Anti-PF4 antibodies associated with disease severity in COVID-19

Longitudinal assessment of immunogenicity of inactivated COVID-19 booster immunization and breakthrough infection in blood donors: A multicenter study from 2021 to 2023

Assessing immune responses across diverse populations is essential for refining public health strategies. Blood donors offer valuable insights into community-level immunity. This study aims to investigate immune responses associated with inactivated COVID-19 booster immunization and breakthrough infections in blood donors. This study was conducted in a cohort of blood donors from six centers across five of China's seven major geographical regions, spanning from December 2021 to February 2023. Blood samples were collected before booster vaccination, at 1, 3, and 6 months post-vaccination, as well as 1 month post-infection. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, T cell specific IFNγ levels, and neutralizing antibodies against wild-type and Omicron strains were measured. Platelet count, anti-PF4 antibody, and D-dimer levels were assessed. Demographic characteristics were analyzed to determine their impact on immunogenicity. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and IFNγ levels significantly increased post-booster, peaking one month after immunization. Antibodies continued to decrease at six months, while IFNγ levels remained stable at this point. Pseudovirus neutralization assays revealed elevated neutralizing antibodies following the booster dose, with minimal response to the XBB.1.5 variant. Following Omicron infection, antibody and IFNγ levels surpassed that observed post-booster. Participants aged 36-49 and those over 50 exhibited weaker immune responses post-booster than those ages 18-35, while those with BMI above 28 showed lower IFNγ levels. This study demonstrates the utility of blood donor samples for tracking immunization effectiveness against emerging pathogens, and highlights enhanced immune responses after booster immunization and breakthrough infections, underscoring the need for tailored vaccination strategies for different groups.

The biological and sociological implications of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI): life within microbiomes and on earth

From a biological point of view, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) are important at multiple levels, which include our genetics, microbiomes, diets, and all organ system interactions. Considering only DEI's sociological aspects is equivalent to the error of "throwing out the baby with the bath water." Variances in microbial diversity within our microbiomes might affect our health through systemic interactions affecting metabolites, maintaining immune homeostasis, and wound healing of cellular damage from an infection, physical stress, or psychological trauma. An imbalance of our immune cell subsets, both innate and adaptive, and the microbes in any of our microbiomes might lead to more cellular damage from excessive inflammation and oxidative stress and less immune regulation. The immune dysregulation may occur due to the loss of endometrial barriers enabling the spread of microbes, environmental pollutants, and allergens. Heat waves, sleep deprivation, and increased prevalence of pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls, which weaken endothelial barriers, may be responsible for the enhanced prevalence of physical and psychological stresses. Leakage of our useful gut microbiota into the periphery might initiate inflammatory responses, and an altered gut microbiome might affect the gut-brain axis that influences physical and mental health.

Prothrombotic antibodies targeting the spike protein's receptor-binding domain in severe COVID-19

ABSTRACT

Thromboembolic complication is common in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to an investigation into the presence of prothrombotic antibodies akin to those found in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In a study of samples from 130 hospitalized patients, collected 3.6 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 80% had immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies recognizing complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4; PF4/H), and 41% had antibodies inducing PF4-dependent P-selectin expression in CpG oligodeoxynucleotide-treated normal platelets. Unlike HIT, both PF4/H-reactive and platelet-activating antibodies were found in patients with COVID-19 regardless of recent heparin exposure. Notably, PF4/H-reactive IgG antibodies correlated with those targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein. Moreover, introducing exogenous RBD to or removing RBD-reactive IgG from COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. RBD-specific antibodies capable of platelet activation were cloned from peripheral blood B cells of patients with COVID-19. These antibodies possessed sequence motifs in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3), resembling those identified in pathogenic HIT antibodies. Furthermore, IgG+ B cells having these HCDR3 signatures were markedly expanded in patients with severe COVID-19. Importantly, platelet-activating antibodies present in patients with COVID-19 were associated with a specific elevation of platelet α-granule proteins in the plasma and showed a positive correlation with markers for inflammation and tissue damage, suggesting a functionality of these antibodies in patients. The demonstration of functional and structural similarities between certain RBD-specific antibodies in patients with COVID-19 and pathogenic antibodies typical of HIT suggests a novel mechanism by which RBD-specific antibodies might contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19.

Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Two Years Later: Should It Still Be on the Scientific Agenda?

