Allele-unrestricted presentation of lidocaine by HLA-DR molecules to specific alphabeta+ T cell clones

Drug hypersensitivity and eosinophilia: The decisive role of p-i stimulation

Eosinophilia is a common finding in drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR). Its cause is unclear, as neither antigen/allergen-driven inflammation nor clonal expansion is involved. Most delayed-DHRs are due to p-i (pharmacologic interaction of drugs with immune receptors). These are off-target activities of drugs with immune receptors that result in various types of T-cell stimulation, some of which involve excessive IL-5 production. Functional and phenotypic studies of T-cell clones and their TCR-transfected hybridoma cell lines revealed that some p-i-induced drug stimulations occur without CD4/ CD8 co-receptor engagement. The CD4/CD8 co-receptors link Lck (lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase) and LAT (linker for activation of T cells) to the TCR. Alteration of Lck or LAT can result in a TCR signalosome with enhanced IL-5 production. Thus, if a more affine TCR-[drug/peptide/HLA] interaction allows bypassing the CD4 co-receptor, a modified Lck/LAT activation may lead to a TCR signalosome with elevated IL-5 production. This "IL-5-TCR-signalosome" hypothesis could also explain eosinophilia in superantigen or allo-stimulation (graft-versus-host disease), in which evasion of CD4/CD8 co-receptors has also been described. It may open new therapeutic possibilities in certain eosinophilic diseases by directly targeting the IL-5-TCR signalosome.

Advances in understanding of the pathogenesis and therapeutic implications of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: an updated review

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) is one type of severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR). It is featured by fever, widespread skin lesions, protracted clinical course, internal organ involvement, and possibly long-term autoimmune sequelae. The presence of high-risk human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, hypersensitivity reaction after culprit drug ingestion, and human herpesvirus reactivation may all contribute to its complex clinical manifestations. Some recent studies focusing on the roles of involved cytokines/chemokines and T cells co-signaling pathways in DRESS/DIHS were conducted. In addition, some predictors of disease severity and prognosis were also reported. In this review, we provided an update on the current understanding of the pathogenesis, potential biomarkers, and the relevant therapeutic rationales of DRESS/DIHS.

Pathology of drug hypersensitivity reactions and mechanisms of immune tolerance

Immune-mediated type IV adverse drug reactions are idiosyncratic in nature, generally not related to the primary or secondary pharmacology of the drug. Due to their complex nature and rarity, these iatrogenic reactions are seldom predicted or encountered during preclinical/early clinical development stages, and often precipitate upon exposure to wider populations (i.e. phase III onwards). They confer a burden on the healthcare sector in both a clinical and financial sense presenting a severe impediment to the drug discovery and development process. Research over the past 50 years has improved our understanding of these reactions markedly as both in vitro and in vivo studies have placed the role of the immune system, in particular; drug-responsive T cells, firmly in the spotlight as the mediators of these reactions. Indeed, the role of different populations of T cells in adverse events and the interaction of drug molecules with HLA proteins expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells is of considerable interest. Herein, this review examines the pathways of immune-mediated adverse events including the various T cell subtypes implicated and the mechanisms of T cell activation. Additionally, we address the enigma of immunological tolerance and explore the role tolerance plays in determination of susceptibility to such adverse events even in individuals carrying immunogenic liabilities.

Drug-Induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions: Insights Into Clinical Presentation, Immunopathogenesis, Diagnostic Methods, Treatment, and Pharmacogenomics

SCARs are rare and life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions. In general, the increased duration of hospital stays and the associated cost burden are common issues, and in the worst-case scenario, they can result in mortality. SCARs are delayed T cell-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. Recovery can take from 2 weeks to many months after dechallenging the culprit drugs. Genetic polymorphism of the HLA genes may change the selection and presentation of antigens, allowing toxic drug metabolites to initiate immunological reactions. However, each SCARs has a different onset latency period, clinical features, or morphological pattern. This explains that, other than HLA mutations, other immuno-pathogenesis may be involved in drug-induced severe cutaneous reactions. This review will discuss the clinical morphology of various SCARs, various immune pathogenesis models, diagnostic criteria, treatments, the association of various drug-induced reactions and susceptible alleles in different populations, and the successful implementation of pharmacogenomics in Thailand for the prevention of SCARs.

The important role of non-covalent drug-protein interactions in drug hypersensitivity reactions

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) are heterogeneous and unusual immune reactions with rather unique clinical presentations. Accumulating evidence indicates that certain non‐covalent drug‐protein interactions are able to elicit exclusively effector functions of antibody reactions or complete T‐cell reactions which contribute substantially to DHR. Here, we discuss three key interactions; (a) mimicry: whereby soluble, non‐covalent drug‐protein complexes (“fake antigens”) mimic covalent drug‐protein adducts; (b) increased antibody affinity: for example, in quinine‐type immune thrombocytopenia where the drug gets trapped between antibody and membrane‐bound glycoprotein; and (c) p‐i‐stimulation: where naïve and memory T cells are activated by direct binding of drugs to the human leukocyte antigen and/or T‐cell receptors. This transient drug‐immune receptor interaction initiates a polyclonal T‐cell response with mild‐to‐severe DHR symptoms. Notable complications arising from p‐i DHR can include viral reactivations, autoimmunity, and multiple drug hypersensitivity. In conclusion, DHR is characterized by abnormal immune stimulation driven by non‐covalent drug‐protein interactions. This contrasts DHR from “normal” immunity, which relies on antigen‐formation by covalent hapten‐protein adducts and predominantly results in asymptomatic immunity.

A Comprehensive Review of HLA and Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: Implication for Clinical Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) encoded by the HLA gene is an important modulator for immune responses and drug hypersensitivity reactions as well. Genetic polymorphisms of HLA vary widely at population level and are responsible for developing severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), maculopapular exanthema (MPE). The associations of different HLA alleles with the risk of drug induced SJS/TEN, DRESS and MPE are strongly supportive for clinical considerations. Prescribing guidelines generated by different national and international working groups for translation of HLA pharmacogenetics into clinical practice are underway and functional in many countries, including Thailand. Cutting edge genomic technologies may accelerate wider adoption of HLA screening in routine clinical settings. There are great opportunities and several challenges as well for effective implementation of HLA genotyping globally in routine clinical practice for the prevention of drug induced SCARs substantially, enforcing precision medicine initiatives.

