Methods for Identifying Patients with Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase (TRK) Fusion Cancer

Prognostic potential of fusion gene analysis using plasma cell-free RNA in malignant bone and soft tissue tumours

BACKGROUND

Liquid biopsy, which facilitates minimally invasive analysis of body fluid samples, has considerable potential as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in various cancers. Analysis of circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA, and exosomes in liquid biopsies has advantages and disadvantages. However, their utility in rare cancers, such as malignant bone and soft tissue tumours, remains unknown. In this study, we examined the levels of circulating cell-free tumour RNA (cfRNA) in the blood of patients with malignant bone and soft tissue tumours harbouring specific fusion genes, to explore the relationship between fusion gene expression in the blood and therapeutic response and disease status, and to validate the clinical utility of liquid biopsy.

METHODS

The study involved 3 cases (7 samples) of Ewing's sarcoma, 6 cases (12 samples) of myxoid liposarcoma, and 1 case (2 samples) of synovial sarcoma with specific fusion genes. Fusion gene analysis was performed using tumour tissue samples to identify breakpoints. Primers for liquid biopsy were designed based on the fusion genes identified. cfRNA was extracted from each patient's plasma and used for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with the designed primers. The RT-PCR product was subjected to Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Fusion gene breakpoints were identified in 10 samples from 6 cases. The fusion gene detection rate in the blood was 100% at both naïve status and symptom exacerbation in patients with Stage IV disease. In patients with Stage III disease progressing to Stage IV, the fusion gene was detected in the blood prior to imaging tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of specific fusion genes from cfRNAs shows potential for monitoring the progression of fusion-related sarcomas in the context of chemotherapy.

The Research Progress of Neurotrophic Tyrosine Receptor Kinase (NTRK) Gene Fusions and Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase (TRK) Inhibitors: A Narrative Review

NTRK gene is responsible for encoding TRK, which consists of three family members: NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3. These family members encode different proteins known as TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC, respectively. NTRK fusion genes are the clearest driving factor for carcinogenesis. NTRK gene fusion detection and TRK inhibitors are effective measures for the treatment of malignant tumors. The development of anti-tumor drugs targeting TRK proteins has been favored by various scientific research institutions and pharmaceutical companies. The first-generation TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, have been approved for the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors harboring NTRK fusion proteins, demonstrating remarkable anticancer efficacy in clinical settings. However, the issue of acquired resistance to TRK inhibitors has emerged. Currently, efforts are underway to develop next-generation TRK inhibitors based on sequence, structural, and kinetic methodologies, as well as to explore the intracellular signaling pathways of TRK and the mechanisms underlying resistance. The main focus of this review was to discuss the fusion of NTRK genes and the application of TRK inhibitor treatment.

A case of quadruple wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumor with CDC42BPB::NTRK3 fusion and abundant lymphoid infiltration

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The most common mutations in GISTs are those in receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). GISTs without KIT or PDGFRA mutations are defined as wild-type (WT) GISTs. The molecular changes, prognosis, and treatments of WT GISTs remain uncertain. Among WT GISTs, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions have rarely been reported. We report a case of quadruple wild-type GIST harboring a novel CDC42BPB::NTRK3 fusion. In this study, we described a 66-year-old male patient with intrajejunal lesion. This case showed massive lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration, which caused diagnostic difficulties in morphology. CDC42BPB::NTRK3 fusion was detected via next-generation sequencing (NGS), and this finding was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which revealed NTRK3 breakage. However, the expression of the Trk protein in tumor tissue was not detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). This finding expands the genetic spectrum of NTRK rearrangements in GISTs.

Actionable Structural Variant Detection via RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Importance

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer suggest that RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) may improve the detection of fusions and splicing variants compared with DNA-NGS alone. However, there is limited adoption of RNA-NGS in routine oncology clinical care today.

Objective

To analyze clinical evidence from a diverse cohort of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and compare the detection of NCCN-recommended actionable structural variants (aSVs; fusions and splicing variants) via concurrent DNA and RNA-NGS vs DNA-NGS alone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multisite, retrospective cohort study examined patients sequenced between February 2021 and October 2023 within the deidentified, Tempus multimodal database, consisting of linked molecular and clinical data. Participants included patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and sufficient tissue sample quantities for both RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS testing.

Exposures

Received results from RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS solid-tissue profiling assays.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Detection rates of NCCN guideline-based structural variants (ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1/2/3 fusions, as well as MET exon 14 skipping splicing alterations) found uniquely by RNA-NGS.

Results

In the evaluable cohort of 5570 patients, median (IQR) age was 67.8 (61.3-75.4) years, and 2989 patients (53.7%) were female. The prevalence of actionable structural variants detected by either RNA-NGS or DNA-NGS was 8.8% (n = 491), with 86.7% (n = 426) of these detected by DNA-NGS. Concurrent RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS identified 15.3% more patients harboring aSVs compared with DNA-NGS alone (491 vs 426 patients, respectively), including 14.3% more patients harboring actionable fusions (376 vs 329 patients) and 18.6% more patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations (115 vs 97 patients). There was no significant association between the assay used for aSV detection and aSV-targeted therapeutic adoption or clinical outcome. Emerging structural variants (eSVs) were found to have a combined prevalence to be 0.7%, with only 47.5% of eSVs detected by DNA-NGS.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, the detection of structural variants via concurrent RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS was higher across multiple NCCN-guideline recommended biomarkers compared with DNA-NGS alone, suggesting that RNA-NGS should be routinely implemented in the care of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase gene fusions in adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors: a clinicogenomic biobank and record linkage study of expression frequency and patient characteristics from Finland