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) was recognized around 2 years ago, at the beginning of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) vaccination campaign, as a rare but life-threatening complication of adenoviral vector vaccines. Two years later, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been tamed, although not defeated, and the vaccines provoking VITT have been abandoned in most high-income countries, thus why should we still speak about VITT? Because a significant fraction of the world population has not been vaccinated yet, especially in low/middle-income countries that can only afford adenoviral vector-based vaccines, because the adenoviral vector platform is being used for the development of a large series of new vaccines for other transmissible diseases, and lastly because there are some clues suggesting that VITT may not be exclusive to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Therefore, a deep understanding of this new syndrome is highly warranted as well as the awareness that we still miss some crucial insight into its pathophysiology and on some aspects of its management. This snapshot review aims to portray our knowledge on VITT, focusing on its clinical presentation, pathophysiological insight, diagnostic and management strategies, and to pinpoint the main unmet needs, highlighting the aspects on which research should focus in the near future.

Assessment of antibodies against platelet factor 4 following vaccination with adenovirus type 26-vectored vaccines

BACKGROUND

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare adverse event identified following vaccination with some adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines, including Ad26.COV2.S. VITT is characterized by the presence of antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether PF4 antibodies were generally induced following vaccination with adenovirus type 26 (Ad26)-vectored vaccines.

METHODS

The study included 913 and 991 healthy participants without thromboembolic (TE) events in Ad26.COV2.S and non-COVID-19 Ad26-vectored vaccine clinical studies, respectively, and 1 participant with VITT following Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. PF4 antibody levels were measured in prevaccination and postvaccination sera. PF4 antibody positivity rates were assessed in a case-control setting in participants who developed TE events during participation in Ad26-vectored vaccine clinical studies.

RESULTS

In the 1 VITT patient, PF4 antibodies were negative before vaccination. Seroconversion for platelet-activating PF4 antibodies was observed upon Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. In participants without TE events, the PF4 antibody levels and positivity rates were similar before and after Ad26 vaccination. Ad26 vaccination did not increase PF4 antibody levels in participants who were PF4 antibody-positive at baseline (n = 47). Lastly, 1 out of 28 TE cases and 2 out of 156 non-TE controls seroconverted after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. None of the 15 TE cases and 3 of the 77 non-TE controls seroconverted following non-COVID-19 Ad26 vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Ad26.COV2.S and the other Ad26-vectored vaccines studied did not generally induce PF4 antibodies or increase preexisting PF4 antibody levels. Moreover, unlike VITT, TE events that occurred at any time following Ad26 vaccination were not associated with PF4 antibodies.

Thymidine phosphorylase mediates SARS-CoV-2 spike protein enhanced thrombosis in K18-hACE2TG mice

INTRODUCTION

Thymidine phosphorylase (TYMP), which facilitates platelet activation and thrombosis, is significantly increased in COVID-19 patients. We hypothesize that TYMP mediates SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (SP)-induced thrombosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmids encoding wildtype SP or empty vector (p3.1) were transfected into COS-7 cells, and cell lysates were prepared as a reservoir for SP or p3.1 (control), respectively. K18-hACE2TG and K18-hACE2TG/Tymp-/- mice were treated with a single dose of SP or p3.1 by intraperitoneal injection and then subjected to thrombosis studies three days later. The role of SP on inflammatory signaling activation was assessed in BEAS-2B cells.

RESULTS

SARS-CoV-2 SP increased the expression of TYMP, resulting in the activation of STAT3 and NF-κB in BEAS-2B cells. A siRNA-mediated knockdown of TYMP attenuated SP-enhanced activation of STAT3. SP significantly promoted arterial thrombosis in K18-hACE2TG mice. SP-accelerated thrombosis was attenuated by inhibition or genetic ablation of TYMP. SP treatment did not influence ADP- or collagen-induced platelet aggregation but significantly increased platelet adhesion to fibrinogen. SP treatment also significantly shortened activated partial thromboplastin time, which was reversed and even prolonged by TYMP deficiency. Additionally, SP binds to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and TYMP. TYMP does not bind PF4 but enhances the formation of the SP/PF4 complex, which may augment the procoagulant and prothrombotic effect of PF4.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that SP is prothrombotic and upregulates TYMP expression, and TYMP inhibition or knockout mitigates SP-enhanced thrombosis. These findings suggest that inhibition of TYMP may be a novel therapeutic strategy for COVID-19-associated thrombosis.

