Challenges With the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebral Radiation Necrosis

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunt treatment for glioma and brain metastasis: a literature review

The incidence and mortality rates of malignant tumors are increasing annually, with gliomas and brain metastases linked to a poor prognosis. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a promising treatment modality for both gliomas and brain metastases. It can alleviate tumor hypoxia and enhance radiosensitivity. When combined with other treatments for gliomas, this therapy has the potential to enhance survival rates. This review addresses the progress in research on the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with radiotherapy. For brain metastases, the combination of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery is both feasible and advantagenous. This combination not only offers protection against radiation-induced brain injury but also supports the recovery of neurological and motor functions. The incidence of adverse reactions to hyperbaric oxygen therapy is relatively low, and it is safe and manageable. Future efforts should be made to investigate the mechanisms by which hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with radiotherapy treats gliomas and brain metastases, optimize protection of the combined treatment against brain injury, minimizing adverse reactions, conducting multidisciplinary research and clinical trials, and training healthcare providers to facilitate broader clinical application.

Local recurrence and radionecrosis after single-isocenter multiple targets stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is frequently used to treat brain metastases (BMs). The single-isocenter for multiple targets (SIMT) technique allows for faster treatment of large numbers of BMs, but may adversely affect planning target volume (PTV) coverage due to possible increased positioning uncertainties with an increased isocenter to tumor distance (ITD). This study aims to investigate the association of ITD with local recurrence (LR) and radionecrosis (RN). Patients treated with SRT using a single isocenter for multiple BMs were retrospectively analyzed. Previous cranial radiotherapy and inability to undergo MR imaging were exclusion criteria. Patients were irradiated using a Versa HD LINAC with 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) energy and a 6D robotic couch. A non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc technique was used and plans were delivered using 6MV FFF energy. Associations between potential risk factors and LR/RN were investigated with Cox regression analyses. Seventy-five patients with a total of 357 BMs were included. Median survival after SRT was nine months. LR occurred in 7 (9%) patients and 10 (13%) had RN. After 18 months, LR-free survival was 89% and RN-free survival was 85%, respectively. ITD was not significantly associated with LR and RN. GTV was significantly associated with both LR (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.17, P 0.0079) and RN (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, P 0.020). LINAC-based SIMT SRT is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with multiple BMs. We found no increased risk of LR or RN for BMs located further away from the isocenter.

Radiation Damage to a Three-Dimensional Hydrogel Model of the Brain Perivascular Niche

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive and recurrent brain cancer characterized by diffuse metastasis at the tumor margins. Radiation therapy is a standard component of current treatment and offers potential for improved patient outcomes. While radiation therapy targets GBM cells in the tumor margins, it may also significantly damage adjacent noncancerous tissues, leading to reduced quality of life and potentially creating a tumor-supportive microenvironment. The perivascular niche (PVN) in the tumor margins is believed to play a significant role in regulating the glioblastoma stem cell subpopulation as well as serving as a site for cancer recurrence and migration. Understanding the impact of radiation on the PVN can better inform radiation schemes and improve our understanding of GBM recurrence, but is difficult in vivo. Here, we adapt a previously developed three-dimensional hydrogel model of the brain PVN to investigate the impact of radiation dosage and delivery rate on PVN properties in vitro. Effects of radiation on vessel architecture can be measured in this hydrogel-based model, suggesting an approach that can provide insight into the effects of radiation on a shorter time scale relative to in vivo experiments.

Radiation damage to a three-dimensional hydrogel model of the brain perivascular niche

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive and recurrent brain cancer characterized by diffuse metastasis at the tumor margins. Radiation therapy is a standard component of current treatment and offers potential for improved patient outcomes. While radiation therapy targets GBM cells in the tumor margins, it may also significantly damage adjacent non-cancerous tissues, leading to reduced quality of life and potentially creating a tumor-supportive microenvironment. The perivascular niche (PVN) in the tumor margins is believed to play a significant role in regulating the glioblastoma stem cell subpopulation as well as serving as a site for cancer recurrence and migration. Understanding the impact of radiation on the PVN can better inform radiation schemes and improve our understanding of GBM recurrence, but is difficult in vivo. Here we adapt a previously developed three-dimensional hydrogel model of the brain perivascular niche to investigate the impact of radiation dosage and delivery rate on perivascular niche properties in vitro. Effects of radiation on vessel architecture can be measured in this hydrogel-based model, suggesting an approach that can provide insight into the effects of radiation on a shorter time scale relative to in vivo experiments.

Investigation of the effects and mechanism of Total Glycosides of paeony against Radiation-Induced brain injury through network Pharmacology, molecular docking and experimental Verification

BACKGROUND

Total glucosides of paeony (TGP), derived from the dried root of Paeonia, is a popular treatment for immune diseases. Radiation induced brain injury (RBI) is a common side effect of brain radiation therapy, but the efficacy of TGP in treating RBI remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the protective effects of TGP against RBI and elucidate its underlying mechanisms using pharmacological network analysis, molecular docking, and experimental validation.

METHODS

The potential targets of TGP and RBI were identified using network pharmacology. Overlapping targets were analyzed for KEGG pathway enrichment and gene ontology (GO) investigations. The therapeutic effectiveness of TGP and the precision of key target genes were assessed in the mouse model of RBI, alongside observations of behavioral changes and experimental techniques.

RESULTS

Network pharmacology identified 43 targets associated with RBI that intersect with TGP. Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis highlighted key targets, including EGFR, TNF, and IL-6. Experimental outcomes demonstrated that TGP can mitigate oxidative stress damage and inflammation while enhancing memoryand learning abilities in RBI mice. Additionally, TGP dramatically decreased the activation of astrocytes and microglia, as well as the expression of key targets like EGFR, TNF, and IL-6.

CONCLUSION

TGP effectively mitigates RBI by targeting key therapeutic targets such as EGFR, TNF, and IL-6.

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for resected brain metastases - a single centre analysis

Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control (LC) after resection of brain metastases. In comparison to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to resection cavity significantly reduces cognitive side effects. However, two phase-III trials have reported suboptimal LC with SRS, leading to increased interest in hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as an alternative to improve outcomes. This single-centre study, based on a prospective quality assurance protocol, included 161 patients with 185 resected brain metastases treated with either SRS or SRT between February 2018 and June 2023. Patients were assigned to treatment based on cavity size, with SRS typically used for cavities < 10 cc and SRT for larger volumes. Primary and secondary endpoints were LC and radiation necrosis (RN), respectively. Data analysis was conducted retrospectively. Median cavity size was 13.3 cc, with 20% of cavities receiving SRS and 80% SRT. 12-month LC was 92.6% (95-CI: 88.2 - 97.3%), 12-month RN incidence was 9% (95-CI: 3-14%), with RN limited to CTCAE v5 ≤ 2. In cavities < 10 cc, no significant difference in LC was found between SRS and SRT. For cavities > 10 cc, PTV volume was the only significant predictor of LC, while fractionation and dose did not significantly impact outcomes. SRS and SRT both offer excellent LC for resection cavities < 10 cc with low rates of RN, suggesting SRS as the preferred treatment in this collective, in consideration of patient comfort and resource allocation. In larger cavities, PTV volume significantly influences LC. Dose escalation might be beneficial in improving outcomes in these cases.

The 5-factor modified frailty index as a prognostic factor following stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic disease to the brain from non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-center cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients often develop brain metastases (BMs), complicating management. We have shown that increasing frailty is associated with decreased overall survival (OS) and central nervous system progression free survival (PFS) for patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to BMs. Leveraging the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, we sought to expand upon these findings, in NSCLC specifically.

METHODS

Across four institutions, 193 patients with (≥1) NSCLC derived BMs with minimum 3 months of clinical/radiographic follow-up were analyzed. Primary outcomes included OS and PFS. Patients were stratified utilizing the mFI-5 into pre-frail (0-1), frail (2), and severely frail (3 + ).

