Predictive markers of anti-VEGF and emerging role of angiogenesis inhibitors as immunotherapeutics

Global research trends on biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Visualization and bibliometric analysis

The global burden of cancer continues to grow, posing a significant public health challenge. Although cancer immunotherapy has shown significant efficacy, the response rate is not high. Therefore, the objective of our research was to identify the latest research trends and hotspots on biomarkers from 1993 to 2023. Data were collected from the database Web of Science core collection. Bibliometric analysis and visualization were conducted with CiteSpace(6.3.1), VOSviewer (v1.6.20), R-bibliometrix(v4.3.3), and Microsoft Excel(2019). A total of 2686 literatures were retrieved. The sheer annual volume of publications has shown a rapid upward trend since 2015. The United States has generated the most publications and Harvard University ranked as a leading institution. The global biomarker research on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revealed regional differences and in-depth explorations should be promoted in developing countries. Although China has become the second largest country in terms of publication, the average citation per paper and the total link strength were both lower than the other countries. The research on biomarkers mainly concentrated upon the following aspects: PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA-4, gene expression, adverse events, total mutational burden (TMB), body mass index (BMI), gut microbiota, cd8(+)/cd4(+) t-cells, and blood-related biomarkers such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), cytokines. Furthermore, "artificial intelligence" and "machine learning" have become the most important research hotspot over the last 2 y, which will help us to identify useful biomarkers from complex big data and provide a basis for precise medicine for malignant tumors.

Innate immune cells in vascular lesions: mechanism and significance of diversified immune regulation

Angiogenesis is a complex physiological process. In recent years, the immune regulation of angiogenesis has received increasing attention, and innate immune cells, which are centred on macrophages, are thought to play important roles in vascular neogenesis and development. Various innate immune cells can act on the vasculature through a variety of mechanisms, with commonalities as well as differences and synergistic effects, which are crucial for the progression of vascular lesions. In recent years, monotherapy with antiangiogenic drugs has encountered therapeutic bottlenecks because of the short-term effect of 'vascular normalization'. The combination treatment of antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy breaks the traditional treatment pattern. While it has a remarkable curative effect and survival benefits, it also faces many challenges. This review focuses on innate immune cells and mainly introduces the regulatory mechanisms of monocytes, macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells (DCs) and neutrophils in vascular lesions. The purpose of this paper was to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of angiogenesis and development and the current research status of innate immune cells in regulating vascular lesions in different states. This review provides a theoretical basis for addressing aberrant angiogenesis in disease processes or finding new antiangiogenic immune targets in inflammation and tumor.

Efficacy of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations, notably epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase, shows reduced sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. A subgroup analysis of the IMpower150 data on patients resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) before enrollment demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) over bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. However, due to the exploratory nature and small sample size, the efficacy of ABCP post-EGFR-TKI failure is still debated. We evaluated ABCP therapy against other platinum-based regimens without immune checkpoint inhibitors in terms of effectiveness and toxicity.

METHODS

Data from patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations treated with platinum-based chemotherapy or ABCP at five Japanese hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching compared efficacy outcomes, including overall response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS.

RESULTS

Of 183 EGFR mutation carriers, 33 underwent ABCP therapy, while 150 received platinum-based chemotherapy. Following propensity score matching, 32 and 74 patients were analyzed. In the ABCP group, median PFS and OS were 6.8 and 16.7 months compared to 5.8 and 25.7 months with platinum-based chemotherapy, showing no significant differences in PFS (p = 0.46) and OS (p = 0.85). In liver metastases, ABCP yielded a median PFS of 9.9 versus 6.1 months and an ORR of 62.5 % versus 35.7 % relative to platinum-based chemotherapy, without statistical significance (PFS p = 0.16; ORR p = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

Compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, ABCP did not improve effectiveness in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after EGFR-TKI failure.

Comparing PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies in unresetable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center, real-world study

With the rise of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) regimens, particularly bevacizumab and atezolizumab, as first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a need to explore PD-L1 and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors in combination therapies for unresectable HCC (uHCC). Integrating systemic therapies with locoregional approaches is also emerging as a potent strategy. This study compares the outcomes of atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and sintilimab (programmed cell death 1 inhibitor) with bevacizumab or its biosimilar, combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies (HAIT) in uHCC patients. From January 2020 to September 2023, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 uHCC patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The cohort included 69 patients treated with atezolizumab with bevacizumab (Bev/Ate) and 69 with bevacizumab biosimilar with sintilimab (Bio/Sin), combined with HAIT. The propensity score matching was also employed to further explore the efficacy and safety. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.8 months for the Bev/Ate group and 10.0 months for the Bio/Sin group (p = 0.188). The Bev/Ate group showed significantly longer intrahepatic mPFS (HR 0.381; 95% confidence interval 0.176-0.824; p = .018) and higher overall response rates compared with the Bio/Sin group (60.87% vs. 31.88%, p = .001; 69.57% vs. 49.28%, p = .024) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (p > .050). Combining atezolizumab or sintilimab with bevacizumab or its biosimilar alongside HAIT provided similar overall PFS in uHCC patients. However, the atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination with HAIT showed superior intrahepatic PFS and control rates, warranting further validation.

Ivonescimab in non-small cell lung cancer: harmonizing immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis has become a useful strategy in cancer treatment. Ivonescimab, the first-approved bispecific antibody targeting both immune checkpoint inhibition and anti-angiogenesis, represents a breakthrough over the conventional dual-drug combination approach. The emerging clinical evidence demonstrates promising efficacy and manageable safety profile of ivonescimab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), suggesting its potential role as a cornerstone in the next generation of cancer immunotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents the pharmacological characteristics of ivonescimab, revisits relevant clinical trials and key data, and provides an in-depth analysis. Additionally, the potential of ivonescimab in NSCLC treatment is discussed, along with its clinical prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

The available clinical data demonstrate that simultaneously targeting both immune checkpoint inhibition and angiogenesis pathways through a single bispecific antibody represents a significant therapeutic advancement in NSCLC treatment. Ivonescimab's innovative dual-targeting mechanism, supported by promising efficacy data from the HARMONi trials and its manageable safety profile, appears to be fundamental to its potential to challenge current standards of care. As the first approved bispecific antibody with this unique mechanism of action, ivonescimab may not only transform current treatment paradigms but also pioneer a new direction in cancer immunotherapy.

Inhibition of VEGF signaling prevents exhaustion and enhances anti-leukemia efficacy of CAR-T cells via Wnt/β-catenin pathway

BACKGROUND

Current challenges in Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) -T cell therapy for hematological cancers include T cell exhaustion and limited persistence, which contribute to cancer relapse.

METHODS

The effects of Axitinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, on the biological functions of CAR-T cells in vitro and in vivo were investigated by comparing CAR-T cells pre-treated ex vivo with Axitinib, as well as utilizing a B-ALL mouse model. Real-time quantitative PCR and Western blotting were employed to detect the expression of molecules related to differentiation, exhaustion, and the Wnt pathway in CAR-T cells. Flow cytometry was used to assess changes in CAR-T cell differentiation, exhaustion, activation, apoptosis, proliferation, and cytokine secretion. Western blotting and flow cytometry were used to assess changes in VEGFR expression. Bioluminescence imaging, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis were used to evaluate changes in tumor burden in mice receiving different treatments, while hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were used to monitor histological changes in the liver and spleen of mice.

RESULTS

Axitinib treatment notably reduced CAR-T cell exhaustion and terminal differentiation both under tonic signaling and tumor antigen exposure scenarios. Furthermore, CAR-T cells pretreated with Axitinib demonstrated enhanced anti-tumor efficacy and prolonged survival in vivo. Mechanistically, Axitinib treatment upregulated the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in CAR-T cells. Using agonists/inhibitors of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway could respectively mimic or counteract the effects of Axitinib on CAR-T cell exhaustion and differentiation. CAR-T cells treated with Axitinib can inhibit the VEGFR2 pathway. CAR-T cells treated with anti-VEGFR2 antibody can activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and prevent CAR-T cell exhaustion.