Exploring the Contrasts and Similarities of Dengue and SARS-CoV-2 Infections During the COVID-19 Era

Extensive research has been conducted on the SARS-CoV-2 virus in association with various infectious diseases to understand the pathophysiology of the infection and potential co-infections. In tropical countries, exposure to local viruses may alter the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection and coinfection. Notably, only a portion of the antibodies produced against SARS-CoV-2 proteins demonstrate neutralizing properties, and the immune response following natural infection tends to be temporary. In contrast, long-lasting IgG antibodies are common after dengue virus infections. In cases where preexisting antibodies from an initial dengue virus infection bind to a different dengue serotype during a subsequent infection, there is a potential for antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and the formation of immune complexes associated with disease severity. Both SARS-CoV-2 and dengue infections can result in immunodeficiency. Viral proteins of both viruses interfere with the host's IFN-I signaling. Additionally, a cytokine storm can occur after viral infection, impairing a proper response, and autoantibodies against a wide array of proteins can appear during convalescence. Most of the reported autoantibodies are typically short-lived. Vaccines against both viruses alter the immune response, affecting the course of viral infection and enhancing clearance. A comprehensive analysis of both viral infections and pathogenicity is revisited to prevent infection, severity, and mortality.

Anti-PF4 antibodies and their relationship with COVID infection

Detecting anti-PF4 antibodies remains the golden diagnostic method for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) diagnosis with high sensitivity and specificity. Various lab tests detect anti-PF4 antibodies, including immunoassays and functional assays. Even with positive detection of the anti-PF4 antibody, several factors are involved in the result. The concept of anti-PF4 disorders was recently brought to light during the COVID pandemic since the development of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) with the adenovirus-vectored-DNA vaccine during the pandemic. Circumstances that detect anti-PF4 antibodies are classified as anti-PF4 disorders, including VITT, autoimmune HIT and spontaneous HIT. Some studies showed a higher percentage of anti-PF4 antibody detection among the population infected by COVID-19 without heparin exposure and some supported the theory that the anti-PF4 antibodies were related to the disease severity. In this review article, we provide a brief review of anti-PF4 disorders and summarize the current studies of anti-PF4 antibodies and COVID-19 infection.

Prothrombotic autoantibodies targeting platelet factor 4/polyanion are associated with pediatric cerebral malaria

BACKGROUNDFeatures of consumptive coagulopathy and thromboinflammation are prominent in cerebral malaria (CM). We hypothesized that thrombogenic autoantibodies contribute to a procoagulant state in CM.METHODSPlasma from children with uncomplicated malaria (UM) (n = 124) and CM (n = 136) was analyzed by ELISA for a panel of 8 autoantibodies including anti-platelet factor 4/polyanion (anti-PF4/P), anti-phospholipid, anti-phosphatidylserine, anti-myeloperoxidase, anti-proteinase 3, anti-dsDNA, anti-β-2-glycoprotein I, and anti-cardiolipin. Plasma samples from individuals with nonmalarial coma (NMC) (n = 49) and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 56) were assayed for comparison. Associations with clinical and immune biomarkers were determined using univariate and logistic regression analyses.RESULTSMedian anti-PF4/P and anti-PS IgG levels were elevated in individuals with malaria infection relative to levels in HCs (P < 0.001) and patients with NMC (PF4/P: P < 0.001). Anti-PF4/P IgG levels were elevated in children with CM (median = 0.27, IQR: 0.19-0.41) compared with those with UM (median = 0.19, IQR: 0.14-0.22, P < 0.0001). Anti-PS IgG levels did not differ between patients with UM and those with CM (P = 0.39). When patients with CM were stratified by malaria retinopathy (Ret) status, the levels of anti-PF4/P IgG correlated negatively with the peripheral platelet count in patients with Ret+ CM (Spearman's rho [Rs] = 0.201, P = 0.04) and associated positively with mortality (OR = 15.2, 95% CI: 1.02-275, P = 0.048). Plasma from patients with CM induced greater platelet activation in an ex vivo assay relative to plasma from patients with UM (P = 0.02), and the observed platelet activation was associated with anti-PF4/P IgG levels (Rs= 0.293, P = 0.035).CONCLUSIONSThrombosis mediated by elevated anti-PF4/P autoantibodies may be one mechanism contributing to the clinical complications of CM.

