Heat-shock protein peptide DiaPep277 treatment in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind phase II study

Enhancing anti-CD3 mAb-mediated diabetes remission in autoimmune diabetes through regulation of dynamin-related protein 1(Drp1)-mediated mitochondrial dynamics in exhausted CD8+T-cell subpopulations

BACKGROUND

Antigen-specific immunotherapy shows potential for inducing long-term immune tolerance in type 1 diabetes (T1D), yet its clinical application is hampered by uncertainty regarding dominant epitopes. Conversely, non-antigen-specific treatments such as anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) present a more straightforward approach but struggle to maintain tolerance after treatment. Addressing these issues is critical for advancing T1D therapies.

METHODS

The phenotypic and metabolic properties of two subsets of exhausted CD8+ T cells were analyzed in both humans and NOD mice. T-cell receptor (TCR) diversity and Bulk RNA sequencing provided insights into the transcriptomic profiles and TCR reactivity of these cells. Mechanistic studies were conducted using the HEK-293 T cell line and primary cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was applied to evaluate the characteristics of different CD8+ T cell subsets following two types of immunotherapies. In NY8.3 mice, the effect of mitochondrial fission inhibitors on immunotherapy results was evaluated. Final validation was carried out with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from T1D patients.

RESULTS

Our study reveals the diversity of two distinct exhausted CD8+ T cell subsets in T1D through flow cytometry, highlighting unique clinical features, phenotypes, and functions. Notable differences in TCR reactivity and metabolic pathways between these subsets were identified through TCR sequencing and transcriptomic analyses in NOD mice. Both antigen-specific and non-antigen-specific stimuli produced unique exhausted CD8+ T cell subsets. Our research identified leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (Lrrk2) as a key regulator of mitochondrial fission, influencing the interconversion of exhausted CD8+ T cell subsets by phosphorylating dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) at serine 637 (Ser637) and serine 616 (Ser616). scRNA-seq confirmed that antigen-specific immunotherapy effectively suppresses T cell signaling, induces exhaustion, and promotes the development of terminally exhausted T (TEX) cells. Mitochondrial division inhibitor 1 (Mdivi-1) enhanced the therapeutic effect of anti-CD3 mAb treatment by promoting the development of more TEX cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results point to a new immunotherapeutic approach that targets exhausted CD8+ T cells' energy metabolism, offering valuable insights for advancing clinical strategies in T1D therapy.

Immunotherapies for prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by the autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing β-cells of the pancreatic islets necessitating lifelong insulin therapy. Despite significant advancements in diabetes technology with increasingly sophisticated methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring, people with T1D remain at risk of severe complications like hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis. There has long been an interest in altering the immune response in T1D to prevent or cure T1D across its various stages with limited efficacy. This review highlights immunomodulatory approaches over the years including the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody teplizumab which is now approved to delay onset of T1DM and other interventions under current investigation.

Introducing Molecular Chaperones into the Causality and Prospective Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis

Molecular chaperones influence the immunogenicity of peptides and the activation of effector T cells, and their pathogenic roles in autoimmune hepatitis are unclear. Heat shock proteins are pivotal in the processing and presentation of peptides that activate CD8+ T cells. They can also induce regulatory B and T cells and promote immune tolerance. Tapasin and the transporter associated with antigen processing-binding protein influence the editing and loading of high-affinity peptides for presentation by class I molecules of the major histocompatibility complex. Their over-expression could enhance the autoimmune response, and their deficiency could weaken it. The lysosome-associated membrane protein-2a isoform in conjunction with heat shock cognate 70 supports the importation of cytosolic proteins into lysosomes. Chaperone-mediated autophagy can then process the peptides for activation of CD4+ T cells. Over-expression of autophagy in T cells may also eliminate negative regulators of their activity. The human leukocyte antigen B-associated transcript three facilitates the expression of class II peptide receptors, inhibits T cell apoptosis, prevents T cell exhaustion, and sustains the immune response. Immunization with heat shock proteins has induced immune tolerance in experimental models and humans with autoimmune disease by inducing regulatory T cells. Therapeutic manipulation of other molecular chaperones may promote T cell exhaustion and induce tolerogenic dendritic cells. In conclusion, molecular chaperones constitute an under-evaluated family of ancillary proteins that could affect the occurrence, severity, and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis. Clarification of their contributions to the immune mechanisms and clinical activity of autoimmune hepatitis could have therapeutic implications.

Umbilical cord blood and peripheral blood-derived regulatory T cells therapy: Progress in type 1 diabetes

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are key regulators for the inflammatory response and play a role in maintaining the immune tolerance. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a relatively common autoimmune disease that results from the loss of immune tolerance to β-cell-associated antigens. Preclinical models have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of Tregs given in transplant rejection and autoimmune diseases such as T1D. Adoptive transfer of Tregs has been utilized in clinical trials for over a decade. However, the achievement of the adoptive transfer of Tregs therapy in clinical application remains challenging. In this review, we highlight the characterization of Tregs and compare the differences between umbilical cord blood and adult peripheral blood-derived Tregs. Additionally, we summarize conditional modifications in the expansion of Tregs in clinical trials, especially for the treatment of T1D. Finally, we discuss the existing technical challenges for Tregs in clinical trials for the treatment of T1D.

Leverage biomaterials to modulate immunity for type 1 diabetes

The pathogeny of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is mainly provoked by the β-cell loss due to the autoimmune attack. Critically, autoreactive T cells firsthand attack β-cell in islet, that results in the deficiency of insulin in bloodstream and ultimately leads to hyperglycemia. Hence, modulating immunity to conserve residual β-cell is a desirable way to treat new-onset T1D. However, systemic immunosuppression makes patients at risk of organ damage, infection, even cancers. Biomaterials can be leveraged to achieve targeted immunomodulation, which can reduce the toxic side effects of immunosuppressants. In this review, we discuss the recent advances in harness of biomaterials to immunomodulate immunity for T1D. We investigate nanotechnology in targeting delivery of immunosuppressant, biological macromolecule for β-cell specific autoreactive T cell regulation. We also explore the biomaterials for developing vaccines and facilitate immunosuppressive cells to restore immune tolerance in pancreas.