BACKGROUND

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are oncogenic drivers. Using the Auria Biobank in Finland, we aimed to identify and characterize patients with these gene fusions, and describe their clinical and tumor characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We evaluated pediatrics with any solid tumor type and adults with colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sarcoma, or salivary gland cancer. We determined tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) protein expression by pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of tumor samples from the Auria Biobank, scored by a certified pathologist. NTRK gene fusion was confirmed by next generation sequencing (NGS). All 2,059 patients were followed-up starting 1 year before their cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Frequency of NTRK gene fusion tumors was 3.1% (4/127) in pediatrics, 0.7% (8/1,151) for CRC, 0.3% (1/288) for NSCLC, 0.9% (1/114) for salivary gland cancer, and 0% (0/379) for sarcoma. Among pediatrics there was one case each of fibrosarcoma (TPM3::NTRK1), Ewing's sarcoma (LPPR1::NTRK2), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (DAB2IP::NTRK2), and papillary thyroid carcinoma (RAD51B::NTRK3). Among CRC patients, six harbored tumors with NTRK1 fusions (three fused with TPM3), one harbored a NTRK3::GABRG1 fusion, and the other a NTRK2::FXN/LPPR1 fusion. Microsatellite instability was higher in CRC patients with NTRK gene fusion tumors versus wild-type tumors (50.0% vs. 4.4%). Other detected fusions were SGCZ::NTRK3 (NSCLC) and ETV6::NTRK3 (salivary gland cancer). Four patients (three CRC, one NSCLC) received chemotherapy; one patient (with CRC) received radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

NTRK gene fusions are rare in adult CRC, NSCLC, salivary tumors, sarcoma, and pediatric solid tumors.

NTRK gene fusion testing and management in lung cancer

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are recurrent oncogenic drivers found in a variety of solid tumours, including lung cancer. Several tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have been developed to treat tumours with NTRK gene fusions. Larotrectinib and entrectinib are first-generation TRK inhibitors that have demonstrated efficacy in patients with TRK fusion lung cancers. Genomic testing is recommended for all patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer for optimal drug therapy selection. Multiple testing methods can be employed to identify NTRK gene fusions in the clinic and each has its own advantages and limitations. Among these assays, RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be considered a gold standard for detecting NTRK gene fusions; however, several alternatives with minimally acceptable sensitivity and specificity are also available in areas where widespread access to NGS is unfeasible. This review highlights the importance of testing for NTRK gene fusions in lung cancer, ideally using the gold-standard method of RNA-based NGS, the various assays that are available, and treatment algorithms for patients.

Detection of Novel Tyrosine Kinase Fusion Genes as Potential Therapeutic Targets in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas Using DNA/RNA-based Clinical Sequencing

BACKGROUND

Approximately 1% of clinically treatable tyrosine kinase fusions, including anaplastic lymphoma kinase, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase, RET proto-oncogene, and ROS proto-oncogene 1, have been identified in soft tissue sarcomas via comprehensive genome profiling based on DNA sequencing. Histologic tumor-specific fusion genes have been reported in approximately 20% of soft tissue sarcomas; however, unlike tyrosine kinase fusion genes, these fusions cannot be directly targeted in therapy. Approximately 80% of tumor-specific fusion-negative sarcomas, including myxofibrosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, that are defined in complex karyotype sarcomas remain genetically uncharacterized; this mutually exclusive pattern of mutations suggests that other mutually exclusive driver oncogenes are yet to be discovered. Tumor-specific, fusion-negative sarcomas may be associated with unique translocations, and oncogenic fusion genes, including tyrosine kinase fusions, may have been overlooked in these sarcomas.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Can DNA- or RNA-based analysis reveal any characteristic gene alterations in bone and soft tissue sarcomas? (2) Can useful and potential tyrosine kinase fusions in tumors from tumor-specific, fusion-negative sarcomas be detected using an RNA-based screening system? (3) Do the identified potential fusion tumors, especially in neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase gene fusions in bone sarcoma, transform cells and respond to targeted drug treatment in in vitro assays? (4) Can the identified tyrosine kinase fusion genes in sarcomas be useful therapeutic targets?

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2020, we treated 100 patients for bone and soft tissue sarcomas at five institutions. Any biopsy or surgery from which a specimen could be obtained was included as potentially eligible. Ninety percent (90 patients) of patients were eligible; a further 8% (8 patients) were excluded because they were either lost to follow-up or their diagnosis was changed, leaving 82% (82 patients) for analysis here. To answer our first and second questions regarding gene alterations and potential tyrosine kinase fusions in eight bone and 74 soft tissue sarcomas, we used the TruSight Tumor 170 assay to detect mutations, copy number variations, and gene fusions in the samples. To answer our third question, we performed functional analyses involving in vitro assays to determine whether the identified tyrosine kinase fusions were associated with oncogenic abilities and drug responses. Finally, to determine usefulness as therapeutic targets, two pediatric patients harboring an NTRK fusion and an ALK fusion were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical trials.

