1
|
Xu M, Mayemura CT, Kong N, Genyk YS, Kahn JA, Terrault NA. Low frequency of HBsAg reemergence in liver transplant recipients after stopping hepatitis B immune globulin: Implications for prophylaxis protocols. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:668-671. [PMID: 38079257 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mimi Xu
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Collin T Mayemura
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Niwen Kong
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yuri S Genyk
- Division of Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic and Abdominal Organ Transplant Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Kahn
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Norah A Terrault
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng H, Zhu Z, Wang N, Qin J, Guo Y, Xu Z, Li X, Qi C, Yuan X, Wu W, Wang J, Liu L, Nashan B. Entecavir Combined With Short-term Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin in Preventing Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence in Liver Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:408-412. [PMID: 36907782 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of nucleoside analogs and long-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is considered to be the standard regimen for preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplant (LT). However, long-term use of HBIG causes many adverse effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nucleoside analogs entecavir combined with short-term HBIG in preventing HBV recurrence after LT. METHODS This retrospective study assessed the effect a combination of entecavir and short-term HBIG in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence among 56 LT recipients who had undergone the procedure because of HBV-associated liver disease at our center between December 2017 and December 2021. All patients received entecavir treatment combined with HBIG for the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence, and HBIG treatment was withdrawn within 1 month. The patients were followed up to determine levels of hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAb), and HBV-DNA and the recurrence rate of HBV. RESULTS Only 1 patient appeared positive for hepatitis B surface antigen at 2 months post-LT. The overall HBV recurrence rate was 1.8%. The HBsAb titers of all patients gradually decreased over time, with a median of 376.6 IU/L at 1 month post-LT and a median of 13.47 IU/L at 12 months post-LT. During the follow-up period, the HBsAb titer of the preoperative HBV-DNA-positive patients remained at a lower level than that of HBV-DNA-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS Entecavir combined with short-term HBIG can exert a good effect for the prevention of HBV reinfection post-LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zheng
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Zebin Zhu
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Ning Wang
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Jiwei Qin
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Yafei Guo
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Zhijun Xu
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Xuefeng Li
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Can Qi
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Xiaodong Yuan
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Wei Wu
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Jizhou Wang
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Lianxin Liu
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China
| | - Björn Nashan
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A human monoclonal antibody against HBsAg for the prevention and treatment of chronic HBV and HDV infection. JHEP REPORTS : INNOVATION IN HEPATOLOGY 2023; 5:100646. [PMID: 36748051 PMCID: PMC9898450 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background & Aims Elimination of chronic HBV/HDV infection remains a major global health challenge. Targeting excessive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) release may provide an interesting window of opportunity to break immune tolerance and to achieve a functional cure using additional antivirals. Methods We evaluated a HBsAg-specific human monoclonal antibody, as part of either a prophylactic or therapeutic strategy, against HBV/HDV infection in cell culture models and in human-liver chimeric mice. To assess prophylactic efficacy, mice were passively immunized prior to infection with HBV or HBV/HDV (coinfection and superinfection setting). Therapeutic efficacy was assessed in HBV and HBV/HDV-coinfected mice receiving 4 weeks of treatment. Viral parameters (HBV DNA, HDV RNA and HBsAg) were assessed in mouse plasma. Results The antibody could effectively prevent HBV/HDV infection in a dose-dependent manner with IC50 values of ∼3.5 ng/ml. Passive immunization showed complete protection of mice from both HBV and HBV/HDV coinfection. Moreover, HDV superinfection was either completely prevented or at least attenuated in HBV-infected mice. Finally, antibody treatment in mice with established HBV/HDV infection resulted in a significant decline in viremia and a concomitant drop in on-treatment HBsAg, with a moderate viral rebound following treatment cessation. Conclusion We present data on a valuable antibody candidate that could complement other antivirals in strategies aimed at achieving functional cure of chronic HBV and HDV infection. Impact and implications Patients chronically infected with HBV may eventually develop liver cancer and are at great risk of being superinfected with HDV, which worsens and accelerates disease progression. Unfortunately, current treatments can rarely eliminate both viruses from chronically infected patients. In this study, we present data on a novel antibody that is able to prevent chronic HBV/HDV infection in a mouse model with a humanized liver. Moreover, antibody treatment of HBV/HDV-infected mice strongly diminishes viral loads during therapy. This antibody is a valuable candidate for further clinical development.
Collapse
|
4
|
Schemmer P, Burra P, Hu R, Hüber CM, Loinaz C, Machida K, Vogel A, Samuel D. State of the art treatment of hepatitis B virus hepatocellular carcinoma and the role of hepatitis B surface antigen post-liver transplantation and resection. Liver Int 2022; 42:288-298. [PMID: 34846790 PMCID: PMC9300017 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the major aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The optimal goal of therapy, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss and anti-HBs production, is achieved rarely and HBsAg-associated HCC risk is well recognized. Here we review the role of HBsAg in HCC, the link between HBsAg and HCC recurrence post-liver transplantation or resection, and the implications for therapy. HBV-associated carcinogenesis is a multifactorial process. The observation that HBV-related HCC can occur in the absence of cirrhosis is compatible with a direct oncogenic effect of the virus, which may occur via multiple mechanisms, including those mediated by both mutated and unmutated HBsAg. HCC recurrence in HBsAg-positive patients post-liver transplantation has been reported in 10%-15% of patients and is likely to be because of expansion of residual HCC tumour cell populations containing integrated HBV DNA, which expand and independently replicate HBV, leading to the recurrence of both HCC and HBV. The direct role of HBsAg in HCC recurrence post-liver resection is less clear. Cirrhosis is the most important risk factor for HCC development, and precancerous cirrhotic liver remains after resection, with the potential to undergo malignant transformation regardless of the existence of HBV-derived oncogenic drivers. The role of HBsAg in the development of HCC and its recurrence post-surgical intervention has multiple implications for therapy and suggests a potential role for immunotherapy in the future management of HCC, in particular post-liver transplantation. Use of hepatitis B immunoglobulins that target HBsAg directly, alongside immune-oncology therapies, may be relevant in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schemmer
- General, Visceral and Transplant SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and GastroenterologyPadua University HospitalPaduaItaly
| | - Rey‐Heng Hu
- Department of SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | | | - Carmelo Loinaz
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryUniversity Hospital 12 de OctubreMadridSpain
| | - Keigo Machida
- Keck Hospital of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and EndocrinologyMedizinische Hochschule HannoverHannoverGermany
| | - Didier Samuel
- Centre HepatobiliaireUniversity Hospital Paul BrousseUniversity Paris‐Saclay and Inserm‐Paris Saclay Research Unit 1193VillejuifFrance
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liver transplantation in acute liver failure due to Hepatitis B. Two clinical cases. Ann Hepatol 2021; 21:100107. [PMID: 31623992 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) related acute liver failure (ALF) is uncommon in our region, and there is limited HBV literature regarding the optimal management of these cases. In this article, we report two clinical cases of young men who have sex with men (MSM), both developed severe acute hepatitis caused by HBV, progressed to ALF and afterward required liver transplantation. Antiviral post-transplant treatment included entecavir without Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin (HBIG), and immunosuppression therapy with steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate. Serologic follow-up showed early Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion, undetectable HBV viral load, and positive Anti-HBs titers. During later follow-up, Anti-HBs titers gradually fell (<10mUI/L after six months), with normal liver function. DISCUSSION: In cases of HBV-related ALF, the liver develops a robust immune response, leading to, an early undetectable viral load and seroconversion, with loss of HBsAg, and the appearance of Anti-HBs as a result of the inflammatory response. The management varies depending on whether this is a de novo acute infection or a reactivation of a previous chronic infection. In both cases, the use of antiviral therapy is recommended, with entecavir or tenofovir, among others, but the use of specific HBIG is supported only in ALF related to chronic HBV infection. The optimal length of the antiviral therapy after liver transplantation is still under discussion. CONCLUSION: These cases of HBV related ALF with an early HBsAg seroconversion demonstrates the relevance of requesting IgM antibody against hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc IgM) for the etiological study of ALF with negative HBsAg. Usage of HBIG does not seem essential during the post-transplantation period in these cases.
