Postoperative chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer receiving preoperative radio(chemo)therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing surgery ± a fluoropyrimidine and surgery + a fluoropyrimidine ± oxaliplatin

Recurrence risk following rectal cancer surgery: a survival analysis of key predictors

BACKGROUND

Identifying predictors of postsurgical recurrence in patients with rectal cancer is critical for optimizing postoperative management and improving patient outcomes. We aimed to assess the effects of demographic, clinical, and pathological factors on recurrence risk after rectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery between 2004 and 2018. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to examine the influence of variables on recurrence risk. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualize cumulative hazards.

RESULTS

Among 961 patients (62.7% male, mean age 63.1 years), 127 (13.2%) experienced recurrence over a median follow-up of 60 months. Based on the Cox model (C-index = 0.770, likelihood ratio test χ2(19) = 127.5, P < 0.001), significant predictors of increased recurrence risk included pathologic node stage N1 (hazard ratio 2.92, 95% CI: 1.84-4.63, P < 0.001) and N2 (4.05, 2.36-6.94, P < 0.001), as well as fewer than 12 harvested lymph nodes (1.95, 1.31-2.90, P = 0.001). Moderately differentiated histology reduced recurrence risk (0.49, 0.27-0.89, P = 0.018), and age (0.98, 0.96-0.99, P = 0.004) was inversely correlated with recurrence risk. Sex, chemotherapy, pathologic tumor stage, and lymphovascular invasion were not significant predictors of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study identified key factors associated with recurrence risk after rectal cancer surgery, highlighting the importance of pathologic node stage, lymph node metrics, and histological differentiation. These findings provide a foundation for personalized postoperative management strategies and improving long-term outcomes in rectal cancer patients.

Survival after surgery beyond total mesorectal excision for primary locally advanced rectal cancer, a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare relative survival in non-metastatic rectal cancer clinically staged as T3-T4 requiring beyond total mesorectal excision (TME) to that after standard TME.

METHODS

This population-based study included all patients operated with anterior resection, abdominoperineal excision or Hartmann's procedure for non-metastatic rectal cancer clinically staged as T3-T4 in Sweden between 2009 and 2018. Relative survival was analysed in relation to surgery beyond TME (bTME), which was subcategorized as bTME- and bTME + to account for extent of resection. In all survival analyses, follow-up started at 90 days after surgery. Based on a causal model defined a priori excess mortality rate ratios (EMRR) were estimated using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Of 8272 included patients 1220 (14.7 %) were operated bTME. In a model adjusted for age and sex bTME was associated with higher excess mortality compared to standard TME (EMRR: 1.76, 95%CI:1.52-2.04). This association persisted after additional adjustment for tumour characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy and hospital volume (EMRR: 1.32, 95%CI:1.11-1.56) and was mainly attributable to restricted relative survival after bTME- (EMRR: 1.42, 95%CI:1.18-1.72) as EMRR after bTME+ was 1.07 (95%CI:0.80-1.44).

CONCLUSION

This national population-based study showed inferior relative survival after bTME compared to standard TME in non-metastasized rectal cancer cT3-cT4. Unexpectedly this difference was mainly seen after bTME of limited extent.

Total neoadjuvant treatment using short-course radiotherapy and four CAPOX cycles in locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk criteria for recurrence: a Swedish nationwide cohort study (LARCT-US)

Background

Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) increases pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and reduces the risk of systemic recurrences over chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in randomised trials, e.g., the RAPIDO trial. A modified RAPIDO schedule was prospectively explored in Sweden to evaluate TNT in routine health care before the RAPIDO results were published.

Methods

Between July 2016 and June 2020, 273 patients with high-risk LARC (clinical tumour stage cT4, clinical nodal stage cN2, extramural vascular invasion, involved mesorectal fascia or enlarged lateral lymph nodes) were treated in a prospective observational cohort study at 16 hospitals (LARCT-US). Another 189 patients at 18 (including the 16) hospitals were similarly treated (ad modum LARCT-US, AdmL) during the same period. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical to the RAPIDO trial. Patients received short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy for 5 days) followed by four cycles of CAPOX or six FOLFOX-6, followed by total mesorectal excision or, if clinical complete response (cCR), inclusion into a watch-and-wait (W&W) study. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), i.e., the sum of pCR in specimens and cCR exceeding one year in W&W patients. Safety was assessed in all patients.

Findings

Compared to the RAPIDO trial, patients were older, and tumours more advanced. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR 4.2-5.2). In LARCT-US all patients received radiotherapy and 268 (98%) started chemotherapy whereas in AdmL all patients received radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In LARCT-US 34 patients had pCR and 31 sustained cCR resulting in a CR-rate of 24% (95% CI 20-28). In AdmL, results were similar (23%, 95% CI 17-30). Locoregional recurrences were 6% (95% CI 4-10) and 5% (95% CI 2-9), respectively, both at 3 years and at last follow-up. Neurotoxicity, recorded in LARCT-US, was lower than in RAPIDO (EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20 tingling toes or feet mean score 24 (SD 31) vs 43 (SD 37)). One treatment-associated death occurred.

Interpretation

Despite older patients and more advanced tumours, results similar to the RAPIDO trial were obtained. Hence, two chemotherapy cycles less do not compromise the results maintaining a high CR-rate. This TNT schedule resulted in favourable outcomes in a nation-wide real-life situation.

Funding

Swedish Cancer Society.

Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer with mesorectal fascia involvement

PURPOSE

For the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), research on primary lesions with mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement is lacking. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes and efficacy of dose-escalated neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to patients with LARC involving MRF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 301 patients who were diagnosed with LARC involving MRF and underwent NCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) doses of ≤50.4 Gy were defined as the non-boost group, while ≥54.0 Gy as the boost group. Pathological tumor response and survival outcomes, including intrapelvic recurrence-free survival (IPRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients (89.4%) achieved a negative pathological circumferential resection margin and 104 (34.6%) had good pathological tumor regression grades. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, IPRFS, DMFS, and OS rates at 5-years were 88.6%, 78.0%, and 91.2%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis by RT dose, the boost group included more advanced clinical stages of patients. For the non-boost group and boost group, 5-year IPRFS rates were 90.3% and 87.0% (p = 0.242), 5-year DMFS rates were 82.0% and 71.3% (p = 0.105), and 5-year OS rates were 93.0% and 80.6% (p = 0.439), respectively. Treatment related toxicity was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.211).

CONCLUSION

Although this retrospective study failed to confirm the efficacy of dose-escalated NCRT, favorable IPRFS and pathological complete response was achieved with NCRT followed by TME. Further studies combining patient customized RT dose with systemic therapies are needed.

Nutritional Status Indicators Predict Tolerability to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after radical surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is now the standard of care. The identification of risk factors for the discontinuation of AC is important for further improvements in survival. We herein examined the prognostic impact of chemotherapy compliance and its relationship with the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) before surgery.

METHODS

A total of 335 stage II-III LARC patients who underwent preoperative CRT between 2003 and 2022 at the University of Tokyo Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. We excluded patients with recurrence during AC and those who had not received AC. The relationship between AC and long-term outcomes and that between PNI values and the duration of AC were examined.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients discontinued AC and 62 continued AC. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly shorter in patients who discontinued AC (p = 0.0056). The discontinuation of AC was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.24, p = 0.0233). Twenty-one patients were classified as having low PNI (less than 40), which correlated with an older age, low body mass index, and incomplete AC. Low PNI was an independent risk factor for a shorter duration of AC (HR: 2.53, p = 0.0123).

CONCLUSION

The discontinuation of AC was related to poor RFS in patients with LARC undergoing preoperative CRT. Furthermore, a low PNI value was identified as a risk factor for a shorter duration of AC.