RESULTS

Increased frailty was associated with diminished OS (frail hazard ratio (HR) = 2.49, 95 % CI [1.61-3.85]; severely frail HR = 2.65, 95 % CI [1.57-4.45]). The 6-month post-SRS survival rate was 86.1 %, 69.5 % and 54.5 % for pre-frail, frail and severely frail patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Frailty was not significantly predictive of time to PFS on multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards analysis although there was a trend towards diminished PFS with increasing frailty (median PFS was 18.4, 8.0, and 7.4 months for pre-frail, frail, and severely frail, respectively (p = 0.11). As age > 65 was also predictive of shorter OS (HR = 1.78, 95 % CI [1.23-2.56]). We generated a novel scoring system incorporating age and frailty status. The median survival of patients that scored 0, 1, 2, and 3 points were 21.1, 18.3, 8.9, and 5.6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the curve of the validation cohort using a logistic regression model was 0.77.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the MFI-5 is a promising metric with application at the point of care to provide decision support for patients with NSCLC derived BMs.

The current research status of the mechanisms and treatment of radioactive brain injury

Radioactive brain injury, a severe complication ensuing from radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies, frequently manifests as cognitive impairment and substantially diminishes patients' quality of life. Despite its profound impact, the pathogenesis of this condition remains inadequately elucidated, and efficacious treatments are notably absent in clinical practice. Consequently, contemporary interventions predominantly focus on symptom alleviation rather than achieving a radical cure or reversing the injury process. This article provides a comprehensive review of the various pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic strategies associated with radioactive brain injury, offering insights that may guide the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Cluster-based radiomics reveal spatial heterogeneity of bevacizumab response for treatment of radiotherapy-induced cerebral necrosis

Background

Bevacizumab is used in the treatment of radiation necrosis (RN), which is a debilitating toxicity following head and neck radiotherapy. However, there is no biomarker to predict if a patient would respond to bevacizumab.

Purpose

We aimed to develop a cluster-based radiomics approach to characterize the spatial heterogeneity of RN and map their responses to bevacizumab.

Methods

118 consecutive nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients diagnosed with RN were enrolled. We divided 152 lesions from the patients into 101 for training, and 51 for validation. We extracted voxel-level radiomics features from each lesion segmented on T1-weighted+contrast and T2 FLAIR sequences of pre- and post-bevacizumab magnetic resonance images, followed by a three-step analysis involving individual- and population-level clustering, before delta-radiomics to derive five radiomics clusters within the lesions. We tested the association of each cluster with response to bevacizumab and developed a clinico-radiomics model using clinical predictors and cluster-specific features.

Results

71 (70.3%) and 34 (66.7%) lesions had responded to bevacizumab in the training and validation datasets, respectively. Two radiomics clusters were spatially mapped to the edema region, and the volume changes were significantly associated with bevacizumab response (OR:11.12 [95% CI: 2.54-73.47], P = 0.004; and 1.63[1.07-2.78], P = 0.042). The combined clinico-radiomics model based on textural features extracted from the most significant cluster improved the prediction of bevacizumab response, compared with a clinical-only model (AUC:0.755 [0.645-0.865] to 0.852 [0.764-0.940], training; 0.708 [0.554-0.861] to 0.816 [0.699-0.933], validation).

Conclusion

Our radiomics approach yielded intralesional resolution, enabling a more refined feature selection for predicting bevacizumab efficacy in the treatment of RN.

Radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases with and without concomitant immunotherapy: comparison of patient outcome and neurotoxicity

BACKGROUND/AIM

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been added to the treatment of brain metastases. While combining radiotherapy and ICI can enhance therapeutic effects, it might also increase the risk of severe autoimmune adverse events. This retrospective study aims to compare treatment responses and neurotoxicity in patients treated with radiotherapy alone versus those receiving a combination of radiotherapy and ICI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with brain metastases who received radiotherapy at Hannover Medical School from 2017 to 2019 were included. The medical reports of all study participants were evaluated. Patients who received radiotherapy alone and those who received a combination of radiation and ICI were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients were analyzed, with the most common tumor types being non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant melanoma. Half of the patients received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and the other half stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Of these, 29 patients received concurrent immunotherapy and radiotherapy, 30 completed immunotherapy before radiotherapy, and 29 started ICI after completing radiotherapy. Two cases lacked information on the duration of immunotherapy. Overall survival post-initial tumor diagnosis within the total cohort was 52 months, with significantly worse survival for patients with multiple brain metastases (p = 0.020). No significant differences in survival or incidence of neurological adverse events were observed between patients with or without ICI.

CONCLUSION

Combining radiotherapy and ICI did not significantly increase neurotoxicity or improve survival in this cohort, though the heterogeneity of the subgroups limits the generalizability of these findings.

A study method using early dynamic acquisition of [18F]fluorodopa positron emission tomography for the differential diagnosis between progression and radionecrosis of brain metastases after radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to distinguish between the brain metastasis progression (BMP) and brain radionecrosis (BRN) on the basis of 18F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed-tomography (18F-FDOPA PET/CT) data. The advent of silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) PET technology makes it possible to study dynamic volumes and potentially improve diagnostic accuracy. We developed a method for processing 18F-FDOPA PET/CT in the differential diagnosis between BMP and BRN. The method involves a short (3-second) sampling time during a 4-minute acquisition on a SiPM-PET/CT machine. We prospectively included 15 patients and 19 metastases. All acquisitions were performed in list mode acquisition for 25 min on a four-ring SiPM PET/CT system. We calculated the ratios between the maximum activity in the lesion's voxel and the mean activity in the contralateral region (VOImax/CLmean) or the mean activity in the white matter (VOImax/WMmean).

RESULTS

Seven lesions were classified as BMP and twelve were classified as BRN. Statistically significant intergroup differences in the VOImax/CLmean and VOImax/WMmean activity ratios were observed for both the clinical volume and the early acquisition. The best performing quantitative variable was the VOImax/CLmean ratio on early acquisition, with a diagnostic accuracy of 94.7%, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 91.7%.

CONCLUSION

The 18F-FDOPA PET/CT data acquired a few minutes after the bolus injection confirms its value in differentiating between BMP and BRN, compared to the much longer classic clinical protocol.

Beyond conventional imaging: Advancements in MRI for glioma malignancy prediction and molecular profiling

This review examines the advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and their pivotal role in diagnosing and managing gliomas, the most prevalent primary brain tumors. The paper underscores the importance of integrating modern MRI modalities, such as diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion MRI, which are essential for assessing glioma malignancy and predicting tumor behavior. Special attention is given to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, emphasizing the integration of molecular diagnostics in glioma classification, significantly impacting treatment decisions. The review also explores radiogenomics, which correlates imaging features with molecular markers to tailor personalized treatment strategies. Despite technological progress, MRI protocol standardization and result interpretation challenges persist, affecting diagnostic consistency across different settings. Furthermore, the review addresses MRI's capacity to distinguish between tumor recurrence and pseudoprogression, which is vital for patient management. The necessity for greater standardization and collaborative research to harness MRI's full potential in glioma diagnosis and personalized therapy is highlighted, advocating for an enhanced understanding of glioma biology and more effective treatment approaches.

A bibliometric analysis of radiation-induced brain injury: a research of the literature from 1998 to 2023

BACKGROUND

Radiation-induced brain injury (RIBI) is a debilitating sequela after cranial radiotherapy. Research on the topic of RIBI has gradually entered the public eye, with more innovations and applications of evidence-based research and biological mechanism research in the field of that. This was the first bibliometric analysis on RIBI, assessing brain injury related to radiation articles that were published during 1998-2023, to provide an emerging theoretical basis for the future development of RIBI.

METHODS

Literature were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) from its inception to December 31, 2023. The column of publications, author details, affiliated institutions and countries, publication year, and keywords were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 2543 journal articles were selected. The annual publications on RIBI fluctuated within a certain range. Journal of Neuro-oncology was the most published journal and Radiation Oncology was the most impactful one. LIMOLI CL was the most prolific author with 37 articles and shared the highest h-index with BARNETT GH. The top one country and institutions were the USA and the University of California System, respectively. Clusters analysis of co-keywords demonstrated that the temporal research trends in this field primarily focused on imaging examination and therapy for RIBI.

CONCLUSION

This study collects, visualizes, and analyzes the literature within the field of RIBI over the last 25 years to map the development process, research frontiers and hotspots, and cutting-edge directions in clinical practice and mechanisms related to RIBI.