RESULTS

DNA/RNA-based analysis demonstrated characteristic alterations in bone and soft tissue sarcomas; DNA-based analyses detected TP53 and copy number alterations of MDM2 and CDK4 . These single-nucleotide variants and copy number variations were enriched in specific fusion-negative sarcomas. RNA-based screening detected fusion genes in 24% (20 of 82) of patients. Useful potential fusions were detected in 19% (11 of 58) of tumor-specific fusion-negative sarcomas, with nine of these patients harboring tyrosine kinase fusion genes; five of these patients had in-frame tyrosine kinase fusion genes ( STRN3-NTRK3, VWC2-EGFR, ICK-KDR, FOXP2-MET , and CEP290-MET ) with unknown pathologic significance. The functional analysis revealed that STRN3-NTRK3 rearrangement that was identified in bone had a strong transforming potential in 3T3 cells, and that STRN3-NTRK3 -positive cells were sensitive to larotrectinib in vitro. To confirm the usefulness of identified tyrosine kinase fusion genes as therapeutic targets, patients with well-characterized LMNA-NTRK1 and CLTC-ALK fusions were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical trials, and a complete response was achieved.

CONCLUSION

We identified useful potential therapeutic targets for tyrosine kinase fusions in bone and soft tissue sarcomas using RNA-based analysis. We successfully identified STRN3-NTRK3 fusion in a patient with leiomyosarcoma of bone and determined the malignant potential of this fusion gene via functional analyses and drug effects. In light of these discoveries, comprehensive genome profiling should be considered even if the sarcoma is a bone sarcoma. There seem to be some limitations regarding current DNA-based comprehensive genome profiling tests, and it is important to use RNA testing for proper diagnosis and accurate identification of fusion genes. Studies on more patients, validation of results, and further functional analysis of unknown tyrosine kinase fusion genes are required to establish future treatments.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

DNA- and RNA-based screening systems may be useful for detecting tyrosine kinase fusion genes in specific fusion-negative sarcomas and identifying key therapeutic targets, leading to possible breakthroughs in the treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Given that current DNA sequencing misses fusion genes, RNA-based screening systems should be widely considered as a worldwide test for sarcoma. If standard treatments such as chemotherapy are not effective, or even if the sarcoma is of bone, RNA sequencing should be considered to identify as many therapeutic targets as possible.

NTRK Therapy among Different Types of Cancers, Review and Future Perspectives

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) has been a remarkable therapeutic target for treating different malignancies, playing an essential role in oncogenic signaling pathways. Groundbreaking trials like NAVIGATE led to the approval of NTRK inhibitors by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat different malignancies, significantly impacting current oncology treatment. Accurate detection of NTRK gene fusion becomes very important for possible targeted therapy. Various methods to detect NTRK gene fusion have been applied widely based on sensitivity, specificity, and accessibility. The utility of different tests in clinical practice is discussed in this study by providing insights into their effectiveness in targeting patients who may benefit from therapy. Widespread use of NTRK inhibitors in different malignancies could remain limited due to resistance mechanisms that cause challenges to medication efficacy in addition to common side effects of the medications. This review provides a succinct overview of the application of NTRK inhibitors in various types of cancer by emphasizing the critical clinical significance of NTRK fusion gene detection. The discussion also provides a solid foundation for understanding the current challenges and potential changes for improving the efficacy of NTRK inhibitor therapy to treat different malignancies.

Detection of NTRK gene fusions in solid tumors: recommendations from a Latin American group of oncologists and pathologists

NTRK gene fusions have been detected in more than 25 types of tumors and their prevalence is approximately 0.3% in solid tumors. This low prevalence makes identifying patients who could benefit from TRK inhibitors a considerable challenge. Furthermore, while numerous papers on the evaluation of NTRK fusion genes are available, not all countries have guidelines that are suitable for their setting, as is the case with Latin America. Therefore, a group of oncologists and pathologists from several countries in Latin America (Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay) met to discuss and reach consensus on how to identify patients with NTRK gene fusions in solid tumors. To do so, they developed a practical algorithm, considering their specific situation and limitations.

Diagnosis and Management of Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase Fusion-Positive Thyroid Carcinomas: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Thyroid epithelial malignant neoplasms include differentiated thyroid carcinomas (papillary, follicular, and oncocytic), follicular-derived high-grade thyroid carcinomas, and anaplastic and medullary thyroid carcinomas, with additional rarer subtypes. The discovery of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions has fostered developments in precision oncology, with the approval of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib) for patients with solid tumors, including advanced thyroid carcinomas, harboring NTRK gene fusions.

OBSERVATIONS

The relative rarity and diagnostic complexity of NTRK gene fusion events in thyroid carcinoma present several challenges for clinicians, including variable access to robust methodologies for comprehensive NTRK fusion testing and poorly defined algorithms of when to test for such molecular alterations. To address these issues in thyroid carcinoma, 3 consensus meetings of expert oncologists and pathologists were convened to discuss diagnostic challenges and propose a rational diagnostic algorithm. Per the proposed diagnostic algorithm, NTRK gene fusion testing should be considered as part of the initial workup for patients with unresectable, advanced, or high-risk disease as well as following the development of radioiodine-refractory or metastatic disease; testing by DNA or RNA next-generation sequencing is recommended. Detecting the presence of NTRK gene fusions is important to identify patients eligible to receive tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This review provides practical guidance for optimal integration of gene fusion testing, including NTRK gene fusion testing, to inform the clinical management in patients with thyroid carcinoma.

Real-world challenges in undertaking NTRK fusion testing in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We performed a retrospective analysis to determine the incidence of neurotrophic tropomyosin-receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Archival NSCLC tissues between 2018-2020 were screened by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with IHC-positive cases undergoing confirmatory molecular analysis. Correlative clinicopathologic parameters were collected.

