Clinical risk factors of adverse outcomes among women with COVID-19 in the pregnancy and postpartum period: a sequential, prospective meta-analysis

The placental transcriptomic profile determined by maternal COVID-19 disease encompasses alterations reminiscent of preeclampsia

INTRODUCTION

During initial stages of the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was related to adverse pregnancy outcomes and alterations in the placenta. Whether placental abnormalities in pregnant women with COVID-19 still persist afterwards remains poorly studied. Here, we determined whether the absence of obstetric complications after maternal COVID-19 disease, including preeclampsia, is accompanied by a complete return to normalcy in terms of placental physiology.

METHODS

Placental RNA was purified from placental samples from SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers taken either in 2022, when Omicron was the predominant variant of concern (termed Omicron) (n = 21); or from healthy pregnancies predating the pandemic (termed preCOVID-19). Our cohort included samples from pregnant women who got infected weeks and even months before term. We performed RNA-seq, identified differentially expressed genes and examined to which biological, biochemical and cellular pathways they belong, using gene set enrichment analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 71 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (defined by p-value ≤0.05 and fold change (FC) of ≤ -2 or ≥2). The alterations identified in placentas delivered by mothers who suffered an episode of COVID-19 disease could be mainly attributed to pathways related to organogenesis, extracellular matrix organization and oxygen transport. These alterations were also detected after exclusion of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) samples. Although none of the samples were taken from cases of preeclampsia, several of the relevant DEGs have been previously reported as dysregulated in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including preeclampsia.

DISCUSSION

We propose that maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection causes alterations in gene expression that are indicative of vascular defects in the placenta.

Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pregnant Women: The COROPREG Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Population-based data are needed to reliably assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the population-based incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severe forms in the obstetric population, identify risk factors of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (severe COVID-19) and describe delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes by disease severity, using a definition of severity based on organ dysfunction.

METHODS

A prospective population-based study conducted over the three first pandemic waves between March 2020 and April 2021 in 281 maternity hospitals in six French regions included all women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy or within 7 days post-partum, whether symptomatic or not, hospitalised or not. Severe COVID-19 forms were defined a priori using clinical, biological and management criteria of organ dysfunction. We calculated infection and severe infection rates and studied associations between sociodemographic, medical and pregnancy characteristics and severe COVID-19 by univariate and multivariate modified Poisson regression modelling.

RESULTS

From a population of 385,214 deliveries in the participating regions, 6015 women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified, including 337 severe cases. The rates of severe COVID-19 were 1.1, 0.9 and 3.6 per 1000 deliveries during the first, second and third pandemic waves, respectively, and the proportions of severe COVID-19 were 8.6%, 3.4% and 9.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the risk of severe COVID-19 was associated with younger and older age, migrant status, living with > 4 people, overweight or obesity, chronic hypertension or diabetes and infection ≥ 22 weeks of gestation rather than earlier in pregnancy. Neonatal morbidity occurred mostly with severe maternal infection.

CONCLUSION

Using an organ-based definition of severity and population-based data, rates of severe COVID-19 appeared lower than in previous studies. A permanent perinatal surveillance system is needed to assess efficiently and rapidly the impact of future pandemics.

Age-associated changes in the heart: implications for COVID-19 therapies

Cardiac aging involves progressive structural, functional, cellular, and molecular changes that impair heart function. This review explores key mechanisms, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired autophagy, and chronic low-grade inflammation. Excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage heart muscle cells, contributing to fibrosis and cellular aging. Mitochondrial dysfunction reduces energy production and increases oxidative stress, accelerating cardiac decline. Impaired autophagy limits the removal of damaged proteins and organelles, while inflammation activates signaling molecules that drive tissue remodeling. Gender differences reveal estrogen's protective role in premenopausal women, with men showing greater susceptibility to heart muscle dysfunction and injury. After menopause, women lose this hormonal protection, increasing their risk of cardiovascular conditions. Ethnic disparities, particularly among underserved minority populations, emphasize how social factors such as access to care, environment, and chronic stress contribute to worsening cardiovascular outcomes. The coronavirus disease pandemic has introduced further challenges by increasing the incidence of heart damage through inflammation, blood clots, and long-term heart failure, especially in older adults with existing metabolic conditions like diabetes and high blood pressure. The virus's interaction with receptors on heart and blood vessel cells, along with a weakened immune response in older adults, intensifies cardiac aging. Emerging therapies include delivery of therapeutic extracellular vesicles, immune cell modulation, and treatments targeting mitochondria. In addition, lifestyle strategies such as regular physical activity, nutritional improvements, and stress reduction remain vital to maintaining cardiac health. Understanding how these biological and social factors intersect is critical to developing targeted strategies that promote healthy aging of the heart.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, the Human Placenta, and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

The relationship among timing and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during pregnancy, placental pathology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes is not well understood. A prospective cohort study of 497 pregnant patients with COVID-19 whose placentas underwent systematic pathologic examination was conducted. The main exposure was timing of COVID-19 during pregnancy (first/second versus third trimester). The primary outcome was composite placental pathology that included high-grade maternal vascular malperfusion or >25% perivillous fibrin deposition. There were 63 patients who had the composite placental pathology outcome. In adjusted analyses that controlled for maternal age, parity, active infection at delivery, interval from time of diagnosis to delivery, and COVID-19 variant, timing of COVID-19 during pregnancy was not associated with risk of the composite placental pathology outcome. Among secondary COVID-19-related exposures that were investigated, severity of disease and treatment for COVID-19 were associated with risk of the composite placental pathology outcome. In addition, patients with COVID-19 in the first 9 months of the pandemic had the highest rate of the composite placental pathology outcome. In this large cohort, placental vascular pathology was common among COVID-19 cases but was unrelated to timing of COVID-19 during pregnancy or adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings suggest that uncomplicated COVID-19 during pregnancy does not require intensive fetal surveillance or detailed pathologic examination of the placenta after delivery.

COVID-19 vaccination rates among pregnant women in France: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women are at an elevated risk for severe COVID-19, but nationwide rates of vaccination and its timing during pregnancy are not well documented in France.

OBJECTIVES

To assess COVID-19 vaccination rates among pregnant women in France, compare them to those of the general population, and analyse factors associated with vaccination status and timing.

METHODS

A nationwide study using the EPI-MERES register, which includes all 1,203,454 pregnant women who delivered between April 2021 and December 2022 in France. Standardization by age and social index was used to compare vaccination rates with those of the general female population. Associations with sociodemographic factors, pregnancy monitoring indicators, and pre-existing comorbidities were measured using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 % of pregnant women received at least one vaccine dose, with 62.1 % vaccinated before conception and 8.2 %, 20.9 %, and 8.8 % vaccinated in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimester, respectively. Vaccination rates initially lagged behind those of the general population but converged by June 2022, with a six-month lag. Younger and more socially deprived women were less highly vaccinated. Unvaccinated women were more likely to be in their third pregnancy (aOR, 1.21 [1.19-1.22]), had fewer ultrasound scans (aOR, 0.71 [0; 70-0.73]), and less often took folic acid (aOR, 0.73 [0.72-0.74]). Women with comorbidities, such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, antidepressant use, or chronic respiratory disease, were less likely to be unvaccinated (aORs ranged from 0.69 to 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women in France were less highly vaccinated than the general population during crucial pandemic periods but eventually reached similar vaccination rates. Socioeconomic status and the level of prenatal care were strongly associated with low vaccine uptake. This should be a focus for future interventions and policy adjustments across all segments of this population.

