Polysaccharides as taste stimuli: their effect in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat

TRPM4 and PLCβ3 contribute to normal behavioral responses to an array of sweeteners and carbohydrates but PLCβ3 is not needed for taste-driven licking for glucose

The peripheral taste system is more complex than previously thought. The novel taste-signaling proteins TRPM4 and PLCβ3 appear to function in normal taste responding as part of Type II taste cell signaling or as part of a broadly responsive (BR) taste cell that can respond to some or all classes of tastants. This work begins to disentangle the roles of intracellular components found in Type II taste cells (TRPM5, TRPM4, and IP3R3) or the BR taste cells (PLCβ3 and TRPM4) in driving behavioral responses to various saccharides and other sweeteners in brief-access taste tests. We found that TRPM4, TRPM5, TRPM4/5, and IP3R3 knockout (KO) mice show blunted or abolished responding to all stimuli compared with wild-type. IP3R3 KO mice did, however, lick more for glucose than fructose following extensive experience with the 2 sugars. PLCβ3 KO mice were largely unresponsive to all stimuli except they showed normal concentration-dependent responding to glucose. The results show that key intracellular signaling proteins associated with Type II and BR taste cells are mutually required for taste-driven responses to a wide range of sweet and carbohydrate stimuli, except glucose. This confirms and extends a previous finding demonstrating that Type II and BR cells are both necessary for taste-driven licking to sucrose. Glucose appears to engage unique intracellular taste-signaling mechanisms, which remain to be fully elucidated.

OUP accepted manuscript

Oligosaccharides, a subclass of complex carbohydrates, occur both naturally in foods and as a result of oral starch digestion. We have previously shown that humans can taste maltooligosaccharides (MOS) and that their detection is independent of the canonical sweet taste receptor. While MOSs most commonly occur in a linear form, they can also exist in cyclic structures, referred to as cyclodextrins (CD). The aim of this study was to investigate how the structure of the MOS backbone (i.e. cyclic form) and the size (i.e. degree of polymerization; DP) affect their taste perception. We tested taste detection of cyclodextrins with DP of 6, 7, and 8 (i.e. α-, β-, and γ-CD, respectively) in the presence and absence of lactisole, a sweet receptor antagonist. We found that subjects could detect the taste of cyclodextrins in aqueous solutions at a significant level (P < 0.05), but were not able to detect them in the presence of lactisole (P > 0.05). These findings suggest that the cyclodextrins, unlike their linear analogs, are ligands of the human sweet taste receptor, hT1R2/hT1R3. Study findings are discussed in terms of how chemical structures may contribute to tastes of saccharides.

An alternative pathway for sweet sensation: possible mechanisms and physiological relevance

Sweet substances are detected by taste-bud cells upon binding to the sweet-taste receptor, a T1R2/T1R3 heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptor. In addition, experiments with mouse models lacking the sweet-taste receptor or its downstream signaling components led to the proposal of a parallel "alternative pathway" that may serve as metabolic sensor and energy regulator. Indeed, these mice showed residual nerve responses and behavioral attraction to sugars and oligosaccharides but not to artificial sweeteners. In analogy to pancreatic β cells, such alternative mechanism, to sense glucose in sweet-sensitive taste cells, might involve glucose transporters and K_ATP channels. Their activation may induce depolarization-dependent Ca²⁺ signals and release of GLP-1, which binds to its receptors on intragemmal nerve fibers. Via unknown neuronal and/or endocrine mechanisms, this pathway may contribute to both, behavioral attraction and/or induction of cephalic-phase insulin release upon oral sweet stimulation. Here, we critically review the evidence for a parallel sweet-sensitive pathway, involved signaling mechanisms, neural processing, interactions with endocrine hormonal mechanisms, and its sensitivity to different stimuli. Finally, we propose its physiological role in detecting the energy content of food and preparing for digestion.

Electrophysiological responses to sugars and amino acids in the nucleus of the solitary tract of type 1 taste receptor double-knockout mice

Strong evidence supports a major role for heterodimers of the type 1 taste receptor (T1R) family in the taste transduction of sugars (T1R2+T1R3) and amino acids (T1R1+T1R3), but there are also neural and behavioral data supporting T1R-independent mechanisms. Most neural evidence for alternate mechanisms comes from whole nerve recordings in mice with deletion of a single T1R family member, limiting conclusions about the functional significance and T1R independence of the remaining responses. To clarify these issues, we recorded single-unit taste responses from the nucleus of the solitary tract in T1R double-knockout (double-KO) mice lacking functional T1R1+T1R3 [KO1+3] or T1R2+T1R3 [KO2+3] receptors and their wild-type background strains [WT; C57BL/6J (B6), 129X1/SvJ (S129)]. In both double-KO strains, responses to sugars and a moderate concentration of an monosodium glutamate + amiloride + inosine 5'-monophosphate cocktail (0.1 M, i.e., umami) were profoundly depressed, whereas a panel of 0.6 M amino acids were mostly unaffected. Strikingly, in contrast to WT mice, no double-KO neurons responded selectively to sugars and umami, precluding segregation of this group of stimuli from those representing other taste qualities in a multidimensional scaling analysis. Nevertheless, residual sugar responses, mainly elicited by monosaccharides, persisted as small "sideband" responses in double-KOs. Thus other receptors may convey limited information about sugars to the central nervous system, but T1Rs appear critical for coding the distinct perceptual features of sugar and umami stimuli. The persistence of amino acid responses supports previous proposals of alternate receptors, but because these stimuli affected multiple neuron types, further investigations are necessary.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The type 1 taste receptor (T1R) family is crucial for transducing sugars and amino acids, but there is evidence for T1R-independent mechanisms. In this study, single-unit recordings from the nucleus of the solitary tract in T1R double-knockout mice lacking T1R1+T1R3 or T1R2+T1R3 receptors revealed greatly reduced umami synergism and sugar responses. Nevertheless, residual sugar responses persisted, mainly elicited by monosaccharides and evident as "sidebands" in neurons activated more vigorously by other qualities.

Gut Mechanisms Linking Intestinal Sweet Sensing to Glycemic Control

Sensing nutrients within the gastrointestinal tract engages the enteroendocrine cell system to signal within the mucosa, to intrinsic and extrinsic nerve pathways, and the circulation. This signaling provides powerful feedback from the intestine to slow the rate of gastric emptying, limit postprandial glycemic excursions, and induce satiation. This review focuses on the intestinal sensing of sweet stimuli (including low-calorie sweeteners), which engage similar G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to the sweet taste receptors (STRs) of the tongue. It explores the enteroendocrine cell signals deployed upon STR activation that act within and outside the gastrointestinal tract, with a focus on the role of this distinctive pathway in regulating glucose transport function via absorptive enterocytes, and the associated impact on postprandial glycemic responses in animals and humans. The emerging role of diet, including low-calorie sweeteners, in modulating the composition of the gut microbiome and how this may impact glycemic responses of the host, is also discussed, as is recent evidence of a causal role of diet-induced dysbiosis in influencing the gut-brain axis to alter gastric emptying and insulin release. Full knowledge of intestinal STR signaling in humans, and its capacity to engage host and/or microbiome mechanisms that modify glycemic control, holds the potential for improved prevention and management of type 2 diabetes.