The value of post-operative chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer-results from the RAPIDO trial

BACKGROUND

Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) rather than radiotherapy (RT) has resulted in fewer locoregional recurrences (LRRs), but no decrease in distant metastasis (DM) rate for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In many countries, patients receive post-operative chemotherapy (pCT) to improve oncological outcomes. We investigated the value of pCT after pre-operative CRT in the RAPIDO trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomised between experimental (short-course RT, chemotherapy and surgery) and standard-of-care treatment (CRT, surgery and pCT depending on hospital policy). In this substudy, we compared curatively resected patients from the standard-of-care group who received pCT (pCT+ group) with those who did not (pCT- group). Subsequently, patients from the pCT+ group who received at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy cycles (pCT ≥75% group) were compared with patients who did not receive pCT (pCT-/- group). By propensity score stratification (PSS), we adjusted for the following unbalanced confounders: age, clinical extramural vascular invasion, distance to the anal verge, ypT stage, ypN stage, residual tumour, serious adverse event (SAE) and/or readmission within 6 weeks after surgery and SAE related to pre-operative CRT. Cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS), DM, LRR and overall survival (OS) was analysed by Cox regression.

RESULTS

In total, 396/452 patients had a curative resection. The number of patients in the pCT+, pCT >75%, pCT- and pCT-/- groups was 184, 112, 154 and 149, respectively. The PSS-adjusted analyses for all endpoints demonstrated hazard ratios between approximately 0.7 and 0.8 (pCT+ versus pCT-), and 0.5 and 0.8 (pCT ≥75% versus pCT-/-). However, all 95% confidence intervals included 1.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a benefit of pCT after pre-operative CRT for patients with high-risk LARC, with approximately 20%-25% improvement in DFS and OS and 20%-25% risk reductions in DM and LRR. Compliance with pCT additionally reduces or improves all endpoints by 10%-20%. However, differences are not statistically significant.

Does the Gain of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Outweigh the Harm in Rectal Cancer? Importance of the ATRESS (neoAdjuvant Therapy-RElated Shortening of Survival) Phenomenon: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate whether total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) results in long-term overall survival (OS) or quality of life (QoL) benefit compared with chemoradiation if all patients are being considered for radical resection, and whether the ATRESS phenomenon (i.e., reduction in post-metastatic survival) impacts OS after TNT.

METHODS

Systematic review of randomised trials comparing TNT with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation.

RESULTS

Six trials were identified. Follow-ups were too short to resolve whether TNT improves long-term OS. QoL analysis in one trial showed worse long-term neurotoxicity-related QoL (any neurotoxicity: 14% vs. 3%), higher rate of grade III+ acute toxicity (48% vs. 25%), longer duration of neoadjuvant treatment (19 vs. 6 weeks) and higher rate of locoregional failure (10% vs. 7%) in TNT vs. chemoradiation. This should be weighed against an absolute 8% reduction in the incidence of distant metastases (DM) after TNT. ATRESS could explain a discrepancy between reduction of DM and the absence of OS improvement after TNT in one trial.

CONCLUSION

In the light of unproven OS benefit, the gain of TNT (reduction of DM) does not seem to outweigh the harm (excess of toxicity). ATRESS can be a reason for the absence of the OS benefit despite the reduction in DM.

Prognostic value of final pathological stage in colon adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A propensity score-matched study

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could improve local tumor control of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC), but the prognostic value of yp stage in colon cancer remains unknown. Here, we aimed to ascertain yp stage as an indicator for LACC prognosis after NAC.

Methods

The data of patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. After 1:2 propensity score matching, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the NAC and Non-NAC groups of different stage classifications. The correlation between clinical and pathological factors and CSS was identified.

Results

A total of 49, 149, and 81 matched pairs of stage 0-I, II, and III patients, respectively, were generated for analysis. For stage 0-I (p = 0.011) and III (p = 0.015), only CSS in the NAC groups were inferior. Receiving NAC was an independent prognostic risk factor for patients with stage 0-I (hazard ratio, 7.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.820-32.5; p = 0.006) and stage III (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.68; p = 0.015).

Conclusions

The CSS was poorer among LACC patients who underwent NAC than among those who did not. The yp stage of colon cancer after NAC has distinctive significance, which may contribute to predicting the prognosis and guiding the treatment of LACC patients after NAC.

Effectiveness of radiotherapy for local control in T3N0 rectal cancer managed with total mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis

Introduction: The total mesorectal excision (TME) significantly improved rectal cancer outcomes. Radiotherapy’s benefit in T3N0 rectal cancer patients managed with TME has not been clearly demonstrated. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to determine whether radiotherapy altered the risk of locoregional recurrence (LR) in T3N0 rectal cancer patients managed with a TME.

Materials and Methods: Studies indexed on PubMed or Embase were systematically searched from inception to October 18, 2020. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were observed for the literature search, study screening, and data extraction; the Newcastle Ottawa Scale evaluated bias; Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group system evaluated certainty; and all were performed independently by at least two investigators. Studies that reported LR data specific to T3N0 rectal cancer patients managed with TME, treated with and without radiotherapy, were included. Data was pooled using a random-effects model. Meta-analyses of the relative risk of local recurrence were conducted.

Results: Five retrospective cohort studies involving 932 unique patients reported LR outcomes; no prospective studies met eligibility criteria. Median follow-up ranged from 38.4–78 months. Adjuvant radiotherapy was provided in 3 studies. Chemotherapy was delivered and reported in 4 studies, providing both concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy. A non-significant LR reduction with radiotherapy alongside TME was estimated, mean relative risk (RR) 0.63 (95% Confidence Interval 0.31–1.29; I² = 41.8%).

Conclusions: A non-significant LR benefit with radiotherapy’s addition was estimated. Meta-analysis of exclusively retrospective cohort studies was concerning for biased results. Adequately powered randomized trials are warranted.

Is short-course radiotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy the new standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer? A sensitivity analysis of the RAPIDO clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The results of the RAPIDO trial have been accepted as evidence in favour of short-course radiotherapy (SC-RT) followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. A noteworthy concern is that the RAPIDO trial did not ensure that all patients in the control arm received adjuvant chemotherapy. This may bias statistical estimates in favour of the experimental arm if adjuvant chemotherapy is active in rectal cancer. Moreover, the 5-year update revealed an increase in the risk of local relapse in the experimental arm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out sensitivity analyses to determine how plausible effects of adjuvant chemotherapy, adjusted by the proportion of patients in the standard arm receiving adjuvant treatment, would have influenced the observed treatment effect estimate of the RAPIDO trial. The most plausible values for the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy were determined by Bayesian re-analysis of a prior meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis suggested that oxaliplatin/fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy may improve disease-free survival (DFS) in rectal cancer although the signal is weak [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% credible interval, 0.57-1.15]; probability of benefit (HR <1) was 91.2%. In the sensitivity analysis, the HR for disease-related treatment failure would remain <1, thus favouring total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), on most occasions, but the null hypothesis would not have been rejected in various credible settings. For the RAPIDO data to be consistent with the null effect, a moderate benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR for DFS between 0.75 and 0.80) and 70%-80% of exposed participants would suffice.

CONCLUSION

The decision to make adjuvant chemotherapy optional in the standard arm may have biased the results in favour of the experimental arm, in a scenario in which TNT does not offset the increase in local recurrences after SC-RT.

The efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer with mismatch repair deficiency

Colon cancers with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) have specific clinicopathologic characteristics compared with mismatch repair proficiency (pMMR); however, the effect of MMR status on the efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains unclear. In our study, 439 dMMR and 26 pMMR colon cancer patients with or without NCT from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively collected. Clinicopathological features, treatment response, and survival were compared between different groups. In the dMMR group, patients with NCT were likely to have higher CEA (abnormal CEA: 51.6% vs. 17.4%, p < 0.001), more multiorgan resection (38.7% vs. 16.8%, p = 0.006), and larger postoperative tumor diameter (7.26 vs. 6.21, p = 0.033) than those without NCT, but nearly half of cT4b patients who had NCT (42.9%, 9/21) avoid multiorgan resection. pT4 stage (HR, 14.97; 95% CI, 1.88-118.92; p = 0.010), number of positive lymph nodes (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.09-1.26; p < 0.001), and tumor deposit (HR, 6.73; 95% CI, 2.08-21.74; p = 0.001) were independent prognosis factors of disease-free survival (DFS). For the advanced tumor subset, there is no significant difference between patients with or without NCT for OS (p = 0.13) and DFS (p = 0.11), although the survival rate of NCT was higher than non-NCT patients. Moreover, tumor regression grade was similar between dMMR and pMMR patients who had NCT. This study showed that NCT was more likely to be employed in dMMR patients with advanced tumors and may reduce the rate of multiorgan resection for cT4b dMMR patients. More large-scaled researches are needed to further explore if MMR status could predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer.

Impact of total neoadjuvant therapy consisting of consolidation chemotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancer survival

PURPOSE

The objective was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis in patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with cT3-4N0M0 or cTxN1-2M0 rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. Patients who received NCRT (radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine) or TNT (radiotherapy with two concurrent cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) followed by another two cycles of CAPOX) during January 2011 and November 2016 at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University were included. All patients had received radical surgery. Adverse events, pathological response and survival outcomes in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-two patients were enrolled, 120 in the TNT and 62 in the NCRT groups. No significant between-group differences in neoadjuvant therapy-associated adverse events or surgical complications were found. TNT achieved a higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (25.8%) compared with NCRT (12.9%, P = 0.044). Patients in the TNT group had a higher 3-year DFS rate (82.8% versus 75.7%, P = 0.041) and lower distant metastasis rate (19.2% versus 33.1%, P = 0.049) than those in the NCRT group. Multivariate analysis showed that NCRT was an independent risk factor for DFS (95%CI 2.023-13.415, P = 0.001) and distant metastasis (95% CI 2.149-20.082, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With similar adverse events and a higher pCR rate when compared with NCRT, TNT might be considered as a safe and effective therapeutic strategy to improve prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

The prognostic value of extramural venous invasion in preoperative MRI of rectal cancer patients

AIM

This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of extramural venous invasion observed in preoperative MRI on survival and recurrences.

METHOD

In total, 778 rectal cancer patients were evaluated in multidisciplinary meetings in Helsinki University Hospital during the years 2016-2018. 635 patients met the inclusion criteria of stage I-III disease and were intended for curative treatment at the time of diagnosis. 128 had extramural venous invasion in preoperative MRI.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 2.5 years. In a univariate analysis extramural venous invasion was associated with poorer disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.174, 95% CI 1.118-4.224, P = 0.022), whereas circumferential margin ≤1 mm, tumour stage ≥T3c or nodal positivity were not. Disease recurrence occurred in 17.3% of the patients: 13.4% had metastatic recurrence only, 1.7% mere local recurrence and 2.2% both metastatic and local recurrence. In multivariate analysis, extramural venous invasion (HR 1.734, 95% CI 1.127-2.667, P = 0.012) and nodal positivity (HR 1.627, 95% CI 1.071-2.472, P = 0.023) were risk factors for poorer disease-free survival (DFS). Circumferential margin ≤1 mm was a risk factor for local recurrence in multivariate analysis (HR 5.675, 95% CI 1.274-25.286, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

In MRI, circumferential margin ≤1 mm is a risk factor for local recurrence, but the risk is quite well controlled with chemoradiotherapy and extended surgery. Extramural venous invasion instead is a significant risk factor for poorer DFS and new tools to reduce the systemic recurrence risk are needed.

The Multimodal Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Making Sense of the New Data

In the past 40 years, the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer has evolved with the addition of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and providing (neo)adjuvant systemic chemotherapy to major surgery. However, recent trends have focused on improving our ability to risk-stratify patients and tailoring treatment to achieve the best oncologic outcome while limiting the impact on long-term quality of life. Therefore, there has been increasing interest in pursuing a watch-and-wait approach to achieve organ preservation. Several retro- and prospective studies suggest safety of the watch-and-wait approach, though it is still considered controversial due to limited clinical evidence, concerns about tumor regrowth, and subsequent distant progression. To further reduce treatment, MRI risk stratification, together with patient characteristics and patient preferences, can guide personalized treatment and reserve radiation and chemotherapy for a select patient population. Ultimately, improved options for reassessment during neoadjuvant treatment may allow for more adaptive therapy options based on treatment response. This article provides an overview of some major developments in the multimodal treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. It reviews some relevant, controversial issues of the watch-and-wait approach and opportunities to personally tailor and reduce treatment. It also reviews the overall neoadjuvant treatment, including total neoadjuvant therapy trials, and how to best optimize for a potential complete response. Finally, it provides an algorithm as an example of how such a personalized, tailored, adaptive, and reduced treatment could look like in the future.

Predicting Distant Metastasis in Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer After Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Background

Although overall colorectal cancer (CRC) cases have been declining worldwide, there has been an increase in the incidence of the CRC among individuals younger than 50 years old, which is associated with distant metastasis (DM) and poor prognosis.

Methods

Young-onset CRC patients' postoperative data were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between January 2010 and December 2015. Data from the SEER database were divided into early stage and advanced stage according to whether chemoradiotherapy was recommended in the guidelines. Independent risk factors for DM were explored by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression separately. A predictive model was established and presented as nomogram in the training set of advanced stage. The model was internally verified in testing set and externally validated in a cohort of 145 patients from Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. The accuracy, reliability, and clinical application value were assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. Different risk subgroups of DM were classified according to the scores of the nomogram in the training set of advanced stage.

Results

A total of 5,584 patients were eligible and enrolled in our study in which 1,277 were in early stage and 4,307 in advanced stage. Preoperative CEA positive was found to be an independent predictor of DM in early stage. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that tumor size, degree of differentiation, T stage, N stage, preoperative CEA, and whether radiation or chemotherapy performed were independent risk factors for DM (all, p < 0.05) in advanced stage. Great accuracies were achieved in our nomogram with AUC of 0.801 in training set, 0.811 in testing set, and 0.791 in the validation cohort, respectively. Calibration curves and DCA in internal validation and external validation both showed good stability and clinical utility values.

Conclusions

Preoperative CEA positive was a significant predictor of DM for young-onset CRC patients. A novel nomogram containing clinical and pathological features was established for predicting DM of advanced CRC in patients younger than 50 years old. This tool may serve as an early alert for clinicians to DM and make better clinical treatment regimens.

The "Immunoscore" in rectal cancer: could we search quality beyond quantity of life?

Because of the function and anatomical environment of the rectum, therapeutic strategies for local advanced rectal cancer (LARC) must deal with two challenging stressors that are a high-risk of local and distal recurrences and a high-risk of poor quality of life (QoL). Over the last three decades, advances in screening tests, therapies, and combined-modality treatment options and strategies have improved the prognosis of patients with LARC. However, owing to the heterogeneous nature of LARC and genetic status, the patient may not respond to a specific therapy and may be at increased risk of side-effects without the life-prolonging benefit. Indeed, each therapy can cause its own side-effects, which may worsen by a combination of treatments resulting in long-term poor QoL. In LARC, QoL has become even more essential with the increasing incidence of rectal cancer in young individuals. Herein, we analyzed the value of the Immunoscore-Biopsy (performed on tumor biopsy at diagnosis) in predicting outcomes, alone or in association with clinical and imaging data, for each therapy used in LARC.