Maternal Immunization

Pregnant individuals and infants are at risk from vaccine-preventable diseases like severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza. Maternal vaccination during pregnancy can protect both the mother and child. Recent progress in developing these vaccines is notable, but vaccine hesitancy and the exclusion of pregnant individuals from clinical trials limit their use. Maternal immunization safeguards mothers from severe illness and adverse pregnancy outcomes while providing infants with antibodies through the placenta and breast milk. Inactivated vaccines are generally effective and safe during pregnancy. Limited safety and efficacy data due to exclusion from trials hinder vaccine uptake; however, vaccines like tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap), influenza, and SARS-CoV-2 have proven effective, and are recommended vaccines during pregnancy. New vaccines for group B Streptococcus (GBS) and cytomegalovirus are in development, with the GBS vaccine being the most advanced. Combating vaccine hesitancy through strong health care provider recommendations is vital to enhance uptake and protect pregnant individuals and their infants.

Immunization thresholds to change the overall level and the effect of cases on deaths by COVID-19 in pregnant and postpartum women

Since the first officially reported case of COVID-19, the scientific community has spent much of its time understanding the dynamics of the virus. Several studies have indicated that some population segments are especially susceptible to COVID-19 complications, including pregnant and postpartum women. Although recommendations such as social distancing, proper sanitation, and the use of protection masks were crucial in slowing down the virus dissemination, the protection provided by vaccination is undeniable, especially for this particular group. Concerning deaths by COVID-19, it is natural to assume that daily deaths are related to reported hospitalized cases and to expect that, as vaccination increases, this effect gradually decreases. As far as we know, no other studies have addressed this issue. Therefore, this study introduces a novel generalized linear model with segmented interaction to fill this gap. The model was used to estimate the vaccination thresholds required to change the overall level and the daily hospitalized cases effect on daily deaths from COVID-19 in pregnant and postpartum women reported between January 3rd, 2021, and January 1st, 2022. Inference methods for the proposed model were developed. The results obtained indicate that, in the first period from May 25th to July 1st, 2021 (between 14,420 and 271,570 first doses, respectively), vaccination caused a significant gradual decrease in the effect of reported hospitalized cases on fatalities and, in a second period from July 25th to October 13th, 2021 (between 653,150 and 968,880 first doses, respectively), it induced a gradual reduction of the overall level of deaths. Using the average number of cases as a reference, during the period of observations, the expected number of deaths reduced from 6.16 to 0.36, a decrease of 94.16%. The importance of learning from COVID-19 data must be highlighted, as it provides us with critical insights to better prepare for future health crises.

Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization study on the association between exposure to chlorinated disinfection byproducts and preterm birth risk

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the correlation between exposure to disinfection byproducts of chlorination and preterm birth (PTB) through evidence-based medicine Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis was conducted on 17 studies involving 1,251,426 neonates, revealing a higher risk of PTB with exposure to total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) and chloroform. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis confirmed a causal relationship between chlorides and PTB.

RESULTS

TTHMs and chloroform were associated with increased PTB risk, while haloacetic acids showed no significant association. TTHMs were linked to small gestational age. Ethnicity and study design influenced heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to chlorination byproducts, particularly TTHMs and chloroform, poses a significant risk for PTB. MR analysis supports a causal relationship between chlorides and PTB, highlighting the importance of water disinfection byproduct control in preventing PTB.

Preeclampsia biomarkers (sFlt-1/PlGF) dynamics are not disrupted by SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy in a hypertensive disorder SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated cohort

OBJECTIVES

To analyze maternal and perinatal outcomes and serum levels of the preeclampsia (PE) biomarkers sFlt-1 and PlGF in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, with or without confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy.

METHODS

Multicenter (two-center) prospective cohort study secondary analysis. The cohort comprised pregnant women with hypertensive disorders who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, assessed from August 2021 to December 2022. Key variables included sociodemographic information, clinical background, maternal and perinatal outcomes, and biomarkers serum concentrations. A sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≥ 38 was the threshold for predicting PE. The study compared outcomes based on the timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection and PE clinical onset.

RESULTS

For biomarker analysis, 170 women provided serum samples: 31 had a confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy, while 139 did not. Among these 170 women, 86 had chronic hypertension, and 100 developed PE. There were no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics and gestational outcomes between the groups. The dynamics of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio were similar regardless of COVID-19. Cesarean delivery was the most common delivery method in both groups, and there was a high rate of preterm births. No neonatal or maternal deaths were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that pregnant women with hypertensive disorders who have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and subsequently infected show comparable maternal and perinatal outcomes and PE biomarker levels to those who were not infected. These results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is protective for pregnant women, potentially reducing the association with a PE-like syndrome in severe cases of COVID-19 among those who are unvaccinated.

High rates of placental inflammation among samples collected by the Multi-Omics for Mothers and Infants consortium

BACKGROUND

The Multi-Omics for Mothers and Infants consortium aims to improve birth outcomes. Preterm birth is a major obstetrical complication globally and causes significant infant and childhood morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed placental samples (basal plate, placenta or chorionic villi, and the chorionic plate) collected by the 5 Multi-Omics for Mothers and Infants sites, namely The Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement Bangladesh, The Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement Pakistan, The Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement Tanzania, The Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth Bangladesh, and The Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth Zambia. The goal was to analyze the morphology and gene expression of samples collected from preterm and uncomplicated term births.

STUDY DESIGN

The teams provided biopsies from 166 singleton preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) and 175 term (≥37 weeks' gestation) deliveries. The samples were fixed in formalin and paraffin embedded. Tissue sections from these samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and subjected to morphologic analyses. Other placental biopsies (n=35 preterm, 21 term) were flash frozen, which enabled RNA purification for bulk transcriptomics.

RESULTS

The morphologic analyses revealed a surprisingly high rate of inflammation that involved the basal plate, placenta or chorionic villi, and the chorionic plate. The rate of inflammation in chorionic villus samples, likely attributable to chronic villitis, ranged from 25% (Pakistan site) to 60% (Zambia site) of cases. Leukocyte infiltration in this location vs in the basal plate or chorionic plate correlated with preterm birth. Our transcriptomic analyses identified 267 genes that were differentially expressed between placentas from preterm vs those from term births (123 upregulated, 144 downregulated). Mapping the differentially expressed genes onto single-cell RNA sequencing data from human placentas suggested that all the component cell types, either singly or in subsets, contributed to the observed dysregulation. Consistent with the histopathologic findings, gene ontology analyses highlighted the presence of leukocyte infiltration or activation and inflammatory responses in both the fetal and maternal compartments.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between placental inflammation and preterm birth is appreciated in developed countries. In this study, we showed that this link also exists in developing geographies. In addition, among the participating sites, we found geographic- and population-based differences in placental inflammation and preterm birth, suggesting the importance of local factors.

Collaborative Real-World Evidence Among Regulators: Lessons and Perspectives

The International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA), comprising 38 global medicines regulatory authorities, collaborates on shared challenges, notably during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article focuses on the ICMRA COVID-19 Real-World Evidence (RWE) and Observational Studies Working Group. The Working Group aimed to address challenges related to RWE and observational studies during the pandemic, resulting in impactful studies and ICMRA statements on international collaboration for RWE and COVID-19 vaccine safety. Reflecting on 3 years of collaboration, the Working Group surveyed members for insights, and recommendations were formulated to enhance research preparedness, collaboration, and response to future public health emergencies. The lessons learned highlight the importance of global collaborations, governance structures for rapid decision-making, and effective utilization of existing networks. Recommendations include the establishment of an international governance structure, a "coalition of the willing" for swift research collaboration, dedicated sub-groups, periodic workshops, common protocols, joint timelines, and data model templates, leveraging existing infrastructure, and strengthening outreach for transparency and engagement. The Working Group envisions repurposing into an RWE strategic and operational entity, contributing to global public health emergency response mechanisms. In conclusion, the Working Group's success lies in effective communication, collaborative research, and leveraging existing infrastructure, with ongoing contributions to global emergency response mechanisms.