CONCLUSION

Axitinib confers resistance to exhaustion in CAR-T cells by modulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

The safety and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and programmed cell death protein- 1 inhibitors combined with HAIC/TACE in the treatment of recurrent unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) frequently recurs after surgical treatment, necessitating effective postoperative recurrence management for improved long-term patient outcomes. Currently, no standardized treatment approach exists for recurrent unresectable HCC. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of combining tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of recurrent unresectable HCC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 83 patients diagnosed with unresectable recurrent HCC. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their treatment regimens: HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors (HTP), TACE combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors (TTP), and TACE alone. Treatment efficacy and safety were compared among these groups, and potential risk factors were identified.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients in the HTP group, TTP group, and TACE alone group was found to be 13.7, 9.2, and 2.5 months (p = 0.001, p = 0.002). According to the mRECIST criteria, the disease control rates (DCR) in the HTP, TTP and TACE groups was 89.7%, 75.0%, 50.0% (p = 0.002); objective response rates (ORR) was 44.8%, 35%, 14.7% (p = 0.037); and complete response (CR) was 17.2%, 0, 0 (p = 0.005). No serious adverse reactions were observed in the HTP and TTP groups.

CONCLUSION

The HTP and TTP groups were safe and effective compared to TACE alone for the treatment of recurrent unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, and the HTP group demonstrated a superior CR.

Advancements in regenerative medicine: a comprehensive review of stem cell and growth factor therapies for osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widely encountered degenerative joint disorder marked by gradual cartilage deterioration, inflammation, and pain, which collectively impose considerable strain on global healthcare systems. While traditional therapies typically offer relief from symptoms, they do not tackle the core pathophysiological aspects of the disease. Regenerative medicine has recently risen as a promising field for addressing OA, capitalizing on the regenerative capabilities of stem cells and growth factors to foster tissue healing and renewal. This thorough review delves into the most recent progress in stem cell and growth factor treatments for OA, covering preclinical studies, clinical trials, and novel technological developments. We discuss the diverse origins of stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), underscoring their therapeutic actions and effectiveness in both preclinical and clinical environments. Moreover, we explore contributions of growth factors like transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) in modifying OA's pathology and enhancing tissue restoration. Additionally, this review discusses the hurdles and constraints tied to current regenerative strategies, including the standardization of cell sources, the refinement of delivery techniques, and considerations for long-term safety. By meticulously assessing the latest research outcomes and technological breakthroughs, this review aims to shed light on the potential of stem cell and growth factor therapies as forthcoming therapeutic options for OA, thereby propelling forward the domain of regenerative medicine and enhancing clinical results for individuals afflicted with this incapacitating ailment.

Enhancing antitumor immunity: the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-angiogenic therapy, and macrophage reprogramming

Cancer treatment has long been hindered by the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the mechanisms that tumors employ to evade immune detection. Recently, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic therapies has emerged as a promising approach to improve cancer treatment outcomes. This review delves into the role of immunostimulatory molecules and ICIs in enhancing anti-tumor immunity, while also discussing the therapeutic potential of anti-angiogenic strategies in cancer. In particular, we highlight the critical role of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in angiogenesis. Moreover, we explore the potential of macrophage reprogramming to bolster anti-tumor immunity, with a focus on restoring macrophage phagocytic function, modulating hypoxic tumor environments, and targeting cytokines and chemokines that shape immune responses. By examining the underlying mechanisms of combining ICIs with anti-angiogenic therapies, we also review recent clinical trials and discuss the potential of biomarkers to guide and predict treatment efficacy.

Systemic therapy for pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer: past developments and recent advances

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains among the most challenging malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, particularly in pretreated patients. As most patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment, effective second-line and subsequent treatments are required. Although the addition of modified FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) to active symptom control improved the overall survival of patients with progressing advanced BTC despite gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment, its efficacy was modest. Moreover, most clinical trials demonstrated modest efficacy of molecular-targeted agents for molecularly unselected pretreated advanced BTC. Patients with advanced BTC carry a relatively high druggable genetic alteration rate and have shown promising responses to molecular-matched therapies targeting gene alterations such as FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, IDH1 mutation, and HER2 overexpression/amplification. Additionally, tumor-agnostic approaches, including BRAF V600E, NTRK fusion, and RET fusion, have expanded the treatment options for some patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited efficacy as mono- or combination therapy in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. Therefore, developmental efforts have shifted to immune checkpoint inhibitor and other combinations such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors or radiation. In addition to refining combination strategies to enhance the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitor, future research should focus on elucidating the tumor microenvironment. This review delineates the evolution of systemic therapies in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. By examining past developments and recent advances through prospective trials, it highlights novel approaches that may improve outcomes in this challenging disease.

Translational Selenium Nanoparticles Promotes Clinical Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Chemotherapy via Activating Selenoprotein-driven Immune Manipulation

Reconstructing the tumor immune microenvironment is an effective strategy to enhance therapeutic efficacy limited by immunosuppression in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, it is found that selenium (Se) depletion and immune dysfunction are present in patients with advanced NSCLC compared with healthy volunteers. Surprisingly, Se deficiency resulted in decreased immunity and accelerated rapid tumor growth in the mice model, which further reveals that the correlation between micronutrient Se and lung cancer progression. This pioneering work achieves 500-L scale production of Se nanoparticles (SeNPs) at GMP level and utilizes it to reveal how and why the trace element Se can enhance clinical immune-mediated treatment efficacy against NSCLC. The results found that translational SeNPs can promote the proliferation of NK cells and enhance its cytotoxicity against cancer cells by activating mTOR signaling pathway driven by GPXs to regulate the secretion of cytokines to achieve an antitumor response. Moreover, a clinical study of an Investigator-initiated Trial shows that translational SeNPs supplementation in combination with bevacizumab/cisplatin/pemetrexed exhibits enhanced therapeutic efficacy with an objective response rate of 83.3% and a disease control rate of 100%, through potentiating selenoprotein-driven antitumor immunity. Taken together, this study, for the first time, highlights the translational SeNPs-enhanced therapeutic efficacy against clinical advanced NSCLC.

A randomised non-comparative phase II study of atezolizumab, bevacizumab and chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC with acquired resistance - The ETOP 15-19 ABC-lung trial

BACKGROUND

ABC-lung explores the potential effect of combining atezolizumab and bevacizumab with either carboplatin/paclitaxel (ABCPac) or pemetrexed (ABPem) in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

ABC-lung is a 1:1 randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial, stratified by prior treatment with a third-generation EGFR TKI, evaluating atezolizumab (1200 mg, Q3W) and bevacizumab (15mg/kg, Q3W) with either 4-6 cycles of carboplatin (AUC5, Q3W) and paclitaxel (175-200mg/m2, Q3W) or pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, Q3W) until progression (PD). The study aimed to improve the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate from 18% to 37%, assessed per RECISTv1.1, separately in each arm. To reject the null hypothesis, at least 14 of 45 evaluable patients in each arm needed to be progression-free at 1-year (power 83%, 1-sided a=0.023). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), PFS, quality of life (QoL) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Between 09/2020 and 09/2022, 95 patients were randomized (ABCPac:45; ABPem:50) with median follow-up time of 19 months. From the evaluable patients, 9 in ABCPac and 11 in ABPem arms reached 1-year without progression, lower than the success criterion of 14patients. Median PFS was 6.4 months in ABCPac and 7.6 months in the ABPem arms, while median OS was 15.4 months and 15.6 months, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were experienced by 50% and 42% of patients in ABCPac and ABPem arms, respectively, while no grade 5 AEs were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed 1-year PFS rate with atezolizumab, bevacizumab in combination with either carboplatin-paclitaxel or pemetrexed was below the aspired rate of 37% in both arms. The safety is consistent with the known toxicity profiles. Clinical trial identification: NCT04245085.

Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Treatment Through VEGF/VEGFR Inhibitors and Immunotherapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Colorectal cancer, ranking as the third most prevalent malignancy globally, substantially benefits from both immunotherapy and VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors. Nevertheless, the use of monotherapy proves inadequate in effectively tackling the heterogeneity of tumors and the intricacies of their microenvironment, frequently leading to drug resistance and immune evasion. This situation underscores the pressing need for innovative strategies aimed at augmenting the effectiveness and durability of treatments. Clinical research demonstrates that the combination of VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors (primarily including VEGF/VEGFR-targeted drugs and multi-kinase inhibitors) with immune checkpoint inhibitors creates a synergistic effect in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Our analysis explores how VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors recalibrate the tumor microenvironment, modulate immune cell functions, and influence the expression of immune checkpoints and cytokines. Furthermore, we critically evaluate the preclinical and clinical feasibility of these combined therapeutic approaches. Despite the potential for toxicity, the significant benefits and prospective applications of these strategies warrant thorough exploration. Exploring the synergistic mechanisms of these combined treatments has the potential to inaugurate a new paradigm in oncology, enabling more personalized and efficacious treatment modalities. Additionally, the synergy between VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors and nascent immunotherapies emerges as a promising field of inquiry.

Anti-PD1 based precision induction therapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II umbrella clinical trial

The efficacy and safety of induction-immunotherapy followed by surgery for unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain challenging. In this open-label, single-center, phase II clinical umbrella trial (ChiCTR2000035367), 100 unresectable Stage III NSCLC patients are enrolled. Patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% but contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy receive immuno-monotherapy. Patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% and no contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy receive immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy. Patients with PD-L1 expression between 1% and 49%, contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy, or negative/unknown PD-L1 expression receive chemoimmunotherapy. The primary endpoint is the major pathological response (MPR) rate. Among 47 surgically-treated patients, the MPR rate is 61.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.4%-75.5%), achieving the prespecified endpoint. For secondary endpoints, the objective response rate for all patients is 54.0% (95% CI: 43.7-64.0). The median event-free survival is 29.9 months (95% CI: 17.0-42.7). Most common adverse event is anemia (49.0%). Exploratory transcriptomic analyses reveal Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Antigen 1 (BST1) as a promising biomarker for response to chemoimmunotherapy. Generally, for unresectable stage III NSCLC patients, anti-PD1 based induction-therapy according to PD-L1 expression and contraindication to antiangiogenic therapy followed by surgery is a feasible option.

Case report: Aumolertinib plus gumarontinib in a patient with EGFR mutated non-small-cell lung cancer harboring acquired MET amplification following progression on afatinib plus crizotinib

Background

Although it remained fully unclear about the optimal regimen for Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition factor (MET) amplification, the dual inhibition of EGFR inhibitor with MET inhibitor were attempted in clinical practice. There is very limited literature on the subsequent treatment when patients develop the resistance to this combination regimen.

Case summary

The patient, a 49-year-old female, initially presented with EGFR exon 21 L858R metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, treated successfully with first-line afatinib on September 2022 with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.0 months. On May 2023, she developed chest tightness and was found to have pericardial and pleural effusions containing malignant cells, indicating disease progression. Next-generation sequencing using pericardial effusion revealed concurrent EGFR L858R mutation and MET amplification. Then, afatinib plus crizotinib was initiated as second-line regimen, achieving stable disease with a PFS of 13.5 months. On July 2024, the patient developed the resistance to afatinib plus crizotinib due to the appearance of brain metastases. Then, this patient was administrated with aumolertinib plus gumarontinib as third-line regimen. Remarkably, this led to significant radiographic improvement of brain metastases. This patient is still undergoing third-line treatment, with a PFS of 3.7 months.

Conclusion

This case underscores the importance of re-challenge using third-generation EGFR-TKI with novel MET-TKI after the failure of second-generation EGFR-TKI plus crizotinib in EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC patients with MET amplification, especially in patients with brain metastases. The successful application of aumolertinib plus gumarontinib highlights its potential in overcoming MET amplification-induced EGFR-TKI resistance, which warrants further investigation in future large-scale clinical trials.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Response Rates, Adverse Events, and Predictors of Response

Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary hepatic malignancy. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines recommend antiangiogenic agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. We present our experience of treating HCC patients with Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab, their response rates, adverse events, survival, and response and survival predictors. Methods: This retrospective analysis included HCC patients diagnosed at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India between July 2021 and April 2024 and receiving at least one dose of Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), comprising complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), as per mRECIST criteria. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and predictors of response and survival. Results: Sixty-three patients were analyzed {mean age: 56.0 + 12.7 years; 82.5% males}. Forty-three (68.2%) patients had BCLC stage C HCC. Thirty-five (55.5%) patients belonged to Child-Pugh class A and 28 (44.5%) belonged to Child-Pugh class B. At 1 year, OS was 39% and PFS was 27%. Among 43 patients with data for radiological response, ORR was 48.8% (CR-9.3% and PR-39.5%) and DCR was 62.7% with stable disease (SD) in 13.9% of patients. PD occurred in 37.2% of patients. AFP response predicted radiological response, while Child-Pugh class and BCLC stage predicted survival. Adverse events were reported in 49.2% of patients. Conclusions: Our study shows slightly lower survival than previous studies with Child-Pugh class being the most important determinant of survival. AFP response predicts radiological response and not survival.

Role of immunotherapy in managing cancers prior to liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increasingly are being evaluated in earlier stage disease. Herein we explore the role of ICIs pre-liver transplant for liver cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the high response rates with combination approaches including locoregional treatments, more patients with liver confined disease, without vascular invasion, who have received ICIs are now being rendered eligible for potential liver transplant. This opportunity to expand the population who may benefit from liver transplant has also come with challenges recognizing the global shortage of organs. Post-liver transplant immunosuppression potentially competes with the immune-stimulating effects of ICIs and graft rejection has been a concern. ICIs may provide an opportunity to maintain patients on the waiting list but an understanding of who is likely to benefit is needed, to circumvent possible toxicities. In addition, ICIs are now considered standard of care, in combination with chemotherapy, for advanced cholangiocarcinoma, where the role of liver transplant is evolving.

SUMMARY

As the eligibility criteria globally for liver transplant in the setting of malignancy continues to expand, the integration of ICIs becomes increasingly important.

Serum Alpha-fetoprotein Associated with Treatment Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis and a Retrospective Cohort Study

Context: Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been shown to be valuable in tumor staging and predicting survival outcomes. In this investigation, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis and a meta-analysis to assess the predictive significance of initial AFP levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We searched databases from inception until 14 July 2024 to identify cohort studies involving ICI treatments in HCC patients with baseline AFP data. We also retrospectively analyzed patients with HCC treated with ICIs to assess the therapeutic effect in the high AFP (AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL) group and the low AFP (AFP < 400 ng/mL) group in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: In the meta-analysis, a total of 34 studies, comprising 8,799 patients, were included, while the retrospective cohort study encompassed 55 patients. In the meta-analysis, the summarized hazard ratios (HRs) of AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL versus AFP < 400 ng/mL for ICI therapy indicated that the high AFP group had a poorer outcome compared to the low AFP group, with a pooled HR for OS of 1.69 (95% CI: 1.57 - 1.82, P < 0.001) and a pooled HR for PFS of 1.47 (95% CI: 1.33 - 1.63, P < 0.001). In the retrospective cohort study, higher AFP levels were associated with a lower DCR for ICIs, with a DCR of 42.9% in the high AFP group and 77.8% in the low AFP group (P = 0.008). Cox model analysis showed that higher serum AFP was an independent predictor for shorter OS (HR 3.584, 95% CI: 1.466 - 8.762, P = 0.005). The toxicity analysis also displayed a strong association between high AFP and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (P = 0.008). Conclusions: Higher serum AFP is associated with poorer efficacy of ICI treatment in HCC patients.