Long non-coding RNA HOXA-AS3 facilitates the malignancy in colorectal cancer by miR-4319/SPNS2 axis

Growing evidence has shown the oncogenic role of long non-coding RNA HOXA-AS3 in the progression of several types of cancers, while the effect of HOXA-AS3 on colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. In this study, HOXA-AS3 was significantly over-expressed in CRC clinical samples and human CRC cell lines (SW480, SW620, HCT116, COLO205, and LOVO). HOXA-AS3 knockdown was further achieved by specific siRNAs in COLO205 and LOVO cell lines. The depletion of HOXA-AS3 remarkably inhibited cell proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest, and promoted cell apoptosis in CRC cell lines. Additionally, HOXA-AS3 knockdown was determined to facilitate miR-4319 expression and reduce expression level of sphingolipid transporter 2 (SPNS2) in CRC cell lines. The dual luciferase reporter assay suggested that HOXA-AS3 acted as a sponge of miR-4319, and miR-4319 further directly targeted SPNS2 for expression regulation. Besides, HOXA-AS3 was determined to mediate CRC cell proliferation and apoptosis via miR-4319/SPNS2 axis. Moreover, tumorigenesis experiment validated that HOXA-AS3 promoted CRC progression in vivo by regulating miR-4319, SPNS2, and protein kinase B (AKT) signaling. In summary, this study reveals the novel role of HOXA-AS3 in pathogenesis of CRC and provides a candidate for CRC therapeutic target.

Total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A tertiary medical center experience

The current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes preoperative chemoradiation, followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. This multimodality treatment improves local control but is associated with low compliance rates without clear beneficial effects on overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis. In this retrospective study, the charts of patients diagnosed with cT3/4 or cT2-node-positive rectal cancer between January 2011 and June 2019 were reviewed. The chemoradiation therapy (CRT) group received a long course of CRT with capecitabine followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) group received 6 cycles mFOLFOX and a short course of radiation therapy followed by surgery. A total of 81 patients were included, among which 55 (67.9%) received CRT and 26 (32.1%) received TNT. In the CRT group, 15 (27.3%) patients achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) compared with 10 (38.5%) in the TNT group (P=0.22). A total of 19 (35.8%) cases in the CRT group downstaged to pT0N0 or pT1N0 compared with 11 (42.3%) in the TNT group (P=0.33). The 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 81.0% in the TNT group and 84.0% in the CRT group (P=0.15). Out of 55 patients in the CRT group, 30 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, 22 (40.0% of CRT cases) of which completed a full course. All 26 patients in the TNT group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, where 22 (84.6%) patients took a full course (P<0.001). In conclusion, the present study revealed that patients treated with TNT were more compliant to chemotherapy than those treated with CRT. A numerically higher pCR rate, and nodal and tumor downstaging were noted in the TNT group without significance. No difference was noted in the 2-year DFS. Longer follow-up is required.

The predictive value of PET/CT for distant recurrences in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

It is well recognized that pathological complete response (pCR) for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) confers a positive survival advantage. Despite this, a small proportion of patients can develop distant recurrence, and these are the patients that will likely benefit from adjuvant therapy. This study aims to investigate the role of PET/CT as a functional imaging to stratify patients according to their risk of distant recurrence.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database in a single quaternary teaching hospital from 2010 to 2019. All consecutive cases of locally advanced rectal cancer with restaging PET/CT were included. The primary outcome measure was 5-year OS and distant recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

A pCR and complete metabolic response (CMR) were identified in 47 (18%) patients and 73 (27.4%) patients respectively. Of these, 26 patients had both pCR and CMR and these patients remained free of local and distant recurrence at their last censored date. Patients with both pCR and CMR achieved the highest 5-year overall survival of 96.2%, followed by those with pCR and incomplete CMR (iCMR) of 85.7%, non-pCR and CMR of 85.1% and non-pCR and iCMR of 83.1%. Independent predictors for 5-year distant recurrence-free survival were pathological and PET metabolic response, nodal staging and lymphovascular invasion (LVI).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, a PET/CT has the potential to better stratify patients of their risk of distant metastasis. However, a larger validation cohort is required before these findings can be translated to clinical utility.

Prognostic Impact of the Neoadjuvant Rectal Score as Compared With the Tumor Regression Grade and Yield Pathologic TNM Stage in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

The present study compared the prognostic value of the yield pathologic (yp) stage, tumor regression grade (TRG), and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For the assessment of tumor regression, the Dworak grading system was used. The NAR score was calculated using the following equation: (5ypN-3[cT-ypT]+12)²÷9.61.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, the NAR score and ypTNM stage were significantly associated with DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=2.514, p<0.001 and HR=3.200, p<0.001] and OS (HR=2.292, p=0.001 and HR=2.859, p<0.001), whereas the TRG was significantly associated with only DFS (HR=2.008, p=0.017). In multivariate analysis, the ypTNM stage was the only independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR=3.796, p<0.001) and OS (HR=3.591, p=0.0034).

CONCLUSION

Only the ypTNM stage was significantly associated with survival outcomes in multivariate analysis, suggesting that it is the most powerful prognostic factor of nCRT in patients with LARC.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy on lymph nodes in rectal adenocarcinoma

The pathological nodal stage, determination of which requires examination of ≥ 12 lymph nodes, is one of the main prognostic factors in rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may reduce the number of both lymph nodes retrieved and positive lymph nodes. Induction chemotherapy before CRT aimed at reducing the rate of distant metastases. However, the impact of this new treatment on number of lymph nodes retrieved and positive lymph nodes is unknown. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on lymph nodes in locally advanced rectal cancer treated by CRT. We retrospectively included patients with T2 - 4 Nx M0 rectal cancer and compared those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus CRT with those receiving CRT alone. From 2012 to 2019, 85 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy + CRT and 189 with CRT alone. The number of lymph nodes retrieved (19 vs. 17, respectively, P = 0.434), the rate of specimens with ≥ 12 lymph nodes (92% vs. 88%, respectively, P = 0.397), and the median number of positive lymph nodes (1 vs. 2, respectively, P = 0.878) were similar between the two groups. However, the rate of pN0 was higher after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + CRT compared to CRT (75% vs. 62%, respectively, P = 0.030). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer did not modify the number of lymph nodes retrieved or the number of positive lymph nodes compared to CRT alone. However, it significantly increased the rate of tumors without any positive lymph nodes (ypN0).

Recurrence hazard of rectal cancer compared with colon cancer by adjuvant chemotherapy status: a nationwide study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of stage III colon cancer using the hazard function demonstrated that the risk of recurrence in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy never exceeded that of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is unclear whether the same can be said for rectal cancer patients and whether adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence. This study aimed to compare the recurrence hazard of stage III rectal cancer with that of colon cancer by adjuvant chemotherapy status using the hazard function, a method that allows for the assessment of instantaneous risk of recurrence over time.

METHODS

This retrospective nationwide study consisted of 10,356 patients with stage III colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection between January 1997 and December 2012 in Japan. Recurrence hazards of rectal and colon cancers were compared between patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and those who were not. Analyses in which recurrence was divided into local and distant recurrence were also performed.

RESULTS

The hazard rate of recurrence in rectal cancer patients with adjuvant chemotherapy was consistently lower throughout the follow-up period, and the peak time of recurrence later, compared to patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (peaked at 15.7 vs. 7.1 months). Adjuvant chemotherapy also strongly suppressed distant recurrence but not local recurrence in rectal cancer patients. Similar results were observed in colon cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results using nationwide real-world data in Japan suggest that, similar to what is observed in colon cancer patients, adjuvant chemotherapy delays the peak of recurrence and suppresses distant recurrence in stage III rectal cancer patients.

Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts cancer prognosis in patients with local advanced rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery

Aim

The clinical significance of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by curative surgery has not been comprehensively evaluated.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 93 LARC patients diagnosed with clinical lymph node metastasis. The GNRI formula was as follows: 1.489 × albumin (g/l) + 41.7 × current weight/ideal weight. Patients were categorized as GNRI low (GNRI < 104.25) or high (GNRI > 104.25) according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for survival analysis. The impact of GNRI status on the prognostic outcomes of curative surgery for LARC was examined.