[Brain metastases]

Cerebral metastases in patients with metastatic lung cancer are found in more than 30% of patients at baseline and manifest themselves in two out of three patients during disease evolution. For a long time, the cerebral manifestation of the disease was classified as prognostically unfavorable and hence such patients were regularly excluded from therapy studies. In the context of targeted molecular therapy strategies and established immuno-oncological systemic therapies, the blood-brain barrier no longer represents an insurmountable barrier. However, the treatment of brain metastases requires decision making in a multidisciplinary team within dedicated lung cancer and/or oncology centers. The differentiated treatment decision is based on the number, size and location of the brain metastases, neurology and general condition, comorbidities, potential life expectancy and the patient's wishes, but also tumor biology including molecular targets, extra-cranial tumor burden and availability of a CNS-effective therapy. Systemic therapies as well as neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic concepts are now often combined for optimized and prognosis-improving therapeutic strategies.

Clinical and radiological effects of Bevacizumab for the treatment of radionecrosis after stereotactic brain radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to analyze the clinical and radiological effects of bevacizumab (BV) on radionecrosis (RN) that developed after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastasis.

METHODS

Forty patients with SRT related symptomatic brain RN treated in 10 radiation oncology centers were analyzed. The clinical response to BV treatment was categorized as follows: complete (no additional treatment required), partial (requiring either steroids or repeat BV), and unresponsive (requiring surgery). The radiological features of brain RN were analyzed in 10 patients whose serial MRI scans were available after corticosteroid and BV treatments.

RESULTS

BV was used as a first line treatment in 11 (27.5%) and as a second line treatment in 29 (72.5%) of patients. The neurological symptoms regressed in 77.5% of patients after treatment with BV (45% complete response, 32.5% partial response). The median edema volume increased from 75.9 cc (range: 5.9-125.8 cc) at RN to 113.65 cc (range: 1.5-382.1 cc) after use of corticosteroids, representing a rate of 39.8% increase (p = 0.074). However, after BV treatment the median volume of edema decreased to 19.5 cc (range: 0-163.3 cc) which represents a difference of 62.2% (p = 0.041) from RN.

CONCLUSION

The use of BV caused clinical response rate of 77.5% and a good radiological response in corticosteroid unresponsive patients. The role of BV should be further investigated in prospective studies.

Pathologic features of brain hemorrhage after radiation treatment: case series with somatic mutation analysis

BACKGROUND

Radiation treatment for diseases of the brain can result in hemorrhagic adverse radiation effects. The underlying pathologic substrate of brain bleeding after irradiation has not been elucidated, nor potential associations with induced somatic mutations.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our department's pathology database over 5 years and identified 5 biopsy specimens (4 patients) for hemorrhagic lesions after brain irradiation. Tissues with active malignancy were excluded. Samples were characterized using H&E, Perl's Prussian Blue, and Masson's Trichrome; immunostaining for B-cells (anti-CD20), T-cells (anti-CD3), endothelium (anti-CD31), macrophages (anti-CD163), α-smooth muscle actin, and TUNEL. DNA analysis was done by two panels of next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations associated with known cerebrovascular anomalies.

RESULTS

One lesion involved hemorrhagic expansion among multifocal microbleeds that had developed after craniospinal irradiation for distant medulloblastoma treatment. Three bleeds arose in the bed of focally irradiated arteriovenous malformations (AVM) after confirmed obliteration. A fifth specimen involved the radiation field distinct from an irradiated AVM bed. From these, 2 patterns of hemorrhagic vascular pathology were identified: encapsulated hematomas and cavernous-like malformations. All lesions included telangiectasias with dysmorphic endothelium, consistent with primordial cavernous malformations with an associated inflammatory response. DNA analysis demonstrated genetic variants in PIK3CA and/or PTEN genes but excluded mutations in CCM genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite pathologic heterogeneity, brain bleeding after irradiation is uniformly associated with primordial cavernous-like telangiectasias and disruption of genes implicated in dysangiogenesis but not genes implicated as causative of cerebral cavernous malformations. This may implicate a novel signaling axis as an area for future study.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as an Alternative Therapeutic Option for Radiation-Induced Necrosis Following Radiotherapy for Intracranial Pathologies

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) is a feasible adjuvant therapeutic option for managing intracranial pathologies. One of the late complications of RT that frequently develops within months following RT is radiation necrosis (RN). Corticosteroids are the first-line therapeutic option for RNs; however, in case of unfavorable outcomes or intolerability, several other options, including bevacizumab, laser interstitial thermal therapy, surgery, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Our goal was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the application of HBOT in RNs following RT and help physicians make decisions based on the latest data in the literature.

METHODS

We provide a comprehensive review of the literature on the current issues of utilization of HBOT in RNs.

RESULTS

We included 11 studies with a total of 46 patients who underwent HBOT. Most of the cases were diagnosed with brain tumors or arteriovenous malformations. Improvement was achieved in most of the cases.

DISCUSSION

HBOT is a noninvasive therapeutic intervention that can play a role in adjuvant therapy concurrent with RT and chemotherapy and treating RNs. HBOT resolves the RN through 3 mechanisms, including angiogenesis, anti-inflammatory modulation, and cellular repair. Previous studies demonstrated that HBOT is a feasible and well-tolerated therapeutic option that has shown promising results in improving clinical and radiological outcomes in intracranial RNs. Complications of HBOT are usually mild and reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

HBOT is a feasible and effective therapeutic option in steroid-refractory RNs and is associated with favorable outcomes and a low rate of side effects.

Brain and Brain Stem Necrosis After Reirradiation for Recurrent Childhood Primary Central Nervous System Tumors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE

Reirradiation is increasingly used in children and adolescents/young adults (AYA) with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) reirradiation task force aimed to quantify risks of brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic literature search using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1975 to 2021 identified 92 studies on reirradiation for recurrent tumors in children/AYA. Seventeen studies representing 449 patients who reported brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation contained sufficient data for analysis. While all 17 studies described techniques and doses used for reirradiation, they lacked essential details on clinically significant dose-volume metrics necessary for dose-response modeling on late effects. We, therefore, estimated incidences of necrosis with an exact 95% CI and qualitatively described data. Results from multiple studies were pooled by taking the weighted average of the reported crude rates from individual studies.

RESULTS

Treated cancers included ependymoma (n = 279 patients; 7 studies), medulloblastoma (n = 98 patients; 6 studies), any CNS tumors (n = 62 patients; 3 studies), and supratentorial high-grade gliomas (n = 10 patients; 1 study). The median interval between initial and reirradiation was 2.3 years (range, 1.2-4.75 years). The median cumulative prescription dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD22; assuming α/β value = 2 Gy) was 103.8 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy). Among 449 reirradiated children/AYA, 22 (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) developed brain necrosis and 14 (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.2%) developed brain stem necrosis with a weighted median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-7.4 years). The median cumulative prescription EQD22 was 111.4 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for development of any necrosis, 107.7 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for brain necrosis, and 112.1 Gy (range, 100.2-117 Gy) for brain stem necrosis. The median latent period between reirradiation and the development of necrosis was 5.7 months (range, 4.3-24 months). Though there were more events among children/AYA undergoing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated reirradiation, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

Existing reports suggest that in children/AYA with recurrent brain tumors, reirradiation with a total EQD22 of about 112 Gy is associated with an approximate 5% to 7% incidence of brain/brain stem necrosis after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (with the initial course of radiation therapy being given with conventional prescription doses of ≤2 Gy per fraction and the second course with variable fractionations). We recommend a uniform approach for reporting dosimetric endpoints to derive robust predictive models of late toxicities following reirradiation.

Hypofractionated re-irradiation for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma

BACKGROUND

Re-irradiation (reRT) increases survival in locally recurrent diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). There is no standard dose and fractionation for reRT, but conventional fractionation (CF) is typically used. We report our institutional experience of reRT for DIPG, which includes hypofractionation (HF).

METHODS

We reviewed pediatric patients treated with brainstem reRT for DIPG at our institution from 2012 to 2022. Patients were grouped by HF or CF. Outcomes included steroid use, and overall survival (OS) was measured from both diagnosis and start of reRT.

RESULTS

Of 22 patients who received reRT for DIPG, two did not complete their course due to clinical decline. Of the 20 who completed reRT, the dose was 20-30 Gy in 2-Gy fractions (n = 6) and 30-36 Gy in 3-Gy fractions (n = 14). Median age was 5 years (range: 3-14), median interval since initial RT was 8 months (range: 3-20), and 12 received concurrent bevacizumab. Median OS from diagnosis was 18 months [95% confidence interval: 17-24]. Median OS from start of reRT for HF versus CF was 8.2 and 7.5 months, respectively (p = .20). Thirteen (93%) in the HF group and three (75%) in the CF group tapered pre-treatment steroid dose down or off within 2 months after reRT due to clinical improvement. There was no significant difference in steroid taper between HF and CF (p = .4). No patients developed radionecrosis.