Insights into the Emerging Therapeutic Targets of Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive breast cancer subtype, is characterized by the non-appearance of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Clinically, TNBC is marked by its low survival rate, poor therapeutic outcomes, high aggressiveness, and lack of targeted therapies. Over the past few decades, many clinical trials have been ongoing for targeted therapies in TNBC. Although some classes, such as Poly (ADP Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and immunotherapies, have shown positive therapeutic outcomes, however, clinical effects are not much satisfiable. Moreover, the development of drug resistance is the major pattern observed in many targeted monotherapies. The heterogeneity of TNBC might be the cause for limited clinical benefits. Hence,, there is a need for the potential identification of new therapeutic targets to address the above limitations. In this context, some novel targets that can address the above-mentioned concerns are emerging in the era of TNBC therapy, which include Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF-1α), Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), Tumour Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α), β-Adrenergic Receptor (β-AR), Voltage Gated Sodium Channels (VGSCs), and Cell Cycle Regulators. Currently, we summarize the ongoing clinical trials and discuss the novel therapeutic targets in the management of TNBC.

Substance P and Neurokinin-1 receptor are overexpressed in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma than in the pituitary gland

BACKGROUND

Human adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is a brain tumor that originates at the base of the skull and shows aggressive local behavior, invading sensitive structures such as the optic pathways and hypothalamus. The conventional treatment of the tumor has been surgery and radiotherapy with the consequent development of serious sequelae. It is well known that Substance P (SP) peptide and Neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) are involved in inflammation and cancer progression and its blockage with NK-1R antagonists has been shown to effectively counteract tumor development in preclinical trials. The oncogenic mechanism underlying ACP is based on a secretory phenotype associated with the production of paracrine biomarkers that establish an inflammatory and angiogenic microenvironment for the progression of ACP.

METHODS

With the aim of describing the existence and distribution of SP/NK-1R in the ACP, we studied by immunohistochemistry the expression of SP and NK-1R in 43 human ACP and compared with healthy pituitary gland samples.

RESULTS

SP and the NK-1R were overexpressed in all ACP more than in pituitary glands samples. SP expression is found widespread the ACP and is preferentially localized in the nucleus than in cytoplasm of tumor cells. Likewise, areas of glial reaction and endothelial cells also express SP preferentially in the cell nuclei. NK-1R is expressed mainly in the glial reaction, especially in the nuclei and membranes of its inflammatory cells and less prominently in the cytoplasm. In ACP neovessels, NK-1R is expressed in endothelial cells and fibroblasts that constitute their basement membranes. Tumor cells did not show significant NK-1R expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings, reported here for the first time, suggest a role for SP and NK-1R in pituitary gland and ACP and opens the door to future clinical trials on treatment with NK-1R antagonist drugs in ACP patients.

Podocyte senescence: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics

As an important component of the glomerular filtration membrane, the state of the podocytes is closely related to kidney function, they are also key cells involved in aging and play a central role in the damage caused by renal aging. Therefore, understanding the aging process of podocytes will allow us to understand their susceptibility to injury and identify targeted protective mechanisms. In fact, the process of physiological aging itself can induce podocyte senescence. Pathological stresses, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, secretion of senescence-associated secretory phenotype, reduced autophagy, oncogene activation, altered transcription factors, DNA damage response, and other factors, play a crucial role in inducing premature senescence and accelerating aging. Senescence-associated-β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) is a marker of aging, and β-hydroxybutyric acid treatment can reduce SA-β-gal activity to alleviate cellular senescence and damage. In addition, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-α, transforming growth factor-β signaling, glycogen synthase kinase-3β, cycle-dependent kinase, programmed cell death protein 1, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 are closely related to aging. The absence or elevation of these factors can affect aging through different mechanisms. Podocyte injury is not an independent process, and injured podocytes interact with the surrounding epithelial cells or other kidney cells to mediate the injury or loss of podocytes. In this review, we discuss the manifestations, molecular mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic drugs for podocyte senescence. We included elamipretide, lithium, calorie restriction, rapamycin; and emerging treatment strategies, such as gene and immune therapies. More importantly, we summarize how podocyte interact with other kidney cells.

Regorafenib enhances M1/M2 macrophage polarization by inhibiting the secretion of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

AIMS

Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of various metastatic/advanced cancers. Although clinical trials have reported the efficacy of regorafenib in multiple cancer types, its immunomodulatory activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear.

MAIN METHODS

This study investigated the effects of regorafenib on tumorigenesis by using two mouse models of HNSCC. The distribution of immune cells in tumor tissues was assessed through flow cytometry, RNA sequencing, and multiplex immunofluorescence staining.

KEY FINDINGS

Regorafenib exhibited significant antitumor activity in our HNSCC mouse models. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte isolation and RNA sequencing revealed that regorafenib can activate immune functions. Moreover, regorafenib-treated tumor-conditioned medium regulated macrophage proliferation ex vivo. Our data suggests that regorafenib modulates immune function by regulating both tumor and immune cells. Specifically, regorafenib induced the polarization of macrophages toward the proinflammatory M1 phenotype by suppressing the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), a macrophage regulator. In addition, regorafenib suppressed the secretion of PAI-1 from ex vivo human HNSCC organoids.

SIGNIFICANCE

Regorafenib enhances M1/M2 macrophage polarization and suppresses PAI-1 secretion from cancer cells, leading to a shift from M2 to M1 macrophages in the HNSCC tumor microenvironment.

Real-world status, efficacy and prognosis analysis of first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients treated at multiple centres

OBJECTIVE

To present the real-world status and explore the predictors of the efficacy and prognosis of first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

Real-world data of uHCC patients who underwent first-line treatment at 4 hospitals in Northern Anhui, China, from July 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. The clinicopathological features, haematological indicators, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), efficacy and safety data were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were enrolled and most of them treated with targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy (TI). Compared to patients treated with TI, patients who were administrated with TI plus locoregional therapy (TIL) showed longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) times (both p < 0.05), with manageable safety profiles. Moreover, compared to patients with low baseline serum levels of SOD, patients with high baseline serum SOD levels had a better treatment efficacy and had longer mPFS and mOS times (all p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with low SOD levels had longer mPFS times when receiving TIL than when receiving TI (p = 0.005), but, among patients with high SOD levels, their prognoses were not substantially different between TIL and TI (p > 0.05). Additionally, patients in the low-VEGF-A group had a longer mOS time than patients in the high-VEGF-A group (p = 0.004). In comparison with TI, TIL can improve the survival time among patients with high VEGF-A levels but not among patients with low VEGF-A levels.

CONCLUSIONS

TI was the most commonly first-line systemic therapy for uHCC patients, with better efficacy and outcomes when combined with locoregional therapy in a certain population. Baseline serum SOD and VEGF-A were found to be potential predictive biomarkers for decision-making, treatment response, and outcome in patients with uHCC in the primary care setting.

Editorial for the Special Issue "Angiogenic Growth Factors in Tumor Development: Beyond New Blood Vessels Formation"

A myriad of growth factors and receptors, whose effects are intertwined in complex interactions, do not only orchestrate tumor angiogenesis [...].

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in driver mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies have changed the landscape of management of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) dramatically. Whereas ICIs in NSCLC without specific driver mutations are well established it is unclear what the place of ICIs in driver mutation-positive NSCLC is. This review summarizes the current view on the use of ICIs in driver mutation-positive NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Immune checkpoint inhibition in combination with chemotherapy (and antiangiogenesis) in recurrent driver mutation-positive NSCLC after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy may be effective.

SUMMARY

Currently the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in driver mutation-positive NSCLC is limited. They can in combination be applied in second and later line settings if no specific therapy is available.