RESULTS

Of 289 samples analyzed, 10 (3.5%) cases had NTRK expression on IHC. The median age of patients with NTRK-positivity on IHC was 74.9 (range, 44-88) years and 70% had a smoking history. The cohort included seven adenocarcinomas and one each squamous cell carcinoma, large-cell neuroendocrine and not otherwise specified histologies. PDL1 expression was ≤50% in five cases. Concurrent EGFR mutations were detected in three cases, with two cases also showing a PIK3CA E542K mutation and MET amplification, respectively. Due to insufficient tumor material, RNA-sequencing was undertaken in only one IHC-positive case, with the other nine cases analyzed by Fluorescent in-situ Hybridisation. A NTRK fusion, EML4-NTRK3 gene fusion was detected in one patient, a frequency of 0.35%.

CONCLUSIONS

NTRK fusions in NSCLC are rare. This study highlights real world diagnostic challenges regarding NTRK testing, such as requirements of adequate tumor tissue and appropriate testing methodologies.

Cost-effectiveness of alternative NTRK testing strategies in cancer patients followed by histology-independent therapy with entrectinib: an analysis of three European countries

Aim: To explore variations in the cost-effectiveness of entrectinib across different testing strategies and settings. Methods: Four testing strategies where adult cancer patients received entrectinib if they tested positive for NTRK gene fusions compared with 'no testing' and standard of care (SoC) for all patients were evaluated. Results: Immunohistochemistry for all patients followed by RNA-based next-generation sequencing after a positive result was the optimal strategy in all included countries. However, the incremental net monetary benefit compared with SoC was negative in all countries, ranging between international euros (int€) -206 and -404. In a subgroup analysis with only NTRK-positive patients, the incremental net monetary benefit was int€ 8405 in England, int€ -53,088 in Hungary and int€ 54,372 in The Netherlands. Conclusion: Using the cost-effectiveness thresholds recommended by national guidelines, none of the testing strategies were cost-effective compared with no testing. The implementation of entrectinib is unlikely to become cost-effective in Hungary, due to the large cost difference between the entrectinib and SoC arms, while there might be more potential in England and The Netherlands.

Guidance for clinicians and patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the time of precision medicine

Major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have resulted in a sharp decline in associated mortality rates, thereby propelling NSCLC to the forefront of precision medicine. Current guidelines recommend upfront comprehensive molecular testing for all known and actionable driver alterations/biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, KRAS, NTRK, MET, RET, HER2 [ERBB2], and PD-L1), especially in advanced disease stages, as they significantly influence response to therapy. In particular, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (HC-NGS) with an RNA fusion panel to detect gene fusions is a veritable requirement at both diagnosis and progression (resistance) of any-stage non-squamous adenocarcinoma NSCLCs. This testing modality ensures selection of the most timely, appropriate, and personalized treatment, maximization of therapeutic efficacy, and prevention of use of suboptimal/contraindicated therapy. As a complement to clinical testing and treatment, patient, family, and caregiver education is also key to early screening and diagnosis, access to care, coping strategies, positive outcomes, and survival. The advent of social media and increased internet access has amplified the volume of educational and support resources, consequently changing the dynamics of patient care. This review provides guidance on integration of comprehensive genomic testing with an RNA fusion panel as a global diagnostic standard for all adenocarcinoma NSCLC disease stages and provides key information on patient and caregiver education and resources.

Case Report: An NTRK1 fusion-positive embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: clinical presentations, pathological characteristics and genotypic analyses

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a prevalent form of soft tissue sarcoma that primarily affects children. Pediatric RMS is characterized by two distinct histological variants: embryonal (ERMS) and alveolar (ARMS). ERMS is a malignant tumor with primitive characteristics resembling the phenotypic and biological features of embryonic skeletal muscles. With the widespread and growing application of advanced molecular biological technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), it has been possible to determine the oncogenic activation alterations of many tumors. Specifically for soft tissue sarcomas, the determination of tyrosine kinase gene and protein related changes can be used as diagnostic aids and may be used as predictive markers for targeted tyrosine kinase inhibition therapy. Our study reports a rare and exceptional case of an 11-year-old patient diagnosed with ERMS, who tested positive for MEF2D-NTRK1 fusion. The case report presents a comprehensive overview of the clinical, radiographic, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and genetic characteristics of a palpebral ERMS. Furthermore, this study sheds light on an uncommon occurrence of NTRK1 fusion-positive ERMS, which may provide theoretical basis for therapy and prognosis.

Prevalence of NTRK Fusions in Canadian Solid Tumour Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions occur in ~ 0.3% of all solid tumours but are enriched in some rare tumour types. Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib are approved as tumour-agnostic therapies for solid tumours harbouring NTRK fusions.

METHODS

This study investigated the prevalence of NTRK fusions in Canadian patients and also aimed to help guide NTRK testing paradigms through analysis of data reported from a national clinical diagnostic testing program between September 2019 and July 2021.

RESULTS

Of 1,687 patients included in the final analysis, NTRK fusions were detected in 0.71% (n = 12) of patients representing salivary gland carcinoma (n = 3), soft tissue sarcoma (n = 3), CNS (n = 3), and one in each of melanoma, lung, and colorectal cancer. All three salivary gland carcinomas contained ETV6-NTRK3 fusions. Thirteen (0.77%) clinically actionable incidental findings were also detected. Two of the 13 samples containing incidental findings were NTRK fusion-positive (GFOD1-NTRK2, FGFR3-TACC3 in a glioblastoma and AFAP1-NTRK2, BRAF c.1799T>A in a glioma). The testing algorithm screened most patient samples via pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), whereas samples from the central nervous system (CNS), pathognomonic cancers, and confirmed/ putative NTRK fusion-positive samples identified under research protocols were reflexed straight to next-generation sequencing (NGS).