Risk of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study based on infected mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to global public health, especially for pregnant women and their offspring. However, little is known about the impact of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on neonatal outcomes, particularly in the context of coexisting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods

Hospitalized pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were retrospectively enrolled between November 2022 and January 2023, and matched with pregnant subjects free of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on their propensity scores. All women were tested for SARS-CoV-2 upon admission as part of routine procedures, then divided into groups of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and GDM (SARS2+GDM), pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection but without GDM (SARS2+noGDM), and pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection or GDM (Normal group). A logistic regression model was used to study the risk of GDM, perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection, and their interaction on neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results

Of 378 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the neonatal infection rate was higher in the GDM group as compared to the SARS-CoV-2 infection only group, but both SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were lower than that of the normal control group. Logistic regression analysis identified an interaction between maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection and GDM on neonatal infection, where maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.22-0.44) and vaccination for anti-SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.50-0.98) were associated with lower odds of neonatal infection, while higher pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10) and GDM (OR = 1.97, 95%CI: 1.21-3.21) were associated with higher odds of neonatal infection.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that the coexistence of GDM and perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an increased probability of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Risk of Hearing Loss in Neonates and Toddlers with in Utero Exposure to SARS-CoV-2

OBJECTIVE

Given the prevalence of neonatal hearing loss (HL) associated with intrauterine viral exposures, the goal of this study is to provide information on neonatal HL in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Data were drawn from the COVID-19 Mother Baby Outcomes (COMBO) Initiative. 1007 participants completed the newborn hearing screen as part of routine clinical care (COMBO-EHR cohort) and 555 completed the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) at 2 and/or 3 years of age for research purposes (COMBO-RSCH cohort). Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection status during pregnancy was determined through electronic health records and maternal-reported questionnaires.

RESULTS

In adjusted multivariate logistic regression models covarying for newborn age at assessment, mode of delivery, and gestational age at delivery, there was no significant association between intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 exposure and newborn hearing screening failure (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.39-2.42, p = 0.91) in the COMBO-EHR cohort. In the COMBO-RSCH cohort, there were similar non-significant associations between intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and maternal-reported concern for HL on the NSCH (OR = 1.19 [95% CI = 0.30-4.24], p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

There is no association between intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and failed hearing screen in neonates. Similarly, based on the NSCH, there is no association between intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and maternal-reported concern for hearing in toddlers. These results offer reassurance given the widespread nature of this pandemic with tens of millions of fetuses having a history of intrauterine exposure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 135:385-392, 2025.

Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission in COVID-19-Infected Pregnant Women Using Machine Learning

Background: The rapid onset of COVID-19 placed immense strain on many already overstretched healthcare systems. The unique physiological changes in pregnancy, amplified by the complex effects of COVID-19 in pregnant women, rendered prioritization of infected expectant mothers more challenging. This work aims to use state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to predict whether a COVID-19-infected pregnant woman will be admitted to ICU (Intensive Care Unit). Methods: A retrospective study using data from COVID-19-infected women admitted to one hospital in Astana and one in Shymkent, Kazakhstan, from May to July 2021. The developed machine learning platform implements and compares the performance of eight binary classifiers, including Gaussian naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression with L2 regularization, random forest, AdaBoost, gradient boosting, eXtreme gradient boosting, and linear discriminant analysis. Results: Data from 1292 pregnant women with COVID-19 were analyzed. Of them, 10.4% were admitted to ICU. Logistic regression with L2 regularization achieved the highest F1-score during the model selection phase while achieving an AUC of 0.84 on the test set during the evaluation stage. Furthermore, the feature importance analysis conducted by calculating Shapley Additive Explanation values points to leucocyte counts, C-reactive protein, pregnancy week, and eGFR and hemoglobin as the most important features for predicting ICU admission. Conclusions: The predictive model obtained here may be an efficient support tool for prioritizing care of COVID-19-infected pregnant women in clinical practice.

Clinical Maternal and Neonatal Features in COVID-19 Infected Pregnancies in Tianjin, China

Purpose

Outbreak of COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a global pandemic, leading to over 6 million deaths worldwide. Pregnant women suffer from a higher risk facing the pandemic COVID-19, while their related clinical information is limited.

Methods

The clinical information of SARS-CoV-2 positive (n = 30) and negative pregnant women (n = 134) in Tianjin First Central Hospital (from November 30, 2022, to January 20, 2023) were collected. All statistical analyses were conducted in R language, employing t test or Chi-square test methods.

Results

Significantly higher heart rate, temperature, and intrapartum hemorrhage were observed in positive pregnant women, besides fetal placentation grading, umbilical cord around the neck, cardiac B-scan ultrasound, and ultrasonic examination of lower limb vessels were significantly differential between positive and negative individuals. As for coagulation test, significantly higher activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), Thrombin Time (TT), and D-dimer (DD2) were found in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. Liver function test results indicated that six indicators were significantly differential between positive and negative individuals.

Conclusion

Compared to negative pregnant women, significantly abnormal liver function and coagulopathy were observed in positive patients. As the unique vulnerable population, SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women should be payed more attention in clinical practice.

Trimester and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy has been linked with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). The aim of this study was to examine how both trimester and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection impact HDP.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals during pregnancy (n = 205) and examined the association between trimester and severity of infection with incidence of HDP using modified Poisson regression models to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We stratified the analysis of trimester by severity to understand the role of timing of infection among those with similar symptomatology and also examined timing of infection as a continuous variable.

RESULTS

Compared to a reference cohort from 2018, SARS-CoV-2 infection did not largely increase the risk of HDP (RR: 1.17; CI:0.90, 1.51), but a non-statistically significant higher risk of preeclampsia was observed (RR: 1.33; CI:0.89, 1.98), in our small sample. Among the SARS-CoV-2 cohort, severity was linked with risk of HDP, with infections requiring hospitalization increasing the risk of HDP compared to asymptomatic/mild infections. Trimester of infection was not associated with risk of HDP, but a slight decline in the risk of HDP was observed with later gestational week of infection. Among patients with asymptomatic or mild symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 in the first trimester conferred a higher risk of HDP compared to the third trimester (RR: 1.70; CI:0.77, 3.77), although estimates were imprecise.

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy may increase the risk of HDP compared to infection later in pregnancy.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes and clinical laboratory testing of pregnant women with COVID-19 during the BA.5.2/BF.7 surge

The impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women and newborns continues to be a critical societal concern. However, the majority of research focuses on the disease resulting from the early pandemic variants, without sufficient study on the more recent BA.5.2/BF.7. We retrospectively recruited pregnant women giving birth during the surge of the BA.5.2/BF.7 and analysed the risk impact of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Furthermore, subjects matched through propensity scores were used for the analysis of clinical laboratory tests. A total of 818 pregnant women were enrolled, among 276 (33.7%) were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 during childbirth. COVID-19 significantly increased the risk of a hospital length of stay equal to or greater than seven days and neonatal admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, with an aHR of 2.03 (95% CI, 1.22-3.38) and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.12-2.03), respectively. In the analysis of 462 matched subjects, it was found that subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 tended slight leucopenia and coagulation abnormalities. We found that during the surge of the BA.5.2/BF.7, COVID-19 increased the risk of maternal and neonatal outcomes among Chinese pregnant women. This finding offers significant insights to guide clinical practices involving pregnant women infected with the recently emerged Omicron subvariants.

Intrapartum and 30-Day Postpartum Complications in Patients With Antenatal COVID-19 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective: The study was aimed at comparing intrapartum and postpartum outcomes between pregnant patients with and without antenatal COVID-19 infection using aggregated, deidentified electronic health record (EHR) data. Design and Setting: This retrospective cohort study included data from over 80 health care organizations within the TriNetX Analytics Research Network. Population: Individuals admitted for delivery from Jan 2020 to May 2023 were studied. Methods: We studied individuals with ICD-10 codes for delivery, COVID-19 diagnosis, and primary outcomes. We compared the incidence of adverse intrapartum and 30-day postpartum outcomes in those with and without antenatal COVID-19. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcomes compared were obstetric, cardiovascular, neurovascular, and respiratory outcomes within 30 days postpartum. Results: Twenty-six thousand nine hundred seventy-four of 369,923 (7%) birthing parents with a delivery encounter had an antenatal COVID-19 diagnosis. Compared to matched controls, having COVID-19 was associated with an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage (RR-1.24 (CI-1.16-1.33)), gestational hypertension (RR-1.27 (CI-1.27-1.34)), preeclampsia (RR-1.25 (CI-1.18-1.32)), eclampsia (RR-1.66 (CI-1.29-2.32)), preterm labor (RR-1.21 (CI-1.21-1.34)), cerebral infarction (RR-1.74 (CI-1.04-2.90)), cardiomyopathy (RR-2.08 (CI-1.30-3.32)), heart failure (RR-1.55 (CI-1.04-2.31)), sepsis (RR-2.21 (CI-1.54-3.19)), DVT (RR-2.32 (CI-1.45-3.71)), and pulmonary embolism (RR-2.68 (CI-1.74-2.90)). Conclusion: Individuals with antenatal COVID-19 were more likely to have intrapartum and postpartum obstetric, cardiovascular, neurovascular, and respiratory complications. This data will inform risk stratification and screening for prenatal care providers.