Biological Functions and Applications of Antimicrobial Peptides

Abstract:

Despite antimicrobial resistance, which is attributed to the misuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, antibiotics can indiscriminately kill pathogenic and beneficial microorganisms. These events disrupt the delicate microbial balance in both humans and animals, leading to secondary infections and other negative effects. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are functional natural biopolymers in plants and animals. Due to their excellent antimicrobial activities and absence of microbial resistance, AMPs have attracted enormous research attention. We reviewed the antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antiparasitic, as well as antitumor properties of AMPs and research progress on AMPs. In addition, we highlighted various recommendations and potential research areas for their progress and challenges in practical applications.

Diabetes type 1: Can it be treated as an autoimmune disorder?

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is characterized by progressive autoimmune-mediated destruction of the pancreatic beta-cells leading to insulin deficiency and hyperglycemia. It is associated with significant treatment burden and necessitates life-long insulin therapy. The role of immunotherapy in the prevention and management of T1DM is an evolving area of interest which has the potential to alter the natural history of this disease.In this review, we give insight into recent clinical trials related to the use of immunotherapeutic approaches for T1DM, such as proinflammatory cytokine inhibition, cell-depletion and cell-therapy approaches, autoantigen-specific treatments and stem cell therapies. We highlight the timing of intervention, aspects of therapy including adverse effects and the emergence of a novel lymphocyte crucial in T1DM autoimmunity. We also discuss the role of cardiac autoimmunity and its link to excess CVD risk in T1DM.We conclude that significant advances have been made in development of immunotherapeutic targets and agents for the treatment and prevention of T1DM. These immune-based therapies promise preservation of beta-cells and decreasing insulin dependency. In their current state, immunotherapeutic approaches cannot yet halt the progression from a preclinical state to overt T1DM nor can they replace standard insulin therapy in existing T1DM. It remains to be seen whether immunotherapy will ultimately play a key role in the prevention of progression to overt T1DM and whether it may find a place in our therapeutic armamentarium to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in established T1DM.

Therapeutic Advances in Diabetes, Autoimmune, and Neurological Diseases

Since 2015, 170 small molecules, 60 antibody-based entities, 12 peptides, and 15 gene- or cell-therapies have been approved by FDA for diverse disease indications. Recent advancement in medicine is facilitated by identification of new targets and mechanisms of actions, advancement in discovery and development platforms, and the emergence of novel technologies. Early disease detection, precision intervention, and personalized treatments have revolutionized patient care in the last decade. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of current and emerging therapeutic modalities developed in the recent years. We focus on nine diseases in three major therapeutics areas, diabetes, autoimmune, and neurological disorders. The pathogenesis of each disease at physiological and molecular levels is discussed and recently approved drugs as well as drugs in the clinic are presented.

Administration of metrnl delays the onset of diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice

Type 1 diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia due to progressive destruction of pancreatic beta cells via autoimmune attack. Meteorin-like protein (metrnl) is a secreted protein homologous to the neurotrophin metrn and it is induced after exercise in the skeletal muscle. In our paper published previously, we showed that the serum level of metrnl was significantly correlated with the lipid profile, glucose profile and insulin resistance. In this experiment, we asked whether intravenous administration of metrnl could delay the onset of diabetes in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice. 4-week-old NOD mice were injected intravenously with metrnl. Blood glucose levels were measured weekly. Insulitis scoring, intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test, adoptive T cell transfer, flow cytometry analysis and real-time PCR were performed to investigate the underlying mechanism. The results showed that intravenous administration of metrnl delayed the onset of diabetes in NOD mice. Histology of pancreas showed a decreased infiltration of leukocytes, which was in association with augmentation of regulatory T cells, suppression of autoreactive T cells and altered cytokine secretion. To sum up, the present study showed that intravenous administration of metrnl ameliorated islet lymphocyte infiltration and modulated immune cell responses, raising the possibility that it might be beneficial in improving islet function clinically.

Auto-antigen and Immunomodulatory Agent-Based Approaches for Antigen-Specific Tolerance in NOD Mice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) can be managed by insulin replacement, but it is still associated with an increased risk of microvascular/cardiovascular complications. There is considerable interest in antigen-specific approaches for treating T1D due to their potential for a favorable risk-benefit ratio relative to non-specific immune-based treatments. Here we review recent antigen-specific tolerance approaches using auto-antigen and/or immunomodulatory agents in NOD mice and provide insight into seemingly contradictory findings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although delivery of auto-antigen alone can prevent T1D in NOD mice, this approach may be prone to inconsistent results and has not demonstrated an ability to reverse established T1D. Conversely, several approaches that promote presentation of auto-antigen in a tolerogenic context through cell/tissue targeting, delivery system properties, or the delivery of immunomodulatory agents have had success in reversing recent-onset T1D in NOD mice. While initial auto-antigen based approaches were unable to substantially influence T1D progression clinically, recent antigen-specific approaches have promising potential.

The Role of Heat Shock Proteins in Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a T-cell mediated autoimmune disease characterized by recognition of pancreatic β-cell proteins as self-antigens, called autoantigens (AAgs), followed by loss of pancreatic β-cells. (Pre-)proinsulin ([P]PI), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), tyrosine phosphatase IA-2, and the zinc transporter ZnT8 are key molecules in T1D pathogenesis and are recognized by autoantibodies detected in routine clinical laboratory assays. However, generation of new autoantigens (neoantigens) from β-cells has also been reported, against which the autoreactive T cells show activity. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) were originally described as “cellular stress responders” for their role as chaperones that regulate the conformation and function of a large number of cellular proteins to protect the body from stress. HSPs participate in key cellular functions under both physiological and stressful conditions, including suppression of protein aggregation, assisting folding and stability of nascent and damaged proteins, translocation of proteins into cellular compartments and targeting irreversibly damaged proteins for degradation. Low HSP expression impacts many pathological conditions associated with diabetes and could play a role in diabetic complications. HSPs have beneficial effects in preventing insulin resistance and hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D). HSPs are, however, additionally involved in antigen presentation, presenting immunogenic peptides to class I and class II major histocompatibility molecules; thus, an opportunity exists for HSPs to be employed as modulators of immunologic responses in T1D and other autoimmune disorders. In this review, we discuss the multifaceted roles of HSPs in the pathogenesis of T1D and in autoantigen-specific immune protection against T1D development.