Results

There were 55 (59.14%) and 38 (40.86%) patients in the GNRI high and low groups, respectively. Of the investigated demographic factors, age, pathological tumor invasion, and presence of recurrence were significantly associated with the GNRI value. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly shorter in the GNRI low group (OS: p = 0.00020, DFS: p = 0.0044, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model showed that a low GNRI was an independent risk factor for poor OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.37–8.23; p = 0.0068) and DFS (HR = 2.32; 95%CI = 1.15–4.79; p = 0.018). Although use of adjuvant therapy has no impact on prognosis (OS: p = 0.26, DFS: p = 0.29), low GNRI showed shorter OS and DFS in patients with pathological lymph node metastasis [ypN(+)] (OS: p = 0.033, DFS: p = 0.032, log-rank test).

Conclusions

GNRI is a useful marker for LARC patients diagnosed with clinical lymph node metastasis and treated by preoperative CRT followed by curative surgery. GNRI is a useful tool to identify high risk of recurrence for improving the survival in LARC patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02139-z.

Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score: Value evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy and prognostic significance after surgery?

INTRODUCTION

The Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score is a new surrogate endpoint to be used in clinical trials for early determination of treatment response to different preoperative therapies. The aim is to further validate the NAR-score, primarily developed using chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with a delay to surgery 6-8 weeks, and explore its value using other schedules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included all 9978 patients diagnosed with non-metastasized RC in 2007-2015 that had undergone surgery and was registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The patients of interest had either short-course radiotherapy (scRT)/CRT + delayed surgery, long-course radiotherapy (RT) + delayed surgery, (C)RT + additional chemotherapy, primary surgery, or scRT + immediate surgery. The scRT/CRT + delayed surgery groups were further divided based on time to surgery.

RESULTS

Mean NAR-score differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between different treatments. (C)RT + additional chemotherapy had the lowest mean score of 16.3 and CRT + delayed surgery had 17.7. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) of patients with a Low NAR-score (<8) compared to those with a High score (>16) for both CRT- and scRT, with a stronger correlation for CRT-patients. C-index for the NAR-score model (0.623) was not superior to when only pathological T- and N-stage was used (0.646).

CONCLUSIONS

The NAR-score is prognostic, but it is not better than pT- and pN-stage. However, the NAR-score can still discriminate between two treatments that have different cell killing effect and may still be of value in clinical trials as an easier method than pT- and N-stage.

Adding Three Cycles of CAPOX after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Increases the Rates of Complete Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

the total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (TNT) includes different strategies, but the most appropriate model remains uncertain. The purpose of this retrospectively study was to evaluate the safety and pathological response in the consolidation chemotherapy model.

METHODS

patients with cT3/T4 or TxN + M0 rectal cancer that were receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (50 Gy with oral capecitabine)/TNT (CRT followed by three cycles of CAPOX) during September 2017 to September 2019 in our department were included. All of the patients were recommended to receive radical surgery.

RESULTS

a total of 197 patients were included. Eighty-one patients received CRT, while one hundred and sixteen patients received TNT. Nine patients did not undergo surgery because of the distant metastases (one patient (1.2%) in CRT group, two patients (1.7%) in TNT group) or a refusal of resection (two patients in CRT group, four patients in TNT group). The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 32.7% in TNT compared with 12.8% in CRT (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in grade 3 acute toxicities of neoadjuvant treatment and surgical complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

the consolidation chemotherapy model is safe for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and it has a high pCR rate. The long-term follow-up is necessary to be evaluated in a future prospective, randomized trial.

Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Systemic relapses remain a major problem in locally advanced rectal cancer. Using short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and delayed surgery, the Rectal cancer And Preoperative Induction therapy followed by Dedicated Operation (RAPIDO) trial aimed to reduce distant metastases without compromising locoregional control.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, participants were recruited from 54 centres in the Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, Slovenia, Denmark, Norway, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, had a biopsy-proven, newly diagnosed, primary, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, which was classified as high risk on pelvic MRI (with at least one of the following criteria: clinical tumour [cT] stage cT4a or cT4b, extramural vascular invasion, clinical nodal [cN] stage cN2, involved mesorectal fascia, or enlarged lateral lymph nodes), were mentally and physically fit for chemotherapy, and could be assessed for staging within 5 weeks before randomisation. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a management system with a randomly varying block design (each block size randomly chosen to contain two to four allocations), stratified by centre, ECOG performance status, cT stage, and cN stage, to either the experimental or standard of care group. All investigators remained masked for the primary endpoint until a prespecified number of events was reached. Patients allocated to the experimental treatment group received short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy over a maximum of 8 days) followed by six cycles of CAPOX chemotherapy (capecitabine 1000 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1-14, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² intravenously on day 1, and a chemotherapy-free interval between days 15-21) or nine cycles of FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² intravenously on day 1, leucovorin [folinic acid] 200 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 2, followed by bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m² intravenously and fluorouracil 600 mg/m² intravenously for 22 h on days 1 and 2, and a chemotherapy-free interval between days 3-14) followed by total mesorectal excision. Choice of CAPOX or FOLFOX4 was per physician discretion or hospital policy. Patients allocated to the standard of care group received 28 daily fractions of 1·8 Gy up to 50·4 Gy or 25 fractions of 2·0 Gy up to 50·0 Gy (per physician discretion or hospital policy), with concomitant twice-daily oral capecitabine 825 mg/m² followed by total mesorectal excision and, if stipulated by hospital policy, adjuvant chemotherapy with eight cycles of CAPOX or 12 cycles of FOLFOX4. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-related treatment failure, defined as the first occurrence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, new primary colorectal tumour, or treatment-related death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed by intention to treat. This study is registered with the EudraCT, 2010-023957-12, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01558921, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between June 21, 2011, and June 2, 2016, 920 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment, of whom 912 were eligible (462 in the experimental group; 450 in the standard of care group). Median follow-up was 4·6 years (IQR 3·5-5·5). At 3 years after randomisation, the cumulative probability of disease-related treatment failure was 23·7% (95% CI 19·8-27·6) in the experimental group versus 30·4% (26·1-34·6) in the standard of care group (hazard ratio 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·95; p=0·019). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse event during preoperative therapy in both groups was diarrhoea (81 [18%] of 460 patients in the experimental group and 41 [9%] of 441 in the standard of care group) and neurological toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy in the standard of care group (16 [9%] of 187 patients). Serious adverse events occurred in 177 (38%) of 460 participants in the experimental group and, in the standard of care group, in 87 (34%) of 254 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and in 64 (34%) of 187 with adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment-related deaths occurred in four participants in the experimental group (one cardiac arrest, one pulmonary embolism, two infectious complications) and in four participants in the standard of care group (one pulmonary embolism, one neutropenic sepsis, one aspiration, one suicide due to severe depression).

INTERPRETATION

The observed decreased probability of disease-related treatment failure in the experimental group is probably indicative of the increased efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy as opposed to adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. Therefore, the experimental treatment can be considered as a new standard of care in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Foundation, Swedish Cancer Society, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and Spanish Clinical Research Network.

Risk Stratification Using Neoadjuvant Rectal Score in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Validation With Long-term Outcome Data

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, there is no prognostic surrogate marker established in locally advanced rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the role of neoadjuvant rectal score as a prognostic factor to stratify individual-level risks of survival and tumor recurrence.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at the Seoul National University Hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 397 patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy plus total mesorectal excision were analyzed.

INTERVENTIONS

There was no intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Harrell C statistic and receiver operating characteristic analysis, as well as Cox regression analysis, were used to assess the prognostic strength.

RESULTS

The low (<8), intermediate (8-16), and high (>16) neoadjuvant rectal score groups included 91 (23%), 208 (52%), and 98 patients (25%). A high neoadjuvant rectal score was independently associated with inferior overall survival and disease-free survival (p = 0.011 and 0.008). Regarding the prognostic models adjusted for neoadjuvant rectal score (I) and ypT/N stage (II), the c-index was higher in model I (0.799 and 0.787, p = 0.009 for overall survival; 0.752 and 0.743, p = 0.093 for disease-free survival). The predictive ability of the neoadjuvant rectal score was superior to tumor regression grade, ypT, and ypN in the receiver operating characteristic analyses (p < 0.05 for all). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better overall and disease-free survival (p = 0.003 and 0.052) in the high neoadjuvant rectal score group.