Vaccine decision-making among pregnant women: a protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-method study in Brazil, Ghana, Kenya and Pakistan

Maternal immunization is a critical strategy to prevent both maternal and infant morbidity and mortality from several infectious diseases. When the first COVID-19 vaccines became available during the pandemic, there was mixed messaging and confusion amongst the broader public and among those associated with health care systems about the recommendations for COVID-19 vaccinations in pregnancy in many countries. A multi-country, mixed-methods study is being undertaken to describe how vaccine decision-making occurs amongst pregnant and postpartum women, with a focus on COVID-19 vaccines. The study is being conducted in Brazil, Ghana, Kenya, and Pakistan. In each country, participants are being recruited from either 2 or 3 maternity hospitals and/or clinics that represent a diverse population in terms of socio-economic and urban/rural status. Data collection includes cross-sectional surveys in pregnant women and semi-structured in-depth interviews with both pregnant and postpartum women. The instruments were designed to identify attitudinal, behavioral, and social correlates of vaccine uptake during and after pregnancy, including the decision-making process related to COVID-19 vaccines, and constructs such as risk perception, self-efficacy, vaccine intentions, and social norms. The aim is to recruit 400 participants for the survey and 50 for the interviews in each country. Qualitative data will be analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, latent variable analysis, and prediction modelling. Both the quantitative and qualitative data will be used to explore differences in attitudes and behaviors around maternal immunization across pregnancy trimesters and the postpartum period among and within countries. Each country has planned dissemination activities to share the study findings with relevant stakeholders in the communities from which the data is collected and to conduct country-specific secondary analyses.

Transplacental Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Narrative Review

Background and Objectives: The study aims to explore the potential for transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2, focusing on its pathophysiology, placental defense mechanisms, and the clinical implications for maternal and neonatal health. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive review of the current literature was conducted, analyzing studies on SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, the expression of key viral receptors (ACE2 and TMPRSS2) in placental cells, and the immune responses involved in placental defense. The review also examined the clinical outcomes related to maternal and neonatal health, including adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal infection. Results: The expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the placenta supports the biological plausibility of SARS-CoV-2 transplacental transmission. Histopathological findings from the infected placentas reveal inflammation, vascular changes, and the evidence of viral particles in placental tissues. Clinical reports indicate an increased risk of preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, and neonatal infection in pregnancies affected by COVID-19. However, the frequency and mechanisms of vertical transmission remain variable across studies, highlighting the need for standardized research protocols. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 can potentially infect placental cells, leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal infection. While evidence of transplacental transmission has been documented, the risk and mechanisms are not fully understood. Ongoing research is essential to clarify these aspects and inform obstetric care practices to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A Brighton Collaboration standardized template with key considerations for a benefit-risk assessment for the Comirnaty COVID-19 mRNA vaccine

The Brighton Collaboration Benefit-Risk Assessment of VAccines by TechnolOgy (BRAVATO) Working Group evaluates the safety and other key features of new platform technology vaccines, including nucleic acid (RNA and DNA) vaccines. This manuscript uses the BRAVATO template to report the key considerations for a benefit-risk assessment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA-based vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®, or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) including the subsequent Original/Omicron BA.1, Original/Omicron BA.4-5 and Omicron XBB.1.5 variant-adapted vaccines developed by BioNTech and Pfizer to protect against COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Initial Emergency Use Authorizations or conditional Marketing Authorizations for the original BNT162b2 vaccine were granted based upon a favorable benefit-risk assessment taking into account clinical safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy data, which was subsequently reconfirmed for younger age groups, and by real world evidence data. In addition, the favorable benefit-risk assessment was maintained for the bivalent vaccines, developed against newly arising SARS-CoV-2 variants, with accumulating clinical trial data.

Set aside-A qualitative study of partners' experiences of pregnancy, labour, and postnatal care in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Due to changes in Swedish maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic, partners were often excluded from antenatal and postnatal care.

AIM

To explore partners' experiences of pregnancy, labour, and postnatal care in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative interview study with 15 partners of women who gave birth from March 2020 to March 2022. Data was collected from April to November 2022, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

FINDINGS

Two themes and six subthemes were identified. The first theme, Feelings of loss and exclusion, emphasises the expectation and desire to share the journey of becoming a parent together with the pregnant partner. When excluded from maternity care, a feeling of missing out was described which could create a sense of distance from the unborn child. The second theme, Dealing with powerlessness, relates to the fear of infection and not being able to participate during the birth, and life being adapted to restrictions. Mixed feelings regarding the restrictions were described since the reasons behind were not always perceived as clear and logical.

DISCUSSION

Sweden prides itself on gender equality, where partners normally are a natural part of maternity care. This likely contributed to strong feelings of exclusion when partners were prevented from participating in maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Partners of women giving birth during the COVID-19 pandemic were substantially affected by the restrictions within maternity care. Partners wish to be involved in pregnancy and birth and want to receive clear information as part of their preparation for parenthood. Society-including maternity care-must decide how to address these needs.

Did we observe changes in obstetric interventions in SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women at the beginning of COVID-pandemic in Belgium? Results of a nationwide population-based study

Background

Pregnant women are more vulnerable to the severe effects of COVID-19 compared to their non-pregnant peers. Early in the pandemic, there was a rise in cesarean deliveries and preterm births among infected pregnant women. This study aims to evaluate whether there were any changes in obstetric interventions during the first two waves of the pandemic in Belgium.

Methods

Between March 2020 and February 2021, the Belgian Obstetric Surveillance System (B.OSS) conducted an extensive, nationwide population-based registry study, that included nearly all births to women with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within six weeks before hospitalization in Belgium. The perinatal outcomes of these women were analyzed and compared with pre-pandemic regional perinatal data.

Results

A total of 923 SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women were admitted to the hospital; 9.3 % were hospitalized for severe COVID-19, while the remaining were hospitalized for obstetric reasons. Infected women had a higher median BMI, a higher incidence of diabetes, and a greater proportion were overweight or obese compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). While the majority of women gave birth vaginally, symptomatic women and those with a severe infection had slightly higher rates of cesarean delivery, though not statistically significant after adjusting for confounders. Only severely ill women had an increased risk of preterm delivery (aOR 2.3; 95 %CI [1.2-2.5]; p = 0.02) and of induced labor (OR 1.8; 95 %CI [1.1-2.8]; p = 0.01). The use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery was more common in the infected group (OR 2.6; 95 %CI [1.6-4.1]; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Obstetric interventions, such as cesarean delivery and induction, remained at pre-pandemic levels. However, a SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to have increased medically induced preterm delivery and the use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Factors associated with COVID-19 death in pregnant women hospitalized in Intensive Care Units

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the factors associated with COVID-19 death in pregnant women hospitalized in Intensive Care Units in Brazil.

METHODS

this ecological study was conducted using secondary data from Brazilian pregnant women with COVID-19 hospitalized in Intensive Care Units between March 2020 and March 2022. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were employed.