T-Cell Activation by Low Molecular Weight Drugs and Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Drug Hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity reactions adversely affect treatment outcome, increase the length of patients' hospitalization, and limit the prescription options available to physicians. In addition, late stage drug attrition and the withdrawal of licensed drugs cost the pharmaceutical industry billions of dollars. This significantly increases the overall cost of drug development and by extension the price of licensed drugs. Drug hypersensitivity reactions are characterized by a delayed onset, and reactions tend to be more serious upon re-exposure. The role of drug-specific T-cells in the pathogenesis of drug hypersensitivity reactions and definition of the nature of the binding interaction of drugs with HLA and T-cell receptors continues to be the focus of intensive research, primarily because susceptibility is associated with expression of one or a small number of HLA alleles. This review critically examines the mechanisms of T-cell activation by drugs. Specific examples of drugs that activate T-cells via the hapten, the pharmacological interaction with immune receptors and the altered self-peptide repertoire pathways, are discussed. Furthermore, the impacts of drug metabolism, drug-protein adduct formation, and immune regulation on the development of drug antigen-responsive T-cells are highlighted. The knowledge gained from understanding the pathways of T-cell activation and susceptibility factors for drug hypersensitivity will provide the building blocks for the development of predictive in vitro assays that will prevent or help to minimize the incidence of these reactions in clinic.

Dapsone- and nitroso dapsone-specific activation of T cells from hypersensitive patients expressing the risk allele HLA-B*13:01

BACKGROUND

Research into drug hypersensitivity associated with the expression of specific HLA alleles has focussed on the interaction between parent drug and the HLA with no attention given to reactive metabolites. For this reason, we have studied HLA-B*13:01-linked dapsone hypersensitivity to (a) explore whether the parent drug and/or nitroso metabolite activate T cells and (b) determine whether HLA-B*13:01 is involved in the response.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from six patients were cultured with dapsone and nitroso dapsone, and proliferative responses and IFN-γ release were measured. Dapsone- and nitroso dapsone-specific T-cell clones were generated and phenotype, function, HLA allele restriction, and cross-reactivity assessed. Dapsone intermediates were characterized by mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from six patients and cloned T cells proliferated and secreted Th1/2/22 cytokines when stimulated with dapsone (clones: n = 395; 80% CD4+ CXCR3hi CCR4hi , 20% CD8+CXCR3hi CCR4hi CCR6hi CCR9hi CCR10hi ) and nitroso dapsone (clones: n = 399; 78% CD4+, 22% CD8+ with same chemokine receptor profile). CD4+ and CD8+ clones were HLA class II and class I restricted, respectively, and displayed three patterns of reactivity: compound specific, weakly cross-reactive, and strongly cross-reactive. Nitroso dapsone formed dimers in culture and was reduced to dapsone, providing a rationale for the cross-reactivity. T-cell responses to nitroso dapsone were dependent on the formation of a cysteine-modified protein adduct, while dapsone interacted in a labile manner with antigen-presenting cells. CD8+ clones displayed an HLA-B*13:01-restricted pattern of activation.

CONCLUSION

These studies describe the phenotype and function of dapsone- and nitroso dapsone-responsive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from hypersensitive patients. Discovery of HLA-B*13:01-restricted CD8+ T-cell responses indicates that drugs and their reactive metabolites participate in HLA allele-linked forms of hypersensitivity.

Immune pathomechanism and classification of drug hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) are based on distinct mechanisms and are clinically heterogeneous. Taking into account that also off-target activities of drugs may lead to stimulations of immune or inflammatory cells, three forms of DHR were discriminated: the allergic-immune mechanism relies on the covalent binding of drugs/chemicals to proteins, which thereby form new antigens, to which a humoural and/or cellular immune response can develop. In IgE-mediated drug allergies, a possible tolerance mechanism to the drug during sensitization and the need of a covalent hapten-carrier link for initiation, but not for elicitation of IgE-mediated reactions is discussed. The p-i ("pharmacological interaction with immune receptor") concept represents an off-target activity of drugs with immune receptors (HLA or TCR), which can result in unorthodox, alloimmune-like stimulations of T cells. Some of these p-i stimulations occur only in carriers of certain HLA alleles and can result in clinically severe reactions. The third form of DHR ("pseudo-allergy") is represented by drug interactions with receptors or enzymes of inflammatory cells, which may lead to their direct activation or enhanced levels of inflammatory products. Specific IgE or T cells are not involved. This classification is based on the action of drugs and is clinically useful, as it can explain differences in sensitizations, unusual clinical symptoms, dependence on drug concentrations, predictability and immunological and pharmacological cross-reactivities in DHR.

Pharmacogenomics of off-target adverse drug reactions

Off-target adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are associated with significant morbidity and costs to the healthcare system, and their occurrence is not predictable based on the known pharmacological action of the drug's therapeutic effect. Off-target ADRs may or may not be associated with immunological memory, although they can manifest with a variety of shared clinical features, including maculopapular exanthema, severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), angioedema, pruritus and bronchospasm. Discovery of specific genes associated with a particular ADR phenotype is a foundational component of clinical translation into screening programmes for their prevention. In this review, genetic associations of off-target drug-induced ADRs that have a clinical phenotype suggestive of an immunologically mediated process and their mechanisms are highlighted. A significant proportion of these reactions lack immunological memory and current data are informative for these ADRs with regard to disease pathophysiology, therapeutic targets and biomarkers which may identify patients at greatest risk. Although many serious delayed immune-mediated (IM)-ADRs show strong human leukocyte antigen associations, only a small subset have successfully been implemented in screening programmes. More recently, other factors, such as drug metabolism, have been shown to contribute to the risk of the IM-ADR. In the future, pharmacogenomic targets and an understanding of how they interact with drugs to cause ADRs will be applied to drug design and preclinical testing, and this will allow selection of optimal therapy to improve patient safety.

Hypersensitivity reactions due to black henna tattoos and their components: are the clinical pictures related to the immune pathomechanism?

Hypersensitivity to para-phenylenediamine (PPD) and related compounds induced by temporary black henna tattoos has become a serious health problem worldwide. Different patterns of sensitization with various clinical aspects are described in literature due to PPD associated to henna tattoo and these manifestations are likely correlated with the immunological and dermatological pathomechanisms involved. Henna is the Persian name of the plant Lawsonia inermis, Fam. Lythraceae. It is a woody shrub that grow in regions of North Africa, South Asia, India and Sri Lanka. Nowadays it is rather frequent to see temporary "tattoos" performed with henna. To make tattoos darker and long-lasting PPD has been associated to henna in tattoo drawings mixtures, so obtaining "black henna". In these years there has been a rise of contact sensitization to PPD and in medical literature an increased number of cases have been reported on temporary henna tattoo application. Here we review the various clinical patterns related to PPD and henna tattoo, to investigate the possible link between clinic-morphological pictures and the immunological response to PPD and henna. The literature underlines that different clinical manifestations are related to black henna containing PPD, and its derivative products may cause delayed-type as well as immediate-type reactions. Further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between clinical and morphological aspects of PPD contact dermatitis and the T cell subsets predominance.