Platelet factor 4(PF4) and its multiple roles in diseases

Platelet factor 4 (PF4) combines with heparin to form an antigen that could produce IgG antibodies and participate in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). PF4 has attracted wide attention due to its role in novel coronavirus vaccine-19 (COVID-9)-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) and cognitive impairments. The electrostatic interaction between PF4 and negatively charged molecules is vital in the progression of VITT, which is similar to HIT. Emerging evidence suggests its multiple roles in hematopoietic and angiogenic inhibition, platelet coagulation interference, host inflammatory response promotion, vascular inhibition, and antitumor properties. The emerging pharmacological effects of PF4 may help deepen the exploration of its mechanism, thus accelerating the development of targeted therapies. However, due to its pleiotropic properties, the development of drugs targeting PF4 is at an early stage and faces many challenges. Herein, we discussed the characteristics and biological functions of PF4, summarized PF4-mediated signaling pathways, and discussed its multiple roles in diseases to inform novel approaches for successful clinical translational research.

The Binding of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein to Platelet Factor 4: A Proposed Mechanism for the Generation of Pathogenic Antibodies

Pathogenic platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies contributed to the abnormal coagulation profiles in COVID-19 and vaccinated patients. However, the mechanism of what triggers the body to produce these antibodies has not yet been clarified. Similar patterns and many comparable features between the COVID-19 virus and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) have been reported. Previously, we identified a new mechanism of autoimmunity in HIT in which PF4-antibodies self-clustered PF4 and exposed binding epitopes for other pathogenic PF4/eparin antibodies. Here, we first proved that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (SP) also binds to PF4. The binding was evidenced by the increase in mass and optical intensity as observed through quartz crystal microbalance and immunosorbent assay, while the switching of the surface zeta potential caused by protein interactions and binding affinity of PF4-SP were evaluated by dynamic light scattering and isothermal spectral shift analysis. Based on our results, we proposed a mechanism for the generation of PF4 antibodies in COVID-19 patients. We further validated the changes in zeta potential and interaction affinity between PF4 and SP and found that their binding mechanism differs from ACE2-SP binding. Importantly, the PF4/SP complexes facilitate the binding of anti-PF4/Heparin antibodies. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on PF4 engagement with the SARS-CoV-2 SP, illuminating the role of PF4/SP complexes in severe thrombotic events.

Transient Autoreactive PF4 and Antiphospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare autoimmune condition associated with recombinant adenovirus (rAV)-based COVID-19 vaccines. It is thought to arise from autoantibodies targeting platelet factor 4 (aPF4), triggered by vaccine-induced inflammation and the formation of neo-antigenic complexes between PF4 and the rAV vector. To investigate the specific induction of aPF4 by rAV-based vaccines, we examined sera from rAV vaccine recipients (AZD1222, AD26.COV2.S) and messenger RNA (mRNA) based (mRNA-1273, BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine recipients. We compared the antibody fold change (FC) for aPF4 and for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) of rAV to mRNA vaccine recipients. We combined two biobanks of Dutch healthcare workers and matched rAV-vaccinated individuals to mRNA-vaccinated controls, based on age, sex and prior history of COVID-19 (AZD1222: 37, Ad26.COV2.S: 35, mRNA-1273: 47, BNT162b2: 26). We found no significant differences in aPF4 FCs after the first (0.99 vs. 1.08, mean difference (MD) = -0.11 (95% CI -0.23 to 0.057)) and second doses of AZD1222 (0.99 vs. 1.10, MD = -0.11 (95% CI -0.31 to 0.10)) and after a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S compared to mRNA-based vaccines (1.01 vs. 0.99, MD = 0.026 (95% CI -0.13 to 0.18)). The mean FCs for the aPL in rAV-based vaccine recipients were similar to those in mRNA-based vaccines. No correlation was observed between post-vaccination aPF4 levels and vaccine type (mean aPF difference -0.070 (95% CI -0.14 to 0.002) mRNA vs. rAV). In summary, our study indicates that rAV and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines do not substantially elevate aPF4 levels in healthy individuals.

The immunology of PF4 polyanion interactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Platelet factor 4 (PF4, CXCL4), the most abundant α-granule platelet-specific chemokine, forms tetramers with an equatorial ring of high positive charge that bind to a wide range of polyanions, after which it changes conformation to expose antigenic epitopes. Antibodies directed against PF4 not only help to clear infection but can also lead to the development of thrombotic disorders such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT). This review will outline the different mechanisms through which PF4 engagement with polyanions combats infection but also contributes to the pathogenesis of inflammatory and thrombotic disease states.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent work has shown that PF4 binding to microbial polyanions may improve outcomes in infection by enhancing leukocyte-bacterial binding, tethering pathogens to neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), decreasing the thrombotic potential of NET DNA, and modulating viral infectivity. However, PF4 binding to nucleic acids may enhance their recognition by innate immune receptors, leading to autoinflammation. Lastly, while HIT is induced by platelet activating antibodies that bind to PF4/polyanion complexes, VITT, which occurs in a small subset of patients treated with COVID-19 adenovirus vector vaccines, is characterized by prothrombotic antibodies that bind to PF4 alone.