Heat Shock Protein 70 as a Double Agent Acting Inside and Outside the Cell: Insights into Autoimmunity

Heat shock proteins (Hsp) are a diverse group of constitutive and/or stress-induced molecules that are categorized into several classes on the basis of their molecular weight. Mammalian Hsp have been mostly regarded as intracellular chaperones that mediate a range of essential cellular functions, including proper folding of newly synthesized polypeptides, refolding of denatured proteins, protein transport, and stabilization of native proteins' structures. The well-characterized and highly evolutionarily conserved, stress-inducible 70-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp70), is a key molecular chaperone that is overexpressed in the cell in response to stress of various origin. Hsp70 exhibits an immunosuppressive activity via, e.g., downregulation of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) activation, and pharmacological induction of Hsp70 can ameliorate the autoimmune arthritis development in animal models. Moreover, Hsp70 might be passively or actively released from the necrotic or stressed cells, respectively. Highly immunogenic extracellular Hsp70 has been reported to impact both the innate and adaptive immune responses, and to be implicated in the autoimmune reaction. In addition, preclinical studies revealed that immunization with highly conserved Hsp70 peptides could be regarded as a potential treatment target for autoimmune arthritis, such as the rheumatoid arthritis, via induction of antigen-specific regulatory T helper cells (also called Treg). Here, a dual role of the intra- and extracellular Hsp70 is presented in the context of the autoimmune reaction.

Long-term safety of α-1 antitrypsin therapy in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes

Promising findings of α-1 antitrypsin (AAT) intervention in mice models of Type 1 diabetes (T1D) led researchers to investigate AAT as a therapeutic modality for β-cell preservation in recent-onset T1D patients. Our prospective, open-label Phase I/II extension study demonstrated that the administration of multiple repeated AAT infusions (up to 36) to AAT-sufficient pediatric T1D patients is safe and well-tolerated. Long-term surveillance of participants (up to 5 years) from diabetes onset revealed normal growth and pubertal progression through adolescence to attainment of full puberty and near adult height. No serious adverse events, clinical or laboratory abnormalities were reported. Given its safety profile, AAT may be an individualized-tailored innovative immunotherapy in AAT-sufficient pediatric patients with diverse immune-related medical conditions. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01661192.

Heat shock proteins in the therapy of autoimmune diseases: too simple to be true?

Autoimmune diseases are characterized by the loss of immune tolerance to self-antigens which leads to an excessive immune responses and chronic inflammation. Although much progress has been made in revealing key players in pathophysiology of various autoimmune diseases, their therapy remains challenging and consists of conventional immunosuppressive treatments, including corticosteroids and more advanced biological therapies which are targeted at molecules involved in maintaining chronic inflammation. These therapies are focused on suppressing inflammation; nevertheless, a permanent balance between protective and pathogenic immune responses is not achieved. In addition, most of currently available therapies for autoimmune diseases induce severe side effects. Consequently, more effective and safer therapies are still required to control autoimmunity. Stress-induced cell protecting heat shock proteins (HSP) have been considered as a potential treatment targets for autoimmune diseases. HSP, predominantly intracellular components, might be released from bacteria or mammalian tissues and activate immune response. This activation may lead to either production of (auto)antibodies against HSP and/or induction of immune regulatory mechanisms, including expansion of desired T regulatory (Treg) cells. Because inadequate frequency or activity of Treg is a characteristic feature of autoimmune diseases, targeting this cell population is an important focus of immunotherapy approaches in autoimmunity.

Current Status on Immunological Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) occurs when there is destruction of beta cells within the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas due to autoimmunity. It is considered a complex disease, and different complications can surface and worsen the condition if T1D is not managed well. Since it is an incurable disease, numerous treatments and therapies have been postulated in order to control T1D by balancing hyperglycemia control while minimizing hypoglycemic episodes. The purpose of this review is to primarily look into the current state of the available immunological therapies and their advantages for the treatment of T1D.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the years, immunological therapy has become the center of attraction to treat T1D. Immunomodulatory approaches on non-antigens involving agents such as cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, anti-CD20, cytotoxic T cells, anti-TNF, anti-CD3, and anti-thymocyte globulin as well as immunomodulative approaches on antigens such as insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase, and heat shock protein 60 have been studied. Aside from these two approaches, studies and trials have also been conducted on regulatory T cells, dendritic cells, interleukin 2, interleukin 4, M2 macrophages, and rapamycin/interleukin 2 combination therapy to test their effects on patients with T1D. Many of these agents have successfully suppressed T1D in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice and in human trials. However, some have shown negative results. To date, the insights into the management of the immune system have been increasing rapidly to search for potential therapies and treatments for T1D. Nevertheless, some of the challenges are still inevitable. A lot of work and effort need to be put into the investigation on T1D through immunological therapy, particularly to reduce complications to improve and enhance clinical outcomes.

Targeting Type 1 Diabetes: Selective Approaches for New Therapies

The clinical onset of type 1 diabetes is characterized by the destruction of the insulin-producing β cells of the pancreas and is caused by autoantigen-induced inflammation (insulitis) of the islets of Langerhans. The current standard of care for type 1 diabetes mellitus patients allows for management of the disease with exogenous insulin, but patients eventually succumb to many chronic complications such as limb amputation, blindness, and kidney failure. New therapeutic approaches now on the horizon are looking beyond glycemic management and are evaluating new strategies from protecting and regenerating endogenous islets to treating the underlying autoimmunity through selective modulation of key immune cell populations. Currently, there are no effective treatments for the autoimmunity that causes the disease, and strategies that aim to delay or prevent the onset of the disease will play an important role in the future of diabetes research. In this review, we summarize many of the key efforts underway that utilize molecular approaches to selectively modulate this disease and look at new therapeutic paradigms that can transform clinical treatment.