T-cell-mediated drug hypersensitivity: immune mechanisms and their clinical relevance

T-cell-mediated drug hypersensitivity represents a significant proportion of immune mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions. In the recent years, there has been an increase in understanding the immune mechanisms behind T-cell-mediated drug hypersensitivity. According to hapten mechanism, drug specific T-cell response is stimulated by drug-protein conjugate presented on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) as it is presented as a new antigenic determinant. On the other hand, p-i concept suggests that a drug can stimulate T cells via noncovalent direct interaction with T-cell receptor and/or peptide-MHC. The drug binding site is quite variable and this leads to several different mechanisms within p-i concept. Altered peptide repertoire can be regarded as an 'atypical' subset of p-i concept since the mode of the drug binding and the binding site are essentially identical to p-i concept. However, the intracellular binding of abacavir to HLA-B(*)57:01 additionally results in alteration in peptide repertoire. Furthermore the T-cell response to altered peptide repertoire model is only shown for abacavir and HLA-B(*)57:01 and therefore it may not be generalised to other drug hypersensitivity. Danger hypothesis has been postulated to play an important role in drug hypersensitivity by providing signal 2 but its experimental data is lacking at this point in time. Furthermore, the recently described allo-immune response suggests that danger signal may be unnecessary. Finally, in view of these new understanding, the classification and the definition of type B adverse drug reaction should be revised.

Evolving models of the immunopathogenesis of T cell-mediated drug allergy: The role of host, pathogens, and drug response

Immune-mediated (IM) adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an underrecognized source of preventable morbidity, mortality, and cost. Increasingly, genetic variation in the HLA loci is associated with risk of severe reactions, highlighting the importance of T-cell immune responses in the mechanisms of both B cell-mediated and primary T cell-mediated IM-ADRs. In this review we summarize the role of host genetics, microbes, and drugs in IM-ADR development; expand on the existing models of IM-ADR pathogenesis to address multiple unexplained observations; discuss the implications of this work in clinical practice today; and describe future applications for preclinical drug toxicity screening, drug design, and development.

Genotyping for severe drug hypersensitivity

Over the past decade, there have been significant advances in our understanding of the immunopathogenesis and pharmacogenomics of severe immunologically-mediated adverse drug reactions. Such T-cell-mediated adverse drug reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), drug-induced liver disease (DILI) and other drug hypersensitivity syndromes have more recently been shown to be mediated through interactions with various class I and II HLA alleles. Key examples have included the associations of HLA-B*15:02 and carbamazepine induced SJS/TEN in Southeast Asian populations and HLA-B*57:01 and abacavir hypersensitivity. HLA-B*57:01 screening to prevent abacavir hypersensitivity exemplifies a successful translational roadmap from pharmacogenomic discovery through to widespread clinical implementation. Ultimately, our increased understanding of the interaction between drugs and the MHC could be used to inform drug design and drive pre-clinical toxicity programs to improve drug safety.

T cell responses to drugs and drug metabolites

Understanding the chemical mechanisms by which drugs and drug metabolites interact with cells of the immune system is pivotal to our knowledge of drug hypersensitivity as a whole.In this chapter, we will discuss the currently accepted mechanisms where there is scientific and clinical evidence to support the ways in which drugs and their metabolites interact with T cells. We will also discuss bioanalytical platforms, such as mass spectrometry, and in vitro test assays such as the lymphocyte transformation test that can be used to study drug hypersensitivity; the combination of such techniques can be used to relate the chemistry of drug antigen formation to immune function. Ab initio T cell priming assays are also discussed with respect to predicting the potential of a drug to cause hypersensitivity reactions in humans in relation to the chemistry of the drug and its ability to form haptens, antigens and immunogens in patients.

Butyrophilin 3A1 plays an essential role in prenyl pyrophosphate stimulation of human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells

Most human γδ T cells express Vγ2Vδ2 TCRs and play important roles in microbial and tumor immunity. Vγ2Vδ2 T cells are stimulated by self- and foreign prenyl pyrophosphate intermediates in isoprenoid synthesis. However, little is known about the molecular basis for this stimulation. We find that a mAb specific for butyrophilin 3 (BTN3)/CD277 Ig superfamily proteins mimics prenyl pyrophosphates. The 20.1 mAb stimulated Vγ2Vδ2 T cell clones regardless of their functional phenotype or developmental origin and selectively expanded blood Vγ2Vδ2 T cells. The γδ TCR mediates 20.1 mAb stimulation because IL-2 is released by β(-) Jurkat cells transfected with Vγ2Vδ2 TCRs. 20.1 stimulation was not due to isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) accumulation because 20.1 treatment of APC did not increase IPP levels. In addition, stimulation was not inhibited by statin treatment, which blocks IPP production. Importantly, small interfering RNA knockdown of BTN3A1 abolished stimulation by IPP that could be restored by re-expression of BTN3A1 but not by BTN3A2 or BTN3A3. Rhesus monkey and baboon APC presented HMBPP and 20.1 to human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells despite amino acid differences in BTN3A1 that localize to its outer surface. This suggests that the conserved inner and/or top surfaces of BTN3A1 interact with its counterreceptor. Although no binding site exists on the BTN3A1 extracellular domains, a model of the intracellular B30.2 domain predicts a basic pocket on its binding surface. However, BTN3A1 did not preferentially bind a photoaffinity prenyl pyrophosphate. Thus, BTN3A1 is required for stimulation by prenyl pyrophosphates but does not bind the intermediates with high affinity.

HLA and pharmacogenetics of drug hypersensitivity

Immunologically mediated drug reactions have been traditionally classified as unpredictable based on the fact that they cannot be predicted strictly on the pharmacological action of the drug. Such adverse drug reactions are associated with considerable morbidity and include severe cutaneous adverse reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis and the drug hypersensitivity syndromes (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome). Over the last decade there have been many associations between these syndromes and Class I and II HLA alleles of the MHC, which have enriched and driven our knowledge of their immunopathogenesis. Significant translation has also occurred in the case of HLA-B*5701 screening being used to exclude at risk patients from abacavir and prevent abacavir hypersensitivity. The ultimate translation of the knowledge of how drugs interact with HLA would be applicable to preclinical drug screening programs to improve the safety and cost-effectiveness of drug design and development.

The p-i Concept: Pharmacological Interaction of Drugs With Immune Receptors

The immune response in drug hypersensitivity is normally explained by the hapten hypothesis. It postulates that drugs with a molecular weight of less than 1000 D are too small to cause an immune response per se. However, if a chemically reactive drug or drug metabolite binds covalently to a protein and thus forms a so-called hapten-carrier complex, this modified protein can induce an immune response. This concept has recently been supplemented by the p-i concept (or pharmacological interaction with immune receptors), which postulates that some drugs that lack hapten characteristics can bind directly and reversibly (noncovalently) to immune receptors and thereby stimulate the cells. For example, a certain drug may bind to a particular T-cell receptor, and this binding suffices to stimulate the T cell to secrete cytokines, to proliferate, and to exert cytotoxicity. The p-i concept has major implications for our understanding of drug interaction with the specific immune system and for drug hypersensitivity reactions. It is based on extensive investigations of T-cell clones reacting with the drug and recently of hybridoma cells transfected with the drug-specific T-cell receptor for antigen (TCR). It is a highly specific interaction dependent on the expression of a TCR into which the drug can bind with sufficient affinity to cause signaling. Small modification of the drug structure may already abrogate reactivity. Stimulation of T cells occurs within minutes as revealed by rapid Ca influx after drug addition to drug-specific T-cell clones or hybridoma cells, thus, before metabolism and processing can occur. As the immune system can only react in an immunologic way, the symptoms arising after drug stimulation of immune receptors imitate an immune response after recognition of a peptide antigen, although it is actually a pharmacological stimulation of some T cells via their TCRs. Clinically, the p-i concept could explain the sometimes rapid appearance of symptoms without previous sensitizations and the sometimes chaotic immune reaction of drug hypersensitivity with participation of different immune mechanisms while normal immune reactions to antigens are highly coordinated. Nevertheless, because the reactions lead to expansion of drug-reactive cells, many features such as skin test reactivity and stronger reactivity upon reexposure are identical to real immune reactions.