Von Hippel-Lindau protein signalling in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

The distinct pathological and molecular features of kidney cancer in adaptation to oxygen homeostasis render this malignancy an attractive model for investigating hypoxia signalling and potentially developing potent targeted therapies. Hypoxia signalling has a pivotal role in kidney cancer, particularly within the most prevalent subtype, known as renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Hypoxia promotes various crucial pathological processes, such as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) activation, angiogenesis, proliferation, metabolic reprogramming and drug resistance, all of which contribute to kidney cancer development, growth or metastasis formation. A substantial portion of kidney cancers, in particular clear cell RCC (ccRCC), are characterized by a loss of function of Von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor (VHL), leading to the accumulation of HIF proteins, especially HIF2α, a crucial driver of ccRCC. Thus, therapeutic strategies targeting pVHL-HIF signalling have been explored in ccRCC, culminating in the successful development of HIF2α-specific antagonists such as belzutifan (PT2977), an FDA-approved drug to treat VHL-associated diseases including advanced-stage ccRCC. An increased understanding of hypoxia signalling in kidney cancer came from the discovery of novel VHL protein (pVHL) targets, and mechanisms of synthetic lethality with VHL mutations. These breakthroughs can pave the way for the development of innovative and potent combination therapies in kidney cancer.

Unveiling the antitumor synergy between pazopanib and metformin on lung cancer through suppressing p-Akt/ NF-κB/ STAT3/ PD-L1 signal pathway

Pazopanib, an inhibitor of the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase, has demonstrated significant antitumor effects in lung cancer. However, its application as a standard treatment for this type of cancer is limited by its drug resistance and toxicity. Metformin has the potential to combat lung cancer by modifying the tumor's immune microenvironment. In this study, we investigated the potential antitumor effects and the associated underlying molecular mechanisms of the combination of pazopanib and metformin in lung cancer. In vitro studies were conducted using the A549 and H460 lung cancer cell lines, whereas urethane-induced lung cancer-bearing mice were used for in vivo assessments. The urethane-induced mice received oral administration of pazopanib (50 mg/kg) and/or metformin (250 mg/kg) for a duration of 21 days. The results indicated that the MTT assay demonstrated a combined cytotoxic effect of the pazopanib/metformin combination in H460 and A549 cells, as evidenced by CI and DRI analyses. The observed increase in annexin V levels and the corresponding increase in Caspase-3 activity strongly suggest that this combination induced apoptosis. Furthermore, the pazopanib/metformin combination significantly inhibited the p-Akt/NF-κB/IL-6/STAT3, HIF1α/VEGF, and TLR2/TGF-β/PD-L1 pathways while also increasing CD8 expression in vivo. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that these antitumor mechanisms were manifested by the suppression of the proliferation marker Ki67. In conclusion, these findings revealed that metformin augments the antitumor efficacy of pazopanib in lung cancer by simultaneously targeting proliferative, angiogenic, and immunogenic signaling pathways, metformin enhances the antitumor effectiveness of pazopanib in lung cancer, making it a promising therapeutic option for lung cancer.

Extracellular Vesicles May Predict Response to Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab has been approved as one of the standards of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The median overall survival (OS) upon available treatments still remains below 2 years, urgently suggesting better stratification tools to identify ideal candidates for this treatment and potentially allowing personalized approaches. In this study, we evaluated the potential role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a novel biomarker in patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab for HCC.

METHODS

We characterized EVs in 212 longitudinal serum samples from an observational cohort of 53 individuals with advanced HCC, who started therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our center between January 2020 and March 2022.

RESULTS

In our cohort, the overall efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab was comparable to previously published phase III data. We detected significantly smaller EVs in treatment responders, while enlarged EVs were associated with significantly decreased efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in terms of OS. A decrease in vesicle size during immunotherapy was related to a longer progression-free survival (PFS). A univariate Cox regression analysis including various clinicopathological parameters (e.g., tumor stage, markers of inflammation, organ dysfunction, or tumor markers) revealed vesicle size as an independent prognostic marker in HCC patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Moreover, higher vesicle concentrations and lower zeta potentials were identified as a positive prognostic factor throughout treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct EV characteristics such as vesicle size, concentration, and zeta potential represent promising novel biomarkers in patients with advanced HCC receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab, potentially helping to identify optimal candidates for checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments.

Immune Indicator Changes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing TACE Plus ICIs and Anti-VEGF Antibodies/TKIs: A Prognostic Biomarker Analysis

Objective

To explore changing trends in circulating immune indicators of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing TACE plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-VEGF antibodies/TKIs and to elucidate the relationship between immune response and tumor prognosis.

Materials

This single-center retrospective study included patients with unresectable HCC undergoing TACE plus ICIs and anti-VEGF antibodies/TKIs from March 11, 2019, to February 15, 2024. Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and every cycle, from which blood cell counts and immune indicators were analyzed. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR) at the first evaluation. According to the first evaluation based on mRECIST, patients were classified into PD, SD, and OR groups for analysis. Further subgroup analysis was performed on the OR group based on whether experiencing progression after the first evaluation. Lymphocyte subsets were measured by flow cytometry. Immunoglobulins were measured using the immune turbidimetric method. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was measured by the complete blood count. Simple linear regression was employed to examine the dynamic trends.

Results

A total of 63 patients were enrolled, with an ORR of 55.6% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 87.3% at the first evaluation. The median overall survival (mOS) was 27.5 months (95% CI: 22.5-32.5 months). In the OR group (n=35), more active immune responses, expressed in a decrease in CD3-CD19+ (p=0.004), CFB (p=0.027), NLR (p<0.001) and an increase in Ig λ (p=0.010), Ig κ (p=0.037), Ig A (p=0.005), Ig G (p=0.006), were related to better prognosis, while similar patterns seen in the OR-nPD subgroup. Concurrently, no significant differences were noted in the PD group (n=8).

Conclusion

The combination therapy may modify the tumor microenvironment of HCC. Changing trends in circulating immune indicators and NLR can serve as potential biomarkers for predicting tumor response and guiding clinical treatment.

Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of Response to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify clinical and radiologic characteristics that could predict response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 108 advanced HCC patients with intrahepatic lesions who were treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Two radiologists independently analyzed imaging characteristics of the index tumor on pretreatment computed tomography. Predictive factors associated with progressive disease (PD) at the best response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, ver. 1.1 were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 108 patients with a median PFS of 15 weeks, 40 (37.0%) had PD during treatment. Factors associated with PD included the presence of extrahepatic metastases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 14.35; p=0.03), the infiltrative appearance of the tumor (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.05 to 8.93; p=0.04), and the absence of arterial-phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (aOR, 6.34; 95% CI, 2.18 to 18.47; p < 0.001). Patients with two or more of these factors had a PD of 66.7% and a median PFS of 8 weeks, indicating a significantly worse outcome compared to the patients with one or no of these factors.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment, the absence of APHE, infiltrative appearance of the intrahepatic tumor, and presence of extrahepatic metastases were associated with poor response and survival. Evaluation of early response may be necessary in patients with these factors.

The Trend of the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Combination of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common type of tumor worldwide. The development of systemic treatment of advanced HCC has remained stagnant for a considerable period. During the last years, a series of new treatment regimens based on the combination of immunotherapeutic drugs and targeted drugs have been gradually developed, increased the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression free survival (PFS) of HCC patients. Among the different combination therapy groups, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus IBI-305 seem to have unique advantages, while head-to-head comparisons are still needed. A comprehensive understanding of the developments, the ongoing clinical trials and the mechanisms of combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy might lead to the development of new combination strategies and solving current challenges such as the molecular biomarkers, the clinical administration order of drugs and the second-line treatments after combination therapy.

Delivering adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in the early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a formidable challenge in oncology, demanding innovative treatment approaches. Both adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, thanks to the introduction of immunotherapy, have emerged as promising strategies in the management of HCC, aiming to reduce the risk of relapse and ultimately to improve survival.

AREAS COVERED

This review considers current evidence, ongoing clinical trials, and future strategies to elucidate the evolving landscape of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in HCC.

