stays were significantly longer in the insulin group (p < 0.001). Although in-hospital mortality was similar, 6-month mortality was significantly higher in insulin-requiring patients (p = 0.022). New-onset DM rates were 4.2% in the non-insulin group vs. 31.1% in the insulin group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin requirement in non-diabetic COVID-19 ICU patients is a predictor of 6-month mortality. High-dose corticosteroids exacerbate glycemic dysregulation, increasing insulin needs. SARS-CoV-2-induced beta-cell damage and hyperinflammation-related stress hyperglycemia elevate the risk of post-discharge DM. Close monitoring and diabetes screening are essential in this population.

SARS-CoV2 variants differentially impact on the plasma metabolome

INTRODUCTION

Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) leads to COVID19 disease and caused a worldwide pandemic in 2019. Since the first wave of infections, there has been significant antigenic shifts, leading to the emergence of new variants. Today, infections have shifted away from the severe, fatal infection seen in 2019.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess how the plasma metabolomes from patients varied with infection with different strains and could reflect disease severity.

METHODS

Patients with COVID19 not requiring intensive care were recruited between January 2021 and May 2022 from the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham; 33 patients with alpha, 13 delta and 14 omicron variants. These were compared to 26 age matched contemporaneously recruited controls. Plasma samples were extracted into chloroform/methanol/water (1:2.5/1 v/v) and assessed by flow injection electrospray mass spectrometry (FIE-MS) using an Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Derived data were assessed using the R based MetaboAnalyst platform.

RESULTS

Plasma metabolomes from COVID19 patients were clearly different from controls. Metabolite variation could be related to infection with different SARS-CoV2 variants. Variant showed different levels of some phospholipids, ganglioside GD1a and a dihydroxyvitamin D3 derivative. Correlations of the plasma metabolomes indicated negative correlations between selected phospholipids and the levels of C-reactive protein, creatinine, neutrophil and D-dimer.

CONCLUSION

The plasma metabolomes of COVID19 patients show changes, particularly in phospholipids, which could reflect disease severity and SARS-CoV2 variant infection.

Implication of Admission Eosinophil Count and Prognosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Elderly Patients With COPD: A Territory-Wide Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the association between elderly patients with COPD with different blood eosinophil on admission and those without COPD and the prognosis of COVID-19.

METHOD

A territory-wide retrospective study was conducted to investigate the association between elderly COPD patients with different blood eosinophil on admission and the prognosis of COVID-19. Elderly patients admitted to public hospitals and community treatment facility in Hong Kong for COVID-19 from January 23, 2020, to September 31, 2021, were included in the study. Severe diseases were defined as those who develop respiratory complications, systemic complications and death.

RESULTS

Among the 1925 patients included, 133 had COPD. Forty had admission blood eosinophil count ≥ 150 cells/μL, and 93 had blood eosinophil count < 150 cells/μL. Patients with COPD and admission blood eosinophil count ≥ 150 cells/μL, but not those with admission blood eosinophil count < 150 cells/μL, had severe COVID-19 with the development of respiratory and systemic complications. They were more likely to develop respiratory failure (OR = 5.235, 95% CI = 2.088-13.122, p < 0.001) and require invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.433, 95% CI = 1.022-5.791, p = 0.045) and intensive care unit admission (OR = 2.214, 95% CI = 1.004-4.881, p = 0.049).

DISCUSSION

Our study suggested that the blood eosinophil count on admission could have significant prognostic implications among elderly patients with COPD. Patients with COPD and admission blood eosinophil count ≥ 150 cells/μL, but not those with admission blood eosinophil count < 150 cells/μL, have significantly increased risks of developing respiratory and systemic complications from COVID-19, when compared with non-COPD patients.

Effect of hydrocortisone on mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia : The REMAP-CAP Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To determine whether hydrocortisone improves mortality in severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

In an international adaptive randomized controlled platform trial testing multiple interventions, adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe CAP were randomized to a 7-day course of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg every 6 h) or control (no corticosteroid). The primary end point was 90-day all-cause mortality, analyzed iteratively by a Bayesian hierarchical model estimating distinct treatment effects for patients presenting with influenza (Y/N) and shock (Y/N).

RESULTS

Fixed 7-day course hydrocortisone enrollment was stopped for futility (< 5% probability of > 20% relative improvement). Of 658 patients enrolled, 536 were randomized to hydrocortisone and 122 to control. Vital status at day 90 was missing for 15 patients. Day 90 mortality was 15% (78/521) and 9.8% (12/122) for the hydrocortisone and control groups. The adjusted odds ratio ranged from 1.52 to 1.63 (with all 95% CrI crossing 1), while the probability of > 20% relative reduction of day 90 mortality ranged from 7.1 to 3.3% across influenza and shock strata. Results were consistent in sensitivity and pre-specified secondary outcomes. In exploratory analyses, the duration of shock appeared lower in the hydrocortisone group compared with control (median (IQR) of 2 (2-5) days compared to control 3 (2-6.75) days, p value = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with severe CAP, treatment with a 7-day course of hydrocortisone, compared with no hydrocortisone, appears unlikely to yield a large reduction in mortality. Smaller benefits and possible harm are not excluded.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02735707 (registration date: November 4th, 2016).

Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Azvudine for Elderly Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-World Study

Azvudine is recommended as a priority treatment for patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) during Omicron wave in China, but its efficacy and safety in elderly patients is unknown. In this multicenter, retrospective study, we identified 19763 elderly patients (aged over 60 years) with COVID-19 from nine hospitals in Henan Province, China. The primary outcome is all-cause death and the secondary outcome is composite disease progression. After propensity score matching, 4109 Azvudine recipients and 4109 matched controls is included, with average age of 75.15 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis reveales a notably survival and progression-free benefit in Azvudine treatment. The Cox analysis shows that compared with controls, Azvudine recipients have a 33% lower risk of all-cause death (95% confidence Interval (CI): 0.580-0.772, p < 0.001), but have no significant difference in composite disease progression (hazard ratio: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.833-1.046, p = 0.234). Subgroup analysis suggested Azvudine have a stronger protective effect in patients concomitant with antibiotics. Three sensitive analyses confirm the robustness of the findings. The safety of Azvudine in elderly patients is acceptable. These findings indicate that Azvudine therapy can reduce the rate of all-cause death in hospitalized elderly patients with COVID-19, and without obvious adverse events.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety between baricitinib and tocilizumab in severe COVID-19: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulators tocilizumab and baricitinib have been used for the treatment of severe COVID-19, however, there are only few published studies comparing their efficacy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All consecutive non-ICU hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients who received baricitinib or tocilizumab, were included retrospectively. Primary outcomes were mortality or intubation on day 14, time to oxygen therapy weaning and duration of hospitalization. Safety was measured as treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

321 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 were included (mean age 62.4 years ± 14.7); 241 (75.1%) received baricitinib (mean age 64.2 years ± 15.2) and 80 (24.9%) tocilizumab (mean age 57.3 ± 11.7). Patients who received baricitinib presented significantly lower risk of mortality or intubation on day 14, compared to the tocilizumab group after adjusting for age, sex, vaccination, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, remdesivir administration and WHO ordinal scale at enrollment (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.86). In the augmented inverse-probability weighting regression, the protective role of baricitinib remained statistically significant (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.88). No difference in secondary bacterial infections was detected, but tocilizumab was associated with significant higher rate of liver injury (Odds Ratio, 95%CI, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests survival and safety are significantly better for baricitinib compared to tocilizumab in severe COVID-19. Clinical randomized trials are needed for confirmation.