Activating interactions of sulfanilamides with T cell receptors

Activation and expansion of drug reactive T cells are key features in drug hypersensitivity reactions. Drugs may interact directly with immune receptors such as the human leukocyte antigens (HLA) or the T-cell receptors (TCR) itself, the pharmacological interaction [p-i] concept. To analyze whether the drug sulfamethoxazole (SMX) interacts directly with the TCR and thereby contributing to signaling and T cell activation, we analyze two SMX specific T cell clones (TCC “1.3” and “H13”). Proliferation to SMX and 11 related sulfanilamides, Ca++ influx in drug stimulated T-cells and the inhibitory effect of non-reactive sulfanilamides on SMX stimulation were analyzed. In silico docking of SMX and related sulfanilamide to the TCR were used to identify possible drug binding sites, and correlated to in vitro data to find the correct docking. In Ca++ influx assays, reactions occurred as early as 14 sec after adding SMX to TCC and APC. The broadly reactive clone (“H13”) was stimulated by 5 additional sulfanilamide, while one TCC (“1.3”) was reactive exclusively with SMX but not other sulfanilamides. Competition experiments with sulfanilamide inhibited SMX induced Ca++ influx and proliferation of the TCC 1.3 in a dose dependent way. Docking experiments with SMX and related sulfanilamides confirmed and explained the in vitro data as docking localized binding sites for SMX and the 5 stimulating sulfanilamides on the CDR2ß domain of the clone H13, while the 6 non-stimulatory SA failed to bind. In TCC 1.3, SMX could be docked on the CDR3α of the TCR. The other, non-stimulatory but inhibitory SA could also be docked to the same site. The combined analysis of in vitro and in silico data show that sulfanilamide can bind directly to TCRs. It shows that TCR, like other receptors, appear to be reamenable to manipulations by small molecules.

T-cell recognition of chemicals, protein allergens and drugs: towards the development of in vitro assays

Chemicals can elicit T-cell-mediated diseases such as allergic contact dermatitis and adverse drug reactions. Therefore, testing of chemicals, drugs and protein allergens for hazard identification and risk assessment is essential in regulatory toxicology. The seventh amendment of the EU Cosmetics Directive now prohibits the testing of cosmetic ingredients in mice, guinea pigs and other animal species to assess their sensitizing potential. In addition, the EU Chemicals Directive REACh requires the retesting of more than 30,000 chemicals for different toxicological endpoints, including sensitization, requiring vast numbers of animals. Therefore, alternative methods are urgently needed to eventually replace animal testing. Here, we summarize the outcome of an expert meeting in Rome on 7 November 2009 on the development of T-cell-based in vitro assays as tools in immunotoxicology to identify hazardous chemicals and drugs. In addition, we provide an overview of the development of the field over the last two decades.

Delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions ? new concepts

Immune reactions to small molecular compounds such as drugs can cause a variety of diseases mainly involving skin, but also liver, kidney, lungs and other organs. In addition to the well-known immediate, IgE-mediated reactions to drugs, many drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions appear delayed. Recent data have shown that in these delayed reactions drug-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells recognize drugs through their T cell receptors (TCR) in an MHC-dependent way. Immunohistochemical and functional studies of drug-reactive T cells in patients with distinct forms of exanthems revealed that distinct T cell functions lead to different clinical phenotypes. Taken together, these data allow delayed hypersensitivity reactions (type IV) to be further subclassified into T cell reactions, which by releasing certain cytokines and chemokines preferentially activate and recruit monocytes (type IVa), eosinophils (type IVb), or neutrophils (type IVd). Moreover, cytotoxic functions by either CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells (type IVc) seem to participate in all type IV reactions. Drugs are not only immunogenic because of their chemical reactivity, but also because they may bind in a labile way to available TCRs and possibly MHC-molecules. This seems to be sufficient to stimulate certain, probably preactivated T cells. The drug seems to bind first to the fitting TCR, which already exerts some activation. For full activation, an additional interaction of the TCR with the MHC molecules is needed. The drug binding to the receptor structures is reminiscent of a pharmacological interaction between a drug and its (immune) receptor and was thus termed the p-i concept. In some patients with drug hypersensitivity, such a response occurs within hours even upon the first exposure to the drug. The T cell reaction to the drug might thus not be due to a classical, primary response, but is due to peptide-specific T cells which happen to be stimulated by a drug. This new concept has major implications for understanding clinical and immunological features of drug hypersensitivity and a model to explain the frequent skin symptoms in drug hypersensitivity is proposed.

HLA-dependent hypersensitivity to nevirapine in Sardinian HIV patients

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reaction to nevirapine, which in some cases can be fatal, shows a higher prevalence in Sardinia in comparison with other Italian regions.

OBJECTIVE

This study demonstrates that hypersensitive reaction to nevirapine in Sardinian HIV-infected patients is associated with the HLA Cw8-B14 haplotype. These two HLA class I antigens are in strong linkage disequilibrium in the Sardinian population.

METHODS

Forty-nine Sardinian HIV-positive patients treated with nevirapine were studied. Thirteen (26%), developed a hypersensitive reaction thus requiring the drug to be discontinued. HLA class I and II molecular typing was performed in both nevirapine-hypersensitive and nevirapine-tolerant patients. To avoid biased representation of the allele frequencies in the two groups of treated patients, molecular typing was also performed in 82 HIV-positive patients who had not been treated with nevirapine.

RESULTS

Considerable overlap was observed for the clinical, immunological and demographic characteristics of the 13 hypersensitive patients and 36 tolerant patients. Clinical parameters included viral load, status of HIV infection, CD4 and CD8 cell counts, hepatitis C virus/hepatitis B virus co-infections. Forty-six percent (6/13) of the nevirapine-hypersensitive subjects had the HLA-Cw8 and HLA-B14(65) antigens compared with 5% (2/36) of the nevirapine-tolerant group (P = 0.004; Pc = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In agreement with other recent reports, the utility of HLA typing in HIV patients to identify genetic factors that may confer susceptibility to drug-induced hypersensitive reaction was confirmed. A careful choice of antiretroviral therapy in susceptible individuals should significantly reduce the risk of severe hypersensitive reaction.