EXPERT OPINION

Both adjuvant and neoadjuvant regimens, notably those incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, demonstrated encouraging safety profiles and efficacy outcomes in HCC.While significant challenges persist, including optimizing patient selection and endpoint definition, the evolving landscape of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy holds promise for maximizing the therapeutic potential of immunotherapy across all stages of HCC. Further insights into tumor biology and host immunity will shape the role of these approaches which are close to becoming reality in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of personalized optimal PD-(L)1 combinations in advanced NSCLC: a network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-directed immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the optimal therapeutic combinations remain uncertain.

METHODS

Our study encompassed phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved anti-PD-(L)1-based therapies for stage-IV NSCLC. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and incidences of adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted by treatment lines, PD-L1 expression levels, histological types, and metastatic sites.

RESULTS

Our analysis incorporated 38 publications, covering 14 therapeutic combinations and involving 18 048 participants. PD-(L)1+chemotherapy (CT), PD-(L)1+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) +CT, and PD-(L)1+ T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain were notably effective in prolonging OS. Overall, PD-(L)1+CT and PD-(L)1+CT+ vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly beneficial for PFS and ORR. As for the subsequent-line treatments, incorporating radiotherapy can enhance PFS and ORR (ranked fourth among enrolled treatments). For patients with PD-L1 <1%, PD-(L)1+CT+VEGF and PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT were favorable approaches. Conversely, in patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, PD-(L)1+CT represented an effective treatment. Patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma or liver metastases might benefit from the addition of VEGF. In cases of squamous cell carcinoma or brain metastases, the combination of PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT yielded superior benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the enhanced efficacy of combination immunotherapies over monotherapy. It highlights the necessity for personalized treatment, considering individual factors. These insights are vital for clinical decision making in the management of advanced NSCLC.

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab plus transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with high tumor burden unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Though atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC).

METHODS

This three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3-4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Employing the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile.

First-line serplulimab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Phase 2 results of a randomized, double-blind, phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND

Whether or not the addition of immunotherapy to current standard-of-care treatments can improve efficacy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the predominant type of mCRC, is unclear.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 part of a phase 2/3 trial was conducted at 23 hospitals across China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04547166). Patients with unresectable metastatic/recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma and no prior systemic therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive every-3-weeks intravenous serplulimab (300 mg) plus HLX04 (7.5 mg/kg) and XELOX (serplulimab group) or placebo (300 mg) plus bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) and XELOX (placebo group). The primary endpoint was independent radiology review committee (IRRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included other efficacy endpoints and safety.

FINDINGS

Between July 16, 2021, and January 20, 2022, 114 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the serplulimab (n = 57) or placebo (n = 57) group. All patients had stage IV CRC, and 95.7% of the patients with available microsatellite instability (MSI) status were MSS. With a median follow-up duration of 17.7 months, median PFS was prolonged in the serplulimab group (17.2 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.14). Although the median overall survival (OS) was not reached for either group, a trend of an OS benefit was observed for the serplulimab group (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41-1.45). 36 (65.5%) and 32 (56.1%) patients in the serplulimab and placebo groups had grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serplulimab plus HLX04 and XELOX exhibits promising efficacy and is safe and tolerable in patients with treatment-naive mCRC.

FUNDING

This work was funded by Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.

The Impact of Infections in Patients Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: The therapeutic landscape of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) continues to evolve. Atezolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), in combination with bevacizumab, has substantially improved outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in patients who develop infections while receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab for uHCC. Methods: Patients who received atezolizumab and bevacizumab for uHCC at a single hospital network were included. Types and rates of infections were reported. Covariates compared among infected and non-infected cohorts included age, sex, race, comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, immunosuppressive use, chronic infections, number of cycles of ICIs given, antibiotic or antiviral therapies at ICI initiation, and line of therapy (first-line, second-line, greater than second-line). Results: Out of 810 evaluable patients, 34 uHCC patients were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. The mean ± SD age was 66.29 ± 9.39; 28 (82.35%) were males. There were 17 (50%) patients with reported infection, with bacterial infection occurring in 12 (70.59%) patients and COVID-19 in 4 (23.5%). Of the infected patients, eight (47.06%) had one infection, five (29.41%) had two infections, and two (11.76%) had three or more infections. Infected and non-infected patients received a median of 12 (IQR: 5-17) and 4 (IQR: 3-12) ICI cycles (p = 0.18), respectively. Infections did not negatively impact OS or PFS but resulted in treatment delays and discontinuation in 11 (64.71%) and 7 (41.18%) patients, respectively. At the last follow-up, 19 (55.88%) patients died, 9 (52.94%) in the non-infected group vs. 10 (58.82%) in the infected group (p = 1.0). Conclusions: While a broad array of infections occurred in 50% of the patients in this cohort, it did not negatively impact survival outcomes. However, it did impact morbidity, with more all-cause admissions and treatment delays.

Ivonescimab Plus Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Variant: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

For patients with non-small cell lung cancer whose disease progressed while receiving EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy, particularly third-generation TKIs, optimal treatment options remain limited.

Objective

To compare the efficacy of ivonescimab plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for patients with relapsed advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variant.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 trial at 55 sites in China enrolled participants from January 2022 to November 2022; a total of 322 eligible patients were enrolled.

Interventions

Participants received ivonescimab (n = 161) or placebo (n = 161) plus pemetrexed and carboplatin once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy of ivonescimab plus pemetrexed or placebo plus pemetrexed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population assessed by an independent radiographic review committee (IRRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The results of the first planned interim analysis are reported.

Results

Among 322 enrolled patients in the ivonescimab and placebo groups, the median age was 59.6 vs 59.4 years and 52.2% vs 50.9% of patients were female. As of March 10, 2023, median follow-up time was 7.89 months. Median progression-free survival was 7.1 (95% CI, 5.9-8.7) months in the ivonescimab group vs 4.8 (95% CI, 4.2-5.6) months for placebo (difference, 2.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46 [95% CI, 0.34-0.62]; P < .001). The prespecified subgroup analysis showed progression-free survival benefit favoring patients receiving ivonescimab over placebo across almost all subgroups, including patients whose disease progressed while receiving third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy (HR, 0.48 [95% CI 0.35-0.66]) and those with brain metastases (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.22-0.73]). The objective response rate was 50.6% (95% CI, 42.6%-58.6%) with ivonescimab and 35.4% (95% CI, 28.0%-43.3%) with placebo (difference, 15.6% [95% CI, 5.3%-26.0%]; P = .006). The median overall survival data were not mature; at data cutoff, 69 patients (21.4%) had died. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 99 patients (61.5%) in the ivonescimab group vs 79 patients (49.1%) in the placebo group, the most common of which were chemotherapy-related. Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 10 patients (6.2%) in the ivonescimab group vs 4 (2.5%) in the placebo group. Grade 3 or higher vascular endothelial growth factor-related adverse events occurred in 5 patients (3.1%) in the ivonescimab group vs 4 (2.5%) in the placebo group.

Conclusions

Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival with tolerable safety profile in TKI-treated non-small cell lung cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05184712.

Efficacy of chemotherapy containing bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer according to programmed cell death ligand 1

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor growth. Serum VEGF-C, lactate dehydrogenase, and inflammatory markers have been reported as predictive markers related to bevacizumab treatment. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) could act upon VEGF receptor 2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the expression of PD-L1.

METHODS

This analysis included CRC patients who received bevacizumab plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line therapy between June 24, 2014 and February 28, 2022, at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, South Korea). Analysis of patient data included evaluation of PD-L1 expression by the combined positive score (CPS). We analyzed the efficacy of bevacizumab according to PD-L1 expression status in patients with CRC.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients was included in this analysis. Almost all patients were treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX as the first-line chemotherapy. While 77% of patients received FOLFOX, 23% received FOLFIRI as backbone first-line chemotherapy. The numbers of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more, 5 or more, or 10 or more were 105 (85%), 64 (52%), and 32 (26%), respectively. The results showed no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with bevacizumab treatment between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 1 and those with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more (PD-L1 < 1% vs PD-L1 ≥ 1%; PFS: P = 0.93, OS: P = 0.33), between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 5 and of 5 or more (PD-L1 < 5% vs PD-L1 ≥ 5%; PFS: P = 0.409, OS: P = 0.746), and between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 10 and of 10 or more (PD-L1 < 10% vs PD-L1 ≥ 10%; PFS: P = 0.529, OS: P = 0.568).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy containing bevacizumab can be considered as first-line therapy in metastatic CRC irrespective of PD-L1 expression.