CONCLUSION

reRT with HF achieved survival duration comparable to published outcomes and effectively palliated symptoms. Future investigation of this regimen in the context of new systemic therapies and upfront HF is warranted.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial postoperative cavities after resection of brain metastases - Clinical outcome and prognostic factors

Background and Purpose

After surgical resection of brain metastases (BM), radiotherapy (RT) is indicated. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reduces the risk of local progression and neurocognitive decline compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Aside from the optimal dose and fractionation, little is known about the combination of systemic therapy and postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), especially regarding tumour control and toxicity.

Methods

In this study, 105 patients receiving postoperative fSRT with 35 Gy in 7 fractions performed with Cyberknife were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and total intracranial brain control (TIBC) were analysed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors.

Results

Median follow-up was 20.8 months. One-year TIBC was 61.6% and one-year LC was 98.6%. Median OS was 28.7 (95%-CI: 16.9-40.5) months. In total, local progression (median time not reached) occurred in 2.0% and in 20.4% radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) of the cavity (after median of 14.3 months) were diagnosed. Absence of extracranial metastases was identified as an independent prognostic factor for superior OS (p = <0.001) in multivariate analyses, while a higher Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was predictive for longer OS in univariate analysis (p = 0.041). Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) developed in 13% of patients.

Conclusion

FSRT after surgical resection of BM is an effective and safe treatment approach with excellent local control and acceptable toxicity. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to establish standardized therapeutic guidelines.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Perfusion MRI and Conventional MRI in Distinguishing Recurrent Cerebral Metastasis from Brain Radiation Necrosis

Differentiating recurrent cerebral metastasis (CM) from brain radiation necrosis (BRN) is pivotal for guiding appropriate treatment and prognostication. Despite advances in imaging techniques, however, accurately distinguishing these conditions non-invasively is still challenging. This single-center retrospective study reviewed 32 cases (28 patients) with confirmed cerebral metastases who underwent surgical excision of lesions initially diagnosed by MRI and/or MR perfusion scans from 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2020. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing imaging findings with postoperative histopathology. Conventional MRI accurately identified recurrent CM in 75% of cases. MR perfusion scans showed significantly higher mean maximum relative cerebral blood volume (max. rCBV) in metastasis cases, indicating its potential as a discriminative biomarker. No single imaging modality could definitively distinguish CM from BRN. Survival analysis revealed gender as the only significant factor affecting overall survival, with no significant survival difference observed between patients with CM and BRN after controlling for confounding factors. This study underscores the limitations of both conventional MRI and MR perfusion scans in differentiating recurrent CM from BRN. Histopathological examination remains essential for accurate diagnosis. Further research is needed to improve the reliability of non-invasive imaging and to guide the management of patients with these post-radiation events.

Single-Fraction Versus Fractionated Preoperative Radiosurgery for Resected Brain Metastases: A PROPS-BM International Multicenter Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a feasible alternative to postoperative SRS for resected brain metastases (BM). Most reported studies of preoperative SRS used single-fraction SRS (SF-SRS). The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and toxicity of preoperative SF-SRS with multifraction (3-5 fractions) SRS (MF-SRS) in a large international multicenter cohort (Preoperative Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases-PROPS-BM).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with BM from solid cancers, of which at least 1 lesion was treated with preoperative SRS followed by planned resection, were included from 8 institutions. SRS to synchronous intact BM was allowed. Exclusion criteria included prior or planned whole brain radiation therapy. Intracranial outcomes were estimated using cumulative incidence with competing risk of death. Propensity score matched (PSM) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 404 patients with 416 resected index lesions, of which SF-SRS and MF-SRS were used for 317 (78.5%) and 87 patients (21.5%), respectively. Median dose was 15 Gy in 1 fraction for SF-SRS and 24 Gy in 3 fractions for MF-SRS. Univariable analysis demonstrated that SF-SRS was associated with higher cavity local recurrence (LR) compared with MF-SRS (2-year: 16.3% vs 2.9%; P = .004), which was also demonstrated in multivariable analysis. PSM yielded 81 matched pairs (n = 162). PSM analysis also demonstrated significantly higher rate of cavity LR with SF-SRS (2-year: 19.8% vs 3.3%; P = .003). There was no difference in adverse radiation effect, meningeal disease, or overall survival between cohorts in either analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative MF-SRS was associated with significantly reduced risk of cavity LR in both the unmatched and PSM analyses. There was no difference in adverse radiation effect, meningeal disease, or overall survival based on fractionation. MF-SRS may be a preferred option for neoadjuvant radiation therapy of resected BMs. Additional confirmatory studies are needed. A phase 3 randomized trial of single-fraction preoperative versus postoperative SRS (NRG-BN012) is ongoing (NCT05438212).

Can low-dose intravenous bevacizumab be as effective as high-dose bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis?

Although intravenous bevacizumab (IVBEV) is the most promising treatment for cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN), there is no conclusion on the optimal dosage. Our retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose with low-dose IVBEV in treating CRN associated with radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs). This paper describes 75 patients who were diagnosed with CRN secondary to radiotherapy for BMs, treated with low-dose or high-dose IVBEV and followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The clinical data collected for this study include changes in brain MRI, clinical symptoms, and corticosteroid usage before, during, and after IVBEV treatment. At the 3-month mark following administration of IVBEV, a comparison of two groups revealed that the median percentage decreases in CRN volume on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted gadolinium contrast-enhanced image (T1CE), as well as the signal ratio reduction on T1CE, were 65.8% versus 64.8% (p = 0.860), 41.2% versus 51.9% (p = 0.396), and 37.4% versus 35.1% (p = 0.271), respectively. Similarly, at 6 months post-IVBEV, the median percentage reductions of the aforementioned parameters were 59.5% versus 62.0% (p = 0.757), 39.1% versus 31.3% (p = 0.851), and 35.4% versus 28.2% (p = 0.083), respectively. Notably, the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was higher in the high-dose group (n = 4, 9.8%) than in the low-dose group (n = 0). Among patients with CRN secondary to radiotherapy for BMs, the administration of high-dose IVBEV did not demonstrate superiority over low-dose IVBEV. Moreover, the use of high-dose IVBEV was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events compared with low-dose IVBEV.

Comparing [18F]FET PET and [18F]FDOPA PET for glioma recurrence diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The purpose of our meta-analysis and systematic review was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic effectiveness of [18F]FET PET and [18F]FDOPA PET in detecting glioma recurrence.

Methods

Sensitivities and specificities were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird methodology, and subsequently transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double inverse sine transformation. Confidence intervals were computed employing the Jackson method, while heterogeneity within and between groups was evaluated through the Cochrane Q and I² statistics. If substantial heterogeneity among the studies was observed (P < 0.10 or I² > 50%), we conducted meta-regression and sensitivity analyses. Publication bias was assessed through the test of a funnel plot and the application of Egger's test. For all statistical tests, except for assessing heterogeneity (P < 0.10), statistical significance was determined when the two-tailed P value fell below 0.05.

Results

Initially, 579 publications were identified, and ultimately, 22 studies, involving 1514 patients(1226 patients for [18F]FET PET and 288 patients for [18F]FDOPA PET), were included in the analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of [18F]FET PET were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91), respectively, while for [18F]FDOPA PET, the values were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-1.00) for sensitivity and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98) for specificity. A statistically significant difference in sensitivity existed between these two radiotracers (P=0.04), while no significant difference was observed in specificity (P=0.58).

Conclusion

It seems that [18F]FDOPA PET demonstrates superior sensitivity and similar specificity to [18F] FET PET. Nevertheless, it's crucial to emphasize that [18F]FDOPA PET results were obtained from studies with limited sample sizes. Further larger prospective studies, especially head-to-head comparisons, are needed in this issue.

Systematic Review Registration

identifier CRD42023463476.

Bibliometric and visualization analysis of radiation brain injury from 2003 to 2023

Background

Over the past two decades, the field of radiation brain injury has attracted the attention of an increasing number of brain scientists, particularly in the areas of molecular pathology and therapeutic approaches. Characterizing global collaboration networks and mapping development trends over the past 20 years is essential.

Objective

The aim of this paper is to examine significant issues and future directions while shedding light on collaboration and research status in the field of radiation brain injury.