RESULTS

out of 3,547 pregnant women with COVID-19 hospitalized in Intensive Care Units, 811 died (22.8%). It was found that lack of COVID-19 vaccination (OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.83; 4.04), dyspnea (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.17; 2.56), obesity (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.05; 2.17), chronic cardiovascular disease (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.14; 2.38), and non-white race/color (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.00; 1.66) were independently and significantly associated with death.

CONCLUSIONS

it is concluded that vaccination status, presence of comorbidities, and clinical and ethnic-racial characteristics are associated with COVID-19 death in pregnant women hospitalized in Intensive Care Units in Brazil.

Maternal-Fetal Transfer of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Amniotic Fluid: Insights from Maternal Vaccination and COVID-19 Infection

Objectives: As the COVID-19 pandemic wanes, understanding maternal-fetal antibody transfer remains crucial for optimizing vaccination strategies. This study evaluates anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in amniotic fluid following maternal BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination and/or COVID-19 infection during early pregnancy, focusing on the first and second trimesters. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital, involving 149 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG levels were measured in amniotic fluid samples. Participants were categorized based on vaccination and infection status: vaccine-only, infection-only, vaccine + infection, and no vaccine/infection. Correlations between antibody levels and the time since vaccination or infection were analyzed. Results: The vaccine + infection group had a higher proportion of positive antibody levels compared to the vaccine-only group (63.6% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.029). Median SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were significantly higher in the vaccine + infection group (283.0 AU/mL) than in the vaccine-only group (64.1 AU/mL, p = 0.006). Women who received three vaccine doses had higher antibody levels and more positive antibody rates compared to those with one or two doses. A significant negative correlation was found between antibody levels and the interval since the last vaccine dose or infection. Conclusions: Our results indicate the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the amniotic fluid, reflecting antibody transfer during early pregnancy. However, a noticeable decrease in immunity was observed, as indicated by declining amniotic fluid antibody levels over time. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing and number of boosters required to protect against new variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Peripartum Infections: A Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine

This position statement reviews the evidence and rationale for the management of severe peripartum infections with a special focus on tropical infections and is tailored for resource-limited settings.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Samavedam S, Sodhi K, Anand P, Bajwa SJS, Karnad DR, Karanth S, et al. Peripartum Infections: A Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S92-S103.

Assessing the Impact of Hematological Changes in Pregnancy on Maternal and Fetal Death: A Narrative Review

Hematological changes during pregnancy encompass a wide range of alterations in blood composition and function, including variations in hemoglobin levels, red blood cell count, and coagulation factors. These changes can be physiological or pathological and may significantly impact maternal and fetal health outcomes. This narrative review examines the relationship between various hematological changes and disorders during pregnancy and their effects on maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. We explore conditions such as anemia, sickle cell disease, thrombophilia, and blood-borne infections like malaria, as well as the impact of multiple pregnancies on hematological parameters. The review also discusses the effects of COVID-19 on maternal hematology. Key findings include the high prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with these conditions, including early miscarriages, preterm birth, low birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction, and increased risk of maternal complications. The importance of early screening, diagnosis, and appropriate management of hematological disorders during pregnancy is emphasized. This review highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach to managing pregnant women with hematological changes to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes.

Preeclampsia in the Context of COVID-19: Mechanisms, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Outcomes

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to the global COVID-19 pandemic, significantly impacting the health of pregnant women. Obstetric populations, already vulnerable, face increased morbidity and mortality related to COVID-19, aggravated by preexisting comorbidities. Recent studies have shed light on the potential correlation between COVID-19 and preeclampsia (PE), a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity worldwide, emphasizing the significance of exploring the relationship between these two conditions. Here, we review the pathophysiological similarities that PE shares with COVID-19, with a particular focus on severe COVID-19 cases and in PE-like syndrome cases related with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We highlight cellular and molecular mechanistic inter-connectivity between these two conditions, for example, regulation of renin-angiotensin system, tight junction and barrier integrity, and the complement system. Finally, we discuss how COVID-19 pandemic dynamics, including the emergence of variants and vaccination efforts, has shaped the clinical scenario and influenced the severity and management of both COVID-19 and PE. Continued research on the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and the potential risk of developing PE from previous infections is warranted to delineate the complexities of COVID-19 and PE interactions and to improve clinical management of both conditions.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection during Delivery Causes Histopathological Changes in the Placenta

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 can damage human placentas, leading to pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia and premature birth. This study investigates the histopathological changes found in COVID-19-affected placentas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 23 placentas from patients with active COVID-19 during delivery and 22 samples from patients without COVID-19 infection in their medical history. The samples underwent histopathological examination for pathology, such as trophoblast necrosis, signs of vessel damage, or fetal vascular malperfusion.

RESULTS

Newborns from the research group have lower weights and Apgar scores than healthy newborns. In the COVID-19 group, calcifications and collapsed intervillous space were more frequent, and inflammation was more severe than in the healthy group. At the same time, the placenta of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients showed signs of accelerated vascular maturation. Trophoblast necrosis was found only in the placentas of the research group. The expression of CD68+ was elevated in the COVID-19 cohort, suggesting that macrophages constituted a significant part of the inflammatory infiltrate. The increase in lymphocyte B markers was associated with placental infarctions, while high levels of CD3+, specific for cytotoxic T lymphocytes, correlated with vascular injury.

CONCLUSIONS

SARS-CoV-2 is associated with pathological changes in the placenta, including trophoblast necrosis, calcification, and accelerated villous maturation. Those changes appear to be driven by T cells and macrophages, whose increased expression reflects ongoing histiocytic intervillositis in the placenta.

Eighteen-Month Outcomes Among Pregnant and Nonpregnant Reproductive-Aged People Hospitalized for Coronavirus Disease 2019

Background

Physiologic and immunologic adaptations in pregnancy may increase the risk of adverse outcomes from respiratory viral infections. However, data are limited on longer-term outcomes after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnancy prior to widespread vaccine availability.

Methods

Using electronic health record data, we retrospectively compared 6-, 12-, and 18-month outcomes including death and rehospitalization between pregnant and nonpregnant reproductive-aged individuals hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection between 2020 and 2021 at 2 academic referral hospitals.

Results

There were 190 nonpregnant and 70 pregnant participants. Mean age was 31 years for pregnant and 34 years for nonpregnant participants. For pregnant patients, mean gestational age at coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis was 36 weeks, 54% delivered by cesarean, and 97% delivered a live birth. Compared to pregnant participants, nonpregnant participants had a higher prevalence of baseline comorbidities and a higher proportion received mechanical ventilation (84% vs 55%). Index hospitalization complications (31% vs 17%) and mortality (3% vs 0%) were more common in nonpregnant participants. Over 18 months following index hospitalization, 39 (21%) nonpregnant and 5 (7%) pregnant participants were readmitted, most for infection (28/44 [64%]). Most readmissions occurred within 6 months. There were no posthospitalization deaths in the pregnant group.

Conclusions

Pregnant people with severe COVID-19 disease had a low rate of severe adverse outcomes after index hospitalization. The low readmission rate is reassuring that pregnant individuals may not be at higher risk for long-term severe adverse health outcomes after COVID-19 compared to the nonpregnant reproductive-aged population, possibly because any increased risk conferred by pregnancy resolves soon after delivery.

Association between acquiring SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: RECOVER electronic health record cohort analysis

Background

Little is known about post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) after acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. We aimed to evaluate the association between acquiring SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy compared with acquiring SARS-CoV-2 outside of pregnancy and the development of PASC.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study from the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative Patient-Centred Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) used electronic health record (EHR) data from 19 U.S. health systems. Females aged 18-49 years with lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 2020 through June 2022 were included. Validated algorithms were used to identify pregnancies with a delivery at >20 weeks' gestation. The primary outcome was PASC, as previously defined by computable phenotype in the adult non-pregnant PCORnet EHR dataset, identified 30-180 days post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes were the 24 component diagnoses contributing to the PASC phenotype definition. Univariable comparisons were made for baseline characteristics between individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired during pregnancy compared with outside of pregnancy. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for baseline differences, the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired during pregnancy and the selected outcomes was modelled. The incident risk is reported as the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals.