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the benefit and practicality of a diagnostic testing program to identify patients suitable for tumour-agnostic TRK inhibitor therapies, as well as other targeted therapies, due to clinically actionable incidental findings identified. Collectively, these findings may inform future guidance on selecting the appropriate testing approach per tumour type and on optimal NTRK testing algorithms.

Recommended testing algorithms for NTRK gene fusions in pediatric and selected adult cancers: Consensus of a Singapore Task Force

The occurrence of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions in a wide range of tumor types presents an attractive opportunity for using a tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor as cancer therapy. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated highly efficacious outcomes associated with the use of TRK inhibitors, such as larotrectinib and entrectinib in NTRK fusion-bearing cancers, in both adult and pediatric populations. While NTRK gene fusions are commonly found in some uncommon adult and pediatric malignancies, they are also found, albeit rarely, in a wide range of more common malignancies. The potential value of testing for NTRK gene fusions in practically all advanced malignancies is underpinned by the remarkable therapeutic outcomes that TRK inhibitors offer. This requirement presents practical and financial challenges in real-world oncological practice. Furthermore, different testing platforms exist to detect NTRK gene fusions, each with its advantages and disadvantages. It is, therefore, imperative to develop strategies for NTRK gene fusion testing in an attempt to optimize the use of limited tissue specimen and financial resources, and to minimize the turnaround time. A multidisciplinary task force of Singapore medical experts in both public and private sectors was convened in late 2020 to propose testing algorithms for adult colorectal tumors, sarcomas, non-small cell lung cancer, and pediatric cancers, with particular adaptation to the Singapore oncological practice. The recommendations presented here highlight the heterogeneity of NTRK-fusion positive cancers, and emphasize the need to customize the testing methods to each tumor type to optimize the workflow.

Liquid biopsy and non-small cell lung cancer: are we looking at the tip of the iceberg?

The possibility to analyse the tumour genetic material shed in the blood is undoubtedly one of the main achievements of translational research in the latest years. In the modern clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, molecular characterisation plays an essential role. In parallel, immunotherapy is widely employed, but reliable predictive markers are not available yet. Liquid biopsy has the potential to face the two issues and to increase its role in advanced NSCLC in the next future. The aim of this review is to summarise the main clinical applications of liquid biopsy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, underlining both its potential and limitations from a clinically driven perspective.

Larotrectinib Treatment for Patients With TRK Fusion-Positive Salivary Gland Cancers

BACKGROUND

Larotrectinib is a first-in-class, highly selective, and central nervous system-active tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with TRK fusion cancer. We report the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancer treated with larotrectinib were identified from two clinical trials (NCT02122913 and NCT02576431). Patients received larotrectinib 100 mg twice daily (BID) except for one patient who received 150 mg BID in the phase I trial. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

At the data cut-off (July 20, 2020), 24 patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancer had been treated. The most common histologies were secretory carcinoma (54%), adenocarcinoma (25%), and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (13%). All 24 patients had an ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. The ORR was 92% (95% confidence interval, 73-99). Best overall response was complete response in three (13%) patients, partial response in 19 (79%), and progressive disease in two (8%). The rate of progression-free survival at 24 months was 78% (median follow-up 30.9 months). Most treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2, and no patients discontinued treatment due to AEs.

CONCLUSION

Larotrectinib demonstrated robust and durable efficacy in patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland tumors of various histologies, and a favorable safety profile. These findings support NTRK gene fusion testing in patients with advanced salivary gland cancers.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBERS

NCT02122913 and NCT02576431.

Characterizing kinase intergenic-breakpoint rearrangements in a large-scale lung cancer population and real-world clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Kinase gene fusions are strong driver mutations in neoplasia; however, kinase intergenic-breakpoint rearrangements (IGRs) confound the detection of such fusions and of targeted treatments. We aim to provide an overview of kinase IGRs in a large lung cancer cohort and examine real-world survival outcomes of patients with such fusions.

METHODS

Mutational profiles analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing of 425 cancer-related genes between June 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographic data, clinical characteristics, and survivals were analyzed. RNA sequencing or immunohistochemical assays were carried out to verify chimeric fusion products.

RESULTS

We identified 3411 patients with kinase fusions from a cohort of 30 450 patients with lung cancer, and 624 kinase IGR events were identified in 538 of the 3411 patients. The most frequently identified kinase genes included anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), RET proto-oncogene (RET), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2/3 (ERBB2/3), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Our data showed that most (67%) kinase IGRs occurred on the same chromosome and kinase domains remained intact at the 3'-end. Approximately 3% (19/624) of the kinase IGRs had one genomic breakpoint located in gene promoter regions, including nine fusion events involving ALK, RET, ROS1, EGFR, ERBB2, or fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). Among the 538 patients with kinase IGRs, 167 (31%) lacked oncogenic driver mutations, among which 28 received targeted therapies in real-world practice. Notably, three ALK IGR patients who harbored no canonical oncogenic aberrations were confirmed with an EML4-ALK chimeric fusion product by RNA sequencing and/or ALK immunohistochemical assays. One patient demonstrated a favorable clinical outcome after 14 months on crizotinib. An additional two patients who had ROS1 IGRs demonstrated a clinical benefit after 13 and 19 months on crizotinib, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A large real-world lung cancer cohort with kinase IGRs was comprehensively analyzed for their molecular characteristics. The data indicated the potential oncogenic function of kinase IGRs and their outcomes following the administration of targeted therapies.