Collapse
|
6
|
Dooghaie Moghadam A, Eslami P, Dowlati Beirami A, Iravani S, Farokhi E, Mansour-Ghanaei A, Hashemi MR, Aghajanpoor Pasha M, Mehrvar A, Nassiri-Toosi M. An Overview of the Current Hepatitis B Treatment Strategies after Liver Transplantation. Middle East J Dig Dis 2021; 13:5-14. [PMID: 34712432 PMCID: PMC8531931 DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2021.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, liver transplantation (LT) is considered as the only option for the treatment of patients with various causes of liver failure, including patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. Overall, patients with HBV who undergo LT are at increased risk of hepatitis B infection recurrence. Although the current knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of this infection has been dramatically increased over the past few decades, it is still considered a complex disease process with varying degrees of clinical characteristics and changing patterns over time. There are various treatment strategies for preventing HBV recurrence in the LT setting. Generally, these regimens include oral nucleoside/ nucleotide analogues (NAs), hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), and vaccines or the combination of these drugs. The treatment strategy of choice should be based on cost-effectiveness, along with other patients underlying conditions. In this case, studies indicate that potent NAs are more cost-effective than HBIG in most case scenarios. In this article, we aimed to review the general medications used in the prophylaxis of the recurrence of HBV infection after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Dooghaie Moghadam
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pegah Eslami
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirreza Dowlati Beirami
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahrokh Iravani
- Research Center for Cancer Screening and Epidemiology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ermia Farokhi
- Liver Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Mansour-Ghanaei
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center (GLDRC), Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Guilan, Iran
| | - Mahmood Reza Hashemi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Aghajanpoor Pasha
- Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azim Mehrvar
- Research Center for Cancer Screening and Epidemiology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohssen Nassiri-Toosi
- Liver Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Muhammad H, Zaffar D, Tehreem A, Ting PS, Simsek C, Gokcan H, Gurakar A, Idilman R. HBV/HDV management after liver transplantation: Review. JOURNAL OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.liver.2021.100046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
8
|
Lai Q, Mennini G, Giovanardi F, Rossi M, Giannini EG. Immunoglobulin, nucleos(t)ide analogues and hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplant: A meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest 2021; 51:e13575. [PMID: 33866547 PMCID: PMC8365701 DOI: 10.1111/eci.13575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) represents an efficient strategy for reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Unfortunately, the long-term use of HBIG presents high costs. Therefore, the use of prophylaxis based only on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) has been recently postulated. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of HBIG ± NUC vs HBIG alone or NUC alone in post-LT HBV recurrence prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome investigated was the HBV recurrence after LT. Three analyses were done comparing the effect of (a) HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone; (b) HBIG+NUC vs NUC alone; and (c) HBIG alone vs NUC alone. Sub-analyses were also performed investigating the effect of low and high genetic barrierto-recurrence NUC. RESULTS Fifty-one studies were included. The summary OR (95%CI) showed a decreased risk with the combination of HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone for HBV recurrence, being 0.36 (95% CI = 0.22-0.61; P < .001). HBIG + NUC combined treatment reduced HBV reappearance respect to NUC alone (OR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.16-0.30; P < .0001). Similarly, HBIG alone was significantly better than NUC alone in preventing HBV recurrence (OR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.09-0.44; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Prophylaxis with HBIG is relevant in preventing post-LT HBV recurrence. Its combination with NUC gives the best results in terms of protection. The present results should be considered in light of the fact that also old studies based on lamivudine use were included. Studies exploring in detail high genetic barrier-to-recurrence NUC and protocols with definite use of HBIG are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Mennini
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Giovanardi
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Rossi
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo G Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dobrindt EM, Keshi E, Salim Y, Gillespie A, Saipbaev A, Schöning W, Öllinger R, Pratschke J, Eurich D. Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin discontinuation in long-term liver transplant patients. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22:e13303. [PMID: 32367631 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-as a monotherapy or combined with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs)-has effectively lowered Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. However, it is associated with high costs and viral resistance. HBIG-free prophylaxis with novel NUCs (tenofovir, entecavir) composes a viable alternative. We evaluated reinfection rate, histological changes, and outcome associated with HBIG discontinuation. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease at our center since 1988. A controlled HBIG discontinuation was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in 65 patients. Recurrent infection was determined by HbsAg values. Fibrosis and inflammation were evaluated by routine biopsy. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was compared to a control population on HBIG for prophylaxis. RESULTS From 1988 to 2013, 352 patients underwent liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease. 169 patients could be included for analysis. 104 (51.5%) patients continued a prophylaxis containing HBIG. HBIG was discontinued in 65 (38.5%) patients in a controlled manner, maintaining an oral NUC. None of those patients showed HBV reinfection or graft dysfunction. No significant changes of inflammation grades (P = .067) or fibrosis stages (P = .051) were detected. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was comparable to the control (P = .95). CONCLUSION HBIG withdrawal under continuation of oral NUC therapy is safe and not related to graft dysfunction, based on blood tests and histology. HBIG-free prophylaxis is not associated with a worse outcome and displays a financial relief as well as a logistic simplification during long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Maria Dobrindt
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eriselda Keshi
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yones Salim
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Allan Gillespie
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Akylbek Saipbaev
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dennis Eurich
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fernández I, Pascasio JM, Colmenero J. Prophylaxis and treatment in liver transplantation. VII Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2020; 43:169-177. [PMID: 32094045 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Whilst prophylaxis of hepatitis B is universally accepted after liver transplantation (LT), national recommendations for the prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after LT are lacking in Spain. The aim of the VII consensus meeting organised by the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (SETH) was to set recommendations on the prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B after LT. The scientific evidence and strength of recommendations was evaluated by using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) system. This document describes the recommendations and their level of evidence for: the definition and risk factors for hepatitis B recurrence after LT, monitoring and prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence at different periods after LT, treatment of hepatitis B before and after LT, and the prophylaxis of HBV infection by the recipients of LT with hepatitis B core antigen positive donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inmaculada Fernández
- Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - Juan Manuel Pascasio
- Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | - Jordi Colmenero
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Univ. Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu Y, Liu H, Hu Z, Ding Y, Pan X, Zou J, Xi J, Yu G, Huang H, Luo M, Guo F, Liu S, Sheng Q, Jia J, Zheng Y, Wang J, Chen X, Guo J, Wei L, Lu F. Hepatitis B Virus Virions Produced Under Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatment Are Mainly Not Infectious Because of Irreversible DNA Chain Termination. Hepatology 2020; 71:463-476. [PMID: 31278760 PMCID: PMC7028043 DOI: 10.1002/hep.30844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) have been widely used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Because viral DNA polymerase lacks proofreading function (3' exonuclease activity), theoretically, the incorporated NAs would irreversibly terminate viral DNA synthesis. This study explored the natures of nascent hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and infectivity of progeny virions produced under NA treatment. HBV infectivity was determined by infection of HepG2-NTCP cells and primary human hepatocytes (PHHs). Biochemical properties of HBV DNA in the progeny virions were investigated by qPCR, northern blotting, or Southern blotting hybridization, sucrose gradient centrifugation, and in vitro endogenous DNA polymerase assay. Progeny HBV virions produced under NA treatment were mainly not infectious to HepG2-NTCP cells or PHHs. Biochemical analysis revealed that under NA treatment, HBV DNA in nucleaocapsids or virions were predominantly short minus-strand DNA with irreversible termination. This finding was supported by the observation of first disappearance of relaxed circular DNA and then the proportional decline of HBV-DNA levels corresponding to the regions of PreC/C, S, and X genes in serial sera of patients receiving NA treatment. Conclusion: HBV virions produced under NA treatment are predominantly replication deficient because the viral genomes are truncated and elongation of DNA chains is irreversibly terminated. Clinically, our results suggest that the viral loads of CHB patients under NA therapy vary with the different regions of genome being detected by qPCR assays. Our findings also imply that NA prevention of perinatal and sexual HBV transmission as well as infection of transplanted livers works not only by reducing viral loads, but also by producing noninfectious virions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongzhen Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China
| | - Hui Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China
| | | | - Yang Ding
- Department of Infectious DiseasesShengjing Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangP.R. China
| | - Xiao‐Ben Pan
- Hangzhou Key Laboratory of Inflammation and Immunoregulation, Department of Basic Medical Science, School of MedicineHangzhou Normal UniversityHangzhouP.R. China
| | - Jun Zou
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China
| | - Jingyuan Xi
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China
| | - Guangxin Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China
| | - Hongxin Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China
| | - Meng‐Ting Luo
- Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan ProvinceKunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
| | - Fang Guo
- China Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Zhangjiang Hi‐Tech ParkShanghaiP.R. China
| | - Shuang Liu
- Beijing Artificial Liver Treatment & Training CenterBeijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingP.R. China
| | - Qiuju Sheng
- Department of Infectious DiseasesShengjing Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangP.R. China
| | - Jidong Jia
- Liver Research CenterBeijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingP.R. China
| | - Yong‐Tang Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan ProvinceKunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
| | - Jie Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China
| | - Xiangmei Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China
| | - Ju‐Tao Guo
- Baruch S. Blumberg InstituteDoylestownPA
| | - Lai Wei
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung HospitalTsinghua UniversityBeijingP.R. China