Antigen-based immune modulation therapy for type 1 diabetes: the era of precision medicine

Precision medicine has emerged as a mantra for therapeutic approaches to complex diseases. The defining concept relies on a detailed insight into disease pathogenesis and therapeutic mechanism. Although the type 1 diabetes field has gained new insights into disease endotypes and indications of efficacy for several therapies, none of these is yet licensed, partly because of immune suppressive side-effects beyond control of islet autoimmunity. New strategies designed to regulate the immune system continue to emerge as basic science discoveries are made, including the use of antigen-based immunotherapies. A single agent or approach seems unlikely to halt disease progression in all people with or at risk of type 1 diabetes; as such, tailored methods relying on patient subgroups and knowledge of disease endotypes are gaining attention. Recent insights into disease mechanisms and emerging trial data are being translated into opportunities for tissue-specific prevention of progressive loss of β-cell function and survival. Results so far point to feasibility, safety, and tolerability of administration of islet autoantigens and peptides thereof into recipients with or at risk of type 1 diabetes. Findings from mechanistic studies suggest favourable changes in islet autoimmunity, with signs of immune regulation. Major challenges remain, including those related to dose and dosing frequency, route of administration, and use of adjuvants. However, the first steps towards tissue-specific and personalised medicine in type 1 diabetes have been made, which will guide future studies into induction of immune tolerance to intervene in the initiation and progression of islet autoimmunity and disease.

Antigen-Specific Tolerization and Targeted Delivery as Therapeutic Strategies for Autoimmune Diseases

The prevalence of autoimmune disorders is increasing steadily and there is no permanent cure available. Immunomodulation through repeated exposure of antigens, known as antigen-specific immune tolerance or antigen-specific immunotherapy (ASI), is a promising approach to treat or prevent autoimmune disorders. Different optimization protocols (immunization routes, delivery systems, and approaches) are being developed to implement ASI against self-proteins. Including appropriate adjuvants, altered peptide ligand, and using multipeptides are approaches that can be used to specifically target autoimmunity. This review explores various ASI application methods, including different routes of antigen-specific sensitization, delivery systems, immunomodulators containing specific antigens, and other targeted approaches that have been successfully demonstrated to have therapeutic effects on autoimmune diseases.

A rationally designed peptide IA-2-P2 against type 1 diabetes in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice

Recent studies have investigated the potential of type 1 diabetes mellitus-related autoantigens, such as heat shock protein 60, to induce immunological tolerance or to suppress the immune response. A functional 24-residue peptide derived from heat shock protein 60 (P277) has shown anti-type 1 diabetes mellitus potential in experimental animals and in clinical studies, but it also carries a potential atherogenic effect. In this study, we have modified P277 to retain an anti-type 1 diabetes mellitus effect and minimize the atherogenic potential by replacing the P277 B epitope with another diabetes-associated autoantigen, insulinoma antigen-2 (IA-2), to create the fusion peptide IA-2-P2. In streptozotocin-induced diabetic C57BL/6J mice, the IA-2-P2 peptide displayed similar anti-diabetic effects to the control P277 peptide. Also, the IA-2-P2 peptide did not show atherogenic activity in a rabbit model. Our findings indicate the potential of IA-2-P2 as a promising vaccine against type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Antigen-based immunotherapies do not prevent progression of recent-onset autoimmune diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of antigen-based immunotherapies in tertiary prevention of autoimmune diabetes. We searched for randomised controlled trials testing antigen-based immunotherapies in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes or latent autoimmune diabetes of adults in MEDLINE, COCHRANE and EMBASE databases, trial registries, conference proceedings and reference lists of pertinent records. Primary outcomes were fasting and stimulated C-peptide (after glucagon or mixed meal stimulation). Change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA_1c), daily insulin needs and incidence of any or severe hypoglycaemic events or severe adverse events were secondary outcomes. Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, there was no difference in fasting [weighted mean difference (WMD) 0.01 nmol/L; 95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.09, 0.11; I ² = 73 %] or mixed meal stimulated C-peptide (WMD 0.02 nmol/L/min; 95 % CI -0.08, 0.12; I ² = 50 %) compared with placebo. Glucagon stimulated C-peptide was maintained higher (WMD 0.13 nmol/L/min; 95 % CI 0.05, 0.21; I ² = 0 %) in patients treated with Diapep277. Moreover, there was no change in daily insulin needs (WMD 0.02 IU/kg; 95 % CI -0.04, 0.09; I ² = 51 %) or HbA_1c (WMD -0.06 %; 95 % CI -0.35, 0.23; I ² = 42 %) vs. placebo. Finally, there was no effect on the incidence of severe hypoglycaemic events or overall serious adverse events [risk ratio 0.94, 95 % CI 0.62, 1.41; I ² = 0 % and 0.87; 95 % CI 0.53, 1.44; I ² = 0 %, respectively). Antigen-based immunotherapies are not effective in preventing the progression of autoimmune diabetes in newly diagnosed patients.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin therapy is safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents with recent onset type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) has been shown to reduce pro-inflammatory markers and protect pancreatic islets from autoimmune responses in recent studies. Our aim was to evaluate its safety and tolerability in three different doses, in a pediatric population with recent onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

A 37-wk prospective, open-label, phase I/II interventional trial, comprised of 24 recently diagnosed subjects (12 males; age 12.9 ± 2.4 yr), who received 18 infusions of 40, 60, or 80 mg/kg/dose high-purity, liquid, ready to use AAT over 28 wk (Glassia(®) ; Kamada Ltd., Ness Ziona, Israel).