Efficacy and safety of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in cancer patients with COVID-19

Cancer significantly contributes to the unfavorable prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The efficacy and safety of azvudine and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in cancer patients with COVID-19 remain uncertain. Therefore, we designed a comprehensive retrospective study encompassing clinical data of 32,864 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 691 of whom were cancer patients treated with azvudine and 200 were cancer patients treated with Paxlovid. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 397 patients in the azvudine group and 199 patients in the Paxlovid group were enrolled. Cox regression analysis revealed the risk of all-cause death (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.059-3.182, P = 0.030) and composite disease progression (HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.043-2.757, P = 0.033) were greater in the Paxlovid group than in the azvudine group. Two sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our findings. The safety analysis of adverse events revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, we carried out the first analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of azvudine and Paxlovid in cancer patients with COVID-19 and demonstrated that azvudine significantly reduced the risk of all-cause death and composite disease progression among cancer patients with COVID-19 compared with Paxlovid.

The hidden ophthalmic dangers of steroids in COVID-19 treatment: a case report

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been coexisted with us, and corticosteroids are now recommended for patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory failure. Steroid treatments may increase intraocular pressure (IOP) and steroid-induced glaucoma (SIG). This study reported a rapid IOP elevation in a COVID-19 pneumonia child treated with systemic steroids within 3 days. Steroid-induced ocular hypertension (SIOH) during pneumonia treatment has not been previously reported.

Case Description

The 6-year-old Chinese girl was diagnosed with COVID-19 and presented with pulmonary exudative lesions. Intravenous steroid (methylprednisolone, 1 mg/kg/12 h) was administered to control the inflammatory reaction on the fourth day post-infection. The child complained of ocular pain in the left eye (OS) after 3 days of steroid application. A high IOP of 40 mmHg in the right eye (OD) and 60 mmHg (OS) was detected. Following the exclusion of elevated IOP secondary to COVID-19 infection, SIOH was considered as a potential etiology. The IOP was effectively controlled through prompt tapering of systemic steroids and the immediate initiation of IOP-lowering therapy, including intravenous mannitol and topical antiglaucoma medications.

Conclusions

Clinicians treating COVID-19 in hospitals should pay attention to SIOH or SIG risk, especially in pediatric patients.

Outcomes of non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 versus seasonal influenza during the fall-winter 2022-2023 period

BACKGROUND

The comparability of outcomes for non-hospitalized COVID-19 outpatients during the Omicron wave to outpatients with influenza remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the outcomes of non-hospitalized outpatients with COVID-19 and seasonal influenza during the fall-winter of 2022-2023.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a collaborative clinical research platform. Non-hospitalized outpatients with COVID-19 and seasonal influenza between 01 October 2022 and 31 January 2023 were selected from TriNetX. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare patients receiving corresponding outpatient antiviral treatments. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the primary outcome-a composite of all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, or mortality during the 30-day follow-up period-were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

After PSM, two well-balanced groups of 9,030 patients each were identified. Non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients had a lower risk of primary composites outcomes including all-cause ED visits, hospitalization, or mortality (5.9% vs. 9.2%, HR, 0.661[95% CI, 0.593-0.737]) compared to the influenza group. In addition, the COVID-19 group demonstrated a reduced risk of all-cause ED visits (4.4% vs. 6.6%, HR 0.683[0.601-0.776]), hospitalization (1.7% vs. 2.9%, HR 0.605[0.495-0.739]) and mortality (0.1% vs. 0.2%, HR 0.176[0.052-0.597]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates a lower risk of all-cause ED visits, hospitalization, and mortality in the non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to the seasonal influenza group, supporting the current public health strategy of adjusting COVID-19 management based on approaches used for seasonal influenza.

SARS-CoV-2 induced abducens nerve palsy: A case report and response to methylprednisolone

Introduction

The abducens nerve (sixth cranial nerve) is a motor nerve that innervates the lateral rectus muscle, playing a key role in ocular abduction. Palsy of this nerve leads to convergent strabismus and diplopia. Common causes include strokes, trauma, inflammation, and infections, though in some cases, the etiology remains undetermined. With the emergence of COVID-19, neurological manifestations such as cranial neuropathies, including abducens nerve palsy, have been reported.

Case presentation

We present a case of a previously healthy 48-year-old male diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection who developed abducens nerve palsy in the left eye. Following the resolution of respiratory symptoms, strabismus persisted. Treatment with methylprednisolone was initiated, resulting in partial recovery within one week and complete resolution after three months.

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2-induced abducens nerve palsy can be reversible with conservative treatment using methylprednisolone. Early recognition and appropriate management are crucial for achieving a favorable prognosis.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective study

Background

The global impact of SARS-CoV-2 and its associated coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has necessitated urgent characterization of prognostic biomarkers. This study aimed to delineate the epidemiological and clinical predictors of mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 123 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to Huoshenshan Hospital (Wuhan, China) from 1 February 2020 to 30 April 2020. Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariate Cox regression were used to assess the independent factors with survival time. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.05.

Results

The cohort exhibited a mortality rate of 49.6% (61/123), with the critical clinical type (HR = 7.970, p = 0.009), leukocytosis (HR = 3.408, p = 0.006), and lymphopenia (HR = 0.817, p = 0.038) emerging as independent predictors of reduced survival. Critical-type patients demonstrated significantly elevated inflammatory markers (neutrophils: 10.41 ± 6.23 × 109/L; CRP: 104.47 ± 29.18 mg/L) and coagulopathy (D-dimer: 5.21 ± 2.34 μg/ml) compared to non-critical cases. Deceased patients exhibited pronounced metabolic derangements, including hyperglycemia (9.81 ± 2.07 mmol/L) and hepatic dysfunction (ALP: 174.03 ± 30.13 U/L).

Conclusion

We revealed the epidemiological and clinical features of different clinical types of SARS-CoV-2 as summarized in this paper. We found that critical type, leukocyte, and lymphocyte are risk factors that affect survival time, which could be an early and helpful marker to improve management of COVID-19 patients.

Advances in acute respiratory distress syndrome: focusing on heterogeneity, pathophysiology, and therapeutic strategies

In recent years, the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been gradually increasing. Despite advances in supportive care, ARDS remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. ARDS is characterized by acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure with diffuse pulmonary inflammation and bilateral edema due to excessive alveolocapillary permeability in patients with non-cardiogenic pulmonary diseases. Over the past seven decades, our understanding of the pathology and clinical characteristics of ARDS has evolved significantly, yet it remains an area of active research and discovery. ARDS is highly heterogeneous, including diverse pathological causes, clinical presentations, and treatment responses, presenting a significant challenge for clinicians and researchers. In this review, we comprehensively discuss the latest advancements in ARDS research, focusing on its heterogeneity, pathophysiological mechanisms, and emerging therapeutic approaches, such as cellular therapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. Moreover, we also examine the pathological characteristics of COVID-19-related ARDS and discuss the corresponding therapeutic approaches. In the face of challenges posed by ARDS heterogeneity, recent advancements offer hope for improved patient outcomes. Further research is essential to translate these findings into effective clinical interventions and personalized treatment approaches for ARDS, ultimately leading to better outcomes for patients suffering from ARDS.