Revolutionizing cancer treatment: Harnessing the power of terrestrial microbial polysaccharides

Cancer treatment faces numerous challenges, such as inadequate drug targeting, steep price tags, grave toxic side effects, and limited therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a safe and effective new drug to combat cancer. Microbial polysaccharides, complex and diverse biological macromolecules, exhibit significant microbial variability and uniqueness. Studies have shown that terrestrial microbial polysaccharides possess a wide range of biological activities, including immune enhancement, antioxidant properties, antiviral effects, anti-tumour potential, and hypoglycemic functions. To delve deeper into the structure-activity relationship of these land-based microbial polysaccharides against cancer, we conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of anti-cancer literature published between 2020 and 2024. The anticancer efficacy of terrestrial microbial polysaccharides is influenced by multiple factors, including the microbial species, existing form, chemical structure, and polysaccharide purity. According to the literature, an optimal molecular weight and good water solubility are essential for demonstrating anticancer activity. Furthermore, the addition of mannose and galactose has been found to significantly enhance the anticancer properties of these polysaccharides. These insights will serve as a valuable reference for future research and progress in the field of cancer drug therapy, particularly with regards to terrestrial microbial polysaccharides.

Organ-specific responses to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicentre, retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monotherapy triggers various responses by each organ. In advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while extrahepatic lesions demonstrate objective response rates (ORR) of 20%-40%, only 10% of intrahepatic lesions respond. Although first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab has shown survival benefits in advanced HCC, organ-specific responses remain unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to assess organ-specific responses in patients with advanced HCC receiving atezolizumab/bevacizumab.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter, observational study included patients who received first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab for advanced HCC. Patients with Child-Pugh class A, measurable tumour lesions and serial imaging available for response evaluation were eligible.

RESULTS

Between May 2020 and June 2021, 131 patients (median age: 62) from three cancer referral institutions were included. Ninety-one had hepatitis B (69.5%), 108 were at Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C (82.4%), and 78 had extrahepatic metastasis (59.5%). After a median follow-up of 10.1 months, median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-9.2), median overall survival remained unreached (95% CI, range unavailable) and the ORR was 29.0%. Among 270 individual tumour lesions, the liver was the most commonly involved organ (n = 158). Atezolizumab/bevacizumab induced ORR of 27.8%, 42.2%, 29.1% and 21.0% for liver, lymph nodes, lungs and other sites, respectively. The organ-specific response rate for intrahepatic tumours decreased with increasing size (35.6%: <5 cm, 15.0%: ≥ 5 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike anti-PD-1 monotherapy, atezolizumab/bevacizumab demonstrated favourable responses in intrahepatic lesions, comparable to those in extrahepatic lesions, and may potentially overcome the immune-tolerant hepatic microenvironment in patients with advanced HCC.

Gastric cancer fibroblasts affect the effect of immunotherapy and patient prognosis by inducing micro-vascular production

Introduction

Immunotherapy is critical for treating many cancers, and its therapeutic success is linked to the tumor microenvironment. Although anti-angiogenic drugs are used to treat gastric cancer (GC), their efficacy remains limited. Cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF)-targeted therapies complement immunotherapy; however, the lack of CAF-specific markers poses a challenge. Therefore, we developed a CAF angiogenesis prognostic score (CAPS) system to evaluate prognosis and immunotherapy response in patients with GC, aiming to improve patient stratification and treatment efficacy.

Methods

We assessed patient-derived GC CAFs for promoting angiogenesis using EdU, cell cycle, apoptosis, wound healing, and angiogenesis analysis.

Results

We then identified CAF-angiogenesis-associated differentially-expressed genes, leading to the development of CAPS, which included THBS1, SPARC, EDNRA, and VCAN. We used RT-qPCR to conduct gene-level validation, and eight GEO datasets and the HPA database to validate the CAPS system at the gene and protein levels. Six independent GEO datasets were utilized for validation. Overall survival time was shorter in the high- than the low-CAPS group. Immune microenvironment and immunotherapy response analysis showed that the high-CAPS group had a greater tendency toward immune escape and reduced immunotherapy efficacy than the low-CAPS group.

Discussion

CAPS is closely associated with GC prognosis and immunotherapy outcomes. It is therefore an independent predictor of GC prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy.

Dynamics of the neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio during lenvatinib treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Lenvatinib is an approved therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved as frontline chemotherapies for HCC, and the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) has been demonstrated to significantly affect HCC treatment. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with the TIME, and the dynamics of the NLR are associated with prognosis or treatment efficacy in various cancer types. The present study investigated the dynamics of the TIME using the NLR in 101 patients with HCC treated with lenvatinib. Immunostaining for CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was also performed in 9 patients who underwent liver tumor biopsy prior to subsequent chemotherapy for progression or discontinuation due to adverse events on lenvatinib treatment. The NLR values measured at the start of treatment (SOT), after 1 month of treatment and after 3 months of treatment were 2.78±2.20, 2.61±1.86 and 2.66±2.36, respectively (P=0.733). Among the patients with no reduction in the initial dose, there was no significant difference between the NLR after 1 month (2.34±0.25) and that at the SOT (2.86±2.33) (P=0.613). In patients who achieved a complete or partial response, the NLR at the time of the best tumor response was 1.65±0.56, which was significantly lower than that at the SOT (2.05±0.78) (P=0.023). In patients who did not respond to lenvatinib, the NLR at the time of disease progression was 3.68±3.19, which was significantly higher than that at the SOT (2.78±1.79) (P=0.043). Overall, 5 out of the 6 patients who did not respond to lenvatinib had low CD8+ TIL counts at disease progression. Although the present study included a limited number of patients, the NLR was associated with the therapeutic effects of lenvatinib. These findings suggest the potential of lenvatinib as an immunomodulator.

PD-L1 inhibitor versus PD-1 inhibitor plus bevacizumab with transvascular intervention in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Both atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) plus bevacizumab (A+B) and sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus bevacizumab (S+B) are recommended as the first-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in China. Different efficacy between the two regimens combined with transvascular intervention for unresectable HCC (uHCC) remain unknown. We retrospectively analyzed uHCC patients treated in three centers by simultaneous combination of A+B or S+B with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared. Totally 188 patients were included, with 92 and 96 administered A+B+TACE-HAIC (ABTH) and S+B+TACE-HAIC (SBTH), respectively. ORRs (62.0 vs. 70.8%, respectively; P = 0.257) and disease control rates (88.0 vs. 93.8%, P = 0.267) were similar between groups by the mRECIST criteria. ABTH showed no survival advantage over SBTH, with median PFS times of 11.7 months and 13.0 months, respectively (HR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.52-1.26, P = 0.35) and similar OS times (HR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.32-4.39, P = 0.8). No significant differences were observed in grade 3-4 TRAEs between groups. Either PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor plus bevacizumab combined with TACE-HAIC have similarly excellent therapeutic efficacy with manageable adverse events, representing promising treatment options for uHCC.

PD-1 Inhibitors Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors with or without Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of HBV-Related Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Comparing the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with or without hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HBV-related advanced HCC and exploring prognostic predictors of the combined regimen.

Patients and Methods

A total of 194 patients diagnosed with HBV-related advanced HCC between 2020 and 2022 were included in the study, including 99 in the HAIC combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus TKIs (HPT group) and 95 in the PD-1 inhibitors plus TKIs (PT group). The efficacy was evaluated according to the tumor response rate and survival, and the safety was evaluated according to the adverse events.