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

safety and tolerability; secondary outcomes: glycemic control, C-peptide reserve, and autoantibody levels. Possible responders were defined as individuals with peak C-peptide that declined less than 7.5% below baseline.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), or severe hypoglycemic episodes were reported. Adverse events were dose-independent and transient. Glycemic control parameters improved during the study in all groups, independent of dosage. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.43 to 7.09% (mean, p < 0.001). At the end of the study, 18 subjects (75%) had a peak C-peptide ≥0.2 pmol/mL. Eight subjects (33.3%) were considered possible responders and were characterized by shorter duration of T1DM at screening (54.5 ± 34.3 vs. 95.9 ± 45.7 d, p = 0.036) and greater decrease in their HbA1c during the study period (-2.94 ± 1.55 vs.-0.95 ± 1.83%, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

AAT treatment was safe and well tolerated in pediatric subjects with recently diagnosed autoimmune diabetes. Placebo-controlled studies with larger cohorts and dose range are warranted in order to assess efficacy in maintaining pancreatic beta cell reserve and glycemic control.

Insulin B chain 9-23 gene transfer to hepatocytes protects from type 1 diabetes by inducing Ag-specific FoxP3+ Tregs

Antigen (Ag)-specific tolerance in type 1 diabetes (T1D) in human has not been achieved yet. Targeting lentiviral vector (LV)-mediated gene expression to hepatocytes induces active tolerance toward the encoded Ag. The insulin B chain 9-23 (InsB9-23) is an immunodominant T cell epitope in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. To determine whether auto-Ag gene transfer to hepatocytes induces tolerance and control of T1D, NOD mice were treated with integrase-competent LVs (ICLVs) that selectively target the expression of InsB9-23 to hepatocytes. ICLV treatment induced InsB9-23-specific effector T cells but also FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs), which halted islet immune cell infiltration, and protected from T1D. Moreover, ICLV treatment combined with a single suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) is effective in T1D reversal. Splenocytes from LV.InsB9-23-treated mice, but not from LV.OVA (ovalbumin)-treated control mice, stopped diabetes development, demonstrating that protection is Ag-specific. Depletion of CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) T cells led to diabetes progression, indicating that Ag-specific FoxP3(+) Tregs mediate protection. Integrase-defective LVs (IDLVs).InsB9-23, which alleviate the concerns for insertional mutagenesis and support transient transgene expression in hepatocytes, were also efficient in protecting from T1D. These data demonstrate that hepatocyte-targeted auto-Ag gene expression prevents and resolves T1D and that stable integration of the transgene is not required for this protection. Gene transfer to hepatocytes can be used to induce Ag-specific tolerance in autoimmune diseases.

Tolerization against atherosclerosis using heat shock protein 60

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the artery wall, and both innate and adaptive immunity play important roles in the pathogenesis of this disease. In several experimental and human experiments of early atherosclerotic lesions, it has been shown that the first pathogenic event in atherogenesis is intimal infiltration of T cells at predilection sites. These T cells react to heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), which is a ubiquitous self-antigen expressed on the surface of endothelial cells (ECs) together with adhesion molecules in response to classical risk factors for atherosclerosis. When HSP60 is expressed on the EC surface, it can act as a "danger-signal" for both cellular and humoral immune reactions. Acquired by infection or vaccination, beneficial protective immunity to microbial HSP60 and bona fide autoimmunity to biochemically altered autologous HSP60 is present in all humans. Thus, the development of atherosclerosis during aging is paid by the price for lifelong protective preexisting anti-HSP60 immunity by harmful (auto)immune cross-reactive attack on arterial ECs maltreated by atherosclerosis risk factors. This is supported by experiments, which shows that bacterial HSP60 immunization can lead and accelerate experimental atherosclerosis. This review article presents accumulating proof that supports the idea that tolerization with antigenic HSP60 protein or its peptides may arrest or even prevent atherosclerosis by increased production of regulatory T cells and/or anti-inflammatory cytokines. Recent data indicates that HSP60, or more likely some of its derivative peptides, has immunoregulatory functions. Therefore, these peptides may have important potential for being used as diagnostic agents or therapeutic targets.

Prevention and reversal of type 1 diabetes--past challenges and future opportunities

Over the past three decades there have been a number of clinical trials directed at interdicting the type 1 diabetes (T1D) disease process in an attempt to prevent the development of the disease in those at increased risk or to stabilize-potentially even reverse-the disease in people with T1D, usually of recent onset. Unfortunately, to date there has been no prevention trial that has resulted in delay or prevention of T1D. And, trials in people with T1D have had mixed results with some showing promise with at least transient improvement in β-cell function compared with randomized control groups, while others have failed to slow the decline in β-cell function when compared with placebo. This Perspective will assess the past and present challenges in this effort and provide an outline for potential future opportunities.

Type 1 diabetes and T regulatory cells

T-regulatory cells (Tregs) play a fundamental role in the creation and maintenance of peripheral tolerance. Deficits in the numbers and/or function of Tregs may be an underlying cause of human autoimmune diseases including type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1D), whereas an over-abundance of Tregs can hinder immunity against cancer or pathogens. The importance of Tregs in the control of autoimmunity is well established in a variety of experimental animal models. In mice, manipulating the numbers and/or function of Tregs can decrease pathology in a wide range of contexts, including autoimmunity and it is widely assumed that similar approaches will be possible in humans. T1D, the most prevalent human autoimmune disease, has been a focus of interventions either through direct and indirect in vivo proliferations or through adoptive transfer of the in vitro generated antigen specific and non specific Treg. Some challenges still need to be addressed, including a more specific phenotype marker for Tregs; the reproducibility of satisfactory animal results in human and the reconcile of discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo studies. In this article, we will highlight the role of Tregs in autoimmune disease in general with a special focus on T1D, highlighting progress made and challenges ahead in developing Treg-based therapies.