Molecular diagnosis and targeted treatment of advanced follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer in the precision medicine era

Most malignant thyroid tumours are initially treated with surgery or a combination of surgery and radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. However, in patients with metastatic disease, many tumours become refractory to RAI, and these patients require alternative treatments, such as locoregional therapies and/or systemic treatment with multikinase inhibitors. Improvements in our understanding of the genetic alterations that occur in thyroid cancer have led to the discovery of several targeted therapies with clinical efficacy. These alterations include NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase) gene fusions, with the tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib both approved by the European Medicines Agency and in other markets worldwide. Inhibitors of aberrant proteins resulting from alterations in RET (rearranged during transfection) and BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene) have also shown promising efficacy, and so far have received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration. Selpercatinib, a RET kinase inhibitor, was approved for use in Europe in early 2021. With the discovery of multiple actionable targets, it is imperative that effective testing strategies for these genetic alterations are integrated into the diagnostic armamentarium to ensure that patients who could potentially benefit from targeted treatments are identified. In this review, we offer our recommendations on the optimal testing strategies for detecting genetic alterations in thyroid cancer that have the potential to be targeted by molecular therapy. We also discuss the future of treatments for thyroid cancers, including the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and new generations of targeted treatments that are being developed to counter acquired tumour resistance.

Diagnostic testing approaches for the identification of patients with TRK fusion cancer prior to enrollment in clinical trials investigating larotrectinib

INTRODUCTION

NTRK gene fusions are targetable oncogenic drivers independent of tumor type. Prevalence varies from highly recurrent in certain rare tumors to <1% in common cancers. The selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was shown to be highly active in adult and pediatric patients with tumors harboring NTRK gene fusions.

METHODS

We examined the techniques used by local sites to detect tumor NTRK gene fusions in patients enrolled in clinical trials of larotrectinib. We also report the characteristics of the detected fusions in different tumor types.

RESULTS

The analysis included 225 patients with 19 different tumor types. Testing methods used were next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 196 of 225 tumors (87%); this was RNA-based in 96 (43%); DNA-based in 53 (24%); DNA/RNA-based in 46 (20%) and unknown in 1 (<1%); FISH in 14 (6%) and PCR-based in 12 (5%). NanoString, Sanger sequencing and chromosome microarray were each utilized once (<1%). Fifty-four different fusion partners were identified, 39 (72%) of which were unique occurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common local testing approach was RNA-based NGS. Many different NTRK gene fusions were identified with most occurring at low frequency. This supports the need for validated and appropriate testing methodologies that work agnostic of fusion partners.

The oncogenic roles of NTRK fusions and methods of molecular diagnosis

The NTRK gene family is composed of NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3, which encode three tropomyosin-receptor kinases, belonging to a class of tyrosine kinase receptors. These proteins are known to play roles in cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and survival. Fusions involving the NTRK genes are long known as drivers in many tumors. Although they occur in less than 5% of all malignancies, their occurrence in a great diversity of tumors has been documented. Several rare tumors including infantile fibrosarcoma, secretory breast carcinoma, and mammary analogue secretory carcinoma are accompanied by NTRK fusions in more than 90% of cases, demonstrating a diagnostic value for the NTRK fusion testing in these tumors. More recently, the development of effective targeted therapies has created a demand for their detection in all malignancies. A variety of approaches are available for testing including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). This article reviews the molecular biology and tumorigenesis of NTRK fusions, their prevalence and clinical significance with a focus on available methods for fusion detection. The advantages and limitations of different technologies, the best practice algorithms for NTRK fusion detection, and the future direction of NTRK testing are also discussed.

Highly sensitive fusion detection using plasma cell-free RNA in non-small-cell lung cancers

ALK, ROS1, and RET kinase fusions are important predictive biomarkers of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Analysis of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) provides a noninvasive method to identify gene changes in tumor cells. The present study sought to use cfRNA and cfDNA for identifying fusion genes. A reliable protocol was established to detect fusion genes using cfRNA and assessed the analytical validity and clinical usefulness in 30 samples from 20 cases of fusion‐positive NSCLC. The results of cfRNA‐based assays were compared with tissue biopsy and cfDNA‐based liquid biopsy (Guardant360 plasma next‐generation sequencing [NGS] assay). The overall sensitivity of the cfRNA‐based assay was 26.7% (8/30) and that of cfDNA‐based assay was 16.7% (3/18). When analysis was limited to the samples collected at chemo‐naïve or progressive disease status and available for both assays, the sensitivity of the cfRNA‐based assay was 77.8% (7/9) and that of cfDNA‐based assay was 33.3% (3/9). Fusion gene identification in cfRNA was correlated with treatment response. These results suggest that the proposed cfRNA assay is a useful diagnostic test for patients with insufficient tissues to facilitate effective administration of first‐line treatment and is a useful tool to monitor the progression of NSCLC for consideration of second‐line treatments.

Updates in the molecular pathology of non-small cell lung cancer

An understanding of the molecular pathology of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is important for pathologists as molecular characterization is now required for treatment decisions in advanced stage disease. While assessment for EGFR mutations, ALK and ROS1 fusions, and in some countries BRAF mutations, is now standard practice, other oncogenic mutations are also emerging that may impact routine clinical practice including alterations involving KRAS, NTRK, RET, MET and HER2. In addition, molecular pathology alterations of NSCLC are associated with responses to immune checkpoint therapy and are being increasingly investigated. Finally, specific molecular pathological alterations define some rarer subtypes of NSCLC such as salivary gland tumours, NUT carcinoma and SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumour, and an understanding of the molecular pathology is important for their accurate diagnosis. In this review, the molecular pathology of NSCLC is discussed with a focus on clinically relevant molecular alterations.