LIMITATIONS

Potential selection bias attributed to the retrospective study design was a limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

We verified the applicability of the neoadjuvant rectal score to stratify the relapse risk at the individual level for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Additional studies are needed to validate the usability of neoadjuvant rectal score levels as a determinant of adjuvant strategy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B354. ESTRATIFICACIÓN DE RIESGO UTILIZANDO LA PUNTUACIÓN RECTAL NEOADYUVANTE EN LA ERA DE LA QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE: VALIDACIÓN CON DATOS DE RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO: A pesar del uso generalizado de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante, no existe un marcador subrogado pronóstico establecido en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.Este estudio evaluó el papel de la puntuación rectal neoadyuvante como factor pronóstico para estratificar los riesgos a nivel individual de supervivencia y recurrencia tumoral.Este es un estudio retrospectivo.Este estudio se realizó en el Hospital de la Universidad Nacional de Seúl.Se analizaron un total de 397 pacientes que se sometieron a quimiorradioterapia más escisión mesorrectal total.No hubo intervención.El análisis estadístico C de Harrell y las características operativas del receptor, así como el análisis de regresión de Cox, se utilizaron para evaluar la fuerza pronóstica.Los grupos de puntaje rectal neoadyuvante bajo (<8), intermedio (8-16) y alto (> 16) incluyeron 91 (23%), 208 (52%) y 98 (25%) pacientes, respectivamente. Una puntuación rectal neoadyuvante alta se asoció independientemente con una supervivencia general y una supervivencia libre de enfermedad inferiores (p = 0.011 y 0.008, respectivamente). Con respecto a los modelos pronósticos ajustados por la puntuación rectal neoadyuvante (I) y el estadio ypT/N (II), el índice c fue mayor en el modelo I (0.799 y 0.787, p = 0.009 para la supervivencia general; 0.752 y 0.743, p = 0.093 para supervivencia libre de enfermedad). La capacidad predictiva de la puntuación rectal neoadyuvante fue superior al grado de regresión tumoral, ypT y ypN en los análisis de características operativas del receptor (p <0.05 para todos). La quimioterapia adyuvante se asoció con una mejor supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad (p = 0.003 y 0.052, respectivamente) en el grupo de puntaje rectal neoadyuvante alto.El sesgo de selección potencial debido al diseño retrospectivo del estudio fue la limitación.Verificamos la aplicabilidad de la puntuación rectal neoadyuvante para estratificar el riesgo de recurrencia a nivel individual para pacientes con cáncer rectal en estadio II/III sometidos a quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. Se necesitan más estudios para validar la usabilidad de los niveles de puntuación rectal neoadyuvante como determinante de la estrategia adyuvante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B354.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer: state of the art and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The value of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer is controversial with opinions varying from 'not be used' since randomized trials have not shown significant gains to 'be used as in colon cancer' as the need is the same and colon and rectal cancers are quite similar. This review will look upon data critically and with open eyes.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the exception of one randomized phase II trial (ADORE) revealing a significant gain in disease-free survival using one more effective regimen (mFOLFOX) than bolus 5-fluorouracil leucovorin, no new data have been presented. However, bringing up aspects in previous trials, either considered irrelevant for the present situation or overall negative, of what adjuvant treatment can achieve, a small reduction (hazard ratio about 0.8) in the risk of recurrence is present. This reduction is not fundamentally different from that in colon cancer considering that adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer cannot be initiated as rapidly as it can after a colon cancer diagnosis.

SUMMARY

Adjuvant chemotherapy after rectal cancer surgery reduces recurrence risks but the benefit is limited and for most patients not clinically relevant. Neoadjuvant therapy can be more effective but results from randomized trials are not yet available.

Impact of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs. Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Multimodality treatment is a standard of care for LARC, but the optimal sequencing of the treatment modalities remains unclear. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) vs. standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with inconsistent results. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of TNT in terms of complete pathological response (pCR) rate, disease-free and overall survival vs. standard CRT in LARC. A systematic search was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and meeting abstracts up to May 2020. RCTs comparing CRT vs. TNT followed by surgery in LARC were eligible for the study. Study selection and data extraction were done following PRISMA guidelines by two independent reviewers. The Mantel-Haenzel method was used to obtain a fixed-effects model of pooled odds or hazard ratios for the main outcomes. Eight RCTs, including 2301 patients, met the eligibility criteria. TNT significantly improved pCR rate (OR = 1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-2.49; p < 0.001), 3-year disease-free-survival (DFS) (HR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.71-0.95; p = 0.01) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, p = 0.04). Grade 3-4 adverse events were not significantly different in both strategies (OR = 1.58; p = 0.14). An improved pCR rate was documented regardless of the type of radiotherapy administered (long vs. short fractionation schedules). No significant heterogeneity was found. The results of this meta-analysis show that TNT improves pCR and survival rates vs. standard preoperative CRT in patients with LARC. TNT may become a new standard of care in LARC, although longer follow-up is needed to properly assess its long-term impact on survival.

Recent advances in (chemo-)radiation therapy for rectal cancer: a comprehensive review

The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of (colo)-rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the past decades. Introduced with the aim of reducing the high rates of local recurrences after conventional surgery, major developments in imaging, surgical technique, systemic therapy and radiation delivery have now created a much more complex environment leading to a more personalized approach. Functional aspects including reduction of acute or late treatment-related side effects, sphincter or even organ-preservation and the unsolved problem of still high distant failure rates have become more important while local recurrence rates can be kept low in the vast majority of patients. This review summarizes the actual role of radiation therapy in different subgroups of patients with rectal cancer, including the current standard approach in different subgroups as well as recent developments focusing on neoadjuvant treatment intensification and/or non-operative treatment approaches aiming at organ-preservation.

Recurrence Risk after Radical Colorectal Cancer Surgery-Less Than before, But How High Is It?

Simple Summary

Evidence indicates that recurrence risk after colon cancer today is less than it was when trials performed decades ago showed that adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk and prolong disease-free and overall survival. After rectal cancer surgery, local recurrence rates have decreased but it is unclear if systemic recurrences have. After a systematic review of available literature reporting recurrence risks after curative colorectal cancer surgery we report that the risks are lower today than they were in the past and that this risk reduction is not solely ascribed to the use of adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant therapy always means overtreatment of many patients, already cured by the surgery. Fewer recurrences mean that progress in the care of these patients has happened but also that the present guidelines giving recommendations based upon old data must be adjusted. The relative gains from adding chemotherapy are not altered, but the absolute number of patients gaining is less.

Abstract

Adjuvant chemotherapy aims at eradicating tumour cells sometimes present after radical surgery for a colorectal cancer (CRC) and thereby diminish the recurrence rate and prolong time to recurrence (TTR). Remaining tumour cells will lead to recurrent disease that is usually fatal. Adjuvant therapy is administered based upon the estimated recurrence risk, which in turn defines the need for this treatment. This systematic overview aims at describing whether the need has decreased since trials showing that adjuvant chemotherapy provides benefits in colon cancer were performed decades ago. Thanks to other improvements than the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, such as better staging, improved surgery, the use of radiotherapy and more careful pathology, recurrence risks have decreased. Methodological difficulties including intertrial comparisons decades apart and the present selective use of adjuvant therapy prevent an accurate estimate of the magnitude of the decreased need. Furthermore, most trials do not report recurrence rates or TTR, only disease-free and overall survival (DFS/OS). Fewer colon cancer patients, particularly in stage II but also in stage III, today display a sufficient need for adjuvant treatment considering the burden of treatment, especially when oxaliplatin is added. In rectal cancer, neo-adjuvant treatment will be increasingly used, diminishing the need for adjuvant treatment.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients

The value of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients has been the subject of many overviews, with opinions varying from “not effective”, since randomized trials have not been performed, to “as effective as in young individuals”, based upon many retrospective analyses of randomized trials that have included patients of all ages. In the absence of randomized trials performed specifically with elderly patients, retrospective analyses demonstrate that the influence on the time to tumour recurrence (TTR) may be the same as in young individuals, but that endpoints that include death for any reason, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), are poorer in the elderly. This is particularly true if oxaliplatin has been part of the treatment. The need for adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients is basically the same as that in younger patients. The reduction in recurrence risks may be similar, provided the chosen treatment is tolerated but survival gains are less. Adding oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine is probably not beneficial in individuals above a biological age of approximately 70 years. If an oxaliplatin combination is administered to elderly patients, three months of therapy is in all probability the most realistic goal.