Impact of disease heterogeneity on treatment efficacy of immunotherapy in Type 1 diabetes: different shades of gray

Type 1 diabetes results from selective destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells by a progressive autoimmune process. Type 1 diabetes proves very heterogeneous in pathology, disease progression and efficacy of therapeutic intervention. Indeed, several immunotherapies that appear ineffective for the entire treated patient population in fact look promising in subgroups of patients. It therefore seems inconceivable that one standard therapy will provide the golden bullet of disease intervention. Instead, personalized medicine may improve immune intervention efficacy rates. We discuss the effect of disease heterogeneity on treatment outcome of immunotherapies, identifying apparent gaps in our understanding of treatment efficacy in subgroups of Type 1 diabetic patients as well as identifying future opportunities for immunotherapy.

Alteration of regulatory T cells in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a comprehensive review

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of pancreatic β cells. Numerous studies have demonstrated the key role of CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the development of T1DM. However, the changes in Treg expression and function as well as the regulation of these activities are not clearly elucidated. Most studies on the role of Tregs in T1DM were performed on peripheral blood rather than pancreas or pancreatic lymph nodes. Tissue-based studies are more difficult to perform, and there is a lack of histological data to support the role of Tregs in T1DM. In spite of this, strategies to increase Treg cell number and/or function have been viewed as potential therapeutic approaches in treating T1DM, and several clinical trials using these strategies have already emerged. Notably, many trials fail to demonstrate clinical response even when Treg treatment successfully boosts Tregs. In view of this, whether a failure of Tregs does exist and contribute to the development of T1DM and whether more Tregs would be clinically beneficial to patients should be carefully taken into consideration before applying Tregs as treatments in T1DM.

GAD-treatment of children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes preserves residual insulin secretion after 30 months

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyse data from two different studies (phase II and phase III) regarding the safety and efficacy of treatment with alum formulated glutamic acid decarboxylase GAD65 (GAD-alum) at 30 months after administration to children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

The phase II trial was a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled study, including 70 children and adolescents who were followed for 30  months. Participants received a subcutaneous injection of either 20 µg of GAD-alum or placebo at baseline and 1 month later. During a subsequent larger European phase III trial including three treatment arms, participants received two or four subcutaneous injections of either 20 µg of GAD-alum and/or placebo at baseline, 1, 3 and 9  months. The phase III trial was prematurely interrupted at 15 months, but of the 148 Swedish patients, a majority completed the 21 months follow-up, and 45 patients completed the trial at 30 months. Both studies included GAD65 auto-antibodies-positive patients with fasting C-peptide ≥ 0.10 nmol/l. We have now combined the results of these two trials.

RESULTS

There were no treatment related adverse events. In patients treated with 2 GAD-alum doses, stimulated C-peptide area under the curve had decreased significantly less (9  m: p  <  0.037; 15 m: p  <  0.032; 21 m: p  <  0.003 and 30  m: p <  0.004), and a larger proportion of these patients were also able to achieve a peak stimulated C-peptide > 0.2  nmol/L (p  <  0.05), as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with two doses of GAD-alum in children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes shows no adverse events and preserves residual insulin secretion.

Modulation of the pancreatic islet-stress axis as a novel potential therapeutic target in diabetes mellitus

Loss of pancreatic islet function and insulin-producing beta cell mass is a central hallmark in the pathogenesis of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. While in type 1 diabetes this phenomenon is due to an extensive destruction of beta cells caused by an autoimmune process, the mechanisms resulting in beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes are different and less clear. Also, beta cell destruction in type 1 diabetes occurs early and is the initial step in the pathogenetic process, while beta cell loss in type 2 diabetes after an initial phase of hyperinsulinemia due to the underlying insulin resistance occurs relatively late and it is less pronounced. Since diabetes mellitus is the most frequent endocrine disease, with an increasing high prevalence worldwide, huge efforts have been made over the past many decades to identify predisposing genetic, environmental, and nutritional factors in order to develop effective strategies to prevent the disease. In parallel, extensive studies in different cell systems and animal models have helped to elucidate our understanding of the physiologic function of islets and to gain insight into the immunological and non-immunological mechanisms of beta cell destruction and failure. Furthermore, currently emerging concepts of beta cell regeneration (e.g., the restoration of the beta cell pool by regenerative, proliferative and antiapoptotic processes, and recovery of physiologic islet function) apparently is yielding the first promising results. Recent insights into the complex endocrine and paracrine mechanisms regulating the physiologic function of pancreatic islets, as well as beta cell life and death, constitute an essential part of this new and exciting area of diabetology. For example, understanding of the physiological role of glucagon-like peptide 1 has resulted in the successful clinical implementation of incretin-based therapies over the last years. Further, recent data suggesting paracrine effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone and corticotropin-releasing hormone on the regulation of pancreatic islet function, survival, and proliferation as well as on local glucocorticoid metabolism provide evidence for a potential role of the pancreatic islet-stress axis in the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus. In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive overview of current preventive and regenerative concepts as a basis for the development of novel therapeutic approaches to the treatment of diabetes mellitus. A particular focus is given on the potential of the pancreatic islet-stress axis in the development of novel regenerative strategies.

Trials in type 1 diabetes: Antigen-specific therapies

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from an aberrant immunological response against the insulin-producing beta cells in the islets of the pancreas. The ideal therapy would restore immune balance in a safe and lasting fashion, stopping the process of beta cell decay. The efficacy of immune suppressive agents such as cyclosporin underscores the notion that T1D can in principle be prevented, albeit at an unacceptable long-term safety risk. Immune modulatory drugs such as monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody, on the other hand, have recently had rather disappointing results in phase 3 trials, possibly due to inadequate dosing or choice of inappropriate endpoints. Therefore, it is argued that striking the right balance between safety and efficacy, together with careful trial design, will be paramount in preventing T1D. Here we outline the concept of antigen-specific tolerization as a strategy to safely induce long-term protection against T1D, focusing on available clinical trial data, key knowledge gaps and potential future directions.