Transfection of drug-specific T-cell receptors into hybridoma cells: tools to monitor drug interaction with T-cell receptors and evaluate cross-reactivity to related compounds

In the context of drug hypersensitivity, our group has recently proposed a new model based on the structural features of drugs (pharmacological interaction with immune receptors; p-i concept) to explain their recognition by T cells. According to this concept, even chemically inert drugs can stimulate T cells because certain drugs interact in a direct way with T-cell receptors (TCR) and possibly major histocompatibility complex molecules without the need for metabolism and covalent binding to a carrier. In this study, we investigated whether mouse T-cell hybridomas transfected with drug-specific human TCR can be used as an alternative to drug-specific T-cell clones (TCC). Indeed, they behaved like TCC and, in accordance with the p-i concept, the TCR recognize their specific drugs in a direct, processing-independent, and dose-dependent way. The presence of antigen-presenting cells was a prerequisite for interleukin-2 production by the TCR-transfected cells. The analysis of cross-reactivity confirmed the fine specificity of the TCR and also showed that TCR transfectants might provide a tool to evaluate the potential of new drugs to cause hypersensitivity due to cross-reactivity. Recombining the alpha- and beta-chains of sulfanilamide- and quinolone-specific TCR abrogated drug reactivity, suggesting that both original alpha- and beta-chains were involved in drug binding. The TCR-transfected hybridoma system showed that the recognition of two important classes of drugs (sulfanilamides and quinolones) by TCR occurred according to the p-i concept and provides an interesting tool to study drug-TCR interactions and their biological consequences and to evaluate the cross-reactivity potential of new drugs of the same class.

Noncovalent interactions of drugs with immune receptors may mediate drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions

Drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions are instructive examples of immune reactions against low molecular weight compounds. Classically, such reactions have been explained by the hapten concept, according to which the small antigen covalently modifies an endogenous protein; recent studies show strong associations of several HLA molecules with hypersensitivity. In recent years, however, evidence has become stronger that not all drugs need to bind covalently to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-peptide complex in order to trigger an immune response. Rather, some drugs may bind reversibly to the MHC or possibly to the T-cell receptor (TCR), eliciting immune reactions akin to the pharmacological activation of other receptors. While the exact mechanism is still a matter of debate, noncovalent drug presentation clearly leads to the activation of drug-specific T cells. In some patients with hypersensitivity, such a response may occur within hours of even the first exposure to the drug. Thus, the reaction to the drug may not be the result of a classical, primary response but rather be mediated by existing, preactivated T cells that display cross-reactivity for the drug and have additional (peptide) specificity as well. In this way, certain drugs may circumvent the checkpoints for immune activation imposed by the classical antigen processing and presentation mechanisms, which may help to explain the idiosyncratic nature of many drug hypersensitivity reactions.

Pharmacological interaction of drugs with immune receptors: the p-i concept

Drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions have been explained by the hapten concept, according to which a small chemical compound is too small to be recognized by the immune system. Only after covalently binding to an endogenous protein the immune system reacts to this so called hapten-carrier complex, as the larger molecule (protein) is modified, and thus immunogenic for B and T cells. Consequently, a B and T cell immune response might develop to the drug with very heterogeneous clinical manifestations. In recent years, however, evidence has become stronger that not all drugs need to bind covalently to the MHC-peptide complex in order to trigger an immune response. Rather, some drugs may bind directly and reversibly to immune receptors like the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) or the T cell receptor (TCR), thereby stimulating the cells similar to a pharmacological activation of other receptors. This concept has been termed pharmacological interaction with immune receptors the (p-i) concept. While the exact mechanism is still a matter of debate, non-covalent drug presentation clearly leads to the activation of drug-specific T cells as documented for various drugs (lidocaine, sulfamethoxazole (SMX), lamotrigine, carbamazepine, p-phenylendiamine, etc.). In some patients with drug hypersensitivity, such a response may occur within hours even upon the first exposure to the drug. Thus, the reaction to the drug may not be due to a classical, primary response, but rather be mediated by stimulating existing, pre-activated, peptide-specific T cells that are cross specific for the drug. In this way, certain drugs may circumvent the checkpoints for immune activation imposed by the classical antigen processing and presentation mechanisms, which may help to explain the peculiar nature of many drug hypersensitivity reactions.

Cellular mechanisms of T cell mediated drug hypersensitivity

Noncovalent drug presentation leads to the activation of drug-specific T cells. In some patients with hypersensitivity, such a response occurs within hours even upon the first exposure to the drug. Thus, the reaction to the drug might not be due to a classical, primary response, but rather mediated by existing, preactivated T cells that are cross specific for the drug, and have an additional (peptide) specificity as well.

Immune mechanism of drug hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity reactions can lead to a great variety of different diseases. The main cause is a specific interaction of antibodies or T cells with a drug. In addition to the hapten concept, some drugs can bind directly to T-cell receptors and stimulate them. Based on recent investigation on different exanthemas, an extended classification of the Gell and Coombs type IV reaction is proposed.

Characterization of Human T Cells That Regulate Neutrophilic Skin Inflammation

It is unknown whether neutrophilic inflammations can be regulated by T cells. This question was analyzed by studying acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), which is a severe drug hypersensitivity resulting in intraepidermal or subcorneal sterile pustules. Recently, we found that drug-specific blood and skin T cells from AGEP patients secrete high levels of the potent neutrophil-attracting chemokine IL-8/CXCL8. In this study, we characterize the phenotype and function of CXCL8-producing T cells. Supernatants from CXCL8(+) T cells were strongly chemotactic for neutrophils, CXCR1, and CXCR2 transfectants, but not for transfectants expressing CXCR4, CX3CR1, human chemokine receptor, and RDC1. Neutralization experiments indicated that chemotaxis was mainly mediated by CXCL8, but not by granulocyte chemotactic protein-2/CXCL6, epithelial cell-derived neutrophil attractant-78/CXCL5, or growth-related oncogene-alpha,beta,gamma/CXCL1,2,3. Interestingly, approximately 2.5% of CD4(+) T cells in normal peripheral blood also produced CXCL8. In addition to CXCL8, AGEP T cells produced large amounts of the monocyte/neutrophil-activating cytokine GM-CSF, and the majority released IFN-gamma and the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha. Furthermore, apoptosis in neutrophils treated with conditioned medium from CXCL8(+) T cells could be reduced by 40%. In lesional skin, CXCL8(+) T cells consistently expressed the chemokine receptor CCR6, suggesting a prominent role for CCR6 in early inflammatory T cell recruitment. Finally, our data suggest that CXCL8-producing T cells facilitate skin inflammation by orchestrating neutrophilic infiltration and ensuring neutrophil survival, which leads to sterile pustular eruptions found in AGEP patients. This mechanism may be relevant for other T cell-mediated diseases with a neutrophilic inflammation such as Behçet's disease and pustular psoriasis.

Cytotoxic mechanisms in different forms of T-cell-mediated drug allergies

BACKGROUND

Cytotoxic mechanisms are involved in different forms of drug induced exanthems.