Prognostic Significance of Neoadjuvant Rectal Score and Indication for Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for patients with clinical Stage II/III rectal cancer. However, the benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients after neoadjuvant CRT is uncertain. Recently, neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was suggested as an independent prognostic factor for patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of NAR score in rectal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery, and to investigate which patients may benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 72 patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by R0 resection for clinical stage II /III rectal cancer were evaluated. The correlation between NAR score, various clinicopathological factors and disease recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

Disease recurrence was significantly more often observed in patients with incomplete neoadjuvant CRT, tumor regression grade (TRG) 3-4, and high NAR score. Multivariate analysis revealed that NAR score was an independent predictor of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

NAR score may be one of the predictive markers for disease recurrence in patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery for rectal cancer. Patients with a low NAR score may benefit form postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

NORAD01-GRECCAR16 multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized trial comparing preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX without irradiation to radiochemotherapy for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (intergroup FRENCH-GRECCAR- PRODIGE trial)

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) is recommended in France prior to total mesorectal excision in patients with mid or low locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (cT3/T4 and/or N+) because it has been shown to improve local control. Preoperative RCT has also disadvantages including the absence of proven impact on metastatic recurrence and the risk of late side effects on bowel and genitourinary function. In patients with primarily resectable LARC, preoperative systemic chemotherapy without pelvic irradiation could be used as an alternative to RCT.

METHODS

This study is a multicenter, open-label randomized, 2-arm phase III non-inferiority trial. Patients with mid or low resectable LARC (cT3N0 or cT1-T3N+ with circumferential resection margin [CRM] > 2 mm on pretreatment MRI) will be randomized to either modified FOLFIRINOX for 3 months or RCT (Cap50 intensified-modulated radiotherapy). All patients have restaging MRI after preoperative treatment. The primary endpoint is 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) from the time to randomization including progression during preoperative treatment. Secondary endpoints are treatment related toxicity, treatment compliance, R0 resection rate, sphincter saving surgery rate, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, loco-regional recurrence free survival, overall survival, bowel and sexual functions at diagnosis, quality of life, radiologic and pathologic response after preoperative treatment. The number of patients required is 574.

DISCUSSION

The choice of modified FOLFIRINOX for preoperative chemotherapy is supported by recent and consistent data on safety and efficacy of this regimen on rectal cancer. The use of preoperative chemotherapy instead of RCT could be associated with pronounced advantages in terms of functional results and quality of life in cancer survivors. However and first of all, the non-inferiority of preoperative chemotherapy compared to RCT on oncologic outcome has to be validated. If this study demonstrates the non-inferiority of chemotherapy compared to RCT, this can lead to a crucial change in clinical practice in a large subset of rectal cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03875781 (March 15, 2019). Version 1.1.

Compliance and tolerability of short-course radiotherapy followed by preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for high-risk rectal cancer - Results of the international randomized RAPIDO-trial

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is widely accepted as the standard of care for high-risk rectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy is advised in several international guidelines, although the survival benefit remains unclear and compliance is poor. The current multidisciplinary approach has led to major improvements in local control, yet the occurrence of distant metastases has not decreased accordingly. The combination of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and chemotherapy in the waiting period before surgery might have several benefits, including higher compliance, downstaging and better effect of systemic therapy.

METHODS

This is an investigator-initiated, international multicentre randomized phase III trial. High-risk rectal cancer patients were randomized to SCRT followed by chemotherapy (6 cycles CAPOX or alternatively 9 cycles FOLFOX4) and subsequent surgery, or long-course radiotherapy (25-28 × 2-1.8 Gy) with concomitant capecitabine followed by surgery and optional postoperative chemotherapy (8 cycles CAPOX or 12 cycles FOLFOX4) according to local institutions' policy. The primary endpoint is time to disease-related treatment failure. Here, we report the compliance, toxicity and postoperative complications in both study groups.

FINDINGS

Between June 2011 and June 2016, 920 patients were enrolled. Of these, 901 were evaluable (460 in the experimental arm and 441 in the standard arm). All patients in the experimental arm received 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy, and 84% of all patients received at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy. In the standard arm, the compliance for CRT was 93% and 58% for postoperative chemotherapy. Toxicity ≥grade 3 occurred in 48% of patients in the experimental arm, compared to 25% of patients in the standard arm during preoperative treatment and 35% of patients during postoperative chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences in surgical procedures or postoperative complications were observed.

INTERPRETATION

High compliance (84%) of preoperative systemic treatment could be achieved with the experimental approach. Although considerable toxicity was observed during preoperative therapy, this did not lead to differences in surgical procedures or postoperative complications. Longer follow-up time is needed to assess the primary endpoint and related outcomes.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: The past, present, and future

From a series of clinical trials in the last several decades, current treatment paradigms for locally advanced rectal cancer include: (1) preoperative long-course radiotherapy (RT) combined with radiosensitizing chemotherapy; (2) preoperative short-course RT alone followed by adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy; and (3) total neoadjuvant therapy with induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. Other strategies under active investigation in both institutional and cooperative trials include neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone without RT in select patients, total neoadjuvant therapy, watchful waiting after a clinical complete response as an alternative to surgical resection, and the use of different chemotherapeutic and targeted agents. The focus of this review is on established and novel therapeutic strategies for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Standard (8 weeks) vs long (12 weeks) timing to minimally-invasive surgery after NeoAdjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled parallel group trial (TiMiSNAR)

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of surgery in relation to chemoradiation is still controversial. Retrospective analysis has demonstrated in the recent decades that the regression of adenocarcinoma can be slow and not complete until after several months. More recently, increasing pathologic Complete Response rates have been demonstrated to be correlated with longer time interval. The purpose of the trial is to demonstrate if delayed timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy actually affects pathologic Complete Response and reflects on disease-free survival and overall survival rather than standard timing.

METHODS

The trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial comparing standard and delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Three-hundred and forty patients will be randomized on an equal basis to either robotic-assisted/standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery after 8 weeks or robotic-assisted/standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery after 12 weeks.

DISCUSSION

To date, it is well-know that pathologic Complete Response is associated with excellent prognosis and an overall survival of 90%. In the Lyon trial the rate of pCR or near pathologic Complete Response increased from 10.3 to 26% and in retrospective studies the increase rate was about 23-30%. These results may be explained on the relationship between radiation therapy and tumor regression: DNA damage occurs during irradiation, but cellular lysis occurs within the next weeks. Study results, whether confirmed that performing surgery after 12 weeks from neoadjuvant treatment is advantageous from a technical and oncological point of view, may change the current pathway of the treatment in those patient suffering from rectal cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT3465982.

Delay to Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Survival and Recurrence in Patients of Rectal Cancer Treated with Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery

PURPOSE

This aim of the study is to evaluate the survival function and hazard risks of delayed adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) to distant recurrence risk in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery.