Non-antigenic and antigenic interventions in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic β-cells. Current T1D therapies are exclusively focused on regulating glycemia rather than the underlying immune response. A handful of trials have sought to alter the clinical course of T1D using various broad immune-suppressors, e.g., cyclosporine A and azathioprine.^1–3 The effect on β-cell preservation was significant, however, these therapies were associated with unacceptable side-effects. In contrast, more recent immunomodulators, such as anti-CD3 and antigenic therapies such as DiaPep277, provide a more targeted immunomodulation and have been generally well-tolerated and safe; however, as a monotherapy there appear to be limitations in terms of therapeutic benefit. Therefore, we argue that this new generation of immune-modifying agents will likely work best as part of a combination therapy. This review will summarize current immune-modulating therapies under investigation and discuss how to move the field of immunotherapy in T1D forward.

Clinical application of regulatory T cells in type 1 diabetes

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are responsible for the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. Animal studies have shown that administration of Tregs can prevent type 1 diabetes (DM1). Several clinical trials attempted to induce Tregs with various agents, and thus provide long-term tolerance of β cells in DM1. Nevertheless, most of these studies have focused on clinical parameters (e.g. C-peptide) and not Treg numbers nor their function after treatment. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude if the majority of these therapies failed because the drugs did not induce Tregs, or if they failed despite Treg expansion. The current knowledge regarding Tregs, along with our experience in Treg therapy of patients with graft versus host disease, prompted us to use ex vivo expanded Tregs in 10 children with recent-onset DM1. No adverse effects in the treated individuals were observed. There was a significant increase in Treg number in peripheral blood immediately after the treatment administration, while the first clinical differences between treated and control patients were observed 4 months after Treg injection. Treated individuals had higher C-peptide levels and lower insulin requirements than non-treated children. Eleven months after diagnosis of DM1, there are still 2 individuals who are independent of exogenous insulin. These results indicate that autologous Tregs are a safe and well-tolerated therapy in children with DM1, which can inhibit or delay the destruction of pancreatic β cells. Additionally, Tregs can be a useful tool for local protection of transplanted pancreatic islets. Isolation and expansion of antigen-specific Tregs is one of the directions for future studies on cellular therapy of DM1.

Progress in immune-based therapies for type 1 diabetes

Immune-based therapies that prevent type 1 diabetes or preserve metabolic function remaining at diagnosis have become a major objective for funding agencies and international trial consortia, and receive backing from notable patient advocate groups. The development of immune-based therapeutic strategies in this arena requires a careful balancing of the risks of the therapy against the potential benefits, because many individuals are diagnosed or identified as being at increased risk of disease in early childhood, a period when manipulation of the developing immune system should be undertaken with caution. In addition, a therapy exists (daily insulin injection) that is life-saving in the acute stages of disease and can be used effectively over a lifetime as maintenance. Conversely, the disease is increasing in incidence; is peaking in ever-younger age groups; carries significant risk of increased morbidity and early mortality; and remains difficult to manage effectively in many settings. With these issues in mind, in this article we review progress towards immune-based strategies for this chronic autoimmune disease.

Antigen-specific therapeutic approaches in Type 1 diabetes

Development of strategies capable of specifically curbing pathogenic autoimmune responses in a disease- and organ-specific manner without impairing foreign or tumor antigen-specific immune responses represents a long sought-after goal in autoimmune disease research. Unfortunately, our current understanding of the intricate details of the different autoimmune diseases that affect mankind, including type 1 diabetes, is rudimentary. As a result, progress in the development of the so-called "antigen-specific" therapies for autoimmunity has been slow and fraught with limitations that interfere with bench-to-bedside translation. Absent or incomplete understanding of mechanisms of action and lack of adequate immunological biomarkers, for example, preclude the rational design of effective drug development programs. Here, we provide an overview of antigen-specific approaches that have been tested in preclinical models of T1D and, in some cases, human subjects. The evidence suggests that effective translation of these approaches through clinical trials and into patients will continue to meet with failure unless detailed mechanisms of action at the level of the organism are defined.

Heat shock protein bystander antigens for peptide immunotherapy in autoimmune disease

Mucosal administration of an antigen eliciting bystander suppression at the site of inflammation results in effective antigen-specific immunotherapy for autoimmune diseases. Heat shock proteins are bystander antigens that are effective in peptide-specific immunotherapy in both experimental and human autoimmune disease. The efficacy of preventive peptide immunotherapy is increased by enhancing peptide-specific immune responses with proinflammatory agents. Combining peptide-specific immunotherapy with general suppression of inflammation may improve its therapeutic effect.

Lessons from the mixed-meal tolerance test: use of 90-minute and fasting C-peptide in pediatric diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) area under the curve C-peptide (AUC CP) is the gold-standard measure of endogenous insulin secretion in type 1 diabetes but is intensive and invasive to perform. The 90-min MMTT-stimulated CP ≥0.2 nmol/L (90CP) is related to improved clinical outcomes, and CP ≥0.1 nmol/L is the equivalent fasting measure (FCP). We assessed whether 90CP or FCP are alternatives to a full MMTT.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

CP was measured during 1,334 MMTTs in 421 type 1 diabetes patients aged <18 years at 3, 9, 18, 48, and 72 months duration. We assessed: 1) correlation between mean AUC CP and 90CP or FCP; 2) sensitivity and specificity of 90CP ≥0.2 nmol/L and FCP ≥ 0.1 nmol/L to detect peak CP ≥0.2 nmol/L and the equivalent AUC CP; and 3) how the time taken to reach the CP peak varied with age of diagnosis and diabetes duration.

RESULTS

AUC CP was highly correlated to 90CP (r(s) = 0.96; P < 0.0001) and strongly correlated to FCP (r(s) = 0.84; P < 0.0001). AUC CP ≥23 nmol/L/150 min was the equivalent cutoff for peak CP ≥0.2 nmol/L (98% sensitivity/97% specificity). A 90CP ≥0.2 nmol/L correctly classified 96% patients using AUC or peak CP, whereas FCP ≥0.1 nmol/L classified 83 and 85% patients, respectively. There was only a small difference seen between peak and 90CP (median 0.02 nmol/L). The CP peak occurred earlier in patients with longer diabetes duration (6.1 min each 1-year increase in duration) and younger age (2.5 min each 1-year increase).