Osteonecrosis following Steroid Therapy in COVID-19 Patients: An Outlook on the Emerging Problem

Steroids are used in management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with severe illness and their use has been demonstrated to decrease mortality. Although life-saving, steroids are well documented as risk factors for osteonecrosis. Osteonecrosis of the hip can be debilitating and surgery may be required to improve the quality of life. With the increasing number of COVID-19 cases, osteonecrosis of the hip and other joints resulting from steroid use is expected to show a sharp rise in the coming years. In this review we discuss the association between steroids and osteonecrosis, indications for steroid therapy in COVID-19 patients, and incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of osteonecrosis secondary to steroids in COVID-19.

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibition enhances platelet production and megakaryocyte maturation in patients with COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a systemic infection frequently involving the haematopoietic system. Thrombocytopenia is associated with increased risks of severe disease progression and mortality. Antiviral agents have shown much promise in decreasing viral load and shortening the time to the resolution of symptoms. However, their effect on platelet counts in patients with COVID-19 remains unexplored. Therefore, we first performed a retrospective study to evaluate the variation in platelet mass of hospitalized patients with high-risk COVID-19 who were given either SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitor, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or no antiviral agents. A total of 177 patients were included, among which 64 received azvudine, 12 received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and 101 patients received none. Compared to those without antiviral treatment, significantly higher platelet counts' increments were observed in patients receiving azvudine or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (p = 0.001). Of note, this elevation was significantly more profound in the azvudine group than that in the control group (p < 0.001) or the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group (p = 0.042). Subsequently, in vitro experiments were conducted to investigate the mechanism of platelet elevation underlying the activity of azvudine. Results showed that azvudine promoted the polyploidization and platelet production of the MEG-01 cell line. Although azvudine had minimal effect on megakaryopoiesis, it could significantly trigger platelet release of megakaryocytes in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 spike-membrane recombinant fusion protein or not. Finally, RNA-sequencing demonstrated that azvudine-treated MEG-01 exhibited a marked increase in VWF, TUBB1 and GP1BA, and upregulated genes associated with the PI3K/AKT and JAK/STAT signalling pathways. In conclusion, our findings indicated that nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibition potentially enhances platelet production and megakaryocyte maturation in patients with COVID-19, suggesting a new therapeutic option for thrombocytopenia.

Beyond the Fragility Index

The results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are frequently assessed with the fragility index (FI). Although the information provided by FI may supplement the p value, this indicator presents intrinsic weaknesses and shortcomings. In this article, we establish an analysis of fragility within a broader framework so that it can reliably complement the information provided by the p value. This perspective is named the analysis of strength. We first propose a new strength index (SI), which can be adopted in normal distribution settings. This measure can be obtained for both significance and nonsignificance and is straightforward to calculate, thus presenting compelling advantages over FI, starting from the presence of a threshold. The case of time-to-event outcomes is also addressed. Then, beyond the p value, we develop the analysis of strength using likelihood ratios from Royall's statistical evidence viewpoint. A new R package is provided for performing strength calculations, and a simulation study is conducted to explore the behavior of SI and the likelihood-based indicator empirically across different settings. The newly proposed analysis of strength is applied in the assessment of the results of three recent trials involving the treatment of COVID-19.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Emerging Lung Infections in the Immunocompromised Patient

The immunocompromised are at higher risk of COVID-19 and lung infections, and these are associated with more severe presentations and greater risk of complication, increasing the risks of intensive care unit admission and poor outcomes. However, only limited high-quality data are available about the diagnosis and management of lung infections in this population, with many clinical trials and other large studies excluding the immunocompromised. Well-designed studies are needed to better understand the optimal diagnostic and management options to improve outcomes in the increasingly heterogeneous group of immunocompromised patients.

Marked Global Differences in Mortality in Male Patients with COVID-19: An Analysis of the CARDIO COVID 19-20 and WHF COVID-19 CVD Studies

Background

COVID-19 has led to nearly seven million deaths and male sex has been reported as one of the main risk factors for mortality. Few studies have analyzed cohorts of male patients, especially in underrepresented regions in the medical literature, such as low and middle-income nations. To address this gap, we conducted large-scale, male-specific, multinational analyses, to improve understanding of factors associated with mortality in this high-risk population and global variations.

Methods

This is a prospective, multicenter study that includes data from the CARDIO COVID-19-20 registry and the WHF COVID-19 CVD study. A multiple Poisson regression model was performed to evaluate differences in factors associated with in-hospital mortality among male COVID-19 patients across different regions.

Results

We analyzed 4,899 hospitalized male COVID-19 patients from 32 countries: Africa (11.2%), the Americas (44.7%), Asia (33.8%), and Europe (10.2%). Median age was 59 years (IQR: 47-69), with 50.5% aged 40-64. ICU admission was 42.4%, and mortality was 19.2%, with marked regional differences (ranging from 6% in Europe to 26.9% in the Americas). Poisson regression showed age >80 years (aRR = 4.21) and IMV (aRR = 3.80) as the strongest factors associated with mortality. Other factors included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, myocarditis, and decompensated heart failure. Mortality risk was higher in Africa (aRR = 3.86), Asia (aRR = 2.72), and the Americas (aRR = 2.23) compared to Europe (p < 0.001). Anticoagulation/Antiplatelet therapy showed a potential correlation with survival.

Conclusion

This study reflects the complexity of factors influencing COVID-19 mortality among male patients hospitalized with COVID-19, emphasizing global variability. The substantial differences in mortality noted across countries are likely due to differences in disease severity, comorbidities, clinical care, and health system factors. Age remains a primary risk factor, with older populations particularly vulnerable. Our findings underscore the need for targeted and tailored regional approaches to manage male COVID-19 patients.

Complement activity and autophagy are dysregulated in the lungs of patients with nonresolvable COVID-19 requiring lung transplantation

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged the current understanding of the complement cascade mechanisms of host immune responses during infection-induced nonresolvable lung disease. While the complement system is involved in opsonization and phagocytosis of the invading pathogens, uncontrolled complement activation also leads to aberrant autophagic response and tissue damage. Our recent study revealed unique pathologic and fibrotic signature genes associated with epithelial bronchiolization in the lung tissues of patients with nonresolvable COVID-19 (NR-COVID-19) requiring lung transplantation. However, there is a knowledge gap if complement components are modulated to contribute to tissue damage and the fibrotic phenotype during NR-COVID-19. We, therefore, aimed to study the role of the complement factors and their corresponding regulatory proteins in the pathogenesis of NR-COVID-19. We further examined the association of complement components with mediators of the host autophagic response. We observed significant upregulation of the expression of the classical pathway factor C1qrs and alternative complement factors C3 and C5a, as well as the anaphylatoxin receptor C5aR1, in NR-COVID-19 lung tissues. Of note, complement regulatory protein, decay accelerating factor (DAF; CD55) was significantly downregulated at both transcript and protein levels in the NR-COVID-19 lungs, indicating a dampened host protective response. Furthermore, we observed significantly decreased levels of the autophagy mediators PPARγ and LC3a/b, which was corroborated by decreased expression of factor P and the C3b receptor CR1, indicating impaired clearance of damaged cells that may contribute to the fibrotic phenotype in NR-COVID-19 patients. Thus, our study revealed previously unrecognized complement dysregulation associated with impaired cell death and clearance of damaged cells, which may promote NR-COVID-19 in patients, ultimately necessitating lung transplantation. The identified network of dysregulated complement cascade activity indicates the interplay of regulatory factors and the receptor-mediated modulation of host immune and autophagic responses as potential therapeutic targets for treating NR-COVID-19.