Evidence supporting oral sensitivity to complex carbohydrates independent of sweet taste sensitivity in humans

Compared to simple sugars, complex carbohydrates have been assumed invisible to taste. However, two recent studies proposed that there may be a perceivable taste quality elicited by complex carbohydrates independent of sweet taste. There is precedent with behavioural studies demonstrating that rats are very attracted to complex carbohydrates, and that complex carbohydrates are preferred to simple sugars at low concentrations. This suggests that rats may have independent taste sensors for simple sugars and complex carbohydrates. The aim of this paper is to investigate oral sensitivities of two different classes of complex carbohydrates (a soluble digestible and a soluble non-digestible complex carbohydrate), and to compare these to other caloric and non-nutritive sweeteners in addition to the prototypical tastes using two commonly used psychophysical measures. There were strong correlations between the detection thresholds and mean intensity ratings for complex carbohydrates (maltodextrin, oligofructose) (r = 0.94, P < 0.001). There were no significant correlations between the detection thresholds of the complex carbohydrates (maltodextrin, oligofructose) and the sweeteners (glucose, fructose, sucralose, Rebaudioside A, erythritol) (all P > 0.05). However, moderate correlations were observed between perceived intensities of complex carbohydrates and sweeteners (r = 0.48–0.61, P < 0.05). These data provide evidence that complex carbohydrates can be sensed in the oral cavity over a range of concentrations independent of sweet taste sensitivity at low concentrations, but with partial overlap with sweet taste intensity at higher concentrations.

Humans Can Taste Glucose Oligomers Independent of the hT1R2/hT1R3 Sweet Taste Receptor

It is widely accepted that humans can taste mono- and disaccharides as sweet substances, but they cannot taste longer chain oligo- and polysaccharides. From the evolutionary standpoint, the ability to taste starch or its oligomeric hydrolysis products would be highly adaptive, given their nutritional value. Here, we report that humans can taste glucose oligomer preparations (average degree of polymerization 7 and 14) without any other sensorial cues. The same human subjects could not taste the corresponding glucose polymer preparation (average degree of polymerization 44). When the sweet taste receptor was blocked by lactisole, a known sweet inhibitor, subjects could not detect sweet substances (glucose, maltose, and sucralose), but they could still detect the glucose oligomers. This suggests that glucose oligomer detection is independent of the hT1R2/hT1R3 sweet taste receptor. Human subjects described the taste of glucose oligomers as "starchy," while they describe sugars as "sweet." The dose-response function of glucose oligomer was also found to be indistinguishable from that of glucose on a molar basis.

Ventral pallidal coding of a learned taste aversion

The hedonic value of a sweet food reward, or how much a taste is 'liked', has been suggested to be encoded by neuronal firing in the posterior ventral pallidum (VP). Hedonic impact can be altered by psychological manipulations, such as taste aversion conditioning, which can make an initially pleasant sweet taste become perceived as disgusting. Pairing nausea-inducing LiCl injection as a Pavlovian unconditioned stimulus (UCS) with a novel taste that is normally palatable as the predictive conditioned stimulus (CS+) suffices to induce a learned taste aversion that changes orofacial 'liking' responses to that sweet taste (e.g., lateral tongue protrusions) to 'disgust' reactions (e.g., gapes) in rats. We used two different sweet tastes of similar initial palatability (a sucrose solution and a polycose/saccharin solution, CS ± assignment was counterbalanced across groups) to produce a discriminative conditioned aversion. Only one of those tastes (arbitrarily assigned and designated as CS+) was associatively paired with LiCl injections as UCS to form a conditioned aversion. The other taste (CS-) was paired with mere vehicle injections to remain relatively palatable as a control sweet taste. We recorded the neural activity in VP in response to each taste, before and after aversion training. We found that the safe and positively hedonic taste always elicited excitatory increases in firing rate of VP neurons. By contrast, aversion learning reversed the VP response to the 'disgusting' CS+ taste from initial excitation into a conditioned decrease in neuronal firing rate after training. Such neuronal coding of hedonic impact by VP circuitry may contribute both to normal pleasure and disgust, and disruptions of VP coding could result in affective disorders, addictions and eating disorders.

Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains

Rodents are strongly attracted to the taste(s) of maltodextrins. A first step toward discovery of the underlying genes involves identifying phenotypic differences among inbred strains of mice. To do this, we used 5-s brief-access tests and 48-h 2-bottle choice tests to survey the avidity for the maltodextrin, Maltrin M040, of mice from 8 inbred strains (129S1/SvImJ, A/J, CAST/EiJ, C57BL/6J, NOD/ShiLTJ, NZO/HlLtJ, PWK/PhJ, and WSB/EiJ). In brief-access tests, the CAST and PWK strains licked significantly less maltodextrin than equivalent concentrations of sucrose, whereas the other strains generally licked the 2 carbohydrates equally. Similarly, in 2-bottle choice tests, the CAST and PWK strains drank less 4% maltodextrin than 4% sucrose, whereas the other strains had similar intakes of these 2 solutions; the CAST and PWK strains did not differ from the C57, NOD, or NZO strains in 4% sucrose intake. In sum, we have identified strain variation in maltodextrin perception that is distinct from variation in sucrose perception. The phenotypic variation characterized here will aid in identifying genes responsible for maltodextrin acceptance. Our results identify C57 × PWK mice or NZO × CAST mice as informative crosses to produce segregating hybrids that will expose quantitative trait loci underlying maltodextrin acceptance and preference.

Maltodextrin and fat preference deficits in "taste-blind" P2X2/P2X3 knockout mice

Adenosine triphosphate is a critical neurotransmitter in the gustatory response to the 5 primary tastes in mice. Genetic deletion of the purinergic P2X2/P2X3 receptor greatly reduces the neural and behavioral response to prototypical primary taste stimuli. In this study, we examined the behavioral response of P2X double knockout mice to maltodextrin and fat stimuli, which appear to activate additional taste channels. P2X double knockout and wild-type mice were given 24-h choice tests (vs. water) with ascending concentrations of Polycose and Intralipid. In Experiment 1, naive double knockout mice, unlike wild-type mice, were indifferent to dilute (0.5-4%) Polycose solutions but preferred concentrated (8-32%) Polycose to water. In a retest, the Polycose-experienced double knockout mice, like wild-type mice, preferred all Polycose concentrations. In Experiment 2, naive double knockout mice, unlike wild-type mice, were indifferent to dilute (0.313-2.5%) Intralipid emulsions but preferred concentrated (5-20%) Intralipid to water. In a retest, the fat-experienced double knockout mice, like wild-type mice, strongly preferred 0.313-5% Intralipid to water. These results indicate that the inherent preferences of mice for maltodextrin and fat are dependent upon adenosine triphosphate taste cell signaling. With experience, however, P2X double knockout mice develop strong preferences for the nontaste flavor qualities of maltodextrin and fat conditioned by the postoral actions of these nutrients.

Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal

Evidence in the literature supports the hypothesis that the T1R2+3 heterodimer binds to compounds that humans describe as sweet. Here, we assessed the necessity of the T1R2 and T1R3 subunits in the maintenance of normal taste sensitivity to carbohydrate stimuli. We trained and tested water-restricted T1R2 knockout (KO), T1R3 KO and their wild-type (WT) same-sex littermate controls in a two-response operant procedure to sample a fluid and differentially respond on the basis of whether the stimulus was water or a tastant. Correct responses were reinforced with water and incorrect responses were punished with a time-out. Testing was conducted with a modified descending method of limits procedure across daily 25-min sessions. Both KO groups displayed severely impaired performance and markedly decreased sensitivity when required to discriminate water from sucrose, glucose, or maltose. In contrast, when Polycose was tested, KO mice had normal EC(50) values for their psychometric functions, with some slight, but significant, impairment in performance. Sensitivity to NaCl did not differ between these mice and their WT controls. Our findings support the view that the T1R2+3 heterodimer is the principal receptor that mediates taste detection of natural sweeteners, but not of all carbohydrate stimuli. The combined presence of T1R2 and T1R3 appears unnecessary for the maintenance of relatively normal sensitivity to Polycose, at least in this task. Some detectability of sugars at high concentrations might be mediated by the putative polysaccharide taste receptor, the remaining T1R subunit forming either a homodimer or heteromer with another protein(s), or nontaste orosensory cues.

Opioid mediation of starch and sugar preference in the rat

In our prior studies, administration of the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone did not block conditioned preferences for a flavor paired with a preferred sugar solution over a flavor paired with saccharin. This may be because both training solutions were sweet, and their attractiveness was reduced by naltrexone. The present study compared the effects of naltrexone on preferences for flavors paired with sugar or starch drinks that have distinctive tastes to rats. Experiment 1 assessed naltrexone's effect on the preference for unflavored 8% cornstarch and 8% sucrose aqueous solutions/suspensions. The food-restricted rats displayed a significant sucrose preference which increased following systemic treatment with naltrexone (1 or 3mg/kg) even though total intake of both solutions declined. In Experiment 2, rats were trained to drink flavored (cherry or grape) starch and sucrose solutions in separate one-bottle sessions. In a two-bottle choice test with both flavors presented in a sucrose-starch mixture, the rats significantly preferred the starch-paired flavor. Naltrexone treatment blocked the expression of this starch-conditioned preference. In Experiment 3, rats were treated with saline or naltrexone throughout one-bottle training with flavored sucrose and starch solutions. In a subsequent choice test, both the saline and naltrexone groups displayed significant preferences for the starch-paired flavor, indicating that opioid antagonism failed to alter the acquisition of this conditioned preference. In summary, novel outcomes of this study included the increased rather than the predicted decrease in sucrose preference produced by naltrexone. Also, starch unexpectedly conditioned the stronger flavor preference, although this can be explained by the differential post-oral reinforcing actions of starch and sucrose, and naltrexone blocked the expression, but not the acquisition, of this preference. These findings suggest that the reward value of starch in liquid form is more dependent upon opioid signaling than is that of sugar.

Amylase expression in taste receptor cells of rat circumvallate papillae

The chemical composition of the luminal content is now accepted to have a profound influence on the performance of chemosensory receptors. Gustatory and intestinal chemoreceptors have in common their expression of molecules involved in taste sensing and signal transduction pathways. The recent finding that enterocytes of the duodenal epithelium are capable of expressing luminal pancreatic amylase suggests that taste cells of the gustatory epithelium might, in the same way, express salivary amylase in the oral cavity. Therefore, we investigated amylase expression in rat circumvallate papillae by using analyses involving immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and reverse transcription with the polymerase chain reaction. In addition, we used double-labeling confocal laser microscopy to compare amylase immunolabeling with that of the following markers: protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) and chromogranin A (CgA) for endocrine cells, alpha-gustducin and phospholipase C beta 2 (PLC beta 2) as taste-signaling molecules, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) and Clara-cell-specific secretory protein of 10-kDa (CC10) as secretory markers. The results showed that amylase was present in some taste bud cells; its immunoreactivity was observed in subsets of cells that expressed CgA, alpha-gustducin, PLC beta 2, CFTR, or CC10. PGP 9.5 immunoreactivity was never colocalized with amylase. The data suggest that amylase-positive cells constitute an additional subset of taste receptor cells also associated with chemoreceptorial and/or secretory molecules, confirming the occurrence of various pathways in taste buds.

T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice

The T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are expressed in taste receptor cells and form a heterodimer binding with compounds described as sweet by humans. We examined whether Polycose taste might be mediated through this heterodimer by testing T1R2 knockout (KO) and T1R3 KO mice and their wild-type (WT) littermate controls in a series of brief-access taste tests (25-min sessions with 5-s trials). Sucrose, Na-saccharin, and Polycose were each tested for three consecutive sessions with order of presentation varied among subgroups in a Latin-Square manner. Both KO groups displayed blunted licking responses and initiated significantly fewer trials of sucrose and Na-saccharin across a range of concentrations. KO mice tested after Polycose exposure demonstrated some degree of concentration-dependent licking of sucrose, likely attributable to learning related to prior postingestive experience. These results are consistent with prior findings in the literature, implicating the T1R2+3 heterodimer as the principal taste receptor for sweet-tasting ligands, and also provide support for the potential of postingestive experience to influence responding in the KO mice. In contrast, T1R2 KO and T1R3 KO mice displayed concentration-dependent licking responses to Polycose that tracked those of their WT controls and in some cases licked midrange concentrations more; the number of Polycose trials initiated overall did not differ between KO and WT mice. Thus, the T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are individually unnecessary for normal concentration-dependent licking of Polycose to be expressed in a brief-access test. Whether at least one of these T1R protein subunits is necessary for normal Polycose responsiveness remains untested. Alternatively, there may be a novel taste receptor(s) that mediates polysaccharide taste.

Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats

Rats have an inborn preference for sweet taste and learn to prefer flavors associated with sweetness. They are also strongly attracted to the taste of glucose polymers (e.g., Polycose). This "poly" taste differs in quality from the sweet taste of sugar. To determine if poly taste, like sweet taste, conditions flavor preferences rats were trained with a distinctive flavor (CS+) added to 2% Polycose solution and a different flavor (CS-) added to plain water. In a subsequent two-bottle test the rats did not prefer the CS+ to CS- when both flavors were presented in water. In contrast, other rats significantly preferred a CS+ flavor that had been paired with 2% sucrose. Adding saccharin to a flavored Polycose solution did not improve CS+ flavor learning; rather, Polycose appeared to overshadow saccharin-induced conditioning. Flavor conditioning by a 16% Polycose solution was assessed using a sham-feeding procedure to prevent post-oral reinforcement. Although the rats sham-fed substantial amounts of the CS+ flavored Polycose solution, they failed to prefer the CS+ to the CS- flavor. This contrasts with the preference other rats displayed for a CS+ paired with sham-fed sucrose. Why attractive sweet and poly tastes differ in their ability to condition flavor preferences is not certain, although some findings suggest that they differentially activate dopamine and/or serotonin circuits involved in flavor learning.

The taste of sugars

Sugars evoke a distinctive perceptual quality ("sweetness" in humans) and are generally highly preferred. The neural basis for these phenomena is reviewed for rodents, in which detailed electrophysiological measurements have been made. A receptor has been identified that binds sweeteners and activates G-protein-mediated signaling in taste receptor cells, which leads to changes in neural firing rates in the brain, where perceptions of taste quality, intensity, and palatability are generated. Most cells in gustatory nuclei are broadly tuned, so quality perception presumably arises from patterns of activity across neural populations. However, some manipulations affect only the most sugar-oriented cells, making it useful to consider them as a distinct neural subtype. Quality perception may also arise partly due to temporal patterns of activity to sugars, especially within sugar-oriented cells that give large but delayed responses. Non-specific gustatory neurons that are excited by both sugars and unpalatable stimuli project to ventral forebrain areas, where neural responses provide a closer match with behavioral preferences. This transition likely involves opposing excitatory and inhibitory influences by different subgroups of gustatory cells. Sweeteners are generally preferred over water, but the strength of this preference can vary across time or between individuals, and higher preferences for sugars are often associated with larger taste-evoked responses.

Fat and carbohydrate preferences in mice: the contribution of alpha-gustducin and Trpm5 taste-signaling proteins

Trpm5 and alpha-gustducin are key to the transduction of tastes of sugars, amino acids, and bitter compounds. This study investigated the role of these signaling proteins in the preference for fat, starch, and starch-derived polysaccharides (Polycose), using Trpm5 knockout (Trpm5 KO) and alpha-gustducin knockout (Gust KO) mice. In initial two-bottle tests (24 h/day), Trpm5 KO mice showed no preference for soybean oil emulsions (0.313-2.5%), Polycose solutions (0.5-4%), or starch suspensions (0.5-4%). Gust KO mice displayed an attenuated preference for Polycose, but their preferences for soybean oil and starch were comparable to those of C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) mice. Gust KO mice preferred starch to Polycose, whereas WT mice had the opposite preference. After extensive experience with soybean oil emulsions (Intralipid) and Polycose solutions, the Trpm5 KO mice developed preferences comparable to the WT mice, although their absolute intakes remained suppressed. Similarly, Gust KO mice developed a strong Polycose preference with experience, but they continued to consume less than the WT mice. These results implicate alpha-gustducin and Trpm5 as mediators of polysaccharide taste and Trpm5 in fat taste. The disruption in Polycose, but not starch, preference in Gust KO mice indicates that distinct sensory signaling pathways mediate the response to these carbohydrates. The experience-induced rescue of fat and Polycose preferences in the KO mice likely reflects the action of a postoral-conditioning mechanism, which functions in the absence of alpha-gustducin and Trpm5.

Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice

Compared with mice from the 129P3/J (129) inbred strain, mice from the C57BL/6ByJ (B6) inbred strain have higher consumption of several sweet-tasting amino acids and carbohydrates. To examine the relative contribution of taste and nutritive properties in these strain differences, we measured responses of B6 and 129 mice to eight sweet and non-sweet amino acids and carbohydrates in two-bottle preference tests with water. Mice from the two strains did not differ in consumption of non-sweet l-valine and l-histidine. Compared with 129 mice, B6 mice had higher consumption and lower preference thresholds for sweet amino acids l-glutamine, l-alanine and l-threonine, monosaccharides glucose and fructose, and maltooligosaccharide. These data suggest that differences in gustatory responsiveness are an important factor underlying higher consumption of some amino acids and carbohydrates by B6 mice compared with 129 mice. It is likely that in B6 mice, higher sweet taste responsiveness results in increased consumption of sweet-tasting amino acids and sugars, and higher taste responsiveness to complex carbohydrates results in increased consumption of maltooligosaccharide. However, postingestive processes also influence nutrient consumption and may be responsible for higher intake of carbohydrates compared with sweet-tasting amino acids. Results of this study set the stage for genetic analysis of differences between B6 and 129 mice in taste responsiveness and macronutrient consumption.

Single neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract respond selectively to bitter taste stimuli

Molecular data suggest that receptors for all bitter ligands are coexpressed in the same taste receptor cells (TRCs), whereas physiological results indicate that individual TRCs respond to only a subset of bitter stimuli. It is also unclear to what extent bitter-responsive neurons are stimulated by nonbitter stimuli. To explore these issues, single neuron responses were recorded from the rat nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) during whole mouth stimulation with a variety of bitter compounds: 10 microM cycloheximide, 7 mM propylthiouracil, 10 mM denatonium benzoate, and 3 mM quinine hydrochloride at intensities matched for behavioral effectiveness. Stimuli representing the remaining putative taste qualities were also tested. Particular emphasis was given to activating taste receptors in the foliate papillae innervated by the quinine-sensitive glossopharyngeal nerve. This method revealed a novel population of bitter-best (B-best) cells with foliate receptive fields and significant selectivity for bitter tastants. Across all neurons, multidimensional scaling depicted bitter stimuli as loosely clustered yet clearly distinct from nonbitter tastants. When neurons with posterior receptive fields were analyzed alone, bitter stimuli formed a tighter cluster. Nevertheless, responses to bitter stimuli were variable across B-best neurons, with cycloheximide the most, and quinine the least frequent optimal stimulus. These results indicate heterogeneity for the processing of ionic and nonionic bitter tastants, which is dependent on receptive field. Further, they suggest that neurons selective for bitter substances could contribute to taste coding.