Findings

In total, 83,915 females with SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired outside of pregnancy and 5397 females with SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired during pregnancy were included in analysis. Non-pregnant females with SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to be older and have comorbid health conditions. SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired in pregnancy as compared with acquired outside of pregnancy was associated with a lower incidence of PASC (25.5% vs 33.9%; aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.91). SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired in pregnant females was associated with increased risk for some PASC component diagnoses including abnormal heartbeat (aHR 1.67, 95% CI 1.43-1.94), abdominal pain (aHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.16-1.55), and thromboembolism (aHR 1.88, 95% CI 1.17-3.04), but decreased risk for other diagnoses including malaise (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.27-0.47), pharyngitis (aHR 0.36, 95% CI 0.26-0.48) and cognitive problems (aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.56).

Interpretation

SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired during pregnancy was associated with lower risk of development of PASC at 30-180 days after incident SARS-CoV-2 infection in this nationally representative sample. These findings may be used to counsel pregnant and pregnant capable individuals, and direct future prospective study.

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) OT2HL16184.

Hybrid Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 During Pregnancy Provides More Durable Infant Antibody Responses Compared to Natural Infection Alone

BACKGROUND

Hybrid immunity (infection plus vaccination) may increase maternally derived SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses and durability versus infection alone.

METHODS

Prospective cohort of pregnant participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (anti-nucleocapsid IgG, RT-PCR, or antigen positive) and their infants had blood collected in pregnancy, at delivery/birth, and postpartum tested for anti-spike (anti-S) IgG and neutralizing antibodies (neutAb).

RESULTS

Among 107 participants at enrollment, 40% were unvaccinated and 60% were vaccinated (received ≥1 dose); 102 had previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy (median, 19 weeks' gestation); 5 were diagnosed just prior to pregnancy (median, 8 weeks). At delivery, fewer unvaccinated participants (87% anti-S IgG+, 86% neutAb) and their infants (86% anti-S IgG+, 75% neutAb) had anti-S IgG+ or neutAb compared to vaccinated participants and their infants (100%, P ≤ .01 for all). By 3-6 months postpartum, 50% of infants of unvaccinated participants were anti-S IgG+ and 14% had neutAb, versus 100% among infants of vaccinated participants (all P < .01), with lower median antibody responses (anti-S IgG log10 1.95 vs 3.84 AU/mL, P < .01; neutAb log10 1:1.34 vs 1:3.20, P = .11).

CONCLUSIONS

In pregnant people with prior SARS-CoV-2, vaccination before delivery provided more durable maternally derived antibody responses than infection alone in infants through 6 months.

COVID-19 therapeutics for the pregnant patient

SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause severe disease among pregnant persons. Pregnant persons were not included in initial studies of therapeutics for COVID-19, but cumulative experience demonstrates that most are safe for pregnant persons and the fetus, and effective for prevention or treatment of severe COVID-19.

Does weight influence the course of RSV bronchiolitis in hospitalized infants?

Acute bronchiolitis is among the most common causes of hospitalizations in infants worldwide. Associations between weight and severity of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate this association. A single-center, retrospective cohort study of infants aged under 24 months, who were hospitalized between 2018 and 2022 for RSV bronchiolitis. Data from computerized medical records were extracted using the MDclone platform. Participants were divided into three groups according to weight percentiles: underweight (below 5th percentile), normal-weight, and overweight (above 85th percentile). A total of 1936 infants (mean age 6.3 months, 55% males) were included, comprising 274 infants who were underweight, 1470 with normal weight, and 192 with overweight. Underweight infants had a higher rate of admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (9.1% vs. 3.5%, P < 0.005) and prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the hospital (3.13 vs. 2.79 days P < 0.001) compared to those with normal weight. Hyponatremia was also more common in the underweight group (23% vs. 15%, P < 0.001). A multivariable model accounting for prematurity and birthweight predicted a relative risk of 2.01 (95% CI 1.13-3.48, P = 0.015) for PICU admission and 1.42 (95% CI 1.17-1.7, P < 0.001) for a prolonged LOS. Being overweight was not associated with a more severe disease.  Conclusion: Underweight infants, hospitalized for RSV bronchiolitis, had a more severe disease course with a higher complication rate, including PICU admission and prolonged LOS. Thus, careful attention and supervision should be given to this subgroup of infants. What is Known: • Established risk factors for severe bronchiolitis include prematurity, BPD, CHD, and compromised immunity. • Abnormal weight status has been associated with an increased risk for morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases, proposedly due to the effects on endocrine and immunologic systems. What is New: • Underweight infants hospitalized with RSV bronchiolitis face an independent risk of PICU admission and prolonged hospital stay. • Conversely, overweight infants did not display associations with severity measures in our study.

[Pregnant women with COVID-19 ARDS on the intensive care unit]

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk of severe disease progression. Comorbidities, such as chronic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, advanced maternal age and high body mass index, may predispose to severe disease. The management of pregnant COVID-19 patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and requires careful consideration of maternal, fetal and ethical issues.

OBJECTIVE

Description and discussion of intensive care treatment strategies and perinatal anesthesiological management in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the demographic data, maternal medical history, clinical intensive care management, complications, indications and management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and infant survival of all pregnant patients treated for severe CARDS in the anesthesiological ICU of a German university hospital between March and November 2021.

RESULTS

The cohort included 9 patients with a mean age of 30.3 years (range 26-40 years). The gestational age ranged from 21 + 3 weeks to 37 + 2 weeks. None of the patients had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV‑2. Of the nine patients seven were immigrants and communication was hampered by inadequate Central European language skills. Of the patients five had a PaO2/FiO2 index < 150 mm Hg despite escalated invasive ventilation (FiO2 > 0.9 and a positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] of 14 mbar) and were therefore treated with repeated prolonged prone positioning maneuvers (5-14 prone positions for 16 h each, a total of 47 prone positioning treatments) and 2 required treatment with inhaled nitric oxide and venovenous ECMO. The most common complications were bacterial superinfection of the lungs, urinary tract infection and delirium. All the women and five neonates survived. All newborns were delivered by cesarean section, two patients were discharged home with an intact pregnancy and two intrauterine fetal deaths were observed. None of the newborns tested positive for SARS-CoV‑2 at birth.

CONCLUSION

High survival rates are possible in pregnant patients with CARDS. The peripartum management of pregnant women with CARDS requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and should prioritize maternal survival in early pregnancy. In our experience, prolonged prone positioning, an essential evidence-based cornerstone in the treatment of ARDS, can also be safely used in advanced stages of pregnancy. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and ECMO should be considered as life-saving treatment options for carefully selected patients. For cesarean section, neuraxial anesthesia can be safely performed in patients with mild CARDS if well planned but the therapeutic anticoagulation recommended for COVID-19 may increase the risk of bleeding complications, making general anesthesia a more viable alternative, especially in severe disease.

Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy-A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Available data on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and pregnancy outcomes mostly refer to women contracting the infection during advanced pregnancy or close to delivery. There is limited information on the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy and outcomes thereof.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We aimed to systematically review the maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy, defined as <20 weeks of gestation (PROSPERO Registration 2020 CRD42020177673). Searches were carried out in PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from January 2020 until April 2023 and the WHO database of publications on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from December 2019 to April 2023. Cohort and case-control studies on COVID-19 occurring in early pregnancy that reported data on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes were included. Case reports and studies reporting only exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or not stratifying outcomes based on gestational age were excluded. Data were extracted in duplicate. Meta-analyses were conducted when appropriate, using R meta (R version 4.0.5).