A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Using Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) on Mortality, Severity, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study is to explore the potential link between the utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and its impact on mortality, disease severity, and healthcare resource utilization in individuals diagnosed with COVID-19. We aim to establish a solid theoretical foundation for safe and effective clinical medications.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of various databases, including CNKI, PubMed, Science, Cell, Springer, Nature, Web of Science, and Embase. We also traced the literature of the included studies to ensure a thorough analysis of the available evidence. After applying a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria, we ultimately included a total of 41 articles in our analysis. To determine the overall effect size for dichotomous variables, we used the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio in random effect models. For continuous variables, we calculated the inverse variance SMD using random effect models. To assess the outcomes and heterogeneity, we considered p-values (p < 0.05) and I2 values for all outcomes. We performed multivariate and univariate meta-regression analyses using the maximum likelihood approach with the CMA 3.0 software.

RESULTS

The results of our analysis indicated that the use of ACEIs or ARBs did not significantly influence mortality (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.83-1.46, p = 0.43, I2 = 84%), severity (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.68-1.45, p = 0.98, I2 = 84%), or healthcare resource utilization (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI 0.06-0.12, p = 0.54, I2 = 37%) in patients with COVID-19 compared to those not taking ACEIs or ARBs. The multivariate meta-regression analysis model explained 63%, 31%, and 100% of the sources of heterogeneity for the three outcome indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ACEIs and ARBs is not significantly correlated with mortality, severity, or healthcare resource utilization in patients with COVID-19, indicating safe clinical use of the medications.

The association between early corticosteroid use and the risk of secondary infections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a double-edged sword. Results from the international SCCM discovery viral infection and respiratory illness universal study (VIRUS) COVID-19 registry

Background

Corticosteroids improve survival in hospitalized COVID-19 patients needing supplemental oxygen. However, concern exists about increased risk of secondary infections. This study investigated the impact of early corticosteroids use on these infections.

Methods

Data from the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS): COVID-19 registry were analyzed for adult patients, stratified by early corticosteroid use (within 48 h of admission). The primary outcome was documented secondary infections, including bacteremia, bacterial pneumonia, empyema, meningitis/encephalitis, septic shock, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between early corticosteroids and these outcomes.

Results

Among 17,092 eligible patients, with 13.5% developed at least one secondary bacterial infection during hospitalization. Patients receiving early corticosteroids were older (median 63 years) compared to those who did not (median 60 years), with a similar gender distribution (42.5% vs. 44.2% female). Unadjusted analysis revealed a higher risk for any secondary infection (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.76-2.12). This association persisted for specific infections including bacteremia (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.58-2.54), bacterial pneumonia (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.27-1.77), and septic shock (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.44-1.93). However, the effect on meningitis/encephalitis (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.24-1.57) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP; OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.75-1.57) was non-significant. Adjusted analysis maintained significance for any secondary infection (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29), bacteremia (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.09-1.88), and infections with unknown sources (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.31-2.02). Notably, the association weakened and became non-significant for bacterial pneumonia (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.20) and septic shock (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79-1.11), while it became significant for meningitis/encephalitis (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.82). VAP remained non-significant (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.56-1.34).

Conclusion

Early use of corticosteroids increased overall secondary infection risk in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but the impact varied. Risk of bacteremia was notably increased, while the association with bacterial pneumonia and septic shock weakened after adjustment becoming non-significant and surprisingly reduced meningitis/encephalitis risk was noted suggesting the complexity of corticosteroid effects. Further research is needed to understand how corticosteroids influence specific secondary infections, and thereby optimize the treatment strategies.

Interventions for the management of post-COVID-19 condition (long COVID): protocol for a living systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Up to 15% of survivors of COVID-19 infection experience long-term health effects, including fatigue, myalgia and impaired cognitive function, termed post-COVID-19 condition or long COVID. Several trials that study the benefits and harms of various interventions to manage long COVID have been published and hundreds more are planned or are ongoing. Trustworthy systematic reviews that clarify the benefits and harms of interventions are critical to promote evidence-based practice.

OBJECTIVE

To create and maintain a living systematic review and network meta-analysis addressing the benefits and harms of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions for the treatment and management of long COVID.

METHODS

Eligible trials will randomise adults with long COVID to pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic interventions, placebo, sham or usual care. We will identify eligible studies by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED and CENTRAL from inception, without language restrictions.Reviewers will work independently and in duplicate to screen search records, collect data from eligible trials, including trial and patient characteristics and outcomes of interest and assess risk of bias. Our outcomes of interest will include patient-reported fatigue, pain, postexertional malaise, changes in education or employment status, cognitive function, mental health, dyspnoea, quality of life, physical function, recovery and serious adverse events.For each outcome, when possible, we will perform a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis. When there are compelling reasons to suspect that certain interventions are only applicable or effective for a subtype of long COVID, we will perform separate network meta-analyses. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach will guide our assessment of the certainty of evidence.We will update our living review biannually, on the publication of a seminal trial, or when new evidence emerges that may change clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

This living systematic review and network meta-analysis will provide comprehensive, trustworthy and up-to-date summaries of the evidence addressing the benefits and harms of interventions for the treatment and management of long COVID. We will make our findings available publicly and work with guideline-producing organisations to inform their recommendations.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study describes the protocol for a systematic review that uses data from published trial reports. Therefore, the study is exempt from ethics review. We intend to deposit all data in a public repository and publish each iteration of the living review online.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): from mechanistic insights to therapeutic strategies

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome of acute hypoxic respiratory failure caused by diffuse lung inflammation and edema. ARDS can be precipitated by intrapulmonary factors or extrapulmonary factors, which can lead to severe hypoxemia. Patients suffering from ARDS have high mortality rates, including a 28-day mortality rate of 34.8% and an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 40.0%. The pathophysiology of ARDS is complex and involves the activation and dysregulation of multiple overlapping and interacting pathways of systemic inflammation and coagulation, including the respiratory system, circulatory system, and immune system. In general, the treatment of inflammatory injuries is a coordinated process that involves the downregulation of proinflammatory pathways and the upregulation of anti-inflammatory pathways. Given the complexity of the underlying disease, treatment needs to be tailored to the problem. Hence, we discuss the pathogenesis and treatment methods of affected organs, including 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related pneumonia, drowning, trauma, blood transfusion, severe acute pancreatitis, and sepsis. This review is intended to provide a new perspective concerning ARDS and offer novel insight into future therapeutic interventions.

Determination of oxidative stress and copeptin levels of COVID-19 according to the clinical course

OBJECTIVE

COVID-19, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, is characterized by hyperinflammation, which can trigger oxidative stress. At the same time, COVID-19 is accompanied by both psychological and physical stress. Copeptin, a novel stress marker, has been shown to predict disease outcomes in stress-induced diseases. In this study, we aimed to explore the potential of copeptin, with inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, in distinguishing between different clinical courses of COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This case-control study included 75 participants: 25 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU), 25 non-ICU COVID-19 patients, and 25 healthy individuals. 64 % of the ICU patients received corticosteroid treatment for 4-10 days before sampling. Serum concentrations of the study parameters were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared between the study groups.