| | - Fengmin Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology & Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingP.R. China,Academy of Medical ScienceZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouP.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Duan BW, Tian LT, Lin DD, Zhang J, Guo QL, Wu JS, Zeng DB, Lu SC. Long-term consequences of stopping HBIG and/or nucleotide analogues in liver transplant recipients administered hepatitis B vaccination to prevent HBV reinfection. J Viral Hepat 2019; 26 Suppl 1:85-89. [PMID: 31380589 DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term administration of nucleotide analogues (NAs) and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) comprises standard prophylaxis for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver diseases to prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation (LT). However, prolonging the prophylaxis strategy involves safety issues, such as the development of escape mutations and/or emerging resistant strains, and is also associated with high costs; further, it remains unclear how long prophylactic treatment should be continued. METHOD Liver transplantation recipients responding to hepatitis B vaccination due to HBV-related liver diseases were retrospectively analysed after stopping HBIG and/or NAs, administered to prevent HBV reinfection, after long-term follow-up. The safety and effectiveness of the strategy were then evaluated for these responders. RESULT Seventy-eight responders were enrolled. All responders discontinued HBIG, among which 36 stopped both HBIG and NAs. During follow-up, four recipients experienced HBV reinfection, which was associated with HBV escape mutations, after the withdrawal of both HBIG and NAs. No death or graft loss occurred in recipients during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION A careful withdrawal of HBIG and/or NAs is feasible and safe for responders to hepatitis B vaccination receiving transplants for HBV-related liver diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin-Wei Duan
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lan-Tian Tian
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Dong-Dong Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qing-Liang Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ju-Shan Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dao-Bing Zeng
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shi-Chun Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B. Clin Mol Hepatol 2019; 25:93-159. [PMID: 31185710 PMCID: PMC6589848 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2019.1002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
14
|
Lee WC, Chou HS, Wu TH, Cheng CH, Lee CF, Wang YC, Wu TJ, Chan KM. Low-dose anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin regimen as prophylaxis for hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2019; 21:e13190. [PMID: 31587427 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combination of anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and antiviral nucleotide/nucleoside is the most common regimen for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. However, what the optimal regimen is for HBIg administration remains subject to debate. METHODS Two hundred and thirty-two HBV patients who had liver transplantation were included in this study. According to the decline rate of HBIg, the patients were divided into quick (group Q, n = 95) and slow decline groups (group S, n = 137). Quick HBIg decline was defined as anti-HBs titer <200 IU/mL at postoperative month (POM) 1, when 24 000 IU of HBIg was given perioperatively. HBV recurrence was defined as reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). RESULTS After a mean (range) follow-up of 42.2 (24.1-76.8) months, the HBV recurrence rate was 12.1% for all 232 patients. The median (interquartile) HBIg titer was 96.2 (41.0-158.0) IU in group Q patients, compared to 418.0 (298.8-692.8) IU in group S patients at POM 1 (P < .001). For the patients in group Q, 18 patients (18.9%) had HBV recurrence; this was higher than the 10 (7.3%) patients in group S (P = .013). Multivariate analysis showed that quick HBIg decline and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence were the risk factors for HBV recurrence. CONCLUSION Perioperative low-dose HBIg and antiviral nucleotide/nucleoside can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in patients with slow HBIg decline. For patients with quick HBIg decline, the idealized HBIg and antiviral agent regimen should be adjusted to establish an effective regimen as prophylaxis against HBV recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Chen Lee
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Shiue Chou
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Han Wu
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hsien Cheng
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Fang Lee
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chao Wang
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Jung Wu
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ming Chan
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Coffin CS, Fung SK, Alvarez F, Cooper CL, Doucette KE, Fournier C, Kelly E, Ko HH, Ma MM, Martin SR, Osiowy C, Ramji A, Tam E, Villeneuve JP. Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection: 2018 Guidelines from the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease and Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada. CANADIAN LIVER JOURNAL 2018; 1:156-217. [PMID: 35992619 PMCID: PMC9202759 DOI: 10.3138/canlivj.2018-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important public health problem in Canada. In keeping with evolving evidence and understanding of HBV pathogenesis, the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease periodically publishes HBV management guidelines. The goals of the 2018 guidelines are to (1) highlight the public health impact of HBV infection in Canada and the need to improve diagnosis and linkage to care, (2) recommend current best-practice guidelines for treatment of HBV, (3) summarize the key HBV laboratory diagnostic tests, and (4) review evidence on HBV management in special patient populations and include more detail on management of HBV in pediatric populations. An overview of novel HBV tests and therapies for HBV in development is provided to highlight the recent advances in HBV clinical research. The aim and scope of these guidelines are to serve as an up-to-date, comprehensive resource for Canadian health care providers in the management of HBV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla S. Coffin
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Scott K. Fung
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Fernando Alvarez
- Centre hospitalier de l’université de Montréal (CHUM)—CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec
| | - Curtis L. Cooper
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Karen E. Doucette
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Claire Fournier
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec
| | - Erin Kelly
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Hin Hin Ko
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Mang M Ma
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | | | - Carla Osiowy
- Viral Hepatitis and Bloodborne Pathogens, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba
| | - Alnoor Ramji
- St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Edward Tam
- LAIR Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Beckebaum S, Herzer K, Bauhofer A, Gelson W, De Simone P, de Man R, Engelmann C, Müllhaupt B, Vionnet J, Salizzoni M, Volpes R, Ercolani G, De Carlis L, Angeli P, Burra P, Dufour JF, Rossi M, Cillo U, Neumann U, Fischer L, Niemann G, Toti L, Tisone G. Recurrence of Hepatitis B Infection in Liver Transplant Patients Receiving Long-Term Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis. Ann Transplant 2018; 23:789-801. [PMID: 30420590 PMCID: PMC6249983 DOI: 10.12659/aot.910176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term real-world data are relatively sparse regarding recurrence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation using hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) prophylaxis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 371 adults transplanted for HBV-related disease at 20 European centers and given HBIg for ³12 months ± NUC therapy were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS HBIg comprised Hepatect® (iv HBIgB; n=299), subcutaneous Zutectra® (sc HBIg, n=236), and other HBIg preparations (n=130); 93.5% received NUC therapy. Mean follow-up was 6.8±3.5 years. The primary efficacy variable, freedom from HBV recurrence, occurred in 95.7% of patients (95% CI [93.1%, 97.5%]). The observed incidence of recurrence was 16/371 (4.3%) (annual rate 0.65%); 5/16 patients with recurrence had discontinued HBIg and 7/16 had anti-HBs <100 IU/l. Excluding these 7 patients, the HBV recurrence rate was 2.4%. The recurrence rate while on HBIg therapy was 1 per 2069 months. In patients who discontinued HBIg, risk of HBV recurrence versus sc HBIg users was increased by 5.2-fold (1 per 1 603 versus 1 per 8379 treatment months). The annual rate of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence was 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS These results support the long-term use of HBIg with NUC therapy as an effective management strategy to minimize risk of HBV recurrence and virus-related complications after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Beckebaum
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Kerstin Herzer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Artur Bauhofer
- Corporate Medical Affairs and Corporate Clinical Research and Development, Biotest AG, Dreieich, Germany
| | - William Gelson
- Cambridge Liver Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Paolo De Simone
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Chirurgia Epatica e del Trapianto Fegato Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Robert de Man
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelius Engelmann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Beat Müllhaupt
- Swiss HPB Center and Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Julien Vionnet
- Transplantation Centre and Service of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mauro Salizzoni
- Chirurgia Generale 2U, Centro Trapianto Fegato, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Volpes
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, ISMETT-IRCCS, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni General Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Division, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Angeli
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Jean-François Dufour
- University Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Rossi
- Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Umberto I Policlinic, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Ulf Neumann
- Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriele Niemann
- Corporate Medical Affairs and Corporate Clinical Research and Development, Biotest AG, Dreieich, Germany
| | - Luca Toti
- Transplant Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Transplant Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lens S, García-Eliz M, Fernández I, Castells L, Bonacci M, Mas A, Crespo G, Buti M, Prieto M, Forns X. Shorter hepatitis B immunoglobulin administration is not associated to hepatitis B virus recurrence when receiving combined prophylaxis after liver transplantation. Liver Int 2018; 38:1940-1950. [PMID: 29660249 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and a nucleos(t)ide analogues has markedly reduced the rate of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation; however, the optimal duration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin has not been clarified. This lack of consensus perpetuates the use of different strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors associated to hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation in a large cohort of patients under different hepatitis B immunoglobulin regimens. METHODS Retrospective multicentre analysis of hepatitis B virus-related liver transplantation recipients receiving combined prophylaxis (hepatitis B immunoglobulin + nucleos(t)ide analogues). The strategy of short-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin was compared to lifelong administration. Hepatitis B virus recurrence was defined as positive HBsAg after liver transplantation. RESULTS Three hundred and thirty-eight patients were analysed. After a median follow-up period of 72 months, 37 patients (11%) developed hepatitis B virus recurrence. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and lamivudine resistance after liver transplantation were the only factors independently associated to hepatitis B virus recurrence (HR 5.4 [2.3-12] and 9.3 [4.2-20] respectively P < .001). HBsAg reappearance after hepatitis B virus recurrence was transient (16 patients), persistent (15) or alternant (6). The hepatitis B immunoglobulin regimen did not have an impact on the rate or evolution of hepatitis B virus recurrence. Overall, patient survival was good and not influenced by hepatitis B virus recurrence (82% at 5 years). Fulminant liver failure, hepatitis C coinfection or hepatocellular carcinoma at liver transplantation were independent risk factors for lower survival. CONCLUSIONS Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for hepatitis B virus-related liver disease. Since the introduction of combined prophylaxis the rate of hepatitis B virus recurrence is very low. However, lifelong hepatitis B immunoglobulin administration does not seem necessary to reduce hepatitis B virus recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabela Lens