METHODS

Here we compare the killing pathways of CD4+, CD8+ and CD4/CD8+ T-cell lines (TCL) and clones derived from patients suffering from maculopapular, bullous and pustular drug eruptions. In vitro, perforin and Fas-mediated killing was analysed in cytotoxicity assays against autologous Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B-cell lines, Fas-transfected mouse lymphoblasts and natural killer (NK)-target cells. In addition, affected skin lesions and the TCL and clones were stained for perforin and FasL-expression.

RESULTS

We detected perforin and some FasL-mediated killing in all three types of exanthems. Some of the drug-specific T-cell clones analysed exerted mainly perforin-, other more FasL-mediated killing showing no strict relationship between their perforin- and Fas-mediated cytotoxic capacity. Using a cell culture method focusing on the generation of cytotoxic T cells, we detected drug-specific CD8+, TCRalphabeta+ T cells, which failed to proliferate to drug presentation by antigen presenting cells but killed in a drug dependent way. Interestingly, these cells had substantial natural killer-like T cell(s) like features as they were CD56+ and CD94+ and had the ability to kill the NK-sensitive cell line K562.

CONCLUSION

Our data underline the important role of cytotoxic mechanisms in different forms of drug induced exanthems and suggest that even some T cells with NK-like characteristics may be involved in drug hypersensitivity.

Drug interaction with T-cell receptors: T-cell receptor density determines degree of cross-reactivity

BACKGROUND

Immune-mediated adverse reactions to drugs are often due to T-cell reactivity, and cross-reactivity is an important problem in pharmacotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether chemical inert drugs can stimulate T cells through their T-cell receptor (TCR) and analyzed the cross-reactivities to related compounds.

METHODS

We transfected human TCRs isolated from two drug-reactive T-cell clones (TCCs) by PCR into a TCR-negative mouse T-cell hybridoma. The TCCs were isolated from a patient with drug hypersensitivity to the antibacterial sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole (SMX).

RESULTS

The transfectants reacted to SMX only in the presence of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Glutaraldehyde-fixed APCs, however, were sufficient to elicit T-cell stimulation, indicating a processing-independent direct interaction of the drug with the TCR and MHC molecule. The transfected hybridomas secreted IL-2 in a drug dose-dependent manner, whereas the degree of reactivity was dependent on the level of TCR expression. One transfectant reacted not only to SMX but also to related sulfonamide compounds. Interestingly, high TCR expression increased cross-reactivity to other structurally related compounds. In addition, SMX-specific TCR cross-reacted only with sulfonamides bearing a sulfanilamide core structure but not with sulfonamides such as celecoxib, furosemide, or glibenclamide.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that the T-cell reactivity to drugs is solely determined by the TCR. Moreover, these results show that cross-reactivity of structurally similar compounds correlates with the density of the TCR. Stably transfected T-cell hybridomas may represent a powerful screening tool for cross-reactivity of newly generated sulfonamide-containing compounds such as celecoxib.

Gene polymorphisms within the immune system that may underlie drug allergy

Drug allergy encompasses a broad spectrum of different diseases. It occurs in some individuals, whereas it does not occur in many others. This suggests, among others, the involvement of hereditary factors, and thus of gene polymorphisms. Since drug metabolising enzymes as well as the immune system itself may be responsible for drug allergy, gene polymorphisms are relevant in both systems. While already some information exists on gene polymorphisms of drug metabolising enzymes that result in drug allergy, little information is available on gene polymorphisms within the immune system that result in such allergy. This review sets out to provide an avenue for future research aimed at discovering such polymorphisms. To this end, immune mechanisms that underlie drug allergy will be discussed. A pivotal mechanism underlying several types of drug allergy, immediate-type (type I) hypersensitivity, is also a hallmark of asthma, and therefore drug allergy and asthma share a range of candidate genes. Research on asthma has come relatively far in establishing associations of disease with polymorphisms in these genes. Therefore, these polymorphisms and their associations with asthma will be discussed. These studies on asthma provide us with lessons on how to conduct such studies on drug allergy.

Cross-reactivity with drugs at the T cell level

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cross-reactivity with drugs is an important clinical problem in drug hypersensitivity. Once a patient is labeled 'drug-allergic' all drugs of the same class are withheld and future therapeutic interventions are limited. Here we review cross-reactivity with drugs at the T cell level.

RECENT FINDINGS

Analysis of T cell recognition of various classes of drugs (beta-lactam antibiotics, sulfonamides, local anesthetics) using T cell clones suggests that at the T cell level the whole structure, in particular the core and to a lesser degree side chains, are recognized.

SUMMARY

It is necessary to differentiate cross-reactivity mediated by T cells and antibodies as only the latter seem to recognize side chains exclusively.

Drug-induced autoimmunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Presentation of different mechanism of drug-induced autoimmunity and highlighting of new developments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drugs can induce autoimmune diseases by their pharmacological properties. Injection of certain drugs into the thymus can alter positive selection in the thymus and elicit autoimmune reactions. Peripheral tolerance can be broken by increasing the expression of LFA-1 adhesion molecule on T cells. This can be related to the inhibition of intracellular kinases. Alternatively, a drug specific immune response might elicit autoimmunity by cross-reactivity: the drug reactive T cells might be cross-reactive with certain peptide antigens and possibly autoantigens.

SUMMARY

Drug-specific immune responses are well described. They have a great tendency to be cross-reactive with peptide antigens. This 'immunological' cause of autoimmunity elicited by drugs may occur more frequently than thought. It connects the field of drug hypersensitivity with drug-induced autoimmunity.

[Identifying and understanding drug allergies]

Drug hypersensitivity reactions frequently occur in hospitalized and out-patients. Clinical presentations are numerous and heterogeneous, from a mild urticaria to a dramatic anaphylactic shock and an extensive bullous skin disease. Allergic reactions are unpredictable reactions, related to immunologic mechanisms. Some reactions mimic allergic reactions but no drug specific antibody or T cell proliferation can be demonstrated. A true diagnosis is rarely set up and the tools for it are lacking. In this review, we will focus on the available epidemiological data concerning these reactions, including data on incidence and mortality and on the most recent advances in the pathophysiology and allergy diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions.

Modes of presentation of chemical neoantigens to the immune system

The immune system can interact with small molecular compounds like drugs. Drugs are not only immunogenic because of their chemical reactivity, but also because they may bind in a labile way to MHC-molecules and fit into available T-cell receptors. This seems to be sufficient to stimulate T-cells. Such structural features of a drug have to be considered in the evaluation of drug hypersensitivity reactions and should be taken into account in predictive drug allergy testing.

Non-covalent presentation of sulfamethoxazole to human CD4+ T cells is independent of distinct human leucocyte antigen-bound peptides

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that drugs comprise a group of non-peptide antigens that can be recognized by human T cells in the context of HLA class II and that this recognition is involved in allergic reactions. Recent studies have demonstrated a MHC-restricted but processing- and metabolism-independent pathway for the presentation of allergenic drugs such as lidocaine and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) to drug-specific T cells. However, there is little information so far on the precise molecular mechanisms of this non-covalent drug presentation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the requirements for a specific peptide occupying the groove of the MHC class II molecule for the efficient presentation of non-covalently bound drugs to CD4+ T cells.