The representation of taste quality in the mammalian nervous system

The process by which the mammalian nervous system represents the features of a sapid stimulus that lead to a perception of taste quality has long been controversial. The labeled-line (sparse coding) view differs from the across-neuron pattern (ensemble) counterpoint in proposing that activity in a given class of neurons is necessary and sufficient to generate a specific taste perception. This article critically reviews molecular, electro-physiological, and behavioral findings that bear on the issue. In the peripheral gustatory system, the authors conclude that most qualities appear to be signaled by labeled lines; however, elements of both types of coding characterize signaling of sodium salts. Given the heterogeneity of neuronal tuning functions in the brain, the central coding mechanism is less clear. Both sparse coding and neuronal ensemble models remain viable possibilities. Furthermore, temporal patterns of discharge could contribute additional information. Ultimately, until specific classes of neurons can be selectively manipulated and perceptual consequences assessed, it will be difficult to go beyond mere correlation and conclusively discern the validity of these coding models.

Polycose taste pre-exposure fails to influence behavioral and neural indices of taste novelty

Taste novelty can strongly modulate the speed and efficacy of taste aversion learning. Novel sweet tastes enhance c-Fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) in the central amygdala and insular cortex. The present studies examined whether this neural correlate of novelty extends to different taste types by measuring FLI signals after exposure to novel and familiar polysaccharide (Polycose) and salt (NaCl) tastes. Novel Polycose not only failed to elevate FLI expression in central amygdala and insular cortex, but also failed to induce stronger taste aversion learning than familiar Polycose. Novel NaCl, on the other hand, showed patterns of FLI activation and aversion learning similar to that of novel sweet tastes. Possible reasons for the resistance of Polycose to typical pre-exposure effects are discussed.

Neural representation of bitter taste in the nucleus of the solitary tract

Based on the molecular findings that many bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are expressed within the same receptor cells, it has been proposed that bitter taste is encoded by the activation of discrete neural elements. Here we examined how a variety of bitter stimuli are represented by neural activity in central gustatory neurons. Taste responses (spikes/s) evoked by bathing the tongue and palate with intensity-matched concentrations (in M) of 2 sugars (0.32 sucrose and 0.5 D-fructose), ethanol (40%), 4 salts (0.01 NaCl, 0.008 NaNO(3), 0.01 MgCl(2), and 0.05 KCl), 2 acids (0.003 HCl and 0.005 citric acid), and 10 bitter ligands (0.007 quinine-HCl, 0.015 denatonium benzoate, 0.003 l-cysteine, 0.001 nicotine, 0.005 strychnine-HCl, 0.04 tetraethylammonium chloride, 0.03 atropine-SO(4), 0.005 brucine-SO(4), 0.03 papaverine-HCl, and 0.009 sparteine) were recorded from 51 neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract of anesthetized rats. Cluster analysis was used to categorize neurons into types based on responses to sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine-HCl. Three groupings emerged: type S (responded optimally to sweets), type N (sodium-optimal), and type H/Q (responded robustly to bitters, acids, and salts). Multivariate analyses revealed that across-neuron patterns of response among bitter stimuli were strongly correlated. However, neural type H/Q, which was most responsive to bitter tastants, was not differentially sensitive to bitter stimuli and Na(+) salts, which rats perceive as distinct. Thus central neurons most responsive to bitter substances receive significant input from receptors that mediate other tastes, indicating that bitter stimuli are not represented by activity in specifically tuned neurons.

The sixth taste?

Five taste qualities are recognized in humans: sweet, bitter, sour, salty, and umami. Rats and some other species may also have a sixth taste. Behavioral and electrophysiological data suggest that rats can taste polysaccharides derived from starch. Furthermore, the tastes of sugars and polysaccharides appear to differ in quality. Rats also discriminate different types of polysaccharide and starch molecules. Recent studies indicate that sweet taste is mediated by a T1R2 and T1R3 receptor complex but the identity of the hypothesized polysaccharide taste receptor remains to be established.

Artificial neural network analysis of gustatory responses in the thalamic taste relay of the rat

We used an artificial neural network (ANN) as a model for analyzing single-neuron responses from the thalamic taste relay of rats. The network consisted of: (1) a layer of 44 input units, representing the responses of the 44 thalamic taste cells; (2) a layer of hidden units of varying numbers; and (3) a layer of four output units. We used the back-propagation algorithm to train the output units to discriminate among tastants based on inputs from the thalamic neurons. As the network became fully trained, we found that: (1) only two hidden units were necessary to provide nearly the full discriminative capacity of the network; (2) the loss of even a few of the input units that had the highest impact on hidden units caused a drastic reduction of discriminative power, implying that not all neurons contribute equally to the neural code; and (3) adding a temporal component to the input, by representing each 100-ms time bin as a separate input unit, increased the accuracy with which output units were able to identify tastants. We used data from behavioral discrimination tasks as a measure of the capacity of the network to identify stimuli correctly. A network with two hidden units was about as effective as an across-pattern analysis in accounting for the rat's discriminative ability.

Responses to taste stimulation in the ventroposteromedial nucleus of the thalamus in rats

Extracellular action potentials were recorded from 73 neurons in the parvicellular division of the ventroposteromedial (VPMpc) nucleus of the thalamus of anesthetized Wistar rats during gustatory, thermal, and tactile stimulation of the whole oral cavity. The stimulus array consisted of 16 room-temperature (23 degrees C) sapid stimuli, distilled water at three temperatures (0, 23, and 37 degrees C), and 0.1 M NaCl at three temperatures (0, 23, and 37 degrees C). Among all 151 neurons isolated in VPMpc, 9% responded exclusively to taste, 33% to taste and temperature, none to taste and touch, but 6% to all three modalities. Discharge rates evoked by the basic tastants were 13.8 +/- 1.6 (SD) spikes/s for 0.1 M NaCl, 9.3 +/- 1.4 spikes/s for 0.01 M HCl, 5.1 +/- 0.9 spikes/s for 0.5 M sucrose, and 4.3 +/- 0.6 spikes/s for 0.01 M quinine HCl. Water evoked mean responses at 0, 23, and 37 degrees C of 9.9 +/- 1.5, 0.6 +/- 0.4, and 1.3 +/- 0.9 spikes/s, respectively. The mean firing rate evoked by 37 and 0 degrees C NaCl was 15.0 +/- 2.4 and 17.0 +/- 2.8 spikes/s, respectively. The exponent of the NaCl concentration-response power function was 0.39. Thalamic taste cells were broadly tuned. The mean breadth-of-tuning coefficient for these 73 gustatory cells was 0.79 +/- 0.02. Two cells responded predominantly with inhibition, which accounted for the majority of inhibitory responses. The taste neurons were statistically divisible into three groups: sodium-oriented (n = 40), acid-oriented (n = 12), and sugar-oriented (n = 17). Four additional bitter-oriented neurons were not closely enough related to be defined as a group and were considered outliers. The sodium-oriented group could be divided into three statistically distinct subgroups, differing in the specificity of their responses to NaCl. With respect to polymodal sensitivity, spontaneous rate, evoked response rates, signal-to-noise ratio, proportions of cells responding best to basic tastants, taste neuron groups, taste spaces, and temporal responses, VPMpc neurons have characteristics that are intermediate between those of parabrachial and cortical gustatory neurons.