Current Knowledge about Mechanisms of Drug Resistance against ALK Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is a devastating disease, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most common subtype. With the development of novel targeted therapeutics, survival times have continuously improved over the past two decades. In a subset of NSCLC, gene rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), or gene fusions involving ALK, can be determined. ALK-inhibitors are increasingly used as a standard of care in patients with ALK gene abnormalities, and can also be administered as first-line treatment in advanced-stage NSCLC. However, over the disease course, cancers tend to develop resistance mechanisms, warranting the switch from first- to second- or third-generation ALK inhibitors. With this literature review, we aim to give a concise overview about these resistance mechanisms, and what kind of sequential treatment may be feasible if therapy failure upon an ALK inhibitor occurs.

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the majority of lung cancer subtypes. Two to seven percent of NSCLC patients harbor gene rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene or, alternatively, harbor chromosomal fusions of ALK with echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4). The availability of tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting ALK (ALK-TKIs) has significantly improved the progression-free and overall survival of NSCLC patients carrying the respective genetic aberrations. Yet, increasing evidence shows that primary or secondary resistance to ALK-inhibitors during the course of treatment represents a relevant clinical problem. This necessitates a switch to second- or third-generation ALK-TKIs and a close observation of NSCLC patients on ALK-TKIs during the course of treatment by repetitive molecular testing. With this review of the literature, we aim at providing an overview of current knowledge about resistance mechanisms to ALK-TKIs in NSCLC.

[Diagnosis and therapy of tumors with NTRK gene fusion]

NTRK-Genfusionen sind seltene genetische Alterationen, die tumorentitätenübergreifend vorkommen können. Während sie in den meisten soliden Tumoren nur sehr niederfrequent vorkommen, lassen sie sich in bestimmten Tumoren wie dem infantilen Fibrosarkom, dem kongenitalen mesoblastischen Nephrom und dem sekretorischen Mamma- oder Speicheldrüsenkarzinom jedoch häufig nachweisen. NTRK-Genfusionen bzw. TRK-Fusionsproteine gelten als starke onkogene Treiber. Bei Nachweis von NTRK-Genfusionen können TRK-Inhibitoren unabhängig von der Tumorentität eingesetzt werden. Vertreter sind Entrectinib und Larotrectinib. Bislang ist nur Larotrectinib in der Europäischen Union zugelassen. Für beide wurden Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit in Phase-I- und Phase-II-Studien gezeigt. Die Seltenheit der TRK-Fusionstumoren stellt diagnostische und klinische Prozesse vor große Herausforderungen: Einerseits sollen alle Patienten mit TRK-Fusionstumoren identifiziert werden, andererseits sind epidemiologische und histologische Aspekte sowie Ressourcen zu berücksichtigen. Basierend auf diesen Punkten möchten wir einen Diagnosealgorithmus für TRK-Fusionstumoren vorschlagen, außerdem stellen wir aktuelle Daten zu den TRK-Inhibitoren vor.

NTRK Fusions Identified in Pediatric Tumors: The Frequency, Fusion Partners, and Clinical Outcome

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions have been described as oncogenic drivers in a variety of tumors. However, little is known about the overall frequency of NTRK fusion in unselected pediatric tumors. Here, we assessed the frequency, fusion partners, and clinical course in pediatric patients with NTRK fusion–positive tumors.

NTRK Fusions and TRK Inhibitors: Potential Targeted Therapies for Adult Glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary central nervous (CNS) system malignancy with a poor prognosis. The standard treatment for GBM is neurosurgical resection, followed by radiochemotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. Predictive biomarkers, such as methylation of the promoter region of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene, can successfully distinguish subgroups with different prognosis after temozolomide chemotherapy. Based on multiomics studies, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), BRAF V600E mutation, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions and other potential therapy targets have been found.

METHODS

We have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence for NTRK fusions and TRK inhibitors therapy in cancers with NTRK fusions in pan-cancer and gliomas.

RESULTS

Several NTRK1/2/3 fusions have been reported in GBM and preclinical studies have proven that NTRK fusions are potential driver mutations in some high-grade gliomas. Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have shown efficacy as targeted therapies for extracranial tumors with NTRK fusions in recent clinical trials, with potential CNS tolerability and activity. However, whether NTRK gene fusions can affect survival status, the efficacy and resistance of TRK inhibitors in GBMs are lacking high-level evidences.

CONCLUSIONS

For GBM patients, NTRK fusions and TRK inhibitors are potential target therapy strategy but remain biological mechanism and clinical significance unclarified. More clinical data and future clinical trials are needed to provide more evidence that supports targeted therapy for GBM with NTRK fusions.

Diagnosis and management of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion sarcomas: expert recommendations from the World Sarcoma Network

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with mesenchymal lineage differentiation. The discovery of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions as tissue-agnostic oncogenic drivers has led to new personalized therapies for a subset of patients with sarcoma in the form of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors. NTRK gene rearrangements and fusion transcripts can be detected with different molecular pathology techniques, while TRK protein expression can be demonstrated with immunohistochemistry. The rarity and diagnostic complexity of NTRK gene fusions raise a number of questions and challenges for clinicians. To address these challenges, the World Sarcoma Network convened two meetings of expert adult oncologists and pathologists and subsequently developed this article to provide practical guidance on the management of patients with sarcoma harboring NTRK gene fusions. We propose a diagnostic strategy that considers disease stage and histologic and molecular subtypes to facilitate routine testing for TRK expression and subsequent testing for NTRK gene fusions.