METHODS

A single tertiary hospital retrospective cohort study of a duration of 5 years between January 2012 and December 2016 was performed. As no previous study shown a temporal relationship of delay to adjuvant/systemic ChT leading to increased risk of metastatic disease, we compared between our proposed cut-off with the median and mean value determined by our dataset. Time to event analysis and log rank tests were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients with rectal cancer were identified. Two hundred eighteen patients were ineligible, leaving 51 patients for final analysis. Patients in the non-delayed group at 23 (proposed) and 25 (median) weeks' cut-off reported better 5 years' disease free survival (DFS) compared with the delayed group by 4.1% and 0.8%. Inversely, at the cut-off 28 (mean) weeks, the delayed group had a better DFS by 4.4%. Females and patients less than 60 years old had better 5-year DFS by 22.8% and 24%. Delayed group has a higher hazard risk ratio (HR) of 1.28 of distant recurrence compared with non-delayed at 23 weeks' cut-off.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated delaying a patient to adjuvant ChT will lower their DFS and increase their HR compared with those whose treatment is not delayed. We have long been too focused on local control; hence, priority needs to be shifted to efforts in managing potential distant disease in a timely manner.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Survival Following Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with Pathologic Complete Response

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists over the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced (stages II-III) rectal cancer (LARC) patients who demonstrate pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. We conducted a retrospective analysis to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy imparts survival benefit among this population.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify LARC patients with pCR following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The cohort was stratified by receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Multiple imputation and a Cox proportional hazards model were employed to estimate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival.

RESULTS

There were 24,418 patients identified in the NCDB with clinically staged II or III rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Of these, 5606 (23.0%) had pCR. Among patients with pCR, 1401 (25%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 4205 (75%) did not. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were slightly younger, more likely to have private insurance, and more likely to have clinically staged III disease, but did not differ significantly in comparison to patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to race, sex, facility type, Charlson comorbidity score, histologic tumor grade, procedure type, length of stay, or rate of 30-day readmission following surgery. On adjusted analysis, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death at a given time compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.808; 95% CI 0.679-0.961; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Supporting existing NCCN guidelines, the findings from this study suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival for LARC with pCR following neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Association between Preoperative Pelvic Irradiation and Toxicity of Subsequent Chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have shown a lower efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients having received preoperative radiotherapy than in nonirradiated colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We hypothesized that preoperative radio(chemo)therapy impairs the relative dose intensity (RDI) of further chemotherapy because of long-term radiation damage. This retrospective study aimed to test this hypothesis.

METHODS

The analysis was conducted on 220 consecutive patients with CRC who received FOLFOX-4 postoperatively or because of cancer relapse. Of these, 41 patients with rectal cancer had preoperatively received radio(chemo)therapy (study group) and the remaining 179 with CRC had not (control group). The RDI of oxaliplatin at 8 and 16 weeks was calculated.

RESULTS

The median RDI of oxaliplatin at 8 weeks was 95.91% in the study group and 96.15% in the control group (p = 0.79). The corresponding percentages at 16 weeks were 87.6 and 86.5%, respectively (p = 0.55). It was found that within 0-8 weeks, 26.9% of the patients in the study group and 26.3% in the control group had grade 3+ toxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration (p = 0.94). The corresponding percentages for 0-16 weeks were 44.8 and 43.9%, respectively (p = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no association between preoperative radio(chemo)therapy and the RDI of FOLFOX-4. We failed to explain the inferior efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer who had preoperatively received irradiation compared to those with CRC who had not.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study evaluated the prognostic impact of ACT in patients who achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Articles published from January 1990 to September 2018 were searched in EMBASE, PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) were extracted. Thirteen observational studies were included. There were four National Cancer Database studies with overlapping study periods, thus individual pooled analyses of four different datasets were conducted (n = 3,182, 3,330, 3,575, and 4,739 for pooled analysis sets including Dossa et al., Polanco et al., Xu et al., and Shahab et al., respectively). Although a trend toward improved OS with ACT was observed, statistical significance was not proven (P = 0.09, P = 0.03, P = 0.12, and P = 0.10, respectively). When we performed a stratified analysis comparing the results from single institution and multicenter studies, there was no significant prognostic benefit of ACT. Publication bias was not observed. Routine use of ACT in patients with a pCR could not be warranted from the present meta-analysis. Further study of individual patient data from randomized trials is needed to clarify the role of ACT.

Total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Role of systemic chemotherapy

For the past several decades, disease-related outcomes, particularly local recurrence rate, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer have significantly improved as a result of advancement of surgical technique and implementation of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. However, distant metastasis remains unresolved, being a significant cause of cancer death. To focus on micrometastases early in the course of multimodal treatment, delivering systemic chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting is emerging. Also, driven by patient demand and interest in preserving quality of life, upfront chemotherapy prior to surgery serves as a strategy for organ preservation in the management of rectal cancer. Herein, currently available literature on different methods and strategies of the multimodal approach is critically appraised.

Postoperative complications in relation to overall treatment time in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy

Background

The optimal timing of surgery for rectal cancer after radiotherapy (RT) is disputed. The Stockholm III trial concluded that it was oncologically safe to delay surgery for 4–8 weeks after short-course RT (SRT), with fewer postoperative complications compared with SRT with surgery within a week. Other studies have indicated that an even shorter interval between RT and surgery (0–3 days) might be beneficial. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal interval to surgery after RT.

Methods

Patients were analysed as treated, in terms of overall treatment time (OTT), the interval from the start of RT until the day of surgery. Patients receiving SRT (5 × 5 Gy) were categorized according to OTT: 7 days (group A), 8–13 days (group B), 5–7 weeks (group C) and 8–13 weeks (group D). Patients receiving long-course RT (25 × 2 Gy) were grouped into those with an OTT of 9–11 weeks (group E) or 12–14 weeks (group F). Outcomes assessed were postoperative complications and early mortality.

Results

A total of 810 patients were analysed (group A, 100; group B, 247; group C, 192; group D, 160; group E, 52; group F, 59). Baseline patient characteristics were similar. There were significantly more overall complications in group B than in groups C and D. Adjusted odds ratios, with B as the reference group, were: 0·72 (95 per cent c.i. 0·40 to 1·32; P = 0·289), 0·50 (0·30 to 0·84; P = 0·009) and 0·39 (0·23 to 0·65; P &lt; 0·001) for groups A, C and D respectively. Early mortality was similar in all groups. There were no significant differences between long-course RT groups.

Conclusion

These results suggest that surgery should optimally be delayed for 4–12 weeks (OTT 5–13 weeks) after SRT.

Impact of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Long-course Chemoradiotherapy in Stage II Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) is controversial in rectal cancer (RC). We assessed a multi-institutional database to determine if there was benefit from AC for pathologic stage II RC patients and whether the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine (OXAC) therapy impacted outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included patients who underwent nCRT and had pathologic stage II (ypT3/4 ypN0) tumors. Disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed. Multivariate Cox models adjusting for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, high-risk features (pT4, poor differentiation, <12 nodes removed, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, or obstruction/perforation), and clinical stage were constructed.

RESULTS

Of 485 patients, 73.6% received AC, of which 25.5% received OXAC. Patients receiving AC were younger (median age 61 vs. 64; P=0.003) and had higher rates of total mesorectal excision (81.5% vs. 78.9%; P=0.049), but had similar high-risk features, performance status, clinical stage, margin status, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, and nCRT regimen. In univariate analysis, overall survival was improved with fluoropyrimidine AC compared with no AC or OXAC (P=0.049), but not disease-free survival (P=0.33). In multivariate analysis, any AC, fluoropyrimidine AC, or OXAC did not improve outcomes. After stratifying patients by the presence of high-risk features, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen, margin status, or preoperative clinical stage, we did not identify a group with improved outcomes following AC.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multi-institutional cohort of yp stage II RC patients, we failed to identify a group that derives benefit from AC following nCRT. The addition of oxaliplatin did not appear to improve outcomes when compared with fluoropyrimidine alone.