METHODS

We analysed the effect of coincubation or prepulse of antigen presenting cells (APC) with different peptides on the proliferative responses of SMX-specific CD4+ T cell clones. In a second series of experiments, we eluted HLA-bound peptides from the surface of antigen presenting cells by mild acid treatment. Successful removal of peptides was tested directly using labelled peptides and functionally by monitoring activation and proliferation of peptide-specific T cell clones. Finally, the presentation of SMX to SMX-specific T cell clones before and after elution of MHC class II bound peptides was tested.

RESULTS

We found that neither peptide coincubation nor peptide prepulse of APC altered the proliferative response of SMX-specific T cells. APC treated with the acid for a short time retained cell viability, MHC class II expression and antigen presenting cell function. However, defined peptides could be eluted from surface MHC class II molecules nearly quantitatively. Nevertheless, the chemically non-reactive drug SMX could still be presented to specific T cells independent of the presence of distinct self-peptides.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that small molecules like drugs can bind to a multitude of HLA-bound peptides or that, similar to superantigens, they might bind directly to HLA.

Pharmacological interaction of drugs with antigen-specific immune receptors: the p-i concept

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug allergies are examples of immune reactions to small molecular compounds. In many drug allergies drug specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells can be detected, which recognize small chemicals via their alphabeta-T-cell receptor in a major histocompatibility complex dependent way. In this review a new concept of drug presentation to T-cells is presented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drugs were stimulatory for T-cells if they bound covalently to peptides or proteins, but also if the drug had structural features allowing it to bind in a labile way (noncovalently) to the major histocompatibility peptide complex. This latter binding method has some similarities to superantigen stimulations and can explain allergies to drugs that are not metabolized. It has been described in patients with maculopapular, bullous and neutrophilic drug eruption, as well as in contact dermatitis.

SUMMARY

Noncovalent drug presentation leads to the stimulation of immune cells, namely T-cells. The drug needs two surface molecules (one inert serving as a scaffold, major histocompatibility complex, and one reactive, T-cell receptor) to exert its function. Although two receptor structures are involved, the process is reminiscent of a pharmacological interaction between a drug and its receptors and, from the phrase pharmacological interaction with immune receptors, was thus termed the p-i concept.

Cellular and molecular pathophysiology of cutaneous drug reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions to drugs can cause a variety of skin diseases like maculopapular, bullous and pustular eruptions. In recent years increasing evidence indicates the important role of T cells in these drug-induced skin diseases. Analysis of such drug-specific T cell clones has revealed that drugs can be recognized by alpha beta-T cell receptors, not only if bound covalently to peptides, but also if the drug binds in a rather labile way to the presenting major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-peptide. This presentation is sufficient to stimulate T cells. In maculopapular exanthema (MPE), histopathological analysis typically shows a dominant T cell infiltration together with a vacuolar interface dermatitis. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrate the presence of cytotoxic CD4+ and to a lesser degree of CD8+ T cells, which contain perforin and granzyme B. They are close to keratinocytes that show signs of cell destruction. Expression of Fas ligand is barely detectable, suggesting that cytotoxic granule exocytosis may be the dominant pathway leading to keratinocyte cell damage. While in MPE, the killing of cells seems to be predominantly mediated by CD4+ T cells, patients with bullous skin disease show a strong CD8+ T cell migration to the epidermis. This is probably due to a preferential presentation of the drug by MHC class I molecules, and a more extensive killing of cells that present drugs on MHC class I molecules. This might lead to bullous skin diseases. In addition to the presence of cytotoxic T cells, drug-specific T cells also orchestrate the inflammatory skin reaction through the release and induction of various cytokines [i.e. interleukin (IL)-5, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma] and chemokines (RANTES, eotaxin or IL-8). The increased expression of these mediators seems to contribute to the generation of tissue and blood eosinophilia, a hallmark of many drug-induced allergic reactions. However, in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (a peculiar form of drug allergy), neutrophils represent the predominant cell type within pustules, probably due to their recruitment by IL-8 secreting drug specific T cells and keratinocytes.

Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to paraphenylenediamine is mediated by 2 different pathways of antigen recognition by specific alphabeta human T-cell clones

BACKGROUND

Allergic contact dermatitis to paraphenylenediamine (PPD) is a frequent cause of morbidity and occupational disability.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to characterize T-cell responses to PPD and Bandrowski's base (BB), an autoxidation product of PPD, by using polyclonal and monoclonal T-lymphocyte cultures.

METHODS

PPD- and BB-driven proliferation of PBMCs and T-cell clones (TCCs) was assessed by means of tritiated thymidine incorporation. Surface markers were studied by means of flow cytometry, and cytokine generation was assessed with an ELISA.

RESULTS

TCCs, with one exception, were CD4+/CD45RO+, and T-cell receptors were alphabeta+. Three of 6 TCCs expressed Vbeta 16. TCC stimulation was HLA-DP restricted, and TCCs secreted IL-4, IL-5, and marginal levels of IFN-gamma. TCCs reacted to both PPD and BB. Presentation of BB to TCCs was dependent on viable antigen-presenting cells (APCs) pulsed for 4 hours, and fixed APCs failed to stimulate TCCs. Moreover, polyclonal responses to BB were enhanced by metabolically active enzymes, such as cytochrome P450 enzymes. BB has to be metabolized and processed. In contrast, fixation of APCs did not impair their ability to present PPD to TCC, whereas pulsing of APCs with PPD failed to stimulate TCCs. Thus PPD had to be present during the process, and polyclonal stimulation was not enhanced by cytochromes.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that PPD itself can be recognized by T cells through a processing-independent pathway, whereas its autoxidation product, BB, required processing and possibly metabolism to stimulate the same TCC. Our data demonstrate that 2 distinct pathways of antigen presentation to activate specific TCCs are involved in the immune response to PPD.

Characterization of drug-specific T cells in phenobarbital-induced eruption

Phenobarbital has a high potential to elicit adverse reactions including severe skin eruptions and systemic involvements among the worldwide-prescribed drugs. Although phenobarbital hypersensitivity is thought to be mediated by T cells specific to the drug, its precise mechanism remains not fully elucidated. To characterize T cells reactive with phenobarbital, we generated drug-specific T cell clones and lines from PBMCs of patients with phenobarbital hypersensitivity showing various degrees of cutaneous and extracutaneous involvements. Although the TCR Vbeta repertoire and phenotype in the T cell clones/T cell lines were heterogeneous among the patients, Vbeta13.1(+) and Vbeta5.1(+) clones or lines were raised from the individuals examined who possessed different HLA haplotypes. Histopathological examination suggested that Vbeta5.1(+)CD8(+) T cells and Vbeta13.1(+) T cells played a role in cutaneous and extracutaneous involvements, respectively. A Vbeta13.1(+)CD4(+) clone was found to proliferate in response to the Ag with processing-impaired, fixed APCs. Most of the clones and lines belonged to the Th2 phenotype, producing IL-4 and IL-5 but not IFN-gamma upon phenobarbital stimulation. Clones/lines with Th1 or Th0 phenotypes also constituted minor populations. These observations clearly indicate the heterogeneity and a marked individual deviation of reactive T cell subsets among the patients in terms of CD4/8 phenotype, Vbeta repertoire, Ag recognition pattern, and cytokine production; and thus provide evidence whereby each pathogenic T cell subset contributes to special elements of clinical presentation.