Methods

Bibliometric studies were performed using CiteSpaceR-bibliometrix and VOSviewer software on papers regarding radiation brain injury that were published before November 2023 in the Web of Science Core Collection.

Results

In the final analysis, we found 4,913 records written in 1,219 publications by 21,529 authors from 5,007 institutions in 75 countries. There was a noticeable increase in publications in 2014 and 2021. The majority of records listed were produced by China, the United States, and other high-income countries. The largest nodes in each cluster of the collaboration network were Sun Yat-sen University, University of California-San Francisco, and the University of Toronto. Galldiks N, Barnett GH, Langen KJ and Kim JH are known to be core authors in the field. The top 3 keywords in that time frame are radiation, radiation necrosis, and radiation-therapy.

Conclusions

The objective and thorough bibliometric analysis also identifies current research hotspots and potential future paths, providing a retrospective perspective on RBI and offering useful advice to researchers choosing research topics. Future development directions include the integration of multi-omics methodologies and novel imaging techniques to improve RBI's diagnostic effectiveness and the search for new therapeutic targets.

Adding simultaneous integrated boost to whole brain radiation therapy improved intracranial tumour control and minimize radiation-induced brain injury risk for the treatment of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most frequent intracranial tumours associated with poor clinical outcomes. Radiotherapy is essential in the treatment of these tumours, although the optimal radiation strategy remains controversial. The present study aimed to assess whether whole brain radiation therapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT + SIB) provides any therapeutic benefit over WBRT alone.

METHODS

We included and retrospectively analysed 82 patients who received WBRT + SIB and 83 who received WBRT alone between January 2012 and June 2021. Intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), local tumour control (LTC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Compared to WBRT alone, WBRT + SIB improved intracranial LTC and PFS, especially in the lung cancer subgroup. Patients with high graded prognostic assessment score or well-controlled extracranial disease receiving WBRT + SIB had improved intracranial PFS and LTC. Moreover, WBRT + SIB also improved the long-term intracranial tumour control of small cell lung cancer patients. When evaluating toxicity, we found that WBRT + SIB might slightly increase the risk of radiation-induced brain injury, and that the risk increased with increasing dosage. However, low-dose WBRT + SIB had a tolerable radiation-induced brain injury risk, which was lower than that in the high-dose group, while it was comparable to that in the WBRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

WBRT + SIB can be an efficient therapeutic option for patients with BMs, and is associated with improved intracranial LTC and PFS. Furthermore, low-dose WBRT + SIB (biologically effective dose [BED] ≤ 56 Gy) was recommended, based on the acceptable risk of radiation-induced brain injury and satisfactory tumour control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Histopathologically confirmed radiation-induced damage of the brain - an in-depth analysis of radiation parameters and spatio-temporal occurrence

BACKGROUND

Radiation-induced damage (RID) after radiotherapy (RT) of primary brain tumors and metastases can be challenging to clinico-radiographically distinguish from tumor progression. RID includes pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis; the latter being irreversible and often associated with severe symptoms. While histopathology constitutes the diagnostic gold standard, biopsy-controlled clinical studies investigating RID remain limited. Whether certain brain areas are potentially more vulnerable to RID remains an area of active investigation. Here, we analyze histopathologically confirmed cases of RID in relation to the temporal and spatial dose distribution.

METHODS

Histopathologically confirmed cases of RID after photon-based RT for primary or secondary central nervous system malignancies were included. Demographic, clinical, and dosimetric data were collected from patient records and treatment planning systems. We calculated the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD22) and the biologically effective dose (BED2) for normal brain tissue (α/β ratio of 2 Gy) and analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution using frequency maps.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were identified. High-grade glioma patients (n = 18) mostly received one normofractionated RT series (median cumulative EQD22 60 Gy) to a large planning target volume (PTV) (median 203.9 ccm) before diagnosis of RID. Despite the low EQD22 and BED2, three patients with an accelerated hyperfractionated RT developed RID. In contrast, brain metastases patients (n = 15; 16 RID lesions) were often treated with two or more RT courses and with radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic RT, resulting in a higher cumulative EQD22 (median 162.4 Gy), to a small PTV (median 6.7 ccm). All (n = 34) RID lesions occurred within the PTV of at least one of the preceding RT courses. RID in the high-grade glioma group showed a frontotemporal distribution pattern, whereas, in metastatic patients, RID was observed throughout the brain with highest density in the parietal lobe. The cumulative EQD22 was significantly lower in RID lesions that involved the subventricular zone (SVZ) than in lesions without SVZ involvement (median 60 Gy vs. 141 Gy, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated hyperfractionated RT can lead to RID despite computationally low EQD22 and BED2 in high-grade glioma patients. The anatomical location of RID corresponded to the general tumor distribution of gliomas and metastases. The SVZ might be a particularly vulnerable area.

Regression of a melanoma brain metastasis that had appeared after immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation: a hypothesis-generating case

We present the case of a 50-year-old woman previously treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy for a metastatic melanoma. Despite premature discontinuation of these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after 2 cycles due to severe immune-related hepatitis, the patient achieved a complete response. Nine months later, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed progression of a single cerebral lesion, and the patient was referred for stereotactic radiosurgery. Unexpectedly, the brain MRI acquired one month later as part of radiosurgery planning showed a spontaneous regression of this lesion, allowing for radiosurgery cancellation. Follow-up imaging showed a sustained response, although the patient did not receive any other oncological treatment. We discuss here the potential immune mechanisms involved in this unusual course and the importance of better understanding the behaviour of tumours in the era of ICIs.

LITT for biopsy proven radiation necrosis: A qualitative systematic review

INTRODUCTION

With the widespread use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), post-radiation treatment effects (PTREs) are increasing in prevalence. Radiation necrosis (RN) is a serious PTRE which carries a poor prognosis. Since 2012, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been used to treat RN. However, reviews have attempting to generalise the efficacy of LITT against biopsy-proven RN are limited. In this systematic review, patient demographic characteristics and post-LITT clinical outcomes are characterised.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in four major databases for cohort studies and case reports published between 2012 and 2022, following the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Data was extracted and descriptively analysed. Quality of reporting was assessed using the PROCESS criteria and reporting bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I scoring system.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria, with an overall moderate risk of reporting bias being observed. Mean pre-LITT target lesion volume was 6.75 cm3, and was independent of gender, time since SRS, age and number of interventions prior to LITT.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

LITT is a versatile treatment option which may be used to treat a vast range of patients with refractory biopsy-proven RN. However, neurosurgeons should exercise caution when selecting patients for LITT due to insufficient data on the treatment's efficacy against biopsy-proven RN. This warrants further studies to unequivocally determine the safety and clinical outcomes.

Presence of Activated (Phosphorylated) STAT3 in Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

Brain radiation necrosis (RN) is a subacute or late adverse event following radiotherapy, involving an exacerbated inflammatory response of the brain tissue. The risk of symptomatic RN associated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as part of the treatment of brain metastases (BMs) has been a subject of recent investigation. The activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was shown in reactive astrocytes (RA) associated with BMs. Given that the pathophysiological mechanisms behind RN are not fully understood, we sought to investigate the role of STAT3 among other inflammatory markers in RN development. A mouse model of RN using clinical LINAC-based SRS was designed to induce brain necrosis with the administration of 50 Gy in a single fraction to the left hemisphere using a circular collimator of 5 mm diameter. Immunohistochemistry and multiplex staining for CD4, CD8, CD68, GFAP, and STAT3 were performed. For validation, eleven patients with BMs treated with SRS who developed symptomatic RN and required surgery were identified to perform staining for CD68, GFAP, and STAT3. In the mouse model, the RN and perinecrotic areas showed significantly higher staining for F4/80+ and GFAP+ cells, with a high infiltration of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes, when compared to the non-irradiated cerebral hemisphere. A high number of GFAP+pSTAT3+ and F4/80+pSTAT3+ cells was found in the RN areas and the rest of the irradiated hemisphere. The analysis of human brain specimens showed that astrocytes and microglia were actively phosphorylating STAT3 in the areas of RN and gliosis. Phosphorylated STAT3 is highly expressed in the microglia and RA pertaining to the areas of brain RN. Targeting STAT3 via inhibition represents a promising strategy to ameliorate symptomatic RN in BM patients undergoing SRS.