Results

The HPT group showed higher overall response rate and disease control rate than the PT group. The median overall survival (OS) of the HPT group and the PT group were 18.10 months and 12.57 months, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.519, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.374-0.722, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.20 months in the HPT group and 6.33 months in the PT group (HR = 0.632, 95% CI: 0.470-0.851, P = 0.002). In addition, albumin bilirubin (ALBI) and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) are independent prognostic factors affecting HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy and can be used as prognostic predictors. Almost all patients included in the study experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of varying degrees of severity, with grade 1-2 adverse events predominating.

Conclusion

The HPT group had better OS and PFS than the PT group in patients with HBV-related advanced HCC. In addition, high ALBI and high SIRI were associated with poor prognosis in the HAIC combined group.

New hopes and promises in the treatment of ovarian cancer focusing on targeted treatment-a narrative review

Unfortunately, ovarian cancer is still diagnosed most often only in an advanced stage and is also the most lethal gynecological cancer. Another problem is the fact that treated patients have a high risk of disease recurrence. Moreover, ovarian cancer is very diverse in terms of molecular, histological features and mutations. Many patients may also develop platinum resistance, resulting in poor response to subsequent lines of treatment. To improve the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer, it is expected to make better existing and implement new, promising treatment methods. Targeted therapies seem very promising. Currently, bevacizumab - a VEGF inhibitor and therapy with olaparib - a polyADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor are approved. Other methods worth considering in the future include: folate receptor α, immune checkpoints or other immunotherapy methods. To improve the treatment of ovarian cancer, it is also important to ameliorate the determination of molecular features to describe and understand which group of patients will benefit most from a given treatment method. This is important because a larger group of patients treated for ovarian cancer can have a greater chance of surviving longer without recurrence.

Case report: Sustained remission after combined sintilimab, anti-VEGF therapy, and chemotherapy in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer harboring acquired EGFR 19Del/T790M/cis-C797S mutation resistance

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are highly effective against tumors harboring the T790M mutation. However, patients treated with these inhibitors ultimately develop resistance, and the most common mechanism is the emergence of the EGFR C797S mutation. Few treatment regimens have been reported for this condition. In this report, we present a successful combination treatment with the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, and chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed acquired resistance with EGFR 19 exon deletion (19Del)/T790M/cis-C797S mutation following progression with ametinib therapy. This regimen was well tolerated, and the patient has remained progression-free for 15 months. Our case provides clinical evidence that the combination of PD-1 inhibitor, anti-VEGF therapy, and chemotherapy may be an efficacious therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR 19Del/T790M/cis-C797S mutation resistance following progression with EGFR TKI therapy.

Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and prospectives

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health concern worldwide, with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. In recent years, immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made great progress in the systemic treatment of HCC. The combination treatments based on ICIs have been the major trend in this area. Recently, dual immune checkpoint blockade with durvalumab plus tremelimumab has also emerged as an effective treatment for advanced HCC. However, the majority of HCC patients obtain limited benefits. Understanding the immunological rationale and exploring novel ways to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy has drawn much attention. In this review, we summarize the latest progress in this area, the ongoing clinical trials of immune-based combination therapies, as well as novel immunotherapy strategies such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells, personalized neoantigen vaccines, oncolytic viruses, and bispecific antibodies.

Treatment Options for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Immunotherapy: Present and Future

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer, and the body's immune responses greatly affect its progression and the prognosis of patients. Immunological suppression and the maintenance of self-tolerance in the tumor microenvironment are essential responses, and these form part of the theoretical foundations of immunotherapy. In this review, we first discuss the tumor microenvironment of HCC, describe immunosuppression in HCC, and review the major biomarkers used to track HCC progression and response to treatment. We then examine antibody-based therapies, with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), monoclonal antibodies that target key proteins in the immune response (programmed cell death protein 1, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4, and programmed death-ligand 1) which have transformed the treatment of HCC and other cancers. ICIs may be used alone or in conjunction with various targeted therapies for patients with advanced HCC who are receiving first-line treatments or subsequent treatments. We also discuss the use of different cellular immunotherapies, including T cell receptor (TCR) T cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. We then review the use of HCC vaccines, adjuvant immunotherapy, and oncolytic virotherapy, and describe the goals of future research in the development of treatments for HCC.

Osimertinib in combination with anti-angiogenesis therapy presents a promising option for osimertinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib has become standard care for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whereas drug resistance remains inevitable. Now we recognize that the interactions between the tumor and the tumor microenvironment (TME) also account for drug resistance. Therefore, we provide a new sight into post-osimertinib management, focusing on the alteration of TME.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on the prognosis of different treatments after osimertinib resistance. Next, we carried out in vivo experiment to validate our findings using a humanized mouse model. Furthermore, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing (scRNA-seq) of tumor tissue from the above treatment groups to explore the mechanisms of TME changes.

RESULTS

Totally 111 advanced NSCLC patients have been enrolled in the retrospective study. The median PFS was 9.84 months (95% CI 7.0-12.6 months) in the osimertinib plus anti-angiogenesis group, significantly longer than chemotherapy (P = 0.012) and osimertinib (P = 0.003). The median OS was 16.79 months (95% CI 14.97-18.61 months) in the osimertinib plus anti-angiogenesis group, significantly better than chemotherapy (P = 0.026), the chemotherapy plus osimertinib (P = 0.021), and the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (P = 0.006). The efficacy of osimertinib plus anlotinib in the osimertinib-resistant engraft tumors (R-O+A) group was significantly more potent than the osimertinib (R-O) group (P<0.05) in vitro. The combinational therapy could significantly increase the infiltration of CD4+ T cells (P<0.05), CD25+CD4+ T cells (P<0.001), and PD-1+CD8+ T cells (P<0.05) compared to osimertinib. ScRNA-seq demonstrated that the number of CD8+ T and proliferation T cells increased, and TAM.mo was downregulated in the R-O+A group compared to the R-O group. Subtype study of T cells explained that the changes caused by combination treatment were mainly related to cytotoxic T cells. Subtype study of macrophages showed that proportion and functional changes in IL-1β.mo and CCL18.mo might be responsible for rescue osimertinib resistance by combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, osimertinib plus anlotinib could improve the prognosis of patients with a progressed disease on second-line osimertinib treatment, which may ascribe to increased T cell infiltration and TAM remodeling via VEGF-VEGFR blockage.

Phase 1a dose escalation study of ivonescimab (AK112/SMT112), an anti-PD-1/VEGF-A bispecific antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Studies showed that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors could improve therapeutic efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies by transforming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) into an immunoresponsive TME. Ivonescimab is a first-in-class, humanized tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF-A simultaneously. Here, we report the first-in-human, phase 1a study of ivonescimab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with ivonescimab 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 20 or 30 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks using a 3+3+3 dose escalation design. Dose expansion occurred at 10 and 20 mg/kg in selected tumor types. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary antitumor activity based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1.

RESULTS

Between October 2, 2019 and January 14, 2021, a total of 51 patients were enrolled and received ivonescimab. Two dose-limiting toxicities were reported at 30 mg/kg. The MTD of ivonescimab was 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Grade≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 patients (27.5%). The most common TRAEs of any grade were rash (29.4%), arthralgia (19.6%), hypertension (19.6%), fatigue (17.6%), diarrhea (15.7%) and pruritus (11.8%). The most common grade≥3 TRAEs were hypertension (7/51, 13.7%), alanine aminotransferase increased (3/51, 5.2%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (2/51, 3.9%) and colitis (2/51, 3.9%). Of 47 patients who had at least one postbaseline assessment, the confirmed objective response rate was 25.5% (12/47) and disease control rate was 63.8% (30/47). Among 19 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, 5 patients (26.3%) achieved partial response (PR). Efficacy signals were also observed in patients with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and both MMR deficient and pMMR endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Ivonescimab demonstrated manageable safety profiles and promising efficacy signals in multiple solid tumors. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens of ivonescimab monotherapy and combination therapies is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04047290.