RESULTS

Serum IL-6 levels (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients and the control group. Serum MDA (p < 0.001) and 4-HNE (p = 0.027) concentrations were significantly lower in the ICU group in comparison with the other groups. Copeptin was not statistically significant. MDA (p = 0.040) and 4-HNE (p = 0.017) levels were significantly lower in the treated ICU group than the untreated one.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum IL-6 levels were noticeably associated with COVID-19 severity. Corticosteroid therapy administration seemed to influence MDA and 4-HNE levels in the treated group, with no obvious influence on IL-6 and copeptin in the same cohort. This data suggests that in SARS-CoV-2 infection, corticosteroids may act through a rapid non-genomic mechanism.

Notch4 regulatory T cells and SARS-CoV-2 viremia shape COVID19 survival outcome

BACKGROUND

Immune dysregulation and SARS-CoV-2 plasma viremia have been implicated in fatal COVID-19 disease. However, how these two factors interact to shape disease outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

We carried out viral and immunological phenotyping on a prospective cohort of 280 patients with COVID-19 presenting to acute care hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts and Genoa, Italy between June 1, 2020 and February 8, 2022. Disease severity, mortality, plasma viremia, and immune dysregulation were assessed. A mouse model of lethal H1N1 influenza infection was used to analyze the therapeutic potential of Notch4 and pyroptosis inhibition in disease outcome.

RESULTS

Stratifying patients based on %Notch4+ Treg cells and/or the presence of plasma viremia identified four subgroups with different clinical trajectories and immune phenotypes. Patients with both high %Notch4+ Treg cells and viremia suffered the most disease severity and 90-day mortality compared to the other groups even after adjusting for baseline comorbidities. Increased Notch4 and plasma viremia impacted different arms of the immune response in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Increased Notch4 was associated with decreased Treg cell amphiregulin expression and suppressive function whereas plasma viremia was associated with increased monocyte cell pyroptosis. Combinatorial therapies using Notch4 blockade and pyroptosis inhibition induced stepwise protection against mortality in a mouse model of lethal H1N1 influenza infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical trajectory and survival outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is predicated on two cardinal factors in disease pathogenesis: viremia and Notch4+ Treg cells. Intervention strategies aimed at resetting the immune dysregulation in COVID-19 by antagonizing Notch4 and pyroptosis may be effective in severe cases of viral lung infection.

State of type 2 diabetic Iraqi patients after hospitalization for COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, triggered by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has affected over 100 million people and killed around 2 million individuals. One of the most common chronic illnesses in the world is diabetes, which greatly raises the risk of hospitalization and death for COVID-19 patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the novel coronavirus's general characteristics and shed light on COVID-19 and its management in diabetic individuals by measuring some metabolic and inflammatory factors in type 2 diabetic patients with and without COVID-19.

METHODS

One hundred Iraqi patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were enrolled in the current study; 50 had COVID-19 with the Omicron variant, and 50 weren't. The diagnosis was designed by the consultant medical staff at the clinic. Eligible individuals had a positive nasal swab for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. They were compared with 50 healthy individuals as a control group. Every participant's anthropometric and clinical features were measured. The study includes the study groups' glycemic, lipid profile, serum urea, and C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements.

RESULTS

There were remarkable rises (p < 0.05) in fasting and random blood glucose, serum lipid, and urea levels in diabetic patients with COVID-19 compared to those without COVID-19 and the control group. Also, a significant elevation (p = 0.01) was found in fasting serum insulin among diabetic patients with COVID-19 as compared to those without COVID-19 and the control group (32.75 ± 8.63 vs. 25.82 ± 3.50 and 10.65 ± 1.12) µU/L, respectively. Serum CRP levels significantly increased (p = 0.0001) in diabetic patients with COVID-19 compared to other groups.

CONCLUSION

Hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and dyslipidemia resulting from cytokine storm significantly increased the risk of hospitalization and death among coronavirus disease-19 patients. It has been concluded that T2DM reliably predicts morbidity among COVID-19 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of severe hyperglycemia. The results also show the temporary and reversible deficiency in insulin secretion associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. Consequently, it is recommended to examine variables of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic islet activity among patients with COVID-19 who have a history of diabetes.

The Role of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Administration During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Questionnaire Survey

In December 2022, China classified COVID-19 as a category B infectious disease. This ended 2 years of close epidemiological surveillance of COVID-19. The objective of this questionnaire was to assess the infection status in the COVID-19 pandemic since December in Henan Province, China, and the prevalence of infection in people who were taking ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) during this period. We distributed questionnaires to patients attending the gastroenterology clinic at the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine. The questionnaire lasted for 3 weeks and a total of 660 were collected, of which the number of people taking UDCA was 70. This is the first investigation into the rate of infection among those taking UDCA during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results showed that the overall infection rate among those taking UDCA was 71.43% (n = 50), with a 10% (n = 7) rate of asymptomatic infections, which was significantly lower than the 85.42% (n = 504) and 6.27% (n = 37) rates among respondents who did not take. The administration of UDCA showed a trend toward reducing the rate of COVID-19 infection, but the difference was not statistically significant when compared to patients with shorter durations of medication use. While less than 30% of participants remained uninfected during the study period, indicating a potential protective effect, it is important to note that complete prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection by UDCA was not observed.

Correlation between the severity of COVID-19 infection and the presence of oropharyngeal candidiasis: a cross-sectional study in Al-Diwaniyah Hospital, Iraq

Introduction

oropharyngeal candidiasis, commonly known as oral thrush, is a fungal infection caused by candida species, especially Candida albicans. With the onset of COVID-19, concerns have arisen about a possible link between the severity of COVID-19 infections and the presence of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients. The aim to study the frequency of oropharyngeal candidiasis in COVID-19 patients and identify associated risk factors.

Methods

a cross-sectional study involving 100 COVID-19 patients was conducted at Al-Diwaniyah Hospital in Iraq. Samples were collected using blood tests and oropharyngeal tampons to diagnose oropharyngeal candidiasis. The mean age of the study population was 55.3 years (SD±12.4), with 60% male and 40% female. The data was analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 22, focusing on the correlation between the severity of COVID-19 and the occurrence of candidiasis.

Results

among the 100 patients, 30 (30%) were diagnosed with oropharyngeal candidiasis. In patients with severe COVID-19 (45%) symptoms, the prevalence was significantly higher than in patients with mild (15%) and moderate (25%) symptoms (p=0.002). In addition, patients with candidiasis (CRP: 12.5 mg/l) had significantly higher mean levels of C-reactive protein (CRP: 12.5 mg/l) than patients without candidiasis (CRP: 6.8 mg/l, p < 0.001). Other risk factors identified included long-term hospitalization (mean duration of patients with candidiasis 12 days vs. 7 days without patients, p=0.005) and use of corticosteroids (70% of patients with candidiasis vs. 40% without, p=0.01).

Conclusion

the results show that oropharyngeal candidiasis is common among COVID-19 patients, especially those with severe infections, with a prevalence rate of 45%. The study emphasizes the importance of monitoring fungal infections in COVID-19 patients and the need for early diagnosis and treatment to improve patient outcomes. These findings are supported by the significant differences in prevalence and inflammatory markers observed in the study.

Effect of perioperative methylprednisolone administration on postoperative pleural effusion in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain whether the utilization of methylprednisolone during surgery effectively mitigates the occurrence of adverse outcomes. To examine the association between perioperative methylprednisolone administration and postoperative pleural effusion and pneumonia in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study included non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 65 years or older undergoing thoracic surgery between January 2012 and December 2019 in China. Primary outcome was pleural effusion. Secondary outcome was postoperative pneumonia. Multivariate logistic regression models assessed the independent effects of various factors on pleural effusion and pneumonia. Propensity score matching (PSM) method reduced selection bias enhancing causal inference validity. Subgroup analyses identified potential effect heterogeneity in specific sub-populations.