Gustatory responsiveness to polycose in four species of nonhuman primates

The taste responsiveness of six squirrel monkeys, five pigtail macaques, four olive baboons, and four spider monkeys to polycose, a starch-derived polysaccharide, was assessed in two-bottle preference tests of brief duration (2 min). In experiment 1, the monkeys were given the choice between tap water and defined concentrations of polycose dissolved in tap water. In experiment 2, the animals were given the choice between polycose and sucrose, fructose, glucose, lactose, and maltose presented in equimolar concentrations of 100 and 200 mM, respectively. The animals were found to prefer concentrations of polycose as low as 10 mM (pigtail macaques), 30 mM (olive baboons and spider monkeys), and 60 mM (squirrel monkeys) over tap water. Relative taste preferences were stable across the concentrations tested and indicate an order of relative effectiveness (sucrose > polycose > or = maltose) in squirrel monkeys, spider monkeys, and olive baboons that is similar to the order of relative sweetness in humans. Pigtail macaques, however, displayed an order of relative effectiveness (maltose > polycose > or = sucrose) that differs markedly from that found in the other primate species tested and is similar to relative taste preferences found in rodents such as rats. Both the high sensitivity of the pigtail macaques to polycose and their vivid predilection for this polysaccharide and its disaccharide constituent maltose suggest that Macaca nemestrina, unlike other primates, but like rodents, may have specialized taste receptors for starch.

Issues of gustatory neural coding: where they stand today

The basic issues of gustatory neural coding are revisited. Questions addressed and conclusions drawn are: (1) what is the physical dimension across which gustatory neurons are sensitive, and upon which taste perceptions are based? The dimension that unites the various taste qualities is not physical, but physiological: a dimension of well-being, bounded by toxins at one extreme and nutrients at the other. (2) How broadly tuned are taste cells across the dimension? There are instances of specificity, but most mammalian taste cells respond to a range of qualities. (3) Are there basic taste qualities? Sweet, salty, sour, and bitter are widely accepted as basic tastes. Umami and starch tastes are considered basic by some. (4) Is taste topographically organized? There is some degree of physical separation among neurons most responsive to different taste qualities, but this does not appear to be sufficient precision to act as a meaningful coding mechanism. (5) Are there gustatory neuron types? Neurons, separated into categories according to their response profiles, respond as members of their category to the challenges of conditioned aversions and preferences, sodium deprivation, hyperglycemia, and receptor blockade, while cells from other categories react differently. This indicates the existence of functionally distinct types of taste cells. (6) Is the quality signal coded within the activity of the single most appropriate category of neurons, or is it carried by the pattern of response across neuronal categories? Both the breadth of responsiveness and the logical ambiguity of the signal in any one category of neurons argue that the taste message is carried by a pattern of activity across gustatory neuron types.

Taste in the monkey cortex

The sense of taste in humans differs substantially from that of rodents, from which a preponderance of gustatory electrophysiology derives. To establish a more appropriate neural model for human gustation, we recorded the activity of single neurons in the primary taste cortex in 11 alert cynomolgus macaques. Taste cells composed 6% of all neurons encountered. Another 24% responded during mouth and jaw movements, and 4% were sensitive to tactile stimulation of the mouth. Smaller numbers responded during olfactory or visual stimulation, or when the monkey extended his tongue. Taste cells could be divided into four statistically independent groups, corresponding to those most responsive to glucose (38%), NaCl (34%), quinine (22%), or HCI (5%). The location of a taste cell did not predict its response profile, i.e., there was no clear topographic organization of taste sensitivity. We established neural thresholds and intensity-response functions to the basic stimuli and determined that-with the exception of HCl, to which the macaque is relatively insensitive-they were similar to those reported by human subjects. We then turned to the coding of taste quality, as inferred in macaques from the patterns of neural activity elicited by each of greater than 100 stimuli. The results proved generally faithful to human reports of the perceived qualities of these same tastants. Finally, an investigation of taste mixtures revealed a degree of mixture suppression and interaction among basic qualities similar to those reported by humans. We conclude that the alert macaque offers a reliable neural model for human gustation.

Effects of osmolarity on taste receptor cell size and function

Osmotic effects on salt taste were studied by recording from the rat chorda tympani (CT) nerve and by measuring changes in cell volume of isolated rat fungiform taste receptor cells (TRCs). Mannitol, cellobiose, urea, or DMSO did not induce CT responses. However, the steady-state CT responses to 150 mM NaCl were significantly increased when the stimulus solutions also contained 300 mM mannitol or cellobiose, but not 600 mM urea or DMSO. The enhanced CT responses to NaCl were reversed when the saccharides were removed and were completely blocked by addition of 100 microM amiloride to the stimulus solution. Exposure of TRCs to hyperosmotic solutions of mannitol or cellobiose induced a rapid and sustained decrease in cell volume that was completely reversible, whereas exposure to hypertonic urea or DMSO did not induce sustained reductions in cell volume. These data suggest that the osmolyte-induced increase in the CT response to NaCl involves a sustained decrease in TRC volume and the activation of amiloride-sensitive apical Na(+) channels.

Macronutrient-specific dietary selection in rodents and its neural bases

The only evidence for nutrient selection comes from baseline or treatment effects on nutrient intakes that are qualitatively similar when sensorily contrasting forms of each macronutrient are investigated and/or dietary compositions and strains of rat or mouse are different within or between laboratories. By that criterion the only potential case of a treatment reliably altering macronutrient selection identified in the present review of the literature is d-norfenfluramine, fluoxetine and paraventricular serotonin (5-HT) reducing the intake of dextrin-containing diets at early dark. The only clear example of reverse effects of an agonist and an antagonist on dietary intake was found with serotonergic agents. Claims for catecholaminergic or opioid involvement in protein intake and peptidergic involvement in carbohydrate intake were not substantiated. There remain the issues of which learnt macronutrient-specific postgastric actions and sensory cues from the affected diet rely on the neural pathway(s) on which the drug is acting to alter dietary selection. Until experiments address these questions, the neural bases of nutrient-specific appetites will remain unknown. Drug effects must be consistent across differently textured and flavoured versions of each macronutrient tested.

What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?