Next Generation Sequencing for Gene Fusion Analysis in Lung Cancer: A Literature Review

Gene fusions have a pivotal role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) precision medicine. Several techniques can be used, from fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to next generation sequencing (NGS). Although several NGS panels are available, gene fusion testing presents more technical challenges than other variants. This is a PubMed-based narrative review aiming to summarize NGS approaches for gene fusion analysis and their performance on NSCLC clinical samples. The analysis can be performed at DNA or RNA levels, using different target enrichment (hybrid-capture or amplicon-based) and sequencing chemistries, with both custom and commercially available panels. DNA sequencing evaluates different alteration types simultaneously, but large introns and repetitive sequences can impact on the performance and it does not discriminate between expressed and unexpressed gene fusions. RNA-based targeted approach analyses and quantifies directly fusion transcripts and is more accurate than DNA panels on tumor tissue, but it can be limited by RNA quality and quantity. On liquid biopsy, satisfying data have been published on circulating tumor DNA hybrid-capture panels. There is not a perfect method for gene fusion analysis, but NGS approaches, though still needing a complete standardization and optimization, present several advantages for the clinical practice.

NTRK Fusions, from the Diagnostic Algorithm to Innovative Treatment in the Era of Precision Medicine

In the era of precision medicine, the identification of several predictive biomarkers and the development of innovative therapies have dramatically increased the request of tests to identify specific targets on cytological or histological samples, revolutionizing the management of the tumoral biomaterials. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved a selective neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) inhibitor, larotrectinib. Contemporarily, the development of multi-kinase inhibitors with activity in tumors carrying TRK fusions is ongoing. Chromosomal translocations involving the NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 genes result in constitutive activation and aberrant expression of TRK kinases in numerous cancer types. In this context, the identification of tumors harboring TRK fusions is crucial. Several methods of detection are currently available. We revise the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques used for identifying TRK alterations, including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and next generation sequencing-based approaches. Finally, we propose a diagnostic algorithm based on histology and the relative frequency of TRK fusions in each specific tumor, considering also the economic feasibility in the clinical practice.

NTRK-rearranged mesenchymal tumours: diagnostic challenges, morphological patterns and proposed testing algorithm

Oncogenic fusions involving neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) genes are being increasingly identified in a range of mesenchymal tumours unrelated to infantile fibrosarcoma or cellular congenital mesoblastic nephroma, where the canonical ETV6-NTRK3 fusion was first described more than two decades ago. Recognition of these NTRK-rearranged tumours poses a diagnostic challenge to surgical pathologists due to their non-specific clinical and pathological features. However, their recognition is of heightened importance, particularly in locally advanced and metastatic sarcomas, due to the recent availability of selective and highly effective targeted therapy. Herein, we present an Australian multi-institutional series of six of these rare NTRK-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasms to share the local experience and diagnostic challenges as well as to highlight key morphological patterns and immunoprofiles that provide the most helpful clues in routine practice. We also propose a diagnostic algorithm for the detection of these fusions, drawing attention to the limitations of ancillary studies including immunohistochemistry against tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) protein, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and next generation sequencing.

Roles of TrkC Signaling in the Regulation of Tumorigenicity and Metastasis of Cancer

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk) C contributes to the clinicopathology of a variety of human cancers, and new chimeric oncoproteins containing the tyrosine kinase domain of TrkC occur after fusion to the partner genes. Overexpression of TrkC and TrkC fusion proteins was observed in patients with a variety of cancers, including mesenchymal, hematopoietic, and those of epithelial cell lineage. Both microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) were involved in the regulation of TrkC expression through transcriptional and posttranscriptional alteration. Aberrant activation of TrkC and TrkC fusion proteins markedly induces the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) program, growth rate, tumorigenic capacity via constitutive activation of Ras-MAP kinase (MAPK), PI3K-AKT, and the JAK2-STAT3 pathway. The clinical trial of TrkC or TrkC fusion-positive cancers with newly developed Trk inhibitors demonstrated that Trk inhibitors were highly effective in inducing tumor regression in patients who do not harbor mutations in the kinase domain. Recently, there has been a progressive accumulation of mutations in TrkC or the TrkC fusion protein detected in the clinic and its related cancer cell lines caused by high-throughput DNA sequencing. Despite given the high overall response rate against Trk or Trk fusion proteins-positive solid tumors, acquired drug resistance was observed in patients with various cancers caused by mutations in the Trk kinase domain. To overcome acquired resistance caused by kinase domain mutation, next-generation Trk inhibitors have been developed, and these inhibitors are currently under investigation in clinical trials.

Update on selected advances in the immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis of soft tissue tumors

Although traditional morphological evaluation remains the cornerstone for the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, ancillary diagnostic modalities such as immunohistochemistry and molecular genetic analysis are of ever-increasing importance in this field. New insights into the molecular pathogenesis of soft tissue tumors, often obtained from high-throughput sequencing technologies, has enabled significant progress in the characterization and biologic stratification of mesenchymal neoplasms, expanding the spectrum of immunohistochemical tests (often aimed towards recently discovered genetic events) and molecular genetic assays (most often fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction). This review discusses selected novel molecular and immunohistochemical assays with diagnostic applicability in mesenchymal neoplasms, with emphasis on diagnosis, refinement of tumor classification, and treatment stratification.