Risk Factors for Progression and Toxic Effects After Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients With Resected Brain Metastases

Importance

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been demonstrated as a feasible alternative to postoperative SRS for resectable brain metastases (BMs) with potential benefits in adverse radiation effects (AREs) and meningeal disease (MD). However, mature large-cohort multicenter data are lacking.

Objective

To evaluate preoperative SRS outcomes and prognostic factors from a large international multicenter cohort (Preoperative Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases-PROPS-BM).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter cohort study included patients with BMs from solid cancers, of which at least 1 lesion received preoperative SRS and a planned resection, from 8 institutions. Radiosurgery to synchronous intact BMs was allowed. Exclusion criteria included prior or planned whole-brain radiotherapy and no cranial imaging follow-up. Patients were treated between 2005 and 2021, with most treated between 2017 and 2021.

Exposures

Preoperative SRS to a median dose to 15 Gy in 1 fraction or 24 Gy in 3 fractions delivered at a median (IQR) of 2 (1-4) days before resection.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end points were cavity local recurrence (LR), MD, ARE, overall survival (OS), and multivariable analysis of prognostic factors associated with these outcomes.

Results

The study cohort included 404 patients (214 women [53%]; median [IQR] age, 60.6 [54.0-69.6] years) with 416 resected index lesions. The 2-year cavity LR rate was 13.7%. Systemic disease status, extent of resection, SRS fractionation, type of surgery (piecemeal vs en bloc), and primary tumor type were associated with cavity LR risk. The 2-year MD rate was 5.8%, with extent of resection, primary tumor type, and posterior fossa location being associated with MD risk. The 2-year any-grade ARE rate was 7.4%, with target margin expansion greater than 1 mm and melanoma primary being associated with ARE risk. Median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI, 14.1-21.3 months), with systemic disease status, extent of resection, and primary tumor type being the strongest prognostic factors associated with OS.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, the rates of cavity LR, ARE, and MD after preoperative SRS were found to be notably low. Several tumor and treatment factors were identified that are associated with risk of cavity LR, ARE, MD, and OS after treatment with preoperative SRS. A phase 3 randomized clinical trial of preoperative vs postoperative SRS (NRG BN012) has began enrolling (NCT05438212).

Toxicity and outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: the risk of subsequent symptomatic intralesional hemorrhage exceeds that of radiation necrosis

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the outcomes and patterns of toxicity in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without immunotherapy (IO).

METHODS

From a prospective registry, we reviewed MBM patients treated with single fraction Gamma Knife SRS between 2008 and 2021 at our center. We recorded all systemic therapies (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy) administered before, during, or after SRS. Patients with prior brain surgery were excluded. We captured adverse events following SRS, including intralesional hemorrhage (IH), radiation necrosis (RN) and local failure (LF), as well as extracranial disease status. Distant brain failure (DBF), extracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using a cumulative Incidence function and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 165 patients with 570 SRS-treated MBM. Median OS for patients who received IO was 1.41 years versus 0.79 years in patients who did not (p = 0.04). Ipilimumab monotherapy was the most frequent IO regimen (30%). In the absence of IO, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2 +) RN was 3% at 24 months and remained unchanged with respect to the type or timing of IO. The incidence of post-SRS g2 + IH in patients who did not receive systemic therapy was 19% at 1- and 2 years compared to 7% at 1- and 2 years among patients who did (HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.98; p = 0.046). Overall, neither timing nor type of IO correlated to rates of DBF, OS, or LF. Among patients treated with IO, the median time to extracranial PFS was 5.4 months (95% IC 3.2 - 9.1).

CONCLUSION

The risk of g2 + IH exceeds that of g2 + RN in MBM patients undergoing SRS, with or without IO. IH should be considered a critical adverse event following MBM treatments.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: predictive factors of radionecrosis

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is a highly effective approach and represents the current standard of treatment for patients with limited number of brain metastasis (BM). SRT is generally well tolerated but can sometimes lead to radionecrosis (RN). The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of radionecrosis related to SRT for brain metastasis.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study included patients who underwent SRT in the Institut Sainte Catherine between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2020 for the treatment of brain metastasis from any cancer. Individual data and particularly signs of radionecrosis (clinical, imaging, anatomopathological) were collected from electronic medical records. Radionecrosis was defined as the occurrence on MRI of contrast-enhancing necrotic lesions, surrounded by edema, occurring at least 6 months after SRT and localized within fields of irradiation.

RESULTS

123 patients were included; median age was 66 years. 17 patients (11.8%) developed radionecrosis after a median follow up of 418.5 days [63;1498]. Predictive factors of radionecrosis in multivariate analysis were age under 66 years with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 56%. No other factor as the presence of comorbidities, the number of irradiated metastases, the PTV volume or the volume of irradiated healthy brain were predictive of radionecrosis.

CONCLUSION

Age at treatment initiation and tumor location seems to be correlated with radionecrosis in patients with brain metastasis treated with SRT. These elements could be useful to adapted radiation therapy.

18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study

PURPOSE

Distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery represents a common diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective pilot study to determine whether PET/CT with 18F-fluciclovine, a widely available amino acid PET radiotracer, repurposed intracranially, can accurately diagnose equivocal lesions.

METHODS

Adults with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a follow-up tumor-protocol MRI brain equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT of the brain within 30 days. The reference standard for final diagnosis consisted of clinical follow-up until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation.

RESULTS

Of 16 patients imaged from 7/2019 to 11/2020, 15 subjects were evaluable with 20 lesions (radiation necrosis, n = 16; tumor progression, n = 4). Higher SUVmax statistically significantly predicted tumor progression (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.011). Lesion SUVmean (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.018), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.813; p = 0.007), and SUVpeak-to-normal-brain (AUC = 0.859; p = 0.002) also predicted tumor progression, whereas SUVmax-to-normal-brain (p = 0.1) and SUVmean-to-normal-brain (p = 0.5) did not. Qualitative visual scores were significant predictors for readers 1 (AUC = 0.750; p < 0.001) and 3 (AUC = 0.781; p = 0.045), but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3). Visual interpretations were significant predictors for reader 1 (AUC = 0.898; p = 0.012) but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3) or 3 (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective pilot study of patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a contemporary MRI brain with a lesion equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT repurposed intracranially demonstrated encouraging diagnostic accuracy, supporting the pursuit of larger clinical trials which will be necessary to establish diagnostic criteria and performance.

Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors

Research regarding the mechanisms of brain damage following radiation treatments for brain tumors has increased over the years, thus providing a deeper insight into the pathobiological mechanisms and suggesting new approaches to minimize this damage. This review has discussed the different factors that are known to influence the risk of damage to the brain (mainly cognitive disturbances) from radiation. These include patient and tumor characteristics, the use of whole-brain radiotherapy versus particle therapy (protons, carbon ions), and stereotactic radiotherapy in various modalities. Additionally, biological mechanisms behind neuroprotection have been elucidated.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Treatment for Brain Metastases: An Update

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a mainstay treatment option for brain metastasis (BM). While guidelines for SRS use have been outlined by professional societies, consideration of these guidelines should be weighed in the context of emerging literature, novel technology platforms, and contemporary treatment paradigms. Here, we review recent advances in prognostic scale development for SRS-treated BM patients and survival outcomes as a function of the number of BM and cumulative intracranial tumor volume. Focus is placed on the role of stereotactic laser thermal ablation in the management of BM that recur after SRS and the management of radiation necrosis. Neoadjuvant SRS prior to surgical resection as a means of minimizing leptomeningeal spread is also discussed.

Computed tomography-guided stereotactic surgery in the management of brain lesions: A single-center experience

Background

The present study presents our experience with computed tomography (CT)-guided stereotactic surgery in managing deep-seated brain lesions and provides a background in the expanding fields of morphological stereotactic neurosurgery.

Methods

We conducted this retrospective cohort study on 80 patients managed at the Department of Neurosurgery, Zagazig University Hospitals, Zagazig, Egypt, between January 2019 to January 2021. We targeted patients with morphological stereotactic surgeries performed as the primary management modality of their treatment.

Results

A total of 80 patients, with a mean age of 44.3 years, were included in the study. The stereotactic targets were supratentorial in 71 patients (88.75%), infratentorial in seven patients (8.75%), and both supraand infratentorial in two patients (2.5%). The lesions showed enhancements with IV contrast in 55 patients (68.75%). Stereotactic procedures were performed under local anesthesia in 64 patients and general anesthesia in 16 patients. Of the 80 stereotactic procedures, 52 were biopsies (65%). We observed a significant improvement in the postoperative Karnofsky performance score compared to the postoperative score (63.4 ± 19.8 vs. 56.7 ± 15.4, P = 0.001). The level of agreement between clinical, radiological, and final pathological diagnosis was assessed; it was complete in 47.5% of the patients. The postprocedural CT scan demonstrated intracranial hemorrhage in five patients (6.25%); four (5%) were silent with no neurological complications.