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBERehd, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Lluis Castells
- Internal Medicine, Hepatology Section, Hospital Vall Hebron, CIBERehd, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Martin Bonacci
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBERehd, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Mas
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBERehd, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Crespo
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBERehd, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Buti
- Internal Medicine, Hepatology Section, Hospital Vall Hebron, CIBERehd, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Martín Prieto
- Liver Unit, CIBERehd, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Xavier Forns
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBERehd, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Verna EC. Updated Hepatitis B Guidance: Implications for liver transplant patients. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:465-469. [PMID: 29466838 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chauhan R, Lingala S, Gadiparthi C, Lahiri N, Mohanty SR, Wu J, Michalak TI, Satapathy SK. Reactivation of hepatitis B after liver transplantation: Current knowledge, molecular mechanisms and implications in management. World J Hepatol 2018; 10:352-370. [PMID: 29599899 PMCID: PMC5871856 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i3.352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major global health problem affecting an estimated 350 million people with more than 786000 individuals dying annually due to complications, such as cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver transplantation (LT) is considered gold standard for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure and HCC. However, post-transplant viral reactivation can be detrimental to allograft function, leading to poor survival. Prophylaxis with high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and anti-viral drugs have achieved remarkable progress in LT by suppressing viral replication and improving long-term survival. The combination of lamivudine (LAM) plus HBIG has been for many years the most widely used. However, life-long HBIG use is both cumbersome and costly, whereas long-term use of LAM results in resistant virus. Recently, in an effort to develop HBIG-free protocols, high potency nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as Entecavir or Tenofovir, have been tried either as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose HBIG with excellent results. Current focus is on novel antiviral targets, especially for covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), in an effort to eradicate HBV infection instead of viral suppression. However, there are several other molecular mechanisms through which HBV may reactivate and need equal attention. The purpose of this review is to address post-LT HBV reactivation, its risk factors, underlying molecular mechanisms, and recent advancements and future of anti-viral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Chauhan
- Molecular Virology and Hepatology Research Group, Division of BioMedical Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Shilpa Lingala
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38104, United States
| | - Chiranjeevi Gadiparthi
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38104, United States
| | - Nivedita Lahiri
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Smruti R Mohanty
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Disease, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY 11215, United States
| | - Jian Wu
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Fudan University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Tomasz I Michalak
- Molecular Virology and Hepatology Research Group, Division of BioMedical Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Sanjaya K Satapathy
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38104, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Arora A, Singh SP, Kumar A, Saraswat VA, Aggarwal R, Bangar M, Bhaumik P, Devarbhavi H, Dhiman RK, Dixit VK, Goel A, Goswami B, Kapoor D, Madan K, Narayan J, Nijhawan S, Pandey G, Rai RR, Sahu MK, Saraf N, Shalimar, Shenoy T, Thomas V, Wadhawan M. INASL Position Statements on Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in India: The Andaman Statements. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2018; 8:58-80. [PMID: 29743798 PMCID: PMC5938334 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 12/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection is one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure in India. There are no Indian consensus guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and management of HBV infection. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) set up a taskforce on HBV in 2016, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of HBV infection, relevant to disease patterns and clinical practices in India. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of HBV management, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A 2-day round table discussion was held on 11th and 12th February 2017 at Port Blair, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The members of the taskforce reviewed and discussed the existing literature threadbare at this meeting and formulated the 'INASL position statements' on each of the issues. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong: 1, weak: 2) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (A, B, C, D). We present here the INASL position statements on prevention, diagnosis and management of HBV in India.
Collapse
Key Words
- AASLD, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
- ADV, adefovir dipivoxil
- ALT, alanine aminotransferase
- APASL, Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver
- ART, antiretroviral therapy
- AST, aspartate aminotransferase
- Anti-HBe, antibodies to hepatitis B envelope antigen
- CBC, complete blood count
- CDC, Center for Disease Control
- CHB, chronic hepatitis B
- CU-HCC, Chinese University-Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- DAA, direct-acting antiviral
- DILI, drug induced liver injury
- DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid
- EASL, European Association for the Study of the Liver
- ETV, entecavir
- GAG-HCC, Guide with Age, Gender, HBV DNA, Core Promoter Mutations and Cirrhosis-Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase
- GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation
- HBIG, hepatitis B immune globulin
- HBV, hepatitis B virus
- HBeAg, hepatitis B envelope antigen
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HCV, hepatitis C virus
- HDV, hepatitis D virus
- HIV, human immunodeficiency virus
- IFN-α, interferon alpha
- INASL, Indian National Association for Study of the Liver
- INR, international normalized ratio
- KASL, Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
- LAM, lamivudine
- NA, nucleos(t)ide analogue
- PAGE-B, platelets, age, gender—hepatitis B
- PVNR, primary virological non-response
- PVR, partial virological response
- PegIFN-α, pegylated interferon alpha
- RCT, randomized controlled trial
- REACH-B, risk estimation for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B
- SOVR, sustained off-therapy virological response
- TAF, tenofovir alafenamide
- TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
- TDV, telbivudine
- TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone
- VR, virologic response
- WHO, World Health Organization
- anti-HBs, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen
- cccDNA, covalently closed circular DNA
- chronic hepatitis
- cirrhosis
- eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate
- hepatitis B
- jaundice
- liver failure
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Arora
- Director, Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology, and Pancreatico-Biliary Sciences, Ganga Ram Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (GRIPMER), Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang B, Agarwal K, Joshi D. Management of chronic hepatitis B before and after liver transplantation. Frontline Gastroenterol 2018; 9:79-84. [PMID: 29484165 PMCID: PMC5824762 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2016-100768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B infection is a global public health problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Persistent infection may evolve to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatitis B-related liver disease is a common indication for liver transplantation. Patients with advanced liver disease should be treated with antiviral therapy which may result in clinical improvement. The management of patients after liver transplant then focuses on preventing hepatitis B recurrence in the graft. With the introduction of prophylactic treatment, patient and graft survival has improved significantly. In this review, we will discuss the management of patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis, both compensated and decompensated. We also review the management of hepatitis B after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Wang
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Agarwal
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Joshi
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Short Course of Postoperative Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Plus Antivirals Prevents Reinfection of Liver Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2017; 101:2079-2082. [PMID: 28880197 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) has been an integral component of prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence in liver transplantation (LT) recipients, but HBIG is costly and inconvenient to administer, prompting consideration of alternative regimens. METHODS In this retrospective cohort, we report on the success of antiviral therapy combined with a short course (in hospital only) HBIG in liver transplant recipients with HBV DNA less than 100 IU/mL pre-LT. RESULTS A total of 42 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive, human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis D virus-negative patients with pretransplant HBV DNA undetectable to 100 IU/mL who received HBIG 5000 IU in anhepatic phase and daily for 5 days together with nucleos(t)ide analogues indefinitely yielded 1- and 3-year cumulative incidences of recurrence, defined by positive serum HBsAg, of 2.9% (upper 95% confidence interval, 19%). One patient had HBV viremia 16 months post-LT without detectable HBsAg. Both patients with either HBsAg positivity or viremia had recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed within a month of detection. Post-LT survival was 98% and 94% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that a very short course of HBIG combined with long-term antiviral therapy is highly effective in preventing HBV recurrence and should be the preferred strategy for LT recipients with undetectable or low-level viremia at time of LT.
Collapse
|
24
|
EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 2017; 67:370-398. [PMID: 28427875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3187] [Impact Index Per Article: 455.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health problem with changing epidemiology due to several factors including vaccination policies and migration. This Clinical Practice Guideline presents updated recommendations for the optimal management of HBV infection. Chronic HBV infection can be classified into five phases: (I) HBeAg-positive chronic infection, (II) HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis, (III) HBeAg-negative chronic infection, (IV) HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis and (V) HBsAg-negative phase. All patients with chronic HBV infection are at increased risk of progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), depending on host and viral factors. The main goal of therapy is to improve survival and quality of life by preventing disease progression, and consequently HCC development. The induction of long-term suppression of HBV replication represents the main endpoint of current treatment strategies, while HBsAg loss is an optimal endpoint. The typical indication for treatment requires HBV DNA >2,000IU/ml, elevated ALT and/or at least moderate histological lesions, while all cirrhotic patients with detectable HBV DNA should be treated. Additional indications include the prevention of mother to child transmission in pregnant women with high viremia and prevention of HBV reactivation in patients requiring immunosuppression or chemotherapy. The long-term administration of a potent nucleos(t)ide analogue with high barrier to resistance, i.e., entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil or tenofovir alafenamide, represents the treatment of choice. Pegylated interferon-alfa treatment can also be considered in mild to moderate chronic hepatitis B patients. Combination therapies are not generally recommended. All patients should be monitored for risk of disease progression and HCC. Treated patients should be monitored for therapy response and adherence. HCC remains the major concern for treated chronic hepatitis B patients. Several subgroups of patients with HBV infection require specific focus. Future treatment strategies to achieve 'cure' of disease and new biomarkers are discussed.