T cells in drug allergy

In recent years, increasing evidence has indicated an important role for T cells in various drug-induced diseases. A detailed analysis of patients with various drug allergies revealed the existence of drug-specific T cells in the circulation or in eluate from skin infiltration in bullous, pustular, and maculopapular drug eruptions. The drug-specific T cells use the ab-T cell receptor CD4+ or CD8+ and react with drugs acting as haptens (covalently bound to larger molecules, such as penicillins), but also recognize drugs if they are bound only in a labile way to major histocompatibility complex molecules (noncovalent drug presentation). Functional analysis revealed a predominant IL-5 production by drug-specific CD4+ T cells in maculopapular exanthema (MPE) and bullous skin diseases, while patients with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis have a peculiar T cell subset secreting high amounts of IL-8. Moreover, in MPE CD4+, perforin+ T cells were found in vitro and in immunohistology that had cytotoxic potential and killed keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo.

T cell involvement in cutaneous drug eruptions

BACKGROUND

The most frequent side-effects of drug therapy are skin eruptions. Their pathomechanism is rather unclear.

OBJECTIVE

In this prospective study we investigated the T cell activation and drug specificity in different forms of drug-induced exanthemas from 22 patients.

METHODS

During acute drug allergy, liver parameters and T cell subset activation in the circulation (up-regulation of CD25 and HLA-DR) were evaluated and skin biopsies of the acute lesion performed. After recovery, the causative drug was identified by lymphocyte transformation (LTT) and scratch-patch tests.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 22 (17/22) patients had maculo-papular exanthema, 4/22 bullous exanthema and 1/22 urticaria. The causative drugs were mainly antibiotics, anti-epileptics and anti-hypertensives. Up-regulation of HLA-DR on circulating CD4(+) and/or CD8(+) T cells was detected in 17 patients, being most marked in patients with bullous reactions or hepatic involvement. The LTT was positive in 14/21 analysed and the patch test in 7/15. All patients showed lymphocytic infiltration in the skin biopsy of the acute lesion. Generally CD4(+) T cells dominated; a higher percentage of circulating CD8(+) T cells was found in patients with bullous skin reactions or hepatic involvement.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate activation and drug specificity of T cells in drug-induced skin eruptions. A predominant CD8(+) T cell activation leads to more severe (bullous) skin symptoms or liver involvement, while predominant activation of CD4(+) cells elicits mainly maculo-papular reactions.

Degeneracy and additional alloreactivity of drug-specific human alpha beta(+) T cell clones

It has been well established that T cells can recognize small mol. wt compounds such as drugs. Results from previous studies revealing a high heterogeneity and cross-reactivity of drug-specific T cell clones (TCC) in individual patients prompted us to analyze the degeneracy of drug-reactive TCR in detail. Hence, we analyzed the MHC restriction pattern of a panel of 100 drug-specific TCC isolated from different drug-allergic donors. We found that 28 of the tested clones showed an MHC allele-unrestricted drug recognition. Most of these clones were at the same time highly drug specific, i.e. they could only be stimulated by the original drug and not by any drug derivatives. In contrast, TCC with the ability to interact with different drug derivatives displayed a clearly MHC allele-restricted drug recognition. Therefore, we concluded that the TCR of these clones is mainly interacting with side chains of the appropriate drug molecules and hence able to tolerate alterations in the MHC molecule. Moreover, we tested all clones for additional alloreactivity and found that 27 clones could be stimulated by a self-MHC--peptide--drug complex as well as by a non-self-MHC--peptide complex. This cross-reactivity with allogeneic MHC molecules was substantially higher in drug-specific TCC compared to tetanus toxoid-specific clones from the same donors. This suggests that from the point of view of drug-specific TCR, non-self-MHC--peptide complexes have a higher incidence to mimic the 'original' self-MHC--peptide-drug complex and this may occur for TCR recognizing self-MHC--pathogen-derived peptide complexes. Finally, the biological functions of bispecific TCC were not influenced by the nature of the stimulating ligand. Both drug as well as allogeneic stimulation led to similar reaction patterns in the analyzed TCC.

T-cell involvement in drug-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is an uncommon eruption most often provoked by drugs, by acute infections with enteroviruses, or by mercury. It is characterized by acute, extensive formation of nonfollicular sterile pustules on erythematous background, fever, and peripheral blood leukocytosis. We present clinical and immunological data on four patients with this disease, which is caused by different drugs. An involvement of T cells could be implied by positive skin patch tests and lymphocyte transformation tests. Immunohistochemistry revealed a massive cell infiltrate consisting of neutrophils in pustules and T cells in the dermis and epidermis. Expression of the potent neutrophil-attracting chemokine IL-8 was elevated in keratinocytes and infiltrating mononuclear cells. Drug-specific T cells were generated from the blood and skin of three patients, and phenotypic characterization showed a heterogeneous distribution of CD4/CD8 phenotype and of T-cell receptor Vbeta-expression. Analysis of cytokine/chemokine profiles revealed that IL-8 is produced significantly more by drug-specific T cells from patients with AGEP compared with drug-specific T cells from patients that had non-AGEP exanthemas. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the involvement of drug-specific T cells in the pathomechanism of this rather rare and peculiar form of drug allergy. In addition, they indicate that even in some neutrophil-rich inflammatory responses specific T cells are engaged and might orchestrate the immune reaction.

Predictive drug allergy testing: an alternative viewpoint

T- and B-cells recognise drugs when bound as haptens to carrier molecules. Recent studies suggest that drugs might also bind in a non-covalent form to MHC-peptide complexes and T cell receptors, and are thereby able to stimulate T cells. This has, however, only been shown for drug-specific T cell clones. Functional analysis revealed that drug-reactive T cells secrete high amounts of IL-5 and are cytotoxic. Cytotoxicity is mediated by drug-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells and, as revealed by the immunohistochemical analysis of drug-induced exanthems, might be involved in the killing of keratinocytes thus explaining the drug-induced exanthem. Further work is needed to clarify the type and exact location of the rather labile drug binding to MHC and T cell receptors, and to evaluate what drug allergies might be caused by such an unusual presentation and immune stimulation. This new model as well as findings from the analysis of clinical drug allergies may have major implications on how to test and predict the allergenic potential of drugs. A change and expansion of currently performed test procedures is required to predict the allergenic potential of drugs.