Conclusion

This study provided evidence that the stereotactic procedure is easy to perform, accurate in targeting the lesion, and spares patients from undergoing major surgical procedures. Stereotactic applications of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, deep-seated abscesses, encysted tumors, or medically refractory benign intracranial hypertension can improve the outcome even in medically high-risk patients.

Novel Mechanisms and Future Opportunities for the Management of Radiation Necrosis in Patients Treated for Brain Metastases in the Era of Immunotherapy

Radiation necrosis, also known as treatment-induced necrosis, has emerged as an important adverse effect following stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) for brain metastases. The improved survival of patients with brain metastases and increased use of combined systemic therapy and SRS have contributed to a growing incidence of necrosis. The cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway (cGAS-STING) represents a key biological mechanism linking radiation-induced DNA damage to pro-inflammatory effects and innate immunity. By recognizing cytosolic double-stranded DNA, cGAS induces a signaling cascade that results in the upregulation of type 1 interferons and dendritic cell activation. This pathway could play a key role in the pathogenesis of necrosis and provides attractive targets for therapeutic development. Immunotherapy and other novel systemic agents may potentiate activation of cGAS-STING signaling following radiotherapy and increase necrosis risk. Advancements in dosimetric strategies, novel imaging modalities, artificial intelligence, and circulating biomarkers could improve the management of necrosis. This review provides new insights into the pathophysiology of necrosis and synthesizes our current understanding regarding the diagnosis, risk factors, and management options of necrosis while highlighting novel avenues for discovery.

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography, Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion, and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiation between Recurrence of a High-grade Glioma and Radiation Necrosis

Background

Differentiation between recurrence of brain tumor and radiation necrosis remains a challenge in current neuro-oncology practice despite recent advances in both radiological and nuclear medicine techniques.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging, and F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (F18-FDG-PET) in the differentiation between the recurrence of a high-grade glioma and radiation necrosis.

Materials and Methods

Patients with a diagnosis of high-grade glioma (WHO Grades III and IV) who had undergone surgical resection of the tumor followed by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy were included in the study. DSC perfusion, diffusion-weighted MRI, and PET scan were acquired on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner. For each lesion, early and delayed tumor-to-brain ratio (TBR), early and delayed maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), normalized ADC ratio, and normalized relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) ratio were calculated and the pattern of lesional enhancement was noted. The diagnosis was finalized with either histopathological examination or the characteristics on follow-up imaging. The statistical analysis using the receiver operator characteristic curves was done to determine the diagnostic performance of DSC perfusion, 18-F FDG-PET, and ADC in differentiation between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis.

Results

Fifty patients were included in the final analysis, 32 of them being men (64%). A cutoff value of early TBR >0.8 (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 80%), delayed TBR >0.93 (sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 80%), early SUVmax >10.2 (sensitivity of 76.9% and specificity of 80%), delayed SUVmax >13.2 (sensitivity of 61.54% and specificity of 100%), normalized rCBV ratio >1.21 (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 60%), normalized ADC ratio >1.66 (sensitivity of 38.5% and specificity of 80%), and Grade 3 enhancement (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 60%) were found to differentiate recurrence from radiation necrosis. Early TBR had the highest accuracy (94.44%), while ADC ratio had the lowest accuracy (50%). A combination of early TBR (cutoff value of 0.8), late TBR (cutoff value of 0.93), and rCBV ratio (cutoff value of 1.21) showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.3%, positive predictive value of 88.9%, negative predictive value of 93.7%, and an accuracy of 96.6% in discrimination between radiation necrosis and recurrence of tumor.

Conclusion

F18-FDG-PET and DSC perfusion can reliably differentiate tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis, with early TBR showing the highest accuracy. ADC demonstrates a low sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in differentiating radiation necrosis from recurrence. A combination of early TBR, delayed TBR, and rCBV may be more useful in discrimination between radiation necrosis and recurrence of glioma, with this combination showing a better diagnostic performance than individual parameters or any other combination of parameters.

Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Related Radiation Necrosis in Patients with Intracranial Metastasis from Melanoma

Background:

Radiation necrosis (RN) is a clinically relevant complication of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial metastasis (ICM) treatments. Radiation necrosis development is variable following SRS. It remains unclear if risk factors for and clinical outcomes following RN may be different for melanoma patients. We reviewed patients with ICM from metastatic melanoma to understand the potential impact of RN in this patient population.

Methods:

Patients who received SRS for ICM from melanoma at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, radiation parameters, prior surgical and systemic treatments, and patient outcomes. Radiation necrosis was diagnosed by clinical evaluation including brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, in some cases, tissue evaluation.

Results:

Radiation necrosis was diagnosed in 7 (27%) of 26 patients at 1.6 to 38 months following initial SRS. Almost 92% of all patients received systemic therapy and 35% had surgical resection prior to SRS. Patients with RN trended toward having larger ICM and a prior history of surgical resection, although statistical significance was not reached. Among patients with resection, those who developed RN had a longer period between surgery and SRS start (mean 44 vs 33 days). Clinical improvement following treatment for RN was noted in 2 (29%) patients.

Conclusions:

Radiation necrosis is relatively common following SRS for treatment of ICM from metastatic melanoma and clinical outcomes are poor. Further studies aimed at mitigating RN development and identifying novel approaches for treatment are warranted.

Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure

Introduction

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor diagnosed in adults. In patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the incidence of post-treatment radionecrosis appears to be rising, which has been attributed to improved patient survival as well as novel systemic treatments. The impacts of concomitant immunotherapy and the interval between diagnosis and treatment on patient outcomes are unclear.

Methods

This single institution, retrospective study consisted of patients who received single or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for intact brain metastases. Exclusion criteria included neurosurgical resection prior to treatment and treatment of non-malignant histologies or primary central nervous system malignancies. A univariate screen was implemented to determine which factors were associated with radionecrosis. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the two groups for categorical variables, and the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous data. Those factors that appeared to be associated with radionecrosis on univariate analyses were included in a multivariable model. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess potential predictors of time to local failure and time to regional failure.

Results

A total of 107 evaluable patients with a total of 256 individual brain metastases were identified. The majority of metastases were non-small cell lung cancer (58.98%), followed by breast cancer (16.02%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated increased risk of radionecrosis with increasing MRI maximum axial dimension (OR 1.10, p=0.0123) and a history of previous whole brain radiation therapy (OR 3.48, p=0.0243). Receipt of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of local failure (HR 0.31, p=0.0159). Time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, and concurrent immunotherapy had no impact on incidence of radionecrosis or regional failure.

Discussion

An optimal time interval between diagnosis and treatment for intact brain metastases that minimizes radionecrosis and maximizes local and regional control could not be identified. Concurrent immunotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of radionecrosis and may improve local control. These data further support the safety and synergistic efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy.

Tumor Habitat Analysis Using Longitudinal Physiological MRI to Predict Tumor Recurrence After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis

OBJECTIVE

It is difficult to predict the treatment response of tissue after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) because radiation necrosis (RN) and tumor recurrence can coexist. Our study aimed to predict tumor recurrence, including the recurrence site, after SRS of brain metastasis by performing a longitudinal tumor habitat analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two consecutive multiparametric MRI examinations were performed for 83 adults (mean age, 59.0 years; range, 27-82 years; 44 male and 39 female) with 103 SRS-treated brain metastases. Tumor habitats based on contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images (structural habitats) and those based on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) images (physiological habitats) were defined using k-means voxel-wise clustering. The reference standard was based on the pathology or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncologycriteria for brain metastases (RANO-BM). The association between parameters of single-time or longitudinal tumor habitat and the time to recurrence and the site of recurrence were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Dice similarity coefficient, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean interval between the two MRI examinations was 99 days. The longitudinal analysis showed that an increase in the hypovascular cellular habitat (low ADC and low CBV) was associated with the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-4.91; P = 0.001). During the single-time analysis, a solid low-enhancing habitat (low T2 and low contrast-enhanced T1 signal) was associated with the risk of recurrence (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01-2.35; P = 0.045). A hypovascular cellular habitat was indicative of the future recurrence site (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.423).