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The therapeutic goal which is currently unfrequent but realistic in HBV infected patients is sustained HBsAg clearance. It is preceded by the loss or significant suppression of HBV replication and leads to inhibition of the progression of liver fibrosis, normalization of biochemical indicators of liver damage, reduction in the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, prolongation of survival, prevention of HBV infection in the transplanted organ in post-transplant patients, enhancement of the quality of life, inhibition or reversal of extrahepatic changes associated with HBV infection, and halting of the spread of HBV infections. Recommendations of Polish Group of Experts for HBV for 2017 provide guidelines to assess treatment eligibility, choice of the first-line drug, monitoring and duration of treatment, management of treatment failure as well as therapy of HBV associated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover it contains advice for treatment of HBV infection in children, females planning pregnancy or pregnant. We also included recommendations for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis, prevention of HBV transmission from mother to infant, after liver transplantation, on immunosuppressive therapy and during HCV treatment.
Collapse
|
26
|
Xiao M, Xu X, Zhu H, Zhuang R, Xiang P, Wang T, Zhuang L, Wei Q, Wei X, Zhang L, Wu J, Zheng S. Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B virus-related diseases: a single centre study. Int J Clin Pract 2016:35-42. [PMID: 26177265 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of basiliximab in liver transplantation (LT) for patients with hepatitis B virus-related diseases. METHODS A total of 268 patients with hepatitis B virus-related diseases undergoing LT were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the usage of basiliximab. Total survival, the survival of high-risk patients defined by the posttransplant model for predicting mortality, acute rejection rate, biochemical parameters and other follow-up data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Group Bas was composed of 131 patients who received basiliximab, and Group Triple enrolled the other 137 patients who did not. Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in the cumulative survival of patients without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or in the cumulative survival of patients with HCC. For patients with benign end-stage liver diseases, Group Bas had more patients with a high risk of short- and medium-term mortality than Group Triple (22.81% vs. 8.85%, p = 0.017), but the survival curves of the two groups were not significantly different. The 1-year incidence of acute rejection was lower in Group Bas, although the difference was not significant (8.75% vs. 15.33%, p > 0.05). In both Group Bas and Group Triple, the level of serum creatinine (Scr) at 1 week posttransplantation was significantly lower than pretransplantation (61.00 vs. 88.50 μmol/l, p < 0.001; 61.50 vs. 74.00 μmol/l, p < 0.001; respectively). There was a significant difference in the pretransplantation Scr between the two groups (88.50 vs. 74.00 μmol/l, p = 0.005), but the values of Scr decreased to the same level 1 week (61.00 vs. 61.50 μmol/l, p > 0.05) and 4 weeks (61.00 vs. 59.00 μmol/l, p > 0.05) after transplantation. Significantly fewer recipients in Group Bas experienced hepatitis B relapse than in Group Triple (2/131 vs. 13/137, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS A basiliximab-induced immunosuppressive protocol is a safe regimen that achieves similar survival without increasing the acute rejection rate for LT recipients with hepatitis B virus-related diseases. For patients with benign end-stage liver diseases, this regimen reduces medium-term mortality in high-risk patients. This regimen remarkably improves renal function in the first month after LT and is correlated with a decreased hepatitis B recurrence rate in adult patients after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Xiao
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - X Xu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - H Zhu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - R Zhuang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - P Xiang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - T Wang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - L Zhuang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Q Wei
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - X Wei
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - L Zhang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - J Wu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - S Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Roche B, Samuel D. Withdrawal of posttransplant hepatitis B virus prophylaxis: A blind test. Liver Transpl 2016; 22:1183-5. [PMID: 27389861 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Roche
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, Unité 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Sud, Unités Mixtes de Recherche en Santé 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Hepatinov, Villejuif, France
| | - Didier Samuel
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, Unité 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Sud, Unités Mixtes de Recherche en Santé 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Hepatinov, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lenci I, Baiocchi L, Tariciotti L, Di Paolo D, Milana M, Santopaolo F, Manzia TM, Toti L, Svicher V, Tisone G, Perno CF, Angelico M. Complete hepatitis B virus prophylaxis withdrawal in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive liver transplant recipients after longterm minimal immunosuppression. Liver Transpl 2016; 22:1205-13. [PMID: 27272189 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Revised: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Tailored approaches have been attempted to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection in antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive liver transplantation (LT) recipients in order to minimize the use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and nucleoside analogues (NAs). We report the results of complete HBV prophylaxis withdrawal after a follow-up of at least 6 years in LT recipients with undetectable serum HBV DNA and intrahepatic total HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA at LT. We included 30 HBsAg positive, hepatitis B e antigen-negative recipients, 6 with hepatitis C virus and 7 with hepatitis D virus coinfection, who had received HBIG plus NA for at least 5 years after LT. Stepwise HBIG and NA withdrawal was performed in two 6-month periods under strict monitoring of HBV virology. All patients underwent a clinical, biochemical, and virological follow-up at 3-6 month intervals. HBV recurrence (HBsAg seroreversion ± detectable HBV DNA) occurred in 6 patients: in 1 patient after HBIG interruption and in 5 after both HBIG and NA cessation. Only 3 patients required reinstitution of HBV prophylaxis because of persistent HBV replication, and all achieved optimal control of HBV infection and did not experience clinical events. The other who recurred showed only short-lasting HBsAg positivity, with undetectable HBV DNA, followed by spontaneous anti-HBs seroconversion. An additional 15 patients mounted an anti-HBs titer, without previous serum HBsAg detectability. At the end of follow-up, 90% of patients were still prophylaxis-free, 93.3% were HBsAg negative, and 100% were HBV DNA negative; 60% had anti-HBs titers >10 IU/L (median, 143; range, 13-1000). This small series shows that complete prophylaxis withdrawal is safe in patients transplanted for HBV-related disease at low risk of recurrence and is often followed by spontaneous anti-HBs seroconversion. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding. Liver Transplantation 22 1205-1213 2016 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology Unit, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Luca Toti
- Liver Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Svicher
- Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Malik MU, Ucbilek E, Trilianos P, Cameron AM, Gurakar A. Prophylaxis Among Hepatitis B Core Antibody-positive Deceased-donor Liver Transplant Recipients: Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Plus Oral Antiviral Agents Versus Antiviral Agents Alone: A Single-center Experience. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2016; 15:183-188. [PMID: 27212251 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2015.0277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hepatitis B core antibody immunoglobulin G seropositivity is evidence of past exposure to hepatitis B virus. Donor or recipient hepatitis B core antibody positivity may pose a risk of reactivation, especially early after liver transplant. Although most centers advocate using antiviral agents plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin, some have recently relied on antivirals only as prophylaxis after liver transplant. Here, we retrospectively investigated patient survival in hepatitis B core antibody-positive recipients, comparing those treated with antivirals plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin versus antivirals alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS After Internal Review Board approval, we reviewed medical records of deceased-donor liver transplant recipients between 1995 and 2013. Demographic characteristics, transplant indication, hepatitis B core antibody status, time to death, and type of posttransplant prophylaxis were recorded. We also recorded whether donors showed hepatitis B core antibody positivity. Patients who died within 30 days of liver transplant were excluded. RESULTS There were 148 hepatitis B core antibody-positive recipients. Prophylaxis was given to 75 recipients after transplant: 8 (5%) received hepatitis B immunoglobulin, 22 (15%) received antivirals, and 45 (30%) received the combination. There were 34 deaths: 3 (38%) in hepatitis B immunoglobulin only, 3 (14%) in antiviral only, 8 (18%) in the combination, and 20 (27%) in no prophylaxis groups. One- and 5-year survival rates were similar for binary comparisons among prophylaxis groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS Preliminary results support the current practice of using hepatitis B immunoglobulin plus antivirals for prophylaxis after liver transplant. The similar survival benefit with the combination versus antiviral agents alone suggests equal effectivity for prophylaxis posttransplant. However, a clear benefit of antivirals was not evident in our analysis. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to identify potential benefits of using antivirals alone as prophylaxis after liver transplant and to further clarify their role as the sole prophylactic regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad U Malik
- >From the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rational Basis for Optimizing Short and Long-term Hepatitis B Virus Prophylaxis Post Liver Transplantation: Role of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin. Transplantation 2016; 99:1321-34. [PMID: 26038873 PMCID: PMC4539198 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogues with lower resistance rates, such as entecavir or tenofovir, suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, and delay or obviate the need for liver transplantation in some patients. After liver transplantation, the combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in greater than 90% of transplant recipients. Some forms of HBV prophylaxis need to be continued indefinitely after transplantation but, in patients with a low-risk of HBV recurrence (i.e., HBV DNA levels undetectable before transplantation), it is possible to discontinue HBIG and maintain only long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) therapy. A more cautious approach is necessary for those patients with high pretransplant HBV DNA levels, those with limited antiviral options if HBV recurrence occurs (i.e., HIV or hepatitis D virus coinfection, preexisting drug resistance), those with a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, and those at risk of noncompliance with antiviral therapy. In this group, HBIG-free prophylaxis cannot be recommended. The combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose Hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in > 90% of liver transplant recipients. In patients with low HBV DNA levels, nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) treatment without HBIG is possible.