SUMMARY

Investigating the complex interplay of PF4 and polyanions may provide insights relevant to the treatment of infectious disease while also improving our understanding of the pathogenesis of thrombotic disorders driven by anti-PF4/polyanion and anti-PF4 antibodies.

Thrombocytopenia is associated with a dysregulated host response in severe COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between thrombocytopenia and alterations in host response pathways implicated in disease pathogenesis in patients with severe COVID-19.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We studied COVID-19 patients admitted to a general hospital ward included in a national (CovidPredict) cohort derived from 13 hospitals in the Netherlands. In a subgroup, 43 host response biomarkers providing insight in aberrations in distinct pathophysiological domains (coagulation and endothelial cell function; inflammation and damage; cytokines and chemokines) were determined in plasma obtained at a single time point within 48 h after admission. Patients were stratified in those with normal platelet counts (150-400 × 109/L) and those with thrombocytopenia (<150 × 109/L).

RESULTS

6.864 patients were enrolled in the national cohort, of whom 1.348 had thrombocytopenia and 5.516 had normal platelets counts; the biomarker cohort consisted of 429 patients, of whom 85 with thrombocytopenia and 344 with normal platelet counts. Plasma D-dimer levels were not different in thrombocytopenia, although patients with moderate-severe thrombocytopenia (<100 × 109/L) showed higher D-dimer levels, indicating enhanced coagulation activation. Patients with thrombocytopenia had lower plasma levels of many proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and antiviral mediators, suggesting involvement of platelets in inflammation and antiviral immunity. Thrombocytopenia was associated with alterations in endothelial cell biomarkers indicative of enhanced activation and a relatively preserved glycocalyx integrity.

CONCLUSION

Thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 is associated with broad host response changes across several pathophysiological domains. These results suggest a role of platelets in the immune response during severe COVID-19.

Severe COVID-19 patients exhibit elevated levels of autoantibodies targeting cardiolipin and platelet glycoprotein with age: a systems biology approach

Age is a significant risk factor for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity due to immunosenescence and certain age-dependent medical conditions (e.g., obesity, cardiovascular disorder, and chronic respiratory disease). However, despite the well-known influence of age on autoantibody biology in health and disease, its impact on the risk of developing severe COVID-19 remains poorly explored. Here, we performed a cross-sectional study of autoantibodies directed against 58 targets associated with autoimmune diseases in 159 individuals with different COVID-19 severity (71 mild, 61 moderate, and 27 with severe symptoms) and 73 healthy controls. We found that the natural production of autoantibodies increases with age and is exacerbated by SARS-CoV-2 infection, mostly in severe COVID-19 patients. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that severe COVID-19 patients have a significant age-associated increase of autoantibody levels against 16 targets (e.g., amyloid β peptide, β catenin, cardiolipin, claudin, enteric nerve, fibulin, insulin receptor a, and platelet glycoprotein). Principal component analysis with spectrum decomposition and hierarchical clustering analysis based on these autoantibodies indicated an age-dependent stratification of severe COVID-19 patients. Random forest analysis ranked autoantibodies targeting cardiolipin, claudin, and platelet glycoprotein as the three most crucial autoantibodies for the stratification of severe COVID-19 patients ≥50 years of age. Follow-up analysis using binomial logistic regression found that anti-cardiolipin and anti-platelet glycoprotein autoantibodies significantly increased the likelihood of developing a severe COVID-19 phenotype with aging. These findings provide key insights to explain why aging increases the chance of developing more severe COVID-19 phenotypes.

Reducing Inappropriate Simultaneous Ordering of Heparin Antibody and Serotonin Release Assays

INTRODUCTION

A 4T score with intermediate or high probability of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prompts ordering of anti-platelet 4 heparin complex. If positive, a serotonin release assay (SRA) is recommended to confirm diagnosis. Despite these recommendations, overtesting of both anti-platelet 4 and SRA is highly prevalent.