CONCLUSION

After SRS of brain metastases, an increased hypovascular cellular habitat observed using a longitudinal MRI analysis was associated with the risk of recurrence (i.e., treatment resistance) and was indicative of recurrence site. A tumor habitat analysis may help guide future treatments for patients with brain metastases.

Radiation necrosis and therapeutic outcomes in patients treated with linear accelerator-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for intact intracranial metastases

INTRODUCTION

Balancing disease control and treatment-related toxicities can be challenging when treating higher-risk brain metastases (BMs) that are larger in size or eloquent anatomical locations. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hfSRS) is expected to offer superior or equal efficacy with lower toxicity profile compared with single-fraction SRS (sfSRS). We report the efficacy and toxicity profiles of hfSRS in a consecutive cohort of patients to support this predicted benefit from hfSRS for high-risk BMs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 185 consecutive individual lesions from 152 patients with intact BMs treated with hfSRS between 1 July 2016 and 31 October 2019 and followed up to 30 April 2022 with serial brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary endpoint was the event of radiation necrosis (RN). Local control (LC) rate and distant brain failure (DBF) were reported as secondary outcomes. Kaplan-Meier method was used to report the cumulative incidence of RN and overall survival and the incidence of DBF. Potential risk factors for RN were assessed using univariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 38.0 months, and the median survival post-SRS was 9.5 months. The cumulative incidence rate of RN was 13.2% (95% CI: 7.0-24.7%), and 18.1% of patients with confirmed RN were symptomatic. Higher mean dose delivered to planning target volume (PTV) (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05-1.42, P = 0.01), higher mean BED₁₀ (biological equivalent dose assuming a tissue α / β $$ \alpha /\beta $$ ratio of 10) (HR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04-1.2, P < 0.001), and higher mean BED₂ (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 1-1.04, P = 0.04) delivered to the lesion was associated with increased risk of RN. LC rate was 86% and the cumulative incidence of DBF was 36% with a median onset of 28.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the predicted radiobiological benefit of the use of hfSRS in high-risk BMs to limit treatment-related toxicity with low risk for symptomatic RN comparable with lower risk population receiving sfSRS while achieving satisfactory local disease control.

A phase 2 study of thalidomide for the treatment of radiation-induced blood-brain barrier injury

Radiation-induced brain injury (RIBI) is a debilitating sequela after radiotherapy to treat head and neck cancer, and 20 to 30% of patients with RIBI fail to respond to or have contraindications to the first-line treatments of bevacizumab and corticosteroids. Here, we reported a Simon's minmax two-stage, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT03208413) to assess the efficacy of thalidomide in patients with RIBI who were unresponsive to or had contraindications to bevacizumab and corticosteroid therapies. The trial met its primary endpoint, with 27 of 58 patients enrolled showing ≥25% reduction in the volume of cerebral edema on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-magnetic resonance imaging (FLAIR-MRI) after treatment (overall response rate, 46.6%; 95% CI, 33.3 to 60.1%). Twenty-five (43.1%) patients demonstrated a clinical improvement based on the Late Effects Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scale, and 36 (62.1%) experienced cognitive improvement based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. In a mouse model of RIBI, thalidomide restored the blood-brain barrier and cerebral perfusion, which were attributed to the functional rescue of pericytes secondary to elevation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) expression by thalidomide. Our data thus demonstrate the therapeutic potential of thalidomide for the treatment of radiation-induced cerebral vasculature impairment.

Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis

PURPOSE

Cerebral radiation necrosis is a complication of radiation therapy that can be seen months to years following radiation treatment. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often difficult and advanced imaging techniques may be needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging modalities used in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression following radiation therapy for brain metastases.

METHODS

We performed a review of the literature addressing the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis.

RESULTS

Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains a diagnostic challenge and advanced imaging modalities are often required to make a definitive diagnosis. If diagnostic uncertainty remains following conventional imaging, a multi-modality diagnostic approach with perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission spectroscopy (SPECT), and radiomics may be used to improve diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Several imaging modalities exist to aid in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. Future studies developing advanced imaging techniques are needed.

Adverse radiation effect and freedom from progression following repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

The authors previously evaluated risk and time course of adverse radiation effects (AREs) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, excluding lesions treated after prior SRS. In the present analysis they focus specifically on single-fraction salvage SRS to brain metastases previously treated with SRS or hypofractionated SRS (HFSRS), evaluating freedom from progression (FFP) and the risk and time course of AREs.

METHODS

Brain metastases treated from September 1998 to May 2019 with single-fraction SRS after prior SRS or HFSRS were analyzed. Serial follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical pathology reports were reviewed to score local treatment failure and AREs. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate FFP and risk of ARE measured from the date of repeat SRS with censoring at the last brain MRI.

RESULTS

A total of 229 retreated brain metastases in 124 patients were evaluable. The most common primary cancers were breast, lung, and melanoma. The median interval from prior SRS/HFSRS to repeat SRS was 15.4 months, the median prescription dose was 18 Gy, and the median duration of follow-up imaging was 14.5 months. At 1 year after repeat SRS, FFP was 80% and the risk of symptomatic ARE was 11%. The 1-year risk of imaging changes, including asymptomatic RE and symptomatic ARE, was 30%. Among lesions that demonstrated RE, the median time to onset was 6.7 months (IQR 4.7-9.9 months) and the median time to peak imaging changes was 10.1 months (IQR 5.6-13.6 months). Lesion size by quadratic mean diameter (QMD) showed similar results for QMDs ranging from 0.75 to 2.0 cm (1-year FFP 82%, 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE 11%). For QMD < 0.75 cm, the 1-year FFP was 86% and the 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE was only 2%. Outcomes were worse for QMDs 2.01-3.0 cm (1-year FFP 65%, 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE 24%). The risk of symptomatic ARE was not increased with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy before or after repeat SRS.

CONCLUSIONS

RE on imaging was common after repeat SRS (30% at 1 year), but the risk of a symptomatic ARE was much less (11% at 1 year). The results of repeat single-fraction SRS were good for brain metastases ≤ 2 cm. The authors recommend an interval ≥ 6 months from prior SRS and a prescription dose ≥ 18 Gy. Alternatives such as HFSRS, laser interstitial thermal therapy, or resection with adjuvant radiation should be considered for recurrent brain metastases > 2 cm.

Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 1: classification and a multistep approach for diagnosis

PURPOSE

The Working Group for Neuro-Oncology of the German Society for Radiation Oncology in cooperation with members of the Neuro-Oncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society aimed to define a practical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of radiation-induced necrosis (RN) of the central nervous system (CNS).

METHODS

Panel members of the DEGRO working group invited experts, participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for medical treatment of RN including bevacizumab in clinical routine.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis and treatment of RN requires multidisciplinary structures of care and defined processes. Diagnosis has to be made on an interdisciplinary level with the joint knowledge of a neuroradiologist, radiation oncologist, neurosurgeon, neuropathologist, and neuro-oncologist. A multistep approach as an opportunity to review as many characteristics as possible to improve diagnostic confidence is recommended. Additional information about radiotherapy (RT) techniques is crucial for the diagnosis of RN. Misdiagnosis of untreated and progressive RN can lead to severe neurological deficits. In this practice guideline, we propose a detailed nomenclature of treatment-related changes and a multistep approach for their diagnosis.

DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 2: treatment

Purpose

The Working Group for Neurooncology of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO; AG NRO) in cooperation with members of the Neurooncological Working Group of the German Cancer Society (DKG-NOA) aimed to define a practical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of radiation-induced necrosis (RN) of the central nervous system (CNS).

Methods

Panel members of the DEGRO working group invited experts, participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for medical treatment of RN, including bevacizumab, in clinical routine.

Conclusion

Diagnosis and treatment of RN requires multidisciplinary structures of care and defined processes. Diagnosis has to be made on an interdisciplinary level with the joint knowledge of a neuroradiologist, radiation oncologist, neurosurgeon, neuropathologist, and neurooncologist. If the diagnosis of blood–brain barrier disruptions (BBD) or RN is likely, treatment should be initiated depending on the symptoms, location, and dynamic of the lesion. Multiple treatment options are available (such as observation, surgery, steroids, and bevacizumab) and the optimal approach should be discussed in an interdisciplinary setting. In this practice guideline, we offer detailed treatment strategies for various scenarios.