RESULTS

A total of 1951 older patients with non-small cell lung cancer were included. The incidence of postoperative pleural effusion in the methylprednisolone group before and after PSM matching was significantly lower than that in the control group (before PSM: 9.4% vs. 19.2, P < 0.001; after PSM: 9.8% vs. 18.2%, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia between the two groups before and after matching. After adjusting all the variables and PSM, we found that intraoperative methylprednisolone was associated with a reduction in postoperative pleural effusion in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.48, P < 0.001; OR = 0.47, P < 0.001]. Perioperative methylprednisolone showed consistent protective effects in all sub-populations of gender, age, surgery duration, and smoking (P all < 0.05). Logistic regression models and PSM found that methylprednisolone was not associated with postoperative pneumonia and long-term survival in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative methylprednisolone was associated with reducing the occurrence of postoperative pleural effusions in older patients with non-small volume lung cancer, but it was not associated with pneumonia or long-term survival outcomes.

The comparative effectiveness of methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone on in-hospital mortality in patients with severe or critical COVID-19: a retrospective observational study

Background

Studies comparing the effectiveness of dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone for treating severe-to-critical COVID-19 have produced conflicting results. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of dexamethasone compared with methylprednisolone on in-hospital mortality among patients with severe or critical COVID-19.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of dexamethasone in comparison to methylprednisolone in reducing in-hospital mortality in patients suffering from severe-to-critical COVID-19 pneumonia.

Design

This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center.

Methods

Clinical data from 706 hospitalized patients with severe or critical COVID-19 in Karachi, Pakistan, were reviewed. Of these patients, 217 received either oral or intravenous dexamethasone, and 393 were treated with methylprednisolone. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included the length of hospitalization and the need for mechanical ventilation.

Results

The methylprednisolone group had a male predominance (74% vs 54%; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in median age between the dexamethasone group (55 years) and the methylprednisolone group (57 years) (p = 0.09). Mortality was significantly higher in the methylprednisolone group compared to the dexamethasone group (13.7% vs 3.2%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that dexamethasone was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09-0.62; p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients in the dexamethasone group had a shorter length of hospital stay (aOR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92)) compared to the methylprednisolone group. A higher proportion of patients required invasive mechanical ventilation in the methylprednisolone group compared to the dexamethasone group (13.7% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Dexamethasone was associated with lower mortality and a reduced length of hospital stay and a lower proportion of patients required mechanical ventilation compared to methylprednisolone in patients with severe-to-critical COVID-19.

Anticoagulation Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 : A Systematic Review and Prospective Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Reported results of clinical trials assessing higher-dose anticoagulation in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 have been inconsistent.

PURPOSE

To estimate the association of higher- versus lower-dose anticoagulation with clinical outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Randomized trials were identified from the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov with no restriction by trial status or language.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible randomized trials assigned patients hospitalized for COVID-19 to higher- versus lower-dose anticoagulation.

DATA EXTRACTION

20 eligible trials provided data in a prospectively agreed format. Two further studies were included based on published data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were progression to invasive mechanical ventilation or death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Therapeutic- compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation with heparins reduced 28-day mortality (OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93]; I 2 = 29%; 11 trials, 6297 patients, of whom 5456 required low or no oxygen at randomization). The ORs for 28-day mortality were 1.21 (CI, 0.93 to 1.58; I 2 = 0%) for therapeutic-dose compared with intermediate-dose anticoagulation (6 trials, 1803 patients, 843 receiving noninvasive ventilation at randomization) and 0.95 (CI, 0.76 to 1.19; I 2 = 0%; 10 trials, 3897 patients, 2935 receiving no or low oxygen at randomization) for intermediate- versus prophylactic-dose anticoagulation. Treatment effects appeared broadly consistent across predefined patient subgroups, although some analyses were limited in power. Higher- compared with lower-dose anticoagulation was associated with fewer thromboembolic events, but a greater risk for major bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic-dose compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation reduced 28-day mortality. Mortality was similar for intermediate-dose compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation and higher for therapeutic-dose compared with intermediate-dose anticoagulation, although this comparison was not estimated precisely.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

No direct funding. (PROSPERO: CRD42020213461).

COVID-19 in pregnancy: Perinatal outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

The risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnant women is elevated.

AIM

To examine the outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 and report perinatal outcomes and complications, while providing a brief review of current literature.

METHODS

The study included pregnant women presenting from April 2020 to February 2022 to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital. We retrospectively recorded the maternal and perinatal files, including patient epidemiological and clinical characteristics, laboratory values, outcomes, treatment modalities and associations were explored.

RESULTS

Among the 60 pregnant women, 25% required hospitalization, all of whom were symptomatic. Preterm delivery occurred in 30% of cases. Ten percent of neonates required admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and 5% were classified as small for their gestational age. All mothers survived COVID-19 and pregnancy, with 6.6% requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Preterm delivery rates did not differ between hospitalized and non-hospitalized pregnant women; composite unfavorable perinatal outcomes, including stillbirth, small for gestational age, or neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) admission, did not significantly increase in the cases hospitalized for COVID-19 (P = 0.09). The odds of hospitalization increased 2.3-fold for each day of delayed ED presentation [adj. OR (95%CI: 1.46-3.624), P < 0.001]. Comorbidity status was an independent predictor of hospitalization, albeit with marginal significance [adj. OR = 16.13 (95%CI: 1.021-255.146), P = 0.048]. No independent predictors of adverse fetal outcome (composite) were identified, and eventual hospitalization failed to reach statistical significance by a slight margin (P = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

Delayed ED presentation and comorbidities increase hospitalization odds. This study highlights the importance of continuous and specific guidance for managing pregnant COVID-19 patients, including timely and appropriate interventions to minimize maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.

The triple combination DBDx alleviates cytokine storm and related lung injury

Cytokine storm is a life-threatening disorder, and therapeutic treatments are urgently needed. Here, we investigated the anti-cytokine storm efficacy of DBDx, a triple drug combination composed of dipyridamole, ubenimex and dexamethasone. Evaluated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced cytokine storm murine model, DBDx significantly improved survival rate and prolonged survival time of the model mice. Notably, the efficacy of DBDx was higher than that of dipyridamole, ubenimex and dexamethasone. Determined by ELISA, DBDx significantly reduced the LPS-stimulated serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in mice. Luminex assay showed that DBDx suppressed the serum levels of a wide variety of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which was more potent than dexamethasone alone. Otherwise, DBDx exerted similar inhibitory effects on cytokine profiles in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Histopathological observation showed that DBDx significantly reduced the LPS-induced thickening of alveolar septum, indicating its suppression of capillary congestion, edema and neutrophil infiltration in the lung. Ultra-structure analysis showed that DBDx suppressed the LPS-induced morphological changes of microvilli in type II pneumocytes. In vitro experiment showed that DBDx inhibited IL-6 and TNF-α secretion in THP-1 cells, and downregulated TLR4/NF-κB/HIF-1α signaling pathway. All of these results demonstrate that DBDx, a triple combination of clinical orally-administered drugs, can alleviate cytokine storm and related lung injury. DBDx is beneficial for treating cytokine storm disorders.

Tocilizumab in COVID-19: A Double-Edged Sword?