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies, 12 retrospective and six prospective, were included in this review, reporting on 10 147 SARS-CoV-2-positive women infected in early pregnancy, 9533 neonates, and 180 882 SARS-CoV-2 negative women. The studies had low to moderate risk of bias according to the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment Scale. The studies showed significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity. A meta-analysis could be performed only on the outcome miscarriage rate, with a pooled random effect odds ratio of 1.44 (95% confidence interval 0.96-2.18), showing no statistical difference in miscarriage in SARS-CoV-2-infected women. Individual studies reported increased incidences of stillbirth, low birthweight and preterm birth among neonates born to mothers affected by COVID-19 in early pregnancy; however, these results were not consistent among all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In this comprehensive systematic review of available evidence, we identified no statistically significant adverse association between SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy (before 20 weeks of gestation) and fetal, neonatal, or maternal outcomes. However, a 44% increase in miscarriage rate is concerning and further studies of larger sample size are needed to confirm or refute our findings.

Brief report: Effect of cardiac multi-morbidity on COVID hospitalization outcomes

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has stretched healthcare resources thin and led to significant morbidity and mortality. There have been no studies utilizing national data to investigate the role of cardiac risk factors on outcomes of COVID hospitalizations. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of cardiac multimorbidity on healthcare utilization and outcomes among COVID hospitalizations during the first year of the pandemic.

METHODS

Using the national inpatient sample (NIS), we identified all adult hospital admissions with a primary diagnosis of COVID in 2020, using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes (ICD010-CM). Coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, previous stroke, and atrial fibrillation were then identified as cardiac comorbidities using ICD-10-CM codes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of cardiac multimorbidity on mortality and mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

We identified 1,005,040 primary COVID admissions in 2020. Of these admissions, 216,545 (20.6%) had CAD, 413,195 (39.4%) had DM, 176,780 (16.8%) had HF, 159,700 (15.2%) had AF, 30735 (2.9%) had PVD, and 25,155 (2.4%) had a previous stroke. When stratified by number of comorbidities, 428390 (40.8%) had 0 comorbidities, 354960 (33.8%) had 1, 161225 (15.4%) had 2, and 105465 (10.0%) had 3+ comorbidities. COVID hospitalizations with higher cardiac multimorbidity had higher mortality rates (p<0.001) higher MV rates (p<0.001). In our multivariable regression, these associations remained with increasing odds for mortality with each stepwise increase in cardiac multimorbidity (1: OR 1.48 (1.45-1.50); 2: OR 2.13 (2.09-2.17); 3+: OR 2.43 (2.38-2.48), p<0.001, all).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first national examination of the impact of cardiac comorbidities on COVID outcomes. A higher number of cardiac comorbidities was associated with significantly higher rates of MV and in-hospital mortality, independent of age. Future, more granular, and longitudinal studies are needed to further examine these associations.

Maternal and Newborn Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 and Pregnancy: Parallels and Contrasts with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Purpose of Review

Our review aims to compare and contrast Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19's impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. We have made significant progress in Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome prevention and treatment over the last few decades. Drawing on empirical evidence with past public health crises can offer valuable insights into dealing with current and future pandemics. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct a comparative analysis of the resemblances and disparities existing between Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19.This research endeavor represents a pioneering and all-encompassing examination, aiming to discern and comprehend the parallels and contrasts in the respective impacts of SARS-CoV-2 and Human Immunodeficiency Virus on pregnancy.

Recent Findings

Based on the current evidence, there is no indication that pregnancy increases women's susceptibility to acquiring Human Immunodeficiency Virus or SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, the state of being pregnant was correlated with the worsening of diseases and their progression. Both Human Immunodeficiency Virus and SARS-CoV-2 pose increased risks of maternal mortality and several obstetric complications, including premature birth and pre-eclampsia. While the vertical transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus is well-established, a comprehensive understanding of the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 remains elusive, emphasizing the need for further investigations. Initial data suggest low SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission rates in the setting of proper preventative interventions and universal screening. A cesarean delivery could reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected women with high viral loads or poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, it did not offer additional protection for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected women who adhered to Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy or those with COVID-19. Human Immunodeficiency Virus and SARS-CoV-2 were linked to neonatal complications such as stillbirth, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The universal testing of both pregnant patients and neonates is an effective strategy to prevent the spread and complications of both Human Immunodeficiency Virus and SARS-CoV-2. Human Immunodeficiency Virus control largely relies on preventing vertical transmission and medications during pregnancy and postpartum, whereas safety behaviors and vaccines have proven effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmissions.

Summary

This review aims to compare and contrast the impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and SARS-CoV-2 on pregnancy outcomes, vertical transmissions, delivery modalities, neonatal outcomes, and clinical management. SARS-CoV-2 and Human Immunodeficiency Virus were associated with significant obstetric-related complications, making close clinical monitoring and preparation essential. Integration of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 management with reproductive health services is crucial to ensuring maternal and neonatal outcomes. Our review is not only the first to establish a groundwork for the current state of knowledge and its clinical implications on this topic, but it also sheds new insights for future research directions.Comparing Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and SARS-CoV-2 in terms of their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes provides valuable insights despite their differences. Leveraging Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome research can help understand SARS-CoV-2 effects on pregnancy. Both infections pose risks to pregnant individuals and their fetuses, leading to increased maternal mortality and complications. Identifying common patterns and risk factors can improve clinical management for pregnant individuals with SARS-CoV-2. While a direct observational study for this comparison may not be feasible, comparing with Human Immunodeficiency Virus offers an ethical and practical approach. However, specific studies on SARS-CoV-2 are still necessary to gather detailed data on maternal and fetal outcomes.

Fear of giving birth alone: Experiences of psychological distress, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and coping- strategies of childbearing women during COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Psychological distress during pregnancy is a well-documented risk factor for adverse maternal outcomes. Distress related to the COVID-19 pandemic may further increase the vulnerability of pregnant women to negative mental health outcomes.

AIM

To explore the mental health experiences of pregnant women, focusing on mental health outcomes, challenges related to the pandemic, coping strategies, and factors buffering mental health factors during the restricted COVID-19 lockdown period.

METHODS

A mixed-methods survey study was conducted, examining symptoms of anxiety, depression, and burnout among 21 pregnant women. Qualitative data were gathered through open-ended questions about participants' experiences of challenges, coping strategies and buffering factors amid the pandemic. Symptoms of anxiety, depression and burnout were calculated, and qualitative data was thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

Approximately one-third (24 %) of the respondents reported clinically significant levels of depression, 19 % reported clinically significant levels of anxiety, and 43 % reported experiencing burnout. All participants reported distress and emotional burden, including fear, worry, stress and anxiety related to the pandemic. Specific concerns such as fear of giving birth alone, fear of the consequences due to lockdown restrictions, insufficient information, disruption of prenatal healthcare services, and fear of miscarriage were prevalent among the participants. Social support, financial stability, stable relationships, adherence to daily routines, reduced stress and social demands, a calmer daily life, physical activity, and less work-related stress including working from home, emerges as buffering factors that aided women in coping with pandemic-related distress.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare providers should prioritize stability, predictability, and minimizing disruptions to prenatal care. Broad-based screening is crucial to identify women at risk of depression, anxiety, and burnout. Recommendations for clinical pathways aimed at pregnant women are discussed.

Effects of SARS-Cov-2 mRNA vaccine on placental histopathology: Comparison of a population of uncomplicated COVID-19 positive pregnant women

1.

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on placental histopathology in pregnant women, comparing outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated individuals. Despite known adverse pregnancy outcomes linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the specific effects on the placenta remain unclear. Although vaccination has demonstrated a substantial reduction in infection severity, its impact on placental health requires more insight. 2.

METHODS

Between March 2021 and July 2022, 387 COVID-19-positive women were admitted for delivery. Of these, 98 with non-severe symptoms were analyzed: 35 vaccinated during pregnancy, and 63 non-vaccinated. Two independent pathologists evaluated all placental specimens. 3.