Collapse
|
31
|
Pinter M, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Sieghart W. Cancer and liver cirrhosis: implications on prognosis and management. ESMO Open 2016; 1:e000042. [PMID: 27843598 PMCID: PMC5070280 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver cirrhosis, the end-stage of every chronic liver disease, is not only the major risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma but also a limiting factor for anticancer therapy of liver and non-hepatic malignancies. Liver cirrhosis may limit surgical and interventional approaches to cancer treatment, influence pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs, increase side effects of chemotherapy, render patients susceptible for hepatotoxicity, and ultimately result in a competitive risk for morbidity and mortality. In this review, we provide a concise overview about the impact of liver cirrhosis on the management and prognosis of patients with primary liver cancer or non-hepatic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Pinter
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Edwin L. Steele Laboratories for Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Sieghart
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Society of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Working Group GI-Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Maiwall R, Kumar M. Prevention and Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis B after Liver Transplantation. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2016; 4:54-65. [PMID: 27047773 PMCID: PMC4807144 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2015.00041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2015] [Revised: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B is a global health problem that leads to development of various complications, such as cirrhosis, liver cancer, and liver failure requiring liver transplantation. The recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) post-liver transplantation is a major cause of allograft dysfunction, cirrhosis of the allograft, and graft failure. Patients with high viral load at the time of transplantation, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity, or those with a history of anti-viral drug resistance are considered as high-risk for recurrent HBV post-liver transplantation, while patients with low viral load, including HBeAg negative status, acute liver failure, and hepatitis D virus (HDV) co-infection are considered to be at low-risk for recurrent HBV post-liver transplantation. Antivirals for patients awaiting liver transplantation(LT) cause suppression of HBV replication and reduce the risk of recurrent HBV infection of the allograft and, therefore, all HBV patients with decompensated cirrhosis should be treated with potent antivirals with high genetic barrier to resistance (entecavir or tenofovir) prior to liver transplantation. Prevention of post-liver transplantation recurrence should be done using a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antivirals in patients at high risk of recurrence. Low dose HBIG, HBIG-free protocols, and monoprophylaxis with high potency antivirals can still be considered in patients at low risk of recurrence. Even, marginal grafts from anti-HBc positive donors can be safely used in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, preferably in anti-hepatitis B core (HBc)/anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) positive recipients. In this article, we aim to review the mechanisms and risk factors of HBV recurrence post-LT in addition to the various treatment strategies proposed for the prevention of recurrent HBV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhi Maiwall
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Manoj Kumar
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Togashi J, Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Kaneko J, Tamura S, Tanaka T, Arita J, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N. One-year extended, monthly vaccination prophylaxis combined with hepatitis B immune globulin for hepatitis B after liver transplantation. Hepatol Res 2016; 46:E51-9. [PMID: 25899139 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Revised: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM The feasibility of vaccination in liver transplant recipients is highly controversial, and the present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a 1-year extended, monthly vaccine prophylaxis protocol of a second-generation recombinant vaccine for transplant recipients. METHODS The recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (10 µg) was administrated s.c. every month for 12 months as the vaccination protocol to 39 liver transplant recipients in stable condition, including those with hepatitis B-related chronic liver disease (n = 30), those with acute hepatitis B liver failure (hepatitis B surface antibody [HBsAb], n = 4), and those with hepatitis B core antibody positive grafts (n = 5). A fixed dose of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) was administrated during the study based on the monoprophylaxis approach, and the increase in the hepatitis B surface antibody titer was measured to evaluate the efficacy of the vaccination. RESULTS The vaccination protocol was initiated a mean of 54 months (range, 13-124) after liver transplantation, and all patients tolerated the vaccination well without adverse effects. The overall hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rate was 5% (2/39) based on hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, and 2% (1/39) based on HBV DNA detectability. Six (15%) patients showed a good response to vaccination with an increase in the HBsAb titer greater than 100 IU/L at the end of vaccination, but only three (8%) maintained an adequate HBsAb level to spare HBIG during the 2-year observation period. CONCLUSION While a few patients demonstrated an adequate response to vaccination, the clinical indication for the HBV vaccination for liver transplant recipients is currently minimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Togashi
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Tokyo Rosai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Akamatsu
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Sugawara
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Kaneko
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sumihito Tamura
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Tanaka
- Department of Organ Transplant Service, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Arita
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sakamoto
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Inhibition of preS1-hepatocyte interaction by an array of recombinant human antibodies from naturally recovered individuals. Sci Rep 2016; 6:21240. [PMID: 26888694 PMCID: PMC4758072 DOI: 10.1038/srep21240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are being found to be increasingly useful in viral infections. In hepatitis B infection, antibodies are proven to be useful for passive prophylaxis. The preS1 region (21–47a.a.) of HBV contains the viral hepatocyte-binding domain crucial for its attachment and infection of hepatocytes. Antibodies against this region are neutralizing and are best suited for immune-based neutralization of HBV, especially in view of their not recognizing decoy particles. Anti-preS1 (21–47a.a.) antibodies are present in serum of spontaneously recovered individuals. We generated a phage-displayed scFv library using circulating lymphocytes from these individuals and selected four preS1-peptide specific scFvs with markedly distinct sequences from this library. All the antibodies recognized the blood-derived and recombinant preS1 containing antigens. Each scFv showed a discrete binding signature, interacting with different amino acids within the preS1-peptide region. Ability to prevent binding of the preS1 protein (N-terminus 60a.a.) to HepG2 cells stably expressing hNTCP (HepG2-hNTCP-C4 cells), the HBV receptor on human hepatocytes was taken as a surrogate marker for neutralizing capacity. These antibodies inhibited preS1-hepatocyte interaction individually and even better in combination. Such a combination of potentially neutralizing recombinant antibodies with defined specificities could be used for preventing/managing HBV infections, including those by possible escape mutants.
Collapse
|
35
|
Onoe T, Tahara H, Tanaka Y, Ohdan H. Prophylactic managements of hepatitis B viral infection in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:165-175. [PMID: 26755868 PMCID: PMC4698483 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Revised: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a considerably effective treatment for patients with end-stage hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease. However, HBV infection often recurs after LT without prophylaxis. Since the 1990s, the treatment for preventing HBV reinfection after LT has greatly progressed with the introduction of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), resulting in improved patient survival. The combination therapy consisting of high-dose HBIG and lamivudine is highly efficacious for preventing the recurrence of HBV infection after LT and became the standard prophylaxis for HBV recurrence. However, mainly due to the high cost of HBIG treatment, an alternative protocol for reducing the dose and duration of HBIG has been evaluated. Currently, combination therapy using low-dose HBIG and NAs is considered as the most efficacious and cost-effective prophylaxis for post-LT HBV reinfection. Recently, NA monotherapy and withdrawal of HBIG from combination therapy, along with the development of new, potent high genetic barrier NAs, have provided promising efficacy, especially for low-risk recipients. This review summarizes the prophylactic protocol and their efficacy including prophylaxis of de novo HBV infection from anti-HBc antibody-positive donors. In addition, challenging approaches such as discontinuation of all prophylaxis and active immunity through hepatitis B vaccination are discussed.