Background/Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 was responsible for the global pandemic. Approximately 10-15% of patients with COVID-19 developed respiratory failure with adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which required treatment in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The cytokine storm observed in severe COVID-19 was frequently handled with steroids. Synergically, tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, gained popularity as a cytokine storm-suppressing agent. However, immunosuppression was proven to increase the predisposition to infections with resistant bacteria. Our study aimed to assess the relationship between positive tests for secondary infections and the survival of patients with severe COVID-19-attributed ARDS treated with immunosuppressive agents. Methods: This study included 342 patients qualified for the ICU and mechanical ventilation (MV). The patients were divided based on the type of immunomodulating therapy and the culture tests results. Results: The results showed the highest survival rate among patients <61 years, favoring the combined treatment (tocilizumab + steroids). Atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary heart disease (CHD) correlated with a lower survival rate than other comorbidities. Tocilizumab was associated with an increased risk of positive pathogen cultures, which could potentially cause secondary infections; however, the survival rate among these patients was higher. Conclusions: MV and ICU procedures as well as the application of tocilizumab significantly decreased the mortality rate in patients with severe COVID-19-related ARDS. The suppression of cytokine storms played a crucial role in survival. Tocilizumab was found to be both efficient and safe despite the 'side effect' of the increased risk of positive results for secondary infections.

Viral sepsis: diagnosis, clinical features, pathogenesis, and clinical considerations

Sepsis, characterized as life-threatening organ dysfunction resulting from dysregulated host responses to infection, remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. Despite advancements in understanding host-bacterial interactions, molecular responses, and therapeutic approaches, the mortality rate associated with sepsis has consistently ranged between 10 and 16%. This elevated mortality highlights critical gaps in our comprehension of sepsis etiology. Traditionally linked to bacterial and fungal pathogens, recent outbreaks of acute viral infections, including Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), influenza virus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), among other regional epidemics, have underscored the role of viral pathogenesis in sepsis, particularly when critically ill patients exhibit classic symptoms indicative of sepsis. However, many cases of viral-induced sepsis are frequently underdiagnosed because standard evaluations typically exclude viral panels. Moreover, these viruses not only activate conventional pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs) but also initiate primary antiviral pathways such as cyclic guanosine monophosphate adenosine monophosphate (GMP-AMP) synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signaling and interferon response mechanisms. Such activations lead to cellular stress, metabolic disturbances, and extensive cell damage that exacerbate tissue injury while leading to a spectrum of clinical manifestations. This complexity poses substantial challenges for the clinical management of affected cases. In this review, we elucidate the definition and diagnosis criteria for viral sepsis while synthesizing current knowledge regarding its etiology, epidemiology, and pathophysiology, molecular mechanisms involved therein as well as their impact on immune-mediated organ damage. Additionally, we discuss clinical considerations related to both existing therapies and advanced treatment interventions, aiming to enhance the comprehensive understanding surrounding viral sepsis.

The Role of Age and Comorbidity Interactions in COVID-19 Mortality: Insights from Cardiac and Pulmonary Conditions

Background: Understanding the interactions between age and comorbidities is crucial for assessing COVID-19 mortality, particularly in patients with cardiac and pulmonary conditions. This study investigates the relationship between comorbidities and mortality outcomes in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, emphasizing the interplay of age, cardiac, and pulmonary conditions. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 3005 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between 2020 and 2022. Key variables included age, comorbidities (diabetes, cardiac, pulmonary, and neoplasms), and clinical outcomes. Chi-square tests and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between comorbidities and mortality. Stratified analyses by age, diabetes, and pulmonary conditions were conducted to explore interaction effects. Additionally, interaction terms were included in multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the combined impact of age, comorbidities, and mortality. Results: Cardiac conditions such as hypertension, ischemic cardiopathy, and myocardial infarction showed significant protective effects against mortality in younger patients and in those without pulmonary conditions (p < 0.001). However, these protective effects were diminished in older patients and those with pulmonary comorbidities. Age was found to be a significant modifier of the relationship between cardiac conditions and mortality, with a stronger protective effect observed in patients under the median age (p < 0.001). Pulmonary comorbidities significantly increased the risk of mortality, particularly when co-occurring with cardiac conditions (p < 0.001). Diabetes did not significantly modify the relationship between cardiac conditions and mortality. Conclusions: The findings highlight the complex interactions between age, cardiac conditions, and pulmonary conditions in predicting COVID-19 mortality. Younger patients with cardiac comorbidities show a protective effect against mortality, while pulmonary conditions increase mortality risk, especially in older patients. These insights suggest that individualized risk assessments incorporating age and comorbidities are essential for managing COVID-19 outcomes.

A Retrospective Data Audit of Outcome of Moderate and Severe Covid-19 Patients Who Had Received MP and Dex: A Single Center Study

Purpose

To evaluate the necessity of the application of glucocorticoid (GC) in moderate COVID-19 patients, and which is the optimal choice between methylprednisolone (MP) and dexamethasone (DEX) in the clinical use of GC in different types of COVID-19 patients.

Patients and Methods

The study included patients with COVID-19 in Shanxi, China, from December 18, 2022, to March 1, 2023. The main clinical outcomes were 30-day mortality, disease exacerbations, and hospitalization days. Secondary outcomes included the demand for non-invasive ventilator-assisted ventilation (NIPPV)/invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), the need for GC regimen escalation in follow-up treatment, duration of GC treatment, and complications including hyperglycemia and fungal infection.

Results

In moderate patients (N = 351), the rate of exacerbation and the need for GC regimen escalation in follow-up treatment was highest in the no-use GC group (P = 0.025, P = 0.01), the rate of fungal infections was highest in the DEX group (P = 0.038), and MP 40 mg/day or DEX 5 mg/day reduced exacerbations with consistent effects. In severe patients (N = 371), the two GC regimens do not affect their 30-day mortality and exacerbation rate, but the number of hospital days was significantly lower in the MP group compared with the DEX group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

GC use is beneficial in mitigating exacerbations in moderate patients and in patients with moderate COVID-19. In severe patients, MP reduces the number of hospitalization days compared with DEX and may be a superior choice.

Nanotherapy therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a review

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a complex and life-threatening disease characterized by severe respiratory failure. The lethality of ARDS remains alarmingly high, especially with the persistent ravages of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in recent years. ARDS is one of the major complications of neocoronavirus pneumonia and the leading cause of death in infected patients. The large-scale outbreak of COVID-19 has greatly increased the incidence and mortality of ARDS. Despite advancements in our understanding of the causes and mechanisms of ARDS, the current clinical practice is still limited to the use of supportive medications to alleviate its progression. However, there remains a pressing need for effective therapeutic drugs to combat this devastating disease. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the commonly used therapeutic drugs for ARDS, including steroids, vitamin C, targeted inhibitors, and heparin. While these medications have shown some promise in managing ARDS, there is still a significant gap in the availability of definitive treatments. Moreover, we highlight the potential of nanocarrier delivery systems, such as liposomes, lipid nanoparticles, polymer nanoparticles, and inorganic nanoparticles, as promising therapeutic approaches for ARDS in the future. These innovative delivery systems have demonstrated encouraging results in early clinical trials and offer the potential for more targeted and effective treatment options. Despite the promising early results, further clinical trials are necessary to fully assess the efficacy and safety of nanotherapies for ARDS. Additionally, more in-depth research should be conducted to focus on the continuous development of precision therapies targeting different stages of ARDS development or different triggers. This will provide more ideas and rationale for the treatment of ARDS and ultimately lead to better patient outcomes.