METHODS

This was a quality improvement initiative using two forms of clinical decision support across 11 acute care hospitals. First, a 4T calculator was incorporated into anti-platelet 4 orders. Second, a Best Practice Advisory fired when anti-platelet 4 and SRA were ordered simultaneously, prompting the provider to remove the SRA order. Data were analyzed by a quasi-experimental interrupted time series linear regression comparing weekly average laboratory tests per 1,000 patient-days pre- and postintervention.

RESULTS

Average ordering frequency of anti-platelet 4 changed from 0.508 to 0.510 per 1,000 patient-days (0.5%, p = 0.42) without significant slope or level differences. Average ordering frequency of SRA decreased from 0.430 to 0.289 per 1,000 patient-days (32.8%, p < 0.001) with a significant level difference of -0.128 orders per 1,000 patient-days (-31.2%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A simultaneous Best Practice Advisory was effective in reducing SRA orders, but not anti-platelet 4 orders.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: what do we know hitherto?

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), also known as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, is a catastrophic and life-threatening reaction to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, which occurs disproportionately in response to vaccination with non-replicating adenovirus vector (AV) vaccines. The mechanism of VITT is not well defined and it has not been resolved why cases of VITT are predominated by vaccination with AV vaccines. However, virtually all VITT patients have positive platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody titers. Subsequently, platelets are activated and depleted in an Fcγ-receptor IIa (FcγRIIa or CD32a)-dependent manner, but it is not clear why or how the anti-PF4 response is mounted. This review describes the pathogenesis of VITT and provides insight into possible mechanisms that prompt the formation of a PF4/polyanion complex, which drives VITT pathology, as an amalgam of current experimental data or hypotheses.

Mechanisms of COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Thrombosis: A Narrative Review

COVID-19, the infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is frequently associated with pulmonary thrombotic events, especially in hospitalized patients. Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by a proinflammatory state and an associated disbalance in hemostasis. Immune pathology analysis supports the inflammatory nature of pulmonary arterial thrombi composed of white blood cells, especially neutrophils, CD3+ and CD20+ lymphocytes, fibrin, red blood cells, and platelets. Immune cells, cytokines, chemokines, and the complement system are key drivers of immunothrombosis, as they induce the damage of endothelial cells and initiate proinflammatory and procoagulant positive feedback loops. Neutrophil extracellular traps induced by COVID-19-associated "cytokine storm", platelets, red blood cells, and coagulation pathways close the inflammation-endotheliopathy-thrombosis axis, contributing to SARS-CoV-2-associated pulmonary thrombotic events. The hypothesis of immunothrombosis is also supported by the minor role of venous thromboembolism with chest CT imaging data showing peripheral blood clots associated with inflammatory lesions and the high incidence of thrombotic events despite routine thromboprophylaxis. Understanding the complex mechanisms behind COVID-19-induced pulmonary thrombosis will lead to future combination therapies for hospitalized patients with severe disease that would target the crossroads of inflammatory and coagulation pathways.

Autoimmune complications of COVID-19 and potential consequences for long-lasting disease syndromes

The latest WHO report determined the increasing diversity within the CoV-2 omicron and its descendent lineages. Some heavily mutated offshoots of BA.5 and BA.2, such as BA.4.6, BF.7, BQ.1.1, and BA.2.75, are responsible for about 20% of infections and are spreading rapidly in multiple countries. It is a sign that Omicron subvariants are now developing a capacity to be more immune escaping and may contribute to a new wave of COVID-19. Covid-19 infections often induce many alterations in human physiological defense and the natural control systems, with exacerbated activation of the inflammatory and homeostatic response, as for any infectious diseases. Severe activation of the early phase of hemostatic components, often occurs, leading to thrombotic complications and often contributing to a lethal outcome selectively in certain populations. Development of autoimmune complications increases the disease burden and lowers its prognosis. While the true mechanism still remains unclear, it is believed to mainly be related to the host autoimmune responses as demonstrated, only in some patients suffering from the presence of autoantibodies that worsens the disease evolution. In fact in some studies the development of autoantibodies to angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) was identified, and in other studies autoantibodies, thought to be targeting interferon or binding to annexin A1, or autoantibodies to phospholipids were seen. Moreover, the occurrence of autoimmune heparin induced thrombocytopenia has also been described in infected patients treated with heparin for controlling thrombogenicity. This commentary focuses on the presence of various autoantibodies reported so far in Covid-19 diseases, exploring their association with the disease course and the durability of some related symptoms. Attempts are also made to further analyze the potential mechanism of actions and link the presence of antibodies with pathological complications.