CONCLUSIONS

90CP is a highly sensitive and specific measure of AUC and peak CP in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and offers a practical alternative to a full MMTT.

Clinical potential of antigen-specific therapies in type 1 diabetes

In type 1 diabetes (T1D), pancreatic beta-cells are attacked and destroyed by the immune system, which leads to a loss of endogenous insulin secretion. The desirable outcome of therapeutic intervention in autoimmune diseases is the restoration of immune tolerance to prevent organ damage. Past trials with immune suppressive drugs highlight the fact that T1D is in principle a curable condition. However, the barrier in T1D therapy in terms of drug safety is set particularly high because of the predominantly young population and the good prognosis associated with modern exogenous insulin therapy. Thus, there is a general consensus that chronic immune suppression is associated with unacceptable long-term safety risks. On the other hand, immune-modulatory biologicals have recently failed to confer significant protection in phase 3 clinical trials. However, the concept of antigen-specific tolerization may offer a unique strategy to safely induce long-term protection against T1D. In this review, we analyze the potential reasons for the failure of the different tolerization therapies, and describe how the concept of antigen-specific toleraization may overcome the obstacles associated with clinical therapy in T1D.

Current and future immunomodulation strategies to restore tolerance in autoimmune diseases

Autoimmune diseases reflect a breakdown in self-tolerance that results from defects in thymic deletion of potentially autoreactive T cells (central tolerance) and in T-cell intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms that normally control potentially autoreactive T cells in the periphery (peripheral tolerance). The mechanisms leading to autoimmune diseases are multifactorial and depend on a complex combination of genetic, epigenetic, molecular, and cellular elements that result in pathogenic inflammatory responses in peripheral tissues driven by self-antigen-specific T cells. In this article, we describe the different checkpoints of tolerance that are defective in autoimmune diseases as well as specific events in the autoimmune response which represent therapeutic opportunities to restore long-term tolerance in autoimmune diseases. We present evidence for the role of different pathways in animal models and the therapeutic strategies targeting these pathways in clinical trials in autoimmune diseases.

The impact of insulin administration during the mixed meal tolerance test

AIMS

The mixed meal tolerance test is the gold standard measure of endogenous insulin secretion. Practical issues limit the routine clinical use of this test, including omitting insulin prior to the ingestion of a high-carbohydrate liquid mixed meal, which can result in marked hyperglycaemia. We aimed to assess whether insulin omission is necessary during the mixed meal tolerance test and whether fasting C-peptide was a practical alternative to the test.

METHODS

Ninety-one adults with insulin-treated diabetes (Type 1 n = 56, Type 2 n = 35) underwent two mixed meal tolerance tests; one standard without insulin and one with the patient's usual morning insulin.

RESULTS

The 90-min serum C-peptide was highly correlated in the standard mixed meal tolerance test and the test with insulin (r = 0.98, P < 0.0001). There was a 20% reduction in the peak C-peptide value when insulin was given {test with insulin [0.39 (0.01-1.16) vs. test without insulin 0.48 (0.01-1.36) nmol/l, P = 0.001]}, but the original serum C-peptide cut-off for significant endogenous insulin secretion (≥ 0.2 nmol/l) still correctly classified 90/91 patients (98% sensitivity/100% specificity). Fasting serum C-peptide was highly correlated to 90-min serum C-peptide during the test (r = 0.97, P < 0.0001). A fasting serum C-peptide ≥ 0.07 nmol/l was the optimal cut-off (100% sensitivity and 97% specificity) for significant endogenous insulin secretion (defined as 90-min stimulated serum C-peptide ≥ 0.2 nmol/l).

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin omission may not always be necessary during a mixed meal tolerance test and fasting serum C-peptide may offer a practical alternative in insulin-treated patients.

Clinical immunologic interventions for the treatment of type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease, hence the rationale for immunotherapy to halt disease progression. Based on knowledge gained from other autoimmune diseases and from transplantation, the first immunointervention trials used immunosuppressive drugs, e.g., cyclosporin, in patients with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Although remarkable, the effect vanished following drug withdrawal. Efforts were then devoted to devise strategies to induce/restore self-tolerance and avoid chronic immunosuppression. Various approaches were identified from work in spontaneous models of autoimmune diabetes, including the use of β-cell autoantigens and monoclonal antibodies directed at relevant immune molecules such as costimulatory ligands, T-cell receptor molecules such as CD3, and B cells. Phase II and phase III trials were launched, results of which are now available. Although the endeavor is challenging, the experience gained indicates that immunotherapy appears as the real hope of inducing long-term remission of the disease provided the treatment is started early and that protocols are adapted based on lessons from the past.

Immunotherapies in diabetes mellitus type 1

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease that gradually destructs insulin-producing beta cells. Over the years, clinicians' knowledge regarding the immunopathogenesis of this disease has greatly increased. Immunotherapies that can change the course of immune-mediated destruction and preserve and possibly regenerate the pancreatic beta cells seem to be promising in preclinical trials but so far have been unsuccessful in human studies. This article reviews the important immune interventions for type 1 diabetes that have been tried so far targeting the different stages of disease development and provides an insight into what the future might hold.

New and future immunomodulatory therapy in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes is a common autoimmune disease that affects millions of people worldwide and has an incidence that is increasing at a striking rate, especially in young children. It results from the targeted self-destruction of the insulin-secreting β cells of the pancreas and requires lifelong insulin treatment. The effects of chronic hyperglycemia - the result of insulin deficiency - include secondary endorgan complications. Over the past two decades our increased understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease has led to the development of new immunomodulatory treatments. None have yet received regulatory approval, but this report highlights recent progress in this area.