What roles do mesolimbic and neostriatal dopamine systems play in reward? Do they mediate the hedonic impact of rewarding stimuli? Do they mediate hedonic reward learning and associative prediction? Our review of the literature, together with results of a new study of residual reward capacity after dopamine depletion, indicates the answer to both questions is 'no'. Rather, dopamine systems may mediate the incentive salience of rewards, modulating their motivational value in a manner separable from hedonia and reward learning. In a study of the consequences of dopamine loss, rats were depleted of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and neostriatum by up to 99% using 6-hydroxydopamine. In a series of experiments, we applied the 'taste reactivity' measure of affective reactions (gapes, etc.) to assess the capacity of dopamine-depleted rats for: 1) normal affect (hedonic and aversive reactions), 2) modulation of hedonic affect by associative learning (taste aversion conditioning), and 3) hedonic enhancement of affect by non-dopaminergic pharmacological manipulation of palatability (benzodiazepine administration). We found normal hedonic reaction patterns to sucrose vs. quinine, normal learning of new hedonic stimulus values (a change in palatability based on predictive relations), and normal pharmacological hedonic enhancement of palatability. We discuss these results in the context of hypotheses and data concerning the role of dopamine in reward. We review neurochemical, electrophysiological, and other behavioral evidence. We conclude that dopamine systems are not needed either to mediate the hedonic pleasure of reinforcers or to mediate predictive associations involved in hedonic reward learning. We conclude instead that dopamine may be more important to incentive salience attributions to the neural representations of reward-related stimuli. Incentive salience, we suggest, is a distinct component of motivation and reward. In other words, dopamine systems are necessary for 'wanting' incentives, but not for 'liking' them or for learning new 'likes' and 'dislikes'.

Parabrachial neural coding of taste stimuli in awake rats

Parabrachial neural coding of taste stimuli in awake rats. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2254-2268, 1997. In awake, behaving rats, the activity of 74 single neurons in the pontine parabrachial nucleus (PBN) was recorded in response to sapid stimulation by 15 chemicals. Of these, 44 taste cells were tested with all 15 stimuli. Based on their responsiveness to 4 standard stimuli, these neurons were categorized as follows: 23 NaCl-best, 15 sucrose-best, 5 citric acid-best, and 1 quinine HCl-best. Several forms of multivariate analyses indicated that the taste responses matched both the behavioral responses to and, less well, the chemical structure of, the sapid stimuli. A hierarchical cluster analysis of the neurons substantially confirmed the best-stimulus categorization, but separated the NaCl-best cells into those that responded more to Na+-containing salts and those that responded more to Cl--containing salts. The cells that responded best to the Na+ moiety actually were somewhat more correlated with the sucrose-best cells than with those that responded to the Cl--containing stimuli. Citric acid-best neurons and the lone quinine-best unit formed a single cluster of neurons that responded well to acids, as well as to NH4Cl and, to a lesser extent, NaNO3. A factor analysis of the neuronal response profiles revealed that three factors accounted for 78.8% of the variance in the sample. Similar analyses of the stimuli suggested that PBN neurons respond to four or five sets of stimuli related by their chemical makeup or by human psychophysical reports. The capacity of rats to make these discriminations has been documented by other behavioral studies in which rodents generalize across sapid chemicals within each of 5 stimulus categories. Furthermore, a simulation analysis of the neural data replicated behavioral results that used amiloride, a Na+ channel blocker, in which rats generalized NaCl to non-Na+, Cl- salts. Thus, using a variety of analyses, in awake rats, the activity of PBN taste neurons tracks their behavioral responses to a variety of chemical stimuli.

Beyond sweet taste: saccharin, sucrose, and polycose differ in their effects upon morphine-induced analgesia

The effects of saccharin, sucrose, or Polycose intake on morphine-induced analgesia (MIA) were examined in 40 adult male Long-Evans rats. Rats were tested for MIA on a tail-flick apparatus following acute (5-h) and chronic (3-wk) intake of a 0.15% saccharin solution, a 32% sucrose solution, a 33.68% Polycose solution, or water. During the chronic phase, all rats were given a choice between the test solution and water. Morphine sulfate was administered according to a cumulative dosing procedure beginning with 2.5 mg/kg morphine. The same dose was administered every 30 min. Tail-flick latencies were measured immediately prior to injections and 30 min following each injection. After acute intake of flavored solutions or water, there were no differences in MIA as a function of diet. However, after drinking the flavored solutions or water for three weeks rats drinking Polycose or sucrose showed significantly enhanced MIA relative to rats drinking saccharin. Rats drinking Polycose also showed enhanced MIA relative to rats drinking water. Comparison between the acute and chronic phases of the study demonstrated that tolerance to morphine's analgesic effects did not develop in rats drinking Polycose or sucrose, but did develop in rats drinking saccharin or water. The results support the hypothesis that, in addition to palatability, the nutritive value of flavored solutions influences MIA.

Analysis of polysaccharide taste in hamsters: behavioral and neural studies

A series of studies was carried out in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) to determine whether polysaccharides have behavioral and neurophysiological characteristics that distinguish them from simple sugars. Behavioral studies utilized solutions of glucose, maltose, sucrose, Polycose, and glycogen in two-bottle preference tests and in tests of generalization of conditioned taste aversions. Multiunit and single-unit responses of the chorda tympani nerve were studied with the same stimuli. Neural responses to Polycose and glycogen were found to be generated primarily by ionic contaminants. Dialysis or deionization dramatically reduced electrophysiological responses, a result consistent with occurrence of Polycose and glycogen sensitivity in electrolyte-sensitive nerve fibers. Effects of treatment with the Na + -channel blocker amiloride and cross-adaptation were also consistent with neural responses generated by ionic contaminants. Hamsters showed strong preferences for the sugars and Polycose, a mixture of glucose polymers with alpha-1,4 linkages, and even stronger preferences for a glycogen preparation. Conditioned flavor aversions were established to glycogen, sucrose, and maltose, but no aversion was learned to 3.2% Polycose. The learned aversion to maltose partly generalized to glycogen and sucrose, but sucrose and glycogen did not cross-generalize. Deionization did not affect the preferences for Polycose and glycogen but removal of contaminants of mol.wt. < or = 7000 Da greatly reduced preference for glycogen. In conclusion, glycogen itself, after removal of low molecular weight contaminants, is a poor taste stimulus in hamsters, both behaviorally and neurophysiologically. However, Polycose is highly preferred by hamsters but gives little chorda tympani response after removal of ionic contaminants. In alert animals, the action of salivary amylase on polysaccharides may produce simpler, detectable taste stimuli.

Differences in taste responses to Polycose and common sugars in the rat as revealed by behavioral and electrophysiological studies

Behavioral and electrophysiological experiments were performed to examine the suggestion that rats have two types of carbohydrate taste receptors, one for polysaccharides (e.g., Polycose) and one for common sugars (e.g., sucrose). Qualitative difference between the tastes of Polycose and sugars including sucrose, maltose, glucose, and fructose was surveyed by means of a conditioned taste aversion paradigm in which the number of licks for 20 s to each taste stimulus was measured. Aversive conditioning to Polycose did not generalize to sugars, while aversive conditioning to sucrose generalized to other sugars, but not to Polycose. In the electrophysiological study, taste responses of the whole chorda tympani were recorded. A proteolytic enzyme, pronase E, suppressed nerve responses to both Polycose and sugars to less than 50%. A novel anti-sweet peptide, gurmarin, strongly suppressed responses to sugars, but had essentially no effect on Polycose responses. On the other hand, KHCO3 enhanced responses to sugars to about 300%, but had little effect on Polycose responses. These results have confirmed the notion that rats can differentiate the tastes between Polycose and common sugars and that rats have two types of carbohydrate receptors.

Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats

The present studies examined rats' responses to two maltodextrin preparations. One maltodextrin, a maltooligosaccharide, had an average chain length of 4.4 glucose units. The other maltodextrin was a maltopolysaccharide, having an average chain length of 22. In 24-h preference tests, rats strongly preferred 1% and 5% maltodextrin over water, regardless of the type of maltodextrin offered. When given a choice of two maltodextrins, rats preferred the maltooligosaccharide, but the degree of preference was influenced by the rats' previous experience with maltodextrins. Conditioned flavor aversion experiments were conducted to determine whether rats detect qualitative flavor differences between the these two maltodextrins. Rats trained to avoid one maltodextrin also avoided the other maltodextrin. Nevertheless, rats could be trained to drink maltooligosaccharide but avoid maltopolysaccharide; these rats showed no reliable tendency to respond to the intensity of maltooligosaccharide flavor. Therefore, maltodextrins of varying chain length differ more in flavor quality than in flavor intensity. This difference in flavor quality is not attributable to known sweet and starch flavors because neither maltodextrin contained much glucose and because rats trained to avoid the polysaccharide did not avoid starch. Because rats can discriminate between solutions containing only 0.5-1% maltodextrin, their ability to discriminate among carbohydrates must be far more acute than that of humans.

Relative preference for starch and sugar in rats

When given a choice between fluids containing equal amounts of corn starch or glucose, Fischer rats preferred the fluid containing starch when the fluids contained 0.5%, 1%, 5%, or 20% carbohydrate, but not when the fluids contained 10% carbohydrate. Fischer rats preferred 0.5% sucrose over 0.5% starch on the first day of testing, but then switched to preferring starch. Rats of the CD strain also preferred 0.5% starch over 0.5% sucrose or 0.5% glucose, but showed no reliable preference when offered a choice of 5% starch vs. 5% sucrose or 5% glucose. Most experiments used corn starch, but rats prefer 1% rice, wheat, and tapioca starch over 1% glucose. Rats given only one substance to drink, drank more fluid if the fluid contained 1% starch than if it contained 1% glucose. Preexposing rats to either glucose or starch for 3 days did not influence subsequent preference for starch over glucose. Since the starch and glucose mixtures used in the present work had the same number of calories, preference for starch over glucose must be attributed to the hedonic effects of starch flavor rather than to the postingestive effects of starch.

Deprivation alters rats' flavor preferences for carbohydrates and fats

The effects of food deprivation on rats' preferences for the flavors of different macronutrients were investigated. To minimize postingestive influences on flavor preferences, brief test sessions (30 min) and calorically dilute (0.08 kcal/g) solutions or suspensions were used. The findings revealed that whereas nondeprived rats preferred sucrose (2%) to hyrolyzed starch (2% Polycose), food-deprived rats strongly preferred Polycose to sucrose. Deprived rats also acquired a preference for a cue flavor paired with Polycose, while nondeprived rats preferred a sucrose-paired cue flavor. Food deprivation also caused rats to switch their preferences from sucrose to corn starch, and from sucrose to corn oil. Food deprivation did not, however, alter the rats' preference for Polycose over corn starch, and it blocked, but did not reverse, their preference for Polycose over corn oil. Taken together, the findings indicate that food deprivation enhances the preference for palatable nonsweet nutrients (Polycose, corn starch, corn oil) over a sweet nutrient (sucrose). This effect was specific to food deprivation; water deprivation did not reverse the rats' preference for sucrose to Polycose.

Is starch flavor unitary? Evidence from studies of cooked starch

Although starch is the world's most abundant nutritive carbohydrate, its sensory properties are not as well understood as those of sugars. Previous researchers have assumed that all starches have the same flavor. The present experiments examined flavor differences among starches. Untrained rats were offered a choice of suspensions containing raw versus cooked starch. For some starches (potato and rice), rats strongly preferred cooked over uncooked starch. For other starches (regular corn, corn amylopectin, and wheat), rats showed little or no preference for cooked over uncooked starch. In order to determine whether the greater preference for cooked starch reflects a difference in flavor intensity, rats were conditioned to avoid potato or corn amylopectin starches by pairing ingestion of these substances with lithium chloride injections. Rats trained to avoid raw starch also avoided cooked starch, indicating that cooked and raw starch have similar flavors. However, when these trained rats were offered a choice between cooked and raw starch, they avoided the raw starch; this result is inconsistent with the assumption that cooking enhances the intensity of starch flavor. Similar results were obtained with corn amylopectin and potato starch, even though these starches differ greatly with regard to the effects of cooking on preference in untrained rats. However, rats trained to avoid potato starch avoided this starch to a greater degree than did rats trained to avoid corn amylopectin; conversely, rats trained to avoid corn amylopectin avoided this starch to a greater degree than did rats trained to avoid potato starch. Therefore, the flavor of starch is complex; there are specific flavor notes related to species and cooking.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Information processing in mammalian gustatory systems

The taste system has multiple functions that are carried by three cranial nerves. It is now apparent that these functions cannot be accommodated by a single coding mechanism for taste quality. A current view emphasizes the likely existence of coding channels activated by specific sets of receptors.

Starch and sugar tastes in rodents: an update

Rats are strongly attracted to the sweet taste of sugar. Recent behavioral studies demonstrate that rats also have a well-developed taste for starch-derived polysaccharides (e.g., Polycose). In fact, rats prefer Polycose to sucrose and other sugars at low concentrations. Polycose appetite develops at a very young age (9 days) and, thus, appears to be innate. The results of conditioned taste aversion tests suggest that rats taste Polycose as qualitatively different from sucrose. Recent electrophysiological findings support the idea that rodents have separate taste channels for polysaccharides and sugars. In particular, copper chloride suppresses the chorda tympani nerve response to sucrose and other sugars but has minimal effect on the neural response to Polycose. Also, Polycose evokes a profile of neural activity in the nucleus tractus solitarius that differs substantially from that produced by sucrose. Preliminary results indicate that polysaccharide and sugar tastes also differ in their metabolic consequences, i.e., unlike sugars, Polycose does not elicit a cephalic phase insulin response. The presumed function of polysaccharide taste is to facilitate the identification of starch-rich foods. Recent findings demonstrate that rats can readily detect starch even at low concentrations, but whether polysaccharide taste receptors or other orosensory receptors mediate this response remains to be clarified.