Rates, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 in the United States

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and predictors of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as well as the inpatient outcomes associated with this complication.

METHODS

This was an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database from January to December 2020. Adult COVID-19 patients were categorized into two groups based on NVUGIB development during hospitalization. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify predictors and outcomes associated with NVUGIB in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the US, after adjusting for age, sex, race, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, using Stata/BE 17.0.

RESULTS

Among 1 050 045 hospitalized patients, 1.87% developed NVUGIB. Asian Americans had the highest risk, followed by Native Americans, Hispanics, and African Americans, with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.70, 1.59, 1.40, and 1.14, respectively. Patients with higher CCI scores were also at greater risk (with ORs of 1.47, 2.09, and 3.45 for CCI scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively). COVID-19 patients with NVUGIB had a higher risk of inpatient mortality (OR=3.84), acute kidney injury (OR=3.12), hypovolemic shock (OR=13.7), blood transfusion (OR=7.02), and in-hospital cardiac arrest (OR=4.02).

CONCLUSION

NVUGIB occurred in 1.87% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and was associated with a threefold increase in mortality. Further research is necessary to identify strategies for reducing its incidence in COVID-19 patients with multiple risk factors.

Precision Medicine in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Progress, Challenges, and the Road ahead

Several novel high-dimensional biologic measurements are increasingly being applied to biomedical sciences. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a theoretically fertile ground for such approaches. Not only are these biologic and analytic tools available to better understand ARDS but also arguably, simpler approaches such as respiratory physiology has been vastly underutilized as a means of delivering precision-based care in the field. Here we review the progress made in ARDS toward discovering biologically homogeneous phenotypes, treatment responsive subgroups, the challenges to implement these discoveries at the bedside, and the road ahead that will enable precision medicine in ARDS.

Glucocorticoid treatment during COVID-19 infection: does it affect the incidence of long COVID?

BACKGROUND

Long COVID (LC) is a frequent complication of COVID infection. It usually results in cognitive impairment, myalgia, headache and fatigue. No effective treatment has been found yet. We aimed to explore the effect of glucocorticoid (GC) treatment during COVID-19 infection on the later development of LC.

METHODS

We examined electronic health records from Clalit Health Services for documentation of COVID-19, GC treatment, and LC frequency. Background diagnoses, demographic data, hospitalization rates, and the use of anti-COVID drugs were recorded.

RESULTS

1,322,599 cases of COVID-19 infection met the inclusion criteria; 13,530 patients (1.02%) received GC treatment. 149,272 patients, 11.29% of COVID-19 patients were diagnosed with LC. Age and female gender were prognostic risk factors for LC (OR 1.06 for age, OR 1.4 for female gender; p value < 0.0001). Background psychiatric diagnoses, migraine, backache and irritable bowel syndrome were predisposing conditions for LC (OR 2.7, p value < .0001). Higher BMI was associated with a greater probability of LC (OR of 1.25 for obese population). COVID patients who received GC were diagnosed with LC more frequently: 2294 cases (16.95%) compared to 146,978 cases (11.23%) in the non-GC group; (adjusted OR of 1.28 ± 0.07, 95% CI, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

GC treatment during COVID-19 is correlated with the development of LC. In vivo and animal models may be used to explore the mechanism of this correlation. Future directions include prospective studies as well.

Cushing's syndrome and COVID-19

PURPOSE

This review aims to present current data on the course of COVID-19 in patients with Cushing syndrome (CS) and discuss treatment for CS during to the pandemic.

METHODS

Literature review using PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The search included the following terms: "COVID19" in combination with "Cushing syndrome", "Hypercortisolism" and "Glucocorticoid".

RESULTS

Chronic hypercortisolism has been reported to increase infectious risk and worsens prognostic of patients with COVID-19 potentially due to its direct impact on the immune system: lymphopenia, impairment of monocytes and neutrophils activity, diminution of complement activation. Main metabolic complications of CS - i.e. diabetes, hypertension and obesity - have been recognized as COVID-19 complications risk factors. Patients with CS treated with steroidogenesis inhibitors might experience adrenal insufficiency during COVID-19. Special attention should be paid to patients with CS and COVID-19. The pandemic has impacted - and delayed - care of chronic illnesses including CS. Specific recommendations had been provided during the pandemic: favor telemedicine consultations, limit in-hospital explorations and postpone surgery when feasible.

CONCLUSION

There are enough evidence for an increased prevalence and severity of COVID-19 to recommend a specific attention and caution in patients with CS.

Necroptosis in alveolar epithelial cells drives lung inflammation and injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, results in irreversible or fatal lung injury. We assumed that necroptosis of virus-infected alveolar epithelial cells (AEC) could promote local inflammation and further lung injury in COVID-19. Since CD8+ lymphocytes induced AEC cell death via cytotoxic molecules such as FAS ligands, we examined the involvement of FAS-mediated cell death in COVID-19 patients and murine COVID-19 model. We identified the occurrence of necroptosis and subsequent release of HMGB1 in the admitted patients with COVID-19. In the mouse model of COVID-19, lung inflammation and injury were attenuated in Fas-deficient mice compared to Fas-intact mice. The infection enhanced Type I interferon-inducible genes in both groups, while inflammasome-associated genes were specifically upregulated in Fas-intact mice. The treatment with necroptosis inhibitor, Nec1s, improved survival rate, lung injury, and systemic inflammation. SARS-CoV-2 induced necroptosis causes cytokine induction and lung damage, and its inhibition could be a novel therapeutic strategy for COVID-19.

Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes among hospitalised COVID-19 patients in tertiary hospitals in Tanzania, 2021-2022: a retrospective cohort study

Background

There have been differential mortality rates from COVID-19 in different parts of the world. It is not clear whether the clinical presentation does also differ, thus the need for this study in a sub-Saharan African setting. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in selected tertiary hospitals in Tanzania.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of hospitalised adults confirmed SAR-COV-2 infection in five tertiary-level hospitals in Tanzania. Data collected and analysed included sociodemographic, radiological and clinical characteristics of the patients as well as the outcome of the admission (discharge vs death).

Results

Out of 1387 COVID-19 patients, 52% were males. The median age was 60 years ((IQR)=(19-102)). The most common symptoms were dyspnoea (943,68%), cough (889, 64%), fever (597,43%) and fatigue (570, 41%). In-hospital mortality was (476, 34%). Mortality significantly increased with increasing age, being the most in age >90 years (aHR (95% CI)=4.4 (2.52 to 28.82), p=0.02). Other predictors of mortality were not possessing a health insurance, (aHR (95% CI)=3.7 (1.09 to 14.25), p=0.04); chest pain, (aHR (95% CI)=2.27 (1.36 to 4.13), p=0.03); HIV positivity, (aHR (95% CI)=3.9 (1.46 to 8.15), p=0.03); neutrophilia, (aHR (95% CI)=1.12 (1.01 to 2.65), p=0.03); no use of ivermectin, (aHR (95% CI)=1.21 (1.04 to 1.57), p=0.04) and non-use of steroids, (aHR (95% CI)=1.36 (1.18 to 2.78), p=0.04). The retrospective nature of this study which based on documented patients' records, with a large number of patients left out of the analysis due to missed data, this might in a way affect the results of the present study.

Conclusion

In-hospital mortality was 34%. The independent predictors of mortality were advanced age, HIV infection, no possession of a health insurance, chest pain, neutrophilia and no use of steroids or ivermectin.