RESULTS

The only differing obstetrical characteristic between groups was the mode of delivery (p 0.047), lacking clinical implications. Over 85% of placentas exhibited microscopic abnormalities, predominantly maternal vascular supply disorders (vaccinated 89.1%; unvaccinated 85.5%). Comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups revealed statistically significant differences, notably in increased focal perivillous fibrin deposits (IFPFD) [17.1% vs. 33.3% (p 0.04)] and avascular fibrotic villi (AFV) [0% vs. 11.1% (p 0.04)]. Binomial logistic regression confirmed the vaccine's protective role against IFPFD (aOR 0.36; 95%CI 013-0.99) and AVF (aOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.003-0.98). A sub-analysis in vaccinated women showed a positive correlation between the timing of the first dose and IFPFD presence (p 0.018). 4.

DISCUSSION

The lower incidence of maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion placental features in vaccinated women, coupled with the timing correlation, supports the vaccine's protective effect on placental tissue in COVID-19-infected pregnant patients. Notably, no side effects were reported post-vaccination, emphasizing the vaccine's safety and advocating for its secure administration in pregnant populations.

Statistical primer: individual patient data meta-analysis and meta-analytic approaches in case of non-proportional hazards

Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses build upon traditional (aggregate data) meta-analyses by collecting IPD from the individual studies rather than using aggregated summary data. Although both traditional and IPD meta-analyses produce a summary effect estimate, IPD meta-analyses allow for the analysis of data to be performed as a single dataset. This allows for standardization of exposure, outcomes, and analytic methods across individual studies. IPD meta-analyses also allow the utilization of statistical methods typically used in cohort studies, such as multivariable regression, survival analysis, propensity score matching, uniform subgroup and sensitivity analyses, better management of missing data, and incorporation of unpublished data. However, they are more time-intensive, costly, and subject to participation bias. A separate issue relates to the meta-analytic challenges when the proportional hazards assumption is violated. In these instances, alternative methods of reporting time-to-event estimates, such as restricted mean survival time should be used. This statistical primer summarizes key concepts in both scenarios and provides pertinent examples.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease- 2019 Among Pregnant Women in Saudi Arabia; a Retrospective Study

Background

Pregnancy-related coronavirus disease 2019 infection ranges from asymptomatic to very serious illness. This study aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 infection on pregnant women in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Retrospective observational study of women who had COVID-19 positive test in pregnancy admitted in King Fahd Hospital, Abu Arish General Hospital, and Sabya General Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia during the period between March 2020 and March 2022. Data were extracted from the patient's records. Frequency and percentage distributions were calculated for categorical variables. Descriptive studies and regression analysis were conducted to evaluate the association between selected variables and pregnancy outcomes.

Results

Of the 33 pregnant women with confirmed infection, the majority were in their second and third trimester, with approximately 42.4% requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission and oxygen therapy. The most prevalent symptoms were high respiratory rate and low blood pressure, often accompanied by fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Live births resulted in 54.5% of the cases, while two maternal deaths were reported. Significant associations were found between the need for non-invasive ventilation and timing of infection (p = 0.026), the mode of delivery and timing of infection (p = 0.036), and the mode of delivery and body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

COVID-19 poses significant risks to pregnant women, particularly in the third trimester, and emphasized the importance of early identification of high-risk pregnancies, strategic planning, and enhanced monitoring during antenatal care.

Maternal high-care and intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries

Despite notable advancements in minimizing maternal mortality during recent decades, a pronounced disparity persists between high-income nations and low-to middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in intensive and high-care for pregnant and postpartum individuals. This divergence is multifactorial and influenced by factors such as the availability and accessibility of community-based maternity healthcare services, the quality of preventive care, timeliness in accessing hospital or critical care, resource availability, and facilities equipped for advanced interventions. Complications from various conditions, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), unsafe abortions, puerperal sepsis, and, notably, the COVID-19 pandemic, intensify the complexity of these challenges. In confronting these challenges and deliberating on potential solutions, we hope to contribute to the ongoing discourse around maternal healthcare in LMICs, ultimately striving toward an equitable health landscape where every mother, regardless of geographic location or socioeconomic status, has access to the care they require and deserve. The use of traditional and innovative methods to achieve adequate knowledge, appropriate skills, location of applicable resources, and strong leadership is essential. By implementing and enhancing these strategies, limited-resource settings can optimize the available resources to promptly recognize the severity of illness in obstetric individuals, ensuring timely and appropriate interventions for mothers and children. Additionally, strategies that could significantly improve the situation include increased investment in healthcare infrastructure, effective resource management, enhanced supply chain efficiency, and the development and use of low-cost, high-quality equipment. Through targeted investments, innovations, efficient resource management, and international cooperation, it is possible to ensure that every maternal high-care and ICU unit, regardless of geographical location or socioeconomic status, has access to high-quality critical care to provide life-saving care.

Newborn Hospitalizations Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland: A Comparative Study Based on a National Hospital Registry

Objectives: There are limited data on the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in Poland on newborn health. The aim of the study is to show recent information on hospitalizations of newborns in Poland in the pre-pandemic and COVID-19 pandemic era. Methods: A retrospective, population-based study was conducted using data from hospital discharge records of patients hospitalized in 2017-2021. Results: The data on which the study was based consisted of a substantial number of 104,450 hospitalization records. Annual hospitalization rate was estimated to be 50.3-51.9 per 1,000 in 2017-2019, 56 per 1,000 in 2020 and it rose to 77.7 per 1,000 in 2021. In comparison to the pre-pandemic period, in the COVID-19 era, we observed significantly more hospitalization cases of newborns affected by maternal renal and urinary tract diseases (p < 0.001), syndrome of infant of mother with gestational diabetes (p < 0.001), maternal complications of pregnancy (p < 0.001). In the COVID-19 era, the prevalence of COVID-19 among newborns was 4.5 cases per 1,000 newborn hospitalizations. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak could significantly contribute to qualitative and quantitative changes in hospitalizations among newborns.

An Update on COVID-19-Associated Placental Pathologies

COVID-19 pregnancies are associated with increased rates of premature delivery and stillbirths. It is still a matter of debate whether there is a COVID-19-associated pattern of placenta pathology. We updated our previously published results on a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 pregnancies. In total, 38 reports on 3677 placentas were evaluated regarding histopathological changes. Maternal vascular malperfusion (32%), fetal vascular malperfusion (19%), acute and chronic inflammation (20% and 22%) were frequent pathologies. In non-COVID-19 pregnancies, placentas show similar histologic patterns and mainly similar frequencies of manifestation. It has to be taken into account that there might be an observation bias, because some findings are diagnosed as a "pathology" that might have been classified as minor or unspecific findings in non-COVID-19 placentas. COVID-19 placentitis occurs in 1-2% of cases at the most. In conclusion, this updated meta-analysis indicates that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy does not result in an increased rate of a specific placenta pathology and COVID-19 placentitis is rare.

Post-COVID in women after SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy - a pilot study with follow-up data from the COVID-19-related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS)

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19 and adverse pregnancy outcomes; data on maternal long-term outcome is scarce. We analyzed long-term follow-ups on women who experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy to evaluate post-COVID symptoms, particularly fatigue, and their association with quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

773 women who enrolled in the CRONOS registry between April 2020 and August 2021 were contacted for follow-up from December 2022 to April 2023. Data was gathered through a web-based questionnaire. Subsequently, study coordinators matched the follow-up data with the existing CRONOS data.

RESULTS

110/773 (14%) women provided data. 20.9% experienced only acute symptoms during their SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, while 2.7% women experienced symptoms lasting longer than 4 weeks (long COVID). Symptoms lasting longer than 12 weeks (post-COVID) were reported by 63.6% women and occurred more often after severe COVID-19. Fatigue was the most frequently reported symptom (88%), with 55% of women still experiencing it more than one year after initial infection. 76% of women rated their QoL as "good" or "very good". Women experiencing post-COVID reported a significantly lower QoL.

CONCLUSION

This is the first German long-term data on women after SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, showing a high rate of post-COVID, a persistence of fatigue, and the impact on QoL. Continuous monitoring of pregnant women with COVID-19 is needed to develop comprehensive management strategies.