Collapse
|
36
|
Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, Abbas Z, Chan HLY, Chen CJ, Chen DS, Chen HL, Chen PJ, Chien RN, Dokmeci AK, Gane E, Hou JL, Jafri W, Jia J, Kim JH, Lai CL, Lee HC, Lim SG, Liu CJ, Locarnini S, Al Mahtab M, Mohamed R, Omata M, Park J, Piratvisuth T, Sharma BC, Sollano J, Wang FS, Wei L, Yuen MF, Zheng SS, Kao JH. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int 2016; 10:1-98. [PMID: 26563120 PMCID: PMC4722087 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-015-9675-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1661] [Impact Index Per Article: 207.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Worldwide, some 240 million people have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), with the highest rates of infection in Africa and Asia. Our understanding of the natural history of HBV infection and the potential for therapy of the resultant disease is continuously improving. New data have become available since the previous APASL guidelines for management of HBV infection were published in 2012. The objective of this manuscript is to update the recommendations for the optimal management of chronic HBV infection. The 2015 guidelines were developed by a panel of Asian experts chosen by the APASL. The clinical practice guidelines are based on evidence from existing publications or, if evidence was unavailable, on the experts' personal experience and opinion after deliberations. Manuscripts and abstracts of important meetings published through January 2015 have been evaluated. This guideline covers the full spectrum of care of patients infected with hepatitis B, including new terminology, natural history, screening, vaccination, counseling, diagnosis, assessment of the stage of liver disease, the indications, timing, choice and duration of single or combination of antiviral drugs, screening for HCC, management in special situations like childhood, pregnancy, coinfections, renal impairment and pre- and post-liver transplant, and policy guidelines. However, areas of uncertainty still exist, and clinicians, patients, and public health authorities must therefore continue to make choices on the basis of the evolving evidence. The final clinical practice guidelines and recommendations are presented here, along with the relevant background information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Sarin
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - M Kumar
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - G K Lau
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Humanity and Health Medical Centre, Hong Kong SAR, China
- The Institute of Translational Hepatology, Beijing, China
| | - Z Abbas
- Department of Hepatogastroenterlogy, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - H L Y Chan
- Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - C J Chen
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - D S Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - H L Chen
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - P J Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - R N Chien
- Liver Research Unit, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Chilung, Taiwan
| | - A K Dokmeci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ed Gane
- New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - J L Hou
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Unit, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - W Jafri
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - J Jia
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - C L Lai
- Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - H C Lee
- Internal Medicine Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - S G Lim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C J Liu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - S Locarnini
- Research and Molecular Development, Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Al Mahtab
- Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - R Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - M Omata
- Yamanashi Hospitals (Central and Kita) Organization, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu-shi, Yamanashi, 400-8506, Japan
| | - J Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - T Piratvisuth
- NKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - B C Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - J Sollano
- Department of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
| | - F S Wang
- Treatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - L Wei
- Peking University Hepatology Institute, Beijing, China
| | - M F Yuen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pofulam, Hong Kong
| | - S S Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - J H Kao
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine and Hepatitis Research Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ku W, Wang U, Nguyen MH. Efficacy and effectiveness of anti-HBV therapy with early withdrawal of HBIG prophylaxis to prevent HBV recurrence following liver transplantation. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2015; 15:665-77. [PMID: 25865452 DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1025045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The traditional regimen for prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence post-liver transplantation is to use hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) along with oral antiviral therapy; however, it is unclear when it is safe to discontinue HBIG after certain time point and to maintain patients with only oral antiviral therapy. Several studies have suggested that maintenance with oral anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapy following short-term or no HBIG following the immediate post-transplantation period may also be safe and effective in prevention of HBV recurrence. AREAS COVERED We reviewed relevant literature to determine the effectiveness of early withdrawal of HBIG after liver transplantation and its effect on prevention of HBV recurrence. We used PubMed to search for any studies that used HBIG-free or short-term HBIG protocols with continued anti-HBV therapy. Short-term is defined as 12 months or less, and it is an evolving concept as new data on shorter and shorter duration becomes available. Additionally, a mini-quantitative analysis of the studies was performed using studies that involved the use of entecavir and tenofovir as anti-HBV therapy with or without HBIG. EXPERT OPINION Patients who are considered low risk for HBV recurrence at the time of liver transplant may safely be able to utilize a short-term duration of HBIG with indefinite antiviral maintenance therapy afterwards, whereas high-risk patients will likely need long-term HBIG in combination with antiviral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winston Ku
- Stanford University Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , 750 Welch Rd, Suite #210, Palo Alto, CA 94304 , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Song ZL, Cui YJ, Zheng WP, Teng DH, Zheng H. Application of nucleoside analogues to liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:12091-12100. [PMID: 26576094 PMCID: PMC4641127 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Revised: 08/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B is a common yet serious infectious disease of the liver, affecting millions of people worldwide. Liver transplantation is the only possible treatment for those who advance to end-stage liver disease. Donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb) have previously been considered unsuitable for transplants. However, those who test negative for the more serious hepatitis B surface antigen can now be used as liver donors, thereby reducing organ shortages. Remarkable improvements have been made in the treatment against HBV, most notably with the development of nucleoside analogues (NAs), which markedly lessen cirrhosis and reduce post-transplantation HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs in many patients following liver transplantation due to the development of drug resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Optimized prophylactic treatment with appropriate NA usage is crucial prior to liver transplantation, and undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation should be achieved. NA-based and hepatitis B immune globulin-based treatment regimens can differ between patients depending on the patients’ condition, virus status, and presence of drug resistance. This review focuses on the current progress in applying NAs during the perioperative period of liver transplantation and the prophylactic strategies using NAs to prevent de novo HBV infection in recipients of HBcAb-positive liver grafts.
Collapse
|
39
|
Ishigami M, Ogura Y, Hirooka Y, Goto H. Change of strategies and future perspectives against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:10290-10298. [PMID: 26420956 PMCID: PMC4579876 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 08/31/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A few decades ago, liver transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was considered a relative contraindication because of the high rate of graft infections and poor prognosis. Since then, remarkable progress was introduced by using nucleos(t)ide analogues and/or hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and liver transplantation for HBV-related disease is now becoming one of the good indication. However, high cost burden is the main problem for this combination prophylaxis for a long time use, and this issue should be emerged to be resolved. In this review, we show the progress of post anti-HBV strategies showing the history from introduction of HBIg and nucleos(t)ide analogues to recent new strategies with hepatitis B vaccine or saving or stopping protocols of HBIg, and clarify and discuss how to do for further improvement of prevention strategies with better quality.
Collapse
|
40
|
Kornberg A. Intravenous immunoglobulins in liver transplant patients: Perspectives of clinical immune modulation. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:1494-1508. [PMID: 26085909 PMCID: PMC4462688 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i11.1494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2015] [Revised: 04/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/08/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Shortage of appropriate donor grafts is the foremost current problem in organ transplantation. As a logical consequence, waiting times have extended and pretransplant mortality rates were significantly increasing. The implementation of a priority-based liver allocation system using the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score helped to reduce waiting list mortality in liver transplantation (LT). However, due to an escalating organ scarcity, pre-LT MELD scores have significantly increased and liver recipients became more complex in recent years. This has finally led to posttransplant decreasing survival rates, attributed mainly to elevated rates of infectious and immunologic complications. To meet this challenging development, an increasing number of extended criteria donor grafts are currently accepted, which may, however, aggravate the patients’ infectious and immunologic risk profiles. The administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) is an established treatment in patients with immune deficiencies and other antibody-mediated diseases. In addition, IVIg was shown to be useful in treatment of several disorders caused by deterioration of the cellular immune system. It proved to be effective in preventing hyperacute rejection in highly sensitized kidney and heart transplants. In the liver transplant setting, the administration of specific Ig against hepatitis B virus is current standard in post-LT antiviral prophylaxis. The mechanisms of action of IVIg are complex and not fully understood. However, there is increasing experimental and clinical evidence that IVIg has an immuno-balancing impact by a combination of immuno-supporting and immuno-suppressive properties. It may be suggested that, especially in the context of a worsening organ shortage with all resulting clinical implications, liver transplant patients should benefit from immuno-regulatory capabilities of IVIg. In this review, perspectives of immune modulation by IVIg and impact on outcome in liver transplant patients are described.
Collapse
|
41
|
Choudhary NS, Saraf N, Saigal S, Mohanka R, Rastogi A, Goja S, Menon PB, Soin AS. Low-dose short-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin with high genetic barrier antivirals: the ideal post-transplant hepatitis B virus prophylaxis? Transpl Infect Dis 2015; 17:329-33. [PMID: 25682715 DOI: 10.1111/tid.12369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Revised: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ides analogs (lamivudine/adefovir) used for the prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are associated with some risk of HBV recurrence and antiviral resistance. METHODS The study cohort included 176 patients (at least >12 months follow-up) with HBV cirrhosis/hepatocellular carcinoma who received secondary prophylaxis with indefinite entecavir/tenofovir after living-donor LT (LDLT). All patients received 10,000 IU intravenous HBIG in anhepatic phase followed by 600-1000 IU intramuscularly daily for 7 days, weekly for 3 weeks, and then monthly, to keep antiHBs levels >100 mIU/mL for 1 year. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA were tested every 6 months. RESULTS The study cohort is composed of 157 men and 19 women, mean age 47.9 ± 10.1 years, all HBsAg positive, 35 (19.8%) had HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL before LT. After LT, patients received entecavir (n = 126, 71.5%), tenofovir (n = 20, 11.3%), or a combination of entecavir and tenofovir (n = 30, 17% for 3 months), followed by entecavir alone. During follow-up of 43 (12-117) months, 2 patients (including 1 with non-compliance) had HBV recurrence. CONCLUSION In a large cohort of LDLT recipients for HBV-related liver disease, use of low-dose short-term HBIG with high genetic barrier drugs results in a substantially lower incidence of HBV recurrence, even in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N S Choudhary
- Medanta Liver Institute, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - N Saraf
- Medanta Liver Institute, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - S Saigal
- Medanta Liver Institute, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - R Mohanka
- Medanta Liver Institute, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - A Rastogi
- Medanta Liver Institute, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - S Goja
- Medanta Liver Institute, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - P B Menon
- Medanta Liver Institute, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - A S Soin
- Medanta Liver Institute, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hulstaert E, Verhelst X, Geerts A, Van Vlierberghe H. Intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulins for reinfection control after liver transplantation: a cost-saving alternative. J Comp Eff Res 2015; 4:259-265. [DOI: 10.2217/cer.15.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: We explore the effectiveness and cost–effectiveness of intramuscular versus intravenous hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG-IV vs HBIG-IM) to prevent reinfection with the hepatitis B virus after orthotopic liver transplantation. Patients & methods: Overall, 14 patients had orthotopic liver transplantation in 2003–2013 at Ghent University Hospital for HBV-related liver disease. On average 32 months after transplantation patients switched from high-dose HBIG-IV to low-dose HBIG-IM, always in combination with a nucleos(t)ide analog. Results: Seven patients were switched so far. No significant differences between HBIG-IV and HBIG-IM were found in HBsAg and hepatitis B virus-DNA. Conclusion: Switching patients from HBIG-IV to HBIG-IM can be done safely if well monitored. Net yearly savings for the healthcare payer were €5000 for each patient switched to HBIG-IM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Hulstaert
- Department of Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Xavier Verhelst
- Department of Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anja Geerts
- Department of Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Vlierberghe
- Department of Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cerino A, Bremer CM, Glebe D, Mondelli MU. A Human Monoclonal Antibody against Hepatitis B Surface Antigen with Potent Neutralizing Activity. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0125704. [PMID: 25923526 PMCID: PMC4414269 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe the production and characterization of human monoclonal antibodies (mAb) specific for the major hepatitis B virus (HBV) S protein. The mAbs, two IgG1κ and one IgG1λ, were secreted by B-cell clones obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of one person convalescent from acute hepatitis B and one vaccinated individual. The former recognized a denaturation-insensitive epitope within the p24 protein whereas the latter recognized a denaturation-sensitive, conformational epitope located within the HBsAg common "a" determinant. This mAb, denominated ADRI-2F3, displayed a very high protective titer of over 43,000 IU/mg mAb and showed an extremely potent neutralizing activity in the in vitro model of HBV infection using primary hepatocytes from Tupaia belangeri as target. Recombinant variable heavy and light domain sequences derived from mAb ADRI-2F3 were cloned into eukaryotic expression vectors and showed identical fine specificity and 1 log10 higher titer than the original IgG1λ. It is envisaged that such mAb will be able to efficiently prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation for end-stage chronic HBV infection or infection after needle-stick exposure, providing an unlimited source of valuable protective anti-HBs antibody.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Cerino
- Research Laboratories, Department of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Corinna M. Bremer
- Institute of Medical Virology, National Reference Centre for Hepatitis B and D Viruses, German Center for Infection Research, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Dieter Glebe
- Institute of Medical Virology, National Reference Centre for Hepatitis B and D Viruses, German Center for Infection Research, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Mario U. Mondelli
- Research Laboratories, Department of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Orlando R, Foggia M, Maraolo AE, Mascolo S, Palmiero G, Tambaro O, Tosone G. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection: from the past to the future. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015; 34:1059-70. [PMID: 25678010 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-015-2341-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
About 3-5 % of the world's population is chronically infected by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and is at risk of developing liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. The risk of dying prematurely because of chronic HBV infection is higher in younger people. The current strategies to prevent HBV infection involve immunization (active and/or passive) and antiviral chemoprophylaxis. The vaccines available for active immunization, containing hepatitis B surface antigen, are safe and confer long-term immunity in most healthy subjects. Since the vaccination is unsatisfactory in some patients, e.g., those with chronic kidney disease, human immunodeficiency virus infection, type I diabetes mellitus, and celiac disease, new strategies of vaccination are required. The neonatal, infant, and adolescent routine program vaccination in about 180 countries has greatly decreased the disease burden. Passive immunization with specific HBV immunoglobulins is recommended after single acute exposure, in infants born to infected mothers, and in HBV-infected patients undergoing liver transplantation combined with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (chemoprophylaxis). Chemoprophylaxis is also indicated in HBV carrier candidates for immunosuppressive treatment and in patients with occult B infection undergoing immunosuppressive therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Since HBV is not eradicable by an immune response or by antiviral drugs developed so far, the only preventive strategy remains global neonatal vaccination in all countries, firstly in HBV-endemic countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Orlando
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Xi ZF, Xia Q. Recent advances in prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:829-835. [PMID: 25624716 PMCID: PMC4299335 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2014] [Revised: 08/31/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related end-stage liver disease. However, without antiviral prophylaxis, the recurrence rate of hepatitis B is as high as 80%-100%, which leads to a 50% mortality rate in the first 2 years after liver transplantation. Combination therapy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine demonstrated a higher efficacy of prophylaxis and further reduced the rate of recurrence to < 10%. The strategy of HBIG combined with lamivudine has been the standard treatment in many centers. However, the high rate of lamivudine resistance and the many disadvantages of HBIG have compelled surgeons to reconsider the long-term efficacy of this strategy for the prevention of HBV reinfection. Recently, new nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as entecavir and tenofovir, have been approved as first-line monotherapies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. These antiviral medicines have replaced lamivudine as the first choice in the prevention of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation. Various therapies that are composed of entecavir, tenofovir, and lamivudine plus adefovir, with or without HBIG have been adopted in several liver transplant centers. This article reviews the recent advances in prophylaxis for the recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
46
|
Jeong SW, Choi Y, Kim JW. Management of viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipients. Clin Mol Hepatol 2014; 20:338-44. [PMID: 25548738 PMCID: PMC4278063 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2014.20.4.338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Recurrence of viral hepatitis after liver transplantation (LT) can progress to graft failure and lead to a decrease in long-term survival. Recently, there have been remarkable improvement in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) using potent antiviral agents. Combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and potent antiviral therapy has brought marked advances in the management of CHB for liver transplant recipients. Post-transplant antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection is generally reserved for patients showing progressive disease. Acheiving a sustained virological response in patients with LT greatly ameliorates graft and overall survival, however this only occurs in 30% of transplant recipient using pegylated interferon and ribavirin (RBV). Direct acting antivirals such as protease inhibitors, polymerase or other non-structural proteins inhibitors are anticipated to establish the new standard of care for transplant recipients. In liver transplant recipients, hepatitis E virus infection is an uncommon disease. However, it can lead to chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis and may require retransplantation. Recently, 3-month course of RBV monotherapy has been reported as an effective treatment. This review focuses on the recent management and therapeutic approaches of viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soung Won Jeong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jin-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Verna EC. Hepatitis viruses and liver transplantation: evolving trends in antiviral management. Clin Liver Dis 2014; 18:575-601. [PMID: 25017077 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2014.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Viral hepatitis is both a leading indication for liver transplant (LT) and an important cause of posttransplant graft loss and mortality. Treatment and prevention of hepatitis B virus in LT recipients, with the observed corresponding improvement in post-LT outcomes, is among the great success stories in transplantation. By comparison, treatment of hepatitis C virus with safe and effective regimens is only just becoming a reality. Chronic hepatitis E virus infection in LT recipients represents a newly described phenomenon that can also lead to graft loss; early diagnosis and treatment may be key in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Verna
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gehring A, Bertoletti A, Tavis JE. Host factor-targeted hepatitis B virus therapies. Intervirology 2014; 57:158-62. [PMID: 25034483 DOI: 10.1159/000360938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review we will focus on host factors known to impact hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication as current or potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Some immunotherapeutic strategies will be discussed because they have the potential to activate interferon-mediated clearance of HBV, but attention will also be paid to host machinery and proteins that silence covalently closed circular DNA, destabilize viral RNA, or disrupt entry and trafficking of HBV virions. Many of these are in the early stages of development, but may represent novel avenues to reduce HBV burden when combined with nucleos(t)ide analogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Gehring
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo., USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Roche B, Samuel D. Prevention of hepatitis B virus reinfection in liver transplant recipients. Intervirology 2014; 57:196-201. [PMID: 25034488 DOI: 10.1159/000360944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogues with lower resistance rates such as entecavir or tenofovir could suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function, delay or obviate the need for liver transplantation in some patients, and reduce the risk of HBV recurrence. The combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in more than 90% of transplant recipients. Some form of HBV prophylaxis needs be continued indefinitely after transplantation. However, in patients with a low risk of HBV recurrence (i.e. HBV DNA levels undetectable before transplantation), it is possible to discontinue HBIG and maintain long-term antiviral therapy. A more cautious approach to prophylaxis regimen is necessary for those patients with high pretransplant HBV DNA levels, those with limited antiviral options if HBV recurrence occurs (i.e. HIV or HDV coinfection, preexisting drug resistance), those with a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, and those with a risk of noncompliance to antiviral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Roche
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Urban S, Bartenschlager R, Kubitz R, Zoulim F. Strategies to inhibit entry of HBV and HDV into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 2014; 147:48-64. [PMID: 24768844 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 234] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2013] [Revised: 03/11/2014] [Accepted: 04/21/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although there has been much research into the pathogenesis and treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV) infections, we still do not completely understand how these pathogens enter hepatocytes. This is because in vitro infection studies have only been performed in primary human hepatocytes. Development of a polarizable, HBV-susceptible human hepatoma cell line and studies of primary hepatocytes from Tupaia belangeri have provided important insights into the viral and cellular factors involved in virus binding and infection. The large envelope (L) protein on the surface of HBV and HDV particles has many different functions and is required for virus entry. The L protein mediates attachment of virions to heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the surface of hepatocytes. The myristoylated N-terminal preS1 domain of the L protein subsequently binds to the sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP, encoded by SLC10A1), the recently identified bona fide receptor for HBV and HDV. The receptor functions of NTCP and virus entry are blocked, in vitro and in vivo, by Myrcludex B, a synthetic N-acylated preS1 lipopeptide. Currently, the only agents available to treat chronic HBV infection target the viral polymerase, and no selective therapies are available for HDV infection. It is therefore important to study the therapeutic potential of virus entry inhibitors, especially when combined with strategies to induce immune-mediated killing of infected hepatocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Urban
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Ralf Bartenschlager
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ralf Kubitz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Fabien Zoulim
- INSERM Unité 1052, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon University, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|